Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-associated cardiotoxic events (CEs) are of increasing concern. Existing research about glucocorticoids (GCs) on immunotherapy focused on ICIs' efficacy and patients' outcome. The influence of GCs on ICIs-associated CEs and myocardial damage (MD) remains unknown.
Research design and methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients treated with ICIs from 2018 to 2022, with follow-up period ending on 30 June 2023. The incidence, risk factors of ICIs-associated CEs, especially MD were described. Additionally, the impact of baseline GCs was assessed by propensity score matching (PSM) to mitigate intergroup differences and ensure comparability.
Results: Among 1018 patients, 204 (20.04%) experienced ICIs-associated CEs, including 71 (6.97%) with MD. The mean follow-up time was 40.39 (95% CI 38.47-42.31) weeks. The median time to onset of MD was the shortest at 12.57 weeks (IQR 5.29-25.14). Tumor type, co-medication with platinum and angiogenesis inhibitors may be influential factors of MD. After PSM, the relative risks of CEs (OR 0.4625,95%CI 0.2514-0.7235, p = 0.0020) and MD (OR 0.3254, 95% CI 0.1190-0.8898, p = 0.0378) in GCs1 ≥ 20 mg group were both significantly lower than those in GCs1 < 20 mg.
Conclusion: GCs ≥ 20 mg during the first ICIs treatment cycle is significantly associated with the reduced risks of both ICIs-associated CEs and MD.
{"title":"Impact of baseline glucocorticoids (GCs) on cardiotoxic events and myocardial damage related to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective clinical research.","authors":"Qiaoyun Wang, Haixia Zhang, Yawen Chen, Xin Lv, Yanli Qiao, Qiaoling Zhu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467814","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-associated cardiotoxic events (CEs) are of increasing concern. Existing research about glucocorticoids (GCs) on immunotherapy focused on ICIs' efficacy and patients' outcome. The influence of GCs on ICIs-associated CEs and myocardial damage (MD) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients treated with ICIs from 2018 to 2022, with follow-up period ending on 30 June 2023. The incidence, risk factors of ICIs-associated CEs, especially MD were described. Additionally, the impact of baseline GCs was assessed by propensity score matching (PSM) to mitigate intergroup differences and ensure comparability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1018 patients, 204 (20.04%) experienced ICIs-associated CEs, including 71 (6.97%) with MD. The mean follow-up time was 40.39 (95% CI 38.47-42.31) weeks. The median time to onset of MD was the shortest at 12.57 weeks (IQR 5.29-25.14). Tumor type, co-medication with platinum and angiogenesis inhibitors may be influential factors of MD. After PSM, the relative risks of CEs (OR 0.4625,95%CI 0.2514-0.7235, <i>p</i> = 0.0020) and MD (OR 0.3254, 95% CI 0.1190-0.8898, <i>p</i> = 0.0378) in GCs1 ≥ 20 mg group were both significantly lower than those in GCs1 < 20 mg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCs ≥ 20 mg during the first ICIs treatment cycle is significantly associated with the reduced risks of both ICIs-associated CEs and MD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143425433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-23DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180
Yi Zeng, Bingshuo Liu, Lisi Zhou, Wenling Zeng, Xiaona Tian, Jiazhen Jiang, Dandan Dai
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The combination of Donepezil and Memantine is the only FDA-approved therapy for AD, but its adverse drug reactions (ADRs) lack systematic analysis. This study carried out drug combination analysis for AD population to provide evidence support for clinical safety of drug use.
Research design and methods: Using FAERS database reports (January 2004-January 2024) with Donepezil and Memantine as primary suspected drugs, four disproportionality analysis methods - ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM - were applied to identify positive ADR signals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and gender.
Results: A total of 712 reports were analyzed (54.6% female, 55.1% aged 65-85). Across the AD population, 42 ADRs were identified, including hypertensive crisis, hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, proteinuria, and hydronephrosis, many of which were newly reported. Subgroup analysis revealed prostate hypertrophy, acute kidney injury, and cerebral infarction in males, while females experienced more severe cardiovascular events, such as complete AV block and ventricular extrasystole. Additional ADRs included hyperkalemia, sinus bradycardia, and extrapyramidal disorders.
Conclusions: Despite partial consistency of combined ADRs for Donepezil and Memantine with instructions, new ADR signals emerged, with significant differences in AD subgroups.
{"title":"Safety issues of Donepezil combined with Memantine in Alzheimer's disease population: real-world pharmacovigilance.","authors":"Yi Zeng, Bingshuo Liu, Lisi Zhou, Wenling Zeng, Xiaona Tian, Jiazhen Jiang, Dandan Dai","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The combination of Donepezil and Memantine is the only FDA-approved therapy for AD, but its adverse drug reactions (ADRs) lack systematic analysis. This study carried out drug combination analysis for AD population to provide evidence support for clinical safety of drug use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using FAERS database reports (January 2004-January 2024) with Donepezil and Memantine as primary suspected drugs, four disproportionality analysis methods - ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM - were applied to identify positive ADR signals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 712 reports were analyzed (54.6% female, 55.1% aged 65-85). Across the AD population, 42 ADRs were identified, including hypertensive crisis, hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, proteinuria, and hydronephrosis, many of which were newly reported. Subgroup analysis revealed prostate hypertrophy, acute kidney injury, and cerebral infarction in males, while females experienced more severe cardiovascular events, such as complete AV block and ventricular extrasystole. Additional ADRs included hyperkalemia, sinus bradycardia, and extrapyramidal disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite partial consistency of combined ADRs for Donepezil and Memantine with instructions, new ADR signals emerged, with significant differences in AD subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143413810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Cell-cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are widely used in patients with early and advanced breast cancer (BC). CDK4/6is also lead to numerous side effects. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between CDK4/6is and hepatotoxicities.
Research design and methods: As of 31 March 2024, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as several oncology conference proceedings. We included 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 24,342 breast cancer (BC) patients and 400 cases from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of hepatotoxicity in the RCTs, while Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) were calculated for the FAERS data.
Results: Overall, CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) were associated with significant hepatotoxicities compared to controls (OR = 1.76, 95%CI 1.40-2.22, I2 = 75%). Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib exhibited significant hepatotoxicities, while dalpiciclib did not. FAERS data showed significant liver enzyme and organ toxicity signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib but not for palbociclib.
Conclusions: CDK4/6is increase the risk of hepatotoxicities in patients with BC. Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib caused liver damage, while dalpiciclib did not. The most common manifestations were elevated ALT and AST levels.
{"title":"Hepatic adverse events with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a systematic review combining meta-analysis and FAERS database.","authors":"Yuyao Tang, Yongxin Li, Chengrong Zhang, Yinyin Ye, Tianlei Qiu, Zijun Zhu, Jiuda Zhao","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468357","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell-cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are widely used in patients with early and advanced breast cancer (BC). CDK4/6is also lead to numerous side effects. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between CDK4/6is and hepatotoxicities.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>As of 31 March 2024, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as several oncology conference proceedings. We included 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 24,342 breast cancer (BC) patients and 400 cases from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of hepatotoxicity in the RCTs, while Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) were calculated for the FAERS data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) were associated with significant hepatotoxicities compared to controls (OR = 1.76, 95%CI 1.40-2.22, I<sup>2</sup> = 75%). Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib exhibited significant hepatotoxicities, while dalpiciclib did not. FAERS data showed significant liver enzyme and organ toxicity signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib but not for palbociclib.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDK4/6is increase the risk of hepatotoxicities in patients with BC. Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib caused liver damage, while dalpiciclib did not. The most common manifestations were elevated ALT and AST levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-23DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2467811
Aniketh Naidu, Bret Silverglate, Mary Silverglate, George T Grossberg
Introduction: BACE1 (beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1) inhibitors have shown promise in treating Alzheimer's disease (AD) by reducing amyloid-beta (Aβ) production. However, clinical trials of inhibitors such as atabecestat, verubecestat, and lanabecestat have faced challenges, including limited efficacy and significant adverse effects.
Areas covered: This narrative review discusses randomized-controlled trials of BACE1 inhibitors. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and Web of Science for studies from 2010 to 2024. Association with BACE1's widespread expression beyond the brain shows adverse effects such as anxiety, depressive symptoms, and hepatotoxicity.
Expert opinion: The trial results underscore the need for CNS-specific BACE1 inhibitors to reduce adverse effects. Future research should focus on optimizing drug design and identifying additional therapeutic avenues, such as prostate cancer and insulin resistance.
{"title":"Safety concerns associated with BACE1 inhibitors - past, present, and future.","authors":"Aniketh Naidu, Bret Silverglate, Mary Silverglate, George T Grossberg","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467811","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467811","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>BACE1 (beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1) inhibitors have shown promise in treating Alzheimer's disease (AD) by reducing amyloid-beta (Aβ) production. However, clinical trials of inhibitors such as atabecestat, verubecestat, and lanabecestat have faced challenges, including limited efficacy and significant adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review discusses randomized-controlled trials of BACE1 inhibitors. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and Web of Science for studies from 2010 to 2024. Association with BACE1's widespread expression beyond the brain shows adverse effects such as anxiety, depressive symptoms, and hepatotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The trial results underscore the need for CNS-specific BACE1 inhibitors to reduce adverse effects. Future research should focus on optimizing drug design and identifying additional therapeutic avenues, such as prostate cancer and insulin resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143413807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-22DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2465870
Lama Alfehaid, Majed Alyami, Sumaya Almohareb, Omar Alshaya, Abdulaali Almutairi
Introduction: This research evaluated the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and bowel obstruction or ileus.
Methods: We searched databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, for studies on adult patients treated with GLP-1 RA. We included randomized control trials (RCT), cohort, case-control studies, and case reports. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to evaluate the quality of RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies.
Results: Out of 317 records identified, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 6 studies with a combined total of 550,426 participants. The use of GLP-1 RA did not show an incremental risk of bowel obstruction or ileus compared to controls (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.43-8.79). However, the studies had high heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). A subgroup analysis by specific medication revealed that liraglutide was associated with a significantly high risk of bowel obstruction or ileus (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.03-4.45; I2 = 0%).
Conclusions: GLP-1 receptor agonists do not significantly increase the risk of bowel obstruction or ileus. However, liraglutide is associated with a higher risk compared to semaglutide. Clinicians should remain aware of these rare events while recognizing the benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists for glycemic control and cardiovascular health.
Prospero registration: CRD42024585971.
{"title":"Evaluating bowel obstruction and ileus events in patients on GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lama Alfehaid, Majed Alyami, Sumaya Almohareb, Omar Alshaya, Abdulaali Almutairi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465870","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research evaluated the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and bowel obstruction or ileus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, for studies on adult patients treated with GLP-1 RA. We included randomized control trials (RCT), cohort, case-control studies, and case reports. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to evaluate the quality of RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 317 records identified, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 6 studies with a combined total of 550,426 participants. The use of GLP-1 RA did not show an incremental risk of bowel obstruction or ileus compared to controls (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.43-8.79). However, the studies had high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 94%). A subgroup analysis by specific medication revealed that liraglutide was associated with a significantly high risk of bowel obstruction or ileus (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.03-4.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1 receptor agonists do not significantly increase the risk of bowel obstruction or ileus. However, liraglutide is associated with a higher risk compared to semaglutide. Clinicians should remain aware of these rare events while recognizing the benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists for glycemic control and cardiovascular health.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42024585971.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have radically transformed the therapeutic landscape for cancer treatment, but little is known about the treatment-related fatal adverse events (FAEs). We aimed to comprehensively investigate the safety of ADCs regarding treatment-related FAEs.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADCs. The meta-analysis assessed the incidence of treatment-related FAEs and the odds ratio (OR) in the ADCs group compared with the control group.
Results: A total of 49 RCTs involving 13,052 patients treated with ADCs were included. The incidence of treatment-related FAEs in the ADCs group was 0.62% (95% CI = 0.36-1.08), while the control group was 0.52% (95% CI = 0.29-0.95), with an OR of 1.41 (95% CI = 1.12-1.79; p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis by drug and cancer type, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, which for acute myeloid leukemia were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related FAEs compared to controls (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.12-2.36; p < 0.05). There was no evidence of publication bias observed.
Conclusions: The meta-analysis of RCTs found that ADCs were associated with an increased risk of treatment-related FAEs compared with the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of treatment-related FAEs was associated with specific types of ADCs.
{"title":"Incidence and risk of treatment-related fatal adverse events in cancer patients treated with antibody conjugated drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Zhaohui Huang, Xinyu Li, Xin Zhou, Ziwen Yang, Xiaotong Huo, Jianhong Zhu, Sha Li, Jie Jiang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460452","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460452","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have radically transformed the therapeutic landscape for cancer treatment, but little is known about the treatment-related fatal adverse events (FAEs). We aimed to comprehensively investigate the safety of ADCs regarding treatment-related FAEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADCs. The meta-analysis assessed the incidence of treatment-related FAEs and the odds ratio (OR) in the ADCs group compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 RCTs involving 13,052 patients treated with ADCs were included. The incidence of treatment-related FAEs in the ADCs group was 0.62% (95% CI = 0.36-1.08), while the control group was 0.52% (95% CI = 0.29-0.95), with an OR of 1.41 (95% CI = 1.12-1.79; <i>p</i> < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis by drug and cancer type, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, which for acute myeloid leukemia were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related FAEs compared to controls (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.12-2.36; <i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no evidence of publication bias observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meta-analysis of RCTs found that ADCs were associated with an increased risk of treatment-related FAEs compared with the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of treatment-related FAEs was associated with specific types of ADCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-21DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852
Xiaojiang Tian, Lin Chen, Yonghong Chen, Ni Zhang
Background: The safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors has not yet been systemically analysed in the real world. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS database.
Methods: FAERS data (2014Q1 to 2022Q4) were searched for reports of all FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors across all indications. We used the SMQ generalized search AEs on the PT level. Disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals by calculating RORs.
Results: Within the standardized MedDRA queries, significant safety signals were found, including those for palbociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia, erythropenia], ribociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia , conduction defects], and abemaciclib [eosinophilic pneumonia, dehydration]. For AEs at the PT level, we found several significant blood and lymphatic system disorders for both palbociclib and ribociclib, such as abnormal full blood count and decreased white blood cell count for palbociclib and anisocytosis, neutropenia for ribociclib. Palbociclib also had high RORs for pseudocirrhosis, stomatitis, oral pain, and alopecia, while ribociclib had high RORs for electrocardiogram PR shortened, sinus arrhythmia, and blood bilirubin abnormal. However, the RORs were significant for abemaciclib in terms of diarrhoea, vena cava thrombosis, thrombophlebitis migrans and pneumonitis.
Conclusion: CDK4/6 inhibitors differed in their safety profile reports.
{"title":"Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.","authors":"Xiaojiang Tian, Lin Chen, Yonghong Chen, Ni Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors has not yet been systemically analysed in the real world. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of AEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS data (2014Q1 to 2022Q4) were searched for reports of all FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors across all indications. We used the SMQ generalized search AEs on the PT level. Disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals by calculating RORs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the standardized MedDRA queries, significant safety signals were found, including those for palbociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia, erythropenia], ribociclib [haematopoietic leukopenia , conduction defects], and abemaciclib [eosinophilic pneumonia, dehydration]. For AEs at the PT level, we found several significant blood and lymphatic system disorders for both palbociclib and ribociclib, such as abnormal full blood count and decreased white blood cell count for palbociclib and anisocytosis, neutropenia for ribociclib. Palbociclib also had high RORs for pseudocirrhosis, stomatitis, oral pain, and alopecia, while ribociclib had high RORs for electrocardiogram PR shortened, sinus arrhythmia, and blood bilirubin abnormal. However, the RORs were significant for abemaciclib in terms of diarrhoea, vena cava thrombosis, thrombophlebitis migrans and pneumonitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDK4/6 inhibitors differed in their safety profile reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Riociguat is a novel soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite its widespread use, there has been a lack of large-scale studies assessing the adverse events (AEs) associated with this medication.
Research design and methods: This study aimed to evaluate the AEs related to Riociguat by analyzing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q4 2013 to Q1 2024. A total of 12,149 AE reports were analyzed using four different disproportionality signal detection methodologies to identify significant AEs associated with Riociguat.
Results: The analysis revealed 117 preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality signals across all four methods. Among these, common AEs included 'headache,' 'dizziness,' 'hypotension,' 'nausea,' 'fall,' and 'loss of consciousness.' Notably, several unexpected AEs, such as 'fatigue,' 'malaise,' 'asthenia,' 'feeling abnormal,' and 'pain in extremity,' were identified, which were not highlighted in the product's package insert. Additionally, gender-specific differences were observed in certain adverse events.
Conclusions: This study offers insights into Riociguat's side effects. Clinicians should monitor patients closely for unexpected symptoms like limb pain and fatigue, paying particular attention to male patients, as some AEs occur more frequently in this group.
{"title":"Assessment of Riociguat-related adverse events: a disproportionality analysis utilizing the FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Lingling Wang, Zhenyu Mao, Pengdou Zheng, Guisha Zi, Fengqin Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Lixiang Chen, Huiguo Liu, Ling Zhou, Shuang Wei","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2466676","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2466676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Riociguat is a novel soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite its widespread use, there has been a lack of large-scale studies assessing the adverse events (AEs) associated with this medication.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the AEs related to Riociguat by analyzing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q4 2013 to Q1 2024. A total of 12,149 AE reports were analyzed using four different disproportionality signal detection methodologies to identify significant AEs associated with Riociguat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed 117 preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality signals across all four methods. Among these, common AEs included 'headache,' 'dizziness,' 'hypotension,' 'nausea,' 'fall,' and 'loss of consciousness.' Notably, several unexpected AEs, such as 'fatigue,' 'malaise,' 'asthenia,' 'feeling abnormal,' and 'pain in extremity,' were identified, which were not highlighted in the product's package insert. Additionally, gender-specific differences were observed in certain adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insights into Riociguat's side effects. Clinicians should monitor patients closely for unexpected symptoms like limb pain and fatigue, paying particular attention to male patients, as some AEs occur more frequently in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143398799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2468351
Zhanshen Wu, Yang Zhao, Xiangyu Zhang, Yanyan Li
Background: Previous studies have explored the association between levetiracetam (LEV) and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). However, most investigations have relied on clinical trial data or case reports from individual medical centers. Consequently, the precise relationship between LEV and SCARs in real-world settings remains elusive.
Research design and methods: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance databases were analyzed, focusing on LEV-associated SCAR events utilizing disproportionality analysis methods.
Results: This study identified a significant correlation between LEV and SCARs (p < 0.05). However, combined analyses with other antiepileptic drugs revealed that the association of LEV with SCARs was comparatively weaker (p < 0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that males, individuals aged 45 ~ 65 years, and combination therapy with eslicarbazepine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine significantly increased the risk of developing SCARs (p < 0.05). Notably, SCARs were most likely to occur within the initial week of LEV treatment (39.39%).
Conclusions: Despite certain limitations, this study offers updated insights into the association between LEV and SCARs. These findings underscore the significance of monitoring and actively managing LEV-associated SCARs to promote its safe and effective use.
背景:以往的研究探讨了左乙拉西坦(LEV)与严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)之间的关联。然而,大多数调查都依赖于临床试验数据或个别医疗中心的病例报告。因此,在现实世界中,LEV与SCAR之间的确切关系仍然难以确定:研究设计和方法:分析了来自 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和 EudraVigilance 数据库的数据,利用比例失调分析方法重点研究了与 LEV 相关的 SCAR 事件:结果:本研究发现 LEV 与 SCARs 之间存在明显的相关性(p p p 结论:尽管存在一定的局限性,但本研究提供了 LEV 与 SCARs 之间的相关性:尽管存在某些局限性,但本研究提供了有关 LEV 与 SCAR 之间关联的最新见解。这些发现强调了监测和积极管理 LEV 相关 SCARs 以促进其安全有效使用的重要性。
{"title":"Updated insights on levetiracetam-associated severe cutaneous adverse reactions: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.","authors":"Zhanshen Wu, Yang Zhao, Xiangyu Zhang, Yanyan Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468351","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have explored the association between levetiracetam (LEV) and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). However, most investigations have relied on clinical trial data or case reports from individual medical centers. Consequently, the precise relationship between LEV and SCARs in real-world settings remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance databases were analyzed, focusing on LEV-associated SCAR events utilizing disproportionality analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified a significant correlation between LEV and SCARs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, combined analyses with other antiepileptic drugs revealed that the association of LEV with SCARs was comparatively weaker (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that males, individuals aged 45 ~ 65 years, and combination therapy with eslicarbazepine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine significantly increased the risk of developing SCARs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Notably, SCARs were most likely to occur within the initial week of LEV treatment (39.39%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite certain limitations, this study offers updated insights into the association between LEV and SCARs. These findings underscore the significance of monitoring and actively managing LEV-associated SCARs to promote its safe and effective use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143425434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2467812
Zhaojun Wang, Junhang Zhang, Donglei Shi, Li Wei
Background: Cangrelor is used to reduce thrombotic events in adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but real-world safety data is limited. This study analyzes adverse events (AEs) related to cangrelor using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.
Methods: We employed statistical techniques such as the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker to analyze the data from the FAERS database.
Results: Out of a total of 15,011,506 case reports, 209 events were related to cangrelor. Thirty-one preferred term (PT) describing AEs were identified, affecting eight organ systems. The most reported PT was off-label use (n = 163). Several unexpected AEs not listed in the drug labeling emerged, including cardiac arrest, and cardiac failure. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was the most common indication (35.4%), numerous events were associated with off-label use, particularly for conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulant therapy.
Conclusion: Our research reveals both anticipated and unexpected AEs, providing important new information on the safety profile of cangrelor. Furthermore, we have discovered certain problems pertaining to product applications. It is recommended that manufacturers clearly highlight indications and usage instructions, and medical personnel closely follow drug administration protocols.
{"title":"What does real-world data reveal about cangrelor's safety? An analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.","authors":"Zhaojun Wang, Junhang Zhang, Donglei Shi, Li Wei","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cangrelor is used to reduce thrombotic events in adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but real-world safety data is limited. This study analyzes adverse events (AEs) related to cangrelor using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed statistical techniques such as the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker to analyze the data from the FAERS database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 15,011,506 case reports, 209 events were related to cangrelor. Thirty-one preferred term (PT) describing AEs were identified, affecting eight organ systems. The most reported PT was off-label use (<i>n</i> = 163). Several unexpected AEs not listed in the drug labeling emerged, including cardiac arrest, and cardiac failure. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was the most common indication (35.4%), numerous events were associated with off-label use, particularly for conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulant therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research reveals both anticipated and unexpected AEs, providing important new information on the safety profile of cangrelor. Furthermore, we have discovered certain problems pertaining to product applications. It is recommended that manufacturers clearly highlight indications and usage instructions, and medical personnel closely follow drug administration protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}