首页 > 最新文献

JAMA Network Open最新文献

英文 中文
Hospital COVID-19 Burden and Adverse Event Rates. 医院 COVID-19 负担和不良事件发生率。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42936
Mark L Metersky, David Rodrick, Shih-Yieh Ho, Deron Galusha, Andrea Timashenka, Erin N Grace, Darryl Marshall, Sheila Eckenrode, Harlan M Krumholz
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic introduced stresses on hospitals due to the surge in demand for care and to staffing shortages. The implications of these stresses for patient safety are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with the rate of in-hospital adverse effects (AEs).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Quality and Safety Review System, a surveillance system that tracks the frequency of AEs among selected hospital admissions across the US. The study sample included randomly selected Medicare patient admissions to acute care hospitals in the US between September 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was the association between frequency of AEs and hospital-specific weekly COVID-19 burden. Observed and risk-adjusted rates of AEs per 1000 admissions were stratified by the weekly hospital-specific COVID-19 burden (daily mean number of COVID-19 inpatients per 100 hospital beds each week), presented as less than the 25th percentile (lowest burden), 25th to 75th percentile (intermediate burden), and greater than the 75th percentile (highest burden). Risk adjustment variables included patient and hospital characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 40 737 Medicare hospital admissions (4114 patients [10.1%] with COVID-19 and 36 623 [89.9%] without); mean (SD) patient age was 73.8 (12.1) years, 53.8% were female, and the median number of Elixhauser comorbidities was 4 (IQR, 2-5). There were 59.1 (95% CI, 54.5-64.0) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 77.0 (95% CI, 73.3-80.9) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 97.4 (95% CI, 91.6-103.7) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. Among patients without COVID-19, there were 55.7 (95% CI, 51.1-60.8) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 74.0 (95% CI, 70.2-78.1) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 79.3 (95% CI, 73.7-85.3) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. A similar pattern was seen among patients with COVID-19. After risk adjustment, the relative risk (RR) for AEs among patients admitted during weeks with high compared with low COVID-19 burden for all patients was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001), with similar results seen in the cohorts with (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = .03) and without (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002) COVID-19 individually.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of hospital admissions among Medicare patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, greater hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital AEs among both patients with and without COVID-19. These results illustrate the need for greater h
重要性:COVID-19 大流行给医院带来了压力,原因是护理需求激增和人员短缺。这些压力对患者安全的影响尚不十分清楚:评估医院的 COVID-19 负担是否与院内不良反应(AEs)率有关:这项队列研究使用的数据来自美国医疗保健研究与质量局的质量与安全审查系统,该系统是一个监测系统,用于跟踪全美选定入院患者的不良反应发生频率。研究样本包括 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间随机抽取的美国急症医院住院的医疗保险患者:主要结果是AEs频率与特定医院每周COVID-19负担之间的关联。每1000例入院患者中观察到的AEs发生率和风险调整后的发生率按医院特异性每周COVID-19负担(每周每100张病床COVID-19住院患者的日平均人数)进行分层,分别为小于第25百分位数(最低负担)、第25至75百分位数(中等负担)和大于第75百分位数(最高负担)。风险调整变量包括患者和医院特征:研究纳入了 40 737 名医保住院患者(4114 名患者[10.1%]患有 COVID-19,36 623 名患者[89.9%]未患有 COVID-19);患者平均(标清)年龄为 73.8(12.1)岁,53.8% 为女性,Elixhauser 合并症的中位数为 4(IQR,2-5)。在 COVID-19 负担最低的几周内,每 1000 例住院患者中有 59.1 例(95% CI,54.5-64.0)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担居中的几周内,每 1000 例住院患者中有 77.0 例(95% CI,73.3-80.9)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担最高的几周内,每 1000 例住院患者中有 97.4 例(95% CI,91.6-103.7)AEs。在没有 COVID-19 的患者中,在 COVID-19 负担最低的几周,每 1000 例入院患者中发生 55.7 例(95% CI,51.1-60.8)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担中等的几周,每 1000 例入院患者中发生 74.0 例(95% CI,70.2-78.1)AEs;在 COVID-19 负担最高的几周,每 1000 例入院患者中发生 79.3 例(95% CI,73.7-85.3)AEs。在 COVID-19 患者中也出现了类似的情况。经风险调整后,所有患者在 COVID-19 负担较高与较低的几周内入院发生 AEs 的相对风险 (RR) 为 1.23(95% CI,1.09-1.39;P 结论及意义:在这项关于 COVID-19 大流行期间医保患者入院情况的队列研究中,COVID-19 负担越重的医院与 COVID-19 患者和非 COVID-19 患者的院内 AEs 风险增加相关。这些结果表明,在需求激增时,医院需要提高应变能力和应急能力,以防止患者安全下降。
{"title":"Hospital COVID-19 Burden and Adverse Event Rates.","authors":"Mark L Metersky, David Rodrick, Shih-Yieh Ho, Deron Galusha, Andrea Timashenka, Erin N Grace, Darryl Marshall, Sheila Eckenrode, Harlan M Krumholz","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42936","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42936","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;The COVID-19 pandemic introduced stresses on hospitals due to the surge in demand for care and to staffing shortages. The implications of these stresses for patient safety are not well understood.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess whether hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with the rate of in-hospital adverse effects (AEs).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This cohort study used data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Quality and Safety Review System, a surveillance system that tracks the frequency of AEs among selected hospital admissions across the US. The study sample included randomly selected Medicare patient admissions to acute care hospitals in the US between September 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The main outcome was the association between frequency of AEs and hospital-specific weekly COVID-19 burden. Observed and risk-adjusted rates of AEs per 1000 admissions were stratified by the weekly hospital-specific COVID-19 burden (daily mean number of COVID-19 inpatients per 100 hospital beds each week), presented as less than the 25th percentile (lowest burden), 25th to 75th percentile (intermediate burden), and greater than the 75th percentile (highest burden). Risk adjustment variables included patient and hospital characteristics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The study included 40 737 Medicare hospital admissions (4114 patients [10.1%] with COVID-19 and 36 623 [89.9%] without); mean (SD) patient age was 73.8 (12.1) years, 53.8% were female, and the median number of Elixhauser comorbidities was 4 (IQR, 2-5). There were 59.1 (95% CI, 54.5-64.0) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 77.0 (95% CI, 73.3-80.9) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 97.4 (95% CI, 91.6-103.7) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. Among patients without COVID-19, there were 55.7 (95% CI, 51.1-60.8) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 74.0 (95% CI, 70.2-78.1) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 79.3 (95% CI, 73.7-85.3) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. A similar pattern was seen among patients with COVID-19. After risk adjustment, the relative risk (RR) for AEs among patients admitted during weeks with high compared with low COVID-19 burden for all patients was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P &lt; .001), with similar results seen in the cohorts with (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = .03) and without (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002) COVID-19 individually.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this cohort study of hospital admissions among Medicare patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, greater hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital AEs among both patients with and without COVID-19. These results illustrate the need for greater h","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2442936"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581512/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nurse Care Management of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment After 3 Years: A Secondary Analysis of the PROUD Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. 阿片类药物使用障碍治疗 3 年后的护士护理管理:PROUD 群体随机临床试验的二次分析。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47447
Gwen T Lapham, Noorie Hyun, Jennifer F Bobb, Paige D Wartko, Abigail G Matthews, Onchee Yu, Jennifer McCormack, Amy K Lee, David S Liu, Jeffrey H Samet, Mohammad Zare-Mehrjerdi, Jordan M Braciszewski, Mark T Murphy, Julia H Arnsten, Viviana Horigian, Ryan M Caldeiro, Megan Addis, Katharine A Bradley
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Primary Care Opioid Use Disorders (PROUD) treatment trial was a 2-year implementation trial that demonstrated the Massachusetts office-based addiction treatment (OBAT) model of nurse care management for opioid use disorder (OUD) increased OUD treatment in the 2 years after implementation began (8.2 more patient-years of OUD treatment per 10 000 primary care patients). The intervention was continued for a third year, permitting evaluation of 3-year outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare OUD medication treatment in intervention and usual care clinics over 3 years of implementation.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This is a preplanned secondary analysis of a cluster randomized implementation trial, conducted in 6 health systems in 5 states (2 primary care clinics per health system) with clinic randomization stratified by system (assignment notification February 28, 2018 [August 31, 2018, in 1 system]). Data were obtained from electronic health records and insurance claims. Eligible patients were those aged 16 to 90 years visiting intervention or usual care clinics from 3 years before to 2 years after randomization. Patients new to clinics during the third year after randomization could not be included because COVID-19-era transitions to virtual care precluded assignment of patients to clinics. Data analysis occurred from November 2023 to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Clinics were randomized to intervention or care as usual. Intervention included 3 implementation components: salary for 1 full-time OBAT nurse per intervention clinic; training and ongoing technical assistance for nurses; and 3 or more primary care buprenorphine prescribers.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Patient-years of OUD treatment (buprenorphine or extended-release naltrexone) per 10 000 primary care patients in the 3 years postrandomization. Mixed-effect models adjusted for baseline values of the outcome and included a health system-specific random intercept to account for correlation of clinic pairs within a system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prerandomization, a total of 290 071 primary care patients were seen, including 130 618 in intervention clinics (mean [SD] age, 48.6 [17.7] years; mean [SD] female, 59.3% [4.0%]) and 159 453 in usual care clinics (mean [SD] age, 47.2 [17.5] years; mean [SD] female, 64.0% [5.3%]). Over 3 years postrandomization, intervention clinics provided 19.7 (95% CI, 11.1-28.4) more patient-years of OUD treatment per 10 000 primary care patients compared with usual care clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this secondary analysis of the PROUD cluster randomized trial, after an added year of the intervention, OUD treatment continued to increase in intervention clinics compared with usual care. The treatment increase over 3 years exceeded that of the first 2 years, suggesting that implementation of the Massachusetts OBAT m
重要性:初级保健阿片类药物使用障碍(PROUD)治疗试验是一项为期 2 年的实施试验,该试验表明,马萨诸塞州基于诊室的成瘾治疗(OBAT)护士护理管理阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)模式在实施 2 年后增加了 OUD 治疗(每 10,000 名初级保健患者增加了 8.2 个 OUD 治疗患者年)。干预措施持续了第三年,因此可以对三年的结果进行评估:比较干预诊所和常规护理诊所在实施干预措施 3 年来的 OUD 药物治疗情况:这是一项预先计划的分组随机实施试验的二次分析,该试验在 5 个州的 6 个卫生系统中进行(每个卫生系统 2 个初级保健诊所),诊所随机化按系统分层(分配通知于 2018 年 2 月 28 日发出[1 个系统于 2018 年 8 月 31 日发出])。数据来自电子健康记录和保险索赔。符合条件的患者是在随机化前 3 年至随机化后 2 年期间前往干预或常规护理诊所就诊的 16 至 90 岁患者。随机化后第三年新到诊所就诊的患者不能纳入其中,因为 COVID-19 时代向虚拟医疗的过渡排除了将患者分配到诊所的可能性。数据分析时间为 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 9 月:诊所被随机分配到干预或常规护理。干预包括 3 个实施部分:每个干预诊所 1 名全职 OBAT 护士的工资;护士培训和持续的技术援助;3 名或更多的初级保健丁丙诺啡处方者:主要结果:随机化后 3 年内每 10 000 名初级保健患者接受 OUD 治疗(丁丙诺啡或缓释纳曲酮)的患者年数。混合效应模型对结果的基线值进行了调整,并加入了医疗系统特有的随机截距,以考虑系统内诊所对的相关性:随机化前,共有 290 071 名初级保健患者就诊,其中 130 618 人在干预诊所就诊(平均[标码]年龄为 48.6 [17.7]岁;平均[标码]女性为 59.3% [4.0%]),159 453 人在常规保健诊所就诊(平均[标码]年龄为 47.2 [17.5]岁;平均[标码]女性为 64.0% [5.3%])。在随机化后的 3 年中,与常规护理诊所相比,干预诊所为每 10 000 名初级保健患者提供的 OUD 治疗年数增加了 19.7(95% CI,11.1-28.4)年:在 PROUD 分组随机试验的二次分析中,在干预增加一年后,与常规护理相比,干预诊所的 OUD 治疗持续增加。3年的治疗增幅超过了前2年的增幅,这表明马萨诸塞州OBAT模式的实施使初级保健患者的OUD治疗在实施的第三年持续增加:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03407638.
{"title":"Nurse Care Management of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment After 3 Years: A Secondary Analysis of the PROUD Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Gwen T Lapham, Noorie Hyun, Jennifer F Bobb, Paige D Wartko, Abigail G Matthews, Onchee Yu, Jennifer McCormack, Amy K Lee, David S Liu, Jeffrey H Samet, Mohammad Zare-Mehrjerdi, Jordan M Braciszewski, Mark T Murphy, Julia H Arnsten, Viviana Horigian, Ryan M Caldeiro, Megan Addis, Katharine A Bradley","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47447","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47447","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;The Primary Care Opioid Use Disorders (PROUD) treatment trial was a 2-year implementation trial that demonstrated the Massachusetts office-based addiction treatment (OBAT) model of nurse care management for opioid use disorder (OUD) increased OUD treatment in the 2 years after implementation began (8.2 more patient-years of OUD treatment per 10 000 primary care patients). The intervention was continued for a third year, permitting evaluation of 3-year outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To compare OUD medication treatment in intervention and usual care clinics over 3 years of implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This is a preplanned secondary analysis of a cluster randomized implementation trial, conducted in 6 health systems in 5 states (2 primary care clinics per health system) with clinic randomization stratified by system (assignment notification February 28, 2018 [August 31, 2018, in 1 system]). Data were obtained from electronic health records and insurance claims. Eligible patients were those aged 16 to 90 years visiting intervention or usual care clinics from 3 years before to 2 years after randomization. Patients new to clinics during the third year after randomization could not be included because COVID-19-era transitions to virtual care precluded assignment of patients to clinics. Data analysis occurred from November 2023 to September 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intervention: &lt;/strong&gt;Clinics were randomized to intervention or care as usual. Intervention included 3 implementation components: salary for 1 full-time OBAT nurse per intervention clinic; training and ongoing technical assistance for nurses; and 3 or more primary care buprenorphine prescribers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcome and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Patient-years of OUD treatment (buprenorphine or extended-release naltrexone) per 10 000 primary care patients in the 3 years postrandomization. Mixed-effect models adjusted for baseline values of the outcome and included a health system-specific random intercept to account for correlation of clinic pairs within a system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Prerandomization, a total of 290 071 primary care patients were seen, including 130 618 in intervention clinics (mean [SD] age, 48.6 [17.7] years; mean [SD] female, 59.3% [4.0%]) and 159 453 in usual care clinics (mean [SD] age, 47.2 [17.5] years; mean [SD] female, 64.0% [5.3%]). Over 3 years postrandomization, intervention clinics provided 19.7 (95% CI, 11.1-28.4) more patient-years of OUD treatment per 10 000 primary care patients compared with usual care clinics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;In this secondary analysis of the PROUD cluster randomized trial, after an added year of the intervention, OUD treatment continued to increase in intervention clinics compared with usual care. The treatment increase over 3 years exceeded that of the first 2 years, suggesting that implementation of the Massachusetts OBAT m","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2447447"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142687008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Discussions on Fertility Preservation Before Early-Onset Cancer Treatment. 早期癌症治疗前关于生育力保护的患者报告讨论。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44540
Samantha R Keller, Allison Rosen, Mark A Lewis, Hyo K Park, Rebecca Babyak, Jill Feldman, Fei Ye, Rajiv Agarwal, Kristen K Ciombor, Timothy M Geiger, Cathy Eng, Katherine J Hunzinger, Richard H Viskochil, Michelle K Roach, Digna R Velez Edwards, Michele L Cote, Andreana N Holowatyj
{"title":"Patient-Reported Discussions on Fertility Preservation Before Early-Onset Cancer Treatment.","authors":"Samantha R Keller, Allison Rosen, Mark A Lewis, Hyo K Park, Rebecca Babyak, Jill Feldman, Fei Ye, Rajiv Agarwal, Kristen K Ciombor, Timothy M Geiger, Cathy Eng, Katherine J Hunzinger, Richard H Viskochil, Michelle K Roach, Digna R Velez Edwards, Michele L Cote, Andreana N Holowatyj","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44540","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44540","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2444540"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558471/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142636059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gabapentinoids and Risk of Hip Fracture. 加巴喷丁类药物与髋部骨折风险。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44488
Miriam T Y Leung, Justin P Turner, Clara Marquina, Jenni Ilomäki, Tim Tran, Katsiaryna Bykov, J Simon Bell

Importance: The increased use of gabapentinoids has been most pronounced in older people who are also susceptible to hip fractures.

Objective: To investigate the overall association between gabapentinoids and the risk of hip fractures and the stratified association across age groups, frailty status, and history of chronic kidney disease.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a case-case-time-control study in patients hospitalized for hip fracture in Victoria, Australia, between March 1, 2013, and June 30, 2018, with at least 1 prescription for a gabapentinoid before fracture. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for gabapentinoid dispensing in the index (1-60 days prefracture) compared with the reference (121-180 days prefracture) period. To adjust for the underlying time trend in gabapentinoid use, each index case was matched with up to 5 controls, selected from future cases of the same age and sex. Subgroup analyses were conducted in subgroups with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD), frailty scores less than 5, and frailty scores 5 and above. Frailty was computed using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Data were analyzed from November 2023 to April 2024.

Exposure: Gabapentinoids (pregabalin or gabapentin).

Main outcome and measure: Hip fracture.

Results: Of 28 293 patients hospitalized for hip fractures, 2946 (1752 [59.5%] aged ≥80 years; 2099 [71.2%] female) were dispensed a gabapentinoid before hip fracture. Gabapentinoid dispensing was associated with increased odds of hip fractures (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.66-2.32). After adjusting for the exposure-time trend and concomitant use of other central nervous system medications, the odds of hip fractures remained elevated (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57). The association between gabapentinoid dispensing and hip fracture was higher in patients with HFRS 5 and above (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.31-2.33) and CKD (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.65-3.52).

Conclusions and relevance: In this case-case-time-control study of Australian residents hospitalized for hip fracture, gabapentinoid use was associated with an increased risk of hip fractures, especially in patients who were frail or had chronic kidney disease. In addition to the known risk associated with kidney impairment, frailty status may be an important risk factor when considering use of gabapentinoids.

重要性:加巴喷丁类药物在老年人中的使用增加最为明显,而老年人也是髋部骨折的易感人群:调查加巴喷丁类药物与髋部骨折风险之间的总体关联,以及不同年龄组、虚弱状态和慢性肾脏病史之间的分层关联:这是一项病例-病例-时间对照研究,研究对象为2013年3月1日至2018年6月30日期间在澳大利亚维多利亚州因髋部骨折住院的患者,患者在骨折前至少开过一次加巴喷丁类药物处方。采用条件逻辑回归估计指数期(骨折前1-60天)与参照期(骨折前121-180天)加巴喷丁诺类药物处方的几率比(OR)和95% CI。为了调整加巴喷丁胺使用的潜在时间趋势,每个指数病例都与最多 5 个对照组进行了配对,这些对照组是从年龄和性别相同的未来病例中挑选出来的。对是否患有慢性肾病(CKD)、虚弱评分低于 5 分和虚弱评分 5 分及以上的亚组进行了分组分析。虚弱程度采用医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)计算。数据分析时间为 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 4 月。暴露:加巴喷丁类(普瑞巴林或加巴喷丁)。主要结果和测量:髋部骨折:在28 293名因髋部骨折住院的患者中,有2946人(1752人[59.5%]年龄≥80岁;2099人[71.2%]为女性)在髋部骨折前配发了加巴喷丁类药物。加巴喷丁诺配药与髋部骨折几率增加有关(OR,1.96;95% CI,1.66-2.32)。在对暴露时间趋势和同时使用其他中枢神经系统药物进行调整后,髋部骨折的几率仍然升高(OR,1.30;95% CI,1.07-1.57)。在HFRS 5及以上(OR,1.75;95% CI,1.31-2.33)和患有慢性肾脏病(OR,2.41;95% CI,1.65-3.52)的患者中,加巴喷丁胺配药与髋部骨折之间的相关性更高:在这项针对因髋部骨折住院的澳大利亚居民进行的病例-病例-时间对照研究中,使用加巴喷丁诺类药物与髋部骨折风险增加有关,尤其是在体弱或患有慢性肾病的患者中。除了已知的与肾功能损害相关的风险外,在考虑使用加巴喷丁类药物时,虚弱状态也可能是一个重要的风险因素。
{"title":"Gabapentinoids and Risk of Hip Fracture.","authors":"Miriam T Y Leung, Justin P Turner, Clara Marquina, Jenni Ilomäki, Tim Tran, Katsiaryna Bykov, J Simon Bell","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44488","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44488","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The increased use of gabapentinoids has been most pronounced in older people who are also susceptible to hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the overall association between gabapentinoids and the risk of hip fractures and the stratified association across age groups, frailty status, and history of chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a case-case-time-control study in patients hospitalized for hip fracture in Victoria, Australia, between March 1, 2013, and June 30, 2018, with at least 1 prescription for a gabapentinoid before fracture. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for gabapentinoid dispensing in the index (1-60 days prefracture) compared with the reference (121-180 days prefracture) period. To adjust for the underlying time trend in gabapentinoid use, each index case was matched with up to 5 controls, selected from future cases of the same age and sex. Subgroup analyses were conducted in subgroups with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD), frailty scores less than 5, and frailty scores 5 and above. Frailty was computed using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Data were analyzed from November 2023 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Gabapentinoids (pregabalin or gabapentin).</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>Hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 28 293 patients hospitalized for hip fractures, 2946 (1752 [59.5%] aged ≥80 years; 2099 [71.2%] female) were dispensed a gabapentinoid before hip fracture. Gabapentinoid dispensing was associated with increased odds of hip fractures (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.66-2.32). After adjusting for the exposure-time trend and concomitant use of other central nervous system medications, the odds of hip fractures remained elevated (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57). The association between gabapentinoid dispensing and hip fracture was higher in patients with HFRS 5 and above (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.31-2.33) and CKD (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.65-3.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this case-case-time-control study of Australian residents hospitalized for hip fracture, gabapentinoid use was associated with an increased risk of hip fractures, especially in patients who were frail or had chronic kidney disease. In addition to the known risk associated with kidney impairment, frailty status may be an important risk factor when considering use of gabapentinoids.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2444488"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complication Rates After Ultrasonography-Guided Nerve Blocks Performed in the Emergency Department. 急诊科在超声引导下进行神经阻滞术后的并发症发生率。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44742
Andrew Goldsmith, Lachlan Driver, Nicole M Duggan, Matthew Riscinti, David Martin, Michael Heffler, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrea Dreyfuss, Jordan Sell, Calvin Brown, Christopher Fung, Leland Perice, Daniel Bennett, Natalie Truong, S Zan Jafry, Michael Macias, Joseph Brown, Arun Nagdev

Importance: Ultrasonography-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a core component of multimodal analgesia for acute pain management in the emergency department (ED). Despite their growing use, national adoption of UGNBs has been slow due to a lack of procedural safety in the ED.

Objective: To assess the complication rates and patient pain scores of UGNBs performed in the ED.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included data from the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry, a retrospective multicenter observational registry encompassing procedures performed in 11 EDs in the US from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, of adult patients who underwent a UGNB.

Exposure: UGNB encounters.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome of this study was complication rates associated with ED-performed UGNBs recorded in the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The secondary outcome was patient pain scores of ED-based UGNBs. Data for all adult patients who underwent an ED-based UGNB at each site were recorded. The volume of UGNB at each site, as well as procedural outcomes (including complications), were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of all variables.

Results: In total, 2735 UGNB encounters among adult patients (median age, 62 years [IQR, 41-77 years]; 51.6% male) across 11 EDs nationwide were analyzed. Fascia iliaca blocks were the most commonly performed UGNBs (975 of 2742 blocks [35.6%]). Complications occurred at a rate of 0.4% (10 of 2735 blocks). One episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity requiring an intralipid was reported. Overall, 1320 of 1864 patients (70.8%) experienced 51% to 100% pain relief following UGNBs. Operator training level varied, although 1953 of 2733 procedures (71.5%) were performed by resident physicians.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cohort study of 2735 UGNB encounters support the safety of UGNBs in ED settings and suggest an association with improvement in patient pain scores. Broader implementation of UGNBs in ED settings may have important implications as key elements of multimodal analgesia strategies to reduce opioid use and improve patient care.

重要性:超声引导下神经阻滞(UGNB)已成为急诊科(ED)急性疼痛治疗中多模式镇痛的核心组成部分。尽管超声引导神经阻滞的应用越来越广泛,但由于急诊科缺乏手术安全性,因此在全国范围内的应用进展缓慢:评估在急诊室实施 UGNB 的并发症发生率和患者疼痛评分:这项队列研究纳入了美国国家超声引导神经阻滞注册中心的数据,该注册中心是一个回顾性多中心观察注册中心,涵盖了2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间在美国11家急诊室进行的UGNB成人患者手术:本研究的主要结果是2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间国家超声引导神经阻滞注册中心记录的由急诊室实施的UGNB相关并发症发生率。次要研究结果是基于急诊室的 UGNB 患者疼痛评分。记录了在每个地点接受 ED 型 UGNB 的所有成年患者的数据。记录了每个地点的 UGNB 量以及手术结果(包括并发症)。数据分析采用了所有变量的描述性统计方法:共分析了全国 11 家急诊室的 2735 名成年患者(中位年龄 62 岁 [IQR,41-77 岁];51.6% 为男性)的 UGNB 就诊情况。髂筋膜阻滞是最常见的 UGNB(2742 例阻滞中的 975 例 [35.6%])。并发症发生率为 0.4%(2735 例阻滞中有 10 例)。据报道,有一次局部麻醉剂全身中毒,需要注射内脂。总体而言,1864 位患者中有 1320 位(70.8%)在接受 UGNB 后疼痛缓解率为 51% 至 100% 不等。操作者的培训水平各不相同,但 2733 例手术中有 1953 例(71.5%)是由住院医生实施的:这项对 2735 例 UGNB 患者进行的队列研究结果表明,在急诊室环境中使用 UGNB 是安全的,并且与患者疼痛评分的改善有关。在急诊室环境中更广泛地实施 UGNB 可能具有重要意义,因为它是多模式镇痛策略的关键要素,可减少阿片类药物的使用并改善患者护理。
{"title":"Complication Rates After Ultrasonography-Guided Nerve Blocks Performed in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Andrew Goldsmith, Lachlan Driver, Nicole M Duggan, Matthew Riscinti, David Martin, Michael Heffler, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrea Dreyfuss, Jordan Sell, Calvin Brown, Christopher Fung, Leland Perice, Daniel Bennett, Natalie Truong, S Zan Jafry, Michael Macias, Joseph Brown, Arun Nagdev","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44742","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Ultrasonography-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a core component of multimodal analgesia for acute pain management in the emergency department (ED). Despite their growing use, national adoption of UGNBs has been slow due to a lack of procedural safety in the ED.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the complication rates and patient pain scores of UGNBs performed in the ED.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study included data from the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry, a retrospective multicenter observational registry encompassing procedures performed in 11 EDs in the US from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, of adult patients who underwent a UGNB.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>UGNB encounters.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome of this study was complication rates associated with ED-performed UGNBs recorded in the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The secondary outcome was patient pain scores of ED-based UGNBs. Data for all adult patients who underwent an ED-based UGNB at each site were recorded. The volume of UGNB at each site, as well as procedural outcomes (including complications), were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of all variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2735 UGNB encounters among adult patients (median age, 62 years [IQR, 41-77 years]; 51.6% male) across 11 EDs nationwide were analyzed. Fascia iliaca blocks were the most commonly performed UGNBs (975 of 2742 blocks [35.6%]). Complications occurred at a rate of 0.4% (10 of 2735 blocks). One episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity requiring an intralipid was reported. Overall, 1320 of 1864 patients (70.8%) experienced 51% to 100% pain relief following UGNBs. Operator training level varied, although 1953 of 2733 procedures (71.5%) were performed by resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cohort study of 2735 UGNB encounters support the safety of UGNBs in ED settings and suggest an association with improvement in patient pain scores. Broader implementation of UGNBs in ED settings may have important implications as key elements of multimodal analgesia strategies to reduce opioid use and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2444742"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561692/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142620987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Glimpse at Transplant Outcomes From Kidney Donors After Extended Times to Circulatory Death-Might We Be Turning Away Too Soon? 肾脏捐献者循环死亡时间延长后的移植结果一瞥--我们是否太早放弃?
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43336
Emily A Vail, Matthew D Bacchetta
{"title":"A Glimpse at Transplant Outcomes From Kidney Donors After Extended Times to Circulatory Death-Might We Be Turning Away Too Soon?","authors":"Emily A Vail, Matthew D Bacchetta","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43336","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2443336"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142620903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Error in Affiliations. 隶属关系中的错误。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49923
{"title":"Error in Affiliations.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49923","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49923","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2449923"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568454/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142638985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Telehealth Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 预防自杀的远程健康简短认知行为疗法:随机临床试验
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45913
Justin C Baker, Austin Starkey, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Samantha E Daruwala, Jaryd Hiser, Lauren R Khazem, Keelin Rademacher, Jarrod Hay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Craig J Bryan
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Suicide rates continue to increase in the US. Evidence-based treatments for suicide risk exist, but their effectiveness when delivered via telehealth remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the efficacy of brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for reducing suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among high-risk adults when delivered via telehealth.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This 2-group parallel randomized clinical trial comparing BCBT with present-centered therapy (PCT) was conducted from April 2021 to September 2023 with 1-year follow-up at an outpatient psychiatry and behavioral health clinic located in the midwestern US. Participants reporting suicidal ideation during the past week and/or suicidal behavior during the past month were recruited from clinic waiting lists, inpatient service, intermediate care, research match, and direct referrals from clinicians. A total of 768 participants were invited to participate, 112 were assessed for eligibility, and 98 were eligible and randomly assigned to a treatment condition. Data analysis was from April to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants received either BCBT, an evidence-based suicide-focused treatment that teaches emotion regulation and reappraisal skills, or PCT, a goal-oriented treatment that helps participants identify adaptive responses to stressors. Participants were randomized using a computerized stratified randomization algorithm with 2 strata (sex and history of suicide attempts).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was suicide attempts as measured by the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised. The secondary outcome was severity of suicidal ideation as measured by the Scale for Suicide Ideation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 96 adults (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [12.6] years; 64 female [66.7%] and 32 male [33.3%]), with 51 receiving BCBT and 45 receiving PCT. Of all participants, 85 (88.5%) completed at least 1 session. From baseline to 12 months, 12 participants receiving PCT (estimated percentage, 35.6%) made 56 suicide attempts and 11 participants receiving BCBT (estimated percentage, 30.0%) made 36 suicide attempts. Participants randomized to BCBT made significantly fewer suicide attempts than participants randomized to PCT (mean [range], 0.70 [0.00-8.00] attempts per participant vs 1.40 [0.00-10.00] per participant) and had a 41% reduced risk for suicide attempts (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96; P = .03). Severity of suicidal ideation significantly decreased in both treatments (F4,330 = 50.1; P < .001) but did not differ between groups (F4,330  = 0.2; P = .91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BCBT delivered via video telehealth is effective for reducing suicide attempts among adults with recent suicidal thoughts and
重要性:美国的自杀率持续上升。目前已有针对自杀风险的循证疗法,但通过远程医疗提供这些疗法的效果仍不清楚:目的:测试简短认知行为疗法(BCBT)通过远程医疗方式减少高危成人自杀企图和自杀意念的疗效:这项两组平行随机临床试验比较了简短认知行为疗法(BCBT)和以现在为中心的疗法(PCT),试验于 2021 年 4 月至 2023 年 9 月在美国中西部的一家精神病学和行为健康门诊进行,随访 1 年。报告在过去一周内有自杀意念和/或在过去一个月内有自杀行为的参与者是从诊所候诊名单、住院服务、中间护理、研究匹配和临床医生直接转介中招募的。共有 768 人受邀参加,112 人通过资格评估,98 人符合条件并被随机分配到治疗条件中。数据分析时间为 2024 年 4 月至 9 月:干预措施:参与者接受BCBT或PCT治疗,前者是一种以自杀为重点的循证治疗,教授情绪调节和重新评估技能;后者是一种目标导向型治疗,帮助参与者识别对压力的适应性反应。采用计算机分层随机化算法对参与者进行随机化,其中包括两个分层(性别和自杀未遂史):主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是自杀未遂,通过自伤想法和行为访谈-修订版进行测量。次要结果是自杀意念的严重程度,采用自杀意念量表进行测量:参与者包括 96 名成年人(平均 [SD] 年龄为 31.8 [12.6] 岁;64 名女性 [66.7%] 和 32 名男性 [33.3%]),其中 51 人接受了 BCBT 治疗,45 人接受了 PCT 治疗。在所有参与者中,85 人(88.5%)至少完成了一次治疗。从基线到 12 个月期间,12 名接受 PCT 的参与者(估计比例为 35.6%)有 56 次自杀企图,11 名接受 BCBT 的参与者(估计比例为 30.0%)有 36 次自杀企图。随机接受 BCBT 的参与者自杀未遂的次数明显少于随机接受 PCT 的参与者(平均 [范围],0.70 [0.00-8.00] 次/人 vs 1.40 [0.00-10.00] 次/人),自杀未遂的风险降低了 41%(危险比,0.59;95% CI,0.36-0.96;P = .03)。两种治疗方法的自杀意念严重程度均显著降低(F4,330 = 50.1;P 结论及意义:这项随机临床试验的结果表明,通过视频远程保健提供的 BCBT 能够有效减少近期有自杀想法和/或行为的成年人的自杀企图:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04844294。
{"title":"Telehealth Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Justin C Baker, Austin Starkey, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Samantha E Daruwala, Jaryd Hiser, Lauren R Khazem, Keelin Rademacher, Jarrod Hay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Craig J Bryan","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45913","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45913","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Suicide rates continue to increase in the US. Evidence-based treatments for suicide risk exist, but their effectiveness when delivered via telehealth remains unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To test the efficacy of brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for reducing suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among high-risk adults when delivered via telehealth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This 2-group parallel randomized clinical trial comparing BCBT with present-centered therapy (PCT) was conducted from April 2021 to September 2023 with 1-year follow-up at an outpatient psychiatry and behavioral health clinic located in the midwestern US. Participants reporting suicidal ideation during the past week and/or suicidal behavior during the past month were recruited from clinic waiting lists, inpatient service, intermediate care, research match, and direct referrals from clinicians. A total of 768 participants were invited to participate, 112 were assessed for eligibility, and 98 were eligible and randomly assigned to a treatment condition. Data analysis was from April to September 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Participants received either BCBT, an evidence-based suicide-focused treatment that teaches emotion regulation and reappraisal skills, or PCT, a goal-oriented treatment that helps participants identify adaptive responses to stressors. Participants were randomized using a computerized stratified randomization algorithm with 2 strata (sex and history of suicide attempts).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary outcome was suicide attempts as measured by the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised. The secondary outcome was severity of suicidal ideation as measured by the Scale for Suicide Ideation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Participants included 96 adults (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [12.6] years; 64 female [66.7%] and 32 male [33.3%]), with 51 receiving BCBT and 45 receiving PCT. Of all participants, 85 (88.5%) completed at least 1 session. From baseline to 12 months, 12 participants receiving PCT (estimated percentage, 35.6%) made 56 suicide attempts and 11 participants receiving BCBT (estimated percentage, 30.0%) made 36 suicide attempts. Participants randomized to BCBT made significantly fewer suicide attempts than participants randomized to PCT (mean [range], 0.70 [0.00-8.00] attempts per participant vs 1.40 [0.00-10.00] per participant) and had a 41% reduced risk for suicide attempts (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96; P = .03). Severity of suicidal ideation significantly decreased in both treatments (F4,330 = 50.1; P &lt; .001) but did not differ between groups (F4,330  = 0.2; P = .91).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BCBT delivered via video telehealth is effective for reducing suicide attempts among adults with recent suicidal thoughts and","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2445913"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558477/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Evolving Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mortality in the US. 美国肝细胞癌死亡率的演变情况。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45533
Emad Qayed
{"title":"The Evolving Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mortality in the US.","authors":"Emad Qayed","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45533","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2445533"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142648047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Workplace Violence in a Large Urban Emergency Department. 大型城市急诊室中的工作场所暴力。
IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43160
Marla C Doehring, Megan Palmer, Ashley Satorius, Tabitha Vaughn, Bruck Mulat, Andrew Beckman, Kyra Reed, Theresa Spech Dos Santos, Benton R Hunter
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Workplace violence (WPV) against health care workers (HCWs) is common and likely underreported. Reliable data on the incidence of WPV and its impact on victims are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To prospectively define the frequency of WPV against HCWs in the emergency department (ED), examine whether HCW demographics are associated with increased risk, and explore the impact of these events on HCWs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted over 2 months in 2023 (August 28 to October 22, 2023) in the ED of a large, urban, academic safety net hospital in the US. Participants included ED physicians, nurses, and other HCWs, who were asked to complete a brief so-called shift sheet for every ED shift worked during the study period.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>WPV as recorded on shift sheets.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the number of events per shift. Events were coded for severity (types 1-5) and gender- or race and ethnicity-related bias. Shift sheets asked for the participant's demographics and whether they experienced verbal or physical abuse during the shift. If so, they were asked to provide a description; rate the impact the event had on them; and indicate whether they felt the event was sexist, racist, or otherwise biased. Perceived impact was recorded, and demographic characteristics associated with the likelihood of experiencing WPV were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 72 HCWs who participated in the study, 52 were female (72%). A total of 575 shift sheets were returned of an estimated 1250 possible (46%), with 155 events, including 77 type 1 events (50%; shouting, yelling, or insults), 29 type 2 events (19%; threats of physical or sexual violence, death threats, or use of slurs), and 39 type 3 events (25%; physical violence); there was a mean (SD) of 3.7 (1.9) shifts per 1 event. No type 4 or 5 events, which involve physical violence causing grievous injuries requiring medical attention and, in the case of type 5 events, permanent disability or death, were recorded. Ten events could not be coded. Sexist or racist bias occurred in 38 events (25%) and 11 events (7%), respectively. Participants reported how the event impacted them in 133 events. Of those, moderate or severe impact was reported in 32 (24%) and mild to no effect in 101 (76%). There was no association between self-reported impact and coded severity of events. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, a higher likelihood of experiencing WPV on any given shift was independently associated with being in the nursing role (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.0) and being age 40 years or younger (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of HCWs in the ED, participants experienced WPV once every 3.
重要性:针对医护人员(HCWs)的工作场所暴力(WPV)很常见,但很可能未得到充分报告。目前还缺乏有关 WPV 发生率及其对受害者影响的可靠数据:前瞻性地确定急诊科(ED)中针对医护人员的 WPV 事件的发生频率,研究医护人员的人口统计学特征是否与风险增加有关,并探讨这些事件对医护人员的影响:这项横断面研究于 2023 年在美国一家大型城市学术安全网医院的急诊科进行,历时 2 个月(2023 年 8 月 28 日至 10 月 22 日)。参与者包括急诊科医生、护士和其他医护人员,他们被要求在研究期间的每一次急诊科轮班中填写一份简短的所谓轮班表:主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是每班发生的事件数量。对事件的严重程度(1-5 类)以及性别或种族和民族偏见进行编码。轮班表要求填写参与者的人口统计数据,以及他们在轮班期间是否遭受过言语或身体虐待。如果有,则要求他们提供描述;评价该事件对他们的影响;并指出他们是否认为该事件具有性别歧视、种族主义或其他偏见。记录所感受到的影响,并使用多变量逻辑回归分析探讨与遭遇 WPV 可能性相关的人口特征:在参与研究的 72 名医护人员中,52 人为女性(占 72%)。在估计可能发生的 1250 起事件中,共收回了 575 份轮班表(46%),发生了 155 起事件,其中包括 77 起 1 类事件(50%;大喊大叫或侮辱)、29 起 2 类事件(19%;身体或性暴力威胁、死亡威胁或使用污言秽语)和 39 起 3 类事件(25%;身体暴力);平均(标清)每发生 1 起事件需要轮班 3.7 次(1.9 次)。没有第 4 类和第 5 类事件的记录,第 4 类和第 5 类事件涉及身体暴力,造成严重伤害,需要就医,而第 5 类事件则造成终身残疾或死亡。有 10 起事件无法编码。性别歧视或种族主义偏见分别发生在 38 起事件(25%)和 11 起事件(7%)中。在 133 起事件中,参与者报告了事件对他们的影响。其中,32 人(24%)报告了中度或严重影响,101 人(76%)报告了轻度或无影响。自我报告的影响与事件的编码严重程度之间没有关联。在一项多变量逻辑回归分析中,在任何特定班次中经历 WPV 的可能性较高与护理角色(几率比为 3.1;95% CI,1.9-5.0)和年龄在 40 岁或以下(几率比为 2.0;95% CI,1.2-3.5)独立相关:在这项针对急诊室医护人员的横断面研究中,参与者每 3.7 个班次中就有一次感染 WPV 的经历。护理角色和年轻与风险增加有关。这些结果凸显了确定干预措施以支持和保护高危护理人员的迫切需要。
{"title":"Workplace Violence in a Large Urban Emergency Department.","authors":"Marla C Doehring, Megan Palmer, Ashley Satorius, Tabitha Vaughn, Bruck Mulat, Andrew Beckman, Kyra Reed, Theresa Spech Dos Santos, Benton R Hunter","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43160","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43160","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Workplace violence (WPV) against health care workers (HCWs) is common and likely underreported. Reliable data on the incidence of WPV and its impact on victims are lacking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To prospectively define the frequency of WPV against HCWs in the emergency department (ED), examine whether HCW demographics are associated with increased risk, and explore the impact of these events on HCWs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This cross-sectional study was conducted over 2 months in 2023 (August 28 to October 22, 2023) in the ED of a large, urban, academic safety net hospital in the US. Participants included ED physicians, nurses, and other HCWs, who were asked to complete a brief so-called shift sheet for every ED shift worked during the study period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposure: &lt;/strong&gt;WPV as recorded on shift sheets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary outcome was the number of events per shift. Events were coded for severity (types 1-5) and gender- or race and ethnicity-related bias. Shift sheets asked for the participant's demographics and whether they experienced verbal or physical abuse during the shift. If so, they were asked to provide a description; rate the impact the event had on them; and indicate whether they felt the event was sexist, racist, or otherwise biased. Perceived impact was recorded, and demographic characteristics associated with the likelihood of experiencing WPV were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 72 HCWs who participated in the study, 52 were female (72%). A total of 575 shift sheets were returned of an estimated 1250 possible (46%), with 155 events, including 77 type 1 events (50%; shouting, yelling, or insults), 29 type 2 events (19%; threats of physical or sexual violence, death threats, or use of slurs), and 39 type 3 events (25%; physical violence); there was a mean (SD) of 3.7 (1.9) shifts per 1 event. No type 4 or 5 events, which involve physical violence causing grievous injuries requiring medical attention and, in the case of type 5 events, permanent disability or death, were recorded. Ten events could not be coded. Sexist or racist bias occurred in 38 events (25%) and 11 events (7%), respectively. Participants reported how the event impacted them in 133 events. Of those, moderate or severe impact was reported in 32 (24%) and mild to no effect in 101 (76%). There was no association between self-reported impact and coded severity of events. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, a higher likelihood of experiencing WPV on any given shift was independently associated with being in the nursing role (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.0) and being age 40 years or younger (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this cross-sectional study of HCWs in the ED, participants experienced WPV once every 3.","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2443160"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539014/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA Network Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1