British Journal of Surgery最新文献

Background: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), once the standard for pain management in major abdominal operations, is associated with postoperative complications, making preperitoneal continuous wound infiltration (CWI) a promising alternative. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CWI and TEA in managing postoperative pain after open pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods: In a single-centre, randomized, open-label non-inferiority trial, adult patients undergoing elective open pancreatoduodenectomy were assigned to either CWI or TEA for pain management. The primary outcomes were mean pain scores at rest on the first 3 postoperative days (PODs), using an 11-point numeric rating scale, with a non-inferiority margin of 1 point or less. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during coughing on PODs 1, 2, and 3; total opioid consumption; incidence of postoperative complications; quality of postoperative recovery; and duration of hospital stay.

Results: Among the 134 patients analysed (CWI 70, TEA 64), CWI was non-inferior to TEA in terms of mean pain scores at rest (mean difference -0.13, 95% c.i. -0.72 to 0.47). Additionally, CWI demonstrated superior pain relief at rest and higher-quality recovery scores on POD 3. Compared with CWI, TEA was associated with significantly decreased total opioid consumption and shortened time to the first passage of flatus, but a higher incidence of postoperative hypotension. No other outcome measures showed significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion: CWI was non-inferior to TEA during the early postoperative period, and has emerged as a favourable alternative to TEA, offering better pain relief and enhanced recovery on POD 3. Registration number: NCT04375826 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Background: Oesophago-gastric cancer surgery negatively affects quality of life with a high postoperative symptom burden. Several conditions that may be diagnosed and treated after surgery are recognised. However, consensus regarding their definition and management is lacking. This study aimed to develop consensus regarding the definition, investigation and management of the common symptoms and conditions, and triggers to consider disease recurrence, as a foundation for improving management and quality of life in these patients.

Method: Modified two-round Delphi consensus study of a multidisciplinary expert panel.

Results: Eighty-six of 127 (67.7%) and 77 of 93 (82.8%) responses were received in rounds 1 and 2. Consensus was achieved in defining 26 symptoms. For 10 conditions (anastomotic stricture, acid reflux, non-acid reflux, biliary gastritis, delayed gastric emptying, dumping syndrome, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, bile acid diarrhoea, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and carbohydrate malabsorption), definitions, diagnostic criteria, first- and second-line investigation and first-line treatments were agreed. Consensus was not reached for third-line investigation of some conditions, or for second-, third- or fourth-line treatments for others. Twelve of 14 (85.7%) symptoms were agreed as triggers to consider cancer recurrence, during the early (<1 year) and late (>1 year) postoperative periods.

Conclusion: Expert consensus regarding symptoms, conditions and triggers to consider investigation for recurrence after oesophago-gastric cancer surgery was achieved. This may allow standardization and timely diagnosis and treatment of postoperative conditions, reducing variation in care and optimizing patients' quality of life.

Background: Days at home after surgery is a promising new patient-centred outcome metric that measures time spent outside of healthcare institutions and mortality. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the use of days at home in perioperative research and evaluate how it has been termed, defined, and validated, with a view to inform future use.

Methods: The search was run on MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 30 March 2023 to capture all perioperative research where days at home or equivalent was measured. Days at home was defined as any outcome where time spent outside of hospitals and/or healthcare institutions was calculated.

Results: A total of 78 articles were included. Days at home has been increasingly used, with most studies published in 2022 (35, 45%). Days at home has been applied in multiple study design types, with varying terminology applied. There is variability in how days at home has been defined, with variation in measures of healthcare utilization incorporated across studies. Poor reporting was noted, with 14 studies (18%) not defining how days at home was operationalized and 18 studies (23%) not reporting how death was handled. Construct and criterion validity were demonstrated across seven validation studies in different surgical populations.

Conclusion: Days at home after surgery is a robust, flexible, and validated outcome measure that is being increasingly used as a patient-centred metric after surgery. With growing use, there is also growing variability in terms used, definitions applied, and reporting standards. This review summarizes these findings to work towards coordinating and standardizing the use of days at home after surgery as a patient-centred policy and research tool.

Background: A mural module (MN) within a branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) could be a potential target for local treatment. The main aim was to describe the location of the highest grade of dysplasia relative to the mural module to assess the relevance of local treatment.

Methods: Observational study of patients who underwent a pancreatic resection for suspected high-risk IPMN because of a mural module within a BD-IPMN (2012-2022). All patients had preoperative imaging confirming the enhancing mural module. The mural module was considered as a theoretical appropriate target for local destruction if no cancer or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) was described elsewhere than in the mural module.

Results: Eighty-two patients (male: 44 (54%); mean age: 65 ± 9.2 years) were included. The mean size of BD-IPMN containing the mural module was 32 ± 14.8 mm. The mural module mean diameter was 10.5 ± 5.6 mm, and the main pancreatic duct (MPD) mean diameter was 5.2 ± 3.6 mm. Six patients presented invasive carcinoma (7%), 37 had HGD (45%), and 39 (48%) had exclusively low-grade dysplasia. The mural module was dysplastic in 70 cases (85%). The mural module was considered a relevant target for local ablation in 45 patients (55%), whereas 37 patients (45%) had HGD/invasive carcinoma distant from the mural module. HGD was exclusively present in the mural module in 6/82 patients (7%). Factors independently associated with 'relevant indication for local treatment' were female gender (P = 0.004; OR = 5.2, 95% c.i. 1.7 to 15.9) and MPD < 5 mm (P < 0.0001; OR = 8.6, 95% c.i. 2.7 to 26.8).

Conclusion: In resected pancreata, BD-IPMN mural modules are associated with HGD distant from the mural module almost half of cases. The findings question the safety of local treatment, supporting pancreatectomy as the best approach.