首页 > 最新文献

Global Spine Journal最新文献

英文 中文
What if You Could Treat the Same Patient Again, Would You do the Exact Same Spine Surgery? A Multi-Surgeon Survey of Their Own Revisions 如果您可以再次治疗同一个病人,您会做完全相同的脊柱手术吗?多位外科医生对其自身修改情况的调查
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241286445
Connor Sheehan, Ayman Mohamed, Frank Schwab, Douglas Burton, David Okonkwo, Robert Eastlack, Han J. Kim, Eric Klineberg, KoJo Hamilton, Shay Bess, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Lafage
Study DesignCase-based survey.ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate what a group of surgeons learned from their own revisions, and what they would do differently today.MethodsA multi-center database of ASD surgical patients was queried to identify those with at least 2 surgical procedures performed by the same surgeon between 2009 and 2019. A clinical vignette was created for each case including demographics, a timeline of events, radiographs/measurements, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and surgical strategies used for the index and revision surgeries. The operative surgeon was then asked to fill out a five-question survey aimed at determining factors that contribute to operative decision-making and planning.Results86 patients were operated on by 6 participating surgeons for both index and revision ASD surgery. The revised patients had similar follow-up compared to the non-revised group ( P = 0.73), with the most common complications indicating a need for revision surgery being proximal junctional failure (42%) and pseudoarthrosis (28%). Surgeons reported that they would not change their surgical strategy in 52.3% of the cases. The leading cause for revision was hardware/instrumentation issues (24.4%). Learning points included rod-related choice (23.3%), level selection (19.8), PJF prophylactic strategy (15.1%), and sagittal alignment objective (11.6%).ConclusionsSurgeons saw opportunity in nearly half of the cases to improve outcomes by changing something in the original surgery. While 40% of the failures remained unexplained from the surgeons’ perspective, this study highlights the capacity for adopting changes in adult spinal deformity surgery and illuminates the reasoning behind certain surgical decisions.
研究设计基于病例的调查。研究目的:本研究旨在调查一组外科医生从他们自己的翻修手术中学到了什么,以及他们今天会采取什么不同的做法。方法:查询 ASD 手术患者的多中心数据库,以确定在 2009 年至 2019 年期间由同一外科医生实施过至少 2 次手术的患者。为每个病例创建了一个临床小故事,包括人口统计学、事件时间表、X光片/测量、患者报告的结果、并发症以及首次手术和翻修手术中使用的手术策略。然后要求手术外科医生填写一份由五个问题组成的调查表,旨在确定有助于手术决策和计划的因素。与非翻修组相比,翻修组患者的随访情况相似(P = 0.73),需要进行翻修手术的最常见并发症是近端连接失败(42%)和假关节(28%)。据外科医生报告,52.3%的病例不会改变手术策略。翻修的主要原因是硬件/器械问题(24.4%)。学习要点包括与杆相关的选择(23.3%)、水平选择(19.8%)、PJF预防策略(15.1%)和矢状对齐目标(11.6%)。结论外科医生在近一半的病例中看到了通过改变原始手术中的某些因素来改善结果的机会。虽然从外科医生的角度来看,40%的失败病例仍无法解释原因,但本研究强调了在成人脊柱畸形手术中采用改变的能力,并阐明了某些手术决定背后的原因。
{"title":"What if You Could Treat the Same Patient Again, Would You do the Exact Same Spine Surgery? A Multi-Surgeon Survey of Their Own Revisions","authors":"Connor Sheehan, Ayman Mohamed, Frank Schwab, Douglas Burton, David Okonkwo, Robert Eastlack, Han J. Kim, Eric Klineberg, KoJo Hamilton, Shay Bess, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Lafage","doi":"10.1177/21925682241286445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241286445","url":null,"abstract":"Study DesignCase-based survey.ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate what a group of surgeons learned from their own revisions, and what they would do differently today.MethodsA multi-center database of ASD surgical patients was queried to identify those with at least 2 surgical procedures performed by the same surgeon between 2009 and 2019. A clinical vignette was created for each case including demographics, a timeline of events, radiographs/measurements, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and surgical strategies used for the index and revision surgeries. The operative surgeon was then asked to fill out a five-question survey aimed at determining factors that contribute to operative decision-making and planning.Results86 patients were operated on by 6 participating surgeons for both index and revision ASD surgery. The revised patients had similar follow-up compared to the non-revised group ( P = 0.73), with the most common complications indicating a need for revision surgery being proximal junctional failure (42%) and pseudoarthrosis (28%). Surgeons reported that they would not change their surgical strategy in 52.3% of the cases. The leading cause for revision was hardware/instrumentation issues (24.4%). Learning points included rod-related choice (23.3%), level selection (19.8), PJF prophylactic strategy (15.1%), and sagittal alignment objective (11.6%).ConclusionsSurgeons saw opportunity in nearly half of the cases to improve outcomes by changing something in the original surgery. While 40% of the failures remained unexplained from the surgeons’ perspective, this study highlights the capacity for adopting changes in adult spinal deformity surgery and illuminates the reasoning behind certain surgical decisions.","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Waterpipe Smoking and Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Pilot Study 水烟与腰椎间盘退变:一项试点研究
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241286451
Hala Ishak, Tarek P. Sunna, Sara A. Assaf, Hanin Banna, Riad A. Khouzami, Zhi Wang, Ghazi Zaatari, Diana Rahme, Carine J. Sakr
Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate the association of waterpipe smoking with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD).MethodsThis is a retrospective chart review study. A total of 286 adults who underwent a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a tertiary medical center were included and divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 125) included non-smokers, group 2 (n = 80) smoked cigarettes only, and group 3 (n = 81) smoked waterpipe only. The intervertebral discs were graded using the Pfirmann disc degeneration grading system.ResultsThe study showed higher lumbar disc degeneration scores for waterpipe and cigarette smokers compared to non-smokers at all spinal levels. Specifically, post hoc analysis showed that there was a significant difference at L1-L2 between cigarette smokers and non-smokers ( P = 0.007) and between waterpipe smokers and non-smokers ( P = 0.013), and a significant difference at L3-L4 and L4-L5 between non-smokers and cigarettes smokers ( P < .001 and P = .029 respectively).ConclusionWaterpipe smoking is associated with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.
研究设计回顾性研究。方法这是一项回顾性病历审查研究。共有 286 名成年人在一家三级医疗中心接受了腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)检查,并被分为三组。第一组(n = 125)包括非吸烟者,第二组(n = 80)只吸烟,第三组(n = 81)只吸水烟。研究结果表明,与不吸烟者相比,水烟和香烟吸烟者在所有脊柱水平上的腰椎间盘退变评分都较高。具体而言,事后分析表明,在 L1-L2 段,香烟吸烟者与非吸烟者之间存在显著差异(P = 0.007),水烟吸烟者与非吸烟者之间存在显著差异(P = 0.013),在 L3-L4 和 L4-L5 段,非吸烟者与香烟吸烟者之间存在显著差异(分别为 P < .001 和 P = .029)。
{"title":"Waterpipe Smoking and Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Pilot Study","authors":"Hala Ishak, Tarek P. Sunna, Sara A. Assaf, Hanin Banna, Riad A. Khouzami, Zhi Wang, Ghazi Zaatari, Diana Rahme, Carine J. Sakr","doi":"10.1177/21925682241286451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241286451","url":null,"abstract":"Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate the association of waterpipe smoking with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD).MethodsThis is a retrospective chart review study. A total of 286 adults who underwent a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a tertiary medical center were included and divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 125) included non-smokers, group 2 (n = 80) smoked cigarettes only, and group 3 (n = 81) smoked waterpipe only. The intervertebral discs were graded using the Pfirmann disc degeneration grading system.ResultsThe study showed higher lumbar disc degeneration scores for waterpipe and cigarette smokers compared to non-smokers at all spinal levels. Specifically, post hoc analysis showed that there was a significant difference at L1-L2 between cigarette smokers and non-smokers ( P = 0.007) and between waterpipe smokers and non-smokers ( P = 0.013), and a significant difference at L3-L4 and L4-L5 between non-smokers and cigarettes smokers ( P &lt; .001 and P = .029 respectively).ConclusionWaterpipe smoking is associated with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion after Instrumented Spinal Fusion. 器械脊柱融合术后骶髂关节融合的风险因素。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241286458
Peter Z Du, Gurmit Singh, Spencer Smith, Travis Philipp, Jonathan Kark, Clifford Lin, Jung U Yoo

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: To identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion.

Methods: Patients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion.

Results: 549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; P < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; P < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.

研究设计回顾性队列研究:确定器械脊柱融合术后骶髂关节(SI)融合的风险因素:从PearlDiver BiscayneBay数据库中识别患者。确定了接受 1 级(CPT:22840)、3-6 椎节(22842)和 7+ 椎节脊柱融合术(22843 和 22844)的患者。根据患者在脊柱融合术后是否接受了 SI 关节融合术(27280 和 27279)将其分开。通过单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归来评估患者因素与 SI 关节融合术发生率之间的关系:结果:共发现了 549,625 名接受脊柱后路融合术的患者,其中 6068 人随后接受了 SI 关节融合术(1.1%)。与未来SI关节融合术相关的因素包括:女性、肥胖、纤维肌痛、糖尿病、吸烟、构造长度增加以及曾接受过SI关节注射。曾进行SI关节注射的几率比最高(OR:8.70;95% CI:8.25-9.16;P<0.001),其次是7+椎节(OR:2.17;95% CI:2.03-2.33;P<0.001)和3-6椎节融合(OR:1.49;95% CI:1.42-1.57;P<0.001):结论:预测后续 SI 关节融合需要的最高指标是之前的 SI 关节注射。我们还发现,较长的融合结构与未来 SI 关节融合的风险增加有关。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion after Instrumented Spinal Fusion.","authors":"Peter Z Du, Gurmit Singh, Spencer Smith, Travis Philipp, Jonathan Kark, Clifford Lin, Jung U Yoo","doi":"10.1177/21925682241286458","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682241286458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; <i>P</i> < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241286458"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559710/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142284334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the “Current” and “Theoretical” Roussouly Classification Systems in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) 致编辑的信:根据 "现行 "和 "理论 "Roussouly 分类系统得出的不同无症状人群的脊柱形态特征:多种族对齐规范研究 (MEANS)
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241280652
Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya, Praveen R. Iyer, Ajoy Prasad Shetty
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the “Current” and “Theoretical” Roussouly Classification Systems in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS)","authors":"Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya, Praveen R. Iyer, Ajoy Prasad Shetty","doi":"10.1177/21925682241280652","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241280652","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Atypical Hangman’s Fractures: An Institutional Study of 51 Patients With Atypical Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of C2 非典型刽子手骨折:对 51 名 C2 非典型创伤性脊椎滑脱症患者的机构研究
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241284559
Mina Botros, Aman Singh, Hashim Shaikh, Gabriel Ramirez, Robert W. Molinari, Varun Puvanesarajah
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesAtypical hangman’s fractures are associated with increased risk for neurologic injury due to involvement of the posterior cortex of the axis body. We present the largest single-center cohort of atypical hangman’s fractures with the goal of guiding treatment decisions and outcomes based on fracture classification.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with atypical hangman’s fractures treated at a single Level I trauma center between January 2010 and September 2023. 51 patients met inclusion criteria and demographic, treatment, and radiographic data were recorded and compared across the Type I and II fracture groups.ResultsFinal treatment modalities varied significantly between the groups ( P < 0.01), with hard cervical collar and invasive halo immobilization being the most prevalent treatments for fracture Types I and II respectively. One Type I fracture patient and four Type II fracture patients failed non-operative treatment, requiring surgery. Across both groups, posterior cervical fusion (73%) was the most common surgical approach. Median length of stay varied significantly between the two fracture groups (2.0 (1.0-7.0) vs 5.0 (3.0-8.0) days; P = 0.01). Irrespective of fracture type, longer hospital length of stay was associated with increased patient age (IRR = 1.02; P < 0.01), non-white race (IRR = 2.47; P = 0.01), injury caused by MVC (IRR = 1.93; P < 0.01), and the presence of non-spine orthopedic injuries (IRR = 1.72; P = 0.03).ConclusionsWhile atypical Type I hangman’s fractures may be managed effectively non-operatively with a hard cervical collar, atypical Type II fractures managed with a hard cervical collar are at greater risk of requiring subsequent surgical intervention.
研究设计回顾性队列研究.目的由于轴体后部皮质受累,非典型悬臂骨折与神经损伤风险增加有关。我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月期间在一家一级创伤中心接受治疗的所有非典型悬臂骨折患者进行了回顾性分析。51名患者符合纳入标准,记录了人口统计学、治疗和放射学数据,并在I型和II型骨折组之间进行了比较。结果各组之间的最终治疗方式差异显著(P < 0.01),硬颈圈和侵入性晕固定分别是I型和II型骨折最普遍的治疗方法。一名 I 型骨折患者和四名 II 型骨折患者非手术治疗失败,需要进行手术治疗。在两组患者中,颈椎后路融合术(73%)是最常见的手术方法。两组骨折患者的中位住院时间差异显著(2.0(1.0-7.0)天 vs 5.0(3.0-8.0)天;P = 0.01)。无论骨折类型如何,住院时间较长与患者年龄增加(IRR = 1.02; P <0.01)、非白人种族(IRR = 2.47; P = 0.01)、MVC 损伤(IRR = 1.93; P <0.01)和存在非脊柱骨科损伤(IRR = 1.结论虽然不典型的 I 型绞索骨折可以通过硬颈圈进行有效的非手术治疗,但通过硬颈圈治疗的不典型 II 型骨折需要后续手术干预的风险更大。
{"title":"Atypical Hangman’s Fractures: An Institutional Study of 51 Patients With Atypical Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of C2","authors":"Mina Botros, Aman Singh, Hashim Shaikh, Gabriel Ramirez, Robert W. Molinari, Varun Puvanesarajah","doi":"10.1177/21925682241284559","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241284559","url":null,"abstract":"Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesAtypical hangman’s fractures are associated with increased risk for neurologic injury due to involvement of the posterior cortex of the axis body. We present the largest single-center cohort of atypical hangman’s fractures with the goal of guiding treatment decisions and outcomes based on fracture classification.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with atypical hangman’s fractures treated at a single Level I trauma center between January 2010 and September 2023. 51 patients met inclusion criteria and demographic, treatment, and radiographic data were recorded and compared across the Type I and II fracture groups.ResultsFinal treatment modalities varied significantly between the groups ( P &lt; 0.01), with hard cervical collar and invasive halo immobilization being the most prevalent treatments for fracture Types I and II respectively. One Type I fracture patient and four Type II fracture patients failed non-operative treatment, requiring surgery. Across both groups, posterior cervical fusion (73%) was the most common surgical approach. Median length of stay varied significantly between the two fracture groups (2.0 (1.0-7.0) vs 5.0 (3.0-8.0) days; P = 0.01). Irrespective of fracture type, longer hospital length of stay was associated with increased patient age (IRR = 1.02; P &lt; 0.01), non-white race (IRR = 2.47; P = 0.01), injury caused by MVC (IRR = 1.93; P &lt; 0.01), and the presence of non-spine orthopedic injuries (IRR = 1.72; P = 0.03).ConclusionsWhile atypical Type I hangman’s fractures may be managed effectively non-operatively with a hard cervical collar, atypical Type II fractures managed with a hard cervical collar are at greater risk of requiring subsequent surgical intervention.","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"21925682241284559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A New Method for Scoliosis Screening Incorporating Deep Learning With Back Images 结合深度学习与背部图像的脊柱侧弯筛查新方法
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241282581
Le Zhang, Baoqing Pei, Shijia Zhang, Da Lu, Yangyang Xu, Xin Huang, Xueqing Wu
Study DesignRetrospective observational study.ObjectivesScoliosis is commonly observed in adolescents, with a world0wide prevalence of 0.5%. It is prone to be overlooked by parents during its early stages, as it often lacks overt characteristics. As a result, many individuals are not aware that they may have scoliosis until the symptoms become quite severe, significantly affecting the physical and mental well-being of patients. Traditional screening methods for scoliosis demand significant physician effort and require unnecessary radiography exposure; thus, implementing large-scale screening is challenging. The application of deep learning algorithms has the potential to reduce unnecessary radiation risks as well as the costs of scoliosis screening.MethodsThe data of 247 scoliosis patients observed between 2008 and 2021 were used for training. The dataset included frontal, lateral, and back upright images as well as X-ray images obtained during the same period. We proposed and validated deep learning algorithms for automated scoliosis screening using upright back images. The overall process involved the localization of the back region of interest (ROI), spinal region segmentation, and Cobb angle measurements.ResultsThe results indicated that the accuracy of the Cobb angle measurement was superior to that of the traditional human visual recognition method, providing a concise and convenient scoliosis screening capability without causing any harm to the human body.ConclusionsThe method was automated, accurate, concise, and convenient. It is potentially applicable to a wide range of screening methods for the detection of early scoliosis.
研究设计回顾性观察研究。研究目的脊柱侧弯症常见于青少年,全球发病率为 0.5%。由于脊柱侧弯症往往缺乏明显特征,因此在早期很容易被家长忽视。因此,许多人直到症状变得相当严重时才意识到自己可能患有脊柱侧弯症,严重影响了患者的身心健康。脊柱侧弯症的传统筛查方法需要医生花费大量精力,并需要不必要的放射线照射;因此,实施大规模筛查具有挑战性。深度学习算法的应用有可能降低不必要的辐射风险以及脊柱侧弯筛查的成本。数据集包括正面、侧面和背面直立图像以及同期获得的 X 光图像。我们提出并验证了利用直立背部图像自动筛查脊柱侧弯的深度学习算法。整个过程包括背部感兴趣区(ROI)定位、脊柱区域分割和 Cobb 角度测量。结果结果表明,Cobb 角度测量的准确性优于传统的人体视觉识别方法,提供了简洁方便的脊柱侧弯筛查能力,且不会对人体造成任何伤害。结论该方法具有自动化、准确、简洁、方便的特点,可广泛应用于早期脊柱侧弯的筛查。
{"title":"A New Method for Scoliosis Screening Incorporating Deep Learning With Back Images","authors":"Le Zhang, Baoqing Pei, Shijia Zhang, Da Lu, Yangyang Xu, Xin Huang, Xueqing Wu","doi":"10.1177/21925682241282581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241282581","url":null,"abstract":"Study DesignRetrospective observational study.ObjectivesScoliosis is commonly observed in adolescents, with a world0wide prevalence of 0.5%. It is prone to be overlooked by parents during its early stages, as it often lacks overt characteristics. As a result, many individuals are not aware that they may have scoliosis until the symptoms become quite severe, significantly affecting the physical and mental well-being of patients. Traditional screening methods for scoliosis demand significant physician effort and require unnecessary radiography exposure; thus, implementing large-scale screening is challenging. The application of deep learning algorithms has the potential to reduce unnecessary radiation risks as well as the costs of scoliosis screening.MethodsThe data of 247 scoliosis patients observed between 2008 and 2021 were used for training. The dataset included frontal, lateral, and back upright images as well as X-ray images obtained during the same period. We proposed and validated deep learning algorithms for automated scoliosis screening using upright back images. The overall process involved the localization of the back region of interest (ROI), spinal region segmentation, and Cobb angle measurements.ResultsThe results indicated that the accuracy of the Cobb angle measurement was superior to that of the traditional human visual recognition method, providing a concise and convenient scoliosis screening capability without causing any harm to the human body.ConclusionsThe method was automated, accurate, concise, and convenient. It is potentially applicable to a wide range of screening methods for the detection of early scoliosis.","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"206 1","pages":"21925682241282581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review. 脊柱骨盆固定术演变的历史视角及其对临床护理的影响叙事回顾。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241283726
Alexander von Glinski,Emre Yilmaz,Periklis Godolias,Lorin Benneker,F C Oner,Frank Kandziora,Gregory Schroeder,Klaus Schnake,Marcel Dvorak,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Sharkawi,Alexander Vaccaro,Richard Bransford,Thomas A Schildhauer,Jens R Chapman
STUDY DESIGNBroad narrative review.OBJECTIVESTo review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.METHODSA thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages.RESULTSThe sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons' preference.CONCLUSIONBy a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.
研究设计广泛的叙述性综述.Objectivesto review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.MethodSA就骶骨固定技术的历史演变及其各自的优缺点对同行评议的文献进行了全面的综述.Result骶骨交界处由于解剖学特异性和极高的生物力学力的共同作用,长期以来一直是一个难题。最初的融合方法受到许多材料和手术技术方面的限制,而现代的腰骶部融合方法主要是通过将髂骨纳入腰骶部融合术来实现腰骶部交界处的稳定。虽然 SPF 的适应症范围很广,但所选择的技术仍取决于个体病理和外科医生的偏好。
{"title":"Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review.","authors":"Alexander von Glinski,Emre Yilmaz,Periklis Godolias,Lorin Benneker,F C Oner,Frank Kandziora,Gregory Schroeder,Klaus Schnake,Marcel Dvorak,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Sharkawi,Alexander Vaccaro,Richard Bransford,Thomas A Schildhauer,Jens R Chapman","doi":"10.1177/21925682241283726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241283726","url":null,"abstract":"STUDY DESIGNBroad narrative review.OBJECTIVESTo review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.METHODSA thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages.RESULTSThe sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons' preference.CONCLUSIONBy a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"21925682241283726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142224097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to "Revision Extension of Fusion Surgery in Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Newly Designed Revision Rod - Comparative Matched Cohort Study Versus Implant-Replacement Surgery". 使用新设计的翻修杆进行胸腰椎融合手术的翻修扩展--与假体置换手术的匹配队列比较研究》的更正。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241278202
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Revision Extension of Fusion Surgery in Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Newly Designed Revision Rod - Comparative Matched Cohort Study Versus Implant-Replacement Surgery\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/21925682241278202","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682241278202","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241278202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571384/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Utility and Patient Compliance With Mobile Applications for Home-Based Rehabilitation Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. 经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术后居家康复移动应用的临床实用性和患者依从性。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241282278
Adam Cole, Matthew W Parry, Alex Tang, Frank Vazquez, Tan Chen

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Objectives: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) via open or minimally invasive (MI) techniques is commonly performed. Mobile applications for home-based therapy programs have grown in popularity. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between postoperative patients who were the most and least compliant in using the mobile-based rehabilitation programs, (2) compare PROMs between open vs MI-TLIF cohorts, and (3) quantify overall compliance rates of home-based rehabilitation programs.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. Patients were automatically enrolled in the rehabilitation program. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected. Patients were separated into two study groups. Compliance rate was calculated as the difference between the number of active participants at the preoperative phase and final follow-up.

Results: 220 patients were included. Average follow-up time was 23.2 months. No difference was found in the change in (∆) PROMIS scores (P = 0.261) or ∆ODI scores (P = 0.690) regardless of patient compliance. No difference was found in outcome scores between open vs MI-TLIF techniques stratified by download compliance (downloaded, DL+; did not download, DL-) and phone reminder compliance (set reminder, R+; did not set reminder, R-) postoperatively. Both cohorts demonstrated clinical improvement exceeding minimal clinically important difference at final follow-up. Overall patient compliance was 71% at final postoperative follow up.

Conclusion: Despite high long-term compliance and rising popularity, mobile applications for home-based postoperative rehabilitation programs have low clinical utility in patients undergoing TLIF.

研究设计回顾性病历审查:通过开放或微创(MI)技术进行经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术(TLIF)是常见的手术方式。用于家庭治疗项目的移动应用程序越来越受欢迎。本研究的目的是:(1) 比较使用移动康复项目依从性最高和最低的术后患者的患者报告结果指标(PROMs);(2) 比较开放式和微创式 TLIF 患者的 PROMs;(3) 量化家庭康复项目的总体依从率:方法: 对病历进行回顾性分析。患者自动加入康复计划。收集了患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分。患者被分为两个研究组。依从率按术前阶段积极参与者人数与最终随访人数之差计算。平均随访时间为 23.2 个月。无论患者依从性如何,PROMIS (∆) 评分(P = 0.261)或 ∆ODI 评分(P = 0.690)的变化均无差异。根据下载依从性(已下载,DL+;未下载,DL-)和电话提醒依从性(已设置提醒,R+;未设置提醒,R-)对术后开放式与 MI-TLIF 技术的结果评分进行分层,未发现两者之间存在差异。在最终随访中,两组患者的临床改善均超过了最小临床重要差异。术后最终随访时,患者的总体依从性为 71%:尽管长期依从性很高,而且越来越受欢迎,但在接受TLIF手术的患者中,基于家庭的术后康复计划移动应用的临床实用性较低。
{"title":"Clinical Utility and Patient Compliance With Mobile Applications for Home-Based Rehabilitation Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"Adam Cole, Matthew W Parry, Alex Tang, Frank Vazquez, Tan Chen","doi":"10.1177/21925682241282278","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682241282278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) via open or minimally invasive (MI) techniques is commonly performed. Mobile applications for home-based therapy programs have grown in popularity. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between postoperative patients who were the most and least compliant in using the mobile-based rehabilitation programs, (2) compare PROMs between open vs MI-TLIF cohorts, and (3) quantify overall compliance rates of home-based rehabilitation programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed. Patients were automatically enrolled in the rehabilitation program. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected. Patients were separated into two study groups. Compliance rate was calculated as the difference between the number of active participants at the preoperative phase and final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>220 patients were included. Average follow-up time was 23.2 months. No difference was found in the change in (∆) PROMIS scores (<i>P</i> = 0.261) or ∆ODI scores (<i>P</i> = 0.690) regardless of patient compliance. No difference was found in outcome scores between open vs MI-TLIF techniques stratified by download compliance (downloaded, DL+; did not download, DL-) and phone reminder compliance (set reminder, R+; did not set reminder, R-) postoperatively. Both cohorts demonstrated clinical improvement exceeding minimal clinically important difference at final follow-up. Overall patient compliance was 71% at final postoperative follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite high long-term compliance and rising popularity, mobile applications for home-based postoperative rehabilitation programs have low clinical utility in patients undergoing TLIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241282278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572109/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis on the Occurrence of Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fragility Fractures at Different Ages. 弥漫性特发性骨质增生症对不同年龄段胸腰椎脆性骨折发生率的影响
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241283197
Yinbo Wu, Qin Ye, Dong He, Yuguo Wei, Yaling Pan, Yajie Wang

Study design: Retrospective Case control Study.

Objectives: To analyze the effect of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) on the occurrence of new thoracolumbar vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) at different ages.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 564 patients, including 189 patients who presented with new-onset thoracolumbar VFFs and 375 patients without spinal fractures, was performed in 4 age groups (50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80+ years). DISH was diagnosed based on computed tomography findings, and the Mata score of each disc space level combined with the maximum number of consecutive ossified segments (MNCOS) for each patient was recorded. Data were compared between the fracture and control groups, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for each of the 4 age groups using logistic regression.

Results: Both the crude ORs and the adjusted ORs of DISH for VFFs decreased with age, with statistical significance shown in the 50-59 years group (crude OR = 4.373, P = 0.017; adjusted OR = 7.111, P = 0.009) and the 80+ years group (crude OR = 0.462, P = 0.018; adjusted OR = 0.495, P = 0.045). The Mata scores and the MNCOS were significant risk factors for VFFs (P < 0.05) in the 50-59 years group, but they were protective factors in the 80+ years group, which was more significant in the T11/12-L5/S1 subsegment.

Conclusions: The effect of DISH on the occurrence of thoracolumbar VFFs is complex, and in patients above 50 years, it changes from a risk factor to a protective factor with increasing age.

研究设计回顾性病例对照研究:分析弥漫性特发性骨骼增生症(DISH)对不同年龄段新发胸腰椎椎体脆性骨折(VFF)的影响.方法:对564名患者进行了回顾性分析,其中包括189名新发胸腰椎椎体脆性骨折患者和375名未发生脊柱骨折的患者,共分为4个年龄组(50-59岁、60-69岁、70-79岁和80岁以上)。根据计算机断层扫描结果诊断 DISH,并记录每位患者每个椎间盘间隙水平的 Mata 评分和最大连续骨化节段数 (MNCOS)。对骨折组和对照组的数据进行了比较,并利用逻辑回归法计算了4个年龄组的几率比(ORs):结果:DISH 的粗略 ORs 和调整 ORs 均随年龄的增长而下降,50-59 岁组(粗略 OR = 4.373,P = 0.017;调整 OR = 7.111,P = 0.009)和 80 岁以上组(粗略 OR = 0.462,P = 0.018;调整 OR = 0.495,P = 0.045)具有统计学意义。在50-59岁组中,Mata评分和MNCOS是VFFs的显著风险因素(P < 0.05),但在80岁以上组中,它们是保护因素,这在T11/12-L5/S1亚段中更为显著:结论:DISH 对胸腰椎 VFFs 发生的影响是复杂的,在 50 岁以上的患者中,随着年龄的增长,DISH 会从风险因素变为保护因素。
{"title":"Effect of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis on the Occurrence of Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fragility Fractures at Different Ages.","authors":"Yinbo Wu, Qin Ye, Dong He, Yuguo Wei, Yaling Pan, Yajie Wang","doi":"10.1177/21925682241283197","DOIUrl":"10.1177/21925682241283197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Case control Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effect of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) on the occurrence of new thoracolumbar vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) at different ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 564 patients, including 189 patients who presented with new-onset thoracolumbar VFFs and 375 patients without spinal fractures, was performed in 4 age groups (50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80+ years). DISH was diagnosed based on computed tomography findings, and the Mata score of each disc space level combined with the maximum number of consecutive ossified segments (MNCOS) for each patient was recorded. Data were compared between the fracture and control groups, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for each of the 4 age groups using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the crude ORs and the adjusted ORs of DISH for VFFs decreased with age, with statistical significance shown in the 50-59 years group (crude OR = 4.373, <i>P =</i> 0.017; adjusted OR = 7.111, <i>P =</i> 0.009) and the 80+ years group (crude OR = 0.462, <i>P =</i> 0.018; adjusted OR = 0.495, <i>P =</i> 0.045). The Mata scores and the MNCOS were significant risk factors for VFFs (<i>P</i> < 0.05) in the 50-59 years group, but they were protective factors in the 80+ years group, which was more significant in the T11/12-L5/S1 subsegment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effect of DISH on the occurrence of thoracolumbar VFFs is complex, and in patients above 50 years, it changes from a risk factor to a protective factor with increasing age.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241283197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559949/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Global Spine Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1