Pub Date : 2025-02-21DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02787-w
Anders Peter Skovsen, Thomas Korgaard Jensen, Ismail Gögenur, Mai-Britt Tolstrup
Purpose: In the elective setting, there are high mortality rates for patients with liver cirrhosis after surgery. Few studies focus on emergency surgery. This study investigates mortality and morbidity of patients with cirrhosis undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.
Methods: In a database established at two Copenhagen University Hospitals (Herlev and North Zealand), including all patients operated in an emergency setting (n = 1116), including all patients with known cirrhosis at time of surgery. Postoperative complications, and mortality rates were evaluated by a matched case-control method, matching cases and controls according to surgical procedure, age, sex and American Society of Anaesthesiologists-class (ASA). Medical and surgical complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Results: In the study, 24 patients with cirrhosis and 48 matched controls were evaluated. The 30-day mortality was 37.5% for patients with cirrhosis and 12.5% for controls (OR 4.2, 95% CI [1.28, 13.80], p = 0.014) and 90-day mortality was 62.5% for patients with cirrhosis compared to 18.8% for controls (OR 7.22, 95% CI [2.41, 21.68], p < 0.001). For patients with cirrhosis 58.3% had surgical complications compared to 31.3% for the controls (p = 0.027). The reoperation rate was 45.8% in the cirrhosis group and 22.9% in the control group (p = 0.047). The days-alive-out-of-hospital at 90-days (DAOH-90) was 9 days in the cirrhosis group and 78 days in the control group (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This retrospective study shows that patients with cirrhosis have significantly higher mortality rates after emergency surgery, more surgical complications and reoperations, and reduced DAOH-90.
目的:在选择性的情况下,肝硬化患者术后死亡率高。很少有研究关注急诊手术。本研究探讨肝硬化患者急诊腹部手术的死亡率和发病率。方法:在哥本哈根大学两家医院(Herlev和North Zealand)建立的数据库中,包括所有在急诊环境下手术的患者(n = 1116),包括所有手术时已知肝硬化的患者。术后并发症和死亡率采用配对病例-对照法,根据手术方式、年龄、性别和美国麻醉医师学会分级(ASA)进行配对病例和对照。根据Clavien-Dindo分类对内科和外科并发症进行分类。结果:在研究中,24例肝硬化患者和48例匹配对照进行了评估。肝硬化患者30天死亡率为37.5%,对照组为12.5% (OR为4.2,95% CI [1.28, 13.80], p = 0.014),肝硬化患者90天死亡率为62.5%,对照组为18.8% (OR为7.22,95% CI [2.41, 21.68], p结论:本回顾性研究显示,肝硬化患者急诊手术后死亡率明显高于对照组,手术并发症和再手术较多,dao -90降低。
{"title":"A high rate of mortality in liver cirrhosis patients after emergency abdominal surgery.","authors":"Anders Peter Skovsen, Thomas Korgaard Jensen, Ismail Gögenur, Mai-Britt Tolstrup","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02787-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02787-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the elective setting, there are high mortality rates for patients with liver cirrhosis after surgery. Few studies focus on emergency surgery. This study investigates mortality and morbidity of patients with cirrhosis undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a database established at two Copenhagen University Hospitals (Herlev and North Zealand), including all patients operated in an emergency setting (n = 1116), including all patients with known cirrhosis at time of surgery. Postoperative complications, and mortality rates were evaluated by a matched case-control method, matching cases and controls according to surgical procedure, age, sex and American Society of Anaesthesiologists-class (ASA). Medical and surgical complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, 24 patients with cirrhosis and 48 matched controls were evaluated. The 30-day mortality was 37.5% for patients with cirrhosis and 12.5% for controls (OR 4.2, 95% CI [1.28, 13.80], p = 0.014) and 90-day mortality was 62.5% for patients with cirrhosis compared to 18.8% for controls (OR 7.22, 95% CI [2.41, 21.68], p < 0.001). For patients with cirrhosis 58.3% had surgical complications compared to 31.3% for the controls (p = 0.027). The reoperation rate was 45.8% in the cirrhosis group and 22.9% in the control group (p = 0.047). The days-alive-out-of-hospital at 90-days (DAOH-90) was 9 days in the cirrhosis group and 78 days in the control group (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study shows that patients with cirrhosis have significantly higher mortality rates after emergency surgery, more surgical complications and reoperations, and reduced DAOH-90.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143467387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02779-w
Le Nguyen Binh, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Pham Thi Uyen Nhi, Do Le Hoang Son, Nguyen Bach, Hoang Quoc Huy, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Jiunn-Horng Kang
Objectives: Pediatric elbow fractures are a common injury among children. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in diagnosing these fractures. This study systematically evaluated the performance of DL models in detecting pediatric elbow fractures.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore for studies published up to October 20, 2023. Studies employing DL models for detecting elbow fractures in patients aged 0 to 16 years were included. Key performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023470558).
Results: The search identified 22 studies, of which six met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of DL models for pediatric elbow fracture detection was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Specificity values ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 across studies, with a pooled estimate of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). The AUC ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, with a pooled estimate of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Further analysis highlighted the impact of preprocessing techniques and the choice of model backbone architecture on performance.
Conclusion: DL models demonstrate exceptional accuracy in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. For optimal performance, we recommend leveraging backbone architectures like ResNet, combined with manual preprocessing supervised by radiology and orthopedic experts.
{"title":"Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Le Nguyen Binh, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Pham Thi Uyen Nhi, Do Le Hoang Son, Nguyen Bach, Hoang Quoc Huy, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Jiunn-Horng Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02779-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02779-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric elbow fractures are a common injury among children. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in diagnosing these fractures. This study systematically evaluated the performance of DL models in detecting pediatric elbow fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore for studies published up to October 20, 2023. Studies employing DL models for detecting elbow fractures in patients aged 0 to 16 years were included. Key performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023470558).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 22 studies, of which six met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of DL models for pediatric elbow fracture detection was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Specificity values ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 across studies, with a pooled estimate of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). The AUC ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, with a pooled estimate of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Further analysis highlighted the impact of preprocessing techniques and the choice of model backbone architecture on performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL models demonstrate exceptional accuracy in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. For optimal performance, we recommend leveraging backbone architectures like ResNet, combined with manual preprocessing supervised by radiology and orthopedic experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02792-z
Jennie S Kim, Chih Ying Chien, Meghan R Lewis, Elizabeth R Benjamin, Demetrios Demetriades
Introduction: The role of rib fixation (RF) in flail chest is debated, and guidelines conditionally recommend RF in highly selected patients. Patients with cardiopulmonary disease (CPD) have traditionally not been deemed surgical candidates. We hypothesize that RF would benefit even high-risk patients with CPD.
Methods: Adult patients with isolated flail chest and CPD were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2018). Hospital transfers, patients dead within 72 h, penetrating mechanism, concomitant thoracic aortic injury or cancer were excluded. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications, ventilator days, need for tracheostomy, and length of stay. RF patients were propensity score matched (1:1) to non-operative management (NOM) patients. Multivariate regression identified independent risk factors for outcomes.
Results: In this 3 year period, 4614 patients were admitted with flail chest and history of CPD. After exclusions and propensity matching, 544 (12%) underwent analysis (RF n = 272, NOM n = 272). RF patients had a lower mortality compared to NOM patients (1.8% vs 5.5%, p = 0.023) but more likely to develop venous thromboembolic events (5.1% vs 1.85%, p = 0.036), prolonged ventilation (28.4% vs 15.1%, p < 0.001), and tracheostomy (15.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed RF was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.165, 95% CI 0.037-0.735, p = 0.018) while age > 85 years (OR 145.115, 95% CI 9.721-2166.262) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 8.283, 95% CI 1.375-49.888) were associated with increased mortality.
Conclusions: RF shows a survival benefit even in high-risk patients with CPD. Patient selection should be individualized but RF should not be excluded based solely on pre-existing conditions.
简介:肋骨固定(RF)在连枷胸中的作用是有争议的,指南有条件地推荐在高度选定的患者中使用RF。心肺疾病(CPD)患者传统上不被认为是手术候选人。我们假设射频治疗对高危CPD患者也有益处。方法:从创伤质量改善计划数据库(2016-2018)中确定孤立性连枷胸和CPD的成年患者。排除转院、72 h内死亡、穿透机制、合并胸主动脉损伤或癌症。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要结局是住院并发症、呼吸机天数、气管切开术需要和住院时间。RF患者与非手术治疗(NOM)患者倾向评分匹配(1:1)。多变量回归确定了影响结果的独立危险因素。结果:在这3年中,4614例患者因连枷胸和CPD病史入院。排除和倾向匹配后,544例(12%)进行了分析(RF n = 272, NOM n = 272)。与NOM患者相比,RF患者的死亡率较低(1.8% vs 5.5%, p = 0.023),但更容易发生静脉血栓栓塞事件(5.1% vs 1.85%, p = 0.036),延长通气时间(28.4% vs 15.1%, p = 85年(OR 145.115, 95% CI 9.721-2166.262)和呼吸机相关肺炎(OR 8.283, 95% CI 1.375-49.888)与死亡率增加相关。结论:即使在高风险CPD患者中,RF也显示出生存益处。患者的选择应个体化,但不应仅根据既往疾病排除RF。
{"title":"Surgical rib fixation in patients with cardiopulmonary disease improves outcomes.","authors":"Jennie S Kim, Chih Ying Chien, Meghan R Lewis, Elizabeth R Benjamin, Demetrios Demetriades","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02792-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02792-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of rib fixation (RF) in flail chest is debated, and guidelines conditionally recommend RF in highly selected patients. Patients with cardiopulmonary disease (CPD) have traditionally not been deemed surgical candidates. We hypothesize that RF would benefit even high-risk patients with CPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with isolated flail chest and CPD were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2018). Hospital transfers, patients dead within 72 h, penetrating mechanism, concomitant thoracic aortic injury or cancer were excluded. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications, ventilator days, need for tracheostomy, and length of stay. RF patients were propensity score matched (1:1) to non-operative management (NOM) patients. Multivariate regression identified independent risk factors for outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this 3 year period, 4614 patients were admitted with flail chest and history of CPD. After exclusions and propensity matching, 544 (12%) underwent analysis (RF n = 272, NOM n = 272). RF patients had a lower mortality compared to NOM patients (1.8% vs 5.5%, p = 0.023) but more likely to develop venous thromboembolic events (5.1% vs 1.85%, p = 0.036), prolonged ventilation (28.4% vs 15.1%, p < 0.001), and tracheostomy (15.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed RF was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.165, 95% CI 0.037-0.735, p = 0.018) while age > 85 years (OR 145.115, 95% CI 9.721-2166.262) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 8.283, 95% CI 1.375-49.888) were associated with increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RF shows a survival benefit even in high-risk patients with CPD. Patient selection should be individualized but RF should not be excluded based solely on pre-existing conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Lower back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in modern society, with a lifetime incidence of up to 90%. According to most national and international guidelines, educational interventions play a central role in the multimodal treatment of LBP. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of educational interventions on pain and disability in patients with LBP undergoing physiotherapy compared to patients without educational interventions undergoing physiotherapy.
Methods: In October 2024, a comprehensive computer-aided search was performed to assess the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria with an established PICOTD algorithm. Two authors independently performed the data extraction and risk of bias evaluation. The primary outcome measures extracted were a pain score (VAS or NRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ).
Results: Data from 8152 patients were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 6.2 ± 3.9 months, the mean length of symptom duration was 66.7 ± 51.6 months, and the mean age of the patients was 46.7 ± 9.2 years. Compared to physiotherapy alone, additional education did not reduce pain (P = 0.4) or disability according to the RMQ (P = 0.9).
Conclusion: The addition of education did not impact pain and disability in patients undergoing physiotherapy for chronic non-specific LPB.
Level of evidence: Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
{"title":"Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Luise Schäfer, Nicola Manocchio, Michela Bossa, Calogero Foti, Marcel Betsch, Joshua Kubach","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in modern society, with a lifetime incidence of up to 90%. According to most national and international guidelines, educational interventions play a central role in the multimodal treatment of LBP. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of educational interventions on pain and disability in patients with LBP undergoing physiotherapy compared to patients without educational interventions undergoing physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2024, a comprehensive computer-aided search was performed to assess the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria with an established PICOTD algorithm. Two authors independently performed the data extraction and risk of bias evaluation. The primary outcome measures extracted were a pain score (VAS or NRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 8152 patients were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 6.2 ± 3.9 months, the mean length of symptom duration was 66.7 ± 51.6 months, and the mean age of the patients was 46.7 ± 9.2 years. Compared to physiotherapy alone, additional education did not reduce pain (P = 0.4) or disability according to the RMQ (P = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of education did not impact pain and disability in patients undergoing physiotherapy for chronic non-specific LPB.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839871/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02783-0
Moath Zuhour, Bilsev İnce, Mahmut Tekecik, Majid Ismayilzade, Mehmet Dadacı
Purpose: Total flap failure remains a reported complication, primarily due to arterial thrombosis. Although numerous studies have compared different intraoperative and postoperative anticoagulant regimens, none have specifically addressed the effectiveness of preoperative acetylsalicylic acid treatment. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of pre-operative aspirin administration on free flap survival rate in lower extremity reconstruction.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent free flap transfers for lower extremity reconstruction. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received preoperative acetylsalicylic acid treatment and those who did not. The two groups were compared in terms of flap success and complication rates.
Results: A total of 117 patients were included. Of these, 42 patients received preoperative acetylsalicylic acid, while 75 did not. Trauma was the most common etiology, while burns were the least common. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of flap type or recipient artery (p > 0.05). Arterial thrombosis developed in 13 patients (11%), of whom only one had received preoperative acetylsalicylic acid. 7 of these patients experienced total flap loss. There was a statistically significant difference regarding total flap loss and arterial thrombosis (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Preoperative acetylsalicylic acid treatment may improve free flap success rates by preventing arterial thrombosis. It was found to be effective in preventing arterial thrombosis when initiated in the preoperative period, before endothelial damage occurs during anastomosis. However, Clinicians should weigh the potential benefits of reduced thrombotic events against the risks of complications, such as hematomas, when considering preoperative aspirin administration.
{"title":"The Impact of pre-operative aspirin administration on free flap survival rate in lower extremity reconstructio n.","authors":"Moath Zuhour, Bilsev İnce, Mahmut Tekecik, Majid Ismayilzade, Mehmet Dadacı","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02783-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02783-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Total flap failure remains a reported complication, primarily due to arterial thrombosis. Although numerous studies have compared different intraoperative and postoperative anticoagulant regimens, none have specifically addressed the effectiveness of preoperative acetylsalicylic acid treatment. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of pre-operative aspirin administration on free flap survival rate in lower extremity reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients who underwent free flap transfers for lower extremity reconstruction. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received preoperative acetylsalicylic acid treatment and those who did not. The two groups were compared in terms of flap success and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients were included. Of these, 42 patients received preoperative acetylsalicylic acid, while 75 did not. Trauma was the most common etiology, while burns were the least common. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of flap type or recipient artery (p > 0.05). Arterial thrombosis developed in 13 patients (11%), of whom only one had received preoperative acetylsalicylic acid. 7 of these patients experienced total flap loss. There was a statistically significant difference regarding total flap loss and arterial thrombosis (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative acetylsalicylic acid treatment may improve free flap success rates by preventing arterial thrombosis. It was found to be effective in preventing arterial thrombosis when initiated in the preoperative period, before endothelial damage occurs during anastomosis. However, Clinicians should weigh the potential benefits of reduced thrombotic events against the risks of complications, such as hematomas, when considering preoperative aspirin administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02782-1
Ömer Çelik, Uğur Doğan, Hamit Yaşar Ellidağ, Özlem Etli, Remzi Can Çakir, Turan Can Yildiz, Erhan Aydemir, Kemal Eyvaz
Purpose: Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) is one of the abdominal surgical emergencies with high mortality and morbidity and early diagnosis and treatment are of vital importance. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of serum vaspin level as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of AMI in an experimental animal model.
Materials and methods: Sixty female Wistar-Albino rats were divided into 6 groups. Ischaemia groups (1, 3, 5) underwent SMA dissection and ligation, while control groups (2, 4, 6) did not. Blood and intestinal tissue samples were collected at 30 min, 2 h, and 6 h. Vaspin (ng/ml), TAS (Total antioxidant capacity, μmol Trolox equiv./L), TOS (Total oxidant capacity, μmol H2O2 equiv./L), ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase, U/L), AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase, U/L) and OSI (TOS/TAS) ratio of these biochemical values were studied.
Results: Vaspin levels were compared at 30 min, 2 h, and 6 h in ischaemia and control groups. No significant difference was found at 30 min and 2 h (p > 0.05), but a significant increase was observed at 6 h (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the Vaspin (ng/ml) measurements of the ischaemia groups at three different times (p < 0.05). The highest Vaspin (ng/ml) value was obtained at the 6th hour and the lowest at the 30th minute.
Conclusion: In our study, a statistically significant increase in vaspin levels was detected with increasing ischaemia duration and necrosis. These findings suggest that vaspin may be a potential biomarker in the early diagnosis of AMI.
{"title":"The role of serum vaspin level in the early diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia induced in experimental animal model.","authors":"Ömer Çelik, Uğur Doğan, Hamit Yaşar Ellidağ, Özlem Etli, Remzi Can Çakir, Turan Can Yildiz, Erhan Aydemir, Kemal Eyvaz","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02782-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02782-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) is one of the abdominal surgical emergencies with high mortality and morbidity and early diagnosis and treatment are of vital importance. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of serum vaspin level as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of AMI in an experimental animal model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty female Wistar-Albino rats were divided into 6 groups. Ischaemia groups (1, 3, 5) underwent SMA dissection and ligation, while control groups (2, 4, 6) did not. Blood and intestinal tissue samples were collected at 30 min, 2 h, and 6 h. Vaspin (ng/ml), TAS (Total antioxidant capacity, μmol Trolox equiv./L), TOS (Total oxidant capacity, μmol H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> equiv./L), ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase, U/L), AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase, U/L) and OSI (TOS/TAS) ratio of these biochemical values were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaspin levels were compared at 30 min, 2 h, and 6 h in ischaemia and control groups. No significant difference was found at 30 min and 2 h (p > 0.05), but a significant increase was observed at 6 h (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the Vaspin (ng/ml) measurements of the ischaemia groups at three different times (p < 0.05). The highest Vaspin (ng/ml) value was obtained at the 6th hour and the lowest at the 30th minute.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, a statistically significant increase in vaspin levels was detected with increasing ischaemia duration and necrosis. These findings suggest that vaspin may be a potential biomarker in the early diagnosis of AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02776-z
Eva Steinfeld, Karolina Dahms, Julia Dormann, Kelly Ansems, Heidrun Janka, Maria Inti-Metzendorf, Gernot Marx, Carina Benstoem, Thomas Breuer
Purpose: Effective patient handovers in healthcare settings are critical for ensuring patient safety and care quality. Handover tools have gained prominence as potential aids in improving these transitions. This systematic review seeks to answer the question if the use of validated handover protocols leads to better treatment outcomes in polytrauma patients compared to no use of validated handover protocols.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science to identify relevant studies from inception of each database to June 15, 2022. We intended to include systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials comparing the use of validated handover tools to no use of such tools in adult polytrauma patients.
Results: Despite the absence of systematic reviews and RCTs meeting our criteria, we included 26 initially excluded studies to glean insights into handover tool usage. This broader inclusion facilitated the identification of two categories of tools: standardized tools and customized tools. Among studies employing customized tools, positive outcomes were reported in various aspects, including enhanced information quality, improved staff communication, and reduced risks and treatment errors. In contrast, studies utilizing well-established standardized tools documented improvements in communication, documentation, and overall satisfaction among medical professionals, signaling a reduction in communication errors and lost information.
Conclusion: Heterogeneity of the studies and no trials meeting our eligibility criteria present challenges for conducting a traditional systematic review. In the lack of evidence from RCTs and systematic reviews, our analysis of the available studies sheds light on the complexities of assessing handover tools' utility, especially in diverse clinical settings. It highlights the need for more standardized methodologies and further investigation into the effectiveness of custom-designed tools. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of handover tools in healthcare. While some studies suggest positive outcomes, further research is necessary to elucidate the design and implementation of these tools to enhance care and support healthcare professionals in their roles.
目的:在医疗保健环境中,有效的患者移交对于确保患者安全和护理质量至关重要。移交工具作为改进这些转换的潜在辅助工具已经获得了突出的地位。这篇系统综述试图回答这样一个问题:与不使用有效的交接方案相比,使用有效的交接方案是否能在多发创伤患者中带来更好的治疗结果。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和Web of Science,确定从每个数据库建立到2022年6月15日的相关研究。我们打算纳入系统评价和随机对照试验,比较在成人多发创伤患者中使用经过验证的交接工具与不使用此类工具的情况。结果:尽管缺乏符合我们标准的系统评价和随机对照试验,我们纳入了26项最初被排除的研究,以收集对移交工具使用情况的见解。这种更广泛的包含促进了两类工具的识别:标准化工具和定制工具。在使用定制工具的研究中,报告了各方面的积极结果,包括提高信息质量,改善员工沟通,减少风险和治疗错误。相比之下,利用完善的标准化工具进行的研究记录了医疗专业人员在沟通、文档和总体满意度方面的改进,表明沟通错误和信息丢失有所减少。结论:研究的异质性和没有试验符合我们的资格标准,对进行传统的系统评价提出了挑战。由于缺乏随机对照试验和系统评价的证据,我们对现有研究的分析揭示了评估移交工具效用的复杂性,特别是在不同的临床环境中。它强调需要更标准化的方法,并进一步调查定制设计工具的有效性。它强调了理解交接工具在医疗保健中的作用的重要性。虽然一些研究表明了积极的结果,但需要进一步的研究来阐明这些工具的设计和实施,以增强护理和支持医疗保健专业人员的作用。
{"title":"Examining the impact of validated handover protocols on treatment outcomes in polytrauma patients: a systematic review.","authors":"Eva Steinfeld, Karolina Dahms, Julia Dormann, Kelly Ansems, Heidrun Janka, Maria Inti-Metzendorf, Gernot Marx, Carina Benstoem, Thomas Breuer","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02776-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02776-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Effective patient handovers in healthcare settings are critical for ensuring patient safety and care quality. Handover tools have gained prominence as potential aids in improving these transitions. This systematic review seeks to answer the question if the use of validated handover protocols leads to better treatment outcomes in polytrauma patients compared to no use of validated handover protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science to identify relevant studies from inception of each database to June 15, 2022. We intended to include systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials comparing the use of validated handover tools to no use of such tools in adult polytrauma patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the absence of systematic reviews and RCTs meeting our criteria, we included 26 initially excluded studies to glean insights into handover tool usage. This broader inclusion facilitated the identification of two categories of tools: standardized tools and customized tools. Among studies employing customized tools, positive outcomes were reported in various aspects, including enhanced information quality, improved staff communication, and reduced risks and treatment errors. In contrast, studies utilizing well-established standardized tools documented improvements in communication, documentation, and overall satisfaction among medical professionals, signaling a reduction in communication errors and lost information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Heterogeneity of the studies and no trials meeting our eligibility criteria present challenges for conducting a traditional systematic review. In the lack of evidence from RCTs and systematic reviews, our analysis of the available studies sheds light on the complexities of assessing handover tools' utility, especially in diverse clinical settings. It highlights the need for more standardized methodologies and further investigation into the effectiveness of custom-designed tools. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of handover tools in healthcare. While some studies suggest positive outcomes, further research is necessary to elucidate the design and implementation of these tools to enhance care and support healthcare professionals in their roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836088/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02784-z
Arman Vahabi, Ali Engin Daştan, Omar Aljasım, Özgür Mert Bakan, Levent Küçük, Nadir Özkayın, Kemal Aktuğlu
{"title":"Correction: Preoperative cardiology consultations for geriatric patients with hip fractures rarely provide additional recommendations and are associated with prolonged hospital stays and delayed surgery: a retrospective case control study.","authors":"Arman Vahabi, Ali Engin Daştan, Omar Aljasım, Özgür Mert Bakan, Levent Küçük, Nadir Özkayın, Kemal Aktuğlu","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02784-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02784-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02781-2
K Mattam, P Wijerathne, J N Rao, S Tenconi, L Ventura, J G Edwards
Purpose: Costal margin ruptures (CMR), though rare, are often associated with rib fractures and intercostal hernia. Injuries to the costal cartilages are often poorly recognised. Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures without fixing the CMR is known to result in failure of metalwork. The aim of this study was to characterise the associated rib and costal cartilage fractures according to different categories of the Sheffield Classification of CMR injuries, thus highlighting injury patterns which are of importance with respect to patient management.
Methods: Patients characterised by the Sheffield Classification were identified. Prospective clinical data were collected at the time of presentation. Computed Tomography (CT) multiplanar and 3D images were reviewed. Data were analysed according (i) to the absence or presence of Intercostal Hernia (i.e. CMR + IH and Trans Diaphragmatic Intercostal Hernia (TDIH) versus other CMR injury categories) and (ii) according to the aetiology (Expulsive versus other, where expulsive was defined as related to coughing, sneezing, retching or vomiting). Any associated rib or other costal cartilage fractures were recorded on heatmaps, according to Chest Wall Injury Society taxonomy.
Results: There were 64 patients with Costal Margin Rupture injuries included in the study. The presence of IH in addition to CMR was associated with chronic presentation, expulsive aetiology, higher body mass index, and CMR at the level of the 9th costal cartilage. IH (p = 0.002) and expulsive aetiology (p = 0.04) were associated with presence of rib fractures, but the absence of additional costal cartilage fractures (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001 respectively). Fractures in the IH and expulsive groups were notably more focused in distribution to the posterior sector (p < 0.0001) and with the most common fracture being one level above the CMR.
Conclusion: Posterior sector, lower level rib fractures related to coughing and other "expulsive' aetiologies may be associated costal margin rupture and intercostal hernia. The latter injuries should not be overlooked in the assessment and successful management of the patient.
{"title":"Radiological insights into costal margin rupture injuries: patterns of associated rib and costal cartilage fractures.","authors":"K Mattam, P Wijerathne, J N Rao, S Tenconi, L Ventura, J G Edwards","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02781-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02781-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Costal margin ruptures (CMR), though rare, are often associated with rib fractures and intercostal hernia. Injuries to the costal cartilages are often poorly recognised. Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures without fixing the CMR is known to result in failure of metalwork. The aim of this study was to characterise the associated rib and costal cartilage fractures according to different categories of the Sheffield Classification of CMR injuries, thus highlighting injury patterns which are of importance with respect to patient management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients characterised by the Sheffield Classification were identified. Prospective clinical data were collected at the time of presentation. Computed Tomography (CT) multiplanar and 3D images were reviewed. Data were analysed according (i) to the absence or presence of Intercostal Hernia (i.e. CMR + IH and Trans Diaphragmatic Intercostal Hernia (TDIH) versus other CMR injury categories) and (ii) according to the aetiology (Expulsive versus other, where expulsive was defined as related to coughing, sneezing, retching or vomiting). Any associated rib or other costal cartilage fractures were recorded on heatmaps, according to Chest Wall Injury Society taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 64 patients with Costal Margin Rupture injuries included in the study. The presence of IH in addition to CMR was associated with chronic presentation, expulsive aetiology, higher body mass index, and CMR at the level of the 9th costal cartilage. IH (p = 0.002) and expulsive aetiology (p = 0.04) were associated with presence of rib fractures, but the absence of additional costal cartilage fractures (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001 respectively). Fractures in the IH and expulsive groups were notably more focused in distribution to the posterior sector (p < 0.0001) and with the most common fracture being one level above the CMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior sector, lower level rib fractures related to coughing and other \"expulsive' aetiologies may be associated costal margin rupture and intercostal hernia. The latter injuries should not be overlooked in the assessment and successful management of the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound, performed by non-radiologist specialist physicians, compared to standard X-ray imaging for ankle and foot trauma in the emergency department. Additionally, we analyzed whether other variables, such as demographic characteristics of the included patients, could influence fracture detection with the diagnostic tools used.
Methods: A non-randomized monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study was conducted on 143 patients.
Results: Ankle and foot fractures were more frequently detected by FAST ultrasound compared to standard radiography. Regarding the influence of demographic factors, age and the correlation between Body Mass Index and age significantly influenced the ability to detect fractures.
Conclusion: FAST ultrasound demonstrated good diagnostic value in routine clinical practice for screening purposes and could be easily applied by non-radiologist specialist physicians. Implementing this approach may reduce time and costs in patient management, thereby aiding in alleviating triage congestion in the emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: NCT05528432; 21-02-21.
{"title":"Diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound compared to standard radiography for fracture detection in the emergency department by non-radiologist physicians: a monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study.","authors":"Laeticia Vaiana Frezals, Arnaud Delafontaine, Hélène Scoubeau, Régis Sontou, Sofie Moorthamers, Antoine Plumacker, Alain Plumacker","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02772-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00068-025-02772-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound, performed by non-radiologist specialist physicians, compared to standard X-ray imaging for ankle and foot trauma in the emergency department. Additionally, we analyzed whether other variables, such as demographic characteristics of the included patients, could influence fracture detection with the diagnostic tools used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-randomized monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study was conducted on 143 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ankle and foot fractures were more frequently detected by FAST ultrasound compared to standard radiography. Regarding the influence of demographic factors, age and the correlation between Body Mass Index and age significantly influenced the ability to detect fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FAST ultrasound demonstrated good diagnostic value in routine clinical practice for screening purposes and could be easily applied by non-radiologist specialist physicians. Implementing this approach may reduce time and costs in patient management, thereby aiding in alleviating triage congestion in the emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: NCT05528432; 21-02-21.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143424827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}