Background: The Hueter-Anterior Approach (HAA) with its limited soft tissue and internervous dissection has been shown to be an effective approach for primary total hip and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients requiring revision of HRA to total hip replacement using the HAA, assessing function and complications.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained research database. Between 2006 and 2015, 555 primary metal-on-metal (MoM) HRAs were performed via the HAA; we identified 33 hips in 30 patients that required revisions for aseptic causes to THA: aseptic loosening of acetabulum in 12 and femoral in 7, 10 for pseudotumour/ALTR, 4 for femoral neck fracture. All revision surgeries were performed through a HAA by a single surgeon who had also performed the index operation. PROMs were collected preoperatively and yearly at various timepoints postoperatively.
Results: The mean age at time of revision was 48.9 years (±5.3 SD) for 22 males (67%) and 11 females (33%). The mean time to revision surgery/failure of hip resurfacing was 3.3 years (±2.4 SD). There were 5 major reoperations with 3 infections, 1 acetabular loosening and 1 trunnionosis. There were significant improvements in multiple PROMs.
Conclusions: The HAA is a viable surgical approach for revision of HRA with smaller initial HRA acetabular components generally requiring a relatively larger acetabular compoent at time of revision. Patients reported improvement in symptoms and function and a lower risk of subsequent reoperation than what has previously been reported for failed MoM bearings.
Background: Operative treatment of acetabular fractures generally yields good results, but several authors report up to 15-20% of patients developing post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA). Previous studies have shown that total hip arthroplasty (THA) following post-traumatic OA have inferior results compared to THA for primary OA. The aim of this study was to report on long-term outcome of THA following acetabular fracture, compared to primary OA.
Materials and methods: We performed a matched cohort study with data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). All patients receiving THA following an acetabular fracture between 1987 and 2018 were identified. A 3:1 matched cohort consisting of patients treated for primary OA with THA was selected using propensity scores and matched for age, gender and year of surgery. Survival analysis was performed with revision of any cause as endpoint. Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with risk of revision surgery.
Results: 552 cases were identified, 397 men and 155 women. Mean age was 58.8 (11-91) years. 224 had previously been operated for the acetabular fracture, 328 had been treated non-operatively. Mean follow up time was 8.7 (1-29) years. Implant survival at 10 years was 79.7% (75.6-83.3) and at 20 years 62.4% (55.5-69.3). The hazard ratio for revision was 1.38 (1.07-1.77, p < 0.001) compared to the OA cohort, regardless of operative or non-operative treatment of the index acetabular fracture. Uncemented acetabular components had an increased risk of revision with hazard ratio for revision 1.61 (p = 0.012).
Conclusions: THA following an acetabular fracture can be performed with acceptable results regarding implant survival, however, we report an increased risk for revision when compared to primary OA. Our results indicate that previous operative fracture treatment does not increase the risk for THA revision compared to cases treated non-operatively.
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder of the gut. Few studies have evaluated whether patients with a history of IBD have worse outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether IBD is associated with increased: (1) medical complications; (2) readmissions; and (3) emergency department (ED) visits.
Methods: Using a nationwide claims database, patients with IBD undergoing primary THA were identified and matched to a comparison group according to age, sex and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Outcomes assessed included the development of 90-day medical complications, 90-day re-admissions and 90-day ED visit rates. A p-value <0.0001 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Patients with IBD had a greater incidence and odds ratio of total medical complications (31.90% vs. 11.47%; OR 2.89; p < 0.0001) compared with matched controls. IBD patients had significantly higher incidence and odds ratio of developing acute kidney injury (5.46 vs. 1.46%; OR 3.92; p < 0.0001), cerebrovascular accident (1.32 vs. 0.35%; OR 3.79; p < 0.0001), pneumonia (4.02 vs. 1.30%; OR 3.19; p < 0.0001), respiratory failure (1.21 vs. 0.41%; OR 2.94; p < 0.0001), deep vein thrombosis (0.89% vs. 0.30%; OR 2.93; p < 0.0001), and other adverse events. IBD patients also had higher incidence and odds ratio of 90-day re-admissions (4.20% vs. 3.23%; OR 1.31; p < 0.0001) and ED visits (6.56% vs. 3.99%; OR 1.69; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: This study found that patients with IBD are at increased risk of 90-day medical complications, re-admissions, and ED visits. Due to its systemic nature, surgeons operating on these patients should be aware of the disease's extra-intestinal manifestations, and the potential postoperative risks in IBD patients. Providers should use this investigation when educating patients on potential risks of elective THA.
Background: Multimodal analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly employed to reduce early postoperative pain and promote fast patient discharge. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tramadol/dexketoprofen (TRAM/DKP, Group A) versus paracetamol + tramadol (PARA+TRAM, Group B) in patients undergoing THA using minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA).
Methods: A single-centre, randomised, single-blind, parallel, interventional study conducted in 323 patients undergoing primary THA with DAA was performed. Group A consisted of 188 patients and Group B of 135. The primary endpoints were the change from baseline (measured 2 hours postoperatively) in pain intensity (PI) during the treatment period (48 hours), assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) at pre-specified postoperative time-points (2, 8, 24, 48 hours) and the total rescue medication (RM) use during the first 24 hours postoperatively.
Results: As early as 2 hours after baseline, Group A showed a greater PI reduction from baseline compared to Group B (-26.24% vs. -6.87%; p < 0.001). A lower mean PI (VAS) score was consistently found over the entire observation period following treatment with TRAM/DKP than with PARA+TRAM as well as more than 2-fold higher proportion of responders at the end of treatment period. More patients in Group B required RM in comparison to those in Group A (15.6% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusions: After THA, oral TRAM/DKP provides faster and greater pain relief when compared to intravenous PARA+TRAM with limited consumption of RM and favourable tolerability profile. Our study expands the use of TRAM/DKP in the setting of major orthopaedic surgeries.
Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04178109).
Background: The choice between cemented or uncemented stem fixation in the treatment of a femoral neck fracture may influence patient rehabilitation and the resulting gait pattern, due to potential differences in implant positioning and fixation. We used gait analysis to study temporal gait parameters, hip kinematics and kinetics in patients who, 2 years previously, had been randomised to treatment with a cemented or uncemented stem and due to an acute femoral neck fracture.
Methods: 45 Patients implanted with a cemented Lubinus SP II (n = 29) and an uncemented (n = 16) Corail stem were studied. Gait analysis was performed using a 16-camera motion capture system and force plates. 28 subjects served as controls. Temporal gait parameters, hip kinematics and kinetics were analysed. The patients had no or minimum pain (median Harris pain score 44, range 40-44) and the majority had no limp (median Harris limp score 11, range 5-11).
Results: Temporospatial gait parameters and abduction-adduction motions and moments did not differ between patients with cemented or uncemented stems (p > 0.05). Patients with cemented stems did, however, show more hip flexion and less extension during walking than those with an uncemented stem (p < 0.05). Moreover, the flexion-extension range was less in the cemented group (p < 0.04). Compared with controls, the hip fracture patients walked more slowly, with a shorter stride length and a longer stance phase.
Conclusions: Increased hip flexion and reduced extension in patients using the Lubinus SP II cemented stem could be an effect of its anteverted neck, but this question requires further study. Despite acute treatment with THA, hip fracture patients demonstrated a change in gait pattern compared with controls 2 years after the operation. This suggests that these changes are caused by the presence of an implant, or the soft-tissue trauma partly caused by the surgery than by any degenerative disease present in patients undergoing elective surgery.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04791605.
Introduction: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has known effects on bone health. No large database studies have looked at the effects of pelvic EBRT on total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 90-day and long-term (>2 years) complication rates following THA in patients with a history of pelvic malignancy and EBRT.
Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified using a national insurance claims database. Subjects who underwent THA for osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis were included if they had at least 2-year follow-up and were stratified into 3 cohorts: (1) prior pelvic malignancy diagnosis (prostate, cervical, uterine, ovarian, or rectal) and EBRT (Group A); (2) prior malignancy diagnosis but no EBRT (Group B); and (3) neither prior malignancy diagnosis nor EBRT (Group C). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate for an association between prior EBRT and the incidence of 90-day and 2-year complication rates using chi-square, student t-tests, and logistic regression analyses where appropriate.
Results: 671,554 patients met the inclusion criteria. Group A had higher odds of all-cause revision, septic revision, and loosening with revision after 2 years when compared to Group C and Group B (p < 0.001). Group A subjects had higher rates of 90-day deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, and stroke (p < 0.001) than groups B and C.
Conclusions: Prior EBRT for pelvic malignancy was associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause revision, septic revision, and loosening as well as 90-day medical complications.
Purpose: To determine whether synthetic grafts are a satisfactory treatment option for pathological proximal femoral fractures in children.
Methods: Paediatric patients treated for pathological fractures of the proximal femur between 2013 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. 17 patients with a mean age of 10.7 years (range 6-16 years) were assessed. The definitive histopathological diagnoses were SBC (simple bone cyst) (12) and ABC (aneurysmal bone cyst) (5). The median duration of follow-up was 37 months (range 12-70 months).
Results: All patients returned to their normal daily routine within 3-8 months following surgery. The mean post-op recovery time was 3.2 months (range 3-6 months). Graft was incorporated at approximately 12 months. No significant radiographic healing was observed in 2 patients. In the remaining 15 patients, the mean duration of healing was 14 months (range 8-24 months).
Conclusion: Synthetic grafts are a satisfactory treatment option for pathological proximal femoral fractures in children.
Aim: Preoperative identification of acetabular corrections that optimally improve joint stability and reduce elevated contact stresses could further reduce osteoarthritis progression in patients with hip dysplasia who are treated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of this study was to investigate how providing patient-specific, mechanically optimal acetabular reorientations to the surgeon during preoperative planning affected the surgically achieved correction.
Methods: Preoperative CT scans were used to create patient-specific hip models for 6 patients scheduled for PAO. A simulated acetabular fragment was extracted from the preoperative pelvis model and computationally rotated to simulate candidate acetabular reorientations. For each candidate, discrete element analysis was used to compute contact stresses during walking, which were summed over the gait cycle and scaled by patient age to obtain chronic contact stress-time exposure. The ideal patient-specific reorientation was identified using a cost function that balances minimising chronic stress exposures and achieving surgically acceptable acetabular coverage angles. The optimal reorientation angles and associated contact mechanics were provided to the surgeon preoperatively. After PAO was performed, a model of the surgically achieved correction was created from a postoperative CT scan. Radiographic coverage and contact mechanics were compared between preoperative, optimal, and surgically achieved orientations.
Results: While surgically achieved reorientations were not significantly different from optimal reorientations in radiographically measured lateral (p = 0.094) or anterior (p = 0.063) coverage, surgically achieved reorientations had significantly (p = 0.031) reduced total contact area compared to optimal reorientations. The difference in lateral coverage and peak chronic exposure between surgically achieved and optimal reorientations decreased with increasing surgeon experience using the models (R² = 0.758, R2 = 0.630, respectively).
Conclusions: Providing hip surgeons with a patient-specific, computationally optimal reorientation during preoperative planning may improve contact mechanics after PAO, which may help reduce osteoarthritis progression in patients with hip dysplasia.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：