Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2021.1915683
Spencer E Escobedo, Aashka Shah, Alyssa N Easton, Hana Hall, Vikki M Weake
Binary expression systems are a powerful tool for tissue- and cell-specific research. Many of the currently available Drosophila eye-specific drivers have not been systematically characterized for their expression level and cell-type specificity in the adult eye or during development. Here, we used a luciferase reporter to measure expression levels of different drivers in the adult Drosophila eye, and characterized the cell type-specificity of each driver using a fluorescent reporter in live 10-day-old adult males. We also further characterized the expression pattern of these drivers in various developmental stages. We compared several Gal4 drivers from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) including GMR-Gal4, longGMR-Gal4 and Rh1-Gal4 with newly developed Gal4 and QF2 drivers that are specific to different cell types in the adult eye. In addition, we generated drug-inducible Rh1-GSGal4 lines and compared their induced expression with an available GMR-GSGal4 line. Although both lines had significant induction of gene expression measured by luciferase activity, Rh1-GSGal4 was expressed at levels below the detection of the fluorescent reporter by confocal microscopy, while GMR-GSGal4 showed substantial reporter expression in the absence of drug by microscopy. Overall, our study systematically characterizes and compares a large toolkit of eye- and photoreceptor-specific drivers, while also uncovering some of the limitations of currently available expression systems in the adult eye.
{"title":"Characterizing a gene expression toolkit for eye- and photoreceptor-specific expression in Drosophila.","authors":"Spencer E Escobedo, Aashka Shah, Alyssa N Easton, Hana Hall, Vikki M Weake","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2021.1915683","DOIUrl":"10.1080/19336934.2021.1915683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Binary expression systems are a powerful tool for tissue- and cell-specific research. Many of the currently available <i>Drosophila</i> eye-specific drivers have not been systematically characterized for their expression level and cell-type specificity in the adult eye or during development. Here, we used a luciferase reporter to measure expression levels of different drivers in the adult <i>Drosophila</i> eye, and characterized the cell type-specificity of each driver using a fluorescent reporter in live 10-day-old adult males. We also further characterized the expression pattern of these drivers in various developmental stages. We compared several Gal4 drivers from the Bloomington <i>Drosophila</i> Stock Center (BDSC) including <i>GMR-Gal4, longGMR-Gal4</i> and <i>Rh1-Gal4</i> with newly developed Gal4 and QF2 drivers that are specific to different cell types in the adult eye. In addition, we generated drug-inducible <i>Rh1-GSGal4</i> lines and compared their induced expression with an available <i>GMR-GSGal4</i> line. Although both lines had significant induction of gene expression measured by luciferase activity, <i>Rh1-GSGal4</i> was expressed at levels below the detection of the fluorescent reporter by confocal microscopy, while <i>GMR-GSGal4</i> showed substantial reporter expression in the absence of drug by microscopy. Overall, our study systematically characterizes and compares a large toolkit of eye- and photoreceptor-specific drivers, while also uncovering some of the limitations of currently available expression systems in the adult eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"15 1","pages":"73-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2021.1915683","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38908488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2020.1863124
Amel Chaouch, Paul Lasko
Drosophila melanogaster has proven to be a powerful genetic model to study human disease. Approximately 75% of human disease-associated genes have homologs in the fruit fly and regulatory pathways are highly conserved in Drosophila compared to humans. Drosophila is an established model organism for the study of genetics and developmental biology related to human disease and has also made a great contribution to epigenetic research. Many key factors that regulate chromatin condensation through effects on histone post-translational modifications were first discovered in genetic screens in Drosophila. Recently, the importance of chromatin regulators in cancer progression has been uncovered, leading to a rapid expansion in the knowledge on how perturbations of chromatin can result in the pathogenesis of human cancer. In this review, we provide examples of how Drosophila melanogaster has contributed to better understanding the detrimental effects of mutant forms of histones, called 'oncohistones', that are found in different human tumours.
{"title":"<i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>: a fruitful model for oncohistones.","authors":"Amel Chaouch, Paul Lasko","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1863124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2020.1863124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> has proven to be a powerful genetic model to study human disease. Approximately 75% of human disease-associated genes have homologs in the fruit fly and regulatory pathways are highly conserved in <i>Drosophila</i> compared to humans. <i>Drosophila</i> is an established model organism for the study of genetics and developmental biology related to human disease and has also made a great contribution to epigenetic research. Many key factors that regulate chromatin condensation through effects on histone post-translational modifications were first discovered in genetic screens in <i>Drosophila</i>. Recently, the importance of chromatin regulators in cancer progression has been uncovered, leading to a rapid expansion in the knowledge on how perturbations of chromatin can result in the pathogenesis of human cancer. In this review, we provide examples of how <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> has contributed to better understanding the detrimental effects of mutant forms of histones, called 'oncohistones', that are found in different human tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"15 1","pages":"28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2020.1863124","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39138005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2021.1896960
Lindsey J Gray, Marla B Sokolowski, Stephen J Simpson
Evolved metabolic thriftiness in humans is a proposed contributor to the obesity epidemic. Insect models have been shown to evolve both 'metabolic thrift' in response to rearing on high-protein diets that promote leanness, and 'obesity resistance' when reared on fattening high-carbohydrate, low-protein foods. Despite the hypothesis that human obesity is caused by evolved metabolic thrift, genetic contributions to this physiological trait remain elusive. Here we conducted a pilot study to determine whether thrift and obesity resistance can arise under laboratory based 'quasi-natural selection' in the genetic model organism Drosophila melanogaster. We found that both these traits can evolve within 16 generations. Contrary to predictions from the 'thrifty genotype/phenotype' hypothesis, we found that when animals from a metabolic thrift inducing high-protein environment are mismatched to fattening high-carbohydrate foods, they did not become 'obese'. Rather, they accumulate less triglyceride than control animals, not more. We speculate that this may arise through as yet un-quantified parental effects - potentially epigenetic. This study establishes that D. melanogaster could be a useful model for elucidating the role of the trans- and inter-generational effects of diet on the genetics of metabolic traits in higher animals.
{"title":"Drosophila as a useful model for understanding the evolutionary physiology of obesity resistance and metabolic thrift.","authors":"Lindsey J Gray, Marla B Sokolowski, Stephen J Simpson","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2021.1896960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2021.1896960","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evolved metabolic thriftiness in humans is a proposed contributor to the obesity epidemic. Insect models have been shown to evolve both 'metabolic thrift' in response to rearing on high-protein diets that promote leanness, and 'obesity resistance' when reared on fattening high-carbohydrate, low-protein foods. Despite the hypothesis that human obesity is caused by evolved metabolic thrift, genetic contributions to this physiological trait remain elusive. Here we conducted a pilot study to determine whether thrift and obesity resistance can arise under laboratory based 'quasi-natural selection' in the genetic model organism <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. We found that both these traits can evolve within 16 generations. Contrary to predictions from the 'thrifty genotype/phenotype' hypothesis, we found that when animals from a metabolic thrift inducing high-protein environment are mismatched to fattening high-carbohydrate foods, they did not become 'obese'. Rather, they accumulate less triglyceride than control animals, not more. We speculate that this may arise through as yet un-quantified parental effects - potentially epigenetic. This study establishes that <i>D. melanogaster</i> could be a useful model for elucidating the role of the trans- and inter-generational effects of diet on the genetics of metabolic traits in higher animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"15 1","pages":"47-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2021.1896960","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25475814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2020.1864201
Katharine L Korunes, Russell B Myers, Ryan Hardy, Mohamed A F Noor
Drosophila pseudoobscura is a classic model system for the study of evolutionary genetics and genomics. Given this long-standing interest, many genome sequences have accumulated for D. pseudoobscura and closely related species D. persimilis, D. miranda, and D. lowei. To facilitate the exploration of genetic variation within species and comparative genomics across species, we present PseudoBase, a database that couples extensive publicly available genomic data with simple visualization and query tools via an intuitive graphical interface, amenable for use in both research and educational settings. All genetic variation (SNPs and indels) within the database is derived from the same workflow, so variants are easily comparable across data sets. Features include an embedded JBrowse interface, ability to pull out alignments of individual genes/regions, and batch access for gene lists. Here, we introduce PseudoBase, and we demonstrate how this resource facilitates use of extensive genomic data from flies of the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup.
假鳞翅目果蝇是研究进化遗传学和基因组学的经典模式系统。鉴于这种长期存在的兴趣,我们已经积累了许多伪胸腺果蝇和密切相关物种 D. persimilis、D. miranda 和 D. lowei 的基因组序列。为了便于探索物种内的遗传变异和物种间的比较基因组学,我们推出了 PseudoBase 数据库,该数据库通过直观的图形界面将大量公开的基因组数据与简单的可视化和查询工具结合在一起,适合在研究和教育环境中使用。数据库中的所有基因变异(SNPs 和 indels)都来自相同的工作流程,因此不同数据集之间的变异很容易进行比较。该数据库的功能包括嵌入式 JBrowse 界面、提取单个基因/区域的比对结果以及批量访问基因列表。在这里,我们将介绍 PseudoBase,并演示该资源如何帮助使用来自假鳞翅目果蝇亚群的大量基因组数据。
{"title":"PseudoBase: a genomic visualization and exploration resource for the <i>Drosophila pseudoobscura</i> subgroup.","authors":"Katharine L Korunes, Russell B Myers, Ryan Hardy, Mohamed A F Noor","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1864201","DOIUrl":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1864201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Drosophila pseudoobscura</i> is a classic model system for the study of evolutionary genetics and genomics. Given this long-standing interest, many genome sequences have accumulated for <i>D. pseudoobscura</i> and closely related species <i>D. persimilis, D. miranda</i>, and <i>D. lowei</i>. To facilitate the exploration of genetic variation within species and comparative genomics across species, we present PseudoBase, a database that couples extensive publicly available genomic data with simple visualization and query tools via an intuitive graphical interface, amenable for use in both research and educational settings. All genetic variation (SNPs and indels) within the database is derived from the same workflow, so variants are easily comparable across data sets. Features include an embedded JBrowse interface, ability to pull out alignments of individual genes/regions, and batch access for gene lists. Here, we introduce PseudoBase, and we demonstrate how this resource facilitates use of extensive genomic data from flies of the <i>Drosophila pseudoobscura</i> subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"15 1","pages":"38-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808432/pdf/KFLY_15_1864201.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38714228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01Epub Date: 2020-12-08DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592
Ruijian Guo, Anna-Lena Henke, Klaus Reinhardt
Sperm quality, an important male fitness trait, is commonly compared between studies. However, few studies consider how genetic and environmental variation affect sperm quality, even in the genetic model Drosophila melanogaster. Here we show that sperm viability, the proportion of live sperm, differed across the genotypes Oregon-R, Dahomey, and Canton-S by more than 15%, and across buffers (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Grace's Medium and Drosophila Ringer solution) by more than 20%. In terms of genotype-buffer pair comparisons, nearly half of the comparisons would produce significant differences in sperm viability (15 in 36), or its temporal decrease in a stress medium (19 in 36). Grace's medium produced the longest-lived sperm in vitro and the smallest differences between genotypes, Drosophila Ringer Solution produced the shortest lifespan and the largest differences. Our results suggest that fly and other sperm researchers would benefit from a standardized protocol of measuring sperm viability.
{"title":"Sperm viability varies with buffer and genotype in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.","authors":"Ruijian Guo, Anna-Lena Henke, Klaus Reinhardt","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sperm quality, an important male fitness trait, is commonly compared between studies. However, few studies consider how genetic and environmental variation affect sperm quality, even in the genetic model <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. Here we show that sperm viability, the proportion of live sperm, differed across the genotypes Oregon-R, Dahomey, and Canton-S by more than 15%, and across buffers (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Grace's Medium and <i>Drosophila</i> Ringer solution) by more than 20%. In terms of genotype-buffer pair comparisons, nearly half of the comparisons would produce significant differences in sperm viability (15 in 36), or its temporal decrease in a stress medium (19 in 36). Grace's medium produced the longest-lived sperm <i>in vitro</i> and the smallest differences between genotypes, <i>Drosophila</i> Ringer Solution produced the shortest lifespan and the largest differences. Our results suggest that fly and other sperm researchers would benefit from a standardized protocol of measuring sperm viability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38583257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2021.1943285
Howy Jacobs
{"title":"Dawning of the open era.","authors":"Howy Jacobs","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2021.1943285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2021.1943285","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"15 1","pages":"89-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2021.1943285","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39161015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-01Epub Date: 2020-07-02DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2020.1784674
Po Chen, Sarah Visokay, John M Abrams
Glutamine: fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT) enzymes catalyse the first committed step of the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway (HBP) using glutamine and fructose-6-phosphate to form glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN6P). Numerous species (e.g. mouse, rat, zebrafish, chicken) including humans and Drosophila encode two broadly expressed copies of this enzyme but whether these perform redundant, partially overlapping or distinct functions is not known. To address this question, we produced single gene null mutations in the fly counterparts of gfat1 and gfat2. Deletions for either enzyme were fully lethal and homozygotes lacking either GFAT1 or GFAT2 died at or prior to the first instar larval stage. Therefore, when genetically eliminated, neither isoform was able to compensate for the other. Importantly, dietary supplementation with D-glucosamine-6-phosphate rescued GFAT2 deficiency and restored viability to gfat2-/- mutants. In contrast, glucosamine-6-phosphate did not rescue gfat1-/- animals.
{"title":"<i>Drosophila</i> GFAT1 and GFAT2 enzymes encode obligate developmental functions.","authors":"Po Chen, Sarah Visokay, John M Abrams","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1784674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2020.1784674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glutamine: fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT) enzymes catalyse the first committed step of the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway (HBP) using glutamine and fructose-6-phosphate to form glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN6P). Numerous species (e.g. mouse, rat, zebrafish, chicken) including humans and <i>Drosophila</i> encode two broadly expressed copies of this enzyme but whether these perform redundant, partially overlapping or distinct functions is not known. To address this question, we produced single gene null mutations in the fly counterparts of <i>gfat1</i> and <i>gfat2</i>. Deletions for either enzyme were fully lethal and homozygotes lacking either GFAT1 or GFAT2 died at or prior to the first instar larval stage. Therefore, when genetically eliminated, neither isoform was able to compensate for the other. Importantly, dietary supplementation with D-glucosamine-6-phosphate rescued GFAT2 deficiency and restored viability to <i>gfat2<sup>-/-</sup></i> mutants. In contrast, glucosamine-6-phosphate did not rescue <i>gfat1<sup>-/-</sup></i> animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":" ","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2020.1784674","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38117106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-01Epub Date: 2020-10-21DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2020.1832416
Kevin G Nyberg, Joseph Q Nguyen, Yong-Jae Kwon, Shelby Blythe, Greg J Beitel, Richard Carthew
Genome editing via homology-directed repair (HDR) has made possible precise and deliberate modifications to gene sequences. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR is the simplest means to carry this out. However, technical challenges remain to improve efficiency and broaden applicability to any genetic background of Drosophila melanogaster as well as to other Drosophila species. To address these issues, we developed a two-stage marker-assisted strategy in which embryos are injected with RNPs and pre-screened using T7EI. Using sgRNA in complex with recombinant Cas9 protein, we assayed each sgRNA for genome-cutting efficiency. We then conducted HDR using sgRNAs that efficiently cut target genes and the application of a transformation marker that generates RNAi against eyes absent. This allows for screening based on eye morphology rather than colour. These new tools can be used to make a single change or a series of allelic substitutions in a region of interest, or to create additional genetic tools such as balancer chromosomes.
{"title":"A pipeline for precise and efficient genome editing by sgRNA-Cas9 RNPs in <i>Drosophila</i>.","authors":"Kevin G Nyberg, Joseph Q Nguyen, Yong-Jae Kwon, Shelby Blythe, Greg J Beitel, Richard Carthew","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1832416","DOIUrl":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1832416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome editing via homology-directed repair (HDR) has made possible precise and deliberate modifications to gene sequences. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR is the simplest means to carry this out. However, technical challenges remain to improve efficiency and broaden applicability to any genetic background of <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> as well as to other <i>Drosophila</i> species. To address these issues, we developed a two-stage marker-assisted strategy in which embryos are injected with RNPs and pre-screened using T7EI. Using sgRNA in complex with recombinant Cas9 protein, we assayed each sgRNA for genome-cutting efficiency. We then conducted HDR using sgRNAs that efficiently cut target genes and the application of a transformation marker that generates RNAi against <i>eyes absent</i>. This allows for screening based on eye morphology rather than colour. These new tools can be used to make a single change or a series of allelic substitutions in a region of interest, or to create additional genetic tools such as balancer chromosomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"14 1-4","pages":"34-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2020.1832416","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9278192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-01Epub Date: 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2020.1831879
Howy Jacobs
Shortly after taking over as Chief Editor of my former journal, EMBO Reports, I penned an editorial outlining the kind of research articles we were seeking as submissions [1]. The message was straightforward: we were looking for manuscripts reporting single key findings of note, which were backed up by multiple lines of evidence. Although EMBO Reports embodied the idea of short-format papers in its very name, I’m trying to bring the same philosophy to Fly. A common fault of many submitted ‘in-brief’ papers is that they present the results of just one experiment, often accompanied by exorbitant claims as to their significance. Reviewers, unconvinced that what was presented is a substantial advance, or even doubting its veracity entirely, then propose other experiments that they themselves dreamed up, which go off on a tangent, even if it’s an interesting tangent. The end result is that the paper becomes an unwieldy composite of two, three, or four disparate experiments, none of them backed up by independent evidence. When authors carry out an experiment demanded by a reviewer, which produces the anticipated result (‘the authors must demonstrate that ....’), the satisfied reviewer is often inclined to disregard the fact that the finding is of small magnitude, statistically questionable, or lacks independent repeats which the journal’s revision timetable made impossible. The published paper therefore ends up full of holes, is fundamentally unreliable, meanders all over the place and is rarely cited because nobody knows what it is really trying to say, even if the data are believable. At the opposite extreme, junior investigators often try to bend the parameters of a manuscript so that it includes every possibly relevant experiment they have ever done. The submitted draft thus resembles a ramble built from scraps demanded by reviewers, but from a much earlier stage. If the reviewers are awake, they will often seek removal of extraneous materials until, finally, little of substance is left, and it risks actually becoming the one-experiment paper that lacks evidentiary rigour; unless the editor is also awake. To me, the perfect short-format paper should have a laser focus on one simply formulated scientific question, that is then tested by different experimental approaches. Beyond that I would not seek to be prescriptive. The various streams of verification could be, for example, a bioinformatic prediction of an interaction, plus a biophysical test in vitro, plus a set of pulldown assays from a cell-line grown under different conditions and, finally, a phenotypic analysis of an in vivo model. Or any of hundreds of other possible combinations. The experiments should not simply be linked by a keyword, but should constitute parallel or sequential experimental tests of the specific hypothesis, where the outcome could be either ‘positive’ or ‘negative’, but should be coherent and statistically sound. Note that negative findings can provide at least as much
{"title":"Short is still sweet.","authors":"Howy Jacobs","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1831879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2020.1831879","url":null,"abstract":"Shortly after taking over as Chief Editor of my former journal, EMBO Reports, I penned an editorial outlining the kind of research articles we were seeking as submissions [1]. The message was straightforward: we were looking for manuscripts reporting single key findings of note, which were backed up by multiple lines of evidence. Although EMBO Reports embodied the idea of short-format papers in its very name, I’m trying to bring the same philosophy to Fly. A common fault of many submitted ‘in-brief’ papers is that they present the results of just one experiment, often accompanied by exorbitant claims as to their significance. Reviewers, unconvinced that what was presented is a substantial advance, or even doubting its veracity entirely, then propose other experiments that they themselves dreamed up, which go off on a tangent, even if it’s an interesting tangent. The end result is that the paper becomes an unwieldy composite of two, three, or four disparate experiments, none of them backed up by independent evidence. When authors carry out an experiment demanded by a reviewer, which produces the anticipated result (‘the authors must demonstrate that ....’), the satisfied reviewer is often inclined to disregard the fact that the finding is of small magnitude, statistically questionable, or lacks independent repeats which the journal’s revision timetable made impossible. The published paper therefore ends up full of holes, is fundamentally unreliable, meanders all over the place and is rarely cited because nobody knows what it is really trying to say, even if the data are believable. At the opposite extreme, junior investigators often try to bend the parameters of a manuscript so that it includes every possibly relevant experiment they have ever done. The submitted draft thus resembles a ramble built from scraps demanded by reviewers, but from a much earlier stage. If the reviewers are awake, they will often seek removal of extraneous materials until, finally, little of substance is left, and it risks actually becoming the one-experiment paper that lacks evidentiary rigour; unless the editor is also awake. To me, the perfect short-format paper should have a laser focus on one simply formulated scientific question, that is then tested by different experimental approaches. Beyond that I would not seek to be prescriptive. The various streams of verification could be, for example, a bioinformatic prediction of an interaction, plus a biophysical test in vitro, plus a set of pulldown assays from a cell-line grown under different conditions and, finally, a phenotypic analysis of an in vivo model. Or any of hundreds of other possible combinations. The experiments should not simply be linked by a keyword, but should constitute parallel or sequential experimental tests of the specific hypothesis, where the outcome could be either ‘positive’ or ‘negative’, but should be coherent and statistically sound. Note that negative findings can provide at least as much ","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2020.1831879","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38506343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-01Epub Date: 2019-12-24DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2019.1705118
Hamze Beati, Alistair Langlands, Sara Ten Have, H-Arno J Müller
Quantitative proteomic analyses in combination with genetics provide powerful tools in developmental cell signalling research. Drosophila melanogaster is one of the most widely used genetic models for studying development and disease. Here we combined quantitative proteomics with genetic selection to determine changes in the proteome upon depletion of Heartless (Htl) Fibroblast-Growth Factor (FGF) receptor signalling in Drosophila embryos at the gastrula stage. We present a robust, single generation SILAC (stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture) protocol for labelling proteins in early embryos. For the selection of homozygously mutant embryos at the pre-gastrula stage, we developed an independent genetic marker. Our analyses detected quantitative changes in the global proteome of htl mutant embryos during gastrulation. We identified distinct classes of downregulated and upregulated proteins, and network analyses indicate functionally related groups of proteins in each class. In addition, we identified changes in the abundance of phosphopeptides. In summary, our quantitative proteomic analysis reveals global changes in metabolic, nucleoplasmic, cytoskeletal and transport proteins in htl mutant embryos.
{"title":"SILAC-based quantitative proteomic analysis of <i>Drosophila</i> gastrula stage embryos mutant for fibroblast growth factor signalling.","authors":"Hamze Beati, Alistair Langlands, Sara Ten Have, H-Arno J Müller","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2019.1705118","DOIUrl":"10.1080/19336934.2019.1705118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative proteomic analyses in combination with genetics provide powerful tools in developmental cell signalling research. <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> is one of the most widely used genetic models for studying development and disease. Here we combined quantitative proteomics with genetic selection to determine changes in the proteome upon depletion of Heartless (Htl) Fibroblast-Growth Factor (FGF) receptor signalling in <i>Drosophila</i> embryos at the gastrula stage. We present a robust, single generation SILAC (stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture) protocol for labelling proteins in early embryos. For the selection of homozygously mutant embryos at the pre-gastrula stage, we developed an independent genetic marker. Our analyses detected quantitative changes in the global proteome of <i>htl</i> mutant embryos during gastrulation. We identified distinct classes of downregulated and upregulated proteins, and network analyses indicate functionally related groups of proteins in each class. In addition, we identified changes in the abundance of phosphopeptides. In summary, our quantitative proteomic analysis reveals global changes in metabolic, nucleoplasmic, cytoskeletal and transport proteins in <i>htl</i> mutant embryos.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":" ","pages":"10-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746239/pdf/KFLY_14_1705118.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37487946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}