首页 > 最新文献

ESMO Open最新文献

英文 中文
Laboratory Prognostic Index (LAB-PI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single blood analysis predicts outcomes as good as IPI, NCCN-IPI, and GELTAMO-IPI☆ 弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的实验室预后指数(LAB-PI):单次血液分析预测的结果与IPI、NCCN-IPI和GELTAMO-IPI一样好
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105873
F. Martin-Moro , L. Bento , J. Marquet , S.F. Browne-Arthur , A. Gutierrez , A. Diaz-Lopez , J. Sanchez-Pina , J.A. Garcia-Vela , A. Salar , R. Cordoba , S. Novelli , M.J. Rodriguez-Salazar , S. Gonzalez De Villambrosia , R. Del Campo , H.D. Luzardo , D. Garcia , J.A. Garcia-Marco , J.M. Sancho , P. Abrisqueta , A. Martin , M. Bastos-Oreiro

Background

Many prognostic variables have been described in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and combined in prognostic scores, which are not usually fully objective and may be complex to apply. With the aim of designing and validating a simple, inexpensive, objective, and reproducible prognostic tool in DLBCL, the Laboratory Prognostic Index (LAB-PI) was developed.

Patients and methods

Laboratory parameters routinely evaluated at DLBCL diagnosis were analysed before treatment initiation in a DLBCL cohort (n = 221). The variables associated with event-free survival (EFS) were combined into the new score and graded according to their prognostic impact in multivariate analysis. Patients were clustered according to their risk. The LAB-PI was validated in an independent cohort (n = 885) and compared with other DLBCL scores.

Results

The LAB-PI included three laboratory variables routinely assessed at DLBCL diagnosis: elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (1 point), anaemia (1 point), and high β2-microglobulin (B2M) up to two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) (1 point) or greater than two times the ULN (2 points). Cases were clustered into four groups according to their prognosis in the validation cohort: low risk (0 points, 5-year EFS 87%), low-intermediate risk (1-2 points, 5-year EFS 69%), high-intermediate risk (3 points, 5-year EFS 55%), and high risk (4 points, 5-year EFS 37%). The LAB-PI was comparable with the International Prognostic Index (IPI), National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN)-IPI, and Grupo Español de Linfomas/Trasplante de Médula ósea (GELTAMO)-IPI in predicting prognosis and remained useful in subanalysis according to age and stage.

Conclusion

The LAB-PI predicts outcome in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients by a single blood assessment including LDH, haemoglobin, and B2M.
背景:弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的许多预后变量已经被描述,并结合预后评分,这些评分通常不完全客观,应用起来可能很复杂。为了设计和验证一种简单、廉价、客观、可重复的DLBCL预后工具,实验室预后指数(LAB-PI)被开发出来。患者和方法:在DLBCL队列(n = 221)中,分析治疗开始前DLBCL诊断常规评估的实验室参数。在多变量分析中,将与无事件生存期(EFS)相关的变量合并为新的评分,并根据其对预后的影响进行分级。根据患者的风险进行分组。LAB-PI在独立队列(n = 885)中进行验证,并与其他DLBCL评分进行比较。结果LAB-PI包括3个实验室变量:乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高(1分)、贫血(1分)、β2-微球蛋白(B2M)高至正常上限(ULN)的2倍(1分)或高于ULN的2倍(2分)。在验证队列中,根据预后将病例分为4组:低危(0分,5年EFS 87%)、中低危(1-2分,5年EFS 69%)、中高危(3分,5年EFS 55%)和高危(4分,5年EFS 37%)。在预测预后方面,laboratory - pi与国际预后指数(IPI)、国家癌症综合网络(NCCN)-IPI和Grupo Español de Linfomas/Trasplante de msamuula ósea (GELTAMO)-IPI相当,并且在根据年龄和分期进行亚分析时仍然有用。结论LAB-PI可通过包括LDH、血红蛋白和B2M在内的单一血液评估预测新诊断的DLBCL患者的预后。
{"title":"Laboratory Prognostic Index (LAB-PI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single blood analysis predicts outcomes as good as IPI, NCCN-IPI, and GELTAMO-IPI☆","authors":"F. Martin-Moro ,&nbsp;L. Bento ,&nbsp;J. Marquet ,&nbsp;S.F. Browne-Arthur ,&nbsp;A. Gutierrez ,&nbsp;A. Diaz-Lopez ,&nbsp;J. Sanchez-Pina ,&nbsp;J.A. Garcia-Vela ,&nbsp;A. Salar ,&nbsp;R. Cordoba ,&nbsp;S. Novelli ,&nbsp;M.J. Rodriguez-Salazar ,&nbsp;S. Gonzalez De Villambrosia ,&nbsp;R. Del Campo ,&nbsp;H.D. Luzardo ,&nbsp;D. Garcia ,&nbsp;J.A. Garcia-Marco ,&nbsp;J.M. Sancho ,&nbsp;P. Abrisqueta ,&nbsp;A. Martin ,&nbsp;M. Bastos-Oreiro","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105873","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105873","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many prognostic variables have been described in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and combined in prognostic scores, which are not usually fully objective and may be complex to apply. With the aim of designing and validating a simple, inexpensive, objective, and reproducible prognostic tool in DLBCL, the Laboratory Prognostic Index (LAB-PI) was developed.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Laboratory parameters routinely evaluated at DLBCL diagnosis were analysed before treatment initiation in a DLBCL cohort (<em>n</em> = 221). The variables associated with event-free survival (EFS) were combined into the new score and graded according to their prognostic impact in multivariate analysis. Patients were clustered according to their risk. The LAB-PI was validated in an independent cohort (<em>n</em> = 885) and compared with other DLBCL scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The LAB-PI included three laboratory variables routinely assessed at DLBCL diagnosis: elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (1 point), anaemia (1 point), and high β2-microglobulin (B2M) up to two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) (1 point) or greater than two times the ULN (2 points). Cases were clustered into four groups according to their prognosis in the validation cohort: low risk (0 points, 5-year EFS 87%), low-intermediate risk (1-2 points, 5-year EFS 69%), high-intermediate risk (3 points, 5-year EFS 55%), and high risk (4 points, 5-year EFS 37%). The LAB-PI was comparable with the International Prognostic Index (IPI), National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN)-IPI, and Grupo Español de Linfomas/Trasplante de Médula ósea (GELTAMO)-IPI in predicting prognosis and remained useful in subanalysis according to age and stage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The LAB-PI predicts outcome in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients by a single blood assessment including LDH, haemoglobin, and B2M.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105873"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term outcome data for patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer participating in the WSG PlanB trial after preselection by gene expression analysis: 10-year survival results from the WSG PlanB registry 通过基因表达分析预选参与WSG PlanB试验的激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌患者的长期结局数据:来自WSG PlanB登记的10年生存结果
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105891
U. Nitz , M. Graeser , O. Gluz , S. Kümmel , M. Just , C. Jackisch , C. zu Eulenburg , M. Christgen , N. Harbeck , West German Study Group

Background

The PlanB registry evaluated long-term follow-up data for clinical candidates for chemotherapy enrolled in the PlanB trial in hormone receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer (eBC) patients preselected using the 21-gene expression assay.

Patients and methods

PlanB randomly assigned pT1-4c, pN+, pN0/high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative eBC patients to four cycles of epirubicin + cyclophoshamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel (EC-T arm) or to six cycles of docetaxel + cyclophosphamide (TC); patients with locally HR-positive tumors and recurrence score (RS) <12 received endocrine therapy (ET) only. Following the end of PlanB, patients with HR-positive tumors were included in a prospective, noninterventional PlanB registry. The primary objective was to compare invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); the secondary objectives were the comparisons of overall survival (OS), and distant disease-free survival (dDFS).

Results

The registry included 699 patients (ET only: n = 119, TC: n = 298, EC-T: n = 289). In the TC and EC-T groups, respectively, 41% and 41% were postmenopausal; 63% and 55% were pN0; and 23% and 24% had RS >25. Ten-year survival rates (10.3 years median follow-up) in the TC and EC-T arms were, respectively, 90.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 86.6% to 93.7%] and 92.1% (95% CI 88.2% to 94.7%, P = 0.546) for iDFS; 94.4% (95% CI 90.9% to 96.5%) and 93.2% (95% CI 89.5% to 95.6%, P = 0.789) for dDFS, and 96.8% (95% CI 94.0% to 98.3%) and 96.3% (95% CI 93.3% to 98.0%, P = 0.974) for OS. Overall, 10-year OS was 94.2% (95% CI 88.9% to 97.1%) in RS <12 (77.9% received ET-only), 96.8% (95% CI 94.4% to 98.2%) in RS 12-25, and 96.1% (95% CI 90.9% to 98.4%) in RS >25 group. RS was not predictive of the efficacy of EC-T versus TC.

Conclusions

Ten-year outcomes for TC and EC-T were similar and excellent; six cycles of TC is an effective option in HER2-negative eBC with pN0 or pN1 and intermediate-to-high-risk disease, according to gene expression analysis.
PlanB登记处评估了PlanB试验中激素受体(HR)阳性早期乳腺癌(eBC)患者的化疗临床候选人的长期随访数据,这些患者使用21基因表达测定法预先选择。planb将pT1-4c、pN+、pN0/高危人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)阴性的eBC患者随机分配到4个周期的表柔比星+环磷酰胺,随后4个周期的多西紫杉醇(EC-T组)或6个周期的多西紫杉醇+环磷酰胺(TC);肿瘤局部hr阳性且复发评分(RS) <;12的患者仅接受内分泌治疗(ET)。在计划b结束后,hr阳性肿瘤患者被纳入前瞻性、非介入性计划b登记。主要目的是比较侵袭性无病生存期(iDFS);次要目标是比较总生存期(OS)和远端无病生存期(dDFS)。结果共纳入699例患者(仅ET: n = 119, TC: n = 298, EC-T: n = 289)。TC组和EC-T组分别有41%和41%为绝经后患者;63%和55%为pN0;23%和24%的人有RS >;25。iDFS组TC组和EC-T组的10年生存率(中位随访10.3年)分别为90.8%[95%可信区间(CI) 86.6% ~ 93.7%]和92.1% (95% CI 88.2% ~ 94.7%, P = 0.546);dDFS为94.4% (95% CI 90.9% ~ 96.5%)和93.2% (95% CI 89.5% ~ 95.6%, P = 0.789), OS为96.8% (95% CI 94.0% ~ 98.3%)和96.3% (95% CI 93.3% ~ 98.0%, P = 0.974)。总体而言,RS >; 12组的10年OS为94.2% (95% CI 88.9%至97.1%)(77.9%仅接受et治疗),RS 12-25组的10年OS为96.8% (95% CI 94.4%至98.2%),RS >;25组的10年OS为96.1% (95% CI 90.9%至98.4%)。RS不能预测EC-T与TC的疗效。结论TC与EC-T的10年预后相似且良好;根据基因表达分析,6周期TC是her2阴性eBC伴pN0或pN1和中至高危疾病的有效选择。
{"title":"Long-term outcome data for patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer participating in the WSG PlanB trial after preselection by gene expression analysis: 10-year survival results from the WSG PlanB registry","authors":"U. Nitz ,&nbsp;M. Graeser ,&nbsp;O. Gluz ,&nbsp;S. Kümmel ,&nbsp;M. Just ,&nbsp;C. Jackisch ,&nbsp;C. zu Eulenburg ,&nbsp;M. Christgen ,&nbsp;N. Harbeck ,&nbsp;West German Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105891","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105891","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The PlanB registry evaluated long-term follow-up data for clinical candidates for chemotherapy enrolled in the PlanB trial in hormone receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer (eBC) patients preselected using the 21-gene expression assay.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>PlanB randomly assigned pT1-4c, pN+, pN0/high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative eBC patients to four cycles of epirubicin + cyclophoshamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel (EC-T arm) or to six cycles of docetaxel + cyclophosphamide (TC); patients with locally HR-positive tumors and recurrence score (RS) &lt;12 received endocrine therapy (ET) only. Following the end of PlanB, patients with HR-positive tumors were included in a prospective, noninterventional PlanB registry. The primary objective was to compare invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); the secondary objectives were the comparisons of overall survival (OS), and distant disease-free survival (dDFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The registry included 699 patients (ET only: <em>n</em> = 119, TC: <em>n</em> = 298, EC-T: <em>n</em> = 289). In the TC and EC-T groups, respectively, 41% and 41% were postmenopausal; 63% and 55% were pN0; and 23% and 24% had RS &gt;25. Ten-year survival rates (10.3 years median follow-up) in the TC and EC-T arms were, respectively, 90.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 86.6% to 93.7%] and 92.1% (95% CI 88.2% to 94.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.546) for iDFS; 94.4% (95% CI 90.9% to 96.5%) and 93.2% (95% CI 89.5% to 95.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.789) for dDFS, and 96.8% (95% CI 94.0% to 98.3%) and 96.3% (95% CI 93.3% to 98.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.974) for OS. Overall, 10-year OS was 94.2% (95% CI 88.9% to 97.1%) in RS &lt;12 (77.9% received ET-only), 96.8% (95% CI 94.4% to 98.2%) in RS 12-25, and 96.1% (95% CI 90.9% to 98.4%) in RS &gt;25 group. RS was not predictive of the efficacy of EC-T versus TC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ten-year outcomes for TC and EC-T were similar and excellent; six cycles of TC is an effective option in HER2-negative eBC with pN0 or pN1 and intermediate-to-high-risk disease, according to gene expression analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105891"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical benefit of additional whole-exome sequencing over panel sequencing in an all-comer real-world molecular tumor board 额外的全外显子组测序在全角落真实世界分子肿瘤板面板测序的临床益处
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105894
E. Krieghoff-Henning , T. Michaeli , T. Boch , J. Kirchhof , V. Haselmann , M. Neumaier , W.-K. Hofmann , J. Betge , M. Ebert , A. Teufel , V. Ast , C. Sauer , C. Cotarelo , R. Lozynskyy , M. Janning , F. Marmé , M. Sütterlin , A. Streuer , F. Siegel , C. Brochhausen , S. Loges

Background

Panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) often uncover therapeutic targets for cancer patients. However, it is still largely unclear to what extent patients directly benefit from broader analyses over panel sequencing alone.

Materials and methods

We analyzed the molecular findings and recommendations issued by our molecular tumor board (MTB) in a cohort of patients who had received both a well-established diagnostic panel of medium size (up to 203 genes) and in-house WES, focusing on the number of recommendations that were issued on the basis of WES results only.

Results

Our cohort consisted of 38 patients with advanced cancers, of whom about two-thirds had common and one-third had rare cancers. They received a total of 45 (range 0-4) treatment recommendations overall, of which 29 had a clinical level of evidence (LoE) and/or entailed a feasible study enrollment and were thus considered highly actionable. Sixteen recommendations, of which seven were highly actionable, were issued only on the basis of WES results (five own, two previous WES). Three out of those seven recommendations and one additional recommendation based on a previous large panel were related to complex molecular biomarkers such as homologous recombination deficiency or high tumor mutational burden, with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or checkpoint inhibitors as recommended treatment. As expected, a higher proportion of the WES-only recommendations (63% versus 42% of recommendations overall) were based on non-clinical LoEs. One of eight recommendations implemented so far was based on biomarkers derived by WES only.

Conclusions

In our MTB, WES enabled some additional clinically highly actionable recommendations for selected patients, suggesting that some patients do benefit from additional WES. These recommendations were often related to complex biomarkers, which may in principle also be derived from larger panels. These findings should be re-investigated prospectively in larger cohorts.
面板测序、全外显子组测序(WES)和全基因组测序(WGS)经常发现癌症患者的治疗靶点。然而,目前仍不清楚患者在多大程度上直接受益于更广泛的分析,而不是单独的小组测序。材料和方法我们分析了分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)在一组接受了中等规模诊断小组(多达203个基因)和内部WES的患者中的分子发现和建议,重点关注仅基于WES结果发布的建议数量。结果我们的队列包括38例晚期癌症患者,其中约三分之二为常见癌症,三分之一为罕见癌症。他们总共收到了45个(范围0-4)治疗建议,其中29个具有临床证据水平(LoE)和/或需要可行的研究入组,因此被认为是高度可操作的。16项建议,其中7项具有高度可操作性,仅根据WES结果(5项自己的,2项以前的WES)发布。这7项建议中的3项和基于先前大型小组的另一项建议与复杂的分子生物标志物(如同源重组缺陷或高肿瘤突变负担)相关,建议使用聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶抑制剂或检查点抑制剂作为推荐治疗。正如预期的那样,只有wes推荐的比例更高(63%对42%的总体推荐)是基于非临床loe。到目前为止实施的八项建议中有一项仅基于WES衍生的生物标志物。在我们的MTB研究中,WES为选定的患者提供了一些额外的临床高度可操作的建议,这表明一些患者确实从额外的WES中受益。这些建议通常与复杂的生物标志物有关,原则上也可能来自更大的面板。这些发现应该在更大的队列中进行前瞻性的重新调查。
{"title":"Clinical benefit of additional whole-exome sequencing over panel sequencing in an all-comer real-world molecular tumor board","authors":"E. Krieghoff-Henning ,&nbsp;T. Michaeli ,&nbsp;T. Boch ,&nbsp;J. Kirchhof ,&nbsp;V. Haselmann ,&nbsp;M. Neumaier ,&nbsp;W.-K. Hofmann ,&nbsp;J. Betge ,&nbsp;M. Ebert ,&nbsp;A. Teufel ,&nbsp;V. Ast ,&nbsp;C. Sauer ,&nbsp;C. Cotarelo ,&nbsp;R. Lozynskyy ,&nbsp;M. Janning ,&nbsp;F. Marmé ,&nbsp;M. Sütterlin ,&nbsp;A. Streuer ,&nbsp;F. Siegel ,&nbsp;C. Brochhausen ,&nbsp;S. Loges","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105894","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105894","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) often uncover therapeutic targets for cancer patients. However, it is still largely unclear to what extent patients directly benefit from broader analyses over panel sequencing alone.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We analyzed the molecular findings and recommendations issued by our molecular tumor board (MTB) in a cohort of patients who had received both a well-established diagnostic panel of medium size (up to 203 genes) and in-house WES, focusing on the number of recommendations that were issued on the basis of WES results only.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our cohort consisted of 38 patients with advanced cancers, of whom about two-thirds had common and one-third had rare cancers. They received a total of 45 (range 0-4) treatment recommendations overall, of which 29 had a clinical level of evidence (LoE) and/or entailed a feasible study enrollment and were thus considered highly actionable. Sixteen recommendations, of which seven were highly actionable, were issued only on the basis of WES results (five own, two previous WES). Three out of those seven recommendations and one additional recommendation based on a previous large panel were related to complex molecular biomarkers such as homologous recombination deficiency or high tumor mutational burden, with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or checkpoint inhibitors as recommended treatment. As expected, a higher proportion of the WES-only recommendations (63% versus 42% of recommendations overall) were based on non-clinical LoEs. One of eight recommendations implemented so far was based on biomarkers derived by WES only.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In our MTB, WES enabled some additional clinically highly actionable recommendations for selected patients, suggesting that some patients do benefit from additional WES. These recommendations were often related to complex biomarkers, which may in principle also be derived from larger panels. These findings should be re-investigated prospectively in larger cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105894"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pathological complete response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I TNBC: a registry-based study I期TNBC患者新辅助化疗后的病理完全缓解和生存:一项基于登记的研究
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105923
M. de Graaf , R.C.A.M. Gielen , S. Balduzzi , S. Siesling , S.C. Linn , M. Kok

Background

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a strong prognostic factor in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). One-third of all patients with early-stage TNBC have stage I disease. Chemotherapy is recommended for most patients with stage I TNBC with an increasing use in the neoadjuvant setting supported by recent guidelines. However, little is known on the chemotherapy benefit for stage I TNBC, in particular the likelihood of a pCR and the prognostic value of pCR in this setting.

Patients and methods

Patients with cT1N0M0 TNBC who received standard of care NACT followed by surgery between 2012 and 2022 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Baseline factors associated with pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) and the impact of pCR on overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

Results

A total of 1144 patients treated with anthracycline-taxane-based NACT were identified. Most patients had cT1N0 disease [n = 1077 (94%)] of no special subtype [n = 1034 (90%)]. In total, 656 patients (57.3%) had a pCR. Younger age [odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-2.30], higher tumor grade [OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.58-2.81] and smaller tumors [OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.15-3.69] were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of pCR, while patients with a lobular carcinoma were less likely to have a pCR (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.67). Platinum-based treatment did not significantly improve the pCR rate (P = 0.9). pCR was associated with a better OS [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.45], with a 5-year OS of 97% versus 90% for patients with and without a pCR, respectively. Of 488 patients with residual disease, 280 (57.4%) received adjuvant capecitabine, which was not significantly associated with improved OS [aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.30-1.44].

Conclusions

Data from this real-world nationwide Dutch registry on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage I TNBC, with the majority of patients having cT1cN0 disease of no special subtype, suggests pCR to be associated with a favorable long-term outcome.
新辅助化疗(NACT)后病理完全缓解(pCR)是早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者预后的重要因素。三分之一的早期TNBC患者为I期疾病。化疗被推荐用于大多数I期TNBC患者,并且在新辅助治疗中越来越多的使用得到最近指南的支持。然而,对I期TNBC的化疗益处知之甚少,特别是pCR的可能性和pCR在这种情况下的预后价值。患者和方法从荷兰癌症登记处确定在2012年至2022年期间接受标准护理NACT和手术的cT1N0M0 TNBC患者。评估与pCR相关的基线因素(ypT0/is, ypN0)以及pCR对总生存期(OS)的影响。结果共鉴定出1144例蒽环类紫杉烷类NACT治疗的患者。大多数患者为cT1N0疾病[n = 1077(94%)],无特殊亚型[n = 1034(90%)]。共有656例(57.3%)患者出现pCR。较年轻的年龄[比值比(OR) 1.78, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.38-2.30]、较高的肿瘤分级[OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.58-2.81]和较小的肿瘤[OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.15-3.69]与较高的pCR可能性显著相关,而小叶癌患者较少发生pCR (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.67)。铂基治疗没有显著提高pCR率(P = 0.9)。pCR与更好的OS相关[校正风险比(aHR) 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.45],有和没有pCR的患者的5年OS分别为97%和90%。在488例残留疾病患者中,280例(57.4%)接受了卡培他滨辅助治疗,与OS改善无显著相关[aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.30-1.44]。结论:荷兰全国范围内对I期TNBC新辅助化疗的登记数据显示,大多数患者患有无特殊亚型的cT1cN0疾病,pCR与有利的长期预后相关。
{"title":"Pathological complete response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I TNBC: a registry-based study","authors":"M. de Graaf ,&nbsp;R.C.A.M. Gielen ,&nbsp;S. Balduzzi ,&nbsp;S. Siesling ,&nbsp;S.C. Linn ,&nbsp;M. Kok","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105923","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105923","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a strong prognostic factor in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). One-third of all patients with early-stage TNBC have stage I disease. Chemotherapy is recommended for most patients with stage I TNBC with an increasing use in the neoadjuvant setting supported by recent guidelines. However, little is known on the chemotherapy benefit for stage I TNBC, in particular the likelihood of a pCR and the prognostic value of pCR in this setting.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients with cT1N0M0 TNBC who received standard of care NACT followed by surgery between 2012 and 2022 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Baseline factors associated with pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) and the impact of pCR on overall survival (OS) were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1144 patients treated with anthracycline-taxane-based NACT were identified. Most patients had cT1N0 disease [<em>n</em> = 1077 (94%)] of no special subtype [<em>n</em> = 1034 (90%)]. In total, 656 patients (57.3%) had a pCR. Younger age [odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-2.30], higher tumor grade [OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.58-2.81] and smaller tumors [OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.15-3.69] were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of pCR, while patients with a lobular carcinoma were less likely to have a pCR (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.67). Platinum-based treatment did not significantly improve the pCR rate (<em>P</em> = 0.9). pCR was associated with a better OS [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.45], with a 5-year OS of 97% versus 90% for patients with and without a pCR, respectively. Of 488 patients with residual disease, 280 (57.4%) received adjuvant capecitabine, which was not significantly associated with improved OS [aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.30-1.44].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Data from this real-world nationwide Dutch registry on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage I TNBC, with the majority of patients having cT1cN0 disease of no special subtype, suggests pCR to be associated with a favorable long-term outcome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105923"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145681784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrative analysis of RNA expression signatures and recurrent genomic alterations before treatment: link to menopausal status, short-term endocrine therapy response and disease-free survival in luminal breast cancer 治疗前RNA表达特征和复发性基因组改变的综合分析:与绝经状态、短期内分泌治疗反应和腔内乳腺癌无病生存有关
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105913
G. Zhang , H. Ni , L. Mishieva , S. Bartels , M. Christgen , H. Christgen , L.D. Kandt , M. Raap , R.E. Kates , O. Gluz , M. Graeser , S. Kümmel , U. Nitz , C. Plass , U. Mansmann , C. zu Eulenburg , C. Gerhäuser , H.H. Kreipe , N. Harbeck

Background

Endocrine therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors (AI) is an effective treatment of patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative luminal breast cancer. However, many patients do not respond to this therapy, leading to disease recurrence. This study aimed to identify baseline clinical, molecular, and genetic features associated with menopause status, primary endocrine therapy resistance and long-term outcomes in luminal breast cancer.

Patients and methods

We analyzed 220 patients from the WSG-ADAPT trial with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, who received 3 weeks of preoperative endocrine therapy with TAM or AI. Tumor samples obtained before treatment were profiled using the NanoString BC360 panel, and samples obtained after treatment were analyzed for recurrent genomic alterations by next-generation panel sequencing. A subset of the TCGA-BRCA cohort was used for external validation. Univariate Cox regression analyses were used for prognosis analysis.

Results

The NanoString signatures were clustered into three stable blocks: A (reactive microenvironment and stemness), B (immune) and C (proliferation and genomic risk). Non-responders more frequently harbored TP53 mutations, which were linked to significantly elevated protumorigenic immune- (interferon-γ, inflammatory chemokines, macrophages and regulatory T cells) and proliferation-related [breast cancer proliferation, genomic risk, and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)] signature scores. In the AI group, signatures associated with reduced disease-free survival included breast cancer p53 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-6.94]; genomic risk (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.07-5.83); HRD (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.12-5.29) and hypoxia (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.17-3.87). High expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.94) and progesterone receptor (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.81) indicated better outcomes, respectively. These associations were validated using external data.

Conclusions

Endocrine resistance in luminal breast cancer is characterized by elevated immune signatures, increased proliferation, and specific genomic alterations. The integration of clinical information, gene expression patterns, and genetic data enhances patient stratification and potentially informs treatment decisions. These findings support the use of integrative analyses to guide personalized endocrine therapy and improve outcomes.
背景:他莫昔芬(TAM)或芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)是雌激素受体阳性、her2阴性的腔内乳腺癌患者的有效治疗方法。然而,许多患者对这种治疗没有反应,导致疾病复发。本研究旨在确定与绝经状态、原发性内分泌治疗抵抗和腔内乳腺癌长期预后相关的基线临床、分子和遗传特征。患者和方法我们分析了220例来自WSG-ADAPT试验的早期、雌激素受体阳性、her2阴性乳腺癌患者,这些患者术前接受了3周的TAM或AI内分泌治疗。治疗前获得的肿瘤样本使用NanoString BC360面板进行分析,治疗后获得的样本通过下一代面板测序分析复发性基因组改变。TCGA-BRCA队列的一个子集用于外部验证。预后分析采用单因素Cox回归分析。结果NanoString特征聚类为三个稳定的区块:A(反应性微环境和干性)、B(免疫)和C(增殖和基因组风险)。无应答者更频繁地携带TP53突变,这与显著升高的致瘤性免疫(干扰素-γ、炎症趋化因子、巨噬细胞和调节性T细胞)和增殖相关的[乳腺癌增殖、基因组风险和同源重组缺陷(HRD)]特征评分有关。在人工智能组中,与无病生存率降低相关的特征包括乳腺癌p53[风险比(HR) 2.74, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.08-6.94];基因组风险(HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.07-5.83);HRD (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.12-5.29)和缺氧(HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.17-3.87)。程序性细胞死亡蛋白1 (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.94)和孕激素受体(HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.81)的高表达分别表明预后较好。使用外部数据验证了这些关联。结论腔内乳腺癌的内分泌耐药以免疫特征升高、增殖增加和特异性基因组改变为特征。临床信息、基因表达模式和遗传数据的整合增强了患者分层,并可能为治疗决策提供信息。这些发现支持使用综合分析来指导个性化内分泌治疗和改善结果。
{"title":"Integrative analysis of RNA expression signatures and recurrent genomic alterations before treatment: link to menopausal status, short-term endocrine therapy response and disease-free survival in luminal breast cancer","authors":"G. Zhang ,&nbsp;H. Ni ,&nbsp;L. Mishieva ,&nbsp;S. Bartels ,&nbsp;M. Christgen ,&nbsp;H. Christgen ,&nbsp;L.D. Kandt ,&nbsp;M. Raap ,&nbsp;R.E. Kates ,&nbsp;O. Gluz ,&nbsp;M. Graeser ,&nbsp;S. Kümmel ,&nbsp;U. Nitz ,&nbsp;C. Plass ,&nbsp;U. Mansmann ,&nbsp;C. zu Eulenburg ,&nbsp;C. Gerhäuser ,&nbsp;H.H. Kreipe ,&nbsp;N. Harbeck","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105913","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105913","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endocrine therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors (AI) is an effective treatment of patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative luminal breast cancer. However, many patients do not respond to this therapy, leading to disease recurrence. This study aimed to identify baseline clinical, molecular, and genetic features associated with menopause status, primary endocrine therapy resistance and long-term outcomes in luminal breast cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We analyzed 220 patients from the WSG-ADAPT trial with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, who received 3 weeks of preoperative endocrine therapy with TAM or AI. Tumor samples obtained before treatment were profiled using the NanoString BC360 panel, and samples obtained after treatment were analyzed for recurrent genomic alterations by next-generation panel sequencing. A subset of the TCGA-BRCA cohort was used for external validation. Univariate Cox regression analyses were used for prognosis analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The NanoString signatures were clustered into three stable blocks: A (reactive microenvironment and stemness), B (immune) and C (proliferation and genomic risk). Non-responders more frequently harbored <em>TP53</em> mutations<em>,</em> which were linked to significantly elevated protumorigenic immune- (interferon-γ, inflammatory chemokines, macrophages and regulatory T cells) and proliferation-related [breast cancer proliferation, genomic risk, and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)] signature scores. In the AI group, signatures associated with reduced disease-free survival included breast cancer p53 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-6.94]; genomic risk (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.07-5.83); HRD (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.12-5.29) and hypoxia (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.17-3.87). High expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.94) and progesterone receptor (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.81) indicated better outcomes, respectively. These associations were validated using external data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Endocrine resistance in luminal breast cancer is characterized by elevated immune signatures, increased proliferation, and specific genomic alterations. The integration of clinical information, gene expression patterns, and genetic data enhances patient stratification and potentially informs treatment decisions. These findings support the use of integrative analyses to guide personalized endocrine therapy and improve outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105913"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145570212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with PD-L1-low/negative tumors receiving chemoimmunotherapy: a real-world multicenter retrospective study 肺免疫预后指数对接受化学免疫治疗的pd - l1低/阴性肿瘤非小细胞肺癌患者的影响:一项真实世界的多中心回顾性研究
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105906
A. Yoshimura , T. Takeda , K. Tanimura , Y. Chihara , H. Kawachi , Y. Yamanaka , N. Tamiya , R. Honda , T. Yamada , K. Uryu , S. Shiotsu , H. Yoshioka , T. Yamada , T. Kurata , K. Takayama

Background

Chemoimmunotherapy has become one of the standard first-line treatment options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) strata, yet outcomes in PD-L1-low/negative disease remain suboptimal. We evaluated whether the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) at treatment initiation has prognostic value in this subgroup.

Patients and methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across nine Japanese hospitals (January 2016-September 2021). Clinical data, including results of pretreatment blood tests at first-line treatment initiation, were collected and used to categorize LIPI (good, intermediate, or poor). Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used; prespecified multivariable Cox models were adjusted for LIPI (poor versus good/intermediate), PD-L1 tumor proportion score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, liver/brain metastases, treatment regimen, and age.

Results

We analyzed 176 patients (median age 71 years: PD-L1-low, 60.8%; PD-L1-negative, 39.2%). Median PFS and OS were 7.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.4-9.0 months] and 21.5 months (95% CI 15.4-24.6 months), respectively. Poor LIPI was associated with worse outcomes than good/intermediate LIPI (PFS: 3.6 versus 9.0 months, OS: 7.8 versus 23.9 months, both P < 0.001). In multivariable models, poor LIPI remained independently prognostic [PFS: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, 95% CI 1.66-4.21; OS: adjusted HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.73-4.61].

Conclusions

In first-line chemoimmunotherapy-treated PD-L1-low/negative NSCLC, baseline LIPI can be used to independently stratify PFS and OS and identify a subgroup with poor prognosis. LIPI may support risk stratification at first-line treatment initiation. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize personalized treatment approaches.
化学免疫治疗已经成为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准一线治疗方案之一,但PD-L1低/阴性疾病的预后仍然不理想。我们评估了治疗开始时肺免疫预后指数(LIPI)在该亚组中是否具有预后价值。患者和方法我们在日本9家医院进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究(2016年1月- 2021年9月)。收集临床数据,包括一线治疗开始时的预处理血液检查结果,并用于对LIPI进行分类(良好、中等或较差)。终点为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用Kaplan-Meier检验和log-rank检验;预先设定的多变量Cox模型根据LIPI(较差vs较好/中等)、PD-L1肿瘤比例评分、东部合作肿瘤组表现状况、肝/脑转移、治疗方案和年龄进行调整。结果我们分析了176例患者(中位年龄71岁:pd - l1低,60.8%;pd - l1阴性,39.2%)。中位PFS和OS分别为7.3个月[95%可信区间(CI) 6.4-9.0个月]和21.5个月(95% CI 15.4-24.6个月)。较差的LIPI与较差的预后相关(PFS: 3.6 vs 9.0个月,OS: 7.8 vs 23.9个月,均P <; 0.001)。在多变量模型中,较差的LIPI仍然是独立的预后因素[PFS:校正风险比(HR) 2.64, 95% CI 1.66-4.21;OS:调整后危险度2.82,95% CI 1.73-4.61]。结论在一线化疗免疫治疗的pd - l1低/阴性非小细胞肺癌中,基线LIPI可以独立地划分PFS和OS,并确定预后不良的亚组。LIPI可能支持一线治疗开始时的风险分层。有必要进行前瞻性研究以验证这些发现并优化个性化治疗方法。
{"title":"Impact of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with PD-L1-low/negative tumors receiving chemoimmunotherapy: a real-world multicenter retrospective study","authors":"A. Yoshimura ,&nbsp;T. Takeda ,&nbsp;K. Tanimura ,&nbsp;Y. Chihara ,&nbsp;H. Kawachi ,&nbsp;Y. Yamanaka ,&nbsp;N. Tamiya ,&nbsp;R. Honda ,&nbsp;T. Yamada ,&nbsp;K. Uryu ,&nbsp;S. Shiotsu ,&nbsp;H. Yoshioka ,&nbsp;T. Yamada ,&nbsp;T. Kurata ,&nbsp;K. Takayama","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105906","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105906","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chemoimmunotherapy has become one of the standard first-line treatment options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) strata, yet outcomes in PD-L1-low/negative disease remain suboptimal. We evaluated whether the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) at treatment initiation has prognostic value in this subgroup.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across nine Japanese hospitals (January 2016-September 2021). Clinical data, including results of pretreatment blood tests at first-line treatment initiation, were collected and used to categorize LIPI (good, intermediate, or poor). Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used; prespecified multivariable Cox models were adjusted for LIPI (poor versus good/intermediate), PD-L1 tumor proportion score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, liver/brain metastases, treatment regimen, and age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 176 patients (median age 71 years: PD-L1-low, 60.8%; PD-L1-negative, 39.2%). Median PFS and OS were 7.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.4-9.0 months] and 21.5 months (95% CI 15.4-24.6 months), respectively. Poor LIPI was associated with worse outcomes than good/intermediate LIPI (PFS: 3.6 versus 9.0 months, OS: 7.8 versus 23.9 months, both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). In multivariable models, poor LIPI remained independently prognostic [PFS: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, 95% CI 1.66-4.21; OS: adjusted HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.73-4.61].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In first-line chemoimmunotherapy-treated PD-L1-low/negative NSCLC, baseline LIPI can be used to independently stratify PFS and OS and identify a subgroup with poor prognosis. LIPI may support risk stratification at first-line treatment initiation. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize personalized treatment approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105906"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145570214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Precision medicine strategy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 胰腺导管腺癌的精准医疗策略。
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105899
A. Tarabay , L. Swales , C. Smolenschi , E. Akoury , M. Valéry , A. Fuerea , T. Pudlarz , V. Boige , E. Rouleau , M. Gelli , M.A. Bani , R. Barbe , A. Hollebecque , M. Ducreux , A. Boilève

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer with limited therapeutic options. Integration of molecular profiling may enable personalized treatment approaches. We evaluated the clinical utility of molecularly matched treatment (MMT) in a real-life cohort of PDAC patients.

Patients and methods

A retrospective chart review of clinical/molecular data was carried out, including all PDAC patients with a contributive molecular profile. Survival outcomes were compared across three groups: patients with actionable molecular alterations (MAs) who received MMT (MA/MMT), patients with actionable alterations without MMT (MA/No MMT), and patients without actionable alterations (No MA/No MMT).

Results

Among 342 patients (median age 61 years; 48% female; 95% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1), molecular profiling was carried out using tissue (50%), liquid biopsy (45%), or both (5%). The most common gene alterations were KRAS (84%), TP53 (72%), and CDKN2A (26%). Actionable alterations were found in 69 patients (20%), with 31 (45%) receiving MMT. Targeted therapies included notably olaparib (BRCA2), trastuzumab (HER2), and KRAS G12C inhibitors. Median overall survival (OS) from metastatic diagnosis was significantly longer in the MA/MMT group (32.9 months) compared with MA/No MMT (12.9 months) and No MA/No MMT groups (17.6 months) (P = 0.0008). From initial diagnosis, OS was 34.9, 27.1, and 21.5 months, respectively (P = 0.005). Median progression-free survival from MMT initiation was 5.5 months. The mean growth modulation index was 1.7 in the MA/MMT group versus 0.8 in the MA/No MMT group (P < 0.05). In variate analysis, MMT was correlated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, P < 0.001 from metastasis; HR 0.59, P < 0.01 from diagnosis].

Conclusion

To conclude, molecular profiling identified actionable alterations in 20% of PDAC patients. MMT was associated with a significant survival benefit, supporting molecular profiling into routine management, especially with the perspective of KRAS inhibitors.
背景:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种高致死率的癌症,治疗选择有限。整合分子谱分析可以实现个性化的治疗方法。我们评估了分子匹配治疗(MMT)在现实生活中的PDAC患者队列中的临床应用。患者和方法:对临床/分子数据进行回顾性图表回顾,包括所有具有贡献分子谱的PDAC患者。研究人员比较了三组患者的生存结果:接受MMT治疗的可行动分子改变(MAs)患者(MA/MMT),不接受MMT治疗的可行动分子改变患者(MA/No MMT)和无可行动分子改变患者(No MA/No MMT)。结果:342例患者(中位年龄61岁;48%为女性;95%为东方合作肿瘤组0-1),采用组织(50%)、液体活检(45%)或两者(5%)进行分子谱分析。最常见的基因改变是KRAS(84%)、TP53(72%)和CDKN2A(26%)。69例(20%)患者发现了可操作的改变,其中31例(45%)接受了MMT。靶向治疗包括奥拉帕尼(BRCA2)、曲妥珠单抗(HER2)和KRAS G12C抑制剂。与MA/No MMT组(12.9个月)和No MA/No MMT组(17.6个月)相比,MA/MMT组转移诊断的中位总生存期(OS)明显更长(32.9个月)(P = 0.0008)。自初诊起,总生存期分别为34.9个月、27.1个月和21.5个月(P = 0.005)。MMT开始后的中位无进展生存期为5.5个月。MA/MMT组的平均生长调节指数为1.7,MA/No MMT组的平均生长调节指数为0.8 (P < 0.05)。在变量分析中,MMT与OS改善相关[危险比(HR) 0.51, P < 0.001;HR 0.59, P < 0.01。结论:总而言之,分子分析在20%的PDAC患者中发现了可操作的改变。MMT与显著的生存益处相关,支持分子分析进入常规管理,特别是从KRAS抑制剂的角度来看。
{"title":"Precision medicine strategy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma","authors":"A. Tarabay ,&nbsp;L. Swales ,&nbsp;C. Smolenschi ,&nbsp;E. Akoury ,&nbsp;M. Valéry ,&nbsp;A. Fuerea ,&nbsp;T. Pudlarz ,&nbsp;V. Boige ,&nbsp;E. Rouleau ,&nbsp;M. Gelli ,&nbsp;M.A. Bani ,&nbsp;R. Barbe ,&nbsp;A. Hollebecque ,&nbsp;M. Ducreux ,&nbsp;A. Boilève","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105899","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105899","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer with limited therapeutic options. Integration of molecular profiling may enable personalized treatment approaches. We evaluated the clinical utility of molecularly matched treatment (MMT) in a real-life cohort of PDAC patients.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review of clinical/molecular data was carried out, including all PDAC patients with a contributive molecular profile. Survival outcomes were compared across three groups: patients with actionable molecular alterations (MAs) who received MMT (MA/MMT), patients with actionable alterations without MMT (MA/No MMT), and patients without actionable alterations (No MA/No MMT).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 342 patients (median age 61 years; 48% female; 95% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1), molecular profiling was carried out using tissue (50%), liquid biopsy (45%), or both (5%). The most common gene alterations were <em>KRAS</em> (84%), <em>TP53</em> (72%), and <em>CDKN2A</em> (26%). Actionable alterations were found in 69 patients (20%), with 31 (45%) receiving MMT. Targeted therapies included notably olaparib (BRCA2), trastuzumab (HER2), and KRAS G12C inhibitors. Median overall survival (OS) from metastatic diagnosis was significantly longer in the MA/MMT group (32.9 months) compared with MA/No MMT (12.9 months) and No MA/No MMT groups (17.6 months) (<em>P</em> = 0.0008). From initial diagnosis, OS was 34.9, 27.1, and 21.5 months, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.005). Median progression-free survival from MMT initiation was 5.5 months. The mean growth modulation index was 1.7 in the MA/MMT group versus 0.8 in the MA/No MMT group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In variate analysis, MMT was correlated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 from metastasis; HR 0.59, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01 from diagnosis].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To conclude, molecular profiling identified actionable alterations in 20% of PDAC patients. MMT was associated with a significant survival benefit, supporting molecular profiling into routine management, especially with the perspective of KRAS inhibitors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105899"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First-in-human study of a thorium-227-labeled mesothelin-targeting antibody-chelator conjugate (MSLN-TTC), in patients with malignant mesothelioma and other solid tumors 在恶性间皮瘤和其他实体肿瘤患者中,首次对一种钍-227标记的间皮瘤靶向抗体-螯合剂偶联物(MSLN-TTC)进行人体研究
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105905
A. Minchom , O. Lindén , D.G. Knapen , R. Hassan , F.I. Lin , K. Jalkanen , V. Subbiah , A. Tafuri , D. Ferreira , V. Jardine , A. Cleton , J. Pinkert , F. Bladt , H. Hennekes , E.F. Smit

Introduction

BAY 2287411 [227Th-anetumab corixetan; mesothelin-targeting antibody-chelator conjugate (MSLN-TTC)] is a targeted alpha therapy consisting of a fully human mesothelin-targeting monoclonal antibody conjugated with a 3,2-hydroxypyridinone (3,2-HOPO) chelator radiolabeled with the alpha particle-emitting radionuclide thorium-227. This phase I study determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of MSLN-TTC in mesothelin-expressing mesothelioma and serous ovarian cancer.

Methods

MSLN-TTC was administered i.v. 1.5, 2.5, or 3.5 MBq of thorium-227 and with a total antibody dose of 10, 30, 50, or 150 mg every 6 weeks to 36 patients included in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events, tumor response according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria, and progression-free survival were determined. Tumor mesothelin expression was assessed retrospectively.

Results

In dose escalation, 35 patients (30 with malignant pleural mesothelioma) received MSLN-TTC across three thorium-227 dose levels and four total antibody doses. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached due to treatment discontinuations following 45.7% of the patients developing neutralizing antibodies. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were fatigue (10/36, 27.8%), decreased lymphocyte count (7/36, 19.4%), nausea (7/36, 19.4%), anemia (6/36, 16.7%), and infusion-related reaction (6/36, 16.7%). The disease control rate was 34.3%, including 12 stable diseases (12/36, 34.3%). No complete or partial responses were observed. The median progression-free survival was 70 days (95% confidence interval 29-161 days).

Conclusions

MSLN-TTC showed good tolerability, but the maximum tolerated dose could not be determined due to discontinuations after antidrug antibody formation. Stable disease was observed in 12 out of 36 patients.
[227] th -anetumab corixetan;靶向间皮素抗体-螯合剂缀合物(MSLN-TTC)]是一种靶向α疗法,由一种完全靶向人间皮素的单克隆抗体与一种用α粒子发射放射性核素钍-227放射标记的3,2-羟基吡啶酮(3,2- hopo)螯合剂偶联而成。这项I期研究确定了MSLN-TTC在表达间皮素的间皮瘤和浆液性卵巢癌中的安全性、药代动力学和抗肿瘤活性。方法将smsln - ttc分别以1.5、2.5或3.5 MBq的钍-227和10、30、50或150 mg的总抗体剂量每6周给36例意向治疗人群。根据RECIST 1.1和mRECIST标准确定不良事件、肿瘤反应和无进展生存期。回顾性评估肿瘤间皮素表达。结果在剂量递增过程中,35例患者(30例恶性胸膜间皮瘤)接受了3个钍-227剂量水平和4个总抗体剂量的MSLN-TTC治疗。没有观察到剂量限制性毒性,并且由于45.7%的患者产生中和抗体后停止治疗而未达到最大耐受剂量。最常见的治疗不良事件是疲劳(10/ 36,27.8%)、淋巴细胞计数减少(7/ 36,19.4%)、恶心(7/ 36,19.4%)、贫血(6/ 36,16.7%)和输液相关反应(6/ 36,16.7%)。疾病控制率为34.3%,其中病情稳定者12例(12/36,34.3%)。未观察到完全或部分反应。中位无进展生存期为70天(95%置信区间29-161天)。结论smsln - ttc具有良好的耐受性,但由于抗药抗体形成后停药,不能确定最大耐受剂量。36例患者中12例病情稳定。
{"title":"First-in-human study of a thorium-227-labeled mesothelin-targeting antibody-chelator conjugate (MSLN-TTC), in patients with malignant mesothelioma and other solid tumors","authors":"A. Minchom ,&nbsp;O. Lindén ,&nbsp;D.G. Knapen ,&nbsp;R. Hassan ,&nbsp;F.I. Lin ,&nbsp;K. Jalkanen ,&nbsp;V. Subbiah ,&nbsp;A. Tafuri ,&nbsp;D. Ferreira ,&nbsp;V. Jardine ,&nbsp;A. Cleton ,&nbsp;J. Pinkert ,&nbsp;F. Bladt ,&nbsp;H. Hennekes ,&nbsp;E.F. Smit","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105905","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105905","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>BAY 2287411 [<sup>227</sup>Th-anetumab corixetan; mesothelin-targeting antibody-chelator conjugate (MSLN-TTC)] is a targeted alpha therapy consisting of a fully human mesothelin-targeting monoclonal antibody conjugated with a 3,2-hydroxypyridinone (3,2-HOPO) chelator radiolabeled with the alpha particle-emitting radionuclide thorium-227. This phase I study determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of MSLN-TTC in mesothelin-expressing mesothelioma and serous ovarian cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MSLN-TTC was administered i.v. 1.5, 2.5, or 3.5 MBq of thorium-227 and with a total antibody dose of 10, 30, 50, or 150 mg every 6 weeks to 36 patients included in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events, tumor response according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria, and progression-free survival were determined. Tumor mesothelin expression was assessed retrospectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In dose escalation, 35 patients (30 with malignant pleural mesothelioma) received MSLN-TTC across three thorium-227 dose levels and four total antibody doses. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached due to treatment discontinuations following 45.7% of the patients developing neutralizing antibodies. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were fatigue (10/36, 27.8%), decreased lymphocyte count (7/36, 19.4%), nausea (7/36, 19.4%), anemia (6/36, 16.7%), and infusion-related reaction (6/36, 16.7%). The disease control rate was 34.3%, including 12 stable diseases (12/36, 34.3%). No complete or partial responses were observed. The median progression-free survival was 70 days (95% confidence interval 29-161 days).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MSLN-TTC showed good tolerability, but the maximum tolerated dose could not be determined due to discontinuations after antidrug antibody formation. Stable disease was observed in 12 out of 36 patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105905"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145570164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Whole-exome ctDNA sequencing reveals intratumoral heterogeneity and drivers of relapse in locally advanced head and neck cancer 全外显子组ctDNA测序揭示了局部晚期头颈癌肿瘤内异质性和复发驱动因素
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105904
G. Bruixola , J. Martín-Arana , F. Gimeno-Valiente , J.A. Carbonell-Asins , B. García-Micó , B. Martínez-Castedo , D. González-Camblor , N. Grimalt , M. García-Bartolomé , C. Alfaro-Cervelló , V. Escorihuela , M.E. Iglesias , M. Maroñas , D. Dualde , A. Cervantes , N. Tarazona

Background

The mechanisms underlying tumor evolution and treatment resistance in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) are not fully understood. This study used whole-exome sequencing (WES) of paired tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to analyze intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) and clonal dynamics at diagnosis and relapse.

Patients and methods

Between January 2017 and September 2022, we enrolled 152 patients with LA-HNSCC treated with radical chemoradiotherapy. Tumor tissue and plasma samples were collected at baseline and at relapse. WES was carried out on DNA extracted from tissue, plasma, and germline samples. Oncogenic variants were analyzed to evaluate tumor evolution and ITH. Concordance, pathway alterations, and associations with survival were examined.

Results

Out of the 152 patients selected, 81 were excluded based on clinical criteria. Of the 71 remaining patients, 37 had the complete set of samples of adequate quality for analysis. The most frequent mutations involved TP53 (48%), KMT2D (34%), and NOTCH1 (34%) at diagnosis. Pathogenic germline variants, including actionable mutations in BRCA2, CHK2, and KIT, were identified in 13.5% of cases. Concordance between tissue and plasma was low (median 11.8% at baseline, 12.4% at relapse), with up to 67% of oncogenic variants found only in ctDNA. Longitudinal analysis revealed limited overlap (10.3%) between baseline and relapse ctDNA, with some emerging resistance-associated mutations in PI3K-mTORC2 and ATM-CHK2 pathways. Alterations in IL6-JAK-STAT3 and RHO GTPase pathways were enriched in locoregional relapses (adjusted P < 0.001). Mutations in MMP15 and PTPRE were linked to shorter locoregional progression-free survival, whereas PDE2A mutations were associated with prolonged progression-free survival.

Conclusions

WES of ctDNA uncovers extensive ITH and identifies molecular drivers of resistance not captured by tissue biopsies. These findings support the use of plasma ctDNA analysis to monitor tumor evolution and personalize follow-up in LA-HNSCC, especially given the anatomical complexity that often limits repeated tissue sampling.
背景:局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA-HNSCC)的肿瘤演变和耐药机制尚不完全清楚。本研究使用配对肿瘤组织和循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)的全外显子组测序(WES)来分析肿瘤内异质性(ITH)和诊断和复发时的克隆动力学。患者和方法在2017年1月至2022年9月期间,我们招募了152例接受根治性放化疗的LA-HNSCC患者。在基线和复发时收集肿瘤组织和血浆样本。对组织、血浆和种系样本提取的DNA进行WES检测。分析致瘤变异以评估肿瘤演变和ITH。研究了一致性、通路改变以及与生存的关系。结果入选的152例患者中,根据临床标准排除81例。在剩下的71例患者中,有37例有完整的、质量足够的样本供分析。诊断时最常见的突变包括TP53(48%)、KMT2D(34%)和NOTCH1(34%)。在13.5%的病例中发现了致病性种系变异,包括BRCA2、CHK2和KIT的可操作突变。组织和血浆之间的一致性较低(基线时中位数为11.8%,复发时中位数为12.4%),高达67%的致癌变异仅在ctDNA中发现。纵向分析显示,基线和复发ctDNA之间的重叠有限(10.3%),PI3K-mTORC2和ATM-CHK2途径中出现了一些与耐药相关的突变。IL6-JAK-STAT3和RHO GTPase通路的改变在局部复发中富集(调整P <; 0.001)。MMP15和PTPRE突变与较短的局部无进展生存期有关,而PDE2A突变与延长的无进展生存期有关。结论ctDNA的swes揭示了广泛的ITH,并确定了组织活检未捕获的耐药分子驱动因素。这些发现支持血浆ctDNA分析用于监测LA-HNSCC的肿瘤演变和个性化随访,特别是考虑到解剖复杂性通常限制重复组织采样。
{"title":"Whole-exome ctDNA sequencing reveals intratumoral heterogeneity and drivers of relapse in locally advanced head and neck cancer","authors":"G. Bruixola ,&nbsp;J. Martín-Arana ,&nbsp;F. Gimeno-Valiente ,&nbsp;J.A. Carbonell-Asins ,&nbsp;B. García-Micó ,&nbsp;B. Martínez-Castedo ,&nbsp;D. González-Camblor ,&nbsp;N. Grimalt ,&nbsp;M. García-Bartolomé ,&nbsp;C. Alfaro-Cervelló ,&nbsp;V. Escorihuela ,&nbsp;M.E. Iglesias ,&nbsp;M. Maroñas ,&nbsp;D. Dualde ,&nbsp;A. Cervantes ,&nbsp;N. Tarazona","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105904","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105904","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The mechanisms underlying tumor evolution and treatment resistance in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) are not fully understood. This study used whole-exome sequencing (WES) of paired tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to analyze intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) and clonal dynamics at diagnosis and relapse.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Between January 2017 and September 2022, we enrolled 152 patients with LA-HNSCC treated with radical chemoradiotherapy. Tumor tissue and plasma samples were collected at baseline and at relapse. WES was carried out on DNA extracted from tissue, plasma, and germline samples. Oncogenic variants were analyzed to evaluate tumor evolution and ITH. Concordance, pathway alterations, and associations with survival were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of the 152 patients selected, 81 were excluded based on clinical criteria. Of the 71 remaining patients, 37 had the complete set of samples of adequate quality for analysis. The most frequent mutations involved <em>TP53</em> (48%), <em>KMT2D</em> (34%), and <em>NOTCH1</em> (34%) at diagnosis. Pathogenic germline variants, including actionable mutations in <em>BRCA2, CHK2</em>, and <em>KIT</em>, were identified in 13.5% of cases. Concordance between tissue and plasma was low (median 11.8% at baseline, 12.4% at relapse), with up to 67% of oncogenic variants found only in ctDNA. Longitudinal analysis revealed limited overlap (10.3%) between baseline and relapse ctDNA, with some emerging resistance-associated mutations in PI3K-mTORC2 and ATM-CHK2 pathways. Alterations in IL6-JAK-STAT3 and RHO GTPase pathways were enriched in locoregional relapses (adjusted <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Mutations in MMP15 and PTPRE were linked to shorter locoregional progression-free survival, whereas PDE2A mutations were associated with prolonged progression-free survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>WES of ctDNA uncovers extensive ITH and identifies molecular drivers of resistance not captured by tissue biopsies. These findings support the use of plasma ctDNA analysis to monitor tumor evolution and personalize follow-up in LA-HNSCC, especially given the anatomical complexity that often limits repeated tissue sampling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105904"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145570213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BAP BRAIN): an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase III study 贝伐单抗联合化疗对未治疗的晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者(BAP brain)的化疗:一项开放标签、随机、多中心、III期研究
IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105908
M. Li , Y. Pan , G. Jiang , Q. Wang , G. Wu , W. Feng , C. Zhou , Q. Bu , S. Ma , H. Jiang , J. Chen , H. Yu , M. Yu , Q. Liu , X. Hou , L. Chen

Background

There is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials of antiangiogenic therapy in patients with brain metastases. We conducted this phase III, randomized, multicenter study (BAP BRAIN) to evaluate the intracranial efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases, and provide evidence for this previously unexplored subgroup.

Patients and methods

Treatment-naïve, non-squamous NSCLC patients with confirmed brain metastases and without sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations were screened from 11 centers in China. The eligible patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum or pemetrexed–platinum for four to six cycles, followed by bevacizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed maintenance until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate (iORR), systemic ORR, and safety.

Results

A total of 160 patients were eligible and underwent randomization, and 153 patients received at least one dose of drug and were included in the full analysis set. After a median follow-up of 16.8 months, the median iPFS was 11.07 months in the bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group versus 7.37 months in the pemetrexed–platinum group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.494, P < 0.001]. Similarly, the median systemic PFS was significantly longer with bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum than with pemetrexed–platinum alone (8.77 months versus 5.23 months, HR 0.540, P < 0.001). The bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group had better iORR (69.6% versus 32.4%) and ORR (58.2% versus 27.0%) and remission rate of cerebral edema (88.9% versus 41.9%) than the pemetrexed–platinum group. At data cut-off, the median OS was 28.07 months in the bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group versus 18.53 months in the pemetrexed–platinum group (HR 0.752, P = 0.162). There was no grade ≥3 intracranial hemorrhage, and most of the adverse events were manageable.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated encouraging intracranial efficacy and acceptable safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC and brain metastases in the first-line setting.
背景:目前还缺乏对脑转移患者进行抗血管生成治疗的前瞻性随机对照试验。我们进行了这项III期、随机、多中心研究(BAP BRAIN),以评估贝伐单抗加化疗在非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和脑转移患者的颅内疗效和安全性,并为这一以前未被探索的亚组提供证据。从中国11个中心筛选确诊脑转移且无致敏性表皮生长因子受体或间变性淋巴瘤激酶突变的患者和methodsTreatment-naïve、非鳞状NSCLC患者。符合条件的患者被随机分配(1:1)接受贝伐单抗加培美曲塞铂或培美曲塞铂治疗4 - 6个周期,随后贝伐单抗加培美曲塞或培美曲塞维持,直到疾病进展、不可接受的毒性或死亡。主要终点是颅内无进展生存期(iPFS),次要终点包括PFS、总生存期(OS)、颅内客观缓解率(iORR)、全身缓解率(ORR)和安全性。结果160例患者纳入随机分组,153例患者接受至少一剂药物治疗,纳入完整分析集。中位随访16.8个月后,贝伐单抗联合培美曲塞-铂组的中位iPFS为11.07个月,培美曲塞-铂组为7.37个月[风险比(HR) 0.494, P < 0.001]。同样,贝伐单抗联合培美曲塞-铂组的中位全身PFS明显比单独使用培美曲塞-铂组更长(8.77个月对5.23个月,HR 0.540, P < 0.001)。贝伐单抗联合培美曲塞-铂组的iORR(69.6%对32.4%)和ORR(58.2%对27.0%)以及脑水肿缓解率(88.9%对41.9%)优于培美曲塞-铂组。截止数据时,贝伐单抗联合培美曲塞-铂组的中位OS为28.07个月,培美曲塞-铂组为18.53个月(HR 0.752, P = 0.162)。无≥3级颅内出血,大多数不良事件可控制。结论:本研究显示贝伐单抗联合化疗在非鳞状NSCLC和脑转移患者的一线治疗中具有令人鼓舞的颅内疗效和可接受的安全性。
{"title":"Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BAP BRAIN): an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase III study","authors":"M. Li ,&nbsp;Y. Pan ,&nbsp;G. Jiang ,&nbsp;Q. Wang ,&nbsp;G. Wu ,&nbsp;W. Feng ,&nbsp;C. Zhou ,&nbsp;Q. Bu ,&nbsp;S. Ma ,&nbsp;H. Jiang ,&nbsp;J. Chen ,&nbsp;H. Yu ,&nbsp;M. Yu ,&nbsp;Q. Liu ,&nbsp;X. Hou ,&nbsp;L. Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105908","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105908","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials of antiangiogenic therapy in patients with brain metastases. We conducted this phase III, randomized, multicenter study (BAP BRAIN) to evaluate the intracranial efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases, and provide evidence for this previously unexplored subgroup.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Treatment-naïve, non-squamous NSCLC patients with confirmed brain metastases and without sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations were screened from 11 centers in China. The eligible patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum or pemetrexed–platinum for four to six cycles, followed by bevacizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed maintenance until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate (iORR), systemic ORR, and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 160 patients were eligible and underwent randomization, and 153 patients received at least one dose of drug and were included in the full analysis set. After a median follow-up of 16.8 months, the median iPFS was 11.07 months in the bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group versus 7.37 months in the pemetrexed–platinum group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.494, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001]. Similarly, the median systemic PFS was significantly longer with bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum than with pemetrexed–platinum alone (8.77 months versus 5.23 months, HR 0.540, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group had better iORR (69.6% versus 32.4%) and ORR (58.2% versus 27.0%) and remission rate of cerebral edema (88.9% versus 41.9%) than the pemetrexed–platinum group. At data cut-off, the median OS was 28.07 months in the bevacizumab plus pemetrexed–platinum group versus 18.53 months in the pemetrexed–platinum group (HR 0.752, <em>P</em> = 0.162). There was no grade ≥3 intracranial hemorrhage, and most of the adverse events were manageable.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated encouraging intracranial efficacy and acceptable safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC and brain metastases in the first-line setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 12","pages":"Article 105908"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145570163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
ESMO Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1