首页 > 最新文献

Addiction最新文献

英文 中文
Examining changes in the prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts in the context of a cost-of-living crisis and alcohol duty reforms: A population survey of risky drinkers in Great Britain, 2021-2024. 在生活成本危机和酒精税改革的背景下,研究成本驱动的酒精减少尝试的流行程度的变化:2021-2024年英国高风险饮酒者的人口调查。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1111/add.70248
Sarah E Jackson, Jamie Brown, Colin Angus, Abi Stevely, Magdalena Opazo Breton, Leonie Brose, Luke Wilson, John Holmes

Background and aims: Affordability of alcohol is a key driver of consumption. The cost-of-living crisis in Great Britain has been putting pressure on household budgets since late 2021. In addition, the UK Government implemented substantial reforms to the alcohol duty system and increased alcohol taxes in 2023. This study aimed to estimate changes in the monthly prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers over this period.

Design: Data were drawn from the Alcohol Toolkit Study, a nationally representative monthly cross-sectional household survey.

Setting: Great Britain.

Participants: 26 212 risky drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test - consumption (AUDIT-C) score ≥5] aged ≥18y surveyed between January 2021 and December 2024 [mean (SD) age = 45.9 (17.1); 61.4% men].

Measurements: The primary outcome was having tried to reduce alcohol consumption in the past year due to a decision that drinking was too expensive ('cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempt'). This included participants who also reported other motives (e.g. health concerns) for trying to reduce their consumption.

Findings: Overall, 1355 participants reported making a cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempt. The monthly weighted prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers increased from 4.6% in January 2021 to 7.0% in December 2024 [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-1.74]; equating to ~1.1 million people attempting to reduce their drinking among risky drinkers in 2024. This was primarily driven by a rise in the proportion of all alcohol reduction attempts that were motivated by cost, from 12.4% to 19.7% (PR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.39-1.77), rather than an overall increase in the prevalence of alcohol reduction attempts (which remained relatively stable across the period at an average of 36.0%). The pattern of results was similar when the outcome was restricted to alcohol reduction attempts only motivated by cost [17.3% (95% CI = 15.0-19.7%) of all cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts].

Conclusions: During a period of increasing financial pressures in Great Britain, alcohol reduction attempts were increasingly motivated by cost but the overall prevalence of reduction attempts did not increase.

背景和目的:酒精的可负担性是消费的关键驱动因素。自2021年底以来,英国的生活成本危机一直在给家庭预算带来压力。此外,英国政府对酒精税制度进行了重大改革,并在2023年增加了酒精税。这项研究的目的是估计在这段时间内,有风险的饮酒者每月因成本而减少饮酒尝试的流行程度的变化。设计:数据来自酒精工具包研究,这是一项具有全国代表性的月度横断面家庭调查。背景:英国。参与者:26212名高危饮酒者[酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费(AUDIT-C)评分≥5],年龄≥18岁,于2021年1月至2024年12月接受调查[平均(SD)年龄= 45.9 (17.1);61.4%的男性)。测量方法:主要结果是在过去的一年中,由于决定饮酒太昂贵而试图减少酒精消费量(“成本驱动的酒精减少尝试”)。这包括还报告了试图减少消费的其他动机(例如健康问题)的参与者。研究结果:总体而言,1355名参与者报告说,他们试图减少酒精摄入。高风险饮酒者中以成本为动机的戒酒尝试的月加权患病率从2021年1月的4.6%上升到2024年12月的7.0%[患病率比(PR) = 1.54, 95%置信区间(CI) = 1.34-1.74];相当于到2024年,有110万人在高危饮酒者中试图减少饮酒。这主要是由于成本驱动的所有酒精减少尝试的比例上升,从12.4%上升到19.7% (PR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.39-1.77),而不是酒精减少尝试的总体增加(在整个期间保持相对稳定,平均为36.0%)。当结果仅限于仅以成本为动机的酒精减少尝试时,结果模式相似[17.3% (95% CI = 15.0-19.7%)的所有以成本为动机的酒精减少尝试]。结论:在英国财政压力不断增加的时期,减少酒精的尝试越来越多地受到成本的驱动,但减少尝试的总体流行率并未增加。
{"title":"Examining changes in the prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts in the context of a cost-of-living crisis and alcohol duty reforms: A population survey of risky drinkers in Great Britain, 2021-2024.","authors":"Sarah E Jackson, Jamie Brown, Colin Angus, Abi Stevely, Magdalena Opazo Breton, Leonie Brose, Luke Wilson, John Holmes","doi":"10.1111/add.70248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70248","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Affordability of alcohol is a key driver of consumption. The cost-of-living crisis in Great Britain has been putting pressure on household budgets since late 2021. In addition, the UK Government implemented substantial reforms to the alcohol duty system and increased alcohol taxes in 2023. This study aimed to estimate changes in the monthly prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers over this period.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data were drawn from the Alcohol Toolkit Study, a nationally representative monthly cross-sectional household survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Great Britain.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>26 212 risky drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test - consumption (AUDIT-C) score ≥5] aged ≥18y surveyed between January 2021 and December 2024 [mean (SD) age = 45.9 (17.1); 61.4% men].</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was having tried to reduce alcohol consumption in the past year due to a decision that drinking was too expensive ('cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempt'). This included participants who also reported other motives (e.g. health concerns) for trying to reduce their consumption.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Overall, 1355 participants reported making a cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempt. The monthly weighted prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers increased from 4.6% in January 2021 to 7.0% in December 2024 [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-1.74]; equating to ~1.1 million people attempting to reduce their drinking among risky drinkers in 2024. This was primarily driven by a rise in the proportion of all alcohol reduction attempts that were motivated by cost, from 12.4% to 19.7% (PR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.39-1.77), rather than an overall increase in the prevalence of alcohol reduction attempts (which remained relatively stable across the period at an average of 36.0%). The pattern of results was similar when the outcome was restricted to alcohol reduction attempts only motivated by cost [17.3% (95% CI = 15.0-19.7%) of all cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During a period of increasing financial pressures in Great Britain, alcohol reduction attempts were increasingly motivated by cost but the overall prevalence of reduction attempts did not increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145555884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heated tobacco product use and tobacco abstinence: A prospective cohort study. 加热烟草制品使用和烟草戒断:一项前瞻性队列研究。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1111/add.70257
Tomohiko Ukai, Tomohiro Shinozaki, Takahiro Tabuchi

Background and aims: Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are increasingly used by individuals attempting to quit smoking, particularly in Japan where HTP use is prevalent; however, the effectiveness of HTPs in achieving complete tobacco abstinence remains unclear. This study aimed to estimate the likelihood of complete tobacco abstinence and combustible cigarette abstinence among exclusive HTP users and dual users compared with exclusive combustible cigarette users.

Design: A prospective cohort design using sequential annual follow-ups (2019-2023) from the Japan 'Society and New Tobacco' Internet Survey (JASTIS). Inverse probability-weighted Poisson generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate rate ratios for abstinence outcomes.

Setting: Nationwide internet-based survey conducted in Japan.

Participants: A total of 8969 Japanese adults aged 20 years and older who were current tobacco users at baseline were included. Participants were categorized as exclusive combustible cigarette users (55.6%), exclusive HTP users (16.3%) or dual users (28.0%). Exclusive HTP users were further categorized as established (daily use, ≥100 HTPs used, or >12 months of lifetime use) or non-established users.

Measurements: Primary outcomes were (1) complete tobacco abstinence-defined as no current use of any tobacco products used at baseline-and (2) combustible cigarette abstinence after one year. Abstinence required selecting "used regularly in the past but quit" for each relevant product.

Findings: Compared with exclusive combustible cigarette users (as classified at baseline), the rate ratio (RR) for complete tobacco abstinence was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.71-1.02] among exclusive HTP users and 0.49 (95% CI = 0.42-0.58) among dual users. When stratified, established HTP users had a statistically significantly lower likelihood of complete tobacco abstinence (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.47-0.70), while non-established users showed a higher likelihood (RR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.83-3.17). Compared with exclusive combustible cigarette users, the RR for combustible cigarette abstinence after one year was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.83-1.04) among dual users.

Conclusions: In this one-year follow-up, dual use of cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTP) and established exclusive HTP use were associated with lower rates of complete tobacco abstinence compared with exclusive cigarette use, while non-established exclusive HTP use showed higher abstinence rates. Overall, HTP use was not associated with higher tobacco abstinence rates.

背景和目的:试图戒烟的个人越来越多地使用加热烟草制品,特别是在使用加热烟草制品普遍的日本;然而,HTPs在实现完全戒烟方面的有效性仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估纯HTP使用者和双重使用者与纯可燃香烟使用者相比完全戒断烟草和可燃香烟的可能性。设计:前瞻性队列设计,采用日本“社会与新烟草”互联网调查(JASTIS)的连续年度随访(2019-2023)。使用逆概率加权泊松广义估计方程模型来估计戒断结果的比率。背景:在日本进行的全国性网络调查。参与者:总共包括8969名20岁及以上的日本成年人,他们在基线时是目前的烟草使用者。参与者分为纯可燃香烟使用者(55.6%)、纯HTP使用者(16.3%)和双重使用者(28.0%)。独家http用户进一步分为已建立用户(每日使用,使用≥100个http,或终身使用>个月)或非已建立用户。测量:主要结果是(1)完全戒烟-定义为目前没有使用任何烟草制品的基线-和(2)一年后可燃香烟戒烟。禁欲要求选择“过去经常使用,但戒了”的每一个相关产品。研究结果:与纯可燃卷烟使用者(基线分类)相比,纯HTP使用者完全戒烟的比率(RR)为0.85[95%可信区间(CI) = 0.71-1.02],双烟使用者完全戒烟的比率(RR)为0.49 (95% CI = 0.42-0.58)。当分层时,已建立的HTP使用者完全戒烟的可能性在统计学上显著降低(RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.47-0.70),而未建立的HTP使用者的可能性更高(RR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.83-3.17)。与完全使用可燃香烟的人相比,双重使用可燃香烟一年后戒烟的RR为0.93 (95% CI = 0.83-1.04)。结论:在为期一年的随访中,与专门使用香烟相比,双重使用香烟和加热烟草制品(HTP)和专门使用加热烟草制品与较低的完全烟草戒断率相关,而非专门使用加热烟草制品则显示更高的戒断率。总体而言,HTP使用与较高的戒烟率无关。
{"title":"Heated tobacco product use and tobacco abstinence: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Tomohiko Ukai, Tomohiro Shinozaki, Takahiro Tabuchi","doi":"10.1111/add.70257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are increasingly used by individuals attempting to quit smoking, particularly in Japan where HTP use is prevalent; however, the effectiveness of HTPs in achieving complete tobacco abstinence remains unclear. This study aimed to estimate the likelihood of complete tobacco abstinence and combustible cigarette abstinence among exclusive HTP users and dual users compared with exclusive combustible cigarette users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort design using sequential annual follow-ups (2019-2023) from the Japan 'Society and New Tobacco' Internet Survey (JASTIS). Inverse probability-weighted Poisson generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate rate ratios for abstinence outcomes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nationwide internet-based survey conducted in Japan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 8969 Japanese adults aged 20 years and older who were current tobacco users at baseline were included. Participants were categorized as exclusive combustible cigarette users (55.6%), exclusive HTP users (16.3%) or dual users (28.0%). Exclusive HTP users were further categorized as established (daily use, ≥100 HTPs used, or >12 months of lifetime use) or non-established users.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Primary outcomes were (1) complete tobacco abstinence-defined as no current use of any tobacco products used at baseline-and (2) combustible cigarette abstinence after one year. Abstinence required selecting \"used regularly in the past but quit\" for each relevant product.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with exclusive combustible cigarette users (as classified at baseline), the rate ratio (RR) for complete tobacco abstinence was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.71-1.02] among exclusive HTP users and 0.49 (95% CI = 0.42-0.58) among dual users. When stratified, established HTP users had a statistically significantly lower likelihood of complete tobacco abstinence (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.47-0.70), while non-established users showed a higher likelihood (RR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.83-3.17). Compared with exclusive combustible cigarette users, the RR for combustible cigarette abstinence after one year was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.83-1.04) among dual users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this one-year follow-up, dual use of cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTP) and established exclusive HTP use were associated with lower rates of complete tobacco abstinence compared with exclusive cigarette use, while non-established exclusive HTP use showed higher abstinence rates. Overall, HTP use was not associated with higher tobacco abstinence rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145555840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social cognition in Korsakoff's syndrome: A meta-analysis. Korsakoff综合征的社会认知:一项元分析。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.1111/add.70256
Kyra Wijnen, Willem S Eikelboom, Yvonne C M Rensen, Gwenny T L Janssen, Roy P C Kessels

Background and aims: Korsakoff's syndrome is an alcohol-related neurocognitive disorder characterized by episodic memory impairments, apathy, confabulations and poor illness-insight. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate mean effect sizes of performance in social cognition in people with Korsakoff's syndrome (KS) compared with controls.

Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in May 2024 to identify research articles that examined social cognition in patients with KS and control groups. Weighted effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for the three levels of social cognition: emotion perception, social interpretation and socio-cognitive integration. There was no restriction on setting. Instruments examining emotion perception (facial emotion recognition and prosody), interpretation (mentalizing, self-awareness and empathy) and socio-cognitive integration (moral reasoning and social knowledge) were used in the included studies.

Results: Thirteen studies (n = 622; 292 KS, 330 controls) showed that individuals with KS performed statistically significantly worse across all domains of social cognition compared with controls. Large effect sizes were found in emotion perception [g = -1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.46 to -0.81), P < 0.001, I2 = 58.5%, 8 studies, n = 372], with comparable effect sizes for facial emotion recognition and prosody. In social interpretation (g = -0.77, 95% CI = -1.34 to -0.21, P = 0.007, I2 = 96.6%, 4 studies, n = 188), a large effect was found for mentalizing (g = -1.05, 95% CI = -1.61 to -0.50, P < 0.001, I2 = 74.1%; 3 studies, n = 120). In socio-cognitive integration (g = -0.74, 95% CI = -1.11 to -0.37, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 3 studies, n = 184), social knowledge showed a large effect size (g = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.24 to -0.38, P < 0.001, 1 study, n = 104). Results for empathy (g = -0.43, 95% CI = -1.05 to 0.20, P = 0.18, 1 study, n = 40), self-awareness (g = -0.21, 95% CI = -0.47 to 0.05, P = 0.12, 1 study, n = 68) and moral reasoning (k = 2, g = -0.54, 95% CI = -1.28 to 0.19, P = 0.15, I2 = 0%; 2 studies, n = 80) were uncertain, with possible important differences in both directions.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that people with Korsakoff's syndrome perform statistically significantly worse than controls on socio-cognitive measures, with the largest effect sizes in the perception and interpretation of social information.

背景和目的:Korsakoff综合征是一种酒精相关的神经认知障碍,其特征是情景记忆障碍、冷漠、虚构和疾病洞察力差。本荟萃分析旨在估计与对照组相比,科尔萨科夫综合征(KS)患者社会认知表现的平均效应大小。方法:于2024年5月进行系统的文献检索,找出研究KS患者和对照组社会认知的研究文章。加权效应量(Hedges' g)计算了三个社会认知水平:情绪感知、社会解释和社会认知整合。设置没有限制。在纳入的研究中使用了检查情绪感知(面部情绪识别和韵律),解释(心理化,自我意识和同理心)和社会认知整合(道德推理和社会知识)的工具。结果:13项研究(n = 622; 292名KS, 330名对照)表明,与对照组相比,KS个体在所有社会认知领域的表现都有统计学意义上的显著差。在情绪感知方面发现了较大的效应量[g = -1.14, 95%可信区间(CI) = -1.46至-0.81),P 2 = 58.5%, 8项研究,n = 372],面部情绪识别和韵律方面的效应量相当。在社会解释中(g = -0.77, 95% CI = -1.34 ~ -0.21, P = 0.007, I2 = 96.6%, 4项研究,n = 188),心理化的影响较大(g = -1.05, 95% CI = -1.61 ~ -0.50, p2 = 74.1%; 3项研究,n = 120)。在社会认知整合(g = -0.74, 95% CI = -1.11 ~ -0.37, P 2 = 0%, 3项研究,n = 184)中,社会知识表现出较大的效应量(g = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.24 ~ -0.38, P 2 = 0%; 2项研究,n = 80)不确定,在两个方向上都可能存在重要差异。结论:本荟萃分析显示,科尔萨科夫综合征患者在社会认知测量方面的表现在统计上显著低于对照组,在社会信息的感知和解释方面的效应量最大。
{"title":"Social cognition in Korsakoff's syndrome: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Kyra Wijnen, Willem S Eikelboom, Yvonne C M Rensen, Gwenny T L Janssen, Roy P C Kessels","doi":"10.1111/add.70256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Korsakoff's syndrome is an alcohol-related neurocognitive disorder characterized by episodic memory impairments, apathy, confabulations and poor illness-insight. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate mean effect sizes of performance in social cognition in people with Korsakoff's syndrome (KS) compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in May 2024 to identify research articles that examined social cognition in patients with KS and control groups. Weighted effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for the three levels of social cognition: emotion perception, social interpretation and socio-cognitive integration. There was no restriction on setting. Instruments examining emotion perception (facial emotion recognition and prosody), interpretation (mentalizing, self-awareness and empathy) and socio-cognitive integration (moral reasoning and social knowledge) were used in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (n = 622; 292 KS, 330 controls) showed that individuals with KS performed statistically significantly worse across all domains of social cognition compared with controls. Large effect sizes were found in emotion perception [g = -1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.46 to -0.81), P < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 58.5%, 8 studies, n = 372], with comparable effect sizes for facial emotion recognition and prosody. In social interpretation (g = -0.77, 95% CI = -1.34 to -0.21, P = 0.007, I<sup>2</sup> = 96.6%, 4 studies, n = 188), a large effect was found for mentalizing (g = -1.05, 95% CI = -1.61 to -0.50, P < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 74.1%; 3 studies, n = 120). In socio-cognitive integration (g = -0.74, 95% CI = -1.11 to -0.37, P < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, 3 studies, n = 184), social knowledge showed a large effect size (g = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.24 to -0.38, P < 0.001, 1 study, n = 104). Results for empathy (g = -0.43, 95% CI = -1.05 to 0.20, P = 0.18, 1 study, n = 40), self-awareness (g = -0.21, 95% CI = -0.47 to 0.05, P = 0.12, 1 study, n = 68) and moral reasoning (k = 2, g = -0.54, 95% CI = -1.28 to 0.19, P = 0.15, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; 2 studies, n = 80) were uncertain, with possible important differences in both directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis shows that people with Korsakoff's syndrome perform statistically significantly worse than controls on socio-cognitive measures, with the largest effect sizes in the perception and interpretation of social information.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145547406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contingency management interventions for substance use and addictive behaviours: Review of the United Kingdom evidence base. 物质使用和成瘾行为的应急管理干预措施:对联合王国证据基础的审查。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-16 DOI: 10.1111/add.70240
Carol-Ann Getty, Tricia McQuarrie, Eileen Brobbin
<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Substance use and other addictive behaviours including gambling remain major public health concerns in the UK. Despite the effectiveness of substance use treatment approaches, treatment adherence and success rates remain low. Contingency Management (CM), a behavioural intervention using positive reinforcement, is a promising approach to enhance clinical outcomes; however, its implementation in UK settings remains limited. This scoping review aimed to explore how CM has been adopted to improve outcomes for substance use and addictive behaviours in the UK, addressing the gap between international evidence and UK-specific healthcare needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycArticles and PsycInfo) for UK-based CM studies published before March 2025 was undertaken. The review adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and the protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, full-text articles, reporting the exploration of CM interventions to improve outcomes for substance use and other addictive behaviours within UK settings. Screening and data extraction were independently conducted using Covidence. A narrative synthesis explored study outcomes including effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability. Using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework, key contextual factors influencing CM implementation in the UK across setting, socio-cultural, political and ethical domains were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 208 articles were identified, with 36 full texts reviewed and 29 eligible for inclusion. Nine studies assessed effectiveness, six included economic evaluations, six assessed feasibility and 14 assessed acceptability. Clinical effectiveness was supported in most studies, particularly for promoting abstinence and medication adherence. Feasibility concerns included resource limitations, training and recruitment challenges. CM was generally well-accepted by service users and professionals, and digital approaches showed promise with high adherence and accuracy. Barriers and facilitators to CM implementation operating at micro, meso and macro levels are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review of studies implementing Contingency Management (CM) in UK addiction treatment highlights several barriers to CM adoption, including resource limitations, concerns about its impact on therapeutic relationships and ethical issues regarding manipulation and fairness. It also points to the need for adapting CM protocols to fit UK treatment philosophies, particularly aligning with harm reduction approaches. CM's success depends on multi-level support, including policy, training and integration with existing systems. Recommendations include strengthening research on CM's long-term impact, ensuring fidelity to core principles, and investing in digital tools
背景和目的:物质使用和其他成瘾行为,包括赌博,仍然是英国主要的公共卫生问题。尽管药物使用治疗方法有效,但治疗依从性和成功率仍然很低。应急管理(CM)是一种使用正强化的行为干预,是一种有希望提高临床结果的方法;然而,它在英国的实施仍然有限。本综述旨在探讨CM如何被采用来改善英国药物使用和成瘾行为的结果,解决国际证据与英国特定医疗保健需求之间的差距。方法:系统检索Embase、MEDLINE、PsycArticles和PsycInfo数据库,检索2025年3月前发表的英国CM研究。该综述遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,该方案已在开放科学框架上前瞻性注册。符合条件的研究是同行评审的全文文章,报告了CM干预措施的探索,以改善英国环境下物质使用和其他成瘾行为的结果。筛查和数据提取使用covid - ence独立进行。叙述性综合探讨了研究结果的有效性、可行性和可接受性。利用复杂干预措施的背景和实施(CICI)框架,研究了影响英国CM实施的关键背景因素,包括环境、社会文化、政治和伦理领域。结果:共鉴定出208篇文章,其中36篇全文被审查,29篇符合纳入条件。9项研究评估了有效性,6项包括经济评估,6项评估了可行性,14项评估了可接受性。临床效果在大多数研究中得到了支持,特别是在促进戒断和药物依从性方面。可行性问题包括资源限制、培训和征聘方面的挑战。CM通常被服务用户和专业人员所接受,数字方法显示出高依从性和准确性的希望。提出了在微观、中观和宏观层面上实施管理的障碍和促进因素。结论:本文对在英国成瘾治疗中实施应急管理(CM)的研究进行了范围审查,强调了采用应急管理的几个障碍,包括资源限制、对其对治疗关系的影响的担忧以及关于操纵和公平的伦理问题。它还指出需要调整CM协议以适应英国的治疗理念,特别是与减少伤害的方法保持一致。CM的成功依赖于多层次的支持,包括政策、培训和与现有系统的集成。建议包括加强对管理的长期影响的研究,确保对核心原则的忠诚,以及投资于数字工具以减少管理负担。
{"title":"Contingency management interventions for substance use and addictive behaviours: Review of the United Kingdom evidence base.","authors":"Carol-Ann Getty, Tricia McQuarrie, Eileen Brobbin","doi":"10.1111/add.70240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70240","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and aims: &lt;/strong&gt;Substance use and other addictive behaviours including gambling remain major public health concerns in the UK. Despite the effectiveness of substance use treatment approaches, treatment adherence and success rates remain low. Contingency Management (CM), a behavioural intervention using positive reinforcement, is a promising approach to enhance clinical outcomes; however, its implementation in UK settings remains limited. This scoping review aimed to explore how CM has been adopted to improve outcomes for substance use and addictive behaviours in the UK, addressing the gap between international evidence and UK-specific healthcare needs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A systematic search of databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycArticles and PsycInfo) for UK-based CM studies published before March 2025 was undertaken. The review adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and the protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, full-text articles, reporting the exploration of CM interventions to improve outcomes for substance use and other addictive behaviours within UK settings. Screening and data extraction were independently conducted using Covidence. A narrative synthesis explored study outcomes including effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability. Using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework, key contextual factors influencing CM implementation in the UK across setting, socio-cultural, political and ethical domains were explored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 208 articles were identified, with 36 full texts reviewed and 29 eligible for inclusion. Nine studies assessed effectiveness, six included economic evaluations, six assessed feasibility and 14 assessed acceptability. Clinical effectiveness was supported in most studies, particularly for promoting abstinence and medication adherence. Feasibility concerns included resource limitations, training and recruitment challenges. CM was generally well-accepted by service users and professionals, and digital approaches showed promise with high adherence and accuracy. Barriers and facilitators to CM implementation operating at micro, meso and macro levels are presented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;This scoping review of studies implementing Contingency Management (CM) in UK addiction treatment highlights several barriers to CM adoption, including resource limitations, concerns about its impact on therapeutic relationships and ethical issues regarding manipulation and fairness. It also points to the need for adapting CM protocols to fit UK treatment philosophies, particularly aligning with harm reduction approaches. CM's success depends on multi-level support, including policy, training and integration with existing systems. Recommendations include strengthening research on CM's long-term impact, ensuring fidelity to core principles, and investing in digital tools ","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145533972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in clinical features and severity in patients presenting to European emergency departments with acute cannabis toxicity over the 10-year period from 2013 to 2022. 2013年至2022年10年间,欧洲急诊科急性大麻毒性患者的临床特征和严重程度的变化。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1111/add.70233
Òscar Miró, Miguel Galicia, Paul I Dargan, David M Wood, Alison M Dines, Fridtjof Heyerdahl, Knut Erik Hovda, Isabelle Giraudon, Christopher Yates, Matthias Liechti, Odd Martin Vallersnes, Florian Eyer, Guillermo Burillo-Putze

Background and aims: In recent years, the potency of natural cannabis products (herb and resin) has increased with a higher delta- 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) content, but there are limited data on trends on clinical presentation and severity of toxicity in cannabis users consulting the emergency department (ED) for acute intoxication. This study aimed to analyse the evolution over time of clinical findings and severity of presentations in a large series of patients presenting to European EDs with acute toxicity after lone cannabis use.

Design: Secondary analysis of data included in the Euro-DEN Registry from 1 October 2013 to 31 December 2022.

Setting: 40 EDs in 25 European countries.

Participants/cases: ED presentations reporting lone cannabis use. Presentations reporting concomitant use of, or having positive toxicological tests for, ethanol or other drugs were excluded. 3839 ED presentations reporting lone cannabis use were analysed (median age 25 years, interquartile range= 20-33; 71% male).

Measurements: Temporal trends of 14 pre-defined clinical signs/symptoms and 4 markers of severity, which included the need for ambulance transfer to the ED, hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission (ICU) and death.

Findings: The most frequent clinical features were anxiety (35%), agitation (22%), decreased alertness (drowsiness or coma, 21%) and vomiting (20%), while seizures, arrythmias and hyperthermia were observed in <3% of cases. Statistically significant changes over time were only found in the frequency of hypotension [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.239 per every subsequent year, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.107-1.386], hypertensive crisis (OR = 1.168, 95% CI = 1.070-1.274) and palpitations (OR = 0.922, 95% CI = 0.883-0.962). Nonlinear analyses detected statistically significant mid-period increases for anxiety, agitation and arrhythmias that subsided by the end of the study, and showed increases in chest pain and decreases in seizures that became statistically significant in the latter half of the period. Regarding episode severity, 76% of cases were brought to the ED by ambulance, 13% required hospitalisation, 1% were admitted to the ICU and 0.1% died. No statistically significant changes were observed over time in either the linear or the nonlinear models.

Conclusion: Very few changes in the clinical features of patients presenting to European emergency departments with lone acute cannabis toxicity were identified over 2013 to 2022, suggesting that despite the increase in potency of cannabis in Europe over this period, the severity of acute intoxication has remained unchanged.

背景和目的:近年来,天然大麻产品(药草和树脂)的效力随着δ - 9-四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THC)含量的增加而增加,但关于因急性中毒向急诊科咨询的大麻使用者的临床表现和毒性严重程度趋势的数据有限。本研究旨在分析在单独使用大麻后出现急性毒性的大量欧洲急诊科患者的临床表现和严重程度随时间的演变。设计:从2013年10月1日至2022年12月31日,对Euro-DEN登记处的数据进行二次分析。背景:欧洲25个国家的40个ed。参与者/病例:ED报告单独使用大麻。报告同时使用乙醇或其他药物或毒性试验呈阳性的报告被排除在外。分析了3839例报告单独使用大麻的ED报告(中位年龄25岁,四分位数范围= 20-33;71%为男性)。测量:14种预先定义的临床体征/症状和4种严重程度标记的时间趋势,包括需要救护车转至急诊室、住院、重症监护病房(ICU)和死亡。结果:最常见的临床特征为焦虑(35%)、躁动(22%)、警觉性下降(嗜睡或昏迷,21%)和呕吐(20%),同时观察到癫痫发作、心律失常和高热。2013年至2022年期间,在欧洲急诊室就诊的单独急性大麻中毒患者的临床特征几乎没有变化,这表明尽管在此期间欧洲大麻的效力有所增加,但急性中毒的严重程度保持不变。
{"title":"Changes in clinical features and severity in patients presenting to European emergency departments with acute cannabis toxicity over the 10-year period from 2013 to 2022.","authors":"Òscar Miró, Miguel Galicia, Paul I Dargan, David M Wood, Alison M Dines, Fridtjof Heyerdahl, Knut Erik Hovda, Isabelle Giraudon, Christopher Yates, Matthias Liechti, Odd Martin Vallersnes, Florian Eyer, Guillermo Burillo-Putze","doi":"10.1111/add.70233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>In recent years, the potency of natural cannabis products (herb and resin) has increased with a higher delta- 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) content, but there are limited data on trends on clinical presentation and severity of toxicity in cannabis users consulting the emergency department (ED) for acute intoxication. This study aimed to analyse the evolution over time of clinical findings and severity of presentations in a large series of patients presenting to European EDs with acute toxicity after lone cannabis use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of data included in the Euro-DEN Registry from 1 October 2013 to 31 December 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>40 EDs in 25 European countries.</p><p><strong>Participants/cases: </strong>ED presentations reporting lone cannabis use. Presentations reporting concomitant use of, or having positive toxicological tests for, ethanol or other drugs were excluded. 3839 ED presentations reporting lone cannabis use were analysed (median age 25 years, interquartile range= 20-33; 71% male).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Temporal trends of 14 pre-defined clinical signs/symptoms and 4 markers of severity, which included the need for ambulance transfer to the ED, hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission (ICU) and death.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The most frequent clinical features were anxiety (35%), agitation (22%), decreased alertness (drowsiness or coma, 21%) and vomiting (20%), while seizures, arrythmias and hyperthermia were observed in <3% of cases. Statistically significant changes over time were only found in the frequency of hypotension [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.239 per every subsequent year, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.107-1.386], hypertensive crisis (OR = 1.168, 95% CI = 1.070-1.274) and palpitations (OR = 0.922, 95% CI = 0.883-0.962). Nonlinear analyses detected statistically significant mid-period increases for anxiety, agitation and arrhythmias that subsided by the end of the study, and showed increases in chest pain and decreases in seizures that became statistically significant in the latter half of the period. Regarding episode severity, 76% of cases were brought to the ED by ambulance, 13% required hospitalisation, 1% were admitted to the ICU and 0.1% died. No statistically significant changes were observed over time in either the linear or the nonlinear models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Very few changes in the clinical features of patients presenting to European emergency departments with lone acute cannabis toxicity were identified over 2013 to 2022, suggesting that despite the increase in potency of cannabis in Europe over this period, the severity of acute intoxication has remained unchanged.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145501356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends and correlates of current use of illicitly traded tobacco in Australia: Evidence from a decade of national surveys. 澳大利亚目前使用非法交易烟草的趋势和相关因素:十年来全国调查的证据。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/add.70236
Ara Cho, Michelle Scollo, Carmen Lim, Cheneal Puljević, Coral Gartner
<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Tobacco taxes reduce smoking, particularly among low socioeconomic groups; however, some individuals seek cheaper alternatives instead of quitting. This study estimated use of illicitly traded tobacco among Australian adults who smoke and examined associations with sociodemographic, smoking-related (including quit intentions and attempts) and other illicit substance use factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia, using data from four waves (2013, 2016, 2019 and 2022-2023) of a triennial national survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 12 596 individuals aged 18 years and over who reported smoking at least monthly.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was self-reported current use of illicitly traded tobacco, defined as current use of unbranded tobacco at any frequency or the purchase of one or more non-plain packaged packs in the past three months. Based on these indicators, participants were categorised into four mutually exclusive groups: no use, unbranded use only, non-plain packaged tobacco use only and use of both types. Predictor variables included survey year, age, sex, education, household income, area-level disadvantage, employment status, general health, psychological distress, cigarettes smoked per day, tobacco product type, alcohol use, past-year cannabis use and past-year non-cannabis illicit drug use.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Current use and/or recent purchase of illicitly traded tobacco in Australia rose from 8.6% in 2016 to 16.5% in 2022-2023. Regular use remained relatively low in 2022-2023: 5.2% of study participants used unbranded and 4.1% non-plain packaged tobacco daily. Compared with no use of illicitly traded tobacco, unbranded tobacco use only was statistically significantly associated with being outside the labour force [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-2.59], experiencing high psychological distress (aOR<sub>very high</sub> = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.28-2.97; aOR<sub>high</sub> = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.34-2.81, vs. low), smoking heavily (aOR<sub>11-20CPD</sub> = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.4-3.69; aOR<sub>over 20 CPD</sub> = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.62-4.35, vs. non-daily) and past-year cannabis use (aOR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.52-2.77, vs. no use). Using non-plain packaged tobacco only was statistically significantly associated with past-year non-cannabis illicit substance use (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.15-1.86, vs. no use) and already giving up smoking (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.24-0.65, vs. no intention to quit smoking). Concurrent use of both types of illicitly traded tobacco was statistically significantly associated with living in the most disadvantaged area (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI = 1.68-7.55), using any non-cannabis illicit substance use in the past year (aOR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.45-3.49) and higher cigarette consumption (aOR<sub>11-20C
背景和目的:烟草税减少吸烟,特别是在社会经济地位低下的群体中;然而,有些人会寻找更便宜的替代品,而不是戒烟。本研究估计了澳大利亚成年人吸烟中非法交易烟草的使用情况,并检查了社会人口统计学、吸烟相关(包括戒烟意图和尝试)和其他非法物质使用因素的关系。设计:使用具有全国代表性的数据进行重复横断面研究。背景:澳大利亚,使用四波(2013年、2016年、2019年和2022-2023年)的三年期全国调查数据。参与者:共有12596名年龄在18岁及以上,每月至少吸烟一次的人。测量方法:主要结果是自我报告目前非法交易烟草的使用情况,定义为在过去三个月内以任何频率使用无品牌烟草或购买一种或多种非普通包装烟草。根据这些指标,参与者被分为四个相互排斥的组:不使用、只使用无品牌烟草、只使用非普通包装烟草和两种都使用。预测变量包括调查年份、年龄、性别、教育程度、家庭收入、地区劣势、就业状况、一般健康状况、心理困扰、每天吸烟、烟草产品类型、饮酒情况、过去一年吸食大麻情况和过去一年吸食非大麻非法药物情况。调查结果:澳大利亚目前使用和/或最近购买非法交易烟草的比例从2016年的8.6%上升到2022-2023年的16.5%。2022-2023年期间,经常使用烟草的比例仍然相对较低:5.2%的研究参与者每天使用无品牌烟草,4.1%使用非普通包装烟草。与不使用非法交易烟草相比,仅使用无品牌烟草与以下因素有统计学显著相关:非劳动力人群[调整优势比(aOR) = 1.87, 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.36-2.59]、经历高度心理困扰(or极高= 1.95,95% CI = 1.28-2.97; or高= 1.94,95% CI = 1.34-2.81,比低)、重度吸烟(or 11- 20cpd = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.4-3.69;超过20个CPD = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.62-4.35,与非每天使用相比)和过去一年使用大麻(aOR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.52-2.77,与无使用相比)。仅使用非普通包装烟草与过去一年非大麻非法物质使用(aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.15-1.86, vs.不使用)和已经戒烟(aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.24-0.65, vs.无意戒烟)有统计学显著相关。同时使用两种非法交易烟草与生活在最贫困地区(aOR = 3.56, 95% CI = 1.68-7.55)、在过去一年中使用任何非大麻非法物质(aOR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.45-3.49)和较高的卷烟消费量(aOR11- 20cpd = 6.57, 95% CI = 1.99-21.67; aOR超过20cpd = 9.12, 95% CI = 2.76-30.15,与非每天)有统计学显著相关。结论:虽然近年来澳大利亚对非法交易烟草的认识和使用有所增加,但经常使用仍然相对较低。
{"title":"Trends and correlates of current use of illicitly traded tobacco in Australia: Evidence from a decade of national surveys.","authors":"Ara Cho, Michelle Scollo, Carmen Lim, Cheneal Puljević, Coral Gartner","doi":"10.1111/add.70236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70236","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background and aims: &lt;/strong&gt;Tobacco taxes reduce smoking, particularly among low socioeconomic groups; however, some individuals seek cheaper alternatives instead of quitting. This study estimated use of illicitly traded tobacco among Australian adults who smoke and examined associations with sociodemographic, smoking-related (including quit intentions and attempts) and other illicit substance use factors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting: &lt;/strong&gt;Australia, using data from four waves (2013, 2016, 2019 and 2022-2023) of a triennial national survey.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Participants: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 12 596 individuals aged 18 years and over who reported smoking at least monthly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Measurements: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary outcome was self-reported current use of illicitly traded tobacco, defined as current use of unbranded tobacco at any frequency or the purchase of one or more non-plain packaged packs in the past three months. Based on these indicators, participants were categorised into four mutually exclusive groups: no use, unbranded use only, non-plain packaged tobacco use only and use of both types. Predictor variables included survey year, age, sex, education, household income, area-level disadvantage, employment status, general health, psychological distress, cigarettes smoked per day, tobacco product type, alcohol use, past-year cannabis use and past-year non-cannabis illicit drug use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Current use and/or recent purchase of illicitly traded tobacco in Australia rose from 8.6% in 2016 to 16.5% in 2022-2023. Regular use remained relatively low in 2022-2023: 5.2% of study participants used unbranded and 4.1% non-plain packaged tobacco daily. Compared with no use of illicitly traded tobacco, unbranded tobacco use only was statistically significantly associated with being outside the labour force [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-2.59], experiencing high psychological distress (aOR&lt;sub&gt;very high&lt;/sub&gt; = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.28-2.97; aOR&lt;sub&gt;high&lt;/sub&gt; = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.34-2.81, vs. low), smoking heavily (aOR&lt;sub&gt;11-20CPD&lt;/sub&gt; = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.4-3.69; aOR&lt;sub&gt;over 20 CPD&lt;/sub&gt; = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.62-4.35, vs. non-daily) and past-year cannabis use (aOR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.52-2.77, vs. no use). Using non-plain packaged tobacco only was statistically significantly associated with past-year non-cannabis illicit substance use (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.15-1.86, vs. no use) and already giving up smoking (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.24-0.65, vs. no intention to quit smoking). Concurrent use of both types of illicitly traded tobacco was statistically significantly associated with living in the most disadvantaged area (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI = 1.68-7.55), using any non-cannabis illicit substance use in the past year (aOR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.45-3.49) and higher cigarette consumption (aOR&lt;sub&gt;11-20C","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145487140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How the sales of oral nicotine pouches correlate with prices and respond to taxes on cigarettes and e-cigarettes. 口服尼古丁袋的销售与香烟和电子烟的价格之间的关系以及对香烟和电子烟税收的反应。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/add.70237
Yanyun He, Zezhong Zhang, Brittney Keller-Hamilton, Megan E Roberts, Darren Mays, Theodore L Wagener, Micah L Berman, Ce Shang

BACKGROUND AND  AIMS: Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have seen a dramatic rise in sales since their introduction to the US market in 2016. We aimed to define the relationship between ONP prices and sales (e.g. price elasticity of demand) and determine how taxes on cigarettes and e-cigarettes (ECs) impact ONP sales.

Methods: Using Nielsen ScanTrack data, we employed the Ordinary Least Squares technique and several statistical specifications to examine the relationship between ONP prices and sales, as well as the impacts of other tobacco taxes on ONP sales in the US.

Results: A 10% increase in ONP prices was associated with 2.3% (P < 0.05) lower sales in convenience stores, which account for 92% of total ONP sales. Higher cigarette (but not EC) taxes increased ONP sales, indicating that ONPs likely serve as economic substitutes for cigarettes but not for ECs.

Conclusion: Higher prices are associated with lower sales of oral nicotine pouches (ONPs), which suggests that taxes on ONPs may be effective in reducing ONP use. Moreover, increasing cigarette taxes (but not e-cigarette taxes) may shift consumption from cigarettes to ONPs.

背景和目的:口服尼古丁袋(ONPs)自2016年进入美国市场以来,销量急剧上升。我们的目标是定义ONP价格与销售之间的关系(例如需求的价格弹性),并确定香烟和电子烟(ECs)的税收如何影响ONP销售。方法:使用Nielsen ScanTrack数据,我们采用普通最小二乘技术和几种统计规范来检验ONP价格与销售之间的关系,以及其他烟草税对美国ONP销售的影响。结论:价格上涨与口服尼古丁袋(ONPs)的销量下降相关,表明对口服尼古丁袋征税可能有效减少口服尼古丁袋的使用。此外,增加香烟税(但不包括电子烟税)可能会将消费从香烟转向非电子烟。
{"title":"How the sales of oral nicotine pouches correlate with prices and respond to taxes on cigarettes and e-cigarettes.","authors":"Yanyun He, Zezhong Zhang, Brittney Keller-Hamilton, Megan E Roberts, Darren Mays, Theodore L Wagener, Micah L Berman, Ce Shang","doi":"10.1111/add.70237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND AND  AIMS: Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have seen a dramatic rise in sales since their introduction to the US market in 2016. We aimed to define the relationship between ONP prices and sales (e.g. price elasticity of demand) and determine how taxes on cigarettes and e-cigarettes (ECs) impact ONP sales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Nielsen ScanTrack data, we employed the Ordinary Least Squares technique and several statistical specifications to examine the relationship between ONP prices and sales, as well as the impacts of other tobacco taxes on ONP sales in the US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 10% increase in ONP prices was associated with 2.3% (P < 0.05) lower sales in convenience stores, which account for 92% of total ONP sales. Higher cigarette (but not EC) taxes increased ONP sales, indicating that ONPs likely serve as economic substitutes for cigarettes but not for ECs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher prices are associated with lower sales of oral nicotine pouches (ONPs), which suggests that taxes on ONPs may be effective in reducing ONP use. Moreover, increasing cigarette taxes (but not e-cigarette taxes) may shift consumption from cigarettes to ONPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145487192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy-based smartphone app for smoking cessation in China: A randomized controlled trial. 基于认知行为疗法的智能手机应用程序在中国的戒烟效果:一项随机对照试验。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/add.70239
Jinsong Tang, Xiaocong Liu, Shanshan Chen, Yunkai Sun, Minzhe Zhu, Zitang Zhou, Yueheng Liu, Jie Yang, Wei Chen, Yanhui Liao

Background and aims: Smoking is the leading preventable cause of premature death in China, yet less than 10% of smokers seeking to quit receive treatment. This study aimed to test the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based smoking cessation intervention ('Smokefree Life') via a smartphone app in China.

Design: A digital, parallel, single-blind, two-arm (1:1) randomized controlled trial.

Setting: This trial was conducted via 'Smokefree Life' app in the whole of mainland of China between 13 December 2021 and 15 April 2023.

Participants: Chinese-speaking adult smokers (925 males, 102 females, mean age 35.0 ± 6.7) willing to quit within one month were recruited via WeChat, survey sampling and referral from doctors, friends and family and randomized in a 1:1 ratio.

Intervention: The intervention group (n = 523) received a 13-14 week CBT-based smoking cessation intervention via smartphone app and the control group (n = 504) received only control messages. All participants were followed for 26 weeks post-quit date.

Measurements: The primary outcome was biochemically validated continuous abstinence at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were self-reported 7-day abstinence and continuous abstinence at 26 weeks.

Findings: By intention-to-treat analysis, the biochemically verified 26-week continuous abstinence rate was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group (6.50%) compared with the control group (2.58%) (odds ratio = 2.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.40-5.22, P = 0.0037). Self-reported 7-day and continuous abstinence rates were also consistently higher in the intervention group across follow-ups (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The 'Smokefree Life' app-based smoking cessation intervention statistically significantly improved 6-month biochemically confirmed quit rates among adult smokers in China.

背景和目的:在中国,吸烟是导致过早死亡的主要可预防原因,但寻求戒烟的吸烟者中只有不到10%接受了治疗。本研究旨在通过智能手机应用程序测试基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的戒烟干预(“无烟生活”)的有效性。设计:数字、平行、单盲、双臂(1:1)随机对照试验。环境:该试验于2021年12月13日至2023年4月15日期间通过“无烟生活”应用程序在整个中国大陆进行。参与者:通过微信、调查抽样、医生、朋友、家人推荐等方式招募愿意在一个月内戒烟的汉语成年吸烟者(男性925人,女性102人,平均年龄35.0±6.7岁),按1:1比例随机抽取。干预:干预组(n = 523)通过智能手机应用程序接受为期13-14周的基于cbt的戒烟干预,对照组(n = 504)仅接受控制信息。所有参与者在戒烟后随访了26周。测量:主要结果是生物化学验证的26周持续禁欲。次要结果是自我报告的7天禁欲和26周时的持续禁欲。结果:意向治疗分析,干预组经生化验证的26周持续戒断率(6.50%)显著高于对照组(2.58%)(优势比= 2.63,95%可信区间= 1.40 ~ 5.22,P = 0.0037)。在随访过程中,干预组自我报告的7天和持续戒烟率也始终较高(所有P结论:基于“无烟生活”应用程序的戒烟干预在统计学上显著提高了中国成年吸烟者6个月的生化证实戒烟率。
{"title":"Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy-based smartphone app for smoking cessation in China: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jinsong Tang, Xiaocong Liu, Shanshan Chen, Yunkai Sun, Minzhe Zhu, Zitang Zhou, Yueheng Liu, Jie Yang, Wei Chen, Yanhui Liao","doi":"10.1111/add.70239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Smoking is the leading preventable cause of premature death in China, yet less than 10% of smokers seeking to quit receive treatment. This study aimed to test the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based smoking cessation intervention ('Smokefree Life') via a smartphone app in China.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A digital, parallel, single-blind, two-arm (1:1) randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This trial was conducted via 'Smokefree Life' app in the whole of mainland of China between 13 December 2021 and 15 April 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Chinese-speaking adult smokers (925 males, 102 females, mean age 35.0 ± 6.7) willing to quit within one month were recruited via WeChat, survey sampling and referral from doctors, friends and family and randomized in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention group (n = 523) received a 13-14 week CBT-based smoking cessation intervention via smartphone app and the control group (n = 504) received only control messages. All participants were followed for 26 weeks post-quit date.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was biochemically validated continuous abstinence at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were self-reported 7-day abstinence and continuous abstinence at 26 weeks.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>By intention-to-treat analysis, the biochemically verified 26-week continuous abstinence rate was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group (6.50%) compared with the control group (2.58%) (odds ratio = 2.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.40-5.22, P = 0.0037). Self-reported 7-day and continuous abstinence rates were also consistently higher in the intervention group across follow-ups (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 'Smokefree Life' app-based smoking cessation intervention statistically significantly improved 6-month biochemically confirmed quit rates among adult smokers in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145493899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sample size requirements to evaluate policies in addiction research using interrupted time series analysis (ITS): Tools and guidance. 使用中断时间序列分析(ITS)评估成瘾研究政策的样本量要求:工具和指导。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/add.70220
Emma Beard, Jamie Brown, Lion Shahab

Formal power calculations are rarely presented in interrupted time-series (ITS) studies due to their technical complexity, creating a significant gap in methodological rigor. This paper aimed to make power and sample size determination more accessible for researchers, particularly in the field of addiction, by providing a suite of practical and user-friendly tools. A set of resources was developed using Monte Carlo simulation to allow researchers to estimate statistical power under a wide range of ITS design parameters. The approach allows for the explicit definition of the data-generating process, including specific autocorrelation error structures (ARMA), the presence of covariates and trends and different intervention effect types (step, pulse and trend change). The study produced three key resources: (1) a flexible R code base for conducting custom power simulations, (2) an intuitive, interactive R Shiny App that enables code-free power analysis through a web interface and (3) a series of pre-calculated look-up tables for quick sample size estimation during the initial stages of study design. Illustrative examples from addiction research demonstrate the tools' application. The provided tools bridge a critical gap by simplifying the process of conducting rigorous power calculations for ITS designs. Their adoption can enhance the planning, execution and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies, helping to ensure that research is adequately powered to detect meaningful policy and intervention effects.

由于中断时间序列(ITS)研究的技术复杂性,很少提出正式的功率计算,这在方法的严谨性方面造成了重大差距。本文旨在通过提供一套实用且用户友好的工具,使研究人员更容易获得功率和样本量的测定,特别是在成瘾领域。使用蒙特卡罗模拟开发了一套资源,使研究人员能够在广泛的ITS设计参数下估计统计功率。该方法允许明确定义数据生成过程,包括特定的自相关误差结构(ARMA)、协变量和趋势的存在以及不同的干预效应类型(步进、脉冲和趋势变化)。该研究产生了三个关键资源:(1)一个灵活的R代码库,用于进行自定义功率模拟;(2)一个直观的,交互式的R Shiny应用程序,通过web界面实现无代码功率分析;(3)一系列预先计算的查找表,用于在研究设计的初始阶段快速估计样本量。来自成瘾研究的例子说明了这些工具的应用。提供的工具通过简化对ITS设计进行严格的功率计算的过程,弥合了一个关键的差距。它们的采用可以加强准实验研究的规划、执行和解释,有助于确保研究得到充分的支持,以发现有意义的政策和干预效果。
{"title":"Sample size requirements to evaluate policies in addiction research using interrupted time series analysis (ITS): Tools and guidance.","authors":"Emma Beard, Jamie Brown, Lion Shahab","doi":"10.1111/add.70220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formal power calculations are rarely presented in interrupted time-series (ITS) studies due to their technical complexity, creating a significant gap in methodological rigor. This paper aimed to make power and sample size determination more accessible for researchers, particularly in the field of addiction, by providing a suite of practical and user-friendly tools. A set of resources was developed using Monte Carlo simulation to allow researchers to estimate statistical power under a wide range of ITS design parameters. The approach allows for the explicit definition of the data-generating process, including specific autocorrelation error structures (ARMA), the presence of covariates and trends and different intervention effect types (step, pulse and trend change). The study produced three key resources: (1) a flexible R code base for conducting custom power simulations, (2) an intuitive, interactive R Shiny App that enables code-free power analysis through a web interface and (3) a series of pre-calculated look-up tables for quick sample size estimation during the initial stages of study design. Illustrative examples from addiction research demonstrate the tools' application. The provided tools bridge a critical gap by simplifying the process of conducting rigorous power calculations for ITS designs. Their adoption can enhance the planning, execution and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies, helping to ensure that research is adequately powered to detect meaningful policy and intervention effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145487156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of combined varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy compared with varenicline or nicotine replacement therapy alone for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 伐尼克兰联合尼古丁替代疗法与单独伐尼克兰或尼古丁替代疗法对戒烟的疗效比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1111/add.70235
Xinmei Zhou, Zhenxiao Huang, Qingqing Song, Xin Xia, Anqi Cheng, Zhao Liu, Min Wang, Tingfen Ji, Ailifeire Aihemaiti, Ying Xie, Yi Liu, Yuxin Shi, Shunyi Shi, Yingman Gao, Hang Liu, Jiahui He, Liang Zhao, Dan Xiao, Chen Wang

Aims: To assess whether combining nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) with varenicline improves long-term smoking cessation rates compared with varenicline or NRT alone.

Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted through June 2025. The primary outcome was smoking abstinence at the longest follow-up (≥6 months). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. The protocol was pre-registered in the PROSPERO (registration number CRD42024600510).

Results: Seven trials including 2631 participants met inclusion criteria. Compared with varenicline alone, combination therapy was associated with statistically significantly higher abstinence rates at the longest follow-up (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.04-1.69; 5 studies; I2 = 51%). A sensitivity analysis including trials with ≥3 months of follow-up yielded similar results (RR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06-1.62; 6 studies). However, when excluding the trial at high risk of bias, the result was not statistically significant (RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.94-1.68). Compared with NRT alone, only one RCT was included, and the effect of combination therapy on abstinence was not statistically significant (RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.72). AEs were more common with combination therapy compared with varenicline alone (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.20). Specifically, skin reactions were significantly increased with NRT patch plus varenicline (RR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.29-2.16). Compared with NRT alone, combination therapy was associated with increased AEs (RR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.07-1.41). SAEs were infrequent and generally unrelated to treatment.

Conclusions: Low-certainty evidence indicates that combining varenicline with nicotine replacement therapy may improve long-term smoking cessation rates compared with varenicline alone and is generally well tolerated.

目的:评估尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)与伐尼克兰联合使用是否比单独使用伐尼克兰或NRT能提高长期戒烟率。方法:根据PRISMA指南对随机对照试验(rct)或准rct进行系统评价和荟萃分析。到2025年6月,对PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials进行了全面的文献检索。主要结局为最长随访(≥6个月)时的戒烟情况。次要结局包括不良事件(ae)和严重不良事件(sae)。采用随机效应荟萃分析合并95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(rr)。使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。使用Cochrane RoB 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。该协议在PROSPERO中预注册(注册号CRD42024600510)。结果:7项试验包括2631名受试者符合纳入标准。与单独伐尼克兰相比,联合治疗与最长随访时更高的戒断率相关(RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.04-1.69; 5项研究;I2 = 51%)。包括随访≥3个月的试验的敏感性分析得出了类似的结果(RR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06-1.62; 6项研究)。然而,当排除高偏倚风险的试验时,结果无统计学意义(RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.94-1.68)。与单用NRT相比,仅纳入1项RCT,联合治疗对戒断的影响无统计学意义(RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.72)。与单独使用伐尼克兰相比,联合治疗的ae更常见(RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.20)。具体来说,NRT贴片加伐尼克兰的皮肤反应显著增加(RR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.29-2.16)。与单独NRT相比,联合治疗与ae增加相关(RR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.07-1.41)。SAEs并不常见,通常与治疗无关。结论:低确定性证据表明,与单独使用伐尼克兰相比,伐尼克兰联合尼古丁替代疗法可提高长期戒烟率,并且通常耐受性良好。
{"title":"Efficacy of combined varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy compared with varenicline or nicotine replacement therapy alone for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xinmei Zhou, Zhenxiao Huang, Qingqing Song, Xin Xia, Anqi Cheng, Zhao Liu, Min Wang, Tingfen Ji, Ailifeire Aihemaiti, Ying Xie, Yi Liu, Yuxin Shi, Shunyi Shi, Yingman Gao, Hang Liu, Jiahui He, Liang Zhao, Dan Xiao, Chen Wang","doi":"10.1111/add.70235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess whether combining nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) with varenicline improves long-term smoking cessation rates compared with varenicline or NRT alone.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted through June 2025. The primary outcome was smoking abstinence at the longest follow-up (≥6 months). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. The protocol was pre-registered in the PROSPERO (registration number CRD42024600510).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven trials including 2631 participants met inclusion criteria. Compared with varenicline alone, combination therapy was associated with statistically significantly higher abstinence rates at the longest follow-up (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.04-1.69; 5 studies; I<sup>2</sup> = 51%). A sensitivity analysis including trials with ≥3 months of follow-up yielded similar results (RR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06-1.62; 6 studies). However, when excluding the trial at high risk of bias, the result was not statistically significant (RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.94-1.68). Compared with NRT alone, only one RCT was included, and the effect of combination therapy on abstinence was not statistically significant (RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.72). AEs were more common with combination therapy compared with varenicline alone (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.20). Specifically, skin reactions were significantly increased with NRT patch plus varenicline (RR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.29-2.16). Compared with NRT alone, combination therapy was associated with increased AEs (RR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.07-1.41). SAEs were infrequent and generally unrelated to treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-certainty evidence indicates that combining varenicline with nicotine replacement therapy may improve long-term smoking cessation rates compared with varenicline alone and is generally well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145480372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Addiction
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1