首页 > 最新文献

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
Clinical adverse events to letairis: a real-world drug safety study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). 来泰利的临床不良事件:基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 的真实世界药物安全性研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416243
Yu-Ting Bi, Bo Dong

Background: Letairis (ambrisentan), an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), is a critical medication for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite its efficacy, its safety profile is under scrutiny, warranting a detailed analysis.

Research design and methods: This study leveraged the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2007 to Q4 2023, focusing on Letairis as the primary suspect in adverse events. Employing advanced data mining techniques, such as Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), the study aimed to uncover safety signals.

Results: A total of 43,774 cases were identified, with Letairis implicated in 16,038,963 adverse event reports. There was a notable predominance of female patients (75.30%), with a median age around 64 years. Severe outcomes, including hospitalization (51.63%) and fatalities (20.44%), were prevalent. Signal strength analysis highlighted concerns in infections and infestations, as well as cardiac disorders.

Conclusion: The analysis underscores the need for vigilant pharmacovigilance and highlights Letairis's potential to induce serious AEs, particularly in female and elderly populations. These findings are instrumental in guiding clinical practice and future drug safety assessments.

背景:内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA)Letairis(安立生坦)是治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)的重要药物。尽管该药疗效显著,但其安全性却备受关注,因此有必要对其进行详细分析:本研究利用美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)从 2007 年第 1 季度到 2023 年第 4 季度的数据,重点关注作为不良事件主要嫌疑人的来泰利。研究采用了先进的数据挖掘技术,如报告几率比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPN)和多项目伽马泊松收缩器(MGPS),旨在发现安全信号:结果:共发现 43,774 个病例,16,038,963 份不良事件报告涉及来泰利。女性患者明显占多数(75.30%),中位年龄约为 64 岁。包括住院(51.63%)和死亡(20.44%)在内的严重后果十分普遍。信号强度分析强调了感染和侵袭以及心脏疾病方面的问题:分析强调了警惕药物警戒的必要性,并突出了来泰利诱发严重AEs的可能性,尤其是在女性和老年人群中。这些发现有助于指导临床实践和未来的药物安全性评估。
{"title":"Clinical adverse events to letairis: a real-world drug safety study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).","authors":"Yu-Ting Bi, Bo Dong","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2416243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Letairis (ambrisentan), an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), is a critical medication for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite its efficacy, its safety profile is under scrutiny, warranting a detailed analysis.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study leveraged the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2007 to Q4 2023, focusing on Letairis as the primary suspect in adverse events. Employing advanced data mining techniques, such as Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), the study aimed to uncover safety signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43,774 cases were identified, with Letairis implicated in 16,038,963 adverse event reports. There was a notable predominance of female patients (75.30%), with a median age around 64 years. Severe outcomes, including hospitalization (51.63%) and fatalities (20.44%), were prevalent. Signal strength analysis highlighted concerns in infections and infestations, as well as cardiac disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis underscores the need for vigilant pharmacovigilance and highlights Letairis's potential to induce serious AEs, particularly in female and elderly populations. These findings are instrumental in guiding clinical practice and future drug safety assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse reaction of specific acute kidney injury caused by atorvastatin: an actual study based on the database of the US FDA adverse event reporting system. 阿托伐他汀引起的特异性急性肾损伤不良反应:基于美国 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库的实际研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416919
Manting Liu, Zhenye Chen, Jiazhen Jiang, Hanlin Dong, Caishan Fang, Jiyuan Zheng, Shulan Hunag, Dongqiang Luo

Introduction: Atorvastatin, one of the most widely used drugs, has attracted controversy regarding its potential adverse reactions to acute kidney injury(AKI). This study aims to provide evidence in support of the safe use of atorvastatin.

Areas covered: Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (Q1 2004 to Q1 2024), we extracted reports where atorvastatin was the primary suspect and categorized them into five populations: the general population, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischemic stroke (IS), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and hyperlipidemia (HLD). We performed subgroup analyses by gender and age strata within these populations, assessing positive signals through disproportionality analysis using four criteria: Ratio of Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EGBM). The statistical analysis evaluated differences between adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurrence and nonoccurrence, as well as between high and low induction time groups.

Expert opinion: In the general population, evidence for a positive signal of AKI was insufficient. However, the sub-group analysis revealed a risk in males, with older individuals more often affected in both AMI and IS populations. In T2DM, positive signals were evident in younger age groups. For the HLD population, evidence of a positive AKI signal was insufficient across gender and age strata. Overall, atorvastatin is generally safe, but clinical vigilance for AKI is warranted in T2DM, AMI, and IS populations, particularly in older adults (65+ years).

简介阿托伐他汀是最广泛使用的药物之一,但它对急性肾损伤(AKI)的潜在不良反应却引起了争议。本研究旨在为阿托伐他汀的安全使用提供证据:利用 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 数据库(2004 年第一季度至 2024 年第一季度),我们提取了以阿托伐他汀为主要可疑药物的报告,并将其分为五类人群:普通人群、急性心肌梗死 (AMI)、缺血性中风 (IS)、2 型糖尿病 (T2DM) 和高脂血症 (HLD)。我们在这些人群中按性别和年龄层进行了亚组分析,通过使用四种标准进行比例失调分析来评估阳性信号:比值比 (ROR)、比例报告比 (PRR)、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络 (BCPNN) 和经验贝叶斯几何平均数 (EGBM)。统计分析评估了药物不良反应(ADR)发生率和未发生率之间的差异,以及诱导时间长和诱导时间短两组之间的差异:在一般人群中,AKI 阳性信号的证据不足。然而,亚组分析显示男性存在风险,在AMI和IS人群中,老年人更常受到影响。在 T2DM 患者中,年轻群体中的阳性信号明显。在高密度脂蛋白血症人群中,不同性别和年龄层的 AKI 阳性信号证据不足。总的来说,阿托伐他汀总体上是安全的,但在 T2DM、AMI 和 IS 患者中,尤其是老年人(65 岁以上),临床上应警惕 AKI。
{"title":"Adverse reaction of specific acute kidney injury caused by atorvastatin: an actual study based on the database of the US FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Manting Liu, Zhenye Chen, Jiazhen Jiang, Hanlin Dong, Caishan Fang, Jiyuan Zheng, Shulan Hunag, Dongqiang Luo","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2416919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atorvastatin, one of the most widely used drugs, has attracted controversy regarding its potential adverse reactions to acute kidney injury(AKI). This study aims to provide evidence in support of the safe use of atorvastatin.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (Q1 2004 to Q1 2024), we extracted reports where atorvastatin was the primary suspect and categorized them into five populations: the general population, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischemic stroke (IS), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and hyperlipidemia (HLD). We performed subgroup analyses by gender and age strata within these populations, assessing positive signals through disproportionality analysis using four criteria: Ratio of Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EGBM). The statistical analysis evaluated differences between adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurrence and nonoccurrence, as well as between high and low induction time groups.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In the general population, evidence for a positive signal of AKI was insufficient. However, the sub-group analysis revealed a risk in males, with older individuals more often affected in both AMI and IS populations. In T2DM, positive signals were evident in younger age groups. For the HLD population, evidence of a positive AKI signal was insufficient across gender and age strata. Overall, atorvastatin is generally safe, but clinical vigilance for AKI is warranted in T2DM, AMI, and IS populations, particularly in older adults (65+ years).</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety study on adverse events of zanubrutinib based on WHO-VigiAccess and FAERS databases. 基于 WHO-VigiAccess 和 FAERS 数据库的扎鲁替尼不良事件安全性研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416917
Qiaofang Liang, Xiaolin Liao, Yushen Huang, Jiang Zeng, Cong Liang, Ying He, Hongwen Wu

Objective: The study endeavors to elucidate AE signals associated with zanubrutinib data from the WHO-VigiAccess and FAERS databases. The aim is to furnish robust scientific evidence to inform clinical practice and regulatory decisions.

Methods: We meticulously extracted all AE breports tied to zanubrutinib from the both databases, encompassing the period from the drug's market introduction until 30 April 2024. Retrospective quantitative analysis employing ROR, PRR, and BCPNN methodologies were utilized to analysis.

Results: The investigation unveiled 1,304 reports from WHO-VigiAccess and 1,141 reports from FAERS related to zanubrutinib. Among the top 30 reported PTs in both databases, those not recorded in the drug label included pyrexia, dizziness, and death. In the FAERS database, signals for zanubrutinib were detected across 19 SOCs. Systems not covered in the drug label included reproductive system and breast disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders, ear and labyrinth disorders, among others. Unmentioned signals included intestinal perforation, onychoclasis, night sweats, etc.

Conclusion: This study confirms common AEs of zanubrutinib and identifies new ones, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and personalized treatment. It also emphasizes the importance of ongoing drug safety surveillance and patient management to maximize therapeutic benefits and minimize risks.

研究目的本研究旨在阐明与WHO-VigiAccess和FAERS数据库中扎鲁替尼数据相关的AE信号。目的是为临床实践和监管决策提供可靠的科学证据:我们从这两个数据库中精心提取了与扎鲁替尼相关的所有AE breports,时间跨度为该药物上市至2024年4月30日。采用ROR、PRR和BCPNN方法进行回顾性定量分析:调查发现,WHO-VigiAccess 和 FAERS 分别提供了 1,304 份和 1,141 份与扎鲁替尼有关的报告。在这两个数据库中报告的前 30 种 PTs 中,未在药物标签中记录的包括热病、头晕和死亡。在FAERS数据库中,19个SOC中都检测到了扎鲁替尼的信号。药物标签中未涉及的系统包括生殖系统和乳腺疾病、新陈代谢和营养失调、耳部和迷宫疾病等。未提及的信号包括肠穿孔、甲癣、盗汗等:本研究证实了扎鲁替尼的常见AEs,并发现了新的AEs,强调了仔细监测和个性化治疗的必要性。它还强调了持续的药物安全性监测和患者管理对于最大限度地提高治疗效果和降低风险的重要性。
{"title":"Safety study on adverse events of zanubrutinib based on WHO-VigiAccess and FAERS databases.","authors":"Qiaofang Liang, Xiaolin Liao, Yushen Huang, Jiang Zeng, Cong Liang, Ying He, Hongwen Wu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2416917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study endeavors to elucidate AE signals associated with zanubrutinib data from the WHO-VigiAccess and FAERS databases. The aim is to furnish robust scientific evidence to inform clinical practice and regulatory decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We meticulously extracted all AE breports tied to zanubrutinib from the both databases, encompassing the period from the drug's market introduction until 30 April 2024. Retrospective quantitative analysis employing ROR, PRR, and BCPNN methodologies were utilized to analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The investigation unveiled 1,304 reports from WHO-VigiAccess and 1,141 reports from FAERS related to zanubrutinib. Among the top 30 reported PTs in both databases, those not recorded in the drug label included pyrexia, dizziness, and death. In the FAERS database, signals for zanubrutinib were detected across 19 SOCs. Systems not covered in the drug label included reproductive system and breast disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders, ear and labyrinth disorders, among others. Unmentioned signals included intestinal perforation, onychoclasis, night sweats, etc.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms common AEs of zanubrutinib and identifies new ones, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and personalized treatment. It also emphasizes the importance of ongoing drug safety surveillance and patient management to maximize therapeutic benefits and minimize risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins and Vancomycin: a study on adverse event reporting for monotherapy versus combinations using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS). 多粘菌素和万古霉素的联合肾毒性:利用 FDA 不良事件报告系统对单一疗法与联合疗法的不良事件报告进行的研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416256
Ruijia Zhan, Jiageng Lin, Miao Dai, Bo Ji, Xianxia He, Zhihui Jiang

Background: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections pose a global public health crisis with significant mortality and economic burdens. Combination of polymyxins and vancomycin has shown effectiveness against MDR infections. However, their combined nephrotoxicity complicates clinical use. Given these concerns, we conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess the nephrotoxicity of combinations of polymyxins and vancomycin compared to monotherapy.

Research design and methods: In this retrospective study, data from FAERS reports (2012 Q4 to 2023 Q2) were deduplicated and analyzed for adverse events (AEs) related to vancomycin, polymyxin B, and colistin. Disproportionality analyses were performed to evaluate the association between drugs and nephrotoxicity.

Results: A total of 9,796,784 adverse event reports, including 73,009 reports associated with nephrotoxicity, were included. All three drugs showed significant associations with nephrotoxicity. In combination therapy, polymyxin B-vancomycin exhibited a stronger association with nephrotoxicity compared to monotherapy, whereas colistin-vancomycin demonstrated a lower association with nephrotoxicity than colistin monotherapy.

Conclusions: This study found that combining vancomycin with colistin alleviated colistin-induced nephrotoxicity, while combining vancomycin with polymyxin B worsened polymyxin B-induced nephrotoxicity.

背景:耐多药(MDR)感染是一个全球性的公共卫生危机,造成了严重的死亡率和经济负担。多粘菌素和万古霉素联用已显示出对 MDR 感染的有效性。然而,它们的联合肾毒性使临床应用变得复杂。鉴于这些问题,我们利用美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)进行了一项药物警戒分析,以评估多粘菌素和万古霉素联合疗法与单一疗法相比的肾毒性:在这项回顾性研究中,我们对FAERS报告(2012年第四季度至2023年第二季度)中的数据进行了重复分析,并分析了与万古霉素、多粘菌素B和秋水仙碱相关的不良事件(AEs)。进行了比例失调分析,以评估药物与肾毒性之间的关联:结果:共纳入 9,796,784 份不良事件报告,其中包括 73,009 份与肾毒性相关的报告。所有三种药物都与肾毒性有明显关联。在联合疗法中,多粘菌素 B-万古霉素与肾毒性的相关性比单药疗法更强,而大肠菌素-万古霉素与肾毒性的相关性低于大肠菌素单药疗法:本研究发现,将万古霉素与大肠杆菌素联合使用可减轻大肠杆菌素诱导的肾毒性,而将万古霉素与多粘菌素B联合使用则会加重多粘菌素B诱导的肾毒性。
{"title":"Combined nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins and Vancomycin: a study on adverse event reporting for monotherapy versus combinations using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).","authors":"Ruijia Zhan, Jiageng Lin, Miao Dai, Bo Ji, Xianxia He, Zhihui Jiang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416256","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections pose a global public health crisis with significant mortality and economic burdens. Combination of polymyxins and vancomycin has shown effectiveness against MDR infections. However, their combined nephrotoxicity complicates clinical use. Given these concerns, we conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess the nephrotoxicity of combinations of polymyxins and vancomycin compared to monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data from FAERS reports (2012 Q4 to 2023 Q2) were deduplicated and analyzed for adverse events (AEs) related to vancomycin, polymyxin B, and colistin. Disproportionality analyses were performed to evaluate the association between drugs and nephrotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,796,784 adverse event reports, including 73,009 reports associated with nephrotoxicity, were included. All three drugs showed significant associations with nephrotoxicity. In combination therapy, polymyxin B-vancomycin exhibited a stronger association with nephrotoxicity compared to monotherapy, whereas colistin-vancomycin demonstrated a lower association with nephrotoxicity than colistin monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that combining vancomycin with colistin alleviated colistin-induced nephrotoxicity, while combining vancomycin with polymyxin B worsened polymyxin B-induced nephrotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dapagliflozin cardiovascular effects on end-stage kidney disease (DARE-ESKD-2) trial: rationale and design. 达帕格列净对终末期肾病心血管的影响(DARE-ESKD-2)试验:原理与设计。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412228
Joaquim Barreto, Marilia Martins, Mauro Pascoa, Sheila T K Medorima, Isabella Bonilha, Daniel Campos Jesus, Cinthia E M Carbonara, Kelcia R S Quadros, Barbara Assato, Alessandra M Campos-Staffico, Gil Guerra Júnior, Wilson Nadruz, Rodrigo B de Oliveira, Andrei C Sposito

Background: Dapagliflozin prevents myocardial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease patients regardless of residual kidney function. We hypothesized that this effect is extensible also to patients on dialysis.

Research design and methods: The DARE-ESKD-2 is an ongoing, single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial designed to determine the effects of adding dapagliflozin to standard treatment on myocardial function and structure. Eligible patients were adults on a regular dialysis scheme for more than 3 months. Pregnancy, liver failure, allergy to the investigational drug, and prior use of SGLT2i were exclusion criteria. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to dapagliflozin or standard treatment groups for 24-weeks. The primary goal is to compare the change in NT-proBNP levels between study arms, and secondary goals include comparing the between-group difference in left ventricle global longitudinal strain, indexed mass, ejection fraction, and E/e` ratio, and on symptoms scale and 6-minute walk test distance. An exploratory analysis will evaluate changes in body composition and bone densitometry.

Results: The trial has finished the enrollment of 80 patients, who are currently being followed-up.

Conclusions: This trial will provide novel data on myocardial effects of SGLT2i in dialysis recipients. Results from this study may provide evidence to support SGLT2i use in ESKD.

背景:达帕格列净可预防慢性肾脏病患者的心肌功能障碍,而与残余肾功能无关,我们假设这种效果也可扩展至透析患者:DARE-ESKD-2是一项正在进行的单中心、开放标签随机临床试验,旨在确定在标准治疗的基础上添加达帕格列净对心肌功能和结构的影响。符合条件的患者为接受常规透析治疗 3 个月以上的成人。妊娠、肝功能衰竭、对研究药物过敏以及曾使用过 SGLT2i 均为排除标准。参与者按 1:1 的比例随机分配到达帕格列净或标准治疗组,为期 24 周。主要目标是比较研究组间 NT-proBNP 水平的变化,次要目标包括比较组间左心室整体纵向应变、指数质量、射血分数和 E/e` 比值以及症状量表和 6 分钟步行测试距离的差异。一项探索性分析将评估身体成分和骨密度测量的变化:结果:该试验已完成 80 名患者的注册,目前正在随访中:该试验将为透析患者服用 SGLT2i 对心肌的影响提供新数据。这项研究的结果可为 SGLT2i 在 ESKD 中的应用提供支持证据。
{"title":"Dapagliflozin cardiovascular effects on end-stage kidney disease (DARE-ESKD-2) trial: rationale and design.","authors":"Joaquim Barreto, Marilia Martins, Mauro Pascoa, Sheila T K Medorima, Isabella Bonilha, Daniel Campos Jesus, Cinthia E M Carbonara, Kelcia R S Quadros, Barbara Assato, Alessandra M Campos-Staffico, Gil Guerra Júnior, Wilson Nadruz, Rodrigo B de Oliveira, Andrei C Sposito","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412228","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dapagliflozin prevents myocardial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease patients regardless of residual kidney function. We hypothesized that this effect is extensible also to patients on dialysis.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The DARE-ESKD-2 is an ongoing, single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial designed to determine the effects of adding dapagliflozin to standard treatment on myocardial function and structure. Eligible patients were adults on a regular dialysis scheme for more than 3 months. Pregnancy, liver failure, allergy to the investigational drug, and prior use of SGLT2i were exclusion criteria. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to dapagliflozin or standard treatment groups for 24-weeks. The primary goal is to compare the change in NT-proBNP levels between study arms, and secondary goals include comparing the between-group difference in left ventricle global longitudinal strain, indexed mass, ejection fraction, and E/e` ratio, and on symptoms scale and 6-minute walk test distance. An exploratory analysis will evaluate changes in body composition and bone densitometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial has finished the enrollment of 80 patients, who are currently being followed-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial will provide novel data on myocardial effects of SGLT2i in dialysis recipients. Results from this study may provide evidence to support SGLT2i use in ESKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the EudraVigilance and VigiAccess databases. 与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的胃肠道不良事件:EudraVigilance 和 VigiAccess 数据库的药物警戒分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539
Syed Arman Rabbani, Atul Khurana, Mohamed El-Tanani, Mandeep Kumar Arora, Shrestha Sharma, Sathvik B Sridhar, Harikesh Dubey

Background: This study aimed to provide an overview of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using two pharmacovigilance databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess.

Research design and methods: Data was collected from the date of ICI's marketing authorization until 30 November 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used as a measure of ADR reporting disproportionality for signal detection.

Results: Overall, across both databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess, a total of 76,606 ADR reports were analyzed. In EudraVigilance, colitis (12,581) and diarrhea (12,108) were the most reported GI adverse events, with similar findings in VigiAccess. Furthermore, in both databases, the most ADR reports were associated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Durvalumab (ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28), ipilimumab (ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01), nivolumab (ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07), and atezolizumab (ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07) demonstrated higher risks of GI events compared to other ICIs. EudraVigilance analysis identified dysphagia, ascites, hematochezia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as potential signals associated with ICI therapy. Majority of ADR reports (87.2%) comprised serious GI adverse events, a portion of which was associated with fatal outcomes (14.5%). Atezolizumab (14.9%) and pembrolizumab (11.9%) were linked to a higher incidence of fatal outcomes compared to other ICIs.

Conclusion: The differential risk profiles of ICIs-associated-GI adverse events underscore the importance of personalized therapy in oncology.

研究背景本研究旨在利用两个药物警戒数据库(EudraVigilance和VigiAccess)概述与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)相关的胃肠道(GI)不良事件:数据收集时间为 ICI 获批上市之日起至 2023 年 11 月 30 日。报告几率比(ROR)被用来衡量ADR报告与信号检测的不相称性:总体而言,EudraVigilance 和 VigiAccess 两个数据库共分析了 76,606 份 ADR 报告。在 EudraVigilance 中,结肠炎(12,581 例)和腹泻(12,108 例)是报告最多的消化道不良事件,在 VigiAccess 中也有类似的结果。此外,在这两个数据库中,最多的 ADR 报告与 nivolumab 和 pembrolizumab 有关。与其他 ICIs 相比,Durvalumab(ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28)、ipilimumab(ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01)、nivolumab(ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07)和 atezolizumab(ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07)发生消化道事件的风险较高。EudraVigilance分析发现,吞咽困难、腹水、血尿和胃食管反流病是与ICI治疗相关的潜在信号。大部分 ADR 报告(87.2%)包括严重的消化道不良事件,其中一部分与死亡结果有关(14.5%)。与其他 ICIs 相比,Atezolizumab(14.9%)和 pembrolizumab(11.9%)的致命后果发生率更高:ICIs相关GI不良事件的不同风险特征凸显了肿瘤个性化治疗的重要性。
{"title":"Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the EudraVigilance and VigiAccess databases.","authors":"Syed Arman Rabbani, Atul Khurana, Mohamed El-Tanani, Mandeep Kumar Arora, Shrestha Sharma, Sathvik B Sridhar, Harikesh Dubey","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to provide an overview of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using two pharmacovigilance databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data was collected from the date of ICI's marketing authorization until 30 November 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used as a measure of ADR reporting disproportionality for signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, across both databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess, a total of 76,606 ADR reports were analyzed. In EudraVigilance, colitis (12,581) and diarrhea (12,108) were the most reported GI adverse events, with similar findings in VigiAccess. Furthermore, in both databases, the most ADR reports were associated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Durvalumab (ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28), ipilimumab (ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01), nivolumab (ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07), and atezolizumab (ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07) demonstrated higher risks of GI events compared to other ICIs. EudraVigilance analysis identified dysphagia, ascites, hematochezia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as potential signals associated with ICI therapy. Majority of ADR reports (87.2%) comprised serious GI adverse events, a portion of which was associated with fatal outcomes (14.5%). Atezolizumab (14.9%) and pembrolizumab (11.9%) were linked to a higher incidence of fatal outcomes compared to other ICIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differential risk profiles of ICIs-associated-GI adverse events underscore the importance of personalized therapy in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disproportionality analysis of the safety profile of rufinamide in the real world: an evaluation of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. 现实世界中鲁非那胺安全性概况的比例失调分析:对美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的评估。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237
Lingman Wang, Jianxiong Gui, Xiaofang Zhang, Bing Tian, Linxue Meng, Jie Liu, Li Jiang

Background: Rufinamide (RUF) is an antiepileptic drug recently introduced for managing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but its adverse reactions are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate RUF's safety profile using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess RUF-associated adverse drug events (ADEs), using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker (MGPS).

Results: We collected 338 ADE reports related to RUF. Nervous system disorders were the most frequently reported signals, and several new ADEs were detected, including atonic seizures, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy, seizure clusters, multi-drug resistance, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nearly half of the ADEs in pediatric patients were psychological or neurological. Disproportionality analysis within 4 weeks of treatment showed high RORs for QT shortening, sudden death, and atonic seizures.

Conclusions: Our study revealed prospective signals of new ADEs linked to RUF as well as revealed that both prescribers and patients were more conscious of the risks involved in its clinical use.

背景:抗癫痫药物鲁非那胺(RUF)最近被用于缓解伦诺克斯-加斯豪特综合征(LGS)患者的癫痫发作。然而,人们对其不良反应知之甚少。本研究旨在通过 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 数据库中的数据,探究、评估和分享有关 RUF 安全性的证据:方法:通过计算报告几率(ROR)、比例报告率(PRR)、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPN)和多项目伽马-泊松收缩器(MGPS),对RUF相关药物不良事件(ADE)的比例失调分析进行评估:共收集到 338 份与 RUF 相关的 ADE 报告。神经系统疾病是最常见的阳性信号。值得注意的是,还发现了新的意外重大 ADE。其中,失张力性癫痫发作、不明原因的癫痫猝死、癫痫发作群、多重耐药性、史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和其他可能的新信号值得关注。对所发现信号的年龄特异性差异进行的研究表明,在接受 RUF 治疗的儿童中观察到的 ADE 中,近一半被归类为心理或神经系统疾病。我们对治疗后 4 周内的 ADE 进行了比例失调分析,发现心电图 Qt 缩短、癫痫患者不明原因猝死和失张力癫痫发作的 ROR 较高:我们的研究揭示了与 RUF 相关的新 ADE 的前瞻性信号,并显示处方者和患者都更加意识到临床使用 RUF 所涉及的风险。
{"title":"Disproportionality analysis of the safety profile of rufinamide in the real world: an evaluation of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.","authors":"Lingman Wang, Jianxiong Gui, Xiaofang Zhang, Bing Tian, Linxue Meng, Jie Liu, Li Jiang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rufinamide (RUF) is an antiepileptic drug recently introduced for managing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but its adverse reactions are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate RUF's safety profile using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess RUF-associated adverse drug events (ADEs), using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker (MGPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 338 ADE reports related to RUF. Nervous system disorders were the most frequently reported signals, and several new ADEs were detected, including atonic seizures, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy, seizure clusters, multi-drug resistance, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nearly half of the ADEs in pediatric patients were psychological or neurological. Disproportionality analysis within 4 weeks of treatment showed high RORs for QT shortening, sudden death, and atonic seizures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed prospective signals of new ADEs linked to RUF as well as revealed that both prescribers and patients were more conscious of the risks involved in its clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse events associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥65: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. 与阿奇霉素和克拉霉素有关的≥65 岁成人不良事件:对 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 数据库的比例失调分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412226
Zhenpo Zhang, Jiaxin He, Yankun Liang, Yuting Wang, Jingping Zheng, Lin Ma, Ling Su

Background: Azithromycin and clarithromycin are commonly used to treat community-acquired pneumonia in adults aged ≥ 65, such as mycoplasma pneumonia. This study aims to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in this age group by analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), providing insights for clinical use and management of AEs in this population.

Research design and methods: We retrieved reports of AEs related to azithromycin and clarithromycin from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) to identify AEs associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥ 65.

Results: A total of 2,019 adverse event reports were retrieved for azithromycin, and 2,392 for clarithromycin. Off-label use (n = 349) and drug interactions (n = 487) were the most reported AEs in adults aged ≥ 65 for azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. Prolonged QT interval showed the strongest signal among AEs for azithromycin in this age group. Drug interaction-related medication errors had the strongest signal for clarithromycin. Seven signals not explicitly included in the azithromycin package insert were identified in adults aged ≥ 65. Fourteen signals not explicitly included in the clarithromycin package insert were identified.

Conclusions: Among adults aged ≥ 65, cardiac-related adverse events are more closely associated with azithromycin than with clarithromycin. Conversely, AEs related to drug interactions and psychiatric symptoms are more associated with clarithromycin. Additionally, clinicians should be vigilant regarding AEs not specified in the package inserts. The findings of this study may help optimize the selection of azithromycin and clarithromycin based on patient circumstances and assist clinicians in focusing on relevant AEs for early intervention.

背景:阿奇霉素和克拉霉素常用于治疗≥65岁成人的社区获得性肺炎,如支原体肺炎。本研究旨在通过分析美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS),评估阿奇霉素和克拉霉素在这一年龄组中的相关不良事件(AEs),从而为这一人群中AEs的临床使用和管理提供见解:我们从 FAERS 数据库中检索了与阿奇霉素和克拉霉素相关的 AE 报告。使用报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPN)和多伽马泊松收缩(MGPS)进行比例失调分析,以确定年龄≥65岁的成年人中与阿奇霉素和克拉霉素相关的AE:阿奇霉素共检索到 2,019 份不良事件报告,克拉霉素共检索到 2,392 份不良事件报告。阿奇霉素和克拉霉素在标签外使用(349例)和药物相互作用(487例)分别是年龄≥65岁的成人中报告最多的不良反应。在这一年龄组中,阿奇霉素的 AEs 中 QT 间期延长的信号最强。克拉霉素的药物相互作用相关用药错误信号最强。在年龄≥65岁的成人中,阿奇霉素包装说明书中未明确包含的信号有7个。发现了 14 个未明确包含在克拉霉素包装说明书中的信号:结论:在年龄≥65岁的成年人中,心脏相关不良事件与阿奇霉素的关系比与克拉霉素的关系更为密切。相反,与药物相互作用和精神症状相关的不良反应与克拉霉素的关系更为密切。此外,临床医生应警惕包装说明书中未明确指出的不良反应。本研究的结果有助于根据患者的具体情况优化阿奇霉素和克拉霉素的选择,并帮助临床医生关注相关的不良反应,以便及早干预。
{"title":"Adverse events associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥65: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.","authors":"Zhenpo Zhang, Jiaxin He, Yankun Liang, Yuting Wang, Jingping Zheng, Lin Ma, Ling Su","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412226","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azithromycin and clarithromycin are commonly used to treat community-acquired pneumonia in adults aged ≥ 65, such as mycoplasma pneumonia. This study aims to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in this age group by analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), providing insights for clinical use and management of AEs in this population.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We retrieved reports of AEs related to azithromycin and clarithromycin from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) to identify AEs associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥ 65.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,019 adverse event reports were retrieved for azithromycin, and 2,392 for clarithromycin. Off-label use (<i>n</i> = 349) and drug interactions (<i>n</i> = 487) were the most reported AEs in adults aged ≥ 65 for azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. Prolonged QT interval showed the strongest signal among AEs for azithromycin in this age group. Drug interaction-related medication errors had the strongest signal for clarithromycin. Seven signals not explicitly included in the azithromycin package insert were identified in adults aged ≥ 65. Fourteen signals not explicitly included in the clarithromycin package insert were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among adults aged ≥ 65, cardiac-related adverse events are more closely associated with azithromycin than with clarithromycin. Conversely, AEs related to drug interactions and psychiatric symptoms are more associated with clarithromycin. Additionally, clinicians should be vigilant regarding AEs not specified in the package inserts. The findings of this study may help optimize the selection of azithromycin and clarithromycin based on patient circumstances and assist clinicians in focusing on relevant AEs for early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in safety profiles of anti-herpesvirus medications: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database. 抗疱疹病毒药物安全性的差异:基于 FAERS 数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412235
Dan He, Dexuan Kong, Yanbin Zeng, Meifen Han, Shunguo Zhang, Zhiling Li

Background: Anti-herpesvirus drug safety profiles have not been systematically compared. Understanding variations in adverse events (AEs) could provide reference for rational clinical use.

Methods: We collected data on acyclovir, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and foscarnet from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to evaluate the risk of AEs.

Results: All drugs exhibited significant associations with hematotoxicity, with ganciclovir and foscarnet being more myelosuppressive. The correlation with renal impairment ranked as follows: foscarnet, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and acyclovir (ROR = 16.72, 7.06, 3.51, and 2.02, respectively). Regarding hepatotoxicity, ganciclovir was associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ROR = 52.83), and foscarnet was associated with fulminant hepatitis (ROR = 49.91). In the nervous system, acyclovir showed the highest intensity of neurotoxicity (ROR = 14.95). Valaciclovir ranked first in toxic encephalopathy (ROR = 64.70). Foscarnet showed the highest intensity of status epilepticus (ROR = 6.45). Besides, acyclovir showed the strongest association with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).

Conclusions: Our study revealed differences in safety profiles of four anti-herpesvirus medications. Ganciclovir exhibited the highest risk of hematotoxicity but appeared relatively safe in seizures and SCARs. Foscarnet was more likely to induce nephrotoxicity, seizures, and electrolyte imbalances than others. Acyclovir and valaciclovir were strongly associated with plasmacytosis, neurotoxicity, and SCARs.

背景:抗疱疹病毒药物的安全性尚未进行系统比较。了解不良事件(AEs)的变化可为临床合理用药提供参考:我们从美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中收集了 2004 年第一季度至 2023 年第三季度期间阿昔洛韦、更昔洛韦、伐昔洛韦和福斯康定的数据。结果显示,所有药物都与血液病有显著关联:结果:所有药物都与血液毒性有明显相关性,其中更昔洛韦和福沙奈特的骨髓抑制作用更强。与肾功能损害的相关性排序如下:福斯卡尼、更昔洛韦、伐昔洛韦和阿昔洛韦(ROR 分别为 16.72、7.06、3.51 和 2.02)。在肝脏毒性方面,更昔洛韦与急性-慢性肝功能衰竭有关(ROR = 52.83),而福沙耐特与暴发性肝炎有关(ROR = 49.91)。在神经系统中,阿昔洛韦的神经毒性最强(ROR = 14.95)。在中毒性脑病方面,伐昔洛韦排名第一(ROR = 64.70)。Foscarnet 的癫痫状态强度最高(ROR = 6.45)。此外,阿昔洛韦与严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)的关联性最强:我们的研究揭示了四种抗疱疹病毒药物在安全性方面的差异。更昔洛韦显示出最高的血液毒性风险,但在癫痫发作和 SCAR 方面似乎相对安全。与其他药物相比,Foscarnet 更容易引起肾毒性、癫痫发作和电解质失衡。阿昔洛韦和伐昔洛韦与浆细胞增多症、神经毒性和 SCAR 密切相关。
{"title":"Differences in safety profiles of anti-herpesvirus medications: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Dan He, Dexuan Kong, Yanbin Zeng, Meifen Han, Shunguo Zhang, Zhiling Li","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412235","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-herpesvirus drug safety profiles have not been systematically compared. Understanding variations in adverse events (AEs) could provide reference for rational clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on acyclovir, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and foscarnet from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to evaluate the risk of AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All drugs exhibited significant associations with hematotoxicity, with ganciclovir and foscarnet being more myelosuppressive. The correlation with renal impairment ranked as follows: foscarnet, ganciclovir, valaciclovir, and acyclovir (ROR = 16.72, 7.06, 3.51, and 2.02, respectively). Regarding hepatotoxicity, ganciclovir was associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ROR = 52.83), and foscarnet was associated with fulminant hepatitis (ROR = 49.91). In the nervous system, acyclovir showed the highest intensity of neurotoxicity (ROR = 14.95). Valaciclovir ranked first in toxic encephalopathy (ROR = 64.70). Foscarnet showed the highest intensity of status epilepticus (ROR = 6.45). Besides, acyclovir showed the strongest association with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed differences in safety profiles of four anti-herpesvirus medications. Ganciclovir exhibited the highest risk of hematotoxicity but appeared relatively safe in seizures and SCARs. Foscarnet was more likely to induce nephrotoxicity, seizures, and electrolyte imbalances than others. Acyclovir and valaciclovir were strongly associated with plasmacytosis, neurotoxicity, and SCARs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for finerenone. 美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统对非格列酮事件的真实世界药物警戒研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412218
Youqi Huang, Hongjin Gao, Yuze Lin, Xiaowen Chen, Mingyu Chen, Min Chen

Objective: This study analyzed the signal mining of adverse events caused by finerenone based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and evaluated the drug's safety to provide a reference for the safe administration of this medication in medical institutions.

Methods: FAERS data from the third quarter of 2021 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were used, and the adverse event codes of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities were compared. After the data were processed, adverse event reports that featured finerenone as the most suspected drug were extracted.

Results: A total of 905 reported cases of adverse events including finerenone as the first suspected drug were extracted. The ratio of male to female patients was 1.25, and most were aged 65-85 years (30.1%). The adverse events that were reported more frequently with positive signals were decreased glomerular filtration rate, hyperkalemia, increased blood creatinine, and dizziness. The adverse events that were concentrated on in investigations were metabolism and nutrition disorders and diseases of the renal and urinary system.

Conclusions: Our study identified significant novel adverse events (AEs) signals for finerenone that could provide support for clinical monitoring of and risk identification for finerenone.

研究目的该研究基于美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS),对非格列酮引起的不良事件进行信号挖掘分析,评估该药物的安全性,为医疗机构安全用药提供参考:方法:采用2021年第三季度至2023年第四季度的FAERS数据,对比《监管活动医学词典》中的不良事件代码。数据处理后,提取以非格列酮为最可疑药物的不良事件报告:结果:共提取了 905 例以非格列酮为首要可疑药物的不良事件报告。男性和女性患者的比例为 1.25,大多数患者的年龄在 65-85 岁之间(30.1%)。阳性信号较多的不良事件是肾小球滤过率下降、高钾血症、血肌酐升高和头晕。调查中集中出现的不良事件是代谢和营养失调以及肾脏和泌尿系统疾病:我们的研究发现了非格列酮的重大新不良事件(AEs)信号,可为非格列酮的临床监测和风险识别提供支持。
{"title":"Real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for finerenone.","authors":"Youqi Huang, Hongjin Gao, Yuze Lin, Xiaowen Chen, Mingyu Chen, Min Chen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2412218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzed the signal mining of adverse events caused by finerenone based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and evaluated the drug's safety to provide a reference for the safe administration of this medication in medical institutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS data from the third quarter of 2021 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were used, and the adverse event codes of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities were compared. After the data were processed, adverse event reports that featured finerenone as the most suspected drug were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 905 reported cases of adverse events including finerenone as the first suspected drug were extracted. The ratio of male to female patients was 1.25, and most were aged 65-85 years (30.1%). The adverse events that were reported more frequently with positive signals were decreased glomerular filtration rate, hyperkalemia, increased blood creatinine, and dizziness. The adverse events that were concentrated on in investigations were metabolism and nutrition disorders and diseases of the renal and urinary system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified significant novel adverse events (AEs) signals for finerenone that could provide support for clinical monitoring of and risk identification for finerenone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1