ESMO Open最新文献

Background: Nivolumab-based therapies are efficacious with acceptable safety in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). Novel nivolumab-based combination immunotherapies may offer enhanced efficacy in these indications. FRACTION-GC was a signal-seeking, randomized, open-label, phase II adaptive-design trial assessing efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab [cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibody], relatlimab (lymphocyte-activation gene 3 antibody), or IDO1i (BMS986205, an indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 inhibitor) in patients with unresectable, advanced/metastatic GC/GEJC.

Patients and methods: Previously treated patients with GC/GEJC were randomized to receive nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab + relatlimab, or nivolumab + IDO1i across two tracks: anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1/anti-CTLA-4-naïve (track 1) and -experienced (track 2). Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by investigator per RECIST v1.1, duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoint was safety.

Results: Eighty-one patients in track 1 and 81 in track 2 received one combination therapy. With a median follow-up of 50.2 months, ORR [95% confidence interval (CI)] by investigator for nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab + relatlimab, and nivolumab + IDO1i in track 1 was 4% (0.1% to 21.9%), 5% (0.1% to 24.9%), and 13% (4.4% to 28.1%), and for track 2 was 9% (1.1% to 28.0%), 6% (0.7% to 18.7%), and 0% (0% to 15.4%), respectively. PFS rate at 24 weeks (95% CI) was 24% (11% to 39%) for nivolumab + IDO1i track 1, 17% (16% to 32%) for nivolumab + relatlimab track 2, and not estimable for other treatment arms. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 22%, 5%, and 18% of patients receiving nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab + relatlimab, and nivolumab + IDO1i in track 1 and in 35%, 11%, and 18% of patients in track 2, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions: While ORR did not meet prespecified expansion criteria in any treatment arm, the safety profile of the combinations was manageable. FRACTION-GC represents a novel adaptive protocol for testing multiple combination immunotherapies.

Background: Many patients with cancer exhibit primary or rapid secondary resistance to targeted therapy (TT). We hypothesized that a higher number of altered oncogenic signaling pathways [pathway alteration load (PAL)] would reduce the benefit of TT which only intervenes in one pathway. This hypothesis was tested in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).

Patients and methods: DRUP is a prospective, pan-cancer, non-randomized clinical trial (NCT02925234) that treats patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancer and an actionable molecular profile using matched off-label targeted and immunotherapies. All patients treated with TT with available clinical outcomes and whole genome sequencing were included. PAL was determined based on driver gene alterations and correlated with clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were validated in the independent Hartwig Medical database of metastatic cancers.

Results: In 154 patients treated with TT, the median PAL was 3. Patients with a PAL below median (n = 60) demonstrated a higher CBR (41.7% versus 25.5%, odds ratio 0.48, P = 0.051), longer PFS [median 4.7 versus 2.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.70, P = 0.020] and OS (median 13.7 versus 5.6 months, aHR 3.80, P < 0.001) compared with those with PAL ≥3. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients in the Hartwig database showed similar results for CBR (54.2% versus 36.7%, odds ratio 2.04, P = 0.009) and PFS (7.0 versus 4.2 months, aHR 1.55, P = 0.009).

Conclusions: In our population, PAL emerged as a pan-cancer determinant of outcome to TT. Our findings support refined patient selection for TT and highlight the rationale for combinatorial treatment strategies in patients with multiple affected pathways.

Background: Daratumumab-refractory multiple myeloma (Dara-R MM) presents a significant treatment challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and survival outcomes of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloPd) in a large, real-world cohort of patients with Dara-R MM, with particular focus on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis included 247 Dara-R MM patients treated with EloPd. All patients were also refractory to lenalidomide, with 51.4% to a proteasome inhibitor, thus classified as triple-class refractory (TCR). Survival risk-scoring systems for PFS (progression-free risk score-PRS_DaraR) and OS (survival risk score-SRS_DaraR) were developed to stratify patients based on their risk profiles.

Results: The overall response rate was 52.6%, with a median PFS and OS of 6.6 and 17.0 months, respectively. The International Staging System (ISS) stages II and III, low hemoglobin (Hb) levels, the last therapy being daratumumab, and symptomatic relapse were identified as significant independent predictors of shorter PFS in multivariable analysis. In addition to advanced ISS stages, low Hb levels (<10.6 g/dl), symptomatic relapse, and refractory disease exhibited an independent negative impact on OS. Importantly, no significant differences in both PFS and OS were observed between TCR and non-TCR patients. Based on these multivariable analyses, we developed PRS_DaraR and SRS_DaraR according to the magnitude of the hazard ratio. In PRS_DaraR, 10.1% were low-risk, 41.3% intermediate, 43.3% high, and 5.3% very high-risk. The 12-month PFS probabilities were 86.3% (low), 67.6% (intermediate), 52.9% (high), and 31.8% (very high). For SRS_DaraR, 6.1% were low-risk, 47.8% intermediate, 19.4% high, and 26.7% very high. The 12-month OS probabilities were 90.9% (low), 75.7% (intermediate), 55.9% (high), and 32.6% (very high).

Conclusions: This study supports EloPd as an effective treatment option in Dara-R MM patients, providing valuable disease control and acting as a potential bridge to newer therapies, such as CAR-T and bispecific antibodies.

Background: Intimal sarcoma is a rare and aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma with limited treatment options. We explored genomic profiles of intimal sarcoma to uncover therapeutic implications.

Materials and methods: We analyzed tumor tissues from patients with intimal sarcoma who visited the Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) using whole-exome, whole-transcriptome, and clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS), integrated with intimal sarcoma NGS data from two public cohorts. We examined expression characteristics and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) according to molecular subtypes.

Results: Our study included 42 samples in total. Thirty-three patients showing copy number variation (CNV) enrichment with frequent CDK4/MDM2 amplifications were classified as the CNV-high (CNV-H) subtype. Five patients showing predominant MLH1 mutations or homozygous deletions were classified as the microsatellite instability-high-like (MSI-H-like) subtype. Hallmark pathways up-regulated in the CNV-H subtype included Wnt β-catenin and Hedgehog signaling. In the MSI-H-like subtype, interferon-γ response, tumor necrosis factor-α signaling via nuclear factor-κB, interferon-α response, inflammatory response, and interleukin-6-Jak-Stat3 signaling were up-regulated. CNV-H subtype samples predominantly showed an immune-desert phenotype, whereas MSI-H-like subtype samples predominantly showed an immune-inflamed phenotype. Two MSI-H-like subtype patients received pembrolizumab and experienced tumor shrinkage.

Conclusions: We identified two intimal sarcoma molecular subtypes. Compared with CNV-H, MSI-H-like is enriched in pathways associated with tumor immune responses and TILs. Further efforts and clinical trials to better define these molecular subtypes are warranted to open new avenues for personalized treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes.

Background: Concomitant intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may create drug-drug interactions, potentially impacting efficacy of anticancer agents. In the phase III PALLAS trial, the addition of palbociclib capsules to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). We explored whether concomitant use of PPIs affected survival outcomes in patients treated with palbociclib in PALLAS.

Methods: This is an exploratory analysis of PALLAS including patients who received at least one dose of palbociclib capsules. We aimed to determine the association of concomitant PPI use with iDFS, distant relapse-free survival and overall survival. Uni- and multivariable Cox models with time-dependent PPI were used. The association between PPI use and neutropenia was also investigated.

Results: Of 2840 patients treated with palbociclib + endocrine therapy, 525 (18.5%) had concomitant PPI and palbociclib intake. PPI intake was significantly associated with older age, post-menopausal status, use of aromatase inhibitors, higher body mass index, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (all P < 0.001). Concomitant PPI intake was not significantly associated with survival outcomes (iDFS, distant relapse-free survival, overall survival). All-grade neutropenia rates were numerically lower in patients who initiated a PPI before study start compared with patients never initiating PPIs (adjusted odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.09).

Conclusions: Our exploratory analysis did not demonstrate worse survival outcomes in patients receiving concomitant palbociclib and PPIs in PALLAS. Nonetheless, careful consideration of possible drug-drug interactions is important, especially when studying novel agents in the early breast cancer setting.

Background: Cancer researchers frequently consider the use of single-arm and randomized controlled clinical trial designs that leverage external data. The literature has reported extensively on how the use of external data can introduce bias through a variety of distortion mechanisms. In this article, we focus on a distortion mechanism that is often overlooked: informative censoring. Informative censoring arises when there is statistical dependence between patients' censoring times and survival times.

Materials and methods: We used simulations to investigate how informative censoring of external controls (ECs) can influence the results of cancer clinical trials. Our simulations included the following: (i) model-based replicates of clinical trials and in silico glioblastoma trials obtained by resampling patients from completed phase III trials; (ii) single-arm and randomized controlled cancer clinical trial designs; and (iii) different types of informative censoring, with positive or negative associations between censoring times and survival times.

Results: Our simulations showed that informative censoring of EC data can bias cancer clinical trial results. The direction of the bias depends on the censoring mechanism. Similarly, informative censoring can inflate or reduce type I error and power.

Conclusions: Selection of EC data and the decision to leverage these data in the analysis of clinical trials should account for the risk of bias due to informative censoring. Analyses to detect informative censoring are recommended when the clinical trial design involves external data.

Background: Non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a challenging scenario: the rarity of the disease, the limited number of completed prospective trials, and the shortcomings of comparability across series produce several controversial topics and unanswered questions. Guideline recommendations usually include all the different therapeutic options, de facto transferring to the multidisciplinary team the responsibility on the final decision. This secondary analysis of the GARIBALDI study was aimed to explore the correlation of center type, self-declared volume, and commitment with the overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic PDAC.

Patients and methods: Treatment-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with a pathological diagnosis of non-metastatic PDAC, enrolled between July 2017 and October 2019, were analyzed. OS was defined as the time from treatment start to death. The impact of centers and clinical-demographic characteristics on OS was evaluated using Cox models.

Results: Overall, 402 patients enrolled in 41 centers were eligible for this analysis. The median age was 68.4 years (range 35.6-88.8 years), 49.5% were females, 93.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 16.7% had prior cancer history, and the median CA 19-9 level was 171.5 IU/ml (first-third quartile 24.5-937.5 IU/ml). For 79.8% of patients treatment started within 1 month from diagnosis. Thirty six point six percent of patients underwent upfront surgery and 91.8% of these received a subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy; 14.2% received chemotherapy followed by surgery and 49.3% chemotherapy without surgery. The preferred chemotherapy schemes were gemcitabine (54.8%) for adjuvant chemotherapy and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (55.3%) for upfront chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 57.6 months and 300 patients died. A statistically significant shorter OS was observed in both low- [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-2.32, P = 0.0099] and medium-commitment (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10-2.23, P = 0.0120) compared to high-commitment institutions, when adjusting for clinically relevant covariates.

Conclusion: The GARIBALDI study suggests that the volume and the academic brand are not associated with OS in patients with non-metastatic PDAC, while center commitment warrants further exploration.

Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy with few established chemotherapy options and a dismal prognosis. We investigated the expression of claudin 18.2, nectin-4, human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in SBA to identify potential antibody drug targets and analyzed associated clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with SBA who underwent adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy at our hospital between July 2010 and July 2023. Pathological samples were immunohistochemically stained for claudin 18.2, nectin-4, HER3, and PD-L1. Overall survival (OS) was assessed in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy to examine its association with the expression of each protein, excluding those with microsatellite instability-high who were treated with immunotherapy.

Results: Pathological samples and clinical data were available for 51 patients. The primary lesion was in the duodenum in 49% of these patients and in the jejunum or ileum in 51%. Positive rates for claudin 18.2, nectin-4, and HER3 were 35%, 82%, and 88%, respectively. All cases expressed at least one of the proteins, and 25% expressed all three proteins. The PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was <1, 1-5, and ≥5 in 33%, 32%, and 35%, respectively; nectin-4-positive samples showed higher CPS. Neither claudin 18.2 nor HER3 positivity was associated with OS. However, nectin-4 positivity was associated with significantly shorter OS [12.6 versus 43.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) 5.12, P = 0.006]. Similarly, PD-L1 CPS ≥5 was associated with shorter OS relative to CPS <5 (9.7 versus 18.0 months, HR 2.60, P = 0.028). Multivariate analysis identified nectin-4 positivity (HR 4.55, P = 0.020) as an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS.

Conclusions: Claudin 18.2, nectin-4, and HER3 are potential therapeutic targets in SBA, and nectin-4 positivity is independently associated with an unfavorable prognosis. These proteins may represent new therapeutic targets for SBA.

Background: Randomized controlled trials have shown inconsistent overall survival (OS) benefit among the three cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as first-line (1L) treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Several real-world studies compared CDK4/6i effectiveness, with inconsistent findings. This study compared overall survival (OS) of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), in US clinical practice.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study used real-world data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified longitudinal database. Patients with HR+/HER2- mBC aged ≥18 years at mBC diagnosis started 1L CDK4/6i therapy (index treatment) between February 2015 and November 2023, with a potential ≥6-month follow-up. OS was defined as months from start of index treatment to death. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW; primary analysis) was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was carried out as a sensitivity analysis.

Results: Of 9146 eligible patients, 6831, 1279, and 1036 received palbociclib plus AI, ribociclib plus AI, or abemaciclib plus AI, respectively. After sIPTW, baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. After sIPTW, no significant OS differences were found between treatment groups [ribociclib versus palbociclib: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.10, P = 0.7531; abemaciclib versus palbociclib: aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.08, P = 0.4292; abemaciclib versus ribociclib: aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.14, P = 0.6956]. Sensitivity analysis including a subanalysis of patients who started index treatment in 2017 or later also showed no significant OS differences between treatment groups.

Conclusions: This large real-world study suggested that there were no significant OS differences between 1L ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib in combination with an AI for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC. These findings together with other factors such as safety and quality of life are helpful in the selection of CDK4/6i combination therapy for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC.

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer, increasing morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy for BMs can be effective, with the triple combination of trastuzumab, capecitabine, and tucatinib being a potential standard. More recently, intracranial activity of antibody-drug conjugates has been reported, but the size of individual studies has been small. Therefore, this patient-level pooled analysis was conducted.

Patients and methods: This is a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective phase II DEBBRAH and TUXEDO-1 trials and the retrospective DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort. Patients with evaluable active BMs (defined as newly diagnosed and untreated or progressing with measurable tumor-related size after previous local therapy) from HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) and treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) included in these studies were eligible. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)-BM criteria.

Results: Overall, 37 patients were assessable for intracranial response assessment. BMs progressing after prior local therapy were present in 64.9% of patients. The median patient age was 49.1 years. All patients had received prior trastuzumab and the median number of prior systemic treatment lines was 3 (0-13). The pooled ORR-IC by RANO-BM criteria was 64.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.5% to 79.8%] with low heterogeneity observed between the studies included. The clinical benefit rate by RANO-BM was 81.1% (95% CI 64.8% to 92.0%). The median progression-free survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-22.6 months) and the median overall survival was 22.5 months (95% CI 14.9 months-not achieved) with high heterogeneity between studies and numerically longer in patients with few prior treatment lines. Quality of life remained stable throughout treatment, with no new safety concerns.

Conclusions: This patient-level pooled analysis of DEBBRAH, TUXEDO-1, and the DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort indicates clinically relevant intracranial activity of T-DXd in patients with active HER2-positive BC, BMs, and extensive systemic pretreatment. The results therefore support the use of T-DXd when clinically indicated irrespective of BMs.