首页 > 最新文献

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
COVID-19 vaccine safety studies- the need for a third group for extended monitoring. COVID-19疫苗安全性研究——需要第三组进行延长监测。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-03 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2542249
Upinder Kaur, Sankha Shubhra Chakrabarti

Introduction: Studies assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness have generally categorized individuals into 'vaccinated' and 'unvaccinated' groups. Long-term safety studies are sparse and have usually compared adverse events with background rates. Studies on timing of COVID-19 vaccination as a determinant of long COVID have provided variable results, while there is scarce data on timing of vaccination as a determinant of adverse events.

Areas covered: We discuss some of our observations as well as the global evidence on the timing of COVID-19 vaccination as a determinant of long-COVID and adverse events. This special report is hypothesis-generating and aims to propose a conceptual framework and not establish causality.

Expert opinion: We propose an alternative classification strategy for COVID-19 vaccinees, with special emphasis on individuals who received any dose of vaccination after recovering from natural COVID-19, i.e. the 'vaccine-after-COVID' (VAC) group. These individuals should be followed up for an extended period through multicentric and database studies. This may help in understanding the long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines and the natural course of long COVID. Immunological characteristics of this group should also be scrutinized. The evidence gained might be useful in planning vaccination policies in the event of future pandemics.

导论:评估COVID-19疫苗有效性的研究通常将个体分为“接种疫苗”和“未接种疫苗”两组。长期安全性研究很少,并且通常将不良事件与背景发生率进行比较。关于COVID-19疫苗接种时间作为长期COVID决定因素的研究提供了不同的结果,而关于疫苗接种时间作为不良事件决定因素的数据很少。涵盖领域:我们讨论了我们的一些观察结果以及关于COVID-19疫苗接种时间作为长期covid和不良事件决定因素的全球证据。这个特别报告是假设生成,旨在提出一个概念框架,而不是建立因果关系。专家意见:我们为COVID-19疫苗接种者提出了另一种分类策略,特别强调在自然COVID-19恢复后接种任何剂量疫苗的个人,即“covid后疫苗”(VAC)组。应通过多中心和数据库研究长期跟踪这些人。这可能有助于了解COVID-19疫苗的长期安全性和长期COVID-19的自然过程。这组患者的免疫学特征也应仔细观察。获得的证据可能有助于在未来发生大流行时制定疫苗接种政策。
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine safety studies- the need for a third group for extended monitoring.","authors":"Upinder Kaur, Sankha Shubhra Chakrabarti","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2542249","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2542249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness have generally categorized individuals into 'vaccinated' and 'unvaccinated' groups. Long-term safety studies are sparse and have usually compared adverse events with background rates. Studies on timing of COVID-19 vaccination as a determinant of long COVID have provided variable results, while there is scarce data on timing of vaccination as a determinant of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We discuss some of our observations as well as the global evidence on the timing of COVID-19 vaccination as a determinant of long-COVID and adverse events. This special report is hypothesis-generating and aims to propose a conceptual framework and not establish causality.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>We propose an alternative classification strategy for COVID-19 vaccinees, with special emphasis on individuals who received any dose of vaccination after recovering from natural COVID-19, i.e. the 'vaccine-after-COVID' (VAC) group. These individuals should be followed up for an extended period through multicentric and database studies. This may help in understanding the long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines and the natural course of long COVID. Immunological characteristics of this group should also be scrutinized. The evidence gained might be useful in planning vaccination policies in the event of future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144752824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mechanism and clinical utility of abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. 阿巴接受治疗类风湿关节炎的机制及临床应用。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2505542
Qin-Yi Su, Jing-Ting Zhang, Hong-Jie Gao, Yan Zhang, Jing Luo, Ting-Yu Cao, Meng-Yu Yang, Sheng-Xiao Zhang

Introduction: Abatacept, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(bDMARD), has demonstrated unique and effective therapeutic properties for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Areas covered: This review offers an in-depth examination of the mechanism by which abatacept exerts its effects in RA treatment and assesses its efficacy and safety based on a range of studies. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase databases, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Wanfang Data, and CNKI from the time the databases were created until 30 July 2024.

Expert opinion: By modulating the CD28 and CD80/CD86 costimulatory signaling pathways, abatacept is instrumental in regulating immune cells and cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis RA. Longitudinal studies have highlighted its capacity to mitigate disease advancement and maintain joint functionality. The most frequently reported adverse effects associated with abatacept are headache, nausea, and upper respiratory tract infections, which are typically self-resolving. The incidence of serious infections was not high, mainly various types of bacterial pneumonia. Comparative safety analyses of abatacept with other DMARDs yield encouraging results. As our understanding of the mechanism of action of abatacept improves, we may be able to better identify appropriate biologic therapies and advanced combination therapies for RA patients and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Abatacept是一种生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARD),具有独特而有效的治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的特性。涵盖领域:本综述深入探讨了abataccept在类风湿关节炎治疗中发挥作用的机制,并基于一系列研究评估了其有效性和安全性。我们对PubMed、Embase数据库、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、万方数据和CNKI等数据库进行了全面检索,检索时间从数据库创建到2024年7月30日。专家意见:通过调节CD28和CD80/CD86共刺激信号通路,abataccept在调节与RA发病机制相关的免疫细胞和细胞因子中发挥重要作用。纵向研究强调了其减缓疾病进展和维持关节功能的能力。最常报道的与阿巴接受相关的不良反应是头痛、恶心和上呼吸道感染,这些通常是自愈的。严重感染发生率不高,以各类细菌性肺炎为主。abataccept与其他dmard的安全性比较分析得出了令人鼓舞的结果。随着我们对abataccept作用机制的了解的提高,我们可能能够更好地为RA患者确定合适的生物疗法和高级联合疗法,并最终改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Mechanism and clinical utility of abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Qin-Yi Su, Jing-Ting Zhang, Hong-Jie Gao, Yan Zhang, Jing Luo, Ting-Yu Cao, Meng-Yu Yang, Sheng-Xiao Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2505542","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2505542","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abatacept, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(bDMARD), has demonstrated unique and effective therapeutic properties for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review offers an in-depth examination of the mechanism by which abatacept exerts its effects in RA treatment and assesses its efficacy and safety based on a range of studies. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase databases, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Wanfang Data, and CNKI from the time the databases were created until 30 July 2024.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>By modulating the CD28 and CD80/CD86 costimulatory signaling pathways, abatacept is instrumental in regulating immune cells and cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis RA. Longitudinal studies have highlighted its capacity to mitigate disease advancement and maintain joint functionality. The most frequently reported adverse effects associated with abatacept are headache, nausea, and upper respiratory tract infections, which are typically self-resolving. The incidence of serious infections was not high, mainly various types of bacterial pneumonia. Comparative safety analyses of abatacept with other DMARDs yield encouraging results. As our understanding of the mechanism of action of abatacept improves, we may be able to better identify appropriate biologic therapies and advanced combination therapies for RA patients and ultimately improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"59-70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143984824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the EudraVigilance and VigiAccess databases. 与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的胃肠道不良事件:EudraVigilance 和 VigiAccess 数据库的药物警戒分析。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539
Syed Arman Rabbani, Atul Khurana, Mohamed El-Tanani, Mandeep Kumar Arora, Shrestha Sharma, Sathvik B Sridhar, Harikesh Dubey

Background: This study aimed to provide an overview of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using two pharmacovigilance databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess.

Research design and methods: Data was collected from the date of ICI's marketing authorization until 30 November 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used as a measure of ADR reporting disproportionality for signal detection.

Results: Overall, across both databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess, a total of 76,606 ADR reports were analyzed. In EudraVigilance, colitis (12,581) and diarrhea (12,108) were the most reported GI adverse events, with similar findings in VigiAccess. Furthermore, in both databases, the most ADR reports were associated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Durvalumab (ROR: 3.96, 95%CI :3.65-4.28), ipilimumab (ROR: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.89-2.01), nivolumab (ROR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.07), and atezolizumab (ROR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.07) demonstrated higher risks of GI events compared to other ICIs. EudraVigilance analysis identified dysphagia, ascites, hematochezia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as potential signals associated with ICI therapy. Majority of ADR reports (87.2%) comprised serious GI adverse events, a portion of which was associated with fatal outcomes (14.5%). Atezolizumab (14.9%) and pembrolizumab (11.9%) were linked to a higher incidence of fatal outcomes compared to other ICIs.

Conclusion: The differential risk profiles of ICIs-associated-GI adverse events underscore the importance of personalized therapy in oncology.

研究背景本研究旨在利用两个药物警戒数据库(EudraVigilance和VigiAccess)概述与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)相关的胃肠道(GI)不良事件:数据收集时间为 ICI 获批上市之日起至 2023 年 11 月 30 日。报告几率比(ROR)被用来衡量ADR报告与信号检测的不相称性:总体而言,EudraVigilance 和 VigiAccess 两个数据库共分析了 76,606 份 ADR 报告。在 EudraVigilance 中,结肠炎(12,581 例)和腹泻(12,108 例)是报告最多的消化道不良事件,在 VigiAccess 中也有类似的结果。此外,在这两个数据库中,最多的 ADR 报告与 nivolumab 和 pembrolizumab 有关。与其他 ICIs 相比,Durvalumab(ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28)、ipilimumab(ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01)、nivolumab(ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07)和 atezolizumab(ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07)发生消化道事件的风险较高。EudraVigilance分析发现,吞咽困难、腹水、血尿和胃食管反流病是与ICI治疗相关的潜在信号。大部分 ADR 报告(87.2%)包括严重的消化道不良事件,其中一部分与死亡结果有关(14.5%)。与其他 ICIs 相比,Atezolizumab(14.9%)和 pembrolizumab(11.9%)的致命后果发生率更高:ICIs相关GI不良事件的不同风险特征凸显了肿瘤个性化治疗的重要性。
{"title":"Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the EudraVigilance and VigiAccess databases.","authors":"Syed Arman Rabbani, Atul Khurana, Mohamed El-Tanani, Mandeep Kumar Arora, Shrestha Sharma, Sathvik B Sridhar, Harikesh Dubey","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to provide an overview of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using two pharmacovigilance databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data was collected from the date of ICI's marketing authorization until 30 November 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used as a measure of ADR reporting disproportionality for signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, across both databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess, a total of 76,606 ADR reports were analyzed. In EudraVigilance, colitis (12,581) and diarrhea (12,108) were the most reported GI adverse events, with similar findings in VigiAccess. Furthermore, in both databases, the most ADR reports were associated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Durvalumab (ROR: 3.96, 95%CI :3.65-4.28), ipilimumab (ROR: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.89-2.01), nivolumab (ROR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.07), and atezolizumab (ROR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.07) demonstrated higher risks of GI events compared to other ICIs. EudraVigilance analysis identified dysphagia, ascites, hematochezia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as potential signals associated with ICI therapy. Majority of ADR reports (87.2%) comprised serious GI adverse events, a portion of which was associated with fatal outcomes (14.5%). Atezolizumab (14.9%) and pembrolizumab (11.9%) were linked to a higher incidence of fatal outcomes compared to other ICIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differential risk profiles of ICIs-associated-GI adverse events underscore the importance of personalized therapy in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"103-113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Clinical adverse events to letairis: a real-world drug safety study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). 来泰利的临床不良事件:基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 的真实世界药物安全性研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416243
Yu-Ting Bi, Bo Dong
{"title":"RETRACTED ARTICLE: Clinical adverse events to letairis: a real-world drug safety study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).","authors":"Yu-Ting Bi, Bo Dong","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416243","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416243","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"i-viii"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Levetiracetam and severe cutaneous adverse reactions: insights from FAERS database analysis. 左乙拉西坦与严重皮肤不良反应:来自FAERS数据库分析的见解。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2435411
Jing Yao, Yujie Lin, Linwei Chen

Objective: To investigate the association between levetiracetam and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: Disproportionality analysis was performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Information Component (IC) methods. Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, time to onset, and concomitant medication data were examined.

Results: A total of 1,188 SCAR cases with levetiracetam as the primary suspect were analyzed through disproportionality analysis. Female patients comprised 45.96% of cases, with 50.42% aged between 18 and 65 years. The analysis indicated a significant association with SCARs, showing an ROR of 4.47 and an IC of 2.14. The most common SCAR was Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), occurring in 540 cases. The median time to onset for SCARs was 16 days, with DRESS having a longer median of 20 days, while Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) had a shorter median of 3 days. Concomitant medications, including phenytoin, valproate, and aspirin, were common, with some drugs indicating an increased SCAR risk when used alongside levetiracetam.

Conclusion: The findings suggest a notable risk of SCARs associated with levetiracetam, with an emphasis on monitoring patients, particularly females and those on concomitant medications.

目的:利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,探讨左乙拉西坦与严重皮肤不良反应(scar)之间的关系。方法:采用报告优势比(ROR)和信息成分(IC)方法进行歧化分析。检查患者人口统计学、临床结果、发病时间和伴随用药数据。结果:通过歧化分析,共分析了1188例以左乙拉西坦为主要嫌疑的SCAR病例。女性占45.96%,年龄在18 ~ 65岁之间的占50.42%。分析显示与scar显著相关,ROR为4.47,IC为2.14。最常见的SCAR是伴有嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状的药物反应(DRESS), 540例发生。scar的中位发病时间为16天,DRESS的中位发病时间较长,为20天,而急性全身性脓疱病(AGEP)的中位发病时间较短,为3天。同时用药,包括苯妥英、丙戊酸和阿司匹林,是常见的,一些药物表明,当与左乙曲坦一起使用时,疤痕风险增加。结论:研究结果表明,左乙拉西坦有显著的疤痕风险,需要重点监测患者,特别是女性和那些同时服用药物的患者。
{"title":"Levetiracetam and severe cutaneous adverse reactions: insights from FAERS database analysis.","authors":"Jing Yao, Yujie Lin, Linwei Chen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2435411","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2435411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between levetiracetam and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Information Component (IC) methods. Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, time to onset, and concomitant medication data were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,188 SCAR cases with levetiracetam as the primary suspect were analyzed through disproportionality analysis. Female patients comprised 45.96% of cases, with 50.42% aged between 18 and 65 years. The analysis indicated a significant association with SCARs, showing an ROR of 4.47 and an IC of 2.14. The most common SCAR was Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), occurring in 540 cases. The median time to onset for SCARs was 16 days, with DRESS having a longer median of 20 days, while Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) had a shorter median of 3 days. Concomitant medications, including phenytoin, valproate, and aspirin, were common, with some drugs indicating an increased SCAR risk when used alongside levetiracetam.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest a notable risk of SCARs associated with levetiracetam, with an emphasis on monitoring patients, particularly females and those on concomitant medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"175-183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pulmonary adverse events associated with amiodarone: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system. 与胺碘酮相关的肺部不良事件:一项基于FDA不良事件报告系统的真实世界药物警戒研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2438742
Jingrong Yang, Guangheng Zhang, Mengfan You, Han Zhang, Yonghan Shang, Kaidi Xing, Deye Ge, Wenge Su, Yifei Wang

Background: Amiodarone is used to treat cardiac arrhythmias but carries a risk of pulmonary toxicity. Despite this well-known side effect, there is currently no large descriptive case series studying amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity.

Methods: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was utilized to quantify signals of amiodarone-related pulmonary adverse events (AEs) from 2004 to 2023. Severity comparisons between serious and non-serious cases were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square (χ2) test, and signal prioritization was achieved through rating scales.

Results: A total of 4896 cases of amiodarone-related pulmonary AEs were found, and 56 signals were detected. 27 AEs were classified as serious adverse reactions, and 21 AEs were identified as new and unexpected signals. Even when stratified by age, weight, sex, and reporter type, the association between amiodarone and pulmonary diseases persisted. Seven strong clinical priority signals were defined. The median time to onset (TTO) for strong, moderate, and weak clinical priority signals was 221, 126, and 227 days, respectively. All disproportional signals exhibited an early failure-type pattern.

Conclusion: Our study offers a deeper and broader understanding of the pulmonary safety profile of amiodarone, which will aid healthcare professionals in mitigating the risk of pulmonary adverse events in clinical practice.

背景:胺碘酮用于治疗心律失常,但有肺毒性的风险。尽管有这种众所周知的副作用,但目前还没有大型描述性病例系列研究胺碘酮引起的肺毒性。方法:采用报告优势比(ROR)量化2004 - 2023年胺碘酮相关肺部不良事件(ae)的信号。严重病例与非严重病例的严重程度比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验或χ2检验,并通过评定量表确定信号优先级。结果:共发现与胺碘酮相关的肺ae 4896例,检出56个信号。27例为严重不良反应,21例为新发和意外信号。即使按年龄、体重、性别和报告类型分层,胺碘酮与肺部疾病之间的关联仍然存在。确定了七个强烈的临床优先信号。强、中、弱临床优先信号的中位发病时间(TTO)分别为221、126和227天。所有非比例信号均表现出早期失效型模式。结论:我们的研究提供了对胺碘酮肺安全性更深入和更广泛的了解,这将有助于医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中降低肺不良事件的风险。
{"title":"Pulmonary adverse events associated with amiodarone: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Jingrong Yang, Guangheng Zhang, Mengfan You, Han Zhang, Yonghan Shang, Kaidi Xing, Deye Ge, Wenge Su, Yifei Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438742","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amiodarone is used to treat cardiac arrhythmias but carries a risk of pulmonary toxicity. Despite this well-known side effect, there is currently no large descriptive case series studying amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was utilized to quantify signals of amiodarone-related pulmonary adverse events (AEs) from 2004 to 2023. Severity comparisons between serious and non-serious cases were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square (χ2) test, and signal prioritization was achieved through rating scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4896 cases of amiodarone-related pulmonary AEs were found, and 56 signals were detected. 27 AEs were classified as serious adverse reactions, and 21 AEs were identified as new and unexpected signals. Even when stratified by age, weight, sex, and reporter type, the association between amiodarone and pulmonary diseases persisted. Seven strong clinical priority signals were defined. The median time to onset (TTO) for strong, moderate, and weak clinical priority signals was 221, 126, and 227 days, respectively. All disproportional signals exhibited an early failure-type pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study offers a deeper and broader understanding of the pulmonary safety profile of amiodarone, which will aid healthcare professionals in mitigating the risk of pulmonary adverse events in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"131-141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142785077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Updates on immunosuppressant safety and malignancy risk in patients with multiple sclerosis. 多发性硬化症患者免疫抑制剂安全性和恶性肿瘤风险的最新进展。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2543457
Gloria Dalla Costa, Giancarlo Comi

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, characterized by relapses or progressive neurological decline. Over recent decades, high-efficacy immunosuppressive therapies have dramatically reduced relapse rates and curtailed new MRI lesion activity in MS, but also raise safety concerns regarding infections, malignancy, and other serious adverse events.

Areas covered: This review discusses immunosuppressants in MS, from older cytotoxic agents (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone) to newer therapies (cladribine, alemtuzumab, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). Key efficacy data are summarized, alongside risks of hematologic, hepatic, and autoimmune toxicities. Emerging evidence on malignancy risk is highlighted, including therapy-related acute leukemias (mitoxantrone), urothelial tumors (cyclophosphamide), and potential neoplasms linked to newer agents. Strategies for patient selection, screening, and long-term vigilance are examined to balance high-efficacy disease control with acceptable safety margins.

Expert opinion: Immunosuppressants remain vital for certain MS phenotypes, especially those with highly active or refractory disease. Although novel agents offer more selective mechanisms, they still pose notable risks demanding careful monitoring and individualized care. Ongoing research, including predictive biomarkers and post-marketing surveillance, will refine patient selection and mitigate adverse events. With judicious use and robust safety protocols, clinicians can achieve durable disease control while minimizing long-term toxicities.

简介:多发性硬化症(MS)是一种慢性、免疫介导的中枢神经系统疾病,以复发或进行性神经功能衰退为特征。近几十年来,高效免疫抑制疗法显著降低了多发性硬化症的复发率,减少了新的MRI病变活动,但也引起了对感染、恶性肿瘤和其他严重不良事件的安全性担忧。涵盖领域:本综述讨论了MS中的免疫抑制剂,从较老的细胞毒药物(硫唑嘌呤、环磷酰胺、米托蒽醌)到较新的治疗药物(克拉宾、阿仑单抗和抗cd20单克隆抗体)。总结了关键的疗效数据,以及血液、肝脏和自身免疫性毒性的风险。强调了恶性肿瘤风险的新证据,包括治疗相关的急性白血病(米托蒽醌)、尿路上皮肿瘤(环磷酰胺)和与新药相关的潜在肿瘤。研究了患者选择、筛查和长期警惕的策略,以平衡高效疾病控制和可接受的安全边际。专家意见:免疫抑制剂对某些MS表型仍然至关重要,特别是那些高活性或难治性疾病。尽管新型药物提供了更多的选择性机制,但它们仍然存在明显的风险,需要仔细监测和个性化护理。正在进行的研究,包括预测性生物标志物和上市后监测,将改进患者选择并减轻不良事件。通过明智的使用和健全的安全方案,临床医生可以实现持久的疾病控制,同时最大限度地减少长期毒性。
{"title":"Updates on immunosuppressant safety and malignancy risk in patients with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Gloria Dalla Costa, Giancarlo Comi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2543457","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2543457","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, characterized by relapses or progressive neurological decline. Over recent decades, high-efficacy immunosuppressive therapies have dramatically reduced relapse rates and curtailed new MRI lesion activity in MS, but also raise safety concerns regarding infections, malignancy, and other serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review discusses immunosuppressants in MS, from older cytotoxic agents (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone) to newer therapies (cladribine, alemtuzumab, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). Key efficacy data are summarized, alongside risks of hematologic, hepatic, and autoimmune toxicities. Emerging evidence on malignancy risk is highlighted, including therapy-related acute leukemias (mitoxantrone), urothelial tumors (cyclophosphamide), and potential neoplasms linked to newer agents. Strategies for patient selection, screening, and long-term vigilance are examined to balance high-efficacy disease control with acceptable safety margins.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Immunosuppressants remain vital for certain MS phenotypes, especially those with highly active or refractory disease. Although novel agents offer more selective mechanisms, they still pose notable risks demanding careful monitoring and individualized care. Ongoing research, including predictive biomarkers and post-marketing surveillance, will refine patient selection and mitigate adverse events. With judicious use and robust safety protocols, clinicians can achieve durable disease control while minimizing long-term toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"71-87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144948250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring SGLT-2 inhibitors and sarcopenia in FAERS: a post-marketing surveillance study. 探索 SGLT-2 抑制剂与 FAERS 中的肌肉疏松症:一项上市后监测研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412234
Zheng Kuai, Yangli Ye, Xiaoyi Zhang, Lihong Gao, Guowen Tang, Jie Yuan

Background: The sodium-dependent glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) is associated with body weight loss but the composition of the losing weight remains unclear.

Research design and methods: Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi- item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of SGLT-2i-associated musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders AEs.

Results: The search retrieved a total of 3,206 cases of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder-related AEs during the reporting period. This included 1,061 cases for Canagliflozin, 1,052 cases for Dapagliflozin, 1,074 cases for Empagliflozin, and 19 cases for Ertugliflozin. Fifteen preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality were retained. No musculoskeletal and connective tissue system-related AE signals were reported for Ertugliflozin. We identified a risk of muscle necrosis with Canagliflozin use, a risk of sarcopenia with Dapagliflozin use, and a chance of muscle atrophy with Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin prescriptions. Most cases occurred within the first month after SGLT-2i initiation, and AEs can persist beyond 360 days of use.

Conclusions: Our study identified potential new musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder-related AE signals associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors.

背景:钠依赖性葡萄糖转运体2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)与体重减轻有关,但体重减轻的成分仍不清楚:采用报告几率比(ROR)、报告比例比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)算法等比例失调分析方法,量化与SGLT-2i相关的肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病AEs信号:结果:在报告期内,共检索到 3,206 例与肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病相关的 AEs。其中包括1,061例Canagliflozin、1,052例Dapagliflozin、1,074例Empagliflozin和19例Ertugliflozin。保留了 15 个比例严重失调的首选术语 (PT)。Ertugliflozin 未报告与肌肉骨骼和结缔组织系统相关的 AE 信号。我们发现使用 Canagliflozin 有发生肌肉坏死的风险,使用 Dapagliflozin 有发生肌少症的风险,使用 Dapagliflozin 和 Empagliflozin 处方有发生肌肉萎缩的可能。大多数病例发生在开始使用SGLT-2i后的第一个月内,AEs可持续到使用360天以后:我们的研究发现了与 SGLT-2 抑制剂相关的肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病相关的潜在新 AE 信号。
{"title":"Exploring SGLT-2 inhibitors and sarcopenia in FAERS: a post-marketing surveillance study.","authors":"Zheng Kuai, Yangli Ye, Xiaoyi Zhang, Lihong Gao, Guowen Tang, Jie Yuan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412234","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sodium-dependent glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) is associated with body weight loss but the composition of the losing weight remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi- item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of SGLT-2i-associated musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search retrieved a total of 3,206 cases of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder-related AEs during the reporting period. This included 1,061 cases for Canagliflozin, 1,052 cases for Dapagliflozin, 1,074 cases for Empagliflozin, and 19 cases for Ertugliflozin. Fifteen preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality were retained. No musculoskeletal and connective tissue system-related AE signals were reported for Ertugliflozin. We identified a risk of muscle necrosis with Canagliflozin use, a risk of sarcopenia with Dapagliflozin use, and a chance of muscle atrophy with Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin prescriptions. Most cases occurred within the first month after SGLT-2i initiation, and AEs can persist beyond 360 days of use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified potential new musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder-related AE signals associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins and Vancomycin: a study on adverse event reporting for monotherapy versus combinations using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS). 多粘菌素和万古霉素的联合肾毒性:利用 FDA 不良事件报告系统对单一疗法与联合疗法的不良事件报告进行的研究。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416256
Ruijia Zhan, Jiageng Lin, Miao Dai, Bo Ji, Xianxia He, Zhihui Jiang

Background: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections pose a global public health crisis with significant mortality and economic burdens. Combination of polymyxins and vancomycin has shown effectiveness against MDR infections. However, their combined nephrotoxicity complicates clinical use. Given these concerns, we conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess the nephrotoxicity of combinations of polymyxins and vancomycin compared to monotherapy.

Research design and methods: In this retrospective study, data from FAERS reports (2012 Q4 to 2023 Q2) were deduplicated and analyzed for adverse events (AEs) related to vancomycin, polymyxin B, and colistin. Disproportionality analyses were performed to evaluate the association between drugs and nephrotoxicity.

Results: A total of 9,796,784 adverse event reports, including 73,009 reports associated with nephrotoxicity, were included. All three drugs showed significant associations with nephrotoxicity. In combination therapy, polymyxin B-vancomycin exhibited a stronger association with nephrotoxicity compared to monotherapy, whereas colistin-vancomycin demonstrated a lower association with nephrotoxicity than colistin monotherapy.

Conclusions: This study found that combining vancomycin with colistin alleviated colistin-induced nephrotoxicity, while combining vancomycin with polymyxin B worsened polymyxin B-induced nephrotoxicity.

背景:耐多药(MDR)感染是一个全球性的公共卫生危机,造成了严重的死亡率和经济负担。多粘菌素和万古霉素联用已显示出对 MDR 感染的有效性。然而,它们的联合肾毒性使临床应用变得复杂。鉴于这些问题,我们利用美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)进行了一项药物警戒分析,以评估多粘菌素和万古霉素联合疗法与单一疗法相比的肾毒性:在这项回顾性研究中,我们对FAERS报告(2012年第四季度至2023年第二季度)中的数据进行了重复分析,并分析了与万古霉素、多粘菌素B和秋水仙碱相关的不良事件(AEs)。进行了比例失调分析,以评估药物与肾毒性之间的关联:结果:共纳入 9,796,784 份不良事件报告,其中包括 73,009 份与肾毒性相关的报告。所有三种药物都与肾毒性有明显关联。在联合疗法中,多粘菌素 B-万古霉素与肾毒性的相关性比单药疗法更强,而大肠菌素-万古霉素与肾毒性的相关性低于大肠菌素单药疗法:本研究发现,将万古霉素与大肠杆菌素联合使用可减轻大肠杆菌素诱导的肾毒性,而将万古霉素与多粘菌素B联合使用则会加重多粘菌素B诱导的肾毒性。
{"title":"Combined nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins and Vancomycin: a study on adverse event reporting for monotherapy versus combinations using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).","authors":"Ruijia Zhan, Jiageng Lin, Miao Dai, Bo Ji, Xianxia He, Zhihui Jiang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416256","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections pose a global public health crisis with significant mortality and economic burdens. Combination of polymyxins and vancomycin has shown effectiveness against MDR infections. However, their combined nephrotoxicity complicates clinical use. Given these concerns, we conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess the nephrotoxicity of combinations of polymyxins and vancomycin compared to monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data from FAERS reports (2012 Q4 to 2023 Q2) were deduplicated and analyzed for adverse events (AEs) related to vancomycin, polymyxin B, and colistin. Disproportionality analyses were performed to evaluate the association between drugs and nephrotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,796,784 adverse event reports, including 73,009 reports associated with nephrotoxicity, were included. All three drugs showed significant associations with nephrotoxicity. In combination therapy, polymyxin B-vancomycin exhibited a stronger association with nephrotoxicity compared to monotherapy, whereas colistin-vancomycin demonstrated a lower association with nephrotoxicity than colistin monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that combining vancomycin with colistin alleviated colistin-induced nephrotoxicity, while combining vancomycin with polymyxin B worsened polymyxin B-induced nephrotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anaphylactic risk associated with iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media. 与碘和钆基造影剂相关的过敏风险。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2435431
Sainan Bian, Zixi Wang, Lisha Li, Le Cui, Yingyang Xu, Kai Guan, Bin Zhao, Huadan Xue

Background: This study aimed to analyze the risk signals of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media associated with anaphylaxis.

Research design and methods: Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were retrospectively reviewed from January 2004 to September 2022. Disproportionality and Bayesian analyses were used in data mining to screen for suspected anaphylaxis using contrast media.

Results: A total of 1240 reports of anaphylaxis associated with contrast media were identified (464 men, 37.4%). The average age of anaphylaxis associated with iodinated contrast media (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) was 56.8 ± 17.2 and 50.9 ± 18.0 years old, respectively (p < .001). Among ICM, iopamidol showed the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR) (29.0), and amidotrizoate showed the lowest ROR (7.4). Among low-osmolality ICM, iopamidol had the highest ROR (29.0), and iopromide had the lowest ROR (8.8). Among the macrocyclic agents, gadoteridol had the highest ROR (37.3), while gadoterate meglumine had the lowest (10.4). Among the linear agents, gadobenate dimeglumine had the highest ROR (28.8), and gadodiamide had the lowest (1.4). The mortality rate in ICM was significantly higher than that in GBCM (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study provides clinicians and pharmacists evidence for risk signals of anaphylactic reactions among contrast agents.

背景:本研究旨在分析含碘和含钆造影剂与过敏反应相关的危险信号。研究设计和方法:回顾性分析2004年1月至2022年9月美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据。歧化和贝叶斯分析在数据挖掘中使用造影剂筛选疑似过敏反应。结果:共发现1240例与造影剂相关的过敏反应报告(464例男性,37.4%)。与碘化造影剂(ICM)和钆基造影剂(GBCM)相关的过敏反应的平均年龄分别为56.8±17.2岁和50.9±18.0岁(p p)结论:本研究为临床医生和药师提供了造影剂过敏反应的危险信号依据。
{"title":"Anaphylactic risk associated with iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media.","authors":"Sainan Bian, Zixi Wang, Lisha Li, Le Cui, Yingyang Xu, Kai Guan, Bin Zhao, Huadan Xue","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2435431","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2435431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the risk signals of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media associated with anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were retrospectively reviewed from January 2004 to September 2022. Disproportionality and Bayesian analyses were used in data mining to screen for suspected anaphylaxis using contrast media.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1240 reports of anaphylaxis associated with contrast media were identified (464 men, 37.4%). The average age of anaphylaxis associated with iodinated contrast media (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) was 56.8 ± 17.2 and 50.9 ± 18.0 years old, respectively (<i>p</i> < .001). Among ICM, iopamidol showed the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR) (29.0), and amidotrizoate showed the lowest ROR (7.4). Among low-osmolality ICM, iopamidol had the highest ROR (29.0), and iopromide had the lowest ROR (8.8). Among the macrocyclic agents, gadoteridol had the highest ROR (37.3), while gadoterate meglumine had the lowest (10.4). Among the linear agents, gadobenate dimeglumine had the highest ROR (28.8), and gadodiamide had the lowest (1.4). The mortality rate in ICM was significantly higher than that in GBCM (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides clinicians and pharmacists evidence for risk signals of anaphylactic reactions among contrast agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"167-173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142750424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1