Corey J Hayes, Rebecca A Raciborski, Mahip Acharya, Nahiyan Bin Noor, Edward V Nunes, T John Winhusen
Background and aims: Clinicians have little guidance on the ideal length of time patients should remain on medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) before being able to safely discontinue MOUD. This study estimated how the risk of all-cause mortality changes with the duration of MOUD, controlling for patient characteristics that change the risk profile independent of duration of therapy.
Design, setting and participants: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from the US Veterans Healthcare Administration. Veterans initiating MOUD with buprenorphine, methadone or extended-release naltrexone from October 2010 to September 2020. Our analytic sample included 19 666 buprenorphine initiators, 8675 methadone initiators and 4007 extended-release naltrexone initiators.
Measurement: Duration of MOUD was measured in days. Discontinuation was defined as a gap in any MOUD coverage exceeding 28 days, regardless of MOUD type initiated. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We estimated multistate survival models allowing for the modeling of multiple states (i.e. on and off MOUD, death) without having to consider censoring or competing events, while adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, prescription and facility and provider characteristics.
Findings: We observed approximately 226 000 person-years of time at risk for discontinuation or pre-discontinuation death, during which we observed 26 841 discontinuations (118.9 discontinuations per 1000 person-years). We similarly observed a total of about 106 000 person-years of post-discontinuation follow-up, during which we observed 3251 deaths (3.1 deaths per 1000 person-years). We found the largest marginal gain in probability of 6-year survival from an additional year on MOUD appears to occur around 2 years, as compared to 6 months on MOUD. Statistically significant gains continued through approximately 4-5 years of MOUD retention relative to 6-month MOUD retention. After 4-5 years, the marginal gain from one additional year of MOUD was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Among US veterans, the benefit of retention on medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) towards overall survival continues through at least 4 years of MOUD treatment. Quality metrics based on 6-month MOUD retention may be insufficient.
{"title":"Evaluating the optimal duration of medication treatment for opioid use disorder.","authors":"Corey J Hayes, Rebecca A Raciborski, Mahip Acharya, Nahiyan Bin Noor, Edward V Nunes, T John Winhusen","doi":"10.1111/add.70211","DOIUrl":"10.1111/add.70211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Clinicians have little guidance on the ideal length of time patients should remain on medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) before being able to safely discontinue MOUD. This study estimated how the risk of all-cause mortality changes with the duration of MOUD, controlling for patient characteristics that change the risk profile independent of duration of therapy.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from the US Veterans Healthcare Administration. Veterans initiating MOUD with buprenorphine, methadone or extended-release naltrexone from October 2010 to September 2020. Our analytic sample included 19 666 buprenorphine initiators, 8675 methadone initiators and 4007 extended-release naltrexone initiators.</p><p><strong>Measurement: </strong>Duration of MOUD was measured in days. Discontinuation was defined as a gap in any MOUD coverage exceeding 28 days, regardless of MOUD type initiated. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We estimated multistate survival models allowing for the modeling of multiple states (i.e. on and off MOUD, death) without having to consider censoring or competing events, while adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, prescription and facility and provider characteristics.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We observed approximately 226 000 person-years of time at risk for discontinuation or pre-discontinuation death, during which we observed 26 841 discontinuations (118.9 discontinuations per 1000 person-years). We similarly observed a total of about 106 000 person-years of post-discontinuation follow-up, during which we observed 3251 deaths (3.1 deaths per 1000 person-years). We found the largest marginal gain in probability of 6-year survival from an additional year on MOUD appears to occur around 2 years, as compared to 6 months on MOUD. Statistically significant gains continued through approximately 4-5 years of MOUD retention relative to 6-month MOUD retention. After 4-5 years, the marginal gain from one additional year of MOUD was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among US veterans, the benefit of retention on medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) towards overall survival continues through at least 4 years of MOUD treatment. Quality metrics based on 6-month MOUD retention may be insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145916223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aims: Extensive critique of the evidence-based policy paradigm has led to new ways of considering the role of evidence; for example Katherine Smith suggests that "ideas" rather than evidence mediate "the relationship between research and policy". In this paper, we used Smith's typology on "ideas" to explore how this can be applied to a case of Australian policy making: a police diversion scheme for simple possession of drugs. We aimed to analyse the idea's journey into policy in one Australian jurisdiction (New South Wales) and assess its fit with the four different types of ideas outlined by Smith.
Method: Qualitative case study analysis using data from New South Wales, Australia, over the period 2018 to 2024. Multiple data sources were used: interviews with stakeholders (n = 26), documents [reports, non-governmental organization (NGO) advocacy documents], media and official reports of a Drug Summit. Each data source was searched for narration/text concerned with police diversion in addition to decriminalisation, extracted and analysed against Smith's typology.
Results: Features of 'institutionalised ideas' suggest that police diversion is not an institutionalised idea. It appears in this case to be a 'chameleonic idea' inasmuch as its characteristics change and are malleably deployed by different stakeholders with different interests. 'Flexian policy actors' (including police, government officials, advocates and researchers) are able to interpret, transform and shape the meaning of police diversion to suit their interests and commitments. Despite evidence synthesis and expert review recommending police diversion as a second-best option to decriminalisation, it was taken up into policy. We suggest this is because of its chameleonic nature, serving simultaneously at the hands of different policy actors as a roadblock to decriminalisation and as a Trojan horse for decriminalisation reform whilst also obscuring tensions between police diversion and decriminalisation.
Conclusions: Applying Katherine Smith's typology of ideas to an Australian police diversion scheme for simple possession of drugs shows that the scheme is not an institutionalised idea but rather a chameleonic idea. Smith's typology of ideas adds another layer to policy process frameworks, enhancing analysis seeking to understand the uptake of ideas into policy.
{"title":"Analysing police diversion for simple possession as a policy idea.","authors":"Alison Ritter, Paul Kelaita","doi":"10.1111/add.70300","DOIUrl":"10.1111/add.70300","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Extensive critique of the evidence-based policy paradigm has led to new ways of considering the role of evidence; for example Katherine Smith suggests that \"ideas\" rather than evidence mediate \"the relationship between research and policy\". In this paper, we used Smith's typology on \"ideas\" to explore how this can be applied to a case of Australian policy making: a police diversion scheme for simple possession of drugs. We aimed to analyse the idea's journey into policy in one Australian jurisdiction (New South Wales) and assess its fit with the four different types of ideas outlined by Smith.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative case study analysis using data from New South Wales, Australia, over the period 2018 to 2024. Multiple data sources were used: interviews with stakeholders (n = 26), documents [reports, non-governmental organization (NGO) advocacy documents], media and official reports of a Drug Summit. Each data source was searched for narration/text concerned with police diversion in addition to decriminalisation, extracted and analysed against Smith's typology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Features of 'institutionalised ideas' suggest that police diversion is not an institutionalised idea. It appears in this case to be a 'chameleonic idea' inasmuch as its characteristics change and are malleably deployed by different stakeholders with different interests. 'Flexian policy actors' (including police, government officials, advocates and researchers) are able to interpret, transform and shape the meaning of police diversion to suit their interests and commitments. Despite evidence synthesis and expert review recommending police diversion as a second-best option to decriminalisation, it was taken up into policy. We suggest this is because of its chameleonic nature, serving simultaneously at the hands of different policy actors as a roadblock to decriminalisation and as a Trojan horse for decriminalisation reform whilst also obscuring tensions between police diversion and decriminalisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying Katherine Smith's typology of ideas to an Australian police diversion scheme for simple possession of drugs shows that the scheme is not an institutionalised idea but rather a chameleonic idea. Smith's typology of ideas adds another layer to policy process frameworks, enhancing analysis seeking to understand the uptake of ideas into policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145888239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Japan's addiction landscape appears paradoxical. The lifetime use of illicit drugs is among the lowest in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, but harm from alcohol, tobacco, and gambling ranks among the world's highest. Historically, methamphetamine accounted for the majority of drug-related offenses, but the number of people who were apprehended for cannabis offenses in 2023 exceeded the number who were apprehended for stimulants for the first time since 1958. Nevertheless, the lifetime prevalence of illicit drug use among adults remains under ~3%. In contrast, heavy drinking among working-age men, decades of tobacco consumption, and rapid digitalization that has more recently led to a surge in online gambling and gaming disorder have imposed a substantial disease burden. The present review discusses Japan's epidemiology, social impact, policy changes, prevention, and treatment infrastructure of drug-related problems and the latest trends in addiction science and proposes ways to link policy and research. Japan's experience, balancing strict enforcement with health-centered care, may offer lessons for regions that have similar social contexts.
{"title":"Addiction-related problems in Japan: A regional perspective.","authors":"Soichiro Ide, Yoko Nishitani, Masahiko Sumitani, Masabumi Minami, Tadashi Isa, Masako Iseki, Michiko Ohkura, Hitoshi Okamoto, Tetsuro Kikuchi, Yuko Sekino, Hidehiko Takahashi, Kenji Takeuchi, Atsumi Nitta, Takeshi Honjo, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Tsuyoshi Miyakawa, Toshiya Murai, Toshihiko Matsumoto, Kazuyuki Nakagome, Kazutaka Ikeda","doi":"10.1111/add.70307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Japan's addiction landscape appears paradoxical. The lifetime use of illicit drugs is among the lowest in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, but harm from alcohol, tobacco, and gambling ranks among the world's highest. Historically, methamphetamine accounted for the majority of drug-related offenses, but the number of people who were apprehended for cannabis offenses in 2023 exceeded the number who were apprehended for stimulants for the first time since 1958. Nevertheless, the lifetime prevalence of illicit drug use among adults remains under ~3%. In contrast, heavy drinking among working-age men, decades of tobacco consumption, and rapid digitalization that has more recently led to a surge in online gambling and gaming disorder have imposed a substantial disease burden. The present review discusses Japan's epidemiology, social impact, policy changes, prevention, and treatment infrastructure of drug-related problems and the latest trends in addiction science and proposes ways to link policy and research. Japan's experience, balancing strict enforcement with health-centered care, may offer lessons for regions that have similar social contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145861468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Grace L Kulik, Hsing-Yu Hsu, Jacqueline Rudolph, Yutong Jiang, Kristine M Erlandson, Damani A Piggott, Shruti Mehta, Jeremy D Walston, Gregory Kirk, Todd T Brown, Jing Sun
Background and aims: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) experience a high burden of early-onset frailty, primarily due to multifactorial causes such as infections (human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis C virus [HCV]), substance use, and polypharmacy. Methadone, although an effective treatment for opioid use disorder, has demonstrated toxicity across several body systems that may impact or accelerate the aging process. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to determine the association of methadone use with frailty and physical function among PWID.
Design: This study performed a retrospective analysis from the AIDS Linked to IntraVenous Experience (ALIVE) longitudinal cohort between 2005 and 2020, using multivariable mixed effect logistic regression, adjusting for demographics, body mass index, substance use, HIV, and comorbidities.
Setting: Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Participants: Adult participants (≥18 years) were recruited into the ALIVE cohort if they reported a history of or current injection drug use. Our study included 2153 participants with 13 909 person-years of follow-up.
Measurements: Methadone usage, whether prescribed or non-medical, was self-reported by participants during study follow-up. The primary outcome measurement was frailty as defined by the Fried frailty phenotype. Physical function was measured using grip strength and 4-m gait speed.
Findings: At baseline, 883 were currently using methadone. Median age was 48 (interquartile range: 42, 53) years; 81% were Black, 34% female, 80% had incomes <$5000, and 31% were living with HIV. Methadone use was associated with 25% higher odds of frailty (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09, 1.43). This difference suggested that the odds of frailty among individuals using methadone at age 50 were comparable to those not using methadone at age 54. Methadone use was associated with lower average grip strength [-0.71 kg (95% CI: -0.94, -0.48)], but not slower gait speed.
Conclusions: Among persons who inject drugs, those using methadone appear to be more likely to experience frailty at an earlier age compared with those not using methadone. Early screening for frailty and other geriatric conditions may be warranted among individuals with active methadone use in this population.
{"title":"The association of methadone use with physical function and frailty among persons who inject drugs.","authors":"Grace L Kulik, Hsing-Yu Hsu, Jacqueline Rudolph, Yutong Jiang, Kristine M Erlandson, Damani A Piggott, Shruti Mehta, Jeremy D Walston, Gregory Kirk, Todd T Brown, Jing Sun","doi":"10.1111/add.70306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Persons who inject drugs (PWID) experience a high burden of early-onset frailty, primarily due to multifactorial causes such as infections (human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis C virus [HCV]), substance use, and polypharmacy. Methadone, although an effective treatment for opioid use disorder, has demonstrated toxicity across several body systems that may impact or accelerate the aging process. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to determine the association of methadone use with frailty and physical function among PWID.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study performed a retrospective analysis from the AIDS Linked to IntraVenous Experience (ALIVE) longitudinal cohort between 2005 and 2020, using multivariable mixed effect logistic regression, adjusting for demographics, body mass index, substance use, HIV, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Baltimore, Maryland, United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult participants (≥18 years) were recruited into the ALIVE cohort if they reported a history of or current injection drug use. Our study included 2153 participants with 13 909 person-years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Methadone usage, whether prescribed or non-medical, was self-reported by participants during study follow-up. The primary outcome measurement was frailty as defined by the Fried frailty phenotype. Physical function was measured using grip strength and 4-m gait speed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>At baseline, 883 were currently using methadone. Median age was 48 (interquartile range: 42, 53) years; 81% were Black, 34% female, 80% had incomes <$5000, and 31% were living with HIV. Methadone use was associated with 25% higher odds of frailty (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09, 1.43). This difference suggested that the odds of frailty among individuals using methadone at age 50 were comparable to those not using methadone at age 54. Methadone use was associated with lower average grip strength [-0.71 kg (95% CI: -0.94, -0.48)], but not slower gait speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among persons who inject drugs, those using methadone appear to be more likely to experience frailty at an earlier age compared with those not using methadone. Early screening for frailty and other geriatric conditions may be warranted among individuals with active methadone use in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145814677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yung-Feng Yen, Yun-Ju Lai, Sheng-Siang Su, Chian-Jue Kuo
Background and aims: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) may induce angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) overexpression, potentially increasing vulnerability to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. However, the relationship between AUD and the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains unclear. This study aimed to measure the association between AUD and the incidence of COVID-19 infection.
Design: We identified 247 000 individuals with AUD between 2001 and 2019 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Another 2 470 000 age- and sex-matched controls without AUD were randomly selected for comparison. All study participants were followed up until the occurrence of new-onset COVID-19 infection, death, or December 31, 2021.
Setting: Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.
Participants: A total of 247 000 individuals with AUD and 2 470 000 controls without AUD.
Measurements: A new diagnosis of COVID-19 was determined by a positive real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test. We employed a Cox regression model, considering death as a competing risk, to assess the impact of AUD on the risk of COVID-19 infection.
Findings: Among 2 717 000 participants, 2374 developed incident COVID-19 during an average follow-up of 1.98 years, including 415 (0.17%) individuals with AUD and 1959 (0.08%) controls. After adjusting for age, sex, urbanization, COVID-19 vaccination status, anxiety disorder, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, AUD was statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of incident COVID-19 infection (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]:1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.06-1.34). Subgroup analyses, stratified by age, sex, and COVID-19 vaccination status, revealed that AUD was linked to the risk of incident COVID-19 infection across all subgroups, except for individuals aged 18-49 years, men, and those who were unvaccinated.
Conclusions: Alcohol use disorder appears to be an independent risk factor for incident COVID-19 infection. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing individuals with AUD as a key target population for COVID-19 prevention efforts.
{"title":"Alcohol use disorder and risk of incident COVID-19 infection: A nested case-control study in Taiwan.","authors":"Yung-Feng Yen, Yun-Ju Lai, Sheng-Siang Su, Chian-Jue Kuo","doi":"10.1111/add.70309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Alcohol use disorder (AUD) may induce angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) overexpression, potentially increasing vulnerability to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. However, the relationship between AUD and the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains unclear. This study aimed to measure the association between AUD and the incidence of COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We identified 247 000 individuals with AUD between 2001 and 2019 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Another 2 470 000 age- and sex-matched controls without AUD were randomly selected for comparison. All study participants were followed up until the occurrence of new-onset COVID-19 infection, death, or December 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 247 000 individuals with AUD and 2 470 000 controls without AUD.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>A new diagnosis of COVID-19 was determined by a positive real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test. We employed a Cox regression model, considering death as a competing risk, to assess the impact of AUD on the risk of COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 2 717 000 participants, 2374 developed incident COVID-19 during an average follow-up of 1.98 years, including 415 (0.17%) individuals with AUD and 1959 (0.08%) controls. After adjusting for age, sex, urbanization, COVID-19 vaccination status, anxiety disorder, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, AUD was statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of incident COVID-19 infection (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]:1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.06-1.34). Subgroup analyses, stratified by age, sex, and COVID-19 vaccination status, revealed that AUD was linked to the risk of incident COVID-19 infection across all subgroups, except for individuals aged 18-49 years, men, and those who were unvaccinated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alcohol use disorder appears to be an independent risk factor for incident COVID-19 infection. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing individuals with AUD as a key target population for COVID-19 prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145814637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ethan H Mereish, Hyemin Lee, Jeremy T Goldbach, Sophie Hathaway, Emily A Hennessy
<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Sexual minority youth report significantly higher rates of substance use than heterosexual youth, yet a comprehensive and systematic evaluation and synthesis of the magnitude of this inequity has not been conducted. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the magnitude of overall inequities in substance use between sexual minority and heterosexual youth and examine demographic and methodological moderating factors that might impact variability in substance use patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis of studies that examined sexual orientation inequities in substance use. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across four electronic databases (PubMed, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest; January 2008-July 2024). Studies were eligible if they included a youth participant population (mean sample age of 25 years or younger), examined differences in substance use between sexual minority and heterosexual groups, and published between 2008 and 2024 in English. Primary outcomes were any measures of substance use; secondary outcome was age of substance use initiation. Following PRISMA guidelines, reviewers independently reviewed and extracted data. Analyses employed random-effects models, with robust variance estimation to account for dependency among multiple effect sizes within studies. Analyses examined continuous and dichotomous outcomes separately. Bivariate meta-regression examined moderators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 304 studies of 5 928 282 youth, sexual minority youth reported greater quantity and frequency of all assessed substances (i.e. alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, prescription drugs, powder cocaine, crack cocaine, meth/amphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, heroin, and other substances) and engaged in more polysubstance use than heterosexual youth. For continuous outcomes, Hedges' g ranged from 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.15, I<sup>2</sup> = 99.52, participants = 354 201, studies = 48) for alcohol to 0.40 (95% CI, 0.21-0.59, I<sup>2</sup> = 100.00, participants = 30 679, studies = 5) for mixed/polysubstance use. Dichotomous outcomes showed consistently elevated odds ratios, ranging from 1.34 (95% CI: 1.24-1.46, I<sup>2</sup> = 96.01, participants = 3 500 203, studies = 128) for alcohol to 4.63 (95% CI, 2.91-7.38, I<sup>2</sup> = 86.35, participants = 391 827, studies = 10) for heroin use. Sexual minority youth also had earlier ages of initiation (all substance outcomes: odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.39, participants = 619 187, studies = 11). Moderation results indicated that inequities were larger for plurisexual youth (e.g. bisexual, pansexual), sexual minority girls and young women, and adolescents 18 years of age or younger. The magnitude of inequities was also larger for lifetime measures of use compared with measures of recent use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sexual minori
{"title":"A meta-analysis of sexual orientation inequities in substance use among youth.","authors":"Ethan H Mereish, Hyemin Lee, Jeremy T Goldbach, Sophie Hathaway, Emily A Hennessy","doi":"10.1111/add.70301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70301","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Sexual minority youth report significantly higher rates of substance use than heterosexual youth, yet a comprehensive and systematic evaluation and synthesis of the magnitude of this inequity has not been conducted. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the magnitude of overall inequities in substance use between sexual minority and heterosexual youth and examine demographic and methodological moderating factors that might impact variability in substance use patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis of studies that examined sexual orientation inequities in substance use. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across four electronic databases (PubMed, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest; January 2008-July 2024). Studies were eligible if they included a youth participant population (mean sample age of 25 years or younger), examined differences in substance use between sexual minority and heterosexual groups, and published between 2008 and 2024 in English. Primary outcomes were any measures of substance use; secondary outcome was age of substance use initiation. Following PRISMA guidelines, reviewers independently reviewed and extracted data. Analyses employed random-effects models, with robust variance estimation to account for dependency among multiple effect sizes within studies. Analyses examined continuous and dichotomous outcomes separately. Bivariate meta-regression examined moderators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 304 studies of 5 928 282 youth, sexual minority youth reported greater quantity and frequency of all assessed substances (i.e. alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, prescription drugs, powder cocaine, crack cocaine, meth/amphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, heroin, and other substances) and engaged in more polysubstance use than heterosexual youth. For continuous outcomes, Hedges' g ranged from 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.15, I<sup>2</sup> = 99.52, participants = 354 201, studies = 48) for alcohol to 0.40 (95% CI, 0.21-0.59, I<sup>2</sup> = 100.00, participants = 30 679, studies = 5) for mixed/polysubstance use. Dichotomous outcomes showed consistently elevated odds ratios, ranging from 1.34 (95% CI: 1.24-1.46, I<sup>2</sup> = 96.01, participants = 3 500 203, studies = 128) for alcohol to 4.63 (95% CI, 2.91-7.38, I<sup>2</sup> = 86.35, participants = 391 827, studies = 10) for heroin use. Sexual minority youth also had earlier ages of initiation (all substance outcomes: odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.39, participants = 619 187, studies = 11). Moderation results indicated that inequities were larger for plurisexual youth (e.g. bisexual, pansexual), sexual minority girls and young women, and adolescents 18 years of age or younger. The magnitude of inequities was also larger for lifetime measures of use compared with measures of recent use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sexual minori","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145814609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeanne E Savage, Fazil Aliev, Peter B Barr, Maia Choi, Gabin Drouard, Megan E Cooke, Sally I Kuo, Mallory Stephenson, Sarah J Brislin, Zoe E Neale, Antti Latvala, Richard J Rose, Jaakko Kaprio, Danielle M Dick, Jacquelyn Meyers, Jessica E Salvatore, Danielle Posthuma
Background and aims: Alcohol use behaviors (AUBs) manifest in a variety of normative and problematic ways across the life course, all of which are heritable. Twin studies show that genetic influences on AUBs change across development, but this is usually not considered in research identifying and investigating the genes linked to AUBs. Understanding the dynamics of how genes shape AUBs could point to critical periods in which interventions may be most effective and provide insight into the mechanisms behind AUB-related genes. In this project, we estimated how genetic influences on AUBs unfold across development using longitudinal modelling of polygenic scores (PGSs).
Design: Using results from genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we created PGSs to index individual-level genetic risk for multiple AUB-related dimensions: Consumption, Problems, a temporally variable pattern of drinking associated with a preference for beer (BeerPref) and externalizing behavior (EXT). We created latent growth curve models and tested PGSs as predictors of latent growth factors (intercept, slope, quadratic) underlying trajectories of AUBs.
Setting: PGSs were derived in six longitudinal epidemiological cohorts from the United States, United Kingdom and Finland.
Participants: Participant data were obtained from the longitudinal studies AddHealth, ALSPAC, COGA, FinnTwin12, the older Finnish Twin Cohort and Spit for Science (total n = 19 194). These cohorts included individuals aged 14 to 67, with repeated measures collected over a span of 4 to 36 years.
Measurements: Primary measures included monthly frequency of typical alcohol consumption (CON) and heavy episodic drinking (HED).
Findings: When drinking behaviors were averaged across time, higher Consumption, Problems and EXT PGSs were robustly associated with higher levels of CON and HED (βs ranged from 0.105 to 0.333, P < 3.09E-04) and higher BeerPref PGSs with higher HED (β = 0.064, P = 3.65E-05). However, these PGSs were largely not associated with drinking trajectories in the latent growth curve models. In the meta-analysis, only PGSs for chronic alcohol Problems consistently predicted a steeper slope (increasing trajectory) of CON across time (B = 0.470, P = 4.20E-06). Other PGSs were associated with latent growth factors in some individual cohorts, but there was a large degree of heterogeneity.
Conclusions: Genetic associations appear to differ not only between alcohol use behaviors, but also across developmental time points and across cohorts, highlighting the need for genetic studies to take such heterogeneity into account. Individual-level genetic profiles may be useful to point to personalized intervention timelines, particularly for individuals with high genetic risk scores for alcohol problems.
背景和目的:酒精使用行为(aub)在整个生命过程中以各种规范和有问题的方式表现出来,所有这些都是可遗传的。双胞胎研究表明,在发育过程中,基因对aub的影响会发生变化,但在识别和调查与aub相关的基因时,通常不会考虑到这一点。了解基因如何塑造aub的动力学可以指出干预可能最有效的关键时期,并为aub相关基因背后的机制提供见解。在这个项目中,我们使用多基因评分(pgs)纵向建模来估计遗传对aub的影响如何在整个发育过程中展开。设计:利用全基因组关联研究(GWASs)的结果,我们创建了pgs,以索引与aub相关的多个维度的个人水平遗传风险:消费、问题、与啤酒偏好(BeerPref)和外化行为(EXT)相关的临时可变饮酒模式。我们建立了潜在生长曲线模型,并测试了pgs作为aub潜在生长因子(截距、斜率、二次曲线)潜在轨迹的预测因子。背景:pgs来自美国、英国和芬兰的6个纵向流行病学队列。参与者:参与者数据来自纵向研究AddHealth、ALSPAC、COGA、FinnTwin12、老年芬兰双胞胎队列和Spit for Science(总n = 19194)。这些队列包括14至67岁的个体,在4至36年的时间里收集了重复的测量数据。测量:主要测量包括每月典型酒精消费(CON)和重度间歇性饮酒(HED)的频率。研究结果:当对饮酒行为进行时间平均时,较高的消耗量、问题和EXT pgs与较高的CON和HED水平密切相关(βs范围从0.105到0.333)。结论:遗传关联似乎不仅在饮酒行为之间存在差异,而且在不同的发育时间点和不同的人群中也存在差异,这突出了遗传学研究考虑这种异质性的必要性。个体水平的遗传概况可能有助于指出个性化的干预时间表,特别是对于酒精问题遗传风险得分高的个体。
{"title":"Trajectories of genetic risk across dimensions of alcohol use behaviors.","authors":"Jeanne E Savage, Fazil Aliev, Peter B Barr, Maia Choi, Gabin Drouard, Megan E Cooke, Sally I Kuo, Mallory Stephenson, Sarah J Brislin, Zoe E Neale, Antti Latvala, Richard J Rose, Jaakko Kaprio, Danielle M Dick, Jacquelyn Meyers, Jessica E Salvatore, Danielle Posthuma","doi":"10.1111/add.70292","DOIUrl":"10.1111/add.70292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Alcohol use behaviors (AUBs) manifest in a variety of normative and problematic ways across the life course, all of which are heritable. Twin studies show that genetic influences on AUBs change across development, but this is usually not considered in research identifying and investigating the genes linked to AUBs. Understanding the dynamics of how genes shape AUBs could point to critical periods in which interventions may be most effective and provide insight into the mechanisms behind AUB-related genes. In this project, we estimated how genetic influences on AUBs unfold across development using longitudinal modelling of polygenic scores (PGSs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using results from genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we created PGSs to index individual-level genetic risk for multiple AUB-related dimensions: Consumption, Problems, a temporally variable pattern of drinking associated with a preference for beer (BeerPref) and externalizing behavior (EXT). We created latent growth curve models and tested PGSs as predictors of latent growth factors (intercept, slope, quadratic) underlying trajectories of AUBs.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PGSs were derived in six longitudinal epidemiological cohorts from the United States, United Kingdom and Finland.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participant data were obtained from the longitudinal studies AddHealth, ALSPAC, COGA, FinnTwin12, the older Finnish Twin Cohort and Spit for Science (total n = 19 194). These cohorts included individuals aged 14 to 67, with repeated measures collected over a span of 4 to 36 years.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Primary measures included monthly frequency of typical alcohol consumption (CON) and heavy episodic drinking (HED).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>When drinking behaviors were averaged across time, higher Consumption, Problems and EXT PGSs were robustly associated with higher levels of CON and HED (βs ranged from 0.105 to 0.333, P < 3.09E-04) and higher BeerPref PGSs with higher HED (β = 0.064, P = 3.65E-05). However, these PGSs were largely not associated with drinking trajectories in the latent growth curve models. In the meta-analysis, only PGSs for chronic alcohol Problems consistently predicted a steeper slope (increasing trajectory) of CON across time (B = 0.470, P = 4.20E-06). Other PGSs were associated with latent growth factors in some individual cohorts, but there was a large degree of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic associations appear to differ not only between alcohol use behaviors, but also across developmental time points and across cohorts, highlighting the need for genetic studies to take such heterogeneity into account. Individual-level genetic profiles may be useful to point to personalized intervention timelines, particularly for individuals with high genetic risk scores for alcohol problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145814657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan Brett, Toby Lea, Elizabeth Knock, Steven Albert, Liam Acheson, Krista J Siefried, Sebastian Job
Background and aims: There is an urgent unmet need for novel treatments for methamphetamine (MA) use disorder. We explored the qualitative experiences of people participating in a study of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAT) to treat MA use disorder.
Design and setting: Qualitative study of participants enrolled in a single arm, open-label pilot study of PAT for MA use disorder delivered in an outpatient stimulant treatment program setting in Sydney, Australia.
Participants: Twelve participants were interviewed before starting PAT and then again one month following PAT.
Measurements: Pre-PAT interviews explored participants' experiences of MA use and expectations of receiving PAT. Post-PAT interviews explored participants' experiences of PAT, with a focus on phenomena related to the acute subjective effects of psilocybin, the perceived effects of PAT on MA use, self-perception, beliefs, values, behaviours, interpersonal relationships and spirituality, and acceptability of the intervention. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using an inductive qualitative approach.
Findings: While participants generally hoped to have positive outcomes from study participation, their expectations were generally tempered and realistic. Their trial experiences of PAT were often characterised by new understandings of themselves, their narrative histories and interpersonal relationships, all of which were frequently prompted by leaning into vividly presented challenging experiences within the psychedelic experience. This volitional attitude of 'leaning into the obstacle' emerged as a key theme, meriting exploration for its potential to expose the subjective dimension of the psychedelic mechanism of effect. Resolution of this obstacle was associated with a reduction in the salience of methamphetamine. Therapeutic alliance was seen as critical to positive outcomes and was achieved through high levels of concentrated therapeutic attention and intersubjective intimacy between participant and therapist.
Conclusions: Interviewed participants in a study of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAT) for methamphetamine use disorder perceived PAT as an acceptable intervention. Transformation in understandings of self and interpersonal relationships and subsequent reduced salience of methamphetamine use often occurred through confronting psychic obstacles in the context of high levels of therapeutic support from study therapists.
{"title":"A qualitative analysis of participant expectations and experiences of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder.","authors":"Jonathan Brett, Toby Lea, Elizabeth Knock, Steven Albert, Liam Acheson, Krista J Siefried, Sebastian Job","doi":"10.1111/add.70284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is an urgent unmet need for novel treatments for methamphetamine (MA) use disorder. We explored the qualitative experiences of people participating in a study of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAT) to treat MA use disorder.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study of participants enrolled in a single arm, open-label pilot study of PAT for MA use disorder delivered in an outpatient stimulant treatment program setting in Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twelve participants were interviewed before starting PAT and then again one month following PAT.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Pre-PAT interviews explored participants' experiences of MA use and expectations of receiving PAT. Post-PAT interviews explored participants' experiences of PAT, with a focus on phenomena related to the acute subjective effects of psilocybin, the perceived effects of PAT on MA use, self-perception, beliefs, values, behaviours, interpersonal relationships and spirituality, and acceptability of the intervention. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using an inductive qualitative approach.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>While participants generally hoped to have positive outcomes from study participation, their expectations were generally tempered and realistic. Their trial experiences of PAT were often characterised by new understandings of themselves, their narrative histories and interpersonal relationships, all of which were frequently prompted by leaning into vividly presented challenging experiences within the psychedelic experience. This volitional attitude of 'leaning into the obstacle' emerged as a key theme, meriting exploration for its potential to expose the subjective dimension of the psychedelic mechanism of effect. Resolution of this obstacle was associated with a reduction in the salience of methamphetamine. Therapeutic alliance was seen as critical to positive outcomes and was achieved through high levels of concentrated therapeutic attention and intersubjective intimacy between participant and therapist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interviewed participants in a study of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAT) for methamphetamine use disorder perceived PAT as an acceptable intervention. Transformation in understandings of self and interpersonal relationships and subsequent reduced salience of methamphetamine use often occurred through confronting psychic obstacles in the context of high levels of therapeutic support from study therapists.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145802781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Giné <i>et al</i>. [<span>1</span>] report compelling data on overdose mortality trends in Spain since 2010. Although Spain has relatively low rates of overdose compared with other European countries—likely because of a well-organized network of harm-reduction and specialized services for people who use drugs—notable changes in overdose patterns have emerged over time. These include (1) an acceleration of overdose events from 2018 onward, almost coinciding with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic; (2) a rising burden among individuals over 50 years old; and (3) shifting patterns in the substances involved, with differences observed between women and men. The authors also suggest a higher risk of intentional overdoses among women.</p><p>This study provides important new evidence on the overlooked dimension of gender differences in drug-related harms. Beyond biological factors, overdose outcomes are profoundly shaped by social and structural inequalities that influence both exposure and access to care. Differences in overdose risk reflect disparities that begin much earlier—at the levels of prevention, diagnosis and treatment initiation.</p><p>Women who use drugs often face specific barriers to engaging with health systems. They experience higher levels of public and internalized stigma when seeking harm-reduction or addiction services [<span>2</span>]. They are less likely to be referred to, or retained in, opioid maintenance treatment programs and more likely to discontinue prematurely because of social or logistical constraints [<span>3, 4</span>]. Gendered stigma, caregiving responsibilities and fears of criminalization or child-custody loss can further prevent them from seeking help [<span>5</span>]. Many opioid maintenance programs remain structured around male participation patterns, with rigid schedules and limited provision for childcare or trauma-informed support [<span>6</span>]. Gender-based violence and trauma are common among women who use opioids, yet few programs integrate trauma-informed care or mental health services [<span>7, 8</span>]. Women, therefore, have fewer opportunities to enter and remain in treatment or to receive harm reduction materials.</p><p>More importantly, women appear to face disparities in access to naloxone for overdose prevention. A retrospective analysis of opioid overdose patients seen by emergency medical services from 2012 to 2014 found that women were almost three times more likely as men not to receive naloxone [<span>9</span>]. Women also report more problems for storing and carrying naloxone because of unstable housing [<span>10</span>] and lower awareness or availability of this life-saving intervention [<span>11</span>].</p><p>These cumulative disadvantages make overdose outcomes the visible endpoint of a broader continuum of unequal access. Gendered disparities in overdose risk mirror those already documented for other health outcomes, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In a study on
{"title":"Commentary on Giné et al.: The hidden face of overdose: Gender inequities along the continuum of care","authors":"Patrizia Carrieri, Fabienne Marcellin","doi":"10.1111/add.70304","DOIUrl":"10.1111/add.70304","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Giné <i>et al</i>. [<span>1</span>] report compelling data on overdose mortality trends in Spain since 2010. Although Spain has relatively low rates of overdose compared with other European countries—likely because of a well-organized network of harm-reduction and specialized services for people who use drugs—notable changes in overdose patterns have emerged over time. These include (1) an acceleration of overdose events from 2018 onward, almost coinciding with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic; (2) a rising burden among individuals over 50 years old; and (3) shifting patterns in the substances involved, with differences observed between women and men. The authors also suggest a higher risk of intentional overdoses among women.</p><p>This study provides important new evidence on the overlooked dimension of gender differences in drug-related harms. Beyond biological factors, overdose outcomes are profoundly shaped by social and structural inequalities that influence both exposure and access to care. Differences in overdose risk reflect disparities that begin much earlier—at the levels of prevention, diagnosis and treatment initiation.</p><p>Women who use drugs often face specific barriers to engaging with health systems. They experience higher levels of public and internalized stigma when seeking harm-reduction or addiction services [<span>2</span>]. They are less likely to be referred to, or retained in, opioid maintenance treatment programs and more likely to discontinue prematurely because of social or logistical constraints [<span>3, 4</span>]. Gendered stigma, caregiving responsibilities and fears of criminalization or child-custody loss can further prevent them from seeking help [<span>5</span>]. Many opioid maintenance programs remain structured around male participation patterns, with rigid schedules and limited provision for childcare or trauma-informed support [<span>6</span>]. Gender-based violence and trauma are common among women who use opioids, yet few programs integrate trauma-informed care or mental health services [<span>7, 8</span>]. Women, therefore, have fewer opportunities to enter and remain in treatment or to receive harm reduction materials.</p><p>More importantly, women appear to face disparities in access to naloxone for overdose prevention. A retrospective analysis of opioid overdose patients seen by emergency medical services from 2012 to 2014 found that women were almost three times more likely as men not to receive naloxone [<span>9</span>]. Women also report more problems for storing and carrying naloxone because of unstable housing [<span>10</span>] and lower awareness or availability of this life-saving intervention [<span>11</span>].</p><p>These cumulative disadvantages make overdose outcomes the visible endpoint of a broader continuum of unequal access. Gendered disparities in overdose risk mirror those already documented for other health outcomes, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In a study on ","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"121 2","pages":"273-274"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.70304","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145808809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annelies L Robijn, Sarah Donald, Jacqueline M Cohen, Duong T Tran, Carolyn E Cesta, Kari Furu, Lianne Parkin, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Johan Reutfors, Helga Zoega, Nicholas Zwar, Alys Havard
Aims: As clinical trial evidence on the effectiveness of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy is inconclusive, we conducted a large cohort study examining their effectiveness and comparative effectiveness during pregnancy.
Design: Population-based cohort study. We used propensity score matching and conditional Poisson regression to compare pharmacotherapy-exposed with unexposed pregnancies, and to compare varenicline-exposed with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) -exposed pregnancies.
Setting: Birth records (2005-2020) from New South Wales (NSW) Australia, New Zealand (NZ) and Norway/Sweden linked to pharmacotherapy dispensing records.
Participants/cases: Women with a birth record indicating smoking in early pregnancy [during first 20 weeks' gestation (NSW), at lead maternity registration (NZ) or during the first trimester (Norway/Sweden)]. Participants were dispensed prescription NRT, varenicline or bupropion in the first 18 weeks of gestation (NSW, Norway/Sweden) or between the first antenatal visit and childbirth (NZ).
Measurements: We defined smoking cessation as not smoking after gestational week 20 (NSW), at gestational week 32-36 (Norway/Sweden) and at two weeks postpartum (NZ), identified via self-report and documented in the birth record.
Findings: Our NRT analyses included 623, 7074 and 70 exposed and 6026, 68 161 and 700 propensity-score-matched unexposed pregnancies from NSW, NZ and Norway/Sweden, respectively. The associations between NRT and smoking cessation were mixed but tended toward reduced cessation compared with no pharmacotherapy. In NSW, NRT was associated with a reduction in cessation [relative risk (RR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.48-0.97], while in NZ, the effect was smaller (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89-0.98) but inconclusive in Norway/Sweden (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.35). Smoking cessation was also equally or less common among varenicline-exposed pregnancies (NSW: 308 exposed vs 3077 matched unexposed, RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.72-1.09, Norway/Sweden: 196 exposed vs 1960 matched unexposed, RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.70). Our comparison of varenicline-exposed with NRT-exposed pregnancies indicated increased smoking cessation among varenicline-exposed pregnancies (NSW: 108 vs 154 exposed, RR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.10-3.22). There were too few bupropion-exposed pregnancies to support interpretation.
Conclusions: Varenicline appears to be more effective at smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy. The uncertainty about the real-world effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion remains as this study's analyses were impacted by non-adherence and biased by unmeasured confounding.
目的:由于怀孕期间戒烟药物治疗有效性的临床试验证据尚无定论,我们进行了一项大型队列研究,检查其在怀孕期间的有效性和比较有效性。设计:基于人群的队列研究。我们使用倾向评分匹配和条件泊松回归来比较暴露于药物治疗和未暴露于药物治疗的妊娠,并比较暴露于伐尼克林和暴露于尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的妊娠。背景:新南威尔士州(NSW)、澳大利亚、新西兰(NZ)和挪威/瑞典的出生记录(2005-2020)与药物治疗配药记录相关。参与者/病例:有出生记录表明怀孕早期吸烟的妇女[在妊娠前20周(新南威尔士州),在产前登记(新西兰)或在妊娠前三个月(挪威/瑞典)]。参与者在妊娠的前18周(新南威尔士州,挪威/瑞典)或第一次产前检查和分娩之间(新西兰)分配处方NRT,伐尼克兰或安非他酮。测量:我们将戒烟定义为在妊娠20周(NSW)、妊娠32-36周(挪威/瑞典)和产后两周(NZ)后不吸烟,通过自我报告确定并记录在出生记录中。研究结果:我们的NRT分析分别包括来自新南威尔士州、新西兰和挪威/瑞典的623、7074和70例暴露孕妇,以及6026、68、161和700例倾向评分匹配的未暴露孕妇。NRT与戒烟之间的联系是混合的,但与没有药物治疗相比,倾向于减少戒烟。在新南威尔士州,NRT与戒烟减少相关[相对危险度(RR) = 0.68, 95%可信区间(CI) = 0.48-0.97],而在新西兰,效果较小(RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89-0.98),但在挪威/瑞典尚无定论(RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.35)。在接触伐兰尼克林的孕妇中,戒烟也同样或更不常见(新南威尔士州:308例接触者vs 3077例未接触者,RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.72-1.09,挪威/瑞典:196例接触者vs 1960例未接触者,RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.70)。我们比较了暴露于瓦伦尼克林和nrt的孕妇,发现暴露于瓦伦尼克林的孕妇戒烟率增加(NSW: 108 vs 154, RR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.10-3.22)。很少有接触安非他酮的孕妇支持这种解释。结论:在怀孕期间,伐尼克兰似乎比尼古丁替代疗法更有效地戒烟。关于尼古丁替代疗法和安非他酮在现实世界中的有效性的不确定性仍然存在,因为本研究的分析受到非依从性的影响,并受到未测量的混杂因素的影响。
{"title":"Effectiveness of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy: A multi-national population-based study.","authors":"Annelies L Robijn, Sarah Donald, Jacqueline M Cohen, Duong T Tran, Carolyn E Cesta, Kari Furu, Lianne Parkin, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Johan Reutfors, Helga Zoega, Nicholas Zwar, Alys Havard","doi":"10.1111/add.70290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>As clinical trial evidence on the effectiveness of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy is inconclusive, we conducted a large cohort study examining their effectiveness and comparative effectiveness during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based cohort study. We used propensity score matching and conditional Poisson regression to compare pharmacotherapy-exposed with unexposed pregnancies, and to compare varenicline-exposed with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) -exposed pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Birth records (2005-2020) from New South Wales (NSW) Australia, New Zealand (NZ) and Norway/Sweden linked to pharmacotherapy dispensing records.</p><p><strong>Participants/cases: </strong>Women with a birth record indicating smoking in early pregnancy [during first 20 weeks' gestation (NSW), at lead maternity registration (NZ) or during the first trimester (Norway/Sweden)]. Participants were dispensed prescription NRT, varenicline or bupropion in the first 18 weeks of gestation (NSW, Norway/Sweden) or between the first antenatal visit and childbirth (NZ).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We defined smoking cessation as not smoking after gestational week 20 (NSW), at gestational week 32-36 (Norway/Sweden) and at two weeks postpartum (NZ), identified via self-report and documented in the birth record.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our NRT analyses included 623, 7074 and 70 exposed and 6026, 68 161 and 700 propensity-score-matched unexposed pregnancies from NSW, NZ and Norway/Sweden, respectively. The associations between NRT and smoking cessation were mixed but tended toward reduced cessation compared with no pharmacotherapy. In NSW, NRT was associated with a reduction in cessation [relative risk (RR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.48-0.97], while in NZ, the effect was smaller (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89-0.98) but inconclusive in Norway/Sweden (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.35). Smoking cessation was also equally or less common among varenicline-exposed pregnancies (NSW: 308 exposed vs 3077 matched unexposed, RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.72-1.09, Norway/Sweden: 196 exposed vs 1960 matched unexposed, RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.70). Our comparison of varenicline-exposed with NRT-exposed pregnancies indicated increased smoking cessation among varenicline-exposed pregnancies (NSW: 108 vs 154 exposed, RR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.10-3.22). There were too few bupropion-exposed pregnancies to support interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Varenicline appears to be more effective at smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy. The uncertainty about the real-world effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion remains as this study's analyses were impacted by non-adherence and biased by unmeasured confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145802743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}