Rebecca L. Siegel MPH, Nikita Sandeep Wagle MBBS, MHA, PhD, Andrea Cercek MD, Robert A. Smith PhD, Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society provides an update of CRC statistics based on incidence from population-based cancer registries and mortality from the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2023, approximately 153,020 individuals will be diagnosed with CRC and 52,550 will die from the disease, including 19,550 cases and 3750 deaths in individuals younger than 50 years. The decline in CRC incidence slowed from 3%–4% annually during the 2000s to 1% annually during 2011–2019, driven partly by an increase in individuals younger than 55 years of 1%–2% annually since the mid-1990s. Consequently, the proportion of cases among those younger than 55 years increased from 11% in 1995 to 20% in 2019. Incidence since circa 2010 increased in those younger than 65 years for regional-stage disease by about 2%–3% annually and for distant-stage disease by 0.5%–3% annually, reversing the overall shift to earlier stage diagnosis that occurred during 1995 through 2005. For example, 60% of all new cases were advanced in 2019 versus 52% in the mid-2000s and 57% in 1995, before widespread screening. There is also a shift to left-sided tumors, with the proportion of rectal cancer increasing from 27% in 1995 to 31% in 2019. CRC mortality declined by 2% annually from 2011–2020 overall but increased by 0.5%–3% annually in individuals younger than 50 years and in Native Americans younger than 65 years. In summary, despite continued overall declines, CRC is rapidly shifting to diagnosis at a younger age, at a more advanced stage, and in the left colon/rectum. Progress against CRC could be accelerated by uncovering the etiology of rising incidence in generations born since 1950 and increasing access to high-quality screening and treatment among all populations, especially Native Americans.
{"title":"Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023","authors":"Rebecca L. Siegel MPH, Nikita Sandeep Wagle MBBS, MHA, PhD, Andrea Cercek MD, Robert A. Smith PhD, Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.21772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21772","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society provides an update of CRC statistics based on incidence from population-based cancer registries and mortality from the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2023, approximately 153,020 individuals will be diagnosed with CRC and 52,550 will die from the disease, including 19,550 cases and 3750 deaths in individuals younger than 50 years. The decline in CRC incidence slowed from 3%–4% annually during the 2000s to 1% annually during 2011–2019, driven partly by an increase in individuals younger than 55 years of 1%–2% annually since the mid-1990s. Consequently, the proportion of cases among those younger than 55 years increased from 11% in 1995 to 20% in 2019. Incidence since circa 2010 increased in those younger than 65 years for regional-stage disease by about 2%–3% annually and for distant-stage disease by 0.5%–3% annually, reversing the overall shift to earlier stage diagnosis that occurred during 1995 through 2005. For example, 60% of all new cases were advanced in 2019 versus 52% in the mid-2000s and 57% in 1995, before widespread screening. There is also a shift to left-sided tumors, with the proportion of rectal cancer increasing from 27% in 1995 to 31% in 2019. CRC mortality declined by 2% annually from 2011–2020 overall but increased by 0.5%–3% annually in individuals younger than 50 years and in Native Americans younger than 65 years. In summary, despite continued overall declines, CRC is rapidly shifting to diagnosis at a younger age, at a more advanced stage, and in the left colon/rectum. Progress against CRC could be accelerated by uncovering the etiology of rising incidence in generations born since 1950 and increasing access to high-quality screening and treatment among all populations, especially Native Americans.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 3","pages":"233-254"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21772","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6016710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Miriam B. Garcia DO, Keri L. Schadler PhD, Joya Chandra PhD, Steven K. Clinton MD, PhD, Kerry S. Courneya PhD, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate PhD, Carrie R. Daniel PhD, MPH, Andrew J. Dannenberg MD, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried PhD, RD, Mark W. Dewhirst DVM, PhD, Carol J. Fabian MD, Stephen D. Hursting PhD, Melinda L. Irwin PhD, MPH, Neil M. Iyengar MD, Jennifer L. McQuade MD, Kathryn H. Schmitz PhD, MPH, Karen Basen-Engquist PhD, MPH
Advances in energy balance and cancer research to date have largely occurred in siloed work in rodents or patients. However, substantial benefit can be derived from parallel studies in which animal models inform the design of clinical and population studies or in which clinical observations become the basis for animal studies. The conference Translating Energy Balance from Bench to Communities: Application of Parallel Animal-Human Studies in Cancer, held in July 2021, convened investigators from basic, translational/clinical, and population science research to share knowledge, examples of successful parallel studies, and strong research to move the field of energy balance and cancer toward practice changes. This review summarizes key topics discussed to advance research on the role of energy balance, including physical activity, body composition, and dietary intake, on cancer development, cancer outcomes, and healthy survivorship.
{"title":"Translating energy balance research from the bench to the clinic to the community: Parallel animal-human studies in cancer","authors":"Miriam B. Garcia DO, Keri L. Schadler PhD, Joya Chandra PhD, Steven K. Clinton MD, PhD, Kerry S. Courneya PhD, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate PhD, Carrie R. Daniel PhD, MPH, Andrew J. Dannenberg MD, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried PhD, RD, Mark W. Dewhirst DVM, PhD, Carol J. Fabian MD, Stephen D. Hursting PhD, Melinda L. Irwin PhD, MPH, Neil M. Iyengar MD, Jennifer L. McQuade MD, Kathryn H. Schmitz PhD, MPH, Karen Basen-Engquist PhD, MPH","doi":"10.3322/caac.21773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21773","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advances in energy balance and cancer research to date have largely occurred in siloed work in rodents or patients. However, substantial benefit can be derived from parallel studies in which animal models inform the design of clinical and population studies or in which clinical observations become the basis for animal studies. The conference <i>Translating Energy Balance from Bench to Communities: Application of Parallel Animal-Human Studies in Cancer,</i> held in July 2021, convened investigators from basic, translational/clinical, and population science research to share knowledge, examples of successful parallel studies, and strong research to move the field of energy balance and cancer toward practice changes. This review summarizes key topics discussed to advance research on the role of energy balance, including physical activity, body composition, and dietary intake, on cancer development, cancer outcomes, and healthy survivorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 4","pages":"425-442"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21773","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6018610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebecca L. Siegel MPH, Kimberly D. Miller MPH, Nikita Sandeep Wagle MBBS, MHA, PhD, Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD
Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes using incidence data collected by central cancer registries and mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2023, 1,958,310 new cancer cases and 609,820 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Cancer incidence increased for prostate cancer by 3% annually from 2014 through 2019 after two decades of decline, translating to an additional 99,000 new cases; otherwise, however, incidence trends were more favorable in men compared to women. For example, lung cancer in women decreased at one half the pace of men (1.1% vs. 2.6% annually) from 2015 through 2019, and breast and uterine corpus cancers continued to increase, as did liver cancer and melanoma, both of which stabilized in men aged 50 years and older and declined in younger men. However, a 65% drop in cervical cancer incidence during 2012 through 2019 among women in their early 20s, the first cohort to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine, foreshadows steep reductions in the burden of human papillomavirus-associated cancers, the majority of which occur in women. Despite the pandemic, and in contrast with other leading causes of death, the cancer death rate continued to decline from 2019 to 2020 (by 1.5%), contributing to a 33% overall reduction since 1991 and an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted. This progress increasingly reflects advances in treatment, which are particularly evident in the rapid declines in mortality (approximately 2% annually during 2016 through 2020) for leukemia, melanoma, and kidney cancer, despite stable/increasing incidence, and accelerated declines for lung cancer. In summary, although cancer mortality rates continue to decline, future progress may be attenuated by rising incidence for breast, prostate, and uterine corpus cancers, which also happen to have the largest racial disparities in mortality.
{"title":"Cancer statistics, 2023","authors":"Rebecca L. Siegel MPH, Kimberly D. Miller MPH, Nikita Sandeep Wagle MBBS, MHA, PhD, Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.21763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes using incidence data collected by central cancer registries and mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2023, 1,958,310 new cancer cases and 609,820 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Cancer incidence increased for prostate cancer by 3% annually from 2014 through 2019 after two decades of decline, translating to an additional 99,000 new cases; otherwise, however, incidence trends were more favorable in men compared to women. For example, lung cancer in women decreased at one half the pace of men (1.1% vs. 2.6% annually) from 2015 through 2019, and breast and uterine corpus cancers continued to increase, as did liver cancer and melanoma, both of which stabilized in men aged 50 years and older and declined in younger men. However, a 65% drop in cervical cancer incidence during 2012 through 2019 among women in their early 20s, the first cohort to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine, foreshadows steep reductions in the burden of human papillomavirus-associated cancers, the majority of which occur in women. Despite the pandemic, and in contrast with other leading causes of death, the cancer death rate continued to decline from 2019 to 2020 (by 1.5%), contributing to a 33% overall reduction since 1991 and an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted. This progress increasingly reflects advances in treatment, which are particularly evident in the rapid declines in mortality (approximately 2% annually during 2016 through 2020) for leukemia, melanoma, and kidney cancer, despite stable/increasing incidence, and accelerated declines for lung cancer. In summary, although cancer mortality rates continue to decline, future progress may be attenuated by rising incidence for breast, prostate, and uterine corpus cancers, which also happen to have the largest racial disparities in mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 1","pages":"17-48"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21763","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6206635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>A new study finds that patient participation in clinical trials (CTs) leading to approval for hematologic cancer indications significantly underrepresents certain at-risk demographic groups in comparison with their incidence of these diseases. These disparities are most prominent and most consistent for Black, Hispanic, and Native American patients.</p><p>In their article, which appears in the <i>Journal of Clinical Oncology</i> (doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00504), researchers from the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia, point out that, as of 2021, hematologic cancers represent only 10% of cancers diagnosed in the United States. This is one reason, they write, that these cancers often are not examined separately from other malignancies when disparities in oncology drug approval CTs are being explored. Filling this gap was a key reason for their new study.</p><p>The study focused on CTs leading to drug approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for multiple myeloma (MM); myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms; and leukemias, including acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).</p><p>The researchers identified potentially relevant CTs from the FDA’s Oncology (Cancer)/Hematologic Malignancies Approval Notifications and Novel Drug Approvals databases. Participants’ demographic information and CT geographic site locations were obtained from studies on ClinicalTrials.gov and from articles found in PubMed via the drug name and CT numbers. Population-based incidence and mortality rates, delineated by race, ethnicity, and gender, came from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 21 registries and US census population estimates for more than 21 locations from 2014 to 2018. The researchers excluded CTs of pediatric populations, lymphomas, and rare hematologic cancers with data insufficient for statistical analysis.</p><p>Of the 61 CTs (with 13,731 participants), 67.2% reported data on race, and 48.8% also included ethnicity.</p><p>Of the 7287 patients in MM CTs, 80.3% were White, 4.7% were Black, 10.7% were Asian/Pacific Islander (API), <0.1% were Native American, and 2.9% were Hispanic. The corresponding percentages for MM incidence in SEER registries were 68.7%, 27.4%, 3.4%, 0.2%, and 17.5%. All of</p><p>these disparities in CT representation were statistically significant.</p><p>For the 1629 patients in acute myeloid leukemia trials, the percentages for CT participation and SEER incidence were 79.6% and 77.3%, respectively, for Whites; 3.8% and 12.3%, respectively, for Blacks; 8.8% and 5.6%, respectively, for APIs; 0.1% and 1.5%, respectively, for Native Americans; and 6.3% and 15.3%, respectively, for Hispanics. Again, all of these comparisons were statistically significant.</p><p>Varying levels of White and API overrepresentation, in contrast to Black, Native American,
一项新的研究发现,与这些疾病的发病率相比,参与临床试验(ct)导致批准血液学癌症适应症的患者显著低于某些高危人群。这些差异在黑人、西班牙裔和美洲原住民患者中最为突出和一致。在他们发表在《临床肿瘤学杂志》(doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00504)上的文章中,来自乔治亚州奥古斯塔大学乔治亚医学院的研究人员指出,截至2021年,血液病癌症仅占美国癌症诊断的10%。他们写道,这就是为什么在探索肿瘤药物批准ct的差异时,这些癌症通常不会与其他恶性肿瘤分开检查的原因之一。填补这一空白是他们进行新研究的一个关键原因。该研究的重点是导致美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准多发性骨髓瘤(MM)药物的ct;骨髓增生异常综合征与骨髓增生性肿瘤;和白血病,包括急性髓性白血病、慢性淋巴细胞白血病、慢性髓性白血病(CML)和急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)。研究人员从FDA的肿瘤(癌症)/血液恶性肿瘤批准通知和新药批准数据库中确定了潜在的相关ct。参与者的人口统计信息和CT地理位置是通过ClinicalTrials.gov上的研究和PubMed上通过药物名称和CT编号找到的文章获得的。基于人群的发病率和死亡率,按种族、民族和性别划分,来自美国国家癌症研究所的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER) 21个登记处和2014年至2018年超过21个地点的美国人口普查人口估计数。研究人员排除了儿科人群、淋巴瘤和罕见血液病的ct,因为数据不足以进行统计分析。在61项ct(13731名参与者)中,67.2%报告了种族数据,48.8%还包括种族。在7287例MM ct患者中,80.3%为白人,4.7%为黑人,10.7%为亚洲/太平洋岛民(API), 0.1%为美洲原住民,2.9%为西班牙裔。SEER登记的MM发病率相应百分比分别为68.7%、27.4%、3.4%、0.2%和17.5%。所有这些差异在CT表现上都具有统计学意义。在1629例急性髓系白血病试验中,白人的CT参与率和SEER发生率分别为79.6%和77.3%;黑人分别为3.8%和12.3%;原料药分别为8.8%和5.6%;印第安人分别为0.1%和1.5%;西班牙裔的比例分别为6.3%和15.3%。同样,所有这些比较在统计上都是显著的。在慢性淋巴细胞白血病、CML和ALL中,不同程度的白人和API患者比例过高,而黑人、美洲原住民和西班牙裔患者比例偏低。这种模式的例外是在CML和ALL ct中白人和ALL ct中的api中没有明显的过度代表或代表性不足。41个报告参与者种族的ct发生在990个地点,其中30.4% (n = 301)在美国。大多数CT位点位于东北部、东南部和中西部。研究作者写道,他们认为地理分布不能充分反映大多数血液学癌症的地理负担,但值得注意的是,结论是MM例外。“我们的分析表明,批准用于某些血液学恶性肿瘤的新药的关键试验正在人群中进行,并不能完全代表患有这些恶性肿瘤的一般人群。”研究作者Jorge E. Cortes,医学博士,Cecil F. Whitaker Jr,医学博士,奥古斯塔乔治亚州癌症中心癌症杰出学者主席说。“遗传学的差异,可能包括药物遗传学,以及营养、社会、经济、教育和其他因素会影响患者对治疗的反应和给定药物的安全性,因此我们不应期望结果可以推广到所有患者。”Arif Kamal,医学博士,MBA, MHS,美国癌症协会(位于北卡罗莱纳州教堂山)的首席病人官,同意Cortes博士的观点。“对于血癌,尤其是多发性骨髓瘤的治疗,治疗标准几乎每年都在变化,研究进展非常迅速。”Kamal博士说,由于试验参与者的多样性有限,临床医生可能无法为少数患者开出最新、最优的治疗方案。“在我看来,真正的危害是,我们根据可能无法推广到某些患者的旧数据,贸然行事。 科尔特斯博士说,他认为参与ct试验已经有些偏颇了,因为它们有非常严格的资格标准,一旦获得批准,很大一部分可能从药物中受益的人群可能不符合这些标准。“当研究人群的种族和性别构成与风险人群相比存在显著差异时,情况就更糟了。”他补充说,向所有患者提供研究机会也很重要。“人们不能指望病人可以直接去研究地点。我们必须把研究成果带给患者,而不是让患者参与研究。”在同一期研究的社论中,来自佛罗里达州迈阿密市迈阿密大学西尔维斯特综合癌症中心血液学部门的Namrata S. Chandhok医学博士和Mikkael A. Sekeres医学硕士写道,这项研究证实了美国血液恶性肿瘤“在导致药物批准的研究中没有充分的种族和民族代表性”。他们还写道,他们认为这种缺陷的一个驱动因素是在该国特殊人群居住的地区缺乏可用的试验。Chandhok博士和Sekeres博士还指出,缺乏对种族差异的理解,这导致了将具有不同遗传变异和“种族内社会经济、文化和行为实践”的人群混为一谈。因此,他们写道,“需要解决特定人群获得服务的障碍……比如语言障碍、沟通障碍和社会经济挑战。”
{"title":"Minority groups underrepresented in hematologic cancer trials","authors":"Mike Fillon","doi":"10.3322/caac.21769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21769","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new study finds that patient participation in clinical trials (CTs) leading to approval for hematologic cancer indications significantly underrepresents certain at-risk demographic groups in comparison with their incidence of these diseases. These disparities are most prominent and most consistent for Black, Hispanic, and Native American patients.</p><p>In their article, which appears in the <i>Journal of Clinical Oncology</i> (doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00504), researchers from the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia, point out that, as of 2021, hematologic cancers represent only 10% of cancers diagnosed in the United States. This is one reason, they write, that these cancers often are not examined separately from other malignancies when disparities in oncology drug approval CTs are being explored. Filling this gap was a key reason for their new study.</p><p>The study focused on CTs leading to drug approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for multiple myeloma (MM); myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms; and leukemias, including acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).</p><p>The researchers identified potentially relevant CTs from the FDA’s Oncology (Cancer)/Hematologic Malignancies Approval Notifications and Novel Drug Approvals databases. Participants’ demographic information and CT geographic site locations were obtained from studies on ClinicalTrials.gov and from articles found in PubMed via the drug name and CT numbers. Population-based incidence and mortality rates, delineated by race, ethnicity, and gender, came from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 21 registries and US census population estimates for more than 21 locations from 2014 to 2018. The researchers excluded CTs of pediatric populations, lymphomas, and rare hematologic cancers with data insufficient for statistical analysis.</p><p>Of the 61 CTs (with 13,731 participants), 67.2% reported data on race, and 48.8% also included ethnicity.</p><p>Of the 7287 patients in MM CTs, 80.3% were White, 4.7% were Black, 10.7% were Asian/Pacific Islander (API), <0.1% were Native American, and 2.9% were Hispanic. The corresponding percentages for MM incidence in SEER registries were 68.7%, 27.4%, 3.4%, 0.2%, and 17.5%. All of</p><p>these disparities in CT representation were statistically significant.</p><p>For the 1629 patients in acute myeloid leukemia trials, the percentages for CT participation and SEER incidence were 79.6% and 77.3%, respectively, for Whites; 3.8% and 12.3%, respectively, for Blacks; 8.8% and 5.6%, respectively, for APIs; 0.1% and 1.5%, respectively, for Native Americans; and 6.3% and 15.3%, respectively, for Hispanics. Again, all of these comparisons were statistically significant.</p><p>Varying levels of White and API overrepresentation, in contrast to Black, Native American,","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 1","pages":"6-7"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21769","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6206631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although no one disputes the efficacy of opioids for the relief of pain related to cancer and its therapies, there is alarm over nonmedical opioid use (NMOU) and its substantial adverse impacts on patients, their families, and their communities. A new study reports on an approach called Compassionate High-Alert Team (CHAT) to counteract NMOU.
“Non-medical opiate use is a frequent and devastating complication for patients with advanced cancer. Patience with these conditions is distressing and time demanding for clinicians,” says study researcher Eduardo Bruera, MD, the McGraw Chair in the Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, & Integrative Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. “Our study found a major reduction in non-medical abuse behaviors accompanied by high adherence to the intervention among these patients.”
{"title":"Team approach for nonmedical opioid use","authors":"Mike Fillon","doi":"10.3322/caac.21770","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21770","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although no one disputes the efficacy of opioids for the relief of pain related to cancer and its therapies, there is alarm over nonmedical opioid use (NMOU) and its substantial adverse impacts on patients, their families, and their communities. A new study reports on an approach called Compassionate High-Alert Team (CHAT) to counteract NMOU.</p><p>“Non-medical opiate use is a frequent and devastating complication for patients with advanced cancer. Patience with these conditions is distressing and time demanding for clinicians,” says study researcher Eduardo Bruera, MD, the McGraw Chair in the Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, & Integrative Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. “Our study found a major reduction in non-medical abuse behaviors accompanied by high adherence to the intervention among these patients.”</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 1","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21770","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"5657682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy defined by the clonal proliferation of transformed plasma cells. Despite tremendous advances in the treatment paradigm of MM, a cure remains elusive for most patients. Although long-term disease control can be achieved in a very large number of patients, the acquisition of tumor resistance leads to disease relapse, especially in patients with triple-class refractory MM (defined as resistance to immunomodulatory agents, proteosome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies). There is an unmet need for effective treatment options in these patients. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a novel approach that has demonstrated promising efficacy in the treatment of relapsed, refractory MM (RRMM). These genetically modified cellular therapies have demonstrated deep and durable remissions in other B-cell malignancies, and current efforts aim to achieve similar results in patients with RRMM. Early studies have demonstrated remarkable response rates with CAR T-cell therapy in RRMM; however, durable responses with CAR T-cell therapies in myeloma have yet to be realized. In this comprehensive review, the authors describe the development of CAR T-cell therapies in myeloma, the outcomes of notable clinical trials, the toxicities and limitations of CAR T-cell therapies, and the strategies to overcome therapeutic challenges of CAR T cells in the hope of achieving a cure for multiple myeloma.
{"title":"Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: A comprehensive review of current data and implications for clinical practice","authors":"Rujul H. Parikh MD, Sagar Lonial MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.21771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21771","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy defined by the clonal proliferation of transformed plasma cells. Despite tremendous advances in the treatment paradigm of MM, a cure remains elusive for most patients. Although long-term disease control can be achieved in a very large number of patients, the acquisition of tumor resistance leads to disease relapse, especially in patients with triple-class refractory MM (defined as resistance to immunomodulatory agents, proteosome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies). There is an unmet need for effective treatment options in these patients. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a novel approach that has demonstrated promising efficacy in the treatment of relapsed, refractory MM (RRMM). These genetically modified cellular therapies have demonstrated deep and durable remissions in other B-cell malignancies, and current efforts aim to achieve similar results in patients with RRMM. Early studies have demonstrated remarkable response rates with CAR T-cell therapy in RRMM; however, durable responses with CAR T-cell therapies in myeloma have yet to be realized. In this comprehensive review, the authors describe the development of CAR T-cell therapies in myeloma, the outcomes of notable clinical trials, the toxicities and limitations of CAR T-cell therapies, and the strategies to overcome therapeutic challenges of CAR T cells in the hope of achieving a cure for multiple myeloma.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 3","pages":"275-285"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21771","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6225076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eric O. Aboagye BPharm, MSc, PhD, Tara D. Barwick MBChB, MSc, Uwe Haberkorn MD
A quintessential setting for precision medicine, theranostics refers to a rapidly evolving field of medicine in which disease is diagnosed followed by treatment of disease-positive patients using tools for the therapy identical or similar to those used for the diagnosis. Against the backdrop of only-treat-when-visualized, the goal is a high therapeutic index with efficacy markedly surpassing toxicity. Oncology leads the way in theranostics innovation, where the approach has become possible with the identification of unique proteins and other factors selectively expressed in cancer versus healthy tissue, advances in imaging technology able to report these tissue factors, and major understanding of targeting chemicals and nanodevices together with methods to attach labels or warheads for imaging and therapy. Radiotheranostics—using radiopharmaceuticals—is becoming routine in patients with prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors who express the proteins PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) and SSTR2 (somatostatin receptor 2), respectively, on their cancer. The palpable excitement in the field stems from the finding that a proportion of patients with large metastatic burden show complete and partial responses, and this outcome is catalyzing the search for more radiotheranostics approaches. Not every patient will benefit from radiotheranostics; but, for those who cross the target-detected line, the likelihood of response is very high.
{"title":"Radiotheranostics in oncology: Making precision medicine possible","authors":"Eric O. Aboagye BPharm, MSc, PhD, Tara D. Barwick MBChB, MSc, Uwe Haberkorn MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.21768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21768","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A quintessential setting for precision medicine, <i>theranostics</i> refers to a rapidly evolving field of medicine in which disease is diagnosed followed by treatment of disease-positive patients using tools for the therapy identical or similar to those used for the diagnosis. Against the backdrop of <i>only-treat-when-visualized</i>, the goal is a high therapeutic index with efficacy markedly surpassing toxicity. Oncology leads the way in theranostics innovation, where the approach has become possible with the identification of unique proteins and other factors selectively expressed in cancer versus healthy tissue, advances in imaging technology able to report these tissue factors, and major understanding of targeting chemicals and nanodevices together with methods to attach <i>labels or warheads</i> for imaging and therapy. <i>Radiotheranostics</i>—using radiopharmaceuticals—is becoming routine in patients with prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors who express the proteins PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) and SSTR2 (somatostatin receptor 2), respectively, on their cancer. The palpable excitement in the field stems from the finding that a proportion of patients with large metastatic burden show complete and partial responses, and this outcome is catalyzing the search for more radiotheranostics approaches. Not every patient will benefit from radiotheranostics; but, for those who cross the <i>target-detected</i> line, the likelihood of response is very high.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 3","pages":"255-274"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21768","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6153607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cancer development is driven by the accumulation of alterations affecting the structure and function of the genome. Whereas genetic changes disrupt the DNA sequence, epigenetic alterations contribute to the acquisition of hallmark tumor capabilities by regulating gene expression programs that promote tumorigenesis. Shifts in DNA methylation and histone mark patterns, the two main epigenetic modifications, orchestrate tumor progression and metastasis. These cancer-specific events have been exploited as useful tools for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment choice to aid clinical decision making. Moreover, the reversibility of epigenetic modifications, in contrast to the irreversibility of genetic changes, has made the epigenetic machinery an attractive target for drug development. This review summarizes the most advanced applications of epigenetic biomarkers and epigenetic drugs in the clinical setting, highlighting commercially available DNA methylation-based assays and epigenetic drugs already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
{"title":"Cancer epigenetics in clinical practice","authors":"Veronica Davalos PhD, Manel Esteller MD, PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.21765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21765","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cancer development is driven by the accumulation of alterations affecting the structure and function of the genome. Whereas genetic changes disrupt the DNA sequence, epigenetic alterations contribute to the acquisition of hallmark tumor capabilities by regulating gene expression programs that promote tumorigenesis. Shifts in DNA methylation and histone mark patterns, the two main epigenetic modifications, orchestrate tumor progression and metastasis. These cancer-specific events have been exploited as useful tools for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment choice to aid clinical decision making. Moreover, the reversibility of epigenetic modifications, in contrast to the irreversibility of genetic changes, has made the epigenetic machinery an attractive target for drug development. This review summarizes the most advanced applications of epigenetic biomarkers and epigenetic drugs in the clinical setting, highlighting commercially available DNA methylation-based assays and epigenetic drugs already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 4","pages":"376-424"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21765","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6234019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura Ashley PhD, Claire Surr PhD, Rachael Kelley RMN, PhD, Mollie Price PhD, Alys Wyn Griffiths PhD, Nicole R. Fowler MHSA, PhD, Dana E. Giza MD, Richard D. Neal MBChB, FRCGP, PhD, Charlene Martin PhD, Jane B. Hopkinson RGN, PhD, Anita O’Donovan PhD, William Dale MD, PhD, Bogda Koczwara BMBS, MBioethics, Katie Spencer MB BChir, FRCR, PhD, Lynda Wyld MBChB, FRCS, PhD
As many countries experience population aging, patients with cancer are becoming older and have more preexisting comorbidities, which include prevalent, age-related, chronic conditions such as dementia. People living with dementia (PLWD) are vulnerable to health disparities, and dementia has high potential to complicate and adversely affect care and outcomes across the cancer trajectory. This report offers an overview of dementia and its prevalence among patients with cancer and a summary of the research literature examining cancer care for PLWD. The reviewed research indicates that PLWD are more likely to have cancer diagnosed at an advanced stage, receive no or less extensive cancer treatment, and have poorer survival after a cancer diagnosis. These cancer disparities do not necessarily signify inappropriately later diagnosis or lower treatment of people with dementia as a group, and they are arguably less feasible and appropriate targets for care optimization. The reviewed research indicates that PLWD also have an increased risk of cancer-related emergency presentations, lower quality processes of cancer-related decision making, accessibility-related barriers to cancer investigations and treatment, higher experienced treatment burden and higher caregiver burden for families, and undertreated cancer-related pain. The authors propose that optimal cancer care for PLWD should focus on proactively minimizing these risk areas and thus must be highly person-centered, with holistic decision making, individualized reasonable adjustments to practice, and strong inclusion and support of family carers. Comprehensive recommendations are made for clinical practice and future research to help clinicians and providers deliver best and equitable cancer care for PLWD and their families.
{"title":"Cancer care for people with dementia: Literature overview and recommendations for practice and research","authors":"Laura Ashley PhD, Claire Surr PhD, Rachael Kelley RMN, PhD, Mollie Price PhD, Alys Wyn Griffiths PhD, Nicole R. Fowler MHSA, PhD, Dana E. Giza MD, Richard D. Neal MBChB, FRCGP, PhD, Charlene Martin PhD, Jane B. Hopkinson RGN, PhD, Anita O’Donovan PhD, William Dale MD, PhD, Bogda Koczwara BMBS, MBioethics, Katie Spencer MB BChir, FRCR, PhD, Lynda Wyld MBChB, FRCS, PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.21767","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21767","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As many countries experience population aging, patients with cancer are becoming older and have more preexisting comorbidities, which include prevalent, age-related, chronic conditions such as dementia. <i>People living with dementia</i> (PLWD) are vulnerable to health disparities, and dementia has high potential to complicate and adversely affect care and outcomes across the cancer trajectory. This report offers an overview of dementia and its prevalence among patients with cancer and a summary of the research literature examining cancer care for PLWD. The reviewed research indicates that PLWD are more likely to have cancer diagnosed at an advanced stage, receive no or less extensive cancer treatment, and have poorer survival after a cancer diagnosis. These cancer disparities do not necessarily signify inappropriately later diagnosis or lower treatment of people with dementia as a group, and they are arguably less feasible and appropriate targets for care optimization. The reviewed research indicates that PLWD also have an increased risk of cancer-related emergency presentations, lower quality processes of cancer-related decision making, accessibility-related barriers to cancer investigations and treatment, higher <i>experienced</i> treatment burden and higher caregiver burden for families, and undertreated cancer-related pain. The authors propose that optimal cancer care for PLWD should focus on proactively minimizing these risk areas and thus must be highly person-centered, with holistic decision making, individualized reasonable adjustments to practice, and strong inclusion and support of family carers. Comprehensive recommendations are made for clinical practice and future research to help clinicians and providers deliver best and equitable cancer care for PLWD and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 3","pages":"320-338"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21767","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6234015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vaibhav Wadhwa MD, Nicole Patel MD-DR, MBA, Dheera Grover MD, Faisal S. Ali MD, Nirav Thosani MD MHA
Cancer is one of the foremost health problems worldwide and is among the leading causes of death in the United States. Gastrointestinal tract cancers account for almost one third of the cancer-related mortality globally, making it one of the deadliest groups of cancers. Early diagnosis and prompt management are key to preventing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. With advancements in technology and endoscopic techniques, endoscopy has become the core in diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tract cancers. In this extensive review, the authors discuss the role endoscopy plays in early detection, diagnosis, and management of esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, ampullary, biliary tract, and small intestinal cancers.
{"title":"Interventional gastroenterology in oncology","authors":"Vaibhav Wadhwa MD, Nicole Patel MD-DR, MBA, Dheera Grover MD, Faisal S. Ali MD, Nirav Thosani MD MHA","doi":"10.3322/caac.21766","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21766","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cancer is one of the foremost health problems worldwide and is among the leading causes of death in the United States. Gastrointestinal tract cancers account for almost one third of the cancer-related mortality globally, making it one of the deadliest groups of cancers. Early diagnosis and prompt management are key to preventing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. With advancements in technology and endoscopic techniques, endoscopy has become the core in diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tract cancers. In this extensive review, the authors discuss the role endoscopy plays in early detection, diagnosis, and management of esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, ampullary, biliary tract, and small intestinal cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"73 3","pages":"286-319"},"PeriodicalIF":254.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21766","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"6182221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}