首页 > 最新文献

JAMA Network Open最新文献

英文 中文
KRAS Mutation Status and Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. 转移性胰腺腺癌患者的KRAS突变状态和治疗结果。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53588
Carter Norton, Matthew Steven Shaw, Zachary Rubnitz, Jarrod Smith, Heloisa P Soares, Christopher D Nevala-Plagemann, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Vaia Florou

Importance: Despite the high prevalence of KRAS alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the clinical impact of common KRAS mutations with different cytotoxic regimens is unknown. This evidence is important to inform current treatment and provide a benchmark for emergent targeted KRAS therapies in metastatic PDAC.

Objective: To assess the clinical implications of common KRAS G12 mutations in PDAC and to compare outcomes of standard-of-care multiagent therapies across these common mutations.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study obtained deidentified clinical data for 5382 patients from a nationwide (US-based) clinicogenomic database. The deidentified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care). Patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC from February 9, 2010, to September 20, 2022, and with sufficient follow-up and treatment data were included.

Main outcomes and measures: Median overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were calculated for each KRAS mutation group. Hazard ratios (HRs) were generated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for KRAS mutations and mutation-treatment combinations.

Results: A total of 2433 patients with PDAC were included in the analysis (mean age at first treatment, 67.0 [range, 66.0-68.0] years; 1340 male [55.1%]). Among 2023 patients with KRAS mutations, those with G12R had the longest median TTNT (6.0 [95% CI, 5.2-6.6] months) and the longest median OS (13.2 [95% CI, 10.6-15.2] months). Patients with KRAS G12D and G12V mutations had a significantly higher risk of disease progression (HRs, 1.15; [95% CI, 1.04-1.29; P = .009] and 1.16 [95% CI, 1.04-1.30; P = .01], respectively) and death (HRs, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.15-1.45; P < .001] and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001], respectively) compared with KRAS wild type. The FOLFIRINOX regimen (fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin) had a significantly lower risk of treatment progression and death than gemcitabine with (HRs, 1.19 [95% CI, [1.09-1.29; P < .001] and 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07-1.29; P < .001], respectively) or without (HRs, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.11-1.69; P = .003] and 1.41 [95% CI 1.13-1.75; P = .002], respectively) nab-paclitaxel across all patients.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of 2433 patients with PDAC, KRAS G12D and G12V mutations were associated with worse patient outcomes compared with KRAS wild type. KRAS G12R was associated with more favorable patient outcomes, and FOLFIRINOX was associated with better patient outcomes than gemcitabine-based therapies. These findings highlight the need for more effective systemic therapies for these groups of patients.

重要性:尽管KRAS突变在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的发生率很高,但不同细胞毒方案对常见KRAS突变的临床影响尚不清楚。这一证据对当前的治疗具有重要意义,并为转移性PDAC的紧急靶向KRAS治疗提供了基准。目的:评估PDAC中常见KRAS G12突变的临床意义,并比较针对这些常见突变的标准治疗多药治疗的结果。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究从全国(美国)临床基因组学数据库中获得5382例患者的未确定临床数据。未确定的数据来自大约280个美国癌症诊所(大约800个护理点)。2010年2月9日至2022年9月20日诊断为转移性PDAC的患者,并有足够的随访和治疗数据。主要结局和指标:计算每个KRAS突变组的中位总生存期(OS)和到下一次治疗的时间(TTNT)。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型生成KRAS突变和突变治疗组合的风险比(hr)。结果:共有2433例PDAC患者纳入分析(首次治疗时平均年龄67.0[范围,66.0-68.0]岁;男性1340人[55.1%])。在2023例KRAS突变患者中,G12R患者的中位TTNT最长(6.0 [95% CI, 5.2-6.6]个月),中位OS最长(13.2 [95% CI, 10.6-15.2]个月)。KRAS G12D和G12V突变患者的疾病进展风险显著增加(hr, 1.15;[95% ci, 1.04-1.29;p =。009]和1.16 [95% CI, 1.04-1.30;p =。[01])和死亡(hr, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.15-1.45;结论和相关性:在这项2433例PDAC患者的队列研究中,与KRAS野生型相比,KRAS G12D和G12V突变与更差的患者预后相关。KRAS G12R与更有利的患者预后相关,而FOLFIRINOX与基于吉西他滨的治疗相关的患者预后更好。这些发现强调需要对这些患者群体进行更有效的全身治疗。
{"title":"KRAS Mutation Status and Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Carter Norton, Matthew Steven Shaw, Zachary Rubnitz, Jarrod Smith, Heloisa P Soares, Christopher D Nevala-Plagemann, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Vaia Florou","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53588","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53588","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Despite the high prevalence of KRAS alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the clinical impact of common KRAS mutations with different cytotoxic regimens is unknown. This evidence is important to inform current treatment and provide a benchmark for emergent targeted KRAS therapies in metastatic PDAC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the clinical implications of common KRAS G12 mutations in PDAC and to compare outcomes of standard-of-care multiagent therapies across these common mutations.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study obtained deidentified clinical data for 5382 patients from a nationwide (US-based) clinicogenomic database. The deidentified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care). Patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC from February 9, 2010, to September 20, 2022, and with sufficient follow-up and treatment data were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Median overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were calculated for each KRAS mutation group. Hazard ratios (HRs) were generated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for KRAS mutations and mutation-treatment combinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2433 patients with PDAC were included in the analysis (mean age at first treatment, 67.0 [range, 66.0-68.0] years; 1340 male [55.1%]). Among 2023 patients with KRAS mutations, those with G12R had the longest median TTNT (6.0 [95% CI, 5.2-6.6] months) and the longest median OS (13.2 [95% CI, 10.6-15.2] months). Patients with KRAS G12D and G12V mutations had a significantly higher risk of disease progression (HRs, 1.15; [95% CI, 1.04-1.29; P = .009] and 1.16 [95% CI, 1.04-1.30; P = .01], respectively) and death (HRs, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.15-1.45; P < .001] and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001], respectively) compared with KRAS wild type. The FOLFIRINOX regimen (fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin) had a significantly lower risk of treatment progression and death than gemcitabine with (HRs, 1.19 [95% CI, [1.09-1.29; P < .001] and 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07-1.29; P < .001], respectively) or without (HRs, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.11-1.69; P = .003] and 1.41 [95% CI 1.13-1.75; P = .002], respectively) nab-paclitaxel across all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of 2433 patients with PDAC, KRAS G12D and G12V mutations were associated with worse patient outcomes compared with KRAS wild type. KRAS G12R was associated with more favorable patient outcomes, and FOLFIRINOX was associated with better patient outcomes than gemcitabine-based therapies. These findings highlight the need for more effective systemic therapies for these groups of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2453588"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142949080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors in Initial Anticoagulation Choice in Hospitalized Patients With Pulmonary Embolism. 肺栓塞住院患者初始抗凝选择的影响因素。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52877
William B Stubblefield, Ron Helderman, Natalie Strokes, Colin F Greineder, Geoffrey D Barnes, David R Vinson, Lauren M Westafer

Importance: Despite guideline recommendations to use low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of most patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), US-based studies have found increasing use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hospitalized patients.

Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE.

Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews from February 1 to June 3, 2024, that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process using reflexive thematic analysis. Interview participants were physicians in emergency medicine, hospital medicine (hospitalist), interventional cardiology, and interventional radiology. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling targeting UFH-dominant vs LMWH-dominant approaches in hospitalized patients with acute PE. We triangulated results with a group of interventional cardiologists and radiologists (interventionalists).

Main outcomes and measures: Common themes and factors associated with anticoagulant selection for hospitalized patients with acute PE. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify these themes and factors.

Results: Of the 46 interviewees (median [IQR] age, 43 [36-50] years; 33 who identified as men [71.7%]), 25 (54.3%) were emergency physicians, 17 (37.0%) were hospitalists, and 4 (8.7%) were interventionalists. Each interview lasted a median (IQR) of 29 (25-32) minutes. Prominent themes associated with anticoagulant selection included agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, the inertia of learned practice, and therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation. Institutional culture and support were factors associated with choice of the dominant anticoagulation strategy. Additionally, factors associated with UFH use were fear of decompensation and misperceptions regarding the pharmacology of anticoagulants and catheter-directed treatments.

Conclusions and relevance: In this qualitative study, physicians across a spectrum of specialties and geographical settings reported common barriers and facilitators to the use of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE, particularly agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, inertia of learned practice, therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation, and institutional culture and support. Future implementation efforts may consider targeting these domains.

重要性:尽管指南建议使用低分子肝素(LMWHs)或直接口服抗凝剂治疗大多数急性肺栓塞(PE)患者,但美国的研究发现,住院患者越来越多地使用未分离肝素(UFH)。目的:探讨急性肺心病住院患者符合指南抗凝治疗的障碍和促进因素。设计、环境和参与者:本定性研究从2024年2月1日至6月3日进行了半结构化访谈,并使用反身性主题分析在迭代过程中进行了记录、转录和分析。访谈对象为急诊医学、医院医学(住院医师)、介入心脏病学和介入放射学的医生。在急性PE住院患者中,采用最大变异抽样针对ufh优势vs lmwh优势的方法招募参与者。我们与一组介入性心脏病专家和放射科医生(介入性医生)对结果进行了三角测量。主要结局和措施:急性肺泡栓塞住院患者抗凝选择的共同主题和相关因素。反身性主题分析用于识别这些主题和因素。结果:46名受访者(中位[IQR]年龄43[36-50]岁;男性33例(71.7%),急诊医师25例(54.3%),住院医师17例(37.0%),介入医师4例(8.7%)。每次访谈的中位数(IQR)为29(25-32)分钟。与抗凝剂选择相关的突出主题包括抗凝剂选择的不可知论、习得性实践的惯性以及抗凝剂开始后的治疗势头。机构文化和支持是影响首选抗凝策略选择的因素。此外,与使用UFH相关的因素是对失代偿的恐惧和对抗凝剂药理学和导管指导治疗的误解。结论和相关性:在这项定性研究中,不同专业和地区的医生报告了急性肺心病住院患者使用符合指南的抗凝治疗的常见障碍和促进因素,特别是抗凝剂的选择、学习实践的惯性、抗凝治疗开始后的治疗势头以及机构文化和支持方面的不可知论。未来的实现工作可能会考虑瞄准这些领域。
{"title":"Factors in Initial Anticoagulation Choice in Hospitalized Patients With Pulmonary Embolism.","authors":"William B Stubblefield, Ron Helderman, Natalie Strokes, Colin F Greineder, Geoffrey D Barnes, David R Vinson, Lauren M Westafer","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52877","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Despite guideline recommendations to use low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of most patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), US-based studies have found increasing use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify barriers and facilitators of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews from February 1 to June 3, 2024, that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process using reflexive thematic analysis. Interview participants were physicians in emergency medicine, hospital medicine (hospitalist), interventional cardiology, and interventional radiology. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling targeting UFH-dominant vs LMWH-dominant approaches in hospitalized patients with acute PE. We triangulated results with a group of interventional cardiologists and radiologists (interventionalists).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Common themes and factors associated with anticoagulant selection for hospitalized patients with acute PE. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify these themes and factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 46 interviewees (median [IQR] age, 43 [36-50] years; 33 who identified as men [71.7%]), 25 (54.3%) were emergency physicians, 17 (37.0%) were hospitalists, and 4 (8.7%) were interventionalists. Each interview lasted a median (IQR) of 29 (25-32) minutes. Prominent themes associated with anticoagulant selection included agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, the inertia of learned practice, and therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation. Institutional culture and support were factors associated with choice of the dominant anticoagulation strategy. Additionally, factors associated with UFH use were fear of decompensation and misperceptions regarding the pharmacology of anticoagulants and catheter-directed treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this qualitative study, physicians across a spectrum of specialties and geographical settings reported common barriers and facilitators to the use of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE, particularly agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, inertia of learned practice, therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation, and institutional culture and support. Future implementation efforts may consider targeting these domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2452877"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Model-Guided Clinical Decision Support for Suicide Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 风险模型引导的自杀筛查临床决策支持:一项随机临床试验。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52371
Colin G Walsh, Michael A Ripperger, Laurie Novak, Carrie Reale, Shilo Anders, Ashley Spann, Jhansi Kolli, Katelyn Robinson, Qingxia Chen, David Isaacs, Lealani Mae Y Acosta, Fenna Phibbs, Elliot Fielstein, Drew Wilimitis, Katherine Musacchio Schafer, Rachel Hilton, Dan Albert, Jill Shelton, Jessica Stroh, William W Stead, Kevin B Johnson
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Suicide prevention requires risk identification, intervention, and follow-up. Traditional risk identification relies on patient self-reporting, support network reporting, or face-to-face screening. Statistical risk models have been studied and some have been deployed to augment clinical judgment. Few have been tested in clinical practice via clinical decision support (CDS). Barriers to effective CDS include potential alert burden for a stigmatized clinical problem and lack of data on how best to integrate scalable risk models into clinical workflows.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of risk model-driven CDS on suicide risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial was performed from August 17, 2022, to February 16, 2023, in the Department of Neurology across the divisions of Neuro-Movement Disorders, Neuromuscular Disorders, and Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, an academic medical center in the US Mid-South. Patients scheduled for routine care in those settings were randomized at visit check-in. Follow-up was completed March 16, 2023, and data were analyzed from April 11 to July 24, 2023. Analyses were based on intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Interruptive vs noninterruptive CDS to prompt further suicide risk assessment using a real-time, validated statistical suicide attempt risk model. In the interruptive CDS, an alert window via on-screen pop-up and a patient panel icon were visible simultaneously. Dismissing the alert hid it with no effect on the patient panel icon. The noninterruptive CDS showed the patient panel icon without the pop-up alert. When present, the noninterruptive CDS displayed "elevated suicide risk score" in the patient summarization panel. Hovering over this icon resulted in a pop-up identical to the interruptive CDS.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was the decision to assess risk in person. Secondary outcomes included rates of suicidal ideation and attempts in both treatment arms and baseline rates of documented screening during the prior year. Manual medical record review of every trial encounter was used to determine whether suicide risk assessment was subsequently documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 561 patients with 596 encounters were randomized to interruptive or noninterruptive CDS in a 1:1 ratio (mean [SD] age, 59.3 [16.5] years; 292 [52%] women). Adjusting for clinician cluster effects, interruptive CDS led to significantly higher numbers of decisions to screen (121 of 289 encounters [42%]) compared with noninterruptive CDS (12 of 307 encounters [4%]) (odds ratio, 17.70; 95% CI, 6.42-48.79; P < .001) and compared with the baseline rate the prior year (64 of 832 encounters [8%]). No documented episodes of suicidal ideation or attempts occurred in eith
重要性:预防自杀需要风险识别、干预和跟踪。传统的风险识别依赖于患者自我报告、支持网络报告或面对面筛查。对统计风险模型进行了研究,其中一些模型已被用于辅助临床判断。通过临床决策支持(CDS)在临床实践中进行测试的却寥寥无几。有效临床决策支持(CDS)的障碍包括对一个被污名化的临床问题的潜在警报负担,以及缺乏关于如何最好地将可扩展风险模型整合到临床工作流程中的数据:评估风险模型驱动的 CDS 对自杀风险评估的有效性:这项比较有效性随机临床试验于 2022 年 8 月 17 日至 2023 年 2 月 16 日在美国中南部学术医疗中心范德比尔特大学医学中心神经内科的神经运动障碍、神经肌肉障碍以及行为和认知神经内科进行。计划在这些机构接受常规治疗的患者在就诊签到时进行了随机分配。随访于 2023 年 3 月 16 日结束,数据分析于 2023 年 4 月 11 日至 7 月 24 日进行。分析基于意向治疗:间断性 CDS 与非间断性 CDS,使用经过验证的实时自杀未遂风险统计模型提示进一步的自杀风险评估。在中断式 CDS 中,通过屏幕弹出的警报窗口和患者面板图标同时可见。解除警报会将其隐藏,但对病人面板图标没有影响。非中断式 CDS 显示病人面板图标,但没有弹出警报。当出现警报时,非中断 CDS 会在患者摘要面板中显示 "自杀风险评分升高"。将鼠标悬停在该图标上会弹出与中断式 CDS 相同的提示:主要结果是决定亲自评估风险。次要结果包括两个治疗组的自杀意念和自杀未遂率,以及上一年有记录的筛查基线率。对每次试验的病历进行人工审核,以确定随后是否记录了自杀风险评估:共有 561 名患者接受了 596 次治疗,并按 1:1 的比例随机接受了间断性或非间断性 CDS 治疗(平均 [SD] 年龄为 59.3 [16.5] 岁;女性 292 [52%])。在对临床医生的群集效应进行调整后,与非中断式 CDS(307 次中有 12 次[4%])相比,中断式 CDS 导致的决定筛查次数(289 次中有 121 次[42%])明显更高(几率比,17.70;95% CI,6.42-48.79;P 结论及相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,中断式 CDS 和非中断式 CDS 都能促使患者进行面对面的自杀风险评估,中断式 CDS 使患者做出更多筛查决定,并记录了自杀风险评估结果。为衡量减少自杀自残的有效性,有必要对这类 CDS 与标准护理进行随机对比,并进行有充分证据的大规模试验:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05312437.
{"title":"Risk Model-Guided Clinical Decision Support for Suicide Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Colin G Walsh, Michael A Ripperger, Laurie Novak, Carrie Reale, Shilo Anders, Ashley Spann, Jhansi Kolli, Katelyn Robinson, Qingxia Chen, David Isaacs, Lealani Mae Y Acosta, Fenna Phibbs, Elliot Fielstein, Drew Wilimitis, Katherine Musacchio Schafer, Rachel Hilton, Dan Albert, Jill Shelton, Jessica Stroh, William W Stead, Kevin B Johnson","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52371","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52371","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Suicide prevention requires risk identification, intervention, and follow-up. Traditional risk identification relies on patient self-reporting, support network reporting, or face-to-face screening. Statistical risk models have been studied and some have been deployed to augment clinical judgment. Few have been tested in clinical practice via clinical decision support (CDS). Barriers to effective CDS include potential alert burden for a stigmatized clinical problem and lack of data on how best to integrate scalable risk models into clinical workflows.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the effectiveness of risk model-driven CDS on suicide risk assessment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial was performed from August 17, 2022, to February 16, 2023, in the Department of Neurology across the divisions of Neuro-Movement Disorders, Neuromuscular Disorders, and Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, an academic medical center in the US Mid-South. Patients scheduled for routine care in those settings were randomized at visit check-in. Follow-up was completed March 16, 2023, and data were analyzed from April 11 to July 24, 2023. Analyses were based on intention to treat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Interruptive vs noninterruptive CDS to prompt further suicide risk assessment using a real-time, validated statistical suicide attempt risk model. In the interruptive CDS, an alert window via on-screen pop-up and a patient panel icon were visible simultaneously. Dismissing the alert hid it with no effect on the patient panel icon. The noninterruptive CDS showed the patient panel icon without the pop-up alert. When present, the noninterruptive CDS displayed \"elevated suicide risk score\" in the patient summarization panel. Hovering over this icon resulted in a pop-up identical to the interruptive CDS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The main outcome was the decision to assess risk in person. Secondary outcomes included rates of suicidal ideation and attempts in both treatment arms and baseline rates of documented screening during the prior year. Manual medical record review of every trial encounter was used to determine whether suicide risk assessment was subsequently documented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 561 patients with 596 encounters were randomized to interruptive or noninterruptive CDS in a 1:1 ratio (mean [SD] age, 59.3 [16.5] years; 292 [52%] women). Adjusting for clinician cluster effects, interruptive CDS led to significantly higher numbers of decisions to screen (121 of 289 encounters [42%]) compared with noninterruptive CDS (12 of 307 encounters [4%]) (odds ratio, 17.70; 95% CI, 6.42-48.79; P &lt; .001) and compared with the baseline rate the prior year (64 of 832 encounters [8%]). No documented episodes of suicidal ideation or attempts occurred in eith","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2452371"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recombinant vs Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccination for Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Trial. 重组与基于鸡蛋的四价流感疫苗在养老院居民中的应用:一项聚类随机试验。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677
Kevin W McConeghy, H Edward Davidson, David H Canaday, Lisa Han, Kaleen Hayes, Rosa R Baier, Yasin Abul, Elie Saade, Vince Mor, Stefan Gravenstein

Importance: Influenza vaccination remains the most important intervention to prevent influenza morbidity and mortality among nursing home residents. The additional effectiveness of recombinant influenza vaccine vs standard dose vaccines was demonstrated in outpatient older adults but has not been evaluated in nursing home populations.

Objective: To compare hospitalization rates among residents in nursing homes immunized with a recombinant vs a standard dose egg-based influenza vaccine.

Design, setting, and participants: This pragmatic cluster randomized trial assessed nursing home residents 65 years or older residing in a US facility for 100 or more days before the start of influenza season (October 1). The study was conducted across the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 influenza seasons and randomly assigned nursing homes 1:1 within blocks categorized by proportion of Black residents and prior resident hospitalization rates. Medicare claims data were used to evaluate resident-level hospitalization outcomes. Enrollment and allocation to treatment groups began on July 20, 2019. Data analysis began on January 1, 2021, with primary end points finalized June 30, 2024.

Intervention: Nursing homes were cluster randomized to vaccinate all residents with recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) or standard egg-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4).

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was respiratory-related hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included death and hospitalization due to any cause.

Results: A total of 144 565 person observations (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [13.1] years; 63.0% female) at 1078 nursing homes were included, with 72 005 residents in nursing homes randomized to provide RIV4 and 72 560 residents in nursing home randomized to provide IIV4. In total, 85.6% of the residents received influenza vaccination. Baseline resident characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. For the primary end point of respiratory-related hospitalizations, there were 1387 hospitalizations (1.9%) in the RIV4 group vs 1424 (2.0%) in the IIV4 group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-2.17). Hospitalization rates by vaccine were similar for other hospitalization outcomes and death, overall, and by season and subgroups (gender, race, and comorbidities).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cluster randomized trial of nursing homes, there was no significant difference between recombinant or standard dose vaccine for reducing hospitalizations associated with influenza illness. However, the COVID-19 pandemic restricting influenza activity along with poor vaccine match to circulating strains substantially limits the conclusions.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03965195.

重要性:流感疫苗接种仍然是预防养老院居民流感发病率和死亡率的最重要干预措施。重组流感疫苗与标准剂量疫苗的额外有效性已在门诊老年人中得到证实,但尚未在养老院人群中进行评估。目的:比较重组疫苗与标准剂量蛋基流感疫苗在养老院居民中的住院率。设计、环境和参与者:这项实用的集群随机试验评估了在流感季节开始(10月1日)之前在美国设施居住100天或更长时间的65岁或以上的养老院居民。该研究在2019年至2020年和2020年至2021年流感季节进行,并按黑人居民比例和先前居民住院率随机分配了1:1的养老院。医疗保险索赔数据用于评估居民水平的住院治疗结果。2019年7月20日开始登记和分配治疗组。数据分析于2021年1月1日开始,主要终点于2024年6月30日确定。干预:对养老院进行整群随机分组,让所有居民接种重组四价流感疫苗(RIV4)或标准蛋基四价灭活流感疫苗(IIV4)。主要结局和措施:主要结局为呼吸相关住院。次要结局包括死亡和因任何原因住院。结果:共144 565人观察(平均[SD]年龄77.4[13.1]岁;纳入1078家养老院的63.0%女性),其中72 005名养老院居民随机提供RIV4, 72 560名养老院居民随机提供IIV4。85.6%的居民接种了流感疫苗。各治疗组的基线居民特征具有可比性。对于呼吸相关住院的主要终点,RIV4组有1387例(1.9%)住院,IIV4组有1424例(2.0%)住院(风险比,1.01;95% ci, 0.62-2.17)。总体而言,疫苗的住院率与其他住院结果和死亡相似,按季节和亚组(性别、种族和合并症)也相似。结论和相关性:在养老院的整群随机试验中,重组疫苗和标准剂量疫苗在减少流感相关住院率方面没有显著差异。然而,COVID-19大流行限制了流感活动,以及疫苗与流行毒株的不匹配大大限制了结论。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT03965195。
{"title":"Recombinant vs Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccination for Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Trial.","authors":"Kevin W McConeghy, H Edward Davidson, David H Canaday, Lisa Han, Kaleen Hayes, Rosa R Baier, Yasin Abul, Elie Saade, Vince Mor, Stefan Gravenstein","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Influenza vaccination remains the most important intervention to prevent influenza morbidity and mortality among nursing home residents. The additional effectiveness of recombinant influenza vaccine vs standard dose vaccines was demonstrated in outpatient older adults but has not been evaluated in nursing home populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare hospitalization rates among residents in nursing homes immunized with a recombinant vs a standard dose egg-based influenza vaccine.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This pragmatic cluster randomized trial assessed nursing home residents 65 years or older residing in a US facility for 100 or more days before the start of influenza season (October 1). The study was conducted across the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 influenza seasons and randomly assigned nursing homes 1:1 within blocks categorized by proportion of Black residents and prior resident hospitalization rates. Medicare claims data were used to evaluate resident-level hospitalization outcomes. Enrollment and allocation to treatment groups began on July 20, 2019. Data analysis began on January 1, 2021, with primary end points finalized June 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Nursing homes were cluster randomized to vaccinate all residents with recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) or standard egg-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4).</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was respiratory-related hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included death and hospitalization due to any cause.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 565 person observations (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [13.1] years; 63.0% female) at 1078 nursing homes were included, with 72 005 residents in nursing homes randomized to provide RIV4 and 72 560 residents in nursing home randomized to provide IIV4. In total, 85.6% of the residents received influenza vaccination. Baseline resident characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. For the primary end point of respiratory-related hospitalizations, there were 1387 hospitalizations (1.9%) in the RIV4 group vs 1424 (2.0%) in the IIV4 group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-2.17). Hospitalization rates by vaccine were similar for other hospitalization outcomes and death, overall, and by season and subgroups (gender, race, and comorbidities).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cluster randomized trial of nursing homes, there was no significant difference between recombinant or standard dose vaccine for reducing hospitalizations associated with influenza illness. However, the COVID-19 pandemic restricting influenza activity along with poor vaccine match to circulating strains substantially limits the conclusions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03965195.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2452677"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142914745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 减少青少年心理健康污名的干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54730
Marcelo A Crockett, Daniel Núñez, Pablo Martínez, Francesca Borghero, Susana Campos, Álvaro I Langer, Jimena Carrasco, Vania Martínez

Importance: Mental health stigma is a considerable barrier to help-seeking among young people.

Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma in young people.

Data sources: Comprehensive searches were conducted in the CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases from inception to February 27, 2024. Search terms included "stigma," "mental health," "mental disorders," "adolescents," "youth," and "randomized controlled trial."

Study selection: Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs involving interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma among young people (aged 10-24 years). Studies had to report outcomes related to stigma or help-seeking behaviors. Exclusion criteria included grey literature and studies without results.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted independently by 7 authors (M.A.C., D.N., F.B., S.C., Á.I.L., J.C., V.M.) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Three-level multivariate meta-analyses were conducted to account for within-study correlations and to maximize data use. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) (Hedges g) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. The data analysis was conducted from May 30 through July 4, 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes included stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and general stigma. Help-seeking outcomes were categorized into attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy and empowerment.

Results: A total of 97 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 43 852 young people (mean [IQR] age, 18.7 [15.8-21.3] years; mean [IQR] females, 59.2% [49.4%-72.0%]), and 74 studies were included in 3-level multivariate meta-analyses. Significant short-term effect sizes were found for stigma-related knowledge (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89), attitudes (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.56), behaviors (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.45), and general stigma (SMD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34) and for help-seeking attitudes (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28) and intentions (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.21). Social contact interventions had a greater influence on stigma-related behaviors than did educational approaches.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that interventions to reduce mental health stigma among youth are beneficial in the short term. Further high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to better understand and enhance these interventions' outcomes.

重要性:心理健康污名是年轻人寻求帮助的一大障碍。目的:系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在减少年轻人心理健康污名化的随机临床试验(rct)。数据来源:在CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed和PsycINFO数据库中进行了全面的检索,从成立到2024年2月27日。搜索词包括“耻辱”、“精神健康”、“精神障碍”、“青少年”、“青年”和“随机对照试验”。研究选择:纳入标准包括涉及旨在减少年轻人(10-24岁)心理健康污名的干预措施的随机对照试验。研究必须报告与耻辱或寻求帮助行为相关的结果。排除标准包括灰色文献和无结果的研究。数据提取与合成:数据由7位作者(M.A.C, d.n., f.b., s.c., Á.I.L)独立提取。, j.c., V.M.)在系统评价和元分析指南中使用首选报告项。使用Cochrane风险-偏倚工具评估偏倚风险。进行了三水平多变量荟萃分析,以解释研究内的相关性并最大限度地利用数据。计算95% ci的标准化平均差异(SMDs) (Hedges g)和优势比(ORs)。数据分析时间为2024年5月30日至7月4日。主要结局和测量:主要结局包括耻感相关知识、态度、行为和总体耻感。寻求帮助的结果分为态度、意图和行为。次要结果包括自我效能和授权。结果:系统评价共纳入97项研究,代表43 852名年轻人(平均[IQR]年龄,18.7[15.8-21.3]岁;平均[IQR]女性,59.2%[49.4%-72.0%]),74项研究被纳入3水平多因素荟萃分析。耻感相关知识的短期效应显著(SMD, 0.66;95% CI, 0.43-0.89),态度(SMD, 0.38;95% CI, 0.20-0.56),行为(SMD, 0.29;95% CI, 0.13-0.45)和一般柱头(SMD, 0.20;95% CI, 0.06-0.34)和寻求帮助的态度(SMD, 0.18;95% CI, 0.09-0.28)和意向(SMD, 0.14;95% ci, 0.07-0.21)。社会接触干预对耻感相关行为的影响比教育方法更大。结论和相关性:这些发现表明,减少青少年心理健康污名的干预措施在短期内是有益的。需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验和长期随访,以更好地了解和加强这些干预措施的结果。
{"title":"Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marcelo A Crockett, Daniel Núñez, Pablo Martínez, Francesca Borghero, Susana Campos, Álvaro I Langer, Jimena Carrasco, Vania Martínez","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54730","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mental health stigma is a considerable barrier to help-seeking among young people.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma in young people.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Comprehensive searches were conducted in the CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases from inception to February 27, 2024. Search terms included \"stigma,\" \"mental health,\" \"mental disorders,\" \"adolescents,\" \"youth,\" and \"randomized controlled trial.\"</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs involving interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma among young people (aged 10-24 years). Studies had to report outcomes related to stigma or help-seeking behaviors. Exclusion criteria included grey literature and studies without results.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted independently by 7 authors (M.A.C., D.N., F.B., S.C., Á.I.L., J.C., V.M.) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Three-level multivariate meta-analyses were conducted to account for within-study correlations and to maximize data use. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) (Hedges g) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. The data analysis was conducted from May 30 through July 4, 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and general stigma. Help-seeking outcomes were categorized into attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 43 852 young people (mean [IQR] age, 18.7 [15.8-21.3] years; mean [IQR] females, 59.2% [49.4%-72.0%]), and 74 studies were included in 3-level multivariate meta-analyses. Significant short-term effect sizes were found for stigma-related knowledge (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89), attitudes (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.56), behaviors (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.45), and general stigma (SMD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34) and for help-seeking attitudes (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28) and intentions (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.21). Social contact interventions had a greater influence on stigma-related behaviors than did educational approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest that interventions to reduce mental health stigma among youth are beneficial in the short term. Further high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to better understand and enhance these interventions' outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2454730"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736514/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Travel Time as an Indicator of Poor Access to Care in Surgical Emergencies. 旅行时间作为外科急诊中难以获得护理的指标。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55258
Nina M Clark, Alexandra H Hernandez, Mia S Bertalan, Virginia Wang, Sarah L M Greenberg, Andrew M Ibrahim, Barclay T Stewart, John W Scott

Importance: Timely access to care is a key metric for health care systems and is particularly important in conditions that acutely worsen with delays in care, including surgical emergencies. However, the association between travel time to emergency care and risk for complex presentation is poorly understood.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of travel time on disease complexity at presentation among people with emergency general surgery conditions and to evaluate whether travel time was associated with clinical outcomes and measures of increased health resource utilization.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used administrative statewide inpatient and emergency department databases with linkage across encounters, including nearly every inpatient or emergency department encounter in the states of Florida and California in 2021. Participants included adult patients who presented to an emergency department with 1 of 5 common emergency surgical conditions. Data were collected from January to December 2021 and analyzed from June to December 2023.

Exposure: The primary exposure was travel time from the patient's home to the facility where they initially received emergency care.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome of interest was surgical disease complexity at the time of presentation to emergency care. Secondary outcomes included inpatient complications, mortality, and indicators of health system resource utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models were used, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs were reported.

Results: Among 190 311 adults with emergency general surgery conditions, 7138 (3.8%) lived further than 60 minutes from the facility where they sought emergency care. Longer travel times were associated with higher odds of complex disease presentation for travel time of more than 120 minutes vs 15 minutes or less (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40). Patients with a travel time 60 minutes or more were more likely to require operative intervention (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26), inpatient admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.50), interfacility transfer (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.51), and longer inpatient stay (adjusted mean difference, 0.47 days; 95% CI, 0.35-0.59), and had higher charges (adjusted mean difference, $8284; 95% CI, $5532-$11 035).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with emergency surgical conditions, travel time to emergency care was associated with markers of delayed presentation and increased facility resource utilization. As opposed to static measures, such as rurality, travel time may serve as a more useful metric to inform policy efforts aimed at preserving access to care amidst rural hospital closures and regionalization.

重要性:及时获得护理是卫生保健系统的一项关键指标,在因护理延误而严重恶化的情况下(包括外科急诊)尤为重要。然而,前往急救中心的旅行时间与复杂症状风险之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:评估急诊普通外科患者就诊时出行时间对疾病复杂性的影响,并评估出行时间是否与临床结果和提高卫生资源利用率的措施相关。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了全州住院和急诊科的行政数据库,其中包括2021年佛罗里达州和加利福尼亚州几乎所有住院或急诊科的病例。参与者包括以5种常见急诊手术条件中的1种到急诊科就诊的成年患者。数据收集于2021年1月至12月,分析于2023年6月至12月。接触:主要接触是从患者家中到他们最初接受紧急护理的机构的旅行时间。主要结局和措施:主要结局是在急诊护理时的外科疾病复杂性。次要结局包括住院并发症、死亡率和卫生系统资源利用指标。采用多变量logistic回归模型,并报道校正优势比(aOR)和95% ci。结果:在190 311名急诊普通外科患者中,7138人(3.8%)的住所距离他们寻求急诊护理的机构超过60分钟。较长的旅行时间与超过120分钟的旅行时间比15分钟或更短的旅行时间出现复杂疾病的几率更高(aOR, 1.28;95% ci, 1.17-1.40)。旅行时间为60分钟或更长时间的患者更有可能需要手术干预(aOR, 1.17;95% CI, 1.10-1.26),住院率(aOR, 1.41;95% CI, 1.33-1.50),设施间转移(aOR, 1.32;95% CI, 1.15-1.51)和更长的住院时间(调整后的平均差值,0.47天;95% CI, 0.35-0.59),且收费较高(调整后的平均差异为8284美元;95% ci, $5532-$11 035)。结论和相关性:在这项对急诊手术患者的队列研究中,前往急诊护理的时间与延迟就诊和增加的设施资源利用率相关。与乡村性等静态措施不同,旅行时间可以作为一种更有用的衡量标准,为旨在在农村医院关闭和区域化的情况下保持获得医疗服务的政策努力提供信息。
{"title":"Travel Time as an Indicator of Poor Access to Care in Surgical Emergencies.","authors":"Nina M Clark, Alexandra H Hernandez, Mia S Bertalan, Virginia Wang, Sarah L M Greenberg, Andrew M Ibrahim, Barclay T Stewart, John W Scott","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55258","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Timely access to care is a key metric for health care systems and is particularly important in conditions that acutely worsen with delays in care, including surgical emergencies. However, the association between travel time to emergency care and risk for complex presentation is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of travel time on disease complexity at presentation among people with emergency general surgery conditions and to evaluate whether travel time was associated with clinical outcomes and measures of increased health resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used administrative statewide inpatient and emergency department databases with linkage across encounters, including nearly every inpatient or emergency department encounter in the states of Florida and California in 2021. Participants included adult patients who presented to an emergency department with 1 of 5 common emergency surgical conditions. Data were collected from January to December 2021 and analyzed from June to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The primary exposure was travel time from the patient's home to the facility where they initially received emergency care.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome of interest was surgical disease complexity at the time of presentation to emergency care. Secondary outcomes included inpatient complications, mortality, and indicators of health system resource utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models were used, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 190 311 adults with emergency general surgery conditions, 7138 (3.8%) lived further than 60 minutes from the facility where they sought emergency care. Longer travel times were associated with higher odds of complex disease presentation for travel time of more than 120 minutes vs 15 minutes or less (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40). Patients with a travel time 60 minutes or more were more likely to require operative intervention (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26), inpatient admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.50), interfacility transfer (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.51), and longer inpatient stay (adjusted mean difference, 0.47 days; 95% CI, 0.35-0.59), and had higher charges (adjusted mean difference, $8284; 95% CI, $5532-$11 035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of patients with emergency surgical conditions, travel time to emergency care was associated with markers of delayed presentation and increased facility resource utilization. As opposed to static measures, such as rurality, travel time may serve as a more useful metric to inform policy efforts aimed at preserving access to care amidst rural hospital closures and regionalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2455258"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social Risks and Nonadherence to Recommended Cancer Screening Among US Adults. 美国成年人的社会风险和不遵守推荐的癌症筛查
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49556
Ami E Sedani, Scarlett L Gomez, Wayne R Lawrence, Justin X Moore, Heather M Brandt, Charles R Rogers
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Research indicates that social drivers of health are associated with cancer screening adherence, although the exact magnitude of these associations remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the associations between individual-level social risks and nonadherence to guideline-recommended cancer screenings.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 39 US states and Washington, DC. Analyses for each specific cancer screening subsample were limited to screening-eligible participants according to the latest US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Data were analyzed from February 22 to June 5, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Ten social risk items, including life satisfaction, social and emotional support, social isolation, employment stability, food security (2 questions), housing security, utility security, transportation access, and mental well-being.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Up-to-date status (adherence) was assessed using USPSTF definitions. Adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 922 individuals, representing a weighted sample of 78 784 149 US adults, were included in the analysis (65.8% women; mean [SD] age, 56.1 [13.3] years). The subsamples included 119 113 individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening (CRCS), 7398 eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS), 56 585 eligible for cervical cancer screening (CCS), and 54 506 eligible for breast cancer screening (BCS). Findings revealed slight differences in effect size magnitude and in some cases direction; therefore results were stratified by sex, although precision was reduced for LCS. For the social contextual variables, life dissatisfaction was associated with nonadherence for CCS (ARR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16) and BCS (ARR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.29). Lack of support was associated with nonadherence in CRCS in men and women and BCS, as was feeling isolated in CRCS in women and BCS. An association with feeling mentally distressed was seen in BCS. Under economic stability, food insecurity was associated with increased risk of nonadherence in CRCS in both men and women, CCS, and BCS; the direction of effect sizes for LCS were the same, but were not statistically significant. Under built environment, transportation insecurity was associated with nonadherence in CRCS in women and BCS, and cost barriers to health care access were associated with increased risk of nonadherence in CRCS for both men and women, LCS in women, and BCS, with the greatest risk and with reduced precision seen in LCS in women (ARR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of adults eligible for cancer screening, findings reveal
重要性:研究表明,健康的社会驱动因素与癌症筛查依从性有关,尽管这些关联的确切程度尚不清楚。目的:探讨个人层面的社会风险与不遵守指南推荐的癌症筛查之间的关系。设计、环境和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了来自美国39个州和华盛顿特区的2022年行为风险因素监测系统数据。根据最新的美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)指南,对每个特定癌症筛查子样本的分析仅限于符合筛查条件的参与者。数据分析时间为2024年2月22日至6月5日。暴露:10个社会风险项目,包括生活满意度、社会和情感支持、社会孤立、就业稳定性、食品安全(2题)、住房安全、公用事业安全、交通便利和心理健康。主要结果和测量:使用USPSTF定义评估最新状态(依从性)。校正风险比(ARRs)和95% ci使用修正泊松回归和稳健方差估计器进行估计。结果:共有147 922人,代表78 784 149名美国成年人的加权样本,被纳入分析(65.8%为女性;平均[SD]年龄,56.1[13.3]岁)。亚样本包括119 113名符合结肠直肠癌筛查(CRCS)的个体,7398名符合肺癌筛查(LCS)的个体,56 585名符合宫颈癌筛查(CCS)的个体,54 506名符合乳腺癌筛查(BCS)的个体。研究结果显示,效应大小和某些情况下的方向略有不同;因此,结果按性别分层,尽管LCS的精度降低了。对于社会情境变量,生活不满与CCS的不依从性相关(ARR, 1.08;95% CI, 1.01-1.16)和BCS (ARR, 1.22;95% ci, 1.15-1.29)。缺乏支持与男性、女性和BCS患者的不依从性相关,女性和BCS患者的孤立感也与此相关。BCS与精神痛苦有关联。在经济稳定的情况下,食品不安全与男性和女性、CCS和BCS中不遵守CRCS的风险增加有关;LCS的效应量方向相同,但无统计学意义。在人造环境下,交通不安全与女性和BCS不遵守CRCS相关,获得医疗保健的成本障碍与男性和女性CRCS不遵守风险增加相关,女性LCS和BCS风险最大,准确性降低(ARR, 1.54;95% ci, 1.01-2.33)。结论和相关性:在这项针对有资格接受癌症筛查的成年人的横断面研究中,研究结果显示,筛查类型和性别在筛查模式上存在显著差异。鉴于这些风险可能并不总是与以患者为中心的社会需求相一致,在实施有效的干预措施之前,有必要对特定目标人群进行进一步的研究。
{"title":"Social Risks and Nonadherence to Recommended Cancer Screening Among US Adults.","authors":"Ami E Sedani, Scarlett L Gomez, Wayne R Lawrence, Justin X Moore, Heather M Brandt, Charles R Rogers","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49556","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49556","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Research indicates that social drivers of health are associated with cancer screening adherence, although the exact magnitude of these associations remains unclear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To investigate the associations between individual-level social risks and nonadherence to guideline-recommended cancer screenings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This cross-sectional study used 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 39 US states and Washington, DC. Analyses for each specific cancer screening subsample were limited to screening-eligible participants according to the latest US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Data were analyzed from February 22 to June 5, 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposures: &lt;/strong&gt;Ten social risk items, including life satisfaction, social and emotional support, social isolation, employment stability, food security (2 questions), housing security, utility security, transportation access, and mental well-being.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Up-to-date status (adherence) was assessed using USPSTF definitions. Adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimator.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 147 922 individuals, representing a weighted sample of 78 784 149 US adults, were included in the analysis (65.8% women; mean [SD] age, 56.1 [13.3] years). The subsamples included 119 113 individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening (CRCS), 7398 eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS), 56 585 eligible for cervical cancer screening (CCS), and 54 506 eligible for breast cancer screening (BCS). Findings revealed slight differences in effect size magnitude and in some cases direction; therefore results were stratified by sex, although precision was reduced for LCS. For the social contextual variables, life dissatisfaction was associated with nonadherence for CCS (ARR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16) and BCS (ARR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.29). Lack of support was associated with nonadherence in CRCS in men and women and BCS, as was feeling isolated in CRCS in women and BCS. An association with feeling mentally distressed was seen in BCS. Under economic stability, food insecurity was associated with increased risk of nonadherence in CRCS in both men and women, CCS, and BCS; the direction of effect sizes for LCS were the same, but were not statistically significant. Under built environment, transportation insecurity was associated with nonadherence in CRCS in women and BCS, and cost barriers to health care access were associated with increased risk of nonadherence in CRCS for both men and women, LCS in women, and BCS, with the greatest risk and with reduced precision seen in LCS in women (ARR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.33).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this cross-sectional study of adults eligible for cancer screening, findings reveal","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2449556"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699527/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baseline Fasting Glucose Level, Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index and the Development of Diabetes in US Adults.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56067
Aoife M Egan, Christina M Wood-Wentz, Sneha Mohan, Kent R Bailey, Adrian Vella
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding the interplay between diabetes risk factors and diabetes development is important to develop individual, practice, and population-level prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the progression from normal and impaired fasting glucose levels to diabetes among adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective community-based cohort study used data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, in Olmsted County, Minnesota, on 44 992 individuals with at least 2 fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2017. People who met criteria for diabetes on or before their first FPG measurement were excluded. Data were electronically retrieved in December 2019 with analyses finalized in November 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>The exposure was baseline FPG level, with covariates including the following measures that are consistently recorded in the electronic health record: body mass index (BMI), age, and sex.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The cumulative probability of freedom from diabetes was estimated and presented graphically using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to estimate the partial hazard ratios (HRs) for variables of interest. Diabetes was defined as an FPG level greater than 125 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 992 individuals (mean [SD] age at baseline, 43.7 [11.8] years; 26 025 women [57.8%]) were included. The baseline mean (SD) BMI was 28.9 (6.6). Over a median follow-up of 6.8 years (IQR, 3.6-9.7 years), 3879 individuals (8.6%) developed diabetes. The Kaplan-Meier 10-year cumulative risk of incident diabetes was 12.8% (95% CI, 12.4%-13.2%). All initial FPG levels outside a range of 80 to 94 mg/dL were associated with increased risk for diabetes (ie, FPG <70 mg/dL: HR, 3.49 [95% CI, 2.19-5.57]; FPG 120-125 mg/dL: HR, 12.47 [10.84-14.34]). Other independent risk factors were male sex (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.22-1.40]), older age (≥60 years: HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.71-2.28]), and any abnormal category of BMI, including underweight (BMI <18.5: HR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.77-3.29]; BMI ≥40: HR, 4.03 [95% CI, 3.56-4.56]). There was a significant additive association of variables, particularly FPG level and BMI. For instance, a woman aged 55 to 59 years with a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 and an FPG level of 95 to 99 mg/dL had an estimated 10-year diabetes risk of 7.0%. However, an almost doubling of risk to 13.0% was observed if the BMI was 30.0 to 34.9, and risk more than doubled again to 28.0% if FPG level also increased to 105 to 109 mg/dL. A nomogram was generated to facilitate individual classification into one of four 10-year risk categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of 44 992 individuals suggests that FPG level, age, BMI, and male sex were all associated with developm
{"title":"Baseline Fasting Glucose Level, Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index and the Development of Diabetes in US Adults.","authors":"Aoife M Egan, Christina M Wood-Wentz, Sneha Mohan, Kent R Bailey, Adrian Vella","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56067","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56067","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Understanding the interplay between diabetes risk factors and diabetes development is important to develop individual, practice, and population-level prevention strategies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the progression from normal and impaired fasting glucose levels to diabetes among adults.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This retrospective community-based cohort study used data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, in Olmsted County, Minnesota, on 44 992 individuals with at least 2 fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2017. People who met criteria for diabetes on or before their first FPG measurement were excluded. Data were electronically retrieved in December 2019 with analyses finalized in November 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposures: &lt;/strong&gt;The exposure was baseline FPG level, with covariates including the following measures that are consistently recorded in the electronic health record: body mass index (BMI), age, and sex.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The cumulative probability of freedom from diabetes was estimated and presented graphically using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to estimate the partial hazard ratios (HRs) for variables of interest. Diabetes was defined as an FPG level greater than 125 mg/dL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 44 992 individuals (mean [SD] age at baseline, 43.7 [11.8] years; 26 025 women [57.8%]) were included. The baseline mean (SD) BMI was 28.9 (6.6). Over a median follow-up of 6.8 years (IQR, 3.6-9.7 years), 3879 individuals (8.6%) developed diabetes. The Kaplan-Meier 10-year cumulative risk of incident diabetes was 12.8% (95% CI, 12.4%-13.2%). All initial FPG levels outside a range of 80 to 94 mg/dL were associated with increased risk for diabetes (ie, FPG &lt;70 mg/dL: HR, 3.49 [95% CI, 2.19-5.57]; FPG 120-125 mg/dL: HR, 12.47 [10.84-14.34]). Other independent risk factors were male sex (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.22-1.40]), older age (≥60 years: HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.71-2.28]), and any abnormal category of BMI, including underweight (BMI &lt;18.5: HR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.77-3.29]; BMI ≥40: HR, 4.03 [95% CI, 3.56-4.56]). There was a significant additive association of variables, particularly FPG level and BMI. For instance, a woman aged 55 to 59 years with a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 and an FPG level of 95 to 99 mg/dL had an estimated 10-year diabetes risk of 7.0%. However, an almost doubling of risk to 13.0% was observed if the BMI was 30.0 to 34.9, and risk more than doubled again to 28.0% if FPG level also increased to 105 to 109 mg/dL. A nomogram was generated to facilitate individual classification into one of four 10-year risk categories.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;This retrospective cohort study of 44 992 individuals suggests that FPG level, age, BMI, and male sex were all associated with developm","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2456067"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758592/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143023310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender Disparities and Lung Cancer Screening Outcomes Among Individuals Who Have Never Smoked. 不吸烟人群的性别差异和肺癌筛查结果
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54057
Yeon Wook Kim, Dong-Hyun Joo, So Yeon Kim, Young Sik Park, Sowon Jang, Jong Hyuk Lee, Gerard A Silvestri, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, Jihang Kim, Hyeontaek Hwang, Choon-Taek Lee

Importance: Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (INS) is a growing global concern, with a rapidly increasing incidence and proportion among all lung cancer cases. Particularly in East Asia, opportunistic lung cancer screening (LCS) programs targeting INS have gained popularity. However, the sex-specific outcomes and drawbacks of screening INS remain unexplored, with data predominantly focused on women.

Objective: To compare LCS outcomes between Asian women and men with no smoking history.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study was conducted at health checkup centers in South Korea from 2009 to 2021. Participants included individuals aged 50 to 80 years with no smoking history who underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. Data were retrospectively analyzed from November 2023 to June 2024.

Exposures: Opportunistic LDCT screening for lung cancer.

Main outcomes and measures: Participants were followed up until December 2022 for the outcome of death. Lung cancer diagnosis, diagnostic characteristics, clinical course, and lung cancer-specific deaths (LCSD) were compared between women and men.

Results: A total of 21 062 participants (16 133 [76.6%] women and 4929 [23.4%] men) with a mean (SD) age of 59.8 (7.2) years were included. From baseline screening, 176 participants (139 women [0.9%] and 37 men [0.8%]) were diagnosed with lung cancer (screen-detected); 131 of 139 women (94.3%) and 33 of 37 men (89.2%) were diagnosed with stage 0 to I disease, with 133 of 139 women (95.7%) and 36 of 37 men (97.3%) having adenocarcinoma. There were no significant sex-based differences in stage or histologic type distribution. Among the 21 062 screened individuals, LCSD was reported in 8 women and 3 men during a mean (SD) follow-up of 83.8 (41.7) months. Multivariable analyses found no significant association between sex and cumulative hazards of lung cancer diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64-1.26] for men vs women) or LCSD (aHR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.28-4.00] for men vs women). The estimated 5-year lung cancer-specific survival rate was 97.7% for women and 100% for men with screen-detected lung cancer, showing no significant sex differences.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of Asian individuals with no smoking history who underwent LDCT screening, no significant sex-based differences were detected in lung cancer diagnosis, stage distribution, or LCSD. These findings suggest that men and women who have never smoked would experience similar risks of overdiagnosis with little to no benefit when exposed to indiscriminate screening.

重要性:从未吸烟个体的肺癌(INS)是一个日益受到全球关注的问题,在所有肺癌病例中的发病率和比例迅速增加。特别是在东亚,针对INS的机会性肺癌筛查(LCS)项目越来越受欢迎。然而,筛查INS的性别特异性结果和缺点仍未得到探索,数据主要集中在女性身上。目的:比较无吸烟史的亚洲女性和男性的LCS结果。设计、环境和参与者:这项多中心队列研究于2009年至2021年在韩国的健康检查中心进行。参与者包括50至80岁无吸烟史的个体,接受了低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查。对2023年11月至2024年6月的数据进行回顾性分析。暴露:机会性LDCT筛查肺癌。主要结局和措施:随访至2022年12月,观察受试者的死亡结局。比较女性和男性的肺癌诊断、诊断特征、临床病程和肺癌特异性死亡(LCSD)。结果:共纳入21 062名参与者(16 133名[76.6%]女性和4929名[23.4%]男性),平均(SD)年龄为59.8(7.2)岁。从基线筛查开始,176名参与者(139名女性[0.9%]和37名男性[0.8%])被诊断为肺癌(筛查检测);139名女性中有131名(94.3%)和37名男性中有33名(89.2%)被诊断为0至1期疾病,139名女性中有133名(95.7%)和37名男性中有36名(97.3%)患有腺癌。在分期和组织学类型分布上没有明显的性别差异。在21名 062名筛查个体中,在平均(SD) 83.8(41.7)个月的随访期间,报告了8名女性和3名男性的康文署。多变量分析发现,性别与肺癌诊断累积风险之间没有显著关联(男性与女性校正风险比[aHR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64-1.26])或LCSD(男性与女性校正风险比[aHR], 1.06 [95% CI, 0.28-4.00])。筛查出肺癌的女性和男性的5年肺癌特异性生存率分别为97.7%和100%,没有明显的性别差异。结论和相关性:在这项对亚洲无吸烟史的个体进行LDCT筛查的队列研究中,在肺癌诊断、分期分布或LCSD方面没有发现显著的性别差异。这些发现表明,从不吸烟的男性和女性在接受不加区分的筛查时,会经历类似的过度诊断风险,而且几乎没有任何益处。
{"title":"Gender Disparities and Lung Cancer Screening Outcomes Among Individuals Who Have Never Smoked.","authors":"Yeon Wook Kim, Dong-Hyun Joo, So Yeon Kim, Young Sik Park, Sowon Jang, Jong Hyuk Lee, Gerard A Silvestri, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, Jihang Kim, Hyeontaek Hwang, Choon-Taek Lee","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54057","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (INS) is a growing global concern, with a rapidly increasing incidence and proportion among all lung cancer cases. Particularly in East Asia, opportunistic lung cancer screening (LCS) programs targeting INS have gained popularity. However, the sex-specific outcomes and drawbacks of screening INS remain unexplored, with data predominantly focused on women.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare LCS outcomes between Asian women and men with no smoking history.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter cohort study was conducted at health checkup centers in South Korea from 2009 to 2021. Participants included individuals aged 50 to 80 years with no smoking history who underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. Data were retrospectively analyzed from November 2023 to June 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Opportunistic LDCT screening for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Participants were followed up until December 2022 for the outcome of death. Lung cancer diagnosis, diagnostic characteristics, clinical course, and lung cancer-specific deaths (LCSD) were compared between women and men.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 062 participants (16 133 [76.6%] women and 4929 [23.4%] men) with a mean (SD) age of 59.8 (7.2) years were included. From baseline screening, 176 participants (139 women [0.9%] and 37 men [0.8%]) were diagnosed with lung cancer (screen-detected); 131 of 139 women (94.3%) and 33 of 37 men (89.2%) were diagnosed with stage 0 to I disease, with 133 of 139 women (95.7%) and 36 of 37 men (97.3%) having adenocarcinoma. There were no significant sex-based differences in stage or histologic type distribution. Among the 21 062 screened individuals, LCSD was reported in 8 women and 3 men during a mean (SD) follow-up of 83.8 (41.7) months. Multivariable analyses found no significant association between sex and cumulative hazards of lung cancer diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64-1.26] for men vs women) or LCSD (aHR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.28-4.00] for men vs women). The estimated 5-year lung cancer-specific survival rate was 97.7% for women and 100% for men with screen-detected lung cancer, showing no significant sex differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of Asian individuals with no smoking history who underwent LDCT screening, no significant sex-based differences were detected in lung cancer diagnosis, stage distribution, or LCSD. These findings suggest that men and women who have never smoked would experience similar risks of overdiagnosis with little to no benefit when exposed to indiscriminate screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2454057"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736501/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Changes in Adult Body Mass Index.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56170
Emily F Liu, Deborah R Young, Margo A Sidell, Catherine Lee, Deborah A Cohen, Lee J Barton, Jennifer Falbe, Galina Inzhakova, Sneha Sridhar, Allison C Voorhees, Bing Han, Monique M Hedderson

Importance: Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes are popular policy interventions aimed at decreasing SSB purchasing and consumption to improve cardiometabolic health and generate revenue for public health initiatives. There is limited evidence that these taxes in the US are associated with weight-related outcomes in adults, a primary contributor to cardiometabolic health.

Objective: To determine the association between SSB excise taxes and adult body mass index (BMI) and proportion of adults with overweight or obesity among California cities and assess whether associations vary by demographic characteristics.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study compared California cities with SSB taxes (Albany, Berkeley, Oakland, and San Francisco) and demographically matched cities without SSB excise taxes from 6 years before the tax and 4 to 6 years after the tax from January 2009 through December 2020 using electronic health record data. Participants were Kaiser Permanente (KP) members aged 20 to 65 years at cohort entry with at least 1 pretax and 1 posttax BMI measurement. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to May 2023.

Exposure: Implementation of city-level SSB excise taxes.

Main outcomes and measures: Mean BMI and proportion of adults with overweight or obesity. Analysis used the differences-in-differences (DID) method.

Results: The cohort had a total of 1 044 272 members (178 931 participants in 4 cities with excise taxes; mean [SD] age, 39.7 [11.2] years; 99 501 [55.6%] female; 865 343 participants in 40 control cities without excise taxes; mean [SD] age, 39.9 [11.6] years; 480 155 [55.5%] female). DID estimates for mean BMI showed a modest decrease among adults aged 20 to 39 years (20-25 years: -0.30; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.08; 26-39 years: -0.19; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.20), female participants (-0.19; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.11), and White participants (-0.19; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.04) living in cities with SSB excise taxes. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean BMI in Berkeley (-0.16; 95% CI, -0.27 to -0.04). There were no overall differences in BMI or proportion with overweight or obesity.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, SSB excise taxes were associated with reduced mean BMI among adults in demographic subgroups, including in young adults who consumed the most SSBs, and in Berkeley. Future research should examine the mechanisms of these associations to inform how SSB taxes could be more equitable for weight-related outcomes.

{"title":"City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Changes in Adult Body Mass Index.","authors":"Emily F Liu, Deborah R Young, Margo A Sidell, Catherine Lee, Deborah A Cohen, Lee J Barton, Jennifer Falbe, Galina Inzhakova, Sneha Sridhar, Allison C Voorhees, Bing Han, Monique M Hedderson","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56170","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes are popular policy interventions aimed at decreasing SSB purchasing and consumption to improve cardiometabolic health and generate revenue for public health initiatives. There is limited evidence that these taxes in the US are associated with weight-related outcomes in adults, a primary contributor to cardiometabolic health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between SSB excise taxes and adult body mass index (BMI) and proportion of adults with overweight or obesity among California cities and assess whether associations vary by demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study compared California cities with SSB taxes (Albany, Berkeley, Oakland, and San Francisco) and demographically matched cities without SSB excise taxes from 6 years before the tax and 4 to 6 years after the tax from January 2009 through December 2020 using electronic health record data. Participants were Kaiser Permanente (KP) members aged 20 to 65 years at cohort entry with at least 1 pretax and 1 posttax BMI measurement. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to May 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Implementation of city-level SSB excise taxes.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Mean BMI and proportion of adults with overweight or obesity. Analysis used the differences-in-differences (DID) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had a total of 1 044 272 members (178 931 participants in 4 cities with excise taxes; mean [SD] age, 39.7 [11.2] years; 99 501 [55.6%] female; 865 343 participants in 40 control cities without excise taxes; mean [SD] age, 39.9 [11.6] years; 480 155 [55.5%] female). DID estimates for mean BMI showed a modest decrease among adults aged 20 to 39 years (20-25 years: -0.30; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.08; 26-39 years: -0.19; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.20), female participants (-0.19; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.11), and White participants (-0.19; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.04) living in cities with SSB excise taxes. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean BMI in Berkeley (-0.16; 95% CI, -0.27 to -0.04). There were no overall differences in BMI or proportion with overweight or obesity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, SSB excise taxes were associated with reduced mean BMI among adults in demographic subgroups, including in young adults who consumed the most SSBs, and in Berkeley. Future research should examine the mechanisms of these associations to inform how SSB taxes could be more equitable for weight-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2456170"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762258/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143032968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA Network Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1