首页 > 最新文献

JAMA Network Open最新文献

英文 中文
Blood-Based Analysis of Different Tau Variants in Patients With Multiple Traumatic Injuries. 多发性创伤患者不同Tau变异的血液分析。
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58573
Rebecca Halbgebauer, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Benjamin Mayer, Claudius Berger, Christian Bergmann, Helen Rinderknecht, Eberhard Barth, Lisa Wohlgemuth, Marco Mannes, Markus Otto, Hayrettin Tumani, Borna Relja, Florian Gebhard, Markus Huber-Lang, Henrik Zetterberg, Steffen Halbgebauer, Kaj Blennow

Importance: With blood-based phosphorylated tau biomarkers soon to be used for diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, analyzing tau levels in other conditions could enhance biomarker interpretability. Moreover, mechanisms of tau release into circulation remain unclear.

Objective: To evaluate concentrations of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated tau variants in the blood of patients with multiple traumatic injuries on days 0, 1, 5, and 10 and investigate biological processes driving tau release.

Design, setting, and participants: This multiple-trauma cohort (injury severity score, ≥18) included 45 severely injured patients with (n = 27) and without (n = 18) moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury on emergency computed tomographic imaging. Controls consisted of 24 healthy volunteers. Participants were recruited from December 1, 2013, to October 31, 2022. Blood samples were analyzed for brain-derived tau (BD-tau), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) and 231 (p-tau231) levels. Associations among tau concentrations, clinical data, and outcome (eg, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score) were assessed. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024.

Exposures: Serum BD-tau, t-tau, p-tau217, and p-tau231 levels.

Results: A total of 214 serum samples were analyzed. Median age of the 45 patients was 48 (IQR, 33-60) years (35 [77.8%] male); median age of the 24 controls, 43 (IQR, 28-50) years (16 [66.7%] male). Median serum levels of tau variants were increased in patients with multiple traumatic injuries at day 0 compared with controls (t-tau: 43 [IQR, 21-95] vs 3 [IQR, 3-5] pg/mL; BD-tau: 78 [IQR, 30-343] vs 2 [IQR, 2-3] pg/mL; p-tau231: 61 [IQR, 21-79] vs 2 [IQR, 1-3] pg/mL; all, P < .001). Only median BD-tau levels remained elevated until day 10 (day 1, 25 [IQR, 14-69] pg/mL; day 5, 9 [IQR, 4-15] pg/mL; day 10, 8 [IQR, 4-18] pg/mL). Median tau levels at admission were higher in patients with lower GCS scores (BD-tau: 107 [ IQR, 59-838] vs 33 [IQR, 24-78] pg/mL [P = .01]; p-tau231: 76 [IQR, 36-114] vs 28 [IQR, 9-63] pg/mL [P = .02]). Elevated median tau levels were also observed in patients with hemorrhagic shock vs those without shock (eg, BD-tau on day 0: 113 [IQR, 78-378] vs 31 [IQR, 24-61] pg/mL; P = .002) and in nonsurvivors vs survivors with uncomplicated courses (eg, BD-tau on day 1: 92 [IQR, 22-527] vs 16 [IQR, 7-23] pg/mL; P = .009).

Conclusions and relevance: In this exploratory study among a cohort of patients with multiple traumatic injuries, levels of tau variants reflected both direct and indirect neurological injury, with BD-tau showing the most persistent elevation in the acute phase.

重要性:随着基于血液的磷酸化tau生物标志物即将用于阿尔茨海默病的诊断,分析其他情况下的tau水平可以提高生物标志物的可解释性。此外,tau释放进入循环的机制仍不清楚。目的:评估多重创伤性损伤患者血液中磷酸化和非磷酸化tau变体在第0、1、5和10天的浓度,并研究驱动tau释放的生物学过程。设计、环境和参与者:这个多重创伤队列(损伤严重程度评分≥18)包括45例有(n = 27)和无(n = 18)中度至重度颅脑外伤的患者,急诊计算机断层成像显示。对照组由24名健康志愿者组成。参与者的招募时间为2013年12月1日至2022年10月31日。分析血液样本的脑源性tau (BD-tau)、总tau (t-tau)和磷酸化tau217 (p-tau217)和231 (p-tau231)水平。评估tau浓度、临床数据和结局(如格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评分)之间的关系。数据分析时间为2023年3月1日至2024年9月30日。暴露:血清BD-tau、t-tau、p-tau217和p-tau231水平。结果:共分析了214份血清样本。45例患者中位年龄48岁(IQR, 33-60岁),其中男性35例(77.8%);对照组24例,中位年龄43岁(IQR, 28-50岁),其中男性16例(66.7%)。与对照组相比,多发性创伤患者血清中位tau变异水平在第0天升高(t-tau: 43 [IQR, 21-95]对3 [IQR, 3-5] pg/mL; BD-tau: 78 [IQR, 30-343]对2 [IQR, 2-3] pg/mL; p-tau231: 61 [IQR, 21-79]对2 [IQR, 1-3] pg/mL;结论和相关性:在一组多处创伤性损伤患者的探索性研究中,tau变异水平反映了直接和间接的神经损伤,其中BD-tau在急性期表现出最持久的升高。
{"title":"Blood-Based Analysis of Different Tau Variants in Patients With Multiple Traumatic Injuries.","authors":"Rebecca Halbgebauer, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Benjamin Mayer, Claudius Berger, Christian Bergmann, Helen Rinderknecht, Eberhard Barth, Lisa Wohlgemuth, Marco Mannes, Markus Otto, Hayrettin Tumani, Borna Relja, Florian Gebhard, Markus Huber-Lang, Henrik Zetterberg, Steffen Halbgebauer, Kaj Blennow","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58573","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58573","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>With blood-based phosphorylated tau biomarkers soon to be used for diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, analyzing tau levels in other conditions could enhance biomarker interpretability. Moreover, mechanisms of tau release into circulation remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate concentrations of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated tau variants in the blood of patients with multiple traumatic injuries on days 0, 1, 5, and 10 and investigate biological processes driving tau release.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multiple-trauma cohort (injury severity score, ≥18) included 45 severely injured patients with (n = 27) and without (n = 18) moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury on emergency computed tomographic imaging. Controls consisted of 24 healthy volunteers. Participants were recruited from December 1, 2013, to October 31, 2022. Blood samples were analyzed for brain-derived tau (BD-tau), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) and 231 (p-tau231) levels. Associations among tau concentrations, clinical data, and outcome (eg, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score) were assessed. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Serum BD-tau, t-tau, p-tau217, and p-tau231 levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 214 serum samples were analyzed. Median age of the 45 patients was 48 (IQR, 33-60) years (35 [77.8%] male); median age of the 24 controls, 43 (IQR, 28-50) years (16 [66.7%] male). Median serum levels of tau variants were increased in patients with multiple traumatic injuries at day 0 compared with controls (t-tau: 43 [IQR, 21-95] vs 3 [IQR, 3-5] pg/mL; BD-tau: 78 [IQR, 30-343] vs 2 [IQR, 2-3] pg/mL; p-tau231: 61 [IQR, 21-79] vs 2 [IQR, 1-3] pg/mL; all, P < .001). Only median BD-tau levels remained elevated until day 10 (day 1, 25 [IQR, 14-69] pg/mL; day 5, 9 [IQR, 4-15] pg/mL; day 10, 8 [IQR, 4-18] pg/mL). Median tau levels at admission were higher in patients with lower GCS scores (BD-tau: 107 [ IQR, 59-838] vs 33 [IQR, 24-78] pg/mL [P = .01]; p-tau231: 76 [IQR, 36-114] vs 28 [IQR, 9-63] pg/mL [P = .02]). Elevated median tau levels were also observed in patients with hemorrhagic shock vs those without shock (eg, BD-tau on day 0: 113 [IQR, 78-378] vs 31 [IQR, 24-61] pg/mL; P = .002) and in nonsurvivors vs survivors with uncomplicated courses (eg, BD-tau on day 1: 92 [IQR, 22-527] vs 16 [IQR, 7-23] pg/mL; P = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this exploratory study among a cohort of patients with multiple traumatic injuries, levels of tau variants reflected both direct and indirect neurological injury, with BD-tau showing the most persistent elevation in the acute phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2558573"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12892155/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146157054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complications, Deaths, and Disability Burden in the 2 Years Following Dengue Infection. 登革热感染后2年内的并发症、死亡和残疾负担
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.59108
Jo Yi Chow, Wei Zhi Tan, Liang En Wee, Peihong Guo, Esther Li Wen Choo, Calvin Chiew, Lalitha Kurupatham, Lee Ching Ng, Po Ying Chia, David Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan, Jue Tao Lim
{"title":"Complications, Deaths, and Disability Burden in the 2 Years Following Dengue Infection.","authors":"Jo Yi Chow, Wei Zhi Tan, Liang En Wee, Peihong Guo, Esther Li Wen Choo, Calvin Chiew, Lalitha Kurupatham, Lee Ching Ng, Po Ying Chia, David Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan, Jue Tao Lim","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.59108","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.59108","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2559108"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12902890/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Marriage, Dependent Care, and Burnout Among Medical Students. 医学生的婚姻、受抚养照顾与职业倦怠
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.59889
Mytien Nguyen, Sarwat I Chaudhry, Alexandra M Hajduk, Tonya L Fancher, Shruthi Venkataraman, Dowin Boatright
{"title":"Marriage, Dependent Care, and Burnout Among Medical Students.","authors":"Mytien Nguyen, Sarwat I Chaudhry, Alexandra M Hajduk, Tonya L Fancher, Shruthi Venkataraman, Dowin Boatright","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.59889","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.59889","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2559889"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146201772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Promoting an Active Lifestyle Across the Cancer Spectrum. 在癌症谱系中提倡积极的生活方式。
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56873
Chao Cao
{"title":"Promoting an Active Lifestyle Across the Cancer Spectrum.","authors":"Chao Cao","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56873","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2556873"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk and Mortality. 无柄锯齿病变检出率与结直肠癌的风险和死亡率。
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56964
Edward S Huang, Qiwen Huang, Pragati Kenkare, Satish Mudiganti, Meghan C Martinez, Scarlett Lin Gomez, Su-Ying Liang

Importance: Although the adenoma detection rate is a key colonoscopy quality metric, benchmarks for serrated polyp removal, specifically the sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR), are currently lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the physician SSLDR and the risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and related mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021, within a large integrated health care system in Northern California and included colonoscopies performed for patients aged 18 years or older, without a diagnosis of colorectal cancer within 6 months of colonoscopy, history of colorectal cancer, or history of inflammatory bowel disease by 50 gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was performed from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021.

Exposure: The primary exposure was the SSLDR, defined as the proportion of screening colonoscopies with at least 1 histologically confirmed sessile serrated adenoma or traditional serrated adenoma, categorized into quartiles.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was PCCRC diagnosed more than 6 months after negative colonoscopy results. Secondary outcomes included proximal or distal PCCRC, advanced stage colorectal cancer, all-cause mortality, and colorectal cancer-related mortality. Outcomes were ascertained through linked state and institutional cancer registries and vital records.

Results: Among 328 416 colonoscopies performed for 226 695 unique patients (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [10.7] years; 51.7% women), 562 PCCRC cases were identified over 2 038 816 person-years of follow-up. The absolute PCCRC incidence rate decreased with higher SSLDR quartiles, from 3.9 cases per 10 000 person-years in the lowest quartile to 2.4 cases per 10 000 person-years in the highest quartile. Compared with patients in the lowest SSLDR quartile, those in the highest SSLDR quartile had a significantly lower risk of PCCRC (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.94; P = .01 for trend), primarily associated with lower risk of proximal PCCRC. A higher SSLDR was associated with lower all-cause mortality (second quartile, 57.7 deaths per 10 000 person-years; third quartile, 58.0 deaths per 10 000 person-years) and colorectal cancer-related mortality (second quartile, 0.2 deaths per 10 000 person-years; third quartile, 0.2 deaths per 10 000 person-years) in the second and third SSLDR quartiles, but the association was not significant in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile.

Conclusions and relevance: In this large community-based cohort study, a higher physician SSLDR was associated with a significantly lower risk of PCCRC in a dose-dependent manner. These findings support using the SSLDR as a crucial quality metric for colonoscopy.

重要性:虽然腺瘤的检出率是结肠镜检查质量的关键指标,但目前缺乏锯齿状息肉切除的基准,特别是无底锯齿状病变检出率(SSLDR)。目的:评价医师SSLDR与结肠镜后结直肠癌(PCCRC)发生风险及相关死亡率。设计、环境和参与者:本回顾性队列研究于2000年1月1日至2021年12月31日在北加州的一个大型综合医疗保健系统中进行,包括50名胃肠病学家对年龄在18岁或以上、结肠镜检查后6个月内未诊断出结直肠癌、有结直肠癌史或有炎症性肠病史的患者进行结肠镜检查。统计分析时间为2000年1月1日至2021年12月31日。暴露:主要暴露为SSLDR,定义为结肠镜筛查中至少有1例组织学证实的无柄锯齿状腺瘤或传统锯齿状腺瘤的比例,分为四分位数。主要结局和指标:主要结局是结肠镜检查结果阴性后6个月以上诊断出PCCRC。次要结局包括近端或远端PCCRC、晚期结直肠癌、全因死亡率和结直肠癌相关死亡率。通过相关的州和机构癌症登记处和生命记录确定结果。结果:在226 695例独特患者(平均[SD]年龄58.6[10.7]岁,51.7%为女性)进行的328 416次结肠镜检查中,在2 038 816人年的随访中发现了562例PCCRC病例。随着SSLDR四分位数的升高,PCCRC的绝对发病率下降,从最低四分位数的3.9例/ 10 000人年到最高四分位数的2.4例/ 10 000人年。与最低SSLDR四分位数的患者相比,最高SSLDR四分位数的患者发生PCCRC的风险显著降低(多因素风险比,0.69;95% CI, 0.50-0.94; P =。01表示趋势),主要与近端PCCRC风险较低相关。较高的SSLDR与第二和第三SSLDR四分位数中较低的全因死亡率(第二四分位数,每10 000人年有57.7例死亡;第三四分位数,每10 000人年有58.0例死亡)和结直肠癌相关死亡率(第二四分位数,每10 000人年有0.2例死亡;第三四分位数,每10 000人年有0.2例死亡)相关,但与最低四分位数相比,最高四分位数的相关性不显著。结论和相关性:在这项以社区为基础的大型队列研究中,较高的医生SSLDR与较低的PCCRC风险呈剂量依赖关系。这些发现支持使用SSLDR作为结肠镜检查的关键质量指标。
{"title":"Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk and Mortality.","authors":"Edward S Huang, Qiwen Huang, Pragati Kenkare, Satish Mudiganti, Meghan C Martinez, Scarlett Lin Gomez, Su-Ying Liang","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56964","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although the adenoma detection rate is a key colonoscopy quality metric, benchmarks for serrated polyp removal, specifically the sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR), are currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the physician SSLDR and the risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and related mortality.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021, within a large integrated health care system in Northern California and included colonoscopies performed for patients aged 18 years or older, without a diagnosis of colorectal cancer within 6 months of colonoscopy, history of colorectal cancer, or history of inflammatory bowel disease by 50 gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was performed from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The primary exposure was the SSLDR, defined as the proportion of screening colonoscopies with at least 1 histologically confirmed sessile serrated adenoma or traditional serrated adenoma, categorized into quartiles.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was PCCRC diagnosed more than 6 months after negative colonoscopy results. Secondary outcomes included proximal or distal PCCRC, advanced stage colorectal cancer, all-cause mortality, and colorectal cancer-related mortality. Outcomes were ascertained through linked state and institutional cancer registries and vital records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 328 416 colonoscopies performed for 226 695 unique patients (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [10.7] years; 51.7% women), 562 PCCRC cases were identified over 2 038 816 person-years of follow-up. The absolute PCCRC incidence rate decreased with higher SSLDR quartiles, from 3.9 cases per 10 000 person-years in the lowest quartile to 2.4 cases per 10 000 person-years in the highest quartile. Compared with patients in the lowest SSLDR quartile, those in the highest SSLDR quartile had a significantly lower risk of PCCRC (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.94; P = .01 for trend), primarily associated with lower risk of proximal PCCRC. A higher SSLDR was associated with lower all-cause mortality (second quartile, 57.7 deaths per 10 000 person-years; third quartile, 58.0 deaths per 10 000 person-years) and colorectal cancer-related mortality (second quartile, 0.2 deaths per 10 000 person-years; third quartile, 0.2 deaths per 10 000 person-years) in the second and third SSLDR quartiles, but the association was not significant in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this large community-based cohort study, a higher physician SSLDR was associated with a significantly lower risk of PCCRC in a dose-dependent manner. These findings support using the SSLDR as a crucial quality metric for colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2556964"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Errors in Key Points, Abstract, Results, and Discussion. 关键点、摘要、结果和讨论中的错误。
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2085
{"title":"Errors in Key Points, Abstract, Results, and Discussion.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2085","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e262085"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predischarge Car Seat Tolerance Screening in Preterm and At-Risk Full-Term Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 早产和有风险的足月婴儿的出生前汽车座椅耐受性筛查:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58197
Brian C King, Nisha Dalvie, Susanne Hay, Erik A Jensen, John A F Zupancic

Importance: Predischarge car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) has been recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics since 1991 for preterm and at-risk full-term-born infants. However, it remains unclear whether routine CSTS prevents adverse outcomes after discharge.

Objective: To estimate the frequency of failed CSTS and its association with adverse postdischarge outcomes.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for English-language studies published before June 2025.

Study selection: Randomized trials, nonrandomized intervention studies (utilizing a comparison group discharged without CSTS), and single-group observational studies were eligible.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline by 2 reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies tool.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes were 30-day readmission, mortality, and predischarge length of stay for intervention studies, and first and subsequent CSTS failure rates for single-group studies. Random-effects models were used to pool data, and generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate pooled treatment effects from 2-group studies and CSTS failure event rates from all included studies.

Results: A total of 21 studies were included. No randomized trials were identified. Three nonrandomized intervention studies (54 358 participants; 27 786 participants without CSTS) reported postdischarge outcomes. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (2 studies; not pooled due to 0 events), 30-day readmissions (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.86-1.28; 3 studies; 54 559 participants), or combined 30-day mortality or readmission (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.95-1.43; 2 studies; 49 420 participants) among infants receiving predischarge CSTS compared with those that did not. Pooled analysis estimated 8.62 (95% CI, 6.42-11.47) first-test failures per 100 patients (21 studies; 39 052 participants) and 24.40 (95% CI, 6.44-34.64) repeat-test failures per 100 patients (11 studies; 912 participants).

Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of predischarge CSTS for preterm and at-risk full-term-born infants, CSTS was not associated with a reduction in postdischarge readmission or mortality. These findings call into question whether routine CSTS before discharge improves outcomes in preterm or at-risk full-term infants.

重要性:自1991年以来,美国儿科学会建议对早产儿和有风险的足月婴儿进行产前汽车座椅耐受筛查(CSTS)。然而,尚不清楚常规CSTS是否能预防出院后的不良后果。目的:评估CSTS失败的频率及其与不良出院后预后的关系。数据来源:PubMed, Embase和Web of Science检索了2025年6月之前发表的英语研究。研究选择:随机试验、非随机干预研究(使用未使用CSTS的对照组)和单组观察性研究均符合条件。数据提取和综合:数据按照2位审稿人的系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南的首选报告项目提取。使用非随机研究中的偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。主要结局和指标:干预研究的结局是30天再入院、死亡率和出院前住院时间,单组研究的首次和后续CSTS失败率。随机效应模型用于合并数据,广义线性混合模型用于估计两组研究的合并治疗效果和所有纳入研究的CSTS失败事件发生率。结果:共纳入21项研究。未发现随机试验。三个非随机干预研究(54 358名受试者;27 786名无CSTS受试者)报告了出院后的结果。与未接受出院前CSTS的婴儿相比,接受出院前CSTS的婴儿的30天死亡率(2项研究;因0个事件而未合并)、30天再入院(优势比1.05;95% CI, 0.86-1.28; 3项研究;54 559名受试者)或合并30天死亡率或再入院(优势比1.17;95% CI, 0.95-1.43; 2项研究;49 420名受试者)均无差异。合并分析估计每100名患者中有8.62例(95% CI, 6.42-11.47)首次试验失败(21项研究,39 052名参与者),每100名患者中有24.40例(95% CI, 6.44-34.64)重复试验失败(11项研究,912名参与者)。结论和相关性:在这项对早产儿和高危足月婴儿的出院前CSTS的系统回顾和荟萃分析中,CSTS与出院后再入院或死亡率的降低无关。这些发现提出了一个问题,即出院前常规CSTS是否能改善早产儿或有风险的足月婴儿的预后。
{"title":"Predischarge Car Seat Tolerance Screening in Preterm and At-Risk Full-Term Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Brian C King, Nisha Dalvie, Susanne Hay, Erik A Jensen, John A F Zupancic","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58197","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Predischarge car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) has been recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics since 1991 for preterm and at-risk full-term-born infants. However, it remains unclear whether routine CSTS prevents adverse outcomes after discharge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the frequency of failed CSTS and its association with adverse postdischarge outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for English-language studies published before June 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized trials, nonrandomized intervention studies (utilizing a comparison group discharged without CSTS), and single-group observational studies were eligible.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline by 2 reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies tool.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcomes were 30-day readmission, mortality, and predischarge length of stay for intervention studies, and first and subsequent CSTS failure rates for single-group studies. Random-effects models were used to pool data, and generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate pooled treatment effects from 2-group studies and CSTS failure event rates from all included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 studies were included. No randomized trials were identified. Three nonrandomized intervention studies (54 358 participants; 27 786 participants without CSTS) reported postdischarge outcomes. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (2 studies; not pooled due to 0 events), 30-day readmissions (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.86-1.28; 3 studies; 54 559 participants), or combined 30-day mortality or readmission (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.95-1.43; 2 studies; 49 420 participants) among infants receiving predischarge CSTS compared with those that did not. Pooled analysis estimated 8.62 (95% CI, 6.42-11.47) first-test failures per 100 patients (21 studies; 39 052 participants) and 24.40 (95% CI, 6.44-34.64) repeat-test failures per 100 patients (11 studies; 912 participants).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis of predischarge CSTS for preterm and at-risk full-term-born infants, CSTS was not associated with a reduction in postdischarge readmission or mortality. These findings call into question whether routine CSTS before discharge improves outcomes in preterm or at-risk full-term infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2558197"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12887743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive Resilience Training to Prevent PTSD and Major Depressive Disorder in Paramedic Recruits: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 认知弹性训练预防护理新兵创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症:一项随机临床试验。
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57241
Jennifer Wild, Gabriella Tyson, Graham Thew, Abbie Wilkins, Esther Beierl, Shama El-Salahi, Hjördis Lorenz, Ceri Storch, Haddi Browne, Daniel Morris, Ed Watkins, Anke Ehlers

Importance: Rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are high among paramedics.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive resilience training program for reducing the development of PTSD and MDD among early career paramedics compared with psychoeducation and standard practice.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial of paramedics training at 15 universities across England was conducted between October 2017 to October 2022 with 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to July 2025.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to receive internet-delivered cognitive training in resilience (iCT-R), psychoeducation, or standard practice. iCT-R, a guided online intervention that utilizes cognitive therapy tools to target predictors of PTSD and MDD identified in prospective research with paramedics, consisted of 6 modules delivered over 6 weeks with 6-monthly top-up sessions delivered by email. Internet-delivered psychoeducation, a supported online psychoeducation intervention, consisted of 6 topics (1 topic per week) with 6-monthly top-up sessions delivered by email. Standard practice was training as usual.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was rate of PTSD and MDD at 1-year follow-up, assessed by independent assessors blinded to intervention using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition). Secondary outcomes included measures of PTSD and depression symptom severity, resilience, rumination, anxiety, psychological distress, and well-being. Intent-to-treat analyses were conducted, with the primary outcome analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression.

Results: Of 570 student paramedics enrolled (372 female [65.3%]; mean [SD] age, 23.67 [6.88] years), 195 were randomized to iCT-R, 197 to psychoeducation, and 178 to standard practice. For participants randomized to iCT-R, the odds of meeting criteria for PTSD or MDD at 12 months were significantly lower compared with psychoeducation (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.73) and standard practice (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.97). Providing iCT-R training to 18 to 24 paramedic trainees (number needed to treat) would prevent 1 case of PTSD or MDD.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, participants receiving iCT-R were approximately 5 times less likely to develop PTSD or MDD at 1-year follow-up compared with psychoeducation and 4 times less likely when compared with standard practice. These findings suggest that iCT-R appears to decrease the likelihood of developing PTSD and MDD in early career paramedics.

Trial registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16493616.

重要性:在护理人员中,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)的发病率很高。目的:评价认知弹性训练方案与心理教育和标准实践相比较,对降低早期护理人员PTSD和MDD发病的效果。设计、环境和参与者:这项随机临床试验于2017年10月至2022年10月在英国15所大学进行,随访12个月。数据分析时间为2023年12月至2025年7月。干预:参与者随机接受互联网提供的认知训练(iCT-R)、心理教育或标准实践。iCT-R是一种指导在线干预,利用认知治疗工具针对护理人员在前瞻性研究中确定的创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症的预测因素,由6个模块组成,为期6周,并通过电子邮件提供6个月的补充课程。网络心理教育是一种支持的在线心理教育干预,包括6个主题(每周1个主题)和6个月通过电子邮件提供的补充课程。标准做法是照常训练。主要结局和测量:主要结局是1年随访时PTSD和MDD的发生率,由独立评估者采用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)》的结构化临床访谈对干预进行盲法评估。次要结局包括PTSD和抑郁症状严重程度、恢复力、反刍、焦虑、心理困扰和幸福感的测量。进行意向治疗分析,使用混合效应逻辑回归分析主要结局。结果:570名在校生护理人员(372名女性[65.3%],平均[SD]年龄23.67[6.88]岁),195名随机分配到iCT-R组,197名随机分配到心理教育组,178名随机分配到标准实践组。对于随机分配到iCT-R的参与者,与心理教育(比值比[or], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.73)和标准实践(or, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.97)相比,12个月时符合PTSD或MDD标准的几率显着降低。向18至24名护理受训人员(治疗所需人数)提供iCT-R培训将预防1例创伤后应激障碍或重度抑郁症。结论和相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,与心理教育相比,接受iCT-R的参与者在1年随访时患PTSD或MDD的可能性降低了约5倍,与标准实践相比降低了4倍。这些发现表明,iCT-R似乎降低了早期职业护理人员患PTSD和MDD的可能性。试验注册:isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN16493616。
{"title":"Cognitive Resilience Training to Prevent PTSD and Major Depressive Disorder in Paramedic Recruits: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jennifer Wild, Gabriella Tyson, Graham Thew, Abbie Wilkins, Esther Beierl, Shama El-Salahi, Hjördis Lorenz, Ceri Storch, Haddi Browne, Daniel Morris, Ed Watkins, Anke Ehlers","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57241","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are high among paramedics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive resilience training program for reducing the development of PTSD and MDD among early career paramedics compared with psychoeducation and standard practice.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial of paramedics training at 15 universities across England was conducted between October 2017 to October 2022 with 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to July 2025.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive internet-delivered cognitive training in resilience (iCT-R), psychoeducation, or standard practice. iCT-R, a guided online intervention that utilizes cognitive therapy tools to target predictors of PTSD and MDD identified in prospective research with paramedics, consisted of 6 modules delivered over 6 weeks with 6-monthly top-up sessions delivered by email. Internet-delivered psychoeducation, a supported online psychoeducation intervention, consisted of 6 topics (1 topic per week) with 6-monthly top-up sessions delivered by email. Standard practice was training as usual.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was rate of PTSD and MDD at 1-year follow-up, assessed by independent assessors blinded to intervention using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition). Secondary outcomes included measures of PTSD and depression symptom severity, resilience, rumination, anxiety, psychological distress, and well-being. Intent-to-treat analyses were conducted, with the primary outcome analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 570 student paramedics enrolled (372 female [65.3%]; mean [SD] age, 23.67 [6.88] years), 195 were randomized to iCT-R, 197 to psychoeducation, and 178 to standard practice. For participants randomized to iCT-R, the odds of meeting criteria for PTSD or MDD at 12 months were significantly lower compared with psychoeducation (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.73) and standard practice (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.97). Providing iCT-R training to 18 to 24 paramedic trainees (number needed to treat) would prevent 1 case of PTSD or MDD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, participants receiving iCT-R were approximately 5 times less likely to develop PTSD or MDD at 1-year follow-up compared with psychoeducation and 4 times less likely when compared with standard practice. These findings suggest that iCT-R appears to decrease the likelihood of developing PTSD and MDD in early career paramedics.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16493616.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2557241"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12887744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146142635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Video Remote Sign Language Interpreting and Health Communication for Deaf Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 聋人视频远程手语翻译与健康沟通:一项随机临床试验
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57189
Minerva Rivas Velarde, Laura Catalina Izquierdo Martinez, Jyoti Dalal, Angela Martinez-R, Karen Libey Guevara Rojas, Nicolas Alfonso Parra Valero, Danna Lesley Cruz Reyes, Jess Cuculick, Alexie Vallejo-Silva, Jonathan Irreño-Sotomonte, Nora Groce

Importance: Current interpretation services for Deaf patients who use sign language are often ineffective or unacceptable. In-person interpretation is frequently unavailable, and while video remote interpreting (VRI) remains underused, its scalability may be a solution given interpreter shortages and cost barriers. Existing research focuses on user and interpreter preferences, leaving a critical gap in understanding how interpretation formats affect communication quality.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of VRI in improving communication outcomes between Deaf patients and physicians compared with usual communication tools, such as self-arranging interpretation, lip-reading, note-taking, and the use of images.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in Colombia at a public hospital from August 2023 to October 2024, involving Deaf adults who use Colombian Sign Language as their primary language. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or intervention group. The data were analyzed between January and May 2025.

Interventions: Patients were divided into 2 groups: an intervention group that received a medical appointment via VRI and a control group that received one via the current standard of communication. Both the Deaf participants and the health care professionals were blinded to the allocation.

Main outcomes and measures: An assessment of communication using the Doctor-Patient Communication scale.

Results: Data were collected from 210 Deaf participants, including 123 (58.6%) women and 87 (41.4%) men, with a mean (SD) age of 42 (13) years (range, 18-84 years). Overall, 108 participants (51.4%) reported using VRI. The intervention revealed that having VRI did not always result in improved communication between Deaf individuals and physicians. While those using VRI were more likely to report positive outcomes in certain areas, such as being encouraged to express themselves (odds ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.13-3.18; P = .02), there was no difference in other areas, such as understanding the doctor (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.79-2.23; P = .28).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of VRI in the health care context, some aspects of clinical communication were improved, but others were not. This suggests that critical preconditions have to be met for this technology to achieve its intended impact.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05966623.

重要性:目前为使用手语的聋人提供的口译服务通常是无效的或不可接受的。现场口译通常不可用,而视频远程口译(VRI)仍未得到充分利用,但鉴于口译员短缺和成本障碍,其可扩展性可能是一种解决方案。现有的研究主要集中在用户和口译员的偏好上,在理解口译格式如何影响沟通质量方面留下了关键的空白。目的:评价VRI在改善耳聋患者与医生之间沟通效果方面的效果,并与常用的沟通工具(如自安排传译、唇读、笔记和图像使用)进行比较。设计、环境和参与者:这项随机临床试验于2023年8月至2024年10月在哥伦比亚的一家公立医院进行,涉及以哥伦比亚手语为主要语言的聋人成年人。参与者被随机分配到对照组或干预组。这些数据是在2025年1月至5月期间分析的。干预:患者被分为两组:干预组通过VRI接受医疗预约,对照组通过当前通信标准接受医疗预约。聋人参与者和卫生保健专业人员都对分配不知情。主要结果和措施:使用医患沟通量表评估沟通。结果:收集了210名聋人参与者的数据,其中女性123名(58.6%),男性87名(41.4%),平均(SD)年龄42(13)岁(范围18-84岁)。总体而言,108名参与者(51.4%)报告使用VRI。干预显示,VRI并不总是导致聋人与医生之间沟通的改善。而那些使用VRI的人更有可能在某些领域报告积极的结果,比如被鼓励表达自己(优势比,1.90;95% CI, 1.13-3.18; P =。02),其他方面无差异,如理解医生(OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.79-2.23; P = 0.28)。结论和相关性:在这个卫生保健背景下的VRI随机临床试验中,临床沟通的某些方面得到了改善,但其他方面则没有。这表明,这项技术要实现其预期的影响,必须满足关键的先决条件。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05966623。
{"title":"Video Remote Sign Language Interpreting and Health Communication for Deaf Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Minerva Rivas Velarde, Laura Catalina Izquierdo Martinez, Jyoti Dalal, Angela Martinez-R, Karen Libey Guevara Rojas, Nicolas Alfonso Parra Valero, Danna Lesley Cruz Reyes, Jess Cuculick, Alexie Vallejo-Silva, Jonathan Irreño-Sotomonte, Nora Groce","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57189","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Current interpretation services for Deaf patients who use sign language are often ineffective or unacceptable. In-person interpretation is frequently unavailable, and while video remote interpreting (VRI) remains underused, its scalability may be a solution given interpreter shortages and cost barriers. Existing research focuses on user and interpreter preferences, leaving a critical gap in understanding how interpretation formats affect communication quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of VRI in improving communication outcomes between Deaf patients and physicians compared with usual communication tools, such as self-arranging interpretation, lip-reading, note-taking, and the use of images.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted in Colombia at a public hospital from August 2023 to October 2024, involving Deaf adults who use Colombian Sign Language as their primary language. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or intervention group. The data were analyzed between January and May 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were divided into 2 groups: an intervention group that received a medical appointment via VRI and a control group that received one via the current standard of communication. Both the Deaf participants and the health care professionals were blinded to the allocation.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>An assessment of communication using the Doctor-Patient Communication scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from 210 Deaf participants, including 123 (58.6%) women and 87 (41.4%) men, with a mean (SD) age of 42 (13) years (range, 18-84 years). Overall, 108 participants (51.4%) reported using VRI. The intervention revealed that having VRI did not always result in improved communication between Deaf individuals and physicians. While those using VRI were more likely to report positive outcomes in certain areas, such as being encouraged to express themselves (odds ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.13-3.18; P = .02), there was no difference in other areas, such as understanding the doctor (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.79-2.23; P = .28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial of VRI in the health care context, some aspects of clinical communication were improved, but others were not. This suggests that critical preconditions have to be met for this technology to achieve its intended impact.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05966623.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2557189"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12873765/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeting Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction in Asian and Pacific Islander Populations. 亚洲和太平洋岛民心血管疾病风险预测的目标差异
IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56865
Britton Scheuermann
{"title":"Targeting Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction in Asian and Pacific Islander Populations.","authors":"Britton Scheuermann","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56865","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56865","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2556865"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA Network Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1