Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-08-07DOI: 10.1177/21925682251367379
Rachana Mehta, Ranjana Sah
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding \"Normative Relationships Between Spinopelvic Alignment and Femoroacetabular Orientation: A Cross-Sectional Study\".","authors":"Rachana Mehta, Ranjana Sah","doi":"10.1177/21925682251367379","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251367379","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1349-1350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331634/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1177/21925682251374671
Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo investigate the risk factors and clinical impact of progression of thoracic kyphosis (PTK) in who underwent lower thoracic fusion for lumbar flatback deformity (LFBD).MethodsThe study included 170 patients (mean age 70.2 years; 90.6% female) who underwent fusion from the lower thoracic spine (T9 or T10) for LFBD with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. PTK was defined as a final thoracic kyphosis (TK) ≥ 40° and ΔTK ≥10°. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for PTK. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine predictive cutoff values.ResultsPTK developed in 55 patients (32.4%) during a mean follow-up of 35.8 months. Patients with PTK exhibited significantly higher final TK (48.2° vs 27.3°), worse sagittal alignment, and lower clinical outcome scores compared to those without PTK. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative TK (odds ratio [OR] = 1.120, P = 0.007) and age (OR = 1.094; P = 0.041) as independent risk factors for PTK. ROC analysis determined a preoperative TK cutoff value of 10.0° (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.834) and an age cutoff of 69.5 years (AUC = 0.661).ConclusionsIn this study, PTK developed in 32.4% of patients following fusion to the lower thoracic spine for LFBD. Advanced age (>70 years) and high baseline TK (>10°) were significant risk factors for PTK. Extending fusion to a more cephalad thoracic spine should be considered for patients at high risk of PTK development.
{"title":"Progression of Thoracic Kyphosis After Lower Thoracic Fusion in Lumbar Flatback Deformity: Analysis of Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences.","authors":"Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee","doi":"10.1177/21925682251374671","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251374671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo investigate the risk factors and clinical impact of progression of thoracic kyphosis (PTK) in who underwent lower thoracic fusion for lumbar flatback deformity (LFBD).MethodsThe study included 170 patients (mean age 70.2 years; 90.6% female) who underwent fusion from the lower thoracic spine (T9 or T10) for LFBD with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. PTK was defined as a final thoracic kyphosis (TK) ≥ 40° and ΔTK ≥10°. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for PTK. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine predictive cutoff values.ResultsPTK developed in 55 patients (32.4%) during a mean follow-up of 35.8 months. Patients with PTK exhibited significantly higher final TK (48.2° vs 27.3°), worse sagittal alignment, and lower clinical outcome scores compared to those without PTK. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative TK (odds ratio [OR] = 1.120, <i>P</i> = 0.007) and age (OR = 1.094; <i>P</i> = 0.041) as independent risk factors for PTK. ROC analysis determined a preoperative TK cutoff value of 10.0° (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.834) and an age cutoff of 69.5 years (AUC = 0.661).ConclusionsIn this study, PTK developed in 32.4% of patients following fusion to the lower thoracic spine for LFBD. Advanced age (>70 years) and high baseline TK (>10°) were significant risk factors for PTK. Extending fusion to a more cephalad thoracic spine should be considered for patients at high risk of PTK development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1145-1155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397085/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144951349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1177/21925682251379024
Chong Sun, Shuwen Cao, Yang Gao, Quanfa Wang, Mingzheng Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Jirong Wang, Kai Zheng
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesUnilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in elderly patients. Cement leakage is the most common complication and may cause serious consequences. Although various techniques have been proposed to reduce leakage, few studies have addressed cases with preexisting anterior vertebral wall defects. This study aims to evaluate whether intraoperative sealing of these defects with gelatin sponge strips pre-soaked in bone cement can reduce leakage and improve surgical outcomes.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 patients who underwent unilateral single-level PKP for thoracolumbar OVCF from December 2021 to October 2024. All patients had preoperative cortical defects in the anterior vertebral wall and were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 43) received conventional PKP, while Group B (n = 43) underwent PKP with defect sealing using pre-soaked gelatin sponge strips. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at 3 months, and at 12 months.ResultsBoth groups achieved favorable outcomes without severe complications. Cement leakage at the anterior vertebral wall was significantly lower in Group B than in Group A (P = 0.007). Group B also demonstrated better cement diffusion (P = 0.013) and a higher cement injection volume (P = 0.022).ConclusionsIn elderly patients with thoracolumbar OVCF and anterior vertebral cortical defects, unilateral puncture PKP combined with bone cement-soaked gelatin sponge strips effectively reduces anterior vertebral wall cement leakage and improves cement distribution, which may contribute to better procedural safety and stability.
{"title":"The Role of Pre-soaked Bone Cement Gelatin Sponge Strips in Sealing Anterior Vertebral Wall Defects During Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures in the Elderly: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Chong Sun, Shuwen Cao, Yang Gao, Quanfa Wang, Mingzheng Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Jirong Wang, Kai Zheng","doi":"10.1177/21925682251379024","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251379024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesUnilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in elderly patients. Cement leakage is the most common complication and may cause serious consequences. Although various techniques have been proposed to reduce leakage, few studies have addressed cases with preexisting anterior vertebral wall defects. This study aims to evaluate whether intraoperative sealing of these defects with gelatin sponge strips pre-soaked in bone cement can reduce leakage and improve surgical outcomes.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 patients who underwent unilateral single-level PKP for thoracolumbar OVCF from December 2021 to October 2024. All patients had preoperative cortical defects in the anterior vertebral wall and were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 43) received conventional PKP, while Group B (n = 43) underwent PKP with defect sealing using pre-soaked gelatin sponge strips. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at 3 months, and at 12 months.ResultsBoth groups achieved favorable outcomes without severe complications. Cement leakage at the anterior vertebral wall was significantly lower in Group B than in Group A (<i>P</i> = 0.007). Group B also demonstrated better cement diffusion (<i>P</i> = 0.013) and a higher cement injection volume (<i>P</i> = 0.022).ConclusionsIn elderly patients with thoracolumbar OVCF and anterior vertebral cortical defects, unilateral puncture PKP combined with bone cement-soaked gelatin sponge strips effectively reduces anterior vertebral wall cement leakage and improves cement distribution, which may contribute to better procedural safety and stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1248-1258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420642/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145029531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1177/21925682251390518
Matthew N Bartels
{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor CLBP RCT-GSJ-25-1283.","authors":"Matthew N Bartels","doi":"10.1177/21925682251390518","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251390518","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1380-1381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12549601/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145345002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-27DOI: 10.1177/21925682251383891
Hanjun Ma, Ju Liao, Qi Wei, Changwei Lu
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding \"Increased Risk of Lumbar Fusion Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis\".","authors":"Hanjun Ma, Ju Liao, Qi Wei, Changwei Lu","doi":"10.1177/21925682251383891","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251383891","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1371-1372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476365/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145174728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1177/21925682251371602
Peng Du, Minghui Liang, Ruiyuan Chen, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Shuo Yuan, Aobo Wang, Ziqian Ma, Yu Xi, Lei Zang
Study DesignRetrospective Study.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy of pedicle Hounsfield unit (HU) values and pedicle bone quality (PBQ) scores in predicting pedicle screw loosening (PSL) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in elderly patients and to identify the most discriminative bone mineral density (BMD) assessment indicator.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 275 consecutive patients who underwent PLIF. L1 and pedicle HU values were obtained from CT scans, whereas vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and PBQ scores were obtained from MRI. Logistic regression analysis determined factors associated with PSL. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of pedicle HU and PBQ score for PSL and to additionally compare their predictive value with that of L1 HU value and VBQ score.ResultsThe PSL rate was 20.36% (56/275). The loosening group demonstrated a higher postoperative low-back pain visual analog scale score (P < 0.05), lower L1 (P < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (P < 0.001) and higher VBQ (P < 0.001) and PBQ scores (P < 0.001) than the non-loosening group. The logistic regression analysis identified L1 (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99, P < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-0.99, P < 0.001) and VBQ (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.43-5.52, P = 0.003) and PBQ scores (OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.03-7.32, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of PSL. The area under the curve for L1 and pedicle HU values and VBQ and PBQ scores were 0.751, 0.766, 0.684, and 0.702, respectively. The optimal pedicle HU cut-off for predicting PSL was 106.32 (sensitivity: 78.49%; specificity: 75.00%).ConclusionsPedicle HU values exhibited a relatively higher predictive performance for PSL compared with the PBQ score and served as the most discriminative BMD indicator in patients who underwent PLIF. Measuring the pedicle HU value preoperatively help surgeons to select a more appropriate surgical plan and is expected to improve the patient outcomes.
研究设计:回顾性研究。目的比较椎弓根Hounsfield单位(HU)值和椎弓根骨质量(PBQ)评分对老年患者后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)后椎弓根螺钉松动(PSL)的预测效果,并确定最具鉴别性的骨密度(BMD)评价指标。方法回顾性分析275例连续行PLIF的患者。L1和椎弓根HU值通过CT扫描获得,而椎体骨质量(VBQ)和PBQ评分通过MRI获得。Logistic回归分析确定与PSL相关的因素。采用受体-操作特征曲线分析,评价椎弓根HU和PBQ评分对PSL的预测价值,并与L1 HU值和VBQ评分的预测价值进行比较。结果PSL发生率为20.36%(56/275)。松动组术后腰痛视觉模拟量表评分(P < 0.05)、L1 (P < 0.001)和椎弓根HU值(P < 0.001)较低,VBQ (P < 0.001)和PBQ评分(P < 0.001)较未松动组高。logistic回归分析确定L1 (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99, P < 0.001)、椎弓根HU值(OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-0.99, P < 0.001)、VBQ (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.43-5.52, P = 0.003)和PBQ评分(OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.03-7.32, P < 0.001)为PSL的独立预测因子。L1和椎弓根的HU值和VBQ、PBQ评分曲线下面积分别为0.751、0.766、0.684、0.702。预测PSL的最佳椎弓根HU截止值为106.32(敏感性:78.49%,特异性:75.00%)。结论与PBQ评分相比,spedicle HU值对PSL具有较高的预测能力,是PLIF患者最具鉴别性的BMD指标。术前测量椎弓根HU值有助于外科医生选择更合适的手术方案,有望改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Comparison of the Predictive Roles of CT- and MRI-Based Pedicle Regional Osteoporosis Status Measurements for Pedicle Screw Loosening After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"Peng Du, Minghui Liang, Ruiyuan Chen, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Shuo Yuan, Aobo Wang, Ziqian Ma, Yu Xi, Lei Zang","doi":"10.1177/21925682251371602","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251371602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Study.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy of pedicle Hounsfield unit (HU) values and pedicle bone quality (PBQ) scores in predicting pedicle screw loosening (PSL) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in elderly patients and to identify the most discriminative bone mineral density (BMD) assessment indicator.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 275 consecutive patients who underwent PLIF. L<sub>1</sub> and pedicle HU values were obtained from CT scans, whereas vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and PBQ scores were obtained from MRI. Logistic regression analysis determined factors associated with PSL. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of pedicle HU and PBQ score for PSL and to additionally compare their predictive value with that of L<sub>1</sub> HU value and VBQ score.ResultsThe PSL rate was 20.36% (56/275). The loosening group demonstrated a higher postoperative low-back pain visual analog scale score (<i>P</i> < 0.05), lower L<sub>1</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher VBQ (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and PBQ scores (<i>P</i> < 0.001) than the non-loosening group. The logistic regression analysis identified L<sub>1</sub> (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and VBQ (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.43-5.52, <i>P</i> = 0.003) and PBQ scores (OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.03-7.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001) as independent predictors of PSL. The area under the curve for L<sub>1</sub> and pedicle HU values and VBQ and PBQ scores were 0.751, 0.766, 0.684, and 0.702, respectively. The optimal pedicle HU cut-off for predicting PSL was 106.32 (sensitivity: 78.49%; specificity: 75.00%).ConclusionsPedicle HU values exhibited a relatively higher predictive performance for PSL compared with the PBQ score and served as the most discriminative BMD indicator in patients who underwent PLIF. Measuring the pedicle HU value preoperatively help surgeons to select a more appropriate surgical plan and is expected to improve the patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1075-1084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397096/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144951377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-07DOI: 10.1177/21925682251379073
Jibran Mubashir
{"title":"Letter to the Editor, \"What is the Evidence Supporting Osteobiologic Use in Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?\"","authors":"Jibran Mubashir","doi":"10.1177/21925682251379073","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251379073","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145014925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1177/21925682251390524
Matthew N Bartels
{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor CLBP RCT-GSJ-25-1265.","authors":"Matthew N Bartels","doi":"10.1177/21925682251390524","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251390524","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12549590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1177/21925682251393979
Yabin Liu, Guowu Chen
{"title":"\"Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis by Spinal Cord Injury Level: A Population-Based Analysis\" by Alejandro Pando et al.","authors":"Yabin Liu, Guowu Chen","doi":"10.1177/21925682251393979","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682251393979","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1391-1392"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12672273/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}