首页 > 最新文献

CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology最新文献

英文 中文
Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Personalized Infliximab Dosing in IBD IBD患者英夫利昔单抗个体化用药的药代动力学模型选择。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70152
Sahira Chaiben, Peggy Gandia, Thibaut Jamme, Nicolas Congy, Didier Concordet

Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody used for immune-mediated diseases, shows high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Prolonged exposure increases the risk of adverse effects and costs, making dose personalization essential to balance safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Population pharmacokinetic models support individualized dosing, but different models may predict varying drug exposure for the same patient. This study aims to identify compatible models for each patient and assess the impact of model selection on dosing. This retrospective study included adult Crohn's disease patients receiving infliximab. Published pharmacokinetic models were screened. Model-patient compatibility was evaluated using Multivariate Exact Discrepancy through 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations. The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm generated individual parameter distributions. For each model-patient pair, the median and 90% confidence interval of the dose required to achieve a target exposure of 2079 mg*day/L were computed. Sixteen models were tested. No model was compatible with all patients. Dosing was calculated only for compatible pairs. The average median dose was 9.25 mg/kg, with an average imprecision of 6.63 mg/kg. The highest median dose reached 23.21 mg/kg, reflecting inter-model differences, while the greatest imprecision (25.69 mg/kg) stemmed from patient variability. This concentration-based method personalizes dosing via pharmacokinetic profiling. Patients can be classified into three groups: (1) those for whom all models provide similar recommendations, indicating high reliability across models; (2) those incompatible with all models, for whom the posology recommended by the manufacturer should be prioritized; and (3) those for whom some models are compatible but intensified therapeutic drug monitoring is required.

英夫利昔单抗是一种用于免疫介导疾病的单克隆抗体,在患者间表现出很高的药代动力学变异性。长时间接触增加了不良反应的风险和成本,使剂量个性化对于平衡安全性、有效性和成本效益至关重要。人群药代动力学模型支持个体化给药,但不同的模型可能预测同一患者不同的药物暴露。本研究旨在为每位患者确定兼容的模型,并评估模型选择对给药的影响。这项回顾性研究包括接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的成年克罗恩病患者。筛选已发表的药代动力学模型。通过100,000次蒙特卡罗模拟,使用多元精确差异评估模型患者相容性。Metropolis-Hastings算法生成单个参数分布。对于每对模型患者,计算达到2079 mg*day/L目标暴露所需剂量的中位数和90%置信区间。共测试了16个模型。没有一种模型与所有患者兼容。只计算相容对的剂量。平均中位剂量为9.25 mg/kg,平均不精确度为6.63 mg/kg。最高中位剂量达到23.21 mg/kg,反映了模型间的差异,而最大的不精确性(25.69 mg/kg)源于患者的差异。这种基于浓度的方法通过药代动力学分析个性化给药。患者可分为三组:(1)所有模型提供相似建议的患者,表明模型之间的可靠性较高;(2)与所有型号不兼容的,应优先考虑厂家推荐的型号;(3)某些模式兼容但需要加强治疗药物监测的。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Personalized Infliximab Dosing in IBD","authors":"Sahira Chaiben,&nbsp;Peggy Gandia,&nbsp;Thibaut Jamme,&nbsp;Nicolas Congy,&nbsp;Didier Concordet","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70152","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70152","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody used for immune-mediated diseases, shows high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Prolonged exposure increases the risk of adverse effects and costs, making dose personalization essential to balance safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Population pharmacokinetic models support individualized dosing, but different models may predict varying drug exposure for the same patient. This study aims to identify compatible models for each patient and assess the impact of model selection on dosing. This retrospective study included adult Crohn's disease patients receiving infliximab. Published pharmacokinetic models were screened. Model-patient compatibility was evaluated using Multivariate Exact Discrepancy through 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations. The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm generated individual parameter distributions. For each model-patient pair, the median and 90% confidence interval of the dose required to achieve a target exposure of 2079 mg*day/L were computed. Sixteen models were tested. No model was compatible with all patients. Dosing was calculated only for compatible pairs. The average median dose was 9.25 mg/kg, with an average imprecision of 6.63 mg/kg. The highest median dose reached 23.21 mg/kg, reflecting inter-model differences, while the greatest imprecision (25.69 mg/kg) stemmed from patient variability. This concentration-based method personalizes dosing via pharmacokinetic profiling. Patients can be classified into three groups: (1) those for whom all models provide similar recommendations, indicating high reliability across models; (2) those incompatible with all models, for whom the posology recommended by the manufacturer should be prioritized; and (3) those for whom some models are compatible but intensified therapeutic drug monitoring is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70152","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145563208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exposure-Response Analysis for Time-to-Event Data in the Presence of Adaptive Dosing: Efficient Approaches and Pitfalls 自适应剂量下时间-事件数据的暴露-响应分析:有效方法和缺陷。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70149
Alexandra Lavalley-Morelle, Félicien Le Louedec, Richard Anziano, France Mentré, Martin Bergstrand

Analyzing exposure-response (E-R) relationships for time-to-event (TTE) endpoints presents challenges due to the inherent time-dependent nature of the data. Some authors address these difficulties by using a fixed timepoint approach, where exposure is assessed at a predetermined time rather than dynamically over time. (e.g., initial exposure or last exposure). The aim of the current work is to compare the use of time-static and time-varying metrics to assess the E-R relationship through simulations. PK exposures were simulated from a one-compartment model and TTE data from a parametric proportional hazard model, involving the weekly average PK concentration as a time-varying covariate. Several scenarios were considered to handle the type of dosing (fixed or adaptive), the accumulation of the drug (low or strong), the type of event (efficacy, safety or independent), and the timing of the event onset (early or late). Wald tests on the exposure effect parameter were performed to assess the significance of the E-R relationship. For each simulation scenario, the type-I error and the power of the Wald tests were reported, revealing that no time-static metric consistently produced reliable results across all conditions. In order to ensure adequate statistical properties, we recommend using time-varying exposure, which shows good performance across all scenarios.

由于数据固有的时间依赖性,分析时间到事件(TTE)端点的暴露-响应(E-R)关系带来了挑战。一些作者通过使用固定时间点方法来解决这些困难,在这种方法中,暴露是在预定的时间而不是随时间动态评估的。(例如,初次暴露或最后暴露)。当前工作的目的是通过模拟比较使用时间静态和时变指标来评估E-R关系。采用单室模型模拟PK暴露,采用参数比例风险模型模拟TTE数据,将周平均PK浓度作为时变协变量。考虑了几种情况来处理剂量类型(固定或适应性),药物积累(低或强),事件类型(有效性,安全性或独立性)以及事件发生的时间(早或晚)。对暴露效应参数进行Wald检验,以评估E-R关系的显著性。对于每个模拟场景,报告了i型误差和Wald测试的功率,表明没有时间静态度量在所有条件下始终产生可靠的结果。为了确保充分的统计特性,我们建议使用时变曝光,它在所有场景中都显示出良好的性能。
{"title":"Exposure-Response Analysis for Time-to-Event Data in the Presence of Adaptive Dosing: Efficient Approaches and Pitfalls","authors":"Alexandra Lavalley-Morelle,&nbsp;Félicien Le Louedec,&nbsp;Richard Anziano,&nbsp;France Mentré,&nbsp;Martin Bergstrand","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70149","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70149","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Analyzing exposure-response (E-R) relationships for time-to-event (TTE) endpoints presents challenges due to the inherent time-dependent nature of the data. Some authors address these difficulties by using a fixed timepoint approach, where exposure is assessed at a predetermined time rather than dynamically over time. (e.g., initial exposure or last exposure). The aim of the current work is to compare the use of time-static and time-varying metrics to assess the E-R relationship through simulations. PK exposures were simulated from a one-compartment model and TTE data from a parametric proportional hazard model, involving the weekly average PK concentration as a time-varying covariate. Several scenarios were considered to handle the type of dosing (fixed or adaptive), the accumulation of the drug (low or strong), the type of event (efficacy, safety or independent), and the timing of the event onset (early or late). Wald tests on the exposure effect parameter were performed to assess the significance of the E-R relationship. For each simulation scenario, the type-I error and the power of the Wald tests were reported, revealing that no time-static metric consistently produced reliable results across all conditions. In order to ensure adequate statistical properties, we recommend using time-varying exposure, which shows good performance across all scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70149","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145563131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Advance of In Silico Evidence to Transform Pediatric Drug Development for Rare Diseases 计算机证据的进展将改变罕见病儿科药物的开发
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70139
Jane Knöchel, Ping Zhao, Rajat Desikan, Jiawei Zhou, João A. Abrantes, Lutz Harnisch
<p>Rare diseases (RDs)—defined in the U.S. as those affecting fewer than 200,000 people and in the EU as fewer than 1 in 2000—represent a persistent unmet need. These differing definitions contribute to variation in reported numbers: the U.S. recognized over 7000 rare diseases impacting 25–30 million people (https://www.fda.gov/patients/rare-diseases-fda) while the EU estimates around 36 million affected individuals (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/orphan-designation-overview). Most manifest early in life and progress relentlessly (around 70% [https://www.rarediseasesinternational.org/living-with-a-rare-disease/]), yet fewer than 5% currently have approved therapy [<span>1</span>]. Pediatric rare diseases amplify every obstacle of drug development: small and heterogeneous populations, ethical constraints and limited usefulness of conventional clinical trials.</p><p>Recognizing this urgency, initiatives such as the FDA's Rare Disease Innovation Hub and the LEADER 3D Program (https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/accelerating-rare-disease-cures-arc-program/learning-and-education-advance-and-empower-rare-disease-drug-developers-leader-3d) aim to accelerate the development of medicines. Still, as highlighted in Michelle Werner's ASCPT 2025 State-of-the-Art Lecture (https://ascpt2025.eventscribe.net/agenda.asp?BCFO=&pfp=BrowsebyDay&fa=&fb=&fc=&fd=&all=1), attention alone is not enough—innovation requires translation into action. Today, the growing availability of large-scale biological datasets and advanced modeling offers that opportunity. Pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology can transform sparse data into quantitative insights, enabling virtual exploration of therapies and supporting confident decision-making even in the absence of large trials.</p><p>A recent review by Chen et al. outlines the distinct challenges of pediatric RDs [<span>2</span>]—slow disease progression, limited natural-history data, genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, and uncertain surrogate endpoints. These challenges call for a change in the mindset of conventional drug development, which is based on evidence generation through an extensive clinical program including multiple clinical trials.</p><p>Designing clinical trials for RDs, particularly those with genetic origins, presents unique challenges due to the difficulty in demonstrating immediate clinical improvement. Since resolving the root cause is often unattainable, the primary goal of most current RD treatment is typically to prevent disease progression rather than to elicit a rapid clinical response. This necessitates a deep understanding of the disease's progression timeline and the ability to model outcome metrics over time. Proof-of-concept (PoC) trials for RD often focus on detecting any treatment response—typically a binary outcome—using high-dose strategies to maximize the chance of observing an effect. However, predicting responses across a range of doses requires intr
罕见病(RDs)——在美国定义为患病人数少于20万人,在欧盟定义为2000年患病人数少于1人——是一个长期未得到满足的需求。这些不同的定义导致了报告数字的差异:美国确认了超过7000种罕见疾病,影响了2500万至3000万人(https://www.fda.gov/patients/rare-diseases-fda),而欧盟估计约有3600万人受影响(https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/orphan-designation-overview)。大多数表现在生命早期,并且持续发展(约70% [https://www.rarediseasesinternational.org/living-with-a-rare-disease/]]),但目前批准治疗的不到5%。儿科罕见病扩大了药物开发的每一个障碍:小而异质的人群,伦理约束和传统临床试验的有限效用。认识到这一紧迫性,FDA的罕见病创新中心和LEADER 3D计划(https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/accelerating-rare-disease-cures-arc-program/learning-and-education-advance-and-empower-rare-disease-drug-developers-leader-3d)等举措旨在加速药物的开发。然而,正如米歇尔·维尔纳在《2025年ASCPT最新技术讲座》(https://ascpt2025.eventscribe.net/agenda.asp?BCFO=&pfp=BrowsebyDay&fa=&fb=&fc=&fd=&all=1)中所强调的那样,仅仅关注是不够的——创新需要转化为行动。如今,大规模生物数据集和高级建模的日益普及提供了这样的机会。药物计量学和系统药理学可以将稀疏的数据转化为定量的见解,即使在没有大型试验的情况下,也可以对疗法进行虚拟探索,并支持自信的决策。Chen等人最近的一篇综述概述了儿科rd的独特挑战——疾病进展缓慢、自然病史数据有限、遗传和表型异质性以及替代终点不确定。这些挑战要求改变传统药物开发的思维方式,传统药物开发是基于通过包括多个临床试验在内的广泛临床项目来产生证据的。为rd设计临床试验,特别是那些具有遗传来源的rd设计临床试验,由于难以证明立即的临床改善,提出了独特的挑战。由于解决根本原因往往无法实现,目前大多数RD治疗的主要目标通常是防止疾病进展,而不是引起快速的临床反应。这就需要深入了解疾病的进展时间表,并能够随着时间的推移模拟结果指标。RD的概念验证(PoC)试验通常侧重于检测任何治疗反应-通常是二元结果-使用高剂量策略来最大化观察效果的机会。然而,预测不同剂量的反应需要复杂的潜在生物学机制知识,包括特定途径如何受到影响以及这些变化如何转化为可测量的临床结果。基于模型的药物开发(MIDD)方法——跨越药物计量学、定量系统药理学(QSP)和机器学习(ML)——为解决儿科RD的内在挑战提供了一种变革性的手段。这些计算工具通常用于现代药物开发,以增强我们对疾病和药物药理学的理解,并在整个药物开发生命周期的连续体中支持决策。包括儿科rd药物的开发和批准。《药物计量学和系统药理学》的这一主题问题提供了MIDD方法的作用和影响的观点,这些方法正在推进儿科罕见病患者的创新治疗。计算工具现在是现代研发研究的核心。它们允许试验的虚拟设计,治疗的机械探索,以及碎片化知识的自动合成,压缩了开发时间表,提高了决策质量。Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)是一种主要影响男孩b[4]的进行性x连锁神经肌肉疾病,它体现了儿童RD药物开发中患者群体有限、表型异质性和伦理约束的挑战。两个互补的计算工具利用疾病进展模型在执行前模拟试验场景。第一个工具是试验模拟器,它可以帮助研究人员优化试验设计——样本量、持续时间和纳入标准——跨越五个常见的DMD功能终点[4]。使用这些工具的案例研究表明,在不影响统计能力的情况下,提高了试验效率,这在患者招募挑战中至关重要。另一个模拟界面结合了机器学习生成的虚拟种群和多变量模型,将功能结果与成像生物标志物[5]联系起来。 对最近试验数据的验证证实了其预测的准确性。直观的图形界面使临床领导和MIDD专家能够协作探索与各自临床药物开发相关的场景范围。QSP框架也在迅速发展。Meno-Tetang等人强调了QSP建模如何增强对生物动力学的理解,告知表达动力学和持久性,并指导剂量优化,同时减轻脱靶效应[6]。在RNA疗法、疫苗、基因和酶替代疗法中的应用表明,QSP模型现在支持设计、翻译和生命周期管理。在此基础上,Saini等人介绍了一种人工智能增强的QSP-Copilot,应用于凝血系统和戈谢病[7](一种隐性遗传溶酶体储存疾病,由葡萄糖脑苷酶缺乏引起,导致葡萄糖神经酰胺[8]积聚)。该工具实现了高精度的自动数据提取(99.1%和100%),同时最小的机构损失。这标志着向可扩展的、可用的、影响更大的QSP工具的关键转变,特别是在儿科rd中,深入的生物学见解是必不可少的。总之,这些进步说明了计算方法是如何在曾经被认为过于罕见或复杂而无法进行严格研究的情况下改变试验计划和转化决策的。随着治疗创新在儿科rd领域的扩展,基于模型的策略在克服小群体、异质人群和零散临床数据的局限性方面被证明是不可或缺的。从庞贝病的酶替代到失调性毛细血管扩张的类固醇给药,再到DMD、HoFH、CAH和ret驱动型癌症的暴露匹配剂量,药物计量学和系统建模实现了量身定制的方案、虚拟队列桥接和机制洞察。这些例子反映了儿科药物开发向精确和高效的更广泛转变——建模不仅仅是一种辅助工具,而是临床决策的核心驱动力。庞贝病(PD)就是一个显著的例子。PD是一种罕见的退行性多系统代谢紊乱,其α-葡萄糖苷酶缺陷导致糖原积聚。根据发病年龄的不同,晚期疾病(LOPD)会导致肌肉无力和呼吸功能不全,而早期疾病(IOPD)和更罕见的疾病会在出生后的第一年就导致心肌病的结果。Rachedi等人开发了一种机制QSP模型,将生物标志物与功能终点联系起来,并在晚发和早发PD患者之间架起虚拟队列,以优化avalglucosidase α -[9]的剂量。该方法为IOPD患儿确定了合适的治疗方案,而无需进行新的、更大规模的比较试验。在患有共济失调毛细血管扩张症(一种由共济失调毛细血管扩张突变基因[10]的双等位致病变异引起的神经退行性疾病)的患者中,一个例子说明了群体PK模型如何表征创新的给药系统。Ozdin等人整合了稀疏的儿童和健康成人数据,通过EryDex系统建立了持续地塞米松释放的模型,预测了每月输注支持长期类固醇治疗的安全、持续暴露,提高了依从性,降低了毒性[10]。罕见病试验,尤其是针对儿童的试验,往往样本量小,因此敏感的终点对于评估药物疗效至关重要。为了解决这个问题,Hamdan等人引入了一个项目反应理论框架,该框架联合模拟了退行性失调性疾病的临床报告(SARA)和数字运动结果,减少了不确定性,提高了统计能力,并有效地
{"title":"The Advance of In Silico Evidence to Transform Pediatric Drug Development for Rare Diseases","authors":"Jane Knöchel,&nbsp;Ping Zhao,&nbsp;Rajat Desikan,&nbsp;Jiawei Zhou,&nbsp;João A. Abrantes,&nbsp;Lutz Harnisch","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70139","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Rare diseases (RDs)—defined in the U.S. as those affecting fewer than 200,000 people and in the EU as fewer than 1 in 2000—represent a persistent unmet need. These differing definitions contribute to variation in reported numbers: the U.S. recognized over 7000 rare diseases impacting 25–30 million people (https://www.fda.gov/patients/rare-diseases-fda) while the EU estimates around 36 million affected individuals (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/orphan-designation-overview). Most manifest early in life and progress relentlessly (around 70% [https://www.rarediseasesinternational.org/living-with-a-rare-disease/]), yet fewer than 5% currently have approved therapy [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Pediatric rare diseases amplify every obstacle of drug development: small and heterogeneous populations, ethical constraints and limited usefulness of conventional clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recognizing this urgency, initiatives such as the FDA's Rare Disease Innovation Hub and the LEADER 3D Program (https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/accelerating-rare-disease-cures-arc-program/learning-and-education-advance-and-empower-rare-disease-drug-developers-leader-3d) aim to accelerate the development of medicines. Still, as highlighted in Michelle Werner's ASCPT 2025 State-of-the-Art Lecture (https://ascpt2025.eventscribe.net/agenda.asp?BCFO=&amp;pfp=BrowsebyDay&amp;fa=&amp;fb=&amp;fc=&amp;fd=&amp;all=1), attention alone is not enough—innovation requires translation into action. Today, the growing availability of large-scale biological datasets and advanced modeling offers that opportunity. Pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology can transform sparse data into quantitative insights, enabling virtual exploration of therapies and supporting confident decision-making even in the absence of large trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A recent review by Chen et al. outlines the distinct challenges of pediatric RDs [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]—slow disease progression, limited natural-history data, genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, and uncertain surrogate endpoints. These challenges call for a change in the mindset of conventional drug development, which is based on evidence generation through an extensive clinical program including multiple clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Designing clinical trials for RDs, particularly those with genetic origins, presents unique challenges due to the difficulty in demonstrating immediate clinical improvement. Since resolving the root cause is often unattainable, the primary goal of most current RD treatment is typically to prevent disease progression rather than to elicit a rapid clinical response. This necessitates a deep understanding of the disease's progression timeline and the ability to model outcome metrics over time. Proof-of-concept (PoC) trials for RD often focus on detecting any treatment response—typically a binary outcome—using high-dose strategies to maximize the chance of observing an effect. However, predicting responses across a range of doses requires intr","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 11","pages":"1731-1734"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70139","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145538066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Pediatric Clinical Development: An IQ Working Group Perspective on the Current Status and Challenges 基于生理的药代动力学建模以支持儿科临床发展:IQ工作组对现状和挑战的看法。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70141
James W. T. Yates, Michael Zientek, Kunal S. Taskar, Wen Lin, Tycho Heimbach, Stefan Willmann, Jessica Rehmel, Neil Parrott, Michael Hanley, Justine Badee, Yuan Chen, Susan Cole, Loeckie De Zwart, Sebastian Haertter, Rongrong Jiang, Masakatsu Kotsuma, Guiqing Liang, Yu-Wei Lin, Jing Liu, Ying Ou, Juliane Rascher, Naveed A. Shaik, Jan Wahlstrom, Xiaofeng Wang, Guangqing Xiao, Ka Lai Yee, S. Y. Amy Cheung

Pediatric extrapolation strategies issued by health authorities have streamlined pediatric drug development and reduced the unnecessary burden of conducting pediatric clinical studies. In line with these strategies, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been utilized extensively for initial dosing regimen and sampling timepoint selection for pediatric studies, as well as dose validation throughout pediatric drug development. Here, the status and challenges of PBPK modeling in pediatric drug development have been summarized by the IQ Pediatric PBPK Working Group. Our work reviews current practices for pediatric PBPK modeling across various therapeutic areas. To enable best practice, we propose an optimized workflow for pediatric PBPK modeling recommendations. Two selected key pediatric PBPK case examples are also described, where modeling impacted the drug label extension to pediatric patients. Moreover, we analyze the current gaps and challenges in our understanding of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination in pediatric PBPK model development. Since neonates are the least studied and the most medically fragile, the depth of our understanding of their rapidly evolving physiological processes is limited and so there exist significant modeling gaps which we summarize here. Finally, we provide recommendations, including building a public data repository, leveraging real-world data, and implementing microdose studies for addressing pediatric PBPK modeling challenges.

卫生当局发布的儿科外推策略简化了儿科药物开发,减少了进行儿科临床研究的不必要负担。与这些策略一致,基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型已广泛用于儿科研究的初始给药方案和采样时间点选择,以及整个儿科药物开发过程中的剂量验证。在此,IQ儿科PBPK工作组总结了PBPK建模在儿科药物开发中的现状和挑战。我们的工作回顾了目前在不同治疗领域的儿科PBPK建模实践。为了实现最佳实践,我们提出了儿科PBPK建模建议的优化工作流程。还描述了两个选定的关键儿科PBPK案例示例,其中建模影响了药物标签扩展到儿科患者。此外,我们分析了目前在儿童PBPK模型开发中对药物吸收、分布、代谢和消除的理解方面的差距和挑战。由于新生儿是研究最少,医学上最脆弱的,我们对其快速进化的生理过程的理解深度有限,因此存在显着的建模差距,我们在这里总结。最后,我们提出建议,包括建立公共数据存储库,利用真实世界的数据,并实施微剂量研究,以解决儿科PBPK建模的挑战。
{"title":"Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Pediatric Clinical Development: An IQ Working Group Perspective on the Current Status and Challenges","authors":"James W. T. Yates,&nbsp;Michael Zientek,&nbsp;Kunal S. Taskar,&nbsp;Wen Lin,&nbsp;Tycho Heimbach,&nbsp;Stefan Willmann,&nbsp;Jessica Rehmel,&nbsp;Neil Parrott,&nbsp;Michael Hanley,&nbsp;Justine Badee,&nbsp;Yuan Chen,&nbsp;Susan Cole,&nbsp;Loeckie De Zwart,&nbsp;Sebastian Haertter,&nbsp;Rongrong Jiang,&nbsp;Masakatsu Kotsuma,&nbsp;Guiqing Liang,&nbsp;Yu-Wei Lin,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Ying Ou,&nbsp;Juliane Rascher,&nbsp;Naveed A. Shaik,&nbsp;Jan Wahlstrom,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Wang,&nbsp;Guangqing Xiao,&nbsp;Ka Lai Yee,&nbsp;S. Y. Amy Cheung","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70141","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70141","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pediatric extrapolation strategies issued by health authorities have streamlined pediatric drug development and reduced the unnecessary burden of conducting pediatric clinical studies. In line with these strategies, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been utilized extensively for initial dosing regimen and sampling timepoint selection for pediatric studies, as well as dose validation throughout pediatric drug development. Here, the status and challenges of PBPK modeling in pediatric drug development have been summarized by the IQ Pediatric PBPK Working Group. Our work reviews current practices for pediatric PBPK modeling across various therapeutic areas. To enable best practice, we propose an optimized workflow for pediatric PBPK modeling recommendations. Two selected key pediatric PBPK case examples are also described, where modeling impacted the drug label extension to pediatric patients. Moreover, we analyze the current gaps and challenges in our understanding of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination in pediatric PBPK model development. Since neonates are the least studied and the most medically fragile, the depth of our understanding of their rapidly evolving physiological processes is limited and so there exist significant modeling gaps which we summarize here. Finally, we provide recommendations, including building a public data repository, leveraging real-world data, and implementing microdose studies for addressing pediatric PBPK modeling challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70141","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145548729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Radiocopper to Cold Copper: Mechanistic Modeling and Simulation to Define Clinical Response Criteria and Biomarkers for VTX-801 in Wilson Disease 从放射性铜到冷铜:机制建模和模拟以确定Wilson病VTX-801的临床反应标准和生物标志物。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70153
Andreas Lindauer, Bernard Benichou, Gloria González Aseguinolaza, Jean-Philippe Combal

We developed a comprehensive, mechanistic model of human copper metabolism to support biomarker qualification for VTX-801, an adeno-associated vector-based gene therapy which is being developed to restore the mutated ATP7B copper transporter gene in Wilson disease (WD). The model integrates physiological copper kinetics with pathophysiological features of WD by distinguishing between ceruloplasmin-bound and non-ceruloplasmin-bound copper (NCC), and by explicitly incorporating ATP7B-dependent processes: biliary excretion and ceruloplasmin loading of copper. Literature-derived time–activity data from healthy subjects, heterozygous carriers, and WD patients, as well as clinical radiocopper data in plasma and feces from a pilot study in non-WD subjects, were used for model development and validation. VTX-801's dose–response was quantified in WD mouse models using ceruloplasmin oxidase activity measurement and 64Cu fecal excretion. This enabled derivation of activity factors (AFs) corresponding to restored ATP7B function, with 15% and 40% selected as minimal and optimal efficacy targets. Simulations linked AFs to clinical biomarkers, demonstrating that the 48/2-h plasma radioactivity ratio can effectively differentiate VTX-801 responders from non-responders, providing a decision criterion to safely withdraw standard treatment in participants of a phase 1/2 trial. To broaden applicability beyond radiotracer studies, we simulated “cold” copper kinetics under steady-state conditions, deriving expected values for plasma copper, NCC, urinary copper excretion, and relative exchangeable copper (REC). These simulations suggest that REC may also serve as a suitable and simpler to implement, non-radioactive biomarker for ATP7B gene therapy. This model provides a robust quantitative framework to assess copper-related biomarkers in WD and their response to treatment in silico.

Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2019-001157-13

我们建立了一个全面的人体铜代谢机制模型,以支持VTX-801的生物标志物鉴定,VTX-801是一种基于腺相关载体的基因疗法,正在开发中,用于恢复威尔逊病(WD)中突变的ATP7B铜转运蛋白基因。该模型通过区分铜蓝蛋白结合铜和非铜蓝蛋白结合铜(NCC),并明确结合atp7b依赖过程:胆道排泄和铜蓝蛋白装载铜,将生理铜动力学与WD的病理生理特征结合起来。从健康受试者、杂合携带者和WD患者的文献中获得的时间活动数据,以及在非WD受试者中进行的一项试点研究中血浆和粪便中的临床放射性铜数据,被用于模型的开发和验证。通过测定铜蓝蛋白氧化酶活性和64Cu粪便排泄量,在WD小鼠模型中量化VTX-801的剂量反应。这使得衍生出与恢复的ATP7B功能相对应的活性因子(AFs),选择15%和40%作为最小和最佳功效目标。模拟将AFs与临床生物标志物联系起来,表明48/2-h血浆放射性比可以有效区分VTX-801应答者和无应答者,为1/2期试验参与者安全退出标准治疗提供决策标准。为了扩大放射性示踪剂研究之外的适用性,我们模拟了稳态条件下的“冷”铜动力学,得出了血浆铜、NCC、尿铜排泄和相对可交换铜(REC)的期望值。这些模拟表明,REC也可以作为一种合适的、更容易实现的、非放射性的ATP7B基因治疗生物标志物。该模型提供了一个强大的定量框架来评估WD中与铜相关的生物标志物及其对硅处理的反应。试验注册:草案号:2019-001157-13。
{"title":"From Radiocopper to Cold Copper: Mechanistic Modeling and Simulation to Define Clinical Response Criteria and Biomarkers for VTX-801 in Wilson Disease","authors":"Andreas Lindauer,&nbsp;Bernard Benichou,&nbsp;Gloria González Aseguinolaza,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Combal","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70153","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70153","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We developed a comprehensive, mechanistic model of human copper metabolism to support biomarker qualification for VTX-801, an adeno-associated vector-based gene therapy which is being developed to restore the mutated ATP7B copper transporter gene in Wilson disease (WD). The model integrates physiological copper kinetics with pathophysiological features of WD by distinguishing between ceruloplasmin-bound and non-ceruloplasmin-bound copper (NCC), and by explicitly incorporating ATP7B-dependent processes: biliary excretion and ceruloplasmin loading of copper. Literature-derived time–activity data from healthy subjects, heterozygous carriers, and WD patients, as well as clinical radiocopper data in plasma and feces from a pilot study in non-WD subjects, were used for model development and validation. VTX-801's dose–response was quantified in WD mouse models using ceruloplasmin oxidase activity measurement and <sup>64</sup>Cu fecal excretion. This enabled derivation of activity factors (AFs) corresponding to restored ATP7B function, with 15% and 40% selected as minimal and optimal efficacy targets. Simulations linked AFs to clinical biomarkers, demonstrating that the 48/2-h plasma radioactivity ratio can effectively differentiate VTX-801 responders from non-responders, providing a decision criterion to safely withdraw standard treatment in participants of a phase 1/2 trial. To broaden applicability beyond radiotracer studies, we simulated “cold” copper kinetics under steady-state conditions, deriving expected values for plasma copper, NCC, urinary copper excretion, and relative exchangeable copper (REC). These simulations suggest that REC may also serve as a suitable and simpler to implement, non-radioactive biomarker for ATP7B gene therapy. This model provides a robust quantitative framework to assess copper-related biomarkers in WD and their response to treatment in silico.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> EudraCT number: 2019-001157-13</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70153","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145538465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Model-Based Meta-Analysis Framework Quantifying Drivers of Placebo Response in Atopic Dermatitis Trials 基于模型的meta分析框架量化特应性皮炎试验中安慰剂反应的驱动因素。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70150
Jean C. Serrano, John Maringwa, Roel Straetemans, Wouter Willems, Sophia G. Liva, Jeroen Verhoeven, Jennifer L. Ford, Kuan-Hsiang Gary Huang, Jonathan J. Hubbard, Jonathan L. French, Damayanthi Devineni, An Vermeulen, Chandni Valiathan

Atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials exhibit substantial placebo response variability, confounding efficacy assessments of novel therapies. Traditional meta-analyses have identified potential contributors to this variability but rely on single time-point estimates, which fail to account for dynamic, longitudinal response patterns across trials. To overcome this limitation, we developed a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) framework that characterizes time-course projections of EASI-75 placebo responses while accounting for key covariates. A systematic literature review identified 40 moderate-to-severe AD trials (18 Phase 2, 22 Phase 3), encompassing 4827 patients, suitable for longitudinal modeling. Modeling results highlighted concomitant therapy as a significant driver of placebo response, with trials permitting topical corticosteroids (TCS) demonstrating a 1.8-fold increase in EASI-75 placebo rates compared to trials without concomitant therapy. Additionally, baseline disease severity of the study population, as reflected by the mean baseline EASI score, was inversely associated with placebo response; each 1-point increase in baseline EASI reduced EASI-75 placebo rates at Weeks 12 and 16 by 0.96-fold. Time-course modeling suggested that placebo responses plateaued by Week 12, with EASI-75 outcomes at Week 12 capturing 94% of the projected response at Week 16. Overall, this MBMA framework provides quantitative guidance to optimize clinical trial design, refine power calculations, and improve the differentiation between therapeutic and placebo effects in AD drug development.

特应性皮炎(AD)临床试验显示出大量安慰剂反应变异性,混淆了新疗法的疗效评估。传统的荟萃分析已经确定了这种可变性的潜在因素,但依赖于单一时间点的估计,无法解释跨试验的动态、纵向反应模式。为了克服这一局限性,我们开发了一个基于模型的元分析(MBMA)框架,在考虑关键协变量的同时,表征EASI-75安慰剂反应的时间过程预测。一项系统的文献综述确定了40项中重度AD试验(18项二期试验,22项三期试验),包括4827例患者,适合纵向建模。建模结果强调了伴随治疗是安慰剂反应的重要驱动因素,与没有伴随治疗的试验相比,允许局部皮质类固醇(TCS)的试验显示EASI-75安慰剂率增加了1.8倍。此外,研究人群的基线疾病严重程度(由平均基线EASI评分反映)与安慰剂反应呈负相关;基线EASI每增加1点,在第12周和第16周时,EASI-75安慰剂率降低0.96倍。时间过程模型表明,安慰剂反应在第12周趋于平稳,第12周的EASI-75结果达到了第16周预期反应的94%。总体而言,该MBMA框架为优化临床试验设计、改进功效计算以及区分AD药物开发中的治疗和安慰剂效应提供了定量指导。
{"title":"A Model-Based Meta-Analysis Framework Quantifying Drivers of Placebo Response in Atopic Dermatitis Trials","authors":"Jean C. Serrano,&nbsp;John Maringwa,&nbsp;Roel Straetemans,&nbsp;Wouter Willems,&nbsp;Sophia G. Liva,&nbsp;Jeroen Verhoeven,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Ford,&nbsp;Kuan-Hsiang Gary Huang,&nbsp;Jonathan J. Hubbard,&nbsp;Jonathan L. French,&nbsp;Damayanthi Devineni,&nbsp;An Vermeulen,&nbsp;Chandni Valiathan","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70150","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70150","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials exhibit substantial placebo response variability, confounding efficacy assessments of novel therapies. Traditional meta-analyses have identified potential contributors to this variability but rely on single time-point estimates, which fail to account for dynamic, longitudinal response patterns across trials. To overcome this limitation, we developed a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) framework that characterizes time-course projections of EASI-75 placebo responses while accounting for key covariates. A systematic literature review identified 40 moderate-to-severe AD trials (18 Phase 2, 22 Phase 3), encompassing 4827 patients, suitable for longitudinal modeling. Modeling results highlighted concomitant therapy as a significant driver of placebo response, with trials permitting topical corticosteroids (TCS) demonstrating a 1.8-fold increase in EASI-75 placebo rates compared to trials without concomitant therapy. Additionally, baseline disease severity of the study population, as reflected by the mean baseline EASI score, was inversely associated with placebo response; each 1-point increase in baseline EASI reduced EASI-75 placebo rates at Weeks 12 and 16 by 0.96-fold. Time-course modeling suggested that placebo responses plateaued by Week 12, with EASI-75 outcomes at Week 12 capturing 94% of the projected response at Week 16. Overall, this MBMA framework provides quantitative guidance to optimize clinical trial design, refine power calculations, and improve the differentiation between therapeutic and placebo effects in AD drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70150","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neural Controlled Differential Equation and Its Application in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 神经控制微分方程及其在药代动力学和药效学中的应用。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70146
Zhisong Wu, Pingyao Luo, Rong Chen, Yaou Liu, Weizhe Jian, Tianyan Zhou

With the recent advances in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), data-driven modeling approaches for pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) have gained popularity due to their versatility in diverse settings and reduced reliance on prior assumptions. However, most of the ML methods ignore the hidden dynamics behind the data, lacking interpretability. This study investigated the applicability of neural controlled differential equation (NCDE), a novel ML method that is suitable for data-driven modeling of PK and PD profiles, especially in the setting of multiple dosing. We demonstrated that NCDE was capable of combining differential-equation-based dynamics with data-driven characteristics, flexibly incorporating various types of inputs, and embedding discontinuous dynamics. Moreover, a direct correspondence was identified between the learned dynamics of NCDE and the dynamics behind the data, which highlights the intrinsic interpretability of NCDE. Additionally, the influence of important hyperparameters was systematically investigated, and it was found that L1 regularization and the AdaMax optimizer were useful for stabilizing the training process and leading to a generalizable NCDE model. Together, these findings demonstrate the accuracy, generalizability, and interpretability of NCDE, indicating that NCDE is a reliable method for further application. In the future, NCDE may further facilitate PK and PD prediction in general.

随着机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)的最新进展,药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)的数据驱动建模方法因其在不同环境中的通用性和对先前假设的依赖减少而受到欢迎。然而,大多数ML方法忽略了数据背后隐藏的动态,缺乏可解释性。神经控制微分方程(neural controlled differential equation, NCDE)是一种新颖的ML方法,适用于数据驱动的PK和PD曲线建模,特别是在多次给药的情况下。我们证明了NCDE能够将基于微分方程的动力学与数据驱动的特性相结合,灵活地结合各种类型的输入,并嵌入不连续动力学。此外,我们还发现NCDE的学习动态与数据背后的动态之间存在直接对应关系,这突出了NCDE的内在可解释性。此外,系统地研究了重要超参数的影响,发现L1正则化和AdaMax优化器对于稳定训练过程和生成可推广的NCDE模型是有用的。总之,这些发现证明了NCDE的准确性、普遍性和可解释性,表明NCDE是一种可靠的进一步应用方法。在未来,NCDE可能会进一步促进PK和PD的预测。
{"title":"Neural Controlled Differential Equation and Its Application in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","authors":"Zhisong Wu,&nbsp;Pingyao Luo,&nbsp;Rong Chen,&nbsp;Yaou Liu,&nbsp;Weizhe Jian,&nbsp;Tianyan Zhou","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70146","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70146","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the recent advances in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), data-driven modeling approaches for pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) have gained popularity due to their versatility in diverse settings and reduced reliance on prior assumptions. However, most of the ML methods ignore the hidden dynamics behind the data, lacking interpretability. This study investigated the applicability of neural controlled differential equation (NCDE), a novel ML method that is suitable for data-driven modeling of PK and PD profiles, especially in the setting of multiple dosing. We demonstrated that NCDE was capable of combining differential-equation-based dynamics with data-driven characteristics, flexibly incorporating various types of inputs, and embedding discontinuous dynamics. Moreover, a direct correspondence was identified between the learned dynamics of NCDE and the dynamics behind the data, which highlights the intrinsic interpretability of NCDE. Additionally, the influence of important hyperparameters was systematically investigated, and it was found that L1 regularization and the AdaMax optimizer were useful for stabilizing the training process and leading to a generalizable NCDE model. Together, these findings demonstrate the accuracy, generalizability, and interpretability of NCDE, indicating that NCDE is a reliable method for further application. In the future, NCDE may further facilitate PK and PD prediction in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70146","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145530462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Generating Control Groups for Organ Impairment Studies: A Case-Study Comparing Statistical and Population Pharmacokinetic-Based Matching Approaches 产生器官损害研究的控制组:一个案例研究比较统计和基于人群药代动力学的匹配方法。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70144
Jessica Barry, Sumit Bhatnagar, Wei Liu, Mohamed-Eslam F. Mohamed

A common challenge in conducting phase 1 studies that assess the impact of organ impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a drug is the recruitment of a demographically matched control group. The work presented here evaluated alternative approaches for generating control groups in these studies. Available phase 1 data from the upadacitinib and elagolix clinical programs were leveraged as case studies. A statistical matching approach and a population pharmacokinetic model-based approach were evaluated retrospectively for these programs' hepatic and renal impairment clinical studies. Geometric mean ratios of logarithmically transformed Cmax and AUCinf were used to compare exposure in organ impairment groups to respective matched or virtual control groups. In the statistical matching approach, the genetic matching algorithm using Mahalanobis distance showed that external control groups were adequately demographically balanced across all impairment groups of the study except for age. A 3:1 k-match approach minimized the prediction error between matched and reference in-study results for both case studies, resulting in differences in geometric mean ratios ranging from −19% to 3% and −27% to 40% for upadacitinib and elagolix, respectively, compared to in-study controls. Similarly, the population pharmacokinetic approach used models developed from phase 1 data in healthy participants and found that the results were generally comparable to the in-study results, with differences in geometric mean ratios ranging from −30% to 17% and −24% to 41% for upadacitinib and elagolix, respectively. These analyses demonstrate that both approaches may be viable alternatives to assess the impact of organ impairment on pharmacokinetics.

在进行评估器官损害对药物药代动力学影响的一期研究时,一个共同的挑战是招募一个人口统计学匹配的对照组。本文介绍的工作评估了在这些研究中产生对照组的替代方法。upadacitinib和elagolix临床项目中可用的1期数据被用作案例研究。回顾性评估了统计匹配方法和基于群体药代动力学模型的方法,用于这些项目的肝肾损害临床研究。使用对数变换Cmax和AUCinf的几何平均比率来比较器官损伤组与相应匹配或虚拟对照组的暴露。在统计匹配方法中,使用马氏距离的遗传匹配算法显示,除了年龄外,外部对照组在研究的所有损伤组中都具有充分的人口统计学平衡。3:1的k-match方法最小化了两个案例研究中匹配结果和参考研究结果之间的预测误差,与研究对照相比,upadacitinib和elagolix的几何平均比率分别为-19%至3%和-27%至40%。同样,群体药代动力学方法使用了从健康参与者的1期数据中开发的模型,发现结果总体上与研究结果相当,upadacitinib和elagolix的几何平均比率差异分别为-30%至17%和-24%至41%。这些分析表明,这两种方法可能是评估器官损伤对药代动力学影响的可行选择。
{"title":"Generating Control Groups for Organ Impairment Studies: A Case-Study Comparing Statistical and Population Pharmacokinetic-Based Matching Approaches","authors":"Jessica Barry,&nbsp;Sumit Bhatnagar,&nbsp;Wei Liu,&nbsp;Mohamed-Eslam F. Mohamed","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70144","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70144","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A common challenge in conducting phase 1 studies that assess the impact of organ impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a drug is the recruitment of a demographically matched control group. The work presented here evaluated alternative approaches for generating control groups in these studies. Available phase 1 data from the upadacitinib and elagolix clinical programs were leveraged as case studies. A statistical matching approach and a population pharmacokinetic model-based approach were evaluated retrospectively for these programs' hepatic and renal impairment clinical studies. Geometric mean ratios of logarithmically transformed C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> were used to compare exposure in organ impairment groups to respective matched or virtual control groups. In the statistical matching approach, the genetic matching algorithm using Mahalanobis distance showed that external control groups were adequately demographically balanced across all impairment groups of the study except for age. A 3:1 k-match approach minimized the prediction error between matched and reference in-study results for both case studies, resulting in differences in geometric mean ratios ranging from −19% to 3% and −27% to 40% for upadacitinib and elagolix, respectively, compared to in-study controls. Similarly, the population pharmacokinetic approach used models developed from phase 1 data in healthy participants and found that the results were generally comparable to the in-study results, with differences in geometric mean ratios ranging from −30% to 17% and −24% to 41% for upadacitinib and elagolix, respectively. These analyses demonstrate that both approaches may be viable alternatives to assess the impact of organ impairment on pharmacokinetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70144","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145511731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictive AI in Clinical Pharmacology: A Call to Action to Develop Robust Benchmarking Practices 临床药理学中的预测人工智能:呼吁采取行动发展稳健的基准实践。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70155
Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla, Dominic Bräm, Ali Farnoud, Holger Fröhlich, Alexander Janssen, Niklas Korsbo, Klaus Lindauer, Elba Raimúndez, Anuraag Saini, Sven Stodtmann, Diego Valderrama, Kristoffer Winther Balling, Jane Knöchel, Sven Mensing
<p>AI-driven predictive analytics is transforming clinical pharmacology by enhancing precision and integrating high-dimensional data. Insights from a recent AI in Clinical Pharmacology meeting organized in April 2025 have underscored a critical challenge among others: the lack of robust, standardized benchmarking datasets and evaluation tasks that reflect real-world clinical data complexities. This perspective addresses this challenge and proposes a roadmap for developing robust datasets and metrics to advance the use of AI in pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology.</p><p>AI offers transformative potential for clinical pharmacology, particularly through its applications in predictive modeling [<span>1</span>]. These applications promise to enhance the accuracy of drug response predictions, optimize clinical trial design, and support individualized treatment decisions [<span>2</span>]. Although AI stands to significantly improve many aspects of clinical pharmacology, such as predictive modeling, research efficiency, and operational efficiency, this perspective primarily focuses on predictive modeling applications and the challenges related to standardization.</p><p>A key advantage of AI, specifically machine learning (ML), in Clinical Pharmacology is its ability to train predictive models on high-dimensional data such as medical imaging and multi-omics data collected from patients during clinical trials [<span>2, 3</span>]. This capability, often missing in traditional statistical and mechanistic approaches, can enhance the accuracy of treatment response predictions. Furthermore, AI/ML allows the use of high-dimensional and complex real-world data such as wearable device information, enhancing our understanding of a drug's effectiveness in specific disease conditions [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Realizing these benefits necessitates addressing critical challenges—particularly the lack of widely accepted standards and reference datasets for evaluating newly proposed algorithms [<span>4</span>]. In this regard, restricted access to realistic clinical data poses a significant barrier. These challenges undermine confidence in newly proposed model architectures and, especially, their broader application. In addition, while regulatory bodies have acknowledged the potential for AI applications, adequate validation methods remain a key requirement for acceptance. Hence, appropriate evaluation and benchmarking of AI algorithms are essential for determining which AI approaches can reliably contribute to clinical decision making.</p><p>This perspective outlines the current challenges and advocates for a database of comprehensive and realistic benchmarking datasets. It describes the various advantages of having such a database and its impact on diverse stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to fully harness AI's potential in the field.</p><p>As clinical pharmacology practitioners implementing AI methodologies, we consistently
人工智能驱动的预测分析通过提高准确性和整合高维数据正在改变临床药理学。最近于2025年4月组织的临床药理学人工智能会议的见解强调了一个关键挑战:缺乏反映现实世界临床数据复杂性的强大、标准化基准数据集和评估任务。这一观点解决了这一挑战,并提出了开发稳健数据集和指标的路线图,以推进人工智能在药物计量学和系统药理学中的应用。人工智能为临床药理学提供了变革的潜力,特别是通过其在预测建模中的应用。这些应用有望提高药物反应预测的准确性,优化临床试验设计,并支持个性化治疗决策[10]。尽管人工智能将显著改善临床药理学的许多方面,如预测建模、研究效率和操作效率,但本观点主要关注预测建模应用和与标准化相关的挑战。人工智能,特别是机器学习(ML)在临床药理学中的一个关键优势是它能够根据临床试验期间从患者收集的医学成像和多组学数据等高维数据训练预测模型[2,3]。这种在传统的统计和机械方法中经常缺失的能力可以提高治疗反应预测的准确性。此外,AI/ML允许使用高维和复杂的现实世界数据,如可穿戴设备信息,增强我们对药物在特定疾病条件下有效性的理解。实现这些好处需要解决关键的挑战,特别是缺乏广泛接受的标准和参考数据集来评估新提出的算法[4]。在这方面,限制获得实际临床数据构成了重大障碍。这些挑战破坏了人们对新提出的模型体系结构的信心,尤其是对其更广泛应用的信心。此外,虽然监管机构已经认识到人工智能应用的潜力,但充分的验证方法仍然是接受的关键要求。因此,对人工智能算法进行适当的评估和基准测试对于确定哪些人工智能方法可以可靠地为临床决策做出贡献至关重要。这一观点概述了当前的挑战,并主张建立一个全面和现实的基准数据集数据库。它描述了拥有这样一个数据库的各种优势及其对不同利益相关者的影响,强调了跨学科合作的重要性,以充分利用人工智能在该领域的潜力。作为实施人工智能方法的临床药理学从业者,我们在评估特定应用的方法时始终遇到四个基本挑战。首先,方法学论文经常使用不同的性能指标来适应不同的建模目标,比如插值、外推或综合主题模拟,这使得很难进行有意义的比较。其次,我们必须评估用于验证每个新模型体系结构的方法是否提供了模型性能的正确和可靠的表示。至关重要的是,合成或简化数据与现实世界临床数据集的性能之间仍然存在显著差距,后者的复杂性和可变性往往超过前者。这种差距削弱了人们对新的人工智能方法的信任,特别是考虑到“自我基准测试”的做法,即在专有的、通常是综合生成的数据集上评估模型。这些数据集往往掩盖了常见的临床数据挑战,如缺失、不规则采样/剂量和异常值,这可能导致对模型性能的过度乐观评估。因此,在外部开发人员通常无法获得的实际数据上进行测试时,模型性能经常会出现不足。图1突出显示了合成数据和真实数据之间的主要区别。我们按照美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)关于数字健康和人工智能(https://www.fda.gov/science-research/artificial-intelligence-and-medical-products/fda-digital-health-and-artificial-intelligence-glossary-educational-resource)的术语表对合成数据进行定义,并在Pasculli等人最近的文献综述中概念化。第三个基本挑战是本文中描述的模型与实际实现的模型之间的差异,这导致了另一个关键挑战。模型代码的不可用或基于共享模型代码的结果的可重复性问题加剧了这种情况,如Chung等人对血液凝固网络[6]的例子所示。 这些问题使得难以进行有意义的比较,并妨碍在该领域以前工作的基础上进一步发展。最后一个基本挑战是,跨建模范例的评估协议存在分歧。在数据驱动的ML工作流中,标准的方法是使用嵌套的交叉验证,然后是保留测试集,使用性能指标(例如RMSE, AUROC)来评估模型预测未见(即样本外)数据的效果。相比之下,传统的非线性混合效应(NLME)和ml增强NLME模型通常依赖于样本内图形和基于模拟的诊断(例如,拟合优度图、VPC/pcVPC、NPDE),所有这些都是在用于模型估计的同一数据集上计算的。在这种情况下,样本内是指在用于构建模型的相同数据上执行的诊断,而样本外是指在模型训练期间未使用的未见过的新数据上评估模型性能。为了确保方法上可比较的模型性能评估,我们提倡对所有框架进行样本外评估,并对未见过的数据计算的度量进行独家报告。在不可见的数据中进行框架评估,特别是对于数据驱动的框架,是必要的,因为它可以暴露与过拟合相关的问题,并且可以提供模型是否泛化超出其训练数据集的指示。在这种情况下,框架在非分布数据中的性能也应该是模型评估的一个重要方面。只有在相同的评估方法下,才能对ML、NLME和ML增强NLME方法进行严格和公平的比较。在临床药理学中,评估不同方法的适用性的困难是非常重要的。这个问题被临床项目中典型的快节奏环境所加剧,分析员的主要责任通常是提供及时的答案。严格的最后期限会激励分析师选择保守的、成熟的方法。新技术性能中任何额外的不确定性都会使决策远离潜在的更优越、但不太熟悉的解决方案,而转向更简单、更可预测的方法。这种对久经考验的方法的偏好无意中限制了创新,并减缓了先进方法的采用。虽然我们承认并支持在患者安全至上的学科中一定的保守主义,但我们的目标是减少不必要的不确定性。这样做将使分析人员能够自信地探索更先进的方法,并探索优势和劣势。这可能最终提高具体项目的结果,并加速更广泛的临床药理学领域的进展。最近,Sale和Liang提出了一项药物计量学领域机器学习的年度基准测试。在分享相似目标的同时,我们的提案通过扩大PK/PD模型选择和定期评估的范围来扩展他们的框架。我们的愿景是建立一个任务和数据集的存储库,这些任务和数据集也可以在开发新方法(如ImageNet[8])期间使用。这些方法可以相互补充,为评估人工智能在临床药理学中的应用创建一个全面的生态系统。将人工智能整合到临床药理学中,需要明确定义的方法来评估新提出的模型,并将其与现有的最先进技术进行比较。有效的验证方法包括定义针对临床应用的具体和有意义的评估标准。为了以标准化的方式测试算法,我们认为需要建立一个现实的公共基准测试数据集的存储库,这些数据集应该仔细关注现实世界的场景。由于数据隐私的原因,合并模拟不同临床相关场景的合成数据将是非常有价值的。同样重要的是详细和准确地描述所使用的方法。所提出的方法应充分详尽地加以描述,以便其他人能够复制这些方法并获得可比较的结果。模型代码和评估管道的公开发布可以进一步支持这项工作。建立这样的方法可以使人工智能模型和后续评估更加一致和可靠,为临床采用提供基础。我们提出了一个公开可用的基准数据集存储库。在临床药理学中使用人工智能的基准数据集将专注于但不限于帮助药物计量学中的典型任务,如人群PK和PKPD分析。这个存储库将包括真实数据集和合成数据集。对于合成数据集,我们呼吁仔细创建和管理,使合成数据集更紧密地反映现实的临床数据,包括缺失,不一致和其他特征。 其余作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Predictive AI in Clinical Pharmacology: A Call to Action to Develop Robust Benchmarking Practices","authors":"Ana Victoria Ponce-Bobadilla,&nbsp;Dominic Bräm,&nbsp;Ali Farnoud,&nbsp;Holger Fröhlich,&nbsp;Alexander Janssen,&nbsp;Niklas Korsbo,&nbsp;Klaus Lindauer,&nbsp;Elba Raimúndez,&nbsp;Anuraag Saini,&nbsp;Sven Stodtmann,&nbsp;Diego Valderrama,&nbsp;Kristoffer Winther Balling,&nbsp;Jane Knöchel,&nbsp;Sven Mensing","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70155","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70155","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;AI-driven predictive analytics is transforming clinical pharmacology by enhancing precision and integrating high-dimensional data. Insights from a recent AI in Clinical Pharmacology meeting organized in April 2025 have underscored a critical challenge among others: the lack of robust, standardized benchmarking datasets and evaluation tasks that reflect real-world clinical data complexities. This perspective addresses this challenge and proposes a roadmap for developing robust datasets and metrics to advance the use of AI in pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AI offers transformative potential for clinical pharmacology, particularly through its applications in predictive modeling [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. These applications promise to enhance the accuracy of drug response predictions, optimize clinical trial design, and support individualized treatment decisions [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Although AI stands to significantly improve many aspects of clinical pharmacology, such as predictive modeling, research efficiency, and operational efficiency, this perspective primarily focuses on predictive modeling applications and the challenges related to standardization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A key advantage of AI, specifically machine learning (ML), in Clinical Pharmacology is its ability to train predictive models on high-dimensional data such as medical imaging and multi-omics data collected from patients during clinical trials [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. This capability, often missing in traditional statistical and mechanistic approaches, can enhance the accuracy of treatment response predictions. Furthermore, AI/ML allows the use of high-dimensional and complex real-world data such as wearable device information, enhancing our understanding of a drug's effectiveness in specific disease conditions [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Realizing these benefits necessitates addressing critical challenges—particularly the lack of widely accepted standards and reference datasets for evaluating newly proposed algorithms [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. In this regard, restricted access to realistic clinical data poses a significant barrier. These challenges undermine confidence in newly proposed model architectures and, especially, their broader application. In addition, while regulatory bodies have acknowledged the potential for AI applications, adequate validation methods remain a key requirement for acceptance. Hence, appropriate evaluation and benchmarking of AI algorithms are essential for determining which AI approaches can reliably contribute to clinical decision making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This perspective outlines the current challenges and advocates for a database of comprehensive and realistic benchmarking datasets. It describes the various advantages of having such a database and its impact on diverse stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to fully harness AI's potential in the field.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As clinical pharmacology practitioners implementing AI methodologies, we consistently","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70155","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145502606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Obesity and MASH on Zonal Hepatocellular Statin Exposure: Pharmacodynamic Insights From a Permeability-Limited Multicompartment Liver Model 肥胖和MASH对区域性肝细胞他汀暴露的影响:来自渗透性有限的多室肝模型的药效学见解。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.70138
William A. Murphy, Noora Sjöstedt, Mailys De Sousa Mendes, Mattie Hartauer, Kim L. R. Brouwer, Sibylle Neuhoff

Statins are frequently prescribed for hyperlipidemia, a common comorbidity in patients with obesity and/or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). However, limited knowledge exists on how MASH may alter statin disposition within hepatocytes where the statin target, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, is located. This study used a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)/permeability-limited multicompartment liver (PerMCL) framework, incorporating zonal transporter and drug-metabolizing enzyme data. Systemic and hepatocellular concentrations of pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and atorvastatin were simulated in Healthy Volunteers (HV), Obese, Morbidly Obese, and MASH virtual populations with the Simcyp Simulator. A pharmacodynamic model in Simcyp Designer was then used to simulate alterations in rosuvastatin cholesterol-lowering efficacy between these populations. Hepatic transport and metabolism pathways were verified against clinical data. Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B model uptake pathways were verified using genotype and drug–drug interaction data. Atorvastatin metabolism pathways were verified using metabolite data. Steady-state plasma and zonal hepatocellular concentration–time profiles for each statin were simulated across virtual populations of 100 individuals aged 40–65 years. Simulations predicted > 70% increases in maximal total plasma concentrations and area under the curve for pravastatin and rosuvastatin in MASH compared to HV, with changes in these parameters for atorvastatin simulated to increase > 250%. In MASH, unbound hepatocellular exposure increased by up to 127% in the periportal region for atorvastatin and decreased by up to 55% in the pericentral region for rosuvastatin. The pharmacodynamic model simulated decreased rosuvastatin cholesterol-lowering efficacy in MASH compared with Obese, which could be compensated for with a 50% increase in dose according to exploratory simulations.

他汀类药物常用于治疗高脂血症,这是肥胖和/或代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH)患者的常见合并症。然而,关于MASH如何改变他汀类药物在肝细胞中的配置的知识有限,肝细胞是他汀类药物的靶点,3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A (HMG-CoA)还原酶的所在地。本研究采用了基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)/渗透性限制的多室肝(PerMCL)框架,结合了区域转运蛋白和药物代谢酶的数据。使用Simcyp模拟器模拟健康志愿者(HV)、肥胖、病态肥胖和MASH虚拟人群中普伐他汀、瑞舒伐他汀和阿托伐他汀的全身和肝细胞浓度。然后使用Simcyp Designer中的药效学模型模拟这些人群之间瑞舒伐他汀降胆固醇功效的变化。肝脏运输和代谢途径与临床数据进行了验证。利用基因型和药物-药物相互作用数据验证有机阴离子转运多肽(OATP)1B模型摄取途径。利用代谢物数据验证了阿托伐他汀的代谢途径。在100个年龄在40-65岁的虚拟人群中模拟了每种他汀类药物的稳态血浆和分区肝细胞浓度-时间谱。模拟预测,与HV相比,普伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀在MASH中的最大总血浆浓度和曲线下面积增加了bbb70 %,模拟阿托伐他汀的这些参数变化增加了bbb50 %。在MASH中,阿托伐他汀在门静脉周围区域的未结合肝细胞暴露增加了127%,瑞舒伐他汀在中心周围区域的未结合肝细胞暴露减少了55%。药效学模型模拟了与肥胖患者相比,肥胖患者的瑞舒伐他汀降胆固醇效果下降,根据探索性模拟,这可以通过剂量增加50%来补偿。
{"title":"Impact of Obesity and MASH on Zonal Hepatocellular Statin Exposure: Pharmacodynamic Insights From a Permeability-Limited Multicompartment Liver Model","authors":"William A. Murphy,&nbsp;Noora Sjöstedt,&nbsp;Mailys De Sousa Mendes,&nbsp;Mattie Hartauer,&nbsp;Kim L. R. Brouwer,&nbsp;Sibylle Neuhoff","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70138","DOIUrl":"10.1002/psp4.70138","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Statins are frequently prescribed for hyperlipidemia, a common comorbidity in patients with obesity and/or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). However, limited knowledge exists on how MASH may alter statin disposition within hepatocytes where the statin target, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, is located. This study used a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)/permeability-limited multicompartment liver (PerMCL) framework, incorporating zonal transporter and drug-metabolizing enzyme data. Systemic and hepatocellular concentrations of pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and atorvastatin were simulated in Healthy Volunteers (HV), Obese, Morbidly Obese, and MASH virtual populations with the Simcyp Simulator. A pharmacodynamic model in Simcyp Designer was then used to simulate alterations in rosuvastatin cholesterol-lowering efficacy between these populations. Hepatic transport and metabolism pathways were verified against clinical data. Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B model uptake pathways were verified using genotype and drug–drug interaction data. Atorvastatin metabolism pathways were verified using metabolite data. Steady-state plasma and zonal hepatocellular concentration–time profiles for each statin were simulated across virtual populations of 100 individuals aged 40–65 years. Simulations predicted &gt; 70% increases in maximal total plasma concentrations and area under the curve for pravastatin and rosuvastatin in MASH compared to HV, with changes in these parameters for atorvastatin simulated to increase &gt; 250%. In MASH, unbound hepatocellular exposure increased by up to 127% in the periportal region for atorvastatin and decreased by up to 55% in the pericentral region for rosuvastatin. The pharmacodynamic model simulated decreased rosuvastatin cholesterol-lowering efficacy in MASH compared with Obese, which could be compensated for with a 50% increase in dose according to exploratory simulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.70138","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145502595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1