HIP International最新文献

Introduction: When operating in lateral decubitus apparent operative inclination (AOI) is the angle between the handle of the acetabular cup introducer and the theatre floor. A digital inclinometer has demonstrated optimal control of AOI. This study aims to compare the deviation from a target AOI with a novel autoclavable ball-in-cage mechanical alignment guide (MAG) as compared to a digital inclinometer.

Methods: 90 primary total hip arthroplasty cases performed in lateral decubitus using a posterior approach were included. The ball-in-cage mechanical alignment guide on a standard Pinnacle cup introducer handle was used to achieve the target AOI of 35° ± 2.5°. Final AOI was measured with a digital inclinometer. These readings were compared to a published historical series of 90 patients using a digital inclinometer.

Results: The ball-in-cage MAG mean inclination was 35.0° (range 32.5-37.4°), with 100% falling within target. This compared to a mean inclination of 34.0° (range 27.5-37.5°), with the digital inclinometer where 87.8% fell within target. However, the range of postoperative radiographic inclination for the ball-in-cage MAG was 23.4-53.9° with 31.1% being outside a ±5° target.

Conclusions: These results indicate that this simple autoclavable ball-in-cage MAG consistently achieves an intraoperative AOI within target range. In isolation this does not guarantee a postoperative radiographic inclination within target range.

Background: The incorporation of spinopelvic alignment measurement in the planning of primary hip arthroplasties is a simple and low-cost method whose isolated impact on reducing dislocation rates has not been clearly established.

Aim: The objective was to estimate the probability of dislocation and its occurrence rate by comparing 2 demographically similar populations, 1 with the measurement incorporated and the other without it. Additionally, the modification and distribution of surgical practices and indications aimed at reducing the risk of dislocations were compared.

Methods: A before-and-after study with prospective registry and retrospective control group was designed. We compared 693 patients (prospective registry) with the incorporation of spinopelvic alignment measurement in preoperative planning versus 341 from a previous period who constituted the control group (retrospective registry). All had a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Results: The dislocation rate significantly decreased from 3.2% to 0.7%, with an OR of 0.22 for dislocation in the intervention group. There was a significant increase in the use of dual-mobility components in patients with complete misalignment and stems with extended offset in patients with partial misalignment.

Conclusions: In conclusion, the incorporation of spinopelvic alignment measurement in preoperative planning is an accessible method for any medical centre that contributed to modifying surgical practices, ultimately leading to a significant reduction in the dislocation rate.

Background: Valgus osteotomy is a femoral head-preserving surgery to treat femoral neck non-union in young, active patients. The traditional approach, however, causes medialisation of the femoral shaft during valgus correction, which alters femoral anatomy and complicates conversion to total hip arthroplasty if head osteosynthesis fails. This study aims to outline a novel surgical technique, medial opening wedge valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy (VITO), and evaluate its clinical and radiographic outcomes, focusing on restoring hip biomechanics and improving union rates.

Methods: Between 2007 and 2022, this technique was used in 18 cases (mean age :39; range :16-51 years). There were 14 males and 4 females. In 10 cases,non-union was due to failed internal fixation, while in 8 cases, it was due to neglected fractures. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by assessing union, pre- and postoperative neck-shaft angle (NSA) correction, and functional outcomes by the Harris Hip Score (HHS).

Results: 16 out of 18 patients were available for follow-up. The average duration of non-union was 10.7 (range 1-60) months, and the mean follow-up was 64 (range 24-140) months. All achieved successful union, with an average neck shaft angle correction of 16°. 3 patients were converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to implant failure. Complications included 3 cases of avascular necrosis (AVN). Despite these complications, 62% of patients had excellent HHS, while 19% had good HHS. The mean HHS improved from 46(preoperative) to 92 (postoperative).

Conclusions: The medial opening wedge VITO is an effective technique for restoring hip biomechanics and achieving high union rates in patients with femoral neck non-union. This technique preserves proximal femoral anatomy, facilitating easier conversion to THA when necessary.

Introduction: Hip hemiarthroplasties are performed in medically frail and/or comorbid patients who sustain a displaced intracapsular hip fracture. Dislocations occur in approximately 0.6-5.0% patients and are associated with worse outcomes, including mortality when compared against a similar cohort of patients who do not suffer a dislocation of their hemiarthroplasty.This study aimed to quantify the outcomes from the management of dislocated hip hemiarthroplasties in a cohort of contemporaneously used implants and the associated 1-year mortality.

Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of 4116 consecutive patients treated with a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty, in which 63 dislocations were identified was performed.The outcomes of the management of each dislocation were quantified, including the number of dislocations sustained after a preceding successful closed reduction. 1-year mortality was ascertained and stratified for each treatment option.

Results: 63 patients with a dislocation of a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty performed for an intracapsular hip fracture were included. Closed reduction was unsuccessful in 72% of (31/43) patients who had a closed reduction of their first dislocation. Failure rates of a second closed reduction increased to 76.9% and 100.0% with a third closed reduction.1-year mortality rate after a dislocation was 46.0% for all patients and lowest in the cohort of patients who were treated with a revision arthroplasty (27.3%).

Conclusions: Closed reduction of dislocated hip hemiarthroplasty is associated with a high failure rate, especially after a second dislocation. Consideration should be made to perform a revision procedure after a second dislocation with a high suspicion for soft tissue repair failure and/or infection.

Introduction: Constrained acetabular liners (CALs) are predominantly used as a salvage procedure in patients with a severe risk for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the constrained design of CALs bears the risk of impingement with subsequent loosening or failure of the integrity of the implant. We investigated the use and survival of CALs in primary and revision THA in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).

Methods: Use of CAL in THAs was extracted from the LROI in the period 2007-2022. 423,773 primary THAs and 52,706 revision THAs have been registered, of which 29 CALs were implanted in primary THA and 236 CALs in revision THA. Patient characteristics and survival of the CAL placed in primary and revision THA were separately analysed.

Results: Of the CALs placed in primary THA, no revisions of the implant occurred during a median follow-up of 5.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-12.4). The CALs in revision THA were most frequently used for cases with recurrent dislocation (183/236). Median follow-up was 4.8 (IQR 2.3-8.2) years. The re-revision rate was 10% (95% CI, 6.6-14) at 5-year follow-up and 12% (CI, 8.1-17) at 9-year follow-up. The most frequently registered reason for re-revision was dislocation (n = 19, 70%).

Conclusions: In the Netherlands there is a relatively low use of CALs in primary as well as revision THA. The survival rate of CALs is acceptable, with recurrent dislocation as the main reason for re-revision. The use of CALs should be reserved for specific cases with high risk for dislocation.

Introduction: The unnecessary over-ordering of routine pre-transfusion tests (blood typing, screening, and cross-matching) for surgical cases results in substantial avoidable costs and imposes an undue burden on transfusion services. This study specifically focuses on conducting a systematic review of the literature to assess the necessity of routine pre-transfusion tests before total hip arthroplasty (THA) and aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the outcomes associated with this practice.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to analyse the study's characteristics, assess the prevalence of over-ordering, defined as ordering more routine pre-transfusion tests than clinically necessary, examine transfusion rates, and evaluate potential cost savings to the healthcare system.

Results: The study included 12,178 patients. Pooled results revealed an 88.1% over-ordering pre-transfusion test rate (95% CI, 0.80-0.96; p < 0.001) among patients undergoing primary THA. The pooled prevalence of hospital transfusion rate was 11.9%, with a percentage of intraoperative transfusion of 0.4% (95% CI, 0.001-0.007; p = 0.007). There were statistically significant differences in preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) levels between patients not requiring 14.1 g/dl (95% CI, 13.2-14.9; p < 0.001) and those needing transfusion 11.9 g/dl (95% CI, 10.9-12.9; p < 0.001) (p < 0.001). The per-patient total cost savings ranged from 2.10 to 191.27 dollars.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that routine pretransfusion testing for all patients undergoing primary THA may be unnecessary. We recommend restricting pre-transfusion test orders to patients with preoperative haemoglobin levels below 12 g/dl specifically in the context of unilateral primary THA, always considering individual patient and surgical risk factors. This focused approach has the potential to yield substantial cost savings for healthcare systems and transfusion services by mitigating the unnecessary over-ordering of pre-transfusion tests associated with these surgical procedures.

Background: Survival at 25 years' follow-up for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported at 5%-77%, with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating, due to its osteo-conductive properties, used to enhance implant fixation and survival. The progressive increase in life expectancy raises doubts regarding HA-coated THA survival and THA revision surgery risk. The aim of our study was to retrospectively analyse survival for primary uncemented fully HA-coated THA after 28 years' follow-up.

Methods: Our cohort survival study of the JRI Furlong HA-coated system retrospectively included patients aged 18-75 years who had undergone THA between 1992 and 1998 at our centre and who were followed up according to clinical records by orthopaedic surgeons to 2022. Data on THA revision surgery and its causes, follow-up, and death were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression modelling.

Results: The cohort included 196 patients (268 hips) followed up to a maximum of 27.5 years (mean 15.54 (SD 6.01) years) with 62 patients (88 hips) >25 years. THA revision surgery was performed in 7.5% of cases, occurring a mean of 11.1 years following primary surgery. Aseptic loosening accounted for 4.4% of these revisions, affecting both the acetabular component (2.2%) and the femoral stem (1.3%). THA survival at 15 years', 20 years', and 27.5 years' follow-up was 95.5%, 88.3%, and 79.3%, respectively. According to the log-rank and Cox regression analysis, no significant relationships were found.

Conclusions: Furlong HA-coated stem provides excellent long-term bone fixation for a long-term follow-up over 27.5 years with an aseptic loosening stem revision rate of 1.3%.

Introduction: A primary objective when performing a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is to restore hip biomechanics in accordance with a chosen surgical plan. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a 3D-printed patient-specific guide for delivering a planned femoral osteotomy for both a posterior and an anterior approach.

Methodology: 40 patients (20 anterior and 20 posterior) scheduled for THA received a preoperative work-up allowing for patient-specific implant sizing and positioning. Following surgeon confirmation, a patient-specific guide was designed and printed, enabling the desired osteotomy to be executed. Achieved osteotomies were assessed using commercially available software platforms. Planning accuracy was also assessed using both the planning platform as well as more traditional 2D-templating techniques.

Results: The mean deviation between the planned and achieved osteotomy level was -0.6 mm (range -4.1-6.4 mm). 95% of the achieved osteotomy levels were within 3 mm of the plan for both the posterior and anterior approach groups. 70% of the Optimized Positioning System (OPS) planned femoral components were the exact size as planned versus 25% of the 2D-planned components. 98% of the OPS planned femoral components were within 1 size of plan versus 58% for the 2D-planned components. No sizing accuracy difference was observed between planning approaches (p = 0.70).

Conclusions: A patient-specific osteotomy guide can be a simple and accurate method to reproduce a planned femoral neck resection through an anterior or posterior approach. Further, 3D planning appears to more accurately predict femoral sizing in THA than more conventional 2D methods.

Background: Different methods can help to optimise sagittal cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on individual spinopelvic characteristics. This study aimed to: (1) assess how often combined sagittal index (CSI) and hip-spine-classification targets were achieved post THA; (2) compare anteversion/inclination between cups in-/outside optimal CSI zone; and (3) determine association with outcome.

Methods: This is a multicentre, prospective, case-cohort study of 435 primary THA for osteoarthritis (53% females; age: 65 ± 12 years; follow-up: 2.4 ± 0.6 years) (58% lateral, 29% anterior, 13% posterior approach). No robotics or dual-mobility were used. Patients underwent spinopelvic radiographs to measure parameters including lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and ante-inclination (AI) on lateral spinopelvic radiographs. Unbalanced spine was defined as PI - LL ⩾ 10° (PI: pelvic incidence; LL: lumbar lordosis), stiffness as ∆LL < 20°. Optimal cup orientation was based on CSI targets: 205-245° for balanced spine (n = 327), or 215-235° for unbalanced spine (n = 108), hip-spine classification targets (±5°), and conventional inclination/anteversion (40/20° ± 10°) target. Patient-reported outcome was measured using Oxford Hip Score (OHS).

Results: CSI targets were achieved in 60% (n = 261/435), whilst 44% had cup position within hip-spine classification targets (n = 125/284). Anteversion was higher among cups within CSI targets (26° ± 8° vs. 22° ± 10°; p < 0.001). Overall dislocation rate was 0.9% (n = 4/435), without difference whether CSI targets were achieved (0.4% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.178). Postoperative OHS was better among those within CSI targets (42 ± 8 vs. 40 ± 9; p = 0.003) or within hip-spine-classification targets (p = 0.028), but not according to conventional orientation (p = 0.384).

Conclusions: Awareness of adverse spinopelvic characteristics and using sagittal characteristics (especially CSI) can help surgeons to achieve optimal cup orientation, improving outcome and reducing dislocation risk post-THA.

Introduction: The RM Pressfit vitamys is an uncemented, titanium particle-coated, isoelastic monoblock cup made of vitamin E blended highly cross-linked polyethylene. We addressed the following questions: (1) What are the clinical and (2) radiographic outcomes 10 years after implantation? (3) What is the revision rate?

Methods: In this prospective observational study in a tertiary care centre we investigated all consecutive cases of total hip replacement with the RM Pressfit vitamys cup between September 2009 and November 2011. It was implanted in 162 hips, 49.4% in women. The mean age was 67.2 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.5), and the mean BMI was 27.3 kg/m² (SD 4.7). In 153 cases (94.4%), primary or secondary osteoarthritis was the diagnosis. We evaluated preoperative and follow-up data at 6 weeks, 1, 5, and 10 years. A modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), pain and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS), radiographic evaluation, complications and revision rate were investigated.

Results: At the 10-year follow-up (mean 120.5 months, SD 1.4, range 118-126), 99 hips were available for clinical and radiographic evaluation. (1) The mean mHHS was 94.8 (SD 9.9), rest pain 0.2 (SD 0.6), load pain 0.5 (SD 1.5), and satisfaction 9.5 (SD 1.1). The mean improvement as compared to preoperatively was +33.7 (SD 16.8), -3.3 (SD 2.7), -6.0 (SD 2.4) and +5.7 (SD 2.5), respectively. (2) In the radiographic evaluation, no loose cups, no acetabular lucent lines, or acetabular osteolysis were seen. (3) 2 cups were revised, both due to malpositioning. The 10-year cumulative revision rate was 2.0% (95%CI, 0.0-4.2%). The implant survival rate with aseptic loosening as endpoint was 100%. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: At the 10-year follow-up, the RM Pressfit vitamys cup still had promising results with good clinical and radiographic outcomes and a low revision rate.