Current Oncology Reports最新文献

Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize available literature on uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma while highlighting remaining unanswered questions.

Recent findings: The need for uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma is growing with the increasing number of cases in younger patients or those who cannot undergo surgery. We reviewed the oncological and reproductive outcomes associated with endocrine therapies used for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. The rising prevalence of delayed childbearing, obesity, and diabetes in reproductive-age individuals and of medical comorbidities associated with high surgical risk continues to amplify the demand for uterine-conserving therapies. Appropriate patient selection for such therapies is imperative to maximize likelihood of treatment response. The ideal candidates are patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer with no evidence of myometrial invasion or extrauterine disease. The most accepted conservative therapeutic approach is hormonal therapy with close surveillance, with or without eventual hysterectomy following childbearing or failure of treatment. Further prospective and randomized trials are needed to address optimal patient and treatment selection, as well as the use of molecular profiling for treatment individualization and prognostication.

Purpose: During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and reimbursement policy changes provided patients improved access to neuro-oncology by telehealth. Here we discuss benefits and limitations of telehealth use in neuro-oncology. We review utilization of telemedicine services following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recent findings: Utilization of telemedicine by neuro-oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic was 52%, compared to 27-29% for other solid tumors groups. Following the pandemic, between January 2021 and April 2024, telehealth utilization has remained high in neuro-oncology with approximately 30% of all visits completed by telemedicine, compared to 10-15% for other solid tumor groups. The striking difference between telehealth visit utilization in neuro-oncology and general medical oncology even after expiration of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency expiration and end of pandemic-related restrictions, underscores the potential value of convenient access to care for patients with central nervous system tumors. Given widespread use of telehealth in neuro-oncology, prospective evaluation to determine the safety, usability, and acceptance of video-enabled, telehealth visits is critical. Such data may lead to broader adoption of telehealth, lead to regulatory and reimbursement reform for telehealth sustainability, and improve clinical trial access and accruals.

Purpose of review: It elucidates advancements in identifying and managing high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), moving from observation strategies to intervention approaches. It highlights the significance of differentiating high-risk SMM from its less aggressive counterparts to prevent progression to multiple myeloma (MM).

Recent findings: Recent developments have improved SMM risk-stratification, integrating clinical, molecular and biological markers to identify high-risk individuals accurately. The advent of dynamic risk models that incorporate disease evolution and the application of novel diagnostic technologies are enhancing the understanding of SMM. Clinical trials exploring low to high intensity interventions, have shown promise in delaying MM onset and improving patient prognosis. There is a significant change in high-risk SMM management, leaning towards early intervention and precision medicine. The focus now is on refining these approaches, exploring new treatments, and proving the sustained benefits of early interventions to ultimately improve SMM patient care and outcomes.

Purpose of review: To describe current and future strategies to reduce the burden of ovarian cancer through prevention.

Recent findings: Current strategies in genetic testing are missing a substantial number of individuals at risk, representing a missed opportunity for ovarian cancer prevention. Past efforts at screening and early detection have thus far failed to improve ovarian cancer mortality, and novel techniques are needed. Surgical prevention is highly effective, but surgical menopause from oophorectomy has significant side effects. Novel surgical strategies aimed at reducing risk while minimizing these harms are currently being studied. To maximize ovarian cancer prevention, a multi-pronged approach is needed. We propose that more inclusive and accurate genetic testing to identify more individuals at risk, novel molecular screening and early detection, surgical prevention that maximizes quality of life while reducing risk, and broader adoption of targeted and opportunistic salpingectomy will together reduce the burden of ovarian cancer.

Purpose of the review: Despite advances in surgical procedures, cancer recurrence still affects a substantial proportion of patients for whom surgery is considered a curative therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RIOT, addressing its definition, influencing factors, and clinical implications.

Findings: RIOT can be defined as a continuous variable as the time from surgery to initiation of adjuvant therapies or categorically as whether patients can successfully receive adjuvant therapies or not. Factors influencing RIOT are age, sex, socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, physical performance and comorbidities, and quality of anesthesia and surgical care. Adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy are often administered to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery and improve survival. Return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) has emerged as a promising outcome metric reflecting patients' functional recovery after surgery and their ability to receive adjuvant therapies.

Purpose of review: This narrative review explores the efficacy and applicability of anti-EGFR therapy as the first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It critically examines current guidelines, along with recent evidence in the literature, to assess whether it should be universally applied.

Recent findings: Recent evidences highlight the variability of the response to anti-EGFR therapies due to molecular diversity and several clinical factors, such as RAS mutational status and primary tumor location. Anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for most patients with MSS, RAS-WT, left-sided mCRC. Whether this combination is the best treatment for these patients remains an open question. This review delves into the role of EGFR inhibition in mCRC, focusing on clinical factors and the knowledge of biology, molecular targets, and biomarkers. It underscores the crucial role of a personalized approach, empowering healthcare providers and equipping them with the confidence to make informed decisions.

Purpose of review: We herein assess the distinct biological and clinical features of AML in older patients. We emphasize the importance of pre-treatment assessment to individualize care but note the changing treatment paradigm from intensive towards non-intensive therapy.

Recent finding: Geriatric assessments and genetic data provide predictive information that guides treatment. During the past decade the FDA approved at least nine new targeted therapies, mostly small molecule inhibitors, in AML patients of all ages. These agents have created novel therapeutic options for this poorly chemo tolerant population whose AML tends to be intrinsically resistant to such therapy. Older AML patients may now be treated with less toxic therapy that provides similar, if not superior, efficacy compared with conventional chemotherapy. Although TP53 mutant AML remains a particular unmet need, additional novel agents on the horizon provide hope for improving outcomes for older adults with AML.

Purpose of review: Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum), an anaerobic, gram-negative microbe, commonly found in human dental biofilm and the gut flora. It has long been known to have a higher concentration in periodontal disease and has recently been implicated in both oral and distant cancers such as colorectal, gastrointestinal, esophageal, breast, pancreatic hepatocellular, and genitourinary cancers. However, the mechanism of its involvement in the development of cancer has not been fully discussed. This review aims to cover biological molecular and clinical aspects of F. nucleatum and cancers.

Recent findings: Studies indicate F. nucleatum promotes tumor development through chronic inflammation, immune evasion, cell proliferation activation, and direct cell interactions, as in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). In colorectal cancer (CRC), F. nucleatum contributes to tumorigenesis through β-catenin signaling and NF-κB activation. It also induces autophagy, leading to chemoresistance in CRC and esophageal cancers, and enhances tumor growth and metastasis in breast cancer by reducing T-cell infiltration. F. nucleatum is linked to carcinogenesis and increased bacterial diversity in OSCC, with improved oral hygiene potentially preventing OSCC. F. nucleatum triggers cancer by causing mutations and epigenetic changes through cytokines and reactive oxygen species. It also promotes chemoresistance in CRC. F. nucleatum may potentially serve as a diagnostic tool in various cancers, with non-invasive detection methods available. Further investigation is needed to discover its potential in the diagnosis and treatment of OSCC and other cancers.

Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesize the old issues and current understandings of the etiology of liver cancer, focusing on the diverse causative factors influenced by geographical, socioeconomic, and lifestyle variations across different regions.

Recent findings: We highlight significant geographic disparities in liver cancer risk factors. While hepatitis B and C viruses, aflatoxin exposure, and alcohol consumption remain globally established contributors; metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic syndromes are increasingly prominent in the West. Chronic HBV and aflatoxin continue to dominate as risk factors in Asia and Africa. Dietary factors, metabolic diseases like diabetes and obesity, genetic predispositions, environmental risk factors and lifestyle choices such as smoking and alcohol use play substantial roles in specific populations. Protective factors like coffee and tea consumption, along with aspirin use, vegetables and fruits have shown potential in reducing HCC risk, although findings vary by population and dietary habits. Liver cancer etiology is influenced by various factors that differ by region. Established risk factors include hepatitis B and C, aflatoxin, and alcohol. Emerging risks, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, are more prevalent in Western countries, while aflatoxin and HBV remains significant in Asia and Africa. Diet, metabolic conditions like diabetes and obesity, genetic predispositions, and lifestyle choices also play crucial roles. Coffee, tea, aspirin, vegetables, and fruits may reduce HCC risk, but effectiveness varies. Future research should integrate epidemiology, genetics, and nutrition, with global cooperation and data sharing essential for effective cancer control strategies.

Purpose of review: This document critically examines the role of cannabinoids in cancer care during an era marked by rapid advancements in oncology and changing perceptions on cannabis. It traces the historical context of cannabis in medicinal use, navigating its journey from widespread acceptance, subsequent criminalization, to its resurgence in modern therapeutic applications, particularly within the framework of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM).

Recent findings: Anchored in EBM principles, this study synthesizes current research from clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids in oncology. The focus is on their palliative effects, considering the nuances of effectiveness, risk assessment, and challenges inherent in translating these findings into clinical guidelines. The study seeks to bridge the gap between scientific research and clinical practice, offering insights to inform future oncological therapies and symptom management strategies involving cannabinoids. The potential benefits and risks of cannabinoid use in cancer treatment are assessed to guide clinicians and researchers in developing comprehensive, evidence-based approaches to patient care.