首页 > 最新文献

JAMA Network Open最新文献

英文 中文
Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Among Adults With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0268
Rachel V Aaron, Scott G Ravyts, Nicolette D Carnahan, Kavya Bhattiprolu, Nicole Harte, Claire C McCaulley, Lauren Vitalicia, Alexandria B Rogers, Stephen T Wegener, Joanne Dudeney
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Depression and anxiety are common among adults with chronic pain, but their prevalence is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence of depression and anxiety among adults with chronic pain and identify factors that moderate prevalence.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from January 2013 to October 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies reporting the prevalence of depression or anxiety using a validated assessment tool among adults with chronic pain (excluding chronic headache disorders).</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>A total of 31 159 initial records were identified, and 5177 full texts were screened. Data were extracted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline using Covidence. Two independent reviewers completed abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction and rated risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were applied to pool prevalence, assess moderation, and compare prevalence of depression or anxiety among samples with chronic pain vs control samples.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Prevalence of depression and anxiety based on clinically significant symptoms or diagnosis. The moderators of prevalence identified were pain condition, recruitment setting, continent, age, percentage female, and pain duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 376 studies from 50 countries comprising 347 468 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.3 [9.5] years; 70.0% female) with chronic pain. Among adults with chronic pain, clinical symptoms of depression were present in 39.3% (95% CI, 37.3%-41.1%; I2 = 98.9%), and clinical symptoms of anxiety were present in 40.2% (95% CI, 38.0%-42.4%; I2 = 99.0%). Prevalence differed by pain condition (highest among samples of people with fibromyalgia [depression, 54.0% (95% CI, 48.5%-59.4%); anxiety, 55.5% (95% CI, 50.4%-60.4%)]; lowest among samples of people with arthritis conditions [eg, osteoarthritis: depression, 29.1% (95% CI, 20.3%-39.7%); anxiety, 17.5% (95% CI, 6.6%-38.8%)]) and was highest among younger people (depression, β = -0.02 [95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01]; anxiety, β = -0.02 [95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01]) and women (depression, β = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.31-1.08]; anxiety, β = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.48-1.33]). With regard to diagnoses, 36.7% (95% CI, 29.0%-45.1%) had a major depressive disorder, and 16.7% (95% CI, 11.8%-23.2%) had generalized anxiety disorder. Women, younger people, and people with nociplastic pain (ie, pain arising from altered nociception without tissue damage) were most likely to have depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis of depression and anxiety among individuals with chronic pain, approximately 40% of adults had clinically significant depression and anxiety.
{"title":"Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Among Adults With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rachel V Aaron, Scott G Ravyts, Nicolette D Carnahan, Kavya Bhattiprolu, Nicole Harte, Claire C McCaulley, Lauren Vitalicia, Alexandria B Rogers, Stephen T Wegener, Joanne Dudeney","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0268","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0268","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Depression and anxiety are common among adults with chronic pain, but their prevalence is unclear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the prevalence of depression and anxiety among adults with chronic pain and identify factors that moderate prevalence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data sources: &lt;/strong&gt;A literature search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from January 2013 to October 2023.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study selection: &lt;/strong&gt;Studies reporting the prevalence of depression or anxiety using a validated assessment tool among adults with chronic pain (excluding chronic headache disorders).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data extraction and synthesis: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 31 159 initial records were identified, and 5177 full texts were screened. Data were extracted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline using Covidence. Two independent reviewers completed abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction and rated risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were applied to pool prevalence, assess moderation, and compare prevalence of depression or anxiety among samples with chronic pain vs control samples.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Prevalence of depression and anxiety based on clinically significant symptoms or diagnosis. The moderators of prevalence identified were pain condition, recruitment setting, continent, age, percentage female, and pain duration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The search identified 376 studies from 50 countries comprising 347 468 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.3 [9.5] years; 70.0% female) with chronic pain. Among adults with chronic pain, clinical symptoms of depression were present in 39.3% (95% CI, 37.3%-41.1%; I2 = 98.9%), and clinical symptoms of anxiety were present in 40.2% (95% CI, 38.0%-42.4%; I2 = 99.0%). Prevalence differed by pain condition (highest among samples of people with fibromyalgia [depression, 54.0% (95% CI, 48.5%-59.4%); anxiety, 55.5% (95% CI, 50.4%-60.4%)]; lowest among samples of people with arthritis conditions [eg, osteoarthritis: depression, 29.1% (95% CI, 20.3%-39.7%); anxiety, 17.5% (95% CI, 6.6%-38.8%)]) and was highest among younger people (depression, β = -0.02 [95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01]; anxiety, β = -0.02 [95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01]) and women (depression, β = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.31-1.08]; anxiety, β = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.48-1.33]). With regard to diagnoses, 36.7% (95% CI, 29.0%-45.1%) had a major depressive disorder, and 16.7% (95% CI, 11.8%-23.2%) had generalized anxiety disorder. Women, younger people, and people with nociplastic pain (ie, pain arising from altered nociception without tissue damage) were most likely to have depression and anxiety.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this systematic review and meta-analysis of depression and anxiety among individuals with chronic pain, approximately 40% of adults had clinically significant depression and anxiety.","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250268"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143572979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bowel Disorder Incidence and Rectal Spacer Use in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0491
Michael R Folkert, Ryoko Sato, James B Yu, Danielle Vannan, Samir Bhattacharyya, Carrie Noriega, Daniel A Hamstra

Importance: The polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacer (PHS) system temporarily separates the rectum from the prostate in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective: To compare incidence of bowel disorders and related procedures in patients receiving RT with and without PHS.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used 4 datasets: Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files, Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files, Merative MarketScan Commercial Database, and Premier Healthcare Database. Participants included adult patients with PCa undergoing RT from 2015 to 2021.

Exposure: Placement of PHS.

Main outcomes: All-cause bowel disorders and related procedures, identified from diagnosis and procedure codes. Results were compared with age-matched male general population without PCa or RT.

Results: Of 261 906 patients with PCa included in the study, 25 167 (9.6%) received PHS (mean [SD] age, 70.7 [6.5] years) and 236 739 did not (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [7.5] years). One year prior to RT, patients who received PHS had a lower mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score than those who did not (2.48 [1.08] vs 3.14 [1.95]; P < .001). Stereotactic RT was more common in patients who received PHS (2743 [10.9%] vs 8810 [3.7%]; P < .001), while intensity-modulated RT was less common (12 755 [50.7%] vs 142 402 [60.2%]; P < .001). After 4 years post RT, patients who received PHS had a 25% lower hazard of bowel disorders (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.72-0.78]; P < .001) and a 46% lower hazard of related procedures (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.47-0.62]; P < .001) than patients who did not receive PHS. Patients without PHS had higher hazard compared with an age-matched general population (disorders: 17.1% [95% CI, 17.3%-17.6%] vs 10.3% [95% CI, 10.1%-10.5%]; HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.32-1.37]; P < .001; procedures: 2.0% [95% CI, 1.9%-2.1%] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%]; HR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.79-2.06]; P < .001), while patients who received PHS did not (disorders: 12.4% vs 10.3%; HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.05]; P = .82; procedures: 1.1% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.3%] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%]; HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.96-1.29]; P = .15). Common procedures included colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and rectal resection.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with PCa receiving RT, those receiving a PHS had a significantly lower incidence of all-cause bowel disorders and related procedures compared with patients who did not receive a PHS over the 4-year follow-up. The incidence among patients with PHS was similar to the general population. These findings are consistent with prior phase 3 trial results, where patients receiving PHS experienced no decline in bowel quality of life.

{"title":"Bowel Disorder Incidence and Rectal Spacer Use in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.","authors":"Michael R Folkert, Ryoko Sato, James B Yu, Danielle Vannan, Samir Bhattacharyya, Carrie Noriega, Daniel A Hamstra","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0491","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0491","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacer (PHS) system temporarily separates the rectum from the prostate in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare incidence of bowel disorders and related procedures in patients receiving RT with and without PHS.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used 4 datasets: Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files, Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files, Merative MarketScan Commercial Database, and Premier Healthcare Database. Participants included adult patients with PCa undergoing RT from 2015 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Placement of PHS.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>All-cause bowel disorders and related procedures, identified from diagnosis and procedure codes. Results were compared with age-matched male general population without PCa or RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 261 906 patients with PCa included in the study, 25 167 (9.6%) received PHS (mean [SD] age, 70.7 [6.5] years) and 236 739 did not (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [7.5] years). One year prior to RT, patients who received PHS had a lower mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score than those who did not (2.48 [1.08] vs 3.14 [1.95]; P < .001). Stereotactic RT was more common in patients who received PHS (2743 [10.9%] vs 8810 [3.7%]; P < .001), while intensity-modulated RT was less common (12 755 [50.7%] vs 142 402 [60.2%]; P < .001). After 4 years post RT, patients who received PHS had a 25% lower hazard of bowel disorders (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.72-0.78]; P < .001) and a 46% lower hazard of related procedures (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.47-0.62]; P < .001) than patients who did not receive PHS. Patients without PHS had higher hazard compared with an age-matched general population (disorders: 17.1% [95% CI, 17.3%-17.6%] vs 10.3% [95% CI, 10.1%-10.5%]; HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.32-1.37]; P < .001; procedures: 2.0% [95% CI, 1.9%-2.1%] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%]; HR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.79-2.06]; P < .001), while patients who received PHS did not (disorders: 12.4% vs 10.3%; HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.05]; P = .82; procedures: 1.1% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.3%] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%]; HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.96-1.29]; P = .15). Common procedures included colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and rectal resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of patients with PCa receiving RT, those receiving a PHS had a significantly lower incidence of all-cause bowel disorders and related procedures compared with patients who did not receive a PHS over the 4-year follow-up. The incidence among patients with PHS was similar to the general population. These findings are consistent with prior phase 3 trial results, where patients receiving PHS experienced no decline in bowel quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250491"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897833/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143604976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Outcomes of Hypertonic Saline vs Mannitol Treatment Among Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0438
Shu-Ling Chong, Yanan Zhu, Quan Wang, Paula Caporal, Juan D Roa, Freddy Israel Pantoja Chamorro, Thelma Elvira Teran Miranda, Hongxing Dang, Chin Seng Gan, Qalab Abbas, Ivan J Ardila, Mohannad Ahmad Antar, Jesús A Domínguez-Rojas, María Miñambres Rodríguez, Natalia Zita Watzlawik, Natalia Elizabeth Gómez Arriola, Adriana Yock-Corrales, Rubén Eduardo Lasso-Palomino, Ming Mei Xiu, Jacqueline S M Ong, Hiroshi Kurosawa, Gabriela Aparicio, Chunfeng Liu, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Juan C Jaramillo-Bustamante, Nattachai Anantasit, Yek Kee Chor, Deborah M Turina, Pei Chuen Lee, Marisol Fonseca Flores, Francisco Javier Pilar Orive, Jane Ng Pei Wen, Sebastián González-Dambrauskas, Jan Hau Lee

Importance: The use of hypertonic saline (HTS) vs mannitol in the control of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) secondary to neurotrauma is debated.

Objective: To compare mortality and functional outcomes of treatment with 3% HTS vs 20% mannitol among children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) at risk of elevated ICP.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, at 28 participating pediatric intensive care units in the Pediatric Acute and Critical Care Medicine in Asia Network (PACCMAN) and the Red Colaborativa Pediátrica de Latinoamérica (LARed) in Asia, Latin America, and Europe. The study included children (aged <18 years) with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤13).

Exposure: Treatment with 3% HTS compared with 20% mannitol.

Main outcomes and measures: Multiple log-binomial regression analysis was performed for mortality, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed for discharge Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scores and 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Pediatric Version (GOS-E-Peds) scores. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was also performed using the propensity score method to control for baseline imbalance between groups.

Results: This study included 445 children with a median age of 5.0 (IQR, 2.0-11.0) years. More than half of the patients (279 [62.7%]) were boys, and 344 (77.3%) had severe TBI. Overall, 184 children (41.3%) received 3% HTS, 82 (18.4%) received 20% mannitol, 69 (15.5%) received both agents, and 110 (24.7%) received neither agent. The mortality rate was 7.1% (13 of 184 patients) in the HTS group and 11.0% (9 of 82 patients) in the mannitol group (P = .34). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of child abuse, time between injury and hospital arrival, lowest GCS score in the first 24 hours, and presence of extradural hemorrhage, no between-group differences in mortality, hospital discharge PCPC scores, or 3-month GOS-E-Peds scores were observed.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of children with moderate to severe TBI, the use of HTS was not associated with increased survival or improved functional outcomes compared with mannitol. Future large multicenter randomized clinical trials are required to validate these findings.

{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Hypertonic Saline vs Mannitol Treatment Among Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Shu-Ling Chong, Yanan Zhu, Quan Wang, Paula Caporal, Juan D Roa, Freddy Israel Pantoja Chamorro, Thelma Elvira Teran Miranda, Hongxing Dang, Chin Seng Gan, Qalab Abbas, Ivan J Ardila, Mohannad Ahmad Antar, Jesús A Domínguez-Rojas, María Miñambres Rodríguez, Natalia Zita Watzlawik, Natalia Elizabeth Gómez Arriola, Adriana Yock-Corrales, Rubén Eduardo Lasso-Palomino, Ming Mei Xiu, Jacqueline S M Ong, Hiroshi Kurosawa, Gabriela Aparicio, Chunfeng Liu, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Juan C Jaramillo-Bustamante, Nattachai Anantasit, Yek Kee Chor, Deborah M Turina, Pei Chuen Lee, Marisol Fonseca Flores, Francisco Javier Pilar Orive, Jane Ng Pei Wen, Sebastián González-Dambrauskas, Jan Hau Lee","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0438","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The use of hypertonic saline (HTS) vs mannitol in the control of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) secondary to neurotrauma is debated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare mortality and functional outcomes of treatment with 3% HTS vs 20% mannitol among children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) at risk of elevated ICP.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, at 28 participating pediatric intensive care units in the Pediatric Acute and Critical Care Medicine in Asia Network (PACCMAN) and the Red Colaborativa Pediátrica de Latinoamérica (LARed) in Asia, Latin America, and Europe. The study included children (aged <18 years) with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤13).</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Treatment with 3% HTS compared with 20% mannitol.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Multiple log-binomial regression analysis was performed for mortality, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed for discharge Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scores and 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Pediatric Version (GOS-E-Peds) scores. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was also performed using the propensity score method to control for baseline imbalance between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 445 children with a median age of 5.0 (IQR, 2.0-11.0) years. More than half of the patients (279 [62.7%]) were boys, and 344 (77.3%) had severe TBI. Overall, 184 children (41.3%) received 3% HTS, 82 (18.4%) received 20% mannitol, 69 (15.5%) received both agents, and 110 (24.7%) received neither agent. The mortality rate was 7.1% (13 of 184 patients) in the HTS group and 11.0% (9 of 82 patients) in the mannitol group (P = .34). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of child abuse, time between injury and hospital arrival, lowest GCS score in the first 24 hours, and presence of extradural hemorrhage, no between-group differences in mortality, hospital discharge PCPC scores, or 3-month GOS-E-Peds scores were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of children with moderate to severe TBI, the use of HTS was not associated with increased survival or improved functional outcomes compared with mannitol. Future large multicenter randomized clinical trials are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250438"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897838/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143604982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electronic Health Record Use During Paid Time Off Among Primary Care Physicians.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0465
Corey Obermiller, Richa Bundy, Lauren Witek, Adam Moses, Lindsey Carlasare, Gary Rosenthal, Christine Sinsky, Ajay Dharod
{"title":"Electronic Health Record Use During Paid Time Off Among Primary Care Physicians.","authors":"Corey Obermiller, Richa Bundy, Lauren Witek, Adam Moses, Lindsey Carlasare, Gary Rosenthal, Christine Sinsky, Ajay Dharod","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0465","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0465","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250465"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143605042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lifetime and Past-Year Defensive Gun Use. 终生和过去一年的防卫性用枪情况。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0807
Michael D Anestis, Kimberly Burke, Sultan Altikriti, Daniel Semenza

Importance: Defensive gun use (DGU) is cited as a rationale for permissive firearm-carrying policies; however, no consensus exists on how frequently DGU occurs.

Objective: To examine the frequency of DGU relative to gun violence exposure (GVE) in a sample of firearm owners drawn from a nationally representative sample of US adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This survey study used data from a cross-sectional, self-reported survey administered via KnowledgePanel, a probability-based panel, between May 15 and May 28, 2024. Eligible participants were adults residing within the US reporting current firearm access who responded to DGU survey items. Data were analyzed from July to September 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were 4 forms of DGU: telling a perceived threat about a firearm, showing a firearm to a perceived threat, firing in the vicinity of but not at a perceived threat, and firing at a perceived threat.

Results: Among 12 822 adults invited to participate, 8647 (67.4%) read the informed consent, 8009 (92.6%) consented to participate, and 3000 (37.7%; 532 [51.1%] male; 982 [32.7%] aged ≥60 years) endorsed firearm access and responded to DGU items, including 295 Black, non-Hispanic participants (9.8%); 365 Hispanic participants (12.2%); and 2178 White, non-Hispanic participants (72.6%). DGU was rare, with 91.7% (95% CI, 90.6%-92.7%) of participants reporting no lifetime history of DGU. The most reported form of DGU was showing a firearm to a perceived threat (lifetime: 4.7%; 95% CI, 4.0%-5.5%). Less than 1% of the sample reported any form of past-year DGU. GVE was more pervasive for lifetime (eg, loss of a friend or loved one to firearm suicide: 34.4%; 95% CI, 32.7%-36.1%; hearing gunshots in neighborhood: 51.8%; 95% CI, 50.0%-53.6%) and past-year exposure (eg, loss of a friend or loved one to firearm suicide: 3.2%; 95% CI, 2.6%-3.9%; hearing gunshots in neighborhood: 32.7%; 95% CI, 31.0%-34.4%).

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey of adults with firearm access, DGU was rare relative to GVE. Perceived threats may not necessitate DGU, and given the association between DGU and GVE, the consequences of DGU may be substantial. Narratives centering DGU as a consideration in firearm policies may misstate the risk profile of firearm access.

{"title":"Lifetime and Past-Year Defensive Gun Use.","authors":"Michael D Anestis, Kimberly Burke, Sultan Altikriti, Daniel Semenza","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0807","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0807","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Defensive gun use (DGU) is cited as a rationale for permissive firearm-carrying policies; however, no consensus exists on how frequently DGU occurs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the frequency of DGU relative to gun violence exposure (GVE) in a sample of firearm owners drawn from a nationally representative sample of US adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This survey study used data from a cross-sectional, self-reported survey administered via KnowledgePanel, a probability-based panel, between May 15 and May 28, 2024. Eligible participants were adults residing within the US reporting current firearm access who responded to DGU survey items. Data were analyzed from July to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were 4 forms of DGU: telling a perceived threat about a firearm, showing a firearm to a perceived threat, firing in the vicinity of but not at a perceived threat, and firing at a perceived threat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 12 822 adults invited to participate, 8647 (67.4%) read the informed consent, 8009 (92.6%) consented to participate, and 3000 (37.7%; 532 [51.1%] male; 982 [32.7%] aged ≥60 years) endorsed firearm access and responded to DGU items, including 295 Black, non-Hispanic participants (9.8%); 365 Hispanic participants (12.2%); and 2178 White, non-Hispanic participants (72.6%). DGU was rare, with 91.7% (95% CI, 90.6%-92.7%) of participants reporting no lifetime history of DGU. The most reported form of DGU was showing a firearm to a perceived threat (lifetime: 4.7%; 95% CI, 4.0%-5.5%). Less than 1% of the sample reported any form of past-year DGU. GVE was more pervasive for lifetime (eg, loss of a friend or loved one to firearm suicide: 34.4%; 95% CI, 32.7%-36.1%; hearing gunshots in neighborhood: 51.8%; 95% CI, 50.0%-53.6%) and past-year exposure (eg, loss of a friend or loved one to firearm suicide: 3.2%; 95% CI, 2.6%-3.9%; hearing gunshots in neighborhood: 32.7%; 95% CI, 31.0%-34.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this survey of adults with firearm access, DGU was rare relative to GVE. Perceived threats may not necessitate DGU, and given the association between DGU and GVE, the consequences of DGU may be substantial. Narratives centering DGU as a consideration in firearm policies may misstate the risk profile of firearm access.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250807"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909608/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143624669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Rates of Cancer Diagnosis.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0942
Roger Y Kim, Katharine A Rendle, Nandita Mitra, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Robert T Greenlee, Stacey A Honda, Marilyn M Schapira, Michael J Simoff, Jihyoun Jeon, Rafael Meza, Debra P Ritzwoller, Anil Vachani
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Adherence to annual lung cancer screening (LCS) is a proposed quality metric for LCS programs, but data linking annual adherence to lung cancer outcomes are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate annual LCS adherence rates across 2 subsequent LCS rounds among adults undergoing baseline LCS and examine the association of adherence with lung cancer diagnosis rates.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adults aged 55 to 75 years who formerly or currently smoked and underwent baseline LCS between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, across 5 US health care systems in the Population-Based Research to Optimize the Screening Process-Lung Consortium. Participants with missing Lung Computed Tomography Screening Reporting & Data System scores or a lung cancer diagnosis prior to LCS initiation were excluded. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>For negative baseline screening results, T1 and T2 screening adherence was defined as chest computed tomography (CT) between 10 and 18 months and 22 and 30 months after baseline, respectively. For positive baseline screening results, T1 and T2 adherence was defined as chest CT between 11 and 21 months and 28 and 36 months after baseline, respectively.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes were annual T1 and T2 LCS adherence rates and associations between T1 and T2 screening adherence; annual incident lung cancer diagnoses in rounds T0 (0-12 months after baseline), T1 (>12 to 24 months after baseline), and T2 (>24 to 36 months after baseline); and cancer stage distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 170 individuals received baseline LCS (median age, 65 years [IQR, 60-69 years]; 5415 [53.2%] male). During round T1, 6141 of 10 033 eligible patients (61.2% [95% CI, 60.2%-62.2%]) were adherent, and during round T2, 5028 of 9966 eligible patients (50.5% [95% CI, 49.5%-51.4%]) were adherent. T1 adherence was significantly associated with T2 adherence (adjusted relative risk, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.06-2.79). Across 36 months of follow-up, 279 patients (2.7%; 95% CI, 2.4%-3.1%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Incident lung cancer diagnosis rates were 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.6%), 0.7% (95% CI, 0.5%-0.8%), and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.6%-0.9%) during rounds T0, T1, and T2, respectively. Lung cancer diagnosis rates were higher among individuals who were LCS adherent vs nonadherent during both rounds T1 (59 of 6141 [1.0%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.2%] vs 8 of 3892 [0.2%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%]; P < .001) and T2 (63 of 5028 [1.3%; 95% CI, 1.0%-1.6%] vs 12 of 4938 [0.2%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%]; P < .001). A greater proportion of early-stage lung cancers were diagnosed among individuals adherent to screening at T2 compared with those who were not (46 of 63 [73.0%] vs 3 of 12 [25.0%]; P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this mul
{"title":"Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Rates of Cancer Diagnosis.","authors":"Roger Y Kim, Katharine A Rendle, Nandita Mitra, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Robert T Greenlee, Stacey A Honda, Marilyn M Schapira, Michael J Simoff, Jihyoun Jeon, Rafael Meza, Debra P Ritzwoller, Anil Vachani","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0942","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Adherence to annual lung cancer screening (LCS) is a proposed quality metric for LCS programs, but data linking annual adherence to lung cancer outcomes are lacking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To investigate annual LCS adherence rates across 2 subsequent LCS rounds among adults undergoing baseline LCS and examine the association of adherence with lung cancer diagnosis rates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This retrospective cohort study included adults aged 55 to 75 years who formerly or currently smoked and underwent baseline LCS between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, across 5 US health care systems in the Population-Based Research to Optimize the Screening Process-Lung Consortium. Participants with missing Lung Computed Tomography Screening Reporting & Data System scores or a lung cancer diagnosis prior to LCS initiation were excluded. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to October 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposures: &lt;/strong&gt;For negative baseline screening results, T1 and T2 screening adherence was defined as chest computed tomography (CT) between 10 and 18 months and 22 and 30 months after baseline, respectively. For positive baseline screening results, T1 and T2 adherence was defined as chest CT between 11 and 21 months and 28 and 36 months after baseline, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The main outcomes were annual T1 and T2 LCS adherence rates and associations between T1 and T2 screening adherence; annual incident lung cancer diagnoses in rounds T0 (0-12 months after baseline), T1 (&gt;12 to 24 months after baseline), and T2 (&gt;24 to 36 months after baseline); and cancer stage distribution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 10 170 individuals received baseline LCS (median age, 65 years [IQR, 60-69 years]; 5415 [53.2%] male). During round T1, 6141 of 10 033 eligible patients (61.2% [95% CI, 60.2%-62.2%]) were adherent, and during round T2, 5028 of 9966 eligible patients (50.5% [95% CI, 49.5%-51.4%]) were adherent. T1 adherence was significantly associated with T2 adherence (adjusted relative risk, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.06-2.79). Across 36 months of follow-up, 279 patients (2.7%; 95% CI, 2.4%-3.1%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Incident lung cancer diagnosis rates were 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.6%), 0.7% (95% CI, 0.5%-0.8%), and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.6%-0.9%) during rounds T0, T1, and T2, respectively. Lung cancer diagnosis rates were higher among individuals who were LCS adherent vs nonadherent during both rounds T1 (59 of 6141 [1.0%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.2%] vs 8 of 3892 [0.2%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%]; P &lt; .001) and T2 (63 of 5028 [1.3%; 95% CI, 1.0%-1.6%] vs 12 of 4938 [0.2%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%]; P &lt; .001). A greater proportion of early-stage lung cancers were diagnosed among individuals adherent to screening at T2 compared with those who were not (46 of 63 [73.0%] vs 3 of 12 [25.0%]; P = .006).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this mul","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250942"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143657135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adherence to Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening-A Critical Target for Intervention.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0949
Francesca C Duncan, Matthew Triplette
{"title":"Adherence to Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening-A Critical Target for Intervention.","authors":"Francesca C Duncan, Matthew Triplette","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0949","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250949"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143657138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Berberine Ursodeoxycholate for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62185
Linong Ji, Jianhua Ma, Yujin Ma, Zhifeng Cheng, Shenglian Gan, Guoyue Yuan, Dexue Liu, Sheli Li, Yu Liu, Xia Xue, Jie Bai, Kun Wang, Hanqing Cai, Shu Li, Kui Liu, Meng Yu, Liping Liu
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Few of the available therapies for type 2 diabetes (T2D) comprehensively address disease burden beyond glycemic control. Examining whether berberine ursodeoxycholate (HTD1801), a first-in-class gut-liver anti-inflammatory metabolic modulator, has the potential to treat the core aspects of metabolic disease is important.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of HTD1801 in patients with T2D that is inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week randomized clinical trial, conducted in China between March 2022 and January 2023, included patients with T2D who underwent 8 or more weeks of diet and exercise, had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7.0% to 10.5%, and had a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level less than 250.5 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo (n = 38), HTD1801 500 mg twice daily (n = 37), and HTD1801 1000 mg twice daily (n = 38).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was the HbA1c level change from baseline to week 12. Secondary end points included glycemic, hepatic, and cardiometabolic parameters. The primary end point was analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures, with the HbA1c level change from baseline as the dependent variable. Treatment group, measurement time point, and interaction between treatment group and measurement time point were independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 113 patients with T2D (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [10.6] years; 72 male [63.7%]) who were randomized. Among these patients, the mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.2% (0.8%); body mass index, 25.5 (3.7), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; and FPG level, 160.7 (38.3) mg/dL. Baseline disease severity was balanced across treatment groups. The primary end point was achieved with significant dose-dependent reductions in the HbA1c level in both HTD1801 groups compared with the placebo group. The least-squares mean difference in the HbA1c level at week 12 was -0.4% (95% CI, -0.79% to -0.03%; P = .04) for the 500-mg group and -0.7% (95% CI, -1.10% to -0.35%; P < .001) for the 1000-mg group compared with the placebo group. HbA1c level reductions were paralleled with mean (SD) improvements in the FPG level in both the 500-mg group (-13.0 [38.2] mg/dL) and the 1000-mg group (-18.4 [21.8] mg/dL) groups. Reductions were observed in lipids and markers of liver injury in the 1000-mg group. HTD1801 was safe and well tolerated, with 110 patients (97.3%) completing the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events, generally mild, occurred in 59 patients (52.2%) overall. One patient (in the 500-mg group) experienced a serious adverse event of retinal hemorrhage, which was unlikely related to treatment. No patients discontinued due to an adverse event.</p><
{"title":"Berberine Ursodeoxycholate for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Linong Ji, Jianhua Ma, Yujin Ma, Zhifeng Cheng, Shenglian Gan, Guoyue Yuan, Dexue Liu, Sheli Li, Yu Liu, Xia Xue, Jie Bai, Kun Wang, Hanqing Cai, Shu Li, Kui Liu, Meng Yu, Liping Liu","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62185","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62185","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Few of the available therapies for type 2 diabetes (T2D) comprehensively address disease burden beyond glycemic control. Examining whether berberine ursodeoxycholate (HTD1801), a first-in-class gut-liver anti-inflammatory metabolic modulator, has the potential to treat the core aspects of metabolic disease is important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the safety and efficacy of HTD1801 in patients with T2D that is inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week randomized clinical trial, conducted in China between March 2022 and January 2023, included patients with T2D who underwent 8 or more weeks of diet and exercise, had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7.0% to 10.5%, and had a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level less than 250.5 mg/dL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo (n = 38), HTD1801 500 mg twice daily (n = 37), and HTD1801 1000 mg twice daily (n = 38).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary end point was the HbA1c level change from baseline to week 12. Secondary end points included glycemic, hepatic, and cardiometabolic parameters. The primary end point was analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures, with the HbA1c level change from baseline as the dependent variable. Treatment group, measurement time point, and interaction between treatment group and measurement time point were independent variables.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The study included 113 patients with T2D (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [10.6] years; 72 male [63.7%]) who were randomized. Among these patients, the mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.2% (0.8%); body mass index, 25.5 (3.7), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; and FPG level, 160.7 (38.3) mg/dL. Baseline disease severity was balanced across treatment groups. The primary end point was achieved with significant dose-dependent reductions in the HbA1c level in both HTD1801 groups compared with the placebo group. The least-squares mean difference in the HbA1c level at week 12 was -0.4% (95% CI, -0.79% to -0.03%; P = .04) for the 500-mg group and -0.7% (95% CI, -1.10% to -0.35%; P &lt; .001) for the 1000-mg group compared with the placebo group. HbA1c level reductions were paralleled with mean (SD) improvements in the FPG level in both the 500-mg group (-13.0 [38.2] mg/dL) and the 1000-mg group (-18.4 [21.8] mg/dL) groups. Reductions were observed in lipids and markers of liver injury in the 1000-mg group. HTD1801 was safe and well tolerated, with 110 patients (97.3%) completing the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events, generally mild, occurred in 59 patients (52.2%) overall. One patient (in the 500-mg group) experienced a serious adverse event of retinal hemorrhage, which was unlikely related to treatment. No patients discontinued due to an adverse event.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e2462185"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877176/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143541965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Error in Introduction.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4977
{"title":"Error in Introduction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4977","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4977","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e254977"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877169/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143542092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benefits of Patient-Clinician Communication for Timely Health Care Visits in Patients Perceiving Discrimination.
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0053
Luisa N Borrell, Delivette Castor
{"title":"Benefits of Patient-Clinician Communication for Timely Health Care Visits in Patients Perceiving Discrimination.","authors":"Luisa N Borrell, Delivette Castor","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250053"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143541964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA Network Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1