Background: Bipolar disorder requires immediate and frequent daily symptom monitoring due to its extreme mood fluctuations. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) technology uses high-frequency data collection to achieve ecologically valid capture of patient symptoms. Investigating EMA compliance among Chinese patients with bipolar disorder and its influencing factors is essential for developing more feasible daily symptom monitoring protocols.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the 14-day compliance rate of EMA among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder and to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with that compliance.
Methods: A total of 100 adults (63 female individuals) with bipolar disorder across mood states (depressive episode, n=29, 29%; hypomanic or manic episode, n=17, 17%; euthymic state, n=54, 54%) completed self-monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program "Xunkang Assessment System" 3 times daily for 14 days. The compliance rate was calculated as the percentage of completed questionnaires out of the total required over 2 weeks. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with the compliance rate.
Results: The median compliance rate was 75% (IQR 35.7%-90.4%). Compliance did not differ significantly across mood states (P=.15). In multivariable models, higher Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale scores and lower Functioning Assessment Short Test scores were independently associated with better compliance (Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale: B=0.11; P=.03 and Functioning Assessment Short Test: B=-0.06; P=.01).
Conclusions: Two-week EMA monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program is feasible among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder across mood states. Manic symptom severity and functional impairment were associated with EMA adherence and should be considered in study design and interpretation.
{"title":"Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Influencing Ecological Momentary Assessment Compliance in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: Observational Study.","authors":"Linru Yin, Minghui Li, Jinhao Li, Xiaofei Hou, Jianan Song, Xinyan Li, Yue Tong, Xinyue Zhou, Lidan Yuan, Huifang Yin, Guangming Xu","doi":"10.2196/74223","DOIUrl":"10.2196/74223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorder requires immediate and frequent daily symptom monitoring due to its extreme mood fluctuations. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) technology uses high-frequency data collection to achieve ecologically valid capture of patient symptoms. Investigating EMA compliance among Chinese patients with bipolar disorder and its influencing factors is essential for developing more feasible daily symptom monitoring protocols.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the 14-day compliance rate of EMA among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder and to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with that compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 adults (63 female individuals) with bipolar disorder across mood states (depressive episode, n=29, 29%; hypomanic or manic episode, n=17, 17%; euthymic state, n=54, 54%) completed self-monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program \"Xunkang Assessment System\" 3 times daily for 14 days. The compliance rate was calculated as the percentage of completed questionnaires out of the total required over 2 weeks. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with the compliance rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median compliance rate was 75% (IQR 35.7%-90.4%). Compliance did not differ significantly across mood states (P=.15). In multivariable models, higher Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale scores and lower Functioning Assessment Short Test scores were independently associated with better compliance (Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale: B=0.11; P=.03 and Functioning Assessment Short Test: B=-0.06; P=.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-week EMA monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program is feasible among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder across mood states. Manic symptom severity and functional impairment were associated with EMA adherence and should be considered in study design and interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e74223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12824568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anton Elepaño, Carol Stephanie Tan-Lim, Clare Bankhead, Leonila Dans, Noleen Marie Fabian, Josephine Sanchez, Antonio Dans, Catherine Pope
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complimentary subscriptions to UpToDate, a decision support tool, were provided to community health workers (CHWs) in rural and remote primary care sites as part of a government-funded health system research program. A feasibility evaluation conducted after the first year of implementation showed that UpToDate was acceptable among CHWs despite infrastructural barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This follow-up study evaluated the longitudinal adoption of UpToDate among CHWs and examined how sociocultural, political, and environmental factors influenced its use. Drawing on the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework, this study aimed to understand not only use patterns but also broader challenges to scale-up, spread, and sustainability in a complex health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory mixed methods design was used combining analysis of use and program activity logs; program reports; and focus groups with CHWs, health care professionals, and program implementers. Quantitative analysis of use logs (March 2021 to September 2023) compared adoption over time by using descriptive statistics, CIs, and chi-square tests. Qualitative data came from the reanalysis of previous focus group transcripts and program reports and from a new focus group with program implementers. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret how CHWs and implementers perceived and used the tool, and findings were integrated to explain quantitative trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of UpToDate was modest and declined over time. Monthly active use among CHWs and midwives fell substantially from 3.57% (97/2720 person-months) in 2021 to 1.07% (37/3456) in 2022 and remained low at 1.50% (39/2592) up to 2023, with markedly higher engagement in the rural site than in the remote site. Peaks in use coincided with program activities, whereas prolonged troughs followed typhoons, power outages, and other disruptions. Log data showed that users primarily consulted patient education articles rather than clinician-oriented decision tools. Qualitative analyses revealed that CHWs appropriated UpToDate as a learning aid and source of professional credibility. Structural shocks, heavy workloads, language barriers, and limited device access constrained individual use, and communal practices (shared devices and learning activities) meant that meaningful engagement often went unrecorded in vendor metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that acceptability does not guarantee sustained use and that adoption cannot be captured fully by log-in counts. UpToDate's value for CHWs lay in how it was domesticated as a tool for building capacity and professional credibility, not in its intended function as a decision aid used at the point of care. Therefore, evaluations of digital health tools should incorporate indicators of learning and social capital alongside use metrics. Policyma
{"title":"Adoption of an Electronic Decision Support Tool for Capacity Building of Community Health Workers: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Anton Elepaño, Carol Stephanie Tan-Lim, Clare Bankhead, Leonila Dans, Noleen Marie Fabian, Josephine Sanchez, Antonio Dans, Catherine Pope","doi":"10.2196/69874","DOIUrl":"10.2196/69874","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complimentary subscriptions to UpToDate, a decision support tool, were provided to community health workers (CHWs) in rural and remote primary care sites as part of a government-funded health system research program. A feasibility evaluation conducted after the first year of implementation showed that UpToDate was acceptable among CHWs despite infrastructural barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This follow-up study evaluated the longitudinal adoption of UpToDate among CHWs and examined how sociocultural, political, and environmental factors influenced its use. Drawing on the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework, this study aimed to understand not only use patterns but also broader challenges to scale-up, spread, and sustainability in a complex health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory mixed methods design was used combining analysis of use and program activity logs; program reports; and focus groups with CHWs, health care professionals, and program implementers. Quantitative analysis of use logs (March 2021 to September 2023) compared adoption over time by using descriptive statistics, CIs, and chi-square tests. Qualitative data came from the reanalysis of previous focus group transcripts and program reports and from a new focus group with program implementers. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret how CHWs and implementers perceived and used the tool, and findings were integrated to explain quantitative trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of UpToDate was modest and declined over time. Monthly active use among CHWs and midwives fell substantially from 3.57% (97/2720 person-months) in 2021 to 1.07% (37/3456) in 2022 and remained low at 1.50% (39/2592) up to 2023, with markedly higher engagement in the rural site than in the remote site. Peaks in use coincided with program activities, whereas prolonged troughs followed typhoons, power outages, and other disruptions. Log data showed that users primarily consulted patient education articles rather than clinician-oriented decision tools. Qualitative analyses revealed that CHWs appropriated UpToDate as a learning aid and source of professional credibility. Structural shocks, heavy workloads, language barriers, and limited device access constrained individual use, and communal practices (shared devices and learning activities) meant that meaningful engagement often went unrecorded in vendor metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that acceptability does not guarantee sustained use and that adoption cannot be captured fully by log-in counts. UpToDate's value for CHWs lay in how it was domesticated as a tool for building capacity and professional credibility, not in its intended function as a decision aid used at the point of care. Therefore, evaluations of digital health tools should incorporate indicators of learning and social capital alongside use metrics. Policyma","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e69874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12824572/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital vaccination campaigns are increasingly used to address declining vaccine confidence, yet evidence from large-scale, real-world interventions in middle-income countries is limited. Meta's Brand Lift Studies (BLS), which use randomized test-control exposure, provide Bayesian estimates of attitudinal shifts resulting from digital content. Mexico, with over 88.6 million active internet users, provides a setting to evaluate the impact of targeted campaigns on vaccine attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of 5 digital vaccination campaigns implemented by the Asociación Mexicana de Vacunología (@Vacunologia) on Facebook (Meta Platforms Inc) and Instagram (Meta Platforms Inc) in Mexico between 2021 and 2022 on key attitudinal constructs related to COVID-19 vaccine confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a retrospective ecological design. We analyzed aggregated BLS results for 5 campaigns targeting different audiences and vaccination themes. Measured outcomes included standard ad recall, perceived importance, perceived safety, perceived efficacy, and concerns about side effects. Statistical significance within the BLS framework was defined as an incremental lift of ≥2 percentage points with ≥90% posterior probability of replication-a threshold consistent with Meta's operational Bayesian approach. Exploratory comparisons across campaigns were conducted using 1-way ANOVA, unpaired 2-tailed t tests, and Fisher exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Campaigns reached 84.9 million accounts and generated 179.4 million impressions with a total investment of US $215,600. All campaigns produced statistically significant improvements in at least one attitudinal outcome (Bayesian threshold ≥90%). Standard ad recall increased in 4 campaigns (ANOVA, P<.001), and concerns about side effects decreased in 2 campaigns (t test, P=.049; P=.006). Perceived safety, importance, and efficacy improved in selected audiences, with stronger effects observed among younger users and women (ANOVA, P=.005). No direct behavioral outcomes (eg, vaccination uptake) were measured; therefore, the findings reflect attitudinal rather than behavioral change. However, these constructs are recognized as proximal predictors of vaccine decision-making and constitute health-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large-scale digital vaccination campaigns can meaningfully strengthen attitudinal determinants of vaccine confidence in a middle-income context. These social media advertising campaigns effectively increased standard ad recall and improved perceptions of vaccine importance and safety, particularly among younger audiences and women in urban areas. However, changes in efficacy perceptions and concerns about side effects were limited. The innovation and implications of this study lie in evaluating large-scale, real-world digital vaccine campaigns in Latin America using experim
背景:数字疫苗接种运动越来越多地用于解决疫苗信心下降的问题,但来自中等收入国家大规模实际干预措施的证据有限。Meta的品牌提升研究(BLS)使用随机测试控制曝光,提供了由数字内容引起的态度转变的贝叶斯估计。墨西哥拥有8 860多万活跃互联网用户,为评估有针对性的运动对疫苗态度的影响提供了一个环境。目的:本研究评估了2021年至2022年期间墨西哥Asociación Mexicana de Vacunología (@Vacunologia)在Facebook (Meta平台公司)和Instagram (Meta平台公司)上实施的5次数字疫苗接种活动对与COVID-19疫苗信心相关的关键态度结构的影响。方法:本研究采用回顾性生态学设计。我们分析了针对不同受众和疫苗接种主题的5个活动的汇总BLS结果。测量结果包括标准广告召回、感知重要性、感知安全性、感知有效性和对副作用的关注。BLS框架内的统计显著性定义为≥2个百分点的增量提升,且复制的后验概率≥90%,这是与Meta的操作贝叶斯方法一致的阈值。采用单因素方差分析、非配对双尾t检验和Fisher精确检验对各活动进行探索性比较。结果:活动覆盖了8490万个账户,产生了1.794亿次印象,总投资为21.56万美元。所有活动至少在一个态度结果(贝叶斯阈值≥90%)上产生统计学上显著的改善。结论:在中等收入背景下,大规模数字疫苗接种活动可以有意地加强疫苗信心的态度决定因素。这些社交媒体广告活动有效地提高了标准广告的召回率,并改善了对疫苗重要性和安全性的认识,特别是在城市地区的年轻受众和妇女中。然而,疗效认知的变化和对副作用的关注是有限的。这项研究的创新之处在于利用实验性的劳工统计局数据评估拉丁美洲大规模、真实世界的数字疫苗运动。研究结果强调,受众细分会产生更强的感知转变,这表明量身定制的数字战略可以补充传统的公共卫生传播。虽然劳工统计局没有测量行为终点,但观察到的态度改善代表了影响疫苗相关行为的基本步骤。未来的工作应将数字态度指标与疫苗接种和流行病学数据联系起来,以评估现实世界的健康影响。
{"title":"Digital Health Communication and Vaccine Confidence in Mexico Using Aggregated Randomized Brand Lift Studies: Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Berenice Muñoz Cordero, Rodrigo Romero Feregrino, Raul Romero Feregrino, Raúl Romero Cabello, Valeria Magali Rocha Rocha, Roberto Martinez-Medina, Liliana Aline Fernández Urrutia","doi":"10.2196/82889","DOIUrl":"10.2196/82889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital vaccination campaigns are increasingly used to address declining vaccine confidence, yet evidence from large-scale, real-world interventions in middle-income countries is limited. Meta's Brand Lift Studies (BLS), which use randomized test-control exposure, provide Bayesian estimates of attitudinal shifts resulting from digital content. Mexico, with over 88.6 million active internet users, provides a setting to evaluate the impact of targeted campaigns on vaccine attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of 5 digital vaccination campaigns implemented by the Asociación Mexicana de Vacunología (@Vacunologia) on Facebook (Meta Platforms Inc) and Instagram (Meta Platforms Inc) in Mexico between 2021 and 2022 on key attitudinal constructs related to COVID-19 vaccine confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a retrospective ecological design. We analyzed aggregated BLS results for 5 campaigns targeting different audiences and vaccination themes. Measured outcomes included standard ad recall, perceived importance, perceived safety, perceived efficacy, and concerns about side effects. Statistical significance within the BLS framework was defined as an incremental lift of ≥2 percentage points with ≥90% posterior probability of replication-a threshold consistent with Meta's operational Bayesian approach. Exploratory comparisons across campaigns were conducted using 1-way ANOVA, unpaired 2-tailed t tests, and Fisher exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Campaigns reached 84.9 million accounts and generated 179.4 million impressions with a total investment of US $215,600. All campaigns produced statistically significant improvements in at least one attitudinal outcome (Bayesian threshold ≥90%). Standard ad recall increased in 4 campaigns (ANOVA, P<.001), and concerns about side effects decreased in 2 campaigns (t test, P=.049; P=.006). Perceived safety, importance, and efficacy improved in selected audiences, with stronger effects observed among younger users and women (ANOVA, P=.005). No direct behavioral outcomes (eg, vaccination uptake) were measured; therefore, the findings reflect attitudinal rather than behavioral change. However, these constructs are recognized as proximal predictors of vaccine decision-making and constitute health-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large-scale digital vaccination campaigns can meaningfully strengthen attitudinal determinants of vaccine confidence in a middle-income context. These social media advertising campaigns effectively increased standard ad recall and improved perceptions of vaccine importance and safety, particularly among younger audiences and women in urban areas. However, changes in efficacy perceptions and concerns about side effects were limited. The innovation and implications of this study lie in evaluating large-scale, real-world digital vaccine campaigns in Latin America using experim","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e82889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12776657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Terrinieka Powell, Bianca D Smith, Naya Moser, Olivia Kachingwe, Quiana Lewis Wallace, Asari Offiong, Andrea Hwang, Emily Davie, Ashleigh LoVette
Background: Although sexual exploration is normative during adolescence, sexual activities that are unprotected and occur under the influence of substances can pose significant risks to young people. Youth exposed to adversity are among the groups most vulnerable to sexual risk-taking in adolescence. Selective interventions that consider lived experiences and the local context may help reduce sexual risk-taking among this population.
Objective: This pilot study assessed the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention as well as participant engagement with an adapted version of Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together for Black youth exposed to household challenges.
Methods: Participants were recruited using school and community presentations, digital flyers, and referrals. A total of 121 youth from 3 sites in Baltimore, Maryland, were screened. Participants completed 3 assessments: baseline, posttest, and 3-month follow-up. Participant enrollment, session attendance, and assessment completion were used to determine feasibility and engagement. Sexual health knowledge, pregnancy intentions, partner communication, and sexual behaviors were explored as secondary outcomes.
Results: Funded by the National Institutes of Health, the data for this study were collected between January 2022 and April 2023. A total of 61 youth (aged 13-16 years) were recruited and randomized to either the intervention or the control condition (n=33 and n=28, respectively). In total, 87% (53/61) of the participants completed all 3 assessments. There was high engagement: 80% (48/61) of participants attended at least 3 sessions, and 75.2% (115/153) of after-session responses revealed they would recommend a session to a friend. Among the 18 participants who reported having any sex, all 18 (100%) abstained from alcohol use and 12 (67%) abstained from drug use before sex. The intervention group showed a significant increase in sexual health knowledge. No changes in sexual health behaviors or partner communication were observed.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that recruiting, retaining, and engaging participants in the adapted Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together intervention is feasible. Additional research is needed to determine the extent to which this intervention can mitigate sexual risk-taking among youth exposed to adversity. The findings will inform the redesign of our assessments to capture additional factors that may affect sexual health behaviors.
{"title":"Adapting a Sexual Health Intervention for Adolescents Exposed to Adversity: Feasibility Study.","authors":"Terrinieka Powell, Bianca D Smith, Naya Moser, Olivia Kachingwe, Quiana Lewis Wallace, Asari Offiong, Andrea Hwang, Emily Davie, Ashleigh LoVette","doi":"10.2196/72782","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although sexual exploration is normative during adolescence, sexual activities that are unprotected and occur under the influence of substances can pose significant risks to young people. Youth exposed to adversity are among the groups most vulnerable to sexual risk-taking in adolescence. Selective interventions that consider lived experiences and the local context may help reduce sexual risk-taking among this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study assessed the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention as well as participant engagement with an adapted version of Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together for Black youth exposed to household challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited using school and community presentations, digital flyers, and referrals. A total of 121 youth from 3 sites in Baltimore, Maryland, were screened. Participants completed 3 assessments: baseline, posttest, and 3-month follow-up. Participant enrollment, session attendance, and assessment completion were used to determine feasibility and engagement. Sexual health knowledge, pregnancy intentions, partner communication, and sexual behaviors were explored as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Funded by the National Institutes of Health, the data for this study were collected between January 2022 and April 2023. A total of 61 youth (aged 13-16 years) were recruited and randomized to either the intervention or the control condition (n=33 and n=28, respectively). In total, 87% (53/61) of the participants completed all 3 assessments. There was high engagement: 80% (48/61) of participants attended at least 3 sessions, and 75.2% (115/153) of after-session responses revealed they would recommend a session to a friend. Among the 18 participants who reported having any sex, all 18 (100%) abstained from alcohol use and 12 (67%) abstained from drug use before sex. The intervention group showed a significant increase in sexual health knowledge. No changes in sexual health behaviors or partner communication were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that recruiting, retaining, and engaging participants in the adapted Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together intervention is feasible. Additional research is needed to determine the extent to which this intervention can mitigate sexual risk-taking among youth exposed to adversity. The findings will inform the redesign of our assessments to capture additional factors that may affect sexual health behaviors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05033821; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05033821.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e72782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12817038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145905987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katrina Go Yamazaki, Lucy Hewitt, Luis Torres, Kharla Colon-Vazquez, Peyton Rogers, Grace Wang
Background: Biomedical research studies are increasingly using digital tools to enroll, recruit, and collect data from participants. However, variability in digital literacy and technological acceptance can be challenging for recruitment from groups traditionally underrepresented in research, including those served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.
Objective: This study aimed to (1) measure participant accessibility and comfort with digital platforms and (2) examine the interrelation of technology access, digital literacy, and support preferences during enrollment and data submission.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using enrollment data from Federally Qualified Health Centers participating in the All of Us Research Program. Participants had the option of High-Touch (staff-assisted) or Low-Touch (self-directed) support for enrollment and survey completion. Survey items assessed internet access and technology comfort, while support type was recorded by the research staff based on participants' actual selection. Logistic regression models evaluated relationships between technology access, comfort, and enacted support type, while controlling for age, consent language, and education, as well as race and ethnicity.
Results: The analytic sample included 605 participants. The majority reported access to the internet (539/605, 89.1%) and felt comfortable with technology (448/605, 74.1%). In the group requesting High-Touch support (n=346), 14.5% (n=50) reported no internet access, and 31.5% (n=109) felt uncomfortable with technology. In the group requesting Low-Touch support (n=259), 6.2% (n=16) had no access to the internet, and 3.9% (n=10) reported feeling uncomfortable (P<.001). In the adjusted models, much greater comfort with technology was significantly correlated with reduced odds of requesting High-Touch support (comfortable: adjusted odds ratio 0.118, 95% CI 0.055-0.255 and neutral: adjusted odds ratio 0.212, 95% CI 0.077-0.587), but internet access was not significantly correlated.
Conclusions: The strongest predictor for support preference for digital enrollment among the participants was their comfort with technology rather than access alone. These findings illustrate the significance of participant-centric design methods coupling adaptive support paths, mixed enrollment strategies, and individualized onboarding methods aligned with digital confidence to promote equitable engagement in precision health research.
{"title":"Technology Access, Digital Literacy, and Enrollment Support Preferences in a Federally Qualified Health Center: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Katrina Go Yamazaki, Lucy Hewitt, Luis Torres, Kharla Colon-Vazquez, Peyton Rogers, Grace Wang","doi":"10.2196/78850","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78850","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomedical research studies are increasingly using digital tools to enroll, recruit, and collect data from participants. However, variability in digital literacy and technological acceptance can be challenging for recruitment from groups traditionally underrepresented in research, including those served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) measure participant accessibility and comfort with digital platforms and (2) examine the interrelation of technology access, digital literacy, and support preferences during enrollment and data submission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using enrollment data from Federally Qualified Health Centers participating in the All of Us Research Program. Participants had the option of High-Touch (staff-assisted) or Low-Touch (self-directed) support for enrollment and survey completion. Survey items assessed internet access and technology comfort, while support type was recorded by the research staff based on participants' actual selection. Logistic regression models evaluated relationships between technology access, comfort, and enacted support type, while controlling for age, consent language, and education, as well as race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 605 participants. The majority reported access to the internet (539/605, 89.1%) and felt comfortable with technology (448/605, 74.1%). In the group requesting High-Touch support (n=346), 14.5% (n=50) reported no internet access, and 31.5% (n=109) felt uncomfortable with technology. In the group requesting Low-Touch support (n=259), 6.2% (n=16) had no access to the internet, and 3.9% (n=10) reported feeling uncomfortable (P<.001). In the adjusted models, much greater comfort with technology was significantly correlated with reduced odds of requesting High-Touch support (comfortable: adjusted odds ratio 0.118, 95% CI 0.055-0.255 and neutral: adjusted odds ratio 0.212, 95% CI 0.077-0.587), but internet access was not significantly correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strongest predictor for support preference for digital enrollment among the participants was their comfort with technology rather than access alone. These findings illustrate the significance of participant-centric design methods coupling adaptive support paths, mixed enrollment strategies, and individualized onboarding methods aligned with digital confidence to promote equitable engagement in precision health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e78850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145906070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study demonstrates that GPT-4o outperforms traditional natural language processing methods in accurately analyzing patient sentiment toward atopic dermatitis treatments on Reddit, enabling more nuanced and reliable extraction of real-world patient perspectives from large-scale social media data.
{"title":"Identifying Patient Sentiment in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment: Large Language Model Approach.","authors":"Jack Alexander Cummins, JiaDe Yu","doi":"10.2196/78054","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study demonstrates that GPT-4o outperforms traditional natural language processing methods in accurately analyzing patient sentiment toward atopic dermatitis treatments on Reddit, enabling more nuanced and reliable extraction of real-world patient perspectives from large-scale social media data.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e78054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zi Yang, Xiaojuan Wang, Jianlin Wang, Qi Guang, Xueqian Ding, Hao Liu, Yunpeng Xu, Jing Zhao, Ming Bai
Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading global cause of mortality, yet traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation shows subjective variability and limited sensitivity to complex pathologies.
Objective: This study aims to address these challenges by proposing the Cardiovascular Multimodal Prediction Network (CaMPNet), a transformer-based multimodal architecture that integrates raw 12-lead ECG waveforms, 9-structured machine-measured ECG features, and demographic data (age and sex) through cross-attention fusion.
Methods: The model was trained on 384,877 records from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV - Electrocardiogram Matched Subset database and evaluated across 12 cardiovascular disease labels. To further assess temporal robustness, a temporal external validation was performed using the most recent 10% of the data, withheld chronologically from model development.
Results: On the internal test set, the model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.845 (SD 0.04) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.489, outperforming the residual networks-ECG baseline (AUC=0.848 but F1-score=0.152) and all single-modality variants. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across demographics (male AUC= 0.846 vs female=0.843; youngest quartile 0.884 vs oldest 0.811). CaMPNet retained moderate discriminative ability in temporal external validation with a mean AUC of 0.715 (SD 0.03) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.298, although performance declined due to temporal distribution shifts. Despite this, major disease categories, such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and normal rhythm, maintained high AUCs (>0.84). Attention-based visualization revealed clinically interpretable patterns (eg, ST-segment elevations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and ablation experiments verified the model's tolerance to missing structured inputs.
Conclusions: CaMPNet demonstrates robust and interpretable multimodal ECG-based diagnosis, offering a scalable framework for comorbidity screening and continual learning under real-world temporal dynamics.
{"title":"Multimodal Transformer-Based Electrocardiogram Analysis for Cardiovascular Comorbidity Detection: Model Development and Validation Study.","authors":"Zi Yang, Xiaojuan Wang, Jianlin Wang, Qi Guang, Xueqian Ding, Hao Liu, Yunpeng Xu, Jing Zhao, Ming Bai","doi":"10.2196/80815","DOIUrl":"10.2196/80815","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading global cause of mortality, yet traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation shows subjective variability and limited sensitivity to complex pathologies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to address these challenges by proposing the Cardiovascular Multimodal Prediction Network (CaMPNet), a transformer-based multimodal architecture that integrates raw 12-lead ECG waveforms, 9-structured machine-measured ECG features, and demographic data (age and sex) through cross-attention fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model was trained on 384,877 records from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV - Electrocardiogram Matched Subset database and evaluated across 12 cardiovascular disease labels. To further assess temporal robustness, a temporal external validation was performed using the most recent 10% of the data, withheld chronologically from model development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the internal test set, the model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.845 (SD 0.04) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.489, outperforming the residual networks-ECG baseline (AUC=0.848 but F1-score=0.152) and all single-modality variants. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across demographics (male AUC= 0.846 vs female=0.843; youngest quartile 0.884 vs oldest 0.811). CaMPNet retained moderate discriminative ability in temporal external validation with a mean AUC of 0.715 (SD 0.03) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.298, although performance declined due to temporal distribution shifts. Despite this, major disease categories, such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and normal rhythm, maintained high AUCs (>0.84). Attention-based visualization revealed clinically interpretable patterns (eg, ST-segment elevations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and ablation experiments verified the model's tolerance to missing structured inputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CaMPNet demonstrates robust and interpretable multimodal ECG-based diagnosis, offering a scalable framework for comorbidity screening and continual learning under real-world temporal dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e80815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tianmai M Zhang, Sydney P Sharp, John D Scott, Douglas Taren, Jane C Samaniego, Elizabeth R Unger, Jeanne Bertolli, Jin-Mann S Lin, Christian B Ramers, Job G Godino
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long COVID encompasses a range of health problems that can be highly debilitating. While some research has relied on self-reported measures of symptoms and functioning, few studies have characterized symptoms in relation to behaviors and physiology measured objectively through wearable devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to identify longitudinal patterns in physical activity, physiology, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with long COVID at a Federally Qualified Health Center in the United States. The secondary aim was to identify meaningful subgroups or phenotypes within this cohort and examine how PROs and symptoms overlay with physical activity characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study recruiting a subset of low-income patients enrolled in the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program. From March 2022 to May 2023, a total of 172 patients with long COVID or myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome were given Fitbit Charge 5 (Fitbit Inc) devices and instructed to wear them continuously for up to a year. Patients completed PRO questionnaires (PROMIS-29 [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29] and symptom questionnaires, etc) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Inclusion in longitudinal analysis required at least 20 hours of valid wear data per day for a minimum of 7 days. The World Health Organization guideline on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was used to differentiate MPVA-active and MVPA-inactive patients. Linear mixed effects regression was performed to assess longitudinal associations between physical activity levels and PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 172 patients, 80.2% (n=138) were female, 75.6% (n=130) were White, 45.3% (n=78) were unemployed, and 94.8% (n=163) had estimated annual income below US $50,000. Of these patients, 82 (47.7%) met valid wear criteria, providing 50.5 days of Fitbit data on average. At baseline, MVPA-inactive patients (n=41) reported statistically more severe problems regarding physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea than MVPA-active patients (n=41) on both continuous and categorical scales, with P<.05 from both Student t tests (2-tailed) and chi-squared tests. Longitudinal analysis found that MVPA-inactive patients showed a decreased ability to participate in social roles (estimated group difference=-4.21 T-score points over 3 months, 95% CI -6.64 to -1.78, P<.001) and a higher intensity of sleep symptoms (estimated group difference=2.06 severity score points over 3 months, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.71, P=.02) over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that patients with long COVID could remain MVPA-active despite experiencing symptoms. These findings provide insights into the relationship between PROs, physical activity, and long COVID, which suggests the importance of considering
{"title":"Characterization of Post-Viral Infection Behaviors Among Patients With Long COVID: Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Analyses of Fitbit Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Tianmai M Zhang, Sydney P Sharp, John D Scott, Douglas Taren, Jane C Samaniego, Elizabeth R Unger, Jeanne Bertolli, Jin-Mann S Lin, Christian B Ramers, Job G Godino","doi":"10.2196/77644","DOIUrl":"10.2196/77644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long COVID encompasses a range of health problems that can be highly debilitating. While some research has relied on self-reported measures of symptoms and functioning, few studies have characterized symptoms in relation to behaviors and physiology measured objectively through wearable devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to identify longitudinal patterns in physical activity, physiology, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with long COVID at a Federally Qualified Health Center in the United States. The secondary aim was to identify meaningful subgroups or phenotypes within this cohort and examine how PROs and symptoms overlay with physical activity characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study recruiting a subset of low-income patients enrolled in the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program. From March 2022 to May 2023, a total of 172 patients with long COVID or myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome were given Fitbit Charge 5 (Fitbit Inc) devices and instructed to wear them continuously for up to a year. Patients completed PRO questionnaires (PROMIS-29 [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29] and symptom questionnaires, etc) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Inclusion in longitudinal analysis required at least 20 hours of valid wear data per day for a minimum of 7 days. The World Health Organization guideline on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was used to differentiate MPVA-active and MVPA-inactive patients. Linear mixed effects regression was performed to assess longitudinal associations between physical activity levels and PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 172 patients, 80.2% (n=138) were female, 75.6% (n=130) were White, 45.3% (n=78) were unemployed, and 94.8% (n=163) had estimated annual income below US $50,000. Of these patients, 82 (47.7%) met valid wear criteria, providing 50.5 days of Fitbit data on average. At baseline, MVPA-inactive patients (n=41) reported statistically more severe problems regarding physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea than MVPA-active patients (n=41) on both continuous and categorical scales, with P<.05 from both Student t tests (2-tailed) and chi-squared tests. Longitudinal analysis found that MVPA-inactive patients showed a decreased ability to participate in social roles (estimated group difference=-4.21 T-score points over 3 months, 95% CI -6.64 to -1.78, P<.001) and a higher intensity of sleep symptoms (estimated group difference=2.06 severity score points over 3 months, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.71, P=.02) over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that patients with long COVID could remain MVPA-active despite experiencing symptoms. These findings provide insights into the relationship between PROs, physical activity, and long COVID, which suggests the importance of considering ","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e77644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805324/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander Shayesteh, Maja Af Klinteberg, Sophie Vrang, Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Mikael Alsterholm
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a controversial skin condition among health care providers due to a lack of evidence, but it has an impactful and growing presence on social media. There are few previous reports of health care utilization for symptoms attributed to TSW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate health care utilization and requests as well as information sources for TSW among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cross-sectional study used a questionnaire aimed at adults with AD, experiencing symptoms they attribute to TSW. The questionnaire was posted as a link, free to share with others, in a Swedish TSW-themed Facebook group and remained accessible for 4 weeks. Descriptive statistics and topical text analysis on open-ended items were used to present and interpret the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (n=82) reported dermatologists (n=41, 50%), general practitioners (n=40, 49%), and practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM; n=32, 39%) as the most frequent health care contacts for TSW. However, among participants with ongoing symptoms attributed to TSW (n=68), ongoing health care contacts with general practitioners, dermatologists, and practitioners of CAM were reported by only 10% (n=7), 22% (n=15), and 13% (n=11), respectively. For symptoms attributed to AD, the frequencies of health care provider contacts were higher. Almost all participants had sought help from a general practitioner (n=81, 99%) or a dermatologist (n=76, 93%) at some point, and many had also consulted a practitioner of CAM (n=59, 72%). Among those with ongoing symptoms attributed to AD, 43% (n=26) had an ongoing contact with a dermatologist. Participant-requested help and support from health care providers included understanding and confirmation of TSW impairments (n=45, 56%), treatment of symptoms (n=26, 32%), and increased awareness and information about TSW from health care providers (n=21, 26%). The most common TSW information sources were Facebook (n=78, 96%), websites (n=75, 93%), and Instagram (n=45, 56%), but YouTube (n=11, 14%), podcasts (n=7, 10%), and TikTok (n=5, 6%) were also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study investigates health care utilization patterns related to TSW. The results indicate that the participants received insufficient support from health care providers for symptoms they attributed to TSW. The participants initiated and maintained health care provider contacts for symptoms attributed to AD to a greater extent than for TSW and sought information and support for TSW elsewhere. Targeted interventions to overcome this could be educational efforts for general practitioners and dermatologists about the current scientific knowledge of TSW as well as the TSW discourse on social media. In addition, health care providers need to engage and contribute to evidence-based
{"title":"Health Care Utilization in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Experiencing Topical Steroid Withdrawal: Observational Cross-Sectional Social Media Questionnaire Study.","authors":"Alexander Shayesteh, Maja Af Klinteberg, Sophie Vrang, Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Mikael Alsterholm","doi":"10.2196/85183","DOIUrl":"10.2196/85183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a controversial skin condition among health care providers due to a lack of evidence, but it has an impactful and growing presence on social media. There are few previous reports of health care utilization for symptoms attributed to TSW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate health care utilization and requests as well as information sources for TSW among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cross-sectional study used a questionnaire aimed at adults with AD, experiencing symptoms they attribute to TSW. The questionnaire was posted as a link, free to share with others, in a Swedish TSW-themed Facebook group and remained accessible for 4 weeks. Descriptive statistics and topical text analysis on open-ended items were used to present and interpret the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (n=82) reported dermatologists (n=41, 50%), general practitioners (n=40, 49%), and practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM; n=32, 39%) as the most frequent health care contacts for TSW. However, among participants with ongoing symptoms attributed to TSW (n=68), ongoing health care contacts with general practitioners, dermatologists, and practitioners of CAM were reported by only 10% (n=7), 22% (n=15), and 13% (n=11), respectively. For symptoms attributed to AD, the frequencies of health care provider contacts were higher. Almost all participants had sought help from a general practitioner (n=81, 99%) or a dermatologist (n=76, 93%) at some point, and many had also consulted a practitioner of CAM (n=59, 72%). Among those with ongoing symptoms attributed to AD, 43% (n=26) had an ongoing contact with a dermatologist. Participant-requested help and support from health care providers included understanding and confirmation of TSW impairments (n=45, 56%), treatment of symptoms (n=26, 32%), and increased awareness and information about TSW from health care providers (n=21, 26%). The most common TSW information sources were Facebook (n=78, 96%), websites (n=75, 93%), and Instagram (n=45, 56%), but YouTube (n=11, 14%), podcasts (n=7, 10%), and TikTok (n=5, 6%) were also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study investigates health care utilization patterns related to TSW. The results indicate that the participants received insufficient support from health care providers for symptoms they attributed to TSW. The participants initiated and maintained health care provider contacts for symptoms attributed to AD to a greater extent than for TSW and sought information and support for TSW elsewhere. Targeted interventions to overcome this could be educational efforts for general practitioners and dermatologists about the current scientific knowledge of TSW as well as the TSW discourse on social media. In addition, health care providers need to engage and contribute to evidence-based ","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e85183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fereshteh Baygi, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Lars Henrik Jensen, Maria Munch Storsveen, Sonja Wehberg, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Gilså Hansen
Background: Enhancing care coordination and sharing information in cancer care improves patient experiences by promoting clarity and satisfaction.
Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of cross-sectoral video consultation on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information compared to usual care.
Methods: This study presents secondary outcomes on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information from a 7-month follow-up of the Partnership Project. In this randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer were allocated to either an intervention group receiving cross-sectoral video consultation (oncologist, general practitioner, and patient) or a control group receiving usual care. Patients' perceptions of care coordination and information quality were assessed using the Australian Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire (CCCQ) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 at baseline and 7 months. Changes over time between groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.
Results: Of the 278 participants randomized (1:1), only 80 (28.8%) patients received the intervention due to technical and administrative issues. A total of 210 (75.5%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire, while 118 (42.4%) responded at 7 months. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time between the intervention and control groups in any outcome. The estimated differences in the change in score from baseline to 7 months were as follows: for the total CCCQ score, 1.11 (95% CI -2.32 to 4.53; P=.53); for the overall European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 score, 1.49 (95% CI -2.98 to 5.96; P=.51); for the CCCQ communication subscale, -1.49 (95% CI -1.33 to 4.31; P=.30); and for the navigation subscale, -0.03 (95% CI -1.52 to 1.46; P=.97).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate no statistically significant improvement in patients' reported care coordination or satisfaction with received information over 7 months. Technical issues with the video setup reduced fidelity rates and follow-up participation. Further research is needed to optimize the structure and content of cross-sectoral video consultations to better support patients' perceived outcomes.
{"title":"Impact of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation on Perceived Care Coordination and Information Satisfaction in Cancer Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Fereshteh Baygi, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Lars Henrik Jensen, Maria Munch Storsveen, Sonja Wehberg, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Gilså Hansen","doi":"10.2196/76910","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing care coordination and sharing information in cancer care improves patient experiences by promoting clarity and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of cross-sectoral video consultation on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents secondary outcomes on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information from a 7-month follow-up of the Partnership Project. In this randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer were allocated to either an intervention group receiving cross-sectoral video consultation (oncologist, general practitioner, and patient) or a control group receiving usual care. Patients' perceptions of care coordination and information quality were assessed using the Australian Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire (CCCQ) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 at baseline and 7 months. Changes over time between groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 278 participants randomized (1:1), only 80 (28.8%) patients received the intervention due to technical and administrative issues. A total of 210 (75.5%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire, while 118 (42.4%) responded at 7 months. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time between the intervention and control groups in any outcome. The estimated differences in the change in score from baseline to 7 months were as follows: for the total CCCQ score, 1.11 (95% CI -2.32 to 4.53; P=.53); for the overall European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 score, 1.49 (95% CI -2.98 to 5.96; P=.51); for the CCCQ communication subscale, -1.49 (95% CI -1.33 to 4.31; P=.30); and for the navigation subscale, -0.03 (95% CI -1.52 to 1.46; P=.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate no statistically significant improvement in patients' reported care coordination or satisfaction with received information over 7 months. Technical issues with the video setup reduced fidelity rates and follow-up participation. Further research is needed to optimize the structure and content of cross-sectoral video consultations to better support patients' perceived outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716168; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02716168.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e76910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805320/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}