Journal of Addiction Medicine最新文献

Objectives: Alcohol consumption affects sleep both in healthy populations and in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, sleep has typically not been considered within AUD pharmacotherapy trials. We used data from a completed gabapentin clinical treatment trial to explore the medication's effect on patient-rated insomnia measured by a standard insomnia rating (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]) and whether this influenced gabapentin's effects on alcohol consumption.

Methods: This study included 90 individuals with current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition AUD criteria reporting current or past alcohol withdrawal. Participants were assigned to placebo or gabapentin (up to 1200 mg/day) for a 16-week randomized controlled trial with percent heavy drinking days (PHDD) and percent abstinent days (PDA) as outcomes. Utilizing mixed-effects models, this study assessed medication effects on ISI over the trial. We then examined the interaction of baseline ISI and medication on drinking. Finally, given our previous finding of alcohol withdrawal influencing gabapentin efficacy, we added change in ISI as a potential "moderator" of the interaction of medication effects and alcohol withdrawal on drinking.

Results: Sleep (ISI) improved more in those treated with gabapentin (60.6% reduction) compared with placebo (37.8% reduction; P = 0.013). Higher baseline ISI predicted drinking in gabapentin-treated individuals (lower PHDD [ P = 0.026] and higher (PDA [ P = 0.047]). ISI was an independent predictor of PHDD decrease and PDA increase ( P < 0.001; P = 0.002), but this did not significantly moderate gabapentin's effectiveness.

Conclusions: Although gabapentin positively impacts both alcohol use and sleep, its effect on drinking is not fully dependent on sleep improvement, implying a direct biological mechanism on alcohol use.

Objectives: The persistence of the opioid crisis and the proliferation of synthetic fentanyl have heightened the demand for the implementation of novel delivery mechanisms of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of opioid use disorder, including injectable extended-release buprenorphine (buprenorphine-ER). The purpose of this study was to understand provider-level barriers to prescribing buprenorphine in order to facilitate targeted strategies to improve implementation for patients who would benefit from this novel formulation.

Methods: Using an interview template adapted from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted structured focus group interviews with 20 providers in an outpatient addiction clinic across 4 sessions to assess providers' perceptions of buprenorphine-ER. Ninety-four unique comments were identified and deductively coded using standardized CFIR constructs.

Results: Providers expressed mixed receptivity and confidence in using buprenorphine-ER. Although providers could identify a number of theoretical advantages to the injectable formulation over sublingual buprenorphine, many expressed reservations about using it due to inexperience, negative patient experiences, uncertainties about patient candidacy, cost, and logistical constraints.

Conclusions: Provider concerns about buprenorphine-ER may limit utilization. Some concerns may be mitigated through improved education, research, and logistical support. Given the putative benefits of buprenorphine-ER, future research should target barriers to implementation, in part based on hypotheses generated by these findings.

Abstract: Substance use disorder (SUD) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with limited treatments. There is interest in expanding the use of GLP-1 agonists in treating SUD. However, evidence for safety and efficacy in humans is limited. This review aims to bridge the existing knowledge gap by establishing a baseline of literature in this area to inform future trials and clinical practice. Our inclusion criteria were English peer-reviewed manuscripts reporting on use of GLP-1, GIP, and/or glucagon receptor agonists in treatment of SUDs, excluding case studies. The literature search was performed in accordance to PRISMA guidelines. Five studies were included in this review examining the use of this medication in tobacco use disorder, alcohol use disorder, and cocaine use disorder. No studies regarding substance withdrawal syndrome were identified. The included studies varied widely in terms of patient selection, dose/formulation of GLP-1 agonists, and follow-up. The results of this scoping review are mixed, with 3 studies demonstrating positive results and 2 studies finding no efficacy of this medication on SUD outcomes. It is premature to prescribe this medication off-label to patients. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of GLP-1 agonists in treating SUD.

Objectives: Current guidelines for methadone titration may unnecessarily delay reaching effective doses for patients using fentanyl, resulting in an increased risk of ongoing fentanyl use, dissatisfaction with treatment, and early dropout. Development and evaluation of rapid methadone induction protocols may improve treatment for patients using fentanyl.

Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients admitted in 2022 to a single licensed opioid treatment program (OTP) where a rapid induction protocol provides methadone 40 mg on day 1, 60 mg on day 2, and 80 mg on day 3 to patients using fentanyl <65 years old without significant medical comorbidities. The primary feasibility outcome was completion of the protocol, defined by receipt of methadone dose 80 mg or more on treatment day 7. The primary safety outcomes were oversedation, nonfatal overdose, and death. A secondary outcome was retention in treatment at 30 days.

Results: Rapid induction was ordered for 93 patients and completed by 65 (70%). Average dose on day 7 for patients who completed was 89 mg (SD 9.5 mg) versus 49 mg (SD 14.0 mg) for those who did not. No episodes of oversedation, nonfatal overdose, or death were observed. At 30 days, 85% of the patients who had the rapid protocol ordered (79/93) were retained, with 88% (57/65) who completed the protocol retained versus 79% (22/28) who did not complete (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.6-6.2).

Conclusions: Rapid induction to methadone 80 mg by day 7 was feasible for outpatients using fentanyl in this study at a single OTP. No significant safety events were identified.

Abstract: Not all patients respond to effective and approved treatment interventions, and there has been growing recognition in the medical field of these "resistant" or refractory illnesses (eg, treatment-resistant depression, resistant hypertension). In the field of substance use disorders, there has not been an explicit acknowledgement of treatment-refractory addiction (TRA) despite substantial evidence that many patients do not respond to standard-of-care treatment interventions. This article provides a justification for TRA as a critically important condition to recognize and define. TRA is not conceptualized as a diagnosis, but as a signal that a current treatment approach has not worked. The article addresses areas in need of research and consensus in order to ensure the approach to TRA is uniform, thoughtfully addressed, and data-driven. By explicitly acknowledging TRA, clinicians, researchers, and patients and their families can begin to explore the unique features of this population and find ways in which substance use disorders for persons with TRA can be more effectively addressed, which in turn will help to expand remission for persons who suffer from these devastating conditions.

Background: The clinical implications of high potency synthetic opioids (HPSO) on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) are not well understood. Although pharmacological interactions are plausible, the clinical significance of such interaction has not been systematically elucidated. This scoping review investigates the relationship between HPSO exposure and various MOUD treatment outcomes.

Methods: We followed PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) for scoping reviews with extensive a priori search strategy of databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane.

Results: From 9149 studies, 34 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Synthesized data reveal several critical insights: First, there is a variable but high occurrence (38%-80%) of HPSO usage among individuals with MOUDs. Second, MOUDs are linked to a decreased risk of overdoses and deaths associated with HPSO. Third, HPSO consumption is correlated with the risk of precipitated withdrawal when starting buprenorphine. Fourth, low-dose buprenorphine is being recognized as one method to avoid moderate withdrawal symptoms prior to treatment. Lastly, significant gaps exist in human experimental data concerning the effects of HPSO on key factors critical for treating OUD-craving, withdrawal symptoms, and pain.

Conclusions: Current evidence supports MOUD safety and effectiveness in reducing nonmedical opioid use. Further research is needed to explore HPSO's influence on the acute factors preceding nonmedical opioid use, such as cravings, withdrawal symptoms, and pain. This research could inform the optimization of MOUD dosing strategies. Achieving consensus and harmonizing data across clinical and research protocols could diminish variability, enhancing our understanding of HPSOs effect on MOUD treatment outcomes.

Objectives: In 2021, opioid-related deaths have increased by 96% and continue to be higher than prepandemic levels. In particular, women and gender-diverse individuals face numerous challenges when assessing harm reduction supports, including physical supervised consumption sites, compared with male counterparts. Mobile overdose response services (MORSs) including overdose response hotlines and phone-based overdose response applications are novel virtual overdose response technologies that may help mitigate this issue. This study aims to explore how women and gender-diverse individuals engage with and perceive these services.

Methods: A qualitative study using grounded theory was conducted. Using existing peer networks and purposive and snowball sampling between March and July 2023, 19 semistructured interviews were conducted with women and gender-diverse individuals in Canada who have lived experience using substances. NVivo was used for thematic analysis, which continued until saturation was reached.

Results: The interviews elucidated the following 5 themes: Overdose response hotlines and applications were generally preferred over supervised consumption sites due to (1) perceived gender-based safety; (2) better accommodation for mothers concerned with stigma, childcare, and child welfare systems; and (3) eased accessibility for those involved in sex work. It was also noted that (4) judgment-free spaces and trauma-informed care provided by staff with lived experiences were invaluable, and (5) decriminalization of illicit substances will encourage uptake of these harm reduction services.

Conclusion: This study found that women and gender-diverse individuals felt positively toward overdose response hotlines and applications with the potential to fill a need in providing harm reduction services that create feelings of safety, support roles of motherhood and sex work, and generate nonstigmatizing spaces.

Objectives: There has been limited evidence synthesis examining treatment of ketamine use disorder. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions in the management of ketamine use disorder.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from database inception to November 14, 2023, for studies of any design that reported on any pharmacological intervention in the management of ketamine use disorder. We extracted any reported measure of efficacy or tolerability and assessed outcome quality using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework. We planned to combine outcomes using random-effects meta-analysis, where this was not possible results were reported narratively.

Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria reporting on 368 participants. These comprised 1 controlled trial, 2 retrospective case series, and 9 case reports. Two studies reported on ketamine intoxication, 6 on withdrawal, and 4 on craving/relapse prevention. All studies reported only descriptive outcomes, and all evidence was of very low quality. Benzodiazepine regimens and haloperidol were reported to have potential utility in intoxication and withdrawal, whereas naltrexone, lamotrigine, and a combination of paliperidone palmitate and bupropion were reported to have potential utility in craving/relapse prevention.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of research into pharmacological management of ketamine use disorder. The limited very low-quality evidence suggests benzodiazepine regimens may be most salient for future exploration in management of ketamine intoxication and withdrawal, whereas case reports suggest naltrexone, lamotrigine, and paliperidone palmitate plus bupropion may potentially merit further investigation with regard to craving/relapse prevention.

Abstract: This case report highlights a 36-year-old male without history of psychiatric disease, chronic pain, or substance use disorder who developed severe substance use disorder per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Fifth Edition criteria to kratom. He was successfully treated with sublingual buprenorphine after a 3-year period of intermittent withdrawal management and trials of oral and extended-release injectable naltrexone. After a period of abstinence from kratom, he was tapered from buprenorphine using 2 monthly injections of 100 mg extended-release buprenorphine. His case underscores some of the current uncertainties around kratom use disorder diagnosis and treatment.

Objective: Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) remains the first-line therapy for people with opioid use disorder. Whereas overdose rates among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) remain high, little is known about their access to OAT. Therefore, we sought to evaluate factors that shape access to OAT among AYAs aged 14 to 26 years.

Methods: Data were derived from the At-Risk Youth Study, a prospective cohort study that involves street-involved AYAs who use illicit substances in Vancouver, Canada. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with OAT enrollment from September 2005 to October 2021.

Results: A total of 759 AYAs reported at least weekly opioid or OAT use, with a median age of 23 years and 65.7% self-identifying as male. At baseline, 147 participants (19.4%) were on OAT, and another 199 (26.2%) initiated OAT during study follow-up (median number of follow-up visits, 5 [Q1-Q3, 2.5-8]). In a multivariable analysis, being <19 years old (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.71), Indigenous ancestry (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00), homelessness (AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77), drug dealing (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.87), daily opioid use (AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.55), and nonfatal overdose (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) were negatively associated with OAT use.

Conclusions: This study identified a low rate of OAT access among AYAs. Adolescents and young adults were less likely to be on OAT if they were <19 years old, Indigenous, and possessed certain risk markers. These findings highlight the need for mitigation strategies to facilitate OAT access for this population and for additional harm reduction measures to support AYAs who do not want to use OAT.