International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology最新文献

Background

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators improve pulmonary outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF) by stabilizing the CFTR protein on respiratory epithelial surfaces. To determine the efficacy of CFTR modulators on sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF, we performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials to date that include functional and radiographic evidence of sinus disease.

Methods

English full-text articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Two reviewers screened articles and a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Articles were included if they reported functional or radiological sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF before and after CFTR modulator therapies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool was used for quality assessment. The generic inverse variance method with random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) were used as effect measurements.

Results

Seven prospective and two retrospective studies representing 248 patients were included in this analysis. There was a significant improvement in sinonasal outcome test-22 scores on elexacaftor‒tezacaftor‒ivacaftor (MD = 12.80, [95% confidence interval, CI: 10.46‒15.13], p < 0.001, n = 222), with no heterogeneity detected (I² = 0%, p = 0.820). There was also a significant improvement in Lund‒Mackay scores (SMD = 1.25, [95% CI: 0.58‒1.91], p < 0.001, n = 88), with heterogeneity detected (I² = 67%, p = 0.030).

Conclusions

CFTR modulators improve functional and radiologic sinonasal outcomes. Given the utility of CFTR modulators, the treatment paradigm for CF-related chronic rhinosinusitis promises to evolve.

Background

The inability of topical medications to reach sinus cavities is a potential reason for lack of efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). One purpose of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is to enable delivery of medications into the sinus cavities. The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) creates unique biomechanics that enable deposition of intranasal corticosteroid into sinuses and sinus drainage pathways but may have differing efficacy in operated versus unoperated sinuses. Two 24-week randomized trials (ReOpen1/2) evaluated EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo in patients with CRS, stratified by surgical status.

Methods

Surgery-naive (n = 332) and prior-surgery (n = 215) patient groups were analyzed as pooled data from ReOpen1/2. Outcome measures (least-squares mean change from baseline) included combined symptom score (CSS) and congestion score at weeks 4, 8, and 12 and average of percentages of opacified volume (APOV) of ethmoid/maxillary sinuses on CT and Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) total score at week 24.

Results

Baseline scores suggested moderate–severe disease: mean CSS = 5.8; APOV = 67.2%. EDS-FLU produced significant improvement versus placebo (p < 0.05): CSS (surgery-naive, −0.68 vs. −1.42; prior ESS, −0.70 vs. −1.87); congestion (surgery-naive, −0.24 vs. −0.59; prior ESS, −0.24 vs. −0.69); and SNOT-22 (surgery-naive, −7.56 vs. −18.30; prior ESS, −10.72 vs. −18.74). Similar results were observed for APOV (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between surgery subgroups with either EDS-FLU dose.

Conclusion

EDS-FLU improved symptoms, sinus opacification, and quality of life in patients with CRS with or without prior ESS, suggesting a role for EDS-FLU in both populations.

Key points

Key points

Key points

Objectives

To evaluate the treatment outcomes in patients with advanced-stage olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) who received induction chemotherapy (IC).

Materials and methods

The clinical data of 38 patients with advanced-stage ONB who received initial IC were retrospectively analyzed. The response was defined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients with complete remission or partial remission were defined as responders.

Results

Seventeen (44.7%) patients responded to IC. The response rate was higher in patients with high Hyams grade tumor (III/IV) compared to those with low-grade tumors (I/II) (60% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.038). Overall, the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 76.0%. Among nonresponders to IC, a significant difference in 5-year CSS rates was observed between surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) (100%) versus definitive RT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (68.6%) (log-rank p = 0.006). However, for responders, there was no significant difference in 5-year CSS rates between surgery with adjuvant therapy (75%) and definitive RT or CRT (51.1%) (log-rank p = 0.536). When only high-grade tumors were considered among responders, the 5-year CSS rate was significantly higher in patients who received RT or CRT (51.4%) compared to those who underwent surgery with adjuvant therapy (0%) (log-rank p = 0.008).

Conclusion

In advanced-stage ONB, RT or CRT may be preferable for high-grade tumor responding to IC. Higher response rate and a potential role for induction IC in determining the optimal definitive treatment modality suggest a positive role for advanced-stage high-grade ONB.