首页 > 最新文献

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians最新文献

英文 中文
Regorafenib as maintenance therapy showed significant delayed progression of non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas 瑞非尼作为维持治疗显示非脂肪细胞性软组织肉瘤的进展明显延迟
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70032
Carrie Printz
<p>Because advanced non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are aggressive with poor outcomes, the goal of treatment is to delay progression and ensure quality of life. Doxorubicin (an anthracycline chemotherapy) is first-line standard of care for these patients. Researchers have discussed whether adding maintenance therapy might improve progression-free survival (PFS), but few studies have examined the option.</p><p>Non-adipocytic STSs are cancers that start in the body’s connective tissues but not in fat cells (which are called adipocytes).</p><p>EREMISS, a double-blind, randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial, evaluated the safety and PFS of maintenance therapy with regorafenib in patients with non-adipocytic STSs. Findings showed that regorafenib significantly increased PFS after first-line treatment by a median difference of 2.1 months. Results were published in the <i>Annals of Oncology</i> (doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.024).</p><p>“The sarcoma community has had a lot of conversation around the role of maintenance, and I was really pleased to see this well-designed study,” says Lara Davis, MD, an associate professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology and the director of the Sarcoma Program at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland. “The findings are clearly significant and look very promising. While the role of maintenance therapy in general is not fully established, it’s absolutely worth additional investigation.”</p><p>The EREMISS trial assessed the activity and safety of regorafenib in 126 patients with advanced non-adipocytic STSs who were enrolled in 17 centers in France from May 2019 to November 2022.</p><p>Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that can target oncogenic pathways. Studies have shown its effectiveness in treating some sarcoma subtypes, aside from liposarcomas.</p><p>Female patients represented 55% of the total enrollment, and the median age was 58 years. The most common subtype was leiomyosarcoma (59%).</p><p>Participants who had stable disease or a partial response after six cycles of doxorubicin as a first-line treatment received 120 mg of regorafenib per day for 3 weeks on and 1 week off. The primary end point was PFS. It was accessible in 122 patients.</p><p>The median PFS by blinded central review was 3.5 months in the placebo arm and 5.6 months in the regorafenib arm. Although overall survival was not the primary end point, it was 20.5 months for the placebo group and 27.6 months for the regorafenib group.</p><p>In the placebo arm, 4.8% of the patients experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, whereas 56.3% of the patients receiving regorafenib did. The most common adverse events were asthenia (9%), atrial hypertension (8%), and rash (8%).</p><p>Robin Jones, MD, a medical oncologist and sarcoma specialist at the Royal Marsden Cancer Center in London, praises the study’s design.</p><p>“The authors should be congratulated for actually completing and publishing the tria
由于晚期非脂肪细胞性软组织肉瘤(STSs)具有侵袭性且预后差,因此治疗的目标是延迟进展并确保生活质量。阿霉素(一种蒽环类化疗药物)是这些患者的一线治疗标准。研究人员已经讨论了增加维持治疗是否可以改善无进展生存(PFS),但很少有研究检验了这一选择。非脂肪细胞性STSs是一种始于身体结缔组织而非脂肪细胞(称为脂肪细胞)的癌症。EREMISS是一项双盲、随机、对照的2期试验,评估了regorafenib在非脂肪细胞性STSs患者中维持治疗的安全性和PFS。结果显示,瑞非尼显著提高一线治疗后的PFS,中位差值为2.1个月。研究结果发表在《肿瘤学年鉴》上(doi:10.1016/j.a nannon .2025.03.024)。位于波特兰的俄勒冈健康与科学大学血液学/医学肿瘤学部门的医学副教授、肉瘤项目主任Lara Davis医学博士说:“肉瘤社区围绕维持的作用进行了很多讨论,我很高兴看到这项设计良好的研究。”“这些发现显然意义重大,看起来很有希望。虽然维持疗法的作用尚未完全确定,但绝对值得进一步研究。”EREMISS试验于2019年5月至2022年11月在法国17个中心招募了126名晚期非脂肪细胞性STSs患者,评估了regorafenib的活性和安全性。瑞非尼是一种口服多激酶抑制剂,可以靶向致癌途径。研究表明,除脂肪肉瘤外,它对治疗一些肉瘤亚型有效。女性患者占总入组人数的55%,中位年龄为58岁。最常见的亚型是平滑肌肉瘤(59%)。在阿霉素作为一线治疗6个周期后病情稳定或部分缓解的参与者,每天接受120毫克瑞非尼,连续3周,1周休息。主要终点为PFS。122例患者可获得。通过盲法中心评价,安慰剂组的中位PFS为3.5个月,瑞非尼组为5.6个月。虽然总生存期不是主要终点,但安慰剂组为20.5个月,瑞非尼组为27.6个月。在安慰剂组中,4.8%的患者经历了3级或更高的不良事件,而接受瑞非尼治疗的患者中有56.3%发生了不良事件。最常见的不良事件是虚弱(9%)、心房高压(8%)和皮疹(8%)。罗宾·琼斯医学博士是伦敦皇家马斯登癌症中心的肿瘤学家和肉瘤专家,他赞扬了这项研究的设计。他说:“考虑到新冠肺炎大流行带来的挑战,应该祝贺作者真正完成并发表了这项试验。”“我的观点是,这种疗法可能确实帮助了一小部分患者,但我们目前还没有一种很好的方法来识别这些患者——这是治疗肿瘤学家和患者之间就治疗的利弊进行的非常个人化的讨论。”戴维斯博士指出,尽管研究结果令人鼓舞,但将结果应用于临床实践是具有挑战性的。她说:“我们在肉瘤领域的大部分数据都是基于2期试验。”她指出,在这些相对罕见的癌症中,很难找到大量患者进行3期试验。Davis博士补充说,因此,美国的肉瘤临床医生通常依赖于2期试验结果作为治疗指导,但缺乏reorafenib的3期数据可能会限制保险覆盖范围以及将其纳入国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南。她说:“我希望NCCN指南小组能考虑到这项研究的结果,并考虑将瑞非尼维持治疗作为一种选择。”“我认为这项研究比列出的一些疗法有更多的证据支持,但我不认为这是铁板钉钉的。”Jones博士说,在许多欧洲国家,临床医生不太可能在没有三期试验证明其疗效的情况下,开说明书外的瑞非尼用于维持治疗。“不可能对每一种罕见的肉瘤进行大规模的随机3期试验。例如,在英国,每年只有大约10人被诊断出患有一些罕见的肉瘤亚型,”他补充道。琼斯博士指出,尽管一些患者患病多年,但不同肉瘤在存活率和侵袭性上的巨大差异使得进行临床试验变得更加困难。然而,根据Davis博士的说法,在美国,瑞戈非尼可能会被开出标签外处方。她说:“我们非常幸运,因为我们有能力为病人提供一些个性化的建议。”
{"title":"Regorafenib as maintenance therapy showed significant delayed progression of non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas","authors":"Carrie Printz","doi":"10.3322/caac.70032","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70032","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Because advanced non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are aggressive with poor outcomes, the goal of treatment is to delay progression and ensure quality of life. Doxorubicin (an anthracycline chemotherapy) is first-line standard of care for these patients. Researchers have discussed whether adding maintenance therapy might improve progression-free survival (PFS), but few studies have examined the option.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Non-adipocytic STSs are cancers that start in the body’s connective tissues but not in fat cells (which are called adipocytes).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EREMISS, a double-blind, randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial, evaluated the safety and PFS of maintenance therapy with regorafenib in patients with non-adipocytic STSs. Findings showed that regorafenib significantly increased PFS after first-line treatment by a median difference of 2.1 months. Results were published in the &lt;i&gt;Annals of Oncology&lt;/i&gt; (doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.024).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“The sarcoma community has had a lot of conversation around the role of maintenance, and I was really pleased to see this well-designed study,” says Lara Davis, MD, an associate professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology and the director of the Sarcoma Program at Oregon Health &amp; Science University in Portland. “The findings are clearly significant and look very promising. While the role of maintenance therapy in general is not fully established, it’s absolutely worth additional investigation.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The EREMISS trial assessed the activity and safety of regorafenib in 126 patients with advanced non-adipocytic STSs who were enrolled in 17 centers in France from May 2019 to November 2022.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that can target oncogenic pathways. Studies have shown its effectiveness in treating some sarcoma subtypes, aside from liposarcomas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Female patients represented 55% of the total enrollment, and the median age was 58 years. The most common subtype was leiomyosarcoma (59%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Participants who had stable disease or a partial response after six cycles of doxorubicin as a first-line treatment received 120 mg of regorafenib per day for 3 weeks on and 1 week off. The primary end point was PFS. It was accessible in 122 patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The median PFS by blinded central review was 3.5 months in the placebo arm and 5.6 months in the regorafenib arm. Although overall survival was not the primary end point, it was 20.5 months for the placebo group and 27.6 months for the regorafenib group.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the placebo arm, 4.8% of the patients experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, whereas 56.3% of the patients receiving regorafenib did. The most common adverse events were asthenia (9%), atrial hypertension (8%), and rash (8%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Robin Jones, MD, a medical oncologist and sarcoma specialist at the Royal Marsden Cancer Center in London, praises the study’s design.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“The authors should be congratulated for actually completing and publishing the tria","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 5","pages":"368-370"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Talking with adolescent and young adult cancer survivors about health after cancer: A review and communication guide for clinicians 与青少年和年轻的癌症幸存者谈论癌症后的健康:临床医生的回顾和交流指南。
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70030
Stephanie M. Smith MD, MPH, Lauren C. Heathcote PhD, Jennifer N. John BA, Jasan Zimmerman MNA, CFRE, Catherine Benedict PhD, Abby R. Rosenberg MD, MA, MS, Lidia Schapira MD

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors represent a vulnerable population in cancer care and survivorship. AYA survivors are a heterogeneous group that includes people between the ages of 15 and 39 years who were treated for cancer during their childhood or AYA years, at which time they had variable agency and may have received cancer care in pediatric or adult settings. AYA survivors experience one or multiple health care transitions, moving from active oncology to posttreatment survivorship and/or from pediatric to adult care. Clinician communication that centers the needs and preferences of the AYA and their family (parent, partner, other support person) is a therapeutic tool that can support AYAs in these health care transitions and promote AYA engagement in their care. In this article, the authors review clinician communication practices through the lens of AYAs' and families' lived experiences with a focus on the initial diagnosis and treatment phase, completion of treatment, and throughout posttreatment survivorship care. Specific communication topics relevant to survivorship encompass managing uncertainty and fear of cancer recurrence, discussing treatment-related future health risks, and supporting self-management and engagement in care. Best practices for clinician communication include maintaining openness, compassion, and flexibility to re-assess and adapt communication styles as an AYA cancer survivors' needs, concerns, and preferences change over time.

青少年和年轻成人(AYA)癌症幸存者是癌症护理和幸存者中的弱势群体。AYA幸存者是一个异质群体,包括年龄在15至39岁之间的人,他们在童年或AYA期间接受过癌症治疗,当时他们有不同的代理,可能在儿科或成人环境中接受过癌症治疗。AYA幸存者经历一次或多次医疗保健转变,从活跃的肿瘤学转移到治疗后的幸存者和/或从儿科转移到成人护理。临床医生的沟通以AYA及其家人(父母、伴侣、其他支持人员)的需求和偏好为中心,是一种治疗工具,可以在这些医疗保健转变中支持AYA,并促进AYA参与他们的护理。在这篇文章中,作者回顾了临床医生的沟通实践,通过AYAs和家庭的生活经验,重点是最初的诊断和治疗阶段,治疗的完成,以及整个治疗后的生存护理。与生存相关的具体沟通主题包括管理不确定性和对癌症复发的恐惧,讨论与治疗相关的未来健康风险,以及支持自我管理和参与护理。临床医生沟通的最佳实践包括保持开放、同情和灵活性,以重新评估和适应沟通方式,因为AYA癌症幸存者的需求、关注点和偏好会随着时间的推移而变化。
{"title":"Talking with adolescent and young adult cancer survivors about health after cancer: A review and communication guide for clinicians","authors":"Stephanie M. Smith MD, MPH,&nbsp;Lauren C. Heathcote PhD,&nbsp;Jennifer N. John BA,&nbsp;Jasan Zimmerman MNA, CFRE,&nbsp;Catherine Benedict PhD,&nbsp;Abby R. Rosenberg MD, MA, MS,&nbsp;Lidia Schapira MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70030","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors represent a vulnerable population in cancer care and survivorship. AYA survivors are a heterogeneous group that includes people between the ages of 15 and 39 years who were treated for cancer during their childhood or AYA years, at which time they had variable agency and may have received cancer care in pediatric or adult settings. AYA survivors experience one or multiple health care transitions, moving from active oncology to posttreatment survivorship and/or from pediatric to adult care. Clinician communication that centers the needs and preferences of the AYA and their family (parent, partner, other support person) is a therapeutic tool that can support AYAs in these health care transitions and promote AYA engagement in their care. In this article, the authors review clinician communication practices through the lens of AYAs' and families' lived experiences with a focus on the initial diagnosis and treatment phase, completion of treatment, and throughout posttreatment survivorship care. Specific communication topics relevant to survivorship encompass managing uncertainty and fear of cancer recurrence, discussing treatment-related future health risks, and supporting self-management and engagement in care. Best practices for clinician communication include maintaining openness, compassion, and flexibility to re-assess and adapt communication styles as an AYA cancer survivors' needs, concerns, and preferences change over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 6","pages":"667-681"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144960291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prostate cancer statistics, 2025 前列腺癌统计,2025年。
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70028
Tyler B. Kratzer MPH, Natalia Mazzitelli MPH, Jessica Star MA, MPH, William L. Dahut MD, Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD, Rebecca L. Siegel MPH

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, and the incidence of advanced disease is increasing rapidly. This article provides an overview of prostate cancer occurrence using population-based incidence and mortality data from the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prostate cancer incidence trends have reversed from a decline of 6.4% per year during 2007 through 2014 to an increase of 3.0% annually during 2014 through 2021. The increasing trend is confined to distant-stage disease in men younger than 55 years and to regional/distant-stage disease in men aged 55–69 years but includes early stage disease in men aged 70 years and older. Over the past decade of data, distant-stage disease has increased by 2.6% annually in men younger than 55 years, 6.0% annually in men aged 55–69 years, and 6.2% annually in men aged 70 years and older. American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian American/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic men are less likely than Black and White men to be diagnosed with localized disease (64%–67% vs. 71%–72%). Compared with White men, American Indian/Alaska Native men have 12% higher prostate cancer mortality despite 13% lower incidence, whereas Black men have double the prostate cancer mortality, with 67% higher incidence. In summary, continued increases in the diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer and persistent racial disparities underscore the need for redoubled efforts to optimize early detection while limiting overdiagnosis and to understand and address barriers to equitable outcomes.

前列腺癌是美国男性中最常见的癌症,晚期疾病的发病率正在迅速增加。本文利用美国国家癌症研究所和疾病控制与预防中心提供的基于人群的发病率和死亡率数据,概述了前列腺癌的发生情况。前列腺癌发病率趋势已经逆转,从2007年至2014年每年下降6.4%,到2014年至2021年每年增加3.0%。增加的趋势局限于55岁以下男性的远期疾病和55-69岁男性的区域性/远期疾病,但包括70岁及以上男性的早期疾病。在过去十年的数据中,55岁以下男性的远期疾病每年增加2.6%,55-69岁男性每年增加6.0%,70岁及以上男性每年增加6.2%。美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民和西班牙裔男性被诊断为局部疾病的可能性低于黑人和白人(64%-67%对71%-72%)。与白人男性相比,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民男性的前列腺癌死亡率高12%,尽管发病率低13%,而黑人男性的前列腺癌死亡率是白人男性的两倍,发病率高67%。总之,晚期前列腺癌诊断的持续增加和持续的种族差异强调需要加倍努力优化早期发现,同时限制过度诊断,并了解和解决公平结果的障碍。
{"title":"Prostate cancer statistics, 2025","authors":"Tyler B. Kratzer MPH,&nbsp;Natalia Mazzitelli MPH,&nbsp;Jessica Star MA, MPH,&nbsp;William L. Dahut MD,&nbsp;Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Siegel MPH","doi":"10.3322/caac.70028","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, and the incidence of advanced disease is increasing rapidly. This article provides an overview of prostate cancer occurrence using population-based incidence and mortality data from the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prostate cancer incidence trends have reversed from a decline of 6.4% per year during 2007 through 2014 to an increase of 3.0% annually during 2014 through 2021. The increasing trend is confined to distant-stage disease in men younger than 55 years and to regional/distant-stage disease in men aged 55–69 years but includes early stage disease in men aged 70 years and older. Over the past decade of data, distant-stage disease has increased by 2.6% annually in men younger than 55 years, 6.0% annually in men aged 55–69 years, and 6.2% annually in men aged 70 years and older. American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian American/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic men are less likely than Black and White men to be diagnosed with localized disease (64%–67% vs. 71%–72%). Compared with White men, American Indian/Alaska Native men have 12% higher prostate cancer mortality despite 13% lower incidence, whereas Black men have double the prostate cancer mortality, with 67% higher incidence. In summary, continued increases in the diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer and persistent racial disparities underscore the need for redoubled efforts to optimize early detection while limiting overdiagnosis and to understand and address barriers to equitable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 6","pages":"485-497"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144937083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Update and new advances in fertility preservation and cancer 保存生育能力和癌症的最新进展。
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70029
Gwendolyn P. Quinn PhD, Michelle Bayefsky MD, Brooke Cherven PhD, MPH, Lauren V. Ghazal PhD, FNP-BC, Kara N. Goldman MD, Nina Francis Levin PhD, Leena Nahata MD, Bobby Najari MD, Sameer Thakker MD, Daniel R. Greenberg MD, Joshua A. Halpern MD, MS, Susan T. Vadaparampil PhD

Adolescents and young adults with a cancer diagnosis face unique challenges during treatment and into survivorship related to fertility and family building. This review provides an updated overview of the impact of cancer and its associated treatments, including novel treatments in male and female fertility. An overview of fertility preservation and family building options, including experimental options, is also provided.

患有癌症的青少年和年轻人在治疗期间面临着独特的挑战,并进入与生育和家庭建设有关的生存。这篇综述提供了癌症及其相关治疗的最新概述,包括对男性和女性生育能力的新治疗。还提供了保留生育能力和建立家庭选择的概述,包括实验选择。
{"title":"Update and new advances in fertility preservation and cancer","authors":"Gwendolyn P. Quinn PhD,&nbsp;Michelle Bayefsky MD,&nbsp;Brooke Cherven PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Lauren V. Ghazal PhD, FNP-BC,&nbsp;Kara N. Goldman MD,&nbsp;Nina Francis Levin PhD,&nbsp;Leena Nahata MD,&nbsp;Bobby Najari MD,&nbsp;Sameer Thakker MD,&nbsp;Daniel R. Greenberg MD,&nbsp;Joshua A. Halpern MD, MS,&nbsp;Susan T. Vadaparampil PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70029","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adolescents and young adults with a cancer diagnosis face unique challenges during treatment and into survivorship related to fertility and family building. This review provides an updated overview of the impact of cancer and its associated treatments, including novel treatments in male and female fertility. An overview of fertility preservation and family building options, including experimental options, is also provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 6","pages":"602-629"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144825550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treating EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer is no longer a one-size-fits-all approach 治疗egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌不再是一刀切的方法。
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70027
Lauren J. Antrim MD, Jyoti Malhotra MD, MPH
<p>Just over 2 decades ago, Lynch et al. published a landmark article in which they elucidated that activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) positively correlated with clinical responses to the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), gefitinib, in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).<span><sup>1</sup></span> Although estimates vary, it is believed that up to one third of cases of NSCLC may harbor these mutations.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Over the last 20 years, great strides have been made to improve both the efficacy and the tolerability of therapies targeting EGFR, with fourth-generation EGFR TKIs in development. In this edition of <i>CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians</i>, Borgeaud et al. provide an exceptionally detailed review of <i>EGFR</i>-mutant NSCLC that describes the molecular underpinnings of this oncogenic driver, discusses modern treatment approaches, and explores the gamut of clinical situations that can be encountered while treating a patient with <i>EGFR</i>-mutant NSCLC.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Although Borgeaud and colleagues explicitly do not cover the management of <i>EGFR</i> exon 20 insertions, they do provide some brief insights into P-loop and αC-helix compressing (PACC or <i>uncommon</i>) mutations and present a comprehensive review that can be a useful tool for clinicians treating patients with <i>common</i> <i>EGFR</i> mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletions) across all stages of presentation. Studies investigating the effectiveness of immunotherapy and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors to early phase trials targeting potential acquired mutations on EGFR TKIs are detailed. For clinicians treating patients with early stage or locally advanced NSCLC, their article analyzes pivotal studies, such as ADAURA and LAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02511106 and NCT03521154, respectively), which led to osimertinib (third-generation TKI) becoming the standard of care in the adjuvant and postchemoradiation setting, respectively.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> Furthermore, crucial ongoing studies are highlighted, such as NeoADAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04351555), which is investigating the incorporation of osimertinib in the neoadjuvant setting.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Potential considerations for less straight-forward situations, such as metastatic recurrence while on or after adjuvant osimertinib, are also discussed.</p><p>In recent years, treatment of <i>EGFR</i>-mutant NSCLC in the metastatic setting has grown increasingly complex, with multiple treatment regimens now approved. Borgeaud et al. provide a detailed overview of available first-line regimens and important treatment considerations. With the initial publication of the FLAURA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02296125) in 2017 and subsequent study updates, osimertinib became the clear choice for first-line systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, with an improvement
就在20多年前,Lynch等人发表了一篇具有里程碑意义的文章,阐明了表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的激活突变与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者对第一代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)吉非替尼的临床反应呈正相关尽管估计不同,但据信高达三分之一的NSCLC病例可能携带这些突变在过去的20年里,随着第四代EGFR TKIs的开发,在提高靶向EGFR治疗的疗效和耐受性方面取得了巨大进展。在本期CA中:在《临床医生癌症杂志》上,Borgeaud等人对EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌进行了非常详细的回顾,描述了这种致癌驱动因素的分子基础,讨论了现代治疗方法,并探讨了治疗EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者时可能遇到的临床情况。他们确实提供了一些关于p环和α c -螺旋压缩(PACC或不常见)突变的简要见解,并提供了一个全面的回顾,可以成为临床医生治疗所有阶段常见EGFR突变(L858R,外显子19缺失)患者的有用工具。研究了免疫疗法和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂对EGFR TKIs潜在获得性突变的早期试验的有效性。对于临床医生治疗早期或局部晚期NSCLC患者,他们的文章分析了关键研究,如ADAURA和LAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov标识号分别为NCT02511106和NCT03521154),这些研究导致奥西替尼(第三代TKI)分别成为辅助治疗和放化疗后的标准治疗。此外,重要的正在进行的研究也得到了强调,如NeoADAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT04351555),该研究正在研究奥西替尼在新辅助治疗中的应用潜在的考虑不太直接的情况,如转移性复发时,辅助奥希替尼或之后,也进行了讨论。近年来,转移性egfr突变型NSCLC的治疗变得越来越复杂,目前已批准多种治疗方案。Borgeaud等人提供了可用一线方案和重要治疗注意事项的详细概述。随着2017年FLAURA试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识号NCT02296125)的首次发表以及随后的研究更新,奥西替尼成为转移性疾病一线全身治疗的明确选择,与第一代TKIs相比,奥西替尼的中位无进展生存期和中位总生存期(OS)有所改善,重要的是,它具有良好的毒性随后,在2023年,FLAURA2 (ClinicalTrials.gov标识号NCT04035486)在一线环境中,与奥西替尼单药治疗相比,使用奥西替尼联合化疗(铂和培美曲塞)的中位无进展生存期得到改善,8而MARIPOSA (ClinicalTrials.gov标识号NCT04487080)在2024年使用amivantamab(一种EGFR和MET双特异性抗体)联合lazertinib(第三代EGFR TKI)的中位无进展生存期也得到改善虽然两种联合治疗方案的长期随访和生存数据都在不断成熟,但FLAURA2方案的总生存期有改善的趋势,而MARIPOSA方案的中位总生存期也有改善(预计比奥西替尼单药治疗方案超过1年)有了潜在的OS益处,联合疗法会成为新的一线疗法吗?确定哪些患者可能从联合治疗中获益最多是非常重要的。有多种疾病相关因素可能被认为是奥西替尼单药治疗早期进展的高风险因素,如脑转移或L858R突变的存在,Borgeaud等人对此进行了详细描述,并提供了很好的视觉表现(见图5)。然而,患者并不是他们疾病的混合体,建议的方案的潜在毒性影响应作为共同决策的一部分加以考虑。尽管奥西替尼的毒性低于早期的EGFR TKIs,但在FLAURA、FLAURA2和mariposa中,27%-43%的患者接受奥西替尼单药治疗仍报告了3级或更严重的不良事件。7-9在这些研究的奥西替尼单药治疗组中,26%-40%的研究参与者没有继续接受后续治疗。7-9然而,临床试验的患者可能不能反映现实世界的患者群体,在现实世界中,肺癌患者可能有更高的合并症发生率和更差的表现状态。
{"title":"Treating EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer is no longer a one-size-fits-all approach","authors":"Lauren J. Antrim MD,&nbsp;Jyoti Malhotra MD, MPH","doi":"10.3322/caac.70027","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70027","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Just over 2 decades ago, Lynch et al. published a landmark article in which they elucidated that activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (&lt;i&gt;EGFR&lt;/i&gt;) positively correlated with clinical responses to the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), gefitinib, in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Although estimates vary, it is believed that up to one third of cases of NSCLC may harbor these mutations.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Over the last 20 years, great strides have been made to improve both the efficacy and the tolerability of therapies targeting EGFR, with fourth-generation EGFR TKIs in development. In this edition of &lt;i&gt;CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians&lt;/i&gt;, Borgeaud et al. provide an exceptionally detailed review of &lt;i&gt;EGFR&lt;/i&gt;-mutant NSCLC that describes the molecular underpinnings of this oncogenic driver, discusses modern treatment approaches, and explores the gamut of clinical situations that can be encountered while treating a patient with &lt;i&gt;EGFR&lt;/i&gt;-mutant NSCLC.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although Borgeaud and colleagues explicitly do not cover the management of &lt;i&gt;EGFR&lt;/i&gt; exon 20 insertions, they do provide some brief insights into P-loop and αC-helix compressing (PACC or &lt;i&gt;uncommon&lt;/i&gt;) mutations and present a comprehensive review that can be a useful tool for clinicians treating patients with &lt;i&gt;common&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;EGFR&lt;/i&gt; mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletions) across all stages of presentation. Studies investigating the effectiveness of immunotherapy and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors to early phase trials targeting potential acquired mutations on EGFR TKIs are detailed. For clinicians treating patients with early stage or locally advanced NSCLC, their article analyzes pivotal studies, such as ADAURA and LAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02511106 and NCT03521154, respectively), which led to osimertinib (third-generation TKI) becoming the standard of care in the adjuvant and postchemoradiation setting, respectively.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4, 5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Furthermore, crucial ongoing studies are highlighted, such as NeoADAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04351555), which is investigating the incorporation of osimertinib in the neoadjuvant setting.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Potential considerations for less straight-forward situations, such as metastatic recurrence while on or after adjuvant osimertinib, are also discussed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In recent years, treatment of &lt;i&gt;EGFR&lt;/i&gt;-mutant NSCLC in the metastatic setting has grown increasingly complex, with multiple treatment regimens now approved. Borgeaud et al. provide a detailed overview of available first-line regimens and important treatment considerations. With the initial publication of the FLAURA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02296125) in 2017 and subsequent study updates, osimertinib became the clear choice for first-line systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, with an improvement","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 5","pages":"373-375"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144769846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multidisciplinary assessment of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A geriatric tumor board 广泛分期小细胞肺癌患者的多学科评估:一个老年肿瘤委员会。
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70026
Humera Khurshid MD, Sakeena Raza MD, Robert Brunault PharmD, Brittany Duffy RD, Michael Kavanaugh MD
<p>GB, a 74-year-old female with no significant past medical history and active tobacco use disorder of 61 pack-years, underwent a screening computed tomography (CT) of the chest in July 2024. The CT revealed a new, 4.3 × 2.5–cm, spiculated mass in the right upper lobe along with adjacent septal thickening, emphysema, and multiple, stable, subcentimeter pulmonary nodules (Figure 1).</p><p>A positron-emission tomography–CT confirmed the size and location of the lung lesion, showing intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and extensive lymphadenopathy above and below the diaphragm. The scan also revealed numerous additional foci of increased skeletal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the axial and left iliac crest regions (Figure 1). A staging brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed no suspicious lesions.</p><p>GB underwent a diagnostic bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound 1 month after her initial presentation. A biopsy of the station 4R lymph node revealed an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor, which tested positive for thyroid transcription factor 1, synaptophysin, and insulinoma-associated protein 11, with an elevated Ki-67 proliferative index. The final diagnosis was extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with bone and liver metastases.</p><p>Given her advanced age, physicians referred GB to the geriatric-oncology multidisciplinary clinic (GO-MDC) to assess her frailty and stratify her chemotherapy toxicity risk.</p><p>In summary, the patient was <i>fit</i> according to the CGA parameters used in the frailty index.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The Cancer and Aging Research Group Chemotherapy Toxicity Tool (CARG-TT), a calculated score that predicts for grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity, indicated an intermediate risk for GB.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>We discussed in detail that GB has incurable or ES-SCLC. The goal of treatment is to control the cancer with treatment and maintain her quality of life. Based on CGA assessment and an intermediate risk of grade 3 or higher toxicity, we recommended systemic, palliative chemotherapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and an immune checkpoint inhibitor with growth factor support. After a risk/benefit discussion, GB opted for the palliative treatment.</p><p>After visiting the GO-MDC, she began systemic therapy with carboplatin with an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, atezolizumab 1200 mg on day 1, and etoposide 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1–3 every 21 days. Apart from mild fatigue and grade 2 anemia, she did not have any significant toxicity. She received cycle 4 of induction chemoimmunotherapy without further dose reduction on October 30, 2024.</p><p>There was a significant reduction of the mass in the right upper lobe, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and a liver lesion consistent with treatment response observed on a November 20, 2024, follow-up torso CT (Figure 2). The patient received maintenance atezolizumab, which is being administered every 21 days. Because of a lack of survival benefit f
GB, 74岁,女性,既往无明显病史,61包年活跃烟草使用障碍,2024年7月行胸部CT筛查。CT示右肺上叶一新的4.3 × 2.5 cm的棘状肿块,伴相邻的间隔增厚、肺气肿和多发稳定的亚厘米肺结节(图1)。正电子发射断层扫描- ct证实了肺部病变的大小和位置,显示强烈的氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取和横膈膜上下广泛的淋巴结病变。扫描还显示在轴向和左髂嵴区域有许多额外的骨氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取增加的灶(图1)。分期脑磁共振成像(MRI)未见可疑病变。GB在初次就诊后1个月接受了支气管镜检查和支气管内超声检查。4R淋巴结活检显示为侵袭性神经内分泌肿瘤,甲状腺转录因子1、突触素和胰岛素瘤相关蛋白11检测呈阳性,Ki-67增殖指数升高。最终诊断为广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)伴骨和肝转移。鉴于她的高龄,医生将她转到老年肿瘤学多学科诊所(GO-MDC)评估她的虚弱程度,并对她的化疗毒性风险进行分层。综上所述,根据衰弱指数中使用的CGA参数对患者进行拟合癌症和衰老研究小组化疗毒性工具(CARG-TT)是一个预测3级或更高化疗毒性的计算评分,表明GB有中等风险。我们详细讨论了GB有无法治愈或ES-SCLC。治疗的目的是通过治疗控制癌症,维持患者的生活质量。基于CGA评估和3级或更高毒性的中度风险,我们推荐卡铂、依托泊苷和生长因子支持的免疫检查点抑制剂进行全身姑息性化疗。经过风险/收益的讨论,GB选择了姑息治疗。访问GO-MDC后,她开始全身治疗卡铂,第1天曲线下面积为5,第1天阿特唑单抗1200mg,依托泊苷80mg /m2,每21天1 - 3天。除了轻度疲劳和2级贫血外,她没有任何明显的毒性。患者于2024年10月30日接受第4周期诱导化疗免疫治疗,未进一步减量。在2024年11月20日随访的躯干CT上,患者右上叶肿块明显缩小,纵隔淋巴结病变,肝脏病变与治疗效果一致(图2)。患者接受阿特唑单抗维持性治疗,每21天给药一次。由于ES-SCLC患者缺乏预防性颅脑放射治疗(PCI)的生存益处,因此PCI治疗被拒绝。卫生保健提供者使用CGA来评估老年癌症患者耐受化疗等积极癌症治疗的能力。CGA评估老年患者的几个功能领域,并经常发现与健康有关的问题,包括认知能力下降、身体虚弱、营养不良、多种药物、情绪障碍和社会支持不足,这些都会影响患者的预后。识别这些问题可确保及时干预,并有助于提高生活质量。这种多学科方法分析老年癌症患者的数据,并帮助制定个性化的治疗计划。认知障碍会影响决策,并可能因化疗而恶化。当CGA检测到认知能力下降时,它强调需要指定的委托书来协助决策,并帮助选择符合患者护理目标的治疗方案。老年评估还包括情绪评估。研究表明,无论年龄大小,抑郁症都会显著影响癌症患者的预后。对患有癌症的抑郁症患者进行药物治疗和咨询可以改善其预后。营养不良,如肌肉减少症和进行性体重减轻,会导致身体虚弱,并增加化疗毒性的风险。CGA检测这些问题的能力允许及时的营养干预和物理治疗,这可以帮助在癌症治疗之前和期间建立和维持体力和耐力。7,8多种慢性疾病常随年龄增长而增加,生理储备减少,影响老年癌症患者的生存。通过老年评估评估严重的多病有助于讨论适当的护理目标,并有助于制定有关非侵袭性治疗的决策。9,10多种用药增加了药物相互作用和化疗不良副作用的风险。 在老年评估期间发现这一点可以帮助最大限度地减少不良后果的风险。老年评估也为评估老年癌症患者的支持系统提供了机会。社会孤立是老年病学和肿瘤学文献中确定的一个因素,它与死亡风险增加有关。在癌症治疗的早期让社会工作者参与,可以确保建立一个可行的支持系统,以防止治疗不合规和延误。12,13在目前的患者中,老年评估显示除了认知之外,在任何类别中都没有明显的缺陷。GB的低表现与患者女儿提供的病史或她的高功能状态不一致。正常的衰老会导致认知变化,比如从20多岁开始并持续一生的处理速度下降,以及一些记忆力下降。用自由回忆(记住一串单词的能力)来衡量的新学习能力在60岁之前逐渐衰退,然后在60岁之后下降得更快GB只能记住三个单词中的一个,这或许可以解释。执行功能,包括解决问题、决策、计划、注意力和心理灵活性的认知能力,也会随着年龄的增长而下降,尤其是在70岁以后。此外,视觉空间定向随着年龄的增长而减弱。这些变化可能导致在认知测试中的表现较差,特别是在计时测试中,这可能解释了GB在Mini-Cog测试中难以显示正确时间的原因。然而,研究表明,老年人在标准化的神经心理学测试中可能表现不佳,但在现实生活中表现得和年轻人一样好。16 SCLC患者的平均年龄有所增加,年龄在70岁以上的患者比例从1975年的23%增加到2010年的44%,几乎一半的SCLC患者年龄在70岁以上。17,18不幸的是,相当大比例的SCLC患者不符合临床试验的标准纳入标准,特别是那些年龄较大和/或东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)表现状态(PS)较差的患者。从历史上看,这两种通常不相关的患者类别经常在研究中合并。个别试验使用了不同的老年患者定义,进一步复杂化了制定管理和治疗这些具有挑战性的患者的明确指导。大多数研究将老年患者定义为65岁及以上,这与世界卫生组织的定义一致。对于80岁以上的老年人,很少有数据可以作为治疗决策的基础。大约40%的SCLC患者年龄在70岁以上。在这些老年患者中,由于生理储备下降、合并症增加、多药、认知能力下降以及其他与年龄相关的医学和社会问题,SCLC的治疗更具挑战性。大多数关于老年患者治疗的数据来自回顾性研究。可用于指导这一特殊人群的治疗决策的前瞻性数据有限。根据现有数据,标准方法在精心挑选的适合老年患者中是可行的。老年ES-SCLC患者和ECOG PS 0-1 /fit患者可以给予卡铂和依托泊苷加免疫治疗(atezolizumab或durvalumab)的标准治疗,然后进行维持免疫治疗。然而,用于评估癌症功能状态的经典工具,如ECOG-PS20和Karnofsky性能状态21,在老年人群中缺乏验证。最近,已经开发出了针对老年人口的工具。例如,癌症和衰老研究组毒性工具(CARG-TT)3和高龄患者化疗风险评估量表(CRASH)评分汇编了CGA的组成部分来预测化学毒性。CGA的要素需要时间和培训才能实现。齐心协力,肿瘤学和老年病学的共同管理可以为老年人群带来可靠的CGA,从而改变结果。CARG-TT是一种预测中度至重度化疗毒性的化疗前评估工具。它是根据人口统计学、肿瘤和治疗变量计算的;化验结果;以及CGA变量(功能、合并症、认知、心理状态、社会活动/支持和营养状况)。CARG-TT评分范围为0 ~ 19。每个风险类别都与发展为中度至重度毒性的可能性百分比相关联。低风险为0-5分(&lt;30%),中等风险为6-9分(40%-60%),高风险为10-19分(&gt;70%)。在GO-MDC中进行的3CGA,正如本文所阐述的,显示该患者具有非常好的功能状态,在认知能力、心理健康、营养状况和竞争性合并症方面没有损害。 她从女儿那里得到了很好的社会支持。她被认为有合理的预期寿命,与癌症诊断无关。她被认为是一个健康的老年病人。通过使用来自CGA的信息,CARG-TT工具预测了化疗毒性的中等风险(图3)。因此,该患者接受ES
{"title":"Multidisciplinary assessment of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A geriatric tumor board","authors":"Humera Khurshid MD,&nbsp;Sakeena Raza MD,&nbsp;Robert Brunault PharmD,&nbsp;Brittany Duffy RD,&nbsp;Michael Kavanaugh MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70026","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70026","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;GB, a 74-year-old female with no significant past medical history and active tobacco use disorder of 61 pack-years, underwent a screening computed tomography (CT) of the chest in July 2024. The CT revealed a new, 4.3 × 2.5–cm, spiculated mass in the right upper lobe along with adjacent septal thickening, emphysema, and multiple, stable, subcentimeter pulmonary nodules (Figure 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A positron-emission tomography–CT confirmed the size and location of the lung lesion, showing intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and extensive lymphadenopathy above and below the diaphragm. The scan also revealed numerous additional foci of increased skeletal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the axial and left iliac crest regions (Figure 1). A staging brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed no suspicious lesions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GB underwent a diagnostic bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound 1 month after her initial presentation. A biopsy of the station 4R lymph node revealed an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor, which tested positive for thyroid transcription factor 1, synaptophysin, and insulinoma-associated protein 11, with an elevated Ki-67 proliferative index. The final diagnosis was extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with bone and liver metastases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given her advanced age, physicians referred GB to the geriatric-oncology multidisciplinary clinic (GO-MDC) to assess her frailty and stratify her chemotherapy toxicity risk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In summary, the patient was &lt;i&gt;fit&lt;/i&gt; according to the CGA parameters used in the frailty index.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The Cancer and Aging Research Group Chemotherapy Toxicity Tool (CARG-TT), a calculated score that predicts for grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity, indicated an intermediate risk for GB.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We discussed in detail that GB has incurable or ES-SCLC. The goal of treatment is to control the cancer with treatment and maintain her quality of life. Based on CGA assessment and an intermediate risk of grade 3 or higher toxicity, we recommended systemic, palliative chemotherapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and an immune checkpoint inhibitor with growth factor support. After a risk/benefit discussion, GB opted for the palliative treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After visiting the GO-MDC, she began systemic therapy with carboplatin with an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, atezolizumab 1200 mg on day 1, and etoposide 80 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; on days 1–3 every 21 days. Apart from mild fatigue and grade 2 anemia, she did not have any significant toxicity. She received cycle 4 of induction chemoimmunotherapy without further dose reduction on October 30, 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There was a significant reduction of the mass in the right upper lobe, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and a liver lesion consistent with treatment response observed on a November 20, 2024, follow-up torso CT (Figure 2). The patient received maintenance atezolizumab, which is being administered every 21 days. Because of a lack of survival benefit f","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 6","pages":"475-484"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144756235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dr Harmon Eyre, MD (1941–2025) 哈蒙·艾尔博士,医学博士(1941-2025)
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70025
John R. Seffrin PhD, Otis W. Brawley MD
<p>Dr Harmon Eyre, a much-respected figure of the American Cancer Society (ACS), passed away on May 31, 2025, in Salt Lake City. He was 84 years old.</p><p>Dr Eyre started with the ACS as a volunteer in 1971 and joined the ACS national board in 1978. He became its national volunteer president in 1988 and, from 1993 to 2008, served as the Chief Medical Officer and the Editor-in-Chief of <i>CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.</i></p><p>During his tenure, he increased the effectiveness of the ACS by elevating an emphasis on cancer control and the recruitment of world-class scientists into this ACS research program. In time, it would become one of the leading cancer epidemiology and surveillance groups worldwide. These nascent efforts would bring about one of the most influential and effective cancer surveillance and epidemiology programs in the world.</p><p>Under Dr Eyre's stewardship, the Cancer Prevention Study 3 (CPS-3) launched in 2006. The CPS-3 cohort was designed to help the ACS understand the differences between people who get cancer and people who don’t get cancer by utilizing participant recruitment strategy to achieve greater racial and ethnic diversity and collecting biospecimens for molecular epidemiology research. It continues to provide insights into the causes of cancer today and is likely to continue to bear fruit well into the 2030s.</p><p>Dr Eyre was instrumental in ensuring continuous support in the pursuit of cancer-related research. For example, in response to federal reductions in funding of grants available to early career investigators in the 1990s, he effectively convinced the ACS board to shift the ACS research program's emphasis with greater support for such researchers. In addition, he led the ACS’s efforts to sponsor tobacco-control grants at a time when federal sponsorship was waning.</p><p>Dr Eyre also contributed to several ACS guidelines on cancer screening and prevention. For example, he led the ground-breaking prostate cancer screening process, which followed the ACS's organization of a review of the scientific literature and a gathering of external experts in the areas of both screening and treatment for prostate cancer. The ultimate recommendation called for informed decision making between the patient and the physician. It acknowledged the legitimate concerns about over-screening and overtreatment of the disease but also the hope that prostate cancer screening might save lives. Although released in 1997, it remains highly relevant today and serves as the basis for contemporary prostate cancer screening guidelines and statements from numerous organizations in the United States, Canada, and Europe.</p><p>Other ACS guidelines implemented under Dr Eyre include the colorectal screening guideline, which added screening colonoscopy, and the 2002 cervical cancer screening guideline, which added human papillomavirus DNA testing. Dr Eyre went on to write a book entitled <i>Informed Decisions</i>. Together with his work
2025年5月31日,美国癌症协会(ACS)备受尊敬的人物哈蒙·艾尔博士在盐湖城去世。他享年84岁。1971年,艾尔博士以志愿者的身份加入美国癌症学会,并于1978年加入美国癌症学会全国委员会。他于1988年成为其全国志愿者主席,并于1993年至2008年担任CA: A Cancer Journal for clinical的首席医疗官和主编。在他任职期间,他通过提高对癌症控制的重视和招募世界级科学家进入ACS研究项目,提高了ACS的有效性。随着时间的推移,它将成为全球领先的癌症流行病学和监测组织之一。这些新生的努力将带来世界上最具影响力和最有效的癌症监测和流行病学项目之一。在Eyre博士的领导下,癌症预防研究3 (CPS-3)于2006年启动。CPS-3队列旨在帮助美国癌症学会了解癌症患者和非癌症患者之间的差异,方法是利用参与者招募策略实现更大的种族和民族多样性,并收集生物标本用于分子流行病学研究。它继续为今天的癌症病因提供见解,并可能在21世纪30年代继续取得成果。Eyre博士在确保癌症相关研究的持续支持方面发挥了重要作用。例如,在20世纪90年代,联邦政府减少了对早期职业研究人员的资助,他有效地说服了ACS董事会将ACS研究项目的重点转移到对这些研究人员的更多支持上。此外,他还在联邦资助逐渐减少的时候,领导了美国烟草协会资助烟草控制拨款的努力。艾尔博士还为美国癌症学会的一些癌症筛查和预防指南做出了贡献。例如,他领导了开创性的前列腺癌筛查过程,在此之前,美国癌症学会组织了一次科学文献综述,并召集了前列腺癌筛查和治疗领域的外部专家。最终的建议是在病人和医生之间做出明智的决定。它承认对这种疾病的过度筛查和过度治疗的合理担忧,但也承认前列腺癌筛查可能挽救生命的希望。虽然在1997年发布,但它在今天仍然具有高度相关性,并作为美国、加拿大和欧洲许多组织的当代前列腺癌筛查指南和声明的基础。艾尔博士实施的其他ACS指南包括结肠直肠癌筛查指南,其中增加了结肠镜筛查,以及2002年宫颈癌筛查指南,其中增加了人类乳头瘤病毒DNA检测。爱博士接着写了一本名为《明智的决定》的书。与他在指南方面的工作一起,它继续影响着当今许多癌症筛查指南,包括与肺癌和多癌症早期检测测试领域相关的指南。爱博士出生在犹他州,父母都是教师,他有六个孩子。他于1962年毕业于犹他州立大学,1966年毕业于犹他大学医学院,之后在约翰霍普金斯大学完成了奥斯勒内科住院医师。他于1970年在国家癌症研究所完成了医学肿瘤学的奖学金,并于同年加入犹他大学医学院,在那里他继续担任内科副主席和亨茨曼癌症研究所副主任。哈蒙·爱是个富有同情心的人,为人正直,有常识,对科学和医学有着深刻的理解。哈蒙博士与朱莉·西尔斯·艾尔结婚超过66年,在他担任首席医疗官之后,他们通过积极支持ACS的举措和工作人员,继续支持和贡献ACS的使命。他和他的妻子是许多人深爱的朋友和榜样,美国癌症学会很幸运有哈蒙博士作为领导者。愿他安息。
{"title":"Dr Harmon Eyre, MD (1941–2025)","authors":"John R. Seffrin PhD,&nbsp;Otis W. Brawley MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70025","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70025","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Dr Harmon Eyre, a much-respected figure of the American Cancer Society (ACS), passed away on May 31, 2025, in Salt Lake City. He was 84 years old.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr Eyre started with the ACS as a volunteer in 1971 and joined the ACS national board in 1978. He became its national volunteer president in 1988 and, from 1993 to 2008, served as the Chief Medical Officer and the Editor-in-Chief of &lt;i&gt;CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;During his tenure, he increased the effectiveness of the ACS by elevating an emphasis on cancer control and the recruitment of world-class scientists into this ACS research program. In time, it would become one of the leading cancer epidemiology and surveillance groups worldwide. These nascent efforts would bring about one of the most influential and effective cancer surveillance and epidemiology programs in the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Under Dr Eyre's stewardship, the Cancer Prevention Study 3 (CPS-3) launched in 2006. The CPS-3 cohort was designed to help the ACS understand the differences between people who get cancer and people who don’t get cancer by utilizing participant recruitment strategy to achieve greater racial and ethnic diversity and collecting biospecimens for molecular epidemiology research. It continues to provide insights into the causes of cancer today and is likely to continue to bear fruit well into the 2030s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr Eyre was instrumental in ensuring continuous support in the pursuit of cancer-related research. For example, in response to federal reductions in funding of grants available to early career investigators in the 1990s, he effectively convinced the ACS board to shift the ACS research program's emphasis with greater support for such researchers. In addition, he led the ACS’s efforts to sponsor tobacco-control grants at a time when federal sponsorship was waning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr Eyre also contributed to several ACS guidelines on cancer screening and prevention. For example, he led the ground-breaking prostate cancer screening process, which followed the ACS's organization of a review of the scientific literature and a gathering of external experts in the areas of both screening and treatment for prostate cancer. The ultimate recommendation called for informed decision making between the patient and the physician. It acknowledged the legitimate concerns about over-screening and overtreatment of the disease but also the hope that prostate cancer screening might save lives. Although released in 1997, it remains highly relevant today and serves as the basis for contemporary prostate cancer screening guidelines and statements from numerous organizations in the United States, Canada, and Europe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Other ACS guidelines implemented under Dr Eyre include the colorectal screening guideline, which added screening colonoscopy, and the 2002 cervical cancer screening guideline, which added human papillomavirus DNA testing. Dr Eyre went on to write a book entitled &lt;i&gt;Informed Decisions&lt;/i&gt;. Together with his work ","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 5","pages":"371-372"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Personalized care for patients with EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer: Navigating early to advanced disease management egfr突变非小细胞肺癌患者的个性化护理:早期到晚期疾病管理导航
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70024
Maxime Borgeaud MD, Timothée Olivier MD, Jair Bar MD, PhD, Stephanie Pei Li Saw MD, PhD, Kaushal Parikh MD, Giuseppe Luigi Banna MD, Claudio De Vito MD, PhD, Jill Feldman, Xiuning Le MD, PhD, Alfredo Addeo MD

The discovery of activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene has revolutionized the management of lung cancer, enabling the development of targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These therapies offer improved survival and reduced side effects compared with conventional treatments. Recent advancements have significantly reshaped the treatment paradigm for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. TKIs are now incorporated into the management of early stage and locally advanced disease, and phase 3 trials have explored combination strategies in metastatic settings. Although these intensified approaches improve progression-free survival, they come with increased toxicity and higher costs, underscoring the need for precise patient selection to maximize benefit. Emerging data on biomarkers, such as co-mutations and circulating tumor DNA, show promise for refining treatment decisions. In addition, significant progress in understanding resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKIs has broadened therapeutic options. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer, highlighting recent breakthroughs and discussing strategies to optimize treatment based on the latest evidence.

表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因激活突变的发现彻底改变了肺癌的治疗,使靶向酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的开发成为可能。与传统疗法相比,这些疗法提高了生存率,减少了副作用。最近的进展显著地重塑了egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌的治疗模式。TKIs现在被纳入早期和局部晚期疾病的治疗中,3期试验探索了转移性疾病的联合治疗策略。虽然这些强化的方法提高了无进展生存期,但它们的毒性增加,成本更高,强调了精确选择患者以最大化获益的必要性。关于生物标志物的新数据,如共突变和循环肿瘤DNA,显示出改进治疗决策的希望。此外,对EGFR TKIs耐药机制的理解取得了重大进展,拓宽了治疗选择。本文综述了egfr突变型非小细胞肺癌的现状,重点介绍了最近的突破,并讨论了基于最新证据的优化治疗策略。
{"title":"Personalized care for patients with EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer: Navigating early to advanced disease management","authors":"Maxime Borgeaud MD,&nbsp;Timothée Olivier MD,&nbsp;Jair Bar MD, PhD,&nbsp;Stephanie Pei Li Saw MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kaushal Parikh MD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Luigi Banna MD,&nbsp;Claudio De Vito MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jill Feldman,&nbsp;Xiuning Le MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alfredo Addeo MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70024","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The discovery of activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) gene has revolutionized the management of lung cancer, enabling the development of targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These therapies offer improved survival and reduced side effects compared with conventional treatments. Recent advancements have significantly reshaped the treatment paradigm for <i>EGFR</i>-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. TKIs are now incorporated into the management of early stage and locally advanced disease, and phase 3 trials have explored combination strategies in metastatic settings. Although these intensified approaches improve progression-free survival, they come with increased toxicity and higher costs, underscoring the need for precise patient selection to maximize benefit. Emerging data on biomarkers, such as co-mutations and circulating tumor DNA, show promise for refining treatment decisions. In addition, significant progress in understanding resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKIs has broadened therapeutic options. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of <i>EGFR</i>-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer, highlighting recent breakthroughs and discussing strategies to optimize treatment based on the latest evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 5","pages":"387-409"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144645952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is active surveillance an alternative to surgery for some patients with esophageal cancer? 主动监测是食管癌患者手术的替代方案吗?
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70023
Carrie Printz
<p>Overall survival with active surveillance was noninferior to overall survival with surgery after 2 years for some patients with esophageal cancer who achieved a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, according to researchers.</p><p>Results from the phase 3, randomized study showed that the overall survival rate was 74% for patients undergoing active surveillance and 71% for patients having surgery.</p><p>The authors caution that their research will require extended follow-up to determine the long-term efficacy of active surveillance. Some esophageal surgeons have concerns about the trial’s design and findings.</p><p>Results of the Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Active Surveillance Versus Standard Surgery for Esophageal Cancer (SANO) trial appear in <i>The Lancet</i> (doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00027-0).</p><p>Kimberly Wilson, a survivor of stage IV esophageal cancer and patient advocate who underwent surgery in 2022, supports the study’s efforts to assess all potential treatment options for the disease.</p><p>“I believe very strongly in research supporting a wide variety of patients’ needs and perspectives to draw in the medical community’s ability to provide patients with multiple options,” says Wilson, a program specialist for the Esophageal Cancer Action Network, who had a total esophagectomy in 2022 after undergoing chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy.</p><p>Unable to avoid surgery because of her advanced disease, Wilson says that she fits into the rare category of stage IV esophageal cancer “thrivers” who continue to live fairly regular lives—albeit at a slower pace.</p><p>“My stomach was pulled up to make what now functions as my esophagus,” she says. “Despite how challenging the surgery was, I would do it again.”</p><p>The phase 3, randomized SANO trial is a multicenter study of patients in 12 Dutch hospitals. The research was conducted between November 2017 and January 2021. Participants had locally advanced esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy. After screening 1115 patients, researchers included 309 individuals: 198 participants went on active surveillance, whereas 111 had the standard surgery. The standard surgery was esophagectomy within the 2 weeks after a clinical complete response was achieved.</p><p>Seventy-eight percent of the participants were male, and 22% were female. The primary end point was overall survival, which was analyzed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle allowing crossover at the time of clinical complete response and an intention-to-treat principle. The median follow-up was 38 months. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, health-related quality of life, and treatment-related morbidity and mortality.</p><p>The 2-year overall survival rate with active surveillance (74%) was noninferior to the rate with standard surgery (71%) after the modified intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat ana
据研究人员称,一些食管癌患者在新辅助放化疗后达到临床完全缓解,主动监测的总生存率不低于手术后2年的总生存率。3期随机研究结果显示,接受主动监测的患者总生存率为74%,接受手术的患者总生存率为71%。作者警告说,他们的研究将需要延长随访时间,以确定主动监测的长期效果。一些食道外科医生对试验的设计和结果表示担忧。新辅助放化疗后主动监测与食管癌标准手术(SANO)试验的结果发表在《柳叶刀》上(doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00027-0)。金伯利·威尔逊(Kimberly Wilson)是食管癌IV期幸存者,也是2022年接受手术的患者倡导者,她支持该研究评估该疾病所有潜在治疗方案的努力。威尔逊是食管癌行动网络的项目专家,在接受化疗、放疗和免疫治疗后,他于2022年接受了全食管切除术。他说:“我非常坚信,支持各种患者需求和观点的研究,可以吸引医学界的能力,为患者提供多种选择。”由于病情晚期,她无法避免手术,威尔逊说,她属于罕见的四期食管癌“康复者”,他们继续过着相当正常的生活——尽管节奏变慢了。“我的胃被拉起来,形成了现在的食道,”她说。“尽管手术很有挑战性,我还是会再做一次。”3期随机SANO试验是一项针对荷兰12家医院患者的多中心研究。该研究于2017年11月至2021年1月进行。参与者有局部晚期食管癌,在放化疗后临床完全缓解。在筛选了1115名患者后,研究人员包括了309名个体:198名参与者进行了主动监测,而111名参与者进行了标准手术。标准手术是在临床完全缓解后2周内进行食管切除术。78%的参与者是男性,22%是女性。主要终点是总生存期,根据修改后的意向治疗原则进行分析,该原则允许在临床完全缓解时与意向治疗原则交叉。中位随访时间为38个月。次要终点包括无进展生存期、健康相关生活质量和治疗相关发病率和死亡率。经过改进的意向治疗分析后,主动监测的2年总生存率(74%)不低于标准手术的生存率(71%)。在意向治疗分析中,主动监测的总生存率(75%)与手术(70%)相比仍然不差。两组术后标准手术或主动监测后延迟手术的并发症发生率和术后死亡率相似。作者指出,试验结果可用于患者咨询和共同决策;然而,需要长期随访。纽约纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心食道手术项目主任Daniela Molena医学博士对这项研究非常关注。她指出,研究人员将两项研究的参与者混合在一起,在新研究中纳入了来自sano前回顾性研究的手术患者。此外,他们将鳞状食管癌患者和腺癌食管癌患者混合,尽管这两种疾病是独特的疾病,对化疗和放疗的反应不同。Molena博士还对研究人员允许从一只手臂换到另一只手臂表示担忧。她说:“如果病人足够幸运,没有发展成转移性疾病,他们就可以接受手术。”“事实上,只有35%的‘监测’患者和29%的腺癌患者处于缓解期。”她补充说,所有其他患者要么出现全身复发,要么接受了手术,并指出随访时间太短,无法确定这些延迟手术是否与治疗后立即进行手术的结果相同。莫莱纳博士说:“在如此混乱的情况下,很难理解这些结果。”“如果患者和医疗服务提供者被误导,认为监测等同于做手术,那么在大多数情况下,这一过程很可能被忽略。这是一个危险且具有欺骗性的信息,因为大多数患者无论如何都接受了手术,只是延迟了手术时间。”Wayne L. Hofstetter医学博士是位于德克萨斯州休斯顿的MD Anderson癌症中心食道手术项目的主任,他也对此表示担忧。 他指出,试验结果在食道外科界备受期待,因为关于是否对这组患者进行手术的争论正在进行中。Hofstetter博士说,他一直支持在适当的情况下,对那些对联合放化疗(CXRT)有完全反应的高度选择性个体进行器官保留治疗。这一群体包括手术的边缘候选者和不希望接受食管切除术的患者。霍夫斯泰特博士说:“对SANO试验的批评在于,它没有考虑到在6周而不是12周或更长时间接受手术的好处。”他指出,在6周接受手术的患者不包括在研究中。此外,在6周时评估的试验参与者仅接受残留疾病的内窥镜检查,而不是影像学检查。他补充说,后者是诊断过程的关键部分。霍夫斯泰特博士说:“所以,从本质上讲,你是在随机抽取优秀者中的优秀者,然后决定是手术还是观察。”Hofstetter博士强调了包括6周手术患者的重要性,指出NeoRes II试验(doi:10.1016/j.a nonc.2023.08.010),该试验发现,在CXRT后延长10-12周的手术时间并没有改善完全缓解,而且显示出更差的生存趋势。他还批评了SANO试验研究人员的随机化方法,这种方法不是1:1的方法。相反,这项研究是从所有的手术开始的,然后是所有的观察。结果,手术组随访时间较观察组长。尽管研究人员指出,随访的差异并不重要,因为大多数复发发生在头2-3年,但Hofstetter博士更希望在得出结论之前进行4年的随访。Hofstetter博士补充说,SANO试验结果可能不适用于腺癌患者,并指出鳞状细胞食管癌患者对CXRT的反应要比腺癌患者好得多。NeoRes II和SANO研究,以及之前的欧洲研究(doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7118),都支持鳞状细胞癌患者在需要时进行手术的可能性。他说,正在进行的亚洲SINO试验(doi:10.1200/ jco .2024.42.23 _supply .196)正试图直接回答这个问题。同时,根据ESOPEC试验的发现,5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂和多西紫杉醇(FLOT)新辅助治疗现在是可手术腺癌患者的标准治疗,而不是CXRT (doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1)。在FLOT后,这些患者接受手术;霍夫斯泰特博士说,这结束了对这一特定群体在接受CXRT后进行手术的争议。Molena博士补充说,临床医生应该为这些患者争取更个性化的治疗方法,而不是向所有人提供相同的治疗。她说,sano推荐的方法可能对手术风险高的患者是值得的,但肯定不是对所有患者都适用。由于对试验的诸多担忧,Molena医生不会建议其他健康的病人在化疗后立即避免手术,这些病人是很好的手术候选人。她说:“对病人来说,不做手术,等待疾病进展再切除是有很大风险的。”“我们没有很多好的治疗选择,一旦你错过了机会,你就回不去了。”Hofstetter博士和Molena博士都指出,尽管研究结果对临床医生来说很重要,但共同决策对所有人来说都是可取的。
{"title":"Is active surveillance an alternative to surgery for some patients with esophageal cancer?","authors":"Carrie Printz","doi":"10.3322/caac.70023","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70023","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Overall survival with active surveillance was noninferior to overall survival with surgery after 2 years for some patients with esophageal cancer who achieved a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, according to researchers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results from the phase 3, randomized study showed that the overall survival rate was 74% for patients undergoing active surveillance and 71% for patients having surgery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors caution that their research will require extended follow-up to determine the long-term efficacy of active surveillance. Some esophageal surgeons have concerns about the trial’s design and findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results of the Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Active Surveillance Versus Standard Surgery for Esophageal Cancer (SANO) trial appear in &lt;i&gt;The Lancet&lt;/i&gt; (doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00027-0).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kimberly Wilson, a survivor of stage IV esophageal cancer and patient advocate who underwent surgery in 2022, supports the study’s efforts to assess all potential treatment options for the disease.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“I believe very strongly in research supporting a wide variety of patients’ needs and perspectives to draw in the medical community’s ability to provide patients with multiple options,” says Wilson, a program specialist for the Esophageal Cancer Action Network, who had a total esophagectomy in 2022 after undergoing chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unable to avoid surgery because of her advanced disease, Wilson says that she fits into the rare category of stage IV esophageal cancer “thrivers” who continue to live fairly regular lives—albeit at a slower pace.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“My stomach was pulled up to make what now functions as my esophagus,” she says. “Despite how challenging the surgery was, I would do it again.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The phase 3, randomized SANO trial is a multicenter study of patients in 12 Dutch hospitals. The research was conducted between November 2017 and January 2021. Participants had locally advanced esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy. After screening 1115 patients, researchers included 309 individuals: 198 participants went on active surveillance, whereas 111 had the standard surgery. The standard surgery was esophagectomy within the 2 weeks after a clinical complete response was achieved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seventy-eight percent of the participants were male, and 22% were female. The primary end point was overall survival, which was analyzed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle allowing crossover at the time of clinical complete response and an intention-to-treat principle. The median follow-up was 38 months. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, health-related quality of life, and treatment-related morbidity and mortality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 2-year overall survival rate with active surveillance (74%) was noninferior to the rate with standard surgery (71%) after the modified intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat ana","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 4","pages":"274-276"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144537066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chemotherapy-induced taste changes affect nutrition, quality of life 化疗引起的味觉改变会影响营养和生活质量
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70022
Carrie Printz
<p>Although chemotherapy helps to prevent cancer growth in many patients, it also can destroy healthy cells that may cause taste changes and appetite loss. Many patients experience taste alteration as a common symptom but do not report it, and health care professionals may overlook the condition because it is not life-threatening.</p><p>A Turkish study reported that 67.7% of participants treated with chemotherapy experienced a change in taste. Researchers also found that 21.8% of patients were at moderate risk for malnutrition. Quality of life was also diminished in correlation with the intensity of taste changes.</p><p>Researchers found that patients with oral mucositis, dry mouth, gingival sensitivity, and gingival pain had a significantly higher severity of taste alteration and poorer quality of life. The study appears in <i>Supportive Care in Cancer</i> (doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09431-8).</p><p>The descriptive and cross-sectional study analyzed 330 patients, aged 18 years or older, who were receiving at least two outpatient chemotherapy treatments for cancer at a Turkish university hospital between March and June 2023. Participants were interviewed in person with the Descriptive Characteristics Form, the Chemotherapy-Induced Taste Alteration Scale, the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire.</p><p>More than half (57.6%) of the participants were 60 years old or older and female (51.8%). Thirty-seven percent of the participants were obese, 47.6% were smokers, and 27.6% had breast cancer; 39.7% were undergoing chemotherapy for five cycles or fewer, 40% were undergoing chemotherapy every 2 weeks, and 52% were not receiving any additional therapy.</p><p>Findings showed that 67.7% of the patients reported taste alterations of moderate severity, 77.9% had mouth sores, 88.5% had dry mouth, 83.9% had gingival sensitivity, and 17.9% had gingival pain. In the group, 21.8% were at moderate risk for malnutrition. More than half the patients (54.8%) lost weight after chemotherapy, and this correlated with significantly greater taste changes. Researchers identified a statistically significant correlation among taste alteration, malnutrition, and quality-of-life scores, with taste alteration being highly predictive of both conditions.</p><p>Taste alteration was higher in women than men and higher in patients with breast cancer than those with gastrointestinal, lung, urinary, or hematologic cancers. Taste alteration was lower in patients with a good or very good appetite in comparison with those with a poor or moderate appetite.</p><p>No statistically significant differences were found in taste alteration with age or the number of chemotherapy treatments between patients with a good or very good appetite and patients with a poor or moderate appetite.</p><p>Findings showed a statistically significant association between taste alteration and oral mucositis, dry mouth, gingival sensitivity and pain, r
尽管化疗对许多患者来说有助于防止癌症的发展,但它也会破坏健康细胞,从而导致味觉变化和食欲不振。许多患者认为味觉改变是一种常见症状,但没有报告,卫生保健专业人员可能会忽视这种情况,因为它不会危及生命。土耳其的一项研究报告称,接受化疗的参与者中,67.7%的人味觉发生了变化。研究人员还发现,21.8%的患者有中度营养不良的风险。生活质量也随着味觉变化的强度而下降。研究人员发现,患有口腔黏膜炎、口干、牙龈敏感和牙龈疼痛的患者味觉改变的严重程度明显更高,生活质量也更差。这项研究发表在癌症的支持性护理(doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09431-8)。这项描述性和横断面研究分析了330名年龄在18岁或以上的患者,这些患者在2023年3月至6月期间在土耳其大学医院接受了至少两次门诊癌症化疗治疗。采用描述性特征表、化疗引起的味觉改变量表、营养不良普遍筛查工具和世界卫生组织生活质量问卷对参与者进行面谈。超过一半(57.6%)的参与者年龄在60岁及以上,女性(51.8%)。37%的参与者肥胖,47.6%的人吸烟,27.6%的人患有乳腺癌;39.7%的患者化疗周期不超过5个周期,40%的患者每2周化疗一次,52%的患者未接受任何额外治疗。结果显示,67.7%的患者有中度味觉改变,77.9%的患者有口腔溃疡,88.5%的患者有口干,83.9%的患者有牙龈敏感,17.9%的患者有牙龈疼痛。在这一组中,21.8%的人有中度营养不良的风险。超过一半的患者(54.8%)在化疗后体重减轻,这与更大的味觉变化显著相关。研究人员发现,味觉改变、营养不良和生活质量评分之间存在统计学上显著的相关性,味觉改变对这两种情况都有很高的预测作用。女性的味觉改变高于男性,乳腺癌患者的味觉改变高于胃肠道、肺癌、泌尿系统或血液系统癌症患者。胃口好或非常好患者的味觉改变比胃口差或中等的患者要低。在胃口好或非常好的患者和胃口差或中等的患者之间,味觉变化随年龄或化疗次数的变化没有统计学上的显著差异。研究结果显示,味觉改变与口腔黏膜炎、口干、牙龈敏感和疼痛、用醋和碳酸水漱口以及化疗后体重减轻之间存在统计学上的显著关联。作者指出,漱口水的使用表明,患有味觉变化的患者尝试了各种方法来改善症状,但都没有成功。作者建议进行随机对照试验,包括评估预防性或治疗性护理干预措施,以帮助减少味觉变化的发生率和严重程度。“这项研究解决了一个非常重要的问题,即我们如何看待化疗的一些副作用,他们在描述患者经历方面做得很好,也很有趣,”医学博士珍妮弗·道格拉斯(Jennifer Douglas)说,她是费城宾夕法尼亚大学医院耳鼻喉头颈外科的助理教授。“但这项研究没有包括任何客观的测量方法,比如正式的味觉测试,来量化味觉丧失的程度和分类。”道格拉斯博士强调了客观测量味觉丧失的重要性,他指出,之前的研究已经显示了主观和客观测量之间的差异。她补充说,食物感知的另一个关键组成部分是气味,研究人员没有将其纳入研究,应该进一步评估。她说:“我们才刚刚开始了解化疗对我们的嗅觉和味觉以及我们对食物和营养的体验的巨大影响。”“有很多文献表明,当我们只依靠主观测量时,我们低估了味觉和嗅觉丧失的程度。”道格拉斯博士说,未来的研究应该集中在量化不同化疗对味觉和嗅觉的影响,确定特定类型的味觉和嗅觉障碍,并制定更有针对性的干预措施,以帮助患者保持营养和生活质量。一种干预措施可能包括通过刺激口腔中的某些神经来制造对患者更有吸引力的食物。乔尔·B。 爱泼斯坦是加州杜阿尔特市希望之城头颈外科口腔健康服务部门的主任,他指出,这项研究是独一无二的,因为它将味觉变化与营养结果联系起来。他说:“这项研究表明,味觉改变对患者报告的结果有影响。”“在过去的几年里,人们对评估味觉变化的生物学和潜在的管理方式越来越感兴趣。”爱泼斯坦博士说,除了化疗引起的,头颈部放射治疗和免疫治疗也会引起味觉和嗅觉的变化。味觉功能直接关系到口腔健康和口腔功能。唾液会影响人们品尝食物的能力。爱泼斯坦博士指出,在溶解与味蕾受体相互作用并产生味觉信号的食物分子方面,它比水做得更好。他补充说,肿瘤学家经常忽视唾液的功能,应该对患者进行评估。与此同时,研究人员必须找到改善化疗引起的味觉改变患者的味觉的方法。他说:“第一步是让味觉分子到达受体位置,这样信号就可以发生,这表明我们有可能对味觉进行局部和全身治疗。”“随着味觉和嗅觉的生物学原理得到更好的理解,我们正在寻找能够再生味蕾并影响味觉的疗法。”一些方法包括针对神经纤维的红外线治疗,这可能会提高能量产生和减少炎症,以及刺激唾液和促进粘膜修复的方法。爱泼斯坦博士说,随着癌症幸存者人数的增加,肿瘤学家越来越关注患者的生活质量、口味和营养。“在医学、牙科和营养师之间有一个灰色地带,”他说。“这真的需要一个团队,一旦我们有了研究,我们就会有更好的治疗方法。”爱泼斯坦博士指出,该团队需要共同管理口腔状况、味觉和嗅觉功能以及饮食和营养,以提高生活质量。
{"title":"Chemotherapy-induced taste changes affect nutrition, quality of life","authors":"Carrie Printz","doi":"10.3322/caac.70022","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70022","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Although chemotherapy helps to prevent cancer growth in many patients, it also can destroy healthy cells that may cause taste changes and appetite loss. Many patients experience taste alteration as a common symptom but do not report it, and health care professionals may overlook the condition because it is not life-threatening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A Turkish study reported that 67.7% of participants treated with chemotherapy experienced a change in taste. Researchers also found that 21.8% of patients were at moderate risk for malnutrition. Quality of life was also diminished in correlation with the intensity of taste changes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Researchers found that patients with oral mucositis, dry mouth, gingival sensitivity, and gingival pain had a significantly higher severity of taste alteration and poorer quality of life. The study appears in &lt;i&gt;Supportive Care in Cancer&lt;/i&gt; (doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09431-8).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The descriptive and cross-sectional study analyzed 330 patients, aged 18 years or older, who were receiving at least two outpatient chemotherapy treatments for cancer at a Turkish university hospital between March and June 2023. Participants were interviewed in person with the Descriptive Characteristics Form, the Chemotherapy-Induced Taste Alteration Scale, the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More than half (57.6%) of the participants were 60 years old or older and female (51.8%). Thirty-seven percent of the participants were obese, 47.6% were smokers, and 27.6% had breast cancer; 39.7% were undergoing chemotherapy for five cycles or fewer, 40% were undergoing chemotherapy every 2 weeks, and 52% were not receiving any additional therapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Findings showed that 67.7% of the patients reported taste alterations of moderate severity, 77.9% had mouth sores, 88.5% had dry mouth, 83.9% had gingival sensitivity, and 17.9% had gingival pain. In the group, 21.8% were at moderate risk for malnutrition. More than half the patients (54.8%) lost weight after chemotherapy, and this correlated with significantly greater taste changes. Researchers identified a statistically significant correlation among taste alteration, malnutrition, and quality-of-life scores, with taste alteration being highly predictive of both conditions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Taste alteration was higher in women than men and higher in patients with breast cancer than those with gastrointestinal, lung, urinary, or hematologic cancers. Taste alteration was lower in patients with a good or very good appetite in comparison with those with a poor or moderate appetite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No statistically significant differences were found in taste alteration with age or the number of chemotherapy treatments between patients with a good or very good appetite and patients with a poor or moderate appetite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Findings showed a statistically significant association between taste alteration and oral mucositis, dry mouth, gingival sensitivity and pain, r","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 4","pages":"271-273"},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144536891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1