Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-07DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2542063
{"title":"Statement of retraction: clinical adverse events to letairis: a real-world drug safety study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2542063","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2542063","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-21DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2496431
Anas Zaher, Maria Julia Moura Nascimento Santos, Hassan Elsaygh, Stephen J Peterson, Carolina Colli Cruz, Anusha Shirwaikar Thomas, Yinghong Wang
Introduction: This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and factors associated with refractory immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (r-IMDC), emphasizing tailored treatment strategies.
Areas covered: The current literature on r-IMDC was reviewed using PubMed (2015-2025), focusing on clinical trials, meta-analyses, and case reports relevant to its management.
Expert opinion: Effectively managing r-IMDC is crucial for balancing toxicities and antitumor response. Available second and third-line management options for r-IMDC cases must be carefully evaluated. Future perspectives include development of standardized protocols beyond second-line therapies and predictive biomarkers to enable personalized treatment.
{"title":"Management of refractory checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis.","authors":"Anas Zaher, Maria Julia Moura Nascimento Santos, Hassan Elsaygh, Stephen J Peterson, Carolina Colli Cruz, Anusha Shirwaikar Thomas, Yinghong Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2496431","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2496431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and factors associated with refractory immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (r-IMDC), emphasizing tailored treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The current literature on r-IMDC was reviewed using PubMed (2015-2025), focusing on clinical trials, meta-analyses, and case reports relevant to its management.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Effectively managing r-IMDC is crucial for balancing toxicities and antitumor response. Available second and third-line management options for r-IMDC cases must be carefully evaluated. Future perspectives include development of standardized protocols beyond second-line therapies and predictive biomarkers to enable personalized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"49-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143960718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-21DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2601037
Carolin Luisa Hoehne, Bianca Raffaelli
{"title":"Safety and tolerability of fremanezumab for treating migraine: where are we now?","authors":"Carolin Luisa Hoehne, Bianca Raffaelli","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2601037","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2601037","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2596231
Milind Y Desai, Veronique Michaud, David Thacker, Matthew Arwood, Pamela Dow, Matthew Martinez, Michele Michels, Anjali T Owens, Jacques Turgeon
Introduction: Several sarcomeric gene abnormalities associated with left ventricular thickening, hypercontractility, and high left ventricular ejection fraction define hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Standard treatment options such as beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or disopyramide improve symptoms in many patients, but have limited ability to modify disease progression. Two new cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), mavacamten and aficamten, reduce the intensity of myosin - actin cross-bridge formation and could treat causes of HCM.
Areas covered: Drug clearance concepts, relevant information pertaining to cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes involved in the disposition of mavacamten and aficamten, genetic polymorphisms associated with CYP450 isoenzymes, and relevance of multi-drug interactions leading to changes in the systemic exposure of CMIs.
Expert opinion: Both mavacamten and aficamten exhibit complex disposition and are extensively metabolized by CYP450 isoenzymes including CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, which exhibit genetic polymorphisms. CYP3A4 contributes less to the metabolism of mavacamten and aficamten. However, CYP3A4 can influence the disposition of these CMIs and other drugs, as CYP3A4 is subjected to induction and inhibition, and modulation by inflammatory factors. Therefore, multi-drug interactions due to changes in the metabolic clearances of CMIs are expected in HCM patients with other chronic conditions and polypharmacy.
{"title":"CYP450 activity, drug interactions, and genetic polymorphisms: clinical relevance for the new selective cardiac myosin inhibitors.","authors":"Milind Y Desai, Veronique Michaud, David Thacker, Matthew Arwood, Pamela Dow, Matthew Martinez, Michele Michels, Anjali T Owens, Jacques Turgeon","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2596231","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2596231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several sarcomeric gene abnormalities associated with left ventricular thickening, hypercontractility, and high left ventricular ejection fraction define hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Standard treatment options such as beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or disopyramide improve symptoms in many patients, but have limited ability to modify disease progression. Two new cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), mavacamten and aficamten, reduce the intensity of myosin - actin cross-bridge formation and could treat causes of HCM.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Drug clearance concepts, relevant information pertaining to cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes involved in the disposition of mavacamten and aficamten, genetic polymorphisms associated with CYP450 isoenzymes, and relevance of multi-drug interactions leading to changes in the systemic exposure of CMIs.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Both mavacamten and aficamten exhibit complex disposition and are extensively metabolized by CYP450 isoenzymes including CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, which exhibit genetic polymorphisms. CYP3A4 contributes less to the metabolism of mavacamten and aficamten. However, CYP3A4 can influence the disposition of these CMIs and other drugs, as CYP3A4 is subjected to induction and inhibition, and modulation by inflammatory factors. Therefore, multi-drug interactions due to changes in the metabolic clearances of CMIs are expected in HCM patients with other chronic conditions and polypharmacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237
Lingman Wang, Jianxiong Gui, Xiaofang Zhang, Bing Tian, Linxue Meng, Jie Liu, Li Jiang
Background: Rufinamide (RUF) is an antiepileptic drug recently introduced for managing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but its adverse reactions are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate RUF's safety profile using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess RUF-associated adverse drug events (ADEs), using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker (MGPS).
Results: We collected 338 ADE reports related to RUF. Nervous system disorders were the most frequently reported signals, and several new ADEs were detected, including atonic seizures, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy, seizure clusters, multi-drug resistance, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nearly half of the ADEs in pediatric patients were psychological or neurological. Disproportionality analysis within 4 weeks of treatment showed high RORs for QT shortening, sudden death, and atonic seizures.
Conclusions: Our study revealed prospective signals of new ADEs linked to RUF as well as revealed that both prescribers and patients were more conscious of the risks involved in its clinical use.
{"title":"Disproportionality analysis of the safety profile of rufinamide in the real world: an evaluation of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.","authors":"Lingman Wang, Jianxiong Gui, Xiaofang Zhang, Bing Tian, Linxue Meng, Jie Liu, Li Jiang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rufinamide (RUF) is an antiepileptic drug recently introduced for managing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but its adverse reactions are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate RUF's safety profile using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess RUF-associated adverse drug events (ADEs), using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker (MGPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 338 ADE reports related to RUF. Nervous system disorders were the most frequently reported signals, and several new ADEs were detected, including atonic seizures, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy, seizure clusters, multi-drug resistance, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nearly half of the ADEs in pediatric patients were psychological or neurological. Disproportionality analysis within 4 weeks of treatment showed high RORs for QT shortening, sudden death, and atonic seizures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed prospective signals of new ADEs linked to RUF as well as revealed that both prescribers and patients were more conscious of the risks involved in its clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1505-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412226
Zhenpo Zhang, Jiaxin He, Yankun Liang, Yuting Wang, Jingping Zheng, Lin Ma, Ling Su
Background: Azithromycin and clarithromycin are commonly used to treat community-acquired pneumonia in adults aged ≥ 65, such as mycoplasma pneumonia. This study aims to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in this age group by analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), providing insights for clinical use and management of AEs in this population.
Research design and methods: We retrieved reports of AEs related to azithromycin and clarithromycin from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) to identify AEs associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥ 65.
Results: A total of 2,019 adverse event reports were retrieved for azithromycin, and 2,392 for clarithromycin. Off-label use (n = 349) and drug interactions (n = 487) were the most reported AEs in adults aged ≥ 65 for azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. Prolonged QT interval showed the strongest signal among AEs for azithromycin in this age group. Drug interaction-related medication errors had the strongest signal for clarithromycin. Seven signals not explicitly included in the azithromycin package insert were identified in adults aged ≥ 65. Fourteen signals not explicitly included in the clarithromycin package insert were identified.
Conclusions: Among adults aged ≥ 65, cardiac-related adverse events are more closely associated with azithromycin than with clarithromycin. Conversely, AEs related to drug interactions and psychiatric symptoms are more associated with clarithromycin. Additionally, clinicians should be vigilant regarding AEs not specified in the package inserts. The findings of this study may help optimize the selection of azithromycin and clarithromycin based on patient circumstances and assist clinicians in focusing on relevant AEs for early intervention.
{"title":"Adverse events associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥65: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.","authors":"Zhenpo Zhang, Jiaxin He, Yankun Liang, Yuting Wang, Jingping Zheng, Lin Ma, Ling Su","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412226","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azithromycin and clarithromycin are commonly used to treat community-acquired pneumonia in adults aged ≥ 65, such as mycoplasma pneumonia. This study aims to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in this age group by analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), providing insights for clinical use and management of AEs in this population.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We retrieved reports of AEs related to azithromycin and clarithromycin from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) to identify AEs associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥ 65.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,019 adverse event reports were retrieved for azithromycin, and 2,392 for clarithromycin. Off-label use (<i>n</i> = 349) and drug interactions (<i>n</i> = 487) were the most reported AEs in adults aged ≥ 65 for azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. Prolonged QT interval showed the strongest signal among AEs for azithromycin in this age group. Drug interaction-related medication errors had the strongest signal for clarithromycin. Seven signals not explicitly included in the azithromycin package insert were identified in adults aged ≥ 65. Fourteen signals not explicitly included in the clarithromycin package insert were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among adults aged ≥ 65, cardiac-related adverse events are more closely associated with azithromycin than with clarithromycin. Conversely, AEs related to drug interactions and psychiatric symptoms are more associated with clarithromycin. Additionally, clinicians should be vigilant regarding AEs not specified in the package inserts. The findings of this study may help optimize the selection of azithromycin and clarithromycin based on patient circumstances and assist clinicians in focusing on relevant AEs for early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1497-1504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-02-26DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2471515
Yao Zhou, Jie Gong, Xianguang Deng, Lele Shen, Anqi Ge, Hongqiao Fan, Jie Ling, Shiting Wu, Lifang Liu
Background: Lapatinib, an FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor, treats HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer. This study comprehensively analyzed its adverse reaction profile using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to guide clinical use.
Research design and methods: Adverse event (AE) reports for lapatinib from the second quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2024 in FAERS were analyzed using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) to identify AE signals.
Results: Among 8300 AE reports, females (91.47%) and ages 40-59.9 (33.71%) were predominant. 20 system organ classifications (SOCs) were affected, with gastrointestinal disorders (ROR = 3.46) and skin disorders (ROR = 2.47) most significant. Based on the PT level, a total of 111 PTs were analyzed that met the four algorithms, including typical AEs such as diarrhea (n = 3410), vomiting (n = 856), and rash (n = 856), as well as some rare AEs that were not prompted by the drug inserts, such as neutropenia (n = 252), pericardial effusion (n = 43), lymphedema (n = 20). The majority of lapatinib-associated AEs had onset within 30 days (51%).
Conclusions: Lapatinib has a generally favorable safety profile, but gastrointestinal toxicity and dermatotoxicity require close monitoring to prevent serious AEs.
{"title":"A comprehensive exploration of adverse reactions to lapatinib: a disproportionate analysis based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Yao Zhou, Jie Gong, Xianguang Deng, Lele Shen, Anqi Ge, Hongqiao Fan, Jie Ling, Shiting Wu, Lifang Liu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2471515","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2471515","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lapatinib, an FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor, treats HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer. This study comprehensively analyzed its adverse reaction profile using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to guide clinical use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adverse event (AE) reports for lapatinib from the second quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2024 in FAERS were analyzed using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) to identify AE signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8300 AE reports, females (91.47%) and ages 40-59.9 (33.71%) were predominant. 20 system organ classifications (SOCs) were affected, with gastrointestinal disorders (ROR = 3.46) and skin disorders (ROR = 2.47) most significant. Based on the PT level, a total of 111 PTs were analyzed that met the four algorithms, including typical AEs such as diarrhea (<i>n</i> = 3410), vomiting (<i>n</i> = 856), and rash (<i>n</i> = 856), as well as some rare AEs that were not prompted by the drug inserts, such as neutropenia (<i>n</i> = 252), pericardial effusion (<i>n</i> = 43), lymphedema (<i>n</i> = 20). The majority of lapatinib-associated AEs had onset within 30 days (51%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lapatinib has a generally favorable safety profile, but gastrointestinal toxicity and dermatotoxicity require close monitoring to prevent serious AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1521-1530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143476049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Futibatinib is a small, potent, covalent, irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 inhibitor that has been added as a new standard of care for previously treated unresectable and/or advanced FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive BTC. FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements play a key role in BTC survival, proliferation, invasion, and development of distant metastasis. The inhibition of this pathway is an important target in the treatment of BTC.
Areas covered: The article covers the development of futibatinib for the treatment of refractory unresectable/advanced BTC, its mechanism of action, and key pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic data with a focus on the safety profile. Data are based on published clinical trials, pooled analysis, and retrospective studies indexed in PubMed (2010-2024).
Expert opinion: Futibatinib is an FDA and EMA approved FGFR2 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with refractory BTC with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Ongoing drug development strategies are centered on designing new FGFR2 fusion inhibitors able to overcome on-target and off-target resistances coupled with a high target selectivity to spare the most common treatment-related adverse events (hyperphosphatemia, stomatitis, alopecia, nail toxicity, skin reactions, eye toxicity).
{"title":"Pharmacologic features, clinical applications, and drug safety evaluation of futibatinib in the treatment of biliary tract cancer (BTC).","authors":"Angelo Pirozzi, Celine Hoyek, Naohiro Okano, Oluseyi Abidoye, Lorenza Rimassa, Mohamad Bassam Sonbol, Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Mitesh J Borad","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2495178","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2495178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Futibatinib is a small, potent, covalent, irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 inhibitor that has been added as a new standard of care for previously treated unresectable and/or advanced FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive BTC. FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements play a key role in BTC survival, proliferation, invasion, and development of distant metastasis. The inhibition of this pathway is an important target in the treatment of BTC.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The article covers the development of futibatinib for the treatment of refractory unresectable/advanced BTC, its mechanism of action, and key pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic data with a focus on the safety profile. Data are based on published clinical trials, pooled analysis, and retrospective studies indexed in PubMed (2010-2024).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Futibatinib is an FDA and EMA approved FGFR2 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with refractory BTC with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Ongoing drug development strategies are centered on designing new FGFR2 fusion inhibitors able to overcome on-target and off-target resistances coupled with a high target selectivity to spare the most common treatment-related adverse events (hyperphosphatemia, stomatitis, alopecia, nail toxicity, skin reactions, eye toxicity).</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1383-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143986479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2418333
Toru Ogura, Chihiro Shiraishi
Background: Olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib are the three primary poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors that are currently available in the market. Previous studies indicate different incidences of adverse events based on the PARP inhibitor or country.
Research design and methods: This study used data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System collected between January 2018 and December 2023. The data analyzed in this study involved patients receiving PARP inhibitors for treating ovarian cancer. A comparative analysis of the three PARP inhibitors was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR) controlling for patient background differences.
Results: The aROR for niraparib was significant at > 1.000, including platelet count decreased (p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001) when olaparib was set as the reference. Conversely, the aROR for niraparib was significant at < 1.000, including anemia (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in various adverse events for rucaparib. Moreover, significant differences were observed when comparing between countries.
Conclusions: This study indicates that the types of adverse events may vary by PARP inhibitor and by country. These results will be beneficial in clinical practice.
背景:奥拉帕利(Olaparib)、尼拉帕利(niraparib)和鲁卡帕利(rucaparib)是目前市场上三种主要的多(腺苷二磷酸核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂。以往的研究表明,PARP抑制剂或国家不同,不良事件的发生率也不同:本研究使用的数据来自美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统,收集时间为 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月。本研究分析的数据涉及接受PARP抑制剂治疗卵巢癌的患者。使用报告几率(ROR)和控制患者背景差异的调整ROR(aROR)对三种PARP抑制剂进行了比较分析:结果:尼拉帕利的aROR大于1.000,包括血小板计数下降(p p p 结论:尼拉帕利的aROR显著大于1.000:这项研究表明,不同 PARP 抑制剂和不同国家的不良事件类型可能有所不同。这些结果将有助于临床实践。
{"title":"Comparison of adverse events of poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors in patients with ovarian cancer using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Toru Ogura, Chihiro Shiraishi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2418333","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2418333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib are the three primary poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors that are currently available in the market. Previous studies indicate different incidences of adverse events based on the PARP inhibitor or country.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study used data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System collected between January 2018 and December 2023. The data analyzed in this study involved patients receiving PARP inhibitors for treating ovarian cancer. A comparative analysis of the three PARP inhibitors was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR) controlling for patient background differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aROR for niraparib was significant at > 1.000, including platelet count decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (<i>p</i> < 0.001) when olaparib was set as the reference. Conversely, the aROR for niraparib was significant at < 1.000, including anemia (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in various adverse events for rucaparib. Moreover, significant differences were observed when comparing between countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that the types of adverse events may vary by PARP inhibitor and by country. These results will be beneficial in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1443-1451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-07DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412221
Runan Fang, Yang Zhou, Lu Han, Wenjing Chen, Yuan Sun, Jianhong Li
Objective: The study aims to thoroughly assess the adverse events related to infections and infestations associated with biological agents used for psoriasis using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
Methods: We analyzed FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023. The study included TNF-α inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab), IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL-23p19 inhibitors (guselkumab), and IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab). We used disproportionality analysis and Bayesian methods to quantify the related adverse event (AE) signals.
Results: Most AEs related to infections and infestations are already listed on the drug packaging labels. Notably, TNF-α inhibitors are associated with a significantly higher incidence of tuberculosis-related diseases compared to other biological agents. In contrast, IL-17 inhibitors show a greater variety and number of fungal infection-related AEs than their counterparts. Furthermore, our study has identified new potential AEs that require the attention of clinicians.
Conclusion: In clinical practice, it is advisable to monitor the risks of infections and infestations in patients receiving biological agents for psoriasis to enable early detection and intervention. Our findings highlight the need for further epidemiological investigations to establish causality and guide clinical practice in managing these risks effectively.
{"title":"Infection and infestation-related adverse events of biologics in psoriasis: insights from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).","authors":"Runan Fang, Yang Zhou, Lu Han, Wenjing Chen, Yuan Sun, Jianhong Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412221","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to thoroughly assess the adverse events related to infections and infestations associated with biological agents used for psoriasis using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023. The study included TNF-α inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab), IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL-23p19 inhibitors (guselkumab), and IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab). We used disproportionality analysis and Bayesian methods to quantify the related adverse event (AE) signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most AEs related to infections and infestations are already listed on the drug packaging labels. Notably, TNF-α inhibitors are associated with a significantly higher incidence of tuberculosis-related diseases compared to other biological agents. In contrast, IL-17 inhibitors show a greater variety and number of fungal infection-related AEs than their counterparts. Furthermore, our study has identified new potential AEs that require the attention of clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinical practice, it is advisable to monitor the risks of infections and infestations in patients receiving biological agents for psoriasis to enable early detection and intervention. Our findings highlight the need for further epidemiological investigations to establish causality and guide clinical practice in managing these risks effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1459-1470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}