Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models offer a useful platform to integrate drug pharmacology with knowledge about biological mechanisms across multiple scales and data sources into a unified quantitative framework. This makes them invaluable to address many relevant questions in drug research and development. Despite their potential, however, QSP models are seldom employed in the population analysis context due to their complexity and dimensionality. Model order reduction (MOR) techniques can be used to tackle this challenge. However, a single MOR technique might not be sufficient to achieve an applicable reduced model. Furthermore, to date there is no tool to judge whether the reduced model retains important mechanistic features of the original model. In this tutorial, we present a workflow employing index analysis that guides the selection and combination of MOR techniques and includes a check of the preservation of important mechanistic features by the reduced model. To demonstrate the value of the proposed approach, we first explain the concepts in the context of a small-scale example model and then expand to a well-known large-scale QSP model—the blood coagulation model.
{"title":"Tackling High Dimensionality in QSP: Guiding Model Order Reduction With Index Analysis","authors":"Johannes Tillil, Wilhelm Huisinga, Jane Knöchel","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70171","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70171","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models offer a useful platform to integrate drug pharmacology with knowledge about biological mechanisms across multiple scales and data sources into a unified quantitative framework. This makes them invaluable to address many relevant questions in drug research and development. Despite their potential, however, QSP models are seldom employed in the population analysis context due to their complexity and dimensionality. Model order reduction (MOR) techniques can be used to tackle this challenge. However, a single MOR technique might not be sufficient to achieve an applicable reduced model. Furthermore, to date there is no tool to judge whether the reduced model retains important mechanistic features of the original model. In this tutorial, we present a workflow employing index analysis that guides the selection and combination of MOR techniques and includes a check of the preservation of important mechanistic features by the reduced model. To demonstrate the value of the proposed approach, we first explain the concepts in the context of a small-scale example model and then expand to a well-known large-scale QSP model—the blood coagulation model.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823791/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zhu Zhou, Garrett R. Ainslie, Mengyao Li, Jean Dinh, Maciej J. Zamek-Gliszczynski, Ping Zhao, Mary F. Paine
Loperamide is a widely used nonprescription peripherally acting opioid indicated for diarrhea. Loperamide undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism, primarily by cytochrome (CYP) 3A and CYP2C8, with minor contributions from CYP2B6 and CYP2D6, and intestinal efflux by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Increasing case reports have described exaggerated peripheral opioid effects and cardiac toxicities when ultra-high doses (> 70 mg) of loperamide are consumed alone and with CYP or P-gp inhibitors. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for loperamide was developed, verified, and applied by simulating interactions with select inhibitor drugs. The model successfully described the pharmacokinetics of loperamide (4, 8, 16 mg loperamide•HCl) in healthy adults. The predicted area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) at all three doses were within 0.61–1.41-fold of observed values obtained from 10 clinical studies. The model independently well-captured the loperamide pharmacokinetic profile obtained from each of seven drug–drug interaction (DDI) studies. The inhibitor drugs tested included quinidine (P-gp), ritonavir (CYP3A/P-gp), gemfibrozil (CYP2C8), itraconazole (CYP3A/P-gp), gemfibrozil+itraconazole, and abemaciclib (CYP1A). Predicted AUC and Cmax for loperamide from each DDI study were within 0.78–1.45-fold of observed values. Predicted AUC ratios (AUC of loperamide in the presence to absence of inhibitor) were within 0.78–1.09-fold of observed ratios. This novel PBPK model for loperamide could be used to guide loperamide dosing under untested DDI scenarios when the drug is coadministered with certain CYP/transporter inhibitors to minimize toxicity risk.
{"title":"Managing Drug–Drug Interactions Involving the Non-Prescription Opioid Loperamide Through Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling","authors":"Zhu Zhou, Garrett R. Ainslie, Mengyao Li, Jean Dinh, Maciej J. Zamek-Gliszczynski, Ping Zhao, Mary F. Paine","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70148","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70148","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Loperamide is a widely used nonprescription peripherally acting opioid indicated for diarrhea. Loperamide undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism, primarily by cytochrome (CYP) 3A and CYP2C8, with minor contributions from CYP2B6 and CYP2D6, and intestinal efflux by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Increasing case reports have described exaggerated peripheral opioid effects and cardiac toxicities when ultra-high doses (> 70 mg) of loperamide are consumed alone and with CYP or P-gp inhibitors. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for loperamide was developed, verified, and applied by simulating interactions with select inhibitor drugs. The model successfully described the pharmacokinetics of loperamide (4, 8, 16 mg loperamide•HCl) in healthy adults. The predicted area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) at all three doses were within 0.61–1.41-fold of observed values obtained from 10 clinical studies. The model independently well-captured the loperamide pharmacokinetic profile obtained from each of seven drug–drug interaction (DDI) studies. The inhibitor drugs tested included quinidine (P-gp), ritonavir (CYP3A/P-gp), gemfibrozil (CYP2C8), itraconazole (CYP3A/P-gp), gemfibrozil+itraconazole, and abemaciclib (CYP1A). Predicted AUC and C<sub>max</sub> for loperamide from each DDI study were within 0.78–1.45-fold of observed values. Predicted AUC ratios (AUC of loperamide in the presence to absence of inhibitor) were within 0.78–1.09-fold of observed ratios. This novel PBPK model for loperamide could be used to guide loperamide dosing under untested DDI scenarios when the drug is coadministered with certain CYP/transporter inhibitors to minimize toxicity risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823295/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thao-Nguyen Pham, Anna Largajolli, Maria Luisa Sardu, John Maringwa, Matthew L. Zierhut, S. Y. Amy Cheung
Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) utilizes aggregate data (AD) and allows integration of information from multiple studies, which may provide more statistical power to detect clinically relevant treatment effects than an individual randomized controlled trial alone. Access to individual patient data (IPD) is often limited due to confidentiality; therefore, obtaining IPD associated with published literature data is challenging. Thus, to probe predictive covariates, one must rely on an adequate range of aggregate covariate data, or published stratified results could also be used. With access to IPD, or with access to published stratified results, estimates for predictive covariates could be improved. This work is primarily centered on quantifying the potential benefits of having access to IPD when performing MBMA. This was assessed using a 3-step approach. Two scenarios were explored: one to compare MBMAs with and without access to IPD, assuming no predictive covariates; and another to compare MBMAs with and without access to IPD, where a specific predictive covariate was known to be influential and was used to stratify IPD accordingly. The performance of the method was evaluated for different ratios of IPD studies versus AD studies. In the scenario where an MBMA with covariate was used, instead, the performance of the method was evaluated for different ratios of covariate stratified AD studies versus AD studies. Overall, the benefit of IPD over AD was not evident in the model without covariates, whereas including stratified IPD led to improved covariate model performance.
{"title":"Combining Aggregate Data and Individual Patient Data in Model-Based Meta-Analysis: An Illustrative Case Study of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients","authors":"Thao-Nguyen Pham, Anna Largajolli, Maria Luisa Sardu, John Maringwa, Matthew L. Zierhut, S. Y. Amy Cheung","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70159","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70159","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) utilizes aggregate data (AD) and allows integration of information from multiple studies, which may provide more statistical power to detect clinically relevant treatment effects than an individual randomized controlled trial alone. Access to individual patient data (IPD) is often limited due to confidentiality; therefore, obtaining IPD associated with published literature data is challenging. Thus, to probe predictive covariates, one must rely on an adequate range of aggregate covariate data, or published stratified results could also be used. With access to IPD, or with access to published stratified results, estimates for predictive covariates could be improved. This work is primarily centered on quantifying the potential benefits of having access to IPD when performing MBMA. This was assessed using a 3-step approach. Two scenarios were explored: one to compare MBMAs with and without access to IPD, assuming no predictive covariates; and another to compare MBMAs with and without access to IPD, where a specific predictive covariate was known to be influential and was used to stratify IPD accordingly. The performance of the method was evaluated for different ratios of IPD studies versus AD studies. In the scenario where an MBMA with covariate was used, instead, the performance of the method was evaluated for different ratios of covariate stratified AD studies versus AD studies. Overall, the benefit of IPD over AD was not evident in the model without covariates, whereas including stratified IPD led to improved covariate model performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura G. Al-Amiry Santos, Sebastian Polak, Karen Rowland Yeo
A high number of poorly soluble compounds are being developed; thus, understanding the factors that influence their absorption is critical. Intestinal bile salts, which facilitate micelle-mediated solubilization, are particularly important for drugs with low solubility and are reported to be highly variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of luminal bile salt concentrations on the absorption of poorly soluble compounds, using efavirenz, cinnarizine, and posaconazole as examples. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed and validated using the Simcyp Simulator. Sensitivity analyzes were performed to assess the impact of bile salts and other gastrointestinal parameters on drug absorption. Simulations revealed that drug absorption in the fasted state was most sensitive to bile salt concentrations compared to other gastrointestinal parameters such as luminal pH, fluid volumes, and gastric emptying. The findings indicate that efavirenz, cinnarizine, and posaconazole exhibit high micelle-mediated solubility, with bile salts playing a critical role in their absorption, particularly in the fasted state. These results highlight the importance of considering bile salt concentrations in PBPK modeling of poorly soluble compounds.
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Intestinal Bile Salts on Drug Absorption Using PBPK Modeling: Case Studies With Efavirenz, Cinnarizine, and Posaconazole","authors":"Laura G. Al-Amiry Santos, Sebastian Polak, Karen Rowland Yeo","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70177","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70177","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A high number of poorly soluble compounds are being developed; thus, understanding the factors that influence their absorption is critical. Intestinal bile salts, which facilitate micelle-mediated solubilization, are particularly important for drugs with low solubility and are reported to be highly variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of luminal bile salt concentrations on the absorption of poorly soluble compounds, using efavirenz, cinnarizine, and posaconazole as examples. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed and validated using the Simcyp Simulator. Sensitivity analyzes were performed to assess the impact of bile salts and other gastrointestinal parameters on drug absorption. Simulations revealed that drug absorption in the fasted state was most sensitive to bile salt concentrations compared to other gastrointestinal parameters such as luminal pH, fluid volumes, and gastric emptying. The findings indicate that efavirenz, cinnarizine, and posaconazole exhibit high micelle-mediated solubility, with bile salts playing a critical role in their absorption, particularly in the fasted state. These results highlight the importance of considering bile salt concentrations in PBPK modeling of poorly soluble compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823294/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laurens Sluijterman, Marjolein van Borselen, Rick Greupink, Joanna IntHout
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have become increasingly popular for model-informed drug development (MIDD) over the past decade. While several guidelines for model evaluation exist, these are by design often of a general and non-specific nature. It is clear what steps should be carried out but not necessarily how. For instance, a validation step needs to be performed to check if the predictions of a model indeed match with an external dataset. However, how to quantify this is yet unspecified. In this paper, we propose a more thorough validation approach based on the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS), a popular metric that explicitly quantifies how well a model recreates the distribution of observed data. Crucially, when applied to PBPK modeling, this metric can be used both in situations where we have individual level predictions and in situations where an entire virtual population is created. The CRPS can also be used to quantify the difference in predictive performance of two competing models. We applied this validation technique to compare two PBPK models. Additionally, we show that using a skill-score approach facilitates the validation of a single model. While our paper focuses on PBPK models, this metric is equally applicable to other models where the goal is to create a virtual population. Additionally, we provide an easily accessible online tool that can be used to perform the proposed validation method.
{"title":"Validating Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models Using the Continuous Ranked Probability Score: Beyond Being Correct on Average","authors":"Laurens Sluijterman, Marjolein van Borselen, Rick Greupink, Joanna IntHout","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70175","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70175","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have become increasingly popular for model-informed drug development (MIDD) over the past decade. While several guidelines for model evaluation exist, these are by design often of a general and non-specific nature. It is clear what steps should be carried out but not necessarily how. For instance, a validation step needs to be performed to check if the predictions of a model indeed match with an external dataset. However, how to quantify this is yet unspecified. In this paper, we propose a more thorough validation approach based on the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS), a popular metric that explicitly quantifies how well a model recreates the distribution of observed data. Crucially, when applied to PBPK modeling, this metric can be used both in situations where we have individual level predictions and in situations where an entire virtual population is created. The CRPS can also be used to quantify the difference in predictive performance of two competing models. We applied this validation technique to compare two PBPK models. Additionally, we show that using a skill-score approach facilitates the validation of a single model. While our paper focuses on PBPK models, this metric is equally applicable to other models where the goal is to create a virtual population. Additionally, we provide an easily accessible online tool that can be used to perform the proposed validation method.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823297/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mediation analyses can support biomarker development by quantifying the part of the total treatment effect on clinical outcome that is mediated by the biomarker. Given that pharmacometricians are often involved in the analysis of biomarker data with pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) models, mediation analysis can be a valuable addition to the pharmacometrics toolbox. The generalized nature of causal mediation analysis makes it particularly suited for use in pharmacometrics, where complex models with non-linearities or interaction effects are common. This tutorial covers the concepts of causal mediation analysis and how these might be applied within a pharmacometric context using a simulation-based workflow, including example code and datasets.
{"title":"Tutorial on Causal Mediation Analysis for Pharmacometricians","authors":"Sebastiaan Camiel Goulooze, Eleonora Marostica, Nelleke Snelder","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70193","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70193","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mediation analyses can support biomarker development by quantifying the part of the total treatment effect on clinical outcome that is mediated by the biomarker. Given that pharmacometricians are often involved in the analysis of biomarker data with pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) models, mediation analysis can be a valuable addition to the pharmacometrics toolbox. The generalized nature of causal mediation analysis makes it particularly suited for use in pharmacometrics, where complex models with non-linearities or interaction effects are common. This tutorial covers the concepts of causal mediation analysis and how these might be applied within a pharmacometric context using a simulation-based workflow, including example code and datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823299/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul Thoueille, Anne Danion, Morten Hostrup, Michael Petrou, Koen Deventer, Thierry Buclin, François R. Girardin, Irene Mazzoni, Olivier Rabin, Monia Guidi
Salmeterol is a commonly used β2-agonist included on the List of Prohibited Substances and Methods published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model to describe the PK of salmeterol including its major metabolite, α-hydroxysalmeterol, in plasma and urine after inhalation. The model was used to evaluate the ability of the current minimum reporting level (MRL) of 10 ng/mL for salmeterol to discriminate between permitted and prohibited use of salmeterol. Six studies on healthy participants, chronic asthmatics, or athletes were pooled and provided a total of 1175 concentrations (275 and 398 for salmeterol and 185 and 317 for α-hydroxysalmeterol in plasma and urine, respectively) from 92 individuals. A two-compartment model assuming intravenous-like bolus absorption best depicted plasma salmeterol PK, with a complete parent conversion into α-hydroxysalmeterol. Because urine volumes were only recorded in two studies, a separate urine compartment was defined to approximate physiologic micturition. Athletes had a 63% higher salmeterol plasma clearance and a 191% greater salmeterol urinary rate constant compared to other subjects, resulting in significantly higher salmeterol urine concentrations. Our popPK model suggests that salmeterol concentrations in urine at therapeutic doses (100 μg twice daily) are unlikely to be reported using the current MRL. However, to improve its sensitivity to detect cases of doping, an adjustment in the MRL and/or a different analytical target would be recommended.
{"title":"Pharmacometric-Based Evaluation of Salmeterol and Its Metabolite α-Hydroxysalmeterol in Plasma and Urine: Practical Implications for Doping Control","authors":"Paul Thoueille, Anne Danion, Morten Hostrup, Michael Petrou, Koen Deventer, Thierry Buclin, François R. Girardin, Irene Mazzoni, Olivier Rabin, Monia Guidi","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70187","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salmeterol is a commonly used β<sub>2</sub>-agonist included on the List of Prohibited Substances and Methods published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model to describe the PK of salmeterol including its major metabolite, α-hydroxysalmeterol, in plasma and urine after inhalation. The model was used to evaluate the ability of the current minimum reporting level (MRL) of 10 ng/mL for salmeterol to discriminate between permitted and prohibited use of salmeterol. Six studies on healthy participants, chronic asthmatics, or athletes were pooled and provided a total of 1175 concentrations (275 and 398 for salmeterol and 185 and 317 for α-hydroxysalmeterol in plasma and urine, respectively) from 92 individuals. A two-compartment model assuming intravenous-like bolus absorption best depicted plasma salmeterol PK, with a complete parent conversion into α-hydroxysalmeterol. Because urine volumes were only recorded in two studies, a separate urine compartment was defined to approximate physiologic micturition. Athletes had a 63% higher salmeterol plasma clearance and a 191% greater salmeterol urinary rate constant compared to other subjects, resulting in significantly higher salmeterol urine concentrations. Our popPK model suggests that salmeterol concentrations in urine at therapeutic doses (100 μg twice daily) are unlikely to be reported using the current MRL. However, to improve its sensitivity to detect cases of doping, an adjustment in the MRL and/or a different analytical target would be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70187","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bilirubin is a breakdown product of erythrocytes and plays a crucial role in elimination of heme-containing proteins. After its synthesis in the reticuloendothelial system, unconjugated bilirubin is released into plasma and taken up into the liver. In hepatocytes, bilirubin is conjugated and excreted into the gastrointestinal tract via bile, where it is further converted to urobilinoids. There are various genetic factors causing abnormal bilirubin levels in plasma, such as Gilbert syndrome, Crigler-Najjar syndrome, Dubin-Johnson syndrome, and Rotor syndrome. To better understand bilirubin metabolism and its disorders, this study develops a physiologically based computational model incorporating published literature as well as real-world clinical data from the Explorys database. The model simulates bilirubin levels in both healthy individuals and patients with disorders of bilirubin metabolism. Population simulations show that Gilbert syndrome requires a substantial reduction in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 activity, while Crigler-Najjar syndrome requires near-complete loss of its function. In contrast, Dubin-Johnson syndrome is characterized by a significant impairment of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 activity. To also illustrate model behavior under targeted perturbations, we simulated administration of atazanavir in healthy individuals and patients with Gilbert syndrome to investigate its effect on bilirubin levels. Relative to baseline, unconjugated bilirubin maximum concentration (Cmax) increased by 34% in healthy individuals but by 67% in Gilbert syndrome. Overall, this study provides a conceptual and mechanistically informed framework for studying bilirubin homeostasis and the functional consequences of drug administration in health and disease.
{"title":"Development of a Physiologically Based Model of Bilirubin Metabolism in Health and Disease and Its Comparison With Real-World Data","authors":"Ahenk Zeynep Sayin, Lars Kuepfer","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70183","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bilirubin is a breakdown product of erythrocytes and plays a crucial role in elimination of heme-containing proteins. After its synthesis in the reticuloendothelial system, unconjugated bilirubin is released into plasma and taken up into the liver. In hepatocytes, bilirubin is conjugated and excreted into the gastrointestinal tract via bile, where it is further converted to urobilinoids. There are various genetic factors causing abnormal bilirubin levels in plasma, such as Gilbert syndrome, Crigler-Najjar syndrome, Dubin-Johnson syndrome, and Rotor syndrome. To better understand bilirubin metabolism and its disorders, this study develops a physiologically based computational model incorporating published literature as well as real-world clinical data from the Explorys database. The model simulates bilirubin levels in both healthy individuals and patients with disorders of bilirubin metabolism. Population simulations show that Gilbert syndrome requires a substantial reduction in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 activity, while Crigler-Najjar syndrome requires near-complete loss of its function. In contrast, Dubin-Johnson syndrome is characterized by a significant impairment of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 activity. To also illustrate model behavior under targeted perturbations, we simulated administration of atazanavir in healthy individuals and patients with Gilbert syndrome to investigate its effect on bilirubin levels. Relative to baseline, unconjugated bilirubin maximum concentration (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>) increased by 34% in healthy individuals but by 67% in Gilbert syndrome. Overall, this study provides a conceptual and mechanistically informed framework for studying bilirubin homeostasis and the functional consequences of drug administration in health and disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70183","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pratik Bhagunde, Natasha Penner, Brian A. Willis, Robert Bell, Arnaud Charil, Michael C. Irizarry, Steven Hersch, Larisa Reyderman
Lecanemab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody binding with high affinity to protofibrils of amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein. In clinical studies, lecanemab has been shown to reduce amyloid markers in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease and slow decline on clinical endpoints of cognition and function. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling assessed the correlation between amyloid PET and change in CDR-SB using data from lecanemab phase 2 study (Study 201) and phase 3 study (Study 301; Clarity AD). Data from placebo-treated subjects were used to establish a disease-progression model; the effect of amyloid reduction on disease progression was defined using data from lecanemab-treated subjects. CDR-SB scores were used with beta regression to fit a Richard's function parameterized in terms of baseline CDR-SB, intrinsic rate of disease progression, shape, and precision of the beta distribution. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the impact of lecanemab treatment over 4 years. Baseline CDR-SB was predicted by diagnosis and baseline mini-mental state examination (BMMSE) score. Intrinsic rate of disease progression was predicted by amyloid PET and BMMSE. Amyloid PET was a better predictor of drug effect than lecanemab exposure, demonstrating amyloid reduction as a surrogate marker of efficacy. Simulations projected the difference in CDR-SB between lecanemab and placebo treated subjects continued increasing over 4 years. Patients with low baseline amyloid and less severe disease were projected to have slower disease progression and better outcomes with lecanemab treatment.
{"title":"Brain Amyloid Plaque Levels Affect Clinical Progression in Alzheimer Disease: Assessment of Amyloid PET and Change in CDR-SB Utilizing Semi-Mechanistic Model","authors":"Pratik Bhagunde, Natasha Penner, Brian A. Willis, Robert Bell, Arnaud Charil, Michael C. Irizarry, Steven Hersch, Larisa Reyderman","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70173","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lecanemab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody binding with high affinity to protofibrils of amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein. In clinical studies, lecanemab has been shown to reduce amyloid markers in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease and slow decline on clinical endpoints of cognition and function. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling assessed the correlation between amyloid PET and change in CDR-SB using data from lecanemab phase 2 study (Study 201) and phase 3 study (Study 301; Clarity AD). Data from placebo-treated subjects were used to establish a disease-progression model; the effect of amyloid reduction on disease progression was defined using data from lecanemab-treated subjects. CDR-SB scores were used with beta regression to fit a Richard's function parameterized in terms of baseline CDR-SB, intrinsic rate of disease progression, shape, and precision of the beta distribution. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the impact of lecanemab treatment over 4 years. Baseline CDR-SB was predicted by diagnosis and baseline mini-mental state examination (BMMSE) score. Intrinsic rate of disease progression was predicted by amyloid PET and BMMSE. Amyloid PET was a better predictor of drug effect than lecanemab exposure, demonstrating amyloid reduction as a surrogate marker of efficacy. Simulations projected the difference in CDR-SB between lecanemab and placebo treated subjects continued increasing over 4 years. Patients with low baseline amyloid and less severe disease were projected to have slower disease progression and better outcomes with lecanemab treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70173","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145983692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cachexia is a metabolic condition that accelerates the clearance of monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients and is a known mechanism causing time-dependent clearance. Successful anticancer treatment often ameliorates symptoms of cachexia, reducing the drug clearance over time especially in patients who respond. Serum albumin level is a common biomarker of cachexia that is frequently associated with antibody drug clearance. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of antibody drugs have incorporated albumin metabolism but have not been applied to describe time-varying clearance due to improvement in cachexia. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate albumin levels as a biomarker that is predictive of changes in antibody clearance due to cachexia. A PBPK model that jointly describes metabolism of albumin and biologic drugs was fitted to longitudinal albumin data from cancer patients treated with durvalumab and was used to predict changes in durvalumab clearance over time. PBPK model predictions were compared to empirical population pharmacokinetic (PK) models of durvalumab and other checkpoint inhibitors fitted directly to clinical PK. The model fitted the observed albumin data in cancer patients closely, and the three fitted parameters showed low uncertainty (RSE < 10%). By accounting for longitudinal albumin data in patients, the PBPK model recapitulated the observed magnitude of the change in clearance of durvalumab without fitting to clinical PK data. The model simulation demonstrated that utilization of albumin levels as a marker of cachexia in PBPK models can be used to mechanistically predict time-dependent clearance of monoclonal antibodies.
{"title":"Albumin Levels Are Predictive of Cachexia-Induced Time-Dependent Clearance of Therapeutic Antibodies: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Durvalumab","authors":"Jeffrey R. Proctor, Harvey Wong","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70185","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cachexia is a metabolic condition that accelerates the clearance of monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients and is a known mechanism causing time-dependent clearance. Successful anticancer treatment often ameliorates symptoms of cachexia, reducing the drug clearance over time especially in patients who respond. Serum albumin level is a common biomarker of cachexia that is frequently associated with antibody drug clearance. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of antibody drugs have incorporated albumin metabolism but have not been applied to describe time-varying clearance due to improvement in cachexia. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate albumin levels as a biomarker that is predictive of changes in antibody clearance due to cachexia. A PBPK model that jointly describes metabolism of albumin and biologic drugs was fitted to longitudinal albumin data from cancer patients treated with durvalumab and was used to predict changes in durvalumab clearance over time. PBPK model predictions were compared to empirical population pharmacokinetic (PK) models of durvalumab and other checkpoint inhibitors fitted directly to clinical PK. The model fitted the observed albumin data in cancer patients closely, and the three fitted parameters showed low uncertainty (RSE < 10%). By accounting for longitudinal albumin data in patients, the PBPK model recapitulated the observed magnitude of the change in clearance of durvalumab without fitting to clinical PK data. The model simulation demonstrated that utilization of albumin levels as a marker of cachexia in PBPK models can be used to mechanistically predict time-dependent clearance of monoclonal antibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70185","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}