Pub Date : 2024-10-11DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01601-x
Marco Airoldi, Michela Bartolini, Roberta Fazio, Sara Farinatti, Valentina Daprà, Armando Santoro, Alberto Puccini
Purpose of review: This narrative review explores the efficacy and applicability of anti-EGFR therapy as the first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It critically examines current guidelines, along with recent evidence in the literature, to assess whether it should be universally applied.
Recent findings: Recent evidences highlight the variability of the response to anti-EGFR therapies due to molecular diversity and several clinical factors, such as RAS mutational status and primary tumor location. Anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for most patients with MSS, RAS-WT, left-sided mCRC. Whether this combination is the best treatment for these patients remains an open question. This review delves into the role of EGFR inhibition in mCRC, focusing on clinical factors and the knowledge of biology, molecular targets, and biomarkers. It underscores the crucial role of a personalized approach, empowering healthcare providers and equipping them with the confidence to make informed decisions.
{"title":"First-Line Therapy in Metastatic, RAS Wild-Type, Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer: Should Everyone Receive Anti-EGFR Therapy?","authors":"Marco Airoldi, Michela Bartolini, Roberta Fazio, Sara Farinatti, Valentina Daprà, Armando Santoro, Alberto Puccini","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01601-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01601-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review explores the efficacy and applicability of anti-EGFR therapy as the first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It critically examines current guidelines, along with recent evidence in the literature, to assess whether it should be universally applied.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent evidences highlight the variability of the response to anti-EGFR therapies due to molecular diversity and several clinical factors, such as RAS mutational status and primary tumor location. Anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for most patients with MSS, RAS-WT, left-sided mCRC. Whether this combination is the best treatment for these patients remains an open question. This review delves into the role of EGFR inhibition in mCRC, focusing on clinical factors and the knowledge of biology, molecular targets, and biomarkers. It underscores the crucial role of a personalized approach, empowering healthcare providers and equipping them with the confidence to make informed decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01605-7
Jian-Guo Chen, Yong-Hui Zhang, Jian-Hua Lu, Thomas W Kensler
Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize the old issues and current understandings of the etiology of liver cancer, focusing on the diverse causative factors influenced by geographical, socioeconomic, and lifestyle variations across different regions.
Recent findings: We highlight significant geographic disparities in liver cancer risk factors. While hepatitis B and C viruses, aflatoxin exposure, and alcohol consumption remain globally established contributors; metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic syndromes are increasingly prominent in the West. Chronic HBV and aflatoxin continue to dominate as risk factors in Asia and Africa. Dietary factors, metabolic diseases like diabetes and obesity, genetic predispositions, environmental risk factors and lifestyle choices such as smoking and alcohol use play substantial roles in specific populations. Protective factors like coffee and tea consumption, along with aspirin use, vegetables and fruits have shown potential in reducing HCC risk, although findings vary by population and dietary habits. Liver cancer etiology is influenced by various factors that differ by region. Established risk factors include hepatitis B and C, aflatoxin, and alcohol. Emerging risks, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, are more prevalent in Western countries, while aflatoxin and HBV remains significant in Asia and Africa. Diet, metabolic conditions like diabetes and obesity, genetic predispositions, and lifestyle choices also play crucial roles. Coffee, tea, aspirin, vegetables, and fruits may reduce HCC risk, but effectiveness varies. Future research should integrate epidemiology, genetics, and nutrition, with global cooperation and data sharing essential for effective cancer control strategies.
{"title":"Liver Cancer Etiology: Old Issues and New Perspectives.","authors":"Jian-Guo Chen, Yong-Hui Zhang, Jian-Hua Lu, Thomas W Kensler","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01605-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01605-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesize the old issues and current understandings of the etiology of liver cancer, focusing on the diverse causative factors influenced by geographical, socioeconomic, and lifestyle variations across different regions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We highlight significant geographic disparities in liver cancer risk factors. While hepatitis B and C viruses, aflatoxin exposure, and alcohol consumption remain globally established contributors; metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic syndromes are increasingly prominent in the West. Chronic HBV and aflatoxin continue to dominate as risk factors in Asia and Africa. Dietary factors, metabolic diseases like diabetes and obesity, genetic predispositions, environmental risk factors and lifestyle choices such as smoking and alcohol use play substantial roles in specific populations. Protective factors like coffee and tea consumption, along with aspirin use, vegetables and fruits have shown potential in reducing HCC risk, although findings vary by population and dietary habits. Liver cancer etiology is influenced by various factors that differ by region. Established risk factors include hepatitis B and C, aflatoxin, and alcohol. Emerging risks, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, are more prevalent in Western countries, while aflatoxin and HBV remains significant in Asia and Africa. Diet, metabolic conditions like diabetes and obesity, genetic predispositions, and lifestyle choices also play crucial roles. Coffee, tea, aspirin, vegetables, and fruits may reduce HCC risk, but effectiveness varies. Future research should integrate epidemiology, genetics, and nutrition, with global cooperation and data sharing essential for effective cancer control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01595-6
Yen-Nien Hou, Susan Chimonas, Prusha Patel, Elizabeth D Kantor, Tiffany A Traina, Hung-Rong Yen, Jun J Mao
Purpose of review: This review aims to describe the association of integrating traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) herbs into conventional medicine (CM) in preventing breast cancer and improving survival rates among breast cancer patients of Taiwan.
Recent findings: Of 7 relevant studies, spanning 2014-2023, 4 investigated breast cancer risk in women with menopausal symptoms and other comorbidities. All 4 reported that TCM herbal use was associated with lower risks of developing breast cancer. Three studies investigated survival in newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients receiving CM. All reported that adjunctive TCM users had lower mortality rates than CM-only patients. However, the heterogeneity of study designs, populations, and interventions may limit the generalizability and robustness of the findings. TCM herbs may promote breast cancer prevention and survival when used alongside CM. More rigorous observational research and clinical trials in specific patient populations are needed to guide clinical decision-making.
{"title":"Traditional Chinese Medicine Herbs for Breast Cancer Prevention and Survival: A Narrative Review of Epidemiological Studies from Taiwan.","authors":"Yen-Nien Hou, Susan Chimonas, Prusha Patel, Elizabeth D Kantor, Tiffany A Traina, Hung-Rong Yen, Jun J Mao","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01595-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01595-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to describe the association of integrating traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) herbs into conventional medicine (CM) in preventing breast cancer and improving survival rates among breast cancer patients of Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Of 7 relevant studies, spanning 2014-2023, 4 investigated breast cancer risk in women with menopausal symptoms and other comorbidities. All 4 reported that TCM herbal use was associated with lower risks of developing breast cancer. Three studies investigated survival in newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients receiving CM. All reported that adjunctive TCM users had lower mortality rates than CM-only patients. However, the heterogeneity of study designs, populations, and interventions may limit the generalizability and robustness of the findings. TCM herbs may promote breast cancer prevention and survival when used alongside CM. More rigorous observational research and clinical trials in specific patient populations are needed to guide clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01602-w
Iyad Alnahhas
Purpose of review: A number of molecular characteristics are essential for accurate diagnosis and prognostication in glioma.
Recent findings: The 2021 WHO classification of brain tumors and recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pathology agnostic drug approvals highlight the importance of molecular testing in the management of glioma. For diffuse gliomas, it is important to identify IDH mutations, given the favorable clinical behavior and potential for using FDA approved IDH inhibitors in the near future. MGMT promoter methylation testing is the most established molecular marker for response to temozolomide in IDH wild-type glioblastoma and in turn impacts overall survival. Moreover, identification of certain mutations and molecular markers, such as BRAF V600E, hypermutation or elevated tumor-mutational burden and NTRK fusions allow for the use of FDA approved agents that are tumor-agnostic. Finally, molecular testing opens options for clinical trials that are essential for diseases with limited treatment options like gliomas.
综述的目的:一些分子特征对于胶质瘤的准确诊断和预后至关重要:2021年世界卫生组织对脑肿瘤的分类以及最近美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对病理不可知药物的批准,凸显了分子检测在胶质瘤治疗中的重要性。对于弥漫性胶质瘤,鉴于其良好的临床表现以及在不久的将来使用美国食品与药物管理局(FDA)批准的IDH抑制剂的可能性,鉴别IDH突变非常重要。MGMT 启动子甲基化检测是 IDH 野生型胶质母细胞瘤对替莫唑胺反应的最可靠分子标志物,进而影响总生存率。此外,对某些突变和分子标记的鉴定,如 BRAF V600E、高突变或肿瘤突变负荷升高以及 NTRK 融合,可以使用 FDA 批准的具有肿瘤诊断功能的药物。最后,分子检测为临床试验提供了选择,这对治疗方案有限的疾病(如胶质瘤)至关重要。
{"title":"Molecular Testing in Gliomas: What is Necessary in Routine Clinical Practice?","authors":"Iyad Alnahhas","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01602-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01602-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>A number of molecular characteristics are essential for accurate diagnosis and prognostication in glioma.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The 2021 WHO classification of brain tumors and recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pathology agnostic drug approvals highlight the importance of molecular testing in the management of glioma. For diffuse gliomas, it is important to identify IDH mutations, given the favorable clinical behavior and potential for using FDA approved IDH inhibitors in the near future. MGMT promoter methylation testing is the most established molecular marker for response to temozolomide in IDH wild-type glioblastoma and in turn impacts overall survival. Moreover, identification of certain mutations and molecular markers, such as BRAF V600E, hypermutation or elevated tumor-mutational burden and NTRK fusions allow for the use of FDA approved agents that are tumor-agnostic. Finally, molecular testing opens options for clinical trials that are essential for diseases with limited treatment options like gliomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01603-9
Naomi N Adjei, Mikayla Borthwick Bowen, Roni Nitecki Wilke, Melinda S Yates, Shannon N Westin
Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize available literature on uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma while highlighting remaining unanswered questions.
Recent findings: The need for uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma is growing with the increasing number of cases in younger patients or those who cannot undergo surgery. We reviewed the oncological and reproductive outcomes associated with endocrine therapies used for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. The rising prevalence of delayed childbearing, obesity, and diabetes in reproductive-age individuals and of medical comorbidities associated with high surgical risk continues to amplify the demand for uterine-conserving therapies. Appropriate patient selection for such therapies is imperative to maximize likelihood of treatment response. The ideal candidates are patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer with no evidence of myometrial invasion or extrauterine disease. The most accepted conservative therapeutic approach is hormonal therapy with close surveillance, with or without eventual hysterectomy following childbearing or failure of treatment. Further prospective and randomized trials are needed to address optimal patient and treatment selection, as well as the use of molecular profiling for treatment individualization and prognostication.
{"title":"Uterine-Conserving Treatment Options for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer.","authors":"Naomi N Adjei, Mikayla Borthwick Bowen, Roni Nitecki Wilke, Melinda S Yates, Shannon N Westin","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01603-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01603-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesize available literature on uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma while highlighting remaining unanswered questions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The need for uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma is growing with the increasing number of cases in younger patients or those who cannot undergo surgery. We reviewed the oncological and reproductive outcomes associated with endocrine therapies used for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. The rising prevalence of delayed childbearing, obesity, and diabetes in reproductive-age individuals and of medical comorbidities associated with high surgical risk continues to amplify the demand for uterine-conserving therapies. Appropriate patient selection for such therapies is imperative to maximize likelihood of treatment response. The ideal candidates are patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer with no evidence of myometrial invasion or extrauterine disease. The most accepted conservative therapeutic approach is hormonal therapy with close surveillance, with or without eventual hysterectomy following childbearing or failure of treatment. Further prospective and randomized trials are needed to address optimal patient and treatment selection, as well as the use of molecular profiling for treatment individualization and prognostication.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) burdens the lives of those affected. MPN patients endure significant impacts on their physical, psychological, and social well-being. While pharmacological interventions offer some disease and symptom control, they often have unfavorable side effects. This review explores the potential of Integrative Oncology (IO) therapies in managing MPNs and their associated symptoms.
Recent findings: IO is dedicated to augmenting conventional treatments through integrating interventions targeting the mind, body, nutrition, supplements, and other supportive care therapies. Several small studies suggest the benefit of an IO approach in MPN patients. These benefits are postulated to be modulated through enhanced physical capacity, reduced disease-related inflammation, subconscious mind training, and gut microbiome modulation. By combining IO with evidence-based pharmacological treatments, the potential exists to enhance the quality of life and clinical outcomes for individuals with MPNs. Future research should prioritize well-powered studies, including diverse demographics and symptom profiles, with appropriate study duration, to draw definite conclusions regarding the observed effects.
{"title":"Optimizing Care: Integrative Oncology in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm.","authors":"Shagun Singh, Supriya Peshin, Ashley Larsen, Krisstina Gowin","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01568-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-024-01568-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) burdens the lives of those affected. MPN patients endure significant impacts on their physical, psychological, and social well-being. While pharmacological interventions offer some disease and symptom control, they often have unfavorable side effects. This review explores the potential of Integrative Oncology (IO) therapies in managing MPNs and their associated symptoms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>IO is dedicated to augmenting conventional treatments through integrating interventions targeting the mind, body, nutrition, supplements, and other supportive care therapies. Several small studies suggest the benefit of an IO approach in MPN patients. These benefits are postulated to be modulated through enhanced physical capacity, reduced disease-related inflammation, subconscious mind training, and gut microbiome modulation. By combining IO with evidence-based pharmacological treatments, the potential exists to enhance the quality of life and clinical outcomes for individuals with MPNs. Future research should prioritize well-powered studies, including diverse demographics and symptom profiles, with appropriate study duration, to draw definite conclusions regarding the observed effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480179/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141533916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: The aim of this review is two-fold: (1) To examine the mechanisms by which statins may protect from anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and (2) To provide a comprehensive overview of the existing clinical literature investigating the role of statins for the primary prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.
Recent findings: The underlying cardioprotective mechanisms associated with statins have not been fully elucidated. Key mechanisms related to the inhibition of Ras homologous (Rho) GTPases have been proposed. Data from observational studies has supported the beneficial role of statins for the primary prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Recently, several randomized controlled trials investigating the role of statins for the primary prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity have produced contrasting results. Statins have been associated with a lower risk of cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. Further investigation with larger randomized control trials and longer follow-up periods are needed to better evaluate the long-term role of statin therapy and identify the subgroups who benefit most from statin therapy.
{"title":"Statins for the Primary Prevention of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Varun Bhasin, Azin Vakilpour, Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01579-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-024-01579-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is two-fold: (1) To examine the mechanisms by which statins may protect from anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and (2) To provide a comprehensive overview of the existing clinical literature investigating the role of statins for the primary prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The underlying cardioprotective mechanisms associated with statins have not been fully elucidated. Key mechanisms related to the inhibition of Ras homologous (Rho) GTPases have been proposed. Data from observational studies has supported the beneficial role of statins for the primary prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Recently, several randomized controlled trials investigating the role of statins for the primary prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity have produced contrasting results. Statins have been associated with a lower risk of cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. Further investigation with larger randomized control trials and longer follow-up periods are needed to better evaluate the long-term role of statin therapy and identify the subgroups who benefit most from statin therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141603404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-11DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01577-8
Nichanan Osataphan, Husam Abdel-Qadir, Agnieszka Maria Zebrowska, Anna Borowiec
Purpose of review: The goal of this paper is to summarize the data pertaining to the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving anthracyclines for cancer treatment. We discuss the potential efficacy of this class of medications, incorporating insights from existing literature and ongoing studies.
Recent findings: SGLT2i are a class of medications which were initially developed for treatment of Type 2 diabetes and later extended to treat heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction regardless of diabetes status. There remains a need for effective and safe treatments to preventing cardiotoxicity in anthracycline-treated patients. It has been proposed that SGLT2i may provide protection against the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines. Some of the proposed mechanisms include beneficial metabolic, neurohormonal, and hemodynamic effects, renal protection, as well as a decrease in inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction and ion homeostasis. There is emerging evidence from basic science and observational studies that SGLT2i may play a role in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively determine the role of SGLT2 inhibitors as a cardioprotective therapy in patients receiving anthracyclines for the treatment of cancer.
{"title":"Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors During Cancer Therapy: Benefits, Risks, and Ongoing Clinical Trials.","authors":"Nichanan Osataphan, Husam Abdel-Qadir, Agnieszka Maria Zebrowska, Anna Borowiec","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01577-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-024-01577-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The goal of this paper is to summarize the data pertaining to the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving anthracyclines for cancer treatment. We discuss the potential efficacy of this class of medications, incorporating insights from existing literature and ongoing studies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>SGLT2i are a class of medications which were initially developed for treatment of Type 2 diabetes and later extended to treat heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction regardless of diabetes status. There remains a need for effective and safe treatments to preventing cardiotoxicity in anthracycline-treated patients. It has been proposed that SGLT2i may provide protection against the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines. Some of the proposed mechanisms include beneficial metabolic, neurohormonal, and hemodynamic effects, renal protection, as well as a decrease in inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction and ion homeostasis. There is emerging evidence from basic science and observational studies that SGLT2i may play a role in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively determine the role of SGLT2 inhibitors as a cardioprotective therapy in patients receiving anthracyclines for the treatment of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141579225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01582-x
Arya Bhushan, Preeti Misra
Purpose of review: This review aims to explore the intricate interplay between scientific advancements and economic considerations in the development, production, and commercialization of Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs). The focus is on understanding the challenges and opportunities at this unique intersection, highlighting how scientific innovation and economic dynamics mutually influence the trajectory of ADCs in the pharmaceutical landscape.
Recent findings: There has been a significant increase in interest and investment in the development of ADCs. Initially focused on hematological malignancies, ADCs are now being researched for use in treating solid tumors as well. Pharmaceutical companies are heavily investing to broaden the range of indications for which ADCs can be effective. According to a report from the end of 2023, the global ADCs market grew from USD 1.4 billion in 2016 to USD 11.3 billion in 2023, with projections estimating a value of USD 23.9 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 10.7%. ADCs represent a promising class of biopharmaceuticals in oncology, with expanding applications beyond hematological malignancies to solid tumors. The significant growth in the ADC market underscores the impact of scientific and economic factors on their development. This review provides valuable insights into how these factors drive innovation and commercialization, shaping the future of ADCs in cancer treatment.
{"title":"Economics of Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs): Innovation, Investment and Market Dynamics.","authors":"Arya Bhushan, Preeti Misra","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01582-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-024-01582-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to explore the intricate interplay between scientific advancements and economic considerations in the development, production, and commercialization of Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs). The focus is on understanding the challenges and opportunities at this unique intersection, highlighting how scientific innovation and economic dynamics mutually influence the trajectory of ADCs in the pharmaceutical landscape.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There has been a significant increase in interest and investment in the development of ADCs. Initially focused on hematological malignancies, ADCs are now being researched for use in treating solid tumors as well. Pharmaceutical companies are heavily investing to broaden the range of indications for which ADCs can be effective. According to a report from the end of 2023, the global ADCs market grew from USD 1.4 billion in 2016 to USD 11.3 billion in 2023, with projections estimating a value of USD 23.9 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 10.7%. ADCs represent a promising class of biopharmaceuticals in oncology, with expanding applications beyond hematological malignancies to solid tumors. The significant growth in the ADC market underscores the impact of scientific and economic factors on their development. This review provides valuable insights into how these factors drive innovation and commercialization, shaping the future of ADCs in cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141733657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01574-x
Asal Rouhafzay, Jamileh Yousefi
Purpose of review: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prominent contributor to cancer-related mortality in Canada. This review paper sheds light on the research conducted in Canada to scrutinize the influence of economicfactors. The review seeks to uncover notable disparities in Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rate across diverse Canadian populations, including Indigenous communities, rural dwellers, and individuals with lower socioeconomic status (SES).
Recent findings: Recent investigations reveal significant disparities in CRC incidence, mortality, and treatment outcomes among various demographic groups in Canada. Indigenous peoples, rural populations, and those with lower SES are particularly vulnerable to these disparities. Access to screening and specialized cancer care is notably limited for these marginalized populations, exacerbating existing health inequities. Furthermore, emerging evidence underscores the potential influence of dietary factors on CRC risk, highlighting the importance of tailored prevention and treatment strategies. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions aimed at enhancing access to CRC screening and specialized cancer care for disadvantaged populations in Canada. By addressing these disparities, more individuals can undergo timely screening and receive early-stage diagnoses, thereby improving prognosis and ultimately saving lives. However, to effectively bridge these gaps, further research is imperative to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities and to identify and implement effective interventions.
{"title":"Geographical Disparities in Colorectal Cancer in Canada: A Review.","authors":"Asal Rouhafzay, Jamileh Yousefi","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01574-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-024-01574-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prominent contributor to cancer-related mortality in Canada. This review paper sheds light on the research conducted in Canada to scrutinize the influence of economicfactors. The review seeks to uncover notable disparities in Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rate across diverse Canadian populations, including Indigenous communities, rural dwellers, and individuals with lower socioeconomic status (SES).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent investigations reveal significant disparities in CRC incidence, mortality, and treatment outcomes among various demographic groups in Canada. Indigenous peoples, rural populations, and those with lower SES are particularly vulnerable to these disparities. Access to screening and specialized cancer care is notably limited for these marginalized populations, exacerbating existing health inequities. Furthermore, emerging evidence underscores the potential influence of dietary factors on CRC risk, highlighting the importance of tailored prevention and treatment strategies. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions aimed at enhancing access to CRC screening and specialized cancer care for disadvantaged populations in Canada. By addressing these disparities, more individuals can undergo timely screening and receive early-stage diagnoses, thereby improving prognosis and ultimately saving lives. However, to effectively bridge these gaps, further research is imperative to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities and to identify and implement effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}