HIP International最新文献

Background: Objective and subjective outcomes in the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were assessed in this study, using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) as primary outcome. Pain, 3 objective performance-based tests, surgical time, blood loss and length of stay were assessed as secondary outcomes.

Methods: Patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled by shared decision making for the DAA (32 patients) or PA (26 patients). Baseline data were collected preoperatively and outcomes postoperatively at 2-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up.

Results: There is no significant difference (p < 0.05) between the DAA and PA on primary outcome (OHS). There was a main effect of time which indicated an increase of OHS over time independent of group (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: In the current study, no significant differences in postoperative functional outcome were found between DAA and PA in all follow-up moments.

Approximately 20% of patients sustaining a fragility femur fracture use an anticoagulant, and over 30% use an antiplatelet medication, both of which can result in surgical delay. Previously confined to fractures of the proximal femur, performance assessment, outcome and surgical delay is now assessed for all fractures of the femur in older patients, including those involving implants. This narrative review draws together all literature pertaining to anticoagulation and antiplatelet management in older patients with a fracture of the femur to address 5 key points: prevalence of anticoagulant and antiplatelet use; analysis of management protocols; collation of national guidelines; comparison of perioperative management; timing of surgery and perioperative outcomes.Our review found that the prevalence of fragility femur fracture patients taking anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication ranges from 20-40% and 25-35% respectively. More anticoagulated patients are taking direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin k antagonists with growing implications for variation in practice and delays to surgery.Several national guidelines exist although these are characterised by marked variation, there is little standardisation, and none are generalised across all fragility femur fractures.Expedited surgery within 36 hours of admission in patients taking an anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication is safe and has been demonstrated in fractures of the proximal femur across many small number studies although no such evidence exists in non-proximal femur fractures despite this population sharing similar characteristics. There is a need for all fractures of the femur in older people to be considered when researching and assessing performance in this population to prevent needless variation and delay.

Introduction: The inelasticity of ceramic bearings might affect primary stability and migration of implants in press-fit total hip arthroplasty (THA). This randomised controlled trial compares migration patterns of the uncemented Delta-TT cup and H-MAX S stem between ceramic and polyethylene liners, up to 5 years follow-up.

Methods: Patients receiving primary press-fit THA were randomly allocated to a ceramic (n = 28) or polyethylene (n = 25) liner. Migration was measured using model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at baseline and 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months postoperatively and compared between groups using mixed models statistical analysis. The focus of this study is on the 2- to 5-year migration of the Delta-TT cup and migration during complete follow-up of the H-MAX S stem up to 5-years.

Results: At 5-year follow-up, mean (95% CI) proximal cup translation was 0.56 (0.37-0.74) mm in ceramic and 0.58 (0.25-0.90) mm in polyethylene (p = 0.729). The mean change in adduction was 1.05° (0.27-1.82°) in ceramic and 0.78° (-0.16-1.71°) in polyethylene. Mixed modelling showed that all between-group effects were ⩽0.20 mm for translation and ⩽0.22° for rotation at 5 years postoperatively (p ⩾ 0.23). Mean cup migration between 2 and 5 years was limited (all parameters <0.17 mm and <0.30°). At 5-year follow-up, mean stem subsidence was 2.09 mm (0.89-3.29 mm) in ceramic and 2.55 (0.97-4.12) mm in polyethylene. The mean change in internal rotation was 3.69° (1.98-5.40°) in ceramic and 4.01° (2.20-5.81°) in polyethylene. Most stem migration occurred up to 1.5 months, stabilising afterwards. All between-group effects were ⩽0.75 mm for translations and ⩽1.41° for rotations (p ⩾ 0.26).

Conclusions: 5-year migration patterns of press-fit cups and stems were similar between ceramic and polyethylene liners. The Delta-TT cup and H-MAX S stem showed secondary stabilisation and remained stable up to 5 years in both groups, which is promising for long-term survival with both liner types.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03093038).

Purpose: Concerns remain with regards to safety of fast-track (FT) and especially outpatient procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and clinical outcomes of propensity-matched patients who received FT total hip arthroplasty (THA) in outpatient versus inpatient settings. The hypothesis was that 90-day postoperative complication rates of outpatient FT THA would not be higher than after inpatient FT THA.

Methods: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients who received FT THA at various rates of outpatient and inpatient surgery by 10 senior surgeons (10 centres). The decision between outpatient and inpatient surgery was made on a case-by-case basis depending on the surgeon and patient. All patients were followed until 90 days after surgery. Complications, readmissions and reoperations were collected, and their severity was assessed according to Clavien-Dindo. Patients completed Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at the latest follow-up.

Results: Compared to inpatient FT THA, patients scheduled for outpatient FT THA had no significant differences in 90-day postoperative complication rates (10.7% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.129). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in 90-day readmission rates and reoperation rates, in severity of postoperative complications, and in time of occurrence of postoperative complications.

Conclusions: There were no differences in rates of intraoperative complications, 90-day postoperative complications, readmissions, or reoperations between outpatient and inpatient FT THA. These findings may help hesitant surgeons to move towards outpatient THA pathways as there is no greater risk of early postoperative complications that could be more difficult to manage after discharge.

Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation with or without labral reconstruction is considered a hip preservation surgical treatment option for young, active patients. This study aims to report early outcomes for use of OCA and labrum allograft transplants for patients treated for symptomatic femoral head chondral damage and/or acetabular labrum deficiency after implementation of a comprehensive joint restoration approach.

Methods: 33 patients from a lifelong registry were included for analysis. Outcomes were compared for statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences based on graft preservation methodology (standard preservation [SP] vs. Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System [MOPS]), and based on surfaces treated (femoral head only, labrum only, or femoral head and labrum).

Results: Mean follow-up duration was 44.8 (range 12-95) months. Success was documented in 28 (84.8%) patients. For the SP cohort, successful outcomes were documented in 5 cases (50%), while all 23 MOPS cases (100%) were deemed successful at least 1 year after surgery. Hip preservation surgeries performed using MOPS grafts were associated with significantly (p = 0.001; OR = 47x) higher success rates, including significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs at 1 and 2 years after surgery. Revision was performed in 2 patients in the SP cohort and failure requiring total hip arthroplasty was documented in 3 SP patients. Mean time to revision or failure was 23.6 (range 4-43) months. The surfaces treated were significantly associated with failure when comparing patients undergoing a femoral head OCA with or without labral reconstruction to those undergoing labral reconstruction only (p = 0.03; OR = 8.3x).

Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic femoral head cartilage loss and/or irreparable acetabular labrum deficiency undergoing femoral head OCA transplantation and/or labral reconstruction with meniscus allografts using MOPS-preserved tissues experienced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function through at least 2 years after surgery.

Background: The Smith-Peterson approach and its modifications provide an extensive exposure and allow osteotomies through a single incision. However, the risk of complications increases when the quadrilateral surface, ischial and pubic osteotomy sites cannot be seen. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical characteristics, complications, and functional and radiological outcomes of patients with acetabular dysplasia who underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) through modified Stoppa approach and plate-screw fixation.

Methods: The study included 31 patients (41 hips) who had undergone PAO using a modified Stoppa approach. The characteristics of patients and the surgical procedure were described. The lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis roof angle were evaluated in the radiological outcome evaluation. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was used to evaluate functional outcome. Furthermore, complications were described.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 20.4 ± 9.0 years. Of the 31 patients, 21 underwent unilateral Bernese PAO and 10 underwent bilateral Bernese PAO. The mean follow-up period was 25.1 ± 8.8 months. Postoperatively, the mean mHHS improved significantly (68.8 ± 9.4 vs. 88.8 ± 10.0, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, the mean LCEA and Tönnis roof angle improved significantly (17.7 ± 6.0 vs. 42.2 ± 4.8, p < 0.001 for LCEA and 18.3 ± 5.5 vs. 8.0 ± 2.2, p < 0.001 for Tönnis roof angle). There was no significant correlation between preoperative to postoperative improvement in LCEA or Tönnis roof angle and improvement and mHHS (p > 0.005). 5 complications were identified: 1 transient sciatic nerve palsy, 1 external iliac vein injury, 1 infection, and 2 screw irritations of acetabulum.

Conclusions: Performing Bernese PAO through a modified Stoppa approach with plate-screw fixation results in acceptable complication rates, immediate early weight-bearing opportunity, and improved functional and radiological outcomes in patients with acetabular dysplasia.

Background: While often used, Hilgenreiner's line may not always be a reliable reference plane following triple innominate pelvic osteotomy or trauma to the triradiate cartilage. The inferior sacral-iliac line is a horizontal line connecting the sclerotic corners of the inferior sacral-iliac joints. This is a consistent landmark in the ossifying infant pelvis as well as the fully developed adult pelvis. The goal of this study was to determine if there is a difference in measurements between the inferior sacral-iliac line and Hilgenreiner's line in order to identify an alternative horizontal reference plane.

Methods: 3 reviewers (fellowship-trained paediatric orthopaedic surgeon, junior orthopaedic resident, senior orthopaedic resident) reviewed 100 paediatric non-osteotomized pelvises. The difference between Hilgenreiner's line and the inferior sacral-iliac line were measured and reported. Measurements were repeated a minimum of 48 hours apart, resulting in 600 comparisons between Hilgenreiner's line and the inferior sacral-iliac line. The standard error of measurement was calculated to assess the variation in measurements between each individual observer and the group as a whole.

Results: The mean standard error of measurement between Hilgenreiner's line and the inferior sacral-iliac line was 0.44° (95% CI, ± 0.86). Reviewers 1-3 demonstrated a mean standard error of measurement of 0.38, 0.28, and 0.35 (95% CI, ± 0.74, 0.55, and 0.86) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between reviewers (p > 0.05). Intra-observer reliability for reviewers 1, 2, and 3 was 0.64 (0.47-0.76), 0.75 (0.63-0.83), and 0.54 (0.32-0.69) respectively, with an inter-observer reliability of 0.42 (0.20-0.60) degrees.

Conclusions: In this proof-of-concept study, the inferior sacral-iliac line was found to be an appropriate alternative to Hilgenreiner's line that is easily identifiable for all levels of orthopaedic training. Future inferior sacral-iliac line studies should demonstrate the reliability of multiple acetabular measurements, both pre- and post-osteotomy.

Background: Constrained liners (CLs) have been used in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) with varying results. Relatively few studies have identified specific risk factors for failure. This study aimed to assess implant survivorship and complication rates, identify risk factors for constraint-related complications, and assess the effect of multiple factors present in a single case.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 101 rTHAs for various aseptic indications and as second-stage procedures for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) utilising 2 models of conventional single-articulation CLs. We excluded 8 cases in which the liners were removed early due to PJI and assessed the risk factors for constraint-related complications in the remaining 93 cases. The mean follow-up duration for complication-free cases was 6.5 years (range 4.7-10.5 years).

Results: The incidences of dislocation of a prosthetic head and loosening of the acetabular component were 19.8% and 5.0%, respectively. We also observed 8 cases where the locking ring of the liner was dislodged without dislocation (1 case required re-revision). The presence of factors related to impingement (cup retention, smaller internal diameter CLs, signs of probable impingement from the femoral side) was associated with higher rates of constraint-related complications. The presence of factors related to soft-tissue stabilisers did not increase the rate of complications. The simultaneous presence of multiple impingement-related risk factors resulted in worse outcomes.

Conclusions: CLs may be less effective for treating or preventing instability related to impingement. CLs should be used with caution or avoided when multiple impingement-related risk factors are present.

Introduction: Non-modular dual-mobility (DM) acetabular bearing constructs are becoming more popular due to their potential advantages for addressing range of motion (ROM) and stability. The objective of this post-market clinical study was to assess clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction, pain and function, survivorship, and component positioning, in patients ⩾2 years after primary THA using non-modular DM acetabular components.

Methods: This retrospective, multicentre study evaluated complications and functional outcomes in recipients of non-modular DM acetabular constructs at least 2 years post-THA. Our primary outcomes included the dislocation rate and mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (HOOS). Secondary outcomes included radiographic measurements, patient satisfaction, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and survivorship.

Results: 316 eligible patients enrolled in this study across 3 sites, including 168 men (53%) and 148 women (47%). The cohort averaged 5.37 years post-THA (range 2.2-10.1 years) at the study visit. The mean FJS, HHS, and HOOS were good to excellent, with values of 82.3, 90.7, and 92.0, respectively. Patient satisfaction averaged 4.68, between "Very Good" (4) and "Excellent" (5). Minimal radiolucent lines (RLL) surrounded the acetabulum. More RLL surrounded the femur, but most lines were less than 1 mm (4.7% of the study population). There were few adverse events (4 events, 1.3%). Three revisions were performed (0.9%), with one patient requiring removal of the acetabular cup.

Discussion: The high mid- to long-term survivorship and low to no dislocation and reoperation rates indicate this acetabular DM device is a viable option for THA patients. The patient metrics reflect satisfaction, alleviated pain, and restored function with a low risk of adverse outcomes.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess outcomes of using the push-through total femoral prothesis (PTTF) for revision total hip replacement with extreme bone loss.

Methods: 10 consecutive patients who received PTTF between 2012 and 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty were included in the study. Primary functional outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS), Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores. Range of motion, complications, and ambulatory status were also recorded to assess secondary outcomes.

Results: 2 of 10 patients underwent surgery with PTTF for both knee and hip arthroplasty revision. The mean time between index surgery and PTTF was 15 years (3-32 yrs). Acetabular components were revised in 6 of 10 patients during PTTF application. After a mean follow-up of 5.9 years, hip dislocations occurred in 3 patients. All of the dislocated hips were ones with retained conventional non-constrained acetabular bearings. Patient satisfaction was high (MSTS: 67%, HHS: 61.2%, TESS 64.6%) despite high re-operation rate (40%) and minor postoperative problems.

Conclusions: PTTF should be considered for hip and knee arthroplasty revision procedures in patients with an extreme bone defect. Consistent usage of constrained liners should be considered to avoid hip dislocation, which was our main problem following the procedure.