首页 > 最新文献

Asian Law eJournal最新文献

英文 中文
Curbing Agricultural Child Labor: Challenges and Initiatives of the Local Government in the Province of Bukidnon 遏制农业童工:布基农省地方政府的挑战与举措
Pub Date : 2019-08-28 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3497268
Grace O. Galache, Niño Tulang
This inquiry sought to find out the challenges and initiatives of the Local Governments in the province of Bukidnon in addressing issues on child labor in the agriculture sector. The data were gathered through a structured survey questionnaire to determine the profile of households whose children are engaged in child labor, including the child’s reason for entering into work and working condition that may affect their physical, intellectual and social development. The key informants were also interviewed to determine the challenges encountered and initiatives done by the local government to minimize or even make their locale child labor free. The study utilized quantitative and qualitative method to analyze the data. The study revealed that despite the effort done by the government, there are still a significant number of children that are involved in child labor. The primary reason why children entered into work is to supplement the income of the household head that are insufficient to support the family. Although, the program and strategies on child labor adapted from the international framework may have slightly decreased the number of working children but it did not ensure long-term outcomes. The insufficient budget that resulted in the inefficiency of local implementation showed that the national government failed to prioritize in addressing the issue. For the government to provide long term and sustainable outcomes, it is crucial to review the child labor policies and set-up child-centered programs that promote the rights and well-being of working children.
这项调查旨在查明布基农省地方政府在解决农业部门童工问题方面面临的挑战和采取的主动行动。通过结构化调查问卷收集数据,以确定儿童从事童工的家庭概况,包括儿童进入工作的原因以及可能影响其身体、智力和社会发展的工作条件。我们还采访了关键的举报人,以确定他们遇到的挑战以及当地政府为减少甚至消除童工现象所采取的举措。本研究采用定量和定性相结合的方法对数据进行分析。研究表明,尽管政府做出了努力,但仍有相当数量的儿童参与童工劳动。儿童参加工作的主要原因是为了补充户主不足以维持家庭生活的收入。虽然根据国际框架制定的童工方案和战略可能略微减少了童工的数量,但并没有确保长期成果。预算不足导致地方执行效率低下,这表明国家政府未能优先解决问题。为了让政府提供长期和可持续的成果,审查童工政策和建立以儿童为中心的项目是至关重要的,这些项目可以促进童工的权利和福祉。
{"title":"Curbing Agricultural Child Labor: Challenges and Initiatives of the Local Government in the Province of Bukidnon","authors":"Grace O. Galache, Niño Tulang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3497268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497268","url":null,"abstract":"This inquiry sought to find out the challenges and initiatives of the Local Governments in the province of Bukidnon in addressing issues on child labor in the agriculture sector. The data were gathered through a structured survey questionnaire to determine the profile of households whose children are engaged in child labor, including the child’s reason for entering into work and working condition that may affect their physical, intellectual and social development. The key informants were also interviewed to determine the challenges encountered and initiatives done by the local government to minimize or even make their locale child labor free. The study utilized quantitative and qualitative method to analyze the data. The study revealed that despite the effort done by the government, there are still a significant number of children that are involved in child labor. The primary reason why children entered into work is to supplement the income of the household head that are insufficient to support the family. Although, the program and strategies on child labor adapted from the international framework may have slightly decreased the number of working children but it did not ensure long-term outcomes. The insufficient budget that resulted in the inefficiency of local implementation showed that the national government failed to prioritize in addressing the issue. For the government to provide long term and sustainable outcomes, it is crucial to review the child labor policies and set-up child-centered programs that promote the rights and well-being of working children.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120926588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patents' Time to Grant - A Study of China and India 专利授予的时间——以中国和印度为例
Pub Date : 2019-06-13 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3403293
Satyaki Chakravarty, S. Gangopadhyay, Taylan Mavruk
China and India reported highest growth in high-tech exports for the past two decades (World Bank) and hence are increasingly becoming the countries to file for protection of intellectual property. This paper examines whether there is a delay in time to grant of a patent when applied by domestic versus foreign applicants in China and India. A delay in time to grant on the basis of nationality violates the TRIPs agreement. Further, delay in grant of a patent generates dead-weight loss for the society, hence effectively deterring future innovation. The results show that China delays foreign patents, however India does exactly the opposite, indicating that there is a significant variation in patent examination times across applicant characteristics, technology fields and countries. Thus invisible trade barriers do exist in these markets. Applicants can use the details in this paper and plan their filing strategies, e.g. taking into account average grant lag.
中国和印度报告了过去二十年来高科技出口的最高增长(世界银行),因此越来越多地成为申请知识产权保护的国家。本文考察了在中国和印度,国内申请人与外国申请人申请专利时是否存在授予专利的时间延迟。在国籍基础上延迟给予违反了《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》。此外,延迟授予专利会给社会造成无谓损失,从而有效地阻碍未来的创新。结果表明,中国会延迟外国专利申请,而印度则恰恰相反,这表明专利审查时间在申请人特征、技术领域和国家之间存在显著差异。因此,这些市场确实存在无形的贸易壁垒。申请人可以使用本文中的细节并计划他们的申请策略,例如考虑平均补助金滞后时间。
{"title":"Patents' Time to Grant - A Study of China and India","authors":"Satyaki Chakravarty, S. Gangopadhyay, Taylan Mavruk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3403293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3403293","url":null,"abstract":"China and India reported highest growth in high-tech exports for the past two decades (World Bank) and hence are increasingly becoming the countries to file for protection of intellectual property. This paper examines whether there is a delay in time to grant of a patent when applied by domestic versus foreign applicants in China and India. A delay in time to grant on the basis of nationality violates the TRIPs agreement. Further, delay in grant of a patent generates dead-weight loss for the society, hence effectively deterring future innovation. The results show that China delays foreign patents, however India does exactly the opposite, indicating that there is a significant variation in patent examination times across applicant characteristics, technology fields and countries. Thus invisible trade barriers do exist in these markets. Applicants can use the details in this paper and plan their filing strategies, e.g. taking into account average grant lag.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126692792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Compliance of Electronic Bill of Lading Regulation in Korea with Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records 韩国电子提单法规与《电子可转让记录示范法》的符合性
Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI: 10.35611/jkt.2019.23.3.68
Seok-Beom Choi
Purpose – The UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (Model Law) is based on the principles of non-discrimination against the use of electronic means, functional equivalence, and technology neutrality underpinning all UNCITRAL texts on electronic commerce. Investigating the disagreements between the Model Law and the Koran Commercial Act (KC Act), including the B/L Regulation, and suggesting the revision of the KC Act including the B/L Regulation, could be a valuable study. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the harmonization of Korean legislation regarding electronic bill of lading in compliance with the Model Law.

Design/methodology – The Model Law is flexible to accommodate the use of all technologies and models, such as registries, tokens, and distributed ledgers: that is, blockchain. In 2007, the KC Act was revised to regulate electronic bills of lading to promote the widespread legal use of electronic bills of lading. In addition, The Regulation on Implementation of the Provisions of the Commercial Act Regarding Electronic Bills of Lading (the B/L Regulation) was enacted to regulate the detailed procedures in using electronic bills of lading in 2008. This paper employs a legal analysis by which this paper does find differences between two rules in light of technology neutrality and global standard of electronic bills of lading model.

Findings – The main findings are as follows: i) the Korean registry agency has characteristics of a closed system. ii) The KC Act has no provision regarding control. iii) The KC Act discriminates other electronic bills of lading on the ground that it was issued or used abroad. Moreover, this study does comprehensive analysis of Korean Acts in comparison with the Model Law and, in particular, this study analyzes the differences between the KC Act and the Model Law by comparing article by article in view of the harmonization of the two rules.

Originality/value – The subject of previous several studies was draft provisions on Electronic Transferable Records before completion of the Model Law; thus, these studies did not take into consideration the character of the Model Law as the Model Law was chosen at the final stage of legislation. This study is aimed at the final version of the Model Law. So, this study is meaningful by finding the suggestion and directions for the Korean government to revise the KC Act and the B/L Regulation in line with the Model Law.
目的-《贸易法委员会电子可转让记录示范法》(《示范法》)以不歧视使用电子手段、功能对等和技术中立原则为基础,这些原则是贸易法委员会所有关于电子商务的案文的基础。调查《示范法》与《可兰经商法》(KC法)(包括提单规定)之间的分歧,并提出修改《可兰经商法》(包括提单规定)的建议,是一项有价值的研究。本文的目的是促进韩国在电子提单方面的立法与《示范法》的协调。设计/方法-《示范法》灵活地适应所有技术和模型的使用,例如注册表、令牌和分布式账本:即区块链。2007年,KC法案进行了修订,对电子提单进行了规范,以促进电子提单的广泛合法使用。此外,2008年颁布了《商法电子提单条款实施条例》(简称《提单条例》),对电子提单使用的具体程序进行了规范。本文采用法律分析的方法,从技术中立性和电子提单模式的全球标准两方面分析了两种规则之间的差异。▽调查结果=主要发现如下:1)韩国的登记机关具有封闭性。ii) KC法案没有关于控制的规定。iii)《KC法》以其他电子提单在国外签发或使用为理由,对其加以歧视。此外,本研究还将韩国法律与《示范法》进行了全面的比较分析,特别是在《示范法》与《示范法》协调一致的情况下,通过逐条比较来分析《KC法》与《示范法》之间的差异。原创性/价值-前几项研究的主题是《示范法》完成之前关于电子可转让记录的条款草案;因此,这些研究没有考虑到《示范法》的性质,因为《示范法》是在立法的最后阶段选定的。本研究的目的是制订《示范法》的最终版本。因此,本研究为韩国政府根据《示范法》修订《KC法》和《提单条例》提供了建议和方向,具有重要意义。
{"title":"Compliance of Electronic Bill of Lading Regulation in Korea with Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records","authors":"Seok-Beom Choi","doi":"10.35611/jkt.2019.23.3.68","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2019.23.3.68","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (Model Law) is based on the principles of non-discrimination against the use of electronic means, functional equivalence, and technology neutrality underpinning all UNCITRAL texts on electronic commerce. Investigating the disagreements between the Model Law and the Koran Commercial Act (KC Act), including the B/L Regulation, and suggesting the revision of the KC Act including the B/L Regulation, could be a valuable study. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the harmonization of Korean legislation regarding electronic bill of lading in compliance with the Model Law.<br><br>Design/methodology – The Model Law is flexible to accommodate the use of all technologies and models, such as registries, tokens, and distributed ledgers: that is, blockchain. In 2007, the KC Act was revised to regulate electronic bills of lading to promote the widespread legal use of electronic bills of lading. In addition, The Regulation on Implementation of the Provisions of the Commercial Act Regarding Electronic Bills of Lading (the B/L Regulation) was enacted to regulate the detailed procedures in using electronic bills of lading in 2008. This paper employs a legal analysis by which this paper does find differences between two rules in light of technology neutrality and global standard of electronic bills of lading model.<br><br>Findings – The main findings are as follows: i) the Korean registry agency has characteristics of a closed system. ii) The KC Act has no provision regarding control. iii) The KC Act discriminates other electronic bills of lading on the ground that it was issued or used abroad. Moreover, this study does comprehensive analysis of Korean Acts in comparison with the Model Law and, in particular, this study analyzes the differences between the KC Act and the Model Law by comparing article by article in view of the harmonization of the two rules.<br><br>Originality/value – The subject of previous several studies was draft provisions on Electronic Transferable Records before completion of the Model Law; thus, these studies did not take into consideration the character of the Model Law as the Model Law was chosen at the final stage of legislation. This study is aimed at the final version of the Model Law. So, this study is meaningful by finding the suggestion and directions for the Korean government to revise the KC Act and the B/L Regulation in line with the Model Law.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122994239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public Health Insurance and the Labor Market: Evidence from China's Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance 公共医疗保险与劳动力市场:来自中国城镇居民基本医疗保险的证据
Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3385987
Wei Si
This study provides empirical evidence on the labor market effects of public health insurance using evidence from China. In 2007, China launched a national public health insurance program, Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI), targeting residents in urban areas who were not insured by employment-based health insurance. Using panel data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey, I identify the impacts of the program based on its staggered implementation across cities. I find that URBMI did not have a significant average causal effect on labor force participation. However, it did increase employment mobility, as evidenced by the decrease in long-term employment and expansion of fixed-term contract jobs and self-employment. After the program was implemented, job lock declined and job flexibility increased, especially among women, the less educated, and individuals with good health status. The results also suggest increased employment for unhealthy workers, indicating a direct health improvement effect.
本研究以中国实证为基础,对公共医疗保险的劳动力市场效应进行实证研究。2007年,中国推出了全国公共医疗保险制度——城镇居民基本医疗保险,覆盖了未参加就业医疗保险的城镇居民。我利用中国健康与营养调查的面板数据,根据该计划在各城市的交错实施,确定了该计划的影响。我发现城镇居民收入指数对劳动力参与率没有显著的平均因果效应。但是,它确实增加了就业流动性,长期就业减少,定期合同工作和自营职业增加就是明证。该方案实施后,工作锁定减少,工作灵活性增加,特别是在妇女、受教育程度较低的人和健康状况良好的个人中。结果还表明,不健康工人的就业增加,表明直接的健康改善效果。
{"title":"Public Health Insurance and the Labor Market: Evidence from China's Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance","authors":"Wei Si","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3385987","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3385987","url":null,"abstract":"This study provides empirical evidence on the labor market effects of public health insurance using evidence from China. In 2007, China launched a national public health insurance program, Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI), targeting residents in urban areas who were not insured by employment-based health insurance. Using panel data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey, I identify the impacts of the program based on its staggered implementation across cities. I find that URBMI did not have a significant average causal effect on labor force participation. However, it did increase employment mobility, as evidenced by the decrease in long-term employment and expansion of fixed-term contract jobs and self-employment. After the program was implemented, job lock declined and job flexibility increased, especially among women, the less educated, and individuals with good health status. The results also suggest increased employment for unhealthy workers, indicating a direct health improvement effect.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127046817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Measuring China’s Patent Quality: Development and Validation of ISR Indices 衡量中国专利质量:ISR指标的开发与验证
Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3383937
P. Boeing, Elisabeth F. Mueller
Because China has become one of the largest applicants of PCT patents, it is of interest to compare the quality of Chinese and non-Chinese applications. We extend a quality index based on internationally comparable citation data from international search reports (ISR) to consider foreign, domestic, and self citations. Whereas foreign citations show that Chinese PCT patent applications reach only a third of the non-Chinese quality benchmark, the extension towards domestic and self citations suggests a higher quality level that converges to or even surpasses the benchmark. We investigate these differences based on firm-level regressions and find that in China, only foreign citations, but not domestic and self citations, have a significant and positive relation to R&D stocks. Using Germany as a representative country without policy support for patenting, we show that all three citations types may be used as economic indicators if policy distortion is not a concern. Our results show that domestic and self citations suffer from an upward bias in China and should be employed with caution if they are to be interpreted as a measure of patent quality.
由于中国已成为PCT专利的最大申请人之一,比较中国和非中国申请的质量是有意义的。我们扩展了基于国际检索报告(ISR)的国际可比引文数据的质量索引,以考虑国外,国内和自我引用。国外引用表明,中国的PCT专利申请仅达到非中国质量基准的三分之一,而国内引用和自我引用的扩展表明,中国的PCT专利申请质量水平趋近甚至超过了基准。我们基于公司层面的回归研究了这些差异,发现在中国,只有国外引用与研发股票有显著的正相关关系,而国内引用和自我引用与研发股票没有显著的正相关关系。以德国为例,在没有专利政策支持的情况下,我们发现如果不考虑政策扭曲,所有三种引用类型都可以用作经济指标。我们的研究结果表明,国内引用和自我引用在中国都存在向上的倾向,如果要将其解释为专利质量的衡量标准,则应谨慎使用。
{"title":"Measuring China’s Patent Quality: Development and Validation of ISR Indices","authors":"P. Boeing, Elisabeth F. Mueller","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3383937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3383937","url":null,"abstract":"Because China has become one of the largest applicants of PCT patents, it is of interest to compare the quality of Chinese and non-Chinese applications. We extend a quality index based on internationally comparable citation data from international search reports (ISR) to consider foreign, domestic, and self citations. Whereas foreign citations show that Chinese PCT patent applications reach only a third of the non-Chinese quality benchmark, the extension towards domestic and self citations suggests a higher quality level that converges to or even surpasses the benchmark. We investigate these differences based on firm-level regressions and find that in China, only foreign citations, but not domestic and self citations, have a significant and positive relation to R&amp;D stocks. Using Germany as a representative country without policy support for patenting, we show that all three citations types may be used as economic indicators if policy distortion is not a concern. Our results show that domestic and self citations suffer from an upward bias in China and should be employed with caution if they are to be interpreted as a measure of patent quality.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122008769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Achieving Multilateral Investment Court through EU-ASEAN Expansion of Bilateral Investment Court: Is It Possible? 通过欧盟-东盟扩大双边投资法院实现多边投资法院:可能吗?
Pub Date : 2019-03-29 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3375604
Rizky Banyualam Permana
Legitimacy of international investment law is in crisis. One particular area of international investment law that has been progressively re-developed is the area of investment dispute settlement. The EU sees the multilateral investment court as a proper solution to reform ISDS in the future. To achieve this final goal, starting from the bilateral level, the EU has included investment court provisions as an ISDS mechanism in its latest trade and investment agreement with its trading partners, among others, EU-Viet Nam FTA and IPA, as well as EU-Singapore FTA & IPA. This paper addresses central questions on how could existing investment court system in EU and ASEAN member states’ Investment Protection Agreements (IPA) can be expanded towards multilateral investment court in the future, and what are the challenges that can be expected from such expansion. It critically analyses concluded agreements between the EU and some of ASEAN Member States. I argue that for now, it is unlikely that multilateral investment court expansion will happen soon considering the challenges and concerns expressed by both sides.
国际投资法的合法性正处于危机之中。已逐步重新发展的国际投资法的一个特别领域是解决投资争端的领域。欧盟认为,多边投资法庭是未来改革ISDS的适当解决方案。为了实现这一最终目标,从双边层面开始,欧盟已将投资法院条款作为ISDS机制纳入其与贸易伙伴的最新贸易和投资协定,其中包括欧盟-越南自由贸易协定和IPA,以及欧盟-新加坡自由贸易协定;异丙醇。本文探讨了欧盟和东盟成员国投资保护协定(IPA)中现有的投资法院体系如何在未来向多边投资法院扩展,以及这种扩展可能带来的挑战。它批判性地分析了欧盟和一些东盟成员国之间达成的协议。我认为,就目前而言,考虑到双方所表达的挑战和关切,多边投资法庭不太可能很快扩大。
{"title":"Achieving Multilateral Investment Court through EU-ASEAN Expansion of Bilateral Investment Court: Is It Possible?","authors":"Rizky Banyualam Permana","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3375604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3375604","url":null,"abstract":"Legitimacy of international investment law is in crisis. One particular area of international investment law that has been progressively re-developed is the area of investment dispute settlement. The EU sees the multilateral investment court as a proper solution to reform ISDS in the future. To achieve this final goal, starting from the bilateral level, the EU has included investment court provisions as an ISDS mechanism in its latest trade and investment agreement with its trading partners, among others, EU-Viet Nam FTA and IPA, as well as EU-Singapore FTA &amp; IPA. This paper addresses central questions on how could existing investment court system in EU and ASEAN member states’ Investment Protection Agreements (IPA) can be expanded towards multilateral investment court in the future, and what are the challenges that can be expected from such expansion. It critically analyses concluded agreements between the EU and some of ASEAN Member States. I argue that for now, it is unlikely that multilateral investment court expansion will happen soon considering the challenges and concerns expressed by both sides.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121306082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Step Forward for Tax Dispute Resolution between China and ASEAN Countries under the Belt and Road Initiative “一带一路”倡议下中国与东盟国家税收争议解决的新进展
Pub Date : 2019-03-08 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3349398
Xu Diheng
China has a closer business relationship with Southeast Asian countries under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). To ensure tax certainty for the investment, it is necessary to establish an effective and efficient tax dispute resolution mechanism. The mutual agreement procedure (MAP) is the primary means, but it has its limitations, especially for countries in this region. Arbitration could be a powerful complementary to the MAP. China has established a new BRI Court-connected and Mediation Centre (Centre) that aims to resolve commercial disputes in this region. It seems like a new alternative for resolving tax disputes since it combines mediation with arbitration. This article analyzes the pros and cons of adopting arbitration as a complementary means to the MAP in this region. It further discusses the advantages and concerns for the Centre. Although the Centre encourages using mediation to resolve disputes, which could address problems of direct arbitration, it is difficult to maintain impartiality from its current rough rules and its position. This article makes suggestions on improving the mechanism to guarantee the impartiality by selecting mediators and arbitrators with knowledge of the region, endowing disputants the right to appeal, and increasing transparency.
在“一带一路”倡议下,中国与东南亚国家的经贸关系日益密切。为了保证投资的税收确定性,有必要建立有效、高效的税收争议解决机制。相互协议程序(MAP)是主要手段,但也有其局限性,特别是对本地区国家而言。仲裁可以成为MAP的有力补充。中国已经建立了一个新的“一带一路”法院调解中心,旨在解决该地区的商业纠纷。它结合了调解和仲裁,似乎是解决税收纠纷的新选择。本文分析了该地区采用仲裁作为MAP的补充手段的利弊。它进一步讨论了中心的优势和关注的问题。虽然中心鼓励利用调解来解决争端,这可以解决直接仲裁的问题,但由于其目前的粗暴规则和立场,很难保持公正。本文从选择熟悉本地区的调解员和仲裁员、赋予争议当事人上诉权、增加透明度等方面提出完善公正保障机制的建议。
{"title":"A Step Forward for Tax Dispute Resolution between China and ASEAN Countries under the Belt and Road Initiative","authors":"Xu Diheng","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3349398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3349398","url":null,"abstract":"China has a closer business relationship with Southeast Asian countries under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). To ensure tax certainty for the investment, it is necessary to establish an effective and efficient tax dispute resolution mechanism. The mutual agreement procedure (MAP) is the primary means, but it has its limitations, especially for countries in this region. Arbitration could be a powerful complementary to the MAP. China has established a new BRI Court-connected and Mediation Centre (Centre) that aims to resolve commercial disputes in this region. It seems like a new alternative for resolving tax disputes since it combines mediation with arbitration. This article analyzes the pros and cons of adopting arbitration as a complementary means to the MAP in this region. It further discusses the advantages and concerns for the Centre. Although the Centre encourages using mediation to resolve disputes, which could address problems of direct arbitration, it is difficult to maintain impartiality from its current rough rules and its position. This article makes suggestions on improving the mechanism to guarantee the impartiality by selecting mediators and arbitrators with knowledge of the region, endowing disputants the right to appeal, and increasing transparency.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129724143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
How Could the Mechanism of Appointing a Custodian or a Provisional Director Help Solving Corporate Deadlock in China? 托管人或临时董事任命机制如何帮助解决中国的公司僵局?
Pub Date : 2019-02-11 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3397917
Zichao Wang
To enter management deadlock is certainly a misfortune for a corporation, especially for a highly profitable one. Deadlock not only influences the daily operation of a business but will eventually cause great economic loss to it. Delaware corporate law provides several mechanisms including appointing a custodian and a provisional director to solve this dysfunction. On the contrary, there are not many choices available to a Chinese company in deadlock. The only judicial remedy provided to Chinese companies experiencing is judicial dissolution. This article reviews the mechanism of appointing a custodian and a provisional director for a close corporation under Delaware General Corporation Law and discusses the feasibility of transferring them to Chinese corporate law.
对于一个企业来说,进入管理僵局无疑是一种不幸,尤其是对于一个高利润的企业来说。僵局不仅会影响企业的日常经营,最终还会给企业造成巨大的经济损失。特拉华州的公司法提供了几种机制,包括任命一名托管人和一名临时董事来解决这种功能障碍。相反,陷入僵局的中国企业没有太多选择。中国公司面临的唯一司法救济就是司法解散。本文回顾了美国特拉华州《普通公司法》对封闭式公司设立托管人和临时董事的规定,并探讨了将其引入中国公司法的可行性。
{"title":"How Could the Mechanism of Appointing a Custodian or a Provisional Director Help Solving Corporate Deadlock in China?","authors":"Zichao Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3397917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397917","url":null,"abstract":"To enter management deadlock is certainly a misfortune for a corporation, especially for a highly profitable one. Deadlock not only influences the daily operation of a business but will eventually cause great economic loss to it. Delaware corporate law provides several mechanisms including appointing a custodian and a provisional director to solve this dysfunction. On the contrary, there are not many choices available to a Chinese company in deadlock. The only judicial remedy provided to Chinese companies experiencing is judicial dissolution. This article reviews the mechanism of appointing a custodian and a provisional director for a close corporation under Delaware General Corporation Law and discusses the feasibility of transferring them to Chinese corporate law.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133688561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When Coalition Falls Apart: Case of Solidarity Building of Two Unions 当联盟破裂:两个工会建立团结的案例
Pub Date : 2019-02-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3336154
Baran Han
This article examines the external and organizational factors behind the coalition dynamics of two labour unions representing a different mix of employment contract types – temporary and permanent – that led the 2007 Irregular Workers Movement in South Korea. Drawing on semi-structured interview, video, newspapers and internal document data, we find that while political opportunities drove the two unions to come together, broad alliances formed around the coalition on the issue of job security of irregular workers marginalized the union with predominantly regular workers. Organizational differences that seemed complementary at first hindered a collective identity from forming and became a source of resentment as strikes continued on. Varying progression of negotiations not only reduced the benefits of claims coordination and collective action but also invoked otherness among them. Lack of trust and recognition did not allow for even a loose cooperative differentiation relation.
本文考察了代表不同雇佣合同类型(临时合同和永久合同)的两个工会的联盟动态背后的外部和组织因素,这导致了2007年韩国非正规工人运动。根据半结构化采访、视频、报纸和内部文件数据,我们发现,虽然政治机遇促使两个工会走到一起,但围绕非正规工人工作保障问题而形成的广泛联盟使以正规工人为主的工会边缘化。起初看似互补的组织差异阻碍了集体认同的形成,并随着罢工的继续而成为怨恨的根源。谈判的不同进展不仅减少了索赔协调和集体行动的好处,而且还引起了它们之间的差异性。缺乏信任和认可甚至不允许松散的合作差异化关系。
{"title":"When Coalition Falls Apart: Case of Solidarity Building of Two Unions","authors":"Baran Han","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3336154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3336154","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the external and organizational factors behind the coalition dynamics of two labour unions representing a different mix of employment contract types – temporary and permanent – that led the 2007 Irregular Workers Movement in South Korea. Drawing on semi-structured interview, video, newspapers and internal document data, we find that while political opportunities drove the two unions to come together, broad alliances formed around the coalition on the issue of job security of irregular workers marginalized the union with predominantly regular workers. Organizational differences that seemed complementary at first hindered a collective identity from forming and became a source of resentment as strikes continued on. Varying progression of negotiations not only reduced the benefits of claims coordination and collective action but also invoked otherness among them. Lack of trust and recognition did not allow for even a loose cooperative differentiation relation.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127238303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Superior Bargaining Power: Dealing With Aggregate Concentration Concerns 优越的议价能力:处理总体集中度问题
Pub Date : 2018-12-28 DOI: 10.4337/9781788117340.00017
Thomas K. Cheng, M. Gal
Aggregate concentration has recently been recognized as an important source of competitive constraints. The concerns raised by it are, however, particularly difficult to deal with, largely because they do not lend themselves to straightforward solutions. This chapter examines the use of abuse of superior bargaining position provisions to remedy aggregate concentration concerns. Special focus is placed on Japan and South Korea, both of which have attempted to use such provisions to counteract the inherent advantage in bargaining power enjoyed by large conglomerates vis-à-vis smaller or weaker trading counterparts. This experience is interesting, inter alia, because in recent years Japan has shied away from using superior bargaining power prohibitions to deal with aggregate concentration, while South Korea has taken a different stance. The chapter suggests that abuse of superior bargaining position provisions can, at best, be a second-best solution to address aggregate concentration concerns. Nonetheless, they can be used to curb conglomerate abuse of their economic power under some circumstances. It concludes by suggesting that some modifications can be made to these provisions to render them more suitable for this purpose.
总集中度最近被认为是竞争限制的一个重要来源。然而,它所引起的关切特别难以处理,主要是因为它们不适合直接解决。本章探讨了滥用优势议价地位条款来补救总体集中度问题。特别关注的是日本和韩国,这两个国家都试图利用这些条款来抵消大型企业集团相对于-à-vis较小或较弱的贸易对手所享有的议价能力的固有优势。这一经验很有趣,特别是因为近年来,日本在处理总集中度问题上一直避免使用具有优越议价能力的禁令,而韩国则采取了不同的立场。这一章表明,滥用优势谈判地位条款充其量只能是解决总体集中度问题的次优解决方案。然而,在某些情况下,它们可以用来遏制大企业滥用经济权力。它最后建议,可以对这些规定作出一些修改,使它们更适合于这一目的。
{"title":"Superior Bargaining Power: Dealing With Aggregate Concentration Concerns","authors":"Thomas K. Cheng, M. Gal","doi":"10.4337/9781788117340.00017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117340.00017","url":null,"abstract":"Aggregate concentration has recently been recognized as an important source of competitive constraints. The concerns raised by it are, however, particularly difficult to deal with, largely because they do not lend themselves to straightforward solutions. This chapter examines the use of abuse of superior bargaining position provisions to remedy aggregate concentration concerns. Special focus is placed on Japan and South Korea, both of which have attempted to use such provisions to counteract the inherent advantage in bargaining power enjoyed by large conglomerates vis-à-vis smaller or weaker trading counterparts. This experience is interesting, inter alia, because in recent years Japan has shied away from using superior bargaining power prohibitions to deal with aggregate concentration, while South Korea has taken a different stance. The chapter suggests that abuse of superior bargaining position provisions can, at best, be a second-best solution to address aggregate concentration concerns. Nonetheless, they can be used to curb conglomerate abuse of their economic power under some circumstances. It concludes by suggesting that some modifications can be made to these provisions to render them more suitable for this purpose.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121837588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Asian Law eJournal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1