Laura Timms, Sooji Choi, Zoe Marshman, Helen Rodd, Anne R. Wilson, Tamanna Tiwari
BackgroundInternational data suggest that parents may have reservations about the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF).AimThe aims of this study were to: (1) examine the acceptance of parents/carers towards the use of SDF for the management of caries in children's primary teeth in secondary care dental settings in the UK and the United States and (2) determine which factors may affect the acceptance of the use of SDF.DesignThis was a cross‐sectional questionnaire of SDF acceptability, completed by parents of young children. It was validated and adapted to local populations. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics.ResultsOf the 113 Sheffield parents, 73% reported that they would accept SDF treatment of children's posterior teeth, with 58% reporting this for anterior teeth. Parents having less concern about posterior aesthetics had a statistically significant effect on reported acceptance of SDF (p = .013). In the Colorado sample (n = 104), 72% reported that they would accept SDF on posterior teeth, and 58% reported that they would accept SDF on anterior teeth. Concerns about aesthetics had an effect on decreasing SDF acceptance overall (p = .0065) in anterior (p = .023) and posterior teeth (p = .108).ConclusionThe majority of parents in the two study populations accepted the treatment using SDF. However, concern about aesthetics had an influence on acceptability.
{"title":"Parental acceptability of silver diamine fluoride: The UK and US experiences","authors":"Laura Timms, Sooji Choi, Zoe Marshman, Helen Rodd, Anne R. Wilson, Tamanna Tiwari","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13195","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundInternational data suggest that parents may have reservations about the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF).AimThe aims of this study were to: (1) examine the acceptance of parents/carers towards the use of SDF for the management of caries in children's primary teeth in secondary care dental settings in the UK and the United States and (2) determine which factors may affect the acceptance of the use of SDF.DesignThis was a cross‐sectional questionnaire of SDF acceptability, completed by parents of young children. It was validated and adapted to local populations. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics.ResultsOf the 113 Sheffield parents, 73% reported that they would accept SDF treatment of children's posterior teeth, with 58% reporting this for anterior teeth. Parents having less concern about posterior aesthetics had a statistically significant effect on reported acceptance of SDF (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .013). In the Colorado sample (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 104), 72% reported that they would accept SDF on posterior teeth, and 58% reported that they would accept SDF on anterior teeth. Concerns about aesthetics had an effect on decreasing SDF acceptance overall (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .0065) in anterior (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .023) and posterior teeth (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .108).ConclusionThe majority of parents in the two study populations accepted the treatment using SDF. However, concern about aesthetics had an influence on acceptability.","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140809862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marília Pacífico Lucisano, Gilmer Torres Ramos, Daniel José Blanco‐Victorio, Laura Ricardina Ramírez‐Sotelo, Ricardo Barbosa Lima, Paulo Nelson‐Filho, Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva, Jessica Arieta Miranda, Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
BackgroundThe conicity of the root canals of primary teeth is an important measure for endodontic therapies. However, determining this conicity depends on the methods employed, which requires further investigation.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the conicity of the root canals of the upper and lower primary second molars using nanotomography (nCT).DesignAn in vitro study was performed using nine primary second molars, both upper and lower, subjected to nCT. Comparisons between the diameters of root canals were performed between the thirds (cervical—D0, middle—D5, and apical—D7). The conicity (%) was determined for each root canal from cervical to apical. Data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe conicity ranged from 2% to 8% for the upper primary second molars. Significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (D0, D5, and D7 points) were observed in the mesio‐ and distobuccal roots (p < .05), but not in the palatal roots (p > .05). For the lower primary second molars, the conicity ranged from 2% to 17%, as well as significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (D0, D5, and D7 points) were observed in all roots (distal, mesiobuccal, and mesiolingual; p < .05).ConclusionThe conicity of the upper primary second molars was different from that of the lower ones, which showed a greater variability.
{"title":"Root canal conicity determination of primary second molars using nanotomography: An in vitro study","authors":"Marília Pacífico Lucisano, Gilmer Torres Ramos, Daniel José Blanco‐Victorio, Laura Ricardina Ramírez‐Sotelo, Ricardo Barbosa Lima, Paulo Nelson‐Filho, Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva, Jessica Arieta Miranda, Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13198","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe conicity of the root canals of primary teeth is an important measure for endodontic therapies. However, determining this conicity depends on the methods employed, which requires further investigation.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the conicity of the root canals of the upper and lower primary second molars using nanotomography (nCT).DesignAn in vitro study was performed using nine primary second molars, both upper and lower, subjected to nCT. Comparisons between the diameters of root canals were performed between the thirds (cervical—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, middle—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and apical—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7). The conicity (%) was determined for each root canal from cervical to apical. Data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe conicity ranged from 2% to 8% for the upper primary second molars. Significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7 points) were observed in the mesio‐ and distobuccal roots (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05), but not in the palatal roots (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> > .05). For the lower primary second molars, the conicity ranged from 2% to 17%, as well as significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7 points) were observed in all roots (distal, mesiobuccal, and mesiolingual; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05).ConclusionThe conicity of the upper primary second molars was different from that of the lower ones, which showed a greater variability.","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140809899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}