首页 > 最新文献

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of baseline glucocorticoids (GCs) on cardiotoxic events and myocardial damage related to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective clinical research.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2467814
Qiaoyun Wang, Haixia Zhang, Yawen Chen, Xin Lv, Yanli Qiao, Qiaoling Zhu

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-associated cardiotoxic events (CEs) are of increasing concern. Existing research about glucocorticoids (GCs) on immunotherapy focused on ICIs' efficacy and patients' outcome. The influence of GCs on ICIs-associated CEs and myocardial damage (MD) remains unknown.

Research design and methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients treated with ICIs from 2018 to 2022, with follow-up period ending on 30 June 2023. The incidence, risk factors of ICIs-associated CEs, especially MD were described. Additionally, the impact of baseline GCs was assessed by propensity score matching (PSM) to mitigate intergroup differences and ensure comparability.

Results: Among 1018 patients, 204 (20.04%) experienced ICIs-associated CEs, including 71 (6.97%) with MD. The mean follow-up time was 40.39 (95% CI 38.47-42.31) weeks. The median time to onset of MD was the shortest at 12.57 weeks (IQR 5.29-25.14). Tumor type, co-medication with platinum and angiogenesis inhibitors may be influential factors of MD. After PSM, the relative risks of CEs (OR 0.4625,95%CI 0.2514-0.7235, p = 0.0020) and MD (OR 0.3254, 95% CI 0.1190-0.8898, p = 0.0378) in GCs1 ≥ 20 mg group were both significantly lower than those in GCs1 < 20 mg.

Conclusion: GCs ≥ 20 mg during the first ICIs treatment cycle is significantly associated with the reduced risks of both ICIs-associated CEs and MD.

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)相关的心脏毒性事件(CEs)越来越受到关注。现有关于糖皮质激素(GCs)对免疫治疗的研究主要集中在ICIs的疗效和患者的预后上。GCs 对 ICIs 相关 CEs 和心肌损伤(MD)的影响仍然未知:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2018年至2022年接受ICIs治疗的患者,随访期截至2023年6月30日。研究描述了与 ICIs 相关的 CE,尤其是 MD 的发生率和风险因素。此外,研究还通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)评估了基线 GCs 的影响,以减少组间差异并确保可比性:在 1018 名患者中,204 人(20.04%)出现了 ICI 相关 CE,其中 71 人(6.97%)出现了 MD。中位随访时间为 40.39 周(95%CI 38.47-42.31 周)。MD 的中位发生时间最短,为 12.57 周(IQR 5.29-25.14)。肿瘤类型、联合使用铂类药物和血管生成抑制剂可能是导致 MD 的影响因素。PSM后,GCs1≥20mg组CEs(OR 0.4625,95%CI 0.2514-0.7235,p = 0.0020)和MD(OR 0.3254,95%CI 0.1190-0.8898,p = 0.0378)的相对风险均显著低于GCs1结论:第一个 ICI 治疗周期内 GCs≥20 毫克与 ICI 相关 CEs 和 MD 风险的降低明显相关。
{"title":"Impact of baseline glucocorticoids (GCs) on cardiotoxic events and myocardial damage related to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective clinical research.","authors":"Qiaoyun Wang, Haixia Zhang, Yawen Chen, Xin Lv, Yanli Qiao, Qiaoling Zhu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467814","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-associated cardiotoxic events (CEs) are of increasing concern. Existing research about glucocorticoids (GCs) on immunotherapy focused on ICIs' efficacy and patients' outcome. The influence of GCs on ICIs-associated CEs and myocardial damage (MD) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients treated with ICIs from 2018 to 2022, with follow-up period ending on 30 June 2023. The incidence, risk factors of ICIs-associated CEs, especially MD were described. Additionally, the impact of baseline GCs was assessed by propensity score matching (PSM) to mitigate intergroup differences and ensure comparability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1018 patients, 204 (20.04%) experienced ICIs-associated CEs, including 71 (6.97%) with MD. The mean follow-up time was 40.39 (95% CI 38.47-42.31) weeks. The median time to onset of MD was the shortest at 12.57 weeks (IQR 5.29-25.14). Tumor type, co-medication with platinum and angiogenesis inhibitors may be influential factors of MD. After PSM, the relative risks of CEs (OR 0.4625,95%CI 0.2514-0.7235, <i>p</i> = 0.0020) and MD (OR 0.3254, 95% CI 0.1190-0.8898, <i>p</i> = 0.0378) in GCs1 ≥ 20 mg group were both significantly lower than those in GCs1 < 20 mg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCs ≥ 20 mg during the first ICIs treatment cycle is significantly associated with the reduced risks of both ICIs-associated CEs and MD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143425433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety issues of Donepezil combined with Memantine in Alzheimer's disease population: real-world pharmacovigilance.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180
Yi Zeng, Bingshuo Liu, Lisi Zhou, Wenling Zeng, Xiaona Tian, Jiazhen Jiang, Dandan Dai

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The combination of Donepezil and Memantine is the only FDA-approved therapy for AD, but its adverse drug reactions (ADRs) lack systematic analysis. This study carried out drug combination analysis for AD population to provide evidence support for clinical safety of drug use.

Research design and methods: Using FAERS database reports (January 2004-January 2024) with Donepezil and Memantine as primary suspected drugs, four disproportionality analysis methods - ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM - were applied to identify positive ADR signals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and gender.

Results: A total of 712 reports were analyzed (54.6% female, 55.1% aged 65-85). Across the AD population, 42 ADRs were identified, including hypertensive crisis, hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, proteinuria, and hydronephrosis, many of which were newly reported. Subgroup analysis revealed prostate hypertrophy, acute kidney injury, and cerebral infarction in males, while females experienced more severe cardiovascular events, such as complete AV block and ventricular extrasystole. Additional ADRs included hyperkalemia, sinus bradycardia, and extrapyramidal disorders.

Conclusions: Despite partial consistency of combined ADRs for Donepezil and Memantine with instructions, new ADR signals emerged, with significant differences in AD subgroups.

{"title":"Safety issues of Donepezil combined with Memantine in Alzheimer's disease population: real-world pharmacovigilance.","authors":"Yi Zeng, Bingshuo Liu, Lisi Zhou, Wenling Zeng, Xiaona Tian, Jiazhen Jiang, Dandan Dai","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The combination of Donepezil and Memantine is the only FDA-approved therapy for AD, but its adverse drug reactions (ADRs) lack systematic analysis. This study carried out drug combination analysis for AD population to provide evidence support for clinical safety of drug use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using FAERS database reports (January 2004-January 2024) with Donepezil and Memantine as primary suspected drugs, four disproportionality analysis methods - ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM - were applied to identify positive ADR signals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 712 reports were analyzed (54.6% female, 55.1% aged 65-85). Across the AD population, 42 ADRs were identified, including hypertensive crisis, hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, proteinuria, and hydronephrosis, many of which were newly reported. Subgroup analysis revealed prostate hypertrophy, acute kidney injury, and cerebral infarction in males, while females experienced more severe cardiovascular events, such as complete AV block and ventricular extrasystole. Additional ADRs included hyperkalemia, sinus bradycardia, and extrapyramidal disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite partial consistency of combined ADRs for Donepezil and Memantine with instructions, new ADR signals emerged, with significant differences in AD subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143413810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hepatic adverse events with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a systematic review combining meta-analysis and FAERS database.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2468357
Yuyao Tang, Yongxin Li, Chengrong Zhang, Yinyin Ye, Tianlei Qiu, Zijun Zhu, Jiuda Zhao

Background: Cell-cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are widely used in patients with early and advanced breast cancer (BC). CDK4/6is also lead to numerous side effects. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between CDK4/6is and hepatotoxicities.

Research design and methods: As of 31 March 2024, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as several oncology conference proceedings. We included 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 24,342 breast cancer (BC) patients and 400 cases from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of hepatotoxicity in the RCTs, while Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) were calculated for the FAERS data.

Results: Overall, CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) were associated with significant hepatotoxicities compared to controls (OR = 1.76, 95%CI 1.40-2.22, I2 = 75%). Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib exhibited significant hepatotoxicities, while dalpiciclib did not. FAERS data showed significant liver enzyme and organ toxicity signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib but not for palbociclib.

Conclusions: CDK4/6is increase the risk of hepatotoxicities in patients with BC. Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib caused liver damage, while dalpiciclib did not. The most common manifestations were elevated ALT and AST levels.

{"title":"Hepatic adverse events with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a systematic review combining meta-analysis and FAERS database.","authors":"Yuyao Tang, Yongxin Li, Chengrong Zhang, Yinyin Ye, Tianlei Qiu, Zijun Zhu, Jiuda Zhao","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468357","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell-cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are widely used in patients with early and advanced breast cancer (BC). CDK4/6is also lead to numerous side effects. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between CDK4/6is and hepatotoxicities.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>As of 31 March 2024, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as several oncology conference proceedings. We included 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 24,342 breast cancer (BC) patients and 400 cases from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of hepatotoxicity in the RCTs, while Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) were calculated for the FAERS data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) were associated with significant hepatotoxicities compared to controls (OR = 1.76, 95%CI 1.40-2.22, I<sup>2</sup> = 75%). Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib exhibited significant hepatotoxicities, while dalpiciclib did not. FAERS data showed significant liver enzyme and organ toxicity signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib but not for palbociclib.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDK4/6is increase the risk of hepatotoxicities in patients with BC. Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib caused liver damage, while dalpiciclib did not. The most common manifestations were elevated ALT and AST levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety concerns associated with BACE1 inhibitors - past, present, and future.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2467811
Aniketh Naidu, Bret Silverglate, Mary Silverglate, George T Grossberg

Introduction: BACE1 (beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1) inhibitors have shown promise in treating Alzheimer's disease (AD) by reducing amyloid-beta (Aβ) production. However, clinical trials of inhibitors such as atabecestat, verubecestat, and lanabecestat have faced challenges, including limited efficacy and significant adverse effects.

Areas covered: This narrative review discusses randomized-controlled trials of BACE1 inhibitors. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and Web of Science for studies from 2010 to 2024. Association with BACE1's widespread expression beyond the brain shows adverse effects such as anxiety, depressive symptoms, and hepatotoxicity.

Expert opinion: The trial results underscore the need for CNS-specific BACE1 inhibitors to reduce adverse effects. Future research should focus on optimizing drug design and identifying additional therapeutic avenues, such as prostate cancer and insulin resistance.

{"title":"Safety concerns associated with BACE1 inhibitors - past, present, and future.","authors":"Aniketh Naidu, Bret Silverglate, Mary Silverglate, George T Grossberg","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467811","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467811","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>BACE1 (beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1) inhibitors have shown promise in treating Alzheimer's disease (AD) by reducing amyloid-beta (Aβ) production. However, clinical trials of inhibitors such as atabecestat, verubecestat, and lanabecestat have faced challenges, including limited efficacy and significant adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review discusses randomized-controlled trials of BACE1 inhibitors. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and Web of Science for studies from 2010 to 2024. Association with BACE1's widespread expression beyond the brain shows adverse effects such as anxiety, depressive symptoms, and hepatotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The trial results underscore the need for CNS-specific BACE1 inhibitors to reduce adverse effects. Future research should focus on optimizing drug design and identifying additional therapeutic avenues, such as prostate cancer and insulin resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143413807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating bowel obstruction and ileus events in patients on GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2465870
Lama Alfehaid, Majed Alyami, Sumaya Almohareb, Omar Alshaya, Abdulaali Almutairi

Introduction: This research evaluated the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and bowel obstruction or ileus.

Methods: We searched databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, for studies on adult patients treated with GLP-1 RA. We included randomized control trials (RCT), cohort, case-control studies, and case reports. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to evaluate the quality of RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies.

Results: Out of 317 records identified, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 6 studies with a combined total of 550,426 participants. The use of GLP-1 RA did not show an incremental risk of bowel obstruction or ileus compared to controls (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.43-8.79). However, the studies had high heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). A subgroup analysis by specific medication revealed that liraglutide was associated with a significantly high risk of bowel obstruction or ileus (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.03-4.45; I2 = 0%).

Conclusions: GLP-1 receptor agonists do not significantly increase the risk of bowel obstruction or ileus. However, liraglutide is associated with a higher risk compared to semaglutide. Clinicians should remain aware of these rare events while recognizing the benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists for glycemic control and cardiovascular health.

Prospero registration: CRD42024585971.

{"title":"Evaluating bowel obstruction and ileus events in patients on GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lama Alfehaid, Majed Alyami, Sumaya Almohareb, Omar Alshaya, Abdulaali Almutairi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465870","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research evaluated the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and bowel obstruction or ileus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, for studies on adult patients treated with GLP-1 RA. We included randomized control trials (RCT), cohort, case-control studies, and case reports. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to evaluate the quality of RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 317 records identified, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 6 studies with a combined total of 550,426 participants. The use of GLP-1 RA did not show an incremental risk of bowel obstruction or ileus compared to controls (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.43-8.79). However, the studies had high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 94%). A subgroup analysis by specific medication revealed that liraglutide was associated with a significantly high risk of bowel obstruction or ileus (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.03-4.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1 receptor agonists do not significantly increase the risk of bowel obstruction or ileus. However, liraglutide is associated with a higher risk compared to semaglutide. Clinicians should remain aware of these rare events while recognizing the benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists for glycemic control and cardiovascular health.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42024585971.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence and risk of treatment-related fatal adverse events in cancer patients treated with antibody conjugated drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2460452
Zhaohui Huang, Xinyu Li, Xin Zhou, Ziwen Yang, Xiaotong Huo, Jianhong Zhu, Sha Li, Jie Jiang

Introduction: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have radically transformed the therapeutic landscape for cancer treatment, but little is known about the treatment-related fatal adverse events (FAEs). We aimed to comprehensively investigate the safety of ADCs regarding treatment-related FAEs.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADCs. The meta-analysis assessed the incidence of treatment-related FAEs and the odds ratio (OR) in the ADCs group compared with the control group.

Results: A total of 49 RCTs involving 13,052 patients treated with ADCs were included. The incidence of treatment-related FAEs in the ADCs group was 0.62% (95% CI = 0.36-1.08), while the control group was 0.52% (95% CI = 0.29-0.95), with an OR of 1.41 (95% CI = 1.12-1.79; p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis by drug and cancer type, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, which for acute myeloid leukemia were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related FAEs compared to controls (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.12-2.36; p < 0.05). There was no evidence of publication bias observed.

Conclusions: The meta-analysis of RCTs found that ADCs were associated with an increased risk of treatment-related FAEs compared with the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of treatment-related FAEs was associated with specific types of ADCs.

{"title":"Incidence and risk of treatment-related fatal adverse events in cancer patients treated with antibody conjugated drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Zhaohui Huang, Xinyu Li, Xin Zhou, Ziwen Yang, Xiaotong Huo, Jianhong Zhu, Sha Li, Jie Jiang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460452","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460452","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have radically transformed the therapeutic landscape for cancer treatment, but little is known about the treatment-related fatal adverse events (FAEs). We aimed to comprehensively investigate the safety of ADCs regarding treatment-related FAEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADCs. The meta-analysis assessed the incidence of treatment-related FAEs and the odds ratio (OR) in the ADCs group compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 RCTs involving 13,052 patients treated with ADCs were included. The incidence of treatment-related FAEs in the ADCs group was 0.62% (95% CI = 0.36-1.08), while the control group was 0.52% (95% CI = 0.29-0.95), with an OR of 1.41 (95% CI = 1.12-1.79; <i>p</i> < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis by drug and cancer type, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, which for acute myeloid leukemia were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related FAEs compared to controls (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.12-2.36; <i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no evidence of publication bias observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meta-analysis of RCTs found that ADCs were associated with an increased risk of treatment-related FAEs compared with the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of treatment-related FAEs was associated with specific types of ADCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852
Xiaojiang Tian, Lin Chen, Yonghong Chen, Ni Zhang

Background: The safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors has not yet been systemically analysed in the real world. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS database.

Methods: FAERS data (2014Q1 to 2022Q4) were searched for reports of all FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors across all indications. We used the SMQ generalized search AEs on the PT level. Disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals by calculating RORs.

Results: Within the standardized MedDRA queries, significant safety signals were found, including those for palbociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia, erythropenia], ribociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia , conduction defects], and abemaciclib [eosinophilic pneumonia, dehydration]. For AEs at the PT level, we found several significant blood and lymphatic system disorders for both palbociclib and ribociclib, such as abnormal full blood count and decreased white blood cell count for palbociclib and anisocytosis, neutropenia for ribociclib. Palbociclib also had high RORs for pseudocirrhosis, stomatitis, oral pain, and alopecia, while ribociclib had high RORs for electrocardiogram PR shortened, sinus arrhythmia, and blood bilirubin abnormal. However, the RORs were significant for abemaciclib in terms of diarrhoea, vena cava thrombosis, thrombophlebitis migrans and pneumonitis.

Conclusion: CDK4/6 inhibitors differed in their safety profile reports.

{"title":"Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.","authors":"Xiaojiang Tian, Lin Chen, Yonghong Chen, Ni Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors has not yet been systemically analysed in the real world. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS data (2014Q1 to 2022Q4) were searched for reports of all FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors across all indications. We used the SMQ generalized search AEs on the PT level. Disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals by calculating RORs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the standardized MedDRA queries, significant safety signals were found, including those for palbociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia, erythropenia], ribociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia , conduction defects], and abemaciclib [eosinophilic pneumonia, dehydration]. For AEs at the PT level, we found several significant blood and lymphatic system disorders for both palbociclib and ribociclib, such as abnormal full blood count and decreased white blood cell count for palbociclib and anisocytosis, neutropenia for ribociclib. Palbociclib also had high RORs for pseudocirrhosis, stomatitis, oral pain, and alopecia, while ribociclib had high RORs for electrocardiogram PR shortened, sinus arrhythmia, and blood bilirubin abnormal. However, the RORs were significant for abemaciclib in terms of diarrhoea, vena cava thrombosis, thrombophlebitis migrans and pneumonitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDK4/6 inhibitors differed in their safety profile reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of Riociguat-related adverse events: a disproportionality analysis utilizing the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2466676
Lingling Wang, Zhenyu Mao, Pengdou Zheng, Guisha Zi, Fengqin Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Lixiang Chen, Huiguo Liu, Ling Zhou, Shuang Wei

Background: Riociguat is a novel soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite its widespread use, there has been a lack of large-scale studies assessing the adverse events (AEs) associated with this medication.

Research design and methods: This study aimed to evaluate the AEs related to Riociguat by analyzing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q4 2013 to Q1 2024. A total of 12,149 AE reports were analyzed using four different disproportionality signal detection methodologies to identify significant AEs associated with Riociguat.

Results: The analysis revealed 117 preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality signals across all four methods. Among these, common AEs included 'headache,' 'dizziness,' 'hypotension,' 'nausea,' 'fall,' and 'loss of consciousness.' Notably, several unexpected AEs, such as 'fatigue,' 'malaise,' 'asthenia,' 'feeling abnormal,' and 'pain in extremity,' were identified, which were not highlighted in the product's package insert. Additionally, gender-specific differences were observed in certain adverse events.

Conclusions: This study offers insights into Riociguat's side effects. Clinicians should monitor patients closely for unexpected symptoms like limb pain and fatigue, paying particular attention to male patients, as some AEs occur more frequently in this group.

{"title":"Assessment of Riociguat-related adverse events: a disproportionality analysis utilizing the FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Lingling Wang, Zhenyu Mao, Pengdou Zheng, Guisha Zi, Fengqin Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Lixiang Chen, Huiguo Liu, Ling Zhou, Shuang Wei","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2466676","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2466676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Riociguat is a novel soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite its widespread use, there has been a lack of large-scale studies assessing the adverse events (AEs) associated with this medication.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the AEs related to Riociguat by analyzing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q4 2013 to Q1 2024. A total of 12,149 AE reports were analyzed using four different disproportionality signal detection methodologies to identify significant AEs associated with Riociguat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed 117 preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality signals across all four methods. Among these, common AEs included 'headache,' 'dizziness,' 'hypotension,' 'nausea,' 'fall,' and 'loss of consciousness.' Notably, several unexpected AEs, such as 'fatigue,' 'malaise,' 'asthenia,' 'feeling abnormal,' and 'pain in extremity,' were identified, which were not highlighted in the product's package insert. Additionally, gender-specific differences were observed in certain adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insights into Riociguat's side effects. Clinicians should monitor patients closely for unexpected symptoms like limb pain and fatigue, paying particular attention to male patients, as some AEs occur more frequently in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143398799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Updated insights on levetiracetam-associated severe cutaneous adverse reactions: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2468351
Zhanshen Wu, Yang Zhao, Xiangyu Zhang, Yanyan Li

Background: Previous studies have explored the association between levetiracetam (LEV) and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). However, most investigations have relied on clinical trial data or case reports from individual medical centers. Consequently, the precise relationship between LEV and SCARs in real-world settings remains elusive.

Research design and methods: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance databases were analyzed, focusing on LEV-associated SCAR events utilizing disproportionality analysis methods.

Results: This study identified a significant correlation between LEV and SCARs (p < 0.05). However, combined analyses with other antiepileptic drugs revealed that the association of LEV with SCARs was comparatively weaker (p < 0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that males, individuals aged 45 ~ 65 years, and combination therapy with eslicarbazepine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine significantly increased the risk of developing SCARs (p < 0.05). Notably, SCARs were most likely to occur within the initial week of LEV treatment (39.39%).

Conclusions: Despite certain limitations, this study offers updated insights into the association between LEV and SCARs. These findings underscore the significance of monitoring and actively managing LEV-associated SCARs to promote its safe and effective use.

背景:以往的研究探讨了左乙拉西坦(LEV)与严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)之间的关联。然而,大多数调查都依赖于临床试验数据或个别医疗中心的病例报告。因此,在现实世界中,LEV与SCAR之间的确切关系仍然难以确定:研究设计和方法:分析了来自 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和 EudraVigilance 数据库的数据,利用比例失调分析方法重点研究了与 LEV 相关的 SCAR 事件:结果:本研究发现 LEV 与 SCARs 之间存在明显的相关性(p p p 结论:尽管存在一定的局限性,但本研究提供了 LEV 与 SCARs 之间的相关性:尽管存在某些局限性,但本研究提供了有关 LEV 与 SCAR 之间关联的最新见解。这些发现强调了监测和积极管理 LEV 相关 SCARs 以促进其安全有效使用的重要性。
{"title":"Updated insights on levetiracetam-associated severe cutaneous adverse reactions: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.","authors":"Zhanshen Wu, Yang Zhao, Xiangyu Zhang, Yanyan Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468351","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have explored the association between levetiracetam (LEV) and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). However, most investigations have relied on clinical trial data or case reports from individual medical centers. Consequently, the precise relationship between LEV and SCARs in real-world settings remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance databases were analyzed, focusing on LEV-associated SCAR events utilizing disproportionality analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified a significant correlation between LEV and SCARs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, combined analyses with other antiepileptic drugs revealed that the association of LEV with SCARs was comparatively weaker (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that males, individuals aged 45 ~ 65 years, and combination therapy with eslicarbazepine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine significantly increased the risk of developing SCARs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Notably, SCARs were most likely to occur within the initial week of LEV treatment (39.39%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite certain limitations, this study offers updated insights into the association between LEV and SCARs. These findings underscore the significance of monitoring and actively managing LEV-associated SCARs to promote its safe and effective use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143425434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What does real-world data reveal about cangrelor's safety? An analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2467812
Zhaojun Wang, Junhang Zhang, Donglei Shi, Li Wei

Background: Cangrelor is used to reduce thrombotic events in adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but real-world safety data is limited. This study analyzes adverse events (AEs) related to cangrelor using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

Methods: We employed statistical techniques such as the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker to analyze the data from the FAERS database.

Results: Out of a total of 15,011,506 case reports, 209 events were related to cangrelor. Thirty-one preferred term (PT) describing AEs were identified, affecting eight organ systems. The most reported PT was off-label use (n = 163). Several unexpected AEs not listed in the drug labeling emerged, including cardiac arrest, and cardiac failure. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was the most common indication (35.4%), numerous events were associated with off-label use, particularly for conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulant therapy.

Conclusion: Our research reveals both anticipated and unexpected AEs, providing important new information on the safety profile of cangrelor. Furthermore, we have discovered certain problems pertaining to product applications. It is recommended that manufacturers clearly highlight indications and usage instructions, and medical personnel closely follow drug administration protocols.

{"title":"What does real-world data reveal about cangrelor's safety? An analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.","authors":"Zhaojun Wang, Junhang Zhang, Donglei Shi, Li Wei","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cangrelor is used to reduce thrombotic events in adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but real-world safety data is limited. This study analyzes adverse events (AEs) related to cangrelor using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed statistical techniques such as the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker to analyze the data from the FAERS database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 15,011,506 case reports, 209 events were related to cangrelor. Thirty-one preferred term (PT) describing AEs were identified, affecting eight organ systems. The most reported PT was off-label use (<i>n</i> = 163). Several unexpected AEs not listed in the drug labeling emerged, including cardiac arrest, and cardiac failure. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was the most common indication (35.4%), numerous events were associated with off-label use, particularly for conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulant therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research reveals both anticipated and unexpected AEs, providing important new information on the safety profile of cangrelor. Furthermore, we have discovered certain problems pertaining to product applications. It is recommended that manufacturers clearly highlight indications and usage instructions, and medical personnel closely follow drug administration protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1