首页 > 最新文献

JAMA dermatology最新文献

英文 中文
JAMA Dermatology.
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4012
{"title":"JAMA Dermatology.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":"160 12","pages":"1267"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Home- vs Office-Based Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy for Patients With Psoriasis: The LITE Randomized Clinical Trial. 针对银屑病患者的家庭与办公室窄带紫外线-B 光疗:LITE 随机临床试验。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3897
Joel M Gelfand, April W Armstrong, Henry W Lim, Steven R Feldman, Sandra M Johnson, W C Cole Claiborne, Robert E Kalb, Jeannette Jakus, Aaron R Mangold, R Hal Flowers, Tina Bhutani, John R Durkin, Jerry Bagel, Scott Fretzin, Michael P Sheehan, James Krell, Margo Reeder, Jessica Kaffenberger, Francisca Kartono, Junko Takeshita, Alisha M Bridges, Eric Fielding, Umbereen S Nehal, Kenneth L Schaecher, Leah M Howard, Guy S Eakin, Suzette Báez, Brooke E Bishop, Robert C Fitzsimmons, Maryte Papadopoulos, William B Song, Kristin A Linn, Rebecca A Hubbard, Daniel B Shin, Kristina Callis Duffin
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Office-based phototherapy is cost-effective for psoriasis but difficult to access. Home-based phototherapy is patient preferred but has limited clinical data, particularly in patients with darker skin.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of home- vs office-based narrowband UV-B phototherapy for psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Light Treatment Effectiveness study was an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority randomized clinical trial embedded in routine care at 42 academic and private clinical dermatology practices in the US. Enrollment occurred from March 1, 2019, to December 4, 2023, with follow-up through June 2024. Participants were 12 years and older with plaque or guttate psoriasis who were candidates for home- and office-based phototherapy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive a home narrowband UV-B machine with guided mode dosimetry or routine care with office-based narrowband UV-B for 12 weeks, followed by an additional 12-week observation period.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The coprimary effectiveness outcomes were Physician Global Assessment (PGA) dichotomized as clear/almost clear skin (score of ≤1) at the end of the intervention period and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 5 or lower (no to small effect on quality of life) at week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 783 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 48.0 [15.5] years; 376 [48.0%] female), 393 received home-based phototherapy and 390 received office-based phototherapy, with 350 (44.7%) having skin phototype (SPT) I/II, 350 (44.7%) having SPT III/IV, and 83 (10.6%) having SPT V/VI. A total of 93 patients (11.9%) were receiving systemic treatment. At baseline, mean (SD) PGA was 2.7 (0.8) and DLQI was 12.2 (7.2). At week 12, 129 patients (32.8%) receiving home-based phototherapy and 100 patients (25.6%) receiving office-based phototherapy achieved clear/almost clear skin, and 206 (52.4%) and 131 (33.6%) achieved DLQI of 5 or lower, respectively. Home-based phototherapy was noninferior to office-based phototherapy for PGA and DLQI in the overall population and across all SPTs. Home-based phototherapy, compared to office-based phototherapy, was associated with better treatment adherence (202 patients [51.4%] vs 62 patients [15.9%]; P < .001), lower burden of indirect costs to patients, and more episodes of persistent erythema (466 of 7957 treatments [5.9%] vs 46 of 3934 treatments [1.2%]; P < .001). Both treatments were well tolerated with no discontinuations due to adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, home-based phototherapy was as effective as office-based phototherapy for plaque or guttate psoriasis in everyday clinical practice and had less burden to patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration:
重要性:办公室光疗治疗银屑病具有成本效益,但很难获得。家庭光疗是患者的首选,但临床数据有限,尤其是对肤色较深的患者:比较家用窄带 UV-B 光疗与办公室光疗对银屑病的疗效:光疗有效性研究是一项由研究者发起的、务实的、开放标签、平行组、多中心、非劣效随机临床试验,在美国 42 家学术和私人临床皮肤科诊所的常规护理中进行。入组时间为 2019 年 3 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 4 日,随访至 2024 年 6 月。参与者年龄在12岁及以上,患有斑块状或凹陷型银屑病,适合接受家庭和诊室光疗:干预措施:参与者被随机分配接受带有引导模式剂量计的家用窄带紫外线-B 光疗机治疗,或接受为期 12 周的诊室窄带紫外线-B 光疗常规护理,然后再进行为期 12 周的观察:主要疗效结果:主要疗效结果为干预期结束时的医生总体评估(PGA)二分法,即皮肤清晰/基本清晰(评分≤1),以及第12周时皮肤科生活质量指数(DLQI)评分为5分或更低(对生活质量无影响或影响较小):在 783 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 48.0 [15.5] 岁;376 [48.0%] 为女性)中,393 人接受了家庭光疗,390 人接受了办公室光疗,其中 350 人(44.7%)为皮肤光型 (SPT) I/II,350 人(44.7%)为 SPT III/IV,83 人(10.6%)为 SPT V/VI。共有 93 名患者(11.9%)正在接受系统治疗。基线时,平均(标清)PGA 为 2.7(0.8),DLQI 为 12.2(7.2)。第 12 周时,接受家庭光疗的 129 名患者(32.8%)和接受诊室光疗的 100 名患者(25.6%)的皮肤达到透明/基本透明,DLQI 为 5 或更低的患者分别有 206 名(52.4%)和 131 名(33.6%)。在总体人群和所有 SPTs 中,家用光疗在 PGA 和 DLQI 方面均不劣于诊室光疗。与诊室光疗相比,家庭光疗的治疗依从性更好(202 名患者 [51.4%] vs 62 名患者 [15.9%];P 结论及意义:在这项随机临床试验中,在日常临床实践中,家庭光疗与诊室光疗对斑块状或凹陷型银屑病同样有效,而且对患者造成的负担更小:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03726489。
{"title":"Home- vs Office-Based Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy for Patients With Psoriasis: The LITE Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Joel M Gelfand, April W Armstrong, Henry W Lim, Steven R Feldman, Sandra M Johnson, W C Cole Claiborne, Robert E Kalb, Jeannette Jakus, Aaron R Mangold, R Hal Flowers, Tina Bhutani, John R Durkin, Jerry Bagel, Scott Fretzin, Michael P Sheehan, James Krell, Margo Reeder, Jessica Kaffenberger, Francisca Kartono, Junko Takeshita, Alisha M Bridges, Eric Fielding, Umbereen S Nehal, Kenneth L Schaecher, Leah M Howard, Guy S Eakin, Suzette Báez, Brooke E Bishop, Robert C Fitzsimmons, Maryte Papadopoulos, William B Song, Kristin A Linn, Rebecca A Hubbard, Daniel B Shin, Kristina Callis Duffin","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3897","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3897","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Office-based phototherapy is cost-effective for psoriasis but difficult to access. Home-based phototherapy is patient preferred but has limited clinical data, particularly in patients with darker skin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To compare the effectiveness of home- vs office-based narrowband UV-B phototherapy for psoriasis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;The Light Treatment Effectiveness study was an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority randomized clinical trial embedded in routine care at 42 academic and private clinical dermatology practices in the US. Enrollment occurred from March 1, 2019, to December 4, 2023, with follow-up through June 2024. Participants were 12 years and older with plaque or guttate psoriasis who were candidates for home- and office-based phototherapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Participants were randomized to receive a home narrowband UV-B machine with guided mode dosimetry or routine care with office-based narrowband UV-B for 12 weeks, followed by an additional 12-week observation period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The coprimary effectiveness outcomes were Physician Global Assessment (PGA) dichotomized as clear/almost clear skin (score of ≤1) at the end of the intervention period and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 5 or lower (no to small effect on quality of life) at week 12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 783 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 48.0 [15.5] years; 376 [48.0%] female), 393 received home-based phototherapy and 390 received office-based phototherapy, with 350 (44.7%) having skin phototype (SPT) I/II, 350 (44.7%) having SPT III/IV, and 83 (10.6%) having SPT V/VI. A total of 93 patients (11.9%) were receiving systemic treatment. At baseline, mean (SD) PGA was 2.7 (0.8) and DLQI was 12.2 (7.2). At week 12, 129 patients (32.8%) receiving home-based phototherapy and 100 patients (25.6%) receiving office-based phototherapy achieved clear/almost clear skin, and 206 (52.4%) and 131 (33.6%) achieved DLQI of 5 or lower, respectively. Home-based phototherapy was noninferior to office-based phototherapy for PGA and DLQI in the overall population and across all SPTs. Home-based phototherapy, compared to office-based phototherapy, was associated with better treatment adherence (202 patients [51.4%] vs 62 patients [15.9%]; P &lt; .001), lower burden of indirect costs to patients, and more episodes of persistent erythema (466 of 7957 treatments [5.9%] vs 46 of 3934 treatments [1.2%]; P &lt; .001). Both treatments were well tolerated with no discontinuations due to adverse events.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this randomized clinical trial, home-based phototherapy was as effective as office-based phototherapy for plaque or guttate psoriasis in everyday clinical practice and had less burden to patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Trial registration:","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1320-1328"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425190/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142346994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Upadacitinib in Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Through 76 Weeks. 乌达帕替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎青少年:对 3 项为期 76 周的 3 期随机临床试验的分析。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3696
Amy S Paller, Pedro Mendes-Bastos, Elaine Siegfried, Lawrence F Eichenfield, Weily Soong, Vimal H Prajapati, Peter Lio, Eric L Simpson, Eliza M Raymundo, Smitha Suravaram, Xiaofei Hu, Yang Yang, Xiaohong Huang, Brian M Calimlim, Andrew M Platt, John C Su, Min Zheng, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Henrique D Teixeira, Alan D Irvine
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up studies demonstrated the efficacy and adverse events of upadacitinib through 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD); however, longer-term outcomes (longer than 1 year) in adolescents have not previously been available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of upadacitinib in adolescent patients with moderate to severe AD through 76 weeks.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up trials are ongoing double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trials including adolescents (aged 12 to 17 years) with moderate to severe AD. Data were collected from August 2018 to April 2022, and data were analyzed from June 2022 to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Adolescents were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily oral upadacitinib, 15 mg; upadacitinib, 30 mg; or placebo, either alone (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 trials) or with topical corticosteroids (AD Up). At week 16, placebo-treated patients were rerandomized to receive upadacitinib, 15 mg, or upadacitinib, 30 mg, daily.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Coprimary end points assessing efficacy included achievement of 75% reduction or more in the Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI-75) from baseline, Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with 2 grades or more of improvement, and Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) improvement of 4 points or greater through week 76 for participants with a WP-NRS score of 4 points or higher at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From all studies, 542 adolescents were included; of these, 284 (52.4%) were female. At week 76, among patients in the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up trials, EASI-75 was achieved by 89.1%, 84.4%, and 87.8% of adolescents taking upadacitinib, 15 mg, respectively, and by 96.1%, 93.6%, and 82.7% of adolescents taking upadacitinib, 30 mg, indicating maintenance or improvement of EASI-75 across 76 weeks with upadacitinib. Efficacy measured by achievement of vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1 and WP-NRS improvement of 4 points or more from baseline was similarly maintained or improved through week 76 for adolescents taking upadacitinib, 15 mg or 30 mg. Long-term outcomes in Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up participants were consistent with the known adverse event profile of upadacitinib (herpetic infection: 4.0, 1.9, and 1.1 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; creatine kinase elevation: 11.6, 11.0, and 7.1 events per 100 patient-years); no new signals were observed with either dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study assessing 3 randomized clinical trials, long-term treatment of adolescents with moderate to severe AD with upadacitinib demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profi
重要性:Measure Up 1、Measure Up 2和AD Up研究证明了高达替尼对成人和青少年特应性皮炎(AD)患者52周的疗效和不良反应;然而,此前尚未获得青少年的长期疗效(超过1年):目的:评估高达替尼对中重度特应性皮炎青少年患者76周的疗效和不良反应:Measure Up 1、Measure Up 2和AD Up试验是正在进行的双盲、安慰剂对照3期随机临床试验,包括中度至重度AD青少年(12至17岁)。数据收集时间为2018年8月至2022年4月,数据分析时间为2022年6月至2023年9月:青少年按1:1:1的比例随机接受每日一次的口服达帕替尼(15毫克)、达帕替尼(30毫克)或安慰剂,可单独使用(Measure Up 1和Measure Up 2试验)或与局部皮质类固醇一起使用(AD Up)。第16周时,安慰剂治疗患者被重新随机分配到每天接受15毫克或30毫克的达帕西替尼治疗:评估疗效的主要终点包括:湿疹面积和严重程度指数评分(EASI-75)比基线降低75%或以上;特应性皮炎研究者全球评估(vIGA-AD)评分为 "无"(0)或 "基本无"(1),且有2级或以上的改善;基线时WP-NRS评分为4分或以上的参与者,第76周时最严重瘙痒数字评定量表(WP-NRS)评分改善4分或以上:所有研究共纳入了 542 名青少年,其中 284 名(52.4%)为女性。第76周时,在Measure Up 1、Measure Up 2和AD Up试验的患者中,服用15毫克达帕替尼的青少年中分别有89.1%、84.4%和87.8%达到了EASI-75,服用30毫克达帕替尼的青少年中分别有96.1%、93.6%和82.7%达到了EASI-75,这表明服用达帕替尼76周后EASI-75得到了维持或改善。服用达帕替尼(15 毫克或 30 毫克)的青少年在第 76 周时,vIGA-AD 评分达到 0 分或 1 分,WP-NRS 从基线提高 4 分或更多,以此衡量疗效,也同样得到了维持或改善。Measure Up 1、Measure Up 2 和 AD Up 参与者的长期结果与已知的奥达帕替尼不良反应情况一致(疱疹病毒感染:每 100 患者年分别有 4.0、1.9 和 1.1 例;肌酸激酶升高:结论和相关性:在这项评估3项随机临床试验的研究中,奥达帕替尼对中重度AD青少年的长期治疗显示出良好的获益-风险特征,疗效反应可持续76周:Measure Up 1 试验:试验注册:Measure Up 1 试验:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03569293; Measure Up 2试验:NCT03607422; AD Up试验:NCT03568318。
{"title":"Upadacitinib in Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Through 76 Weeks.","authors":"Amy S Paller, Pedro Mendes-Bastos, Elaine Siegfried, Lawrence F Eichenfield, Weily Soong, Vimal H Prajapati, Peter Lio, Eric L Simpson, Eliza M Raymundo, Smitha Suravaram, Xiaofei Hu, Yang Yang, Xiaohong Huang, Brian M Calimlim, Andrew M Platt, John C Su, Min Zheng, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Henrique D Teixeira, Alan D Irvine","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3696","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3696","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up studies demonstrated the efficacy and adverse events of upadacitinib through 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD); however, longer-term outcomes (longer than 1 year) in adolescents have not previously been available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of upadacitinib in adolescent patients with moderate to severe AD through 76 weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up trials are ongoing double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trials including adolescents (aged 12 to 17 years) with moderate to severe AD. Data were collected from August 2018 to April 2022, and data were analyzed from June 2022 to September 2023.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Adolescents were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily oral upadacitinib, 15 mg; upadacitinib, 30 mg; or placebo, either alone (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 trials) or with topical corticosteroids (AD Up). At week 16, placebo-treated patients were rerandomized to receive upadacitinib, 15 mg, or upadacitinib, 30 mg, daily.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Coprimary end points assessing efficacy included achievement of 75% reduction or more in the Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI-75) from baseline, Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with 2 grades or more of improvement, and Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) improvement of 4 points or greater through week 76 for participants with a WP-NRS score of 4 points or higher at baseline.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;From all studies, 542 adolescents were included; of these, 284 (52.4%) were female. At week 76, among patients in the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up trials, EASI-75 was achieved by 89.1%, 84.4%, and 87.8% of adolescents taking upadacitinib, 15 mg, respectively, and by 96.1%, 93.6%, and 82.7% of adolescents taking upadacitinib, 30 mg, indicating maintenance or improvement of EASI-75 across 76 weeks with upadacitinib. Efficacy measured by achievement of vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1 and WP-NRS improvement of 4 points or more from baseline was similarly maintained or improved through week 76 for adolescents taking upadacitinib, 15 mg or 30 mg. Long-term outcomes in Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up participants were consistent with the known adverse event profile of upadacitinib (herpetic infection: 4.0, 1.9, and 1.1 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; creatine kinase elevation: 11.6, 11.0, and 7.1 events per 100 patient-years); no new signals were observed with either dose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this study assessing 3 randomized clinical trials, long-term treatment of adolescents with moderate to severe AD with upadacitinib demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profi","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1304-1313"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581505/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 as a Risk Factor For Autoimmune Skin Disease. 作为自身免疫性皮肤病风险因素的 COVID-19
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4222
Lisa M Arkin, John S Barbieri, Edward W Cowen
{"title":"COVID-19 as a Risk Factor For Autoimmune Skin Disease.","authors":"Lisa M Arkin, John S Barbieri, Edward W Cowen","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4222","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4222","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1269-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Delphi Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Necrobiotic Xanthogranuloma. 坏死性黄疽瘤德尔菲共识诊断标准的验证。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3198
Fatima Bassir, Kailyn Valido, Kaitlin R Maciejewski, William Damsky, Caroline A Nelson
{"title":"Validation of the Delphi Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Necrobiotic Xanthogranuloma.","authors":"Fatima Bassir, Kailyn Valido, Kaitlin R Maciejewski, William Damsky, Caroline A Nelson","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3198","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3198","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1361-1362"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447626/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seborrheic Dermatitis. 脂溢性皮炎。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1074
Tejesh S Patel, Yoseph Dalia
{"title":"Seborrheic Dermatitis.","authors":"Tejesh S Patel, Yoseph Dalia","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1074","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1371"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142390632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Clinical Information on Melanocytic Skin Lesion Pathology Diagnosis: A Scoping Review. 临床信息对黑色素细胞皮肤病变病理诊断的影响:范围综述。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4281
Belinda Lai, H Peter Soyer, Lin Zhu, Peter M Ferguson, Blake O'Brien, Tristan Dodds, Richard A Scolyer, Gerardo Ferrara, Giuseppe Argenziano, Katy J L Bell

Importance: There is poor accuracy and reproducibility for the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions, and the provision of clinical information may improve this.

Objective: To examine the impact of clinical information on the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions.

Evidence review: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for new records published from January 2018 to January 2024. References included in the 2018 Cancer Council Australia evidence review were also screened, and forward and backward citation searches were conducted.

Findings: From 2224 records screened, 162 full-text studies were assessed, and 7 studies were included. Studies included pathologists from Austria, Germany, the US, Italy, the UK, and Australia. Patient populations had a mean age of 43 to 55 years and a proportion of female participants of 23% to 63%. The risk of bias assessment demonstrated that all studies had domains at unclear or high risk of bias. Clinical images increased diagnostic certainty (3 studies) and agreement between pathologists (2 studies) led to diagnostic upgrades in 7.6% to 16.7% of interpretations. Clinical diagnosis on the pathology requisition form reduced the odds of missing a melanoma with progression (1 study), while more clinical elements on the form correlated with higher re-excision rates (1 study). Among patients with distant metastases on long-term follow-up, a prior consensus diagnosis of melanoma was established on histopathology alone.

Conclusions and relevance: Providing clinical information to pathologists may improve diagnostic confidence and interobserver agreement and result in upgrading of the histopathologic diagnosis. While providing the clinical diagnosis may prevent missing a progressive melanoma, more research is needed to determine the appropriateness of histopathology upgrading when clinical images are provided and the impacts on patient outcomes.

重要性:黑色素细胞皮肤病变组织病理学诊断的准确性和可重复性较差,提供临床信息可改善这一状况:研究临床信息对黑色素细胞皮肤病变组织病理学诊断的影响:在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中检索了2018年1月至2024年1月期间发表的新记录。同时还筛选了2018年澳大利亚癌症委员会证据综述中的参考文献,并进行了正向和反向引文检索:从筛选出的 2224 条记录中,评估了 162 项全文研究,并纳入了 7 项研究。研究对象包括来自奥地利、德国、美国、意大利、英国和澳大利亚的病理学家。患者的平均年龄为 43 至 55 岁,女性参与者的比例为 23% 至 63%。偏倚风险评估显示,所有研究的偏倚风险领域均不明确或较高。临床图像增加了诊断的确定性(3 项研究),病理学家之间的一致意见(2 项研究)导致 7.6% 至 16.7% 的诊断升级。病理申请单上的临床诊断降低了遗漏进展期黑色素瘤的几率(1 项研究),而病理申请单上的临床要素越多,再次切除率越高(1 项研究)。在长期随访的远处转移患者中,仅凭组织病理学就能确定黑色素瘤的事先共识诊断:向病理学家提供临床信息可提高诊断的可信度和观察者之间的一致性,从而提高组织病理学诊断的水平。虽然提供临床诊断可避免漏诊进展期黑色素瘤,但仍需开展更多研究,以确定在提供临床图像时组织病理学诊断升级是否合适,以及对患者预后的影响。
{"title":"Impact of Clinical Information on Melanocytic Skin Lesion Pathology Diagnosis: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Belinda Lai, H Peter Soyer, Lin Zhu, Peter M Ferguson, Blake O'Brien, Tristan Dodds, Richard A Scolyer, Gerardo Ferrara, Giuseppe Argenziano, Katy J L Bell","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4281","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4281","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is poor accuracy and reproducibility for the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions, and the provision of clinical information may improve this.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of clinical information on the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for new records published from January 2018 to January 2024. References included in the 2018 Cancer Council Australia evidence review were also screened, and forward and backward citation searches were conducted.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From 2224 records screened, 162 full-text studies were assessed, and 7 studies were included. Studies included pathologists from Austria, Germany, the US, Italy, the UK, and Australia. Patient populations had a mean age of 43 to 55 years and a proportion of female participants of 23% to 63%. The risk of bias assessment demonstrated that all studies had domains at unclear or high risk of bias. Clinical images increased diagnostic certainty (3 studies) and agreement between pathologists (2 studies) led to diagnostic upgrades in 7.6% to 16.7% of interpretations. Clinical diagnosis on the pathology requisition form reduced the odds of missing a melanoma with progression (1 study), while more clinical elements on the form correlated with higher re-excision rates (1 study). Among patients with distant metastases on long-term follow-up, a prior consensus diagnosis of melanoma was established on histopathology alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Providing clinical information to pathologists may improve diagnostic confidence and interobserver agreement and result in upgrading of the histopathologic diagnosis. While providing the clinical diagnosis may prevent missing a progressive melanoma, more research is needed to determine the appropriateness of histopathology upgrading when clinical images are provided and the impacts on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1345-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Penile Persistent Yellow Plaques With Recurrent Ulcerations. 阴茎持续性黄色斑块伴有复发性溃疡。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4183
Laura Parra-Navarro, Ramon M Pujol, Gemma Martín-Ezquerra
{"title":"Penile Persistent Yellow Plaques With Recurrent Ulcerations.","authors":"Laura Parra-Navarro, Ramon M Pujol, Gemma Martín-Ezquerra","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4183","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4183","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1359-1360"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Prurigo Nodularis: The OLYMPIA 1 Randomized Clinical Phase 3 Trial. 奈莫利单抗对中重度结节性瘙痒症患者的疗效与安全性:OLYMPIA 1 随机临床 3 期试验》。
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4796
Sonja Ständer, Gil Yosipovitch, Franz J Legat, Adam Reich, Carle Paul, Dagmar Simon, Luigi Naldi, Martin Metz, Athanasios Tsianakas, Andrew Pink, Simon Fage, Giuseppe Micali, Elke Weisshaar, Hema Sundaram, Andrei Metelitsa, Matthias Augustin, Andreas Wollenberg, Bernhard Homey, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Howard Sofen, Neil J Korman, Lone Skov, Xiaoxiao Chen, Zarif K Jabbar-Lopez, Christophe Piketty, Shawn G Kwatra

Importance: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic and debilitating skin condition, characterized by intense itch with multiple nodular lesions. Nemolizumab demonstrated significant improvements in itch and skin nodules in adults with moderate to severe PN in a previous 16-week phase 3 study (OLYMPIA 2).

Objective: To assess the efficacy and occurrence of adverse events in adults with moderate to severe PN treated with nemolizumab vs those receiving placebo.

Design, setting, and participants: OLYMPIA 1 was a multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial, conducted from August 2020 to March 2023 at 77 centers across 10 countries in adults with moderate to severe PN (at least 20 nodules and an Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3) and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score of at least 7.0; consisted of screening (up to 4 weeks), 24-week treatment, and 8-week follow-up periods.

Interventions: Patients were randomized (2:1) to nemolizumab monotherapy, 30 mg or 60 mg (depending on baseline weight of less than 90 kg vs 90 kg or greater, respectively), or matching placebo administered every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end points were the proportion of patients with itch response (≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average PP-NRS) and IGA success (score of 0/1 [clear/almost clear] and 2-grade or more improvement from baseline) at week 16.

Results: Of 286 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [13.0] years; mean [SD] body weight, 85.0 [20.7] kg; 166 [58.0%] female), 190 were randomized to receive nemolizumab, and 96 were randomized to placebo. A significantly greater proportion of patients assigned to nemolizumab vs placebo achieved itch response (111/190 [58.4%] vs 16/96 [16.7%]; Δ, 40.1% [95% CI, 29.4%-50.8%]; P < .001) and IGA success (50/190 [26.3%] vs 7/96 [7.3%]; Δ, 14.6% [95% CI, 6.7%-22.6%]; P = .003) at week 16. At week 24, the proportion of patients with itch response was 58.3% vs 20.4% (Δ, 38.7% [95% CI, 27.5%-49.9%]) in the ad hoc analysis, and IGA success was 58/190 (30.5%) vs 9/96 (9.4%) (Δ, 19.2% [95% CI, 10.3%-28.1%]) in the nemolizumab-treated vs placebo group. During the treatment period, 134 patients (71.7%) receiving nemolizumab vs 62 patients (65.3%) receiving placebo had at least 1 adverse event; most events were of mild to moderate severity.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, nemolizumab monotherapy led to clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in core signs and symptoms of PN.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04501666.

重要意义结节性瘙痒症(PN)是一种使人衰弱的慢性皮肤病,其特点是剧烈瘙痒并伴有多发性结节性皮损。在之前一项为期 16 周的 3 期研究(OLYMPIA 2)中,奈莫利单抗对中重度 PN 成人患者的瘙痒和皮肤结节有显著改善:目的:评估接受奈莫珠单抗治疗的中重度PN成人患者与接受安慰剂治疗的成人患者的疗效和不良反应发生情况:OLYMPIA 1是一项多中心、安慰剂对照、3期随机临床试验,于2020年8月至2023年3月在10个国家的77个中心进行,对象为中重度PN(至少20个结节且研究者总体评估[IGA]评分≥3分)且瘙痒峰值数字评定量表(PP-NRS)评分至少为7.0分的成人患者;包括筛选期(最长4周)、24周治疗期和8周随访期:患者随机(2:1)接受奈莫珠单抗单药治疗,30毫克或60毫克(分别取决于基线体重小于90千克和大于90千克),或匹配安慰剂,每4周给药一次,持续24周:主要终点是第16周时出现瘙痒反应(每周平均PP-NRS比基线改善≥4分)和IGA成功(评分为0/1[无瘙痒/基本无瘙痒]且比基线改善2级或以上)的患者比例:在286名患者中(平均[标码]年龄为57.5[13.0]岁;平均[标码]体重为85.0[20.7]千克;女性166人[58.0%]),190人被随机分配接受奈莫单抗治疗,96人被随机分配接受安慰剂治疗。与安慰剂相比,接受尼莫利珠单抗治疗的患者获得瘙痒反应的比例明显更高(111/190 [58.4%] vs 16/96 [16.7%];Δ,40.1% [95% CI,29.4%-50.8%];P 结论和意义:在这项随机临床试验中,尼妥珠单抗单药治疗对PN核心体征和症状的改善具有临床意义和统计学意义:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04501666。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Prurigo Nodularis: The OLYMPIA 1 Randomized Clinical Phase 3 Trial.","authors":"Sonja Ständer, Gil Yosipovitch, Franz J Legat, Adam Reich, Carle Paul, Dagmar Simon, Luigi Naldi, Martin Metz, Athanasios Tsianakas, Andrew Pink, Simon Fage, Giuseppe Micali, Elke Weisshaar, Hema Sundaram, Andrei Metelitsa, Matthias Augustin, Andreas Wollenberg, Bernhard Homey, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Howard Sofen, Neil J Korman, Lone Skov, Xiaoxiao Chen, Zarif K Jabbar-Lopez, Christophe Piketty, Shawn G Kwatra","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4796","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic and debilitating skin condition, characterized by intense itch with multiple nodular lesions. Nemolizumab demonstrated significant improvements in itch and skin nodules in adults with moderate to severe PN in a previous 16-week phase 3 study (OLYMPIA 2).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and occurrence of adverse events in adults with moderate to severe PN treated with nemolizumab vs those receiving placebo.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>OLYMPIA 1 was a multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial, conducted from August 2020 to March 2023 at 77 centers across 10 countries in adults with moderate to severe PN (at least 20 nodules and an Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3) and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score of at least 7.0; consisted of screening (up to 4 weeks), 24-week treatment, and 8-week follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized (2:1) to nemolizumab monotherapy, 30 mg or 60 mg (depending on baseline weight of less than 90 kg vs 90 kg or greater, respectively), or matching placebo administered every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end points were the proportion of patients with itch response (≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average PP-NRS) and IGA success (score of 0/1 [clear/almost clear] and 2-grade or more improvement from baseline) at week 16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 286 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [13.0] years; mean [SD] body weight, 85.0 [20.7] kg; 166 [58.0%] female), 190 were randomized to receive nemolizumab, and 96 were randomized to placebo. A significantly greater proportion of patients assigned to nemolizumab vs placebo achieved itch response (111/190 [58.4%] vs 16/96 [16.7%]; Δ, 40.1% [95% CI, 29.4%-50.8%]; P < .001) and IGA success (50/190 [26.3%] vs 7/96 [7.3%]; Δ, 14.6% [95% CI, 6.7%-22.6%]; P = .003) at week 16. At week 24, the proportion of patients with itch response was 58.3% vs 20.4% (Δ, 38.7% [95% CI, 27.5%-49.9%]) in the ad hoc analysis, and IGA success was 58/190 (30.5%) vs 9/96 (9.4%) (Δ, 19.2% [95% CI, 10.3%-28.1%]) in the nemolizumab-treated vs placebo group. During the treatment period, 134 patients (71.7%) receiving nemolizumab vs 62 patients (65.3%) receiving placebo had at least 1 adverse event; most events were of mild to moderate severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, nemolizumab monotherapy led to clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in core signs and symptoms of PN.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04501666.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142728817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Salt and Atopic Dermatitis. 盐与特应性皮炎
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4917
Yi-Cheng Lin, Chia-Hao Hsu
{"title":"Salt and Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"Yi-Cheng Lin, Chia-Hao Hsu","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4917","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142675856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA dermatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1