Geoffroy P. J. C. Noel, Isabella Xiao, Maher Chaouachi, Alexandru Ilie, Jeremy O'Brien, Sean C. McWatt
Mixed reality (MR) offers a way to visualize and manipulate complex digital objects in three dimensions, which is particularly beneficial for human anatomy. However, implementing MR effectively requires a deep understanding of its effects on cognitive processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate cognitive markers of students' engagement and cognitive load while they used MR technology to overlay donor-specific diagnostic imaging onto the corresponding body donors in a fourth-year medical elective course. During two separate dissection sessions, each participant (n = 12) used the imaging on (1) a head-mounted Microsoft HoloLens and (2) an Apple iPad to examine the underlying anatomy of their body donor before beginning dissection. During each activity, participants wore portable five-lead electroencephalographic (EEG) devices to collect cognitive processing data. Separate indexes were calculated from those data to quantify engagement (engagement index; EI) and cognitive load (theta-alpha ratio; TAR), which were compared between HoloLens and iPad usage. Mean EI calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (0.499 ± 0.038) was significantly higher than the mean EI while using an iPad (0.297 ± 0.037; p = 0.002). Conversely, the mean TAR calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (1.508 ± 0.047) was significantly lower than that collected while using an iPad (1.813 ± 0.071; p = 0.012). These results indicate that the use of HoloLens to superimpose radiographic images onto a human body donor during dissection is significantly more engaging and requires less cognitive effort than the same task on an iPad.
{"title":"Engagement and cognitive load of upper-year medical trainees during mixed reality–enhanced dissection","authors":"Geoffroy P. J. C. Noel, Isabella Xiao, Maher Chaouachi, Alexandru Ilie, Jeremy O'Brien, Sean C. McWatt","doi":"10.1002/ase.70126","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.70126","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mixed reality (MR) offers a way to visualize and manipulate complex digital objects in three dimensions, which is particularly beneficial for human anatomy. However, implementing MR effectively requires a deep understanding of its effects on cognitive processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate cognitive markers of students' engagement and cognitive load while they used MR technology to overlay donor-specific diagnostic imaging onto the corresponding body donors in a fourth-year medical elective course. During two separate dissection sessions, each participant (<i>n</i> = 12) used the imaging on (1) a head-mounted Microsoft HoloLens and (2) an Apple iPad to examine the underlying anatomy of their body donor before beginning dissection. During each activity, participants wore portable five-lead electroencephalographic (EEG) devices to collect cognitive processing data. Separate indexes were calculated from those data to quantify engagement (engagement index; EI) and cognitive load (theta-alpha ratio; TAR), which were compared between HoloLens and iPad usage. Mean EI calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (0.499 ± 0.038) was significantly higher than the mean EI while using an iPad (0.297 ± 0.037; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Conversely, the mean TAR calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (1.508 ± 0.047) was significantly lower than that collected while using an iPad (1.813 ± 0.071; <i>p</i> = 0.012). These results indicate that the use of HoloLens to superimpose radiographic images onto a human body donor during dissection is significantly more engaging and requires less cognitive effort than the same task on an iPad.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 11","pages":"1278-1288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.70126","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145278483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Athan Jia Jun Hong, Joel Heng Yi Tan, Jun Wen Tan, Dimpy Gupta, Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali
Plastinates have been gaining popularity as alternatives to standard formalin-fixed donated human bodies in anatomy education; however, their role in facilitating the learning of important emotional and professional lessons has remained understudied. This report explores the emotional and professional impact of medical students' initial engagement with plastinates following a novel, multimodal intervention. A four-phase framework, including a structured lesson, pledge, discussion, and reflective practice, underpins the intervention, which was delivered prior to the first anatomy lesson. It involved an overview of the anatomy program, an introduction to the history of anatomy, and an introduction to the human plastinates (whole bodies, body parts, and organs). Students then took the Anatomy Pledge, a commitment to learning with integrity and treating the donors with respect. Then follows a structured, team-based discussion exploring the ethical implications of body donation, humanistic attitudes, and initial experiences of viewing plastinates. After the learning session, 185 students out of 187 submitted personal reflections generated using Driscoll's model of reflection framework. Initially, 25 reflections were randomly selected for inductive thematic analysis. A two-reflection stopping criterion was set where, if no new themes were found after two reflections, no more were analyzed. Saturation was reached after analyzing 27 reflections. Five overarching themes were discovered relating to students' insights on Navigating Faith, Culture and Ethics, Humanistic Learning in Anatomy Education, Personal Growth, Professional Development, and Reflections on Plastinates. Findings demonstrate the potential value of a multimodal intervention centered around plastinates for fostering professional development and generating personal reflection in medical students.
{"title":"Uncovering the benefits of a multimodal intervention centered around plastinates in initial anatomy education via thematic analysis of personal reflections of medical students","authors":"Athan Jia Jun Hong, Joel Heng Yi Tan, Jun Wen Tan, Dimpy Gupta, Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali","doi":"10.1002/ase.70128","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ase.70128","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plastinates have been gaining popularity as alternatives to standard formalin-fixed donated human bodies in anatomy education; however, their role in facilitating the learning of important emotional and professional lessons has remained understudied. This report explores the emotional and professional impact of medical students' initial engagement with plastinates following a novel, multimodal intervention. A four-phase framework, including a structured lesson, pledge, discussion, and reflective practice, underpins the intervention, which was delivered prior to the first anatomy lesson. It involved an overview of the anatomy program, an introduction to the history of anatomy, and an introduction to the human plastinates (whole bodies, body parts, and organs). Students then took the Anatomy Pledge, a commitment to learning with integrity and treating the donors with respect. Then follows a structured, team-based discussion exploring the ethical implications of body donation, humanistic attitudes, and initial experiences of viewing plastinates. After the learning session, 185 students out of 187 submitted personal reflections generated using Driscoll's model of reflection framework. Initially, 25 reflections were randomly selected for inductive thematic analysis. A two-reflection stopping criterion was set where, if no new themes were found after two reflections, no more were analyzed. Saturation was reached after analyzing 27 reflections. Five overarching themes were discovered relating to students' insights on Navigating Faith, Culture and Ethics, Humanistic Learning in Anatomy Education, Personal Growth, Professional Development, and Reflections on Plastinates. Findings demonstrate the potential value of a multimodal intervention centered around plastinates for fostering professional development and generating personal reflection in medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"109-118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145278465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}