首页 > 最新文献

Critical Reviews in Toxicology最新文献

英文 中文
Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health. 膳食糖化化合物--对人类健康的影响。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985
Michael Hellwig, Patrick Diel, Gerhard Eisenbrand, Tilman Grune, Sabine Guth, Thomas Henle, Hans-Ulrich Humpf, Hans-Georg Joost, Doris Marko, Jana Raupbach, Angelika Roth, Stefan Vieths, Angela Mally

The term "glycation compounds" comprises a wide range of structurally diverse compounds that are formed endogenously and in food via the Maillard reaction, a chemical reaction between reducing sugars and amino acids. Glycation compounds produced endogenously are considered to contribute to a range of diseases. This has led to the hypothesis that glycation compounds present in food may also cause adverse effects and thus pose a nutritional risk to human health. In this work, the Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) summarized data on formation, occurrence, exposure and toxicity of glycation compounds (Part A) and systematically assessed potential associations between dietary intake of defined glycation compounds and disease, including allergy, diabetes, cardiovascular and renal disease, gut/gastrotoxicity, brain/cognitive impairment and cancer (Part B). A systematic search in Pubmed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science using a combination of keywords defining individual glycation compounds and relevant disease patterns linked to the subject area of food, nutrition and diet retrieved 253 original publications relevant to the research question. Of these, only 192 were found to comply with previously defined quality criteria and were thus considered suitable to assess potential health risks of dietary glycation compounds. For each adverse health effect considered in this assessment, however, only limited numbers of human, animal and in vitro studies were identified. While studies in humans were often limited due to small cohort size, short study duration, and confounders, experimental studies in animals that allow for controlled exposure to individual glycation compounds provided some evidence for impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, cardiovascular effects and renal injury in response to oral exposure to dicarbonyl compounds, albeit at dose levels by far exceeding estimated human exposures. The overall database was generally inconsistent or inconclusive. Based on this systematic review, the SKLM concludes that there is at present no convincing evidence for a causal association between dietary intake of glycation compounds and adverse health effects.

糖化化合物 "一词包括多种结构不同的化合物,这些化合物在内源性和食物中通过马氏反应(还原糖和氨基酸之间的化学反应)形成。内源性产生的糖化化合物被认为会导致一系列疾病。由此产生的一个假设是,食物中的糖化化合物也可能造成不良影响,从而对人类健康构成营养风险。在这项工作中,德国研究基金会(DFG)食品安全参议院委员会(SKLM)总结了有关糖化化合物的形成、发生、暴露和毒性的数据(A 部分),并系统评估了膳食中特定糖化化合物的摄入量与疾病(包括过敏、糖尿病、心血管和肾脏疾病、肠道/胃毒性、脑/认知障碍和癌症)之间的潜在关联(B 部分)。在 Pubmed (Medline)、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统性搜索,结合使用了与食品、营养和饮食主题领域相关的定义单个糖化化合物和相关疾病模式的关键词,检索到了 253 篇与研究问题相关的原始出版物。其中只有 192 篇符合之前定义的质量标准,因此被认为适合用于评估膳食糖化化合物的潜在健康风险。不过,对于本评估中考虑的每种不利健康影响,只发现了数量有限的人体、动物和体外研究。虽然对人类的研究往往因队列规模小、研究持续时间短和混杂因素而受到限制,但可控制接触单个糖化化合物的动物实验研究提供了一些证据,证明口服接触二羰基化合物会导致糖耐量受损、胰岛素抵抗、心血管影响和肾损伤,尽管其剂量水平远远超过估计的人类接触量。整个数据库的研究结果普遍不一致或没有定论。根据这项系统审查,科学知识管理小组得出结论,目前没有令人信服的证据表明膳食中摄入的糖化化合物与不良健康影响之间存在因果关系。
{"title":"Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health.","authors":"Michael Hellwig, Patrick Diel, Gerhard Eisenbrand, Tilman Grune, Sabine Guth, Thomas Henle, Hans-Ulrich Humpf, Hans-Georg Joost, Doris Marko, Jana Raupbach, Angelika Roth, Stefan Vieths, Angela Mally","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"glycation compounds\" comprises a wide range of structurally diverse compounds that are formed endogenously and in food <i>via</i> the Maillard reaction, a chemical reaction between reducing sugars and amino acids. Glycation compounds produced endogenously are considered to contribute to a range of diseases. This has led to the hypothesis that glycation compounds present in food may also cause adverse effects and thus pose a nutritional risk to human health. In this work, the Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) summarized data on formation, occurrence, exposure and toxicity of glycation compounds (Part A) and systematically assessed potential associations between dietary intake of defined glycation compounds and disease, including allergy, diabetes, cardiovascular and renal disease, gut/gastrotoxicity, brain/cognitive impairment and cancer (Part B). A systematic search in Pubmed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science using a combination of keywords defining individual glycation compounds and relevant disease patterns linked to the subject area of food, nutrition and diet retrieved 253 original publications relevant to the research question. Of these, only 192 were found to comply with previously defined quality criteria and were thus considered suitable to assess potential health risks of dietary glycation compounds. For each adverse health effect considered in this assessment, however, only limited numbers of human, animal and <i>in vitro</i> studies were identified. While studies in humans were often limited due to small cohort size, short study duration, and confounders, experimental studies in animals that allow for controlled exposure to individual glycation compounds provided some evidence for impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, cardiovascular effects and renal injury in response to oral exposure to dicarbonyl compounds, albeit at dose levels by far exceeding estimated human exposures. The overall database was generally inconsistent or inconclusive. Based on this systematic review, the SKLM concludes that there is at present no convincing evidence for a causal association between dietary intake of glycation compounds and adverse health effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"485-617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the conduct and reporting of the T-cell dependent antibody response in the Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study provided under the EU REACH regulation. 评估欧盟 REACH 法规规定的扩展一代生殖毒性研究中 T 细胞依赖性抗体反应的实施和报告情况。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2377203
Rob J Vandebriel, Betty Hakkert, Jeroen L A Pennings, Laura H Rossi, Ingo Bichlmaier, Wieneke Bil

The European Union (EU) Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability regards chemicals that affect the immune system among the most harmful ones. The Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study (EOGRTS; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline (TG) 443), addresses, among others, potential effects of chemicals on development. In specific cases, the EOGRTS is performed with addition of a so-called cohort 3, that addresses potential effects on the developing immune system, by means of a central assay measuring the T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR). This assay is based on an interplay of antigen presentation, T-cell help and antibody production by B-cells, and together comprises a functional immune response. In the context of the EOGRTS review project of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), we evaluated 15 available TDARs for compliance with conduct and reporting requirements. Collectively, the majority of the TDAR studies were considered to be adequately conducted. We however observed: (i) the protocols differed by the antigen used (sheep red blood cells (SRBC) or KLH), the route of administration (intravenous, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous), prime or prime/boost immunizations, and whether IgG was measured. (ii) There was major variation in the effects of the positive control for immunosuppression, cyclophosphamide. (iii) Proficiency was not always shown. (iv) Statistical analysis was not always done or reported. (v) Results of effects on lymphocyte populations or other immunotoxicity observations obtained in cohort 1 (or 2) of the EOGRTS were not always discussed together with results of the TDAR. Taken together, next to an improved quality of reporting, this may suggest a need to better define the conduct of the TDAR in OECD TG 443 and OECD Guidance Document (GD) 151, at least for certain aspects.

欧洲联盟(欧盟)化学品可持续发展战略将影响免疫系统的化学品视为最有害的化学品。扩展的一代生殖毒性研究(EOGRTS;经济合作与发展组织(OECD)测试指南(TG)443)主要针对化学品对发育的潜在影响。在特定情况下,在进行 EOGRTS 试验时,会增加所谓的队列 3,通过测量 T 细胞依赖性抗体反应 (TDAR) 的中心检测法来解决对发育中的免疫系统的潜在影响。该检测基于抗原呈递、T 细胞帮助和 B 细胞产生抗体的相互作用,共同构成了功能性免疫反应。在欧洲化学品管理局 (ECHA) 的 EOGRTS 审查项目中,我们对 15 种可用的 TDAR 进行了评估,以确定其是否符合行为和报告要求。总体而言,大多数 TDAR 研究都被认为是充分进行的。不过,我们注意到(i) 使用的抗原(绵羊红细胞 (SRBC) 或 KLH)、给药途径(静脉注射、腹腔注射或皮下注射)、初次免疫或初次/加强免疫,以及是否测量 IgG,这些方案各不相同。(ii) 免疫抑制阳性对照环磷酰胺的效果差异很大。(iii) 并非总能显示出熟练程度。(iv) 并非总是进行或报告统计分析。(v) 在 EOGRTS 第 1 组(或第 2 组)中获得的对淋巴细胞群的影响结果或其他 免疫毒性观察结果并不总是与 TDAR 的结果一起讨论。总之,除了提高报告质量之外,这可能表明需要在 OECD TG 443 和 OECD 指导文件 (GD) 151 中更好地界定 TDAR 的进行,至少在某些方面。
{"title":"Evaluating the conduct and reporting of the T-cell dependent antibody response in the Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study provided under the EU REACH regulation.","authors":"Rob J Vandebriel, Betty Hakkert, Jeroen L A Pennings, Laura H Rossi, Ingo Bichlmaier, Wieneke Bil","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2377203","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2377203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Union (EU) Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability regards chemicals that affect the immune system among the most harmful ones. The Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study (EOGRTS; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline (TG) 443), addresses, among others, potential effects of chemicals on development. In specific cases, the EOGRTS is performed with addition of a so-called cohort 3, that addresses potential effects on the developing immune system, by means of a central assay measuring the T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR). This assay is based on an interplay of antigen presentation, T-cell help and antibody production by B-cells, and together comprises a functional immune response. In the context of the EOGRTS review project of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), we evaluated 15 available TDARs for compliance with conduct and reporting requirements. Collectively, the majority of the TDAR studies were considered to be adequately conducted. We however observed: (i) the protocols differed by the antigen used (sheep red blood cells (SRBC) or KLH), the route of administration (intravenous, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous), prime or prime/boost immunizations, and whether IgG was measured. (ii) There was major variation in the effects of the positive control for immunosuppression, cyclophosphamide. (iii) Proficiency was not always shown. (iv) Statistical analysis was not always done or reported. (v) Results of effects on lymphocyte populations or other immunotoxicity observations obtained in cohort 1 (or 2) of the EOGRTS were not always discussed together with results of the TDAR. Taken together, next to an improved quality of reporting, this may suggest a need to better define the conduct of the TDAR in OECD TG 443 and OECD Guidance Document (GD) 151, at least for certain aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"476-484"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mechanisms of neurodevelopmental toxicity of topiramate. 托吡酯对神经发育的毒性机制。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2368552
John W Steele, Vaishnav Krishnan, Richard H Finnell

Prescriptions for antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been rapidly growing over the last several decades due, in part, to an expanding list of clinical indications for which they are now prescribed. This trend has raised concern for potential adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in ASM-exposed pregnancies. Recent large scale population studies have suggested that the use of topiramate (TOPAMAX, Janssen-Cilag), when prescribed for seizure control, migraines, and/or weight management, is associated with an increased risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in exposed offspring. Here, we critically review epidemiologic evidence demonstrating the neurobehavioral teratogenicity of topiramate and speculate on the neuromolecular mechanisms by which prenatal exposure may perturb neurocognitive development. Specifically, we explore the potential role of topiramate's pharmacological interactions with ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels, especially GABAergic signaling, its effects on DNA methylation and histone acetylation, whether topiramate induces oxidative stress, and its association with fetal growth restriction as possible mechanisms contributing to neurodevelopmental toxicity. Resolving this biology will be necessary to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by topiramate or other ASMs.

过去几十年来,抗癫痫药物(ASMs)的处方量一直在快速增长,部分原因是现在处方的临床适应症越来越多。这一趋势引发了人们对妊娠期服用抗癫痫药物可能对神经发育造成不良影响的担忧。最近的大规模人群研究表明,使用托吡酯(TOPAMAX,Janssen-Cilag 公司)来控制癫痫发作、偏头痛和/或控制体重,与暴露于 ASM 的后代患自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD)、智力障碍和注意力缺陷/多动症 (ADHD) 的风险增加有关。在此,我们对证明托吡酯神经行为致畸性的流行病学证据进行了批判性回顾,并对产前暴露可能扰乱神经认知发育的神经分子机制进行了推测。具体来说,我们探讨了托吡酯与配体和电压门控离子通道(尤其是 GABA 能信号传导)的药理学相互作用、其对 DNA 甲基化和组蛋白乙酰化的影响、托吡酯是否会诱导氧化应激以及其与胎儿生长受限的关联等可能导致神经发育毒性的机制。要降低托吡酯或其他 ASM 引起不良妊娠结局的风险,就必须解决这一生物学问题。
{"title":"Mechanisms of neurodevelopmental toxicity of topiramate.","authors":"John W Steele, Vaishnav Krishnan, Richard H Finnell","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2368552","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2368552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescriptions for antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been rapidly growing over the last several decades due, in part, to an expanding list of clinical indications for which they are now prescribed. This trend has raised concern for potential adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in ASM-exposed pregnancies. Recent large scale population studies have suggested that the use of topiramate (TOPAMAX, Janssen-Cilag), when prescribed for seizure control, migraines, and/or weight management, is associated with an increased risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in exposed offspring. Here, we critically review epidemiologic evidence demonstrating the neurobehavioral teratogenicity of topiramate and speculate on the neuromolecular mechanisms by which prenatal exposure may perturb neurocognitive development. Specifically, we explore the potential role of topiramate's pharmacological interactions with ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels, especially GABAergic signaling, its effects on DNA methylation and histone acetylation, whether topiramate induces oxidative stress, and its association with fetal growth restriction as possible mechanisms contributing to neurodevelopmental toxicity. Resolving this biology will be necessary to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by topiramate or other ASMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"465-475"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modeling the human placenta: in vitro applications in developmental and reproductive toxicology. 人类胎盘建模:发育和生殖毒理学中的体外应用。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2295349
Sarah Park, Edward Sidney Hunter

During its temporary tenure, the placenta has extensive and specialized functions that are critical for pre- and post-natal development. The consequences of chemical exposure in utero can have profound effects on the structure and function of pregnancy-associated tissues and the life-long health of the birthing person and their offspring. However, the toxicological importance and critical functions of the placenta to embryonic and fetal development and maturation have been understudied. This narrative will review early placental development in humans and highlight some in vitro models currently in use that are or can be applied to better understand placental processes underlying developmental toxicity due to in utero environmental exposures.

胎盘在其临时存在期间具有广泛而特殊的功能,对产前和产后发育至关重要。在子宫内接触化学品的后果会对妊娠相关组织的结构和功能以及孕妇及其后代的终生健康产生深远影响。然而,有关胎盘对胚胎和胎儿发育及成熟的毒理学重要性和关键功能的研究一直不足。本报告将回顾人类胎盘的早期发育过程,并重点介绍目前正在使用或可以使用的一些体外模型,以更好地了解子宫内环境暴露导致的发育毒性所隐含的胎盘过程。
{"title":"Modeling the human placenta: <i>in vitro</i> applications in developmental and reproductive toxicology.","authors":"Sarah Park, Edward Sidney Hunter","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2295349","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2295349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During its temporary tenure, the placenta has extensive and specialized functions that are critical for pre- and post-natal development. The consequences of chemical exposure <i>in utero</i> can have profound effects on the structure and function of pregnancy-associated tissues and the life-long health of the birthing person and their offspring. However, the toxicological importance and critical functions of the placenta to embryonic and fetal development and maturation have been understudied. This narrative will review early placental development in humans and highlight some <i>in vitro</i> models currently in use that are or can be applied to better understand placental processes underlying developmental toxicity due to <i>in utero</i> environmental exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"431-464"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Talc and human cancer: a systematic review of the experimental animal and mechanistic evidence. 滑石粉与人类癌症:实验动物和机理证据的系统回顾。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2349668
Robyn L Prueitt, Nicholas L Drury, Ross A Shore, Denali N Boon, Julie E Goodman

The potential carcinogenicity of talc has been evaluated in many studies in humans and experimental animals published in the scientific literature over the last several decades, with a number of these studies reporting no associations between talc exposure and any type of cancer. In order to fully understand the current state of the science regarding the potential for talc to induce human cancers, we conducted a comprehensive and systematic review of the available experimental animal and mechanistic evidence (in conjunction with a systematic review of the epidemiology evidence in a companion analysis) to evaluate whether it supports talc as being carcinogenic to humans. We considered study quality and its impact on the interpretation of results and evaluated all types of cancer and all exposure routes. We also evaluated the evidence on the potential for talc to migrate in the body to potential tumor sites. We identified seven experimental animal carcinogenicity studies and 11 mechanistic studies of talc to systematically review. We found that several of the experimental animal carcinogenicity studies of talc have limitations that preclude their sensitivity to detect increases in tumor incidence. Regardless, the studies cover multiple exposure routes, species, and exposure durations, and none indicate that talc is a carcinogen in experimental animals except in rats under conditions of extremely high exposure that likely resulted in lung particle overload, a nonspecific effect of high exposures to poorly soluble particles, and not from any carcinogenic properties of talc. Lung particle overload leading to lung tumor formation has only been observed in rats and not in any other species, including humans. The mechanistic studies indicate that talc is not genotoxic or mutagenic, but can induce some effects that could be events on a possible pathway to carcinogenicity, mainly at high exposures or in in vitro studies with exposures of unclear relevance in vivo, but these effects are not consistent across studies and cell types. This systematic review of the experimental animal carcinogenicity and mechanistic evidence for talc indicates that an association between talc exposure and cancer is not expected in humans. Talc carcinogenicity is not plausible in any species except rats, and only when the exposure conditions are high enough to induce lung particle overload, which is not relevant to human exposures.

过去几十年来,科学文献中发表了许多关于人类和实验动物的研究报告,对滑石粉的潜在致癌性进行了评估。为了充分了解有关滑石粉可能诱发人类癌症的科学现状,我们对现有的实验动物和机理证据进行了全面系统的审查(同时在配套分析中对流行病学证据进行了系统审查),以评估这些证据是否支持滑石粉对人类的致癌性。我们考虑了研究质量及其对结果解释的影响,并评估了所有类型的癌症和所有接触途径。我们还评估了有关滑石粉在体内迁移到潜在肿瘤部位的可能性的证据。我们确定了 7 项实验动物致癌性研究和 11 项滑石粉机理研究,并对其进行了系统审查。我们发现,有几项关于滑石粉的实验性动物致癌性研究存在局限性,无法敏感地检测到肿瘤发病率的增加。无论如何,这些研究涵盖了多种接触途径、物种和接触时间,没有一项研究表明滑石粉是实验动物的致癌物,只有大鼠在极高接触条件下的研究表明滑石粉是致癌物,而这种极高接触条件很可能导致肺微粒超载,这是高接触溶解性差的微粒的非特异性效应,而不是滑石粉的任何致癌特性。只有在大鼠身上观察到肺部微粒超载导致肺部肿瘤形成,而在包括人类在内的任何其他物种身上都没有观察到。机理研究表明,滑石粉不具有基因毒性或诱变性,但可诱发一些影响,这些影响可能是致癌途径上的事件,主要是在高暴露量或体内暴露量不明确的体外研究中,但这些影响在不同研究和细胞类型中并不一致。对滑石粉的实验动物致癌性和机理证据进行的系统审查表明,预计人体接触滑石粉不会致癌。除大鼠外,滑石粉在任何物种中都不可能致癌,而且只有在接触条件高到足以引起肺颗粒超载时才可能致癌,而这与人类接触滑石粉的情况无关。
{"title":"Talc and human cancer: a systematic review of the experimental animal and mechanistic evidence.","authors":"Robyn L Prueitt, Nicholas L Drury, Ross A Shore, Denali N Boon, Julie E Goodman","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2349668","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2349668","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The potential carcinogenicity of talc has been evaluated in many studies in humans and experimental animals published in the scientific literature over the last several decades, with a number of these studies reporting no associations between talc exposure and any type of cancer. In order to fully understand the current state of the science regarding the potential for talc to induce human cancers, we conducted a comprehensive and systematic review of the available experimental animal and mechanistic evidence (in conjunction with a systematic review of the epidemiology evidence in a companion analysis) to evaluate whether it supports talc as being carcinogenic to humans. We considered study quality and its impact on the interpretation of results and evaluated all types of cancer and all exposure routes. We also evaluated the evidence on the potential for talc to migrate in the body to potential tumor sites. We identified seven experimental animal carcinogenicity studies and 11 mechanistic studies of talc to systematically review. We found that several of the experimental animal carcinogenicity studies of talc have limitations that preclude their sensitivity to detect increases in tumor incidence. Regardless, the studies cover multiple exposure routes, species, and exposure durations, and none indicate that talc is a carcinogen in experimental animals except in rats under conditions of extremely high exposure that likely resulted in lung particle overload, a nonspecific effect of high exposures to poorly soluble particles, and not from any carcinogenic properties of talc. Lung particle overload leading to lung tumor formation has only been observed in rats and not in any other species, including humans. The mechanistic studies indicate that talc is not genotoxic or mutagenic, but can induce some effects that could be events on a possible pathway to carcinogenicity, mainly at high exposures or in <i>in vitro</i> studies with exposures of unclear relevance <i>in vivo</i>, but these effects are not consistent across studies and cell types. This systematic review of the experimental animal carcinogenicity and mechanistic evidence for talc indicates that an association between talc exposure and cancer is not expected in humans. Talc carcinogenicity is not plausible in any species except rats, and only when the exposure conditions are high enough to induce lung particle overload, which is not relevant to human exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"359-393"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141558334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive analysis of gastrointestinal side effects in COVID-19 patients undergoing combined pharmacological treatment with azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. 全面分析接受阿奇霉素和羟氯喹联合药物治疗的 COVID-19 患者的胃肠道副作用:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2348169
Gabriella Pacheco, André Luis Fernandes Lopes, Ana Patrícia de Oliveira, Wendson de Ribamar Machado Corrêa, Lucas Daniel Batista Lima, Marcellus Henrique Loiola Ponte de Souza, Ariel Soares Teles, Lucas Antonio Duarte Nicolau, Jand Venes Rolim Medeiros

During the COVID-19 pandemic, several drugs were repositioned and combined to quickly find a way to mitigate the effects of the infection. However, the adverse effects of these combinations on the gastrointestinal tract are unknown. We aimed investigate whether Hydroxychloroquine (HD), Azithromycin (AZ), and Ivermectin (IV) used in combination for the treatment of COVID-19, can lead to the development of gastrointestinal disorders. This is a systematic review and network meta-analysis conducted using Stata and Revman software, respectively. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023372802). A search of clinical trials in Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of Science, Lilacs, PubMed, Scopus and Clinicaltrials.gov conducted on November 26, 2023. The eligibility of the studies was assessed based on PICO criteria, including trials that compared different treatments and control group. The analysis of the quality of the evidence was carried out according to the GRADE. Six trials involving 1,686 COVID-19 patients were included. No trials on the association of HD or AZ with IV met the inclusion criteria, only studies on the association between HD and AZ were included. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain and increased transaminases were related. The symptoms of vomiting and nausea were evaluated through a network meta-analysis, while the symptom of abdominal pain was evaluated through a meta-analysis. No significant associations with these symptoms were observed for HD, AZ, or their combination, compared to control. Low heterogeneity and absence of inconsistency in indirect and direct comparisons were noted. Limitations included small sample sizes, varied drug dosages, and potential publication bias during the pandemic peak. This review unveils that there are no associations between gastrointestinal adverse effects and the combined treatment of HD with AZ in the management of COVID-19, as compared to either the use of a control group or the administration of the drugs individually, on the other hand, highlighting the very low or low certainty of evidence for the evaluated outcomes. To accurately conclude the absence of side effects, further high-quality randomized studies are needed.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对几种药物进行了重新定位和组合,以迅速找到减轻感染影响的方法。然而,这些联合用药对胃肠道的不良影响尚不清楚。我们旨在研究羟氯喹(HD)、阿奇霉素(AZ)和伊维菌素(IV)联合用于治疗 COVID-19 是否会导致胃肠道疾病的发生。这是一项分别使用 Stata 和 Revman 软件进行的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023372802)注册。2023 年 11 月 26 日,在 Cochrane Library 数据库、Embase、Web of Science、Lilacs、PubMed、Scopus 和 Clinicaltrials.gov 中对临床试验进行了检索。根据 PICO 标准评估了研究的资格,包括比较不同治疗方法和对照组的试验。根据 GRADE 对证据质量进行了分析。共纳入六项试验,涉及 1,686 名 COVID-19 患者。没有关于 HD 或 AZ 与 IV 相关性的试验符合纳入标准,仅纳入了关于 HD 与 AZ 相关性的研究。恶心、呕吐、腹泻、腹痛和转氨酶升高与此有关。呕吐和恶心症状通过网络荟萃分析进行评估,腹痛症状则通过荟萃分析进行评估。与对照组相比,HD、AZ 或其组合与这些症状无明显关联。间接和直接比较的异质性较低,且无不一致性。局限性包括样本量小、药物剂量不同以及在大流行高峰期可能出现的发表偏差。本综述揭示,在治疗 COVID-19 的过程中,与使用对照组或单独用药相比,胃肠道不良反应与 HD 和 AZ 联合治疗之间不存在关联,这突出表明评估结果的证据确定性很低或很低。要准确得出无副作用的结论,还需要进一步开展高质量的随机研究。
{"title":"Comprehensive analysis of gastrointestinal side effects in COVID-19 patients undergoing combined pharmacological treatment with azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Gabriella Pacheco, André Luis Fernandes Lopes, Ana Patrícia de Oliveira, Wendson de Ribamar Machado Corrêa, Lucas Daniel Batista Lima, Marcellus Henrique Loiola Ponte de Souza, Ariel Soares Teles, Lucas Antonio Duarte Nicolau, Jand Venes Rolim Medeiros","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2348169","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2348169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, several drugs were repositioned and combined to quickly find a way to mitigate the effects of the infection. However, the adverse effects of these combinations on the gastrointestinal tract are unknown. We aimed investigate whether Hydroxychloroquine (HD), Azithromycin (AZ), and Ivermectin (IV) used in combination for the treatment of COVID-19, can lead to the development of gastrointestinal disorders. This is a systematic review and network meta-analysis conducted using Stata and Revman software, respectively. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023372802). A search of clinical trials in Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of Science, Lilacs, PubMed, Scopus and Clinicaltrials.gov conducted on November 26, 2023. The eligibility of the studies was assessed based on PICO criteria, including trials that compared different treatments and control group. The analysis of the quality of the evidence was carried out according to the GRADE. Six trials involving 1,686 COVID-19 patients were included. No trials on the association of HD or AZ with IV met the inclusion criteria, only studies on the association between HD and AZ were included. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain and increased transaminases were related. The symptoms of vomiting and nausea were evaluated through a network meta-analysis, while the symptom of abdominal pain was evaluated through a meta-analysis. No significant associations with these symptoms were observed for HD, AZ, or their combination, compared to control. Low heterogeneity and absence of inconsistency in indirect and direct comparisons were noted. Limitations included small sample sizes, varied drug dosages, and potential publication bias during the pandemic peak. This review unveils that there are no associations between gastrointestinal adverse effects and the combined treatment of HD with AZ in the management of COVID-19, as compared to either the use of a control group or the administration of the drugs individually, on the other hand, highlighting the very low or low certainty of evidence for the evaluated outcomes. To accurately conclude the absence of side effects, further high-quality randomized studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"345-358"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141300282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of the epidemiology evidence on talc and cancer. 关于滑石粉与癌症的流行病学证据的系统回顾。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2351081
Denali Boon, Julie E Goodman, Kyle J Colonna, Leon M Espira, Robyn L Prueitt

Over the past several decades, there have been many epidemiology studies on talc and cancer published in the scientific literature, and several reviews and meta-analyses of talc and respiratory, female reproductive, and stomach cancers, specifically. To help provide a resource for the evaluation of talc as a potential human carcinogen, we applied a consistent set of examination methods and criteria for all epidemiology studies that examined the association between talc exposure (by various routes) and cancers (of various types). We identified 30 cohort, 35 case-control, and 12 pooled studies that evaluated occupational, medicinal, and personal-care product talc exposure and cancers of the respiratory system, the female reproductive tract, the gastrointestinal tract, the urinary system, the lymphohematopoietic system, the prostate, male genital organs, and the central nervous system, as well as skin, eye, bone, connective tissue, peritoneal, and breast cancers. We tabulated study characteristics, quality, and results in a systematic manner, and evaluated all cancer types for which studies of at least three unique populations were available in a narrative review. We focused on study quality aspects most likely to impact the interpretation of results. We found that only one study, of medicinal talc use, evaluated direct exposure measurements for any individuals, though some used semi-quantitative exposure metrics, and few studies adequately assessed potential confounders. The only consistent associations were with ovarian cancer in case-control studies and these associations were likely impacted by recall and potentially other biases. This systematic review indicates that epidemiology studies do not support a causal association between occupational, medicinal, or personal talc exposure and any cancer in humans.

过去几十年来,科学文献中发表了许多关于滑石粉与癌症的流行病学研究,特别是关于滑石粉与呼吸系统癌症、女性生殖系统癌症和胃癌的一些综述和荟萃分析。为了帮助提供评估滑石粉作为潜在人类致癌物质的资源,我们对所有研究滑石粉接触(各种途径)与癌症(各种类型)之间关系的流行病学研究采用了一套统一的检查方法和标准。我们确定了 30 项队列研究、35 项病例对照研究和 12 项汇总研究,这些研究评估了职业、医疗和个人护理产品中的滑石粉接触与呼吸系统癌症、女性生殖道癌症、胃肠道癌症、泌尿系统癌症、淋巴造血系统癌症、前列腺癌、男性生殖器官癌症和中枢神经系统癌症,以及皮肤癌、眼癌、骨癌、结缔组织癌、腹膜癌和乳腺癌之间的关系。我们系统地列出了研究的特点、质量和结果,并在叙述性综述中评估了至少有三个独特人群研究的所有癌症类型。我们重点关注了最有可能影响结果解释的研究质量方面。我们发现,只有一项关于使用药用滑石粉的研究对任何个体的直接暴露测量进行了评估,尽管有些研究使用了半定量暴露指标,而且很少有研究对潜在的混杂因素进行了充分评估。唯一一致的关联是在病例对照研究中与卵巢癌的关联,这些关联很可能受到回忆偏差和其他潜在偏差的影响。本系统综述表明,流行病学研究并不支持职业、医疗或个人滑石粉暴露与人类任何癌症之间的因果关系。
{"title":"A systematic review of the epidemiology evidence on talc and cancer.","authors":"Denali Boon, Julie E Goodman, Kyle J Colonna, Leon M Espira, Robyn L Prueitt","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2351081","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2351081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past several decades, there have been many epidemiology studies on talc and cancer published in the scientific literature, and several reviews and meta-analyses of talc and respiratory, female reproductive, and stomach cancers, specifically. To help provide a resource for the evaluation of talc as a potential human carcinogen, we applied a consistent set of examination methods and criteria for all epidemiology studies that examined the association between talc exposure (by various routes) and cancers (of various types). We identified 30 cohort, 35 case-control, and 12 pooled studies that evaluated occupational, medicinal, and personal-care product talc exposure and cancers of the respiratory system, the female reproductive tract, the gastrointestinal tract, the urinary system, the lymphohematopoietic system, the prostate, male genital organs, and the central nervous system, as well as skin, eye, bone, connective tissue, peritoneal, and breast cancers. We tabulated study characteristics, quality, and results in a systematic manner, and evaluated all cancer types for which studies of at least three unique populations were available in a narrative review. We focused on study quality aspects most likely to impact the interpretation of results. We found that only one study, of medicinal talc use, evaluated direct exposure measurements for any individuals, though some used semi-quantitative exposure metrics, and few studies adequately assessed potential confounders. The only consistent associations were with ovarian cancer in case-control studies and these associations were likely impacted by recall and potentially other biases. This systematic review indicates that epidemiology studies do not support a causal association between occupational, medicinal, or personal talc exposure and any cancer in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"394-417"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Data derived extrapolation factors (DDEFs) for rat to human interspecies extrapolation for the HPPD inhibitor mesotrione. HPPD 抑制剂美索替龙从大鼠到人类的种间外推数据推导系数 (DDEF)。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174
Alison M Pecquet, Katy Bridgwood, David Cowie, Angela Hofstra, Yaoxing Wu, Sarah Whalley, Steven D Webb

In the risk assessment of agrochemicals, there has been a historical paucity of using data to refine the default adjustment factors, even though large datasets are available to support this. The current state of the science for addressing uncertainty regarding animal to human extrapolation (AFA) is to develop a "data-derived" adjustment factor (DDEF) to quantify such differences, if data are available. Toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) differences between species can be utilized for the DDEF, with human datasets being ideal yet rare. We identified a case for a currently registered herbicide, mesotrione, in which human TK and TD are available. This case study outlines an approach for the development of DDEFs using comparative human and animal data and based on an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenol pyruvate dioxygenase (HHPD). The calculated DDEF for rat to human extrapolation (AFA) for kinetics (AFAK = 2.5) was multiplied by the AFA for dynamics (AFAD = 0.3) resulting in a composite DDEF of ∼1 (AFA = 0.75). This reflects the AOP and available scientific evidence that humans are less sensitive than rats to the effects of HPPD inhibitors. Further analyses were conducted utilizing in vitro datasets from hepatocytes and liver cytosols and extrapolated to whole animal using in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) to support toxicodynamic extrapolation. The in vitro datasets resulted in the same AFAD as derived for in vivo data (AFAD = 0.3). These analyses demonstrate that a majority of the species differences are related to toxicodynamics. Future work with additional in vitro/in vivo datasets for other HPPD inhibitors and cell types will further support this result. This work demonstrates utilization of all available toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to replace default uncertainty factors for agrochemical human health risk assessment.

在农用化学品的风险评估中,历来很少使用数据来完善默认的调整系数,尽管有大量的数据集可以支持这一点。目前,解决从动物到人的外推法(AFA)不确定性的科学方法是,如果数据可用,则开发一种 "数据衍生 "调整因子(DDEF)来量化这种差异。物种间的毒物动力学 (TK) 和毒效学 (TD) 差异可用于 DDEF,而人类数据集是理想但罕见的数据集。我们发现了一种目前已注册的除草剂--间苯三酚--的案例,在这种除草剂中可以获得人类的 TK 和 TD 数据。本案例研究概述了一种利用人类和动物对比数据并基于抑制 4-羟基苯酚丙酮酸二氧酶 (HHPD) 的不良反应途径 (AOP) 来制定 DDEF 的方法。计算得出的从大鼠到人类的动力学外推 DDEF(AFA)(AFAK = 2.5)乘以动力学 AFA(AFAD = 0.3),得出综合 DDEF 为 1∼1(AFA = 0.75)。这反映了 AOP 和现有科学证据表明人类对 HPPD 抑制剂的影响不如大鼠敏感。利用肝细胞和肝细胞溶质的体外数据集进行了进一步分析,并利用体外到体内的外推法(IVIVE)将其外推到整个动物体内,以支持毒效学外推法。体外数据集得出的 AFAD 与体内数据得出的 AFAD 相同(AFAD = 0.3)。这些分析表明,大部分物种差异与毒效学有关。未来针对其他 HPPD 抑制剂和细胞类型使用更多体外/体内数据集的工作将进一步支持这一结果。这项工作表明,可以利用所有可用的毒代动力学和毒效学数据来替代农用化学品人类健康风险评估的默认不确定性因子。
{"title":"Data derived extrapolation factors (DDEFs) for rat to human interspecies extrapolation for the HPPD inhibitor mesotrione.","authors":"Alison M Pecquet, Katy Bridgwood, David Cowie, Angela Hofstra, Yaoxing Wu, Sarah Whalley, Steven D Webb","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2353174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the risk assessment of agrochemicals, there has been a historical paucity of using data to refine the default adjustment factors, even though large datasets are available to support this. The current state of the science for addressing uncertainty regarding animal to human extrapolation (AF<sub>A</sub>) is to develop a \"data-derived\" adjustment factor (DDEF) to quantify such differences, if data are available. Toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) differences between species can be utilized for the DDEF, with human datasets being ideal yet rare. We identified a case for a currently registered herbicide, mesotrione, in which human TK and TD are available. This case study outlines an approach for the development of DDEFs using comparative human and animal data and based on an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenol pyruvate dioxygenase (HHPD). The calculated DDEF for rat to human extrapolation (AF<sub>A</sub>) for kinetics (AF<sub>AK</sub> = 2.5) was multiplied by the AF<sub>A</sub> for dynamics (AF<sub>AD</sub> = 0.3) resulting in a composite DDEF of ∼1 (AF<sub>A</sub> = 0.75). This reflects the AOP and available scientific evidence that humans are less sensitive than rats to the effects of HPPD inhibitors. Further analyses were conducted utilizing <i>in vitro</i> datasets from hepatocytes and liver cytosols and extrapolated to whole animal using <i>in vitro</i> to <i>in vivo</i> extrapolation (IVIVE) to support toxicodynamic extrapolation. The <i>in vitro</i> datasets resulted in the same AF<sub>AD</sub> as derived for <i>in vivo</i> data (AF<sub>AD</sub> = 0.3). These analyses demonstrate that a majority of the species differences are related to toxicodynamics. Future work with additional <i>in vitro/in vivo</i> datasets for other HPPD inhibitors and cell types will further support this result. This work demonstrates utilization of all available toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to replace default uncertainty factors for agrochemical human health risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"418-429"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zebrafish and nematodes as whole organism models to measure developmental neurotoxicity. 将斑马鱼和线虫作为整体生物模型来测量发育神经毒性。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2342448
Samantha Hughes, Ellen V S Hessel

Despite the growing epidemiological evidence of an association between toxin exposure and developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), systematic testing of DNT is not mandatory in international regulations for admission of pharmaceuticals or industrial chemicals. However, to date around 200 compounds, ranging from pesticides, pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals, have been tested for DNT in the current OECD test guidelines (TG-443 or TG-426). There are calls for the development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) for DNT, which has resulted in a DNT testing battery using in vitro human cell-based assays. These assays provide a means to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of toxicity in humans which is lacking in animal-based toxicity tests. However, cell-based assays do not represent all steps of the complex process leading to DNT. Validated models with a multi-organ network of pathways that interact at the molecular, cellular and tissue level at very specific timepoints in a life cycle are currently missing. Consequently, whole model organisms are being developed to screen for, and causally link, new molecular targets of DNT compounds and how they affect whole brain development and neurobehavioral endpoints. Given the practical and ethical restraints associated with vertebrate testing, lower animal models that qualify as 3 R (reduce, refine and replace) models, including the nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) and the zebrafish (Danio rerio) will prove particularly valuable for unravelling toxicity pathways leading to DNT. Although not as complex as the human brain, these 3 R-models develop a complete functioning brain with numerous neurodevelopmental processes overlapping with human brain development. Importantly, the main signalling pathways relating to (neuro)development, metabolism and growth are highly conserved in these models. We propose the use of whole model organisms specifically zebrafish and C. elegans for DNT relevant endpoints.

尽管越来越多的流行病学证据表明,接触毒素与发育神经毒性(DNT)之间存在关联,但在国际药品或工业化学品准入法规中,并未强制要求对 DNT 进行系统检测。不过,迄今为止,经合组织(OECD)的现行测试指南(TG-443 或 TG-426)已对约 200 种化合物(包括杀虫剂、药品和工业化学品)进行了 DNT 测试。人们呼吁针对 DNT 开发新的方法(NAMs),由此产生了使用体外人体细胞检测法的 DNT 检测电池。这些试验为阐明人体毒性的分子机制提供了一种方法,而动物毒性试验则缺乏这种方法。然而,基于细胞的检测并不能代表导致 DNT 的复杂过程的所有步骤。目前,还缺少在生命周期的特定时间点上,在分子、细胞和组织水平上相互作用的多器官通路网络的验证模型。因此,目前正在开发整体生物模型,以筛选 DNT 化合物的新分子靶点,并将其与 DNT 化合物如何影响整个大脑发育和神经行为终点联系起来。鉴于脊椎动物试验在实际操作和伦理方面的限制,符合 3 R(减少、改进和替代)模型的低等动物模型,包括线虫(Caenorhabditis elegans)和斑马鱼(Danio rerio),将被证明对揭示导致 DNT 的毒性途径特别有价值。这 3 种 R 模型虽然不像人脑那样复杂,但它们发育出的大脑功能完整,许多神经发育过程与人脑发育过程重叠。重要的是,与(神经)发育、新陈代谢和生长有关的主要信号通路在这些模型中高度一致。我们建议使用完整的模式生物,特别是斑马鱼和文昌鱼来进行 DNT 相关终点研究。
{"title":"Zebrafish and nematodes as whole organism models to measure developmental neurotoxicity.","authors":"Samantha Hughes, Ellen V S Hessel","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2342448","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2342448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the growing epidemiological evidence of an association between toxin exposure and developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), systematic testing of DNT is not mandatory in international regulations for admission of pharmaceuticals or industrial chemicals. However, to date around 200 compounds, ranging from pesticides, pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals, have been tested for DNT in the current OECD test guidelines (TG-443 or TG-426). There are calls for the development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) for DNT, which has resulted in a DNT testing battery using <i>in vitro</i> human cell-based assays. These assays provide a means to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of toxicity in humans which is lacking in animal-based toxicity tests. However, cell-based assays do not represent all steps of the complex process leading to DNT. Validated models with a multi-organ network of pathways that interact at the molecular, cellular and tissue level at very specific timepoints in a life cycle are currently missing. Consequently, whole model organisms are being developed to screen for, and causally link, new molecular targets of DNT compounds and how they affect whole brain development and neurobehavioral endpoints. Given the practical and ethical restraints associated with vertebrate testing, lower animal models that qualify as 3 R (reduce, refine and replace) models, including the nematode (<i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>) and the zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) will prove particularly valuable for unravelling toxicity pathways leading to DNT. Although not as complex as the human brain, these 3 R-models develop a complete functioning brain with numerous neurodevelopmental processes overlapping with human brain development. Importantly, the main signalling pathways relating to (neuro)development, metabolism and growth are highly conserved in these models. We propose the use of whole model organisms specifically zebrafish and <i>C. elegans</i> for DNT relevant endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"330-343"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141237398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A framework for integrating evidence to assess hazards and risk. 综合证据评估危害和风险的框架。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2342447
Sandra I Sulsky, Tracy Greene, P Robinan Gentry

To accurately characterize human health hazards, human, animal, and mechanistic data must be integrated and the relevance to the research question of all three lines of evidence must be considered. Mechanistic data are often critical to the full integration of animal and human data and to characterizing relevance and uncertainty. This novel evidence integration framework (EIF) provides a method for synthesizing data from comprehensive, systematic, quality-based assessments of the epidemiological and toxicological literature, including in vivo and in vitro mechanistic studies. It organizes data according to both the observed human health effects and the mechanism of action of the chemical, providing a method to support evidence synthesis. The disease-based component uses the evidence of human health outcomes studied in the best quality epidemiological literature to organize the toxicological data according to authors' stated purpose, with the pathophysiology of the disease determining the potential relevance of the toxicological data. The mechanism-based component organizes the data based on the proposed mechanisms of effect and data supporting events leading to each endpoint, with the epidemiological data potentially providing corroborating information. The EIF includes a method to cross-classify and describe the concordance of the data, and to characterize its uncertainty. At times, the two methods of organizing the data may lead to different conclusions. This facilitates identification of knowledge gaps and shows the impact of uncertainties on the strength of causal inference.

要准确描述人类健康危害的特征,必须整合人类、动物和机理数据,并考虑所有三种证据与研究问题的相关性。机理数据通常是全面整合动物和人类数据以及确定相关性和不确定性的关键。这种新颖的证据整合框架(EIF)提供了一种方法,用于综合来自流行病学和毒理学文献(包括体内和体外机理研究)的全面、系统和基于质量的评估数据。它根据观察到的人类健康影响和化学品的作用机制来组织数据,提供了一种支持证据综合的方法。以疾病为基础的部分使用最优质的流行病学文献中研究的人类健康结果证据,根据作者声明的目的组织毒理学数据,由疾病的病理生理学决定毒理学数据的潜在相关性。以机制为基础的组件根据建议的效应机制和支持导致每个终点的事件的数据来组织数据,流行病学数据可能提供佐证信息。EIF 包括一种交叉分类和描述数据一致性的方法,以及描述其不确定性的方法。有时,两种组织数据的方法可能会得出不同的结论。这有助于找出知识差距,并显示不确定性对因果推论强度的影响。
{"title":"A framework for integrating evidence to assess hazards and risk.","authors":"Sandra I Sulsky, Tracy Greene, P Robinan Gentry","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2342447","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2342447","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To accurately characterize human health hazards, human, animal, and mechanistic data must be integrated and the relevance to the research question of all three lines of evidence must be considered. Mechanistic data are often critical to the full integration of animal and human data and to characterizing relevance and uncertainty. This novel evidence integration framework (EIF) provides a method for synthesizing data from comprehensive, systematic, quality-based assessments of the epidemiological and toxicological literature, including <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> mechanistic studies. It organizes data according to both the observed human health effects and the mechanism of action of the chemical, providing a method to support evidence synthesis. The disease-based component uses the evidence of human health outcomes studied in the best quality epidemiological literature to organize the toxicological data according to authors' stated purpose, with the pathophysiology of the disease determining the potential relevance of the toxicological data. The mechanism-based component organizes the data based on the proposed mechanisms of effect and data supporting events leading to each endpoint, with the epidemiological data potentially providing corroborating information. The EIF includes a method to cross-classify and describe the concordance of the data, and to characterize its uncertainty. At times, the two methods of organizing the data may lead to different conclusions. This facilitates identification of knowledge gaps and shows the impact of uncertainties on the strength of causal inference.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"315-329"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141160566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1