首页 > 最新文献

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology最新文献

英文 中文
Quantitative characterization of eosinophilia in nasal polyps with AI-based single cell classification. 利用基于人工智能的单细胞分类对鼻息肉中的嗜酸性粒细胞进行定量表征。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23454
Martin Stampe, Ida Skovgaard Christiansen, Vibeke Backer, Kasper Aanæs, Anne-Sophie Homøe, Jens Tidemandsen, Emilie Neumann Nielsen, Sigrid Louise Hjorth Rasmussen, Rasmus Hartvig, Katalin Kiss, Thomas Hartvig Lindkær Jensen

Key points: Eosinophilic granulocytes have characteristic morphological features. This makes them prime candidates for utilization of a single cell binary classification network. Single cell binary classification networks can reliably help quantify eosinophils in nasal polyps.

要点嗜酸性粒细胞具有特征性的形态特征。这使它们成为利用单细胞二元分类网络的主要候选者。单细胞二元分类网络能可靠地帮助量化鼻息肉中的嗜酸性粒细胞。
{"title":"Quantitative characterization of eosinophilia in nasal polyps with AI-based single cell classification.","authors":"Martin Stampe, Ida Skovgaard Christiansen, Vibeke Backer, Kasper Aanæs, Anne-Sophie Homøe, Jens Tidemandsen, Emilie Neumann Nielsen, Sigrid Louise Hjorth Rasmussen, Rasmus Hartvig, Katalin Kiss, Thomas Hartvig Lindkær Jensen","doi":"10.1002/alr.23454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23454","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Key points: </strong>Eosinophilic granulocytes have characteristic morphological features. This makes them prime candidates for utilization of a single cell binary classification network. Single cell binary classification networks can reliably help quantify eosinophils in nasal polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142286257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to correspondence regarding the article “The relationship between survey-based subjective olfactory awareness and objective olfactory function” 关于 "基于调查的主观嗅觉意识与客观嗅觉功能之间的关系 "一文的信件回复。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23457
Aurelia S. Monk BA, Shreyas Pyati BS, Meredith Lamb DO, Nicholas Melott MS, Ezer H. Benaim MD, Christopher Wiesen PhD, Cristine Klatt-Cromwell MD, Brian D. Thorp MD, Charles S. Ebert Jr. MD, Adam J. Kimple MD, PhD, Brent A. Senior MD
{"title":"Reply to correspondence regarding the article “The relationship between survey-based subjective olfactory awareness and objective olfactory function”","authors":"Aurelia S. Monk BA,&nbsp;Shreyas Pyati BS,&nbsp;Meredith Lamb DO,&nbsp;Nicholas Melott MS,&nbsp;Ezer H. Benaim MD,&nbsp;Christopher Wiesen PhD,&nbsp;Cristine Klatt-Cromwell MD,&nbsp;Brian D. Thorp MD,&nbsp;Charles S. Ebert Jr. MD,&nbsp;Adam J. Kimple MD, PhD,&nbsp;Brent A. Senior MD","doi":"10.1002/alr.23457","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alr.23457","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142286258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rheumatic adverse events associated with biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis 与慢性鼻炎生物疗法相关的风湿不良事件:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23453
Jenny B. Xiao HBSc, MSc, Helen Hsiao BSc, Carlos Khalil MD, John M. Lee MD, FRCSC, MSc

Background

Biologic therapies approved for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have well-established safety profiles but reports of rheumatic adverse events (AEs) are increasing and not well defined. This review aims to assess the risk and incidence of rheumatic AEs associated with biologic therapy in CRSwNP and summarize current reported management strategies.

Methods

A protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]. A search was conducted in four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until January 4, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Data were pooled using a random effects model to calculate overall incidence and relative risk.

Results

Twenty-one studies met the final inclusion criteria, totaling 3434 patients of which 2763 (80%) received either dupilumab (n = 2257; 82%), mepolizumab (n = 372; 13%), or omalizumab (n = 134; 5%) for treatment of CRSwNP. The overall incidence rate for any on-treatment rheumatic AE was 0.05 per person–year (95% CI, 0.03–0.09, I= 75%). Biologic therapy increased the risk of developing a rheumatic AE (RR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.29–4.94) compared with placebo. The most frequently reported rheumatic AE was arthralgia or joint pain (n = 94; 95%), followed by lupus-like syndrome or lupus erythematosus-like reaction (n = 2; 2.5%). Discontinuation of treatment was the most common intervention (n = 21, 39%).

Conclusion

Biologic therapy increases the risk of rheumatic AEs in CRSwNP patients by over twofold. Healthcare providers should remain vigilant in monitoring rheumatic AEs and apply appropriate management strategies on a case-by-case basis.

背景:已获批用于治疗慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的生物疗法具有良好的安全性,但有关风湿性不良事件(AEs)的报道却在不断增加,且定义不清。本综述旨在评估与CRSwNP生物疗法相关的风湿性不良反应的风险和发生率,并总结目前报道的管理策略:方法:在 PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]上注册了一项研究方案。在四个电子数据库中进行了检索:Medline (Ovid)、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane CENTRAL。两名审稿人独立筛选引文并提取数据。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的关键评估工具对方法学质量进行评估。采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总,计算总体发病率和相对风险:21项研究符合最终纳入标准,共纳入了3434名患者,其中2763人(80%)接受了杜匹单抗(n = 2257; 82%)、甲波利珠单抗(n = 372; 13%)或奥马珠单抗(n = 134; 5%)治疗CRSwNP。任何治疗中风湿性 AE 的总发病率为 0.05 人/年(95% CI,0.03-0.09,I2 = 75%)。与安慰剂相比,生物疗法增加了发生风湿性 AE 的风险(RR = 2.53;95% CI,1.29-4.94)。最常见的风湿性 AE 是关节痛或关节疼痛(n = 94;95%),其次是狼疮样综合征或红斑狼疮样反应(n = 2;2.5%)。停止治疗是最常见的干预措施(n = 21,39%):结论:生物治疗会使 CRSwNP 患者发生风湿性 AEs 的风险增加两倍以上。医疗服务提供者在监测风湿性 AEs 时应保持警惕,并根据具体情况采取适当的管理策略。
{"title":"Rheumatic adverse events associated with biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jenny B. Xiao HBSc, MSc,&nbsp;Helen Hsiao BSc,&nbsp;Carlos Khalil MD,&nbsp;John M. Lee MD, FRCSC, MSc","doi":"10.1002/alr.23453","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alr.23453","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Biologic therapies approved for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have well-established safety profiles but reports of rheumatic adverse events (AEs) are increasing and not well defined. This review aims to assess the risk and incidence of rheumatic AEs associated with biologic therapy in CRSwNP and summarize current reported management strategies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]. A search was conducted in four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until January 4, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Data were pooled using a random effects model to calculate overall incidence and relative risk.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-one studies met the final inclusion criteria, totaling 3434 patients of which 2763 (80%) received either dupilumab (<i>n</i> = 2257; 82%), mepolizumab (<i>n</i> = 372; 13%), or omalizumab (<i>n</i> = 134; 5%) for treatment of CRSwNP. The overall incidence rate for any on-treatment rheumatic AE was 0.05 per person–year (95% CI, 0.03–0.09, <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 75%). Biologic therapy increased the risk of developing a rheumatic AE (RR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.29–4.94) compared with placebo. The most frequently reported rheumatic AE was arthralgia or joint pain (<i>n</i> = 94; 95%), followed by lupus-like syndrome or lupus erythematosus-like reaction (<i>n</i> = 2; 2.5%). Discontinuation of treatment was the most common intervention (<i>n</i> = 21, 39%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Biologic therapy increases the risk of rheumatic AEs in CRSwNP patients by over twofold. Healthcare providers should remain vigilant in monitoring rheumatic AEs and apply appropriate management strategies on a case-by-case basis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alr.23453","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142286259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In office sampling of eosinophil peroxidase to diagnose eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis 诊室取样检测嗜酸性粒细胞过氧化物酶以诊断嗜酸性粒细胞慢性鼻炎
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23448
Jacquelyn K. Callander, Annabelle R. Charbit, Kritika Khanna, John V. Fahy, Monica Tang, Maude Liegeois, Steven D. Pletcher, Andrew N. Goldberg, Jose G. Gurrola, Andrew H. Murr, Anna Butrymowicz, Patricia A. Loftus
BackgroundPractical biomarkers for endotypic characterization of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remain elusive, hindering clinical utility. Eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) is an enzyme released by activated eosinophils. The objective of this study was to evaluate a clinic EPX assay as a marker of eosinophilic CRS.MethodsSubjects with and without CRS presenting to a tertiary care rhinology clinic were prospectively enrolled, and nasal cytology brushings were collected from the middle meatus during in‐clinic nasal endoscopy. ELISA assay was used to quantify EPX levels, and a customized multiplex immunoassay was used to quantify inflammatory cytokine mediators. Findings were correlated with clinical data.ResultsForty‐two subjects were enrolled, including 31 CRS subjects and 11 controls. Median EPX levels were 125.0 ng/mL (standard deviation [SD] 1745.8) and 6.5 ng/mL (SD 99.0) for CRS group and controls, respectively (p = 0.003). EPX levels were associated with history of asthma (p = 0.015), allergies (p = 0.028), polyps (p = 0.0006), smell loss (p = 0.006), and systemic eosinophilia or elevated immunoglobulin E (p ≤ 0.0001). Twenty‐eight subjects from both the CRS and control groups had prior pathology for comparison, with histologic confirmation of local tissue eosinophilia (>10 eosinophils/hpf) in 11 subjects. This subgroup had a median EPX level of 967.5 ng/mL compared to 10.6 ng/mL in 17 subjects without local tissue eosinophilia (p = 0.0008). EPX levels were positively correlated to interleukin‐5 levels (p = 0.0005).ConclusionEPX levels can be measured via well‐tolerated in‐clinic collection of nasal mucus. EPX levels are associated with clinical markers of type 2 inflammation and tissue eosinophilia and may provide a valuable diagnostic tool to delineate eosinophilic CRS.
背景用于描述慢性鼻炎(CRS)内型特征的实用生物标志物仍未出现,妨碍了临床应用。嗜酸性粒细胞过氧化物酶(EPX)是活化的嗜酸性粒细胞释放的一种酶。本研究的目的是评估作为嗜酸性粒细胞 CRS 标志物的临床 EPX 检测方法。方法前瞻性地招募了在三级医院鼻科门诊就诊的患有和未患有 CRS 的受试者,并在门诊鼻内窥镜检查期间从中耳采集了鼻腔细胞学刷片。ELISA检测法用于量化EPX水平,定制的多重免疫测定法用于量化炎症细胞因子介质。结果42名受试者参加了研究,包括31名CRS受试者和11名对照组。CRS组和对照组的EPX水平中位数分别为125.0纳克/毫升(标准差[SD] 1745.8)和6.5纳克/毫升(SD 99.0)(P = 0.003)。EPX水平与哮喘病史(p = 0.015)、过敏(p = 0.028)、息肉(p = 0.0006)、嗅觉减退(p = 0.006)、全身嗜酸性粒细胞增多或免疫球蛋白E升高(p ≤ 0.0001)有关。CRS 组和对照组中均有 28 名受试者进行了病理对比,其中 11 名受试者的局部组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多(>10 个嗜酸性粒细胞/hpf)得到了组织学证实。该亚组的 EPX 水平中位数为 967.5 纳克/毫升,而 17 例无局部组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多的受试者的 EPX 水平中位数为 10.6 纳克/毫升(p = 0.0008)。EPX水平与白细胞介素-5水平呈正相关(p = 0.0005)。EPX水平与2型炎症和组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多症的临床标记物相关,可为确定嗜酸性粒细胞增多症CRS提供有价值的诊断工具。
{"title":"In office sampling of eosinophil peroxidase to diagnose eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis","authors":"Jacquelyn K. Callander, Annabelle R. Charbit, Kritika Khanna, John V. Fahy, Monica Tang, Maude Liegeois, Steven D. Pletcher, Andrew N. Goldberg, Jose G. Gurrola, Andrew H. Murr, Anna Butrymowicz, Patricia A. Loftus","doi":"10.1002/alr.23448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23448","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPractical biomarkers for endotypic characterization of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remain elusive, hindering clinical utility. Eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) is an enzyme released by activated eosinophils. The objective of this study was to evaluate a clinic EPX assay as a marker of eosinophilic CRS.MethodsSubjects with and without CRS presenting to a tertiary care rhinology clinic were prospectively enrolled, and nasal cytology brushings were collected from the middle meatus during in‐clinic nasal endoscopy. ELISA assay was used to quantify EPX levels, and a customized multiplex immunoassay was used to quantify inflammatory cytokine mediators. Findings were correlated with clinical data.ResultsForty‐two subjects were enrolled, including 31 CRS subjects and 11 controls. Median EPX levels were 125.0 ng/mL (standard deviation [SD] 1745.8) and 6.5 ng/mL (SD 99.0) for CRS group and controls, respectively (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003). EPX levels were associated with history of asthma (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.015), allergies (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.028), polyps (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.0006), smell loss (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.006), and systemic eosinophilia or elevated immunoglobulin E (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> ≤ 0.0001). Twenty‐eight subjects from both the CRS and control groups had prior pathology for comparison, with histologic confirmation of local tissue eosinophilia (&gt;10 eosinophils/hpf) in 11 subjects. This subgroup had a median EPX level of 967.5 ng/mL compared to 10.6 ng/mL in 17 subjects without local tissue eosinophilia (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.0008). EPX levels were positively correlated to interleukin‐5 levels (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.0005).ConclusionEPX levels can be measured via well‐tolerated in‐clinic collection of nasal mucus. EPX levels are associated with clinical markers of type 2 inflammation and tissue eosinophilia and may provide a valuable diagnostic tool to delineate eosinophilic CRS.","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142263945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient‐reported disease control versus overall symptom severity as global metrics of chronic rhinosinusitis disease status 将患者报告的疾病控制情况与总体症状严重程度作为慢性鼻炎疾病状况的总体衡量标准
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23435
Ryan A. Cotter, Jack T. Garcia, Ahmed Alsayed, Sven Schneider, David T. Liu, Julia Eckl‐Dorna, Firas A. Houssein, Robby S. Boparai, Nikhil A. Parail, Matthew M. Chu, Josh C. Meier, Saad Alsaleh, Katie M. Phillips, Ahmad R. Sedaghat
BackgroundOverall symptom severity (OSS) and patient‐reported chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) control are global measures of CRS identified as consensus, essential criteria for CRS disease control assessment. We sought to determine the functional relationship between these two metrics.MethodsUsing an international multicenter mixed‐methods design, 260 CRS patients were recruited. OSS score was measured using a visual analog scale. Patient‐reported CRS control was measured as “controlled,” “partly controlled,” and “uncontrolled.” Twelve participants underwent semi‐structured interviews to discuss OSS and patient‐reported CRS control.ResultsThe majority of interviewed participants felt OSS and patient‐reported CRS control measured different constructs—while OSS only measured symptoms, patient‐reported CRS control was more global, including not only symptom severity but also concepts such as medication usage, activity impairment, and exacerbations. Nevertheless, OSS score was strongly correlated with (ρ = 0.67, p < 0.001) and highly predictive of patient‐reported CRS control. OSS score of >4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8–4.2) had 74.7% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as not controlled. OSS score of >6.6 (95% CI: 4.1–7.1) had 77.0% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as uncontrolled. The 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test score was also predictive of patient‐reported CRS disease control but OSS was significantly more predictive.ConclusionsPatients conceptually view patient‐reported CRS control as a more global measure that subsumes OSS. Quantitatively, however, OSS is highly correlated with patient‐reported CRS control, possibly reflecting their redundancy. For ease of use, we recommend patient‐reported CRS control be reflected by OSS <4 for controlled, 4 ≤ OSS < 7 for partly controlled, and OSS ≥7 for uncontrolled CRS.
背景总体症状严重程度(OSS)和患者报告的慢性鼻炎(CRS)控制情况是CRS的总体测量指标,被认为是CRS疾病控制评估的共识和基本标准。我们试图确定这两个指标之间的功能关系。方法采用国际多中心混合方法设计,招募了 260 名 CRS 患者。采用视觉模拟量表测量 OSS 评分。患者报告的 CRS 控制情况分为 "控制"、"部分控制 "和 "未控制 "三种。12名参与者接受了半结构化访谈,讨论了OSS和患者报告的CRS控制情况。结果大多数受访者认为,OSS和患者报告的CRS控制情况衡量的是不同的概念--OSS只衡量症状,而患者报告的CRS控制情况更全面,不仅包括症状严重程度,还包括药物使用、活动障碍和病情加重等概念。尽管如此,OSS评分与患者报告的CRS控制情况密切相关(ρ = 0.67,p <0.001),并对患者报告的CRS控制情况有很高的预测性。OSS评分为>4(95%置信区间[CI]:1.8-4.2)时,在识别报告CRS未得到控制的患者方面具有74.7%的灵敏度和93.2%的特异性。OSS评分为>6.6(95% 置信区间:4.1-7.1)的患者,其报告CRS未受控制的敏感性为77.0%,特异性为75.9%。22项鼻窦结果测试评分也能预测患者报告的CRS疾病控制情况,但OSS的预测性明显更高。然而,从数量上看,OSS 与患者报告的 CRS 控制率高度相关,这可能反映了两者的冗余性。为便于使用,我们建议患者报告的 CRS 控制情况用 OSS <4 表示受控,4 ≤ OSS < 7 表示部分受控,OSS ≥ 7 表示 CRS 不受控制。
{"title":"Patient‐reported disease control versus overall symptom severity as global metrics of chronic rhinosinusitis disease status","authors":"Ryan A. Cotter, Jack T. Garcia, Ahmed Alsayed, Sven Schneider, David T. Liu, Julia Eckl‐Dorna, Firas A. Houssein, Robby S. Boparai, Nikhil A. Parail, Matthew M. Chu, Josh C. Meier, Saad Alsaleh, Katie M. Phillips, Ahmad R. Sedaghat","doi":"10.1002/alr.23435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23435","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundOverall symptom severity (OSS) and patient‐reported chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) control are global measures of CRS identified as consensus, essential criteria for CRS disease control assessment. We sought to determine the functional relationship between these two metrics.MethodsUsing an international multicenter mixed‐methods design, 260 CRS patients were recruited. OSS score was measured using a visual analog scale. Patient‐reported CRS control was measured as “controlled,” “partly controlled,” and “uncontrolled.” Twelve participants underwent semi‐structured interviews to discuss OSS and patient‐reported CRS control.ResultsThe majority of interviewed participants felt OSS and patient‐reported CRS control measured different constructs—while OSS only measured symptoms, patient‐reported CRS control was more global, including not only symptom severity but also concepts such as medication usage, activity impairment, and exacerbations. Nevertheless, OSS score was strongly correlated with (<jats:italic>ρ</jats:italic> = 0.67, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and highly predictive of patient‐reported CRS control. OSS score of &gt;4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8–4.2) had 74.7% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as not controlled. OSS score of &gt;6.6 (95% CI: 4.1–7.1) had 77.0% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity in identifying patients reporting their CRS as uncontrolled. The 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test score was also predictive of patient‐reported CRS disease control but OSS was significantly more predictive.ConclusionsPatients conceptually view patient‐reported CRS control as a more global measure that subsumes OSS. Quantitatively, however, OSS is highly correlated with patient‐reported CRS control, possibly reflecting their redundancy. For ease of use, we recommend patient‐reported CRS control be reflected by OSS &lt;4 for controlled, 4 ≤ OSS &lt; 7 for partly controlled, and OSS ≥7 for uncontrolled CRS.","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142263946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing adequacy of surgical extent in CRSwNP: The Completion of Surgery Index 评估 CRSwNP 中手术范围的充分性:手术完成指数
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23450
Alan D. Workman, Krithika Kuppusamy, David K. Lerner, John V. Bosso, Jennifer E. Douglas, Michael A. Kohanski, Nithin D. Adappa, James N. Palmer
BackgroundEndoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) maximized for topical steroid irrigations is highly effective for polyp disease. As extent and completeness of ESS varies widely by situation and practitioner, it is important to understand when revision surgery is appropriate, particularly in the era of biologic treatments.MethodsA Completion of Surgery Index (CoSI) was developed to assess operative changes in polyp patients using pre‐ and postoperative computed tomography scans. The CoSI was then applied and tested in a cohort of consecutive chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients, and examined within the context of quality‐of‐life improvements.ResultsThe CoSI assesses surgical extent on a scale of 0–100, with 100 representing the highest possible degree of surgical completeness. Among 100 consecutive CRSwNP patients undergoing ESS in 2021 with postoperative topical steroid irrigations, including 75 revision surgeries, SNOT‐22 scores improved at 6 months postoperatively, with durable and consistent improvement at 24 months (p < 0.001). Preoperative CoSI scores in revision surgery patients were 49.4 ± 26.0, improving to 91.0 ± 8.1 postoperatively. SNOT‐22 scores for primary ESS patients and patients with a preoperative CoSI score of less than 70 improved by 26.4 and 28.1 points, respectively, in contrast to patients with a preoperative CoSI of 70 or greater (14.1 points, p = 0.029).ConclusionsIt is important to define extent of surgery in CRSwNP to stratify postsurgical patients based on likelihood to benefit from revision surgery or alternative medications. The CoSI can be utilized to identify patients who are likely to improve significantly with revision surgical intervention.
背景内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)最大限度地利用局部类固醇冲洗对息肉疾病非常有效。由于ESS的程度和完整性因情况和医生的不同而有很大差异,因此了解何时适合进行翻修手术非常重要,尤其是在生物治疗时代。方法开发了手术完成指数(CoSI),利用术前和术后计算机断层扫描评估息肉患者的手术变化。结果CoSI以0-100分评估手术程度,100分代表手术的最高完成度。在 2021 年接受 ESS 并在术后进行局部类固醇冲洗的 100 例连续 CRSwNP 患者中,包括 75 例翻修手术患者,SNOT-22 评分在术后 6 个月时有所改善,在 24 个月时持续改善(p <0.001)。翻修手术患者术前的 CoSI 评分为 49.4 ± 26.0,术后提高到 91.0 ± 8.1。初诊ESS患者和术前CoSI评分小于70分的患者的SNOT-22评分分别提高了26.4分和28.1分,而术前CoSI评分大于等于70分的患者则提高了14.1分(P = 0.029)。CoSI可用于确定哪些患者有可能通过翻修手术干预获得显著改善。
{"title":"Assessing adequacy of surgical extent in CRSwNP: The Completion of Surgery Index","authors":"Alan D. Workman, Krithika Kuppusamy, David K. Lerner, John V. Bosso, Jennifer E. Douglas, Michael A. Kohanski, Nithin D. Adappa, James N. Palmer","doi":"10.1002/alr.23450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23450","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundEndoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) maximized for topical steroid irrigations is highly effective for polyp disease. As extent and completeness of ESS varies widely by situation and practitioner, it is important to understand when revision surgery is appropriate, particularly in the era of biologic treatments.MethodsA Completion of Surgery Index (CoSI) was developed to assess operative changes in polyp patients using pre‐ and postoperative computed tomography scans. The CoSI was then applied and tested in a cohort of consecutive chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients, and examined within the context of quality‐of‐life improvements.ResultsThe CoSI assesses surgical extent on a scale of 0–100, with 100 representing the highest possible degree of surgical completeness. Among 100 consecutive CRSwNP patients undergoing ESS in 2021 with postoperative topical steroid irrigations, including 75 revision surgeries, SNOT‐22 scores improved at 6 months postoperatively, with durable and consistent improvement at 24 months (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Preoperative CoSI scores in revision surgery patients were 49.4 ± 26.0, improving to 91.0 ± 8.1 postoperatively. SNOT‐22 scores for primary ESS patients and patients with a preoperative CoSI score of less than 70 improved by 26.4 and 28.1 points, respectively, in contrast to patients with a preoperative CoSI of 70 or greater (14.1 points, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.029).ConclusionsIt is important to define extent of surgery in CRSwNP to stratify postsurgical patients based on likelihood to benefit from revision surgery or alternative medications. The CoSI can be utilized to identify patients who are likely to improve significantly with revision surgical intervention.","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age‐related differences in olfactory training outcomes: A prospective cohort study 嗅觉训练结果中与年龄有关的差异:前瞻性队列研究
IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23451
Amelia S. Lawrence, Jodi Veach, Rahul Alapati, Celina G. Virgen, Robert Wright, Frank Materia, Jennifer A. Villwock
IntroductionWhile olfactory function decreases with age, it is unknown how age affects olfactory training (OT) efficacy. This study compared OT in two cohorts of subjects: aged ≤50 (younger cohort) and aged 51+ (older cohort) with olfactory dysfunction (OD) primarily from COVID‐19 infection.MethodsSubjects with OD primarily secondary to COVID‐19 infection were prospectively recruited and enrolled into an OT registry. Baseline data were collected and they were provided with a training kit and asked to complete OT at home twice daily for 6 months. Participants were asked to follow‐up at 3 and 6 months during training for olfactory testing and quality‐of‐life surveys (Sino‐Nasal Outcomes Test‐22 [SNOT‐22] and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders Negative Statements [QoD‐NS]).ResultsFifty‐six participants completed OT (younger cohort: n = 26, older cohort: n = 30). There were no significant differences between cohorts’ Affordable Rapid Olfactory Measurement Array (AROMA), QoD‐NS, or SNOT‐22 scores at any time point. Both cohorts showed significant AROMA score improvement of more than 16 points from baseline to 3 months (younger cohort: p = 0.001; older cohort: p = 0.008). The younger cohort had significant improvements in QoD‐NS (p = 0.008) and SNOT‐22 (p = 0.042) between baseline and 3 months while the older cohort improved from 3 to 6 months (QoD‐NS: p = 0.027, SNOT‐22: p = 0.049).ConclusionBoth cohorts demonstrated similar significant improvement in olfactory function after 3 months of OT. The timeline of subjective improvement was different between cohorts, with younger patients experiencing earlier improvement.
引言虽然嗅觉功能会随着年龄的增长而下降,但年龄对嗅觉训练(OT)效果的影响尚不清楚。本研究比较了两组受试者的嗅觉训练效果:年龄在 50 岁以下(年轻组)和 51 岁以上(年长组)的受试者,他们的嗅觉功能障碍(OD)主要是由 COVID-19 感染引起的。收集基线数据后,向他们提供一套训练工具,要求他们在 6 个月内每天两次在家完成 OT。在训练期间,要求参与者在 3 个月和 6 个月时进行随访,以进行嗅觉测试和生活质量调查(Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test-22 [SNOT-22] 和嗅觉障碍负面陈述问卷 [QoD-NS])。结果56 名参与者完成了 OT(年轻组群:n = 26,年长组群:n = 30)。在任何时间点,不同组别的平价快速嗅觉测量阵列 (AROMA)、QoD-NS 或 SNOT-22 分数均无明显差异。从基线到 3 个月期间,两个组群的 AROMA 分数都有明显提高,提高幅度超过 16 分(年轻组群:P = 0.001;年长组群:P = 0.008)。从基线到 3 个月期间,年轻组群的 QoD-NS (p = 0.008)和 SNOT-22 (p = 0.042)均有显著改善,而年长组群则从 3 个月到 6 个月期间均有改善(QoD-NS:p = 0.027,SNOT-22:p = 0.049)。两组患者的主观改善时间不同,年轻患者的改善时间更早。
{"title":"Age‐related differences in olfactory training outcomes: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Amelia S. Lawrence, Jodi Veach, Rahul Alapati, Celina G. Virgen, Robert Wright, Frank Materia, Jennifer A. Villwock","doi":"10.1002/alr.23451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23451","url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionWhile olfactory function decreases with age, it is unknown how age affects olfactory training (OT) efficacy. This study compared OT in two cohorts of subjects: aged ≤50 (younger cohort) and aged 51+ (older cohort) with olfactory dysfunction (OD) primarily from COVID‐19 infection.MethodsSubjects with OD primarily secondary to COVID‐19 infection were prospectively recruited and enrolled into an OT registry. Baseline data were collected and they were provided with a training kit and asked to complete OT at home twice daily for 6 months. Participants were asked to follow‐up at 3 and 6 months during training for olfactory testing and quality‐of‐life surveys (Sino‐Nasal Outcomes Test‐22 [SNOT‐22] and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders Negative Statements [QoD‐NS]).ResultsFifty‐six participants completed OT (younger cohort: <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 26, older cohort: <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 30). There were no significant differences between cohorts’ Affordable Rapid Olfactory Measurement Array (AROMA), QoD‐NS, or SNOT‐22 scores at any time point. Both cohorts showed significant AROMA score improvement of more than 16 points from baseline to 3 months (younger cohort: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001; older cohort: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.008). The younger cohort had significant improvements in QoD‐NS (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.008) and SNOT‐22 (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.042) between baseline and 3 months while the older cohort improved from 3 to 6 months (QoD‐NS: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.027, SNOT‐22: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.049).ConclusionBoth cohorts demonstrated similar significant improvement in olfactory function after 3 months of OT. The timeline of subjective improvement was different between cohorts, with younger patients experiencing earlier improvement.","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142199233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A prospective longitudinal study assessing the impact of rhinovirus and bacterial infections in acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis. 一项前瞻性纵向研究,评估鼻病毒和细菌感染对慢性鼻炎急性加重的影响。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23431
Nirushan Narendran, Sophia Volpe, Ibrahim Ramadan, Jacob Ryan Herbert, Bonnie LaFleur, Shireen Samargandy, Christopher H Le, Eugene H Chang

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are thought to arise from common viral infections progressing to secondary bacterial infections. However, the pathophysiology of AECRS remains poorly understood due to a lack of prospective longitudinal studies.

Methods: We conducted a one-year prospective longitudinal study involving chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) adults. At baseline, we assessed subjective symptom scores using a validated upper respiratory infection questionnaire (WURSS), sinonasal outcome testing scores (SNOT-22), and endoscopic scores (modified Lund-Kennedy score). Every 2 weeks, we contacted subjects to collect WURSS and SNOT-22 scores. If WURSS scores were ≥1 and SNOT-22 scores were ≥ 8.9 compared with baseline, subjects underwent an AECRS assessment. We identified rhinovirus (RV) incidence through viral nasal brushings at each visit and bacterial infection through bacterial swabs if mucus scores were ≥1.

Results: Thiry-five of 80 CRS subjects reported at least one AECRS episode during the year, predominantly occurring in the fall and winter seasons. RV infections were detected in 8 of 35 cases, bacterial infections in 17 of 35, and co-occurring infections in 7 of 35. All subjects with AECRS visits exhibited significantly higher endoscopic scores compared with baseline. Subjects with co-occurring RV and bacterial infections demonstrated higher disease severity compared with those with either RV or bacterial infection, or no infection.

Conclusions: In a one-year prospective longitudinal study involving CRS adults, we identified significant risk factors for AECRS including seasonality and the presence of RV and bacterial infections. These data suggest a standard definition of AECRS and the need to target RV and bacterial infections if we are to help reduce disease severity.

背景:慢性鼻炎急性加重(AECRS)被认为是由普通病毒感染继发细菌感染引起的。然而,由于缺乏前瞻性纵向研究,人们对 AECRS 的病理生理学仍然知之甚少:我们开展了一项为期一年的前瞻性纵向研究,研究对象为慢性鼻炎(CRS)成人。基线时,我们使用有效的上呼吸道感染问卷(WURSS)评估主观症状评分、鼻窦结果测试评分(SNOT-22)和内窥镜评分(改良的伦德-肯尼迪评分)。我们每两周联系一次受试者,收集 WURSS 和 SNOT-22 评分。如果与基线相比,WURSS评分≥1分,SNOT-22评分≥8.9分,受试者将接受AECRS评估。我们在每次就诊时通过病毒性鼻刷子确定鼻病毒(RV)的发病率,如果粘液评分≥1,则通过细菌拭子确定细菌感染情况:在80名CRS受试者中,有35人报告在一年中至少发生过一次AECRS,主要发生在秋冬季节。在 35 例病例中,8 例检测到 RV 感染,17 例检测到细菌感染,7 例检测到并发感染。与基线相比,所有接受过 AECRS 检查的受试者的内窥镜评分都明显提高。与RV或细菌感染或无感染的受试者相比,同时患有RV和细菌感染的受试者疾病严重程度更高:在一项为期一年、涉及 CRS 成人的前瞻性纵向研究中,我们发现了 AECRS 的重要风险因素,包括季节性、RV 感染和细菌感染。这些数据表明了 AECRS 的标准定义,以及如果我们要帮助降低疾病的严重程度,就需要针对 RV 和细菌感染进行治疗。
{"title":"A prospective longitudinal study assessing the impact of rhinovirus and bacterial infections in acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.","authors":"Nirushan Narendran, Sophia Volpe, Ibrahim Ramadan, Jacob Ryan Herbert, Bonnie LaFleur, Shireen Samargandy, Christopher H Le, Eugene H Chang","doi":"10.1002/alr.23431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are thought to arise from common viral infections progressing to secondary bacterial infections. However, the pathophysiology of AECRS remains poorly understood due to a lack of prospective longitudinal studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a one-year prospective longitudinal study involving chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) adults. At baseline, we assessed subjective symptom scores using a validated upper respiratory infection questionnaire (WURSS), sinonasal outcome testing scores (SNOT-22), and endoscopic scores (modified Lund-Kennedy score). Every 2 weeks, we contacted subjects to collect WURSS and SNOT-22 scores. If WURSS scores were ≥1 and SNOT-22 scores were ≥ 8.9 compared with baseline, subjects underwent an AECRS assessment. We identified rhinovirus (RV) incidence through viral nasal brushings at each visit and bacterial infection through bacterial swabs if mucus scores were ≥1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thiry-five of 80 CRS subjects reported at least one AECRS episode during the year, predominantly occurring in the fall and winter seasons. RV infections were detected in 8 of 35 cases, bacterial infections in 17 of 35, and co-occurring infections in 7 of 35. All subjects with AECRS visits exhibited significantly higher endoscopic scores compared with baseline. Subjects with co-occurring RV and bacterial infections demonstrated higher disease severity compared with those with either RV or bacterial infection, or no infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a one-year prospective longitudinal study involving CRS adults, we identified significant risk factors for AECRS including seasonality and the presence of RV and bacterial infections. These data suggest a standard definition of AECRS and the need to target RV and bacterial infections if we are to help reduce disease severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142119719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of bovine-derived collagen matrix in the surgical treatment of empty nose syndrome. 使用牛源性胶原蛋白基质对空鼻症进行手术治疗。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23449
Brian H Cameron, Jason Talmadge, Martin J Citardi

Key points: Bovine-derived collagen matrix (BDCM) is a safe augmentation material in patients with empty nose syndrome. BDCM augmentation results in clinically and statistically significant improvement in nasal symptoms. Improvements in nasal symptoms with BDCM augmentation may be durable and can be seen up to 2 years postoperative.

要点:牛源性胶原基质 (BDCM) 是空鼻综合征患者的一种安全隆鼻材料。从临床和统计学角度看,BDCM 植入术可显著改善鼻部症状。BDCM 植入术对鼻部症状的改善可能是持久的,可在术后 2 年内显现。
{"title":"Use of bovine-derived collagen matrix in the surgical treatment of empty nose syndrome.","authors":"Brian H Cameron, Jason Talmadge, Martin J Citardi","doi":"10.1002/alr.23449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23449","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Key points: </strong>Bovine-derived collagen matrix (BDCM) is a safe augmentation material in patients with empty nose syndrome. BDCM augmentation results in clinically and statistically significant improvement in nasal symptoms. Improvements in nasal symptoms with BDCM augmentation may be durable and can be seen up to 2 years postoperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142119720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A response to Min et al. 对 Min 等人的回应
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23446
David R. Grimm MD, Z. Jason Qian MD, Michael Yong MD,MPH,MBA, Peter H. Hwang MD
{"title":"A response to Min et al.","authors":"David R. Grimm MD,&nbsp;Z. Jason Qian MD,&nbsp;Michael Yong MD,MPH,MBA,&nbsp;Peter H. Hwang MD","doi":"10.1002/alr.23446","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alr.23446","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142107076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1