Tengrui Yin, Jing Zou, Mei Tang, Mengchang Yang, Qiwen Han, Hao Jiang, Huihui Hu, Xiuyang Li, Yijue Wu, Yuanyuan Huang, Lin He
HR19042 is a novel, orally administered, targeted-release formulation of the topically active corticosteroid budesonide, developed to release active drug within the terminal ileum and indicated to reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate loss in adults with primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy. This randomized, single-dose, open-label, six-sequence, three-treatment crossover trial aimed to explore the pharmacokinetic (PK) of HR19042 in comparison with two other budesonide targeted-release formulations among healthy Chinese subjects. Plasma budesonide concentrations were measured via liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental methods. Eighteen subjects successfully completed the trial. The median Tlag and Tmax of HR19042 were 1.25 and 3.50 h shorter than those of Nefecon, respectively. The Cmax of HR19042 was approximately 1.9-fold higher than that of Nefecon and 1.4-fold higher than that of Budenofalk. Based on the AUC0-t determination, the relative bioavailability (F) of HR19042 was approximately 136.93% relative to Nefecon and 129.68% relative to Budenofalk. In vitro, the dissolution of HR19042 occurred 30 min earlier than that of Nefecon in the intestinal buffer medium. In conclusion, both in vivo and in vitro findings suggest that HR19042 exhibits a faster absorption rate and higher oral bioavailability.
{"title":"Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of Three Budesonide Formulations in Healthy Chinese Subjects","authors":"Tengrui Yin, Jing Zou, Mei Tang, Mengchang Yang, Qiwen Han, Hao Jiang, Huihui Hu, Xiuyang Li, Yijue Wu, Yuanyuan Huang, Lin He","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1603","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1603","url":null,"abstract":"<p>HR19042 is a novel, orally administered, targeted-release formulation of the topically active corticosteroid budesonide, developed to release active drug within the terminal ileum and indicated to reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate loss in adults with primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy. This randomized, single-dose, open-label, six-sequence, three-treatment crossover trial aimed to explore the pharmacokinetic (PK) of HR19042 in comparison with two other budesonide targeted-release formulations among healthy Chinese subjects. Plasma budesonide concentrations were measured via liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental methods. Eighteen subjects successfully completed the trial. The median T<sub>lag</sub> and T<sub>max</sub> of HR19042 were 1.25 and 3.50 h shorter than those of Nefecon, respectively. The C<sub>max</sub> of HR19042 was approximately 1.9-fold higher than that of Nefecon and 1.4-fold higher than that of Budenofalk. Based on the AUC<sub>0-t</sub> determination, the relative bioavailability (F) of HR19042 was approximately 136.93% relative to Nefecon and 129.68% relative to Budenofalk. In vitro, the dissolution of HR19042 occurred 30 min earlier than that of Nefecon in the intestinal buffer medium. In conclusion, both in vivo and in vitro findings suggest that HR19042 exhibits a faster absorption rate and higher oral bioavailability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145039283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CVW ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CVW < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (Cmax) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Valsartan and Amlodipine Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions","authors":"Yu-Ying Xu, Wen-Tan Xu, Wei-Ping Pan, Xie-Li Guo, Xiao-Min Li, Su-Mei Xu, Shao-Wei Yan, Wen-Ke Cai, Xin-Bin Yan, Wen-Jing Zhong, Shi-Lin Chen, Ping-Sheng Xu","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1597","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1597","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (C<sub>max</sub>) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 12","pages":"911-917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145039242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jie Wang, Fang Yao, Pan Lu, Yafang Xie, Xiuwen Li, Qiangwei Liu, Yang Liu, Dan Cao, Jun Liang, Ming Zhou
Tamsulosin is a highly selective α1A adrenergic receptor antagonist that can relax smooth muscles in the urethra, bladder neck, and prostate and improve urinary disorders. It is therefore widely used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and bioequivalence of 2 different formulations (tamsulosin sustained-release tablets and tamsulosin sustained-release capsules) in healthy Chinese subjects. This study was a single-center, randomized, open label, 2-formulation, single-administration, 2-cycle, double-crossover fasting/postprandial bioequivalence trial that included 56 healthy volunteers (28 fasting and 28 postprandial). Blood samples were collected from volunteers after oral administration, plasma concentrations of tamsulosin were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for PK analysis, and the safety and tolerability of the drug were monitored. Under fasting and postprandial conditions, the 90% confidence intervals for maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last sampling time (AUC0-t) of the test and reference formulations were within an acceptable range (80%-125%). All adverse events (AEs) were mild and no serious AEs were observed in the study. The subject formulation of tamsulosin extended-release tablets was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese Volunteers.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Study and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Sustained-Release Tablets of Tamsulosin in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Postprandial Conditions","authors":"Jie Wang, Fang Yao, Pan Lu, Yafang Xie, Xiuwen Li, Qiangwei Liu, Yang Liu, Dan Cao, Jun Liang, Ming Zhou","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1589","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1589","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tamsulosin is a highly selective α1A adrenergic receptor antagonist that can relax smooth muscles in the urethra, bladder neck, and prostate and improve urinary disorders. It is therefore widely used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and bioequivalence of 2 different formulations (tamsulosin sustained-release tablets and tamsulosin sustained-release capsules) in healthy Chinese subjects. This study was a single-center, randomized, open label, 2-formulation, single-administration, 2-cycle, double-crossover fasting/postprandial bioequivalence trial that included 56 healthy volunteers (28 fasting and 28 postprandial). Blood samples were collected from volunteers after oral administration, plasma concentrations of tamsulosin were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for PK analysis, and the safety and tolerability of the drug were monitored. Under fasting and postprandial conditions, the 90% confidence intervals for maximum observed concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last sampling time (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) of the test and reference formulations were within an acceptable range (80%-125%). All adverse events (AEs) were mild and no serious AEs were observed in the study. The subject formulation of tamsulosin extended-release tablets was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese Volunteers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 12","pages":"971-976"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145022938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Epilepsy is one of the most severe neurological disorders in the world, which might seriously endanger the lives of patients. Phenobarbital is an important medicine clinically used for the treatment of epilepsy, and it is irreplaceable in the treatment of generalized tonic–clonic seizures, focal seizures, status epilepticus, and pediatric epilepsy. However, the original research medicine of phenobarbital has not been launched in China. Therefore, an economical and effective generic medicine is of great significance to patients. In this study, a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-formulation, two-period, two-sequence crossover design and parallel design were adopted. The phenobarbital tablets produced by Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. were used as the test formulation, and Phenobal produced by Fujinaga Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. was used as the reference formulation for a bioequivalence study. Additionally, the influence of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters al was investigated. The results showed that the test formulation and the reference formulation were bioequivalent, and food might reduce the Cmax (maximum concentration) and exposure of phenobarbital. This study provides data support for the marketing of generic phenobarbital medicines and offers a theoretical basis for the rational administration of phenobarbital. The clinical trial was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration numbers: CTR20242404 and CTR20244155).
{"title":"Phenobarbital Bioequivalence in Chinese Population: Considering the Role of Food on Pharmacokinetics","authors":"Wang Xinman, Liu Yuan, Sun Ying, Wang Yiyun","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1604","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1604","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epilepsy is one of the most severe neurological disorders in the world, which might seriously endanger the lives of patients. Phenobarbital is an important medicine clinically used for the treatment of epilepsy, and it is irreplaceable in the treatment of generalized tonic–clonic seizures, focal seizures, status epilepticus, and pediatric epilepsy. However, the original research medicine of phenobarbital has not been launched in China. Therefore, an economical and effective generic medicine is of great significance to patients. In this study, a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-formulation, two-period, two-sequence crossover design and parallel design were adopted. The phenobarbital tablets produced by Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. were used as the test formulation, and Phenobal produced by Fujinaga Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. was used as the reference formulation for a bioequivalence study. Additionally, the influence of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters al was investigated. The results showed that the test formulation and the reference formulation were bioequivalent, and food might reduce the C<sub>max</sub> (maximum concentration) and exposure of phenobarbital. This study provides data support for the marketing of generic phenobarbital medicines and offers a theoretical basis for the rational administration of phenobarbital. The clinical trial was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration numbers: CTR20242404 and CTR20244155).</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 12","pages":"925-933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1604","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145005953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety, pharmacokinetics, and impact of race of pharmacokinetics on monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab and cilgavimab (AZD7442) were assessed in Chinese adult participants in a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. In total, 272 participants were randomized 3:1 to a single intravenous dose of 600 mg AZD7442 or placebo and followed for 451 days. Mean participant age was 34.2 years, 5.9% were aged greater than 60 years, and 69.1% were male. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 72.8% and 80.0% of participants with AZD7442 and placebo, respectively; most were mild or moderate in severity. Serious AEs were reported in 3.0% and 4.3% of participants with AZD7442 and placebo, respectively. No AEs of special interest, infusion-related reactions, or deaths occurred. Maximum serum concentrations of tixagevimab and cilgavimab were rapidly achieved following infusion, then declined through Day 361. Mean half-lives were 85 days for tixagevimab and 80 days for cilgavimab. AZD7442 recipients exhibited greater than 4-fold neutralizing antibody titer increases versus baseline at Day 8, which then declined through Day 361. Among AZD7442 recipients, 20.8% were treatment-emergent antidrug antibody positive. Asian race had no clinically significant impact on AZD7442 pharmacokinetics. Overall, intravenous 600 mg AZD7442 was well tolerated in Chinese adult participants. AZD7442 pharmacokinetics were similar in Asian and non-Asian participants.
{"title":"Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibodies Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (AZD7442) in a China Phase 2 Study and Evaluation of Asian Race Effect","authors":"Jing Zhang, Huixia Zhang, Yajuan Zhang, Shuyuan Liu, Xiaoyun Ge, Haiyue Zhang, Yunfei Li, Cecil Chi-Keung Chen, Oleg Stepanov, Weifeng Tang, Wenhong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1586","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1586","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Safety, pharmacokinetics, and impact of race of pharmacokinetics on monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab and cilgavimab (AZD7442) were assessed in Chinese adult participants in a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. In total, 272 participants were randomized 3:1 to a single intravenous dose of 600 mg AZD7442 or placebo and followed for 451 days. Mean participant age was 34.2 years, 5.9% were aged greater than 60 years, and 69.1% were male. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 72.8% and 80.0% of participants with AZD7442 and placebo, respectively; most were mild or moderate in severity. Serious AEs were reported in 3.0% and 4.3% of participants with AZD7442 and placebo, respectively. No AEs of special interest, infusion-related reactions, or deaths occurred. Maximum serum concentrations of tixagevimab and cilgavimab were rapidly achieved following infusion, then declined through Day 361. Mean half-lives were 85 days for tixagevimab and 80 days for cilgavimab. AZD7442 recipients exhibited greater than 4-fold neutralizing antibody titer increases versus baseline at Day 8, which then declined through Day 361. Among AZD7442 recipients, 20.8% were treatment-emergent antidrug antibody positive. Asian race had no clinically significant impact on AZD7442 pharmacokinetics. Overall, intravenous 600 mg AZD7442 was well tolerated in Chinese adult participants. AZD7442 pharmacokinetics were similar in Asian and non-Asian participants.</p><p><b>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier</b>: NCT05184062</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 11","pages":"846-855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1586","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144999795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bilal Tariq, Chester Lin, Vaibhav Mundra, Yang Gao, Dan Zhang, Ying C. Ou
Zanubrutinib is a next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treating B-cell malignancies. Two phase 1 studies evaluated a new 160-mg zanubrutinib tablet versus 80-mg capsules. In study BGB-3111-115 (n = 43), a randomized 3-period crossover trial, relative bioavailability and food effects were assessed. Under fasted conditions, systemic exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) was comparable between tablets and capsules at both 160- and 320-mg doses. A high-fat meal increased tablet maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by 47%-79% but had minimal effect on AUC (<18%), supporting administration with or without food. Study BGB-3111-114 (n = 58) was a randomized, replicate crossover study that evaluated bioequivalence (BE) under fasted conditions. Geometric mean ratios of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ (tablets vs capsules) were 1.00 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.05) and 0.99 (90% CI 0.94-1.04), meeting BE criteria. Tablet Cmax was modestly higher (geometric mean ratio 1.22, 90% CI 1.14-1.30), with no expected clinical impact based on established zanubrutinib exposure-response relationships. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. In vitro testing showed tablets readily dispersed into a stable suspension suitable for nasogastric tube administration. Together, these results supported zanubrutinib tablets as a flexible alternative to capsules, with the potential to reduce pill burden (4 capsules vs 2 tablets) and improve long-term adherence.
Zanubrutinib是新一代布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,被批准用于治疗b细胞恶性肿瘤。两项1期研究评估了一种新的160毫克扎鲁替尼片剂和80毫克胶囊。在研究BGB-3111-115 (n = 43)中,采用随机3期交叉试验,评估相对生物利用度和食品效应。在禁食条件下,160和320 mg剂量的片剂和胶囊的全身暴露(浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUC])相当。高脂膳食使片剂最大血药浓度(Cmax)增加了47% ~ 79%,但对AUC (0-t)和AUC0-∞(片剂vs胶囊)的影响最小,分别为1.00(90%可信区间[CI] 0.95 ~ 1.05)和0.99 (90% CI 0.94 ~ 1.04),符合BE标准。片剂Cmax略高(几何平均比值1.22,90% CI 1.14-1.30),基于已建立的扎鲁替尼暴露-反应关系,没有预期的临床影响。两种制剂耐受性良好,无严重不良事件。体外试验表明,片剂易分散成稳定的悬浮液,适用于鼻胃管给药。总之,这些结果支持zanubrutinib片剂作为胶囊的灵活替代品,具有减少药丸负担(4粒胶囊vs 2片)和改善长期依从性的潜力。
{"title":"Relative Bioavailability, Food Effect, and Bioequivalence Studies to Assess a New Zanubrutinib 160-mg Tablet: Results From 2 Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Volunteers","authors":"Bilal Tariq, Chester Lin, Vaibhav Mundra, Yang Gao, Dan Zhang, Ying C. Ou","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1584","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1584","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zanubrutinib is a next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treating B-cell malignancies. Two phase 1 studies evaluated a new 160-mg zanubrutinib tablet versus 80-mg capsules. In study BGB-3111-115 (n = 43), a randomized 3-period crossover trial, relative bioavailability and food effects were assessed. Under fasted conditions, systemic exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) was comparable between tablets and capsules at both 160- and 320-mg doses. A high-fat meal increased tablet maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) by 47%-79% but had minimal effect on AUC (<18%), supporting administration with or without food. Study BGB-3111-114 (n = 58) was a randomized, replicate crossover study that evaluated bioequivalence (BE) under fasted conditions. Geometric mean ratios of AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> (tablets vs capsules) were 1.00 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.05) and 0.99 (90% CI 0.94-1.04), meeting BE criteria. Tablet C<sub>max</sub> was modestly higher (geometric mean ratio 1.22, 90% CI 1.14-1.30), with no expected clinical impact based on established zanubrutinib exposure-response relationships. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. In vitro testing showed tablets readily dispersed into a stable suspension suitable for nasogastric tube administration. Together, these results supported zanubrutinib tablets as a flexible alternative to capsules, with the potential to reduce pill burden (4 capsules vs 2 tablets) and improve long-term adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1584","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>If you attended or will soon attend any clinical pharmacology or drug development conference this year, you would have noticed that artificial intelligence (AI) is a major focus everywhere. Headlines, plenaries, and panels all speak to AI's rapid ascendance. Yet, this trend is much more than media hype or marketing spin—it marks a true inflection point for the pharmaceutical industry.</p><p>A report<span><sup>1</sup></span> published this summer offers a timely snapshot into the current state of AI in the pharmaceutical industry. Based on interviews and survey data from senior C-suite executives at more than 40 organizations, including most of the top 20 pharmaceutical companies, the report highlights that AI has reached a critical tipping point. AI is no longer an experimental curiosity but a core strategic priority across drug R&D, clinical development, and commercialization. Leaders from Big Pharma, major tech companies, and innovative startups concur that we are entering a pivotal phase for AI. The next 12 to 24 months will likely determine whether AI becomes a foundational technology or remains an incremental tool in pharmaceutical R&D. As a result, strategies and investments are shifting away from cautious experimentation and pilot projects toward enterprise-wide adoption.</p><p>As clinical pharmacologists and drug development experts, we must ask: What does this strategic shift mean for early phase studies, where rigor and innovation are non-negotiable?</p><p>Enterprise-level AI initiatives are being championed at the C-suite, with leadership aligning budgets, governance structures, and strategic priorities<span><sup>1</sup></span> to achieve measurable gains in speed, efficiency, and scientific innovation. For early-phase clinical studies, these priorities could not be more aligned. Phase I/II trials stand to benefit immensely from AI in several domains.</p><p>Emerging scientific literature demonstrates that generative AI,<span><sup>2</sup></span> multi-omics modeling,<span><sup>3</sup></span> and federated learning<span><sup>4</sup></span> can uncover novel drug targets, optimize biomarker-driven trial designs, and identify subtle signals of efficacy and safety that may otherwise go undetected, especially in smaller, early-phase cohorts. This evolution of AI in clinical trials opens real opportunities for clinical pharmacologists to contribute to innovative, data-driven approaches to drug development.</p><p>The report highlights an ongoing transition: whereas pharma previously sought to build AI tools internally for reasons of data ownership and trust, there is a notable rise in hybrid and partnership models.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Pharma is increasingly open to leveraging foundational models from big tech and specialized startups, provided that solutions are transparent, validated, and regulatory-ready. Similar sentiments are echoed by Brumfeld et al.,<span><sup>14</sup></span> who found that consortium approaches and publi
{"title":"Pharma's AI Inflection Point: What Does It Mean for Early Phase Clinical Development?","authors":"Amalia M. Issa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1596","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1596","url":null,"abstract":"<p>If you attended or will soon attend any clinical pharmacology or drug development conference this year, you would have noticed that artificial intelligence (AI) is a major focus everywhere. Headlines, plenaries, and panels all speak to AI's rapid ascendance. Yet, this trend is much more than media hype or marketing spin—it marks a true inflection point for the pharmaceutical industry.</p><p>A report<span><sup>1</sup></span> published this summer offers a timely snapshot into the current state of AI in the pharmaceutical industry. Based on interviews and survey data from senior C-suite executives at more than 40 organizations, including most of the top 20 pharmaceutical companies, the report highlights that AI has reached a critical tipping point. AI is no longer an experimental curiosity but a core strategic priority across drug R&D, clinical development, and commercialization. Leaders from Big Pharma, major tech companies, and innovative startups concur that we are entering a pivotal phase for AI. The next 12 to 24 months will likely determine whether AI becomes a foundational technology or remains an incremental tool in pharmaceutical R&D. As a result, strategies and investments are shifting away from cautious experimentation and pilot projects toward enterprise-wide adoption.</p><p>As clinical pharmacologists and drug development experts, we must ask: What does this strategic shift mean for early phase studies, where rigor and innovation are non-negotiable?</p><p>Enterprise-level AI initiatives are being championed at the C-suite, with leadership aligning budgets, governance structures, and strategic priorities<span><sup>1</sup></span> to achieve measurable gains in speed, efficiency, and scientific innovation. For early-phase clinical studies, these priorities could not be more aligned. Phase I/II trials stand to benefit immensely from AI in several domains.</p><p>Emerging scientific literature demonstrates that generative AI,<span><sup>2</sup></span> multi-omics modeling,<span><sup>3</sup></span> and federated learning<span><sup>4</sup></span> can uncover novel drug targets, optimize biomarker-driven trial designs, and identify subtle signals of efficacy and safety that may otherwise go undetected, especially in smaller, early-phase cohorts. This evolution of AI in clinical trials opens real opportunities for clinical pharmacologists to contribute to innovative, data-driven approaches to drug development.</p><p>The report highlights an ongoing transition: whereas pharma previously sought to build AI tools internally for reasons of data ownership and trust, there is a notable rise in hybrid and partnership models.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Pharma is increasingly open to leveraging foundational models from big tech and specialized startups, provided that solutions are transparent, validated, and regulatory-ready. Similar sentiments are echoed by Brumfeld et al.,<span><sup>14</sup></span> who found that consortium approaches and publi","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 9","pages":"646-648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1596","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bridget L. Morse, Shobha Bhattachar, Xiaosu Ma, David E. Coutant, Boris Czeskis, Clare Nicoll, Kenneth C. Cassidy
Orforglipron is a non-peptide, oral glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist under development for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and weight management in people with obesity. Two phase 1, open-label studies evaluated the disposition and absolute bioavailability of orforglipron in healthy adults. Study A participants (N = 10) received a 1-mg orforglipron oral capsule while fasting and an intravenous dose of ∼21 µg of [14C]-orforglipron. Study B participants (N = 6) received an oral solution of 3 mg of orforglipron with ∼200 µCi of [14C]-orforglipron while fasting. In study A, total plasma radioactivity and [14C]-orforglipron were measured by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/AMS, while orforglipron was measured by HPLC/MS. The mean absolute oral bioavailability of orforglipron was 79.1% ± 16.8%. In study B, urine and feces were analyzed for total radioactivity. Metabolic radioprofiling was performed on selected plasma and fecal samples by HPLC/high-resolution MS. The primary route of elimination for [14C]-orforglipron-related radioactivity was via the feces (87% ± 2.8%) with minimal urinary excretion (0.2% ± 0.02%). Total recovery of administered radioactivity was 88% over 384 hours after the dose. Metabolite profiling from study B showed that orforglipron underwent extensive oxidative metabolism, followed by microbial metabolism of the oxadiazolone ring. Orforglipron was the most abundant plasma component (93.3%) with minor oxidative metabolites M7 (3.3%) and M23 (1.6%).
{"title":"Disposition and Absolute Bioavailability of Orally Administered Orforglipron in Healthy Participants","authors":"Bridget L. Morse, Shobha Bhattachar, Xiaosu Ma, David E. Coutant, Boris Czeskis, Clare Nicoll, Kenneth C. Cassidy","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1594","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1594","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Orforglipron is a non-peptide, oral glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist under development for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and weight management in people with obesity. Two phase 1, open-label studies evaluated the disposition and absolute bioavailability of orforglipron in healthy adults. Study A participants (N = 10) received a 1-mg orforglipron oral capsule while fasting and an intravenous dose of ∼21 µg of [14C]-orforglipron. Study B participants (N = 6) received an oral solution of 3 mg of orforglipron with ∼200 µCi of [14C]-orforglipron while fasting. In study A, total plasma radioactivity and [14C]-orforglipron were measured by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/AMS, while orforglipron was measured by HPLC/MS. The mean absolute oral bioavailability of orforglipron was 79.1% ± 16.8%. In study B, urine and feces were analyzed for total radioactivity. Metabolic radioprofiling was performed on selected plasma and fecal samples by HPLC/high-resolution MS. The primary route of elimination for [14C]-orforglipron-related radioactivity was via the feces (87% ± 2.8%) with minimal urinary excretion (0.2% ± 0.02%). Total recovery of administered radioactivity was 88% over 384 hours after the dose. Metabolite profiling from study B showed that orforglipron underwent extensive oxidative metabolism, followed by microbial metabolism of the oxadiazolone ring. Orforglipron was the most abundant plasma component (93.3%) with minor oxidative metabolites M7 (3.3%) and M23 (1.6%).</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rosa Chan, Chad Orevillo, Gale O'Connell, Dewey McLin, Shikha Polega, Nuggehally R Srinivas, Randall Kaye
Bexicaserin (LP352) is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT2C) superagonist in development for the treatment of seizures in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). This double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose (SAD) Phase 1 study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of single oral doses of bexicaserin and determine any relevant food effects. Forty healthy adult females were randomized to six treatment groups (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 mg fasted; 6 mg fed) or placebo. Bexicaserin was generally safe and well tolerated: treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate. Bexicaserin was rapidly absorbed into circulation (median Tmax 1.02–1.54 h), with a mean terminal elimination half-life ranging from 4.67–6.66 h. Mean Cmax and AUClast of bexicaserin increased by at least >55-fold for a 24-fold dose increase. Three pharmacologically inactive circulatory metabolites (M9, M12, and M20) were further characterized. M20 was the major metabolite, with levels ranging from 3.47 to 10.8 times higher than bexicaserin. In comparison, M12 ranged from 0.35 to 0.98 times, and M9 from 0.037 to 0.53 times, relative to bexicaserin. Metabolism was the major route of clearance, as <5% of parent bexicaserin was eliminated in the urine. A high-fat meal did not alter the exposure of bexicaserin, supporting administration without regard to food. Increases in prolactin concentrations, a potential PD marker, were dose-dependent, suggesting central 5-HT2C receptor engagement. In summary, this Phase 1 SAD study demonstrated safety, tolerability, and adequate characterization of PK/PD of bexicaserin, which is currently in Phase 3 clinical development.
{"title":"Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Food Effect of Bexicaserin in Healthy Participants: A First-in-Human Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Single Ascending Dose Escalation Phase 1 Study","authors":"Rosa Chan, Chad Orevillo, Gale O'Connell, Dewey McLin, Shikha Polega, Nuggehally R Srinivas, Randall Kaye","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1600","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1600","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bexicaserin (LP352) is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT<sub>2C</sub>) superagonist in development for the treatment of seizures in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). This double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose (SAD) Phase 1 study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of single oral doses of bexicaserin and determine any relevant food effects. Forty healthy adult females were randomized to six treatment groups (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 mg fasted; 6 mg fed) or placebo. Bexicaserin was generally safe and well tolerated: treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate. Bexicaserin was rapidly absorbed into circulation (median <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> 1.02–1.54 h), with a mean terminal elimination half-life ranging from 4.67–6.66 h. Mean <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>last</sub> of bexicaserin increased by at least >55-fold for a 24-fold dose increase. Three pharmacologically inactive circulatory metabolites (M9, M12, and M20) were further characterized. M20 was the major metabolite, with levels ranging from 3.47 to 10.8 times higher than bexicaserin. In comparison, M12 ranged from 0.35 to 0.98 times, and M9 from 0.037 to 0.53 times, relative to bexicaserin. Metabolism was the major route of clearance, as <5% of parent bexicaserin was eliminated in the urine. A high-fat meal did not alter the exposure of bexicaserin, supporting administration without regard to food. Increases in prolactin concentrations, a potential PD marker, were dose-dependent, suggesting central 5-HT<sub>2C</sub> receptor engagement. In summary, this Phase 1 SAD study demonstrated safety, tolerability, and adequate characterization of PK/PD of bexicaserin, which is currently in Phase 3 clinical development.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1600","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}