Background: In 2017 and 2021, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) announced to revise the drug label of fluoroquinolones. We aimed to evaluate the association of fluoroquinolone prescribing with the NMPA announcements of label changes.
Research design and methods: Monthly prevalence of fluoroquinolone prescriptions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTI), acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and acute sinusitis (AS) between 2016 and 2022 was calculated, and interrupted time series analysis was applied to assess the impacts of NMPA label changes on fluoroquinolone use.
Results: Prevalence of fluoroquinolone prescriptions decreased by 2.39% (95% CI, -4.72% to -0.07%) for uUTI but increased by 3.02% (95% CI, 1.71% to 4.34%) for AS immediately after the 2017 label change. Moreover, after the 2021 label change, fluoroquinolone use decreased shortly in all the three indications. However, a significant increasing trend was observed in fluoroquinolone use for AECB episodes, and fluoroquinolons were used for 61.4% of treated uUTI, 31.6% of treated AECB, and 5.42% of treated AS at the end of 2022, respectively.
Conclusions: The label changes issued by the NMPA had no substantial impacts on fluoroquinolone prescribing in the study region in China. Fluoroquinolone prescribing was still highly prevalent for uUTI and AECB and thus requiring further antimicrobial stewardship.
{"title":"Association of outpatient fluoroquinolone prescribing with the National Medical Products Administration announcements of label changes in China.","authors":"Houyu Zhao, Yexiang Sun, Xi Yao, Peng Shen, Hongbo Lin, Siyan Zhan","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2368823","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2368823","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2017 and 2021, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) announced to revise the drug label of fluoroquinolones. We aimed to evaluate the association of fluoroquinolone prescribing with the NMPA announcements of label changes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Monthly prevalence of fluoroquinolone prescriptions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTI), acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and acute sinusitis (AS) between 2016 and 2022 was calculated, and interrupted time series analysis was applied to assess the impacts of NMPA label changes on fluoroquinolone use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of fluoroquinolone prescriptions decreased by 2.39% (95% CI, -4.72% to -0.07%) for uUTI but increased by 3.02% (95% CI, 1.71% to 4.34%) for AS immediately after the 2017 label change. Moreover, after the 2021 label change, fluoroquinolone use decreased shortly in all the three indications. However, a significant increasing trend was observed in fluoroquinolone use for AECB episodes, and fluoroquinolons were used for 61.4% of treated uUTI, 31.6% of treated AECB, and 5.42% of treated AS at the end of 2022, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The label changes issued by the NMPA had no substantial impacts on fluoroquinolone prescribing in the study region in China. Fluoroquinolone prescribing was still highly prevalent for uUTI and AECB and thus requiring further antimicrobial stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141330702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Despite significant measures, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan, struggle to curtail non-prescription antibiotic sales, enforce regulations, and implement National Action Plan (NAP) against antimicrobial resistance (AMR). NAP Pakistan entails drug inspectors (DIs) to ensure prescription-based sales of antibiotics. This study seeks to understand the perspective of DIs regarding antimicrobial sales without prescription, underlying factors, and policy implementation status.
Methods: A qualitative study employing a semi-structured interview guide using in-depth interviews with purposively selected 17 DIs was conducted. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analyzed following a thematic analysis framework utilizing MAXQDA 2022 software.
Results: Five main themes emerged after data analysis: (1) drug inspector - the regulator of the antimicrobial armamentarium, (2) the policy context, (3) awareness regarding AMR, (4) barriers to combatting AMR, and (5) the way forward: strategies and recommendations.
Conclusion: A weak regulatory framework, low level of awareness, quackery, vested interests, and socio-economic factors augment inappropriate antibiotic utilization. Opting for better policies and strengthening the DI fraternity as outlined in NAP Pakistan is recommended. Recognizing drug inspectors as effective surveilling units and mobilizing field force against irrational antibiotic utilization is the need of the hour and requires policy reformation.
背景:尽管采取了大量措施,但包括巴基斯坦在内的中低收入国家(LMICs)仍在努力遏制非处方抗生素的销售,执行相关法规,并实施国家行动计划(NAP)以防止抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)。巴基斯坦国家行动计划要求药品检查员(DIs)确保根据处方销售抗生素。本研究旨在了解药品稽查员对无处方销售抗菌药的看法、潜在因素和政策执行情况:方法:采用半结构化访谈指南,对特意挑选的 17 名直接责任人进行了深入访谈,从而开展了一项定性研究。对访谈内容进行了逐字记录,并利用 MAXQDA 2022 软件的主题分析框架对数据进行了分析:数据分析后得出了五个主题:(1) 药品检查员--抗菌药物库的监管者,(2) 政策背景,(3) 对 AMR 的认识,(4) 应对 AMR 的障碍,以及 (5) 前进之路:战略和建议:结论:监管框架薄弱、认识水平低、庸医、既得利益和社会经济因素加剧了抗生素的不当使用。建议按照《巴基斯坦国家行动计划》的概述,选择更好的政策并加强 DI 兄弟会。认识到药品检查员是有效的监督单位,并动员实地力量打击不合理使用抗生素的行为是当务之急,需要进行政策改革。
{"title":"Drug Inspector as an antibiotic Steward: challenges and recommendations to implement national action plan of Pakistan on antimicrobial resistance.","authors":"Mishal Bajwa, Shairyar Afzal, Sadaf Areej Sheikh, Zikria Saleem","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2368825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2368825","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite significant measures, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan, struggle to curtail non-prescription antibiotic sales, enforce regulations, and implement National Action Plan (NAP) against antimicrobial resistance (AMR). NAP Pakistan entails drug inspectors (DIs) to ensure prescription-based sales of antibiotics. This study seeks to understand the perspective of DIs regarding antimicrobial sales without prescription, underlying factors, and policy implementation status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study employing a semi-structured interview guide using in-depth interviews with purposively selected 17 DIs was conducted. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analyzed following a thematic analysis framework utilizing MAXQDA 2022 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main themes emerged after data analysis: (1) drug inspector - the regulator of the antimicrobial armamentarium, (2) the policy context, (3) awareness regarding AMR, (4) barriers to combatting AMR, and (5) the way forward: strategies and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A weak regulatory framework, low level of awareness, quackery, vested interests, and socio-economic factors augment inappropriate antibiotic utilization. Opting for better policies and strengthening the DI fraternity as outlined in NAP Pakistan is recommended. Recognizing drug inspectors as effective surveilling units and mobilizing field force against irrational antibiotic utilization is the need of the hour and requires policy reformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141316921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2363485
Hayam Al Balushi, Amanj Kurdi, Najla Almutairi, Kirmanj Ismail Baker, Karwan M Amen, Hardee Karwi, Andrew Seaton, Brian Godman
Background: Inappropriate use of antibiotics is expected to increase during the COVID-19 pandemic, but there are limited data on COVID-19's long-term impact. We assessed the impact of COVID-19 on the quantity and quality of antibiotic use in Scotland.
Research design and methods: A segmented interrupted time series was applied to monthly dispensed antibiotics using prescription cost analysis data from March/2019 to March/2023. Antibiotic use was quantified using the number of items dispensed/1000 inhabitants (TIDs) and defined daily dose/1000 inhabitants/day (DIDs). The quality of antibiotic use was assessed using key quality indicators including the WHO AWaRe classification, proportion of broad-spectrum and "4C"-antibiotics.
Results: Overall, for all antibiotics, there was a non-significant increase in TIDs and DIDs before the first lockdown (March/2020) (β1), but a decline in the level immediately after the first (β2) and second lockdowns (β4) (November/2020), albeit non-significant. However, a significant increase in the time trend after the second lockdown (β5) for all antibiotic classes was observed. COVID-19 had no negative impact on AWaRe utilisation, with the proportion of all antibiotics from the Access group increasing from 76% in March/2019 to 90% in March/2023. The proportion of "4C" antibiotic reduced significantly after the second lockdown.
Conclusions: Neither the utilisation nor the quality of total antibiotic use appeared to have been significantly affected by COVID-19.
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the utilisation and quality of antibiotic use in the Scottish primary care setting: a population-based segmented interrupted time-series analysis.","authors":"Hayam Al Balushi, Amanj Kurdi, Najla Almutairi, Kirmanj Ismail Baker, Karwan M Amen, Hardee Karwi, Andrew Seaton, Brian Godman","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2363485","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2363485","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inappropriate use of antibiotics is expected to increase during the COVID-19 pandemic, but there are limited data on COVID-19's long-term impact. We assessed the impact of COVID-19 on the quantity and quality of antibiotic use in Scotland.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A segmented interrupted time series was applied to monthly dispensed antibiotics using prescription cost analysis data from March/2019 to March/2023. Antibiotic use was quantified using the number of items dispensed/1000 inhabitants (TIDs) and defined daily dose/1000 inhabitants/day (DIDs). The quality of antibiotic use was assessed using key quality indicators including the WHO AWaRe classification, proportion of broad-spectrum and \"4C\"-antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, for all antibiotics, there was a non-significant increase in TIDs and DIDs before the first lockdown (March/2020) (β<sub>1</sub>), but a decline in the level immediately after the first (β<sub>2</sub>) and second lockdowns (β<sub>4</sub>) (November/2020), albeit non-significant. However, a significant increase in the time trend after the second lockdown (β<sub>5</sub>) for all antibiotic classes was observed. COVID-19 had no negative impact on AWaRe utilisation, with the proportion of all antibiotics from the Access group increasing from 76% in March/2019 to 90% in March/2023. The proportion of \"4C\" antibiotic reduced significantly after the second lockdown.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neither the utilisation nor the quality of total antibiotic use appeared to have been significantly affected by COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141247683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The emergence of antiparasitic drug resistance poses a concerning threat to animals and humans. Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) have been widely used to treat infections in humans, pets, and livestock. Although this is an emerging field of study, the current review outlines possible mechanisms and examines potential synergism in combination therapies and the possible harmful effects of such an approach.
Areas covered: The present study delved into the latest pre-clinical research on utilizing MSCs to treat parasitic infections. As per investigations, the introduction of MSCs to patients grappling with parasitic diseases like schistosomiasis, malaria, cystic echinococcosis, toxoplasmosis, leishmaniasis, and trypanosomiasis has shown a reduction in parasite prevalence. This intervention also alters the levels of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, the combined administration of MSCs and antiparasitic drugs has demonstrated enhanced efficacy in combating parasites and modulating the immune response.
Expert opinion: Mesenchymal stem cells are a potential solution for addressing parasitic drug resistance. This is mainly because of their remarkable immunomodulatory abilities, which can potentially help combat parasites' resistance to drugs.
{"title":"Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cell therapy on parasitic drug resistance.","authors":"Soheil Sadr, Pouria Ahmadi Simab, Mahta Niazi, Zahra Yousefsani, Narges Lotfalizadeh, Ashkan Hajjafari, Hassan Borji","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2360684","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2360684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The emergence of antiparasitic drug resistance poses a concerning threat to animals and humans. Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) have been widely used to treat infections in humans, pets, and livestock. Although this is an emerging field of study, the current review outlines possible mechanisms and examines potential synergism in combination therapies and the possible harmful effects of such an approach.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The present study delved into the latest pre-clinical research on utilizing MSCs to treat parasitic infections. As per investigations, the introduction of MSCs to patients grappling with parasitic diseases like schistosomiasis, malaria, cystic echinococcosis, toxoplasmosis, leishmaniasis, and trypanosomiasis has shown a reduction in parasite prevalence. This intervention also alters the levels of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, the combined administration of MSCs and antiparasitic drugs has demonstrated enhanced efficacy in combating parasites and modulating the immune response.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Mesenchymal stem cells are a potential solution for addressing parasitic drug resistance. This is mainly because of their remarkable immunomodulatory abilities, which can potentially help combat parasites' resistance to drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"435-451"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141156750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-05-27DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2359725
Susannah Franco, Margaret R Hammerschlag
Introduction: Neonatal ocular prophylaxis with 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment is mandated by law in many U.S. states despite its lack of efficacy in preventing chlamydial ophthalmia and the low incidence of gonococcal ophthalmia today. The current shortage of 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment is bringing into question what alternatives exist for neonatal ocular prophylaxis for the prevention of gonococcal ophthalmia. Providers in states with mandates are concerned with the implications of administering intramuscular ceftriaxone to every newborn. Azithromycin eye drops are being considered as an alternative.
Areas covered: This article discusses 1% azithromycin eye drops as an alternative to 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment. Clinical experience, side effects, resistance, logistics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics are considered.
Expert opinion: Azithromycin eye drops are not an appropriate alternative to 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment for ocular prophylaxis. Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women is the most effective way to prevent neonatal ophthalmia. Mandates for universal prophylaxis should be withdrawn to avoid unnecessary medication administration, healthcare costs, and potential harm.
{"title":"Can we use azithromycin eye drops for gonococcal ophthalmia prophylaxis in the United States?","authors":"Susannah Franco, Margaret R Hammerschlag","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2359725","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2359725","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal ocular prophylaxis with 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment is mandated by law in many U.S. states despite its lack of efficacy in preventing chlamydial ophthalmia and the low incidence of gonococcal ophthalmia today. The current shortage of 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment is bringing into question what alternatives exist for neonatal ocular prophylaxis for the prevention of gonococcal ophthalmia. Providers in states with mandates are concerned with the implications of administering intramuscular ceftriaxone to every newborn. Azithromycin eye drops are being considered as an alternative.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article discusses 1% azithromycin eye drops as an alternative to 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment. Clinical experience, side effects, resistance, logistics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics are considered.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Azithromycin eye drops are not an appropriate alternative to 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment for ocular prophylaxis. Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women is the most effective way to prevent neonatal ophthalmia. Mandates for universal prophylaxis should be withdrawn to avoid unnecessary medication administration, healthcare costs, and potential harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"373-377"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141087526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-02-26DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2322429
Ahmad Z Al Meslamani
{"title":"Is the world crippled by antimicrobial resistance, or simply lacking information?","authors":"Ahmad Z Al Meslamani","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2322429","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2322429","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"365-368"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139930745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-04DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2323122
Niels Frimodt-Møller, Frederik Boetius Hertz
{"title":"Antibiotic stewardship: following in the footsteps of Nordic countries?","authors":"Niels Frimodt-Møller, Frederik Boetius Hertz","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2323122","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2323122","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"369-371"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140021335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-01-31DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2310004
Muhammad Zeeshan Munir, Amer Hayat Khan, Tahir Mehmood Khan
Background: To evaluate the opinions of healthcare workers regarding drug therapy problems linked to anti-infective medicines used for the treatment of COVID-19 infection in Pakistan.
Research methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to October 2022 using a self-administered questionnaire developed by the authors, having three sections: demographics, knowledge, and perception. The study was validated by research experts and pilot-tested on 30 subjects. The study included medical doctors, nurses, pharmacists from Punjab's government and private medical institutes.
Results: In this study, 382 of 400 participants replied. The mean knowledge score was 9.52 (SD 2.97), showing that participants had adequate knowledge of COVID-19 pharmacological interventions. The knowledge scores were significantly higher of those who treated COVID-19 patients and were from Lahore. Many doctors considered that elderly patients and those with blood disorders were at greater risk of experiencing drug-related problems. Most pharmacists support electronic prescription systems. Many doctors thought the lack of unified treatment guidelines, multiple prescribers, and self-medication were key obstacles in managing COVID-19 patients.
Conclusion: Most respondents had adequate knowledge. Older patients with comorbidities are at risk of adverse effects. Self-medication, polypharmacy, and multiple prescriptions can lead to misdiagnosis and complications. Electric prescriptions, team effort, and training programs can decrease these issues.
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' understanding and perception of drug-related issues linked to off-label pharmacological medications used for COVID-19.","authors":"Muhammad Zeeshan Munir, Amer Hayat Khan, Tahir Mehmood Khan","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2310004","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2310004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the opinions of healthcare workers regarding drug therapy problems linked to anti-infective medicines used for the treatment of COVID-19 infection in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Research methodology: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to October 2022 using a self-administered questionnaire developed by the authors, having three sections: demographics, knowledge, and perception. The study was validated by research experts and pilot-tested on 30 subjects. The study included medical doctors, nurses, pharmacists from Punjab's government and private medical institutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 382 of 400 participants replied. The mean knowledge score was 9.52 (SD 2.97), showing that participants had adequate knowledge of COVID-19 pharmacological interventions. The knowledge scores were significantly higher of those who treated COVID-19 patients and were from Lahore. Many doctors considered that elderly patients and those with blood disorders were at greater risk of experiencing drug-related problems. Most pharmacists support electronic prescription systems. Many doctors thought the lack of unified treatment guidelines, multiple prescribers, and self-medication were key obstacles in managing COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents had adequate knowledge. Older patients with comorbidities are at risk of adverse effects. Self-medication, polypharmacy, and multiple prescriptions can lead to misdiagnosis and complications. Electric prescriptions, team effort, and training programs can decrease these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"487-493"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139541792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2309998
Pulin Li, Ling Huang, Rui Han, Min Tang, Guanghe Fei, Daxiong Zeng, Ran Wang
Background: Since December 2022, the Omicron variant has led to a widespread pandemic in China. The study was to explore the safety and effectiveness of Paxlovid for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Research design and methods: We included patients at risk of developing severe COVID-19, all of whom exhibited mild to moderate symptoms and were admitted to three hospital centers. Patients were divided into two groups: one received Paxlovid alongside standard care, while the other was given only standard care. We compared clinical characteristics, hospital stay duration, and clinical outcomes between two groups. Multi-factor analysis determined the independent risk factors influencing the duration of hospitalization and disease progression.
Results: In the study, those treated with Paxlovid shorter hospital stays than those in the control group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the absence of Paxlovid treatment was a distinct risk factor for hospitalizations lasting over 7 days (OR: 4.983, 95% CI: 3.828-6.486, p < 0.001) and 14 days (OR: 2.940, 95% CI: 2.402-3.597, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Amid the Omicron outbreak, Paxlovid has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for reducing hospitalization durations for patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.
背景:自2022年12月以来,奥米克变异株导致中国大范围流行。该研究旨在探讨帕克洛维治疗冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)的安全性和有效性:我们纳入了有发生严重COVID-19风险的患者,他们均表现出轻度至中度症状,并在三家医院中心住院治疗。患者被分为两组:一组在接受标准治疗的同时接受 Paxlovid 治疗,另一组仅接受标准治疗。我们比较了两组患者的临床特征、住院时间和临床结果。多因素分析确定了影响住院时间和疾病进展的独立风险因素:在研究中,与对照组相比,接受 Paxlovid 治疗的患者的住院时间更短(p p p 结论:Paxlovid 治疗的患者的住院时间更短:在Omicron疫情中,Paxlovid被证明是一种安全有效的治疗方法,可缩短轻度至中度COVID-19患者的住院时间。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of Paxlovid in the treatment of adults with mild to moderate COVID-19 during the omicron epidemic: a multicentre study from China.","authors":"Pulin Li, Ling Huang, Rui Han, Min Tang, Guanghe Fei, Daxiong Zeng, Ran Wang","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2309998","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2309998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since December 2022, the Omicron variant has led to a widespread pandemic in China. The study was to explore the safety and effectiveness of Paxlovid for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included patients at risk of developing severe COVID-19, all of whom exhibited mild to moderate symptoms and were admitted to three hospital centers. Patients were divided into two groups: one received Paxlovid alongside standard care, while the other was given only standard care. We compared clinical characteristics, hospital stay duration, and clinical outcomes between two groups. Multi-factor analysis determined the independent risk factors influencing the duration of hospitalization and disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, those treated with Paxlovid shorter hospital stays than those in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the absence of Paxlovid treatment was a distinct risk factor for hospitalizations lasting over 7 days (OR: 4.983, 95% CI: 3.828-6.486, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 14 days (OR: 2.940, 95% CI: 2.402-3.597, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amid the Omicron outbreak, Paxlovid has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for reducing hospitalization durations for patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"469-477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139650631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-03DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2362270
Adriano Focus Lubanga, Akim Nelson Bwanali, Frank Kambiri, Gracian Harawa, Steward Mudenda, Samuel L Mpinganjira, Nathan Singano, Tumaini Makole, Thandizo Kapatsa, Mapeesho Kamayani, Stuart Ssebibubbu
Introduction: Antimicrobial drugs form an essential component of medical treatment in human and animal health. Resistance associated with their use has posed a global public health threat. Multiple efforts have been made at the global level directed by the World Health Organization and associated partners to develop policies aimed at combatting antimicrobial resistance.
Areas covered: Whilst the Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance and people-centered framework aim to guide countries in implementing successful antimicrobial resistance policies, their adoption and success depend on different implementation contexts. Therefore, this paper highlights the challenges and opportunities for implementing the World Health Organization's people-centered approach in sub-Saharan Africa, whilst recognizing antimicrobial resistance as a multifaceted problem rooted in 'complex systems.'
Expert opinion: The people-centered approach provides a solid framework for combating antimicrobial resistance. Countries should build sustainable national action plans, adopt the One Health approach, limit over-the-counter antibiotic consumption, and educate communities on rational antibiotic use. They should also promote inter-country collaborations and innovative solutions, strengthen drug regulatory capacities, invest in infection control, water sanitation, hygiene, diagnostics, and surveillance tools, and promote vaccine uptake to prevent drug-resistant infections.
{"title":"Tackling antimicrobial resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities for implementing the new people-centered WHO guidelines.","authors":"Adriano Focus Lubanga, Akim Nelson Bwanali, Frank Kambiri, Gracian Harawa, Steward Mudenda, Samuel L Mpinganjira, Nathan Singano, Tumaini Makole, Thandizo Kapatsa, Mapeesho Kamayani, Stuart Ssebibubbu","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2362270","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2362270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial drugs form an essential component of medical treatment in human and animal health. Resistance associated with their use has posed a global public health threat. Multiple efforts have been made at the global level directed by the World Health Organization and associated partners to develop policies aimed at combatting antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Whilst the Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance and people-centered framework aim to guide countries in implementing successful antimicrobial resistance policies, their adoption and success depend on different implementation contexts. Therefore, this paper highlights the challenges and opportunities for implementing the World Health Organization's people-centered approach in sub-Saharan Africa, whilst recognizing antimicrobial resistance as a multifaceted problem rooted in 'complex systems.'</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The people-centered approach provides a solid framework for combating antimicrobial resistance. Countries should build sustainable national action plans, adopt the One Health approach, limit over-the-counter antibiotic consumption, and educate communities on rational antibiotic use. They should also promote inter-country collaborations and innovative solutions, strengthen drug regulatory capacities, invest in infection control, water sanitation, hygiene, diagnostics, and surveillance tools, and promote vaccine uptake to prevent drug-resistant infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141175229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}