Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-10DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2461076
Nathalie T O M Dierichs, Aldert H Piersma, Robin P Peeters, W Edward Visser, Marcel E Meima, Ellen V S Hessel
Thyroid hormone (TH) is crucial for proper neurodevelopment. Insufficient TH concentrations in early life are associated with lower IQ and delayed motor development in children. Intracellular levels of TH are modulated via the transmembrane transport of TH and intracellular deiodination, and can mediate gene transcription via binding to the nuclear TH receptor. Chemical exposure can disrupt TH homeostasis via modes of action targeting intracellular mechanisms, thereby potentially influencing TH transport, deiodination or signaling. Understanding the cause and effect relationships of chemical hazards interfering with TH homeostasis in the developing brain is necessary to identify how chemicals might disturb brain development and result in neurodevelopmental disorders. Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) can provide a template for mapping these relationships, and so far multiple AOPs have been developed for TH homeostasis and adverse effects on cognition. The present review aims to expand current AOP networks by (1) summarizing the most important factors in the regulation of brain development under influence of TH, (2) integrating human-based mechanistic information of biological pathways which can be disturbed by TH disrupting chemicals, and (3) by incorporating brain-specific TH-mediated physiology, including barriers and cell specificity, as well as clinical knowledge. TH-specific pathways in the fetal brain are highlighted and supported by distinguishing cell type specific Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and downstream Key Events (KEs) for astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes. Two main pathways leading to adverse outcomes (AOs) in the areas of 'cognition' and 'motor function' are decreased myelination due to oligodendrocyte dysfunction, and decreased synaptogenesis and network formation via the neurons. The proposed AOP framework can form a basis for selecting developmental neurotoxic in vitro and in silico test systems for an innovative human-focused hazard testing strategy and risk assessment of chemical exposure.
{"title":"Mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity mediated by perturbed thyroid hormone homeostasis in the brain: an adverse outcome pathway network.","authors":"Nathalie T O M Dierichs, Aldert H Piersma, Robin P Peeters, W Edward Visser, Marcel E Meima, Ellen V S Hessel","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2461076","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2461076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thyroid hormone (TH) is crucial for proper neurodevelopment. Insufficient TH concentrations in early life are associated with lower IQ and delayed motor development in children. Intracellular levels of TH are modulated via the transmembrane transport of TH and intracellular deiodination, and can mediate gene transcription via binding to the nuclear TH receptor. Chemical exposure can disrupt TH homeostasis via modes of action targeting intracellular mechanisms, thereby potentially influencing TH transport, deiodination or signaling. Understanding the cause and effect relationships of chemical hazards interfering with TH homeostasis in the developing brain is necessary to identify how chemicals might disturb brain development and result in neurodevelopmental disorders. Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) can provide a template for mapping these relationships, and so far multiple AOPs have been developed for TH homeostasis and adverse effects on cognition. The present review aims to expand current AOP networks by (1) summarizing the most important factors in the regulation of brain development under influence of TH, (2) integrating human-based mechanistic information of biological pathways which can be disturbed by TH disrupting chemicals, and (3) by incorporating brain-specific TH-mediated physiology, including barriers and cell specificity, as well as clinical knowledge. TH-specific pathways in the fetal brain are highlighted and supported by distinguishing cell type specific Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and downstream Key Events (KEs) for astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes. Two main pathways leading to adverse outcomes (AOs) in the areas of 'cognition' and 'motor function' are decreased myelination due to oligodendrocyte dysfunction, and decreased synaptogenesis and network formation via the neurons. The proposed AOP framework can form a basis for selecting developmental neurotoxic <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> test systems for an innovative human-focused hazard testing strategy and risk assessment of chemical exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"304-320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143585003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-20DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2415893
My Hua, Kylie McCauley, David Brew, Jonathan Heywood, Jacob Siracusa, Michael Stevens, Dennis Paustenbach
In March 2023, the EPA proposed a 4.0 ppt maximum contaminant level (MCL) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) (each) and a hazard index approach for four other PFAS. The EPA sought public feedback on the proposed MCL in early 2023 and received 1626 comment submissions via the PFAS docket website (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0114). Final MCLs were promulgated on April 10, 2024. Our analysis of the PFAS docket identified 128 comments that had a reasonable degree of scientific merit, with 57 comments endorsing the regulations and 71 questioning the MCLs public health utility. Critics noted the lack of evidence for adverse health effects at low PFAS exposures, the rule's significant impact on the economy, and the EPA's selection of published papers which the Agency chose to support their views. Many well-substantiated comments highlighted that few, if any, adverse health effects were reported at doses as much as 100-1000 times above those associated with the proposed drinking water guidelines. We found that the comments which discussed the evidence linking PFAS exposures below 200 ppt in drinking water to adverse health effects were equivocal. Most of the well-documented science based comments indicated that the data did not justify setting a 4.0 ppt MCL. It was noted that the EPA MCL was quite different from drinking water standards in other countries (up to 8-140 fold lower). During the review, it became apparent that a 4.0 ppt MCL may have little effect on PFAS blood concentrations in most Americans since drinking water accounts for less than 20% of their total PFAS intake. Additionally, a significant portion of the American population consumes minimal amounts of tap water. Commenters noted that the financial burden for treatment and cleanup was much higher than what was reported in the justification for the final MCL which was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and eventually promulgated. It is possible that EPA underestimated the financial impact on the nation by up to 100 to 200-fold. Our analysis indicates that many, if not most, of the scientifically rigorous comments on the EPA's proposed MCL were not acknowledged or considered by the Agency. We conclude the article by offering sixteen recommendations for the EPA to consider if Congress or the courts choose to reopen the evaluation of these MCLs. These included convening an international expert panel, reevaluating the appropriateness of the LNT model for PFAS, ensuring adequate time for study quality assessment and cost-benefit analysis, considering an approach to implementing a series of MCLs, critically reevaluating scientific studies, adhering to EPA risk assessment guidelines, addressing SDWA compliance concerns, revisiting the Hazard Index approach, and ensuring thorough and transparent review of public comments.
{"title":"United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid, and Related Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 2024 Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level: Part 1 - Analysis of Public Comments.","authors":"My Hua, Kylie McCauley, David Brew, Jonathan Heywood, Jacob Siracusa, Michael Stevens, Dennis Paustenbach","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2415893","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2415893","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In March 2023, the EPA proposed a 4.0 ppt maximum contaminant level (MCL) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) (each) and a hazard index approach for four other PFAS. The EPA sought public feedback on the proposed MCL in early 2023 and received 1626 comment submissions <i>via</i> the PFAS docket website (Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0114). Final MCLs were promulgated on April 10, 2024. Our analysis of the PFAS docket identified 128 comments that had a reasonable degree of scientific merit, with 57 comments endorsing the regulations and 71 questioning the MCLs public health utility. Critics noted the lack of evidence for adverse health effects at low PFAS exposures, the rule's significant impact on the economy, and the EPA's selection of published papers which the Agency chose to support their views. Many well-substantiated comments highlighted that few, if any, adverse health effects were reported at doses as much as 100-1000 times above those associated with the proposed drinking water guidelines. We found that the comments which discussed the evidence linking PFAS exposures below 200 ppt in drinking water to adverse health effects were equivocal. Most of the well-documented science based comments indicated that the data did not justify setting a 4.0 ppt MCL. It was noted that the EPA MCL was quite different from drinking water standards in other countries (up to 8-140 fold lower). During the review, it became apparent that a 4.0 ppt MCL may have little effect on PFAS blood concentrations in most Americans since drinking water accounts for less than 20% of their total PFAS intake. Additionally, a significant portion of the American population consumes minimal amounts of tap water. Commenters noted that the financial burden for treatment and cleanup was much higher than what was reported in the justification for the final MCL which was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and eventually promulgated. It is possible that EPA underestimated the financial impact on the nation by up to 100 to 200-fold. Our analysis indicates that many, if not most, of the scientifically rigorous comments on the EPA's proposed MCL were not acknowledged or considered by the Agency. We conclude the article by offering sixteen recommendations for the EPA to consider if Congress or the courts choose to reopen the evaluation of these MCLs. These included convening an international expert panel, reevaluating the appropriateness of the LNT model for PFAS, ensuring adequate time for study quality assessment and cost-benefit analysis, considering an approach to implementing a series of MCLs, critically reevaluating scientific studies, adhering to EPA risk assessment guidelines, addressing SDWA compliance concerns, revisiting the Hazard Index approach, and ensuring thorough and transparent review of public comments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"321-367"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-20DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453
Dennis Paustenbach, Kylie McCauley, Jacob Siracusa, Sarah Smallets, David Brew, Michael Stevens, Blake Deckard, My Hua
<p><p>This paper examines widely held beliefs about the six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) addressed in the final U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule on PFAS in drinking water (e.g., the Maximum Contaminant Levels - MCLs). Based on our understanding of the scientific literature and the comments submitted by stakeholders regarding the EPA's regulation that was promulgated in April 2024, we identified 15 misconceptions that had a weak scientific foundation. These are now memoralized in the MCLs for the six PFAS but remain debated due to ongoing ambiguous research findings. Many critics of the MCLs found the EPA's systematic review of the published relevant information, particularly the toxicology of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), to be inadequate. The following seven views are among the most important. First, the EPA asserted that the toxicology of these six chemicals was poorly understood and lacked sufficient data to determine a safe daily intake level for chronic health effects; nonetheless, they promulgated what may be the costliest environmental regulation to date. Notably, adverse effects remain difficult to demonstrate in occupationally exposed individuals even at blood concentrations 50-100 times higher than current background PFAS levels. Second, the Agency indicated that the epidemiology data showed that exposure to PFOA and PFOS caused kidney and potentially other cancers, yet the data were equivocal and do not support that assertion. Third, it was stated that specific non-cancer effects, such as heart disease, would be prevented under the promulgated rule; however, the studies that they relied upon do not show an increased incidence of heart disease even in highly exposed populations. Fourth, the Agency relied on animal data to support its views on the likely toxic effects in humans, despite ample toxicology data that animals, particularly rodents, are poor predictors of the human response to PFAS exposures. Fifth, the EPA predicted a reduction in healthcare expenditures that would offset much of the cost of complying with the MCL, but, they did not have adequate data to support this prediction. Sixth, the EPA suggested that these six PFAS act through a shared mechanism of action (i.e., PPARα pathway induction); however, data indicate that PPARα induction in humans may be 80% less than what is observed in rodents. Also, induction of the PPARα pathway is not a cause of systemic disease. Seventh, the Agency failed to disclose that achieving the new MCL would yield negligible reductions in blood PFAS levels even among highly exposed populations, given drinking water accounts for only 20% or less of total PFAS exposure. The survey that could answer that question, the EPA's fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, was only 25% complete at the time the MCL was promulgated. Overall, our analysis concluded that while the EPA's intent to regulate these chemicals due to their en
{"title":"United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid, and Related Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 2024 Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level: Part 2 - Fifteen Misconceptions About the Health Hazards.","authors":"Dennis Paustenbach, Kylie McCauley, Jacob Siracusa, Sarah Smallets, David Brew, Michael Stevens, Blake Deckard, My Hua","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines widely held beliefs about the six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) addressed in the final U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule on PFAS in drinking water (e.g., the Maximum Contaminant Levels - MCLs). Based on our understanding of the scientific literature and the comments submitted by stakeholders regarding the EPA's regulation that was promulgated in April 2024, we identified 15 misconceptions that had a weak scientific foundation. These are now memoralized in the MCLs for the six PFAS but remain debated due to ongoing ambiguous research findings. Many critics of the MCLs found the EPA's systematic review of the published relevant information, particularly the toxicology of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), to be inadequate. The following seven views are among the most important. First, the EPA asserted that the toxicology of these six chemicals was poorly understood and lacked sufficient data to determine a safe daily intake level for chronic health effects; nonetheless, they promulgated what may be the costliest environmental regulation to date. Notably, adverse effects remain difficult to demonstrate in occupationally exposed individuals even at blood concentrations 50-100 times higher than current background PFAS levels. Second, the Agency indicated that the epidemiology data showed that exposure to PFOA and PFOS caused kidney and potentially other cancers, yet the data were equivocal and do not support that assertion. Third, it was stated that specific non-cancer effects, such as heart disease, would be prevented under the promulgated rule; however, the studies that they relied upon do not show an increased incidence of heart disease even in highly exposed populations. Fourth, the Agency relied on animal data to support its views on the likely toxic effects in humans, despite ample toxicology data that animals, particularly rodents, are poor predictors of the human response to PFAS exposures. Fifth, the EPA predicted a reduction in healthcare expenditures that would offset much of the cost of complying with the MCL, but, they did not have adequate data to support this prediction. Sixth, the EPA suggested that these six PFAS act through a shared mechanism of action (i.e., PPARα pathway induction); however, data indicate that PPARα induction in humans may be 80% less than what is observed in rodents. Also, induction of the PPARα pathway is not a cause of systemic disease. Seventh, the Agency failed to disclose that achieving the new MCL would yield negligible reductions in blood PFAS levels even among highly exposed populations, given drinking water accounts for only 20% or less of total PFAS exposure. The survey that could answer that question, the EPA's fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, was only 25% complete at the time the MCL was promulgated. Overall, our analysis concluded that while the EPA's intent to regulate these chemicals due to their en","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"368-415"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-15DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2541392
Kimberly G Norman, Lewis E Kaufman, Peter Griem, Linda Loretz, Alexandra Kowcz, Samuel M Cohen, Anthony R Scialli, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash
A comprehensive review of existing toxicity and human exposure data for the ultraviolet filter ensulizole (2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid) as currently used in over-the-counter sunscreen formulations was conducted. Authorized maximum ensulizole usage levels in consumer end-use products worldwide range from 3% to 8%, with the maximum usage level limited to 4% in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Postmarketing clinical safety studies of ensulizole have reported only occasional local skin effects, none of which were associated with systemic toxicity. Ensulizole has been investigated in vitro, in animal toxicity studies, and in human studies for its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential toxicological properties. Experimentally determined values of 4% for oral absorption in rats and of 0.26% for dermal absorption in humans were used for risk calculation purposes. There was no evidence of ensulizole bioaccumulation from rat in vivo studies, consistent with its high water solubility and low octanol/water partition coefficient. Ensulizole is not classifiable as an irritant, although local skin irritation with no systemic effects was noted in a 3-month repeated-dose dermal toxicity study in rabbits. Ensulizole is non-(photo)sensitizing, non-phototoxic, and has demonstrated low toxicity in acute (oral, dermal, and intraperitoneal) and subchronic repeated-dose studies in mammalian species. Subchronic 3-month no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) were identified at 100 mg/kg/day (dermal rabbit) and 1000 mg/kg/day (oral rat OECD 408 study), the highest doses tested, respectively. Ensulizole is considered non-genotoxic, based on negative in vitro studies. No in vivo genotoxicity or long-term carcinogenicity studies were identified. Carcinogenicity risk is not expected based on the negative genotoxicity data, empirical evidence from repeated-dose toxicity and developmental toxicity studies, and the absence of effects on the androgen, estrogen, thyroid, immune, developmental, or reproductive systems. Based on the selected rat subchronic NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg/day and conservative assumptions for estimating the systemic exposure dose (SED) from the application of sunscreen products, margins of safety (defined as NOAEL/SED) >100 were obtained for ensulizole. Therefore, the available data show that ensulizole does not pose risks to human health when used in sunscreen products at concentrations up to 4%, the permitted maximum usage level in the United States, Canada, and Australia.
{"title":"Comprehensive review of ensulizole toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products.","authors":"Kimberly G Norman, Lewis E Kaufman, Peter Griem, Linda Loretz, Alexandra Kowcz, Samuel M Cohen, Anthony R Scialli, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2541392","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2541392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comprehensive review of existing toxicity and human exposure data for the ultraviolet filter ensulizole (2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid) as currently used in over-the-counter sunscreen formulations was conducted. Authorized maximum ensulizole usage levels in consumer end-use products worldwide range from 3% to 8%, with the maximum usage level limited to 4% in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Postmarketing clinical safety studies of ensulizole have reported only occasional local skin effects, none of which were associated with systemic toxicity. Ensulizole has been investigated <i>in vitro</i>, in animal toxicity studies, and in human studies for its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential toxicological properties. Experimentally determined values of 4% for oral absorption in rats and of 0.26% for dermal absorption in humans were used for risk calculation purposes. There was no evidence of ensulizole bioaccumulation from rat <i>in vivo</i> studies, consistent with its high water solubility and low octanol/water partition coefficient. Ensulizole is not classifiable as an irritant, although local skin irritation with no systemic effects was noted in a 3-month repeated-dose dermal toxicity study in rabbits. Ensulizole is non-(photo)sensitizing, non-phototoxic, and has demonstrated low toxicity in acute (oral, dermal, and intraperitoneal) and subchronic repeated-dose studies in mammalian species. Subchronic 3-month no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) were identified at 100 mg/kg/day (dermal rabbit) and 1000 mg/kg/day (oral rat OECD 408 study), the highest doses tested, respectively. Ensulizole is considered non-genotoxic, based on negative <i>in vitro</i> studies. No <i>in vivo</i> genotoxicity or long-term carcinogenicity studies were identified. Carcinogenicity risk is not expected based on the negative genotoxicity data, empirical evidence from repeated-dose toxicity and developmental toxicity studies, and the absence of effects on the androgen, estrogen, thyroid, immune, developmental, or reproductive systems. Based on the selected rat subchronic NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg/day and conservative assumptions for estimating the systemic exposure dose (SED) from the application of sunscreen products, margins of safety (defined as NOAEL/SED) >100 were obtained for ensulizole. Therefore, the available data show that ensulizole does not pose risks to human health when used in sunscreen products at concentrations up to 4%, the permitted maximum usage level in the United States, Canada, and Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"716-734"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145063411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-21DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2543405
Cristian Perez-Fernandez, Diego Ruiz-Sobremazas, Mario Ruiz-Coca, Fernando Sánchez-Santed, Miguel Morales-Navas
Chlorpyrifos (CPF) is one of the most widely used pesticides globally, despite being strictly regulated and banned in several developed countries. It remains in use across many developing and underdeveloped nations. While its primary mechanism of action is acetylcholinesterase inhibition, multiple preclinical and clinical studies have reported developmental and cognitive alterations at lower doses that do not trigger this mechanism. These effects are particularly concerning during early development, when the central nervous system is immature and more vulnerable. Although various alternative molecular targets have been proposed, growing attention has been given to neurotransmitter systems beyond the cholinergic pathway. However, empirical data is inconsistent, and no qualitative or quantitative reviews have provided a clear understanding of these mechanisms. This systematic review aims to address this gap, focusing on preclinical rodent studies. Using a rigorous methodology, 41 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, covering 126 outcomes related to the dopaminergic, serotonergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, and endocannabinoid systems. Overall, the included studies showed a low level of methodological quality and a high risk of bias. Only a few molecular targets were systematically investigated. We introduce two new evaluative metrics-Weight of Evidence and Percentage of Convergence-to highlight five key findings. Notably, preweaning CPF exposure consistently reduced the activity of endocannabinoid-degrading enzymes (FAAH and MAGL), resulting in elevated endocannabinoid tone, particularly increased levels of AEA. Additionally, there is consistent support for CPF-induced serotonergic alterations, particularly upregulation of 5HT2 and 5HT1A receptors following neonatal exposure. Due to insufficient data convergence across laboratories, a meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate. In conclusion, while numerous molecules have been linked to low-dose developmental CPF exposure, only a limited number show consistent empirical support, and only under postnatal exposure conditions. Future research should investigate prenatal exposure effects more systematically and replicate postnatal findings across independent laboratories to strengthen the reliability of these promising results through robust, quantitative analyses.
{"title":"In search of certainty beyond the cholinergic system: a systematic review of developmental chlorpyrifos exposure and neurotransmitter systems disruption in preclinical models.","authors":"Cristian Perez-Fernandez, Diego Ruiz-Sobremazas, Mario Ruiz-Coca, Fernando Sánchez-Santed, Miguel Morales-Navas","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2543405","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2543405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chlorpyrifos (CPF) is one of the most widely used pesticides globally, despite being strictly regulated and banned in several developed countries. It remains in use across many developing and underdeveloped nations. While its primary mechanism of action is acetylcholinesterase inhibition, multiple preclinical and clinical studies have reported developmental and cognitive alterations at lower doses that do not trigger this mechanism. These effects are particularly concerning during early development, when the central nervous system is immature and more vulnerable. Although various alternative molecular targets have been proposed, growing attention has been given to neurotransmitter systems beyond the cholinergic pathway. However, empirical data is inconsistent, and no qualitative or quantitative reviews have provided a clear understanding of these mechanisms. This systematic review aims to address this gap, focusing on preclinical rodent studies. Using a rigorous methodology, 41 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, covering 126 outcomes related to the dopaminergic, serotonergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, and endocannabinoid systems. Overall, the included studies showed a low level of methodological quality and a high risk of bias. Only a few molecular targets were systematically investigated. We introduce two new evaluative metrics-Weight of Evidence and Percentage of Convergence-to highlight five key findings. Notably, preweaning CPF exposure consistently reduced the activity of endocannabinoid-degrading enzymes (FAAH and MAGL), resulting in elevated endocannabinoid tone, particularly increased levels of AEA. Additionally, there is consistent support for CPF-induced serotonergic alterations, particularly upregulation of 5HT2 and 5HT1A receptors following neonatal exposure. Due to insufficient data convergence across laboratories, a meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate. In conclusion, while numerous molecules have been linked to low-dose developmental CPF exposure, only a limited number show consistent empirical support, and only under postnatal exposure conditions. Future research should investigate prenatal exposure effects more systematically and replicate postnatal findings across independent laboratories to strengthen the reliability of these promising results through robust, quantitative analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"751-776"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2388712
Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja, Daniel Zalko, Sabrina Tait, Emanuela Testai, Catherine Viguié, Emanuela Corsini, Nathalie Grova, Franca Maria Buratti, Nicolas J Cabaton, Lucia Coppola, Antonio De la Vieja, Maria Dusinska, Naouale El Yamani, Valentina Galbiati, Patricia Iglesias-Hernández, Yvonne Kohl, Ambra Maddalon, Francesca Marcon, Lydie Naulé, Elise Rundén-Pran, Francesca Salani, Nicoletta Santori, Mónica Torres-Ruiz, Jonathan D Turner, Ondrej Adamovsky, Kiara Aiello-Holden, Hubert Dirven, Henriqueta Louro, Maria João Silva
Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, has been associated with a variety of adverse effects in humans including metabolic, immunological, reproductive, and neurodevelopmental effects, raising concern about its health impact. In the EU, it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and as an endocrine disruptor and was thus included in the candidate list of substances of very high concern (SVHC). On this basis, its use has been banned or restricted in some products. As a consequence, industries turned to bisphenol alternatives, such as bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF), which are now found in various consumer products, as well as in human matrices at a global scale. However, due to their toxicity, these two bisphenols are in the process of being regulated. Other BPA alternatives, whose potential toxicity remains largely unknown due to a knowledge gap, have also started to be used in manufacturing processes. The gradual restriction of the use of BPA underscores the importance of understanding the potential risks associated with its alternatives to avoid regrettable substitutions. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the potential hazards related to BPA alternatives prioritized by European Regulatory Agencies based on their regulatory relevance and selected to be studied under the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC): BPE, BPAP, BPP, BPZ, BPS-MAE, and TCBPA. The focus is on data related to toxicokinetic, endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, developmental neurotoxicity, and genotoxicity/carcinogenicity, which were considered the most relevant endpoints to assess the hazard related to those substances. The goal here is to identify the data gaps in BPA alternatives toxicology and hence formulate the future directions that will be taken in the frame of the PARC project, which seeks also to enhance chemical risk assessment methodologies using new approach methodologies (NAMs).
双酚 A(BPA)是一种合成化学物质,广泛用于聚碳酸酯塑料和环氧树脂的生产,对人体有多种不良影响,包括代谢、免疫、生殖和神经发育方面的影响,引起了人们对其健康影响的关注。在欧盟,它被归类为生殖毒性物质和内分泌干扰物,并因此被列入高度关注物质(SVHC)候选清单。在此基础上,欧盟禁止或限制在某些产品中使用该物质。因此,工业界转而使用双酚替代品,如双酚 S (BPS) 和双酚 F (BPF)。然而,由于其毒性,这两种双酚正在受到管制。其他双酚 A 替代品也开始用于生产过程,但由于知识空白,这些替代品的潜在毒性在很大程度上仍然未知。对双酚 A 使用的逐步限制凸显了了解其替代品潜在风险的重要性,以避免令人遗憾的替代。本综述旨在总结有关双酚 A 替代品潜在危害的现有知识,这些替代品由欧洲监管机构根据其监管相关性进行优先排序,并在欧洲化学品风险评估伙伴关系(PARC)下进行研究:BPE、BPAP、BPP、BPZ、BPS-MAE 和 TCBPA。重点是与毒物动力学、内分泌干扰、免疫毒性、发育神经毒性和遗传毒性/致癌性有关的数据,这些数据被认为是评估这些物质相关危害的最相关终点。本报告的目的是确定双酚 A 替代品毒理学方面的数据缺口,从而制定 PARC 项目框架内的未来发展方向。
{"title":"A critical review to identify data gaps and improve risk assessment of bisphenol A alternatives for human health.","authors":"Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja, Daniel Zalko, Sabrina Tait, Emanuela Testai, Catherine Viguié, Emanuela Corsini, Nathalie Grova, Franca Maria Buratti, Nicolas J Cabaton, Lucia Coppola, Antonio De la Vieja, Maria Dusinska, Naouale El Yamani, Valentina Galbiati, Patricia Iglesias-Hernández, Yvonne Kohl, Ambra Maddalon, Francesca Marcon, Lydie Naulé, Elise Rundén-Pran, Francesca Salani, Nicoletta Santori, Mónica Torres-Ruiz, Jonathan D Turner, Ondrej Adamovsky, Kiara Aiello-Holden, Hubert Dirven, Henriqueta Louro, Maria João Silva","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2388712","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2388712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, has been associated with a variety of adverse effects in humans including metabolic, immunological, reproductive, and neurodevelopmental effects, raising concern about its health impact. In the EU, it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and as an endocrine disruptor and was thus included in the candidate list of substances of very high concern (SVHC). On this basis, its use has been banned or restricted in some products. As a consequence, industries turned to bisphenol alternatives, such as bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF), which are now found in various consumer products, as well as in human matrices at a global scale. However, due to their toxicity, these two bisphenols are in the process of being regulated. Other BPA alternatives, whose potential toxicity remains largely unknown due to a knowledge gap, have also started to be used in manufacturing processes. The gradual restriction of the use of BPA underscores the importance of understanding the potential risks associated with its alternatives to avoid regrettable substitutions. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the potential hazards related to BPA alternatives prioritized by European Regulatory Agencies based on their regulatory relevance and selected to be studied under the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC): BPE, BPAP, BPP, BPZ, BPS-MAE, and TCBPA. The focus is on data related to toxicokinetic, endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, developmental neurotoxicity, and genotoxicity/carcinogenicity, which were considered the most relevant endpoints to assess the hazard related to those substances. The goal here is to identify the data gaps in BPA alternatives toxicology and hence formulate the future directions that will be taken in the frame of the PARC project, which seeks also to enhance chemical risk assessment methodologies using new approach methodologies (NAMs).</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"696-753"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-12-05DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2425669
Ahmad Habibian Sezavar, Nima Rastegar-Pouyani, Nader Rahimi Kakavandi, Fatemeh Fakhari, Emad Jafarzadeh, Shima Aliebrahimi, Seyed Nasser Ostad
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals used widely in industrial and commercial applications. Concerns exist about their potential link to cancer risk as possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the dose-response relationship between PFAS, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) exposure and risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancers. We systematically searched major databases through May 2022 and identified 13 observational studies for inclusion. Using random-effects models, we calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the highest versus lowest PFAS exposure categories. Additionally, we analyzed the dose-response correlation between PFAS and cancer risk in a subset of studies. The study revealed no substantial correlation between exposure to PFASs and the incidence of breast cancer (BC) (ORPFOS = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.91-1.46, ORPFOA = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.68-1.50, ORPFNA = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.64-1.21, ORPFHxS = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.40-3.77, and ORPFDA = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.41-4.10), ovarian cancer (ORPFOA = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84-2.42), prostate cancer (ORPFOA = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88-1.26), and colorectal cancer (ORPFOA = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12) in the highest versus lowest exposure analysis. However, dose-response analysis showed that for every 1 ng/ml increase in PFNA and 2 ng/ml increase in PFOA, the relative risk for BC decreased significantly (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99 and RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, respectively). Non-linear dose-response analysis found no significant changes in BC risk with increasing PFAS levels. In conclusion, while the highest versus lowest analysis does not support associations between PFAS exposure and the risk of these cancers, linear dose-response analysis suggests potential inverse relationships between PFNA/PFOA levels and BC risk. Further research is warranted on these potential protective effects.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是广泛用于工业和商业应用的合成化学品。人们担心它们可能与癌症风险有关,因为它们可能是干扰内分泌的化学物质。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估PFAS、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟壬酸(PFNA)、全氟癸酸(PFDA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)暴露与乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌风险之间的剂量-反应关系。我们系统地检索了截至2022年5月的主要数据库,并确定了13项观察性研究纳入。使用随机效应模型,我们计算了比较最高和最低PFAS暴露类别的总优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。此外,我们在一部分研究中分析了PFAS与癌症风险之间的剂量-反应相关性。这项研究并没有发现实质性的联系接触PFASs和乳腺癌的发病率(BC) (ORPFOS = 1.15, 95% CI -1.46 = 0.91, ORPFOA = 1.01, 95% CI -1.50 = 0.68, ORPFNA = 0.88, 95% CI -1.21 = 0.64, ORPFHxS = 1.22, 95% CI -3.77 = 0.40, ORPFDA = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.41 - -4.10),卵巢癌(ORPFOA = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84 - -2.42),前列腺癌(ORPFOA = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88 - -1.26),和结直肠癌(ORPFOA = 0.77,95% CI = 0.53-1.12)。然而,剂量反应分析显示,PFNA每增加1 ng/ml, PFOA每增加2 ng/ml, BC的相对风险显著降低(RR为0.67,95% CI为0.45-0.99,RR为0.94,95% CI为0.89-0.98)。非线性剂量反应分析发现,随着PFAS水平的增加,BC风险没有显著变化。总之,虽然最高和最低的分析不支持PFAS暴露与这些癌症风险之间的关联,但线性剂量反应分析表明PFNA/PFOA水平与BC风险之间存在潜在的反比关系。这些潜在的保护作用有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Examining the relationship between per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances and breast, colorectal, prostate, and ovarian cancers: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmad Habibian Sezavar, Nima Rastegar-Pouyani, Nader Rahimi Kakavandi, Fatemeh Fakhari, Emad Jafarzadeh, Shima Aliebrahimi, Seyed Nasser Ostad","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2425669","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2425669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals used widely in industrial and commercial applications. Concerns exist about their potential link to cancer risk as possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the dose-response relationship between PFAS, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) exposure and risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancers. We systematically searched major databases through May 2022 and identified 13 observational studies for inclusion. Using random-effects models, we calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the highest versus lowest PFAS exposure categories. Additionally, we analyzed the dose-response correlation between PFAS and cancer risk in a subset of studies. The study revealed no substantial correlation between exposure to PFASs and the incidence of breast cancer (BC) (OR<sub>PFOS</sub> = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.91-1.46, OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.68-1.50, OR<sub>PFNA</sub> = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.64-1.21, OR<sub>PFHxS</sub> = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.40-3.77, and OR<sub>PFDA</sub> = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.41-4.10), ovarian cancer (OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84-2.42), prostate cancer (OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88-1.26), and colorectal cancer (OR<sub>PFOA</sub> = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12) in the highest versus lowest exposure analysis. However, dose-response analysis showed that for every 1 ng/ml increase in PFNA and 2 ng/ml increase in PFOA, the relative risk for BC decreased significantly (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99 and RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, respectively). Non-linear dose-response analysis found no significant changes in BC risk with increasing PFAS levels. In conclusion, while the highest versus lowest analysis does not support associations between PFAS exposure and the risk of these cancers, linear dose-response analysis suggests potential inverse relationships between PFNA/PFOA levels and BC risk. Further research is warranted on these potential protective effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"981-995"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142784392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2399840
Jennifer Go, Nawal Farhat, Karen Leingartner, Elvin Iscan Insel, Franco Momoli, Richard Carrier, Daniel Krewski
Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that were commonly used in the construction of cement pipes for drinking water distribution systems. These pipes deteriorate and can release asbestos fibers into drinking water, raising concerns about potential risk to human health. The objective of this work was to synthesize human, animal, and in vitro evidence on potential health risks due to ingested asbestos in drinking water and evaluate the weight of evidence (WoE) of human health risk. A systematic review of epidemiological evidence was conducted, along with critical review of animal and in vitro evidence, followed by WoE evaluation that integrated human, animal, and in vitro evidence. The systematic review included 17 human studies with health outcomes mostly related to various cancer sites, with the majority focusing on the gastrointestinal system. The WoE evaluation resulted in very low levels of confidence or insufficient evidence of a health effect for cancers in 15 organ systems and for three non-cancer endpoints. While eight studies reported possible associations with stomach cancer in males, few high-quality studies were available to verify a causal relationship. Based on high-quality animal studies, an increased risk for cancer or non-cancer endpoints was not supported, aligning with findings from human studies. Overall, the currently available body of evidence is insufficient to establish a clear link between asbestos contamination in drinking water and adverse health effects. Due to the lack of both high-quality epidemiological studies and a validated kinetic model for ingested asbestos, additional research on this association is warranted.
{"title":"Review of epidemiological and toxicological studies on health effects from ingestion of asbestos in drinking water.","authors":"Jennifer Go, Nawal Farhat, Karen Leingartner, Elvin Iscan Insel, Franco Momoli, Richard Carrier, Daniel Krewski","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2399840","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2399840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that were commonly used in the construction of cement pipes for drinking water distribution systems. These pipes deteriorate and can release asbestos fibers into drinking water, raising concerns about potential risk to human health. The objective of this work was to synthesize human, animal, and <i>in vitro</i> evidence on potential health risks due to ingested asbestos in drinking water and evaluate the weight of evidence (WoE) of human health risk. A systematic review of epidemiological evidence was conducted, along with critical review of animal and <i>in vitro</i> evidence, followed by WoE evaluation that integrated human, animal, and <i>in vitro</i> evidence. The systematic review included 17 human studies with health outcomes mostly related to various cancer sites, with the majority focusing on the gastrointestinal system. The WoE evaluation resulted in very low levels of confidence or insufficient evidence of a health effect for cancers in 15 organ systems and for three non-cancer endpoints. While eight studies reported possible associations with stomach cancer in males, few high-quality studies were available to verify a causal relationship. Based on high-quality animal studies, an increased risk for cancer or non-cancer endpoints was not supported, aligning with findings from human studies. Overall, the currently available body of evidence is insufficient to establish a clear link between asbestos contamination in drinking water and adverse health effects. Due to the lack of both high-quality epidemiological studies and a validated kinetic model for ingested asbestos, additional research on this association is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"856-894"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-12-10DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2420972
Katherine M Rentschler, Urmila P Kodavanti
Air pollution is a significant environmental health risk for urban areas and developing countries. Air pollution may contribute to the incidence of cardiopulmonary and metabolic diseases. Evidence also points to the role of air pollution in worsening or developing neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Inhaled pollutants include compositionally differing mixtures of respirable gaseous and particulate components of varied sizes, solubilities, and chemistry. Inhalation of combustibles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or other irritant particulate matter (PM) may trigger lung sensory afferents which initiate a sympathetic stress response via activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axes. Activation of SAM and HPA axes are associated with selective inhibition of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axes following exposure. Regarding chronic exposure in susceptible hosts, these changes may become pathological by causing neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter, and neuroendocrine imbalances. Soluble PM, such as metals and nano-size particles may translocate across the olfactory, trigeminal, or vagal nerves through retrograde axonal transport, or through systemic circulation which may disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and deposit in neural tissue. Neuronal deposition of metallic components can have a negative impact through multiple molecular mechanisms. In addition to systemic translocation, the release of pituitary and stress hormones, altered metabolic hormonal status and resultant circulating metabolic milieu, and sympathetically and HPA-mediated changes in immune markers, may secondarily impact the brain through a variety of regulatory adrenal hormone-dependent mechanisms. Several reviews covering air pollution as a risk factor for neuropsychiatric disorders have been published, but no reviews discuss the in-depth intersection between molecular and stress-related neuroendocrine mechanisms, thereby addressing adaptation and susceptibility variations and link to peripheral tissue effects. The purpose of this review is to discuss evidence regarding neurochemical, neuroendocrine, and molecular mechanisms which may contribute to neuropathology from air pollution exposure. This review also covers bi-directional neural and systemic interactions which may raise the risk for air pollution-related systemic illness.
{"title":"Mechanistic insights regarding neuropsychiatric and neuropathologic impacts of air pollution.","authors":"Katherine M Rentschler, Urmila P Kodavanti","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2420972","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2420972","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Air pollution is a significant environmental health risk for urban areas and developing countries. Air pollution may contribute to the incidence of cardiopulmonary and metabolic diseases. Evidence also points to the role of air pollution in worsening or developing neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Inhaled pollutants include compositionally differing mixtures of respirable gaseous and particulate components of varied sizes, solubilities, and chemistry. Inhalation of combustibles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or other irritant particulate matter (PM) may trigger lung sensory afferents which initiate a sympathetic stress response <i>via</i> activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axes. Activation of SAM and HPA axes are associated with selective inhibition of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axes following exposure. Regarding chronic exposure in susceptible hosts, these changes may become pathological by causing neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter, and neuroendocrine imbalances. Soluble PM, such as metals and nano-size particles may translocate across the olfactory, trigeminal, or vagal nerves through retrograde axonal transport, or through systemic circulation which may disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and deposit in neural tissue. Neuronal deposition of metallic components can have a negative impact through multiple molecular mechanisms. In addition to systemic translocation, the release of pituitary and stress hormones, altered metabolic hormonal status and resultant circulating metabolic milieu, and sympathetically and HPA-mediated changes in immune markers, may secondarily impact the brain through a variety of regulatory adrenal hormone-dependent mechanisms. Several reviews covering air pollution as a risk factor for neuropsychiatric disorders have been published, but no reviews discuss the in-depth intersection between molecular and stress-related neuroendocrine mechanisms, thereby addressing adaptation and susceptibility variations and link to peripheral tissue effects. The purpose of this review is to discuss evidence regarding neurochemical, neuroendocrine, and molecular mechanisms which may contribute to neuropathology from air pollution exposure. This review also covers bi-directional neural and systemic interactions which may raise the risk for air pollution-related systemic illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"953-980"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}