Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57415
Kevin C Ma, Alexander Webber, Adam S Lauring, Emily Bendall, Leigh K Papalambros, Basmah Safdar, Adit A Ginde, Ithan D Peltan, Samuel M Brown, Manjusha Gaglani, Shekhar Ghamande, Cristie Columbus, Nicholas M Mohr, Kevin W Gibbs, David N Hager, Matthew E Prekker, Michelle N Gong, Amira Mohamed, Nicholas J Johnson, Akram Khan, Catherine L Hough, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G Wilson, Nida Qadir, Steven Y Chang, Christopher Mallow, Laurence W Busse, Jennie H Kwon, Matthew C Exline, Ivana A Vaughn, Mayur Ramesh, Jarrod M Mosier, Aleda M Leis, Estelle S Harris, Adrienne Baughman, Sydney A Cornelison, Paul W Blair, Cassandra A Johnson, Nathaniel M Lewis, Sascha Ellington, Todd W Rice, Carlos G Grijalva, H Keipp Talbot, Jonathan D Casey, Natasha Halasa, James D Chappell, Yuwei Zhu, Wesley H Self, Fatimah S Dawood, Diya Surie
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>As SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 lineage descendants continue to evolve, evaluating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe COVID-19 remains important to guide vaccination strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the VE of the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes overall and by time since dose (7-89, 90-179, and ≥180 days), JN.1 descendant lineage (KP.3.1.1, XEC, LP.8.1), and spike protein mutations associated with immune evasion.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter, test-negative, case-control study conducted by the Investigating Respiratory Viruses in the Acutely Ill Network included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) hospitalized between September 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025, at 26 hospitals in 20 US states. Case patients presented with COVID-19-like illness and positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid or antigen test results; control patients had COVID-19-like illness but tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Receipt of a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine at least 7 days before illness onset.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Main outcomes were COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes (supplemental oxygen therapy, acute respiratory failure, intensive care unit admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation or death). Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of vaccination in case and control patients, adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics, and enrollment region. The VE was estimated as (1 - adjusted odds ratio) × 100%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8493 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [54-76] years; 4338 female [51.1%]), including 1888 case patients with COVID-19 (among whom 951 [50.4%] had successful whole-genome sequencing, including 348 [36.6%] with KP.3.1.1, 218 [22.9%] with XEC, and 134 [14.1%] with LP.8.1 infections) and 6605 control patients were enrolled. Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was 40% (95% CI, 27%-51%), and protection was sustained through 90 to 179 days after vaccination. Vaccine effectiveness was higher against the most severe outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation or death at 79% (95% CI, 55%-92%). It was 49% (95% CI, 25%-67%) against hospitalization with KP.3.1.1, 34% (95% CI, 4%-56%) against XEC, and 24% (95% CI, -19% to 53%) against LP.8.1, with increasing median time since dose receipt among vaccinated case patients due to sequential circulation patterns (60, 89, and 141 days, respectively). The VE was similar against lineages with spike protein S31 deletion (41% [95% CI, 22%-56%]) and T22N and F59S substitutions (37% [95% CI, 9%-57%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this multicenter, case-control analysis of VE, 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccines may have provided protection against hospitalizations and severe in-hospital outcom
{"title":"Estimated Effectiveness of 2024-2025 COVID-19 Vaccination Against Severe COVID-19.","authors":"Kevin C Ma, Alexander Webber, Adam S Lauring, Emily Bendall, Leigh K Papalambros, Basmah Safdar, Adit A Ginde, Ithan D Peltan, Samuel M Brown, Manjusha Gaglani, Shekhar Ghamande, Cristie Columbus, Nicholas M Mohr, Kevin W Gibbs, David N Hager, Matthew E Prekker, Michelle N Gong, Amira Mohamed, Nicholas J Johnson, Akram Khan, Catherine L Hough, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G Wilson, Nida Qadir, Steven Y Chang, Christopher Mallow, Laurence W Busse, Jennie H Kwon, Matthew C Exline, Ivana A Vaughn, Mayur Ramesh, Jarrod M Mosier, Aleda M Leis, Estelle S Harris, Adrienne Baughman, Sydney A Cornelison, Paul W Blair, Cassandra A Johnson, Nathaniel M Lewis, Sascha Ellington, Todd W Rice, Carlos G Grijalva, H Keipp Talbot, Jonathan D Casey, Natasha Halasa, James D Chappell, Yuwei Zhu, Wesley H Self, Fatimah S Dawood, Diya Surie","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57415","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>As SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 lineage descendants continue to evolve, evaluating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe COVID-19 remains important to guide vaccination strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the VE of the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes overall and by time since dose (7-89, 90-179, and ≥180 days), JN.1 descendant lineage (KP.3.1.1, XEC, LP.8.1), and spike protein mutations associated with immune evasion.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter, test-negative, case-control study conducted by the Investigating Respiratory Viruses in the Acutely Ill Network included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) hospitalized between September 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025, at 26 hospitals in 20 US states. Case patients presented with COVID-19-like illness and positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid or antigen test results; control patients had COVID-19-like illness but tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Receipt of a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine at least 7 days before illness onset.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Main outcomes were COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes (supplemental oxygen therapy, acute respiratory failure, intensive care unit admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation or death). Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of vaccination in case and control patients, adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics, and enrollment region. The VE was estimated as (1 - adjusted odds ratio) × 100%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8493 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [54-76] years; 4338 female [51.1%]), including 1888 case patients with COVID-19 (among whom 951 [50.4%] had successful whole-genome sequencing, including 348 [36.6%] with KP.3.1.1, 218 [22.9%] with XEC, and 134 [14.1%] with LP.8.1 infections) and 6605 control patients were enrolled. Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was 40% (95% CI, 27%-51%), and protection was sustained through 90 to 179 days after vaccination. Vaccine effectiveness was higher against the most severe outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation or death at 79% (95% CI, 55%-92%). It was 49% (95% CI, 25%-67%) against hospitalization with KP.3.1.1, 34% (95% CI, 4%-56%) against XEC, and 24% (95% CI, -19% to 53%) against LP.8.1, with increasing median time since dose receipt among vaccinated case patients due to sequential circulation patterns (60, 89, and 141 days, respectively). The VE was similar against lineages with spike protein S31 deletion (41% [95% CI, 22%-56%]) and T22N and F59S substitutions (37% [95% CI, 9%-57%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this multicenter, case-control analysis of VE, 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccines may have provided protection against hospitalizations and severe in-hospital outcom","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2557415"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12869339/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization resulted in immediate abortion bans or severe restrictions in 22 US states. While mental health consequences of restricted abortion access have been suggested, their distribution across socioeconomic strata remain unclear for postpartum depression (PPD) among Medicaid populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess associations of state-level abortion bans enacted after Dobbs with the incidence of PPD, focusing on socioeconomic status (SES) differences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a difference-in-differences (DD) analysis for Medicaid claims data from Kythera Labs (approximately 60% of US Medicaid population) from January 2019 to December 2024. Women and adolescents aged 12 to 55 years with pregnancies resulting in live births or stillbirths were stratified into SES terciles based on zip code-level census data.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>State-level abortion bans or restrictions implemented after Dobbs, defined by residence in trigger law states.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was incidence of PPD within 12 months following delivery, identified through validated claims-based algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 102 597 individuals pre-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 27.21 [5.82] years; 47 305 individuals in trigger states and 55 292 individuals in nontrigger states) and 61 113 individuals post-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 27.48 [5.92] years; 30 451 individuals in trigger states and 30 662 individuals in nontrigger states). Individuals in trigger states were younger than individuals in nontrigger states both pre-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 26.53 [5.69] years vs 27.97 [5.84] years) and post-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 26.61 [5.77] years vs 28.34 [5.94] years). Both pre- and post-Dobbs, individuals in trigger states were more likely to reside in rural areas (pre-Dobbs: 10 562 individuals [22.33%] vs 10 079 individuals [18.23%]; post-Dobbs: 6739 individuals [22.13%] vs 5220 individuals [17.02%]) and low-SES areas (pre-Dobbs: 20 136 individuals [42.57%] vs 13 771 individuals [24.91%]; post-Dobbs: 12 924 individuals [42.44%] vs 7283 [23.75%]); they were less likely to have obstetrical complications (pre-Dobbs: 31 243 individuals [66.05%] vs 42 780 individuals [77.37%]; post-Dobbs: 21 052 individuals [69.13%] vs 24 577 individuals [80.15%]) or maternal complications (pre-Dobbs:7732 individuals [16.34%] vs 10 839 of individuals [19.60%]; post-Dobbs: 5779 of 30 451 individuals [19.04%] vs 6508 individuals [21.17%]). Women with lowest SES residing in trigger states experienced a 9.0% relative increase in PPD diagnoses post-Dobbs vs similar women in nontrigger states (DD coefficient, 0.090; 95% CI, 0.035-0.146; P = .001). No associations were observed in middle or high SES groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>
{"title":"Socioeconomic Status and Postpartum Depression Risk After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision, Based on State Trigger Laws.","authors":"Onur Baser, Facundo Sepulveda, Yuanqing Lu, Amy Endrizal","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57337","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization resulted in immediate abortion bans or severe restrictions in 22 US states. While mental health consequences of restricted abortion access have been suggested, their distribution across socioeconomic strata remain unclear for postpartum depression (PPD) among Medicaid populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess associations of state-level abortion bans enacted after Dobbs with the incidence of PPD, focusing on socioeconomic status (SES) differences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a difference-in-differences (DD) analysis for Medicaid claims data from Kythera Labs (approximately 60% of US Medicaid population) from January 2019 to December 2024. Women and adolescents aged 12 to 55 years with pregnancies resulting in live births or stillbirths were stratified into SES terciles based on zip code-level census data.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>State-level abortion bans or restrictions implemented after Dobbs, defined by residence in trigger law states.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was incidence of PPD within 12 months following delivery, identified through validated claims-based algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 102 597 individuals pre-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 27.21 [5.82] years; 47 305 individuals in trigger states and 55 292 individuals in nontrigger states) and 61 113 individuals post-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 27.48 [5.92] years; 30 451 individuals in trigger states and 30 662 individuals in nontrigger states). Individuals in trigger states were younger than individuals in nontrigger states both pre-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 26.53 [5.69] years vs 27.97 [5.84] years) and post-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 26.61 [5.77] years vs 28.34 [5.94] years). Both pre- and post-Dobbs, individuals in trigger states were more likely to reside in rural areas (pre-Dobbs: 10 562 individuals [22.33%] vs 10 079 individuals [18.23%]; post-Dobbs: 6739 individuals [22.13%] vs 5220 individuals [17.02%]) and low-SES areas (pre-Dobbs: 20 136 individuals [42.57%] vs 13 771 individuals [24.91%]; post-Dobbs: 12 924 individuals [42.44%] vs 7283 [23.75%]); they were less likely to have obstetrical complications (pre-Dobbs: 31 243 individuals [66.05%] vs 42 780 individuals [77.37%]; post-Dobbs: 21 052 individuals [69.13%] vs 24 577 individuals [80.15%]) or maternal complications (pre-Dobbs:7732 individuals [16.34%] vs 10 839 of individuals [19.60%]; post-Dobbs: 5779 of 30 451 individuals [19.04%] vs 6508 individuals [21.17%]). Women with lowest SES residing in trigger states experienced a 9.0% relative increase in PPD diagnoses post-Dobbs vs similar women in nontrigger states (DD coefficient, 0.090; 95% CI, 0.035-0.146; P = .001). No associations were observed in middle or high SES groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2557337"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12869335/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56732
Maximilian Lindholz, Robin Bülow, Ivo G Schoots, Marc Kölln, Saskia Nolte, Georg L Baumgärtner, Jean-Francois Chenot, Carsten O Schmidt, Martin Burchardt, Matthias Nauck, Henry Völzke, Mark O Wielpütz, Tobias Penzkofer, Norbert Hosten, Charlie A Hamm
Importance: Prostate cancer incidence is projected to double by 2040, yet optimal risk stratification approaches for screening remain unclear despite recent international endorsements of organized programs that call for risk-adapted algorithms using readily available biomarkers.
Objective: To identify biomarkers for risk-adapted prostate cancer screening in men without prostate cancer.
Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used data from the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP), a prospective population-based research initiative in Germany that randomly invited participants aged 20 to 79 years who underwent comprehensive examinations with structured 20-year follow-up. Data were collected from October 17, 1997, through September 14, 2021, with final analysis completed November 16, 2025.
Exposures: Baseline clinical and liquid biomarkers, including body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and glycated hemoglobin, together with prostate cancer-specific biomarkers of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and magnetic resonance imaging-derived prostate volume and PSA density.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was long-term prostate cancer incidence. Cumulative incidence functions for prostate cancer and death were treated as competing risks. Cause-specific Cox models were used to estimate risk and assess the association between baseline biomarkers and long-term incidence.
Results: Among 2651 men included in the study (median [IQR] age, 54.0 [48.0-62.0] years), 1482 (55.9%) had low baseline PSA levels (<1.00 ng/mL), with a cumulative prostate cancer incidence of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.4%), 0.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.2%), and 3.3% (95% CI, 2.1%-4.8%) at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. In 958 men (36.1%) with intermediate PSA levels (1.00-3.00 ng/mL), prostate cancer incidence was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.3%), 5.0% (95% CI, 3.6%-6.6%), and 11.8% (95% CI, 9.2%-14.8%) at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. In 211 men (8.0%) with high PSA levels (>3.00 ng/mL), prostate cancer incidence was 14.5% (95% CI, 10.1%-19.7%), 28.3% (95% CI, 22.2%-34.8%), and 34.8% (95% CI, 27.5%-42.2%) at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. Cumulative prostate cancer incidence differed significantly among the PSA groups (P < .001). In univariable and multivariable Cox regression, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), PSA (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07), and PSA density (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30-1.52) remained consistently associated with prostate cancer risk, whereas other variables showed either no association or inconsistent results across models.
Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study found that a low baseline PSA level was associated with low long-term prostate cancer risk among men aged 45 to 70 years, supporting risk-adapted screening with extended intervals for men with low PSA levels.
{"title":"Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.","authors":"Maximilian Lindholz, Robin Bülow, Ivo G Schoots, Marc Kölln, Saskia Nolte, Georg L Baumgärtner, Jean-Francois Chenot, Carsten O Schmidt, Martin Burchardt, Matthias Nauck, Henry Völzke, Mark O Wielpütz, Tobias Penzkofer, Norbert Hosten, Charlie A Hamm","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56732","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56732","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prostate cancer incidence is projected to double by 2040, yet optimal risk stratification approaches for screening remain unclear despite recent international endorsements of organized programs that call for risk-adapted algorithms using readily available biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify biomarkers for risk-adapted prostate cancer screening in men without prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used data from the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP), a prospective population-based research initiative in Germany that randomly invited participants aged 20 to 79 years who underwent comprehensive examinations with structured 20-year follow-up. Data were collected from October 17, 1997, through September 14, 2021, with final analysis completed November 16, 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Baseline clinical and liquid biomarkers, including body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and glycated hemoglobin, together with prostate cancer-specific biomarkers of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and magnetic resonance imaging-derived prostate volume and PSA density.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was long-term prostate cancer incidence. Cumulative incidence functions for prostate cancer and death were treated as competing risks. Cause-specific Cox models were used to estimate risk and assess the association between baseline biomarkers and long-term incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2651 men included in the study (median [IQR] age, 54.0 [48.0-62.0] years), 1482 (55.9%) had low baseline PSA levels (<1.00 ng/mL), with a cumulative prostate cancer incidence of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.4%), 0.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.2%), and 3.3% (95% CI, 2.1%-4.8%) at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. In 958 men (36.1%) with intermediate PSA levels (1.00-3.00 ng/mL), prostate cancer incidence was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.3%), 5.0% (95% CI, 3.6%-6.6%), and 11.8% (95% CI, 9.2%-14.8%) at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. In 211 men (8.0%) with high PSA levels (>3.00 ng/mL), prostate cancer incidence was 14.5% (95% CI, 10.1%-19.7%), 28.3% (95% CI, 22.2%-34.8%), and 34.8% (95% CI, 27.5%-42.2%) at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. Cumulative prostate cancer incidence differed significantly among the PSA groups (P < .001). In univariable and multivariable Cox regression, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), PSA (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07), and PSA density (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30-1.52) remained consistently associated with prostate cancer risk, whereas other variables showed either no association or inconsistent results across models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort study found that a low baseline PSA level was associated with low long-term prostate cancer risk among men aged 45 to 70 years, supporting risk-adapted screening with extended intervals for men with low PSA levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2556732"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57328
Grace L Smith, David B Feldman, Hilary Ma, Christina Checka, Michael E Roth, James C Tucker, Cynthia Anderson, Marin Xavier, Jodi Kagihara, Ethan B Ludmir, Chi-Fang Wu, Edna Paredes, Kathrin Milbury, Benjamin W Corn
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Financial toxicity significantly affects individuals with cancer, impacting not only treatment adherence and outcomes but also psychological dimensions such as satisfaction with life (SWL). Identifying mediators of psychological outcomes of financial toxicity, including hopefulness and social support, is critical for informing interventions to mitigate financial toxicity burdens.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association of financial toxicity with hopefulness, social support, and SWL in patients with cancer, and to test the roles of hopefulness and social support in the association between financial toxicity and SWL.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis assessed baseline patient-reported financial toxicity from participants of the prospective, multisite Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer-II (ENRICh-II) study who enrolled from August 2020 to December 2022. Included patients were adults receiving ambulatory cancer care for various malignant neoplasm types diagnosed in the year prior from academic, community-based, and federally qualified health centers across 6 oncology clinics. Data were primarily analyzed between January and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Financial toxicity was assessed using the ENRICh instrument, which measures global financial toxicity burden and financial toxicity-related material, coping, and psychological distress burden subdomain scores.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The Satisfaction with Life Scale measured life satisfaction. Hypothesized mediators were measured using the State Hope Scale and Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. A bootstrapping approach to multiple mediation was applied, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 519 participants were surveyed (mean [SD] age, 52.0 [15.2] years; 349 female [67.2%]; 49 Black [9.4%], 137 Hispanic [26.4%], 278 White [53.6%]). The most common cancers included breast (202 [38.9%]); colon, rectum, and anal (111 [21.4%]); biliary, liver, pancreatic, and stomach (65 [12.5%]); and leukemia, lymphoma, and other hematologic malignant neoplasms (53 [10.2%]). Higher financial toxicity was significantly associated with lower SWL (r = -0.34, P < .001). Hopefulness and social support each partially mediated this association (social support, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01]; hope, -0.08, [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03]). The combined multiple mediation path was significant (-0.02 [95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01]). These associations also existed for the material, coping, and psychological distress financial toxicity domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this multisite, cross-sectional study, greater financial toxicity burden was associated with lower life satisfaction; individuals' hopefulness and perceived social support levels-representing dimensions of psychosocial resilience-sta
{"title":"Financial Toxicity, Hope, and Satisfaction With Life in Patients Receiving Ambulatory Cancer Care.","authors":"Grace L Smith, David B Feldman, Hilary Ma, Christina Checka, Michael E Roth, James C Tucker, Cynthia Anderson, Marin Xavier, Jodi Kagihara, Ethan B Ludmir, Chi-Fang Wu, Edna Paredes, Kathrin Milbury, Benjamin W Corn","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57328","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Financial toxicity significantly affects individuals with cancer, impacting not only treatment adherence and outcomes but also psychological dimensions such as satisfaction with life (SWL). Identifying mediators of psychological outcomes of financial toxicity, including hopefulness and social support, is critical for informing interventions to mitigate financial toxicity burdens.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association of financial toxicity with hopefulness, social support, and SWL in patients with cancer, and to test the roles of hopefulness and social support in the association between financial toxicity and SWL.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis assessed baseline patient-reported financial toxicity from participants of the prospective, multisite Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer-II (ENRICh-II) study who enrolled from August 2020 to December 2022. Included patients were adults receiving ambulatory cancer care for various malignant neoplasm types diagnosed in the year prior from academic, community-based, and federally qualified health centers across 6 oncology clinics. Data were primarily analyzed between January and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Financial toxicity was assessed using the ENRICh instrument, which measures global financial toxicity burden and financial toxicity-related material, coping, and psychological distress burden subdomain scores.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The Satisfaction with Life Scale measured life satisfaction. Hypothesized mediators were measured using the State Hope Scale and Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. A bootstrapping approach to multiple mediation was applied, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 519 participants were surveyed (mean [SD] age, 52.0 [15.2] years; 349 female [67.2%]; 49 Black [9.4%], 137 Hispanic [26.4%], 278 White [53.6%]). The most common cancers included breast (202 [38.9%]); colon, rectum, and anal (111 [21.4%]); biliary, liver, pancreatic, and stomach (65 [12.5%]); and leukemia, lymphoma, and other hematologic malignant neoplasms (53 [10.2%]). Higher financial toxicity was significantly associated with lower SWL (r = -0.34, P < .001). Hopefulness and social support each partially mediated this association (social support, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01]; hope, -0.08, [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03]). The combined multiple mediation path was significant (-0.02 [95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01]). These associations also existed for the material, coping, and psychological distress financial toxicity domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this multisite, cross-sectional study, greater financial toxicity burden was associated with lower life satisfaction; individuals' hopefulness and perceived social support levels-representing dimensions of psychosocial resilience-sta","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2557328"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12878433/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57620
Pranav R Jani, Traci-Anne Goyen, Kiran Kumar Balegar, Rajesh Maheshwari, Maria Saito-Benz, Tim Schindler, James Moore, Manelle Merhi, Melinda Cruz, Yang Song, Hayley McDonagh, Melissa Luig, Mark Tracy, Daphne D'Cruz, Aldo Perdomo, Stephanie Morakeas, Vishnu Dasireddy, Mihaela Culcer, Vijay Shingde, Karen Bennington, Joanna Michalowski, Andreja Fucek, Jennifer Querim, Sean Stevens, James Santanelli, James Elhindi, Brian Gloss, Robert Halliday, Dharmesh Shah, Himanshu Popat
Importance: Preterm infants are at high risk of developing brain injury, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers the ability to measure cerebral oxygenation. The impact of using a standardized treatment guideline combined with a single NIRS device manufacturer (Nonin Medical Inc) and neonatal sensor on cerebral oxygenation has not been previously examined.
Objective: To investigate whether cerebral oximetry with a dedicated treatment guideline improves cerebral oxygenation stability.
Design, setting, and participants: This was a single-blinded, 2-arm randomized clinical trial conducted from October 2021 to July 2024 at 5 tertiary neonatal intensive care units across Australia, New Zealand, and the US. Infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation and aged younger than 6 hours underwent 1:1 random allocation stratified by gestational age (<26 weeks and ≥26 weeks) and study site.
Intervention: The intervention group received cerebral oximetry and dedicated guideline-based treatment when cerebral oxygenation was outside the range of 65% to 90%. The control group had blinded cerebral oximetry and treatment guided by standard clinical monitoring.
Main outcomes and measures: The burden of cerebral hypoxia and hyperoxia during the first 5 days after birth expressed as percentage hours was the primary outcome. Key secondary outcomes were mortality, morbidities before discharge, and NIRS-related skin injury.
Results: Of 149 screened infants (53 randomized to the intervention and 51 randomized to standard care), 100 infants were included in the final analysis (median [IQR] gestational age, 27 [25-28] weeks; 48 male [48.0%]). The median (IQR) birth weight was 883 (709-1079) g. The intervention group (50 infants) had a significantly lower median (IQR) burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia of 5.7% hours (2.8% hours to 15.0% hours) compared with 39.6% hours (6.5% hours to 82.3% hours) in the standard care group (50 infants), with an adjusted reduction of 42.8% hours (95% CI, 35.6% hours to 53.3% hours; P < .001). Mortality, morbidities before discharge, and safety outcomes were comparable between groups.
Conclusions and relevance: In this study, treatment guided by cerebral oximetry with a single device manufacturer and a neonatal sensor significantly improved the stability of cerebral oxygenation in extremely preterm infants. Larger multicenter trials are warranted to determine if this finding leads to improved survival without brain injury.
Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number ACTRN12621000778886.
{"title":"Cerebral Oximetry-Guided Treatment and Cerebral Oxygenation in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Pranav R Jani, Traci-Anne Goyen, Kiran Kumar Balegar, Rajesh Maheshwari, Maria Saito-Benz, Tim Schindler, James Moore, Manelle Merhi, Melinda Cruz, Yang Song, Hayley McDonagh, Melissa Luig, Mark Tracy, Daphne D'Cruz, Aldo Perdomo, Stephanie Morakeas, Vishnu Dasireddy, Mihaela Culcer, Vijay Shingde, Karen Bennington, Joanna Michalowski, Andreja Fucek, Jennifer Querim, Sean Stevens, James Santanelli, James Elhindi, Brian Gloss, Robert Halliday, Dharmesh Shah, Himanshu Popat","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57620","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Preterm infants are at high risk of developing brain injury, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers the ability to measure cerebral oxygenation. The impact of using a standardized treatment guideline combined with a single NIRS device manufacturer (Nonin Medical Inc) and neonatal sensor on cerebral oxygenation has not been previously examined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether cerebral oximetry with a dedicated treatment guideline improves cerebral oxygenation stability.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a single-blinded, 2-arm randomized clinical trial conducted from October 2021 to July 2024 at 5 tertiary neonatal intensive care units across Australia, New Zealand, and the US. Infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation and aged younger than 6 hours underwent 1:1 random allocation stratified by gestational age (<26 weeks and ≥26 weeks) and study site.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention group received cerebral oximetry and dedicated guideline-based treatment when cerebral oxygenation was outside the range of 65% to 90%. The control group had blinded cerebral oximetry and treatment guided by standard clinical monitoring.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The burden of cerebral hypoxia and hyperoxia during the first 5 days after birth expressed as percentage hours was the primary outcome. Key secondary outcomes were mortality, morbidities before discharge, and NIRS-related skin injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 149 screened infants (53 randomized to the intervention and 51 randomized to standard care), 100 infants were included in the final analysis (median [IQR] gestational age, 27 [25-28] weeks; 48 male [48.0%]). The median (IQR) birth weight was 883 (709-1079) g. The intervention group (50 infants) had a significantly lower median (IQR) burden of hypoxia and hyperoxia of 5.7% hours (2.8% hours to 15.0% hours) compared with 39.6% hours (6.5% hours to 82.3% hours) in the standard care group (50 infants), with an adjusted reduction of 42.8% hours (95% CI, 35.6% hours to 53.3% hours; P < .001). Mortality, morbidities before discharge, and safety outcomes were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, treatment guided by cerebral oximetry with a single device manufacturer and a neonatal sensor significantly improved the stability of cerebral oxygenation in extremely preterm infants. Larger multicenter trials are warranted to determine if this finding leads to improved survival without brain injury.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number ACTRN12621000778886.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2557620"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12878427/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58092
Catherine K Ettman, Andrew Anderson, Megan V Smith, David Radcliffe, Brian C Castrucci, Sandro Galea
{"title":"National Support for Wealth-Building for Children From Low-Income Households.","authors":"Catherine K Ettman, Andrew Anderson, Megan V Smith, David Radcliffe, Brian C Castrucci, Sandro Galea","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58092","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58092","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2558092"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12881980/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57922
Soo-Kyung Park, Dhruv Ahuja, Kuan-Hung Yeh, Sagar B Patel, Shane W Goodwin, Christopher Ma, Namrata Singh, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan, Vipul Jairath, Ronghui Xu, Siddharth Singh
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>With the availability of multiple classes of advanced therapies for the treatment of Crohn disease (CD), understanding the comparative safety of different therapies can inform treatment positioning.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of serious infections, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with different advanced therapies in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective comparative effectiveness research study was conducted between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 26.9 (2.4) months until July 1, 2024. Using an administrative claims database (OptumLabs Data Warehouse), commercially insured patients with CD, who initiated treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin agents (vedolizumab), interleukin (IL)-12/23p40 antagonists (ustekinumab), IL-23p19 antagonists (primarily risankizumab), or Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib) between 2016 and 2022 and had follow-up for at least 1 year before and after treatment initiation, were included.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>TNF antagonists vs anti-integrin agents (vedolizumab) vs IL-12/23p40 antagonists (ustekinumab) vs IL-23p19 antagonists (risankizumab) vs Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The risk of serious infections, VTE, and MACE was compared with various advanced therapies through multinomial propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighting, with propensity scores estimated through generalized boosted models, accounting for disease characteristics, health care utilization, comorbidities, and prior and concomitant medications, and through competing risk of mortality. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for multiple treatment comparisons were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 12 245 patients with CD (mean [SD] age, 46.5 [17.5] years; 6642 females [54.2%]), who were treated with TNF antagonists (n = 5274), vedolizumab (n = 2716), ustekinumab (n = 3544), risankizumab (n = 559), or upadacitinib (n = 152). Serious infection incidence rates ranged from 5.46 (95% CI, 4.86-6.07) to 9.02 (95% CI, 6.38-11.89) per 100 person-years across therapies. After adjusting for confounding variables, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of serious infections across different agents, including between risankizumab and ustekinumab (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.78-1.67]), risankizumab and TNF antagonists (HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68-1.47]), or ustekinumab and TNF antagonists (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.74-1.04]). The incidence of VTE (incidence rate, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.71-1.10] to 2.33 [95% CI, 1.06-3.82] per 100 person-years) and MACE (0.68 [95% CI, 0.51-0.85] to 1.49 [95% CI, 0.43-2.76] per 100 person-years) was low, without any significant differences across agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and re
{"title":"Comparative Safety of Advanced Therapies for Crohn Disease.","authors":"Soo-Kyung Park, Dhruv Ahuja, Kuan-Hung Yeh, Sagar B Patel, Shane W Goodwin, Christopher Ma, Namrata Singh, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan, Vipul Jairath, Ronghui Xu, Siddharth Singh","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57922","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>With the availability of multiple classes of advanced therapies for the treatment of Crohn disease (CD), understanding the comparative safety of different therapies can inform treatment positioning.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of serious infections, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with different advanced therapies in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective comparative effectiveness research study was conducted between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 26.9 (2.4) months until July 1, 2024. Using an administrative claims database (OptumLabs Data Warehouse), commercially insured patients with CD, who initiated treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin agents (vedolizumab), interleukin (IL)-12/23p40 antagonists (ustekinumab), IL-23p19 antagonists (primarily risankizumab), or Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib) between 2016 and 2022 and had follow-up for at least 1 year before and after treatment initiation, were included.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>TNF antagonists vs anti-integrin agents (vedolizumab) vs IL-12/23p40 antagonists (ustekinumab) vs IL-23p19 antagonists (risankizumab) vs Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The risk of serious infections, VTE, and MACE was compared with various advanced therapies through multinomial propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighting, with propensity scores estimated through generalized boosted models, accounting for disease characteristics, health care utilization, comorbidities, and prior and concomitant medications, and through competing risk of mortality. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for multiple treatment comparisons were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 12 245 patients with CD (mean [SD] age, 46.5 [17.5] years; 6642 females [54.2%]), who were treated with TNF antagonists (n = 5274), vedolizumab (n = 2716), ustekinumab (n = 3544), risankizumab (n = 559), or upadacitinib (n = 152). Serious infection incidence rates ranged from 5.46 (95% CI, 4.86-6.07) to 9.02 (95% CI, 6.38-11.89) per 100 person-years across therapies. After adjusting for confounding variables, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of serious infections across different agents, including between risankizumab and ustekinumab (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.78-1.67]), risankizumab and TNF antagonists (HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68-1.47]), or ustekinumab and TNF antagonists (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.74-1.04]). The incidence of VTE (incidence rate, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.71-1.10] to 2.33 [95% CI, 1.06-3.82] per 100 person-years) and MACE (0.68 [95% CI, 0.51-0.85] to 1.49 [95% CI, 0.43-2.76] per 100 person-years) was low, without any significant differences across agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and re","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2557922"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12881986/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58248
Yu Matsui, Jincong Q Freeman, Sarah Poland, Frederick M Howard, Nan Chen, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Dezheng Huo
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Active surveillance has emerged as a deescalation strategy for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to reduce overtreatment while maintaining favorable outcomes. Emerging data in low-risk DCIS, eg, the COMET trial, have highlighted growing interest in surveillance-based management for carefully selected patients. However, recent clinical adoption and national trends in managing low-risk, hormone receptor (HR)-positive DCIS have not been evaluated in the US.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine trends and sociodemographic variations in nonsurgical management and other treatment modalities for low-risk, HR-positive DCIS.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2022, and included patients aged 18 years or older with grade 1 to 2, HR-positive DCIS and at least 12 months of follow-up since initial diagnosis. Analyses were performed between January 10 and August 31, 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Year of diagnosis and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Nonsurgical management, lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy, unilateral mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy, and endocrine therapy were measured using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 590 female patients were included (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [12.0] years; 5.8% Asian or Pacific Islander, 13.9% Black, 6.1% Hispanic, 73.3% White, and 0.9% other race and ethnicity). From 2004 to 2022, nonsurgical management increased from 2.1% to 3.5%, bilateral mastectomy increased from 4.1% to 8.7%, and lumpectomy increased from 22.0% to 25.1%, while lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy decreased from 50.9% to 45.6% and unilateral mastectomy decreased from 20.9% to 17.1%. Nonsurgical management was more common among Black patients and patients with no insurance. Bilateral mastectomy was common in younger, White, and privately insured patients and those who lived in higher-income areas. Endocrine therapy use increased from 2004 to 2020 but declined thereafter. Endocrine therapy was highest after lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy (69.6%), followed by lumpectomy alone (43.9%), unilateral mastectomy (35.3%), and nonsurgical management (29.2%), with the lowest use in patients younger than 50 years in the no surgery (15.2%) and lumpectomy alone (38.6%) groups. Since 2018, radiotherapy use has increased and become progressively more risk adapted, with increasing use with higher Oncotype DX DCIS scores (low risk, 34.5%; intermediate risk, 63.9%; high risk, 73.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study highlights increasing trends and socioeconomic disparities in the nonsurgical management of and the need for precision-based, patient-centered care for low-risk DCIS. Precision prevention may enhance the ident
{"title":"Trends in Nonsurgical Management for Low-Risk, Hormone Receptor-Positive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.","authors":"Yu Matsui, Jincong Q Freeman, Sarah Poland, Frederick M Howard, Nan Chen, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Dezheng Huo","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58248","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58248","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Active surveillance has emerged as a deescalation strategy for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to reduce overtreatment while maintaining favorable outcomes. Emerging data in low-risk DCIS, eg, the COMET trial, have highlighted growing interest in surveillance-based management for carefully selected patients. However, recent clinical adoption and national trends in managing low-risk, hormone receptor (HR)-positive DCIS have not been evaluated in the US.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine trends and sociodemographic variations in nonsurgical management and other treatment modalities for low-risk, HR-positive DCIS.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2022, and included patients aged 18 years or older with grade 1 to 2, HR-positive DCIS and at least 12 months of follow-up since initial diagnosis. Analyses were performed between January 10 and August 31, 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Year of diagnosis and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Nonsurgical management, lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy, unilateral mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy, and endocrine therapy were measured using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 590 female patients were included (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [12.0] years; 5.8% Asian or Pacific Islander, 13.9% Black, 6.1% Hispanic, 73.3% White, and 0.9% other race and ethnicity). From 2004 to 2022, nonsurgical management increased from 2.1% to 3.5%, bilateral mastectomy increased from 4.1% to 8.7%, and lumpectomy increased from 22.0% to 25.1%, while lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy decreased from 50.9% to 45.6% and unilateral mastectomy decreased from 20.9% to 17.1%. Nonsurgical management was more common among Black patients and patients with no insurance. Bilateral mastectomy was common in younger, White, and privately insured patients and those who lived in higher-income areas. Endocrine therapy use increased from 2004 to 2020 but declined thereafter. Endocrine therapy was highest after lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy (69.6%), followed by lumpectomy alone (43.9%), unilateral mastectomy (35.3%), and nonsurgical management (29.2%), with the lowest use in patients younger than 50 years in the no surgery (15.2%) and lumpectomy alone (38.6%) groups. Since 2018, radiotherapy use has increased and become progressively more risk adapted, with increasing use with higher Oncotype DX DCIS scores (low risk, 34.5%; intermediate risk, 63.9%; high risk, 73.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study highlights increasing trends and socioeconomic disparities in the nonsurgical management of and the need for precision-based, patient-centered care for low-risk DCIS. Precision prevention may enhance the ident","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e2558248"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12892143/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146157007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}