Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-19DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006257
Megan E Feeney, Anica C Law, Allan J Walkey, Nicholas A Bosch
Objectives: To describe practice patterns surrounding the use of medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) in critically ill patients.
Design: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study using the Premier AI Healthcare Database.
Setting: The study was conducted in U.S. ICUs.
Patients: Adult (≥ 18 yr old) patients with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) admitted to an ICU between 2016 and 2020.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Of 108,189 ICU patients (658 hospitals) with a history of OUD, 20,508 patients (19.0%) received MOUD. Of patients receiving MOUD, 13,745 (67.0%) received methadone, 2,950 (14.4%) received buprenorphine, and 4,227 (20.6%) received buprenorphine/naloxone. MOUD use occurred in 37.9% of patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation. The median day of MOUD initiation was hospital day 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3) and the median duration of MOUD use was 4 days (IQR 2-8). MOUD use per hospital was highly variable (median 16.0%; IQR 10-24; range, 0-70.0%); admitting hospital explained 8.9% of variation in MOUD use. A primary admitting diagnosis of unintentional poisoning (aOR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.38-0.45), presence of an additional substance use disorder (aOR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.68), and factors indicating greater severity of illness were associated with reduced odds of receiving MOUD in the ICU.
Conclusions: In a large multicenter, retrospective study, there was large variation in the use of MOUD among ICU patients with a history of OUD. These results inform future studies seeking to optimize the approach to MOUD use during critical illness.
{"title":"Variation in Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Critically Ill Patients Across the United States.","authors":"Megan E Feeney, Anica C Law, Allan J Walkey, Nicholas A Bosch","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006257","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe practice patterns surrounding the use of medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, multicenter, observational study using the Premier AI Healthcare Database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in U.S. ICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult (≥ 18 yr old) patients with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) admitted to an ICU between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 108,189 ICU patients (658 hospitals) with a history of OUD, 20,508 patients (19.0%) received MOUD. Of patients receiving MOUD, 13,745 (67.0%) received methadone, 2,950 (14.4%) received buprenorphine, and 4,227 (20.6%) received buprenorphine/naloxone. MOUD use occurred in 37.9% of patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation. The median day of MOUD initiation was hospital day 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3) and the median duration of MOUD use was 4 days (IQR 2-8). MOUD use per hospital was highly variable (median 16.0%; IQR 10-24; range, 0-70.0%); admitting hospital explained 8.9% of variation in MOUD use. A primary admitting diagnosis of unintentional poisoning (aOR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.38-0.45), presence of an additional substance use disorder (aOR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.68), and factors indicating greater severity of illness were associated with reduced odds of receiving MOUD in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large multicenter, retrospective study, there was large variation in the use of MOUD among ICU patients with a history of OUD. These results inform future studies seeking to optimize the approach to MOUD use during critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11176030/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140157750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-13DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006307
{"title":"Pediatric Lung Disease in Resource-Limited Settings: A Secondary Analysis of the Global PARITY Study: Erratum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006307","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006307","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-27DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006256
Aarti Sarwal, Nicholas A Morris, Janet Crumpler, Terri Gordon, Ian Saunders, James E Johnson, Jeff E Carter
Objectives: Transitions to new care environments may have unexpected consequences that threaten patient safety. We undertook a quality improvement project using in situ simulation to learn the new patient care environment and expose latent safety threats before transitioning patients to a newly built adult ICU.
Design: Descriptive review of a patient safety initiative.
Setting: A newly built 24-bed neurocritical care unit at a tertiary care academic medical center.
Subjects: Care providers working in neurocritical care unit.
Interventions: We implemented a pragmatic three-stage in situ simulation program to learn a new patient care environment, transitioning patients from an open bay unit to a newly built private room-based ICU. The project tested the safety and efficiency of new workflows created by new patient- and family-centric features of the unit. We used standardized patients and high-fidelity mannequins to simulate patient scenarios, with "test" patients created through all electronic databases. Relevant personnel from clinical and nonclinical services participated in simulations and/or observed scenarios. We held a debriefing after each stage and scenario to identify safety threats and other concerns. Additional feedback was obtained via a written survey sent to all participants. We prospectively surveyed for missed latent safety threats for 2 years following the simulation and fixed issues as they arose.
Measurements and main results: We identified and addressed 70 latent safety threats, including issues concerning physical environment, infection prevention, patient workflow, and informatics before the move into the new unit. We also developed an orientation manual that highlighted new physical and functional features of the ICU and best practices gleaned from the simulations. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that simulations were beneficial. Two-year follow-up revealed only two missed latent safety threats.
Conclusions: In situ simulation effectively identifies latent safety threats surrounding the transition to new ICUs and should be considered before moving into new units.
{"title":"Pragmatic Approach to In Situ Simulation to Identify Latent Safety Threats Before Moving to a Newly Built ICU.","authors":"Aarti Sarwal, Nicholas A Morris, Janet Crumpler, Terri Gordon, Ian Saunders, James E Johnson, Jeff E Carter","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006256","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transitions to new care environments may have unexpected consequences that threaten patient safety. We undertook a quality improvement project using in situ simulation to learn the new patient care environment and expose latent safety threats before transitioning patients to a newly built adult ICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive review of a patient safety initiative.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A newly built 24-bed neurocritical care unit at a tertiary care academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Care providers working in neurocritical care unit.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We implemented a pragmatic three-stage in situ simulation program to learn a new patient care environment, transitioning patients from an open bay unit to a newly built private room-based ICU. The project tested the safety and efficiency of new workflows created by new patient- and family-centric features of the unit. We used standardized patients and high-fidelity mannequins to simulate patient scenarios, with \"test\" patients created through all electronic databases. Relevant personnel from clinical and nonclinical services participated in simulations and/or observed scenarios. We held a debriefing after each stage and scenario to identify safety threats and other concerns. Additional feedback was obtained via a written survey sent to all participants. We prospectively surveyed for missed latent safety threats for 2 years following the simulation and fixed issues as they arose.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We identified and addressed 70 latent safety threats, including issues concerning physical environment, infection prevention, patient workflow, and informatics before the move into the new unit. We also developed an orientation manual that highlighted new physical and functional features of the ICU and best practices gleaned from the simulations. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that simulations were beneficial. Two-year follow-up revealed only two missed latent safety threats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In situ simulation effectively identifies latent safety threats surrounding the transition to new ICUs and should be considered before moving into new units.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140293058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-13DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006267
Brian Murray
{"title":"Sedation and Ventilator Dyssynchrony: Do We Need a Deeper Dive?","authors":"Brian Murray","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006267","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-13DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006310
Peter D Sottile
{"title":"The author replies.","authors":"Peter D Sottile","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006310","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006310","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006189
Gary A Bass, Cherylee W J Chang, Julie M Winkle, Maurizio Cecconi, Sapna R Kudchadkar, Kwame Akuamoah-Boateng, Sharon Einav, Caoimhe C Duffy, Jorge Hidalgo, Gloria M Rodriquez-Vega, Antonio J Gandra-d'Almeida, Jeffrey F Barletta, Lewis J Kaplan
Objectives: To provide a narrative review of hospital violence (HV) and its impact on critical care clinicians.
Data sources: Detailed search strategy using PubMed and OVID Medline for English language articles describing HV, risk factors, precipitating events, consequences, and mitigation strategies.
Study selection: Studies that specifically addressed HV involving critical care medicine clinicians or their practice settings were selected. The time frame was limited to the last 15 years to enhance relevance to current practice.
Data extraction: Relevant descriptions or studies were reviewed, and abstracted data were parsed by setting, clinician type, location, social media events, impact, outcomes, and responses (agency, facility, health system, individual).
Data synthesis: HV is globally prevalent, especially in complex care environments, and correlates with a variety of factors including ICU stay duration, conflict, and has recently expanded to out-of-hospital occurrences; online violence as well as stalking is increasingly prevalent. An overlap with violent extremism and terrorism that impacts healthcare facilities and clinicians is similarly relevant. A number of approaches can reduce HV occurrence including, most notably, conflict management training, communication initiatives, and visitor flow and access management practices. Rescue training for HV occurrences seems prudent.
Conclusions: HV is a global problem that impacts clinicians and imperils patient care. Specific initiatives to reduce HV drivers include individual training and system-wide adaptations. Future methods to identify potential perpetrators may leverage machine learning/augmented intelligence approaches.
{"title":"In-Hospital Violence and Its Impact on Critical Care Practitioners.","authors":"Gary A Bass, Cherylee W J Chang, Julie M Winkle, Maurizio Cecconi, Sapna R Kudchadkar, Kwame Akuamoah-Boateng, Sharon Einav, Caoimhe C Duffy, Jorge Hidalgo, Gloria M Rodriquez-Vega, Antonio J Gandra-d'Almeida, Jeffrey F Barletta, Lewis J Kaplan","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006189","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide a narrative review of hospital violence (HV) and its impact on critical care clinicians.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Detailed search strategy using PubMed and OVID Medline for English language articles describing HV, risk factors, precipitating events, consequences, and mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies that specifically addressed HV involving critical care medicine clinicians or their practice settings were selected. The time frame was limited to the last 15 years to enhance relevance to current practice.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Relevant descriptions or studies were reviewed, and abstracted data were parsed by setting, clinician type, location, social media events, impact, outcomes, and responses (agency, facility, health system, individual).</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>HV is globally prevalent, especially in complex care environments, and correlates with a variety of factors including ICU stay duration, conflict, and has recently expanded to out-of-hospital occurrences; online violence as well as stalking is increasingly prevalent. An overlap with violent extremism and terrorism that impacts healthcare facilities and clinicians is similarly relevant. A number of approaches can reduce HV occurrence including, most notably, conflict management training, communication initiatives, and visitor flow and access management practices. Rescue training for HV occurrences seems prudent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HV is a global problem that impacts clinicians and imperils patient care. Specific initiatives to reduce HV drivers include individual training and system-wide adaptations. Future methods to identify potential perpetrators may leverage machine learning/augmented intelligence approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139485413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-13DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006279
Lauren E Levy, Joseph E Tonna
{"title":"Are Two Better Than One? The Value of Serial Assessments and the Difficulty of Observational Research.","authors":"Lauren E Levy, Joseph E Tonna","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006279","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006279","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006255
Chinh D Nguyen, Haustine P Panganiban, Timothy Fazio, Amalia Karahalios, Melissa J Ankravs, Christopher M MacIsaac, Thomas Rechnitzer, Lucy Arno, An Tran-Duy, Scott McAlister, Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid, Adam M Deane
Objectives: Hypophosphatemia occurs frequently. Enteral, rather than IV, phosphate replacement may reduce fluid replacement, cost, and waste.
Setting: Single center, 42-bed state trauma, medical and surgical ICUs, from April 20, 2022, to July 1, 2022.
Patients: Patients with serum phosphate concentration between 0.3 and 0.75 mmol/L.
Interventions: We randomized patients to either enteral or IV phosphate replacement using electronic medical record-embedded program.
Measurement and main results: Our primary outcome was serum phosphate at 24 hours with a noninferiority margin of 0.2 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes included cost savings and environmental waste reduction and additional IV fluid administered. The modified intention-to-treat cohort comprised 131 patients. Baseline phosphate concentrations were similar between the two groups. At 24 hours, mean ( sd ) serum phosphate concentration were enteral 0.89 mmol/L (0.24 mmol/L) and IV 0.82 mmol/L (0.28 mmol/L). This difference was noninferior at the margin of 0.2 mmol/L (difference, 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.17 mmol/L). When assigned IV replacement, patients received 408 mL (372 mL) of solvent IV fluid. Compared with IV replacement, the mean cost per patient was ten-fold less with enteral replacement ($3.7 [$4.0] vs. IV: $37.7 [$31.4]; difference = $34.0 [95% CI, $26.3-$41.7]) and weight of waste was less (7.7 g [8.3 g] vs. 217 g [169 g]; difference = 209 g [95% CI, 168-250 g]). C O2 emissions were 60-fold less for comparable phosphate replacement (enteral: 2 g producing 14.2 g and 20 mmol of potassium dihydrogen phosphate producing 843 g of C O2 equivalents).
Conclusions: Enteral phosphate replacement in ICU is noninferior to IV replacement at a margin of 0.2 mmol/L but leads to a substantial reduction in cost and waste.
{"title":"A Randomized Noninferiority Trial to Compare Enteral to Parenteral Phosphate Replacement on Biochemistry, Waste, and Environmental Impact and Healthcare Cost in Critically Ill Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypophosphatemia.","authors":"Chinh D Nguyen, Haustine P Panganiban, Timothy Fazio, Amalia Karahalios, Melissa J Ankravs, Christopher M MacIsaac, Thomas Rechnitzer, Lucy Arno, An Tran-Duy, Scott McAlister, Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid, Adam M Deane","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hypophosphatemia occurs frequently. Enteral, rather than IV, phosphate replacement may reduce fluid replacement, cost, and waste.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, parallel group, noninferiority clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single center, 42-bed state trauma, medical and surgical ICUs, from April 20, 2022, to July 1, 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with serum phosphate concentration between 0.3 and 0.75 mmol/L.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We randomized patients to either enteral or IV phosphate replacement using electronic medical record-embedded program.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>Our primary outcome was serum phosphate at 24 hours with a noninferiority margin of 0.2 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes included cost savings and environmental waste reduction and additional IV fluid administered. The modified intention-to-treat cohort comprised 131 patients. Baseline phosphate concentrations were similar between the two groups. At 24 hours, mean ( sd ) serum phosphate concentration were enteral 0.89 mmol/L (0.24 mmol/L) and IV 0.82 mmol/L (0.28 mmol/L). This difference was noninferior at the margin of 0.2 mmol/L (difference, 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.17 mmol/L). When assigned IV replacement, patients received 408 mL (372 mL) of solvent IV fluid. Compared with IV replacement, the mean cost per patient was ten-fold less with enteral replacement ($3.7 [$4.0] vs. IV: $37.7 [$31.4]; difference = $34.0 [95% CI, $26.3-$41.7]) and weight of waste was less (7.7 g [8.3 g] vs. 217 g [169 g]; difference = 209 g [95% CI, 168-250 g]). C O2 emissions were 60-fold less for comparable phosphate replacement (enteral: 2 g producing 14.2 g and 20 mmol of potassium dihydrogen phosphate producing 843 g of C O2 equivalents).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enteral phosphate replacement in ICU is noninferior to IV replacement at a margin of 0.2 mmol/L but leads to a substantial reduction in cost and waste.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141598844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-20DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006253
Peter J Dunbar, Ryan Peterson, Max McGrath, Raymond Pomponio, Tyree H Kiser, P Michael Ho, R William Vandivier, Ellen L Burnham, Marc Moss, Peter D Sottile
Objectives: To describe U.S. practice regarding administration of sedation and analgesia to patients on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to determine the association of this practice with odds of intubation or death.
Design: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Setting: A total of 1017 hospitals contributed data between January 2010 and September 2020 to the Premier Healthcare Database, a nationally representative healthcare database in the United States.
Patients: Adult (≥ 18 yr) patients admitted to U.S. hospitals requiring NIV for ARF.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: We identified 433,357 patients on NIV of whom (26.7% [95% CI] 26.3%-27.0%) received sedation or analgesia. A total of 50,589 patients (11.7%) received opioids only, 40,646 (9.4%) received benzodiazepines only, 20,146 (4.6%) received opioids and benzodiazepines, 1.573 (0.4%) received dexmedetomidine only, and 2,639 (0.6%) received dexmedetomidine in addition to opioid and/or benzodiazepine. Of 433,357 patients receiving NIV, 50,413 (11.6%; 95% CI, 11.5-11.7%) patients underwent invasive mechanical ventilation on hospital days 2-5 or died on hospital days 2-30. Intubation was used in 32,301 patients (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.3-7.6%). Further, death occurred in 24,140 (5.6%; 95% CI, 5.5-5.7%). In multivariable analysis adjusting for relevant covariates, receipt of any medication studied was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. In inverse probability weighting, receipt of any study medication was also associated with increased odds of intubation or death (average treatment effect odds ratio 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.40).
Conclusions: The use of sedation and analgesia during NIV is common. Medication exposure was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. Further investigation is needed to confirm this finding and determine whether any subpopulations are especially harmed by this practice.
{"title":"Analgesia and Sedation Use During Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure.","authors":"Peter J Dunbar, Ryan Peterson, Max McGrath, Raymond Pomponio, Tyree H Kiser, P Michael Ho, R William Vandivier, Ellen L Burnham, Marc Moss, Peter D Sottile","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006253","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe U.S. practice regarding administration of sedation and analgesia to patients on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to determine the association of this practice with odds of intubation or death.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective multicenter cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A total of 1017 hospitals contributed data between January 2010 and September 2020 to the Premier Healthcare Database, a nationally representative healthcare database in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult (≥ 18 yr) patients admitted to U.S. hospitals requiring NIV for ARF.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We identified 433,357 patients on NIV of whom (26.7% [95% CI] 26.3%-27.0%) received sedation or analgesia. A total of 50,589 patients (11.7%) received opioids only, 40,646 (9.4%) received benzodiazepines only, 20,146 (4.6%) received opioids and benzodiazepines, 1.573 (0.4%) received dexmedetomidine only, and 2,639 (0.6%) received dexmedetomidine in addition to opioid and/or benzodiazepine. Of 433,357 patients receiving NIV, 50,413 (11.6%; 95% CI, 11.5-11.7%) patients underwent invasive mechanical ventilation on hospital days 2-5 or died on hospital days 2-30. Intubation was used in 32,301 patients (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.3-7.6%). Further, death occurred in 24,140 (5.6%; 95% CI, 5.5-5.7%). In multivariable analysis adjusting for relevant covariates, receipt of any medication studied was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. In inverse probability weighting, receipt of any study medication was also associated with increased odds of intubation or death (average treatment effect odds ratio 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of sedation and analgesia during NIV is common. Medication exposure was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. Further investigation is needed to confirm this finding and determine whether any subpopulations are especially harmed by this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140174056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006211
Thitikan Kunapaisal, Abhijit V Lele, Courtney Gomez, Anne Moore, Marie Angele Theard, Monica S Vavilala
Objectives: To examine if increasing blood pressure improves brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO 2 ) in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
Setting: Level-I trauma center teaching hospital.
Patients: Included patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age and with severe (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9) TBI who had advanced neuromonitoring (intracranial blood pressure [ICP], PbtO 2 , and cerebral autoregulation testing).
Interventions: The exposure was mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation with a vasopressor, and the primary outcome was a PbtO 2 response. Cerebral hypoxia was defined as PbtO 2 less than 20 mm Hg (low).
Main results: MAP challenge test results conducted between ICU admission days 1-3 from 93 patients (median age 31; interquartile range [IQR], 24-44 yr), 69.9% male, White ( n = 69, 74.2%), median head abbreviated injury score 5 (IQR 4-5), and median admission GCS 3 (IQR 3-5) were examined. Across all 93 tests, a MAP increase of 25.7% resulted in a 34.2% cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) increase and 16.3% PbtO 2 increase (no MAP or CPP correlation with PbtO 2 [both R2 = 0.00]). MAP augmentation increased ICP when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (8.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06). MAP augmentation resulted in four PbtO 2 responses (normal and maintained [group 1: 58.5%], normal and deteriorated [group 2: 2.2%; average 45.2% PbtO 2 decrease], low and improved [group 3: 12.8%; average 44% PbtO 2 increase], and low and not improved [group 4: 25.8%]). The average end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) increase of 5.9% was associated with group 2 when cerebral autoregulation was impaired ( p = 0.02).
Conclusions: MAP augmentation after severe TBI resulted in four distinct PbtO 2 response patterns, including PbtO 2 improvement and cerebral hypoxia. Traditionally considered clinical factors were not significant, but cerebral autoregulation status and ICP responses may have moderated MAP and ETCO 2 effects on PbtO 2 response. Further study is needed to examine the role of MAP augmentation as a strategy to improve PbtO 2 in some patients.
{"title":"Effect of Increasing Blood Pressure on Brain Tissue Oxygenation in Adults After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Thitikan Kunapaisal, Abhijit V Lele, Courtney Gomez, Anne Moore, Marie Angele Theard, Monica S Vavilala","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006211","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine if increasing blood pressure improves brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO 2 ) in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level-I trauma center teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Included patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age and with severe (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9) TBI who had advanced neuromonitoring (intracranial blood pressure [ICP], PbtO 2 , and cerebral autoregulation testing).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The exposure was mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation with a vasopressor, and the primary outcome was a PbtO 2 response. Cerebral hypoxia was defined as PbtO 2 less than 20 mm Hg (low).</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>MAP challenge test results conducted between ICU admission days 1-3 from 93 patients (median age 31; interquartile range [IQR], 24-44 yr), 69.9% male, White ( n = 69, 74.2%), median head abbreviated injury score 5 (IQR 4-5), and median admission GCS 3 (IQR 3-5) were examined. Across all 93 tests, a MAP increase of 25.7% resulted in a 34.2% cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) increase and 16.3% PbtO 2 increase (no MAP or CPP correlation with PbtO 2 [both R2 = 0.00]). MAP augmentation increased ICP when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (8.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06). MAP augmentation resulted in four PbtO 2 responses (normal and maintained [group 1: 58.5%], normal and deteriorated [group 2: 2.2%; average 45.2% PbtO 2 decrease], low and improved [group 3: 12.8%; average 44% PbtO 2 increase], and low and not improved [group 4: 25.8%]). The average end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) increase of 5.9% was associated with group 2 when cerebral autoregulation was impaired ( p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAP augmentation after severe TBI resulted in four distinct PbtO 2 response patterns, including PbtO 2 improvement and cerebral hypoxia. Traditionally considered clinical factors were not significant, but cerebral autoregulation status and ICP responses may have moderated MAP and ETCO 2 effects on PbtO 2 response. Further study is needed to examine the role of MAP augmentation as a strategy to improve PbtO 2 in some patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139650426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}