首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Infectious Diseases最新文献

英文 中文
Mycoplasma pneumoniae-Associated Cardiac Complications Revisited. 肺炎支原体相关心脏并发症再访。
IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-17 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf610
Daniel Grupel, Ran Nir-Paz, Yonatan Oster
{"title":"Mycoplasma pneumoniae-Associated Cardiac Complications Revisited.","authors":"Daniel Grupel, Ran Nir-Paz, Yonatan Oster","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf610","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciaf610","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"e627-e628"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145480970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State-of-the-Art Review: Managing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis. 外阴阴道念珠菌病的治疗。
IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-17 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf673
Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Jack D Sobel, Neil Stone, Francesco De Seta, Antonio Cassone, Pedro Vieira-Baptista, Manola Comar, Adilia Warris, Elena Roselletti

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most prevalent infections in women worldwide. Together with its recurrent form, it affects millions of women annually, causing significant symptoms and severely impacting quality of life. This review examines the pathophysiology, risk factors, microbiome interactions, clinical manifestations, and challenges in diagnosing and managing vulvovaginal candidiasis, with emphasis on recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. While Candida albicans is the primary cause, non-albicans species are increasingly common. Multiple factors contribute to both forms, including hormonal changes, diabetes, antibiotic use, immune dysfunction, and genetics. The vaginal microbiome plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and preventing Candida overgrowth. Symptoms such as itching, discharge, and soreness overlap with other conditions, complicating the diagnosis. Standard treatment involves topical or systemic antifungals, but recurrence and resistance are frequent. Emerging strategies include novel antifungals, immunomodulators, and vaccines. Future approaches should focus on modulating host and environmental factors to prevent recurrence, reduce resistance, and improve outcomes.

外阴阴道念珠菌病是全世界妇女中最普遍的感染之一。它连同其复发形式,每年影响数百万妇女,造成严重症状并严重影响生活质量。本文综述了外阴阴道念珠菌病的病理生理学、危险因素、微生物组相互作用、临床表现以及诊断和治疗的挑战,重点是复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病。虽然白色念珠菌是主要原因,但非白色念珠菌种类越来越普遍。多种因素导致这两种形式,包括荷尔蒙变化,糖尿病,抗生素的使用,免疫功能障碍和遗传。阴道微生物群在维持体内平衡和防止念珠菌过度生长方面起着关键作用。瘙痒、分泌物和疼痛等症状与其他情况重叠,使诊断复杂化。标准治疗包括局部或全身抗真菌药物,但复发和耐药是常见的。新兴策略包括新型抗真菌药、免疫调节剂和疫苗。未来的方法应侧重于调节宿主和环境因素,以防止复发,减少耐药性,改善预后。
{"title":"State-of-the-Art Review: Managing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis.","authors":"Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Jack D Sobel, Neil Stone, Francesco De Seta, Antonio Cassone, Pedro Vieira-Baptista, Manola Comar, Adilia Warris, Elena Roselletti","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most prevalent infections in women worldwide. Together with its recurrent form, it affects millions of women annually, causing significant symptoms and severely impacting quality of life. This review examines the pathophysiology, risk factors, microbiome interactions, clinical manifestations, and challenges in diagnosing and managing vulvovaginal candidiasis, with emphasis on recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. While Candida albicans is the primary cause, non-albicans species are increasingly common. Multiple factors contribute to both forms, including hormonal changes, diabetes, antibiotic use, immune dysfunction, and genetics. The vaginal microbiome plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and preventing Candida overgrowth. Symptoms such as itching, discharge, and soreness overlap with other conditions, complicating the diagnosis. Standard treatment involves topical or systemic antifungals, but recurrence and resistance are frequent. Emerging strategies include novel antifungals, immunomodulators, and vaccines. Future approaches should focus on modulating host and environmental factors to prevent recurrence, reduce resistance, and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"82 3","pages":"371-382"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147467310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should We Extend the Use of Oral Antibiotics in Infective Endocarditis? The ENDO-ORAL Study. 感染性心内膜炎是否应扩大口服抗生素的使用?口腔内研究。
IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-17 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf452
Benoit Rallet, Romane Pouy, Claire Coutureau, Mathieu Blot, Firouzé Bani-Sadr, Thibault Sixt, Marin Moutel, Lionel Piroth, Maxime Hentzien

Background: Switching to oral therapy has become an option for treating infective endocarditis (IE) in well-selected patients. This study aimed to assess its effectiveness in real-life settings, including patients who would not have been eligible under current guidelines based on the POET trial results.

Methods: All adults treated for IE in two French tertiary centers from January 2016 to December 2023 were included in a retrospective cohort. For each participant, clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic data were collected retrospectively. Patients who received at least 10 days of effective antibiotic therapy were included and categorized based on the route of administration (exclusively intravenous or with a switch to oral therapy). POET-ineligible patients were those who were not eligible in the POET trial. Treatment failure (death, recurrence, or need for suppressive therapy, within 3 months following completion of the initial antibiotic course) was assessed using propensity score (PS) analysis, with oral switch as a time-dependent variable.

Results: Three hundred and thirty-three participants were included (233 in the intravenous group and 100 patients in the oral group). No significant difference in treatment failure was observed between groups after adjustment using a PS (HR = 0.55 in favor of oral switch, 95% CI = .27-1.17). The results were similar in the POET-ineligible subgroup, which accounted for 44.7% of participants. Days alive outside the hospital were significantly higher in the oral group (59 vs 47 days, P = .001).

Conclusions: Oral switch is a suitable option beyond "classical" frontiers in the management of IE, with potential direct and indirect benefits.

背景:口服治疗已成为选择性患者治疗感染性心内膜炎(IE)的一种选择。本研究旨在评估其在现实生活环境中的有效性,包括根据POET试验结果不符合当前指南的患者。方法:2016年1月至2023年12月在法国两个三级中心接受IE治疗的所有成年人纳入回顾性队列。回顾性收集每位参与者的临床、微生物学和治疗数据。接受至少10天有效抗生素治疗的患者被纳入,并根据给药途径(完全静脉注射或转向口服治疗)进行分类。不符合POET条件的患者是那些不符合POET试验条件的患者。使用倾向评分分析评估治疗失败(死亡、复发或需要抑制治疗,在初始抗生素疗程完成后三个月内),口服转换为时间相关变量。结果:共纳入333例患者(静脉注射组233例,口服组100例)。采用倾向评分调整后,两组间治疗失败的发生率无显著差异(赞成口服转换的HR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.27-1.17)。在poet不合格的亚组中结果相似,占参与者的44.7%。口服组患者院外存活天数显著高于口服组(59天vs 47天,p=0.001)。结论:在IE的管理中,口服转换是一种超越“经典”前沿的合适选择,具有潜在的直接和间接益处。
{"title":"Should We Extend the Use of Oral Antibiotics in Infective Endocarditis? The ENDO-ORAL Study.","authors":"Benoit Rallet, Romane Pouy, Claire Coutureau, Mathieu Blot, Firouzé Bani-Sadr, Thibault Sixt, Marin Moutel, Lionel Piroth, Maxime Hentzien","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf452","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciaf452","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Switching to oral therapy has become an option for treating infective endocarditis (IE) in well-selected patients. This study aimed to assess its effectiveness in real-life settings, including patients who would not have been eligible under current guidelines based on the POET trial results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adults treated for IE in two French tertiary centers from January 2016 to December 2023 were included in a retrospective cohort. For each participant, clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic data were collected retrospectively. Patients who received at least 10 days of effective antibiotic therapy were included and categorized based on the route of administration (exclusively intravenous or with a switch to oral therapy). POET-ineligible patients were those who were not eligible in the POET trial. Treatment failure (death, recurrence, or need for suppressive therapy, within 3 months following completion of the initial antibiotic course) was assessed using propensity score (PS) analysis, with oral switch as a time-dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and thirty-three participants were included (233 in the intravenous group and 100 patients in the oral group). No significant difference in treatment failure was observed between groups after adjustment using a PS (HR = 0.55 in favor of oral switch, 95% CI = .27-1.17). The results were similar in the POET-ineligible subgroup, which accounted for 44.7% of participants. Days alive outside the hospital were significantly higher in the oral group (59 vs 47 days, P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral switch is a suitable option beyond \"classical\" frontiers in the management of IE, with potential direct and indirect benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"e462-e470"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of tPa and DNase or tPa Alone for Fibrinolysis. 2026年美国传染病学会和儿科传染病学会关于婴幼儿和3个月以上儿童社区获得性肺炎管理的临床实践指南更新:使用tPa和DNase或单独使用tPa进行纤维蛋白溶解。
IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-17 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag191
Shawn D St Peter, Krow Ampofo, Thomas Brogan, Michael D Cabana, Claudia Espinosa, Todd A Florin, Jeffrey S Gerber, Michelle Gill, Debra L Palazzi, Mark Sawyer, Angela M Statile, Derek J Williams, Sheena Patel, Mark I Neuman, Samir S Shah

This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this report, the panel provides recommendations for intrapleural fibrinolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) alone over tPA and dornase alfa (DNase) in children (3 months to 18 years) with complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

本文是由儿科传染病学会和美国传染病学会制定的关于儿童肺旁积液和脓胸的诊断和管理的较大临床实践指南的一部分。在本报告中,专家组提供了对合并肺旁积液和脓肿的儿童(3个月至18岁)使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)而不是tPA和dornase - alfa (DNase)进行胸膜内纤溶的建议。专家组的建议是基于从系统文献综述中获得的证据,并根据GRADE(建议评估、发展和评估分级)方法坚持对证据的确定性和建议的强度进行评级的标准化方法。
{"title":"2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of tPa and DNase or tPa Alone for Fibrinolysis.","authors":"Shawn D St Peter, Krow Ampofo, Thomas Brogan, Michael D Cabana, Claudia Espinosa, Todd A Florin, Jeffrey S Gerber, Michelle Gill, Debra L Palazzi, Mark Sawyer, Angela M Statile, Derek J Williams, Sheena Patel, Mark I Neuman, Samir S Shah","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this report, the panel provides recommendations for intrapleural fibrinolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) alone over tPA and dornase alfa (DNase) in children (3 months to 18 years) with complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147467275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of Pleural Fluid Drainage versus Observation. 2026年美国传染病学会和儿科传染病学会关于婴幼儿和3个月以上儿童社区获得性肺炎管理的临床实践指南更新:使用胸膜液引流与观察。
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-16 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag188
Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Mark I Neuman,Samir S Shah
This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for pleural fluid drainage in children (3 months to 18 years) with parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
本文是美国传染病学会(Infectious Diseases Society of America)制定的关于儿童肺旁积液和脓胸的诊断和管理的较大临床实践指南的一部分。在这篇论文中,专家小组提供了对有肺旁积液和脓胸的儿童(3个月至18岁)胸腔积液引流的建议。专家组的建议是基于从系统文献综述中获得的证据,并根据GRADE(建议评估、发展和评估分级)方法坚持对证据的确定性和建议的强度进行评级的标准化方法。
{"title":"2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of Pleural Fluid Drainage versus Observation.","authors":"Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Mark I Neuman,Samir S Shah","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag188","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for pleural fluid drainage in children (3 months to 18 years) with parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of Pleural fluid drainage compared to Surgical Debridement. 2026年美国传染病学会和儿科传染病学会关于婴幼儿和3个月以上儿童社区获得性肺炎管理的临床实践指南更新:与手术清创相比,胸膜液引流的使用
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-16 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag189
Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Samir S Shah,Mark I Neuman
This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations on the choice of pleural fluid drainage by chest tube with fibrinolysis versus mechanical debridement. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
本文是美国传染病学会(Infectious Diseases Society of America)制定的关于儿童肺旁积液和脓胸的诊断和管理的较大临床实践指南的一部分。在这篇论文中,专家小组就纤维蛋白溶解胸腔管引流胸腔液与机械清创的选择提供了建议。专家组的建议是基于从系统文献综述中获得的证据,并根据GRADE(建议评估、发展和评估分级)方法坚持对证据的确定性和建议的强度进行评级的标准化方法。
{"title":"2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of Pleural fluid drainage compared to Surgical Debridement.","authors":"Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Samir S Shah,Mark I Neuman","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag189","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations on the choice of pleural fluid drainage by chest tube with fibrinolysis versus mechanical debridement. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the impact of universal mupirocin decolonization in intensive care units on the utility of MRSA PCR nasal swab testing. 评价重症监护病房普遍使用莫匹罗星去菌落对MRSA PCR鼻拭子检测的影响。
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-16 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag183
Andrea S Ito,Kaitlyn C Reasoner,Sharon K Ong'uti,Edward T Qian,Zhiguo Zhao,Rebecca A Stern,Jeffrey A Freiberg
BACKGROUNDThe reliability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSRA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swab testing in the context of mupirocin nasal decolonization has been questioned. This study investigated whether the negative predictive value (NPV) of MSRA PCR nasal swab testing following mupirocin decolonization was non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study included adult inpatients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) from February 2023 - August 2024 who underwent both MRSA PCR nasal swab testing and universal mupirocin decolonization. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on timing of PCR testing: prior to receiving any doses of topical mupirocin, no more than 7 days after, or greater than 7 days after a first dose. The primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swab testing.RESULTS1034 patients were included in the primary analysis; 508 (49.1%) had a MRSA PCR nasal swab collected prior to the start of decolonization and 388 (73.8%) and 138 (26.2%) received nasal swabs > 0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin decolonization, respectively. The differences between the NPV of MRSA PCR testing in patients with swabs collected prior versus in patients with swabs collected >0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin were 0.3% and -0.4% (1-sided 95% CI -0.9% and CI -2.3%), respectively.CONCLUSIONSThe NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swabs is not diminished after mupirocin decolonization. MRSA PCR testing within 7 days of initiation of decolonization is non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.
背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MSRA)聚合酶链反应(PCR)鼻拭子检测在莫比罗星鼻腔非定殖背景下的可靠性一直受到质疑。本研究探讨了莫匹罗星去菌落后MSRA PCR鼻拭子检测的阴性预测值(NPV)是否不低于去菌落前的检测。方法本回顾性队列研究纳入了2023年2月至2024年8月入住重症监护病房(icu)的成年住院患者,这些患者接受了MRSA PCR鼻拭子检测和普遍的莫比罗星非定殖。根据PCR检测的时间将患者分为3组:在接受任何剂量的局部莫匹罗星之前,服用后不超过7天,或首次服用后超过7天。主要结果为MRSA PCR鼻拭子检测的NPV。结果1034例患者纳入初步分析;508例(49.1%)在去菌落开始前收集了MRSA PCR鼻拭子,388例(73.8%)和138例(26.2%)分别在莫匹罗星去菌落开始后0 ~≤7天和7天收集了鼻拭子。先前收集拭子的患者与开始使用莫匹罗星后0 ~≤7天和7天收集拭子的患者的MRSA PCR检测NPV的差异分别为0.3%和-0.4%(单侧95% CI -0.9%和CI -2.3%)。结论莫匹罗星去定殖后,MRSA PCR鼻拭子NPV值未降低。在去菌落开始的7天内进行MRSA PCR检测并不亚于去菌落之前的检测。
{"title":"Evaluation of the impact of universal mupirocin decolonization in intensive care units on the utility of MRSA PCR nasal swab testing.","authors":"Andrea S Ito,Kaitlyn C Reasoner,Sharon K Ong'uti,Edward T Qian,Zhiguo Zhao,Rebecca A Stern,Jeffrey A Freiberg","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag183","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe reliability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSRA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swab testing in the context of mupirocin nasal decolonization has been questioned. This study investigated whether the negative predictive value (NPV) of MSRA PCR nasal swab testing following mupirocin decolonization was non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study included adult inpatients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) from February 2023 - August 2024 who underwent both MRSA PCR nasal swab testing and universal mupirocin decolonization. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on timing of PCR testing: prior to receiving any doses of topical mupirocin, no more than 7 days after, or greater than 7 days after a first dose. The primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swab testing.RESULTS1034 patients were included in the primary analysis; 508 (49.1%) had a MRSA PCR nasal swab collected prior to the start of decolonization and 388 (73.8%) and 138 (26.2%) received nasal swabs > 0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin decolonization, respectively. The differences between the NPV of MRSA PCR testing in patients with swabs collected prior versus in patients with swabs collected >0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin were 0.3% and -0.4% (1-sided 95% CI -0.9% and CI -2.3%), respectively.CONCLUSIONSThe NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swabs is not diminished after mupirocin decolonization. MRSA PCR testing within 7 days of initiation of decolonization is non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nasal decolonization and PCR screening in the ICU: friend or foe? ICU的鼻去殖和PCR筛查:是敌是友?
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-16 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag184
María Jesús Pérez-Granda,Emilio Bouza
{"title":"Nasal decolonization and PCR screening in the ICU: friend or foe?","authors":"María Jesús Pérez-Granda,Emilio Bouza","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"412 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cephalosporins Versus Non-Cephalosporin Antibiotics for Perioperative Prophylaxis in Primary Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 原发性关节置换术围手术期预防的头孢菌素与非头孢菌素抗生素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-14 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag172
Rita Igwilo-Alaneme,Elie Berbari,Jack McHugh,Francesco Petri,Vasupriya Ravi,Takahiro Matsuo,Fabio Borgonovo,Said El Zein,M Hassan Murad,Aaron Tande
BACKGROUNDThe number of arthroplasty procedures and infection-related complications, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), continues to rise. Although current guidelines recommend cefazolin or cefuroxime as the first-line perioperative prophylactic antibiotic, substitutions with non-cephalosporins remain common, especially among patients with reported β-lactam allergies. These substitutions may increase infection risk and healthcare costs. Evidence comparing outcomes across antibiotic classes remains variable.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing single-agent cephalosporin versus single-agent non-cephalosporin prophylaxis in adults undergoing primary arthroplasty. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through January 2025. Random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses stratified results by cephalosporin type, study era, and risk of bias.RESULTSTwenty-three studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included, encompassing 191,527 arthroplasties in the cephalosporin arm and 20,058 in the non-cephalosporin arm. The odds of PJI were lower with cephalosporins (OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75). No overall difference was observed for SSI (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.36), though post-2013 studies and the cefazolin subgroup demonstrated a significant protective effect. Randomized trial estimates were limited and heterogeneous and did not reach statistical significance. Certainty of evidence was graded as moderate.CONCLUSIONSCephalosporins, particularly cefazolin or cefuroxime, remain the preferred prophylactic agents for primary arthroplasty. This quantitative synthesis reinforces their protective association against prosthetic joint infection and supports adherence to guideline-endorsed prophylaxis.
关节置换术和感染相关并发症(包括假体关节感染(PJIs)和手术部位感染(ssi))的数量持续上升。虽然目前的指南推荐头孢唑林或头孢呋辛作为围手术期的一线预防性抗生素,但非头孢菌素的替代仍然很常见,特别是在有β-内酰胺过敏报告的患者中。这些替代品可能会增加感染风险和医疗成本。比较不同抗生素种类的结果的证据仍然是可变的。方法:我们进行了一项比较单药头孢菌素与单药非头孢菌素预防成人初次关节置换术的研究的系统回顾和荟荟性分析。检索了Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus和Web of Science从数据库建立到2025年1月。随机效应或固定效应模型用于估计合并优势比(or)和95%置信区间(CI)。亚组分析按头孢菌素类型、研究时代和偏倚风险对结果进行分层。结果纳入了23项研究(7项随机对照试验和16项观察性研究),包括191,527例头孢菌素组关节置换术和20,058例非头孢菌素组关节置换术。头孢菌素组PJI的发生率较低(OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75)。尽管2013年后的研究和头孢唑林亚组显示了显著的保护作用,但SSI方面没有观察到总体差异(OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.36)。随机试验估计是有限的和异质性的,没有达到统计学意义。证据的确定性等级为中等。结论头孢菌素,尤其是头孢唑林或头孢呋辛,仍是原发性关节置换术的首选预防药物。这种定量合成加强了它们对假体关节感染的保护关联,并支持遵守指南认可的预防措施。
{"title":"Cephalosporins Versus Non-Cephalosporin Antibiotics for Perioperative Prophylaxis in Primary Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rita Igwilo-Alaneme,Elie Berbari,Jack McHugh,Francesco Petri,Vasupriya Ravi,Takahiro Matsuo,Fabio Borgonovo,Said El Zein,M Hassan Murad,Aaron Tande","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag172","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe number of arthroplasty procedures and infection-related complications, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), continues to rise. Although current guidelines recommend cefazolin or cefuroxime as the first-line perioperative prophylactic antibiotic, substitutions with non-cephalosporins remain common, especially among patients with reported β-lactam allergies. These substitutions may increase infection risk and healthcare costs. Evidence comparing outcomes across antibiotic classes remains variable.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing single-agent cephalosporin versus single-agent non-cephalosporin prophylaxis in adults undergoing primary arthroplasty. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through January 2025. Random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses stratified results by cephalosporin type, study era, and risk of bias.RESULTSTwenty-three studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included, encompassing 191,527 arthroplasties in the cephalosporin arm and 20,058 in the non-cephalosporin arm. The odds of PJI were lower with cephalosporins (OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75). No overall difference was observed for SSI (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.36), though post-2013 studies and the cefazolin subgroup demonstrated a significant protective effect. Randomized trial estimates were limited and heterogeneous and did not reach statistical significance. Certainty of evidence was graded as moderate.CONCLUSIONSCephalosporins, particularly cefazolin or cefuroxime, remain the preferred prophylactic agents for primary arthroplasty. This quantitative synthesis reinforces their protective association against prosthetic joint infection and supports adherence to guideline-endorsed prophylaxis.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147454598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antiretroviral Activity, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of MK-8527, an Oral Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Translocation Inhibitor, in Adults Living With HIV-1 Who Had Not Previously Taken Antiretroviral Agents: Results From Two Open-Label, Phase 1 Studies. 口服核苷类逆转录酶易位抑制剂MK-8527在未服用过抗逆转录病毒药物的成人HIV-1患者中的抗逆转录病毒活性、药代动力学和安全性:两项开放标签1期研究的结果
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-14 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag135
Russ P Carstens,Yash Kapoor,Ryan C Vargo,Arinjita Bhattacharyya,Graigory Garrett,Caroline Cilissen,Adedayo Adedoyin,Xiaowei Zang,Jean-Francois Denef,Carlien Leyssens,Tom Reynders,Liliana Preotescu,Richard Kaplan,Mohammed Rassool,Johannes Lombaard,Anca Streinu-Cercel,Randolph P Matthews,S Aubrey Stoch,Marian Iwamoto,Gillian L Gillespie
BACKGROUNDMK-8527 is a novel oral nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor under clinical development as HIV-1 prevention. Two Phase 1 single-dose monotherapy studies were conducted to evaluate antiretroviral activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of MK-8527 in adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents.METHODSIn two Phase 1 studies, participants received a single oral dose of MK-8527 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, or 10 mg). Reduction in viral load (measured as log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at 7 days post-dose), PK of plasma MK-8527 through 7 days, intracellular MK-8527-triphosphate (TP, the active form of MK-8527) through 28 days, exposure-response relationship, and safety through 28 days were assessed. Adverse events were descriptively summarized.RESULTSIn total, 37 participants completed the studies. After single doses of MK-8527 0.5 to 10 mg, the mean decrease in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days-post dose was ≥1.0 log10 copies/mL. The inhibitory quotient (defined as the ratio of MK-8527-TP concentration at 168 hours post-dose [C168] to the mean intracellular concentration of MK-8527-TP at the half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]) exceeded 3 at single doses of ≥0.5 mg. MK-8527 at all dose levels was well tolerated, with a limited number of mild or moderate adverse events that were determined by investigators to be unrelated to the study treatment.CONCLUSIONSIn adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents, single doses of MK-8527 as low as 0.5 mg achieved ≥1.0 log10 decreases in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days post-dose administration.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03615183, NCT05494736.
mk -8527是一种新型口服核苷逆转录酶易位抑制剂,正在临床开发中,用于预防HIV-1。进行了两项1期单剂量单疗法研究,以评估MK-8527在未服用过抗逆转录病毒药物的成人HIV-1感染者中的抗逆转录病毒活性、药代动力学(PK)和安全性。方法在两项i期研究中,受试者接受单次口服剂量MK-8527(0.25、0.5、1、3或10 mg)。降低病毒载量(在给药后7天以log10血浆HIV-1 RNA拷贝数/mL测量)、7天血浆MK-8527的PK、28天细胞内MK-8527-三磷酸(TP, MK-8527的活性形式)、28天的暴露-反应关系和安全性评估。对不良事件进行描述性总结。结果总共有37名参与者完成了研究。单次给药MK-8527 0.5 ~ 10mg后,7天后HIV-1 RNA的平均减少量≥1.0 log10拷贝/mL。单次剂量≥0.5 mg时,抑制商(定义为给药后168小时MK-8527-TP浓度[C168]与最大半数抑制浓度时MK-8527-TP细胞内平均浓度[IC50]之比)超过3。所有剂量水平的MK-8527耐受性良好,研究者确定与研究治疗无关的少量轻度或中度不良事件。结论:在未服用过抗逆转录病毒药物的HIV-1成人中,单次剂量低至0.5 mg的MK-8527在给药后7天使HIV-1 RNA降低≥1.0 log10。临床试验注册www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03615183, NCT05494736。
{"title":"Antiretroviral Activity, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of MK-8527, an Oral Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Translocation Inhibitor, in Adults Living With HIV-1 Who Had Not Previously Taken Antiretroviral Agents: Results From Two Open-Label, Phase 1 Studies.","authors":"Russ P Carstens,Yash Kapoor,Ryan C Vargo,Arinjita Bhattacharyya,Graigory Garrett,Caroline Cilissen,Adedayo Adedoyin,Xiaowei Zang,Jean-Francois Denef,Carlien Leyssens,Tom Reynders,Liliana Preotescu,Richard Kaplan,Mohammed Rassool,Johannes Lombaard,Anca Streinu-Cercel,Randolph P Matthews,S Aubrey Stoch,Marian Iwamoto,Gillian L Gillespie","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag135","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDMK-8527 is a novel oral nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor under clinical development as HIV-1 prevention. Two Phase 1 single-dose monotherapy studies were conducted to evaluate antiretroviral activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of MK-8527 in adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents.METHODSIn two Phase 1 studies, participants received a single oral dose of MK-8527 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, or 10 mg). Reduction in viral load (measured as log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at 7 days post-dose), PK of plasma MK-8527 through 7 days, intracellular MK-8527-triphosphate (TP, the active form of MK-8527) through 28 days, exposure-response relationship, and safety through 28 days were assessed. Adverse events were descriptively summarized.RESULTSIn total, 37 participants completed the studies. After single doses of MK-8527 0.5 to 10 mg, the mean decrease in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days-post dose was ≥1.0 log10 copies/mL. The inhibitory quotient (defined as the ratio of MK-8527-TP concentration at 168 hours post-dose [C168] to the mean intracellular concentration of MK-8527-TP at the half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]) exceeded 3 at single doses of ≥0.5 mg. MK-8527 at all dose levels was well tolerated, with a limited number of mild or moderate adverse events that were determined by investigators to be unrelated to the study treatment.CONCLUSIONSIn adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents, single doses of MK-8527 as low as 0.5 mg achieved ≥1.0 log10 decreases in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days post-dose administration.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03615183, NCT05494736.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147447066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1