Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2391431
Derek Simonsen, Vanessa Livania, David M Cwiertny, Riley J Samuelson, John D Sivey, Hans-Joachim Lehmler
Herbicide safeners are agrochemicals added to herbicide formulations to protect crops from herbicide damage without reducing the effectiveness of the herbicide against weeds. While safeners are typically structurally similar to their co-formulated herbicides, they are classified as "inert" in the United States, meaning they are not held to the same regulatory standards as the herbicides. This review systematically examines the toxicity of safeners, which is important given their large-scale global use and potential for exposure to wildlife, livestock, and humans. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature identified only seven studies examining safener toxicity. Regulatory toxicity data, compiled from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) database, included data for 9 of the 18 commercial safeners. Most safeners have low acute ecotoxicity and mammalian toxicity; however, chronic effects and the underlying mechanism are less clear. Benoxacor showed enantioselective metabolism and depletion by drug-metabolizing enzymes. In conclusion, despite the widespread use of safeners, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding their toxicity. More research is needed to fully characterize the potential risks of safeners to human health and the environment. Regulatory agencies should consider reclassifying safeners as active ingredients to ensure adequate toxicity testing and risk assessment.
{"title":"A systematic review of herbicide safener toxicity.","authors":"Derek Simonsen, Vanessa Livania, David M Cwiertny, Riley J Samuelson, John D Sivey, Hans-Joachim Lehmler","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2391431","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2391431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Herbicide safeners are agrochemicals added to herbicide formulations to protect crops from herbicide damage without reducing the effectiveness of the herbicide against weeds. While safeners are typically structurally similar to their co-formulated herbicides, they are classified as \"inert\" in the United States, meaning they are not held to the same regulatory standards as the herbicides. This review systematically examines the toxicity of safeners, which is important given their large-scale global use and potential for exposure to wildlife, livestock, and humans. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature identified only seven studies examining safener toxicity. Regulatory toxicity data, compiled from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) database, included data for 9 of the 18 commercial safeners. Most safeners have low acute ecotoxicity and mammalian toxicity; however, chronic effects and the underlying mechanism are less clear. Benoxacor showed enantioselective metabolism and depletion by drug-metabolizing enzymes. In conclusion, despite the widespread use of safeners, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding their toxicity. More research is needed to fully characterize the potential risks of safeners to human health and the environment. Regulatory agencies should consider reclassifying safeners as active ingredients to ensure adequate toxicity testing and risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"805-855"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2386260
Arkaprava Banerjee, Supratik Kar, Kunal Roy, Grace Patlewicz, Nathaniel Charest, Emilio Benfenati, Mark T D Cronin
This article aims to provide a comprehensive critical, yet readable, review of general interest to the chemistry community on molecular similarity as applied to chemical informatics and predictive modeling with a special focus on read-across (RA) and read-across structure-activity relationships (RASAR). Molecular similarity-based computational tools, such as quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) and RA, are routinely used to fill the data gaps for a wide range of properties including toxicity endpoints for regulatory purposes. This review will explore the background of RA starting from how structural information has been used through to how other similarity contexts such as physicochemical, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) properties, and biological aspects are being characterized. More recent developments of RA's integration with QSAR have resulted in the emergence of novel models such as ToxRead, generalized read-across (GenRA), and quantitative RASAR (q-RASAR). Conventional QSAR techniques have been excluded from this review except where necessary for context.
{"title":"Molecular similarity in chemical informatics and predictive toxicity modeling: from quantitative read-across (q-RA) to quantitative read-across structure-activity relationship (q-RASAR) with the application of machine learning.","authors":"Arkaprava Banerjee, Supratik Kar, Kunal Roy, Grace Patlewicz, Nathaniel Charest, Emilio Benfenati, Mark T D Cronin","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2386260","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2386260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article aims to provide a comprehensive critical, yet readable, review of general interest to the chemistry community on molecular similarity as applied to chemical informatics and predictive modeling with a special focus on read-across (RA) and read-across structure-activity relationships (RASAR). Molecular similarity-based computational tools, such as quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) and RA, are routinely used to fill the data gaps for a wide range of properties including toxicity endpoints for regulatory purposes. This review will explore the background of RA starting from how structural information has been used through to how other similarity contexts such as physicochemical, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) properties, and biological aspects are being characterized. More recent developments of RA's integration with QSAR have resulted in the emergence of novel models such as ToxRead, generalized read-across (GenRA), and quantitative RASAR (q-RASAR). Conventional QSAR techniques have been excluded from this review except where necessary for context.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"659-684"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142119204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-30DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2377208
James E Klaunig, Samuel M Cohen
Dieldrin is an organochlorine insecticide that was widely used until 1970 when its use was banned because of its liver carcinogenicity in mice. Several long-term rodent bioassays have reported dieldrin to induce liver tumors in in several strains of mice, but not in rats. This article reviews the available information on dieldrin liver effects and performs an analysis of mode of action (MOA) and human relevance of these liver findings. Scientific evidence strongly supports a MOA based on CAR activation, leading to alterations in gene expression, which result in increased hepatocellular proliferation, clonal expansion leading to altered hepatic foci, and ultimately the formation of hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas. Associative events include increased liver weight, centrilobular hypertrophy, increased expression of Cyp2b10 and its resulting increased enzymatic activity. Other associative events include alterations of intercellular gap junction communication and oxidative stress. Alternative MOAs are evaluated and shown not to be related to dieldrin administration. Weight of evidence shows that dieldrin is not DNA reactive, it is not mutagenic, and it is not genotoxic in general. Furthermore, activation of other pertinent nuclear receptors, including PXR, PPARα, AhR, and estrogen are not related to dieldrin-induced liver tumors nor is there liver cytotoxicity. In previous studies, rats, dogs, and non-human primates did not show increased cell proliferation or production of pre-neoplastic or neoplastic lesions following dieldrin treatment. Thus, the evidence strongly indicates that dieldrin-induced mouse liver tumors are due to CAR activation and are specific to the mouse, which are qualitatively not relevant to human hepatocarcinogenesis. Thus, there is no carcinogenic risk to humans. This conclusion is also supported by a lack of positive epidemiologic findings for evidence of liver carcinogenicity. Based on current understanding of the mode of action of dieldrin-induced liver tumors in mice, the appropriate conclusion is that dieldrin is a mouse specific liver carcinogen and it does not pose a cancer risk to humans.
狄氏剂是一种有机氯杀虫剂,曾被广泛使用,直到 1970 年才因其对小鼠肝脏的致癌性而被禁止使用。一些长期的啮齿动物生物测定报告称,狄氏剂可诱发多个品系小鼠的肝脏肿瘤,但不会诱发大鼠的肝脏肿瘤。本文回顾了有关狄氏剂对肝脏影响的现有资料,并对这些肝脏研究结果的作用模式(MOA)和与人类的相关性进行了分析。科学证据有力地支持基于 CAR 激活的作用方式,CAR 激活会导致基因表达的改变,从而导致肝细胞增殖、克隆扩增和肝脏病灶的改变,最终形成肝细胞腺瘤和肝癌。相关事件包括肝脏重量增加、小叶中心肥大、Cyp2b10 表达增加及其导致的酶活性增加。其他相关事件包括细胞间隙连接通信的改变和氧化应激。对替代性作用方式进行了评估,结果表明与服用狄氏剂无关。大量证据表明,狄氏剂不具有 DNA 反应性,不具有诱变性,一般也不具有遗传毒性。此外,其他相关核受体(包括 PXR、PPARα、AhR 和雌激素)的激活与狄氏剂诱发的肝肿瘤无关,也不存在肝细胞毒性。在以往的研究中,大鼠、狗和非人灵长类动物在经狄氏剂处理后,细胞增殖或产生肿瘤前病变或肿瘤病变的情况并没有增加。因此,有证据有力地表明,狄氏剂诱发的小鼠肝脏肿瘤是由于 CAR 激活引起的,而且是小鼠特有的,与人类肝癌的发生没有定性关系。因此,对人类没有致癌风险。这一结论也得到了流行病学研究结果的支持,即缺乏肝脏致癌的正面证据。根据目前对狄氏剂诱发小鼠肝脏肿瘤的作用模式的了解,适当的结论是狄氏剂是一种小鼠特异性肝致癌物,对人类不构成致癌风险。
{"title":"Mode of action of dieldrin-induced liver tumors: application to human risk assessment.","authors":"James E Klaunig, Samuel M Cohen","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2377208","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2377208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dieldrin is an organochlorine insecticide that was widely used until 1970 when its use was banned because of its liver carcinogenicity in mice. Several long-term rodent bioassays have reported dieldrin to induce liver tumors in in several strains of mice, but not in rats. This article reviews the available information on dieldrin liver effects and performs an analysis of mode of action (MOA) and human relevance of these liver findings. Scientific evidence strongly supports a MOA based on CAR activation, leading to alterations in gene expression, which result in increased hepatocellular proliferation, clonal expansion leading to altered hepatic foci, and ultimately the formation of hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas. Associative events include increased liver weight, centrilobular hypertrophy, increased expression of Cyp2b10 and its resulting increased enzymatic activity. Other associative events include alterations of intercellular gap junction communication and oxidative stress. Alternative MOAs are evaluated and shown not to be related to dieldrin administration. Weight of evidence shows that dieldrin is not DNA reactive, it is not mutagenic, and it is not genotoxic in general. Furthermore, activation of other pertinent nuclear receptors, including PXR, PPARα, AhR, and estrogen are not related to dieldrin-induced liver tumors nor is there liver cytotoxicity. In previous studies, rats, dogs, and non-human primates did not show increased cell proliferation or production of pre-neoplastic or neoplastic lesions following dieldrin treatment. Thus, the evidence strongly indicates that dieldrin-induced mouse liver tumors are due to CAR activation and are specific to the mouse, which are qualitatively not relevant to human hepatocarcinogenesis. Thus, there is no carcinogenic risk to humans. This conclusion is also supported by a lack of positive epidemiologic findings for evidence of liver carcinogenicity. Based on current understanding of the mode of action of dieldrin-induced liver tumors in mice, the appropriate conclusion is that dieldrin is a mouse specific liver carcinogen and it does not pose a cancer risk to humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"634-658"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2374281
Puck Roos, Caroline Anggasta, Aldert H Piersma, Peter J K van Meer, Peter T Theunissen
Embryofetal development (EFD) studies are performed to characterize risk of drugs in pregnant women and on embryofetal development. In line with the ICH S5(R3) guideline, these studies are generally conducted in one rodent and one non-rodent species, commonly rats and rabbits. However, the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species to risk assessment is debatable. In this study, rat and rabbit EFD studies were evaluated to analyze the added value of a second species. Information on rat and rabbit EFD studies conducted for human pharmaceuticals submitted for marketing authorization to the European Medicines Agency between 2004 and 2022 was collected from the database of the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, along with EFD studies conducted for known human teratogens. In total, 369 compounds were included in the database. For 55.6% of the compounds similar effects were observed in rat and rabbit EFD studies. Discordance was observed for 44.6% of compounds. Discordance could often be explained based on occurrence of maternal toxicity or the compound's mechanism of action. For other compounds, discordance was considered of limited clinical relevance due to high exposure margins or less concerning EFD toxicity. For 6.2%, discordance could not be explained and was considered clinically relevant. Furthermore, for specific therapeutic classes, concordance between rat and rabbit could vary. In conclusion, in many cases the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species is limited. These data could help identify scenarios in which (additional) EFD studies could be waived or create a weight-of-evidence model to determine the need for (additional) EFD studies.
{"title":"Evaluation of rat and rabbit embryofetal development studies with pharmaceuticals: the added value of a second species.","authors":"Puck Roos, Caroline Anggasta, Aldert H Piersma, Peter J K van Meer, Peter T Theunissen","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2374281","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2374281","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Embryofetal development (EFD) studies are performed to characterize risk of drugs in pregnant women and on embryofetal development. In line with the ICH S5(R3) guideline, these studies are generally conducted in one rodent and one non-rodent species, commonly rats and rabbits. However, the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species to risk assessment is debatable. In this study, rat and rabbit EFD studies were evaluated to analyze the added value of a second species. Information on rat and rabbit EFD studies conducted for human pharmaceuticals submitted for marketing authorization to the European Medicines Agency between 2004 and 2022 was collected from the database of the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, along with EFD studies conducted for known human teratogens. In total, 369 compounds were included in the database. For 55.6% of the compounds similar effects were observed in rat and rabbit EFD studies. Discordance was observed for 44.6% of compounds. Discordance could often be explained based on occurrence of maternal toxicity or the compound's mechanism of action. For other compounds, discordance was considered of limited clinical relevance due to high exposure margins or less concerning EFD toxicity. For 6.2%, discordance could not be explained and was considered clinically relevant. Furthermore, for specific therapeutic classes, concordance between rat and rabbit could vary. In conclusion, in many cases the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species is limited. These data could help identify scenarios in which (additional) EFD studies could be waived or create a weight-of-evidence model to determine the need for (additional) EFD studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"619-633"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141874433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-17DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2379896
Sean M Hays,Christopher R Kirman,Louis Anthony Cox,Satinder S Sarang
Metabolic conversion of benzene (Bz) is thought to be required for the hematotoxic effects observed following Bz exposures. Most safe exposure limits set for Bz utilize epidemiology data on the hematotoxic effects of Bz for the dose-response assessments. These hematotoxic effects occurred among workers exposed to elevated Bz levels, thus dose extrapolation is required for assessing relevant risks for populations exposed orders of magnitude lower. Thus, understanding how Bz is metabolized over a wide range of air Bz levels is an important topic for risk assessments for Bz. Here, we analyze biomonitoring data for workers exposed to Bz to make evaluations of how the metabolism of Bz varies across a wide range of exposures. Our analysis indicates that the presence of metabolites derived from exposures to sources other than Bz (nonspecific metabolites of Bz) are significant confounders among biomonitoring studies and this precludes making any assessments of how Bz metabolism differs below approximately 3 ppm air Bz exposures using such nonspecific metabolites.
{"title":"Benzene metabolism and health risk evaluation: insights gained from biomonitoring.","authors":"Sean M Hays,Christopher R Kirman,Louis Anthony Cox,Satinder S Sarang","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2379896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2024.2379896","url":null,"abstract":"Metabolic conversion of benzene (Bz) is thought to be required for the hematotoxic effects observed following Bz exposures. Most safe exposure limits set for Bz utilize epidemiology data on the hematotoxic effects of Bz for the dose-response assessments. These hematotoxic effects occurred among workers exposed to elevated Bz levels, thus dose extrapolation is required for assessing relevant risks for populations exposed orders of magnitude lower. Thus, understanding how Bz is metabolized over a wide range of air Bz levels is an important topic for risk assessments for Bz. Here, we analyze biomonitoring data for workers exposed to Bz to make evaluations of how the metabolism of Bz varies across a wide range of exposures. Our analysis indicates that the presence of metabolites derived from exposures to sources other than Bz (nonspecific metabolites of Bz) are significant confounders among biomonitoring studies and this precludes making any assessments of how Bz metabolism differs below approximately 3 ppm air Bz exposures using such nonspecific metabolites.","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142253241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-17DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2390020
Amy K Madl,Melinda T Donnell,Lindsey T Covell
Fiber dimension, durability/dissolution, and biopersistence are critical factors for the risk of fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis. In the modern era, to reduce, refine, and replace animals in toxicology research, the application of in vitro test methods is paramount for hazard evaluation and designing synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs) for safe use. The objectives of this review are to: (1) summarize the international frameworks and acceptability criteria for implementation of new approach methods (NAMs), (2) evaluate the adverse outcome pathways (AOPs), key events (KEs), and key event relationships (KERs) for fiber-induced fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis in accordance with Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines, (3) consider existing and emerging technologies for in silico and in vitro toxicity testing for the respiratory system and the ability to predict effects in vivo, (4) outline a recommended testing strategy for evaluating the hazard and safety of novel SVFs, and (5) reflect on methods needs for in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC) and predictive approaches for safety assessment of new SVFs. AOP frameworks following the conceptual model of the OECD were developed through an evaluation of available molecular and cellular initiating events, which lead to KEs and KERs in the development of fiber-induced fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis. AOP framework development included consideration of fiber physicochemical properties, respiratory deposition and clearance patterns, biosolubility, and biopersistence, as well as cellular, organ, and organism responses. Available data support that fiber AOPs begin with fiber physicochemical characteristics which influence fiber exposure and biosolubility and subsequent key initiating events are dependent on fiber biopersistence and reactivity. Key cellular events of pathogenic fibers include oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and epithelial/fibroblast proliferation and differentiation, which ultimately lead to hyperplasia, metaplasia, and fibrosis/tumor formation. Available in vitro models (e.g. single-, multi-cellular, organ system) provide promising NAMs tools to evaluate these intermediate KEs. However, data on SVFs demonstrate that in vitro biosolubility is a reasonable predictor for downstream events of in vivo biopersistence and biological effects. In vitro SVF fiber dissolution rates >100 ng/cm2/hr (glass fibers in pH 7 and stone fibers in pH 4.5) and in vivo SVF fiber clearance half-life less than 40 or 50 days were not associated with fibrosis or tumors in animals. Long (fiber lengths >20 µm) biodurable and biopersistent fibers exceeding these fiber dissolution and clearance thresholds may pose a risk of fibrosis and cancer. In vitro fiber dissolution assays provide a promising avenue and potentially powerful tool to predict in vivo SVF fiber biopersistence, hazard, and health risk. NAMs for fibers (including SVFs) may involve a multi-factor in vitro approach leverag
{"title":"Synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs): adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) and considerations for next generation new approach methods (NAMs).","authors":"Amy K Madl,Melinda T Donnell,Lindsey T Covell","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2390020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2024.2390020","url":null,"abstract":"Fiber dimension, durability/dissolution, and biopersistence are critical factors for the risk of fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis. In the modern era, to reduce, refine, and replace animals in toxicology research, the application of in vitro test methods is paramount for hazard evaluation and designing synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs) for safe use. The objectives of this review are to: (1) summarize the international frameworks and acceptability criteria for implementation of new approach methods (NAMs), (2) evaluate the adverse outcome pathways (AOPs), key events (KEs), and key event relationships (KERs) for fiber-induced fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis in accordance with Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines, (3) consider existing and emerging technologies for in silico and in vitro toxicity testing for the respiratory system and the ability to predict effects in vivo, (4) outline a recommended testing strategy for evaluating the hazard and safety of novel SVFs, and (5) reflect on methods needs for in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC) and predictive approaches for safety assessment of new SVFs. AOP frameworks following the conceptual model of the OECD were developed through an evaluation of available molecular and cellular initiating events, which lead to KEs and KERs in the development of fiber-induced fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis. AOP framework development included consideration of fiber physicochemical properties, respiratory deposition and clearance patterns, biosolubility, and biopersistence, as well as cellular, organ, and organism responses. Available data support that fiber AOPs begin with fiber physicochemical characteristics which influence fiber exposure and biosolubility and subsequent key initiating events are dependent on fiber biopersistence and reactivity. Key cellular events of pathogenic fibers include oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and epithelial/fibroblast proliferation and differentiation, which ultimately lead to hyperplasia, metaplasia, and fibrosis/tumor formation. Available in vitro models (e.g. single-, multi-cellular, organ system) provide promising NAMs tools to evaluate these intermediate KEs. However, data on SVFs demonstrate that in vitro biosolubility is a reasonable predictor for downstream events of in vivo biopersistence and biological effects. In vitro SVF fiber dissolution rates >100 ng/cm2/hr (glass fibers in pH 7 and stone fibers in pH 4.5) and in vivo SVF fiber clearance half-life less than 40 or 50 days were not associated with fibrosis or tumors in animals. Long (fiber lengths >20 µm) biodurable and biopersistent fibers exceeding these fiber dissolution and clearance thresholds may pose a risk of fibrosis and cancer. In vitro fiber dissolution assays provide a promising avenue and potentially powerful tool to predict in vivo SVF fiber biopersistence, hazard, and health risk. NAMs for fibers (including SVFs) may involve a multi-factor in vitro approach leverag","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-51"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142253242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-16DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985
Michael Hellwig, Patrick Diel, Gerhard Eisenbrand, Tilman Grune, Sabine Guth, Thomas Henle, Hans-Ulrich Humpf, Hans-Georg Joost, Doris Marko, Jana Raupbach, Angelika Roth, Stefan Vieths, Angela Mally
The term "glycation compounds" comprises a wide range of structurally diverse compounds that are formed endogenously and in food via the Maillard reaction, a chemical reaction between reducing sugars and amino acids. Glycation compounds produced endogenously are considered to contribute to a range of diseases. This has led to the hypothesis that glycation compounds present in food may also cause adverse effects and thus pose a nutritional risk to human health. In this work, the Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) summarized data on formation, occurrence, exposure and toxicity of glycation compounds (Part A) and systematically assessed potential associations between dietary intake of defined glycation compounds and disease, including allergy, diabetes, cardiovascular and renal disease, gut/gastrotoxicity, brain/cognitive impairment and cancer (Part B). A systematic search in Pubmed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science using a combination of keywords defining individual glycation compounds and relevant disease patterns linked to the subject area of food, nutrition and diet retrieved 253 original publications relevant to the research question. Of these, only 192 were found to comply with previously defined quality criteria and were thus considered suitable to assess potential health risks of dietary glycation compounds. For each adverse health effect considered in this assessment, however, only limited numbers of human, animal and in vitro studies were identified. While studies in humans were often limited due to small cohort size, short study duration, and confounders, experimental studies in animals that allow for controlled exposure to individual glycation compounds provided some evidence for impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, cardiovascular effects and renal injury in response to oral exposure to dicarbonyl compounds, albeit at dose levels by far exceeding estimated human exposures. The overall database was generally inconsistent or inconclusive. Based on this systematic review, the SKLM concludes that there is at present no convincing evidence for a causal association between dietary intake of glycation compounds and adverse health effects.
糖化化合物 "一词包括多种结构不同的化合物,这些化合物在内源性和食物中通过马氏反应(还原糖和氨基酸之间的化学反应)形成。内源性产生的糖化化合物被认为会导致一系列疾病。由此产生的一个假设是,食物中的糖化化合物也可能造成不良影响,从而对人类健康构成营养风险。在这项工作中,德国研究基金会(DFG)食品安全参议院委员会(SKLM)总结了有关糖化化合物的形成、发生、暴露和毒性的数据(A 部分),并系统评估了膳食中特定糖化化合物的摄入量与疾病(包括过敏、糖尿病、心血管和肾脏疾病、肠道/胃毒性、脑/认知障碍和癌症)之间的潜在关联(B 部分)。在 Pubmed (Medline)、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统性搜索,结合使用了与食品、营养和饮食主题领域相关的定义单个糖化化合物和相关疾病模式的关键词,检索到了 253 篇与研究问题相关的原始出版物。其中只有 192 篇符合之前定义的质量标准,因此被认为适合用于评估膳食糖化化合物的潜在健康风险。不过,对于本评估中考虑的每种不利健康影响,只发现了数量有限的人体、动物和体外研究。虽然对人类的研究往往因队列规模小、研究持续时间短和混杂因素而受到限制,但可控制接触单个糖化化合物的动物实验研究提供了一些证据,证明口服接触二羰基化合物会导致糖耐量受损、胰岛素抵抗、心血管影响和肾损伤,尽管其剂量水平远远超过估计的人类接触量。整个数据库的研究结果普遍不一致或没有定论。根据这项系统审查,科学知识管理小组得出结论,目前没有令人信服的证据表明膳食中摄入的糖化化合物与不良健康影响之间存在因果关系。
{"title":"Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health.","authors":"Michael Hellwig, Patrick Diel, Gerhard Eisenbrand, Tilman Grune, Sabine Guth, Thomas Henle, Hans-Ulrich Humpf, Hans-Georg Joost, Doris Marko, Jana Raupbach, Angelika Roth, Stefan Vieths, Angela Mally","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"glycation compounds\" comprises a wide range of structurally diverse compounds that are formed endogenously and in food <i>via</i> the Maillard reaction, a chemical reaction between reducing sugars and amino acids. Glycation compounds produced endogenously are considered to contribute to a range of diseases. This has led to the hypothesis that glycation compounds present in food may also cause adverse effects and thus pose a nutritional risk to human health. In this work, the Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) summarized data on formation, occurrence, exposure and toxicity of glycation compounds (Part A) and systematically assessed potential associations between dietary intake of defined glycation compounds and disease, including allergy, diabetes, cardiovascular and renal disease, gut/gastrotoxicity, brain/cognitive impairment and cancer (Part B). A systematic search in Pubmed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science using a combination of keywords defining individual glycation compounds and relevant disease patterns linked to the subject area of food, nutrition and diet retrieved 253 original publications relevant to the research question. Of these, only 192 were found to comply with previously defined quality criteria and were thus considered suitable to assess potential health risks of dietary glycation compounds. For each adverse health effect considered in this assessment, however, only limited numbers of human, animal and <i>in vitro</i> studies were identified. While studies in humans were often limited due to small cohort size, short study duration, and confounders, experimental studies in animals that allow for controlled exposure to individual glycation compounds provided some evidence for impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, cardiovascular effects and renal injury in response to oral exposure to dicarbonyl compounds, albeit at dose levels by far exceeding estimated human exposures. The overall database was generally inconsistent or inconclusive. Based on this systematic review, the SKLM concludes that there is at present no convincing evidence for a causal association between dietary intake of glycation compounds and adverse health effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"485-617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2377203
Rob J Vandebriel, Betty Hakkert, Jeroen L A Pennings, Laura H Rossi, Ingo Bichlmaier, Wieneke Bil
The European Union (EU) Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability regards chemicals that affect the immune system among the most harmful ones. The Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study (EOGRTS; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline (TG) 443), addresses, among others, potential effects of chemicals on development. In specific cases, the EOGRTS is performed with addition of a so-called cohort 3, that addresses potential effects on the developing immune system, by means of a central assay measuring the T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR). This assay is based on an interplay of antigen presentation, T-cell help and antibody production by B-cells, and together comprises a functional immune response. In the context of the EOGRTS review project of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), we evaluated 15 available TDARs for compliance with conduct and reporting requirements. Collectively, the majority of the TDAR studies were considered to be adequately conducted. We however observed: (i) the protocols differed by the antigen used (sheep red blood cells (SRBC) or KLH), the route of administration (intravenous, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous), prime or prime/boost immunizations, and whether IgG was measured. (ii) There was major variation in the effects of the positive control for immunosuppression, cyclophosphamide. (iii) Proficiency was not always shown. (iv) Statistical analysis was not always done or reported. (v) Results of effects on lymphocyte populations or other immunotoxicity observations obtained in cohort 1 (or 2) of the EOGRTS were not always discussed together with results of the TDAR. Taken together, next to an improved quality of reporting, this may suggest a need to better define the conduct of the TDAR in OECD TG 443 and OECD Guidance Document (GD) 151, at least for certain aspects.
{"title":"Evaluating the conduct and reporting of the T-cell dependent antibody response in the Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study provided under the EU REACH regulation.","authors":"Rob J Vandebriel, Betty Hakkert, Jeroen L A Pennings, Laura H Rossi, Ingo Bichlmaier, Wieneke Bil","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2377203","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2377203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Union (EU) Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability regards chemicals that affect the immune system among the most harmful ones. The Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study (EOGRTS; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline (TG) 443), addresses, among others, potential effects of chemicals on development. In specific cases, the EOGRTS is performed with addition of a so-called cohort 3, that addresses potential effects on the developing immune system, by means of a central assay measuring the T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR). This assay is based on an interplay of antigen presentation, T-cell help and antibody production by B-cells, and together comprises a functional immune response. In the context of the EOGRTS review project of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), we evaluated 15 available TDARs for compliance with conduct and reporting requirements. Collectively, the majority of the TDAR studies were considered to be adequately conducted. We however observed: (i) the protocols differed by the antigen used (sheep red blood cells (SRBC) or KLH), the route of administration (intravenous, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous), prime or prime/boost immunizations, and whether IgG was measured. (ii) There was major variation in the effects of the positive control for immunosuppression, cyclophosphamide. (iii) Proficiency was not always shown. (iv) Statistical analysis was not always done or reported. (v) Results of effects on lymphocyte populations or other immunotoxicity observations obtained in cohort 1 (or 2) of the EOGRTS were not always discussed together with results of the TDAR. Taken together, next to an improved quality of reporting, this may suggest a need to better define the conduct of the TDAR in OECD TG 443 and OECD Guidance Document (GD) 151, at least for certain aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"476-484"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-12DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2368552
John W Steele, Vaishnav Krishnan, Richard H Finnell
Prescriptions for antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been rapidly growing over the last several decades due, in part, to an expanding list of clinical indications for which they are now prescribed. This trend has raised concern for potential adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in ASM-exposed pregnancies. Recent large scale population studies have suggested that the use of topiramate (TOPAMAX, Janssen-Cilag), when prescribed for seizure control, migraines, and/or weight management, is associated with an increased risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in exposed offspring. Here, we critically review epidemiologic evidence demonstrating the neurobehavioral teratogenicity of topiramate and speculate on the neuromolecular mechanisms by which prenatal exposure may perturb neurocognitive development. Specifically, we explore the potential role of topiramate's pharmacological interactions with ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels, especially GABAergic signaling, its effects on DNA methylation and histone acetylation, whether topiramate induces oxidative stress, and its association with fetal growth restriction as possible mechanisms contributing to neurodevelopmental toxicity. Resolving this biology will be necessary to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by topiramate or other ASMs.
{"title":"Mechanisms of neurodevelopmental toxicity of topiramate.","authors":"John W Steele, Vaishnav Krishnan, Richard H Finnell","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2368552","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2368552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescriptions for antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been rapidly growing over the last several decades due, in part, to an expanding list of clinical indications for which they are now prescribed. This trend has raised concern for potential adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in ASM-exposed pregnancies. Recent large scale population studies have suggested that the use of topiramate (TOPAMAX, Janssen-Cilag), when prescribed for seizure control, migraines, and/or weight management, is associated with an increased risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in exposed offspring. Here, we critically review epidemiologic evidence demonstrating the neurobehavioral teratogenicity of topiramate and speculate on the neuromolecular mechanisms by which prenatal exposure may perturb neurocognitive development. Specifically, we explore the potential role of topiramate's pharmacological interactions with ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels, especially GABAergic signaling, its effects on DNA methylation and histone acetylation, whether topiramate induces oxidative stress, and its association with fetal growth restriction as possible mechanisms contributing to neurodevelopmental toxicity. Resolving this biology will be necessary to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by topiramate or other ASMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"465-475"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-17DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2295349
Sarah Park, Edward Sidney Hunter
During its temporary tenure, the placenta has extensive and specialized functions that are critical for pre- and post-natal development. The consequences of chemical exposure in utero can have profound effects on the structure and function of pregnancy-associated tissues and the life-long health of the birthing person and their offspring. However, the toxicological importance and critical functions of the placenta to embryonic and fetal development and maturation have been understudied. This narrative will review early placental development in humans and highlight some in vitro models currently in use that are or can be applied to better understand placental processes underlying developmental toxicity due to in utero environmental exposures.
{"title":"Modeling the human placenta: <i>in vitro</i> applications in developmental and reproductive toxicology.","authors":"Sarah Park, Edward Sidney Hunter","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2295349","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2295349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During its temporary tenure, the placenta has extensive and specialized functions that are critical for pre- and post-natal development. The consequences of chemical exposure <i>in utero</i> can have profound effects on the structure and function of pregnancy-associated tissues and the life-long health of the birthing person and their offspring. However, the toxicological importance and critical functions of the placenta to embryonic and fetal development and maturation have been understudied. This narrative will review early placental development in humans and highlight some <i>in vitro</i> models currently in use that are or can be applied to better understand placental processes underlying developmental toxicity due to <i>in utero</i> environmental exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"431-464"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}