Pub Date : 2026-03-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.053
Parash Pokharel, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
{"title":"Lumenless Defibrillation Lead for LBBAP: Promise for the Future?","authors":"Parash Pokharel, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147377142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.01.058
Federico Migliore, Raimondo Pittorru
{"title":"The Era of Lumenless Defibrillation Leads in Conduction System Pacing: Looking Beyond Implant Success to Lead Extraction.","authors":"Federico Migliore, Raimondo Pittorru","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.01.058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.01.058","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147377096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.049
Nicholas Palmeri, Sarah Neilsen, Jordan Leyton-Mange, Parin Patel, Linda Justice, Allyson Varley, Yaariv Khaykin, Mouhannad Sadek, Saumil R Oza, Michael Hoskins, Benjamin D'Souza, Mohammad-Ali Jazayeri, Susan M Bezenek, Gustavo Morales, Anil Rajendra, Adam Berman, Sandeep Govindan Nair, Joshua Silverstein, Paul Zei, Jose Osorio, Daniel Alyesh
Background: Strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) ablation remain limited.
Objective: This study aimed to determine optimal PsAF ablation strategies.
Methods: REAL-AF (NCT04088971) is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry enrolling patients undergoing de novo ablation for atrial fibrillation. Between January 2018 and August 2024, 746 patients with PsAF were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA); 3 ablation methods were analyzed: group 1, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only; group 2, PVI + substrate modification (SM) + vein of Marshall (VoM) by RFA; and group 3, PVI + SM + VoM by ethanol (EtOH).
Results: Of the overall 746 patients, 564 patients (75.6%) were treated with PVI only (group 1), 94 (12.6%) with PVI + SM + VoM RFA (group 2), and 88 (11.8%) with PVI + SM + VoM EtOH (group 3). Scar burden was higher in group 2 than groups 1 or 3 (20%, 1.0%, and 11%, respectively; P < .001). Procedure times were higher in group 3 (147 minutes; interquartile range 125.0-171.0) than groups 1 (81.0 minutes; 64.0-104.0) and 2 (90.5 minutes; 64.8-119.3). Acute complication rates were low in all groups, lowest in group 3 (0%; P = .438), and 12-month rates remained lowest in group 3 (2.3%; P = .896). Arrhythmia recurrence was reduced in group 3 through 12 months (15.3%) vs groups 1 (24.4%) and 2 (35.3%) (P = .023). Repeat ablations through 12 months trended lowest in group 3 (3.4%) vs groups 1 (5.3%) and 2 (6.4%) (P = .654).
Conclusion: VoM EtOH ablation for PsAF seems safe and efficacious as an adjunctive strategy for the treatment of PsAF. Findings are not based on cohort size, but on comparative effectiveness and safety across distinct ablation strategies in real-world practice.
{"title":"The impact of vein of Marshall alcohol or radiofrequency ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation in the REAL-AF registry.","authors":"Nicholas Palmeri, Sarah Neilsen, Jordan Leyton-Mange, Parin Patel, Linda Justice, Allyson Varley, Yaariv Khaykin, Mouhannad Sadek, Saumil R Oza, Michael Hoskins, Benjamin D'Souza, Mohammad-Ali Jazayeri, Susan M Bezenek, Gustavo Morales, Anil Rajendra, Adam Berman, Sandeep Govindan Nair, Joshua Silverstein, Paul Zei, Jose Osorio, Daniel Alyesh","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.049","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) ablation remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine optimal PsAF ablation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>REAL-AF (NCT04088971) is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry enrolling patients undergoing de novo ablation for atrial fibrillation. Between January 2018 and August 2024, 746 patients with PsAF were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA); 3 ablation methods were analyzed: group 1, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only; group 2, PVI + substrate modification (SM) + vein of Marshall (VoM) by RFA; and group 3, PVI + SM + VoM by ethanol (EtOH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the overall 746 patients, 564 patients (75.6%) were treated with PVI only (group 1), 94 (12.6%) with PVI + SM + VoM RFA (group 2), and 88 (11.8%) with PVI + SM + VoM EtOH (group 3). Scar burden was higher in group 2 than groups 1 or 3 (20%, 1.0%, and 11%, respectively; P < .001). Procedure times were higher in group 3 (147 minutes; interquartile range 125.0-171.0) than groups 1 (81.0 minutes; 64.0-104.0) and 2 (90.5 minutes; 64.8-119.3). Acute complication rates were low in all groups, lowest in group 3 (0%; P = .438), and 12-month rates remained lowest in group 3 (2.3%; P = .896). Arrhythmia recurrence was reduced in group 3 through 12 months (15.3%) vs groups 1 (24.4%) and 2 (35.3%) (P = .023). Repeat ablations through 12 months trended lowest in group 3 (3.4%) vs groups 1 (5.3%) and 2 (6.4%) (P = .654).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VoM EtOH ablation for PsAF seems safe and efficacious as an adjunctive strategy for the treatment of PsAF. Findings are not based on cohort size, but on comparative effectiveness and safety across distinct ablation strategies in real-world practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147372556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.045
Robert N D'Angelo, Yiran Rong, Rahul Khanna, Andrew Locke, Maximiliano Iglesias, Andre D'Avila, Peter J Zimetbaum
Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a widely used therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but limited research compares the effectiveness of CA with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in an elderly population.
Objective: This study aimed to compare AF recurrence and other clinical outcomes for CA with AADs in an elderly population with drug-refractory AF.
Methods: A large nationally representative sample of elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) was studied using the Optum Clinformatics database from 2016 to 2022. The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included direct current cardioversions, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, myocardial infarctions, ischemic strokes, and death. Propensity score matching was used to balance cohorts.
Results: 13,311 patients were identified, with 7230 in the AAD cohort and 6081 in the CA cohort. Patients who underwent CA were 24% less likely to experience recurrence compared with those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.89). The risk of direct current cardioversion (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60-0.91), HF hospitalization (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.90), and ischemic stroke (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.28-0.72) was significantly reduced, without differences in death or myocardial infarction. The rate of complications was 5.9% in the CA cohort, whereas adverse events were frequent in the AAD cohort (45.4%).
Conclusion: CA treatment was associated with a lower risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia, cardioversion, HF hospitalization, and ischemic stroke than AADs. AADs were poorly tolerated in this cohort, and complication rates from CA were similar to those of younger groups. Favorable safety and efficacy support consideration of CA in elderly patients.
{"title":"Antiarrhythmic drugs vs catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in an elderly population: A retrospective analysis of Medicare Advantage enrollees in the United States.","authors":"Robert N D'Angelo, Yiran Rong, Rahul Khanna, Andrew Locke, Maximiliano Iglesias, Andre D'Avila, Peter J Zimetbaum","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.045","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter ablation (CA) is a widely used therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but limited research compares the effectiveness of CA with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in an elderly population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare AF recurrence and other clinical outcomes for CA with AADs in an elderly population with drug-refractory AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large nationally representative sample of elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) was studied using the Optum Clinformatics database from 2016 to 2022. The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included direct current cardioversions, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, myocardial infarctions, ischemic strokes, and death. Propensity score matching was used to balance cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,311 patients were identified, with 7230 in the AAD cohort and 6081 in the CA cohort. Patients who underwent CA were 24% less likely to experience recurrence compared with those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.89). The risk of direct current cardioversion (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60-0.91), HF hospitalization (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.90), and ischemic stroke (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.28-0.72) was significantly reduced, without differences in death or myocardial infarction. The rate of complications was 5.9% in the CA cohort, whereas adverse events were frequent in the AAD cohort (45.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CA treatment was associated with a lower risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia, cardioversion, HF hospitalization, and ischemic stroke than AADs. AADs were poorly tolerated in this cohort, and complication rates from CA were similar to those of younger groups. Favorable safety and efficacy support consideration of CA in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147372494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.042
Ting-Chun Huang, Po-Hsueh Su, Hui-Wen Lin, Po-Tseng Lee, Yu Liao, Chao-Yu Chen, Li-Hao Yap, Sheng-Hsiang Lin, Yi-Heng Li
Background: Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are generally avoided in patients with coronary artery disease owing to concerns about their proarrhythmic potential. However, their impact on mortality and arrhythmic risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the safety of class Ic AADs compared with nonuse in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after PCI.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database included adults with NOAF after PCI. Participants were divided into class Ic users and nonusers. Outcomes evaluated included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, ventricular arrhythmia, and cerebrovascular events. Cox models and competing risk analyses estimated hazard ratios.
Results: Among 3750 patients (mean age 74.70; 69.33% male; CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.98), class Ic users showed significantly lower risks of MACEs (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [asHR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.68; P < .01), all-cause mortality (asHR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.66; P < .01), and cerebrovascular events (asHR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66-0.99; P = .04). No increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia was observed (asHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.69-1.15; P = .37).
Conclusion: In patients with CCS who developed NOAF, the use of class Ic AADs was associated with significantly lower risks of MACEs, all-cause mortality, and cerebrovascular events and without an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia. These findings suggest that class Ic agents may be a safe and effective option for rhythm control in carefully selected patients with CCS.
背景:Ic类抗心律失常药物通常避免用于冠心病(CAD)患者,因为担心它们的促心律失常潜能。然而,它们对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者的死亡率和心律失常风险的影响尚不清楚。目的:评价Ic类抗心律失常药物在PCI术后新发房颤(NOAF)患者中应用与不应用的安全性。方法:采用台湾NHIRD进行回顾性队列研究,纳入pci术后NOAF的成人。参与者被分为第一类使用者和非使用者。评估的结果包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、全因死亡率、室性心律失常和脑血管事件。Cox模型和竞争风险分析估计了风险比。结果:在3750例患者中(平均年龄74.70岁,男性69.33%,CHA2DS2-VASc评分3.98),Ic级使用者的MACE (asHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.68; p < 0.01)、全因死亡率(aHR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.57-0.66; p < 0.01)和脑血管事件(asHR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99; p =0.04)的风险显著降低。未观察到室性心律失常风险增加(asHR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.15; p =0.37)。结论:在发生NOAF的CCS患者中,使用Ic类抗心律失常药物与主要不良心血管事件、全因死亡率、脑血管事件的风险显著降低相关,且未增加室性心律失常的风险。这些发现表明,对于精心挑选的CCS患者,Ic类药物可能是一种安全有效的心律控制选择。
{"title":"Class Ic antiarrhythmic therapy after PCI in new-onset atrial fibrillation: Safety and clinical outcomes from a nationwide cohort.","authors":"Ting-Chun Huang, Po-Hsueh Su, Hui-Wen Lin, Po-Tseng Lee, Yu Liao, Chao-Yu Chen, Li-Hao Yap, Sheng-Hsiang Lin, Yi-Heng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are generally avoided in patients with coronary artery disease owing to concerns about their proarrhythmic potential. However, their impact on mortality and arrhythmic risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the safety of class Ic AADs compared with nonuse in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database included adults with NOAF after PCI. Participants were divided into class Ic users and nonusers. Outcomes evaluated included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, ventricular arrhythmia, and cerebrovascular events. Cox models and competing risk analyses estimated hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3750 patients (mean age 74.70; 69.33% male; CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score 3.98), class Ic users showed significantly lower risks of MACEs (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [asHR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.68; P < .01), all-cause mortality (asHR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.66; P < .01), and cerebrovascular events (asHR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66-0.99; P = .04). No increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia was observed (asHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.69-1.15; P = .37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with CCS who developed NOAF, the use of class Ic AADs was associated with significantly lower risks of MACEs, all-cause mortality, and cerebrovascular events and without an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia. These findings suggest that class Ic agents may be a safe and effective option for rhythm control in carefully selected patients with CCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147372523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.051
Allan Plant, Geoffroy Ditac, Philipp Krisai, Nicolas Johner, Kinan Kneizeh, Laurens Verhaeghe, Francesco Notaristefano, John Fitzgerald, Konstantinos Vlachos, Benjamin Sacristan, Jan Charton, Kevin Gardey, Francis Bessiere, Pierre Bordachar, Marc Strik, Sylvain Ploux, Clement Boiteux, Anand Thiyagarajah, Romain Tixier, Josselin Duchateau, Mélèze Hocini, Frederic Sacher, Michel Haïssaguerre, Pierre Jaïs, Thomas Pambrun, Nicolas Derval
Background: Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion (VOMEI) has benefit in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and perimitral atrial flutter, while coronary sinus ablation (CS RFA) improves mitral isthmus (MI) block. Atrial arrhythmias frequently coexist with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, for which cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) may be indicated OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of VOMEI±CS RFA in patients with CRT METHOD: Coding data was used to identify consecutive patients with CRT who underwent VOMEI±CS RFA at two centres. Controls without CRT who underwent contemporaneous VOMEI±CS RFA provided comparison. Clinical and procedural characteristics as well as recurrence within 12 months were recorded for all patients. Lead parameters were compared pre- and post-ablation in patients with CRT, and any lead dysfunction over 43±21months follow up recorded RESULTS: VOMEI was feasible in 94% (94% CRT vs 97% control, P=0.92), and CS RFA in 89% (84% vs 93%, P=0.71). Complications occurred in 5% (6% vs 3%, P=0.54), precluding successful VOMEI without causing patient morbidity. No difference in the need for alternative fluoroscopic projections, balloon-occlusion venography, or MI block achievement was seen. No significant change in LV lead parameters was observed, and only one case of lead dysfunction was seen (phrenic capture, 2%). Arrhythmia recurrence within one year was 42% vs 24% CONCLUSION: VOMEI and CS RFA is feasible and safe in patients with LV leads. Complications are uncommon and preclude VOMEI without causing patient morbidity when they occur, and the risk of clinically significant lead dysfunction is low.
背景:静脉马歇尔乙醇输注(VOMEI)对持续性心房颤动(AF)和围膜心房扑动患者有益,而冠状动脉窦消融(CS RFA)可改善二尖瓣峡(MI)阻滞。目的:评价VOMEI±CS RFA在CRT患者中的安全性、可行性和结果。方法:使用编码数据识别两个中心连续接受VOMEI±CS RFA的CRT患者。没有CRT的对照组同时进行VOMEI±CS RFA进行比较。记录所有患者的临床和手术特点以及12个月内的复发情况。结果:VOMEI在94% (94% CRT vs 97%对照,P=0.92)中可行,CS RFA在89% (84% vs 93%, P=0.71)中可行。并发症发生率为5% (6% vs 3%, P=0.54),排除了未引起患者发病的VOMEI成功。在替代透视投影、球囊闭塞静脉造影术或心肌梗塞实现方面的需求没有差异。左室导联参数未见明显变化,仅出现1例铅功能障碍(膈膜捕获,2%)。结论:VOMEI和CS RFA在左室导联患者中是可行和安全的。并发症不常见,并且在发生VOMEI时不会导致患者发病,并且临床显着的铅功能障碍的风险很低。
{"title":"Adjunctive Ablation at the Mitral Isthmus in Patients with Left Ventricular Pacing Leads: A Retrospective Multicentre Analysis of Safety and Feasibility.","authors":"Allan Plant, Geoffroy Ditac, Philipp Krisai, Nicolas Johner, Kinan Kneizeh, Laurens Verhaeghe, Francesco Notaristefano, John Fitzgerald, Konstantinos Vlachos, Benjamin Sacristan, Jan Charton, Kevin Gardey, Francis Bessiere, Pierre Bordachar, Marc Strik, Sylvain Ploux, Clement Boiteux, Anand Thiyagarajah, Romain Tixier, Josselin Duchateau, Mélèze Hocini, Frederic Sacher, Michel Haïssaguerre, Pierre Jaïs, Thomas Pambrun, Nicolas Derval","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion (VOMEI) has benefit in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and perimitral atrial flutter, while coronary sinus ablation (CS RFA) improves mitral isthmus (MI) block. Atrial arrhythmias frequently coexist with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, for which cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) may be indicated OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of VOMEI±CS RFA in patients with CRT METHOD: Coding data was used to identify consecutive patients with CRT who underwent VOMEI±CS RFA at two centres. Controls without CRT who underwent contemporaneous VOMEI±CS RFA provided comparison. Clinical and procedural characteristics as well as recurrence within 12 months were recorded for all patients. Lead parameters were compared pre- and post-ablation in patients with CRT, and any lead dysfunction over 43±21months follow up recorded RESULTS: VOMEI was feasible in 94% (94% CRT vs 97% control, P=0.92), and CS RFA in 89% (84% vs 93%, P=0.71). Complications occurred in 5% (6% vs 3%, P=0.54), precluding successful VOMEI without causing patient morbidity. No difference in the need for alternative fluoroscopic projections, balloon-occlusion venography, or MI block achievement was seen. No significant change in LV lead parameters was observed, and only one case of lead dysfunction was seen (phrenic capture, 2%). Arrhythmia recurrence within one year was 42% vs 24% CONCLUSION: VOMEI and CS RFA is feasible and safe in patients with LV leads. Complications are uncommon and preclude VOMEI without causing patient morbidity when they occur, and the risk of clinically significant lead dysfunction is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147372532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.11.038
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Development and validation of a new disease-specific quality-of-life measure for atrial fibrillation derived from patient perspectives: The Atrial Fibrillation Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (AF-PROMs) Questionnaire,\" Heart Rhythm, Volume 22, Issue 8, P1922-1934, August 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.11.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.11.038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147354749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.001
Moshe Giladi, Aviv Solomon, Dana Viskin, Raphael Rosso, Chris van der Werf, Soesja Pinto, Arthur A Wilde, Reem Elbassel, Louise Henriques, J Martijn Bos, Michael J Ackerman, Sami Viskin, Ehud Chorin
Background: In the long QT syndrome, longer QT intervals indicate increased arrhythmic risk, and a QTc ≥500 msec denotes high risk. Establishing similar associations in the short QT syndrome (SQTS) remains elusive.
Objective: To demonstrate that shorter QT intervals denote a higher risk of malignant arrhythmias in the SQTS and to define the "high-risk" QTc value in the SQTS.
Methods: Pooled analysis of patients treated in our institutions or reported in the literature revealed 162 SQTS patients and known symptomatic status; 57 (35.2%) of them had arrhythmic symptoms (sudden death, cardiac arrest, or malignant syncope).
Results: There was a significant inverse association between the QTc and arrhythmic symptoms [with a median QTc of 315.0 (IQR 300.5 - 338.0) msec among symptomatic patients, vs 330.0 (IQR 312.5 - 355.0) msec among asymptomatic patients, p=0.0023]. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that shorter QTc values were associated with higher risk (AUC = 0.64 ±0.04, p=0.0024). When patients were grouped by QTc range, the majority of those with QTc ≤320 msec had malignant arrhythmic symptoms, whereas the reverse was true for QTc ≥320 msec. Male patients were overrepresented in the SQTS cohort and more so in the subgroup with malignant symptoms.
Conclusion: This pooled analysis of patients with SQTS demonstrates that, among patients with congenital SQTS, a shorter QTc is associated with a higher risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. A QTc shorter than 320 msec correlates with higher arrhythmic risk. Males appear to be at higher risk.
{"title":"Risk Stratification in the Short-QT Syndrome: Findings From a Pooled Analysis.","authors":"Moshe Giladi, Aviv Solomon, Dana Viskin, Raphael Rosso, Chris van der Werf, Soesja Pinto, Arthur A Wilde, Reem Elbassel, Louise Henriques, J Martijn Bos, Michael J Ackerman, Sami Viskin, Ehud Chorin","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the long QT syndrome, longer QT intervals indicate increased arrhythmic risk, and a QTc ≥500 msec denotes high risk. Establishing similar associations in the short QT syndrome (SQTS) remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate that shorter QT intervals denote a higher risk of malignant arrhythmias in the SQTS and to define the \"high-risk\" QTc value in the SQTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pooled analysis of patients treated in our institutions or reported in the literature revealed 162 SQTS patients and known symptomatic status; 57 (35.2%) of them had arrhythmic symptoms (sudden death, cardiac arrest, or malignant syncope).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant inverse association between the QTc and arrhythmic symptoms [with a median QTc of 315.0 (IQR 300.5 - 338.0) msec among symptomatic patients, vs 330.0 (IQR 312.5 - 355.0) msec among asymptomatic patients, p=0.0023]. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that shorter QTc values were associated with higher risk (AUC = 0.64 ±0.04, p=0.0024). When patients were grouped by QTc range, the majority of those with QTc ≤320 msec had malignant arrhythmic symptoms, whereas the reverse was true for QTc ≥320 msec. Male patients were overrepresented in the SQTS cohort and more so in the subgroup with malignant symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pooled analysis of patients with SQTS demonstrates that, among patients with congenital SQTS, a shorter QTc is associated with a higher risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. A QTc shorter than 320 msec correlates with higher arrhythmic risk. Males appear to be at higher risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147372565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.043
Aviram Hochstadt, Ilan Merdler, Lior Jankelson
{"title":"Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs and structural heart disease-Time for a randomized controlled study?","authors":"Aviram Hochstadt, Ilan Merdler, Lior Jankelson","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.043","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.043","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147372499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.052
Benjamin W Furman, Vardhmaan Jain, Neal K Bhatia, Mikhael El-Chami, Faisal M Merchant, Jingwen Huang
{"title":"Incidence of 180-day readmission in women with arrhythmias during pregnancy: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.","authors":"Benjamin W Furman, Vardhmaan Jain, Neal K Bhatia, Mikhael El-Chami, Faisal M Merchant, Jingwen Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.052","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.02.052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147372553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}