首页 > 最新文献

JMIR Formative Research最新文献

英文 中文
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Influencing Ecological Momentary Assessment Compliance in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: Observational Study. 影响双相情感障碍患者生态瞬时评估依从性的人口学和临床特征:观察性研究。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.2196/74223
Linru Yin, Minghui Li, Jinhao Li, Xiaofei Hou, Jianan Song, Xinyan Li, Yue Tong, Xinyue Zhou, Lidan Yuan, Huifang Yin, Guangming Xu

Background: Bipolar disorder requires immediate and frequent daily symptom monitoring due to its extreme mood fluctuations. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) technology uses high-frequency data collection to achieve ecologically valid capture of patient symptoms. Investigating EMA compliance among Chinese patients with bipolar disorder and its influencing factors is essential for developing more feasible daily symptom monitoring protocols.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the 14-day compliance rate of EMA among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder and to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with that compliance.

Methods: A total of 100 adults (63 female individuals) with bipolar disorder across mood states (depressive episode, n=29, 29%; hypomanic or manic episode, n=17, 17%; euthymic state, n=54, 54%) completed self-monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program "Xunkang Assessment System" 3 times daily for 14 days. The compliance rate was calculated as the percentage of completed questionnaires out of the total required over 2 weeks. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with the compliance rate.

Results: The median compliance rate was 75% (IQR 35.7%-90.4%). Compliance did not differ significantly across mood states (P=.15). In multivariable models, higher Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale scores and lower Functioning Assessment Short Test scores were independently associated with better compliance (Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale: B=0.11; P=.03 and Functioning Assessment Short Test: B=-0.06; P=.01).

Conclusions: Two-week EMA monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program is feasible among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder across mood states. Manic symptom severity and functional impairment were associated with EMA adherence and should be considered in study design and interpretation.

背景:双相情感障碍由于其极端的情绪波动,需要立即和频繁的日常症状监测。生态瞬时评估(EMA)技术使用高频数据收集来实现对患者症状的生态有效捕获。调查中国双相情感障碍患者的EMA依从性及其影响因素对于制定更可行的日常症状监测方案至关重要。目的:本研究旨在调查中国双相情感障碍患者EMA的14天依从率,并检查与该依从性相关的人口统计学和临床特征。方法:共100例成年双相情感障碍患者(女性63例),各情绪状态(抑郁发作,n=29、29%;轻躁或躁狂发作,n=17、17%;平和状态,n=54、54%)通过微信小程序“寻康评估系统”完成自我监测,每天3次,持续14天。遵规率以两周内完成的问卷占所需问卷总数的百分比计算。采用多变量有序逻辑回归探讨影响依从率的因素。结果:中位依从率为75% (IQR为35.7% ~ 90.4%)。依从性在情绪状态之间没有显著差异(P=.15)。在多变量模型中,较高的Bech-Rafaelsen躁狂量表得分和较低的功能评估短测试得分与较好的依从性独立相关(Bech-Rafaelsen躁狂量表:B=0.11; P= 0.03;功能评估短测试:B=-0.06; P= 0.01)。结论:通过微信小程序对中国双相情感障碍患者进行两周EMA监测是可行的。躁狂症状严重程度和功能损害与EMA依从性相关,应在研究设计和解释中予以考虑。
{"title":"Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Influencing Ecological Momentary Assessment Compliance in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: Observational Study.","authors":"Linru Yin, Minghui Li, Jinhao Li, Xiaofei Hou, Jianan Song, Xinyan Li, Yue Tong, Xinyue Zhou, Lidan Yuan, Huifang Yin, Guangming Xu","doi":"10.2196/74223","DOIUrl":"10.2196/74223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorder requires immediate and frequent daily symptom monitoring due to its extreme mood fluctuations. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) technology uses high-frequency data collection to achieve ecologically valid capture of patient symptoms. Investigating EMA compliance among Chinese patients with bipolar disorder and its influencing factors is essential for developing more feasible daily symptom monitoring protocols.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the 14-day compliance rate of EMA among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder and to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with that compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 adults (63 female individuals) with bipolar disorder across mood states (depressive episode, n=29, 29%; hypomanic or manic episode, n=17, 17%; euthymic state, n=54, 54%) completed self-monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program \"Xunkang Assessment System\" 3 times daily for 14 days. The compliance rate was calculated as the percentage of completed questionnaires out of the total required over 2 weeks. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with the compliance rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median compliance rate was 75% (IQR 35.7%-90.4%). Compliance did not differ significantly across mood states (P=.15). In multivariable models, higher Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale scores and lower Functioning Assessment Short Test scores were independently associated with better compliance (Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale: B=0.11; P=.03 and Functioning Assessment Short Test: B=-0.06; P=.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-week EMA monitoring via the WeChat Mini Program is feasible among Chinese individuals with bipolar disorder across mood states. Manic symptom severity and functional impairment were associated with EMA adherence and should be considered in study design and interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e74223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12824568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adoption of an Electronic Decision Support Tool for Capacity Building of Community Health Workers: Mixed Methods Study. 采用电子决策支持工具进行社区卫生工作者能力建设:混合方法研究。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.2196/69874
Anton Elepaño, Carol Stephanie Tan-Lim, Clare Bankhead, Leonila Dans, Noleen Marie Fabian, Josephine Sanchez, Antonio Dans, Catherine Pope
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complimentary subscriptions to UpToDate, a decision support tool, were provided to community health workers (CHWs) in rural and remote primary care sites as part of a government-funded health system research program. A feasibility evaluation conducted after the first year of implementation showed that UpToDate was acceptable among CHWs despite infrastructural barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This follow-up study evaluated the longitudinal adoption of UpToDate among CHWs and examined how sociocultural, political, and environmental factors influenced its use. Drawing on the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework, this study aimed to understand not only use patterns but also broader challenges to scale-up, spread, and sustainability in a complex health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory mixed methods design was used combining analysis of use and program activity logs; program reports; and focus groups with CHWs, health care professionals, and program implementers. Quantitative analysis of use logs (March 2021 to September 2023) compared adoption over time by using descriptive statistics, CIs, and chi-square tests. Qualitative data came from the reanalysis of previous focus group transcripts and program reports and from a new focus group with program implementers. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret how CHWs and implementers perceived and used the tool, and findings were integrated to explain quantitative trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of UpToDate was modest and declined over time. Monthly active use among CHWs and midwives fell substantially from 3.57% (97/2720 person-months) in 2021 to 1.07% (37/3456) in 2022 and remained low at 1.50% (39/2592) up to 2023, with markedly higher engagement in the rural site than in the remote site. Peaks in use coincided with program activities, whereas prolonged troughs followed typhoons, power outages, and other disruptions. Log data showed that users primarily consulted patient education articles rather than clinician-oriented decision tools. Qualitative analyses revealed that CHWs appropriated UpToDate as a learning aid and source of professional credibility. Structural shocks, heavy workloads, language barriers, and limited device access constrained individual use, and communal practices (shared devices and learning activities) meant that meaningful engagement often went unrecorded in vendor metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that acceptability does not guarantee sustained use and that adoption cannot be captured fully by log-in counts. UpToDate's value for CHWs lay in how it was domesticated as a tool for building capacity and professional credibility, not in its intended function as a decision aid used at the point of care. Therefore, evaluations of digital health tools should incorporate indicators of learning and social capital alongside use metrics. Policyma
背景:作为政府资助的卫生系统研究项目的一部分,向农村和偏远初级保健站点的社区卫生工作者(chw)免费提供了决策支持工具UpToDate。实施第一年后进行的可行性评估显示,尽管基础设施存在障碍,但卫生工作者仍然可以接受“更新日期”。目的:本随访研究评估了卫生工作者对UpToDate的纵向采用情况,并考察了社会文化、政治和环境因素对其使用的影响。利用不采用、放弃、扩大、传播和可持续性框架,本研究不仅旨在了解使用模式,还旨在了解复杂卫生系统中扩大、传播和可持续性的更广泛挑战。方法:采用用户分析与项目活动日志相结合的解释混合方法设计;项目报告;以及由卫生保健工作者、卫生保健专业人员和项目执行者组成的焦点小组。使用日志的定量分析(2021年3月至2023年9月)通过使用描述性统计、ci和卡方检验比较了一段时间内的采用情况。定性数据来自对先前焦点小组记录和计划报告的重新分析,以及来自与计划实施者的新焦点小组。反身性专题分析用于解释卫生工作者和实施者如何感知和使用该工具,并将调查结果整合以解释定量趋势。结果:UpToDate的使用是适度的,并且随着时间的推移而下降。保健医生和助产士的月活跃使用率从2021年的3.57%(97/2720人月)大幅下降至2022年的1.07%(37/3456人月),直到2023年仍保持在1.50%(39/2592人月)的低位,农村地区的参与度明显高于偏远地区。用电高峰与项目活动一致,而长时间的低谷则伴随着台风、停电和其他中断。日志数据显示,用户主要查阅患者教育文章,而不是以临床医生为导向的决策工具。定性分析显示,卫生工作者将UpToDate作为学习辅助工具和专业可信度的来源。结构性冲击、繁重的工作负载、语言障碍和受限的设备访问限制了个人使用,以及公共实践(共享设备和学习活动)意味着有意义的粘性通常不会记录在供应商指标中。结论:我们的研究结果表明,可接受性并不能保证持续使用,并且不能通过登录计数完全捕获采用情况。UpToDate对卫生保健工作者的价值在于它如何被驯养为一种建设能力和专业信誉的工具,而不是它作为在护理点使用的决策辅助工具的预期功能。因此,对数字健康工具的评估应将学习和社会资本指标与使用指标结合起来。政策制定者应该认识到,基础设施的脆弱性和社区适应性影响着数字健康的吸收。将工具嵌入正在进行的培训和同侪学习结构中,提供线下和多语言支持,并投资于复原力规划,对于有意义的扩大规模和可持续性至关重要。
{"title":"Adoption of an Electronic Decision Support Tool for Capacity Building of Community Health Workers: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Anton Elepaño, Carol Stephanie Tan-Lim, Clare Bankhead, Leonila Dans, Noleen Marie Fabian, Josephine Sanchez, Antonio Dans, Catherine Pope","doi":"10.2196/69874","DOIUrl":"10.2196/69874","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Complimentary subscriptions to UpToDate, a decision support tool, were provided to community health workers (CHWs) in rural and remote primary care sites as part of a government-funded health system research program. A feasibility evaluation conducted after the first year of implementation showed that UpToDate was acceptable among CHWs despite infrastructural barriers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This follow-up study evaluated the longitudinal adoption of UpToDate among CHWs and examined how sociocultural, political, and environmental factors influenced its use. Drawing on the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework, this study aimed to understand not only use patterns but also broader challenges to scale-up, spread, and sustainability in a complex health system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;An explanatory mixed methods design was used combining analysis of use and program activity logs; program reports; and focus groups with CHWs, health care professionals, and program implementers. Quantitative analysis of use logs (March 2021 to September 2023) compared adoption over time by using descriptive statistics, CIs, and chi-square tests. Qualitative data came from the reanalysis of previous focus group transcripts and program reports and from a new focus group with program implementers. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret how CHWs and implementers perceived and used the tool, and findings were integrated to explain quantitative trends.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Use of UpToDate was modest and declined over time. Monthly active use among CHWs and midwives fell substantially from 3.57% (97/2720 person-months) in 2021 to 1.07% (37/3456) in 2022 and remained low at 1.50% (39/2592) up to 2023, with markedly higher engagement in the rural site than in the remote site. Peaks in use coincided with program activities, whereas prolonged troughs followed typhoons, power outages, and other disruptions. Log data showed that users primarily consulted patient education articles rather than clinician-oriented decision tools. Qualitative analyses revealed that CHWs appropriated UpToDate as a learning aid and source of professional credibility. Structural shocks, heavy workloads, language barriers, and limited device access constrained individual use, and communal practices (shared devices and learning activities) meant that meaningful engagement often went unrecorded in vendor metrics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Our findings show that acceptability does not guarantee sustained use and that adoption cannot be captured fully by log-in counts. UpToDate's value for CHWs lay in how it was domesticated as a tool for building capacity and professional credibility, not in its intended function as a decision aid used at the point of care. Therefore, evaluations of digital health tools should incorporate indicators of learning and social capital alongside use metrics. Policyma","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e69874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12824572/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital Health Communication and Vaccine Confidence in Mexico Using Aggregated Randomized Brand Lift Studies: Secondary Analysis. 数字健康传播和疫苗信心在墨西哥使用汇总随机品牌提升研究:二次分析。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.2196/82889
Berenice Muñoz Cordero, Rodrigo Romero Feregrino, Raul Romero Feregrino, Raúl Romero Cabello, Valeria Magali Rocha Rocha, Roberto Martinez-Medina, Liliana Aline Fernández Urrutia
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital vaccination campaigns are increasingly used to address declining vaccine confidence, yet evidence from large-scale, real-world interventions in middle-income countries is limited. Meta's Brand Lift Studies (BLS), which use randomized test-control exposure, provide Bayesian estimates of attitudinal shifts resulting from digital content. Mexico, with over 88.6 million active internet users, provides a setting to evaluate the impact of targeted campaigns on vaccine attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of 5 digital vaccination campaigns implemented by the Asociación Mexicana de Vacunología (@Vacunologia) on Facebook (Meta Platforms Inc) and Instagram (Meta Platforms Inc) in Mexico between 2021 and 2022 on key attitudinal constructs related to COVID-19 vaccine confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a retrospective ecological design. We analyzed aggregated BLS results for 5 campaigns targeting different audiences and vaccination themes. Measured outcomes included standard ad recall, perceived importance, perceived safety, perceived efficacy, and concerns about side effects. Statistical significance within the BLS framework was defined as an incremental lift of ≥2 percentage points with ≥90% posterior probability of replication-a threshold consistent with Meta's operational Bayesian approach. Exploratory comparisons across campaigns were conducted using 1-way ANOVA, unpaired 2-tailed t tests, and Fisher exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Campaigns reached 84.9 million accounts and generated 179.4 million impressions with a total investment of US $215,600. All campaigns produced statistically significant improvements in at least one attitudinal outcome (Bayesian threshold ≥90%). Standard ad recall increased in 4 campaigns (ANOVA, P<.001), and concerns about side effects decreased in 2 campaigns (t test, P=.049; P=.006). Perceived safety, importance, and efficacy improved in selected audiences, with stronger effects observed among younger users and women (ANOVA, P=.005). No direct behavioral outcomes (eg, vaccination uptake) were measured; therefore, the findings reflect attitudinal rather than behavioral change. However, these constructs are recognized as proximal predictors of vaccine decision-making and constitute health-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large-scale digital vaccination campaigns can meaningfully strengthen attitudinal determinants of vaccine confidence in a middle-income context. These social media advertising campaigns effectively increased standard ad recall and improved perceptions of vaccine importance and safety, particularly among younger audiences and women in urban areas. However, changes in efficacy perceptions and concerns about side effects were limited. The innovation and implications of this study lie in evaluating large-scale, real-world digital vaccine campaigns in Latin America using experim
背景:数字疫苗接种运动越来越多地用于解决疫苗信心下降的问题,但来自中等收入国家大规模实际干预措施的证据有限。Meta的品牌提升研究(BLS)使用随机测试控制曝光,提供了由数字内容引起的态度转变的贝叶斯估计。墨西哥拥有8 860多万活跃互联网用户,为评估有针对性的运动对疫苗态度的影响提供了一个环境。目的:本研究评估了2021年至2022年期间墨西哥Asociación Mexicana de Vacunología (@Vacunologia)在Facebook (Meta平台公司)和Instagram (Meta平台公司)上实施的5次数字疫苗接种活动对与COVID-19疫苗信心相关的关键态度结构的影响。方法:本研究采用回顾性生态学设计。我们分析了针对不同受众和疫苗接种主题的5个活动的汇总BLS结果。测量结果包括标准广告召回、感知重要性、感知安全性、感知有效性和对副作用的关注。BLS框架内的统计显著性定义为≥2个百分点的增量提升,且复制的后验概率≥90%,这是与Meta的操作贝叶斯方法一致的阈值。采用单因素方差分析、非配对双尾t检验和Fisher精确检验对各活动进行探索性比较。结果:活动覆盖了8490万个账户,产生了1.794亿次印象,总投资为21.56万美元。所有活动至少在一个态度结果(贝叶斯阈值≥90%)上产生统计学上显著的改善。结论:在中等收入背景下,大规模数字疫苗接种活动可以有意地加强疫苗信心的态度决定因素。这些社交媒体广告活动有效地提高了标准广告的召回率,并改善了对疫苗重要性和安全性的认识,特别是在城市地区的年轻受众和妇女中。然而,疗效认知的变化和对副作用的关注是有限的。这项研究的创新之处在于利用实验性的劳工统计局数据评估拉丁美洲大规模、真实世界的数字疫苗运动。研究结果强调,受众细分会产生更强的感知转变,这表明量身定制的数字战略可以补充传统的公共卫生传播。虽然劳工统计局没有测量行为终点,但观察到的态度改善代表了影响疫苗相关行为的基本步骤。未来的工作应将数字态度指标与疫苗接种和流行病学数据联系起来,以评估现实世界的健康影响。
{"title":"Digital Health Communication and Vaccine Confidence in Mexico Using Aggregated Randomized Brand Lift Studies: Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Berenice Muñoz Cordero, Rodrigo Romero Feregrino, Raul Romero Feregrino, Raúl Romero Cabello, Valeria Magali Rocha Rocha, Roberto Martinez-Medina, Liliana Aline Fernández Urrutia","doi":"10.2196/82889","DOIUrl":"10.2196/82889","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Digital vaccination campaigns are increasingly used to address declining vaccine confidence, yet evidence from large-scale, real-world interventions in middle-income countries is limited. Meta's Brand Lift Studies (BLS), which use randomized test-control exposure, provide Bayesian estimates of attitudinal shifts resulting from digital content. Mexico, with over 88.6 million active internet users, provides a setting to evaluate the impact of targeted campaigns on vaccine attitudes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study evaluated the impact of 5 digital vaccination campaigns implemented by the Asociación Mexicana de Vacunología (@Vacunologia) on Facebook (Meta Platforms Inc) and Instagram (Meta Platforms Inc) in Mexico between 2021 and 2022 on key attitudinal constructs related to COVID-19 vaccine confidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This study used a retrospective ecological design. We analyzed aggregated BLS results for 5 campaigns targeting different audiences and vaccination themes. Measured outcomes included standard ad recall, perceived importance, perceived safety, perceived efficacy, and concerns about side effects. Statistical significance within the BLS framework was defined as an incremental lift of ≥2 percentage points with ≥90% posterior probability of replication-a threshold consistent with Meta's operational Bayesian approach. Exploratory comparisons across campaigns were conducted using 1-way ANOVA, unpaired 2-tailed t tests, and Fisher exact tests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Campaigns reached 84.9 million accounts and generated 179.4 million impressions with a total investment of US $215,600. All campaigns produced statistically significant improvements in at least one attitudinal outcome (Bayesian threshold ≥90%). Standard ad recall increased in 4 campaigns (ANOVA, P&lt;.001), and concerns about side effects decreased in 2 campaigns (t test, P=.049; P=.006). Perceived safety, importance, and efficacy improved in selected audiences, with stronger effects observed among younger users and women (ANOVA, P=.005). No direct behavioral outcomes (eg, vaccination uptake) were measured; therefore, the findings reflect attitudinal rather than behavioral change. However, these constructs are recognized as proximal predictors of vaccine decision-making and constitute health-related outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Large-scale digital vaccination campaigns can meaningfully strengthen attitudinal determinants of vaccine confidence in a middle-income context. These social media advertising campaigns effectively increased standard ad recall and improved perceptions of vaccine importance and safety, particularly among younger audiences and women in urban areas. However, changes in efficacy perceptions and concerns about side effects were limited. The innovation and implications of this study lie in evaluating large-scale, real-world digital vaccine campaigns in Latin America using experim","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e82889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12776657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adapting a Sexual Health Intervention for Adolescents Exposed to Adversity: Feasibility Study. 逆境青少年性健康干预的可行性研究。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.2196/72782
Terrinieka Powell, Bianca D Smith, Naya Moser, Olivia Kachingwe, Quiana Lewis Wallace, Asari Offiong, Andrea Hwang, Emily Davie, Ashleigh LoVette

Background: Although sexual exploration is normative during adolescence, sexual activities that are unprotected and occur under the influence of substances can pose significant risks to young people. Youth exposed to adversity are among the groups most vulnerable to sexual risk-taking in adolescence. Selective interventions that consider lived experiences and the local context may help reduce sexual risk-taking among this population.

Objective: This pilot study assessed the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention as well as participant engagement with an adapted version of Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together for Black youth exposed to household challenges.

Methods: Participants were recruited using school and community presentations, digital flyers, and referrals. A total of 121 youth from 3 sites in Baltimore, Maryland, were screened. Participants completed 3 assessments: baseline, posttest, and 3-month follow-up. Participant enrollment, session attendance, and assessment completion were used to determine feasibility and engagement. Sexual health knowledge, pregnancy intentions, partner communication, and sexual behaviors were explored as secondary outcomes.

Results: Funded by the National Institutes of Health, the data for this study were collected between January 2022 and April 2023. A total of 61 youth (aged 13-16 years) were recruited and randomized to either the intervention or the control condition (n=33 and n=28, respectively). In total, 87% (53/61) of the participants completed all 3 assessments. There was high engagement: 80% (48/61) of participants attended at least 3 sessions, and 75.2% (115/153) of after-session responses revealed they would recommend a session to a friend. Among the 18 participants who reported having any sex, all 18 (100%) abstained from alcohol use and 12 (67%) abstained from drug use before sex. The intervention group showed a significant increase in sexual health knowledge. No changes in sexual health behaviors or partner communication were observed.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that recruiting, retaining, and engaging participants in the adapted Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together intervention is feasible. Additional research is needed to determine the extent to which this intervention can mitigate sexual risk-taking among youth exposed to adversity. The findings will inform the redesign of our assessments to capture additional factors that may affect sexual health behaviors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05033821; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05033821.

背景:虽然性探索在青春期是规范的,但在没有保护的情况下以及在药物影响下发生的性活动可能对青少年构成重大风险。面临逆境的青少年是青春期最容易发生性冒险的群体之一。考虑生活经历和当地环境的选择性干预可能有助于减少这一人群的性冒险行为。目的:本试点研究评估了参与者招募和保留的可行性,以及参与者参与针对面临家庭挑战的黑人青年的改编版“关注有知情父母和孩子的青年”的可行性。方法:通过学校和社区演示、数字传单和推荐来招募参与者。来自马里兰州巴尔的摩市3个地点的121名青少年接受了筛选。参与者完成了3项评估:基线、后测和3个月的随访。参与者登记、会议出席和评估完成情况用于确定可行性和参与度。性健康知识、怀孕意向、伴侣沟通和性行为是次要结局。结果:由美国国立卫生研究院资助,本研究的数据收集于2022年1月至2023年4月。共招募了61名青少年(13-16岁),随机分为干预组和对照组(n=33和n=28)。总共有87%(53/61)的参与者完成了所有3项评估。有很高的参与度:80%(48/61)的参与者参加了至少3个疗程,75.2%(115/153)的参与者在疗程结束后表示他们会向朋友推荐疗程。在18名报告有过性行为的参与者中,所有18人(100%)在性行为前戒酒,12人(67%)在性行为前戒酒。干预组在性健康知识方面有显著提高。没有观察到性健康行为或伴侣沟通方面的变化。结论:研究结果表明,招募、保留和吸引参与者参与“关注知情父母和孩子一起的青少年”干预是可行的。需要进一步的研究来确定这种干预在多大程度上可以减轻处于逆境中的青少年的性冒险行为。这些发现将为我们重新设计评估提供信息,以捕捉可能影响性健康行为的其他因素。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05033821;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05033821。
{"title":"Adapting a Sexual Health Intervention for Adolescents Exposed to Adversity: Feasibility Study.","authors":"Terrinieka Powell, Bianca D Smith, Naya Moser, Olivia Kachingwe, Quiana Lewis Wallace, Asari Offiong, Andrea Hwang, Emily Davie, Ashleigh LoVette","doi":"10.2196/72782","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although sexual exploration is normative during adolescence, sexual activities that are unprotected and occur under the influence of substances can pose significant risks to young people. Youth exposed to adversity are among the groups most vulnerable to sexual risk-taking in adolescence. Selective interventions that consider lived experiences and the local context may help reduce sexual risk-taking among this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study assessed the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention as well as participant engagement with an adapted version of Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together for Black youth exposed to household challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited using school and community presentations, digital flyers, and referrals. A total of 121 youth from 3 sites in Baltimore, Maryland, were screened. Participants completed 3 assessments: baseline, posttest, and 3-month follow-up. Participant enrollment, session attendance, and assessment completion were used to determine feasibility and engagement. Sexual health knowledge, pregnancy intentions, partner communication, and sexual behaviors were explored as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Funded by the National Institutes of Health, the data for this study were collected between January 2022 and April 2023. A total of 61 youth (aged 13-16 years) were recruited and randomized to either the intervention or the control condition (n=33 and n=28, respectively). In total, 87% (53/61) of the participants completed all 3 assessments. There was high engagement: 80% (48/61) of participants attended at least 3 sessions, and 75.2% (115/153) of after-session responses revealed they would recommend a session to a friend. Among the 18 participants who reported having any sex, all 18 (100%) abstained from alcohol use and 12 (67%) abstained from drug use before sex. The intervention group showed a significant increase in sexual health knowledge. No changes in sexual health behaviors or partner communication were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that recruiting, retaining, and engaging participants in the adapted Focus on Youth with Informed Parents and Children Together intervention is feasible. Additional research is needed to determine the extent to which this intervention can mitigate sexual risk-taking among youth exposed to adversity. The findings will inform the redesign of our assessments to capture additional factors that may affect sexual health behaviors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05033821; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05033821.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e72782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12817038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145905987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technology Access, Digital Literacy, and Enrollment Support Preferences in a Federally Qualified Health Center: Cross-Sectional Study. 技术获取,数字素养和注册支持偏好在联邦合格的健康中心:横断面研究。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.2196/78850
Katrina Go Yamazaki, Lucy Hewitt, Luis Torres, Kharla Colon-Vazquez, Peyton Rogers, Grace Wang

Background: Biomedical research studies are increasingly using digital tools to enroll, recruit, and collect data from participants. However, variability in digital literacy and technological acceptance can be challenging for recruitment from groups traditionally underrepresented in research, including those served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) measure participant accessibility and comfort with digital platforms and (2) examine the interrelation of technology access, digital literacy, and support preferences during enrollment and data submission.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using enrollment data from Federally Qualified Health Centers participating in the All of Us Research Program. Participants had the option of High-Touch (staff-assisted) or Low-Touch (self-directed) support for enrollment and survey completion. Survey items assessed internet access and technology comfort, while support type was recorded by the research staff based on participants' actual selection. Logistic regression models evaluated relationships between technology access, comfort, and enacted support type, while controlling for age, consent language, and education, as well as race and ethnicity.

Results: The analytic sample included 605 participants. The majority reported access to the internet (539/605, 89.1%) and felt comfortable with technology (448/605, 74.1%). In the group requesting High-Touch support (n=346), 14.5% (n=50) reported no internet access, and 31.5% (n=109) felt uncomfortable with technology. In the group requesting Low-Touch support (n=259), 6.2% (n=16) had no access to the internet, and 3.9% (n=10) reported feeling uncomfortable (P<.001). In the adjusted models, much greater comfort with technology was significantly correlated with reduced odds of requesting High-Touch support (comfortable: adjusted odds ratio 0.118, 95% CI 0.055-0.255 and neutral: adjusted odds ratio 0.212, 95% CI 0.077-0.587), but internet access was not significantly correlated.

Conclusions: The strongest predictor for support preference for digital enrollment among the participants was their comfort with technology rather than access alone. These findings illustrate the significance of participant-centric design methods coupling adaptive support paths, mixed enrollment strategies, and individualized onboarding methods aligned with digital confidence to promote equitable engagement in precision health research.

背景:生物医学研究越来越多地使用数字工具来登记、招募和收集参与者的数据。然而,数字素养和技术接受度的差异可能会对从传统上在研究中代表性不足的群体中招募人员构成挑战,包括那些由联邦合格医疗中心服务的群体。目的:本研究旨在(1)衡量参与者对数字平台的可及性和舒适度;(2)研究技术可及性、数字素养和支持偏好在入学和数据提交过程中的相互关系。方法:采用参与“我们所有人”研究计划的联邦合格医疗中心的登记数据进行横断面分析。参与者可以选择高接触(工作人员协助)或低接触(自我指导)支持登记和调查完成。调查项目评估互联网接入和技术舒适度,而支持类型由研究人员根据参与者的实际选择记录。逻辑回归模型评估了技术获取、舒适度和制定的支持类型之间的关系,同时控制了年龄、同意语言、教育程度以及种族和民族。结果:分析样本共605人。大多数受访者表示可以上网(539/605,89.1%),对科技感到自在(448/605,74.1%)。在要求高触控技术支持的小组中(n=346), 14.5% (n=50)的人表示没有互联网接入,31.5% (n=109)的人对技术感到不舒服。在要求低接触支持的组(n=259)中,6.2% (n=16)没有上网,3.9% (n=10)报告感觉不舒服(p结论:参与者对数字入学的支持偏好的最强预测因子是他们对技术的舒适度,而不是单独的接入。这些发现说明了以参与者为中心的设计方法将适应性支持路径、混合入学策略和个性化入职方法与数字信心相结合,以促进公平参与精准健康研究的重要性。
{"title":"Technology Access, Digital Literacy, and Enrollment Support Preferences in a Federally Qualified Health Center: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Katrina Go Yamazaki, Lucy Hewitt, Luis Torres, Kharla Colon-Vazquez, Peyton Rogers, Grace Wang","doi":"10.2196/78850","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78850","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomedical research studies are increasingly using digital tools to enroll, recruit, and collect data from participants. However, variability in digital literacy and technological acceptance can be challenging for recruitment from groups traditionally underrepresented in research, including those served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) measure participant accessibility and comfort with digital platforms and (2) examine the interrelation of technology access, digital literacy, and support preferences during enrollment and data submission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using enrollment data from Federally Qualified Health Centers participating in the All of Us Research Program. Participants had the option of High-Touch (staff-assisted) or Low-Touch (self-directed) support for enrollment and survey completion. Survey items assessed internet access and technology comfort, while support type was recorded by the research staff based on participants' actual selection. Logistic regression models evaluated relationships between technology access, comfort, and enacted support type, while controlling for age, consent language, and education, as well as race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 605 participants. The majority reported access to the internet (539/605, 89.1%) and felt comfortable with technology (448/605, 74.1%). In the group requesting High-Touch support (n=346), 14.5% (n=50) reported no internet access, and 31.5% (n=109) felt uncomfortable with technology. In the group requesting Low-Touch support (n=259), 6.2% (n=16) had no access to the internet, and 3.9% (n=10) reported feeling uncomfortable (P<.001). In the adjusted models, much greater comfort with technology was significantly correlated with reduced odds of requesting High-Touch support (comfortable: adjusted odds ratio 0.118, 95% CI 0.055-0.255 and neutral: adjusted odds ratio 0.212, 95% CI 0.077-0.587), but internet access was not significantly correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strongest predictor for support preference for digital enrollment among the participants was their comfort with technology rather than access alone. These findings illustrate the significance of participant-centric design methods coupling adaptive support paths, mixed enrollment strategies, and individualized onboarding methods aligned with digital confidence to promote equitable engagement in precision health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e78850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145906070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying Patient Sentiment in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment: Large Language Model Approach. 识别患者在特应性皮炎治疗中的情绪:大语言模型方法。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.2196/78054
Jack Alexander Cummins, JiaDe Yu

This study demonstrates that GPT-4o outperforms traditional natural language processing methods in accurately analyzing patient sentiment toward atopic dermatitis treatments on Reddit, enabling more nuanced and reliable extraction of real-world patient perspectives from large-scale social media data.

本研究表明,gpt - 40在准确分析Reddit上患者对特应性皮炎治疗的看法方面优于传统的自然语言处理方法,能够从大规模社交媒体数据中更细致、更可靠地提取现实世界患者的观点。
{"title":"Identifying Patient Sentiment in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment: Large Language Model Approach.","authors":"Jack Alexander Cummins, JiaDe Yu","doi":"10.2196/78054","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study demonstrates that GPT-4o outperforms traditional natural language processing methods in accurately analyzing patient sentiment toward atopic dermatitis treatments on Reddit, enabling more nuanced and reliable extraction of real-world patient perspectives from large-scale social media data.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e78054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multimodal Transformer-Based Electrocardiogram Analysis for Cardiovascular Comorbidity Detection: Model Development and Validation Study. 基于多模态变压器的心血管共病检测心电图分析:模型开发与验证研究。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.2196/80815
Zi Yang, Xiaojuan Wang, Jianlin Wang, Qi Guang, Xueqian Ding, Hao Liu, Yunpeng Xu, Jing Zhao, Ming Bai

Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading global cause of mortality, yet traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation shows subjective variability and limited sensitivity to complex pathologies.

Objective: This study aims to address these challenges by proposing the Cardiovascular Multimodal Prediction Network (CaMPNet), a transformer-based multimodal architecture that integrates raw 12-lead ECG waveforms, 9-structured machine-measured ECG features, and demographic data (age and sex) through cross-attention fusion.

Methods: The model was trained on 384,877 records from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV - Electrocardiogram Matched Subset database and evaluated across 12 cardiovascular disease labels. To further assess temporal robustness, a temporal external validation was performed using the most recent 10% of the data, withheld chronologically from model development.

Results: On the internal test set, the model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.845 (SD 0.04) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.489, outperforming the residual networks-ECG baseline (AUC=0.848 but F1-score=0.152) and all single-modality variants. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across demographics (male AUC= 0.846 vs female=0.843; youngest quartile 0.884 vs oldest 0.811). CaMPNet retained moderate discriminative ability in temporal external validation with a mean AUC of 0.715 (SD 0.03) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.298, although performance declined due to temporal distribution shifts. Despite this, major disease categories, such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and normal rhythm, maintained high AUCs (>0.84). Attention-based visualization revealed clinically interpretable patterns (eg, ST-segment elevations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and ablation experiments verified the model's tolerance to missing structured inputs.

Conclusions: CaMPNet demonstrates robust and interpretable multimodal ECG-based diagnosis, offering a scalable framework for comorbidity screening and continual learning under real-world temporal dynamics.

背景:心血管疾病仍然是全球死亡的主要原因,但传统的心电图(ECG)解释显示主观变异性和对复杂病理的有限敏感性。目的:本研究旨在通过提出心血管多模态预测网络(CaMPNet)来解决这些挑战,这是一种基于变压器的多模态架构,通过交叉注意融合集成了原始的12导联ECG波形、9结构化机器测量的ECG特征和人口统计数据(年龄和性别)。方法:该模型在重症监护医学信息市场-心电图匹配子集数据库中的384,877条记录上进行训练,并在12种心血管疾病标签上进行评估。为了进一步评估时间稳健性,使用最近10%的数据进行时间外部验证,按时间顺序从模型开发中保留。结果:在内部测试集上,该模型的平均曲线下面积(AUC)为0.845 (SD 0.04),精确召回率曲线下面积为0.489,优于残差网络- ecg基线(AUC=0.848, F1-score=0.152)和所有单模态变量。亚组分析显示了不同人口统计数据的一致表现(男性AUC= 0.846 vs女性=0.843;最年轻四分位数0.884 vs最年长的0.811)。CaMPNet在时间外部验证中保持了中等的判别能力,平均AUC为0.715 (SD为0.03),精确召回率曲线下面积为0.298,但性能因时间分布的变化而下降。尽管如此,主要疾病类别,如心房颤动、心力衰竭和正常心律,仍保持较高的auc(>0.84)。基于注意力的可视化显示了临床可解释的模式(例如,st段抬高型心肌梗死的st段抬高),消融实验验证了该模型对缺失结构化输入的耐受性。结论:CaMPNet展示了稳健且可解释的基于多模态心电图的诊断,为合并症筛查和现实世界时间动态下的持续学习提供了可扩展的框架。
{"title":"Multimodal Transformer-Based Electrocardiogram Analysis for Cardiovascular Comorbidity Detection: Model Development and Validation Study.","authors":"Zi Yang, Xiaojuan Wang, Jianlin Wang, Qi Guang, Xueqian Ding, Hao Liu, Yunpeng Xu, Jing Zhao, Ming Bai","doi":"10.2196/80815","DOIUrl":"10.2196/80815","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading global cause of mortality, yet traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation shows subjective variability and limited sensitivity to complex pathologies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to address these challenges by proposing the Cardiovascular Multimodal Prediction Network (CaMPNet), a transformer-based multimodal architecture that integrates raw 12-lead ECG waveforms, 9-structured machine-measured ECG features, and demographic data (age and sex) through cross-attention fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model was trained on 384,877 records from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV - Electrocardiogram Matched Subset database and evaluated across 12 cardiovascular disease labels. To further assess temporal robustness, a temporal external validation was performed using the most recent 10% of the data, withheld chronologically from model development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the internal test set, the model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.845 (SD 0.04) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.489, outperforming the residual networks-ECG baseline (AUC=0.848 but F1-score=0.152) and all single-modality variants. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across demographics (male AUC= 0.846 vs female=0.843; youngest quartile 0.884 vs oldest 0.811). CaMPNet retained moderate discriminative ability in temporal external validation with a mean AUC of 0.715 (SD 0.03) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.298, although performance declined due to temporal distribution shifts. Despite this, major disease categories, such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and normal rhythm, maintained high AUCs (>0.84). Attention-based visualization revealed clinically interpretable patterns (eg, ST-segment elevations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and ablation experiments verified the model's tolerance to missing structured inputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CaMPNet demonstrates robust and interpretable multimodal ECG-based diagnosis, offering a scalable framework for comorbidity screening and continual learning under real-world temporal dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e80815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterization of Post-Viral Infection Behaviors Among Patients With Long COVID: Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Analyses of Fitbit Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes. 长冠肺炎患者病毒感染后行为特征:Fitbit数据和患者报告结果的前瞻性、观察性、纵向队列分析
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.2196/77644
Tianmai M Zhang, Sydney P Sharp, John D Scott, Douglas Taren, Jane C Samaniego, Elizabeth R Unger, Jeanne Bertolli, Jin-Mann S Lin, Christian B Ramers, Job G Godino
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long COVID encompasses a range of health problems that can be highly debilitating. While some research has relied on self-reported measures of symptoms and functioning, few studies have characterized symptoms in relation to behaviors and physiology measured objectively through wearable devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to identify longitudinal patterns in physical activity, physiology, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with long COVID at a Federally Qualified Health Center in the United States. The secondary aim was to identify meaningful subgroups or phenotypes within this cohort and examine how PROs and symptoms overlay with physical activity characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study recruiting a subset of low-income patients enrolled in the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program. From March 2022 to May 2023, a total of 172 patients with long COVID or myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome were given Fitbit Charge 5 (Fitbit Inc) devices and instructed to wear them continuously for up to a year. Patients completed PRO questionnaires (PROMIS-29 [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29] and symptom questionnaires, etc) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Inclusion in longitudinal analysis required at least 20 hours of valid wear data per day for a minimum of 7 days. The World Health Organization guideline on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was used to differentiate MPVA-active and MVPA-inactive patients. Linear mixed effects regression was performed to assess longitudinal associations between physical activity levels and PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 172 patients, 80.2% (n=138) were female, 75.6% (n=130) were White, 45.3% (n=78) were unemployed, and 94.8% (n=163) had estimated annual income below US $50,000. Of these patients, 82 (47.7%) met valid wear criteria, providing 50.5 days of Fitbit data on average. At baseline, MVPA-inactive patients (n=41) reported statistically more severe problems regarding physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea than MVPA-active patients (n=41) on both continuous and categorical scales, with P<.05 from both Student t tests (2-tailed) and chi-squared tests. Longitudinal analysis found that MVPA-inactive patients showed a decreased ability to participate in social roles (estimated group difference=-4.21 T-score points over 3 months, 95% CI -6.64 to -1.78, P<.001) and a higher intensity of sleep symptoms (estimated group difference=2.06 severity score points over 3 months, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.71, P=.02) over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that patients with long COVID could remain MVPA-active despite experiencing symptoms. These findings provide insights into the relationship between PROs, physical activity, and long COVID, which suggests the importance of considering
背景:长冠状病毒病包括一系列可能非常令人虚弱的健康问题。虽然一些研究依赖于自我报告的症状和功能测量,但很少有研究通过可穿戴设备客观测量与行为和生理相关的症状。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定美国联邦合格医疗中心长COVID患者的身体活动、生理和患者报告结果(PROs)的纵向模式。次要目的是在该队列中确定有意义的亚组或表型,并检查PROs和症状如何与身体活动特征重叠。方法:这是一项前瞻性、观察性、纵向队列研究,招募了一组参加长期COVID和疲劳性疾病康复计划的低收入患者。从2022年3月至2023年5月,共有172名患有长冠状病毒或肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征的患者使用Fitbit Charge 5 (Fitbit Inc .)设备,并指导他们连续佩戴长达一年。患者分别在基线、3、6个月完成PRO问卷(promise -29[患者报告结果测量信息系统-29]和症状问卷等)。纳入纵向分析需要每天至少20小时的有效磨损数据,持续至少7天。采用世界卫生组织关于中度至剧烈体育活动(MVPA)的指南来区分mpva活跃和MVPA不活跃的患者。采用线性混合效应回归来评估体力活动水平与PROs之间的纵向关联。结果:172例患者中,80.2% (n=138)为女性,75.6% (n=130)为白人,45.3% (n=78)为无业人员,94.8% (n=163)年收入低于5万美元。在这些患者中,82例(47.7%)符合有效磨损标准,平均提供50.5天的Fitbit数据。在基线时,在连续和分类量表上,mvpa不活跃患者(n=41)报告的身体功能、疲劳和呼吸困难问题在统计上比mvpa活跃患者(n=41)更严重。结论:本研究表明,长COVID患者尽管出现症状,但仍可以保持mvpa活跃。这些发现为pro、身体活动和长COVID之间的关系提供了见解,这表明在制定治疗计划时考虑个人活动概况的重要性,特别是在低收入人群中。考虑到其探索性和局限性,包括高流失率和缺失数据,本研究的发现应被解释为假设生成。
{"title":"Characterization of Post-Viral Infection Behaviors Among Patients With Long COVID: Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Analyses of Fitbit Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Tianmai M Zhang, Sydney P Sharp, John D Scott, Douglas Taren, Jane C Samaniego, Elizabeth R Unger, Jeanne Bertolli, Jin-Mann S Lin, Christian B Ramers, Job G Godino","doi":"10.2196/77644","DOIUrl":"10.2196/77644","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Long COVID encompasses a range of health problems that can be highly debilitating. While some research has relied on self-reported measures of symptoms and functioning, few studies have characterized symptoms in relation to behaviors and physiology measured objectively through wearable devices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary aim of this study was to identify longitudinal patterns in physical activity, physiology, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with long COVID at a Federally Qualified Health Center in the United States. The secondary aim was to identify meaningful subgroups or phenotypes within this cohort and examine how PROs and symptoms overlay with physical activity characteristics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study recruiting a subset of low-income patients enrolled in the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program. From March 2022 to May 2023, a total of 172 patients with long COVID or myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome were given Fitbit Charge 5 (Fitbit Inc) devices and instructed to wear them continuously for up to a year. Patients completed PRO questionnaires (PROMIS-29 [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29] and symptom questionnaires, etc) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Inclusion in longitudinal analysis required at least 20 hours of valid wear data per day for a minimum of 7 days. The World Health Organization guideline on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was used to differentiate MPVA-active and MVPA-inactive patients. Linear mixed effects regression was performed to assess longitudinal associations between physical activity levels and PROs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 172 patients, 80.2% (n=138) were female, 75.6% (n=130) were White, 45.3% (n=78) were unemployed, and 94.8% (n=163) had estimated annual income below US $50,000. Of these patients, 82 (47.7%) met valid wear criteria, providing 50.5 days of Fitbit data on average. At baseline, MVPA-inactive patients (n=41) reported statistically more severe problems regarding physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea than MVPA-active patients (n=41) on both continuous and categorical scales, with P&lt;.05 from both Student t tests (2-tailed) and chi-squared tests. Longitudinal analysis found that MVPA-inactive patients showed a decreased ability to participate in social roles (estimated group difference=-4.21 T-score points over 3 months, 95% CI -6.64 to -1.78, P&lt;.001) and a higher intensity of sleep symptoms (estimated group difference=2.06 severity score points over 3 months, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.71, P=.02) over time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This study showed that patients with long COVID could remain MVPA-active despite experiencing symptoms. These findings provide insights into the relationship between PROs, physical activity, and long COVID, which suggests the importance of considering ","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e77644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805324/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health Care Utilization in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Experiencing Topical Steroid Withdrawal: Observational Cross-Sectional Social Media Questionnaire Study. 特应性皮炎患者的医疗保健利用经历局部类固醇戒断:观察性横断面社会媒体问卷研究
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.2196/85183
Alexander Shayesteh, Maja Af Klinteberg, Sophie Vrang, Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Mikael Alsterholm
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a controversial skin condition among health care providers due to a lack of evidence, but it has an impactful and growing presence on social media. There are few previous reports of health care utilization for symptoms attributed to TSW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate health care utilization and requests as well as information sources for TSW among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cross-sectional study used a questionnaire aimed at adults with AD, experiencing symptoms they attribute to TSW. The questionnaire was posted as a link, free to share with others, in a Swedish TSW-themed Facebook group and remained accessible for 4 weeks. Descriptive statistics and topical text analysis on open-ended items were used to present and interpret the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (n=82) reported dermatologists (n=41, 50%), general practitioners (n=40, 49%), and practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM; n=32, 39%) as the most frequent health care contacts for TSW. However, among participants with ongoing symptoms attributed to TSW (n=68), ongoing health care contacts with general practitioners, dermatologists, and practitioners of CAM were reported by only 10% (n=7), 22% (n=15), and 13% (n=11), respectively. For symptoms attributed to AD, the frequencies of health care provider contacts were higher. Almost all participants had sought help from a general practitioner (n=81, 99%) or a dermatologist (n=76, 93%) at some point, and many had also consulted a practitioner of CAM (n=59, 72%). Among those with ongoing symptoms attributed to AD, 43% (n=26) had an ongoing contact with a dermatologist. Participant-requested help and support from health care providers included understanding and confirmation of TSW impairments (n=45, 56%), treatment of symptoms (n=26, 32%), and increased awareness and information about TSW from health care providers (n=21, 26%). The most common TSW information sources were Facebook (n=78, 96%), websites (n=75, 93%), and Instagram (n=45, 56%), but YouTube (n=11, 14%), podcasts (n=7, 10%), and TikTok (n=5, 6%) were also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study investigates health care utilization patterns related to TSW. The results indicate that the participants received insufficient support from health care providers for symptoms they attributed to TSW. The participants initiated and maintained health care provider contacts for symptoms attributed to AD to a greater extent than for TSW and sought information and support for TSW elsewhere. Targeted interventions to overcome this could be educational efforts for general practitioners and dermatologists about the current scientific knowledge of TSW as well as the TSW discourse on social media. In addition, health care providers need to engage and contribute to evidence-based
背景:由于缺乏证据,局部类固醇戒断(TSW)在医疗保健提供者中是一种有争议的皮肤病,但它在社交媒体上的影响力越来越大。以前很少有关于TSW症状的医疗保健利用的报道。目的:了解特应性皮炎(AD)患者对TSW的医疗保健利用、需求及信息来源。方法:这项观察性横断面研究使用了一份问卷,针对患有AD的成人,他们认为这些症状是TSW引起的。调查问卷以链接的形式发布在瑞典tsw主题的Facebook群中,可以免费与他人分享,并在四周内保持可访问性。使用描述性统计和开放式项目的主题文本分析来呈现和解释结果。结果:参与者(n=82)报告皮肤科医生(n= 41,50%),全科医生(n= 40,49%)和补充和替代医学医生(n= 32,39%)是TSW最常见的医疗保健接触者。然而,在持续出现TSW症状的参与者(n=68)中,分别报告与全科医生、皮肤科医生和CAM医生进行卫生保健接触的人数分别为10% (n=7)、22% (n=15)和13% (n=11)。对于归因于AD的症状,与卫生保健提供者接触的频率更高。几乎所有的参与者都曾向全科医生(n= 81,99%)或皮肤科医生(n= 76,93%)寻求过帮助,许多人还咨询过CAM的医生(n= 59,72%)。在持续出现AD症状的患者中,43% (n=26)与皮肤科医生有持续接触。参与者要求卫生保健提供者提供的帮助和支持包括了解和确认TSW损伤(n=45, 56%),治疗症状(n=26, 32%),以及提高卫生保健提供者对TSW的认识和信息(n=21, 26%)。最常见的TSW信息源是Facebook (n= 78,96%)、网站(n= 75,93%)和Instagram (n= 45,56%),但YouTube (n= 11,14%)、播客(n= 7,10%)和TikTok (n= 5,6%)也有报道。结论:本研究探讨与身心健康相关的医疗保健利用模式。结果表明,参与者没有得到足够的支持,从卫生保健提供者的症状,他们归咎于TSW。与TSW相比,由于AD引起的症状,参与者开始并保持与医疗保健提供者的联系,并在其他地方寻求TSW的信息和支持。有针对性的干预措施可以克服这一点,对全科医生和皮肤科医生进行有关TSW当前科学知识以及社交媒体上TSW话语的教育努力。此外,卫生保健提供者需要在相关的社交媒体平台上参与并促进有关TSW的循证内容,以防止有关局部糖皮质激素的错误信息传播。
{"title":"Health Care Utilization in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Experiencing Topical Steroid Withdrawal: Observational Cross-Sectional Social Media Questionnaire Study.","authors":"Alexander Shayesteh, Maja Af Klinteberg, Sophie Vrang, Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Mikael Alsterholm","doi":"10.2196/85183","DOIUrl":"10.2196/85183","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a controversial skin condition among health care providers due to a lack of evidence, but it has an impactful and growing presence on social media. There are few previous reports of health care utilization for symptoms attributed to TSW.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to investigate health care utilization and requests as well as information sources for TSW among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This observational cross-sectional study used a questionnaire aimed at adults with AD, experiencing symptoms they attribute to TSW. The questionnaire was posted as a link, free to share with others, in a Swedish TSW-themed Facebook group and remained accessible for 4 weeks. Descriptive statistics and topical text analysis on open-ended items were used to present and interpret the results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The participants (n=82) reported dermatologists (n=41, 50%), general practitioners (n=40, 49%), and practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM; n=32, 39%) as the most frequent health care contacts for TSW. However, among participants with ongoing symptoms attributed to TSW (n=68), ongoing health care contacts with general practitioners, dermatologists, and practitioners of CAM were reported by only 10% (n=7), 22% (n=15), and 13% (n=11), respectively. For symptoms attributed to AD, the frequencies of health care provider contacts were higher. Almost all participants had sought help from a general practitioner (n=81, 99%) or a dermatologist (n=76, 93%) at some point, and many had also consulted a practitioner of CAM (n=59, 72%). Among those with ongoing symptoms attributed to AD, 43% (n=26) had an ongoing contact with a dermatologist. Participant-requested help and support from health care providers included understanding and confirmation of TSW impairments (n=45, 56%), treatment of symptoms (n=26, 32%), and increased awareness and information about TSW from health care providers (n=21, 26%). The most common TSW information sources were Facebook (n=78, 96%), websites (n=75, 93%), and Instagram (n=45, 56%), but YouTube (n=11, 14%), podcasts (n=7, 10%), and TikTok (n=5, 6%) were also reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This study investigates health care utilization patterns related to TSW. The results indicate that the participants received insufficient support from health care providers for symptoms they attributed to TSW. The participants initiated and maintained health care provider contacts for symptoms attributed to AD to a greater extent than for TSW and sought information and support for TSW elsewhere. Targeted interventions to overcome this could be educational efforts for general practitioners and dermatologists about the current scientific knowledge of TSW as well as the TSW discourse on social media. In addition, health care providers need to engage and contribute to evidence-based ","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e85183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation on Perceived Care Coordination and Information Satisfaction in Cancer Care: Randomized Controlled Trial. 跨部门视像会诊对癌症照护认知协调及资讯满意度的影响:随机对照试验。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.2196/76910
Fereshteh Baygi, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Lars Henrik Jensen, Maria Munch Storsveen, Sonja Wehberg, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Gilså Hansen

Background: Enhancing care coordination and sharing information in cancer care improves patient experiences by promoting clarity and satisfaction.

Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of cross-sectoral video consultation on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information compared to usual care.

Methods: This study presents secondary outcomes on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information from a 7-month follow-up of the Partnership Project. In this randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer were allocated to either an intervention group receiving cross-sectoral video consultation (oncologist, general practitioner, and patient) or a control group receiving usual care. Patients' perceptions of care coordination and information quality were assessed using the Australian Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire (CCCQ) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 at baseline and 7 months. Changes over time between groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.

Results: Of the 278 participants randomized (1:1), only 80 (28.8%) patients received the intervention due to technical and administrative issues. A total of 210 (75.5%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire, while 118 (42.4%) responded at 7 months. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time between the intervention and control groups in any outcome. The estimated differences in the change in score from baseline to 7 months were as follows: for the total CCCQ score, 1.11 (95% CI -2.32 to 4.53; P=.53); for the overall European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 score, 1.49 (95% CI -2.98 to 5.96; P=.51); for the CCCQ communication subscale, -1.49 (95% CI -1.33 to 4.31; P=.30); and for the navigation subscale, -0.03 (95% CI -1.52 to 1.46; P=.97).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate no statistically significant improvement in patients' reported care coordination or satisfaction with received information over 7 months. Technical issues with the video setup reduced fidelity rates and follow-up participation. Further research is needed to optimize the structure and content of cross-sectoral video consultations to better support patients' perceived outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716168; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02716168.

背景:在癌症治疗中加强护理协调和信息共享,通过提高清晰度和满意度来改善患者体验。目的:本研究旨在评估与常规护理相比,跨部门视频会诊对患者对护理协调和接收信息满意度的影响。方法:本研究从7个月的伙伴关系项目随访中获得患者对护理协调的感知和对接收信息的满意度的次要结果。在这项随机对照试验中,癌症患者被分配到接受跨部门视频咨询的干预组(肿瘤科医生、全科医生和患者)或接受常规护理的对照组。在基线和7个月时,使用澳大利亚癌症护理协调问卷(CCCQ)和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量信息问卷25来评估患者对护理协调和信息质量的看法。使用广义估计方程分析各组间随时间的变化。结果:在278名随机(1:1)参与者中,由于技术和管理问题,只有80名(28.8%)患者接受了干预。共有210名(75.5%)患者完成了基线问卷,118名(42.4%)患者在7个月时回复了问卷。在任何结果上,干预组和对照组之间没有观察到随时间变化的显著差异。从基线到7个月评分变化的估计差异如下:CCCQ总评分为1.11 (95% CI -2.32 ~ 4.53; P= 0.53);欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织总体生活质量信息问卷25分,1.49 (95% CI -2.98 ~ 5.96; P= 0.51);CCCQ通信子量表为-1.49 (95% CI为-1.33 ~ 4.31;P= 0.30);导航子量表为-0.03 (95% CI为-1.52至1.46;P= 0.97)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在7个月的时间里,患者报告的护理协调或对收到的信息的满意度没有统计学上的显著改善。视频设置的技术问题降低了保真率和后续参与。需要进一步研究优化跨部门视频会诊的结构和内容,以更好地支持患者的感知结果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716168;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02716168。
{"title":"Impact of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation on Perceived Care Coordination and Information Satisfaction in Cancer Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Fereshteh Baygi, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Lars Henrik Jensen, Maria Munch Storsveen, Sonja Wehberg, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Gilså Hansen","doi":"10.2196/76910","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing care coordination and sharing information in cancer care improves patient experiences by promoting clarity and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of cross-sectoral video consultation on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents secondary outcomes on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information from a 7-month follow-up of the Partnership Project. In this randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer were allocated to either an intervention group receiving cross-sectoral video consultation (oncologist, general practitioner, and patient) or a control group receiving usual care. Patients' perceptions of care coordination and information quality were assessed using the Australian Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire (CCCQ) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 at baseline and 7 months. Changes over time between groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 278 participants randomized (1:1), only 80 (28.8%) patients received the intervention due to technical and administrative issues. A total of 210 (75.5%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire, while 118 (42.4%) responded at 7 months. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time between the intervention and control groups in any outcome. The estimated differences in the change in score from baseline to 7 months were as follows: for the total CCCQ score, 1.11 (95% CI -2.32 to 4.53; P=.53); for the overall European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 score, 1.49 (95% CI -2.98 to 5.96; P=.51); for the CCCQ communication subscale, -1.49 (95% CI -1.33 to 4.31; P=.30); and for the navigation subscale, -0.03 (95% CI -1.52 to 1.46; P=.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate no statistically significant improvement in patients' reported care coordination or satisfaction with received information over 7 months. Technical issues with the video setup reduced fidelity rates and follow-up participation. Further research is needed to optimize the structure and content of cross-sectoral video consultations to better support patients' perceived outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716168; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02716168.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e76910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805320/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JMIR Formative Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1