首页 > 最新文献

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of tafasitamab: data mining of the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system. 塔法西他单抗的真实世界药物警戒研究:美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的数据挖掘。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416914
Zhongliang Xu, Shimei Feng, Dan Huang, Hongli Wang, Jiating Liu, Zhengze Shen

Background: Tafasitamab is the first anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. The study was designed to evaluate tafasitamab-associated adverse events (AEs) by data mining the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Research design and methods: A disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the safety profile of tafasitamab based on the reports from the FAERS database between 2020Q3 and 2023Q3. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were used to identify the signals of AEs in patients receiving tafasitamab.

Results: A total of 529 reports with tafasitamab as the primary suspect drug were collected, including 1,262 AEs. Of these, 28 repeated AEs were identified using two algorithms. After excluding events unrelated to drug therapy, the top five repeated AEs by intensity ranking were cytopenia, immunosuppression, neutropenic sepsis, blood lactate dehydrogenase increased, and hematotoxicity. Unexpected significant AEs included polyneuropathy, splenomegaly, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, hypercalcemia, and ascites.

Conclusions: This study provides additional evidence for risk identification of tafasitamab in the real world, which could help clinicians and pharmacists increase vigilance and improve the safety of tafasitamab in clinical practice.

背景:塔法西他单抗是首个获准用于治疗不符合自体干细胞移植条件的复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的抗CD19单克隆抗体。该研究旨在通过挖掘美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,评估与他法西他单抗相关的不良事件(AEs):根据2020Q3至2023Q3期间FAERS数据库中的报告,对塔法西他单抗的安全性概况进行了比例失调分析。采用比例报告比(PRR)和经验贝叶斯几何平均数(EBGM)来确定接受他法西他单抗治疗患者的AEs信号:共收集到 529 份以他法西他单抗为主要可疑药物的报告,包括 1,262 例 AE。其中,使用两种算法确定了 28 例重复 AE。在排除了与药物治疗无关的事件后,按强度排序,前五位的重复 AE 为全血细胞减少、免疫抑制、中性败血症、血乳酸脱氢酶升高和血液毒性。意外的重大 AE 包括多发性神经病、脾肿大、嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症、高钙血症和腹水:本研究为现实世界中塔法西他单抗的风险识别提供了更多证据,有助于临床医生和药剂师提高警惕,改善临床实践中塔法西他单抗的安全性。
{"title":"A real-world pharmacovigilance study of tafasitamab: data mining of the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Zhongliang Xu, Shimei Feng, Dan Huang, Hongli Wang, Jiating Liu, Zhengze Shen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416914","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416914","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tafasitamab is the first anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. The study was designed to evaluate tafasitamab-associated adverse events (AEs) by data mining the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the safety profile of tafasitamab based on the reports from the FAERS database between 2020Q3 and 2023Q3. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were used to identify the signals of AEs in patients receiving tafasitamab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 529 reports with tafasitamab as the primary suspect drug were collected, including 1,262 AEs. Of these, 28 repeated AEs were identified using two algorithms. After excluding events unrelated to drug therapy, the top five repeated AEs by intensity ranking were cytopenia, immunosuppression, neutropenic sepsis, blood lactate dehydrogenase increased, and hematotoxicity. Unexpected significant AEs included polyneuropathy, splenomegaly, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, hypercalcemia, and ascites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides additional evidence for risk identification of tafasitamab in the real world, which could help clinicians and pharmacists increase vigilance and improve the safety of tafasitamab in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1431-1441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection of risk signals for ustekinumab in the real world using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). 使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)在现实世界中检测ustekinumab的风险信号。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2446409
Yi Zhao, Zelin Li, Kanghuai Zhang, Na Wang

Background: Ustekinumab is a fully human interleukin-12/23 (p40) inhibitor used to treat immune-mediated diseases. However, the limitations of clinical trials and the expanding target population necessitate an update on the ustekinumab-associated adverse events (AEs). We conducted signal mining for ustekinumab-related AEs using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Research design and methods: AE reports were collected from 2009 Q3 to 2024 Q1. Four disproportionality analysis algorithms - reporting odds ratio, medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker - were used to quantify the signals of ustekinumab.

Results: During this period 69,345 AE reports associated with ustekinumab were collected, and ustekinumab was identified as the primary suspect. Overall, 319 signals involving 15 system organ classes were identified, and 111 signals had a medium or strong value for IC025. Of them, 67 were classified as important medical events. Squamous cell carcinoma, pertussis, vulval abscess, breast abscess, and fistula exhibited higher signal intensities.

Conclusions: Our study identified the risk signals for ustekinumab using real-world data and provides further evidence to support its rational use. Due to the limitations of FAERS, further studies are warranted to verify these findings.

背景:Ustekinumab是一种完全的人白细胞介素-12/23 (p40)抑制剂,用于治疗免疫介导性疾病。然而,临床试验的局限性和目标人群的扩大需要对ustekinumumab相关不良事件(ae)进行更新。我们使用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)对与ustekinumab相关的ae进行了信号挖掘。研究设计与方法:收集2009年Q3 - 2024年Q1的AE报告。四种歧化分析算法——报告优势比、药品和保健产品监管机构、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络和多项伽玛-泊松分布收缩——被用来量化ustekinumab的信号。结果:在此期间,收集了69,345例与ustekinumab相关的AE报告,ustekinumab被确定为主要怀疑。总共鉴定出319个信号,涉及15个系统器官类别,111个信号具有中等或强IC025值。其中,67起被列为重要医疗事件。鳞状细胞癌、百日咳、外阴脓肿、乳房脓肿和瘘管表现出较高的信号强度。结论:我们的研究使用真实世界数据确定了ustekinumab的风险信号,并为其合理使用提供了进一步的证据。由于FAERS的局限性,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
{"title":"Detection of risk signals for ustekinumab in the real world using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).","authors":"Yi Zhao, Zelin Li, Kanghuai Zhang, Na Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2446409","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2446409","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ustekinumab is a fully human interleukin-12/23 (p40) inhibitor used to treat immune-mediated diseases. However, the limitations of clinical trials and the expanding target population necessitate an update on the ustekinumab-associated adverse events (AEs). We conducted signal mining for ustekinumab-related AEs using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>AE reports were collected from 2009 Q3 to 2024 Q1. Four disproportionality analysis algorithms - reporting odds ratio, medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker - were used to quantify the signals of ustekinumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During this period 69,345 AE reports associated with ustekinumab were collected, and ustekinumab was identified as the primary suspect. Overall, 319 signals involving 15 system organ classes were identified, and 111 signals had a medium or strong value for IC<sub>025</sub>. Of them, 67 were classified as important medical events. Squamous cell carcinoma, pertussis, vulval abscess, breast abscess, and fistula exhibited higher signal intensities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified the risk signals for ustekinumab using real-world data and provides further evidence to support its rational use. Due to the limitations of FAERS, further studies are warranted to verify these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1513-1519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142876366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in safety profiles of anti-herpesvirus medications: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database. 抗疱疹病毒药物安全性的差异:基于 FAERS 数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412235
Dan He, Dexuan Kong, Yanbin Zeng, Meifen Han, Shunguo Zhang, Zhiling Li

Background: Anti-herpesvirus drug safety profiles have not been systematically compared. Understanding variations in adverse events (AEs) could provide reference for rational clinical use.

Methods: We collected data on acyclovir, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and foscarnet from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to evaluate the risk of AEs.

Results: All drugs exhibited significant associations with hematotoxicity, with ganciclovir and foscarnet being more myelosuppressive. The correlation with renal impairment ranked as follows: foscarnet, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and acyclovir (ROR = 16.72, 7.06, 3.51, and 2.02, respectively). Regarding hepatotoxicity, ganciclovir was associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ROR = 52.83), and foscarnet was associated with fulminant hepatitis (ROR = 49.91). In the nervous system, acyclovir showed the highest intensity of neurotoxicity (ROR = 14.95). Valaciclovir ranked first in toxic encephalopathy (ROR = 64.70). Foscarnet showed the highest intensity of status epilepticus (ROR = 6.45). Besides, acyclovir showed the strongest association with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).

Conclusions: Our study revealed differences in safety profiles of four anti-herpesvirus medications. Ganciclovir exhibited the highest risk of hematotoxicity but appeared relatively safe in seizures and SCARs. Foscarnet was more likely to induce nephrotoxicity, seizures, and electrolyte imbalances than others. Acyclovir and valaciclovir were strongly associated with plasmacytosis, neurotoxicity, and SCARs.

背景:抗疱疹病毒药物的安全性尚未进行系统比较。了解不良事件(AEs)的变化可为临床合理用药提供参考:我们从美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中收集了 2004 年第一季度至 2023 年第三季度期间阿昔洛韦、更昔洛韦、伐昔洛韦和福斯康定的数据。结果显示,所有药物都与血液病有显著关联:结果:所有药物都与血液毒性有明显相关性,其中更昔洛韦和福沙奈特的骨髓抑制作用更强。与肾功能损害的相关性排序如下:福斯卡尼、更昔洛韦、伐昔洛韦和阿昔洛韦(ROR 分别为 16.72、7.06、3.51 和 2.02)。在肝脏毒性方面,更昔洛韦与急性-慢性肝功能衰竭有关(ROR = 52.83),而福沙耐特与暴发性肝炎有关(ROR = 49.91)。在神经系统中,阿昔洛韦的神经毒性最强(ROR = 14.95)。在中毒性脑病方面,伐昔洛韦排名第一(ROR = 64.70)。Foscarnet 的癫痫状态强度最高(ROR = 6.45)。此外,阿昔洛韦与严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)的关联性最强:我们的研究揭示了四种抗疱疹病毒药物在安全性方面的差异。更昔洛韦显示出最高的血液毒性风险,但在癫痫发作和 SCAR 方面似乎相对安全。与其他药物相比,Foscarnet 更容易引起肾毒性、癫痫发作和电解质失衡。阿昔洛韦和伐昔洛韦与浆细胞增多症、神经毒性和 SCAR 密切相关。
{"title":"Differences in safety profiles of anti-herpesvirus medications: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Dan He, Dexuan Kong, Yanbin Zeng, Meifen Han, Shunguo Zhang, Zhiling Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412235","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-herpesvirus drug safety profiles have not been systematically compared. Understanding variations in adverse events (AEs) could provide reference for rational clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on acyclovir, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and foscarnet from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to evaluate the risk of AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All drugs exhibited significant associations with hematotoxicity, with ganciclovir and foscarnet being more myelosuppressive. The correlation with renal impairment ranked as follows: foscarnet, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and acyclovir (ROR = 16.72, 7.06, 3.51, and 2.02, respectively). Regarding hepatotoxicity, ganciclovir was associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ROR = 52.83), and foscarnet was associated with fulminant hepatitis (ROR = 49.91). In the nervous system, acyclovir showed the highest intensity of neurotoxicity (ROR = 14.95). Valaciclovir ranked first in toxic encephalopathy (ROR = 64.70). Foscarnet showed the highest intensity of status epilepticus (ROR = 6.45). Besides, acyclovir showed the strongest association with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed differences in safety profiles of four anti-herpesvirus medications. Ganciclovir exhibited the highest risk of hematotoxicity but appeared relatively safe in seizures and SCARs. Foscarnet was more likely to induce nephrotoxicity, seizures, and electrolyte imbalances than others. Acyclovir and valaciclovir were strongly associated with plasmacytosis, neurotoxicity, and SCARs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1487-1496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mining of adverse event signals associated with inclisiran: a post-marketing analysis based on FAERS. 挖掘与 inclisiran 相关的不良事件信号:基于 FAERS 的上市后分析。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2409707
Xuezhong Shi, Ying Qiao, Yongli Yang, Nana Wang, Yi Zhang, Shangxin Shi, Guibin Shen, Xiaocan Jia

Background: This study analyzed adverse events (AEs) associated with inclisiran using the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to detect and characterize relevant safety signals.

Methods: We retrospectively extracted AE reports from the FAERS database spanning Q1 2022 to Q2 2024. Four disproportionality analysis algorithms were employed to identify AE signals for inclisiran, with subsequent comparisons made to PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (alirocumab/evolocumab). Additionally, we examined the characteristics and onset timing of inclisiran-related AE.

Results: A total of 4,122 reports of inclisiran as the 'primary suspected'. Compared with all other drugs, the most significant system organ class (SOC) was 'musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders' (ROR = 3.64, PRR = 3.19) and the most common SOC was 'general disorders and administration site conditions' (n = 2,769). These two SOCs were more strongly with inclisiran than evolocumab. At the preferred term level, strong signals were detected for cellulitis gangrenous (ROR = 101.29, PRR = 101.27, IC = 6.54, EBGM = 92.91) and bladder discomfort (ROR = 12.61, PRR = 12.61, IC = 3.64, EBGM = 12.48). The median onset time for inclisiran-related AEs was 43 days (interquartile range: 7-99 days).

Conclusions: This study enhanced our understanding of AEs to inclisiran. Future research on its long-term real-world use will offer insights into its safety.

背景:本研究利用美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)分析了与替吉瑞林相关的不良事件(AEs):本研究利用 FDA 的不良事件报告系统 (FAERS),分析了与 inclisiran 相关的不良事件 (AEs),以检测和描述相关的安全性信号:我们回顾性地从 FAERS 数据库中提取了 2022 年第一季度至 2024 年第二季度的 AE 报告。我们采用了四种比例失调分析算法来识别 inclisiran 的 AE 信号,随后与 PCSK9 单克隆抗体(alirocumab/evolocumab)进行比较。此外,我们还研究了与 inclisiran 相关的 AE 的特征和发病时间:共有 4122 份报告称 inclisiran 为 "主要疑似药物"。与所有其他药物相比,最重要的系统器官分类(SOC)是 "肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病"(ROR = 3.64,PRR = 3.19),最常见的系统器官分类是 "一般疾病和用药部位状况"(n = 2,769)。这两个 SOC 与 inclisiran 的关系比 evolocumab 更密切。在首选术语层面,检测到坏疽性蜂窝组织炎(ROR = 101.29,PRR = 101.27,IC = 6.54,EBGM = 92.91)和膀胱不适(ROR = 12.61,PRR = 12.61,IC = 3.64,EBGM = 12.48)的强烈信号。普利西兰相关AE的中位发病时间为43天(四分位间范围:7-99天):这项研究加深了我们对 inclisiran 相关不良反应的了解。结论:这项研究加深了我们对 inclisiran AEs 的了解,未来对其长期实际应用的研究将有助于深入了解其安全性。
{"title":"Mining of adverse event signals associated with inclisiran: a post-marketing analysis based on FAERS.","authors":"Xuezhong Shi, Ying Qiao, Yongli Yang, Nana Wang, Yi Zhang, Shangxin Shi, Guibin Shen, Xiaocan Jia","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2409707","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2409707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study analyzed adverse events (AEs) associated with inclisiran using the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to detect and characterize relevant safety signals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively extracted AE reports from the FAERS database spanning Q1 2022 to Q2 2024. Four disproportionality analysis algorithms were employed to identify AE signals for inclisiran, with subsequent comparisons made to PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (alirocumab/evolocumab). Additionally, we examined the characteristics and onset timing of inclisiran-related AE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,122 reports of inclisiran as the 'primary suspected'. Compared with all other drugs, the most significant system organ class (SOC) was 'musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders' (ROR = 3.64, PRR = 3.19) and the most common SOC was 'general disorders and administration site conditions' (n = 2,769). These two SOCs were more strongly with inclisiran than evolocumab. At the preferred term level, strong signals were detected for cellulitis gangrenous (ROR = 101.29, PRR = 101.27, IC = 6.54, EBGM = 92.91) and bladder discomfort (ROR = 12.61, PRR = 12.61, IC = 3.64, EBGM = 12.48). The median onset time for inclisiran-related AEs was 43 days (interquartile range: 7-99 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study enhanced our understanding of AEs to inclisiran. Future research on its long-term real-world use will offer insights into its safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1453-1458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142344393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pre- and post-operative safety considerations for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. 经皮肾镜取石术患者术前和术后的安全考虑。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2493782
Roxana Andra Coman, Lazaros Tzelves, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Ali Talyshinskii, Carlotta Nedbal, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Niall Davis, Bhaskar K Somani

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a widely used surgical procedure for treating large and complex kidney stones. Although effective, it carries risks of complications such as bleeding, infection, and injury to adjacent structures. Optimization of procedural techniques and perioperative care can help minimize these risks.

Areas covered: This review examines key pre- and post-operative safety considerations for PCNL patients. Topics include pre-operative imaging, patient positioning, puncture techniques, tract dilation, postoperative drainage, and complication management. The literature search involved analyzing recent studies and clinical guidelines to identify best practices. The search was conducted in several databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and clinical guidelines. Training modalities for improving procedural skills are discussed.

Expert opinion: Improving the safety of PCNL requires a combination of meticulous surgical technique, proper patient selection, and adherence to standardized protocols. Continuous skill development and technological advancements will further improve patient outcomes.

导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种广泛应用于治疗大型复杂肾结石的手术方法。虽然有效,但有出血、感染和相邻结构损伤等并发症的风险。优化手术技术和围手术期护理有助于减少这些风险。涵盖领域:本综述探讨了PCNL患者术前和术后的关键安全考虑因素。主题包括术前影像、病人定位、穿刺技术、束扩张、术后引流和并发症处理。文献检索包括分析最近的研究和临床指南,以确定最佳做法。搜索在几个数据库中进行,包括PubMed, Embase, Cochrane图书馆和临床指南。讨论了提高程序技能的培训方式。专家意见:提高PCNL的安全性需要结合细致的手术技术,适当的患者选择,并遵守标准化的协议。持续的技能发展和技术进步将进一步改善患者的治疗效果。
{"title":"Pre- and post-operative safety considerations for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Roxana Andra Coman, Lazaros Tzelves, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Ali Talyshinskii, Carlotta Nedbal, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Niall Davis, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2493782","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2493782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a widely used surgical procedure for treating large and complex kidney stones. Although effective, it carries risks of complications such as bleeding, infection, and injury to adjacent structures. Optimization of procedural techniques and perioperative care can help minimize these risks.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines key pre- and post-operative safety considerations for PCNL patients. Topics include pre-operative imaging, patient positioning, puncture techniques, tract dilation, postoperative drainage, and complication management. The literature search involved analyzing recent studies and clinical guidelines to identify best practices. The search was conducted in several databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and clinical guidelines. Training modalities for improving procedural skills are discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Improving the safety of PCNL requires a combination of meticulous surgical technique, proper patient selection, and adherence to standardized protocols. Continuous skill development and technological advancements will further improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1367-1381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143987993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for finerenone. 美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统对非格列酮事件的真实世界药物警戒研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412218
Youqi Huang, Hongjin Gao, Yuze Lin, Xiaowen Chen, Mingyu Chen, Min Chen

Objective: This study analyzed the signal mining of adverse events caused by finerenone based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and evaluated the drug's safety to provide a reference for the safe administration of this medication in medical institutions.

Methods: FAERS data from the third quarter of 2021 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were used, and the adverse event codes of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities were compared. After the data were processed, adverse event reports that featured finerenone as the most suspected drug were extracted.

Results: A total of 905 reported cases of adverse events including finerenone as the first suspected drug were extracted. The ratio of male to female patients was 1.25, and most were aged 65-85 years (30.1%). The adverse events that were reported more frequently with positive signals were decreased glomerular filtration rate, hyperkalemia, increased blood creatinine, and dizziness. The adverse events that were concentrated on in investigations were metabolism and nutrition disorders and diseases of the renal and urinary system.

Conclusions: Our study identified significant novel adverse events (AEs) signals for finerenone that could provide support for clinical monitoring of and risk identification for finerenone.

研究目的该研究基于美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS),对非格列酮引起的不良事件进行信号挖掘分析,评估该药物的安全性,为医疗机构安全用药提供参考:方法:采用2021年第三季度至2023年第四季度的FAERS数据,对比《监管活动医学词典》中的不良事件代码。数据处理后,提取以非格列酮为最可疑药物的不良事件报告:结果:共提取了 905 例以非格列酮为首要可疑药物的不良事件报告。男性和女性患者的比例为 1.25,大多数患者的年龄在 65-85 岁之间(30.1%)。阳性信号较多的不良事件是肾小球滤过率下降、高钾血症、血肌酐升高和头晕。调查中集中出现的不良事件是代谢和营养失调以及肾脏和泌尿系统疾病:我们的研究发现了非格列酮的重大新不良事件(AEs)信号,可为非格列酮的临床监测和风险识别提供支持。
{"title":"Real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for finerenone.","authors":"Youqi Huang, Hongjin Gao, Yuze Lin, Xiaowen Chen, Mingyu Chen, Min Chen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412218","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzed the signal mining of adverse events caused by finerenone based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and evaluated the drug's safety to provide a reference for the safe administration of this medication in medical institutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS data from the third quarter of 2021 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were used, and the adverse event codes of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities were compared. After the data were processed, adverse event reports that featured finerenone as the most suspected drug were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 905 reported cases of adverse events including finerenone as the first suspected drug were extracted. The ratio of male to female patients was 1.25, and most were aged 65-85 years (30.1%). The adverse events that were reported more frequently with positive signals were decreased glomerular filtration rate, hyperkalemia, increased blood creatinine, and dizziness. The adverse events that were concentrated on in investigations were metabolism and nutrition disorders and diseases of the renal and urinary system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified significant novel adverse events (AEs) signals for finerenone that could provide support for clinical monitoring of and risk identification for finerenone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1479-1486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dapagliflozin cardiovascular effects on end-stage kidney disease (DARE-ESKD-2) trial: rationale and design. 达帕格列净对终末期肾病心血管的影响(DARE-ESKD-2)试验:原理与设计。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-13 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412228
Joaquim Barreto, Marilia Martins, Mauro Pascoa, Sheila T K Medorima, Isabella Bonilha, Daniel Campos Jesus, Cinthia E M Carbonara, Kelcia R S Quadros, Barbara Assato, Alessandra M Campos-Staffico, Gil Guerra Júnior, Wilson Nadruz, Rodrigo B de Oliveira, Andrei C Sposito

Background: Dapagliflozin prevents myocardial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease patients regardless of residual kidney function. We hypothesized that this effect is extensible also to patients on dialysis.

Research design and methods: The DARE-ESKD-2 is an ongoing, single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial designed to determine the effects of adding dapagliflozin to standard treatment on myocardial function and structure. Eligible patients were adults on a regular dialysis scheme for more than 3 months. Pregnancy, liver failure, allergy to the investigational drug, and prior use of SGLT2i were exclusion criteria. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to dapagliflozin or standard treatment groups for 24-weeks. The primary goal is to compare the change in NT-proBNP levels between study arms, and secondary goals include comparing the between-group difference in left ventricle global longitudinal strain, indexed mass, ejection fraction, and E/e` ratio, and on symptoms scale and 6-minute walk test distance. An exploratory analysis will evaluate changes in body composition and bone densitometry.

Results: The trial has finished the enrollment of 80 patients, who are currently being followed-up.

Conclusions: This trial will provide novel data on myocardial effects of SGLT2i in dialysis recipients. Results from this study may provide evidence to support SGLT2i use in ESKD.

背景:达帕格列净可预防慢性肾脏病患者的心肌功能障碍,而与残余肾功能无关,我们假设这种效果也可扩展至透析患者:DARE-ESKD-2是一项正在进行的单中心、开放标签随机临床试验,旨在确定在标准治疗的基础上添加达帕格列净对心肌功能和结构的影响。符合条件的患者为接受常规透析治疗 3 个月以上的成人。妊娠、肝功能衰竭、对研究药物过敏以及曾使用过 SGLT2i 均为排除标准。参与者按 1:1 的比例随机分配到达帕格列净或标准治疗组,为期 24 周。主要目标是比较研究组间 NT-proBNP 水平的变化,次要目标包括比较组间左心室整体纵向应变、指数质量、射血分数和 E/e` 比值以及症状量表和 6 分钟步行测试距离的差异。一项探索性分析将评估身体成分和骨密度测量的变化:结果:该试验已完成 80 名患者的注册,目前正在随访中:该试验将为透析患者服用 SGLT2i 对心肌的影响提供新数据。这项研究的结果可为 SGLT2i 在 ESKD 中的应用提供支持证据。
{"title":"Dapagliflozin cardiovascular effects on end-stage kidney disease (DARE-ESKD-2) trial: rationale and design.","authors":"Joaquim Barreto, Marilia Martins, Mauro Pascoa, Sheila T K Medorima, Isabella Bonilha, Daniel Campos Jesus, Cinthia E M Carbonara, Kelcia R S Quadros, Barbara Assato, Alessandra M Campos-Staffico, Gil Guerra Júnior, Wilson Nadruz, Rodrigo B de Oliveira, Andrei C Sposito","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412228","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dapagliflozin prevents myocardial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease patients regardless of residual kidney function. We hypothesized that this effect is extensible also to patients on dialysis.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The DARE-ESKD-2 is an ongoing, single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial designed to determine the effects of adding dapagliflozin to standard treatment on myocardial function and structure. Eligible patients were adults on a regular dialysis scheme for more than 3 months. Pregnancy, liver failure, allergy to the investigational drug, and prior use of SGLT2i were exclusion criteria. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to dapagliflozin or standard treatment groups for 24-weeks. The primary goal is to compare the change in NT-proBNP levels between study arms, and secondary goals include comparing the between-group difference in left ventricle global longitudinal strain, indexed mass, ejection fraction, and E/e` ratio, and on symptoms scale and 6-minute walk test distance. An exploratory analysis will evaluate changes in body composition and bone densitometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial has finished the enrollment of 80 patients, who are currently being followed-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial will provide novel data on myocardial effects of SGLT2i in dialysis recipients. Results from this study may provide evidence to support SGLT2i use in ESKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1471-1477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mining and influencing factors analysis of sacituzumab govitecan adverse drug event based on FAERS database. 基于FAERS数据库的sacituzumab govitecan药物不良事件挖掘及影响因素分析。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2430305
Liu Yang, Xueyu Duan, Shilin Wu, Xiaobo Liu, Hao Fan, Dingcai Zhang, Xuejiao Wu, Peng Hua

Objective: Utilizing the FAERS database, this study aims to analyze the ADE signals of sacituzumab govitecan to provide references for clinical safety.

Methods: By searching the US FAERS database, we applied Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) methods to analyze ADE reports for sacituzumab govitecan from Q2 2020 to Q4 2023, covering 15 quarters.

Results: The total number of reports with sacituzumab govitecan as the first suspicion was 2854. A total of 139 signals involving 26 SOCs were obtained. The most reported were general disorders and administration site conditions (2,307 cases, 25.66%), followed by gastrointestinal disorders (1,125 cases, 12.52%), and investigations (810 cases, 9.01%). Frequent ADEs included sepsis and COVID-19 were not listed in the prescribing information. The signal strength analysis highlighted conditions like cholestasis and epilepsy not mentioned in the prescribing information. Furthermore, an analysis of influencing factors revealed differences in infections and infestations by gender and nationality (p < 0.05), and in gastrointestinal disorders and blood and lymphatic system disorders by gender, treatment duration, and nationality (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Common ADEs generally correspond with the prescribing information. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding unlisted ADEs about sacituzumab govitecan, and close monitoring of laboratory indicators ensure patient medication safety.

研究目的本研究旨在利用FAERS数据库,分析sacituzumab govitecan的ADE信号,为临床安全性提供参考:通过检索美国FAERS数据库,采用报告比值比(ROR)和比例报告比(PRR)方法,分析了2020年第二季度至2023年第四季度,共15个季度的sacituzumab govitecan的ADE报告,并从影响因素层面分析了优先系统器官分类(SOC):结果:以sacituzumab govitecan为首要疑点的报告总数为2854份。共获得 139 个信号,涉及 26 个器官分类。报告最多的是一般疾病和用药部位状况(2307 例,25.66%),其次是胃肠道疾病(1125 例,12.52%)和检查(810 例,9.01%)。常见的 ADE 包括疾病进展和中性粒细胞减少症,而败血症和 COVID-19 等情况则未列入处方信息。信号强度分析强调了胆碱能综合征和三阴性乳腺癌等病症,而胆汁淤积症和癫痫等病症则未在处方信息中提及。此外,对影响因素的分析表明,不同性别和国籍的人在感染和侵袭方面存在差异(p p 结论):常见的 ADE 和涉及的器官系统一般与处方信息相符。临床医生在使用sacituzumab govitecan时应警惕未列出的ADEs,并密切监测实验室指标,确保患者用药安全。
{"title":"Mining and influencing factors analysis of sacituzumab govitecan adverse drug event based on FAERS database.","authors":"Liu Yang, Xueyu Duan, Shilin Wu, Xiaobo Liu, Hao Fan, Dingcai Zhang, Xuejiao Wu, Peng Hua","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2430305","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2430305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Utilizing the FAERS database, this study aims to analyze the ADE signals of sacituzumab govitecan to provide references for clinical safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By searching the US FAERS database, we applied Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) methods to analyze ADE reports for sacituzumab govitecan from Q2 2020 to Q4 2023, covering 15 quarters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of reports with sacituzumab govitecan as the first suspicion was 2854. A total of 139 signals involving 26 SOCs were obtained. The most reported were general disorders and administration site conditions (2,307 cases, 25.66%), followed by gastrointestinal disorders (1,125 cases, 12.52%), and investigations (810 cases, 9.01%). Frequent ADEs included sepsis and COVID-19 were not listed in the prescribing information. The signal strength analysis highlighted conditions like cholestasis and epilepsy not mentioned in the prescribing information. Furthermore, an analysis of influencing factors revealed differences in infections and infestations by gender and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and in gastrointestinal disorders and blood and lymphatic system disorders by gender, treatment duration, and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Common ADEs generally correspond with the prescribing information. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding unlisted ADEs about sacituzumab govitecan, and close monitoring of laboratory indicators ensure patient medication safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1421-1430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Safety, Efficacy, and Clinical Use of Novel Once-Weekly Insulins in the Management of Diabetes. 新型每周一次胰岛素治疗糖尿病的安全性。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2593372
Amanda DeLuca, Ashley Schultz, Hannah Ofori, Viviana Maggio, Manfredi Rizzo, Ali A Rizvi

Introduction: Insulin remains the mainstay of diabetes management. Once weekly insulins (OWI) being investigated as viable options for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Less frequent dosing and better pharmacokinetic profile with these products hold the promise for improved patient adherence and enhanced efficacy in everyday practice.

Areas covered: We conducted a biomedical literature review of the PubMed database from 2009 to 2025. This narrative review summarizes the characteristics, advantages, and drawbacks of the two OWI products on the market and in development, namely insulin icodec and insulin efsitora. We review the published data with an emphasis on the safety of these when compared with daily long-acting insulin in insulin-treated and insulin-naïve patients with diabetes.

Expert opinion: The available data for OWI thus far points to similar adherence, acceptability, and efficacy when compared to once-daily insulin. OWI use was associated with comparable lowering of glycosylated hemoglobin and achievement of glycemic targets, potentially widening the treatment options for individuals with diabetes. However, increased risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain were seen in some studies. The clinical concerns regarding hypoglycemia led the U.S. regulatory agency to vote against recommending approval of icodec for use in patients with type 1 diabetes.

胰岛素仍然是糖尿病治疗的主要手段。每周一次的胰岛素(OWI)作为1型和2型糖尿病的可行选择进行研究。这些产品较少的频繁给药和更好的药代动力学特征,有望改善患者的依从性,并在日常实践中增强疗效。涵盖领域:我们对2009-2025年PubMed数据库进行了生物医学文献综述。这篇叙述性的综述总结了市场上和开发中的两种OWI产品,即胰岛素icodec和胰岛素efsitora的特点、优点和缺点。我们回顾了已发表的数据,重点是与胰岛素治疗和insulin-naïve糖尿病患者的每日长效胰岛素相比,这些药物的安全性。专家意见:迄今为止,OWI的可用数据表明,与每日一次胰岛素相比,OWI具有相似的依从性、可接受性和有效性。OWI的使用与糖化血红蛋白的相应降低和血糖目标的实现相关,潜在地扩大了糖尿病患者的治疗选择。然而,在一些研究中发现,低血糖和体重增加的风险增加。对低血糖的临床担忧导致美国监管机构投票反对推荐批准icodec用于1型糖尿病患者。
{"title":"The Safety, Efficacy, and Clinical Use of Novel Once-Weekly Insulins in the Management of Diabetes.","authors":"Amanda DeLuca, Ashley Schultz, Hannah Ofori, Viviana Maggio, Manfredi Rizzo, Ali A Rizvi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2593372","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2593372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Insulin remains the mainstay of diabetes management. Once weekly insulins (OWI) being investigated as viable options for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Less frequent dosing and better pharmacokinetic profile with these products hold the promise for improved patient adherence and enhanced efficacy in everyday practice.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We conducted a biomedical literature review of the PubMed database from 2009 to 2025. This narrative review summarizes the characteristics, advantages, and drawbacks of the two OWI products on the market and in development, namely insulin icodec and insulin efsitora. We review the published data with an emphasis on the safety of these when compared with daily long-acting insulin in insulin-treated and insulin-naïve patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The available data for OWI thus far points to similar adherence, acceptability, and efficacy when compared to once-daily insulin. OWI use was associated with comparable lowering of glycosylated hemoglobin and achievement of glycemic targets, potentially widening the treatment options for individuals with diabetes. However, increased risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain were seen in some studies. The clinical concerns regarding hypoglycemia led the U.S. regulatory agency to vote against recommending approval of icodec for use in patients with type 1 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of ciprofol and propofol on dreaming and emotional response during painless gastroscopy: a single-center randomized controlled trial. 环丙酚和异丙酚在无痛胃镜检查中梦境和情绪反应的比较:一项单中心随机对照试验。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2596268
Luran Xiong, Kunjie Li, Xinyi Feng, Jiahao Wu, Yong Yang, Tao Zhong

Background and aims: Ciprofol (HSK3486), a novel intravenous anesthetic with a chemical structure similar to propofol, is not inferior to propofol in terms of its effectiveness. We compared the effects of ciprofol and propofol on dreams and emotional states in patients following painless gastroscopy.

Research design and methods: This was a single-center, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was the proportion of positive dreams during sedation.

Results: A total of 110 outpatients were included, with 55 in each group. The proportion of positive dreams among dreamers was significantly greater in the propofol group than in the ciprofol group (60.9% vs 20.0%; p = 0.020). Additionally, the propofol group exhibited significantly higher positive emotion scores compared to the ciprofol group (19 [15,25] vs 17 [12,21]; p = 0.021). No significant differences were observed in vital signs, BIS values, or satisfaction with the procedure between the two groups. As for the adverse drug reactions, the incidence of injection pain of propofol was significantly higher than that of ciprofol (12.7% vs 0%; p = 0.013).

Conclusions: Compared to propofol, ciprofol demonstrated a weaker capacity to induce positive dreams and emotions during painless gastroscopy. However, this does not impact patient satisfaction with the procedure.

Clinical trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn; identifier: ChiCTR2400082655.

背景与目的:环丙酚(HSK3486)是一种新型静脉麻醉药,其化学结构与异丙酚相似,其疗效不逊于异丙酚。我们比较了环丙酚和异丙酚对无痛胃镜检查患者梦境和情绪状态的影响。研究设计和方法:这是一项单中心、随机对照试验。主要结果是镇静期间积极梦境的比例。结果:共纳入门诊患者110例,每组55例。异丙酚组做梦者做积极梦的比例明显高于环丙酚组(60.9% vs 20.0%; p = 0.020)。此外,异丙酚组的积极情绪得分明显高于环丙酚组(19 [15,25]vs 17 [12,21]; p = 0.021)。两组患者的生命体征、BIS值或手术满意度均无显著差异。在药物不良反应方面,异丙酚的注射痛发生率明显高于环丙酚(12.7% vs 0%; p = 0.013)。结论:与异丙酚相比,环丙酚在无痛胃镜检查中诱导积极梦境和情绪的能力较弱。然而,这并不影响患者对手术的满意度。临床试验注册:www.chictr.org.cn;标识符:ChiCTR2400082655。
{"title":"Comparison of ciprofol and propofol on dreaming and emotional response during painless gastroscopy: a single-center randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Luran Xiong, Kunjie Li, Xinyi Feng, Jiahao Wu, Yong Yang, Tao Zhong","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2596268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2596268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Ciprofol (HSK3486), a novel intravenous anesthetic with a chemical structure similar to propofol, is not inferior to propofol in terms of its effectiveness. We compared the effects of ciprofol and propofol on dreams and emotional states in patients following painless gastroscopy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a single-center, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was the proportion of positive dreams during sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 outpatients were included, with 55 in each group. The proportion of positive dreams among dreamers was significantly greater in the propofol group than in the ciprofol group (60.9% vs 20.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.020). Additionally, the propofol group exhibited significantly higher positive emotion scores compared to the ciprofol group (19 [15,25] vs 17 [12,21]; <i>p</i> = 0.021). No significant differences were observed in vital signs, BIS values, or satisfaction with the procedure between the two groups. As for the adverse drug reactions, the incidence of injection pain of propofol was significantly higher than that of ciprofol (12.7% vs 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to propofol, ciprofol demonstrated a weaker capacity to induce positive dreams and emotions during painless gastroscopy. However, this does not impact patient satisfaction with the procedure.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.chictr.org.cn; identifier: ChiCTR2400082655.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1