Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104001
M. Reni , M. Milella , F. Bergamo , M. Di Marco , E. Giommoni , G.G. Cardellino , L. Cavanna , M. Bonomi , F. Zustovich , S. Bozzarelli , F. Salmaso , M. Spada , G. Orsi , M. Macchini , J. Insolda , L. Procaccio , A. Santoni , I. De Simone , L. Caldirola , F. Galli , C. Pinto
Background
Non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a challenging scenario: the rarity of the disease, the limited number of completed prospective trials, and the shortcomings of comparability across series produce several controversial topics and unanswered questions. Guideline recommendations usually include all the different therapeutic options, de facto transferring to the multidisciplinary team the responsibility on the final decision. This secondary analysis of the GARIBALDI study was aimed to explore the correlation of center type, self-declared volume, and commitment with the overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic PDAC.
Patients and methods
Treatment-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with a pathological diagnosis of non-metastatic PDAC, enrolled between July 2017 and October 2019, were analyzed. OS was defined as the time from treatment start to death. The impact of centers and clinical–demographic characteristics on OS was evaluated using Cox models.
Results
Overall, 402 patients enrolled in 41 centers were eligible for this analysis. The median age was 68.4 years (range 35.6-88.8 years), 49.5% were females, 93.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 16.7% had prior cancer history, and the median CA 19-9 level was 171.5 IU/ml (first-third quartile 24.5-937.5 IU/ml). For 79.8% of patients treatment started within 1 month from diagnosis. Thirty six point six percent of patients underwent upfront surgery and 91.8% of these received a subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy; 14.2% received chemotherapy followed by surgery and 49.3% chemotherapy without surgery. The preferred chemotherapy schemes were gemcitabine (54.8%) for adjuvant chemotherapy and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (55.3%) for upfront chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 57.6 months and 300 patients died. A statistically significant shorter OS was observed in both low- [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-2.32, P = 0.0099] and medium-commitment (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10-2.23, P = 0.0120) compared to high-commitment institutions, when adjusting for clinically relevant covariates.
Conclusion
The GARIBALDI study suggests that the volume and the academic brand are not associated with OS in patients with non-metastatic PDAC, while center commitment warrants further exploration.
背景:非转移性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)呈现出一种具有挑战性的情况:该疾病的罕见性,完成的前瞻性试验数量有限,以及跨系列可比性的缺点产生了一些有争议的话题和未回答的问题。指南建议通常包括所有不同的治疗方案,事实上将最终决定的责任移交给多学科团队。这项对GARIBALDI研究的二级分析旨在探讨非转移性PDAC患者的中心类型、自我声明的体积和承诺与总生存期(OS)的相关性。患者和方法:Treatment-naïve年龄≥18岁,病理诊断为非转移性PDAC的患者,纳入2017年7月至2019年10月。OS定义为从治疗开始到死亡的时间。使用Cox模型评估中心和临床人口学特征对OS的影响。结果:总的来说,41个中心的402例患者符合本分析的条件。中位年龄为68.4岁(范围35.6-88.8岁),49.5%为女性,93.5%为东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)表现状态0-1,16.7%有既往癌症病史,CA 19-9中位水平为171.5 IU/ml(前三分位数24.5-937.5 IU/ml)。79.8%的患者在诊断后1个月内开始治疗。36.6%的患者接受了前期手术,其中91.8%的患者接受了随后的辅助化疗;14.2%接受手术后化疗,49.3%接受不手术化疗。首选的化疗方案为辅助化疗的吉西他滨(54.8%)和前期化疗的nab-紫杉醇+吉西他滨(55.3%)。中位随访时间为57.6个月,300例患者死亡。在调整临床相关协变量后,低风险比(HR) 1.61, 95%置信区间(CI) 1.12-2.32, P = 0.0099)和中投入度(HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10-2.23, P = 0.0120)均较高投入度机构的OS短,具有统计学意义。结论:GARIBALDI研究表明,在非转移性PDAC患者中,体积和学术品牌与OS无关,而中心承诺有待进一步探索。
{"title":"Survival analysis of the non-metastatic cohort of the Italian Association for Medical Oncology (AIOM) Guideline Application in Real world: multi-Institutional Based survey of Adjuvant and first-Line pancreatic Ductal adenocarcinoma treatment in Italy (GARIBALDI)","authors":"M. Reni , M. Milella , F. Bergamo , M. Di Marco , E. Giommoni , G.G. Cardellino , L. Cavanna , M. Bonomi , F. Zustovich , S. Bozzarelli , F. Salmaso , M. Spada , G. Orsi , M. Macchini , J. Insolda , L. Procaccio , A. Santoni , I. De Simone , L. Caldirola , F. Galli , C. Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a challenging scenario: the rarity of the disease, the limited number of completed prospective trials, and the shortcomings of comparability across series produce several controversial topics and unanswered questions. Guideline recommendations usually include all the different therapeutic options, <em>de facto</em> transferring to the multidisciplinary team the responsibility on the final decision. This secondary analysis of the GARIBALDI study was aimed to explore the correlation of center type, self-declared volume, and commitment with the overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic PDAC.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Treatment-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with a pathological diagnosis of non-metastatic PDAC, enrolled between July 2017 and October 2019, were analyzed. OS was defined as the time from treatment start to death. The impact of centers and clinical–demographic characteristics on OS was evaluated using Cox models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 402 patients enrolled in 41 centers were eligible for this analysis. The median age was 68.4 years (range 35.6-88.8 years), 49.5% were females, 93.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 16.7% had prior cancer history, and the median CA 19-9 level was 171.5 IU/ml (first-third quartile 24.5-937.5 IU/ml). For 79.8% of patients treatment started within 1 month from diagnosis. Thirty six point six percent of patients underwent upfront surgery and 91.8% of these received a subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy; 14.2% received chemotherapy followed by surgery and 49.3% chemotherapy without surgery. The preferred chemotherapy schemes were gemcitabine (54.8%) for adjuvant chemotherapy and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (55.3%) for upfront chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 57.6 months and 300 patients died. A statistically significant shorter OS was observed in both low- [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-2.32, <em>P</em> = 0.0099] and medium-commitment (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10-2.23, <em>P</em> = 0.0120) compared to high-commitment institutions, when adjusting for clinically relevant covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The GARIBALDI study suggests that the volume and the academic brand are not associated with OS in patients with non-metastatic PDAC, while center commitment warrants further exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104001"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104103
H.S. Rugo , R.M. Layman , F. Lynce , X. Liu , B. Li , L. McRoy , A.B. Cohen , M. Estevez , G. Curigliano , A. Brufsky
Background
Randomized controlled trials have shown inconsistent overall survival (OS) benefit among the three cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as first-line (1L) treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Several real-world studies compared CDK4/6i effectiveness, with inconsistent findings. This study compared overall survival (OS) of patients with HR+/HER2− mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), in US clinical practice.
Patients and methods
This retrospective study used real-world data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified longitudinal database. Patients with HR+/HER2− mBC aged ≥18 years at mBC diagnosis started 1L CDK4/6i therapy (index treatment) between February 2015 and November 2023, with a potential ≥6-month follow-up. OS was defined as months from start of index treatment to death. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW; primary analysis) was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was carried out as a sensitivity analysis.
Results
Of 9146 eligible patients, 6831, 1279, and 1036 received palbociclib plus AI, ribociclib plus AI, or abemaciclib plus AI, respectively. After sIPTW, baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. After sIPTW, no significant OS differences were found between treatment groups [ribociclib versus palbociclib: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.10, P = 0.7531; abemaciclib versus palbociclib: aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.08, P = 0.4292; abemaciclib versus ribociclib: aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.14, P = 0.6956]. Sensitivity analysis including a subanalysis of patients who started index treatment in 2017 or later also showed no significant OS differences between treatment groups.
Conclusions
This large real-world study suggested that there were no significant OS differences between 1L ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib in combination with an AI for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC. These findings together with other factors such as safety and quality of life are helpful in the selection of CDK4/6i combination therapy for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC.
背景:随机对照试验显示,三种细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)作为激素受体阳性(HR+)/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者的一线(1L)治疗,总生存(OS)获益不一致。一些真实世界的研究比较了CDK4/6i的有效性,结果不一致。该研究比较了美国临床实践中HR+/HER2- mBC患者接受1L palbociclib, ribociclib或abemaciclib联合芳香酶抑制剂(AI)的总生存期(OS)。患者和方法:本回顾性研究使用了来自Flatiron Health电子健康记录衍生的未识别纵向数据库的真实数据。在2015年2月至2023年11月期间,年龄≥18岁的HR+/HER2- mBC患者开始了1L CDK4/6i治疗(指数治疗),随访时间可能≥6个月。OS定义为从开始指标治疗到死亡的月数。处理加权稳定逆概率;初步分析)用于平衡基线患者特征。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型进行敏感性分析。结果:在9146例符合条件的患者中,分别有6831例、1279例和1036例接受了palbociclib + AI、ribociclib + AI或abemaciclib + AI。sIPTW后,各组间基线特征平衡。sIPTW后,两组间OS无显著差异[核博西尼vs帕博西尼:校正风险比(aHR) 0.98, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.87-1.10, P = 0.7531;abemaciclib vs palbociclib: aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.08, P = 0.4292;abemaciclib与ribociclib: aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.14, P = 0.6956]。敏感性分析包括2017年或之后开始指数治疗的患者的亚分析也显示治疗组之间没有显着的OS差异。结论:这项大型现实世界研究表明,1L ribociclib、abemaciclib和palbociclib联合AI治疗HR+/HER2- mBC患者的OS无显著差异。这些发现以及其他因素,如安全性和生活质量,有助于选择CDK4/6i联合治疗HR+/HER2- mBC患者。
{"title":"Comparative overall survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus an aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in the US real-world setting☆","authors":"H.S. Rugo , R.M. Layman , F. Lynce , X. Liu , B. Li , L. McRoy , A.B. Cohen , M. Estevez , G. Curigliano , A. Brufsky","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104103","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104103","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials have shown inconsistent overall survival (OS) benefit among the three cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as first-line (1L) treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Several real-world studies compared CDK4/6i effectiveness, with inconsistent findings. This study compared overall survival (OS) of patients with HR+/HER2− mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), in US clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study used real-world data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified longitudinal database. Patients with HR+/HER2− mBC aged ≥18 years at mBC diagnosis started 1L CDK4/6i therapy (index treatment) between February 2015 and November 2023, with a potential ≥6-month follow-up. OS was defined as months from start of index treatment to death. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW; primary analysis) was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was carried out as a sensitivity analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 9146 eligible patients, 6831, 1279, and 1036 received palbociclib plus AI, ribociclib plus AI, or abemaciclib plus AI, respectively. After sIPTW, baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. After sIPTW, no significant OS differences were found between treatment groups [ribociclib versus palbociclib: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.10, <em>P</em> = 0.7531; abemaciclib versus palbociclib: aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.08, <em>P</em> = 0.4292; abemaciclib versus ribociclib: aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.14, <em>P</em> = 0.6956]. Sensitivity analysis including a subanalysis of patients who started index treatment in 2017 or later also showed no significant OS differences between treatment groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This large real-world study suggested that there were no significant OS differences between 1L ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib in combination with an AI for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC. These findings together with other factors such as safety and quality of life are helpful in the selection of CDK4/6i combination therapy for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104103"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758200/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104092
R. Bartsch , J.M. Pérez-García , J. Furtner , A.S. Berghoff , M. Marhold , A.M. Starzer , M. Hughes , S. Kabraji , S. Sammons , C. Anders , R.K. Murthy , A.E.D. Van Swearingen , A. Pereslete , M. Gion , M. Vaz Batista , S. Braga , P.B.C. Pinto , M. Sampayo-Cordero , A. Llombart-Cussac , M. Preusser , N.U. Lin
Background
Brain metastases (BMs) are common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer, increasing morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy for BMs can be effective, with the triple combination of trastuzumab, capecitabine, and tucatinib being a potential standard. More recently, intracranial activity of antibody–drug conjugates has been reported, but the size of individual studies has been small. Therefore, this patient-level pooled analysis was conducted.
Patients and methods
This is a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective phase II DEBBRAH and TUXEDO-1 trials and the retrospective DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort. Patients with evaluable active BMs (defined as newly diagnosed and untreated or progressing with measurable tumor-related size after previous local therapy) from HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) and treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) included in these studies were eligible. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)-BM criteria.
Results
Overall, 37 patients were assessable for intracranial response assessment. BMs progressing after prior local therapy were present in 64.9% of patients. The median patient age was 49.1 years. All patients had received prior trastuzumab and the median number of prior systemic treatment lines was 3 (0-13). The pooled ORR-IC by RANO-BM criteria was 64.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.5% to 79.8%] with low heterogeneity observed between the studies included. The clinical benefit rate by RANO-BM was 81.1% (95% CI 64.8% to 92.0%). The median progression-free survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-22.6 months) and the median overall survival was 22.5 months (95% CI 14.9 months-not achieved) with high heterogeneity between studies and numerically longer in patients with few prior treatment lines. Quality of life remained stable throughout treatment, with no new safety concerns.
Conclusions
This patient-level pooled analysis of DEBBRAH, TUXEDO-1, and the DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort indicates clinically relevant intracranial activity of T-DXd in patients with active HER2-positive BC, BMs, and extensive systemic pretreatment. The results therefore support the use of T-DXd when clinically indicated irrespective of BMs.
背景:脑转移(BMs)在人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)阳性的晚期乳腺癌中很常见,发病率和死亡率都在增加。全身治疗脑转移是有效的,曲妥珠单抗、卡培他滨和图卡替尼的三联用药是一个潜在的标准。最近,已经报道了抗体-药物偶联物的颅内活性,但个体研究的规模很小。因此,我们进行了患者水平的汇总分析。患者和方法:这是对前瞻性II期DEBBRAH和TUXEDO-1试验以及回顾性DFCI/Duke/MDACC队列的患者水平汇总分析。her2阳性乳腺癌(BC)的可评估活动性脑转移(定义为新诊断和未经治疗或在既往局部治疗后进展为可测量的肿瘤相关大小)并接受曲妥珠单抗德鲁德替康(T-DXd)治疗的患者纳入这些研究。主要终点是通过神经肿瘤学(RANO)-BM标准的反应评估颅内客观缓解率(ORR-IC)。结果:总体而言,37例患者可进行颅内反应评估。64.9%的患者在既往局部治疗后出现脑转移进展。患者中位年龄为49.1岁。所有患者既往均接受过曲妥珠单抗治疗,既往全身治疗线的中位数为3(0-13)。根据RANO-BM标准汇总的ORR-IC为64.9%[95%可信区间(CI) 47.5%至79.8%],纳入研究之间的异质性较低。RANO-BM的临床获益率为81.1% (95% CI 64.8% ~ 92.0%)。中位无进展生存期为13.3个月(95% CI 8.4-22.6个月),中位总生存期为22.5个月(95% CI 14.9个月-未达到),研究之间具有高度异质性,并且在先前治疗线较少的患者中数字更长。在整个治疗过程中,生活质量保持稳定,没有新的安全问题。结论:这项患者水平的DEBBRAH、TUXEDO-1和DFCI/Duke/MDACC队列的汇总分析表明,在her2阳性活动性BC、脑转移和广泛的全身预处理患者中,T-DXd的颅内活性具有临床相关性。因此,该结果支持在临床指征时使用T-DXd,而不考虑脑转移。
{"title":"Results of a patient-level pooled analysis of three studies of trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive breast cancer with active brain metastasis","authors":"R. Bartsch , J.M. Pérez-García , J. Furtner , A.S. Berghoff , M. Marhold , A.M. Starzer , M. Hughes , S. Kabraji , S. Sammons , C. Anders , R.K. Murthy , A.E.D. Van Swearingen , A. Pereslete , M. Gion , M. Vaz Batista , S. Braga , P.B.C. Pinto , M. Sampayo-Cordero , A. Llombart-Cussac , M. Preusser , N.U. Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104092","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104092","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Brain metastases (BMs) are common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer, increasing morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy for BMs can be effective, with the triple combination of trastuzumab, capecitabine, and tucatinib being a potential standard. More recently, intracranial activity of antibody–drug conjugates has been reported, but the size of individual studies has been small. Therefore, this patient-level pooled analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>This is a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective phase II DEBBRAH and TUXEDO-1 trials and the retrospective DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort. Patients with evaluable active BMs (defined as newly diagnosed and untreated or progressing with measurable tumor-related size after previous local therapy) from HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) and treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) included in these studies were eligible. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)-BM criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 37 patients were assessable for intracranial response assessment. BMs progressing after prior local therapy were present in 64.9% of patients. The median patient age was 49.1 years. All patients had received prior trastuzumab and the median number of prior systemic treatment lines was 3 (0-13). The pooled ORR-IC by RANO-BM criteria was 64.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.5% to 79.8%] with low heterogeneity observed between the studies included. The clinical benefit rate by RANO-BM was 81.1% (95% CI 64.8% to 92.0%). The median progression-free survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-22.6 months) and the median overall survival was 22.5 months (95% CI 14.9 months-not achieved) with high heterogeneity between studies and numerically longer in patients with few prior treatment lines. Quality of life remained stable throughout treatment, with no new safety concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This patient-level pooled analysis of DEBBRAH, TUXEDO-1, and the DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort indicates clinically relevant intracranial activity of T-DXd in patients with active HER2-positive BC, BMs, and extensive systemic pretreatment. The results therefore support the use of T-DXd when clinically indicated irrespective of BMs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104092"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104112
K. Verkerk , L.J. Zeverijn , J. van de Haar , P. Roepman , B.S. Geurts , A.C. Spiekman , V. van der Noort , J.M. van Berge Henegouwen , L.R. Hoes , H. van der Wijngaart , A.M.L. Jansen , W.W.J. de Leng , A.J. Gelderblom , H.M.W. Verheul , E.E. Voest
Background
Many patients with cancer exhibit primary or rapid secondary resistance to targeted therapy (TT). We hypothesized that a higher number of altered oncogenic signaling pathways [pathway alteration load (PAL)] would reduce the benefit of TT which only intervenes in one pathway. This hypothesis was tested in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).
Patients and methods
DRUP is a prospective, pan-cancer, non-randomized clinical trial (NCT02925234) that treats patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancer and an actionable molecular profile using matched off-label targeted and immunotherapies. All patients treated with TT with available clinical outcomes and whole genome sequencing were included. PAL was determined based on driver gene alterations and correlated with clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were validated in the independent Hartwig Medical database of metastatic cancers.
Results
In 154 patients treated with TT, the median PAL was 3. Patients with a PAL below median (n = 60) demonstrated a higher CBR (41.7% versus 25.5%, odds ratio 0.48, P = 0.051), longer PFS [median 4.7 versus 2.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.70, P = 0.020] and OS (median 13.7 versus 5.6 months, aHR 3.80, P < 0.001) compared with those with PAL ≥3. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients in the Hartwig database showed similar results for CBR (54.2% versus 36.7%, odds ratio 2.04, P = 0.009) and PFS (7.0 versus 4.2 months, aHR 1.55, P = 0.009).
Conclusions
In our population, PAL emerged as a pan-cancer determinant of outcome to TT. Our findings support refined patient selection for TT and highlight the rationale for combinatorial treatment strategies in patients with multiple affected pathways.
背景:许多癌症患者对靶向治疗(TT)表现出原发性或快速继发性耐药。我们假设,更多的致癌信号通路改变[通路改变负荷(PAL)]会降低TT的益处,因为TT只干预一条通路。这一假设在药物再发现方案(DRUP)中得到了验证。患者和方法:DRUP是一项前瞻性、泛癌症、非随机临床试验(NCT02925234),使用匹配的标签外靶向和免疫疗法治疗难治性转移性癌症患者和可操作的分子谱。所有接受TT治疗的患者均具有可用的临床结果和全基因组测序。PAL是根据驱动基因改变来确定的,并与临床获益率(CBR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相关。结果在独立的Hartwig医学转移性癌症数据库中得到验证。结果:154例接受TT治疗的患者中位PAL为3。与PAL≥3的患者相比,PAL低于中位数的患者(n = 60)表现出更高的CBR(41.7%对25.5%,优势比0.48,P = 0.051),更长的PFS(中位数4.7对2.9个月,校正风险比(aHR) 1.70, P = 0.020)和OS(中位数13.7对5.6个月,aHR 3.80, P < 0.001)。Hartwig数据库中的158例患者在CBR(54.2%对36.7%,优势比2.04,P = 0.009)和PFS(7.0对4.2个月,aHR 1.55, P = 0.009)方面显示出相似的结果。结论:在我们的人群中,PAL成为TT预后的泛癌症决定因素。我们的研究结果为TT患者的精细选择提供了支持,并强调了对有多种影响途径的患者采用联合治疗策略的基本原理。
{"title":"The pathway alteration load is a pan-cancer determinant of outcome of targeted therapies: results from the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)","authors":"K. Verkerk , L.J. Zeverijn , J. van de Haar , P. Roepman , B.S. Geurts , A.C. Spiekman , V. van der Noort , J.M. van Berge Henegouwen , L.R. Hoes , H. van der Wijngaart , A.M.L. Jansen , W.W.J. de Leng , A.J. Gelderblom , H.M.W. Verheul , E.E. Voest","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104112","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104112","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many patients with cancer exhibit primary or rapid secondary resistance to targeted therapy (TT). We hypothesized that a higher number of altered oncogenic signaling pathways [pathway alteration load (PAL)] would reduce the benefit of TT which only intervenes in one pathway. This hypothesis was tested in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>DRUP is a prospective, pan-cancer, non-randomized clinical trial (NCT02925234) that treats patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancer and an actionable molecular profile using matched off-label targeted and immunotherapies. All patients treated with TT with available clinical outcomes and whole genome sequencing were included. PAL was determined based on driver gene alterations and correlated with clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were validated in the independent Hartwig Medical database of metastatic cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 154 patients treated with TT, the median PAL was 3. Patients with a PAL below median (<em>n</em> = 60) demonstrated a higher CBR (41.7% versus 25.5%, odds ratio 0.48, <em>P</em> = 0.051), longer PFS [median 4.7 versus 2.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.70, <em>P</em> = 0.020] and OS (median 13.7 versus 5.6 months, aHR 3.80, <em>P</em> < 0.001) compared with those with PAL ≥3. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients in the Hartwig database showed similar results for CBR (54.2% versus 36.7%, odds ratio 2.04, <em>P</em> = 0.009) and PFS (7.0 versus 4.2 months, aHR 1.55, <em>P</em> = 0.009).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In our population, PAL emerged as a pan-cancer determinant of outcome to TT. Our findings support refined patient selection for TT and highlight the rationale for combinatorial treatment strategies in patients with multiple affected pathways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104112"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760820/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104088
J.-Y. Blay , M. Brahmi , A. Dufresne , A. Swalduz , V. Avrillon , S. Assaad , C. Decroisette , B. Mastroianni , M. Dupont , F. Bourbotte-Salmon , I. Ray-Coquard , P. Meeus , A. Dutour , M. Castets , M. Perol , P. Heudel
Background
Paraneoplastic inflammatory syndrome (PIS) with fever and biological inflammation is a rare but severe condition often caused by the systemic production of interleukin 6 (IL-6) by cancer cells. We report on the efficacy of tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, in 35 patients with severe PIS.
Patients and methods
All 35 patients with solid cancers (sarcomas, lung carcinoma, and breast carcinoma) diagnosed with a PIS from 2019 to 2024 treated with tocilizumab were analyzed in this single-center study (health authorities’ approval R201-004-478). Patients’ characteristics and clinical and biological effects of tocilizumab administration are presented.
Results
Thirty-five (97%) patients had paraneoplastic fever. The median performance status (PS) was 2 (range 1-4). Forty percent of patients had lost 10% of body weight. All had increased serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (median 212 mg/l), and 74% and 48% had increased polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) and platelet counts, respectively. Ninety-four percent had inflammatory anemia. Tocilizumab was given once in 23 (66%) patients and more than once in 12 patients. All patients experienced resolution of paraneoplastic fever, and 11 (31%) had improved PS. CRP, PMN, and platelet count decreases were observed in 100%, 85%, and 94% of patients, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of patients had increased hemoglobin levels. CRP and inflammatory symptoms often relapsed 4-6 weeks after tocilizumab in patients receiving only one injection.
Conclusions
Tocilizumab is an efficient treatment for severe PIS providing significant improvement in clinical symptoms and biological abnormalities.
{"title":"Anti-IL-6R Ab tocilizumab to treat paraneoplastic inflammatory syndrome of solid cancers","authors":"J.-Y. Blay , M. Brahmi , A. Dufresne , A. Swalduz , V. Avrillon , S. Assaad , C. Decroisette , B. Mastroianni , M. Dupont , F. Bourbotte-Salmon , I. Ray-Coquard , P. Meeus , A. Dutour , M. Castets , M. Perol , P. Heudel","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104088","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104088","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Paraneoplastic inflammatory syndrome (PIS) with fever and biological inflammation is a rare but severe condition often caused by the systemic production of interleukin 6 (IL-6) by cancer cells. We report on the efficacy of tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, in 35 patients with severe PIS.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>All 35 patients with solid cancers (sarcomas, lung carcinoma, and breast carcinoma) diagnosed with a PIS from 2019 to 2024 treated with tocilizumab were analyzed in this single-center study (health authorities’ approval R201-004-478). Patients’ characteristics and clinical and biological effects of tocilizumab administration are presented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-five (97%) patients had paraneoplastic fever. The median performance status (PS) was 2 (range 1-4). Forty percent of patients had lost 10% of body weight. All had increased serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (median 212 mg/l), and 74% and 48% had increased polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) and platelet counts, respectively. Ninety-four percent had inflammatory anemia. Tocilizumab was given once in 23 (66%) patients and more than once in 12 patients. All patients experienced resolution of paraneoplastic fever, and 11 (31%) had improved PS. CRP, PMN, and platelet count decreases were observed in 100%, 85%, and 94% of patients, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of patients had increased hemoglobin levels. CRP and inflammatory symptoms often relapsed 4-6 weeks after tocilizumab in patients receiving only one injection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tocilizumab is an efficient treatment for severe PIS providing significant improvement in clinical symptoms and biological abnormalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104088"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758126/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104093
H.C. Puhr , E.C. Winkler , M. Preusser
Background
Ethnic diversity in cancer clinical trials is essential to ensure that therapeutic advances are equitable and broadly applicable in multicultural societies. Yet, missing consensus on the documentation of ethnic origin, partially based on the complexity of the terminology and fear of discrimination, leads to suboptimal patient management of minority populations. Additionally, eligibility criteria, such as stringent laboratory cut-offs, often fail to account for variations across ethnic groups, potentially excluding patients without evidence-based justification.
Patients and methods
This analysis addresses this issue by investigating ethnic diversity in clinical trials that led to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals between 2020 and 2022. Trials were identified from FDA and EMA databases, and available protocols and full-text publications were reviewed for documentation of ethnic background and eligibility criteria for organ function (bone marrow, liver, and renal). Descriptive statistics were applied to summarize the findings.
Results
Of the 56 trials analyzed, only two-thirds of primary result publications included information on ethnic origin. Caucasian and Asian groups were documented in most of those trials and also had the highest percentages of participants across trials, while other ethnic subgroups were less frequently documented and only made up a small proportion of trial participants. Eligibility criteria often set strict organ function cut-offs that did not consider variations among ethnic groups, potentially excluding minorities. The Cockcroft–Gault formula was frequently used to assess kidney function, despite its known limitations for multiethnic cohorts.
Conclusions
Ethnic homogenous participants and eligibility criteria that favor majority groups limit the applicability of findings in diverse populations, leading to inadequate patient management. While United States guidelines encourage inclusivity, similar recommendations are lacking in Europe. Thus European regulatory authorities, research organizations, and patient advocates should establish guidelines to improve ethnic diversity in cancer clinical trials, aligning research practices with the increasingly multicultural composition of European societies.
{"title":"Ethnic origin in cancer clinical trials: overrated or understated? A comprehensive analysis of cancer clinical trials leading to FDA and EMA approvals between 2020 and 2022","authors":"H.C. Puhr , E.C. Winkler , M. Preusser","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104093","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104093","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ethnic diversity in cancer clinical trials is essential to ensure that therapeutic advances are equitable and broadly applicable in multicultural societies. Yet, missing consensus on the documentation of ethnic origin, partially based on the complexity of the terminology and fear of discrimination, leads to suboptimal patient management of minority populations. Additionally, eligibility criteria, such as stringent laboratory cut-offs, often fail to account for variations across ethnic groups, potentially excluding patients without evidence-based justification.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>This analysis addresses this issue by investigating ethnic diversity in clinical trials that led to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals between 2020 and 2022. Trials were identified from FDA and EMA databases, and available protocols and full-text publications were reviewed for documentation of ethnic background and eligibility criteria for organ function (bone marrow, liver, and renal). Descriptive statistics were applied to summarize the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 56 trials analyzed, only two-thirds of primary result publications included information on ethnic origin. Caucasian and Asian groups were documented in most of those trials and also had the highest percentages of participants across trials, while other ethnic subgroups were less frequently documented and only made up a small proportion of trial participants. Eligibility criteria often set strict organ function cut-offs that did not consider variations among ethnic groups, potentially excluding minorities. The Cockcroft–Gault formula was frequently used to assess kidney function, despite its known limitations for multiethnic cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ethnic homogenous participants and eligibility criteria that favor majority groups limit the applicability of findings in diverse populations, leading to inadequate patient management. While United States guidelines encourage inclusivity, similar recommendations are lacking in Europe. Thus European regulatory authorities, research organizations, and patient advocates should establish guidelines to improve ethnic diversity in cancer clinical trials, aligning research practices with the increasingly multicultural composition of European societies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104093"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758121/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104091
B. Pellegrino , E.D. Capoluongo , M. Bagnoli , L. Arenare , D. Califano , G. Scambia , S.C. Cecere , E.M. Silini , G.L. Scaglione , A. Spina , G. Tognon , N. Campanini , C. Pisano , D. Russo , A. Pettinato , P. Scollo , R. Iemmolo , L. De Cecco , A. Musolino , S. Marchini , S. Pignata
Background
Ovarian cancer (OvC) constitutes significant management challenges primarily due to its late-stage diagnosis and the development of resistance to chemotherapy. The standard treatment regimen typically includes carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. However, the variability in treatment responses suggests the need to investigate factors beyond BRCA1/2 mutations, such as DNA repair mechanisms and epigenetic alterations. Notably, homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is observed in an additional 20% of HGSOC cases, indicating a broader spectrum of DNA repair defects. Existing commercial HRD assays have certain limitations, prompting a global effort to develop new genomic and functional tests through academic research.
Materials and methods
This study investigates, in the 187 high-grade serous and endometrioid tumors from the MITO16/MaNGO-OV-2 trial, academic HRD genomic tests in conjunction with a RAD51 immunofluorescence assay to assess functional activation of HRD. Additionally, the study incorporates analysis of microRNA-506 (miR-506) expression as a putative epigenetic effector.
Results
The RAD51 test identified HRD in 73% of the samples and genomic HRD testing in 57%, with HRD identified in 45% of samples by both tests. The significant discrepancy between the two assays emphasizes the need to refine tumor classification for HRD. A three-group genomic classification unveiled superior progression-free survival (PFS) in high- and mild-HRD tumors compared with negative-HRD tumors. High concordance between RAD51 and genomic testing in high-HRD tumors suggests a subset of ‘super-HRD’ tumors exhibiting superior PFS. High expression of miR-506 may be used to further refine HRD status.
Conclusions
The study underscores the complexities of HRD assessment and advocates for a combined genomic and functional approach to enhance predictive accuracy in OvC treatment responses.
{"title":"Unraveling the complexity of HRD assessment in ovarian cancer by combining genomic and functional approaches: translational analyses of MITO16-MaNGO-OV-2 trial","authors":"B. Pellegrino , E.D. Capoluongo , M. Bagnoli , L. Arenare , D. Califano , G. Scambia , S.C. Cecere , E.M. Silini , G.L. Scaglione , A. Spina , G. Tognon , N. Campanini , C. Pisano , D. Russo , A. Pettinato , P. Scollo , R. Iemmolo , L. De Cecco , A. Musolino , S. Marchini , S. Pignata","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104091","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104091","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ovarian cancer (OvC) constitutes significant management challenges primarily due to its late-stage diagnosis and the development of resistance to chemotherapy. The standard treatment regimen typically includes carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) harboring <em>BRCA1</em><em>/2</em> mutations. However, the variability in treatment responses suggests the need to investigate factors beyond <em>BRCA1/2</em> mutations, such as DNA repair mechanisms and epigenetic alterations. Notably, homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is observed in an additional 20% of HGSOC cases, indicating a broader spectrum of DNA repair defects. Existing commercial HRD assays have certain limitations, prompting a global effort to develop new genomic and functional tests through academic research.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This study investigates, in the 187 high-grade serous and endometrioid tumors from the MITO16/MaNGO-OV-2 trial, academic HRD genomic tests in conjunction with a RAD51 immunofluorescence assay to assess functional activation of HRD. Additionally, the study incorporates analysis of microRNA-506 (miR-506) expression as a putative epigenetic effector.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The RAD51 test identified HRD in 73% of the samples and genomic HRD testing in 57%, with HRD identified in 45% of samples by both tests. The significant discrepancy between the two assays emphasizes the need to refine tumor classification for HRD. A three-group genomic classification unveiled superior progression-free survival (PFS) in high- and mild-HRD tumors compared with negative-HRD tumors. High concordance between RAD51 and genomic testing in high-HRD tumors suggests a subset of ‘super-HRD’ tumors exhibiting superior PFS. High expression of miR-506 may be used to further refine HRD status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study underscores the complexities of HRD assessment and advocates for a combined genomic and functional approach to enhance predictive accuracy in OvC treatment responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104091"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758122/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104090
F. Camarda , L. Mastrantoni , C. Parrillo , A. Minucci , F. Persiani , D. Giannarelli , T. Pasciuto , F. Giacomini , E. De Paolis , M. Manfredelli , C. Marchetti , G.F. Zannoni , A. Fagotti , G. Scambia , C. Nero
Background
According to the European Society for Clinical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, the therapeutic algorithm for early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is primarily based on grading and histotype. Adjuvant chemotherapy is usually recommended for high-grade tumors and for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IC; however, overtreatment remains a concern. Conversely, patients truly at higher risk of recurrence currently lack access to additional therapeutic strategies.
Patients and methods
This study presents a descriptive analysis of early-stage EOC patients who were prospectively sequenced and stratified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups based on clinicopathological features. Oncogenic alterations were identified using OncoKB and classified according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) Tier I-III. The prevalence of molecular findings was first reported for each risk subgroup, followed by an analysis on the cohort of patients who experienced relapse.
Results
A total of 180 patients with FIGO stage I-II EOC were enrolled between January 2022 and December 2023; 126 patients (70%) had at least one ESCAT Tier I-III alteration (including 51% high risk, 35% intermediate risk, and 14% low risk); among them, approximately one-quarter (26%, 95% confidence interval 19% to 35%) had an ESCAT Tier I alteration. BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations were observed in about one-quarter of patients, with BRCA2 often co-altered with POLE mutations (55%, P = 2.1 × 10−4). Notably, almost all BRCA1 variants were found in high-risk patients. BRAF V600E mutation (ESCAT IC) was found in 2.4% of patients. PIK3CA variants were the most common Tier IIIA alterations found in 59% of patients. Among those who experienced recurrence, 60% had at least one ESCAT Tier I-III alteration, with PIK3CA mutations being the most frequent.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the potential for actionable alterations in most early-stage EOC patients and support the exploration of chemotherapy-free regimens for low- to intermediate-risk groups, as well as targeted maintenance therapy for high-risk individuals.
{"title":"Actionable mutations in early-stage ovarian cancer according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT): a descriptive analysis on a large prospective cohort","authors":"F. Camarda , L. Mastrantoni , C. Parrillo , A. Minucci , F. Persiani , D. Giannarelli , T. Pasciuto , F. Giacomini , E. De Paolis , M. Manfredelli , C. Marchetti , G.F. Zannoni , A. Fagotti , G. Scambia , C. Nero","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104090","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104090","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>According to the European Society for Clinical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, the therapeutic algorithm for early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is primarily based on grading and histotype. Adjuvant chemotherapy is usually recommended for high-grade tumors and for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IC; however, overtreatment remains a concern. Conversely, patients truly at higher risk of recurrence currently lack access to additional therapeutic strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>This study presents a descriptive analysis of early-stage EOC patients who were prospectively sequenced and stratified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups based on clinicopathological features. Oncogenic alterations were identified using OncoKB and classified according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) Tier I-III. The prevalence of molecular findings was first reported for each risk subgroup, followed by an analysis on the cohort of patients who experienced relapse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 180 patients with FIGO stage I-II EOC were enrolled between January 2022 and December 2023; 126 patients (70%) had at least one ESCAT Tier I-III alteration (including 51% high risk, 35% intermediate risk, and 14% low risk); among them, approximately one-quarter (26%, 95% confidence interval 19% to 35%) had an ESCAT Tier I alteration. <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> alterations were observed in about one-quarter of patients, with <em>BRCA2</em> often co-altered with <em>POLE</em> mutations (55%, <em>P</em> = 2.1 × 10<sup>−4</sup>). Notably, almost all <em>BRCA1</em> variants were found in high-risk patients. <em>BRAF V600E</em> mutation (ESCAT IC) was found in 2.4% of patients. <em>PIK3CA</em> variants were the most common Tier IIIA alterations found in 59% of patients. Among those who experienced recurrence, 60% had at least one ESCAT Tier I-III alteration, with <em>PIK3CA</em> mutations being the most frequent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight the potential for actionable alterations in most early-stage EOC patients and support the exploration of chemotherapy-free regimens for low- to intermediate-risk groups, as well as targeted maintenance therapy for high-risk individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104090"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730936/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142871691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104087
F. Miglietta , A. Collesei , C. Vernieri , T. Giarratano , C.A. Giorgi , F. Girardi , G. Griguolo , M. Cacciatore , A. Botticelli , A. Vingiani , G. Fotia , F. Piacentini , D. Massa , F. Zanghì , M. Marino , G. Pruneri , M. Fassan , A.P. Dei Tos , M.V. Dieci , V. Guarneri
Background
HER2-low expression has gained clinical relevance in breast cancer (BC) due to the availability of anti-HER2 antibody–drug conjugates for patients with HER2-low metastatic BC. The well-reported instability of HER2-low status during disease evolution highlights the need to identify patients with HER2-0 primary BC who may develop a HER2-low phenotype at relapse. In response to the urgency of maximizing treatment access, we utilized artificial intelligence to predict this occurrence.
Patients and methods
We included a large multicentric retrospective cohort of patients with BC who underwent tissue resampling at relapse. The dataset was preprocessed to address relevant issues such as missing data, feature abundance, and target class imbalance. We then trained two models: one focused on explainability [Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)] and another aimed at performance (an ensemble of XGBoost and support vector machine).
Results
A total of 1200 patients were included in this study. Among 386 patients with HER2-0 primary BC and matched HER2 status at relapse, 42.5% (n = 157) converted to a HER2-low phenotype. The explainable model achieved a balanced accuracy of 58%, with a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 64%. The most important variables for this model were primary BC phenotype [mean Shapley value (SHAP) 0.540], primary BC histological type (SHAP 0.101), grade (SHAP 0.182), and sites of relapse (SHAP 0.008-0.213). The ensemble model had a balanced accuracy of 64%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 53%.
Conclusions
This work represents one of the first proof-of-concept applications of machine learning models to predict a highly relevant phenomenon for drug access in modern BC oncology. Starting with an explainable model and subsequently integrating it with an ensemble approach enabled us to enhance performance while maintaining transparency, explainability, and intelligibility.
{"title":"Development of two machine learning models to predict conversion from primary HER2-0 breast cancer to HER2-low metastases: a proof-of-concept study","authors":"F. Miglietta , A. Collesei , C. Vernieri , T. Giarratano , C.A. Giorgi , F. Girardi , G. Griguolo , M. Cacciatore , A. Botticelli , A. Vingiani , G. Fotia , F. Piacentini , D. Massa , F. Zanghì , M. Marino , G. Pruneri , M. Fassan , A.P. Dei Tos , M.V. Dieci , V. Guarneri","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104087","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104087","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>HER2-low expression has gained clinical relevance in breast cancer (BC) due to the availability of anti-HER2 antibody–drug conjugates for patients with HER2-low metastatic BC. The well-reported instability of HER2-low status during disease evolution highlights the need to identify patients with HER2-0 primary BC who may develop a HER2-low phenotype at relapse. In response to the urgency of maximizing treatment access, we utilized artificial intelligence to predict this occurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We included a large multicentric retrospective cohort of patients with BC who underwent tissue resampling at relapse. The dataset was preprocessed to address relevant issues such as missing data, feature abundance, and target class imbalance. We then trained two models: one focused on explainability [Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)] and another aimed at performance (an ensemble of XGBoost and support vector machine).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1200 patients were included in this study. Among 386 patients with HER2-0 primary BC and matched HER2 status at relapse, 42.5% (<em>n</em> = 157) converted to a HER2-low phenotype. The explainable model achieved a balanced accuracy of 58%, with a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 64%. The most important variables for this model were primary BC phenotype [mean Shapley value (SHAP) 0.540], primary BC histological type (SHAP 0.101), grade (SHAP 0.182), and sites of relapse (SHAP 0.008-0.213). The ensemble model had a balanced accuracy of 64%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 53%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This work represents one of the first proof-of-concept applications of machine learning models to predict a highly relevant phenomenon for drug access in modern BC oncology. Starting with an explainable model and subsequently integrating it with an ensemble approach enabled us to enhance performance while maintaining transparency, explainability, and intelligibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104087"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730216/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142871692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104104
J.-L. Bulliard, K. Brändle
{"title":"Avoiding spurious comparison of cancer stage in organized and opportunistic breast screening in Switzerland","authors":"J.-L. Bulliard, K. Brändle","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104104","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104104","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 104104"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}