首页 > 最新文献

Critical Reviews in Toxicology最新文献

英文 中文
Mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity mediated by perturbed thyroid hormone homeostasis in the brain: an adverse outcome pathway network. 脑内甲状腺激素稳态紊乱介导的发育性神经毒性机制:一个不良后果通路网络。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2461076
Nathalie T O M Dierichs, Aldert H Piersma, Robin P Peeters, W Edward Visser, Marcel E Meima, Ellen V S Hessel

Thyroid hormone (TH) is crucial for proper neurodevelopment. Insufficient TH concentrations in early life are associated with lower IQ and delayed motor development in children. Intracellular levels of TH are modulated via the transmembrane transport of TH and intracellular deiodination, and can mediate gene transcription via binding to the nuclear TH receptor. Chemical exposure can disrupt TH homeostasis via modes of action targeting intracellular mechanisms, thereby potentially influencing TH transport, deiodination or signaling. Understanding the cause and effect relationships of chemical hazards interfering with TH homeostasis in the developing brain is necessary to identify how chemicals might disturb brain development and result in neurodevelopmental disorders. Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) can provide a template for mapping these relationships, and so far multiple AOPs have been developed for TH homeostasis and adverse effects on cognition. The present review aims to expand current AOP networks by (1) summarizing the most important factors in the regulation of brain development under influence of TH, (2) integrating human-based mechanistic information of biological pathways which can be disturbed by TH disrupting chemicals, and (3) by incorporating brain-specific TH-mediated physiology, including barriers and cell specificity, as well as clinical knowledge. TH-specific pathways in the fetal brain are highlighted and supported by distinguishing cell type specific Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and downstream Key Events (KEs) for astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes. Two main pathways leading to adverse outcomes (AOs) in the areas of 'cognition' and 'motor function' are decreased myelination due to oligodendrocyte dysfunction, and decreased synaptogenesis and network formation via the neurons. The proposed AOP framework can form a basis for selecting developmental neurotoxic in vitro and in silico test systems for an innovative human-focused hazard testing strategy and risk assessment of chemical exposure.

甲状腺激素(TH)对正常的神经发育至关重要。生命早期TH浓度不足与儿童低智商和运动发育迟缓有关。细胞内的TH水平通过TH的跨膜转运和细胞内的去碘作用来调节,并通过与核TH受体的结合介导基因转录。化学暴露可通过针对细胞内机制的作用模式破坏TH稳态,从而潜在地影响TH转运、脱碘或信号传导。了解化学物质干扰发育中的大脑TH稳态的因果关系,对于确定化学物质如何干扰大脑发育并导致神经发育障碍是必要的。不良结果通路(AOPs)可以为绘制这些关系提供一个模板,到目前为止,已经开发了多个AOPs用于TH稳态和对认知的不利影响。本综述旨在通过(1)总结在TH影响下调节大脑发育的最重要因素,(2)整合可被TH干扰化学物质干扰的生物通路的基于人类的机制信息,以及(3)结合脑特异性TH介导的生理学,包括屏障和细胞特异性,以及临床知识来扩展当前的AOP网络。通过区分星形胶质细胞、神经元和少突胶质细胞的细胞类型特异性分子启动事件(MIEs)和下游关键事件(KEs),胎儿大脑中th特异性通路得到突出和支持。导致“认知”和“运动功能”领域不良结果(AOs)的两个主要途径是由于少突胶质细胞功能障碍导致的髓鞘形成减少,以及神经元突触发生和网络形成减少。提出的AOP框架可以为选择发育性神经毒性体外和计算机测试系统提供基础,用于创新的以人为中心的危害测试策略和化学品暴露风险评估。
{"title":"Mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity mediated by perturbed thyroid hormone homeostasis in the brain: an adverse outcome pathway network.","authors":"Nathalie T O M Dierichs, Aldert H Piersma, Robin P Peeters, W Edward Visser, Marcel E Meima, Ellen V S Hessel","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2461076","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2461076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thyroid hormone (TH) is crucial for proper neurodevelopment. Insufficient TH concentrations in early life are associated with lower IQ and delayed motor development in children. Intracellular levels of TH are modulated via the transmembrane transport of TH and intracellular deiodination, and can mediate gene transcription via binding to the nuclear TH receptor. Chemical exposure can disrupt TH homeostasis via modes of action targeting intracellular mechanisms, thereby potentially influencing TH transport, deiodination or signaling. Understanding the cause and effect relationships of chemical hazards interfering with TH homeostasis in the developing brain is necessary to identify how chemicals might disturb brain development and result in neurodevelopmental disorders. Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) can provide a template for mapping these relationships, and so far multiple AOPs have been developed for TH homeostasis and adverse effects on cognition. The present review aims to expand current AOP networks by (1) summarizing the most important factors in the regulation of brain development under influence of TH, (2) integrating human-based mechanistic information of biological pathways which can be disturbed by TH disrupting chemicals, and (3) by incorporating brain-specific TH-mediated physiology, including barriers and cell specificity, as well as clinical knowledge. TH-specific pathways in the fetal brain are highlighted and supported by distinguishing cell type specific Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and downstream Key Events (KEs) for astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes. Two main pathways leading to adverse outcomes (AOs) in the areas of 'cognition' and 'motor function' are decreased myelination due to oligodendrocyte dysfunction, and decreased synaptogenesis and network formation via the neurons. The proposed AOP framework can form a basis for selecting developmental neurotoxic <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> test systems for an innovative human-focused hazard testing strategy and risk assessment of chemical exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"304-320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143585003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid, and Related Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 2024 Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level: Part 1 - Analysis of Public Comments. 美国环境保护局的全氟辛酸、全氟辛烷磺酸以及相关的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质2024年饮用水最大污染物水平:第1部分-公众意见分析。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2415893
My Hua, Kylie McCauley, David Brew, Jonathan Heywood, Jacob Siracusa, Michael Stevens, Dennis Paustenbach

In March 2023, the EPA proposed a 4.0 ppt maximum contaminant level (MCL) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) (each) and a hazard index approach for four other PFAS. The EPA sought public feedback on the proposed MCL in early 2023 and received 1626 comment submissions via the PFAS docket website (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0114). Final MCLs were promulgated on April 10, 2024. Our analysis of the PFAS docket identified 128 comments that had a reasonable degree of scientific merit, with 57 comments endorsing the regulations and 71 questioning the MCLs public health utility. Critics noted the lack of evidence for adverse health effects at low PFAS exposures, the rule's significant impact on the economy, and the EPA's selection of published papers which the Agency chose to support their views. Many well-substantiated comments highlighted that few, if any, adverse health effects were reported at doses as much as 100-1000 times above those associated with the proposed drinking water guidelines. We found that the comments which discussed the evidence linking PFAS exposures below 200 ppt in drinking water to adverse health effects were equivocal. Most of the well-documented science based comments indicated that the data did not justify setting a 4.0 ppt MCL. It was noted that the EPA MCL was quite different from drinking water standards in other countries (up to 8-140 fold lower). During the review, it became apparent that a 4.0 ppt MCL may have little effect on PFAS blood concentrations in most Americans since drinking water accounts for less than 20% of their total PFAS intake. Additionally, a significant portion of the American population consumes minimal amounts of tap water. Commenters noted that the financial burden for treatment and cleanup was much higher than what was reported in the justification for the final MCL which was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and eventually promulgated. It is possible that EPA underestimated the financial impact on the nation by up to 100 to 200-fold. Our analysis indicates that many, if not most, of the scientifically rigorous comments on the EPA's proposed MCL were not acknowledged or considered by the Agency. We conclude the article by offering sixteen recommendations for the EPA to consider if Congress or the courts choose to reopen the evaluation of these MCLs. These included convening an international expert panel, reevaluating the appropriateness of the LNT model for PFAS, ensuring adequate time for study quality assessment and cost-benefit analysis, considering an approach to implementing a series of MCLs, critically reevaluating scientific studies, adhering to EPA risk assessment guidelines, addressing SDWA compliance concerns, revisiting the Hazard Index approach, and ensuring thorough and transparent review of public comments.

2023年3月,美国环保署提出了全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)(每种)的最大污染物水平(MCL)为4.0 ppt,并对其他四种全氟辛烷磺酸采用危害指数方法。EPA于2023年初就拟议的MCL征求公众反馈,并通过PFAS摘要网站(摘要ID: EPA- hq - ow -2022-0114)收到了1626份意见。最终mcl于2024年4月10日公布。我们对PFAS摘要的分析确定了128条具有合理程度的科学价值的评论,其中57条评论支持该法规,71条评论质疑mcl的公共卫生效用。批评人士指出,缺乏证据表明低PFAS暴露会对健康产生不利影响,该规定对经济产生重大影响,以及EPA选择发表的论文来支持他们的观点。许多有充分证据的评论强调,在剂量高达拟议饮用水准则相关剂量100-1000倍的情况下,几乎没有任何不良健康影响的报告。我们发现,讨论饮用水中低于200 ppt的PFAS暴露与不利健康影响之间的证据的评论是模棱两可的。大多数有据可查的基于科学的评论表明,这些数据并不能证明设定4.0 ppt的MCL是合理的。有人指出,环境保护局的MCL与其他国家的饮用水标准有很大不同(最高可低8-140倍)。在审查过程中,很明显,4.0 ppt的MCL可能对大多数美国人的PFAS血液浓度几乎没有影响,因为饮用水占他们总PFAS摄入量的不到20%。此外,很大一部分美国人只消耗少量的自来水。评论者指出,处理和清理的经济负担远高于提交管理和预算办公室(OMB)并最终公布的最终MCL的理由中所报告的负担。美国环境保护署可能低估了对国家的财政影响,低估幅度可能高达100到200倍。我们的分析表明,许多(如果不是大多数的话)对EPA提出的MCL提出的科学严谨的评论并没有得到EPA的承认或考虑。在文章的最后,我们提出了16条建议,供环保署考虑国会或法院是否选择重新评估这些mcl。这些措施包括召集国际专家小组,重新评估LNT模型对PFAS的适用性,确保有足够的时间进行研究质量评估和成本效益分析,考虑实施一系列mcl的方法,批判性地重新评估科学研究,遵守EPA风险评估指南,解决SDWA合规性问题,重新审视危害指数方法,并确保对公众意见进行彻底和透明的审查。
{"title":"United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid, and Related Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 2024 Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level: Part 1 - Analysis of Public Comments.","authors":"My Hua, Kylie McCauley, David Brew, Jonathan Heywood, Jacob Siracusa, Michael Stevens, Dennis Paustenbach","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2415893","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2415893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In March 2023, the EPA proposed a 4.0 ppt maximum contaminant level (MCL) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) (each) and a hazard index approach for four other PFAS. The EPA sought public feedback on the proposed MCL in early 2023 and received 1626 comment submissions <i>via</i> the PFAS docket website (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0114). Final MCLs were promulgated on April 10, 2024. Our analysis of the PFAS docket identified 128 comments that had a reasonable degree of scientific merit, with 57 comments endorsing the regulations and 71 questioning the MCLs public health utility. Critics noted the lack of evidence for adverse health effects at low PFAS exposures, the rule's significant impact on the economy, and the EPA's selection of published papers which the Agency chose to support their views. Many well-substantiated comments highlighted that few, if any, adverse health effects were reported at doses as much as 100-1000 times above those associated with the proposed drinking water guidelines. We found that the comments which discussed the evidence linking PFAS exposures below 200 ppt in drinking water to adverse health effects were equivocal. Most of the well-documented science based comments indicated that the data did not justify setting a 4.0 ppt MCL. It was noted that the EPA MCL was quite different from drinking water standards in other countries (up to 8-140 fold lower). During the review, it became apparent that a 4.0 ppt MCL may have little effect on PFAS blood concentrations in most Americans since drinking water accounts for less than 20% of their total PFAS intake. Additionally, a significant portion of the American population consumes minimal amounts of tap water. Commenters noted that the financial burden for treatment and cleanup was much higher than what was reported in the justification for the final MCL which was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and eventually promulgated. It is possible that EPA underestimated the financial impact on the nation by up to 100 to 200-fold. Our analysis indicates that many, if not most, of the scientifically rigorous comments on the EPA's proposed MCL were not acknowledged or considered by the Agency. We conclude the article by offering sixteen recommendations for the EPA to consider if Congress or the courts choose to reopen the evaluation of these MCLs. These included convening an international expert panel, reevaluating the appropriateness of the LNT model for PFAS, ensuring adequate time for study quality assessment and cost-benefit analysis, considering an approach to implementing a series of MCLs, critically reevaluating scientific studies, adhering to EPA risk assessment guidelines, addressing SDWA compliance concerns, revisiting the Hazard Index approach, and ensuring thorough and transparent review of public comments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"321-367"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid, and Related Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 2024 Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level: Part 2 - Fifteen Misconceptions About the Health Hazards. 美国环境保护局的全氟辛酸、全氟辛烷磺酸和相关的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质2024饮用水最大污染物水平:第2部分-关于健康危害的15个误解。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453
Dennis Paustenbach, Kylie McCauley, Jacob Siracusa, Sarah Smallets, David Brew, Michael Stevens, Blake Deckard, My Hua
<p><p>This paper examines widely held beliefs about the six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) addressed in the final U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule on PFAS in drinking water (e.g., the Maximum Contaminant Levels - MCLs). Based on our understanding of the scientific literature and the comments submitted by stakeholders regarding the EPA's regulation that was promulgated in April 2024, we identified 15 misconceptions that had a weak scientific foundation. These are now memoralized in the MCLs for the six PFAS but remain debated due to ongoing ambiguous research findings. Many critics of the MCLs found the EPA's systematic review of the published relevant information, particularly the toxicology of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), to be inadequate. The following seven views are among the most important. First, the EPA asserted that the toxicology of these six chemicals was poorly understood and lacked sufficient data to determine a safe daily intake level for chronic health effects; nonetheless, they promulgated what may be the costliest environmental regulation to date. Notably, adverse effects remain difficult to demonstrate in occupationally exposed individuals even at blood concentrations 50-100 times higher than current background PFAS levels. Second, the Agency indicated that the epidemiology data showed that exposure to PFOA and PFOS caused kidney and potentially other cancers, yet the data were equivocal and do not support that assertion. Third, it was stated that specific non-cancer effects, such as heart disease, would be prevented under the promulgated rule; however, the studies that they relied upon do not show an increased incidence of heart disease even in highly exposed populations. Fourth, the Agency relied on animal data to support its views on the likely toxic effects in humans, despite ample toxicology data that animals, particularly rodents, are poor predictors of the human response to PFAS exposures. Fifth, the EPA predicted a reduction in healthcare expenditures that would offset much of the cost of complying with the MCL, but, they did not have adequate data to support this prediction. Sixth, the EPA suggested that these six PFAS act through a shared mechanism of action (i.e., PPARα pathway induction); however, data indicate that PPARα induction in humans may be 80% less than what is observed in rodents. Also, induction of the PPARα pathway is not a cause of systemic disease. Seventh, the Agency failed to disclose that achieving the new MCL would yield negligible reductions in blood PFAS levels even among highly exposed populations, given drinking water accounts for only 20% or less of total PFAS exposure. The survey that could answer that question, the EPA's fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, was only 25% complete at the time the MCL was promulgated. Overall, our analysis concluded that while the EPA's intent to regulate these chemicals due to their en
本文考察了美国环境保护署(EPA)关于饮用水中PFAS的最终规则(例如,最大污染物水平- mcl)中关于六氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的广泛看法。根据我们对科学文献的理解和利益相关者对2024年4月颁布的EPA法规提交的意见,我们确定了15个科学基础薄弱的误解。这些现在已被记在六种PFAS的mcl中,但由于正在进行的模棱两可的研究结果仍存在争议。许多批评最低限度标准的人认为,环境保护局对已公布的相关信息,特别是对全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)的毒理学的系统审查是不充分的。以下七个观点是最重要的。首先,环境保护署声称,这六种化学物质的毒理学知之甚少,缺乏足够的数据来确定对慢性健康影响的安全每日摄入量;尽管如此,他们颁布了可能是迄今为止最昂贵的环境法规。值得注意的是,即使在血液浓度高于当前背景PFAS水平50-100倍的情况下,职业暴露个体的不良影响仍然难以证明。其次,该机构指出,流行病学数据显示,接触全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷磺酸会导致肾癌和潜在的其他癌症,但数据模棱两可,不支持这一断言。第三,有人指出,根据已颁布的规则,可以预防特定的非癌症影响,如心脏病;然而,他们所依赖的研究并没有显示,即使在高度暴露的人群中,心脏病的发病率也会增加。第四,尽管大量的毒理学数据表明,动物,特别是啮齿动物,不能很好地预测人类对PFAS暴露的反应,但该机构依靠动物数据来支持其关于PFAS可能对人类产生毒性作用的观点。第五,EPA预测医疗保健支出的减少将抵消遵守MCL的大部分成本,但是,他们没有足够的数据来支持这一预测。第六,EPA认为这六种PFAS通过共同的作用机制(即PPARα通路诱导)起作用;然而,数据表明,PPARα在人类中的诱导作用可能比在啮齿动物中观察到的要少80%。此外,PPARα通路的诱导不是全身性疾病的原因。第七,该机构没有披露,即使在高暴露人群中,实现新的MCL也会使血液中PFAS水平的降低可以忽略不计,因为饮用水只占总PFAS暴露量的20%或更少。可以回答这个问题的调查,即美国环保署的第五项不受管制污染物监测规则,在MCL颁布时只完成了25%。总的来说,我们的分析得出的结论是,尽管EPA因这些化学品在环境中的存在而有意对其进行监管是必要的,但mcl的推导和所谓的健康影响是基于预防原则的应用,而不是强有力的科学证据。
{"title":"United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid, and Related Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 2024 Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level: Part 2 - Fifteen Misconceptions About the Health Hazards.","authors":"Dennis Paustenbach, Kylie McCauley, Jacob Siracusa, Sarah Smallets, David Brew, Michael Stevens, Blake Deckard, My Hua","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper examines widely held beliefs about the six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) addressed in the final U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule on PFAS in drinking water (e.g., the Maximum Contaminant Levels - MCLs). Based on our understanding of the scientific literature and the comments submitted by stakeholders regarding the EPA's regulation that was promulgated in April 2024, we identified 15 misconceptions that had a weak scientific foundation. These are now memoralized in the MCLs for the six PFAS but remain debated due to ongoing ambiguous research findings. Many critics of the MCLs found the EPA's systematic review of the published relevant information, particularly the toxicology of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), to be inadequate. The following seven views are among the most important. First, the EPA asserted that the toxicology of these six chemicals was poorly understood and lacked sufficient data to determine a safe daily intake level for chronic health effects; nonetheless, they promulgated what may be the costliest environmental regulation to date. Notably, adverse effects remain difficult to demonstrate in occupationally exposed individuals even at blood concentrations 50-100 times higher than current background PFAS levels. Second, the Agency indicated that the epidemiology data showed that exposure to PFOA and PFOS caused kidney and potentially other cancers, yet the data were equivocal and do not support that assertion. Third, it was stated that specific non-cancer effects, such as heart disease, would be prevented under the promulgated rule; however, the studies that they relied upon do not show an increased incidence of heart disease even in highly exposed populations. Fourth, the Agency relied on animal data to support its views on the likely toxic effects in humans, despite ample toxicology data that animals, particularly rodents, are poor predictors of the human response to PFAS exposures. Fifth, the EPA predicted a reduction in healthcare expenditures that would offset much of the cost of complying with the MCL, but, they did not have adequate data to support this prediction. Sixth, the EPA suggested that these six PFAS act through a shared mechanism of action (i.e., PPARα pathway induction); however, data indicate that PPARα induction in humans may be 80% less than what is observed in rodents. Also, induction of the PPARα pathway is not a cause of systemic disease. Seventh, the Agency failed to disclose that achieving the new MCL would yield negligible reductions in blood PFAS levels even among highly exposed populations, given drinking water accounts for only 20% or less of total PFAS exposure. The survey that could answer that question, the EPA's fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, was only 25% complete at the time the MCL was promulgated. Overall, our analysis concluded that while the EPA's intent to regulate these chemicals due to their en","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"368-415"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive review of ensulizole toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products. 依苏唑的毒理学数据和个人护理产品的人体暴露评估的综合审查。
IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2541392
Kimberly G Norman, Lewis E Kaufman, Peter Griem, Linda Loretz, Alexandra Kowcz, Samuel M Cohen, Anthony R Scialli, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash

A comprehensive review of existing toxicity and human exposure data for the ultraviolet filter ensulizole (2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid) as currently used in over-the-counter sunscreen formulations was conducted. Authorized maximum ensulizole usage levels in consumer end-use products worldwide range from 3% to 8%, with the maximum usage level limited to 4% in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Postmarketing clinical safety studies of ensulizole have reported only occasional local skin effects, none of which were associated with systemic toxicity. Ensulizole has been investigated in vitro, in animal toxicity studies, and in human studies for its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential toxicological properties. Experimentally determined values of 4% for oral absorption in rats and of 0.26% for dermal absorption in humans were used for risk calculation purposes. There was no evidence of ensulizole bioaccumulation from rat in vivo studies, consistent with its high water solubility and low octanol/water partition coefficient. Ensulizole is not classifiable as an irritant, although local skin irritation with no systemic effects was noted in a 3-month repeated-dose dermal toxicity study in rabbits. Ensulizole is non-(photo)sensitizing, non-phototoxic, and has demonstrated low toxicity in acute (oral, dermal, and intraperitoneal) and subchronic repeated-dose studies in mammalian species. Subchronic 3-month no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) were identified at 100 mg/kg/day (dermal rabbit) and 1000 mg/kg/day (oral rat OECD 408 study), the highest doses tested, respectively. Ensulizole is considered non-genotoxic, based on negative in vitro studies. No in vivo genotoxicity or long-term carcinogenicity studies were identified. Carcinogenicity risk is not expected based on the negative genotoxicity data, empirical evidence from repeated-dose toxicity and developmental toxicity studies, and the absence of effects on the androgen, estrogen, thyroid, immune, developmental, or reproductive systems. Based on the selected rat subchronic NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg/day and conservative assumptions for estimating the systemic exposure dose (SED) from the application of sunscreen products, margins of safety (defined as NOAEL/SED) >100 were obtained for ensulizole. Therefore, the available data show that ensulizole does not pose risks to human health when used in sunscreen products at concentrations up to 4%, the permitted maximum usage level in the United States, Canada, and Australia.

对目前在非处方防晒霜配方中使用的紫外线过滤剂乙磺唑(2-苯基苯并咪唑-5-磺酸)的现有毒性和人体暴露数据进行了全面审查。在全球范围内,最终消费者产品中磺胺唑的授权最大使用量为3%至8%,美国、加拿大和澳大利亚的最大使用量限制为4%。恩素唑上市后的临床安全性研究仅报道了偶尔的局部皮肤效应,没有一例与全身毒性相关。恩素唑已经在体外、动物毒性研究和人体研究中进行了药代动力学、药效学和潜在毒理学特性的研究。实验确定的大鼠口服吸收率为4%,人皮肤吸收率为0.26%,用于风险计算。在大鼠体内研究中,没有证据表明胰唑具有生物蓄积性,这与它的高水溶性和低辛醇/水分配系数一致。恩舒利唑不能归类为刺激物,尽管在对家兔进行的为期3个月的重复给药皮肤毒性研究中发现了局部皮肤刺激而无全身效应。恩舒利唑无(光)致敏性,无光毒性,在哺乳动物的急性(口服、皮肤和腹腔注射)和亚慢性重复剂量研究中显示出低毒性。亚慢性3个月无观察到的不良反应水平(NOAELs)分别在100 mg/kg/天(真皮兔)和1000 mg/kg/天(口服大鼠OECD 408研究)时确定,这是测试的最高剂量。根据体外阴性研究,恩舒利唑被认为是无基因毒性的。未发现体内遗传毒性或长期致癌性研究。根据阴性遗传毒性数据、来自重复剂量毒性和发育毒性研究的经验证据,以及对雄激素、雌激素、甲状腺、免疫、发育或生殖系统没有影响,预计不会有致癌性风险。根据选择的大鼠亚慢性NOAEL为1000 mg/kg/天,并对防晒霜产品的全身暴露剂量(SED)进行保守估计,获得了依沙唑的安全边际(定义为NOAEL/SED) bbb100。因此,现有数据表明,在防晒产品中使用的依苏唑浓度高达4%(美国、加拿大和澳大利亚允许的最大使用量)时,不会对人体健康构成风险。
{"title":"Comprehensive review of ensulizole toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products.","authors":"Kimberly G Norman, Lewis E Kaufman, Peter Griem, Linda Loretz, Alexandra Kowcz, Samuel M Cohen, Anthony R Scialli, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2541392","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2541392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comprehensive review of existing toxicity and human exposure data for the ultraviolet filter ensulizole (2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid) as currently used in over-the-counter sunscreen formulations was conducted. Authorized maximum ensulizole usage levels in consumer end-use products worldwide range from 3% to 8%, with the maximum usage level limited to 4% in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Postmarketing clinical safety studies of ensulizole have reported only occasional local skin effects, none of which were associated with systemic toxicity. Ensulizole has been investigated <i>in vitro</i>, in animal toxicity studies, and in human studies for its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential toxicological properties. Experimentally determined values of 4% for oral absorption in rats and of 0.26% for dermal absorption in humans were used for risk calculation purposes. There was no evidence of ensulizole bioaccumulation from rat <i>in vivo</i> studies, consistent with its high water solubility and low octanol/water partition coefficient. Ensulizole is not classifiable as an irritant, although local skin irritation with no systemic effects was noted in a 3-month repeated-dose dermal toxicity study in rabbits. Ensulizole is non-(photo)sensitizing, non-phototoxic, and has demonstrated low toxicity in acute (oral, dermal, and intraperitoneal) and subchronic repeated-dose studies in mammalian species. Subchronic 3-month no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) were identified at 100 mg/kg/day (dermal rabbit) and 1000 mg/kg/day (oral rat OECD 408 study), the highest doses tested, respectively. Ensulizole is considered non-genotoxic, based on negative <i>in vitro</i> studies. No <i>in vivo</i> genotoxicity or long-term carcinogenicity studies were identified. Carcinogenicity risk is not expected based on the negative genotoxicity data, empirical evidence from repeated-dose toxicity and developmental toxicity studies, and the absence of effects on the androgen, estrogen, thyroid, immune, developmental, or reproductive systems. Based on the selected rat subchronic NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg/day and conservative assumptions for estimating the systemic exposure dose (SED) from the application of sunscreen products, margins of safety (defined as NOAEL/SED) >100 were obtained for ensulizole. Therefore, the available data show that ensulizole does not pose risks to human health when used in sunscreen products at concentrations up to 4%, the permitted maximum usage level in the United States, Canada, and Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"716-734"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145063411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction. 修正。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2461951
{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2461951","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2461951","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"505"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In search of certainty beyond the cholinergic system: a systematic review of developmental chlorpyrifos exposure and neurotransmitter systems disruption in preclinical models. 在寻找超越胆碱能系统的确定性:在临床前模型中对发育性毒死蜱暴露和神经递质系统破坏的系统回顾。
IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2543405
Cristian Perez-Fernandez, Diego Ruiz-Sobremazas, Mario Ruiz-Coca, Fernando Sánchez-Santed, Miguel Morales-Navas

Chlorpyrifos (CPF) is one of the most widely used pesticides globally, despite being strictly regulated and banned in several developed countries. It remains in use across many developing and underdeveloped nations. While its primary mechanism of action is acetylcholinesterase inhibition, multiple preclinical and clinical studies have reported developmental and cognitive alterations at lower doses that do not trigger this mechanism. These effects are particularly concerning during early development, when the central nervous system is immature and more vulnerable. Although various alternative molecular targets have been proposed, growing attention has been given to neurotransmitter systems beyond the cholinergic pathway. However, empirical data is inconsistent, and no qualitative or quantitative reviews have provided a clear understanding of these mechanisms. This systematic review aims to address this gap, focusing on preclinical rodent studies. Using a rigorous methodology, 41 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, covering 126 outcomes related to the dopaminergic, serotonergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, and endocannabinoid systems. Overall, the included studies showed a low level of methodological quality and a high risk of bias. Only a few molecular targets were systematically investigated. We introduce two new evaluative metrics-Weight of Evidence and Percentage of Convergence-to highlight five key findings. Notably, preweaning CPF exposure consistently reduced the activity of endocannabinoid-degrading enzymes (FAAH and MAGL), resulting in elevated endocannabinoid tone, particularly increased levels of AEA. Additionally, there is consistent support for CPF-induced serotonergic alterations, particularly upregulation of 5HT2 and 5HT1A receptors following neonatal exposure. Due to insufficient data convergence across laboratories, a meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate. In conclusion, while numerous molecules have been linked to low-dose developmental CPF exposure, only a limited number show consistent empirical support, and only under postnatal exposure conditions. Future research should investigate prenatal exposure effects more systematically and replicate postnatal findings across independent laboratories to strengthen the reliability of these promising results through robust, quantitative analyses.

毒死蜱(CPF)是全球使用最广泛的农药之一,尽管在一些发达国家受到严格管制和禁止。它仍然在许多发展中国家和不发达国家使用。虽然其主要作用机制是抑制乙酰胆碱酯酶,但多项临床前和临床研究表明,低剂量的发育和认知改变并不会触发这一机制。这些影响在早期发育期间尤其令人担忧,当时中枢神经系统不成熟且更脆弱。虽然已经提出了各种替代的分子靶点,但越来越多的关注已经给予了胆碱能途径以外的神经递质系统。然而,经验数据是不一致的,没有定性或定量的评论提供了这些机制的清晰认识。本系统综述旨在解决这一差距,重点是临床前啮齿动物研究。采用严格的方法,41项研究被纳入定性分析,涵盖126个与多巴胺能、血清素能、gaba能、谷氨酸能和内源性大麻素系统相关的结果。总体而言,纳入的研究显示方法学质量较低,偏倚风险较高。只有少数分子靶点被系统地研究过。我们引入了两个新的评估指标——证据权重和趋同百分比——以突出五个关键发现。值得注意的是,断奶前CPF暴露持续降低内源性大麻素降解酶(FAAH和MAGL)的活性,导致内源性大麻素浓度升高,尤其是AEA水平升高。此外,cpf诱导的血清素能改变,特别是新生儿暴露后5HT2和5HT1A受体的上调,也得到了一致的支持。由于实验室间的数据融合不足,meta分析被认为是不合适的。总之,虽然许多分子与低剂量发育CPF暴露有关,但只有有限数量的分子显示出一致的经验支持,并且仅在出生后暴露条件下。未来的研究应该更系统地调查产前暴露的影响,并在独立的实验室中复制产后的发现,通过强有力的定量分析来加强这些有希望的结果的可靠性。
{"title":"In search of certainty beyond the cholinergic system: a systematic review of developmental chlorpyrifos exposure and neurotransmitter systems disruption in preclinical models.","authors":"Cristian Perez-Fernandez, Diego Ruiz-Sobremazas, Mario Ruiz-Coca, Fernando Sánchez-Santed, Miguel Morales-Navas","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2543405","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2543405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chlorpyrifos (CPF) is one of the most widely used pesticides globally, despite being strictly regulated and banned in several developed countries. It remains in use across many developing and underdeveloped nations. While its primary mechanism of action is acetylcholinesterase inhibition, multiple preclinical and clinical studies have reported developmental and cognitive alterations at lower doses that do not trigger this mechanism. These effects are particularly concerning during early development, when the central nervous system is immature and more vulnerable. Although various alternative molecular targets have been proposed, growing attention has been given to neurotransmitter systems beyond the cholinergic pathway. However, empirical data is inconsistent, and no qualitative or quantitative reviews have provided a clear understanding of these mechanisms. This systematic review aims to address this gap, focusing on preclinical rodent studies. Using a rigorous methodology, 41 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, covering 126 outcomes related to the dopaminergic, serotonergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, and endocannabinoid systems. Overall, the included studies showed a low level of methodological quality and a high risk of bias. Only a few molecular targets were systematically investigated. We introduce two new evaluative metrics-Weight of Evidence and Percentage of Convergence-to highlight five key findings. Notably, preweaning CPF exposure consistently reduced the activity of endocannabinoid-degrading enzymes (FAAH and MAGL), resulting in elevated endocannabinoid tone, particularly increased levels of AEA. Additionally, there is consistent support for CPF-induced serotonergic alterations, particularly upregulation of 5HT2 and 5HT1A receptors following neonatal exposure. Due to insufficient data convergence across laboratories, a meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate. In conclusion, while numerous molecules have been linked to low-dose developmental CPF exposure, only a limited number show consistent empirical support, and only under postnatal exposure conditions. Future research should investigate prenatal exposure effects more systematically and replicate postnatal findings across independent laboratories to strengthen the reliability of these promising results through robust, quantitative analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"751-776"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A critical review to identify data gaps and improve risk assessment of bisphenol A alternatives for human health. 一项重要审查,旨在确定数据缺口并改进双酚 A 替代品对人类健康的风险评估。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2388712
Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja, Daniel Zalko, Sabrina Tait, Emanuela Testai, Catherine Viguié, Emanuela Corsini, Nathalie Grova, Franca Maria Buratti, Nicolas J Cabaton, Lucia Coppola, Antonio De la Vieja, Maria Dusinska, Naouale El Yamani, Valentina Galbiati, Patricia Iglesias-Hernández, Yvonne Kohl, Ambra Maddalon, Francesca Marcon, Lydie Naulé, Elise Rundén-Pran, Francesca Salani, Nicoletta Santori, Mónica Torres-Ruiz, Jonathan D Turner, Ondrej Adamovsky, Kiara Aiello-Holden, Hubert Dirven, Henriqueta Louro, Maria João Silva

Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, has been associated with a variety of adverse effects in humans including metabolic, immunological, reproductive, and neurodevelopmental effects, raising concern about its health impact. In the EU, it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and as an endocrine disruptor and was thus included in the candidate list of substances of very high concern (SVHC). On this basis, its use has been banned or restricted in some products. As a consequence, industries turned to bisphenol alternatives, such as bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF), which are now found in various consumer products, as well as in human matrices at a global scale. However, due to their toxicity, these two bisphenols are in the process of being regulated. Other BPA alternatives, whose potential toxicity remains largely unknown due to a knowledge gap, have also started to be used in manufacturing processes. The gradual restriction of the use of BPA underscores the importance of understanding the potential risks associated with its alternatives to avoid regrettable substitutions. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the potential hazards related to BPA alternatives prioritized by European Regulatory Agencies based on their regulatory relevance and selected to be studied under the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC): BPE, BPAP, BPP, BPZ, BPS-MAE, and TCBPA. The focus is on data related to toxicokinetic, endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, developmental neurotoxicity, and genotoxicity/carcinogenicity, which were considered the most relevant endpoints to assess the hazard related to those substances. The goal here is to identify the data gaps in BPA alternatives toxicology and hence formulate the future directions that will be taken in the frame of the PARC project, which seeks also to enhance chemical risk assessment methodologies using new approach methodologies (NAMs).

双酚 A(BPA)是一种合成化学物质,广泛用于聚碳酸酯塑料和环氧树脂的生产,对人体有多种不良影响,包括代谢、免疫、生殖和神经发育方面的影响,引起了人们对其健康影响的关注。在欧盟,它被归类为生殖毒性物质和内分泌干扰物,并因此被列入高度关注物质(SVHC)候选清单。在此基础上,欧盟禁止或限制在某些产品中使用该物质。因此,工业界转而使用双酚替代品,如双酚 S (BPS) 和双酚 F (BPF)。然而,由于其毒性,这两种双酚正在受到管制。其他双酚 A 替代品也开始用于生产过程,但由于知识空白,这些替代品的潜在毒性在很大程度上仍然未知。对双酚 A 使用的逐步限制凸显了了解其替代品潜在风险的重要性,以避免令人遗憾的替代。本综述旨在总结有关双酚 A 替代品潜在危害的现有知识,这些替代品由欧洲监管机构根据其监管相关性进行优先排序,并在欧洲化学品风险评估伙伴关系(PARC)下进行研究:BPE、BPAP、BPP、BPZ、BPS-MAE 和 TCBPA。重点是与毒物动力学、内分泌干扰、免疫毒性、发育神经毒性和遗传毒性/致癌性有关的数据,这些数据被认为是评估这些物质相关危害的最相关终点。本报告的目的是确定双酚 A 替代品毒理学方面的数据缺口,从而制定 PARC 项目框架内的未来发展方向。
{"title":"A critical review to identify data gaps and improve risk assessment of bisphenol A alternatives for human health.","authors":"Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja, Daniel Zalko, Sabrina Tait, Emanuela Testai, Catherine Viguié, Emanuela Corsini, Nathalie Grova, Franca Maria Buratti, Nicolas J Cabaton, Lucia Coppola, Antonio De la Vieja, Maria Dusinska, Naouale El Yamani, Valentina Galbiati, Patricia Iglesias-Hernández, Yvonne Kohl, Ambra Maddalon, Francesca Marcon, Lydie Naulé, Elise Rundén-Pran, Francesca Salani, Nicoletta Santori, Mónica Torres-Ruiz, Jonathan D Turner, Ondrej Adamovsky, Kiara Aiello-Holden, Hubert Dirven, Henriqueta Louro, Maria João Silva","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2388712","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2388712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, has been associated with a variety of adverse effects in humans including metabolic, immunological, reproductive, and neurodevelopmental effects, raising concern about its health impact. In the EU, it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and as an endocrine disruptor and was thus included in the candidate list of substances of very high concern (SVHC). On this basis, its use has been banned or restricted in some products. As a consequence, industries turned to bisphenol alternatives, such as bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF), which are now found in various consumer products, as well as in human matrices at a global scale. However, due to their toxicity, these two bisphenols are in the process of being regulated. Other BPA alternatives, whose potential toxicity remains largely unknown due to a knowledge gap, have also started to be used in manufacturing processes. The gradual restriction of the use of BPA underscores the importance of understanding the potential risks associated with its alternatives to avoid regrettable substitutions. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the potential hazards related to BPA alternatives prioritized by European Regulatory Agencies based on their regulatory relevance and selected to be studied under the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC): BPE, BPAP, BPP, BPZ, BPS-MAE, and TCBPA. The focus is on data related to toxicokinetic, endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, developmental neurotoxicity, and genotoxicity/carcinogenicity, which were considered the most relevant endpoints to assess the hazard related to those substances. The goal here is to identify the data gaps in BPA alternatives toxicology and hence formulate the future directions that will be taken in the frame of the PARC project, which seeks also to enhance chemical risk assessment methodologies using new approach methodologies (NAMs).</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"696-753"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining the relationship between per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances and breast, colorectal, prostate, and ovarian cancers: a meta-analysis. 检查单氟烷基和多氟烷基物质与乳腺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌和卵巢癌之间的关系:一项荟萃分析。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2425669
Ahmad Habibian Sezavar, Nima Rastegar-Pouyani, Nader Rahimi Kakavandi, Fatemeh Fakhari, Emad Jafarzadeh, Shima Aliebrahimi, Seyed Nasser Ostad

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals used widely in industrial and commercial applications. Concerns exist about their potential link to cancer risk as possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the dose-response relationship between PFAS, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) exposure and risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancers. We systematically searched major databases through May 2022 and identified 13 observational studies for inclusion. Using random-effects models, we calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the highest versus lowest PFAS exposure categories. Additionally, we analyzed the dose-response correlation between PFAS and cancer risk in a subset of studies. The study revealed no substantial correlation between exposure to PFASs and the incidence of breast cancer (BC) (ORPFOS = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.91-1.46, ORPFOA = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.68-1.50, ORPFNA = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.64-1.21, ORPFHxS = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.40-3.77, and ORPFDA = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.41-4.10), ovarian cancer (ORPFOA = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84-2.42), prostate cancer (ORPFOA = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88-1.26), and colorectal cancer (ORPFOA = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12) in the highest versus lowest exposure analysis. However, dose-response analysis showed that for every 1 ng/ml increase in PFNA and 2 ng/ml increase in PFOA, the relative risk for BC decreased significantly (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99 and RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, respectively). Non-linear dose-response analysis found no significant changes in BC risk with increasing PFAS levels. In conclusion, while the highest versus lowest analysis does not support associations between PFAS exposure and the risk of these cancers, linear dose-response analysis suggests potential inverse relationships between PFNA/PFOA levels and BC risk. Further research is warranted on these potential protective effects.

全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是广泛用于工业和商业应用的合成化学品。人们担心它们可能与癌症风险有关,因为它们可能是干扰内分泌的化学物质。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估PFAS、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟壬酸(PFNA)、全氟癸酸(PFDA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)暴露与乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌风险之间的剂量-反应关系。我们系统地检索了截至2022年5月的主要数据库,并确定了13项观察性研究纳入。使用随机效应模型,我们计算了比较最高和最低PFAS暴露类别的总优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。此外,我们在一部分研究中分析了PFAS与癌症风险之间的剂量-反应相关性。这项研究并没有发现实质性的联系接触PFASs和乳腺癌的发病率(BC) (ORPFOS = 1.15, 95% CI -1.46 = 0.91, ORPFOA = 1.01, 95% CI -1.50 = 0.68, ORPFNA = 0.88, 95% CI -1.21 = 0.64, ORPFHxS = 1.22, 95% CI -3.77 = 0.40, ORPFDA = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.41 - -4.10),卵巢癌(ORPFOA = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84 - -2.42),前列腺癌(ORPFOA = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88 - -1.26),和结直肠癌(ORPFOA = 0.77,95% CI = 0.53-1.12)。然而,剂量反应分析显示,PFNA每增加1 ng/ml, PFOA每增加2 ng/ml, BC的相对风险显著降低(RR为0.67,95% CI为0.45-0.99,RR为0.94,95% CI为0.89-0.98)。非线性剂量反应分析发现,随着PFAS水平的增加,BC风险没有显著变化。总之,虽然最高和最低的分析不支持PFAS暴露与这些癌症风险之间的关联,但线性剂量反应分析表明PFNA/PFOA水平与BC风险之间存在潜在的反比关系。这些潜在的保护作用有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Examining the relationship between per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances and breast, colorectal, prostate, and ovarian cancers: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmad Habibian Sezavar, Nima Rastegar-Pouyani, Nader Rahimi Kakavandi, Fatemeh Fakhari, Emad Jafarzadeh, Shima Aliebrahimi, Seyed Nasser Ostad","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2425669","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2425669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals used widely in industrial and commercial applications. Concerns exist about their potential link to cancer risk as possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the dose-response relationship between PFAS, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) exposure and risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancers. We systematically searched major databases through May 2022 and identified 13 observational studies for inclusion. Using random-effects models, we calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the highest versus lowest PFAS exposure categories. Additionally, we analyzed the dose-response correlation between PFAS and cancer risk in a subset of studies. The study revealed no substantial correlation between exposure to PFASs and the incidence of breast cancer (BC) (OR<sub>PFOS</sub> = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.91-1.46, OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.68-1.50, OR<sub>PFNA</sub> = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.64-1.21, OR<sub>PFHxS</sub> = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.40-3.77, and OR<sub>PFDA</sub> = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.41-4.10), ovarian cancer (OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84-2.42), prostate cancer (OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88-1.26), and colorectal cancer (OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12) in the highest versus lowest exposure analysis. However, dose-response analysis showed that for every 1 ng/ml increase in PFNA and 2 ng/ml increase in PFOA, the relative risk for BC decreased significantly (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99 and RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, respectively). Non-linear dose-response analysis found no significant changes in BC risk with increasing PFAS levels. In conclusion, while the highest versus lowest analysis does not support associations between PFAS exposure and the risk of these cancers, linear dose-response analysis suggests potential inverse relationships between PFNA/PFOA levels and BC risk. Further research is warranted on these potential protective effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"981-995"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142784392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of epidemiological and toxicological studies on health effects from ingestion of asbestos in drinking water. 关于摄入饮用水中石棉对健康影响的流行病学和毒理学研究综述。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2399840
Jennifer Go, Nawal Farhat, Karen Leingartner, Elvin Iscan Insel, Franco Momoli, Richard Carrier, Daniel Krewski

Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that were commonly used in the construction of cement pipes for drinking water distribution systems. These pipes deteriorate and can release asbestos fibers into drinking water, raising concerns about potential risk to human health. The objective of this work was to synthesize human, animal, and in vitro evidence on potential health risks due to ingested asbestos in drinking water and evaluate the weight of evidence (WoE) of human health risk. A systematic review of epidemiological evidence was conducted, along with critical review of animal and in vitro evidence, followed by WoE evaluation that integrated human, animal, and in vitro evidence. The systematic review included 17 human studies with health outcomes mostly related to various cancer sites, with the majority focusing on the gastrointestinal system. The WoE evaluation resulted in very low levels of confidence or insufficient evidence of a health effect for cancers in 15 organ systems and for three non-cancer endpoints. While eight studies reported possible associations with stomach cancer in males, few high-quality studies were available to verify a causal relationship. Based on high-quality animal studies, an increased risk for cancer or non-cancer endpoints was not supported, aligning with findings from human studies. Overall, the currently available body of evidence is insufficient to establish a clear link between asbestos contamination in drinking water and adverse health effects. Due to the lack of both high-quality epidemiological studies and a validated kinetic model for ingested asbestos, additional research on this association is warranted.

石棉是一组天然形成的纤维状矿物,通常用于建造饮用水分配系统的水泥管道。这些管道老化后会将石棉纤维释放到饮用水中,从而引发对人类健康潜在风险的担忧。这项工作的目的是综合人类、动物和体外证据,了解摄入饮用水中的石棉对健康造成的潜在风险,并评估人类健康风险的证据权重 (WoE)。在对流行病学证据进行系统审查的同时,还对动物和体外证据进行了严格审查,随后进行了综合人类、动物和体外证据的 WoE 评估。系统性审查包括 17 项人类研究,其健康结果大多与各种癌症部位有关,其中大多数侧重于胃肠道系统。对 15 个器官系统的癌症和 3 个非癌症终点的健康影响,WoE 评估得出的置信度很低或证据不足。虽然有八项研究报告称可能与男性胃癌有关,但很少有高质量的研究可证实两者之间的因果关系。根据高质量的动物研究,癌症或非癌症终点的风险增加未得到支持,这与人类研究的结果一致。总体而言,目前可用的证据不足以确定饮用水中的石棉污染与不良健康影响之间的明确联系。由于缺乏高质量的流行病学研究和经过验证的摄入石棉动力学模型,因此有必要对这种关联进行更多的研究。
{"title":"Review of epidemiological and toxicological studies on health effects from ingestion of asbestos in drinking water.","authors":"Jennifer Go, Nawal Farhat, Karen Leingartner, Elvin Iscan Insel, Franco Momoli, Richard Carrier, Daniel Krewski","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2399840","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2399840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that were commonly used in the construction of cement pipes for drinking water distribution systems. These pipes deteriorate and can release asbestos fibers into drinking water, raising concerns about potential risk to human health. The objective of this work was to synthesize human, animal, and <i>in vitro</i> evidence on potential health risks due to ingested asbestos in drinking water and evaluate the weight of evidence (WoE) of human health risk. A systematic review of epidemiological evidence was conducted, along with critical review of animal and <i>in vitro</i> evidence, followed by WoE evaluation that integrated human, animal, and <i>in vitro</i> evidence. The systematic review included 17 human studies with health outcomes mostly related to various cancer sites, with the majority focusing on the gastrointestinal system. The WoE evaluation resulted in very low levels of confidence or insufficient evidence of a health effect for cancers in 15 organ systems and for three non-cancer endpoints. While eight studies reported possible associations with stomach cancer in males, few high-quality studies were available to verify a causal relationship. Based on high-quality animal studies, an increased risk for cancer or non-cancer endpoints was not supported, aligning with findings from human studies. Overall, the currently available body of evidence is insufficient to establish a clear link between asbestos contamination in drinking water and adverse health effects. Due to the lack of both high-quality epidemiological studies and a validated kinetic model for ingested asbestos, additional research on this association is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"856-894"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mechanistic insights regarding neuropsychiatric and neuropathologic impacts of air pollution. 空气污染对神经精神和神经病理学影响的机理研究。
IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2420972
Katherine M Rentschler, Urmila P Kodavanti

Air pollution is a significant environmental health risk for urban areas and developing countries. Air pollution may contribute to the incidence of cardiopulmonary and metabolic diseases. Evidence also points to the role of air pollution in worsening or developing neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Inhaled pollutants include compositionally differing mixtures of respirable gaseous and particulate components of varied sizes, solubilities, and chemistry. Inhalation of combustibles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or other irritant particulate matter (PM) may trigger lung sensory afferents which initiate a sympathetic stress response via activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axes. Activation of SAM and HPA axes are associated with selective inhibition of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axes following exposure. Regarding chronic exposure in susceptible hosts, these changes may become pathological by causing neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter, and neuroendocrine imbalances. Soluble PM, such as metals and nano-size particles may translocate across the olfactory, trigeminal, or vagal nerves through retrograde axonal transport, or through systemic circulation which may disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and deposit in neural tissue. Neuronal deposition of metallic components can have a negative impact through multiple molecular mechanisms. In addition to systemic translocation, the release of pituitary and stress hormones, altered metabolic hormonal status and resultant circulating metabolic milieu, and sympathetically and HPA-mediated changes in immune markers, may secondarily impact the brain through a variety of regulatory adrenal hormone-dependent mechanisms. Several reviews covering air pollution as a risk factor for neuropsychiatric disorders have been published, but no reviews discuss the in-depth intersection between molecular and stress-related neuroendocrine mechanisms, thereby addressing adaptation and susceptibility variations and link to peripheral tissue effects. The purpose of this review is to discuss evidence regarding neurochemical, neuroendocrine, and molecular mechanisms which may contribute to neuropathology from air pollution exposure. This review also covers bi-directional neural and systemic interactions which may raise the risk for air pollution-related systemic illness.

空气污染对城市地区和发展中国家是一个重大的环境健康风险。空气污染可能导致心肺和代谢疾病的发生。证据还指出,空气污染在恶化或发展神经和神经精神疾病中的作用。吸入污染物包括不同大小、溶解度和化学性质的可吸入气体和颗粒成分组成的不同混合物。吸入可燃物和挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)或其他刺激性颗粒物(PM)可触发肺部感觉传入,通过激活下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)和交感-肾上腺-髓质(SAM)轴引发交感应激反应。暴露后,SAM和HPA轴的激活与下丘脑-垂体-性腺(HPG)和下丘脑-垂体-甲状腺(HPT)轴的选择性抑制有关。对于易感宿主的慢性暴露,这些变化可能通过引起神经炎症、神经递质和神经内分泌失衡而变为病理性。可溶性PM,如金属和纳米大小的颗粒,可通过逆行轴突运输或通过体循环在嗅觉神经、三叶神经或迷走神经上转运,这可能破坏血脑屏障(BBB)并沉积在神经组织中。金属成分的神经元沉积可以通过多种分子机制产生负面影响。除了全身性易位外,垂体和应激激素的释放、代谢激素状态的改变和由此产生的循环代谢环境,以及交感神经和hpa介导的免疫标记物的改变,可能通过多种调节肾上腺激素依赖的机制继发影响大脑。已经发表了一些关于空气污染作为神经精神疾病风险因素的综述,但没有综述讨论分子和应激相关神经内分泌机制之间的深入交叉,从而解决适应和易感性变化以及与外周组织效应的联系。本文的目的是讨论空气污染暴露可能导致神经病理的神经化学、神经内分泌和分子机制方面的证据。这篇综述还包括双向神经和系统的相互作用,这可能会增加与空气污染相关的系统性疾病的风险。
{"title":"Mechanistic insights regarding neuropsychiatric and neuropathologic impacts of air pollution.","authors":"Katherine M Rentschler, Urmila P Kodavanti","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2420972","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2420972","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Air pollution is a significant environmental health risk for urban areas and developing countries. Air pollution may contribute to the incidence of cardiopulmonary and metabolic diseases. Evidence also points to the role of air pollution in worsening or developing neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Inhaled pollutants include compositionally differing mixtures of respirable gaseous and particulate components of varied sizes, solubilities, and chemistry. Inhalation of combustibles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or other irritant particulate matter (PM) may trigger lung sensory afferents which initiate a sympathetic stress response <i>via</i> activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axes. Activation of SAM and HPA axes are associated with selective inhibition of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axes following exposure. Regarding chronic exposure in susceptible hosts, these changes may become pathological by causing neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter, and neuroendocrine imbalances. Soluble PM, such as metals and nano-size particles may translocate across the olfactory, trigeminal, or vagal nerves through retrograde axonal transport, or through systemic circulation which may disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and deposit in neural tissue. Neuronal deposition of metallic components can have a negative impact through multiple molecular mechanisms. In addition to systemic translocation, the release of pituitary and stress hormones, altered metabolic hormonal status and resultant circulating metabolic milieu, and sympathetically and HPA-mediated changes in immune markers, may secondarily impact the brain through a variety of regulatory adrenal hormone-dependent mechanisms. Several reviews covering air pollution as a risk factor for neuropsychiatric disorders have been published, but no reviews discuss the in-depth intersection between molecular and stress-related neuroendocrine mechanisms, thereby addressing adaptation and susceptibility variations and link to peripheral tissue effects. The purpose of this review is to discuss evidence regarding neurochemical, neuroendocrine, and molecular mechanisms which may contribute to neuropathology from air pollution exposure. This review also covers bi-directional neural and systemic interactions which may raise the risk for air pollution-related systemic illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"953-980"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1