European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes最新文献

Background: A lack of consensus exists across guidelines as to which risk model should be used for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Our objective was to determine potential improvements in the number needed to treat (NNT) and number of events prevented (NEP) using different risk models in patients eligible for risk stratification.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort was assembled from primary care patients in Ontario, Canada between January 1st, 2010, to December 31st, 2014 and followed for up to 5 years. Risk estimation was undertaken in patients 40-75 years of age, without CVD, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs), a recalibrated FRS (R-FRS), Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), and the low-risk region recalibrated SCORE2 (LR-SCORE2).

Results: The cohort consisted of 47,399 patients (59% women, mean age 54). The NNT with statins was lowest for SCORE2 at 40, followed by LR-SCORE2 at 41, R-FRS at 43, PCEs at 55, and FRS at 65. Models that selected for individuals with a lower NNT recommended statins to fewer, but higher risk patients. For instance, SCORE2 recommended statins to 7.9% of patients (5-year CVD incidence 5.92%). The FRS, however, recommended statins to 34.6% of patients (5-year CVD incidence 4.01%). Accordingly, the NEP was highest for the FRS at 406 and lowest for SCORE2 at 156.

Conclusions: Newer models such as SCORE2 may improve statin allocation to higher risk groups with a lower NNT but prevent fewer events at the population level.

Background: Existing data on female sex and excess cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) mostly come from high-income countries (HICs). This study aimed to investigate how sex disparities in treatments and outcomes vary across countries with different income levels.

Methods: Data from the ISACS-Archives registry included 22 087 MI patients from 6 HICs and 6 middle-income countries (MICs). MI data were disaggregated by clinical presentation: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results: Among STEMI patients, women in MICs had nearly double the 30-day mortality rate of men (12.4% versus 5.8%; adjusted risk ratio [RR] 2.30, 95% CI 1.98-2.68). This difference was less pronounced in HICs (6.8% versus 5.1%; RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.75). Despite more frequent treatments and timely revascularization in MICs, sex-based mortality differences persisted even after revascularization (8.0% versus 4.1%; RR 2.05, 95% CI, 1.68-2.50 in MICs and 5.6% versus 2.6%; RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.48-3.18) in HICs. Additionally, women from MICs had higher diabetes rates compared to HICs (31.8% versus 25.1%, standardized difference = 0.15). NSTEMI outcomes were relatively similar between sexes and income groups.

Conclusions: Sex disparities in mortality rates following STEMI are more pronounced in MICs compared to HICs. These disparities cannot be solely attributed to sex-related inequities in revascularization. Variations in mortality may also be influenced by sex differences in socioeconomic factors and baseline comorbidities.

Background: Despite continuous advances in post-resuscitation management, outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is limited. To improve the outcome, interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Centers (CACs) have been established in recent years, but survival remains low and treatment strategies vary considerably in clinical and geographical aspects. Here we analyzed a strategy of in-hospital post-resuscitation management while evaluating the outcome.

Methods: A broad spectrum of pre- and in-hospital parameters of 545 resuscitated patients, admitted to the Cardiac Arrest Center of the University Hospital of Marburg (MCAC) between 01/2018 and 12/2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 18 years, resuscitation by emergency medical services, and non-traumatic cause of OHCA.

Results: In the overall patient cohort, the survival rate to hospital discharge was 39.8% (n = 217/545), which is 50.7% higher than in the EuReCa-TWO registry. 77.2% of the survivors had CPC status 1 or 2 (favorable neurological outcome) before and after therapy. A standardized 'therapy bundle' for in-hospital post-resuscitation management was applied to 445 patients who survived the initial treatment in the emergency department. In addition to basic care (standardized antimicrobial therapy, adequate anticoagulation, targeted sedation, early enteral and parenteral nutrition), it includes early whole-body CT (n = 391; 87.9%), invasive coronary diagnostics (n = 322; 72.4%), targeted temperature management (n = 293; 65.8%) and if indicated, mechanical circulatory support (n = 145; 32.6%) and appropriate neurological diagnostics.

Conclusions: Early goal-directed post-resuscitation management in a well-established and highly frequented CAC leads to significantly higher survival rates. However, our results underline the need for a broader standardization in post-resuscitation management to ultimately improve the outcome.

Background: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by unexplained left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH) ≥15 mm. The condition is often hereditary and family screening is recommended to reduce the risk of adverse disease complications and premature death among relatives. Correct diagnosis of index patients is important to ensure that only relatives at risk of disease development are invited for family screening.

Purpose: To investigate if patients with ICD-10 codes for HCM (DI421) or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (DI422) fulfilled recognised diagnostic criteria.

Methods: All patients with ICD-10 codes for HCM or HOCM at a Department of Cardiology were identified and had their diagnosis validated by a cardiac investigation or a review of their medical records and previous investigations.

Results: Two hundred and forty patients had ICD-10 codes for HCM/HOCM, of whom 202 (84%, 202/240) underwent re-examination, while 38 (16%, 38/240) had their hospital notes reviewed. Seventy-six patients (32%, n = 76/240) did not fulfil diagnostic criteria, of whom 39, (51%, n = 39/76) had normal (10 mm) or modest LV wall thickness (11-14 mm). The remaining 37 patients (49%, n = 37/76) had LVH ≥15 mm, which was well-explained by uncontrolled hypertension, (32%, n = 24/76), aortic valve stenosis (19%, n = 7/76) or wild-type amyloidosis (16%, 6/76).

Conclusion: One-third of patients with ICD-10 codes for HCM or HOCM did not fulfil recognised diagnostic criteria. Incorrect diagnosis of HCM may cause unnecessary family investigations which may be associated with anxiety, and a waste of health care resources. This highlights the need for specialised cardiomyopathy services to ensure correct diagnosis and management of HCM.

Background: Spot urinary sodium concentration (UNa) is advocated in guidelines to assess diuretic response and titrate dosage in acute heart failure (AHF). However, no randomised controlled trial data exists to support this approach. We performed a prospective pilot trial to investigate the feasibility of this approach.

Methods: 60 patients with AHF (n = 30 in each arm) were randomly assigned to titration of loop diuretics for the first 48 hours of admission according to UNa levels (intervention arm) or based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion (standard care arm). Diuretic insufficiency was defined as UNa < 50 mmol/L. Endpoints relating to diuretic efficacy, safety and AHF outcomes were evaluated.

Results: UNa-guided therapy patients experienced less acute kidney injury (20% vs 50%, p = 0.01) and a tendency towards less hypokalaemia (serum K+<3.5 mmol, 7% vs 27%, p = 0.04), with greater weight loss (3.3 kg vs 2.1 kg, p = 0.01). They reported a greater reduction in the clinical congestion score (-4.7 vs -2.6, p < 0.01) and were more likely to report marked symptom improvement (40% vs 13.3%, p = 0.04) at 48 hours. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay (median LOS: 8 days in both groups, p = 0.98), 30-day mortality or readmission rate.

Conclusion: UNa-guided titration of diuretic therapy in AHF is feasible and safer than titration based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion, with more effective decongestion at 48 hours. Further large-scale trials are needed to determine if the superiority of this approach translates into improved patient outcomes.

Background: The prognosis for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is based on data that is decades old. Given evolving standards of clinical practice, we sought to evaluate temporal trends in clinically important outcomes among patients with AF.

Methods: California's Department of Health Care Access and Information databases were used to identify adults aged ≥ 18 years with AF receiving hospital-based care in California. We compared 3 time-periods: 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. ICD codes were used to identify chronic diseases and acute events. The outcomes were incident ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and overall mortality.

Results: We included 2 009 832 patients with AF (52.7% males, 70.7% Whites, and mean age of 75.0 years), divided in 3 cohorts: 2005-2009 (n = 738 954), 2010-2014 (n = 609 447), and 2015-2019 (n = 661 431). Each outcome became substantially less common with time: compared to 2005-2009, AF patients diagnosed in 2015-2019 experienced a 34% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.64-0.69), 22% (HR 0.78, 0.75-0.82), and 24% (HR 0.76, 0.75-0.77) reduction in risk of incident ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, respectively. Between 2005-2009 and 2015-2019, patients aged ≥ 65 years experienced more reductions in each outcome compared to younger patients (p < 0.001 for all), and declines in each outcome were significantly lower for Hispanics and Blacks compared to white patients.

Conclusion: The risks of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death have significantly declined among AF patients, although differences in the magnitude of improvement of these outcomes by demographic groups were observed. Commonly described estimates of the prognosis for AF patients should be updated to reflect contemporary care.

Aims: Recent trials have shown that low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduces major cardiovascular events in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine therapy in patients with chronic coronary disease when added to standard background therapy.

Methods and results: This Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model used estimates of therapy effectiveness, transition probabilities, costs and quality of life obtained from the Low-dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial, as well as meta-analyses and public sources. In this trial, Low-dose colchicine was added to standard of care and compared to placebo. The main outcomes were cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary revascularisation, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), the cost per QALY gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), and net monetary benefit. In the model, low-dose colchicine therapy yielded 0.04 additional QALYs compared with standard of care at an incremental cost of €455 from a societal perspective and €729 from a healthcare perspective, resulting in a cost per QALY gained of €12,176/QALY from a societal perspective and €19,499/QALY from a healthcare perspective. Net monetary benefit was €1,414 from a societal perspective and €1,140 from a healthcare perspective. Low-dose colchicine has a 96% and 94% chance of being cost effective, from respectively a societal and healthcare perspective when using a willingness to pay of €50,000/QALY. Net monetary benefit would decrease below zero when annual low-dose colchicine costs would exceed an annual cost of €221 per patient.

Conclusion: Adding low-dose colchicine to standard of care in patients with chronic coronary disease is cost-effective according to commonly accepted thresholds in Europe and Australia and compares favourably in cost-effectiveness to other drugs used in chronic coronary disease.

Aims: To examine determinants of access to treatment, outcomes and hospital utilization in patients undergoing secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in adulthood in England and Wales.

Methods and results: Large retrospective cohort study of all adult patients undergoing secundum ASD closures in England and Wales between 2000/01 and 2016/17. Data were from population-based official data sets covering congenital heart disease procedures, hospital episodes and death registries.Out of 6 541 index closures, 79.4% were transcatheter (median age 47 years, IQR 34-61) and 20.6% were surgical (40 years, 28-52). The study cohort was predominantly female (66%), with socio-ethnic profile similar to the general population.Mortality in hospital was 0.2% and at one year 1.0% (95%CI 0.8%-1.2%). Risk of death was lower for transcatheter repairs, adjusting for age, sex, year of procedure, comorbidities and cardiac risk factors (in-hospital adjusted-OR 0.09, 95%CI 0.02-0.46, one-year adjusted-HR 0.5, 0.3-0.9). There was excess mortality one year after ASD closure compared to matched population data.Median (IQR) peri-procedural length of stay was 1.8 (1.4-2.5) and 7.3 (6.2-9.2) days for transcatheter and surgical closures, respectively. Hospital resource use for cardiac reasons started the year before repair (median 2 inpatient and 2 outpatient-only days) and decreased post-repair (zero inpatient and one outpatient days during the first two years).

Conclusion: This national study confirms that ASD closure in adults, by surgical or transcatheter methods, is provided independently of ethnic or socioeconomic differences, it is low (but not no) risk and appears to reduce future cardiac hospitalisation even in older ages.