Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01716-9
Jingze Zhang, Xiao Zhong, Shijiang Wang, Linlin Wang
Purpose of review: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) remains the standard of care for limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC), while long-term survival remains suboptimal. This review aims to summarize recent advances in combining immunotherapy with cCRT in LS-SCLC and highlight future directions in this evolving treatment landscape.
Recent findings: The ADRIATIC trial demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with durvalumab consolidation post-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). Other studies explore various immunotherapeutic agents and combination strategies, underscoring the potential of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and other novel targets such as BTLA and TIGIT in the treatment of LS-SCLC. However, challenges remain in determining the appropriate timing of immunotherapy and the optimal radiotherapy fraction schedule, as well as the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the context of immunotherapy. Integrating immunotherapy into LS-SCLC treatment represents a promising strategy with the potential to improve outcomes beyond what is achievable with cCRT alone. Ongoing trials are expected to provide further insights, potentially reshaping LS-SCLC treatment strategies.
{"title":"Advances in Immunotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy Combination for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Frontiers.","authors":"Jingze Zhang, Xiao Zhong, Shijiang Wang, Linlin Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01716-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01716-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) remains the standard of care for limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC), while long-term survival remains suboptimal. This review aims to summarize recent advances in combining immunotherapy with cCRT in LS-SCLC and highlight future directions in this evolving treatment landscape.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The ADRIATIC trial demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with durvalumab consolidation post-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). Other studies explore various immunotherapeutic agents and combination strategies, underscoring the potential of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and other novel targets such as BTLA and TIGIT in the treatment of LS-SCLC. However, challenges remain in determining the appropriate timing of immunotherapy and the optimal radiotherapy fraction schedule, as well as the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the context of immunotherapy. Integrating immunotherapy into LS-SCLC treatment represents a promising strategy with the potential to improve outcomes beyond what is achievable with cCRT alone. Ongoing trials are expected to provide further insights, potentially reshaping LS-SCLC treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1416-1426"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145809995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01731-w
Chuan Zhao, Bo Zhang, Wenhao An, Yi Lin, Junping Zhang, Chingching Lau, Quan Cheng, Zhixiong Lin
Purpose of review: Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is a histologically benign but clinically aggressive tumor arising from Rathke's pouch remnants, which is molecularly distinct from the other subtype, papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP). Despite advancements in surgery and radiotherapy, treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory due to the tumor's invasiveness and resistance to conventional therapies. This review systematically examines the molecular pathogenesis of ACP and evaluates current and emerging therapeutic strategies to improve clinical management.
Recent findings: ACP is driven by CTNNB1 mutations and dysregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling, alongside inflammatory and senescence-associated pathways. Current pharmacological approaches, including interferon-α, IL-6 inhibitors (e.g., tocilizumab), and intracystic agents (e.g., bleomycin), exhibit limited efficacy. Promising emerging therapies target the angiogenesis (e.g., bevacizumab) and MAPK/ERK pathway, which is activated by somatic BRAF V600E mutations in PCP, has been successfully targeted with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, demonstrating significant efficacy in the majority of treated PCP patients. whereas immune checkpoint inhibitors and SHH pathway modulators face significant challenges. Additionally, ACP-related endocrine dysfunction and hypothalamic obesity require tailored interventions, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and MC4R-targeted therapies. Precision medicine, informed by molecular subtyping and multi-omics data, holds transformative potential for ACP treatment. Future strategies should focus on combinatorial therapies to address tumor heterogeneity, microenvironment modulation, and senolytic approaches. Collaborative multidisciplinary efforts are crucial to translating these insights into clinical practice, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life.
{"title":"Pharmacological Treatment for Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma.","authors":"Chuan Zhao, Bo Zhang, Wenhao An, Yi Lin, Junping Zhang, Chingching Lau, Quan Cheng, Zhixiong Lin","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01731-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01731-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is a histologically benign but clinically aggressive tumor arising from Rathke's pouch remnants, which is molecularly distinct from the other subtype, papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP). Despite advancements in surgery and radiotherapy, treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory due to the tumor's invasiveness and resistance to conventional therapies. This review systematically examines the molecular pathogenesis of ACP and evaluates current and emerging therapeutic strategies to improve clinical management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>ACP is driven by CTNNB1 mutations and dysregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling, alongside inflammatory and senescence-associated pathways. Current pharmacological approaches, including interferon-α, IL-6 inhibitors (e.g., tocilizumab), and intracystic agents (e.g., bleomycin), exhibit limited efficacy. Promising emerging therapies target the angiogenesis (e.g., bevacizumab) and MAPK/ERK pathway, which is activated by somatic BRAF V600E mutations in PCP, has been successfully targeted with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, demonstrating significant efficacy in the majority of treated PCP patients. whereas immune checkpoint inhibitors and SHH pathway modulators face significant challenges. Additionally, ACP-related endocrine dysfunction and hypothalamic obesity require tailored interventions, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and MC4R-targeted therapies. Precision medicine, informed by molecular subtyping and multi-omics data, holds transformative potential for ACP treatment. Future strategies should focus on combinatorial therapies to address tumor heterogeneity, microenvironment modulation, and senolytic approaches. Collaborative multidisciplinary efforts are crucial to translating these insights into clinical practice, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1537-1554"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01714-x
Morgan J Farley, Brighid Scanlon, Megan Crichton, Ashley Bigaran, Amy Barnes, Nicolas H Hart, Patsy M Yates, Melissa Eastgate, Kim Alexander
Purpose: Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment and outcomes. Patients receiving immunotherapy often encounter immune-related and treatment-related adverse events, leading to substantial supportive care needs. Currently, no recommendations exist to guide the use of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for people with cancer undergoing immunotherapy treatments. This review aims to summarise the available evidence regarding non-pharmacological supportive care strategies to inform future clinical management and research directions.
Methods: Six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus) were systematically searched for studies on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for adults undergoing immunotherapy, published from October 2014 to October 2024.
Results: A total of 5383 studies were screened, with 14 meeting the inclusion criteria. Five were interventional studies and ten were observational. The interventional studies included three physical activity and exercise interventions, two dietary interventions, and one multimodal intervention. Most interventions were found to be feasible, acceptable, and demonstrate preliminary efficacy at improving quality of life, symptom burden, and clinical outcomes. Observational evidence demonstrated associations between physical activity and dietary factors and improved quality of life, reduced symptom burden, and improved clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: Growing observational and preliminary interventional evidence suggests a multimodal supportive care intervention that includes regular symptom monitoring, dietary support and exercise to address the physical and psychosocial needs of cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy may be beneficial. However, further high-quality trials are needed to confirm their efficacy and inform clinical implementation.
目的:免疫疗法已经改变了癌症的治疗和预后。接受免疫治疗的患者经常遇到免疫相关和治疗相关的不良事件,导致大量的支持性护理需求。目前,对于正在接受免疫治疗的癌症患者,尚无指导使用非药物支持性护理干预措施的建议。本综述旨在总结有关非药物支持治疗策略的现有证据,为未来的临床管理和研究方向提供信息。方法:系统检索PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycInfo、Web of Science和Scopus 6个电子数据库,检索2014年10月至2024年10月发表的成人免疫治疗非药物支持治疗干预研究。结果:共筛选5383项研究,其中14项符合纳入标准。5项是干预性研究,10项是观察性研究。干预研究包括三项身体活动和运动干预,两项饮食干预和一项多模式干预。大多数干预措施被发现是可行的、可接受的,并在改善生活质量、症状负担和临床结果方面显示出初步疗效。观察性证据表明,体育活动和饮食因素与改善生活质量、减轻症状负担和改善临床结果之间存在关联。结论:越来越多的观察和初步介入证据表明,包括定期症状监测、饮食支持和锻炼在内的多模式支持性护理干预,以满足接受免疫治疗的癌症患者的生理和心理需求,可能是有益的。然而,需要进一步的高质量试验来证实其有效性并为临床实施提供信息。
{"title":"Non-pharmacological Supportive Care Interventions during Immunotherapy for People with Cancer: A Systematic Scoping Review and Future Directions.","authors":"Morgan J Farley, Brighid Scanlon, Megan Crichton, Ashley Bigaran, Amy Barnes, Nicolas H Hart, Patsy M Yates, Melissa Eastgate, Kim Alexander","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01714-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01714-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment and outcomes. Patients receiving immunotherapy often encounter immune-related and treatment-related adverse events, leading to substantial supportive care needs. Currently, no recommendations exist to guide the use of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for people with cancer undergoing immunotherapy treatments. This review aims to summarise the available evidence regarding non-pharmacological supportive care strategies to inform future clinical management and research directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus) were systematically searched for studies on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for adults undergoing immunotherapy, published from October 2014 to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5383 studies were screened, with 14 meeting the inclusion criteria. Five were interventional studies and ten were observational. The interventional studies included three physical activity and exercise interventions, two dietary interventions, and one multimodal intervention. Most interventions were found to be feasible, acceptable, and demonstrate preliminary efficacy at improving quality of life, symptom burden, and clinical outcomes. Observational evidence demonstrated associations between physical activity and dietary factors and improved quality of life, reduced symptom burden, and improved clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Growing observational and preliminary interventional evidence suggests a multimodal supportive care intervention that includes regular symptom monitoring, dietary support and exercise to address the physical and psychosocial needs of cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy may be beneficial. However, further high-quality trials are needed to confirm their efficacy and inform clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1507-1523"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743693/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145687225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01723-w
Michele Maffezzoli, Jason Lau, Samuel Justin, Dawood Misbah, Giuseppe Luigi Banna
Purpose of review: The treatment landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common EGFR mutations has evolved significantly, with osimertinib established as the first-line standard. Two recent phase III trials, FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA, demonstrated that first-line intensification-through osimertinib plus chemotherapy or amivantamab-lazertinib-significantly prolongs overall survival compared to osimertinib alone. The aim of this review was to critically assess whether treatment intensification should be adopted as a new standard and, if so, in which patients.
Recent findings: We identified high-risk subgroups more likely to benefit from upfront combination strategies, such as those with brain or liver metastases, L858R mutations, TP53 co-mutations, or detectable ctDNA. However, the improved efficacy comes with increased rates of grade ≥ 3 adverse events and treatment discontinuation, raising concerns about tolerability and quality of life (QoL), particularly in real-world settings with frailer patients. Post-progression strategies are also evolving and may impact the long-term value of upfront intensification. Emerging approaches, including targeted and untargeted therapies, and novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), offer promising alternatives that may change future treatment options. Careful patient selection, improved toxicity management, and integration of QoL measures will be critical to ensure that the survival advantage demonstrated in trials can translate into true benefit in routine clinical practice. Future research should focus on identifying robust clinical and molecular markers to guide personalized treatment decisions.
{"title":"Who Truly Benefits From First-Line Intensification in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC?","authors":"Michele Maffezzoli, Jason Lau, Samuel Justin, Dawood Misbah, Giuseppe Luigi Banna","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01723-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01723-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The treatment landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common EGFR mutations has evolved significantly, with osimertinib established as the first-line standard. Two recent phase III trials, FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA, demonstrated that first-line intensification-through osimertinib plus chemotherapy or amivantamab-lazertinib-significantly prolongs overall survival compared to osimertinib alone. The aim of this review was to critically assess whether treatment intensification should be adopted as a new standard and, if so, in which patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We identified high-risk subgroups more likely to benefit from upfront combination strategies, such as those with brain or liver metastases, L858R mutations, TP53 co-mutations, or detectable ctDNA. However, the improved efficacy comes with increased rates of grade ≥ 3 adverse events and treatment discontinuation, raising concerns about tolerability and quality of life (QoL), particularly in real-world settings with frailer patients. Post-progression strategies are also evolving and may impact the long-term value of upfront intensification. Emerging approaches, including targeted and untargeted therapies, and novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), offer promising alternatives that may change future treatment options. Careful patient selection, improved toxicity management, and integration of QoL measures will be critical to ensure that the survival advantage demonstrated in trials can translate into true benefit in routine clinical practice. Future research should focus on identifying robust clinical and molecular markers to guide personalized treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1409-1415"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Although current treatments have improved outcomes in B-cell malignancies, therapy resistance remains a major challenge and is often driven by the tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this review was to assess the roles of monocytes and monocyte-derived cells in leukemia and lymphoma and to evaluate the potential of therapies targeting these populations.
Recent findings: Recent studies indicate that monocytes and monocyte-derived cells are associated with poor prognosis, therapy resistance, and treatment-related side effects in B-cell malignancies. These cells can suppress anti-tumor immunity, support malignant cell survival, and impair therapeutic efficacy. Strategies to deplete or reprogram these populations have shown promise in restoring immune function and enhancing the effectiveness of current treatments. Targeting suppressive monocyte-derived populations offers a promising strategy to overcome therapy resistance and improve outcomes in B-cell malignancies. Modulating these cells may reduce relapses, enhance treatment responses, and provide a foundation for the development of next-generation immunotherapies. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to better define the immunosuppressive and therapy-relevant subpopulations in specific diseases, which will be critical to translating these strategies into effective clinical interventions.
{"title":"\"Monocytes in B-Cell Malignancies: Their Role in Disease Progression and Therapy Resistance\".","authors":"Katsiaryna Marhelava, Justyna Jakubowska, Agata Pastorczak, Malgorzata Firczuk","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01732-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01732-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although current treatments have improved outcomes in B-cell malignancies, therapy resistance remains a major challenge and is often driven by the tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this review was to assess the roles of monocytes and monocyte-derived cells in leukemia and lymphoma and to evaluate the potential of therapies targeting these populations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies indicate that monocytes and monocyte-derived cells are associated with poor prognosis, therapy resistance, and treatment-related side effects in B-cell malignancies. These cells can suppress anti-tumor immunity, support malignant cell survival, and impair therapeutic efficacy. Strategies to deplete or reprogram these populations have shown promise in restoring immune function and enhancing the effectiveness of current treatments. Targeting suppressive monocyte-derived populations offers a promising strategy to overcome therapy resistance and improve outcomes in B-cell malignancies. Modulating these cells may reduce relapses, enhance treatment responses, and provide a foundation for the development of next-generation immunotherapies. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to better define the immunosuppressive and therapy-relevant subpopulations in specific diseases, which will be critical to translating these strategies into effective clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1492-1506"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743705/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145495049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01718-7
Valentina Santo, Leonardo Brunetti, Federica Pecci, Marianna Peroni, Giulia Barnini, Francesco Paoloni, Sebastiano Buti, Marcello Tiseo, Biagio Ricciuti, David James Pinato, Alessio Cortellini
Purpose of review: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease. In addition to tumor-intrinsic characteristics, clinical outcomes from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are influenced by a variety of host-related factors. This review aims to summarize current evidence on how body composition, metabolic comorbidities, sex, and systemic inflammation shape anti-tumor immunity and affect immunotherapy efficacy.
Recent findings: Emerging data suggest that altered body composition, including obesity and sarcopenia, may modulate ICI outcomes, giving rise to the so-called "obesity paradox", which appears inconsistent across tumor types and may reflect disease-specific nutritional and immunological profiles. Likewise, metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia can promote chronic inflammation and immune exhaustion, potentially dampening ICI activity. Advances in cross-sectional imaging and molecular profiling are refining the characterization of host-tumor-immune interactions and providing novel predictive insights. Host-related determinants play an integral role in shaping response to ICIs in NSCLC. A deeper understanding of the dynamic continuum linking metabolism, body composition, systemic inflammation, and immune regulation may enable more precise patient stratification and open opportunities for personalized immunotherapy strategies.
{"title":"Host-related Determinants of Response to Immunotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Interplay of Body Composition, Metabolism, Sex and Immune Regulation.","authors":"Valentina Santo, Leonardo Brunetti, Federica Pecci, Marianna Peroni, Giulia Barnini, Francesco Paoloni, Sebastiano Buti, Marcello Tiseo, Biagio Ricciuti, David James Pinato, Alessio Cortellini","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01718-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01718-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease. In addition to tumor-intrinsic characteristics, clinical outcomes from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are influenced by a variety of host-related factors. This review aims to summarize current evidence on how body composition, metabolic comorbidities, sex, and systemic inflammation shape anti-tumor immunity and affect immunotherapy efficacy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging data suggest that altered body composition, including obesity and sarcopenia, may modulate ICI outcomes, giving rise to the so-called \"obesity paradox\", which appears inconsistent across tumor types and may reflect disease-specific nutritional and immunological profiles. Likewise, metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia can promote chronic inflammation and immune exhaustion, potentially dampening ICI activity. Advances in cross-sectional imaging and molecular profiling are refining the characterization of host-tumor-immune interactions and providing novel predictive insights. Host-related determinants play an integral role in shaping response to ICIs in NSCLC. A deeper understanding of the dynamic continuum linking metabolism, body composition, systemic inflammation, and immune regulation may enable more precise patient stratification and open opportunities for personalized immunotherapy strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1427-1447"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145809949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01729-4
Bin Wang, Limin Xu, Menglong Rui
Purpose of review: Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most prevalent form of thyroid malignancy. While it is widely regarded as having a beneficial prognosis, effective therapies at the advanced stage or metastatic risk pose a significant clinical challenge.
Recent findings: Conventional therapeutic strategies, encompassing surgical interventions, radioiodine therapy, and thyroid hormone inhibition, have demonstrated notable efficacy in the management of early-stage disease. Notwithstanding, the rising prevalence of advanced PTC, including instances that exhibit resistance to traditional therapeutic interventions, has prompted the formulation and exploration of innovative pharmacological treatments. Here we delineate the contemporary paradigm of pharmacological interventions investigated for PTC, emphasizing targeted therapies. We summarize the progress of drug-targeted therapy for PTC, focusing on key molecular pathways, commonly used clinically targeted drugs and their efficacy, the resistance mechanism and response strategy of targeted therapy, as well as the perspective of drug-targeted therapy in the comprehensive treatment system of PTC.
{"title":"Progress in Drug-targeted Therapy for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Bin Wang, Limin Xu, Menglong Rui","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01729-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01729-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most prevalent form of thyroid malignancy. While it is widely regarded as having a beneficial prognosis, effective therapies at the advanced stage or metastatic risk pose a significant clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Conventional therapeutic strategies, encompassing surgical interventions, radioiodine therapy, and thyroid hormone inhibition, have demonstrated notable efficacy in the management of early-stage disease. Notwithstanding, the rising prevalence of advanced PTC, including instances that exhibit resistance to traditional therapeutic interventions, has prompted the formulation and exploration of innovative pharmacological treatments. Here we delineate the contemporary paradigm of pharmacological interventions investigated for PTC, emphasizing targeted therapies. We summarize the progress of drug-targeted therapy for PTC, focusing on key molecular pathways, commonly used clinically targeted drugs and their efficacy, the resistance mechanism and response strategy of targeted therapy, as well as the perspective of drug-targeted therapy in the comprehensive treatment system of PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1331-1345"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01720-z
Sarafina Urenna Otis, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Akash Maniam
Purpose of review: This review explores the use of perioperative immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), highlighting key recent developments in the field, questions that remain, and perspectives on their future use.
Recent findings: Immunotherapy has seen a recent expansion of its use to earlier-stage settings, previously limited to advanced/metastatic cancers, with widespread regulatory adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the perioperative setting of resectable early-stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC. However, questions remain regarding the efficacy of different drug regimens, their duration and scheduling, and, in particular, combinations with other therapies. The use of ICIs alongside molecularly targeted therapy has prompted well-evidenced concerns around toxicity and efficacy, with focus shifting to alternative strategies. Promising findings are seen with the revolutionary use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in various cancer fields, prompting growing interest and a number of trials investigating their use, including combined with immunotherapy, within lung cancer. While promising as a therapy, the full potential of perioperative immunotherapy still remains to be realised, to be aided by further research into optimisation of treatment regimens and combinatorial strategies.
{"title":"Perioperative Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).","authors":"Sarafina Urenna Otis, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Akash Maniam","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01720-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01720-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the use of perioperative immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), highlighting key recent developments in the field, questions that remain, and perspectives on their future use.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Immunotherapy has seen a recent expansion of its use to earlier-stage settings, previously limited to advanced/metastatic cancers, with widespread regulatory adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the perioperative setting of resectable early-stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC. However, questions remain regarding the efficacy of different drug regimens, their duration and scheduling, and, in particular, combinations with other therapies. The use of ICIs alongside molecularly targeted therapy has prompted well-evidenced concerns around toxicity and efficacy, with focus shifting to alternative strategies. Promising findings are seen with the revolutionary use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in various cancer fields, prompting growing interest and a number of trials investigating their use, including combined with immunotherapy, within lung cancer. While promising as a therapy, the full potential of perioperative immunotherapy still remains to be realised, to be aided by further research into optimisation of treatment regimens and combinatorial strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1358-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145408088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01721-y
Anagha J Deshpande, Javier Munoz, Razelle Kurzrock
Purpose of review: Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. The process to develop new anti-cancer drugs is long and arduous. Therefore, additional strategies for drug development could involve drug repositioning, i.e., identifying new uses for already approved medications that have been deemed expendable in the oncologic treatment realm. Indeed, there are already drugs that have proven that they are extendable into oncology and are now Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for malignancies, though they were initially developed for other conditions.
Recent findings: These drugs include: all-trans retinoic acid, first approved as a topical agent for photo-aging, with dramatic activity in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); arsenic, a compound known for its use as a homicidal poison with remarkable activity in APL; thalidomide, a drug with a scandalous past as it was given to pregnant women and resulted in severe fetal limb deformities, which is now approved for multiple myeloma; and the antibiotics amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole, which can result in total regression of MALT lymphomas (triggered by Helicobacter pylori infections). There is also a wealth of compounds that could be repositioned including, but not limited to anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-infectious compounds (anti-bacterial, anti-viral, anti-fungal, anti-parasitic agents), autonomic system regulators, and commonly used drugs such as statins or metformin, which have anti-cancer properties, demonstrated in both preclinical and clinical studies. With improvement in molecular technologies as well as in our understanding of cancer biology, drug repositioning may be exploitable for target-defined anti-neoplastic compounds that are already in use for non-malignant disease.
{"title":"The Expendables: Overlooked Medications with Anti-Cancer Properties.","authors":"Anagha J Deshpande, Javier Munoz, Razelle Kurzrock","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01721-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01721-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. The process to develop new anti-cancer drugs is long and arduous. Therefore, additional strategies for drug development could involve drug repositioning, i.e., identifying new uses for already approved medications that have been deemed expendable in the oncologic treatment realm. Indeed, there are already drugs that have proven that they are extendable into oncology and are now Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for malignancies, though they were initially developed for other conditions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>These drugs include: all-trans retinoic acid, first approved as a topical agent for photo-aging, with dramatic activity in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); arsenic, a compound known for its use as a homicidal poison with remarkable activity in APL; thalidomide, a drug with a scandalous past as it was given to pregnant women and resulted in severe fetal limb deformities, which is now approved for multiple myeloma; and the antibiotics amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole, which can result in total regression of MALT lymphomas (triggered by Helicobacter pylori infections). There is also a wealth of compounds that could be repositioned including, but not limited to anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-infectious compounds (anti-bacterial, anti-viral, anti-fungal, anti-parasitic agents), autonomic system regulators, and commonly used drugs such as statins or metformin, which have anti-cancer properties, demonstrated in both preclinical and clinical studies. With improvement in molecular technologies as well as in our understanding of cancer biology, drug repositioning may be exploitable for target-defined anti-neoplastic compounds that are already in use for non-malignant disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1312-1330"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-11DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01715-w
Jonathon Schutt, Anjali Johal, Natasha Moskowitz, Joe Khoury, Mustafa Al-Roubaie, Christopher Yeisley, Prasad Krishnakurup
Purpose of review: Chest ports are essential for long-term venous access in patients requiring chemotherapy, nutrition, or transfusions. Despite their utility, placement and use carry risks. This review summarizes common and uncommon complications to enhance prevention and management.
Recent findings: Complications are grouped into incision-, catheter-, and reservoir-related categories. Incision complications include adhesive dermatitis, suture pseudoinfection, wound dehiscence, and erosion. Catheter issues include arrhythmias, central venous stenosis, fracture, fibrin sheath formation, thrombosis, and migration, each with distinct clinical implications. Reservoir complications such as port flipping and extravasation may interrupt therapy and cause tissue injury. Advances in imaging guidance, port design, and retrieval methods have improved safety, but vigilance is essential. Chest ports are critical in oncologic and supportive care, but complications can undermine patient safety and treatment continuity. Understanding mechanisms, recognizing risks, and implementing preventive strategies are key to optimizing outcomes. Ongoing refinement of procedural techniques and device innovation will further improve reliability and reduce risk.
{"title":"Common and Uncommon Complications of Chest Port Implantation.","authors":"Jonathon Schutt, Anjali Johal, Natasha Moskowitz, Joe Khoury, Mustafa Al-Roubaie, Christopher Yeisley, Prasad Krishnakurup","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01715-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11912-025-01715-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chest ports are essential for long-term venous access in patients requiring chemotherapy, nutrition, or transfusions. Despite their utility, placement and use carry risks. This review summarizes common and uncommon complications to enhance prevention and management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Complications are grouped into incision-, catheter-, and reservoir-related categories. Incision complications include adhesive dermatitis, suture pseudoinfection, wound dehiscence, and erosion. Catheter issues include arrhythmias, central venous stenosis, fracture, fibrin sheath formation, thrombosis, and migration, each with distinct clinical implications. Reservoir complications such as port flipping and extravasation may interrupt therapy and cause tissue injury. Advances in imaging guidance, port design, and retrieval methods have improved safety, but vigilance is essential. Chest ports are critical in oncologic and supportive care, but complications can undermine patient safety and treatment continuity. Understanding mechanisms, recognizing risks, and implementing preventive strategies are key to optimizing outcomes. Ongoing refinement of procedural techniques and device innovation will further improve reliability and reduce risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1249-1257"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145273864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}