Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Jack D Sobel, Neil Stone, Francesco De Seta, Antonio Cassone, Pedro Vieira-Baptista, Manola Comar, Adilia Warris, Elena Roselletti
Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most prevalent infections in women worldwide. Together with its recurrent form, it affects millions of women annually, causing significant symptoms and severely impacting quality of life. This review examines the pathophysiology, risk factors, microbiome interactions, clinical manifestations, and challenges in diagnosing and managing vulvovaginal candidiasis, with emphasis on recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. While Candida albicans is the primary cause, non-albicans species are increasingly common. Multiple factors contribute to both forms, including hormonal changes, diabetes, antibiotic use, immune dysfunction, and genetics. The vaginal microbiome plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and preventing Candida overgrowth. Symptoms such as itching, discharge, and soreness overlap with other conditions, complicating the diagnosis. Standard treatment involves topical or systemic antifungals, but recurrence and resistance are frequent. Emerging strategies include novel antifungals, immunomodulators, and vaccines. Future approaches should focus on modulating host and environmental factors to prevent recurrence, reduce resistance, and improve outcomes.
{"title":"State-of-the-Art Review: Managing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis.","authors":"Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Jack D Sobel, Neil Stone, Francesco De Seta, Antonio Cassone, Pedro Vieira-Baptista, Manola Comar, Adilia Warris, Elena Roselletti","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most prevalent infections in women worldwide. Together with its recurrent form, it affects millions of women annually, causing significant symptoms and severely impacting quality of life. This review examines the pathophysiology, risk factors, microbiome interactions, clinical manifestations, and challenges in diagnosing and managing vulvovaginal candidiasis, with emphasis on recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. While Candida albicans is the primary cause, non-albicans species are increasingly common. Multiple factors contribute to both forms, including hormonal changes, diabetes, antibiotic use, immune dysfunction, and genetics. The vaginal microbiome plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and preventing Candida overgrowth. Symptoms such as itching, discharge, and soreness overlap with other conditions, complicating the diagnosis. Standard treatment involves topical or systemic antifungals, but recurrence and resistance are frequent. Emerging strategies include novel antifungals, immunomodulators, and vaccines. Future approaches should focus on modulating host and environmental factors to prevent recurrence, reduce resistance, and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"82 3","pages":"371-382"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147467310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Switching to oral therapy has become an option for treating infective endocarditis (IE) in well-selected patients. This study aimed to assess its effectiveness in real-life settings, including patients who would not have been eligible under current guidelines based on the POET trial results.
Methods: All adults treated for IE in two French tertiary centers from January 2016 to December 2023 were included in a retrospective cohort. For each participant, clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic data were collected retrospectively. Patients who received at least 10 days of effective antibiotic therapy were included and categorized based on the route of administration (exclusively intravenous or with a switch to oral therapy). POET-ineligible patients were those who were not eligible in the POET trial. Treatment failure (death, recurrence, or need for suppressive therapy, within 3 months following completion of the initial antibiotic course) was assessed using propensity score (PS) analysis, with oral switch as a time-dependent variable.
Results: Three hundred and thirty-three participants were included (233 in the intravenous group and 100 patients in the oral group). No significant difference in treatment failure was observed between groups after adjustment using a PS (HR = 0.55 in favor of oral switch, 95% CI = .27-1.17). The results were similar in the POET-ineligible subgroup, which accounted for 44.7% of participants. Days alive outside the hospital were significantly higher in the oral group (59 vs 47 days, P = .001).
Conclusions: Oral switch is a suitable option beyond "classical" frontiers in the management of IE, with potential direct and indirect benefits.
{"title":"Should We Extend the Use of Oral Antibiotics in Infective Endocarditis? The ENDO-ORAL Study.","authors":"Benoit Rallet, Romane Pouy, Claire Coutureau, Mathieu Blot, Firouzé Bani-Sadr, Thibault Sixt, Marin Moutel, Lionel Piroth, Maxime Hentzien","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf452","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciaf452","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Switching to oral therapy has become an option for treating infective endocarditis (IE) in well-selected patients. This study aimed to assess its effectiveness in real-life settings, including patients who would not have been eligible under current guidelines based on the POET trial results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adults treated for IE in two French tertiary centers from January 2016 to December 2023 were included in a retrospective cohort. For each participant, clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic data were collected retrospectively. Patients who received at least 10 days of effective antibiotic therapy were included and categorized based on the route of administration (exclusively intravenous or with a switch to oral therapy). POET-ineligible patients were those who were not eligible in the POET trial. Treatment failure (death, recurrence, or need for suppressive therapy, within 3 months following completion of the initial antibiotic course) was assessed using propensity score (PS) analysis, with oral switch as a time-dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and thirty-three participants were included (233 in the intravenous group and 100 patients in the oral group). No significant difference in treatment failure was observed between groups after adjustment using a PS (HR = 0.55 in favor of oral switch, 95% CI = .27-1.17). The results were similar in the POET-ineligible subgroup, which accounted for 44.7% of participants. Days alive outside the hospital were significantly higher in the oral group (59 vs 47 days, P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral switch is a suitable option beyond \"classical\" frontiers in the management of IE, with potential direct and indirect benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"e462-e470"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shawn D St Peter, Krow Ampofo, Thomas Brogan, Michael D Cabana, Claudia Espinosa, Todd A Florin, Jeffrey S Gerber, Michelle Gill, Debra L Palazzi, Mark Sawyer, Angela M Statile, Derek J Williams, Sheena Patel, Mark I Neuman, Samir S Shah
This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this report, the panel provides recommendations for intrapleural fibrinolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) alone over tPA and dornase alfa (DNase) in children (3 months to 18 years) with complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
{"title":"2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of tPa and DNase or tPa Alone for Fibrinolysis.","authors":"Shawn D St Peter, Krow Ampofo, Thomas Brogan, Michael D Cabana, Claudia Espinosa, Todd A Florin, Jeffrey S Gerber, Michelle Gill, Debra L Palazzi, Mark Sawyer, Angela M Statile, Derek J Williams, Sheena Patel, Mark I Neuman, Samir S Shah","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this report, the panel provides recommendations for intrapleural fibrinolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) alone over tPA and dornase alfa (DNase) in children (3 months to 18 years) with complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147467275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Mark I Neuman,Samir S Shah
This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for pleural fluid drainage in children (3 months to 18 years) with parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
本文是美国传染病学会(Infectious Diseases Society of America)制定的关于儿童肺旁积液和脓胸的诊断和管理的较大临床实践指南的一部分。在这篇论文中,专家小组提供了对有肺旁积液和脓胸的儿童(3个月至18岁)胸腔积液引流的建议。专家组的建议是基于从系统文献综述中获得的证据,并根据GRADE(建议评估、发展和评估分级)方法坚持对证据的确定性和建议的强度进行评级的标准化方法。
{"title":"2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of Pleural Fluid Drainage versus Observation.","authors":"Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Mark I Neuman,Samir S Shah","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag188","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for pleural fluid drainage in children (3 months to 18 years) with parapneumonic effusion and empyema. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Samir S Shah,Mark I Neuman
This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations on the choice of pleural fluid drainage by chest tube with fibrinolysis versus mechanical debridement. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
本文是美国传染病学会(Infectious Diseases Society of America)制定的关于儿童肺旁积液和脓胸的诊断和管理的较大临床实践指南的一部分。在这篇论文中,专家小组就纤维蛋白溶解胸腔管引流胸腔液与机械清创的选择提供了建议。专家组的建议是基于从系统文献综述中获得的证据,并根据GRADE(建议评估、发展和评估分级)方法坚持对证据的确定性和建议的强度进行评级的标准化方法。
{"title":"2026 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older than 3 Months of Age: The Use of Pleural fluid drainage compared to Surgical Debridement.","authors":"Shawn D St Peter,Krow Ampofo,Thomas Brogan,Michael D Cabana,Claudia Espinosa,Todd A Florin,Jeffrey S Gerber,Michelle Gill,Debra L Palazzi,Mark Sawyer,Angela M Statile,Derek J Williams,Sheena Patel,Samir S Shah,Mark I Neuman","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag189","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is part of a larger clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations on the choice of pleural fluid drainage by chest tube with fibrinolysis versus mechanical debridement. The panel's recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrea S Ito,Kaitlyn C Reasoner,Sharon K Ong'uti,Edward T Qian,Zhiguo Zhao,Rebecca A Stern,Jeffrey A Freiberg
BACKGROUNDThe reliability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSRA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swab testing in the context of mupirocin nasal decolonization has been questioned. This study investigated whether the negative predictive value (NPV) of MSRA PCR nasal swab testing following mupirocin decolonization was non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study included adult inpatients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) from February 2023 - August 2024 who underwent both MRSA PCR nasal swab testing and universal mupirocin decolonization. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on timing of PCR testing: prior to receiving any doses of topical mupirocin, no more than 7 days after, or greater than 7 days after a first dose. The primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swab testing.RESULTS1034 patients were included in the primary analysis; 508 (49.1%) had a MRSA PCR nasal swab collected prior to the start of decolonization and 388 (73.8%) and 138 (26.2%) received nasal swabs > 0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin decolonization, respectively. The differences between the NPV of MRSA PCR testing in patients with swabs collected prior versus in patients with swabs collected >0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin were 0.3% and -0.4% (1-sided 95% CI -0.9% and CI -2.3%), respectively.CONCLUSIONSThe NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swabs is not diminished after mupirocin decolonization. MRSA PCR testing within 7 days of initiation of decolonization is non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.
{"title":"Evaluation of the impact of universal mupirocin decolonization in intensive care units on the utility of MRSA PCR nasal swab testing.","authors":"Andrea S Ito,Kaitlyn C Reasoner,Sharon K Ong'uti,Edward T Qian,Zhiguo Zhao,Rebecca A Stern,Jeffrey A Freiberg","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag183","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe reliability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSRA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swab testing in the context of mupirocin nasal decolonization has been questioned. This study investigated whether the negative predictive value (NPV) of MSRA PCR nasal swab testing following mupirocin decolonization was non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study included adult inpatients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) from February 2023 - August 2024 who underwent both MRSA PCR nasal swab testing and universal mupirocin decolonization. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on timing of PCR testing: prior to receiving any doses of topical mupirocin, no more than 7 days after, or greater than 7 days after a first dose. The primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swab testing.RESULTS1034 patients were included in the primary analysis; 508 (49.1%) had a MRSA PCR nasal swab collected prior to the start of decolonization and 388 (73.8%) and 138 (26.2%) received nasal swabs > 0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin decolonization, respectively. The differences between the NPV of MRSA PCR testing in patients with swabs collected prior versus in patients with swabs collected >0 to ≤7 days and >7 days after the start of mupirocin were 0.3% and -0.4% (1-sided 95% CI -0.9% and CI -2.3%), respectively.CONCLUSIONSThe NPV of MRSA PCR nasal swabs is not diminished after mupirocin decolonization. MRSA PCR testing within 7 days of initiation of decolonization is non-inferior to testing prior to decolonization.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Nasal decolonization and PCR screening in the ICU: friend or foe?","authors":"María Jesús Pérez-Granda,Emilio Bouza","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"412 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDThe number of arthroplasty procedures and infection-related complications, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), continues to rise. Although current guidelines recommend cefazolin or cefuroxime as the first-line perioperative prophylactic antibiotic, substitutions with non-cephalosporins remain common, especially among patients with reported β-lactam allergies. These substitutions may increase infection risk and healthcare costs. Evidence comparing outcomes across antibiotic classes remains variable.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing single-agent cephalosporin versus single-agent non-cephalosporin prophylaxis in adults undergoing primary arthroplasty. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through January 2025. Random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses stratified results by cephalosporin type, study era, and risk of bias.RESULTSTwenty-three studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included, encompassing 191,527 arthroplasties in the cephalosporin arm and 20,058 in the non-cephalosporin arm. The odds of PJI were lower with cephalosporins (OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75). No overall difference was observed for SSI (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.36), though post-2013 studies and the cefazolin subgroup demonstrated a significant protective effect. Randomized trial estimates were limited and heterogeneous and did not reach statistical significance. Certainty of evidence was graded as moderate.CONCLUSIONSCephalosporins, particularly cefazolin or cefuroxime, remain the preferred prophylactic agents for primary arthroplasty. This quantitative synthesis reinforces their protective association against prosthetic joint infection and supports adherence to guideline-endorsed prophylaxis.
{"title":"Cephalosporins Versus Non-Cephalosporin Antibiotics for Perioperative Prophylaxis in Primary Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rita Igwilo-Alaneme,Elie Berbari,Jack McHugh,Francesco Petri,Vasupriya Ravi,Takahiro Matsuo,Fabio Borgonovo,Said El Zein,M Hassan Murad,Aaron Tande","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag172","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe number of arthroplasty procedures and infection-related complications, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), continues to rise. Although current guidelines recommend cefazolin or cefuroxime as the first-line perioperative prophylactic antibiotic, substitutions with non-cephalosporins remain common, especially among patients with reported β-lactam allergies. These substitutions may increase infection risk and healthcare costs. Evidence comparing outcomes across antibiotic classes remains variable.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing single-agent cephalosporin versus single-agent non-cephalosporin prophylaxis in adults undergoing primary arthroplasty. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through January 2025. Random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses stratified results by cephalosporin type, study era, and risk of bias.RESULTSTwenty-three studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included, encompassing 191,527 arthroplasties in the cephalosporin arm and 20,058 in the non-cephalosporin arm. The odds of PJI were lower with cephalosporins (OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75). No overall difference was observed for SSI (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.36), though post-2013 studies and the cefazolin subgroup demonstrated a significant protective effect. Randomized trial estimates were limited and heterogeneous and did not reach statistical significance. Certainty of evidence was graded as moderate.CONCLUSIONSCephalosporins, particularly cefazolin or cefuroxime, remain the preferred prophylactic agents for primary arthroplasty. This quantitative synthesis reinforces their protective association against prosthetic joint infection and supports adherence to guideline-endorsed prophylaxis.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147454598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Russ P Carstens,Yash Kapoor,Ryan C Vargo,Arinjita Bhattacharyya,Graigory Garrett,Caroline Cilissen,Adedayo Adedoyin,Xiaowei Zang,Jean-Francois Denef,Carlien Leyssens,Tom Reynders,Liliana Preotescu,Richard Kaplan,Mohammed Rassool,Johannes Lombaard,Anca Streinu-Cercel,Randolph P Matthews,S Aubrey Stoch,Marian Iwamoto,Gillian L Gillespie
BACKGROUNDMK-8527 is a novel oral nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor under clinical development as HIV-1 prevention. Two Phase 1 single-dose monotherapy studies were conducted to evaluate antiretroviral activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of MK-8527 in adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents.METHODSIn two Phase 1 studies, participants received a single oral dose of MK-8527 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, or 10 mg). Reduction in viral load (measured as log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at 7 days post-dose), PK of plasma MK-8527 through 7 days, intracellular MK-8527-triphosphate (TP, the active form of MK-8527) through 28 days, exposure-response relationship, and safety through 28 days were assessed. Adverse events were descriptively summarized.RESULTSIn total, 37 participants completed the studies. After single doses of MK-8527 0.5 to 10 mg, the mean decrease in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days-post dose was ≥1.0 log10 copies/mL. The inhibitory quotient (defined as the ratio of MK-8527-TP concentration at 168 hours post-dose [C168] to the mean intracellular concentration of MK-8527-TP at the half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]) exceeded 3 at single doses of ≥0.5 mg. MK-8527 at all dose levels was well tolerated, with a limited number of mild or moderate adverse events that were determined by investigators to be unrelated to the study treatment.CONCLUSIONSIn adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents, single doses of MK-8527 as low as 0.5 mg achieved ≥1.0 log10 decreases in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days post-dose administration.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03615183, NCT05494736.
{"title":"Antiretroviral Activity, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of MK-8527, an Oral Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Translocation Inhibitor, in Adults Living With HIV-1 Who Had Not Previously Taken Antiretroviral Agents: Results From Two Open-Label, Phase 1 Studies.","authors":"Russ P Carstens,Yash Kapoor,Ryan C Vargo,Arinjita Bhattacharyya,Graigory Garrett,Caroline Cilissen,Adedayo Adedoyin,Xiaowei Zang,Jean-Francois Denef,Carlien Leyssens,Tom Reynders,Liliana Preotescu,Richard Kaplan,Mohammed Rassool,Johannes Lombaard,Anca Streinu-Cercel,Randolph P Matthews,S Aubrey Stoch,Marian Iwamoto,Gillian L Gillespie","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciag135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag135","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDMK-8527 is a novel oral nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor under clinical development as HIV-1 prevention. Two Phase 1 single-dose monotherapy studies were conducted to evaluate antiretroviral activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of MK-8527 in adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents.METHODSIn two Phase 1 studies, participants received a single oral dose of MK-8527 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, or 10 mg). Reduction in viral load (measured as log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at 7 days post-dose), PK of plasma MK-8527 through 7 days, intracellular MK-8527-triphosphate (TP, the active form of MK-8527) through 28 days, exposure-response relationship, and safety through 28 days were assessed. Adverse events were descriptively summarized.RESULTSIn total, 37 participants completed the studies. After single doses of MK-8527 0.5 to 10 mg, the mean decrease in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days-post dose was ≥1.0 log10 copies/mL. The inhibitory quotient (defined as the ratio of MK-8527-TP concentration at 168 hours post-dose [C168] to the mean intracellular concentration of MK-8527-TP at the half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]) exceeded 3 at single doses of ≥0.5 mg. MK-8527 at all dose levels was well tolerated, with a limited number of mild or moderate adverse events that were determined by investigators to be unrelated to the study treatment.CONCLUSIONSIn adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously taken antiretroviral agents, single doses of MK-8527 as low as 0.5 mg achieved ≥1.0 log10 decreases in HIV-1 RNA at 7 days post-dose administration.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03615183, NCT05494736.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147447066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}