{"title":"Editorial Board and Table of Contents","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ase.2437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2437","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.2437","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143119004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joy Y. Balta, Thomas H. Champney, Christopher Ferrigno, Laura E. Johnson, Callum F. Ross, Brandi Schmitt, Heather F. Smith
The American Association for Anatomy recently charged a task force with updating and expanding upon best practices and recommendations for human body donation programs. The task force comprised American Association for Anatomy members with specific and detailed knowledge about the legal, ethical, and procedural operations of body donation programs in the United States. The task force developed both foundational and aspirational recommendations. These recommendations emphasize the importance of prioritizing the ethical treatment of all body donors across all education and research sectors. Programs must adhere to several principles to operate an ethical body donation program, the foundation of which is informed consent. The policies and procedures of donation programs must clearly and transparently describe their core operational practices including outreach, registration, custody tracking, use, disposition, and memorialization. Such programs should be governed by a diverse oversight committee whose members are not directly responsible for the program's daily operations. These standards require that all body donation programs follow all national, state, and local laws in the program's jurisdiction. The following recommendations for body donation programs were approved by the Board of Directors of the American Association for Anatomy in 2024 and were conceived as a living document intended to be periodically modified and updated as the ethos and legislation of body donations evolve. Given the importance of these recommendations, translations of this document into Chinese and Spanish are available as supplementary materials S2 and S3.
{"title":"Human body donation programs best practices and recommended standards: A task force report from the American Association for Anatomy","authors":"Joy Y. Balta, Thomas H. Champney, Christopher Ferrigno, Laura E. Johnson, Callum F. Ross, Brandi Schmitt, Heather F. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ase.2520","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.2520","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The American Association for Anatomy recently charged a task force with updating and expanding upon best practices and recommendations for human body donation programs. The task force comprised American Association for Anatomy members with specific and detailed knowledge about the legal, ethical, and procedural operations of body donation programs in the United States. The task force developed both foundational and aspirational recommendations. These recommendations emphasize the importance of prioritizing the ethical treatment of all body donors across all education and research sectors. Programs must adhere to several principles to operate an ethical body donation program, the foundation of which is informed consent. The policies and procedures of donation programs must clearly and transparently describe their core operational practices including outreach, registration, custody tracking, use, disposition, and memorialization. Such programs should be governed by a diverse oversight committee whose members are not directly responsible for the program's daily operations. These standards require that all body donation programs follow all national, state, and local laws in the program's jurisdiction. The following recommendations for body donation programs were approved by the Board of Directors of the American Association for Anatomy in 2024 and were conceived as a living document intended to be periodically modified and updated as the ethos and legislation of body donations evolve. Given the importance of these recommendations, translations of this document into Chinese and Spanish are available as supplementary materials S2 and S3.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"8-26"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.2520","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142845557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joy Y. Balta, Thomas H. Champney, Christopher Ferrigno, Laura E. Johnson, Callum F. Ross, Brandi Schmitt, Heather F. Smith
<p>The American Association for Anatomy convened a task force to create a best practices and recommendations document for human body donation, addressing a critical need for standardized guidelines in this area. The task force included members with specialized expertise in procedural and ethical aspects of body donation programs. Their aim was to ensure that the process of body donation adheres to the highest ethical standards, protecting both the dignity of donors and the integrity of the programs that receive them. This document represents the first comprehensive guide to ethical best practices in working with body donors, offering clear and actionable recommendations for professionals in the field. In this viewpoint article, JYB, Chair of the Human Body Donation Committee, provides a summary of how these guidelines were developed, covering the various procedural and ethical considerations. The Q&A format of the article further explains the document's key areas and its impact on future practices.</p><p>The American Association for Anatomy was lacking a comprehensive document with best practice recommendations. The organization had a list of resources and a few policies—but no detailed guidelines. This may be the first of its kind—a comprehensive document that aligns best practices and recommendations for body donation.</p><p>The Human Body Donation Committee (HBDC) thought it would be helpful to create this because, in the United States, there's not much oversight—legal, federal, or state—in most places. It is really up to the body donation programs to do what they think is best for the donors. As anatomists and body donation program professionals, we have a responsibility to ensure we are promoting best practices and ethical ways of working with donors. Donors trust us with their bodies and expect us to act in their best interest after they pass.</p><p>The process to generate the best practice document took many years and was quite complicated. Initially, the American Association for Anatomy created a task force to respond to legislative bills and media requests. As the task force discovered a big gap between what guidelines were available versus what was needed, the task force advocated for many years to establish a committee. Once approved, one of our jobs was to create these best practices.</p><p>We spent a lot of time discussing and developing definitions and terms, which was challenging but necessary to ensure understanding and consistency. We then created a table of contents, which was first presented to the AAA Board, and then to the membership at the 2023 anatomy meeting, during which we requested and gathered feedback on what the AAA membership wanted to see included in the document.</p><p>Different teams of HBDC members drafted sections, shared among the whole committee and we held meetings to discuss. Once we had a comprehensive draft, we sent it to the Board for feedback, made changes based on their input, and then opened it fo
{"title":"The road to best practices in body donation","authors":"Joy Y. Balta, Thomas H. Champney, Christopher Ferrigno, Laura E. Johnson, Callum F. Ross, Brandi Schmitt, Heather F. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ase.2539","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.2539","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The American Association for Anatomy convened a task force to create a best practices and recommendations document for human body donation, addressing a critical need for standardized guidelines in this area. The task force included members with specialized expertise in procedural and ethical aspects of body donation programs. Their aim was to ensure that the process of body donation adheres to the highest ethical standards, protecting both the dignity of donors and the integrity of the programs that receive them. This document represents the first comprehensive guide to ethical best practices in working with body donors, offering clear and actionable recommendations for professionals in the field. In this viewpoint article, JYB, Chair of the Human Body Donation Committee, provides a summary of how these guidelines were developed, covering the various procedural and ethical considerations. The Q&A format of the article further explains the document's key areas and its impact on future practices.</p><p>The American Association for Anatomy was lacking a comprehensive document with best practice recommendations. The organization had a list of resources and a few policies—but no detailed guidelines. This may be the first of its kind—a comprehensive document that aligns best practices and recommendations for body donation.</p><p>The Human Body Donation Committee (HBDC) thought it would be helpful to create this because, in the United States, there's not much oversight—legal, federal, or state—in most places. It is really up to the body donation programs to do what they think is best for the donors. As anatomists and body donation program professionals, we have a responsibility to ensure we are promoting best practices and ethical ways of working with donors. Donors trust us with their bodies and expect us to act in their best interest after they pass.</p><p>The process to generate the best practice document took many years and was quite complicated. Initially, the American Association for Anatomy created a task force to respond to legislative bills and media requests. As the task force discovered a big gap between what guidelines were available versus what was needed, the task force advocated for many years to establish a committee. Once approved, one of our jobs was to create these best practices.</p><p>We spent a lot of time discussing and developing definitions and terms, which was challenging but necessary to ensure understanding and consistency. We then created a table of contents, which was first presented to the AAA Board, and then to the membership at the 2023 anatomy meeting, during which we requested and gathered feedback on what the AAA membership wanted to see included in the document.</p><p>Different teams of HBDC members drafted sections, shared among the whole committee and we held meetings to discuss. Once we had a comprehensive draft, we sent it to the Board for feedback, made changes based on their input, and then opened it fo","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142845558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The first experience of medical students in the dissecting room (DR) is a challenging event. Few data exist around whether or how culturally appropriate support is required in the DR for students from ethnic minorities. This pilot study explored Pasifika (peoples with heritage from the Pacific Islands) students' first experience of the DR and exposure to body donors to explore cultural perspectives around this event. Participants were second year Pasifika medical students with no prior engagement with body donors. Following a first exposure to body donors, semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted. Questioning explored how Pasifika students experienced initial DR engagement in regard to Pasifika culture and cultural safety. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Eight Pasifika students were interviewed (ages 18–32 years, mean 21.3 years, five females); mean interview duration 24.5 min. Four themes were identified: cultural observations, student behaviors, cultural safety, and cultural comfort. Dominant messages included the cultural challenges presented by this event, conformity of cultural behavior, identification of cultural safety being appropriate, and illumination of potential cultural support strategies. Current mechanisms supporting cultural safety were identified as adequate, which juxtaposed against behavior where students could not act in a culturally authentic manner. Suggestions were made around improving cultural comfort, such as the presence of elders or Christian-focused elements such as prayer. Enhanced cultural support could increase cultural comfort for the initial DR and body donor experience of Pasifika students, which may facilitate increased cultural knowledge and promote cultural diversity within the medical student cohort.
{"title":"Supporting minority cultures during initial engagements with body donors in the dissecting room: A pilot study exploring perspectives of Pasifika medical students around culture and cultural safety","authors":"Jacob Madgwick, Lynley Anderson, Jon Cornwall","doi":"10.1002/ase.2541","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.2541","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The first experience of medical students in the dissecting room (DR) is a challenging event. Few data exist around whether or how culturally appropriate support is required in the DR for students from ethnic minorities. This pilot study explored Pasifika (peoples with heritage from the Pacific Islands) students' first experience of the DR and exposure to body donors to explore cultural perspectives around this event. Participants were second year Pasifika medical students with no prior engagement with body donors. Following a first exposure to body donors, semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted. Questioning explored how Pasifika students experienced initial DR engagement in regard to Pasifika culture and cultural safety. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Eight Pasifika students were interviewed (ages 18–32 years, mean 21.3 years, five females); mean interview duration 24.5 min. Four themes were identified: cultural observations, student behaviors, cultural safety, and cultural comfort. Dominant messages included the cultural challenges presented by this event, conformity of cultural behavior, identification of cultural safety being appropriate, and illumination of potential cultural support strategies. Current mechanisms supporting cultural safety were identified as adequate, which juxtaposed against behavior where students could not act in a culturally authentic manner. Suggestions were made around improving cultural comfort, such as the presence of elders or Christian-focused elements such as prayer. Enhanced cultural support could increase cultural comfort for the initial DR and body donor experience of Pasifika students, which may facilitate increased cultural knowledge and promote cultural diversity within the medical student cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 2","pages":"160-171"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142805548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liu Liu, Yue Chen, Yubin Cao, Lei Yang, Yiyan Yang, Yantong Li, Dingming Huang, Ling Ye, Qinghua Zheng
Anatomy forms the foundation for the training and execution of routine surgical procedures. However, a gap persists in effectively bridging anatomical knowledge with the confident performance of procedures. Virtual simulation (VS) techniques, based on experiential and situated learning theory, hold promise in addressing this challenge. Apicoectomy, a procedure involving root apex resection to preserve a tooth, requires a blend of regional and dental anatomy knowledge, making it an ideal model for assessing the effectiveness of VS. This prospective cohort study evaluated primarily the enhancement of incorporating VS training in the preclinical skill training of apicoectomy for undergraduate dental students, compared to relying solely on traditional methods. VS training includes the simulated dissection process, patient examination, and apicoectomy based on graphically synthesized virtual models. Secondly, the study investigated the influence of exposure to VS training on students' confidence and satisfaction. The training was divided into three progressive levels aligned with students' cognitive processes, employing Miller's competence learning framework. Participants were categorized into the control group (CG) (n = 214) and VS training group (VSTG) (n = 220) based on their classes. The results demonstrated that VSTG showed significantly greater training enhancement (VSTG: 7.14 ± 1.74; CG: 6.57 ± 2.02, p = 0.002) and higher confidence levels (VSTG: 2.94 ± 0.13; CG: 2.69 ± 0.13, p < 0.001), along with greater satisfaction with the training compared to the CG (VSTG: 3.70 ± 0.18; CG: 3.20 ± 0.17, p < 0.001). In conclusion, VS proves to be a valuable adjunct for enhancing procedural skill training in surgical procedures.
{"title":"From anatomy to surgery: Effectiveness of virtual simulation adjuvant to traditional methods in the preclinical training of apicoectomy","authors":"Liu Liu, Yue Chen, Yubin Cao, Lei Yang, Yiyan Yang, Yantong Li, Dingming Huang, Ling Ye, Qinghua Zheng","doi":"10.1002/ase.2538","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.2538","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anatomy forms the foundation for the training and execution of routine surgical procedures. However, a gap persists in effectively bridging anatomical knowledge with the confident performance of procedures. Virtual simulation (VS) techniques, based on experiential and situated learning theory, hold promise in addressing this challenge. Apicoectomy, a procedure involving root apex resection to preserve a tooth, requires a blend of regional and dental anatomy knowledge, making it an ideal model for assessing the effectiveness of VS. This prospective cohort study evaluated primarily the enhancement of incorporating VS training in the preclinical skill training of apicoectomy for undergraduate dental students, compared to relying solely on traditional methods. VS training includes the simulated dissection process, patient examination, and apicoectomy based on graphically synthesized virtual models. Secondly, the study investigated the influence of exposure to VS training on students' confidence and satisfaction. The training was divided into three progressive levels aligned with students' cognitive processes, employing Miller's competence learning framework. Participants were categorized into the control group (CG) (<i>n</i> = 214) and VS training group (VSTG) (<i>n</i> = 220) based on their classes. The results demonstrated that VSTG showed significantly greater training enhancement (VSTG: 7.14 ± 1.74; CG: 6.57 ± 2.02, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and higher confidence levels (VSTG: 2.94 ± 0.13; CG: 2.69 ± 0.13, <i>p</i> < 0.001), along with greater satisfaction with the training compared to the CG (VSTG: 3.70 ± 0.18; CG: 3.20 ± 0.17, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In conclusion, VS proves to be a valuable adjunct for enhancing procedural skill training in surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"97-116"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142794063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Li-Na Ma, Rui Peng, Jing-Ji Xu, Qing-Ling Yang, A-Ceng Li, Ye Han, Lei Yuan, Fan Shen, Dan-Qing Yin, Min-Wen Zheng, Ya-Yu Huang, Jing Ren
The traditional approach of using PowerPoint (PPT) presentations in medical imaging theory classes hinders the spatial thinking ability of most students. Consequently, the learning outcomes are often unsatisfactory. This article proposes a naked eye three-dimensional (3D) medical imaging teaching assistant app based on augmented reality (AR) technology to enhance learning interest, teaching interaction, and effectiveness. The control group consisted of 50 undergraduate students from the 2018 clinical medicine major who receive traditional teaching, while the experimental group includes 52 undergraduate students from the 2019 cohort who utilize an AR-based naked eye 3D teaching assistant app in addition to traditional teaching methods. Based on Bloom's cognitive learning taxonomy (Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create), corresponding teaching curricula and assessment methods were designed in order to achieve more in-depth learning of the curriculum. The evaluation of the teaching effectiveness between the two groups relied on exam scores and student satisfaction questionnaires, with statistical analyses conducted using t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test in SPSS. The experimental group and control group showed statistically significant differences in the theoretical examination scores (62.06 ± 3.06 vs. 59.82 ± 3.38), practical testing scores (22.90 ± 2.35 vs. 21.06 ± 2.65), and total scores (84.96 ± 4.58 vs. 80.88 ± 6.01). Likert scores showed the experimental group scored significantly higher in enjoyment, satisfaction, participation, efficiency, and understanding. They also reported high convenience scores for the app and desired continued use. The naked eye 3D teaching assistant system is an innovative and effective teaching model for undergraduate medical imaging education, enhancing student interest, student interaction, and teaching effectiveness and promising future applications.
{"title":"Naked eye three-dimensional teaching assistant system applied to undergraduate medical imaging education: A pilot study","authors":"Li-Na Ma, Rui Peng, Jing-Ji Xu, Qing-Ling Yang, A-Ceng Li, Ye Han, Lei Yuan, Fan Shen, Dan-Qing Yin, Min-Wen Zheng, Ya-Yu Huang, Jing Ren","doi":"10.1002/ase.2540","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.2540","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The traditional approach of using PowerPoint (PPT) presentations in medical imaging theory classes hinders the spatial thinking ability of most students. Consequently, the learning outcomes are often unsatisfactory. This article proposes a naked eye three-dimensional (3D) medical imaging teaching assistant app based on augmented reality (AR) technology to enhance learning interest, teaching interaction, and effectiveness. The control group consisted of 50 undergraduate students from the 2018 clinical medicine major who receive traditional teaching, while the experimental group includes 52 undergraduate students from the 2019 cohort who utilize an AR-based naked eye 3D teaching assistant app in addition to traditional teaching methods. Based on Bloom's cognitive learning taxonomy (<i>Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create</i>), corresponding teaching curricula and assessment methods were designed in order to achieve more in-depth learning of the curriculum. The evaluation of the teaching effectiveness between the two groups relied on exam scores and student satisfaction questionnaires, with statistical analyses conducted using <i>t</i>-test and Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-test in SPSS. The experimental group and control group showed statistically significant differences in the theoretical examination scores (62.06 ± 3.06 vs. 59.82 ± 3.38), practical testing scores (22.90 ± 2.35 vs. 21.06 ± 2.65), and total scores (84.96 ± 4.58 vs. 80.88 ± 6.01). Likert scores showed the experimental group scored significantly higher in enjoyment, satisfaction, participation, efficiency, and understanding. They also reported high convenience scores for the app and desired continued use. The naked eye 3D teaching assistant system is an innovative and effective teaching model for undergraduate medical imaging education, enhancing student interest, student interaction, and teaching effectiveness and promising future applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 2","pages":"139-148"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142794064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial Board and Table of Contents","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ase.2512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2512","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"17 9","pages":"1655-1658"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.2512","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142764063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Metacognition includes the processes that learners use to plan, monitor, and assess their learning and is tied to academic performance and growth-oriented attitudes toward learning. Learning anatomy presents challenges to learners at all levels, and for many, necessitates a change in learning strategies and metacognitive awareness. We sought to examine whether structured metacognitive training situated in an undergraduate anatomy course could improve these skills. At the beginning and end of the course, students completed the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and several short free response questions. Individually matched pre-and post-course MAI scores were compared using paired-sample t-tests. The authors conducted a directed content analysis for the free response questions using the “knowledge of cognition” (KC) and “regulation of cognition” (RC) domains and their associated subcategories. All three KC subcategories showed statistically significant increases from pre- to post-course questionnaires. Effect sizes were small to moderate. Only two of five RC subcategories showed significant differences between pre- and post-course questionnaires: Information Management strategies and Evaluation. Directed content analysis revealed that students displayed an increase in metacognitive knowledge, particularly in the KC domain. Although RC developed for some learners, others also had insightful comments about challenges in this area—particularly regarding planning, motivation, and focus while learning independently. These results show that metacognitive training in an undergraduate anatomy course can improve students' metacognitive awareness. However, more targeted, specific strategies may be useful to develop students' metacognitive regulation.
元认知包括学习者用来计划、监控和评估自己学习的过程,与学习成绩和以成长为导向的学习态度息息相关。学习解剖学给各个层次的学习者都带来了挑战,对许多人来说,必须改变学习策略和元认知意识。我们试图研究在本科解剖学课程中进行结构化元认知训练是否能提高这些技能。在课程开始和结束时,学生们完成了元认知意识量表(MAI)和几个简短的自由回答问题。使用配对样本 t 检验比较了课程前后各自匹配的 MAI 分数。作者使用 "认知知识"(KC)和 "认知调节"(RC)领域及其相关子类别对自由回答问题进行了定向内容分析。从课程前的问卷调查到课程后的问卷调查,所有三个 KC 子类别都出现了统计学意义上的显著增长。效果大小从小幅到中幅不等。在五个 RC 子类别中,只有两个在课程前和课程后的问卷调查中显示出显著差异:信息管理策略和评价。定向内容分析显示,学生的元认知知识有所增长,尤其是在 KC 领域。虽然一些学生的 RC 有所发展,但其他学生也对这一领域的挑战提出了深刻的看法,特别是在独立学习时的计划、动机和专注力方面。这些结果表明,在本科解剖学课程中进行元认知训练可以提高学生的元认知意识。然而,更有针对性的具体策略可能有助于培养学生的元认知调节能力。
{"title":"Incorporating structured metacognitive training into an undergraduate anatomy classroom","authors":"Aidan A. Ruth, Kristina Dzara","doi":"10.1002/ase.2537","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.2537","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Metacognition includes the processes that learners use to plan, monitor, and assess their learning and is tied to academic performance and growth-oriented attitudes toward learning. Learning anatomy presents challenges to learners at all levels, and for many, necessitates a change in learning strategies and metacognitive awareness. We sought to examine whether structured metacognitive training situated in an undergraduate anatomy course could improve these skills. At the beginning and end of the course, students completed the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and several short free response questions. Individually matched pre-and post-course MAI scores were compared using paired-sample t-tests. The authors conducted a directed content analysis for the free response questions using the “knowledge of cognition” (KC) and “regulation of cognition” (RC) domains and their associated subcategories. All three KC subcategories showed statistically significant increases from pre- to post-course questionnaires. Effect sizes were small to moderate. Only two of five RC subcategories showed significant differences between pre- and post-course questionnaires: Information Management strategies and Evaluation. Directed content analysis revealed that students displayed an increase in metacognitive knowledge, particularly in the KC domain. Although RC developed for some learners, others also had insightful comments about challenges in this area—particularly regarding planning, motivation, and focus while learning independently. These results show that metacognitive training in an undergraduate anatomy course can improve students' metacognitive awareness. However, more targeted, specific strategies may be useful to develop students' metacognitive regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142714788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anatomy is essential for understanding healthy and disease states as well as for the successful completion of clinical clerkships and board examinations. This project provided structured workshops aimed to review anatomical concepts for clerkships and Step 1 and provided a means for medical students to assess their anatomical knowledge. We provided six optional anatomy workshops, in which students (1) took a pre-session quiz, (2) faculty reviewed key anatomy of a particular system (e.g., musculoskeletal), (3) students worked through clinical cases in small groups, and (4) students took a post-session quiz and responded to a post-session survey to rate satisfaction of session content and delivery on a five-point Likert scale. One session was excluded due to small sample size (n = 2). Results from five workshops, including brachial plexus, musculoskeletal, pelvic, gastrointestinal, and head and neck anatomy, showed that students performed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) better on the post-session quizzes compared to pre-session quizzes in all sessions. Post-session survey results indicated that students were satisfied with session content and facilitation, would attend future workshops, and would use session materials to study for Step 1. Based on these short-term benefits of the sessions, we plan to continue offering monthly workshops to medical students to increase knowledge retention of key anatomical concepts and increase preparedness for clerkships and Step 1. Future studies will longitudinally follow up with students post-Step 1 and clerkships to determine the long-term benefits of offering these workshops.
{"title":"Focused anatomy workshops for clerkships and the USMLE Step 1 examination","authors":"Anna Ricci, Ian Minearo, Abigail Hielscher","doi":"10.1002/ase.2536","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.2536","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anatomy is essential for understanding healthy and disease states as well as for the successful completion of clinical clerkships and board examinations. This project provided structured workshops aimed to review anatomical concepts for clerkships and Step 1 and provided a means for medical students to assess their anatomical knowledge. We provided six optional anatomy workshops, in which students (1) took a pre-session quiz, (2) faculty reviewed key anatomy of a particular system (e.g., musculoskeletal), (3) students worked through clinical cases in small groups, and (4) students took a post-session quiz and responded to a post-session survey to rate satisfaction of session content and delivery on a five-point Likert scale. One session was excluded due to small sample size (<i>n</i> = 2). Results from five workshops, including brachial plexus, musculoskeletal, pelvic, gastrointestinal, and head and neck anatomy, showed that students performed significantly (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) better on the post-session quizzes compared to pre-session quizzes in all sessions. Post-session survey results indicated that students were satisfied with session content and facilitation, would attend future workshops, and would use session materials to study for Step 1. Based on these short-term benefits of the sessions, we plan to continue offering monthly workshops to medical students to increase knowledge retention of key anatomical concepts and increase preparedness for clerkships and Step 1. Future studies will longitudinally follow up with students post-Step 1 and clerkships to determine the long-term benefits of offering these workshops.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669074/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142692256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}