Nikolaus Jilg, Mark J Giganti, Kara W Chew, Katy Shaw-Saliba, Justin Ritz, Carlee Moser, Teresa H Evering, Eric S Daar, Joseph J Eron, Judith S Currier, Michael D Hughes, H Cliff Lane, Robin Dewar, Davey M Smith, Jonathan Z Li
Background: Reliable biomarkers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes are critically needed. We evaluated associations of spike antibody (Ab) and plasma nucleocapsid antigen (N Ag) with clinical outcomes in nonhospitalized persons with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.
Methods: Participants were nonhospitalized adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 enrolled in ACTIV-2 between January and July 2021 and randomized to placebo. We used quantitative assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike Ab and N Ag in blood and determined numbers of hospitalization/death events within 28 days and time to symptom improvement.
Results: Of 209 participants, 77 (37%) had quantifiable spike Ab and 139 (67%) quantifiable N Ag. Median age was 50 years; 111 (53%) were female, 182 (87%) White, and 105 (50%) Hispanic/Latino. Higher risk of hospitalization/death was seen with unquantifiable (22/132 [16.7%]) versus quantifiable (1/77 [1.3%]) spike Ab (risk ratio [RR], 12.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.76-93.34]) and quantifiable (22/139 [15.8%]) vs unquantifiable (1/70 [1.4%]) N Ag (RR, 11.08 [95% CI, 1.52-80.51]). Increasing risk of hospitalizations/deaths was seen with increasing N Ag levels. Time to symptom improvement was longer with unquantifiable versus quantifiable spike Ab (median, 14 [interquartile range {IQR}, 8 to >27] vs 8 [IQR, 4-22] days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.66 [95% CI, .45-.96]) and with quantifiable versus unquantifiable N Ag (median, 12 [7 to >27] vs 10 [5-22] days; aHR, 0.79 [95% CI, .52-1.21]).
Conclusions: Absence of spike Ab and presence of plasma N Ag predicted hospitalization/death and delayed symptom improvement in COVID-19 outpatients.
Clinical trials registration: NCT04518410.
背景:2019年冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)预后急需可靠的生物标志物。我们评估了轻度至中度 COVID-19 非住院患者的尖峰抗体(Ab)和血浆核壳抗原(N Ag)与临床预后的关系:参与者为 2021 年 1 月至 7 月间参加 ACTIV-2 并随机接受安慰剂治疗的轻度至中度 COVID-19 非住院成人患者。我们使用定量检测法检测血液中的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2尖峰抗体和N Ag,并测定28天内住院/死亡事件的数量以及症状改善的时间:在 209 名参与者中,77 人(37%)的尖峰抗体可量化,139 人(67%)的 N Ag 可量化。中位年龄为 50 岁;111 人(53%)为女性,182 人(87%)为白人,105 人(50%)为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人。不可量化(22/132 [16.7%])与可量化(1/77 [1.3%])的尖峰抗体(风险比 [RR],12.83 [95% 置信区间 {CI},1.76-93.34])和可量化(22/139 [15.8%])与不可量化(1/70 [1.4%])的 N Ag(RR,11.08 [95% CI,1.52-80.51])的住院/死亡风险较高。随着 N Ag 水平的增加,住院/死亡风险也随之增加。不可量化的尖峰抗体与可量化的尖峰抗体相比,症状改善的时间更长(中位数,14 [四分位距{IQR},8 至 >27] 天 vs 8 [IQR, 4-22] 天;调整后危险比 [aHR],0.66 [95% CI, .45-.96]);可量化的 N Ag 与不可量化的 N Ag 相比,症状改善的时间更长(中位数,12 [7 至 >27] 天 vs 10 [5-22] 天;aHR,0.79 [95% CI, .52-1.21]):结论:在COVID-19门诊患者中,没有尖峰抗体和存在血浆N Ag预示着住院/死亡和症状改善的延迟。
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 Plasma Antibody and Nucleocapsid Antigen Status Predict Outcomes in Outpatients With COVID-19.","authors":"Nikolaus Jilg, Mark J Giganti, Kara W Chew, Katy Shaw-Saliba, Justin Ritz, Carlee Moser, Teresa H Evering, Eric S Daar, Joseph J Eron, Judith S Currier, Michael D Hughes, H Cliff Lane, Robin Dewar, Davey M Smith, Jonathan Z Li","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae324","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reliable biomarkers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes are critically needed. We evaluated associations of spike antibody (Ab) and plasma nucleocapsid antigen (N Ag) with clinical outcomes in nonhospitalized persons with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were nonhospitalized adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 enrolled in ACTIV-2 between January and July 2021 and randomized to placebo. We used quantitative assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike Ab and N Ag in blood and determined numbers of hospitalization/death events within 28 days and time to symptom improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 209 participants, 77 (37%) had quantifiable spike Ab and 139 (67%) quantifiable N Ag. Median age was 50 years; 111 (53%) were female, 182 (87%) White, and 105 (50%) Hispanic/Latino. Higher risk of hospitalization/death was seen with unquantifiable (22/132 [16.7%]) versus quantifiable (1/77 [1.3%]) spike Ab (risk ratio [RR], 12.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.76-93.34]) and quantifiable (22/139 [15.8%]) vs unquantifiable (1/70 [1.4%]) N Ag (RR, 11.08 [95% CI, 1.52-80.51]). Increasing risk of hospitalizations/deaths was seen with increasing N Ag levels. Time to symptom improvement was longer with unquantifiable versus quantifiable spike Ab (median, 14 [interquartile range {IQR}, 8 to >27] vs 8 [IQR, 4-22] days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.66 [95% CI, .45-.96]) and with quantifiable versus unquantifiable N Ag (median, 12 [7 to >27] vs 10 [5-22] days; aHR, 0.79 [95% CI, .52-1.21]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absence of spike Ab and presence of plasma N Ag predicted hospitalization/death and delayed symptom improvement in COVID-19 outpatients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT04518410.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141632860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pedro Landete, Olga-Adriana Caliman-Sturdza, Jose A Lopez-Martin, Liliana Preotescu, Mihaela-Catalina Luca, Anastasia Kotanidou, Paula Villares, Shirley-Patricia Iglesias, Pablo Guisado-Vasco, Elena-Maria Saiz-Lou, Maria Del Carmen Farinas-Alvarez, Esperanza Merino de Lucas, Eduardo Perez-Alba, Jose-Miguel Cisneros, Vicente Estrada, Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, Garyfallia Poulakou, Miguel Torralba, Jesus Fortun, Paula Garcia-Ocana, Adrien Lemaignen, Miguel Marcos-Martin, Maria Molina, Roger Paredes, Maria Teresa Perez-Rodriguez, Dimitar Raev, Pablo Ryan, Fernanda Meira, Javier Gomez, Nadia Torres, Diego Lopez-Mendoza, Jose Jimeno, Jose-Felipe Varona
Background: Plitidepsin has shown potent preclinical activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and was generally well tolerated in a phase I trial of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). NEPTUNO, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of plitidepsin in the management of moderate COVID-19 in hospitalized adult patients.
Methods: Included patients had documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, required oxygen therapy, and had adequate organ function. The planned sample size was 609 patients. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to at least 3 days of dexamethasone plus either plitidepsin (1.5 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day, for 3 days) or standard of care (control). The primary endpoint was the time to sustained withdrawal of supplemental oxygen. Secondary endpoints included time to sustained hospital discharge, clinical status, duration of oxygen support, percentage of patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit, and safety.
Results: After randomizing 205 patients, NEPTUNO was discontinued due to a notable drop in COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Available data suggest a 2-day improvement in the median time to sustained oxygen therapy discontinuation (5 vs 7 days) favoring both plitidepsin arms (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, .96-1.96; P = .08 for plitidepsin 1.5 mg vs control; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, .73-1.53; P = .78 for plitidepsin 2.5 mg vs control). Plitidepsin was generally well tolerated.
Conclusions: Despite the trial limitations, these results suggest that plitidepsin may have a positive benefit-risk ratio in the management of patients requiring oxygen therapy. Further studies with plitidepsin, including those in immunosuppressed patients, are warranted.Results from this phase III trial suggest that plitidepsin, a first-in-class antiviral, may have a positive benefit-risk ratio in the management of hospitalized patients requiring oxygen therapy for moderate COVID-19.
背景:普利替普酶对SARS-CoV-2具有很强的临床前活性,在一项针对COVID-19住院患者的I期试验中,普利替普酶的耐受性普遍良好。NEPTUNO 是一项 III 期多中心随机对照试验,旨在评估普利肝素治疗中度 COVID-19 住院成年患者的疗效和安全性:纳入的患者均有 SARS-CoV-2 感染记录,需要氧气治疗,且器官功能正常。计划样本量为 609 例患者。患者按1:1:1的比例随机接受至少3天的地塞米松加普利替平(1.5毫克/天或2.5毫克/天,共3天)或标准治疗(对照组)。主要终点是持续停止补充氧气的时间。次要终点包括持续出院时间、临床状态、氧气支持持续时间、需要入住重症监护室的患者比例以及安全性:在对205名患者进行随机分组后,由于与COVID-19相关的住院率显著下降,NEPTUNO被终止。现有数据显示,停用持续氧疗的中位时间(5天 vs 7天)缩短了2天,普利替平治疗组更有利(普利替平1.5毫克 vs 对照组的危险比[HR]为1.37,95%置信区间[CI]为0.96-1.96,P=0.08;普利替平2.5毫克 vs 对照组的危险比[HR]为1.06,95%置信区间[CI]为0.73-1.53,P=0.78)。普利替普酶的耐受性总体良好:尽管试验存在局限性,但这些结果表明,普利替普酶在治疗需要氧疗的患者方面可能具有积极的效益-风险比。有必要对普利替平进行进一步研究,包括对免疫抑制患者的研究:本试验由西班牙马德里 Pharmamar 公司资助。
{"title":"A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of Plitidepsin, a Marine-Derived Compound, in Hospitalized Adults With Moderate COVID-19.","authors":"Pedro Landete, Olga-Adriana Caliman-Sturdza, Jose A Lopez-Martin, Liliana Preotescu, Mihaela-Catalina Luca, Anastasia Kotanidou, Paula Villares, Shirley-Patricia Iglesias, Pablo Guisado-Vasco, Elena-Maria Saiz-Lou, Maria Del Carmen Farinas-Alvarez, Esperanza Merino de Lucas, Eduardo Perez-Alba, Jose-Miguel Cisneros, Vicente Estrada, Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio, Garyfallia Poulakou, Miguel Torralba, Jesus Fortun, Paula Garcia-Ocana, Adrien Lemaignen, Miguel Marcos-Martin, Maria Molina, Roger Paredes, Maria Teresa Perez-Rodriguez, Dimitar Raev, Pablo Ryan, Fernanda Meira, Javier Gomez, Nadia Torres, Diego Lopez-Mendoza, Jose Jimeno, Jose-Felipe Varona","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae227","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plitidepsin has shown potent preclinical activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and was generally well tolerated in a phase I trial of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). NEPTUNO, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of plitidepsin in the management of moderate COVID-19 in hospitalized adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included patients had documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, required oxygen therapy, and had adequate organ function. The planned sample size was 609 patients. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to at least 3 days of dexamethasone plus either plitidepsin (1.5 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day, for 3 days) or standard of care (control). The primary endpoint was the time to sustained withdrawal of supplemental oxygen. Secondary endpoints included time to sustained hospital discharge, clinical status, duration of oxygen support, percentage of patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After randomizing 205 patients, NEPTUNO was discontinued due to a notable drop in COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Available data suggest a 2-day improvement in the median time to sustained oxygen therapy discontinuation (5 vs 7 days) favoring both plitidepsin arms (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, .96-1.96; P = .08 for plitidepsin 1.5 mg vs control; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, .73-1.53; P = .78 for plitidepsin 2.5 mg vs control). Plitidepsin was generally well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the trial limitations, these results suggest that plitidepsin may have a positive benefit-risk ratio in the management of patients requiring oxygen therapy. Further studies with plitidepsin, including those in immunosuppressed patients, are warranted.Results from this phase III trial suggest that plitidepsin, a first-in-class antiviral, may have a positive benefit-risk ratio in the management of hospitalized patients requiring oxygen therapy for moderate COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478586/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ryan B Khodadadi, Pansachee Damronglerd, Jack W McHugh, Said El Zein, Brian D Lahr, Brandon J Yuan, Omar M Abu Saleh, Gina A Suh, Aaron J Tande
Background: Native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) is definitively diagnosed by a positive Gram stain or culture, along with supportive clinical findings. Preoperative antibiotics are known to alter synovial fluid cell count, Gram stain, and culture results and are typically postponed until after arthrocentesis to optimize diagnostic accuracy. However, data on the impact of preoperative antibiotics on operative culture yield for NJSA diagnosis are limited.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult cases of NJSA who underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic facilities from 2012 to 2021 to analyze the effect of preoperative antibiotics on operative culture yield through a paired analysis of preoperative culture (POC) and operative culture (OC) results using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations.
Results: Two hundred ninety-nine patients with NJSA affecting 321 joints were included. Among those receiving preoperative antibiotics, yield significantly decreased from 68.0% at POC to 57.1% at OC (P < .001). In contrast, for patients without preoperative antibiotics there was a non-significant increase in yield from 60.9% at POC to 67.4% at OC (P = .244). In a logistic regression model for paired data, preoperative antibiotic exposure was more likely to decrease OC yield compared to non-exposure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-3.64; P = .006). Within the preoperative antibiotic group, additional antibiotic doses and earlier antibiotic initiation were associated with lower OC yield.
Conclusions: In patients with NJSA, preoperative antibiotic exposure resulted in a significant decrease in microbiologic yield of operative cultures as compared to patients in whom antibiotic therapy was held prior to obtaining operative cultures.
{"title":"Effect of Preoperative Antibiotic Therapy on Operative Culture Yield for Diagnosis of Native Joint Septic Arthritis.","authors":"Ryan B Khodadadi, Pansachee Damronglerd, Jack W McHugh, Said El Zein, Brian D Lahr, Brandon J Yuan, Omar M Abu Saleh, Gina A Suh, Aaron J Tande","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae136","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) is definitively diagnosed by a positive Gram stain or culture, along with supportive clinical findings. Preoperative antibiotics are known to alter synovial fluid cell count, Gram stain, and culture results and are typically postponed until after arthrocentesis to optimize diagnostic accuracy. However, data on the impact of preoperative antibiotics on operative culture yield for NJSA diagnosis are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed adult cases of NJSA who underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic facilities from 2012 to 2021 to analyze the effect of preoperative antibiotics on operative culture yield through a paired analysis of preoperative culture (POC) and operative culture (OC) results using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred ninety-nine patients with NJSA affecting 321 joints were included. Among those receiving preoperative antibiotics, yield significantly decreased from 68.0% at POC to 57.1% at OC (P < .001). In contrast, for patients without preoperative antibiotics there was a non-significant increase in yield from 60.9% at POC to 67.4% at OC (P = .244). In a logistic regression model for paired data, preoperative antibiotic exposure was more likely to decrease OC yield compared to non-exposure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-3.64; P = .006). Within the preoperative antibiotic group, additional antibiotic doses and earlier antibiotic initiation were associated with lower OC yield.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with NJSA, preoperative antibiotic exposure resulted in a significant decrease in microbiologic yield of operative cultures as compared to patients in whom antibiotic therapy was held prior to obtaining operative cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478806/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140101230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katherine M Begley, Aleda M Leis, Joshua G Petrie, Rachel Truscon, Emileigh Johnson, Lois E Lamerato, Melissa Wei, Arnold S Monto, Emily T Martin
Background: Data on the true prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) among medically attended acute respiratory illnesses (MAARI) has been limited by the lack of regular clinical testing of mild to moderate illnesses. Here we present a prospective evaluation of the epidemiology of RSV-associated MAARI across age groups and multimorbidity status over 3 seasons, which is informative in light of the recommendations for shared decision making for vaccination in older adults.
Methods: Ambulatory patients ≥6 months of age meeting a common MAARI case definition were prospectively enrolled in the Michigan Ford Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (MFIVE) study, a subsite of the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network. All participants were tested by nasal-throat swab for RSV and influenza, including subtype, independently from clinician-directed testing. Participant illness characteristics and calculated multimorbidity-weighted index (MWI) were collected by in-person survey and electronic medical record review.
Results: Over 3 surveillance seasons (fall 2017 to spring 2020), 9.9% (n = 441) of 4442 participants had RSV detected. RSV-associated MAARI was more prevalent than influenza for participants 6 months to 4 years of age. Adults with RSV-MAARI had higher median MWI scores overall compared to influenza-MAARI and controls with neither virus (1.62, 0.40, and 0.64, respectively).
Conclusions: RSV is a significant, underrecognized cause of MAARI in both children and adults presenting for ambulatory care. Multimorbidity is an important contributor to RSV-associated MAARI in outpatient adults, providing information to support shared clinical decision making for vaccination.
{"title":"Epidemiology of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Adults and Children With Medically Attended Acute Respiratory Illness Over Three Seasons.","authors":"Katherine M Begley, Aleda M Leis, Joshua G Petrie, Rachel Truscon, Emileigh Johnson, Lois E Lamerato, Melissa Wei, Arnold S Monto, Emily T Martin","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae303","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the true prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) among medically attended acute respiratory illnesses (MAARI) has been limited by the lack of regular clinical testing of mild to moderate illnesses. Here we present a prospective evaluation of the epidemiology of RSV-associated MAARI across age groups and multimorbidity status over 3 seasons, which is informative in light of the recommendations for shared decision making for vaccination in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambulatory patients ≥6 months of age meeting a common MAARI case definition were prospectively enrolled in the Michigan Ford Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (MFIVE) study, a subsite of the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network. All participants were tested by nasal-throat swab for RSV and influenza, including subtype, independently from clinician-directed testing. Participant illness characteristics and calculated multimorbidity-weighted index (MWI) were collected by in-person survey and electronic medical record review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 3 surveillance seasons (fall 2017 to spring 2020), 9.9% (n = 441) of 4442 participants had RSV detected. RSV-associated MAARI was more prevalent than influenza for participants 6 months to 4 years of age. Adults with RSV-MAARI had higher median MWI scores overall compared to influenza-MAARI and controls with neither virus (1.62, 0.40, and 0.64, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RSV is a significant, underrecognized cause of MAARI in both children and adults presenting for ambulatory care. Multimorbidity is an important contributor to RSV-associated MAARI in outpatient adults, providing information to support shared clinical decision making for vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141247810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rash-ional Evaluation of a Returning Traveler With Fever.","authors":"Jenny Wei,Rachel Martin-Blais","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae275","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Strengthening and expanding interprofessional team-based care is an important component of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Workforce Development Strategy to expand and promote equitable access to expert infectious diseases (ID) care. This statement defines the roles of care team members and highlights the need for ID curricula and training programs for advanced practice providers to support implementation of ID team-based care.
{"title":"Position of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the HIV Medicine Association on Team-based Infectious Diseases Care and the Roles of Advanced Practice Providers and Clinical Pharmacists.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae265","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Strengthening and expanding interprofessional team-based care is an important component of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Workforce Development Strategy to expand and promote equitable access to expert infectious diseases (ID) care. This statement defines the roles of care team members and highlights the need for ID curricula and training programs for advanced practice providers to support implementation of ID team-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141154682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander Viloria Winnett, Timothy Stenzel, Rustem F Ismagilov
Early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection by diagnostic tests can prompt actions to reduce transmission and improve treatment efficacy, especially for vulnerable groups such as immunocompromised individuals. Recent evidence suggests that sampling the throat in addition to the nose improves clinical sensitivity during early infection for both antigen and molecular coronavirus disease 2019 tests. We urge test manufacturers to validate tests for use with throat swab, in combination with nasal swabs.
{"title":"Validating Combination Throat-Nasal Swab Specimens for COVID-19 Tests Would Improve Early Detection, Especially for the Most Vulnerable.","authors":"Alexander Viloria Winnett, Timothy Stenzel, Rustem F Ismagilov","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae381","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection by diagnostic tests can prompt actions to reduce transmission and improve treatment efficacy, especially for vulnerable groups such as immunocompromised individuals. Recent evidence suggests that sampling the throat in addition to the nose improves clinical sensitivity during early infection for both antigen and molecular coronavirus disease 2019 tests. We urge test manufacturers to validate tests for use with throat swab, in combination with nasal swabs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478585/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Erin M McCartney, Lucy Ralton, Joshua Dawe, Jacqui Richmond, Joshua Zobel, Alan Wigg, Victoria Cock, Edmund Y Tse, Tom Rees, David Shaw, Catherine Ferguson
Background: A barrier to hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure is conventional testing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of HCV antibody and RNA point-of-care testing (POCT) on testing rates, linkage to care, treatment, and acceptability of testing in 3 priority settings in Australia.
Methods: Participants were enrolled in an interventional cohort study at a reception prison, inpatient mental health service, and inpatient alcohol and other drug unit, between October 2020 and December 2021. HCV POCT was performed using SD Bioline HCV antibody fingerstick test and a reflexive Xpert HCV Viral Load Fingerstick test using capillary blood samples. A retrospective audit of HCV testing and treatment data was performed at each site for the preceding 12-month period to generate a historical control.
Results: A total of 1549 participants received a HCV antibody test with 17% (264 of 1549) receiving a positive result, of whom 21% (55 of 264) tested HCV RNA positive. Across all settings the rate of testing per year significantly increased between the historical controls and the study intervention period by 2.57 fold (rate ratio, 2.57 [95% confidence interval, 2.32-2.85]) for HCV antibody testing and 1.62 (rate ratio, 1.62 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.01]) for RNA testing. Treatment uptake was higher during the POCT intervention (86% [47 of 55]; P = .01) compared to the historical controls (61% [27 of 44]).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated across 3 settings that the use of HCV antibody and RNA POCT increased testing rates, treatment uptake, and linkage to care. The testing model was highly acceptable for most participants.
{"title":"Point-of-Care Testing for Hepatitis C in the Priority Settings of Mental Health, Prisons, and Drug and Alcohol Facilities-the PROMPt Study.","authors":"Erin M McCartney, Lucy Ralton, Joshua Dawe, Jacqui Richmond, Joshua Zobel, Alan Wigg, Victoria Cock, Edmund Y Tse, Tom Rees, David Shaw, Catherine Ferguson","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae155","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A barrier to hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure is conventional testing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of HCV antibody and RNA point-of-care testing (POCT) on testing rates, linkage to care, treatment, and acceptability of testing in 3 priority settings in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were enrolled in an interventional cohort study at a reception prison, inpatient mental health service, and inpatient alcohol and other drug unit, between October 2020 and December 2021. HCV POCT was performed using SD Bioline HCV antibody fingerstick test and a reflexive Xpert HCV Viral Load Fingerstick test using capillary blood samples. A retrospective audit of HCV testing and treatment data was performed at each site for the preceding 12-month period to generate a historical control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1549 participants received a HCV antibody test with 17% (264 of 1549) receiving a positive result, of whom 21% (55 of 264) tested HCV RNA positive. Across all settings the rate of testing per year significantly increased between the historical controls and the study intervention period by 2.57 fold (rate ratio, 2.57 [95% confidence interval, 2.32-2.85]) for HCV antibody testing and 1.62 (rate ratio, 1.62 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.01]) for RNA testing. Treatment uptake was higher during the POCT intervention (86% [47 of 55]; P = .01) compared to the historical controls (61% [27 of 44]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated across 3 settings that the use of HCV antibody and RNA POCT increased testing rates, treatment uptake, and linkage to care. The testing model was highly acceptable for most participants.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ACTRN-12621001578897.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140183938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
José Damas, Aline Munting, Jacques Fellay, David Haerry, Catia Marzolini, Philip E Tarr, Ana Steffen, Dominique L Braun, Marcel Stoeckle, Enos Bernasconi, Olivier Nawej Tshikung, Christoph A Fux, Katharine E A Darling, Charles Béguelin, Gilles Wandeler, Matthias Cavassini, Bernard Surial
Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART)-related weight gain is of particular concern in people with HIV (PWH). Although weight gain was observed among PWH receiving tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), little is known about the potential reversibility after TAF discontinuation. We evaluated weight and metabolic changes 12 months after TAF discontinuation in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.
Methods: We included participants who received at least 6 months of TAF-containing ART between January 2016 and March 2023. Using multivariable mixed-effect models, changes in weight and lipid levels were compared between individuals who continued TAF and those who switched to one of the following TAF-free regimens: (1) tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based ART, (2) dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC), or (3) long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV).
Results: Of 6555 participants (median age 54 years, 24.3% female, 13% Black), 5485 (83.7%) continued, and 1070 (16.3%) stopped TAF. Overall, discontinuing TAF was associated with an adjusted mean weight change of -0.54 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] -.98 to -.11) after 12 months. In stratified analyses, switching from TAF to TDF led to an adjusted mean weight decrease of -1.84 kg (95% CI -2.72 to -.97), and to a decrease in mean total cholesterol (-0.44 mmol/L) and triglycerides (-0.38 mmol/L) after 12 months. Switching from TAF-based ART to DTG/3TC (-0.17 kg, 95% CI -.82 to .48) or long-acting CAB/RPV (-0.64 kg, 95% CI -2.16 to .89) did not lead to reductions in weight.
Conclusions: Replacing TAF with TDF in PWH led to a decrease in body weight and an improved lipid profile within 1 year. Weight changes were not observed among individuals who switched to DTG/3TC or long-acting CAB/RPV.
{"title":"Weight, Anthropometric and Metabolic Changes After Discontinuing Antiretroviral Therapy Containing Tenofovir Alafenamide in People With HIV.","authors":"José Damas, Aline Munting, Jacques Fellay, David Haerry, Catia Marzolini, Philip E Tarr, Ana Steffen, Dominique L Braun, Marcel Stoeckle, Enos Bernasconi, Olivier Nawej Tshikung, Christoph A Fux, Katharine E A Darling, Charles Béguelin, Gilles Wandeler, Matthias Cavassini, Bernard Surial","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae189","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiretroviral therapy (ART)-related weight gain is of particular concern in people with HIV (PWH). Although weight gain was observed among PWH receiving tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), little is known about the potential reversibility after TAF discontinuation. We evaluated weight and metabolic changes 12 months after TAF discontinuation in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included participants who received at least 6 months of TAF-containing ART between January 2016 and March 2023. Using multivariable mixed-effect models, changes in weight and lipid levels were compared between individuals who continued TAF and those who switched to one of the following TAF-free regimens: (1) tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based ART, (2) dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC), or (3) long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6555 participants (median age 54 years, 24.3% female, 13% Black), 5485 (83.7%) continued, and 1070 (16.3%) stopped TAF. Overall, discontinuing TAF was associated with an adjusted mean weight change of -0.54 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] -.98 to -.11) after 12 months. In stratified analyses, switching from TAF to TDF led to an adjusted mean weight decrease of -1.84 kg (95% CI -2.72 to -.97), and to a decrease in mean total cholesterol (-0.44 mmol/L) and triglycerides (-0.38 mmol/L) after 12 months. Switching from TAF-based ART to DTG/3TC (-0.17 kg, 95% CI -.82 to .48) or long-acting CAB/RPV (-0.64 kg, 95% CI -2.16 to .89) did not lead to reductions in weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Replacing TAF with TDF in PWH led to a decrease in body weight and an improved lipid profile within 1 year. Weight changes were not observed among individuals who switched to DTG/3TC or long-acting CAB/RPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}