首页 > 最新文献

European Urology Open Science最新文献

英文 中文
Genetic Testing and Imaging in Men with Familial History or Genetic Predisposition of Prostate Cancer—Introducing the Prospective “ProFam-Risk” Study 有前列腺癌家族史或遗传易感性的男性的基因检测和成像——介绍前瞻性“前列腺癌风险”研究
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.018
Jale Lakes , Matthias Boschheidgen , Gerald Antoch , Maike K. Klett , André Karger , Regina Roth , Silke Redler , Mangalore G. Pai , Dagmar Wieczorek , Bernadette Jäger , Tanja N. Fehm , Günter Niegisch , Tilman T. Rau , Peter Albers
Familial and genetic factors influence prostate cancer (PCa) risk, necessitating personalized prevention strategies. This study aims to establish and validate a prevention clinic (ProFam-Risk) for men with a familial or genetic risk of PCa, focusing on genetic testing, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and psychosocial assessment. ProFam-Risk is a prospective registry and outpatient clinic at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, recruiting participants into three groups: healthy men with a familial risk (having two or more affected relatives or early-onset PCa), men with pathogenic germline variants (eg, BRCA1/2), and PCa-affected men meeting familial/genetic criteria. Participants undergo prostate-specific antigen testing, mpMRI, genetic analysis, psychosocial assessment, and receive risk-adapted recommendations for cancer prevention. Outcome measures include prevalence of pathogenic variants, PCa detection rates, and the impact of genetic counseling and mpMRI on clinical decision-making.
家族和遗传因素影响前列腺癌(PCa)的风险,需要个性化的预防策略。本研究旨在通过基因检测、多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)和心理社会评估,为具有家族性或遗传性前列腺癌风险的男性建立预防诊所(ProFam-Risk)。ProFam-Risk是塞尔多夫大学医院的前瞻性登记和门诊诊所,招募参与者分为三组:具有家族性风险的健康男性(有两个或更多患病亲属或早发性PCa),具有致病性种系变异(如BRCA1/2)的男性,以及符合家族/遗传标准的PCa患者。参与者接受前列腺特异性抗原检测、mpMRI、基因分析、心理社会评估,并接受适应风险的癌症预防建议。结果测量包括致病变异的患病率,前列腺癌的检出率,以及遗传咨询和mpMRI对临床决策的影响。
{"title":"Genetic Testing and Imaging in Men with Familial History or Genetic Predisposition of Prostate Cancer—Introducing the Prospective “ProFam-Risk” Study","authors":"Jale Lakes ,&nbsp;Matthias Boschheidgen ,&nbsp;Gerald Antoch ,&nbsp;Maike K. Klett ,&nbsp;André Karger ,&nbsp;Regina Roth ,&nbsp;Silke Redler ,&nbsp;Mangalore G. Pai ,&nbsp;Dagmar Wieczorek ,&nbsp;Bernadette Jäger ,&nbsp;Tanja N. Fehm ,&nbsp;Günter Niegisch ,&nbsp;Tilman T. Rau ,&nbsp;Peter Albers","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Familial and genetic factors influence prostate cancer (PCa) risk, necessitating personalized prevention strategies. This study aims to establish and validate a prevention clinic (ProFam-Risk) for men with a familial or genetic risk of PCa, focusing on genetic testing, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and psychosocial assessment. ProFam-Risk is a prospective registry and outpatient clinic at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, recruiting participants into three groups: healthy men with a familial risk (having two or more affected relatives or early-onset PCa), men with pathogenic germline variants (eg, <em>BRCA1/2</em>), and PCa-affected men meeting familial/genetic criteria. Participants undergo prostate-specific antigen testing, mpMRI, genetic analysis, psychosocial assessment, and receive risk-adapted recommendations for cancer prevention. Outcome measures include prevalence of pathogenic variants, PCa detection rates, and the impact of genetic counseling and mpMRI on clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145922767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility and Implementation of INTERVAL-GAP4: A Global Randomised Controlled Trial of Intense Hybrid-supervised/Self-managed Versus Self-directed Exercise for Metastatic Prostate Cancer INTERVAL-GAP4的可行性和实施:一项针对转移性前列腺癌的高强度混合监督/自我管理与自我指导运动的全球随机对照试验
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.001
Stacey A. Kenfield , Nicolas H. Hart , Kerry S. Courneya , Rosemary Greenwood , June M. Chan , Jennette Sison , Li Zhang , Sarah Rudman , Leah Ung , Moritz Schumann , Erin L. Van Blarigan , Sam McKeown , Charles J. Ryan , James Catto , Daniel A. Galvão , Robert U. Newton , Fred Saad
<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Physical activity is associated with a lower risk of mortality in men with prostate cancer (PC); yet, randomised controlled trials with survival endpoints are nonexistent. INTense ExeRcise for surviVAL-Global Action Plan 4 (INTERVAL-GAP4) was a global phase 3 trial designed to test whether structured, hybrid-supervised/self-managed exercise improves survival in men with metastatic PC. The trial was stopped early due to poor accrual. This paper reports feasibility and implementation outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Men with metastatic PC were randomised (1:1) to a supervised/self-managed moderate- to high-intensity resistance and aerobic programme (three sessions per week for 2 yr) or to self-directed exercise. We evaluated site activation, recruitment, year 1 adherence, adverse events, and barriers to global trial feasibility. Efficacy outcomes—including survival, physical fitness, and biomarker results—will be reported separately.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Of 21 activated sites across seven countries, 13 (62%) randomised patients. Of 938 patients approached, 232 (25%) consented and 145 (15%) were randomised (75 in the intervention and 70 in the control group) between April 2016 and February 2023. The median age was 70 yr (range: 44–89 yr). The study closed early after reaching 17% of the intended target. The median adherence in the intervention arm was 84% (interquartile range: 61–95%), with no difference between metastatic castrate-resistant and hormone-sensitive PC. At 12 mo, 58% of intervention participants met exercise guidelines versus 24% of controls. In year 1, 162 adverse events occurred in the intervention group and 109 in the control group; 19 adverse events were study related, all in the intervention arm. The major feasibility challenges included administrative burden, infrastructure limitations, logistics of supervised exercise delivery, and coronavirus disease 2019 disruptions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>While high adherence to a demanding exercise programme was achieved in selected metastatic PC patients, global recruitment proved difficult. Future large-scale exercise-oncology trials require streamlined protocols, realistic timelines, and greater alignment with site resources. Implementation science research is needed to support integration of exercise into routine advanced cancer care. A forthcoming paper will present the trial’s survival and physical fitness efficacy outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we describe the feasibility of a centrally coordinated, global clinical trial of hybrid-supervised/self-managed versus self-directed exercise for men with metastatic prostate cancer. We report trial implementation as mixed across the world, while exercise session adherence was high among men receiving the intervention. However, of the patients approached, 53% declined t
背景和目的体育活动与前列腺癌(PC)患者较低的死亡风险相关;然而,没有带有生存终点的随机对照试验。高强度运动促进生存-全球行动计划4 (INTERVAL-GAP4)是一项全球3期试验,旨在测试结构化、混合监督/自我管理的运动是否能改善转移性PC患者的生存。由于收益不佳,试验提前停止。本文报告了可行性和实施结果。方法转移性PC患者被随机(1:1)分配到有监督/自我管理的中至高强度阻力和有氧计划(每周3次,持续2年)或自我指导的运动中。我们评估了位点激活、招募、第一年依从性、不良事件和全球试验可行性的障碍。疗效结果(包括生存、体能和生物标志物结果)将单独报告。7个国家的21个活化位点,13例(62%)随机患者。在2016年4月至2023年2月期间,938名患者中,232名(25%)同意,145名(15%)被随机分组(75名在干预组,70名在对照组)。中位年龄为70岁(44-89岁)。研究在达到预期目标的17%后提前结束。干预组的中位依从性为84%(四分位数范围:61-95%),转移性去势抵抗性和激素敏感性PC之间没有差异。12个月时,58%的干预参与者符合运动指南,而对照组只有24%。第1年,干预组发生162例不良事件,对照组发生109例;19例不良事件与研究相关,均发生在干预组。主要的可行性挑战包括行政负担、基础设施限制、监督运动交付的物流以及2019年冠状病毒病的中断。结论和临床意义虽然在转移性PC患者中实现了高要求运动计划的高依从性,但全球招募证明是困难的。未来的大规模运动肿瘤学试验需要简化的方案、现实的时间表和与现场资源更大的一致性。需要实施科学研究来支持将运动纳入常规晚期癌症治疗。即将发表的一篇论文将介绍该试验的生存和身体健康功效结果。在本报告中,我们描述了一项集中协调的全球临床试验的可行性,混合监督/自我管理与自我指导运动对转移性前列腺癌男性的影响。我们报告了世界各地的试验实施情况,而接受干预的男性坚持锻炼的比例很高。然而,在接触的患者中,53%的人拒绝参加这项研究,而那些参加研究的人可能更有动力,更愿意锻炼。这些参与者年龄不同,有其他健康状况,正在接受多种药物治疗,并且在诊断为转移性前列腺癌后处于不同的治疗阶段。最近的指南提供了一个框架,将锻炼计划纳入晚期癌症患者的临床护理。需要进一步的实施科学研究来帮助晚期癌症患者安全有效地锻炼,作为他们癌症治疗的一部分。
{"title":"Feasibility and Implementation of INTERVAL-GAP4: A Global Randomised Controlled Trial of Intense Hybrid-supervised/Self-managed Versus Self-directed Exercise for Metastatic Prostate Cancer","authors":"Stacey A. Kenfield ,&nbsp;Nicolas H. Hart ,&nbsp;Kerry S. Courneya ,&nbsp;Rosemary Greenwood ,&nbsp;June M. Chan ,&nbsp;Jennette Sison ,&nbsp;Li Zhang ,&nbsp;Sarah Rudman ,&nbsp;Leah Ung ,&nbsp;Moritz Schumann ,&nbsp;Erin L. Van Blarigan ,&nbsp;Sam McKeown ,&nbsp;Charles J. Ryan ,&nbsp;James Catto ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Galvão ,&nbsp;Robert U. Newton ,&nbsp;Fred Saad","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background and objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Physical activity is associated with a lower risk of mortality in men with prostate cancer (PC); yet, randomised controlled trials with survival endpoints are nonexistent. INTense ExeRcise for surviVAL-Global Action Plan 4 (INTERVAL-GAP4) was a global phase 3 trial designed to test whether structured, hybrid-supervised/self-managed exercise improves survival in men with metastatic PC. The trial was stopped early due to poor accrual. This paper reports feasibility and implementation outcomes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Men with metastatic PC were randomised (1:1) to a supervised/self-managed moderate- to high-intensity resistance and aerobic programme (three sessions per week for 2 yr) or to self-directed exercise. We evaluated site activation, recruitment, year 1 adherence, adverse events, and barriers to global trial feasibility. Efficacy outcomes—including survival, physical fitness, and biomarker results—will be reported separately.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Key findings and limitations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Of 21 activated sites across seven countries, 13 (62%) randomised patients. Of 938 patients approached, 232 (25%) consented and 145 (15%) were randomised (75 in the intervention and 70 in the control group) between April 2016 and February 2023. The median age was 70 yr (range: 44–89 yr). The study closed early after reaching 17% of the intended target. The median adherence in the intervention arm was 84% (interquartile range: 61–95%), with no difference between metastatic castrate-resistant and hormone-sensitive PC. At 12 mo, 58% of intervention participants met exercise guidelines versus 24% of controls. In year 1, 162 adverse events occurred in the intervention group and 109 in the control group; 19 adverse events were study related, all in the intervention arm. The major feasibility challenges included administrative burden, infrastructure limitations, logistics of supervised exercise delivery, and coronavirus disease 2019 disruptions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions and clinical implications&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;While high adherence to a demanding exercise programme was achieved in selected metastatic PC patients, global recruitment proved difficult. Future large-scale exercise-oncology trials require streamlined protocols, realistic timelines, and greater alignment with site resources. Implementation science research is needed to support integration of exercise into routine advanced cancer care. A forthcoming paper will present the trial’s survival and physical fitness efficacy outcomes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Patient summary&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In this report, we describe the feasibility of a centrally coordinated, global clinical trial of hybrid-supervised/self-managed versus self-directed exercise for men with metastatic prostate cancer. We report trial implementation as mixed across the world, while exercise session adherence was high among men receiving the intervention. However, of the patients approached, 53% declined t","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145922768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world Inter-rater Agreement of PI-QUAL Version 2 for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assessment and Its Association with Diagnostic Accuracy 前列腺磁共振成像质量评估的PI-QUAL版本2的真实世界内部评级协议及其与诊断准确性的关联
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.019
Daniel L. van den Kroonenberg , Jelle Barentsz , Bo J. Hamstra , Stijn M. van den Bosch , Joris-Jan Gijsbertsen , Johannes B. Reitsma , Giorgio Brembilla , Iztok Caglic , H.P.J. Raat , Maarten de Rooij , Arnoud W. Postema , Francesco Giganti , Jorg R. Oddens

Background and objective

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to improve the detection of prostate cancer, the second most diagnosed cancer among men. This study evaluates the inter-rater agreement for MRI quality using Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) v2. It studies the association of PI-QUAL with diagnostic accuracy and the proportion of indeterminate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions with PI-QUAL scores.

Methods

This multicenter cohort study included biopsy-naïve patients from the PCAVISION trial (NCT06281769) who underwent MRI for a suspicion of prostate cancer. Four radiologists independently scored PI-QUAL v2 and PI-RADS. PI-QUAL v2 scores were dichotomized as PI-QUAL 1 versus PI-QUAL ≥2. PI-RADS was dichotomized as PI-RADS ≤2 versus PI-RADS ≥3 and evaluated using percentage agreement, kappa, and Gwet’s agree coefficient (AC) 1. The PI-QUAL consensus score was defined by the majority score or by a referee if no majority was reached. In cases with biopsy pathology, the association between PI-QUAL and diagnostic accuracy was assessed.

Key findings and limitations

In total, 352 MRI scans were included, with 150 multiparametric MRI and 202 biparametric MRI scans. The percentage agreement for dichotomized PI-QUAL was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51–56%) with AC1 of 0.11 (95% CI 0.06–0.16), mainly due to one reader who strictly applied technical criteria classifying 83% as inadequate (PI-QUAL 1), compared with 12–43% by others. Exclusion of this reader resulted in a percentage agreement of 69% (95% CI 65–73%) and an AC1 of 0.51 (95% CI 0.44–0.58). Consensus classified 24% of MRI scan as PI-QUAL 1 and 76% as PI-QUAL ≥2. In an exploratory analysis, the negative predictive value was 68% (95% CI 47–85%) for PI-QUAL 1 and 74% (95% CI 60–85%) for PI-QUAL ≥2, and the positive predictive value was 62% (95% CI 45–78%) and 50% (95% CI 42–59%), respectively. The proportion of PI-RADS 3 lesions was higher in PI-QUAL 1 scans than in PI-QUAL ≥2 scans (difference of –6.5%, 95% CI –11% to –1.4%, p = 0.011).

Conclusions and clinical implications

Strict adherence to the technical PI-QUAL criteria led to poor inter-rater agreement, while visual-based assessment yielded moderate agreement. Importantly, higher PI-QUAL scores were linked to fewer indeterminate PI-RADS 3 lesions.

Patient summary

We studied how doctors agree when judging the quality of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan using the Prostate Imaging Quality scoring system. When they focused too strictly on technical rules, agreement was poor; when scans were judged visually, agreement improved. Better-quality MRI scans led to fewer unclear (“indeterminate”) results, helping doctors make clearer biopsy decisions.
背景与目的磁共振成像(MRI)已被证明可以提高前列腺癌的检出率,前列腺癌是男性中诊出率第二高的癌症。本研究使用前列腺成像质量(PI-QUAL) v2评估MRI质量的分级一致性。研究PI-QUAL与诊断准确性的关系,以及前列腺影像学报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) 3不确定病变与PI-QUAL评分的比例。该多中心队列研究纳入了来自PCAVISION试验(NCT06281769)的biopsy-naïve患者,这些患者因怀疑前列腺癌而接受了MRI检查。4名放射科医师独立进行PI-QUAL v2和PI-RADS评分。PI-QUAL v2评分分为PI-QUAL 1和PI-QUAL≥2。将PI-RADS分为PI-RADS≤2和PI-RADS≥3,并使用同意百分比、kappa和Gwet同意系数(AC) 1进行评估。PI-QUAL共识分数由多数分数定义,如果没有达到多数分数,则由裁判定义。在活检病理的病例中,评估PI-QUAL与诊断准确性之间的关系。主要发现和局限性共纳入352次MRI扫描,其中150次为多参数MRI扫描和202次双参数MRI扫描。二分类PI-QUAL的一致性百分比为53%(95%置信区间[CI] 51-56%), AC1为0.11 (95% CI 0.06-0.16),主要是由于一名严格应用技术标准的读者将83%分类为不充分(PI-QUAL 1),而其他人为12-43%。排除该读者导致69%的百分比一致性(95% CI 65-73%), AC1为0.51 (95% CI 0.44-0.58)。共识将24%的MRI扫描归为PI-QUAL 1, 76%归为PI-QUAL≥2。在探索性分析中,PI-QUAL≥1的阴性预测值为68% (95% CI 47-85%), PI-QUAL≥2的阴性预测值为74% (95% CI 60-85%),阳性预测值分别为62% (95% CI 45-78%)和50% (95% CI 42-59%)。PI-QUAL 1扫描中PI-RADS 3病变的比例高于PI-QUAL≥2扫描中PI-RADS 3病变的比例(差异为-6.5%,95% CI -11%至-1.4%,p = 0.011)。结论和临床意义严格遵守PI-QUAL技术标准导致评分者之间的一致性较差,而基于视觉的评估产生中度一致性。重要的是,较高的PI-QUAL评分与较少的不确定PI-RADS 3病变相关。患者总结:我们研究了医生在使用前列腺成像质量评分系统判断前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)扫描质量时的一致意见。当他们过于严格地关注技术规则时,就很难达成一致;当扫描结果被视觉判断时,一致性得到了提高。高质量的核磁共振扫描减少了不清楚(“不确定”)的结果,帮助医生做出更明确的活检决定。
{"title":"Real-world Inter-rater Agreement of PI-QUAL Version 2 for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assessment and Its Association with Diagnostic Accuracy","authors":"Daniel L. van den Kroonenberg ,&nbsp;Jelle Barentsz ,&nbsp;Bo J. Hamstra ,&nbsp;Stijn M. van den Bosch ,&nbsp;Joris-Jan Gijsbertsen ,&nbsp;Johannes B. Reitsma ,&nbsp;Giorgio Brembilla ,&nbsp;Iztok Caglic ,&nbsp;H.P.J. Raat ,&nbsp;Maarten de Rooij ,&nbsp;Arnoud W. Postema ,&nbsp;Francesco Giganti ,&nbsp;Jorg R. Oddens","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to improve the detection of prostate cancer, the second most diagnosed cancer among men. This study evaluates the inter-rater agreement for MRI quality using Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) v2. It studies the association of PI-QUAL with diagnostic accuracy and the proportion of indeterminate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions with PI-QUAL scores.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter cohort study included biopsy-naïve patients from the PCAVISION trial (NCT06281769) who underwent MRI for a suspicion of prostate cancer. Four radiologists independently scored PI-QUAL v2 and PI-RADS. PI-QUAL v2 scores were dichotomized as PI-QUAL 1 versus PI-QUAL ≥2. PI-RADS was dichotomized as PI-RADS ≤2 versus PI-RADS ≥3 and evaluated using percentage agreement, kappa, and Gwet’s agree coefficient (AC) 1. The PI-QUAL consensus score was defined by the majority score or by a referee if no majority was reached. In cases with biopsy pathology, the association between PI-QUAL and diagnostic accuracy was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>In total, 352 MRI scans were included, with 150 multiparametric MRI and 202 biparametric MRI scans. The percentage agreement for dichotomized PI-QUAL was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51–56%) with AC1 of 0.11 (95% CI 0.06–0.16), mainly due to one reader who strictly applied technical criteria classifying 83% as inadequate (PI-QUAL 1), compared with 12–43% by others. Exclusion of this reader resulted in a percentage agreement of 69% (95% CI 65–73%) and an AC1 of 0.51 (95% CI 0.44–0.58). Consensus classified 24% of MRI scan as PI-QUAL 1 and 76% as PI-QUAL ≥2. In an exploratory analysis, the negative predictive value was 68% (95% CI 47–85%) for PI-QUAL 1 and 74% (95% CI 60–85%) for PI-QUAL ≥2, and the positive predictive value was 62% (95% CI 45–78%) and 50% (95% CI 42–59%), respectively. The proportion of PI-RADS 3 lesions was higher in PI-QUAL 1 scans than in PI-QUAL ≥2 scans (difference of –6.5%, 95% CI –11% to –1.4%, <em>p</em> = 0.011).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Strict adherence to the technical PI-QUAL criteria led to poor inter-rater agreement, while visual-based assessment yielded moderate agreement. Importantly, higher PI-QUAL scores were linked to fewer indeterminate PI-RADS 3 lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We studied how doctors agree when judging the quality of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan using the Prostate Imaging Quality scoring system. When they focused too strictly on technical rules, agreement was poor; when scans were judged visually, agreement improved. Better-quality MRI scans led to fewer unclear (“indeterminate”) results, helping doctors make clearer biopsy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145922695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Socioeconomic Position, Prostate-specific Antigen, and Age with Observation in Low-risk Prostate Cancer Patients in Switzerland 瑞士低危前列腺癌患者的社会经济地位、前列腺特异性抗原和年龄与观察的关系
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.009
Thomas Paul Scherer , Dominik Menges , Uwe Bieri , Lea Wildisen , Katharina Staehelin , Florian Alexander Schmid , Basil Kaufmann , Daniel Eberli , Sabine Rohrmann , Cédric Poyet

Background and objective

Observation remains the recommended management approach for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), aiming to balance oncological control and avoidance of overtreatment. This study investigated the use of observation and its association with patients’ socioeconomic position (SEP), age, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level on treatment choice in Switzerland.

Methods

This cohort study analyzed Gleason score 6 PCa diagnoses in 2020 and 2021 from the Swiss National Agency for Cancer Registration dataset. Variables included age, PSA value, residence, and treatment codes. Municipality-based SEP deciles were linked to patients. Multivariable regression assessed the associations between SEP and observational management.

Key findings and limitations

Of 4296 men, 2876 (65.4%) received observational management, 792 (18.0%) underwent active treatment, and management was unknown in 728 (16.6%). Compared with men from low SEP areas, those from middle (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92–1.35) and high SEP (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06–1.58) areas had higher odds of observation. Men aged 60–70 yr (OR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24–1.89) and >70 yr (OR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.68–2.62) were more likely to undergo observation than those aged <60 yr. PSA 5–10 ng/ml (OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55–0.82) and >10 ng/ml (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.46–0.78) were associated with lower odds of observation compared with PSA <5 ng/ml.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Most men diagnosed with localized low-risk PCa in Switzerland underwent observational management as the primary strategy in 2020 and 2021. However, at least 18% of men still received active treatment. Lower SEP, younger age, and higher PSA values were risk factors for active treatment within low-risk PCa patients.

Patient summary

We looked at how men in Switzerland with low-risk prostate cancer were treated in 2020 and 2021. We found that most men chose observation instead of immediate treatment, but men with lower socioeconomic position, younger age, or higher prostate-specific antigen levels were more likely to have active treatment. This suggests that there are opportunities to reduce unnecessary treatment for certain patient groups.
背景与目的观察仍然是低危前列腺癌(PCa)的推荐治疗方法,旨在平衡肿瘤控制和避免过度治疗。本研究调查了瑞士使用观察法及其与患者社会经济地位(SEP)、年龄和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平在治疗选择中的关系。该队列研究分析了2020年和2021年瑞士国家癌症登记机构数据集中Gleason评分的6种PCa诊断。变量包括年龄、PSA值、居住地和治疗代码。市政当局的SEP十分位数与患者有关。多变量回归评估SEP与观察性管理之间的关系。在4296名男性中,2876名(65.4%)接受了观察性治疗,792名(18.0%)接受了积极治疗,728名(16.6%)治疗未知。与来自低SEP地区的男性相比,来自中等(比值比[OR] 1.11, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.92-1.35)和高SEP地区(比值比[OR] 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06-1.58)的男性有更高的观察几率。60 - 70岁(OR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.89)和70岁(OR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.68-2.62)的男性比60岁的男性更有可能接受观察。PSA 5 - 10 ng/ml (OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.82)和10 ng/ml (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.46-0.78)与PSA 5 ng/ml相比,观察的几率更低。结论和临床意义在2020年和2021年,瑞士大多数诊断为局部低风险PCa的男性将观察性治疗作为主要策略。然而,至少18%的男性仍然接受了积极的治疗。低危PCa患者积极治疗的危险因素是低SEP、年轻和高PSA值。我们研究了瑞士低风险前列腺癌患者在2020年和2021年的治疗情况。我们发现大多数男性选择观察而不是立即治疗,但社会经济地位较低、年龄较小或前列腺特异性抗原水平较高的男性更有可能接受积极治疗。这表明有机会减少某些患者群体的不必要治疗。
{"title":"Association of Socioeconomic Position, Prostate-specific Antigen, and Age with Observation in Low-risk Prostate Cancer Patients in Switzerland","authors":"Thomas Paul Scherer ,&nbsp;Dominik Menges ,&nbsp;Uwe Bieri ,&nbsp;Lea Wildisen ,&nbsp;Katharina Staehelin ,&nbsp;Florian Alexander Schmid ,&nbsp;Basil Kaufmann ,&nbsp;Daniel Eberli ,&nbsp;Sabine Rohrmann ,&nbsp;Cédric Poyet","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Observation remains the recommended management approach for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), aiming to balance oncological control and avoidance of overtreatment. This study investigated the use of observation and its association with patients’ socioeconomic position (SEP), age, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level on treatment choice in Switzerland.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cohort study analyzed Gleason score 6 PCa diagnoses in 2020 and 2021 from the Swiss National Agency for Cancer Registration dataset. Variables included age, PSA value, residence, and treatment codes. Municipality-based SEP deciles were linked to patients. Multivariable regression assessed the associations between SEP and observational management.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Of 4296 men, 2876 (65.4%) received observational management, 792 (18.0%) underwent active treatment, and management was unknown in 728 (16.6%). Compared with men from low SEP areas, those from middle (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92–1.35) and high SEP (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06–1.58) areas had higher odds of observation. Men aged 60–70 yr (OR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24–1.89) and &gt;70 yr (OR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.68–2.62) were more likely to undergo observation than those aged &lt;60 yr. PSA 5–10 ng/ml (OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55–0.82) and &gt;10 ng/ml (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.46–0.78) were associated with lower odds of observation compared with PSA &lt;5 ng/ml.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Most men diagnosed with localized low-risk PCa in Switzerland underwent observational management as the primary strategy in 2020 and 2021. However, at least 18% of men still received active treatment. Lower SEP, younger age, and higher PSA values were risk factors for active treatment within low-risk PCa patients.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We looked at how men in Switzerland with low-risk prostate cancer were treated in 2020 and 2021. We found that most men chose observation instead of immediate treatment, but men with lower socioeconomic position, younger age, or higher prostate-specific antigen levels were more likely to have active treatment. This suggests that there are opportunities to reduce unnecessary treatment for certain patient groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 198-204"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 Scores to EQ-5D-5L Utility Values for Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Novel Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors 在接受新型雄激素受体信号抑制剂的前列腺癌患者中,QLQ-C30和QLQ-PR25评分与EQ-5D-5L效用值的关系
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.005
Shao-Yuan Hao , Shu-Pin Huang , Ching-Chia Li , Hung-Lung Ke , Kuang-Shun Chueh , Hsin-Chih Yeh , Hao-Wei Chen , Hsuan-Yu Hung , Chung-Yu Chen , Ichiro Arai

Background and objective

Disease-specific questionnaires provide detailed health insights and are increasingly used in mapping studies to estimate utility values. Given the limited mapping studies in prostate cancer, our aim was to develop mapping algorithms to convert scores from disease-specific questionnaires to EQ-5D utility values for patients receiving novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs).

Methods

This cross-sectional study enrolled prostate cancer patients in Taiwan. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-item (QLQ-C30), and QLQ-Prostate Cancer 25-item (QLQ-PR25) instruments. Mapping algorithms were developed using ordinary least squares (OLS) and Tobit regression. Model performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error, root mean square error, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion.

Key findings and limitations

A total of 100 patients were included. The mean EQ-5D index score was 0.71 (standard deviation 0.41), and the mean QLQ-C30 global health status score was 70 (standard deviation 21). Patients using an ARSI for ≥2 yr tended to report lower EQ-5D-5L index scores, global health status, and physical and social functioning, along with higher levels of fatigue, pain, and hormonal treatment–related symptoms. OLS and Tobit models demonstrated good predictive performance. However, given the small sample size, the results remain exploratory and are not intended for direct clinical use.

Conclusions and clinical implications

This study provides real-world evidence on the HRQoL of Asian patients with prostate cancer on ARSI therapy. The results demonstrate that QLQ-C30 data can be effectively mapped to EQ-5D-5L utility values. These findings fill a gap in knowledge left by clinical trials.

Patient summary

We tested whether quality of life scores reported by patients with prostate cancer who were taking a specific type of hormone therapy could be converted to values that are used in economic analyses. The results show that our mapping method can efficiently convert scores from the QLQ-C30 patient questionnaire to economic utility scores.
背景和目的疾病特异性问卷提供详细的健康见解,并越来越多地用于制图研究,以估计效用值。鉴于前列腺癌的制图研究有限,我们的目标是开发制图算法,将疾病特异性问卷的评分转换为接受新型雄激素受体信号抑制剂(ARSIs)的患者的EQ-5D效用值。方法本横断面研究纳入台湾地区前列腺癌患者。使用EQ-5D-5L、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-核心30项(QLQ-C30)和qlq -前列腺癌25项(QLQ-PR25)工具评估与健康相关的生活质量。采用普通最小二乘(OLS)和Tobit回归开发映射算法。采用平均绝对误差、均方根误差、赤池信息准则和贝叶斯信息准则评价模型的性能。主要发现和局限性共纳入100例患者。EQ-5D指数平均得分为0.71(标准差为0.41),QLQ-C30整体健康状态平均得分为70(标准差为21)。使用ARSI≥2年的患者倾向于报告较低的EQ-5D-5L指数评分、整体健康状况、身体和社会功能,以及较高水平的疲劳、疼痛和激素治疗相关症状。OLS和Tobit模型显示了良好的预测性能。然而,由于样本量小,结果仍然是探索性的,不打算直接用于临床。结论和临床意义本研究为亚洲前列腺癌患者接受ARSI治疗后的HRQoL提供了真实证据。结果表明,QLQ-C30数据可以有效地映射到EQ-5D-5L的效用值。这些发现填补了临床试验留下的知识空白。患者总结:我们测试了接受特定类型激素治疗的前列腺癌患者报告的生活质量评分是否可以转换为用于经济分析的值。结果表明,我们的映射方法可以有效地将QLQ-C30患者问卷得分转换为经济效用得分。
{"title":"Mapping of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 Scores to EQ-5D-5L Utility Values for Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Novel Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors","authors":"Shao-Yuan Hao ,&nbsp;Shu-Pin Huang ,&nbsp;Ching-Chia Li ,&nbsp;Hung-Lung Ke ,&nbsp;Kuang-Shun Chueh ,&nbsp;Hsin-Chih Yeh ,&nbsp;Hao-Wei Chen ,&nbsp;Hsuan-Yu Hung ,&nbsp;Chung-Yu Chen ,&nbsp;Ichiro Arai","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Disease-specific questionnaires provide detailed health insights and are increasingly used in mapping studies to estimate utility values. Given the limited mapping studies in prostate cancer, our aim was to develop mapping algorithms to convert scores from disease-specific questionnaires to EQ-5D utility values for patients receiving novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study enrolled prostate cancer patients in Taiwan. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-item (QLQ-C30), and QLQ-Prostate Cancer 25-item (QLQ-PR25) instruments. Mapping algorithms were developed using ordinary least squares (OLS) and Tobit regression. Model performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error, root mean square error, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>A total of 100 patients were included. The mean EQ-5D index score was 0.71 (standard deviation 0.41), and the mean QLQ-C30 global health status score was 70 (standard deviation 21). Patients using an ARSI for ≥2 yr tended to report lower EQ-5D-5L index scores, global health status, and physical and social functioning, along with higher levels of fatigue, pain, and hormonal treatment–related symptoms. OLS and Tobit models demonstrated good predictive performance. However, given the small sample size, the results remain exploratory and are not intended for direct clinical use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>This study provides real-world evidence on the HRQoL of Asian patients with prostate cancer on ARSI therapy. The results demonstrate that QLQ-C30 data can be effectively mapped to EQ-5D-5L utility values. These findings fill a gap in knowledge left by clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We tested whether quality of life scores reported by patients with prostate cancer who were taking a specific type of hormone therapy could be converted to values that are used in economic analyses. The results show that our mapping method can efficiently convert scores from the QLQ-C30 patient questionnaire to economic utility scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 219-225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Renal Function Outcomes in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Patients Receiving Everolimus for Renal Angiomyolipoma 接受依维莫司治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的结节性硬化症患者的肾功能结局
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.013
Zhangcheng Liao , Wenda Wang , Yang Zhao , Yi Liu , Dongxu Qiu , Yushi Zhang

Background and objective

Everolimus has been proved effective in treating renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). However, its impact on renal function remains uncertain.

Methods

We analyzed changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 54 TSC-RAML patients undergoing 1-yr everolimus treatment, based on the data from two previously registered clinical trials.

Key findings and limitations

After 1 yr of everolimus treatment, no significant change in eGFR was observed in the overall cohort of 54 patients (102 [81–121] vs 103 [79–122] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.8 for baseline vs post-treatment eGFR). Notably, patients with a tumor volume reduction (TVR) of ≥500 ml showed a significant improvement in eGFR (101 [95, 119] vs 115 [99, 122] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.009), as did those with a tumor shrinkage rate (TSR) of ≥30% (99 [80, 117] vs 104 [76, 119] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.02). Patients who experienced an eGFR improvement exhibited a significantly greater TVR (423 [86, 1035] vs 104 [28, 340] ml, p = 0.005) and higher TSR (40% ± 20% vs 26% ± 21%, p = 0.015) compared with those without improvement. Correlation analyses revealed a positive association between eGFR change and both TVR (r = 0.392, p = 0.003) and TSR (r = 0.430, p = 0.0012). In the linear mixed model, both TVR (β = 0.0046, p = 0.011) and TSR (β = 15.0, p < 0.001) were independently and significantly associated with eGFR change.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Everolimus demonstrates a favorable renal safety profile in TSC-RAML patients and improves renal function in patients with substantial tumor reduction, supporting its use as a therapeutic option for renal function preservation.

Patient summary

In this study, we evaluated kidney function in patients with renal angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC-RAML), who received everolimus treatment. We found that kidney function was generally stable and even improved in patients with marked tumor reduction. These results suggest that everolimus may help preserve or enhance kidney health in selected patients with TSC-RAML.
背景与目的依维莫司已被证明可有效治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(RAML)合并结节性硬化症(TSC)。然而,其对肾功能的影响仍不确定。方法:我们分析了54例接受依维莫司治疗1年的TSC-RAML患者估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化,基于先前注册的两项临床试验的数据。在依维莫司治疗1年后,54例患者的eGFR未见显著变化(102[81-121]对103 [79-122]ml/min/1.73 m2,基线与治疗后eGFR的p = 0.8)。值得注意的是,肿瘤体积缩小(TVR)≥500 ml的患者eGFR显著改善(101 [95,119]vs 115 [99,122] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.009),肿瘤缩小率(TSR)≥30%的患者eGFR显著改善(99 [80,117]vs 104 [77,119] ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.02)。eGFR改善的患者TVR (423 [85,1035] vs 104 [28,340] ml, p = 0.005)和TSR(40%±20% vs 26%±21%,p = 0.015)显著高于未改善的患者。相关分析显示,eGFR变化与TVR (r = 0.392, p = 0.003)和TSR (r = 0.430, p = 0.0012)呈正相关。在线性混合模型中,TVR (β = 0.0046, p = 0.011)和TSR (β = 15.0, p < 0.001)与eGFR变化独立且显著相关。结论和临床意义:severolimus在TSC-RAML患者中具有良好的肾脏安全性,并可改善肿瘤显著缩小患者的肾功能,支持其作为肾功能保护的治疗选择。在这项研究中,我们评估了接受依维莫司治疗的肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤合并结节性硬化症(TSC-RAML)患者的肾功能。我们发现,在肿瘤明显缩小的患者中,肾功能总体稳定,甚至有所改善。这些结果表明依维莫司可能有助于保护或改善选定的TSC-RAML患者的肾脏健康。
{"title":"Renal Function Outcomes in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Patients Receiving Everolimus for Renal Angiomyolipoma","authors":"Zhangcheng Liao ,&nbsp;Wenda Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Zhao ,&nbsp;Yi Liu ,&nbsp;Dongxu Qiu ,&nbsp;Yushi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Everolimus has been proved effective in treating renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). However, its impact on renal function remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 54 TSC-RAML patients undergoing 1-yr everolimus treatment, based on the data from two previously registered clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>After 1 yr of everolimus treatment, no significant change in eGFR was observed in the overall cohort of 54 patients (102 [81–121] vs 103 [79–122] ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.8 for baseline vs post-treatment eGFR). Notably, patients with a tumor volume reduction (TVR) of ≥500 ml showed a significant improvement in eGFR (101 [95, 119] vs 115 [99, 122] ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.009), as did those with a tumor shrinkage rate (TSR) of ≥30% (99 [80, 117] vs 104 [76, 119] ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Patients who experienced an eGFR improvement exhibited a significantly greater TVR (423 [86, 1035] vs 104 [28, 340] ml, <em>p</em> = 0.005) and higher TSR (40% ± 20% vs 26% ± 21%, <em>p</em> = 0.015) compared with those without improvement. Correlation analyses revealed a positive association between eGFR change and both TVR (<em>r</em> = 0.392, <em>p</em> = 0.003) and TSR (<em>r</em> = 0.430, <em>p</em> = 0.0012). In the linear mixed model, both TVR (<em>β</em> = 0.0046, <em>p</em> = 0.011) and TSR (<em>β</em> = 15.0, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were independently and significantly associated with eGFR change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Everolimus demonstrates a favorable renal safety profile in TSC-RAML patients and improves renal function in patients with substantial tumor reduction, supporting its use as a therapeutic option for renal function preservation.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this study, we evaluated kidney function in patients with renal angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC-RAML), who received everolimus treatment. We found that kidney function was generally stable and even improved in patients with marked tumor reduction. These results suggest that everolimus may help preserve or enhance kidney health in selected patients with TSC-RAML.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 191-197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Across Settings With and Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeting 经会阴前列腺活检与经直肠前列腺活检:有和没有磁共振成像靶向的随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.008
Yun-Jung Yang , Eun-Jung Yang , Tuan Thanh Nguyen , Se Young Choi

Background and objective

While transperineal prostate biopsy (TP-Bx) is increasingly being used to mitigate infection risk, its diagnostic equivalence to transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx) remains under investigation. Our aim was to comprehensively compare the diagnostic performance and complication profiles of TP-Bx and TR-Bx across settings with and without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeting using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 RCTs comprising 4244 patients. Outcomes included detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC), anterior tumor detection, procedural pain, infection-related complications, urinary retention, and bleeding, each analyzed in groups with and without MRI targeting for biopsy.

Key findings and limitations

Overall csPC detection rates were comparable between TP-Bx and TR-Bx (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95–1.39). There was no difference in MRI-targeted studies (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85–1.36), whereas TP-Bx showed superior csPC detection in settings without MRI targeting (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.95). TP-Bx was associated with significantly fewer infectious complications (OR 0.70 for any infection; OR 0.35 for grade ≥3 infections), although procedural pain was higher (OR 2.05). No significant differences in urinary retention or bleeding were observed. Heterogeneity in analgesia protocols and MRI use across studies is a limitation.

Conclusions and clinical implications

TP-Bx and TR-Bx yield similar diagnostic performance for csPC in MRI-targeted procedures. However, in settings without MRI targeting, TP-Bx may offer better detection and a substantially lower infection risk. Although TP-Bx is associated with greater procedural discomfort, it can be performed safely under local anesthesia and without antibiotics, which aligns with antibiotic stewardship principles. These findings suggest that biopsy route selection should be individualized according to MRI availability, infection risk, and patient tolerance.

Patient summary

We compared evidence for two prostate biopsy methods: transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR). Both were similar in detecting prostate cancer, but the TP method had fewer infections and may not require antibiotics. TP may cause slightly more discomfort, but pain is generally manageable with local anesthesia. Which approach is best may depend on factors such as the availability of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), the risk of infection, and the patient’s preference.
背景与目的虽然经会阴前列腺活检(TP-Bx)越来越多地被用于降低感染风险,但其与经直肠活检(TR-Bx)的诊断等效性仍在研究中。我们的目的是利用随机对照试验(rct)的数据,全面比较TP-Bx和TR-Bx在有和没有磁共振成像(MRI)靶向的情况下的诊断性能和并发症概况。方法对包含4244例患者的12项随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。结果包括临床显著性前列腺癌(csPC)的检测、前路肿瘤检测、手术疼痛、感染相关并发症、尿潴留和出血,每一项都在有和没有MRI靶向活检的组中进行分析。总体而言,TP-Bx和TR-Bx的csPC检出率具有可比性(优势比[OR] 1.15, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.95-1.39)。在MRI靶向研究中没有差异(OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85-1.36),而TP-Bx在没有MRI靶向的情况下显示出更好的csPC检测(OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.95)。TP-Bx的感染并发症显著减少(任何感染的OR为0.70;≥3级感染的OR为0.35),尽管手术疼痛较高(OR为2.05)。尿潴留和出血无显著差异。研究中镇痛方案和MRI使用的异质性是一个限制。结论和临床意义stp - bx和TR-Bx在mri靶向手术中对csPC的诊断效果相似。然而,在没有MRI靶向的情况下,TP-Bx可能提供更好的检测和更低的感染风险。虽然TP-Bx与更大的手术不适有关,但它可以在局部麻醉下安全进行,不使用抗生素,这符合抗生素管理原则。这些发现表明,活检路线的选择应根据MRI可用性、感染风险和患者耐受性进行个体化。我们比较了两种前列腺活检方法的证据:经会阴(TP)和经直肠(TR)。两种方法在检测前列腺癌方面相似,但TP法感染较少,可能不需要抗生素。TP可能会引起轻微的不适,但疼痛通常在局部麻醉下是可控的。哪种方法是最好的可能取决于诸如MRI(磁共振成像)的可用性、感染的风险和患者的偏好等因素。
{"title":"Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Across Settings With and Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeting","authors":"Yun-Jung Yang ,&nbsp;Eun-Jung Yang ,&nbsp;Tuan Thanh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Se Young Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>While transperineal prostate biopsy (TP-Bx) is increasingly being used to mitigate infection risk, its diagnostic equivalence to transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx) remains under investigation. Our aim was to comprehensively compare the diagnostic performance and complication profiles of TP-Bx and TR-Bx across settings with and without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeting using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 RCTs comprising 4244 patients. Outcomes included detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC), anterior tumor detection, procedural pain, infection-related complications, urinary retention, and bleeding, each analyzed in groups with and without MRI targeting for biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Overall csPC detection rates were comparable between TP-Bx and TR-Bx (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95–1.39). There was no difference in MRI-targeted studies (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85–1.36), whereas TP-Bx showed superior csPC detection in settings without MRI targeting (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.95). TP-Bx was associated with significantly fewer infectious complications (OR 0.70 for any infection; OR 0.35 for grade ≥3 infections), although procedural pain was higher (OR 2.05). No significant differences in urinary retention or bleeding were observed. Heterogeneity in analgesia protocols and MRI use across studies is a limitation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>TP-Bx and TR-Bx yield similar diagnostic performance for csPC in MRI-targeted procedures. However, in settings without MRI targeting, TP-Bx may offer better detection and a substantially lower infection risk. Although TP-Bx is associated with greater procedural discomfort, it can be performed safely under local anesthesia and without antibiotics, which aligns with antibiotic stewardship principles. These findings suggest that biopsy route selection should be individualized according to MRI availability, infection risk, and patient tolerance.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We compared evidence for two prostate biopsy methods: transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR). Both were similar in detecting prostate cancer, but the TP method had fewer infections and may not require antibiotics. TP may cause slightly more discomfort, but pain is generally manageable with local anesthesia. Which approach is best may depend on factors such as the availability of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), the risk of infection, and the patient’s preference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 205-218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and Its Combination Therapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis PARP抑制剂奥拉帕尼及其联合治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.014
Yixian Li , Zongyu Li , Hongxia Lu , Pengjie Shi , Yiting Liu , Lilong Liu , Ke Chen

Background and objective

Olaparib is one of the earliest approved treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to determine the optimal olaparib strategy for treating mCRPC.

Methods

The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched comprehensively using “mCRPC” and “olaparib” as keywords. Study quality was appraised with the National Institutes of Health tools. Data were analyzed in R version 4.4.1. The primary endpoints included progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. The secondary endpoints included adverse events and severe adverse events (grade ≥3). Effect sizes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios, with 95% credibility intervals (CrIs).

Key findings and limitations

Nine studies from seven clinical trials involving 2355 patients were identified. For homologous recombination repair–mutated mCRPC, combination therapies did not demonstrate significant benefits compared with olaparib alone. However, for BRCA-mutated mCRPC, olaparib combined with abiraterone improved PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CrI = 0.41–0.91) and OS (HR = 0.41, 95% CrI = 0.21–0.80) significantly. These significant advantages of olaparib combined with abiraterone were also observed in patients from different prostate-specific antigen subgroups.

Conclusions and clinical implications

These findings suggest that olaparib combined with abiraterone offers substantial benefits in BRCA mutated type (BRCAmt) mCRPC patients. For those with BRCA wild type homologous recombination repair–mutated mCRPC, olaparib monotherapy is effective.

Patient summary

We reviewed the published studies comparing different treatment options using the drug olaparib (alone or combined with other therapies) for advanced prostate cancer that has spread and no longer responds to standard hormone therapy (metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer). We found evidence that the effectiveness of olaparib depends significantly on specific genetic features of the cancer. For patients whose cancer has changes in the BRCA genes, the combination of olaparib and the drug abiraterone was more effective in delaying cancer growth and improving survival than olaparib alone. For patients with changes in other related DNA repair genes (but not BRCA), olaparib alone was an effective treatment. This information may assist doctors and patients in choosing the most suitable treatment based on the cancer’s genetic characteristics.
背景和目的奥拉帕尼是最早被批准用于转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的治疗方案之一。本系统综述和网络荟萃分析旨在确定治疗mCRPC的最佳奥拉帕尼策略。方法以“mCRPC”和“olaparib”为关键词,综合检索Cochrane、Embase、PubMed和Web of Science数据库。使用美国国立卫生研究院的工具评估研究质量。数据在R版本4.4.1中进行分析。主要终点包括无进展(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括不良事件和严重不良事件(≥3级)。效应量以风险比(hr)和风险比报告,可信区间为95%。主要发现和局限性来自7项临床试验的9项研究,涉及2355名患者。对于同源重组修复突变的mCRPC,与单独使用奥拉帕尼相比,联合治疗没有显示出显著的益处。然而,对于brca突变的mCRPC,奥拉帕尼联合阿比特龙可显著改善PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CrI = 0.41 - 0.91)和OS (HR = 0.41, 95% CrI = 0.21-0.80)。奥拉帕尼联合阿比特龙在不同前列腺特异性抗原亚群的患者中也观察到这些显著的优势。结论和临床意义这些发现表明奥拉帕尼联合阿比特龙对BRCA突变型(BRCAmt) mCRPC患者有实质性的益处。对于BRCA野生型同源重组修复突变的mCRPC,奥拉帕尼单药治疗是有效的。患者总结:我们回顾了已发表的研究,比较了使用奥拉帕尼(单独或联合其他疗法)治疗晚期前列腺癌的不同治疗方案,这些晚期前列腺癌已经扩散,不再对标准激素治疗有反应(转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌)。我们发现证据表明奥拉帕尼的有效性在很大程度上取决于癌症的特定遗传特征。对于癌症发生BRCA基因改变的患者,奥拉帕尼联合阿比特龙在延缓癌症生长和提高生存率方面比奥拉帕尼单用更有效。对于其他相关DNA修复基因(但不包括BRCA)发生变化的患者,单独使用奥拉帕尼是有效的治疗方法。这些信息可以帮助医生和病人根据癌症的遗传特征选择最合适的治疗方法。
{"title":"PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and Its Combination Therapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis","authors":"Yixian Li ,&nbsp;Zongyu Li ,&nbsp;Hongxia Lu ,&nbsp;Pengjie Shi ,&nbsp;Yiting Liu ,&nbsp;Lilong Liu ,&nbsp;Ke Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Olaparib is one of the earliest approved treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to determine the optimal olaparib strategy for treating mCRPC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched comprehensively using “mCRPC” and “olaparib” as keywords. Study quality was appraised with the National Institutes of Health tools. Data were analyzed in R version 4.4.1. The primary endpoints included progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. The secondary endpoints included adverse events and severe adverse events (grade ≥3). Effect sizes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios, with 95% credibility intervals (CrIs).</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Nine studies from seven clinical trials involving 2355 patients were identified. For homologous recombination repair–mutated mCRPC, combination therapies did not demonstrate significant benefits compared with olaparib alone. However, for BRCA-mutated mCRPC, olaparib combined with abiraterone improved PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CrI = 0.41–0.91) and OS (HR = 0.41, 95% CrI = 0.21–0.80) significantly. These significant advantages of olaparib combined with abiraterone were also observed in patients from different prostate-specific antigen subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>These findings suggest that olaparib combined with abiraterone offers substantial benefits in BRCA mutated type (BRCAmt) mCRPC patients. For those with BRCA wild type homologous recombination repair–mutated mCRPC, olaparib monotherapy is effective.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We reviewed the published studies comparing different treatment options using the drug olaparib (alone or combined with other therapies) for advanced prostate cancer that has spread and no longer responds to standard hormone therapy (metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer). We found evidence that the effectiveness of olaparib depends significantly on specific genetic features of the cancer. For patients whose cancer has changes in the <em>BRCA</em> genes, the combination of olaparib and the drug abiraterone was more effective in delaying cancer growth and improving survival than olaparib alone. For patients with changes in other related DNA repair genes (but not <em>BRCA</em>), olaparib alone was an effective treatment. This information may assist doctors and patients in choosing the most suitable treatment based on the cancer’s genetic characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145870068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robot-assisted Buccal Mucosa Graft Ureteroplasty for Ureteral Stricture: A European Multicenter Case Series 输尿管狭窄的机器人辅助颊粘膜移植输尿管成形术:欧洲多中心病例系列
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.007
Alice Bourillon , Barry B. McGuire , Ugo Pinar , Ailish Naughton , Thomas Tabourin , Jerome Parra , Christophe Vaessen , Shahed Borojeni , Lucas Freton , Claire Richard , Lee Zhao , Karim Bensalah , Benoît Peyronnet

Background and objective

Robot-assisted buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty was introduced a decade ago and has since gained wide adoption within the urology community. However, available data on the outcomes of robot-assisted BMG ureteroplasty remain limited, and no large European series has been published to date. This study aims to report the outcomes of a multicenter European experience with robot-assisted BMG ureteroplasty (RBMGU) for the management of ureteral strictures.

Methods

Medical records of all the patients who underwent RBMGU for ureteral strictures at four European centers between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was the absence of stricture recurrence at the last follow-up, defined as the lack of need for urinary drainage or repeat surgery, or the presence of symptomatic hydronephrosis.

Key findings and limitations

A total of 39 patients were included. The median stricture length was 3 cm, with 36% involving the pelvic ureter. A period of ureteral rest was implemented in 85% of patients. Early postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (21%), with only one major event (3%). After a median follow-up of 12 mo, the overall success rate was 87%. No predictive factors for recurrence were identified.

Conclusions and clinical implications

RBMGU for ureteral stricture appears to be a feasible and reproducible technique across multiple surgeons and institutions. The outcomes demonstrate a promising trend, with preliminary results indicating low morbidity and recurrence rates. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to identify the risk factors for recurrence and to better define the optimal indications for this procedure.

Patient summary

In this report, we present the outcomes of robotic ureteral stricture reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts across four European centers. The results are encouraging, demonstrating low rates of stricture recurrence and postoperative complications. We emphasize the key advantages of robotic-assisted reconstruction and the broad spectrum of ureteral strictures that may benefit from this approach.
背景与目的机器人辅助颊黏膜输尿管成形术(BMG)在十年前被引入,并在泌尿外科领域得到了广泛的采用。然而,关于机器人辅助BMG输尿管成形术的结果的可用数据仍然有限,迄今为止还没有发表大型的欧洲系列研究。本研究旨在报道欧洲多中心机器人辅助BMG输尿管成形术(RBMGU)治疗输尿管狭窄的结果。方法回顾性分析2018 - 2024年欧洲4个中心输尿管狭窄行RBMGU治疗患者的病历。主要结局是在最后一次随访时没有狭窄复发,定义为不需要尿路引流或重复手术,或存在症状性肾积水。主要发现和局限性共纳入39例患者。中位狭窄长度为3cm, 36%累及盆腔输尿管。85%的患者输尿管休息一段时间。术后早期并发症8例(21%),主要并发症1例(3%)。中位随访12个月后,总成功率为87%。未发现复发的预测因素。结论和临床意义srbmgu治疗输尿管狭窄是一种可行且可重复的技术,适用于多个外科医生和机构。结果显示了一个有希望的趋势,初步结果表明低发病率和复发率。有必要进行更大规模的进一步研究,以确定复发的危险因素,并更好地确定该手术的最佳适应症。在本报告中,我们介绍了四个欧洲中心使用口腔粘膜移植进行输尿管狭窄机器人重建的结果。结果令人鼓舞,显示狭窄复发率和术后并发症较低。我们强调机器人辅助重建的关键优势和广泛的输尿管狭窄可能受益于这种方法。
{"title":"Robot-assisted Buccal Mucosa Graft Ureteroplasty for Ureteral Stricture: A European Multicenter Case Series","authors":"Alice Bourillon ,&nbsp;Barry B. McGuire ,&nbsp;Ugo Pinar ,&nbsp;Ailish Naughton ,&nbsp;Thomas Tabourin ,&nbsp;Jerome Parra ,&nbsp;Christophe Vaessen ,&nbsp;Shahed Borojeni ,&nbsp;Lucas Freton ,&nbsp;Claire Richard ,&nbsp;Lee Zhao ,&nbsp;Karim Bensalah ,&nbsp;Benoît Peyronnet","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Robot-assisted buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty was introduced a decade ago and has since gained wide adoption within the urology community. However, available data on the outcomes of robot-assisted BMG ureteroplasty remain limited, and no large European series has been published to date. This study aims to report the outcomes of a multicenter European experience with robot-assisted BMG ureteroplasty (RBMGU) for the management of ureteral strictures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medical records of all the patients who underwent RBMGU for ureteral strictures at four European centers between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was the absence of stricture recurrence at the last follow-up, defined as the lack of need for urinary drainage or repeat surgery, or the presence of symptomatic hydronephrosis.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>A total of 39 patients were included. The median stricture length was 3 cm, with 36% involving the pelvic ureter. A period of ureteral rest was implemented in 85% of patients. Early postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (21%), with only one major event (3%). After a median follow-up of 12 mo, the overall success rate was 87%. No predictive factors for recurrence were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>RBMGU for ureteral stricture appears to be a feasible and reproducible technique across multiple surgeons and institutions. The outcomes demonstrate a promising trend, with preliminary results indicating low morbidity and recurrence rates. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to identify the risk factors for recurrence and to better define the optimal indications for this procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we present the outcomes of robotic ureteral stricture reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts across four European centers. The results are encouraging, demonstrating low rates of stricture recurrence and postoperative complications. We emphasize the key advantages of robotic-assisted reconstruction and the broad spectrum of ureteral strictures that may benefit from this approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 166-172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Downregulation of ANPEP Is Associated with Aggressive Prostate Cancer and Poor Disease-specific Outcomes ANPEP下调与侵袭性前列腺癌和不良疾病特异性结局相关
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.011
Ryan M. Putney , Purvish Trivedi , Shivanshu Awasthi , Amparo Serna , Jasreman Dhillon , Christopher J. Sweeney , R. Jeffrey Karnes , Matthew R. Cooperberg , Alejandro Berlin , Paul L. Nguyen , Daniel E. Spratt , Elai Davicioni , James Proudfoot , Monica Ryu , Esther Katende , Jong Y. Park , Timothy R. Rebbeck , Asmaa El-Kenawi , Kosj Yamoah

Background and objective

Aminopeptidase N (ANPEP) is linked to malignancy in certain tumor types, but its role in aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) is less well defined. Our aim was to characterize ANPEP expression in various PCa stages to determine whether it is a robust prognostic biomarker of aggressive disease.

Methods

We established baseline ANPEP expression in benign prostate tissue using multiple large databases. Next, we determined the association between ANPEP expression and various clinicopathologic features and molecular subtypes using ∼170 000 tumor samples from the GRID registry. We calculated median expression values, and reported standardized mean differences. We used receiver operating characteristic and Cox regression analyses to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of ANPEP for several endpoints, and performed preranked gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to identify biological pathways over-represented by race or ANPEP category according to hallmark gene sets.

Key findings and limitations

ANPEP expression was higher in normal prostate tissues than in prostate tumors. Advanced clinical stage, higher National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category, and worse Gleason grade group were all associated with lower median ANPEP expression. Genomic markers of aggressive PCa, such as high Decipher scores, low androgen receptor (AR) activity, ERG overexpression, and loss of PTEN expression, were correlated with lower ANPEP expression. Among patients with locally advanced or metastatic PCa, higher ANPEP expression was significantly associated with more favorable PCa-specific outcomes, including biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis, castration-resistant PCa, and overall survival. GSEA revealed AR upregulation for the ANPEP-high group and men with genomic-derived African race. Conversely, the G2-M DNA damage checkpoint and MYC target genes were enriched in the ANPEP-low and genomic-derived European race groups.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Our findings show that ANPEP downregulation is linked to a more aggressive PCa phenotype. Higher ANPEP levels were associated with more favorable outcomes, thereby, establishing ANPEP expression as a prognostic factor for treatment response.

Patient summary

We looked at levels of a protein called aminopeptidase N (ANPEP) in prostate tumors using information from large databases. We found that ANPEP is linked to markers that indicate more aggressive disease and that higher ANPEP levels are associated with more favorable treatment outcomes.
背景与目的氨肽酶N (ANPEP)在某些肿瘤类型中与恶性肿瘤有关,但其在侵袭性前列腺癌(PCa)中的作用尚不明确。我们的目的是表征ANPEP在不同PCa阶段的表达,以确定它是否是侵袭性疾病的可靠预后生物标志物。方法利用多个大型数据库建立良性前列腺组织中ANPEP的基线表达。接下来,我们使用来自GRID登记处的约17万个肿瘤样本,确定了ANPEP表达与各种临床病理特征和分子亚型之间的关系。我们计算中位数表达值,并报告标准化平均差异。我们使用受试者操作特征和Cox回归分析来评估ANPEP在多个终点的诊断和预后意义,并进行预排序基因集富集分析(GSEA),以确定根据标志基因集被种族或ANPEP类别过度代表的生物学途径。sanpep在正常前列腺组织中的表达高于前列腺肿瘤组织。临床分期越晚、国家综合癌症网络风险等级越高、Gleason分级越差的患者ANPEP中位表达水平越低。侵袭性前列腺癌的基因组标记,如高解码分数、低雄激素受体(AR)活性、ERG过表达和PTEN表达缺失,与低ANPEP表达相关。在局部晚期或转移性PCa患者中,较高的ANPEP表达与更有利的PCa特异性结果显著相关,包括生化复发、远处转移、去势抵抗性PCa和总生存率。GSEA显示anpep高组和基因组来源的非洲人种男性的AR上调。相反,G2-M DNA损伤检查点和MYC靶基因在anpep低和基因组衍生的欧洲种族群体中富集。研究结果表明,ANPEP下调与更具侵袭性的PCa表型有关。较高的ANPEP水平与更有利的结果相关,因此,将ANPEP表达作为治疗反应的预后因素。患者总结:我们利用大型数据库中的信息,观察了前列腺肿瘤中一种叫做氨肽酶N (ANPEP)的蛋白质水平。我们发现ANPEP与表明更具侵袭性疾病的标志物相关,并且较高的ANPEP水平与更有利的治疗结果相关。
{"title":"Downregulation of ANPEP Is Associated with Aggressive Prostate Cancer and Poor Disease-specific Outcomes","authors":"Ryan M. Putney ,&nbsp;Purvish Trivedi ,&nbsp;Shivanshu Awasthi ,&nbsp;Amparo Serna ,&nbsp;Jasreman Dhillon ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Sweeney ,&nbsp;R. Jeffrey Karnes ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Cooperberg ,&nbsp;Alejandro Berlin ,&nbsp;Paul L. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Spratt ,&nbsp;Elai Davicioni ,&nbsp;James Proudfoot ,&nbsp;Monica Ryu ,&nbsp;Esther Katende ,&nbsp;Jong Y. Park ,&nbsp;Timothy R. Rebbeck ,&nbsp;Asmaa El-Kenawi ,&nbsp;Kosj Yamoah","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Aminopeptidase N (ANPEP) is linked to malignancy in certain tumor types, but its role in aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) is less well defined. Our aim was to characterize ANPEP expression in various PCa stages to determine whether it is a robust prognostic biomarker of aggressive disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We established baseline ANPEP expression in benign prostate tissue using multiple large databases. Next, we determined the association between ANPEP expression and various clinicopathologic features and molecular subtypes using ∼170 000 tumor samples from the GRID registry. We calculated median expression values, and reported standardized mean differences. We used receiver operating characteristic and Cox regression analyses to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of ANPEP for several endpoints, and performed preranked gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to identify biological pathways over-represented by race or ANPEP category according to hallmark gene sets.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>ANPEP expression was higher in normal prostate tissues than in prostate tumors. Advanced clinical stage, higher National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category, and worse Gleason grade group were all associated with lower median ANPEP expression. Genomic markers of aggressive PCa, such as high Decipher scores, low androgen receptor (AR) activity, <em>ERG</em> overexpression, and loss of <em>PTEN</em> expression, were correlated with lower ANPEP expression. Among patients with locally advanced or metastatic PCa, higher ANPEP expression was significantly associated with more favorable PCa-specific outcomes, including biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis, castration-resistant PCa, and overall survival. GSEA revealed AR upregulation for the ANPEP-high group and men with genomic-derived African race. Conversely, the G<sub>2</sub>-M DNA damage checkpoint and <em>MYC</em> target genes were enriched in the ANPEP-low and genomic-derived European race groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Our findings show that ANPEP downregulation is linked to a more aggressive PCa phenotype. Higher ANPEP levels were associated with more favorable outcomes, thereby, establishing ANPEP expression as a prognostic factor for treatment response.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We looked at levels of a protein called aminopeptidase N (ANPEP) in prostate tumors using information from large databases. We found that ANPEP is linked to markers that indicate more aggressive disease and that higher ANPEP levels are associated with more favorable treatment outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 173-184"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Urology Open Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1