European Clinical Respiratory Journal最新文献

Efforts to grasp the significance of radiologic changes similar to interstitial lung disease (ILD) in undiagnosed individuals have intensified in the recent decade. The term interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) is an emerging definition of such changes, defined by visual examination of computed tomography scans. Substantial insights have been made in the origins and clinical consequences of these changes, as well as automated measures of early lung fibrosis, which will likely lead to increased recognition of early fibrotic lung changes among clinicians and researchers alike. Interstitial lung abnormalities have an estimated prevalence of 7-10% in elderly populations. They correlate with many ILD risk factors, both epidemiologic and genetic. Additionally, histopathological similarities with IPF exist in those with ILA. While no established blood biomarker of ILA exists, several have been suggested. Distinct imaging patterns indicating advanced fibrosis correlate with worse clinical outcomes. ILA are also linked with adverse clinical outcomes such as increased mortality and risk of lung cancer. Progression of ILA has been noted in a significant portion of those with ILA and is associated with many of the same features as ILD, including advanced fibrosis. Those with ILA progression are at risk of accelerated FVC decline and increased mortality. Radiologic changes resembling ILD have also been attained by automated measures. Such measures associate with some, but not all the same factors as ILA. ILA and similar radiologic changes are in many ways analogous to ILD and likely represent a precursor of ILD in some cases. While warranting an evaluation for ILD, they are associated with poor clinical outcomes beyond possible ILD development and thus are by themselves a significant finding. Among the present objectives of this field are the stratification of patients with regards to progression and the discovery of biomarkers with predictive value for clinical outcomes.

Background: Exercise is recommended for all patients with COPD. Evidence for its benefit is considerably weaker in the more severe stages of the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-intensity interval training could improve exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with severe COPD and hypoxemia.

Methods: Stable patients with COPD GOLD stage III or IV and hypoxemia were included. They underwent extensive cardiopulmonary testing including right heart catheterization, lung function tests, echocardiography and 6-minute walk test before and after completion of 10 weeks of high-intensity interval training performed with supplemental oxygen. Primary endpoint was change in pulmonary artery pressure measured by right heart catheterization.

Results: Ten patients with very severe airflow obstruction, mean FEV1 28.7% predicted and mean FEV1/VC 0.39 completed the exercise programme. Pulmonary artery pressure remained unchanged following the intervention (26,3 mmHg vs. 25,8 mmHg at baseline, p 0.673). Six-minute walk distance improved by a mean of44.8 m (p 0.010), which is also clinically significant. We found marginally improved left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography (54.6% vs 59.5%, p 0.046).

Conclusion: High-intensity interval training significantly improved exercise capacity while pulmonary hemodynamics remained unchanged. The improvement may therefore be due to mechanisms other than altered pulmonary artery pressure. The increase in ejection fraction is of uncertain clinical significance. The low number of patients precludes firm conclusions.

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, but the additional economic burden regarding direct and indirect costs is largely unknown. This study provides information on the economic consequences of lung cancer on a national level. Methods: From the Danish National Patient Registry (NPR) and the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR), 53,749 patients with lung cancer were identified and matched with 214,304 controls on age, gender, region of residence and marital status in the period 1998-2010. Direct and indirect costs, health care contacts and frequency, medication and social transfer payments were extracted from national databases. Results: Direct health care cost were higher for lung cancer patients than controls both before and after being diagnosed with lung cancer. At the year of diagnosis, health care cost peaked with cost of €21,497 compared to €2,880 for controls. Average difference in income from employment was €+3,118 in years prior to diagnosis and €+748 after diagnosis in favor of controls. Average difference in total public transfer income was €+1,288 before and €+441 after diagnosis, with higher public transfer income for lung cancer patients. Conclusion: For both genders, lung cancer was associated with significantly higher rates of health-related costs, medication costs, public transfer income, social transfer payments and significantly lower income from employment until retirement (age 65).

INTRODUCTION: This report introduces two cases presenting absorption of considerable radiological changes in the course of the coronavirus pneumonia in patients treated with prolonged oral steroids.CASES: The first case concerns a male receiving steroids only during hospitalisation in the Infectious Disease Hospital. After discharge, the patient experienced increasing dyspnoea resulting in hospitalisation in our Department of Lung Diseases. HRCT revealed progression of a bilateral, middle, and basal ground-glass opacity when compared to the examination performed at the early stage of the disease. The supplementary oxygen therapy and steroids were administered, followed by extended prednisone consumption up to 2 months after discharge. Follow-up HRCT revealed an almost complete absorption of the ground-glass opacity. The second case concerns a male treated with steroids only during hospitalisation in the Infectious Disease Hospital. Chest CT revealed widespread bilateral ground-glass opacities with consolidations. After discharge with no treatment, he suffered from severe dyspnoea and exercise intolerance, resulting in hospitalisation on the 7^th day of home stay. Since then, a continued steroid treatment was administered resulting in a clinical, spirometric, and radiological improvement.CONCLUSIONS: Based on these observations, patients after the COVID-pneumonia may derive benefits from a prolonged steroid treatment. Therefore, this class of medications should be considered in SARS-CoV-2 patients, especially in patients with persistent radiological changes and dyspnoea requiring the supplementary oxygen therapy. However, randomised controlled trials are required to establish guidelines for the steroid treatment in this group of patients.

Background: Idiopathic Non-Specific Interstitial Pneumonia (iNSIP) is a rare interstitial lung disease, diagnosed, by definition, on the basis of a multidisciplinary team discussion (MDD). Association with an autoimmune background has been suggested in iNSIP.

Aims: To test the feasibility of conducting a multinational MDD to review the diagnosis in iNSIP cases and to estimate the emergence of connective tissue disease (CTD) during follow-up.

Methods: Investigators from three expert centers (Denmark, Estonia and Norway) met and discussed cases of biopsy-proven iNSIP at an international MDD. The cases were previously diagnosed at a national level between 2004 and 2014. Based on clinical, radiographic and pathological data, the diagnosis of iNSIP was re-evaluated and a consensus diagnosis was made. Cases incompatible with iNSIP were excluded. Relevant data were registered comprising any development of CTD.

Results: In total, 31 cases were discussed and 23 patients were included with a diagnosis of iNSIP. The mean follow-up time was 57 months. None of the patients developed CTD according to the rheumatologic criteria during the follow up period. Four patients (17.4%) met the criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features.

Conclusion: We found that an international MDD was a feasible and valuable tool in the retrospective diagnostic evaluation of iNSIP. Diagnosis was changed in a statistically significant number of patients by our international MDD team. None of the patients developed CTD during follow-up.

Introduction: The organ-specific Danish cancer patient pathways (CPPs) including standard time frames were introduced in 2008-2009 securing fast tracks for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Previous studies of the CPPs have focussed on patients getting the suspected cancer diagnosis, whereas little is known about patients not getting the cancer diagnosis for which they were examined. We aimed to describe the characteristics of patients who completed a lung cancer CPP (LCPP) without getting a LC diagnosis. Furthermore, to assess the proportion of patients who had invasive procedures performed during the LCPP and radiographic examinations of the chest conducted 30 days prior to the LCPP and during the LCPP. Moreover, we aimed to describe the proportion of patients being diagnosed with any other cancer-type than LC or with non-malignant pulmonary diseases (NMPDs) during the LCPP. Methods: The study was a retrospective population-based cohort study based on Danish national registers. Patients completing a LCPP between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2016 without being diagnosed with LC and who were registered as initiating and completing the LCPP, a total of 35,809, were included in the study. Results: Invasive procedures were performed in 12,986 patients (37.4%) and almost all patients had CT-scans of thorax and lungs conducted 30 days prior to or during the LCPP. During the LCPP other cancer-types than LC were diagnosed in 1,537 patients (4.3% of the study population), including other primary thoracic malignancies in 312 patients, while 6,826 patients (19.1%) were diagnosed with NMPDs, most often infections or chronic respiratory diseases of lower airways. Conclusion: Besides diagnosing LC the LCPP may contribute significantly in diagnosing other primary and secondary cancers as well as non-malignant diseases.

Introduction: Patients admitted with COVID-19 often have severe hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency and it can be difficult to maintain adequate oxygenation with oxygen supplementation alone. There is a physiological rationale for the use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), and CPAP could keep some patients off mechanical ventilation. We aimed to examine the physiological response to CPAP and the outcome of this treatment. Methods: Data from all patients admitted with COVID-19 and treated with CPAP, from March to July 2020 were collected retrospectively. CPAP was initiated on a medical ward when oxygen supplementation exceeded 10 liters/min to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO₂) ≥92%. CPAP was administered with full face masks on a continuous basis until stable improvement in oxygenation or until intubation or death. Results: CPAP was initiated in 53 patients (35 men, 18 women) with a median (IQR) age of 68 (57-78) years. Nine patients were not able to tolerate the CPAP treatment. Median duration for the 44 patients receiving CPAP was 3 (2-6) days. The PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio was severely reduced to an average of 101 mmHg at initiation of treatment. A positive response of CPAP was seen on respiratory rate (p = 0.002) and on oxygenation (p < 0.001). Of the 44 patients receiving CPAP, 12 (27%) avoided intubation,13 (29%) were intubated, and 19 (43%) died. Of the patients with a ceiling of treatment in the ward (26 of 53) only 2 survived. Older age and high initial oxygen demand predicted treatment failure. Discussion: CPAP seems to have positive effect on oxygenation and respiratory rate in most patients with severe respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. Treatment with CPAP to severely hypoxemic patients in a medical ward is possible, but the prognosis for especially elderly patients with high oxygen requirement and with a ceiling of treatment in the ward is poor.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is associated with a risk of severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requiring treatment at an intensive care unit (ICU). Since clinical deterioration may occur rapidly, a simple, fast, bedside, non-invasive method for assessment of lung changes is warranted. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether lung ultrasound (LUS) findings within 72 hours of admission were predictive of clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients with confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: Patients admitted to a dedicated COVID-19 unit were subject to daily LUS examinations. Number of present consolidations and pleural effusions were registered and a Mongodi score was calculated. These findings were correlated with initial chest x-ray and clinical deterioration, defined as ICU-admission, ARDS diagnosis, death. RESULTS: In total, 29 of 83 patients had LUS performed during admission, 18 within 72 h of admission. Of these, four patients died during admission, six were transferred to the ICU and 13 were diagnosed with ARDS. Initial Mongodi-score did not differ significantly between patients with and without clinical deterioration (p = 0.95). Agreement between initial LUS and chest x-ray findings were fair with Cohen's Kappa at 0.21. CONCLUSION: LUS performed within 72 h in patients admitted to a dedicated COVID-19 unit could not predict ARDS, ICU admission or death. However, consecutive investigations may be of value, as sudden substantial changes may herald disease progression, enabling earlier supplementary diagnostics and treatment initiation.

Background: Allergen avoidance is important in allergic asthma management. Nocturnal treatment with Temperature-controlled Laminar Airflow (TLA) has been shown to provide a significant reduction in the exposure to allergens in the breathing zone, leading to a long-term reduction in airway inflammation and improvement in Quality of life (QoL). Allergic asthma patients symptomatic on Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step 4/5 were found to benefit the most as measured by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). However, the effect of TLA on severe asthma exacerbations is uncertain and therefore a meta-analysis was performed. Methods: Patients with severe allergic asthma (GINA 4/5) were extracted from two 1-year randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted with TLA. A meta-analysis of the effect on severe exacerbations was performed by negative binomial regression in a sequential manner, defined by baseline markers of asthma control (symptoms and QoL scores). Results: The pooled dataset included 364patients. Patients with more symptoms at baseline (ACT<18 or ACQ7>3; N=179), had a significant mean 41% reduction in severe exacerbations (RR=0.59 (0.38-0.90); p=0.015) in favour of TLA. Higher ACQ7 cut-points of 3.5-4.5 resulted in significant reductions of 48-59%.More uncontrolled patients based on AQLQ total and symptom domains ≤3.0 at baseline also showed a significant reduction in severe exacerbations for TLA vs. placebo ((47% (p=0.037) and 53% (p=0.011), respectively). The meta-analysis also confirmed a significant difference in AQLQ-responders ((Minimal Clinically Important Difference)≥0.5; 74% vs. 43%, p=0.04). Conclusion: This meta-analysis of individual patient data shows a beneficial effect on severe exacerbations and quality of life for TLA over placebo in more symptomatic patients with severe allergic asthma. These outcomes support the national management recommendations for patients with symptomatic severe allergic asthma. The actual effect of TLA on severe exacerbations should be confirmed in a prospective study with larger numbers of patients.