首页 > 最新文献

European Urology Open Science最新文献

英文 中文
14 PSA based intermediate endpoints to compare cancer specific survival difference between radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00017-5
Wiklund P., Falagario U., Pellegrino F., Lantz A., Akre O.
{"title":"14 PSA based intermediate endpoints to compare cancer specific survival difference between radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer","authors":"Wiklund P., Falagario U., Pellegrino F., Lantz A., Akre O.","doi":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00017-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00017-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages S15-S16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
16 Can we "smell" something important?
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00019-9
Cornford P., Dawson J., Yassaie O., Lazarowicz H., Tharmaratnam K., Garyia-Finana M., Probert C.
{"title":"16 Can we \"smell\" something important?","authors":"Cornford P., Dawson J., Yassaie O., Lazarowicz H., Tharmaratnam K., Garyia-Finana M., Probert C.","doi":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00019-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00019-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Page S18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143097387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complex Ureteral Reconstruction via Open or Robotic Ureteroplasty with a Buccal Mucosa Onlay Graft: A Two-center Comparison 通过开放输尿管成形术或机器人输尿管成形术联合颊粘膜板移植物重建复杂输尿管:两中心比较。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.11.002
Antonio Andrea Grosso , Fabrizio Di Maida , Daniele Paganelli , Simon Udo Engelmann , Emily Rinderknecht , Christoph Eckl , Sebastian Kälble , Alexey Barskov , Rino Oriti , Sofia Giudici , Christoph Pickl , Maximilian Burger , Andrea Mari , Andrea Minervini , Roman Mayr

Background and objective

Management of a long proximal ureteral stricture is challenging. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) ureteroplasty is a reliable technique for ureteral reconstruction that avoids the morbidity of bowel interposition or autotransplantation. We compared open and robotic BMG ureteroplasty in a two-center study.

Methods

We compared prospectively recorded data for 26 patients who underwent robotic or open BMG ureteroplasty at two academic institutions. Stricture location and length, previous reconstructive interventions, complications, and success rates were assessed and compared. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Key findings and limitations

We compared ten patients in the robotic group and 16 in the open group. Stricture location had similar distributions in the open versus robotic group (pelvic junction, 25% vs 20%; proximal ureter, 56.3% vs 60%; middle ureter, 18.7% vs 20%). Median stricture length was significantly longer in the robotic group (26 vs 17 mm; p = 0.01). The rate of previous reconstructive interventions was higher in the robotic group (80% vs 37.5%; p = 0.001). However, previous reconstructive interventions were more complex for the open surgery group. There were no intraoperative complications, and postoperative complication rates were similar in the open and robotic groups (18.7% vs 20%; p = 0.19). Median intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the robotic group (300 vs 175 ml; p = 0.03). The success rate was 93.7% in the open group and 90.0% in robotic group.

Conclusions and clinical implications

We observed high success rates and low perioperative morbidity for both open and robotic BMG ureteroplasty. The robotic approach was associated with significantly lower intraoperative blood loss.

Patient summary

Narrowing of the ureter, which is the tube draining urine from the kidney into the bladder, may need surgical treatment. For reconstruction of long segments, use of a tissue graft from the inside of the mouth is an effective surgical option. Robot-assisted surgery is as safe as open surgery and is associated with lower blood loss.
背景和目的:长输尿管近端狭窄的治疗具有挑战性。颊粘膜移植(BMG)输尿管成形术是一种可靠的输尿管重建技术,可避免肠道插置或自体移植的发病率。我们在一项双中心研究中比较了开放式和机器人 BMG 输尿管成形术:我们比较了在两家学术机构接受机器人或开放式 BMG 输尿管成形术的 26 位患者的前瞻性记录数据。评估并比较了狭窄位置和长度、之前的重建干预、并发症和成功率。进行了描述性统计分析:我们对机器人手术组的10名患者和开放手术组的16名患者进行了比较。开放手术组和机器人手术组的狭窄位置分布相似(骨盆交界处,25% 对 20%;输尿管近端,56.3% 对 60%;输尿管中部,18.7% 对 20%)。机器人组的中位狭窄长度明显更长(26 mm vs 17 mm; p = 0.01)。机器人组既往接受过重建手术的比例更高(80% 对 37.5%;P = 0.001)。不过,开放手术组的既往再造手术更为复杂。开放手术组和机器人手术组没有术中并发症,术后并发症发生率相似(18.7% vs 20%; p = 0.19)。机器人手术组的术中失血量明显降低(300 毫升对 175 毫升;P = 0.03)。开腹组的成功率为 93.7%,机器人组为 90.0%:我们观察到,开放式和机器人 BMG 输尿管成形术的成功率高,围手术期发病率低。患者总结:输尿管是将尿液从肾脏排入膀胱的管道,输尿管狭窄可能需要手术治疗。对于长段输尿管的重建,使用口腔内部的组织移植是一种有效的手术选择。机器人辅助手术与开放手术一样安全,而且失血量较少。
{"title":"Complex Ureteral Reconstruction via Open or Robotic Ureteroplasty with a Buccal Mucosa Onlay Graft: A Two-center Comparison","authors":"Antonio Andrea Grosso ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Di Maida ,&nbsp;Daniele Paganelli ,&nbsp;Simon Udo Engelmann ,&nbsp;Emily Rinderknecht ,&nbsp;Christoph Eckl ,&nbsp;Sebastian Kälble ,&nbsp;Alexey Barskov ,&nbsp;Rino Oriti ,&nbsp;Sofia Giudici ,&nbsp;Christoph Pickl ,&nbsp;Maximilian Burger ,&nbsp;Andrea Mari ,&nbsp;Andrea Minervini ,&nbsp;Roman Mayr","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Management of a long proximal ureteral stricture is challenging. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) ureteroplasty is a reliable technique for ureteral reconstruction that avoids the morbidity of bowel interposition or autotransplantation. We compared open and robotic BMG ureteroplasty in a two-center study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared prospectively recorded data for 26 patients who underwent robotic or open BMG ureteroplasty at two academic institutions. Stricture location and length, previous reconstructive interventions, complications, and success rates were assessed and compared. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>We compared ten patients in the robotic group and 16 in the open group. Stricture location had similar distributions in the open versus robotic group (pelvic junction, 25% vs 20%; proximal ureter, 56.3% vs 60%; middle ureter, 18.7% vs 20%). Median stricture length was significantly longer in the robotic group (26 vs 17 mm; <em>p</em> = 0.01). The rate of previous reconstructive interventions was higher in the robotic group (80% vs 37.5%; <em>p</em> = 0.001). However, previous reconstructive interventions were more complex for the open surgery group. There were no intraoperative complications, and postoperative complication rates were similar in the open and robotic groups (18.7% vs 20%; <em>p</em> = 0.19). Median intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the robotic group (300 vs 175 ml; <em>p</em> = 0.03). The success rate was 93.7% in the open group and 90.0% in robotic group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>We observed high success rates and low perioperative morbidity for both open and robotic BMG ureteroplasty. The robotic approach was associated with significantly lower intraoperative blood loss.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>Narrowing of the ureter, which is the tube draining urine from the kidney into the bladder, may need surgical treatment. For reconstruction of long segments, use of a tissue graft from the inside of the mouth is an effective surgical option. Robot-assisted surgery is as safe as open surgery and is associated with lower blood loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 125-131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722170/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
22 EORTC GUCG 2418 STARBURST: Strategies for treatment adaptation following re-evaluation of the bladder after using primary neoadjuvant systemic therapies: An EORTCplatform trial
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00026-6
Masson-Lecomte A.
{"title":"22 EORTC GUCG 2418 STARBURST: Strategies for treatment adaptation following re-evaluation of the bladder after using primary neoadjuvant systemic therapies: An EORTCplatform trial","authors":"Masson-Lecomte A.","doi":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00026-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00026-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Page S25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143131295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
29 Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the management of prostate cancer - Current state of the art
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00033-3
Dasgupta P., Khanna R., Granados Martinez A., Raison N., Ourselin S., Briganti A., Montorsi F.
{"title":"29 Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the management of prostate cancer - Current state of the art","authors":"Dasgupta P.,&nbsp;Khanna R.,&nbsp;Granados Martinez A.,&nbsp;Raison N.,&nbsp;Ourselin S.,&nbsp;Briganti A.,&nbsp;Montorsi F.","doi":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00033-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-1683(25)00033-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Page S33"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143131296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Copyright page 版权页
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-1683(24)01420-4
{"title":"Copyright page","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2666-1683(24)01420-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2666-1683(24)01420-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"70 ","pages":"Page I"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Which Measure of Stone Burden is the Best Predictor of Interventional Outcomes in Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the YAU Urolithiasis Working Group and EAU Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel 哪种结石负担测量方法最能预测尿路结石的介入治疗结果?YAU泌尿系结石工作组和EAU泌尿系结石指南小组的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.024
Robert Geraghty , Amelia Pietropaolo , Lazaros Tzelves , Riccardo Lombardo , Helene Jung , Andreas Neisius , Ales Petrik , Bhaskar K. Somani , Niall F. Davis , Giovanni Gambaro , Romain Boissier , Andreas Skolarikos , Thomas Tailly

Background and objective

Stone size has traditionally been measured in one dimension. This is reflected in most of the literature and in the EAU guidelines. However, recent studies have shown that multidimensional measures provide better prediction of outcomes.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic accuracy of measures of stone size (PROSPERO reference CRD42022346967). We considered all studies reporting prognostic accuracy statistics on any intervention for kidney stones (extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL], ureterorenoscopy [URS], or percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]; Population) using multiplane measurements of stone burden (area in mm2 or volume in mm3; Intervention) in comparison to single-plane measurements of stone burden (size in mm; Intervention) for the study-defined stone-free rate (Outcome) in a PICO-framed question. We also assessed complication rates (overall and by Clavien-Dindo grade) and the operative time as secondary outcomes. Searches were made between 1970 and August 2023. We used the DeLong method to compare receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Key findings and limitations

Of 24 studies included in the review, 12 were eligible for comparative analysis with the DeLong test following meta-analysis of prognostic accuracy. For prediction of stone-free status, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was significantly higher for stone volume than for stone size (0.71 vs 0.67; p < 0.001). Subanalyses confirmed this for ESWL and URS, but not for PCNL. For URS, the AUC was also significantly higher for stone area than for stone size (0.79 vs 0.77; p < 0.001). Throughout all analyses, there was no difference in AUC between stone area and stone volume. There was high risk of bias for all analyses apart from the URS subanalyses.

Conclusions and clinical implications

According to the limited data currently available, stone-free rates are predicted with significantly higher accuracy using multidimensional measures of stone burden in comparison to a single linear measurement.

Patient summary

We reviewed different ways of measuring the size of stones in the kidney or urinary tract and compared their accuracy in predicting stone-free rates after treatment. We found that measurement of the stone area (2 dimensions) or stone volume (3 dimensions) is better than stone diameter (1 dimension) in predicting stone-free status after treatment.
背景和目的传统上,对结石大小的测量是在一个维度上进行的。这反映在大多数文献和 EAU 指南中。方法我们对结石大小测量的预后准确性进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析(PROSPERO 参考文献 CRD42022346967)。我们考虑了所有报告肾结石任何干预措施(体外冲击波碎石[ESWL]、输尿管镜检查[URS]或经皮肾镜取石术[PCNL];人群)预后准确性统计数据的研究,这些研究使用结石负荷的多平面测量方法(面积以 mm2 为单位或体积以 mm3 为单位;干预措施)与结石负荷的单平面测量方法(大小以 mm 为单位;干预措施)对 PICO 框架问题中研究定义的无结石率(结果)进行了比较。我们还评估了并发症发生率(总体和按克拉维恩-丁多分级)和手术时间作为次要结果。检索时间为 1970 年至 2023 年 8 月。我们使用DeLong方法比较了接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)。在预测无结石状态时,结石体积的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)明显高于结石大小(0.71 vs 0.67; p < 0.001)。ESWL和URS的子分析证实了这一点,但PCNL没有。对于 URS,结石面积的 AUC 也明显高于结石大小(0.79 vs 0.77;p <;0.001)。在所有分析中,结石面积和结石体积的 AUC 没有差异。结论和临床意义根据目前有限的数据,与单一的线性测量相比,采用多维度的结石负荷测量方法预测无石率的准确性要高得多。患者摘要我们回顾了测量肾脏或尿路结石大小的不同方法,并比较了它们在预测治疗后无石率方面的准确性。我们发现,测量结石面积(2 维)或结石体积(3 维)比测量结石直径(1 维)更能预测治疗后的无结石率。
{"title":"Which Measure of Stone Burden is the Best Predictor of Interventional Outcomes in Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the YAU Urolithiasis Working Group and EAU Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel","authors":"Robert Geraghty ,&nbsp;Amelia Pietropaolo ,&nbsp;Lazaros Tzelves ,&nbsp;Riccardo Lombardo ,&nbsp;Helene Jung ,&nbsp;Andreas Neisius ,&nbsp;Ales Petrik ,&nbsp;Bhaskar K. Somani ,&nbsp;Niall F. Davis ,&nbsp;Giovanni Gambaro ,&nbsp;Romain Boissier ,&nbsp;Andreas Skolarikos ,&nbsp;Thomas Tailly","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.024","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.024","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Stone size has traditionally been measured in one dimension. This is reflected in most of the literature and in the EAU guidelines. However, recent studies have shown that multidimensional measures provide better prediction of outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic accuracy of measures of stone size (PROSPERO reference CRD42022346967). We considered all studies reporting prognostic accuracy statistics on any intervention for kidney stones (extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL], ureterorenoscopy [URS], or percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]; Population) using multiplane measurements of stone burden (area in mm<sup>2</sup> or volume in mm<sup>3</sup>; Intervention) in comparison to single-plane measurements of stone burden (size in mm; Intervention) for the study-defined stone-free rate (Outcome) in a PICO-framed question. We also assessed complication rates (overall and by Clavien-Dindo grade) and the operative time as secondary outcomes. Searches were made between 1970 and August 2023. We used the DeLong method to compare receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Of 24 studies included in the review, 12 were eligible for comparative analysis with the DeLong test following meta-analysis of prognostic accuracy. For prediction of stone-free status, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was significantly higher for stone volume than for stone size (0.71 vs 0.67; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Subanalyses confirmed this for ESWL and URS, but not for PCNL. For URS, the AUC was also significantly higher for stone area than for stone size (0.79 vs 0.77; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Throughout all analyses, there was no difference in AUC between stone area and stone volume. There was high risk of bias for all analyses apart from the URS subanalyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>According to the limited data currently available, stone-free rates are predicted with significantly higher accuracy using multidimensional measures of stone burden in comparison to a single linear measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We reviewed different ways of measuring the size of stones in the kidney or urinary tract and compared their accuracy in predicting stone-free rates after treatment. We found that measurement of the stone area (2 dimensions) or stone volume (3 dimensions) is better than stone diameter (1 dimension) in predicting stone-free status after treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142698668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment-related Hypertension as a Prognostic Factor for De Novo Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Real-world Evidence Study 治疗相关性高血压是新发转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌的预后因素:一项回顾性真实世界证据研究
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.023
Giuseppe Salfi , Martino Pedrani , Selin Candan , Vasile Urechie , Sara Merler , Lorenzo Ruinelli , Amos Colombo , Luis Castelo-Branco , Irene Testi , Fabio Turco , Luigi Tortola , Ursula Vogl , Luca Gabutti , Silke Gillessen , Ricardo Pereira Mestre

Background and objective

Hypertension (HTN) has been linked to an elevated risk of prostate cancer (PC) development and poorer prognosis in localized cases, and is a common side effect of hormonal PC treatments. However, its relationship with the prognosis of metastatic PC is still unclear. We assessed the prognostic role of treatment-related HTN in patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or in combination with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs).

Methods

Our retrospective analysis included 100 patients with de novo mHSPC treated with ADT, ADT + docetaxel, or ADT + ARPI between 2014 and 2021. Data on clinical variables, antihypertensive drugs, and blood pressure were collected from treatment initiation to 7 mo from ADT start. HTN development within 7 mo from hormonal treatment initiation was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and Cox analyses were performed for time to castration resistance (TTCR) and overall survival (OS).

Key findings and limitations

In the overall population, grade (G) 2–3 HTN development within 7 mo from hormonal treatment initiation was associated with improved TTCR and OS at both univariate (TTCR: 19.8 vs 7.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20–0.63, p < 0.001; OS: 42 vs 18.4 mo, HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26–0.87, p = 0.017) and multivariate (TTCR: HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18–0.91, p = 0.029; OS: HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.18–0.97, p = 0.042) analyses. A subgroup analysis of the ADT + ARPI–treated population revealed 7-mo treatment-related G2–3 HTN to be an independent positive prognostic factor in terms of both TTCR and OS multivariate survival analyses (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09–0.95, p = 0.040, and HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02–0.57, p = 0.008, respectively).

Conclusions and clinical implications

The early development or worsening of HTN under hormonal treatment may be associated with longer TTCR and OS in de novo mHSPC patients. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and explore the potential underlying mechanisms.

Patient summary

In this report, we examined the outcomes of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and their correlation with hypertension toxicities. We found that patients who developed clinically significant blood pressure toxicity early in oncological treatment experienced longer survival.
背景和目的高血压(HTN)与前列腺癌(PC)发病风险升高和局部病例预后较差有关,也是激素治疗 PC 的常见副作用。然而,它与转移性前列腺癌预后的关系仍不明确。我们评估了在接受雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)单独治疗或与多西他赛或雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARPIs)联合治疗的新发转移性激素敏感性PC(mHSPC)患者中,治疗相关高血压的预后作用。我们收集了从开始治疗到 ADT 开始 7 个月期间的临床变量、降压药物和血压数据。根据《不良事件通用毒性标准》5.0版对激素治疗开始后7个月内出现的高血压进行分级,并对阉割抵抗时间(TTCR)和总生存期(OS)进行Cox分析。在总体人群中,激素治疗开始后7个月内出现2-3级(G)高血压与单变量的TTCR和OS改善相关(TTCR:19.8 vs 7.9 mo,危险比[HR]:0.35,95%置信区间:0.35,95%置信区间:0.35):0.35,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.20-0.63, p < 0.001; OS:42月 vs 18.4月,HR:0.48,95% CI:0.26-0.87,p = 0.017)和多变量(TTCR:HR:0.41,95% CI:0.18-0.91,p = 0.029;OS:HR:0.42,95% CI:0.18-0.97,p = 0.042)分析。ADT+ARPI治疗人群的亚组分析显示,在TTCR和OS多变量生存分析中,7个月治疗相关的G2-3 HTN是一个独立的阳性预后因素(HR:0.30,95% CI:0.09-0.结论和临床意义激素治疗下 HTN 的早期发展或恶化可能与新发 mHSPC 患者更长的 TTCR 和 OS 相关。需要进行更大规模的研究来验证这些发现并探索其潜在的内在机制。我们发现,在肿瘤治疗早期出现临床上明显的血压毒性的患者生存期更长。
{"title":"Treatment-related Hypertension as a Prognostic Factor for De Novo Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Real-world Evidence Study","authors":"Giuseppe Salfi ,&nbsp;Martino Pedrani ,&nbsp;Selin Candan ,&nbsp;Vasile Urechie ,&nbsp;Sara Merler ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Ruinelli ,&nbsp;Amos Colombo ,&nbsp;Luis Castelo-Branco ,&nbsp;Irene Testi ,&nbsp;Fabio Turco ,&nbsp;Luigi Tortola ,&nbsp;Ursula Vogl ,&nbsp;Luca Gabutti ,&nbsp;Silke Gillessen ,&nbsp;Ricardo Pereira Mestre","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Hypertension (HTN) has been linked to an elevated risk of prostate cancer (PC) development and poorer prognosis in localized cases, and is a common side effect of hormonal PC treatments. However, its relationship with the prognosis of metastatic PC is still unclear. We assessed the prognostic role of treatment-related HTN in patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or in combination with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our retrospective analysis included 100 patients with de novo mHSPC treated with ADT, ADT + docetaxel, or ADT + ARPI between 2014 and 2021. Data on clinical variables, antihypertensive drugs, and blood pressure were collected from treatment initiation to 7 mo from ADT start. HTN development within 7 mo from hormonal treatment initiation was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and Cox analyses were performed for time to castration resistance (TTCR) and overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>In the overall population, grade (G) 2–3 HTN development within 7 mo from hormonal treatment initiation was associated with improved TTCR and OS at both univariate (TTCR: 19.8 vs 7.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20–0.63, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; OS: 42 vs 18.4 mo, HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26–0.87, <em>p</em> = 0.017) and multivariate (TTCR: HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18–0.91, <em>p</em> = 0.029; OS: HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.18–0.97, <em>p</em> = 0.042) analyses. A subgroup analysis of the ADT + ARPI–treated population revealed 7-mo treatment-related G2–3 HTN to be an independent positive prognostic factor in terms of both TTCR and OS multivariate survival analyses (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09–0.95, <em>p</em> = 0.040, and HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02–0.57, <em>p</em> = 0.008, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>The early development or worsening of HTN under hormonal treatment may be associated with longer TTCR and OS in de novo mHSPC patients. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and explore the potential underlying mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we examined the outcomes of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and their correlation with hypertension toxicities. We found that patients who developed clinically significant blood pressure toxicity early in oncological treatment experienced longer survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142698666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Standard (≤149 ml) Versus Very Large (≥150 ml) Prostate Glands: Retrospective Analysis of a Propensity Score Matched Cohort of 326 Patients 标准(≤149 ml)与超大(≥150 ml)前列腺腺体的钬激光去核术围手术期结果比较:对326例倾向评分匹配队列患者的回顾性分析
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.019
Jacob Schmidt , Jorien Krediet , Holger Beutel , Ayoub Hidayat Allah , Nella Gagel , Isabel Lichy , Bernhard Ralla , Maha Ullmann , Robert Peters , Frank Friedersdorff , Martin Kanne

Background and objective

Our objective was to evaluate whether a very large prostate volume significantly affects the incidence of perioperative complications and compromises outcomes among patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data for 1815 adult patients who underwent HoLEP at Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, between January 2019 and May 2024. Patients were divided into two groups according to their prostate volume: ≤149 ml (group A) and ≥150 ml (group B). Propensity score matching on age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and the presence of an indwelling catheter was used to balance baseline differences. A Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous variables between the groups, and a χ2 test for comparison of categorical variables, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Postoperative complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Key findings and limitations

After propensity score matching, 163 matched cases per group were analyzed. Group B had significantly longer median total operative time (76 vs 47 min; p < 0.001), enucleation time (42 vs 26 min; p < 0.001), coagulation time (11 vs 6 min; p < 0.001), and morcellation time (15 vs 7 min; p < 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb complications (8.7% vs 1.2%; p = 0.02) and blood transfusion (2.5% vs 0%; p = 0.045) were significantly more frequent in group B. Catheterization time (1.9 vs 2.0 d; p = 0.01) and the proportion of patients with postoperative residual urine volume ≤50 ml (85.2% vs 80.2%; p = 0.18) were comparable between the groups. Limitations include the retrospective and single-center study design.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Prostate volume ≥150 ml is associated with a longer operative time, a higher rate of major complications, and a more frequent need for blood transfusion. Therefore, HoLEP for prostate glands ≥150 ml should be performed in experienced high-volume centers.

Patient summary

We compared outcomes of laser surgery for enlarged prostate glands of different sizes. We found that while the surgery is generally effective for very large prostates, it takes longer and has a higher risk of complications in comparison to more typical prostate sizes. However, this procedure is still the best treatment available for prostate enlargement and should be carried out in high-volume hospitals specializing in this treatment.
我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2024年5月期间在柏林Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge接受前列腺钬激光去核术(HoLEP)的1815名成年患者的数据。根据前列腺体积将患者分为两组:≤149 毫升(A 组)和≥150 毫升(B 组)。根据年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况和是否留置导管等因素进行倾向评分匹配,以平衡基线差异。组间连续变量的比较采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验,分类变量的比较采用 χ2 检验,以 p < 0.05 为差异有统计学意义。术后并发症根据 Clavien-Dindo 分类法进行评估。主要研究结果和局限性经过倾向评分匹配后,对每组 163 例匹配病例进行了分析。B 组的中位总手术时间(76 分钟 vs 47 分钟;p <;0.001)、去核时间(42 分钟 vs 26 分钟;p <;0.001)、凝固时间(11 分钟 vs 6 分钟;p <;0.001)和剥离时间(15 分钟 vs 7 分钟;p <;0.001)明显更长。B组患者的Clavien-Dindo≥IIIb级并发症(8.7% vs 1.2%;p = 0.02)和输血(2.5% vs 0%;p = 0.045)发生率明显更高。两组患者的导尿时间(1.9 vs 2.0 d;p = 0.01)和术后残余尿量≤50 ml的患者比例(85.2% vs 80.2%;p = 0.18)相当。结论和临床意义前列腺体积≥150 毫升与手术时间更长、主要并发症发生率更高以及输血需求更频繁有关。因此,前列腺体积≥150 毫升时,应在经验丰富的大容量中心进行激光前列腺电切术(HoLEP)。我们发现,虽然手术对超大前列腺普遍有效,但与更典型的前列腺大小相比,手术时间更长,并发症风险更高。不过,这种手术仍然是目前治疗前列腺增生的最佳方法,应该在专门从事这种治疗的大医院进行。
{"title":"Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Standard (≤149 ml) Versus Very Large (≥150 ml) Prostate Glands: Retrospective Analysis of a Propensity Score Matched Cohort of 326 Patients","authors":"Jacob Schmidt ,&nbsp;Jorien Krediet ,&nbsp;Holger Beutel ,&nbsp;Ayoub Hidayat Allah ,&nbsp;Nella Gagel ,&nbsp;Isabel Lichy ,&nbsp;Bernhard Ralla ,&nbsp;Maha Ullmann ,&nbsp;Robert Peters ,&nbsp;Frank Friedersdorff ,&nbsp;Martin Kanne","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Our objective was to evaluate whether a very large prostate volume significantly affects the incidence of perioperative complications and compromises outcomes among patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed data for 1815 adult patients who underwent HoLEP at Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, between January 2019 and May 2024. Patients were divided into two groups according to their prostate volume: ≤149 ml (group A) and ≥150 ml (group B). Propensity score matching on age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and the presence of an indwelling catheter was used to balance baseline differences. A Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test was used for comparison of continuous variables between the groups, and a χ<sup>2</sup> test for comparison of categorical variables, with <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant. Postoperative complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>After propensity score matching, 163 matched cases per group were analyzed. Group B had significantly longer median total operative time (76 vs 47 min; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), enucleation time (42 vs 26 min; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), coagulation time (11 vs 6 min; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and morcellation time (15 vs 7 min; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb complications (8.7% vs 1.2%; <em>p</em> = 0.02) and blood transfusion (2.5% vs 0%; <em>p</em> = 0.045) were significantly more frequent in group B. Catheterization time (1.9 vs 2.0 d; <em>p</em> = 0.01) and the proportion of patients with postoperative residual urine volume ≤50 ml (85.2% vs 80.2%; <em>p</em> = 0.18) were comparable between the groups. Limitations include the retrospective and single-center study design.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Prostate volume ≥150 ml is associated with a longer operative time, a higher rate of major complications, and a more frequent need for blood transfusion. Therefore, HoLEP for prostate glands ≥150 ml should be performed in experienced high-volume centers.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We compared outcomes of laser surgery for enlarged prostate glands of different sizes. We found that while the surgery is generally effective for very large prostates, it takes longer and has a higher risk of complications in comparison to more typical prostate sizes. However, this procedure is still the best treatment available for prostate enlargement and should be carried out in high-volume hospitals specializing in this treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142698667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Cause of Death for Men with Prostate Cancer Using Official Mortality Statistics or a Dedicated Cause of Death Committee: Results from 30-year ERSPC Rotterdam Data 使用官方死亡率统计数据或专门的死因委员会评估前列腺癌男性患者的死因:鹿特丹 ERSPC 30 年数据的结果
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.021
Sebastiaan Remmers , Ivo I. de Vos , Frederique B. Denijs , Renée C.A. Leenen , Tycho M.T.W. Lock , Arjen Noordzij , Wim J. Kirkels , Chris H. Bangma , Monique J. Roobol , ERSPC Rotterdam Study Group
For men with prostate cancer (PCa) within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), the cause of death is determined by a Cause of Death Committee (CODC) that evaluates all medical records using a fixed algorithm. The aim of this study was to compare the classification of PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) between the CODC and Statistics Netherlands. We calculated the sensitivity (PCSM agreement divided by total PCSM deaths according to the CODC) and specificity (agreement for other-cause mortality [OCM] divided by total OCM deaths according to the CODC) using the last 21-yr follow-up data from ERSPC Rotterdam. For the core age group (age 55–69 yr at randomization; n = 1732), the sensitivity was 86% (95% CI 83-89) and specificity was 93% (95% CI 91-94), with no statistical difference between the youngest ages and the oldest ages. Extrapolation of our findings to 30 yr of follow-up would result in an expected risk reduction of PCSM of 30% using data from the CODC and 33% using official statistics in favor of screening. In conclusion, our results support the use of official statistics in determining the cause of death, without compromising the main outcome of ERSPC Rotterdam.

Patient summary

We compared the classification of prostate cancer death between a dedicated trial committee and official statistics in the Netherlands. We found that official statistics are an accurate representation in determining the cause of death.
在欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)中,男性前列腺癌患者的死因由死因委员会(CODC)确定,该委员会采用固定算法评估所有医疗记录。本研究旨在比较 CODC 和荷兰统计局对 PCa 特异性死亡率(PCSM)的分类。我们利用鹿特丹 ERSPC 最近 21 年的随访数据计算了灵敏度(根据 CODC,PCSM 一致性除以 PCSM 死亡总数)和特异性(根据 CODC,其他原因死亡率 [OCM] 一致性除以 OCM 死亡总数)。对于核心年龄组(随机化时年龄为 55-69 岁;n = 1732),灵敏度为 86%(95% CI 83-89),特异度为 93%(95% CI 91-94),最小年龄和最大年龄之间没有统计学差异。将我们的研究结果推断到 30 年的随访中,如果使用 CODC 的数据,则 PCSM 的预期风险降低率为 30%;如果使用官方统计数据,则筛查的预期风险降低率为 33%。总之,我们的结果支持在确定死因时使用官方统计数据,而不会影响鹿特丹 ERSPC 的主要结果。患者摘要我们比较了荷兰专门试验委员会和官方统计数据对前列腺癌死亡的分类。我们发现,官方统计数据在确定死因方面具有准确的代表性。
{"title":"Assessing the Cause of Death for Men with Prostate Cancer Using Official Mortality Statistics or a Dedicated Cause of Death Committee: Results from 30-year ERSPC Rotterdam Data","authors":"Sebastiaan Remmers ,&nbsp;Ivo I. de Vos ,&nbsp;Frederique B. Denijs ,&nbsp;Renée C.A. Leenen ,&nbsp;Tycho M.T.W. Lock ,&nbsp;Arjen Noordzij ,&nbsp;Wim J. Kirkels ,&nbsp;Chris H. Bangma ,&nbsp;Monique J. Roobol ,&nbsp;ERSPC Rotterdam Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For men with prostate cancer (PCa) within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), the cause of death is determined by a Cause of Death Committee (CODC) that evaluates all medical records using a fixed algorithm. The aim of this study was to compare the classification of PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) between the CODC and Statistics Netherlands. We calculated the sensitivity (PCSM agreement divided by total PCSM deaths according to the CODC) and specificity (agreement for other-cause mortality [OCM] divided by total OCM deaths according to the CODC) using the last 21-yr follow-up data from ERSPC Rotterdam. For the core age group (age 55–69 yr at randomization; <em>n</em> = 1732), the sensitivity was 86% (95% CI 83-89) and specificity was 93% (95% CI 91-94), with no statistical difference between the youngest ages and the oldest ages. Extrapolation of our findings to 30 yr of follow-up would result in an expected risk reduction of PCSM of 30% using data from the CODC and 33% using official statistics in favor of screening. In conclusion, our results support the use of official statistics in determining the cause of death, without compromising the main outcome of ERSPC Rotterdam.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We compared the classification of prostate cancer death between a dedicated trial committee and official statistics in the Netherlands. We found that official statistics are an accurate representation in determining the cause of death.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 11-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142656245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Urology Open Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1