Hui G Cheng, Brendan Noggle, Andrea R Vansickel, Edward G Largo, Pierpaolo Magnani
Background: The Tobacco Heating System (THS; commercialized as IQOS) is a smoke-free heated tobacco product introduced in the United States in 2019 and authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration as a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) in 2020. THS consists of a holder and specially designed tobacco sticks that are heated instead of burned to produce a nicotine-containing aerosol. THS was available in Atlanta, Georgia; Richmond, Virginia; Charlotte, North Carolina; the Northern Virginia region; and South Carolina before its market removal in November 2021.
Objective: This study aims to describe selected sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported health history of adults who used IQOS (AUIs), their tobacco use patterns (eg, tobacco use history, exclusive and dual-use, and switching from cigarette smoking), their risk perceptions of the product, and their understanding of MRTP messages.
Methods: The IQOS Cross-Sectional Postmarket Adult Consumer Study was a study of AUIs aged 21 years or older who were recruited from a consumer database via direct postal mail and emails. Participants completed the online survey between September and November 2021.
Results: The survey was completed by 645 current and 43 former AUIs who had used at least 100 tobacco sticks (considered established THS use) before the assessment. Of the 688 participants, 424 (61.6%) were male, 502 (73.0%) were non-Hispanic White, and the mean age was 45 years. The vast majority (680/688, 98.8%) of AUIs had ever smoked combusted cigarettes before first trying THS and 628 (91.3%) had smoked cigarettes in the 30 days before first using THS. At the time of assessment, 161 (23.4%) reported using e-cigarettes (vs 229, 33.3%, before THS use), 92 (13.4%) reported smoking cigars (vs 114, 16.6%, before THS use), and 338 (49.1%) were still smoking after an average of 1 year of THS use. Among those currently using THS who were still smoking (n=298), 249 (83.6%) smoked fewer cigarettes compared with before first trying THS; 362 of 688 (52.6%) AUIs reported having no physical health conditions evaluated in this study and almost three-quarters reported having no mental health conditions. Among all AUIs, over 563 (81.8%) had never used a cessation treatment or had not used it in the past 12 months, and 555 (80.7%) AUIs demonstrated a correct understanding of the MRTP message and AUIs perceived THS as having a lower risk than cigarettes (43.8 vs 64.4 on a 100-point composite score scale).
Conclusions: This study provides evidence that THS can help adult smokers in the United States completely switch away from cigarettes or reduce smoking.
{"title":"Tobacco Use, Risk Perceptions, and Characteristics of Adults Who Used a Heated Tobacco Product (IQOS) in the United States: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Hui G Cheng, Brendan Noggle, Andrea R Vansickel, Edward G Largo, Pierpaolo Magnani","doi":"10.2196/57398","DOIUrl":"10.2196/57398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Tobacco Heating System (THS; commercialized as IQOS) is a smoke-free heated tobacco product introduced in the United States in 2019 and authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration as a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) in 2020. THS consists of a holder and specially designed tobacco sticks that are heated instead of burned to produce a nicotine-containing aerosol. THS was available in Atlanta, Georgia; Richmond, Virginia; Charlotte, North Carolina; the Northern Virginia region; and South Carolina before its market removal in November 2021.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to describe selected sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported health history of adults who used IQOS (AUIs), their tobacco use patterns (eg, tobacco use history, exclusive and dual-use, and switching from cigarette smoking), their risk perceptions of the product, and their understanding of MRTP messages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IQOS Cross-Sectional Postmarket Adult Consumer Study was a study of AUIs aged 21 years or older who were recruited from a consumer database via direct postal mail and emails. Participants completed the online survey between September and November 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 645 current and 43 former AUIs who had used at least 100 tobacco sticks (considered established THS use) before the assessment. Of the 688 participants, 424 (61.6%) were male, 502 (73.0%) were non-Hispanic White, and the mean age was 45 years. The vast majority (680/688, 98.8%) of AUIs had ever smoked combusted cigarettes before first trying THS and 628 (91.3%) had smoked cigarettes in the 30 days before first using THS. At the time of assessment, 161 (23.4%) reported using e-cigarettes (vs 229, 33.3%, before THS use), 92 (13.4%) reported smoking cigars (vs 114, 16.6%, before THS use), and 338 (49.1%) were still smoking after an average of 1 year of THS use. Among those currently using THS who were still smoking (n=298), 249 (83.6%) smoked fewer cigarettes compared with before first trying THS; 362 of 688 (52.6%) AUIs reported having no physical health conditions evaluated in this study and almost three-quarters reported having no mental health conditions. Among all AUIs, over 563 (81.8%) had never used a cessation treatment or had not used it in the past 12 months, and 555 (80.7%) AUIs demonstrated a correct understanding of the MRTP message and AUIs perceived THS as having a lower risk than cigarettes (43.8 vs 64.4 on a 100-point composite score scale).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence that THS can help adult smokers in the United States completely switch away from cigarettes or reduce smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e57398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143370670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marshall K Cheney, Adam C Alexander, Lorra Garey, Matthew W Gallagher, Emily T Hébert, Anka A Vujanovic, Krista M Kezbers, Cameron T Matoska, Michael J Zvolensky, Michael S Businelle
<p><strong>Background: </strong>At least half of smokers make a serious quit attempt each year, but Black adults who smoke are less likely than White adults who smoke to quit smoking successfully. Black adults who smoke and have high anxiety sensitivity (an individual difference factor implicated in smoking relapse and culturally relevant to Black adults) are even less successful. The Mobile Anxiety Sensitivity Program for Smoking (MASP) is a smoking cessation smartphone app culturally tailored to Black adults who smoke to increase smoking cessation rates by targeting anxiety sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the acceptability and feasibility of the MASP smartphone app following a 6-week pilot test through postintervention qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MASP smoking cessation app was adapted from an evidence-based app by adding culturally tailored narration and images specific to the Black community, educational content on tobacco use in the Black community and the role of menthol, culturally tailored messages, and addressing tobacco use and racial discrimination. The MASP app was piloted with 24 adults with high anxiety sensitivity who identified as Black, smoked daily, and were not currently using medications or psychotherapy for smoking cessation. At the end of the 6-week pilot test, 21/24 participants (67% female; 95.2% non-Hispanic; mean age=47.3 years; 43% college educated; 86% single or separated) completed an audio-recorded semistructured interview assessing the acceptability and utility of the app, individual experiences, barriers to use, the cultural fit for Black adults who wanted to quit smoking, and identified areas for improvement. Transcribed interviews were coded using NVivo (Lumivero), and then analyzed for themes using an inductive, use-focused process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (17/21, 81%) had smoked for more than 20 years and 29% (6/21) of them smoked more than 20 cigarettes daily. Participants felt the MASP app was helpful in quitting smoking (20/21, 95%) and made them more aware of smoking thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (16/19, 84%). Half of the participants (11/21, 52%) thought the combination of medication and smartphone app gave them the best chance of quitting smoking. Themes related to participant experiences using the app included establishing trust and credibility through the recruitment experience, providing personally tailored content linked to evidence-based stress reduction techniques, and self-reflection through daily surveys. The culturally tailored material increased app relevance, engagement, and acceptability. Suggested improvements included opportunities to engage with other participants, more control over app functions, and additional self-monitoring functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding culturally tailored material to an evidence-based mobile health (mHealth) intervention could increase the use of smok
{"title":"Adapting a Mobile Health App for Smoking Cessation in Black Adults With Anxiety Through an Analysis of the Mobile Anxiety Sensitivity Program Proof-of-Concept Trial: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Marshall K Cheney, Adam C Alexander, Lorra Garey, Matthew W Gallagher, Emily T Hébert, Anka A Vujanovic, Krista M Kezbers, Cameron T Matoska, Michael J Zvolensky, Michael S Businelle","doi":"10.2196/53566","DOIUrl":"10.2196/53566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At least half of smokers make a serious quit attempt each year, but Black adults who smoke are less likely than White adults who smoke to quit smoking successfully. Black adults who smoke and have high anxiety sensitivity (an individual difference factor implicated in smoking relapse and culturally relevant to Black adults) are even less successful. The Mobile Anxiety Sensitivity Program for Smoking (MASP) is a smoking cessation smartphone app culturally tailored to Black adults who smoke to increase smoking cessation rates by targeting anxiety sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the acceptability and feasibility of the MASP smartphone app following a 6-week pilot test through postintervention qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MASP smoking cessation app was adapted from an evidence-based app by adding culturally tailored narration and images specific to the Black community, educational content on tobacco use in the Black community and the role of menthol, culturally tailored messages, and addressing tobacco use and racial discrimination. The MASP app was piloted with 24 adults with high anxiety sensitivity who identified as Black, smoked daily, and were not currently using medications or psychotherapy for smoking cessation. At the end of the 6-week pilot test, 21/24 participants (67% female; 95.2% non-Hispanic; mean age=47.3 years; 43% college educated; 86% single or separated) completed an audio-recorded semistructured interview assessing the acceptability and utility of the app, individual experiences, barriers to use, the cultural fit for Black adults who wanted to quit smoking, and identified areas for improvement. Transcribed interviews were coded using NVivo (Lumivero), and then analyzed for themes using an inductive, use-focused process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (17/21, 81%) had smoked for more than 20 years and 29% (6/21) of them smoked more than 20 cigarettes daily. Participants felt the MASP app was helpful in quitting smoking (20/21, 95%) and made them more aware of smoking thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (16/19, 84%). Half of the participants (11/21, 52%) thought the combination of medication and smartphone app gave them the best chance of quitting smoking. Themes related to participant experiences using the app included establishing trust and credibility through the recruitment experience, providing personally tailored content linked to evidence-based stress reduction techniques, and self-reflection through daily surveys. The culturally tailored material increased app relevance, engagement, and acceptability. Suggested improvements included opportunities to engage with other participants, more control over app functions, and additional self-monitoring functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding culturally tailored material to an evidence-based mobile health (mHealth) intervention could increase the use of smok","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e53566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laurence Astill Wright, Matthew Moore, Stuart Reeves, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Richard Morriss
Background: Coproduction with users of new digital technology, such as passive mood monitoring, is likely to improve its utility, safety, and successful implementation via improved design and consideration of how such technology fits with their daily lives. Mood-monitoring interventions are commonly used by people with bipolar disorder (BD) and have promising potential for digitization using novel technological methods.
Objective: This study aims to explore how a passive behavioral monitoring platform, Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse, would meet the needs of people with BD by specifically considering purpose and function, diversity of need, personal preference, essential components and potential risks, and harms and mitigation strategies through an iterative coproduction process.
Methods: A total of 17 people with BD were recruited via national charities. We conducted 3 web-based focus groups as a part of an iterative coproduction process in line with responsible research and innovation principles and with consideration of clinical challenges associated with BD. Data were analyzed thematically. Results were cross-checked by someone with lived experience of BD.
Results: Focus groups were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Six themes were identified as follows: (1) the purpose of using the app, (2) desired features, (3) when to use the app, (4) risks of using the app, (5) sharing with family and friends, and (6) sharing with health care professionals.
Conclusions: People with BD who are interested in using passive technology to monitor their mood wish to do so for a wide variety of purposes, identifying several preferences and potential risks. Principally, people with BD wished to use this novel technology to aid them in self-managing their BD with greater insight and a better understanding of potential triggers. We discuss key features that may aid this functionality and purpose, including crisis plans and sharing with others. Future development of passive mood-monitoring technologies should not assume that the involvement of formal mental health services is desired.
{"title":"Improving the Utility, Safety, and Ethical Use of a Passive Mood-Tracking App for People With Bipolar Disorder Using Coproduction: Qualitative Focus Group Study.","authors":"Laurence Astill Wright, Matthew Moore, Stuart Reeves, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Richard Morriss","doi":"10.2196/65140","DOIUrl":"10.2196/65140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coproduction with users of new digital technology, such as passive mood monitoring, is likely to improve its utility, safety, and successful implementation via improved design and consideration of how such technology fits with their daily lives. Mood-monitoring interventions are commonly used by people with bipolar disorder (BD) and have promising potential for digitization using novel technological methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore how a passive behavioral monitoring platform, Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse, would meet the needs of people with BD by specifically considering purpose and function, diversity of need, personal preference, essential components and potential risks, and harms and mitigation strategies through an iterative coproduction process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 17 people with BD were recruited via national charities. We conducted 3 web-based focus groups as a part of an iterative coproduction process in line with responsible research and innovation principles and with consideration of clinical challenges associated with BD. Data were analyzed thematically. Results were cross-checked by someone with lived experience of BD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focus groups were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Six themes were identified as follows: (1) the purpose of using the app, (2) desired features, (3) when to use the app, (4) risks of using the app, (5) sharing with family and friends, and (6) sharing with health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with BD who are interested in using passive technology to monitor their mood wish to do so for a wide variety of purposes, identifying several preferences and potential risks. Principally, people with BD wished to use this novel technology to aid them in self-managing their BD with greater insight and a better understanding of potential triggers. We discuss key features that may aid this functionality and purpose, including crisis plans and sharing with others. Future development of passive mood-monitoring technologies should not assume that the involvement of formal mental health services is desired.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e65140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christian Rose, Emily Shearer, Isabela Woller, Ashley Foster, Nicholas Ashenburg, Ireh Kim, Jennifer Newberry
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precision medicine promises to revolutionize health care by providing the right care to the right patient at the right time. However, the emergency department's unique mandate to treat "anyone, anywhere, anytime" creates critical tensions with precision medicine's requirements for comprehensive patient data and computational analysis. As emergency departments serve as health care's safety net and provide a growing proportion of acute care in America, identifying and addressing the ethical challenges of implementing precision medicine in this setting is crucial to prevent exacerbation of existing health care disparities. The rapid advancement of precision medicine technologies makes it imperative to understand these challenges before widespread implementation in emergency care settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify high priority ethical concerns facing the implementation of precision medicine in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using a modified nominal group technique (NGT) with emergency physicians who had previous knowledge of precision medicine concepts. The NGT process consisted of four phases: (1) silent generation of ideas, (2) round-robin sharing of ideas, (3) structured discussion and clarification, and (4) thematic grouping of priorities. Participants represented diverse practice settings (county hospital, community hospital, academic center, and integrated managed care consortium) and subspecialties (education, ethics, pediatrics, diversity, equity, inclusion, and informatics) across various career stages from residents to late-career physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 emergency physicians identified 82 initial challenges during individual ideation, which were consolidated to 48 unique challenges after removing duplicates and combining related items. The average participant contributed 6.8 (SD 2.9) challenges. These challenges were organized into a framework with 3 themes: values, privacy, and justice. The framework identified the need to address these themes across 3 time points of the precision medicine process: acquisition of data, actualization in the care setting, and the after effects of its use. This systematic organization revealed interrelated concerns spanning from data collection and bias to implementation challenges and long-term consequences for health care equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study developed a novel framework that maps critical ethical challenges across 3 domains (values, privacy, and justice) and 3 temporal stages of precision medicine implementation. This framework identifies high-priority areas for future research and policy development, particularly around data representation, privacy protection, and equitable access. Successfully addressing these challenges is essential to realize precision medicine's potential while preserving emergency medicine'
{"title":"Identifying High-Priority Ethical Challenges for Precision Emergency Medicine: Nominal Group Study.","authors":"Christian Rose, Emily Shearer, Isabela Woller, Ashley Foster, Nicholas Ashenburg, Ireh Kim, Jennifer Newberry","doi":"10.2196/68371","DOIUrl":"10.2196/68371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precision medicine promises to revolutionize health care by providing the right care to the right patient at the right time. However, the emergency department's unique mandate to treat \"anyone, anywhere, anytime\" creates critical tensions with precision medicine's requirements for comprehensive patient data and computational analysis. As emergency departments serve as health care's safety net and provide a growing proportion of acute care in America, identifying and addressing the ethical challenges of implementing precision medicine in this setting is crucial to prevent exacerbation of existing health care disparities. The rapid advancement of precision medicine technologies makes it imperative to understand these challenges before widespread implementation in emergency care settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify high priority ethical concerns facing the implementation of precision medicine in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using a modified nominal group technique (NGT) with emergency physicians who had previous knowledge of precision medicine concepts. The NGT process consisted of four phases: (1) silent generation of ideas, (2) round-robin sharing of ideas, (3) structured discussion and clarification, and (4) thematic grouping of priorities. Participants represented diverse practice settings (county hospital, community hospital, academic center, and integrated managed care consortium) and subspecialties (education, ethics, pediatrics, diversity, equity, inclusion, and informatics) across various career stages from residents to late-career physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 emergency physicians identified 82 initial challenges during individual ideation, which were consolidated to 48 unique challenges after removing duplicates and combining related items. The average participant contributed 6.8 (SD 2.9) challenges. These challenges were organized into a framework with 3 themes: values, privacy, and justice. The framework identified the need to address these themes across 3 time points of the precision medicine process: acquisition of data, actualization in the care setting, and the after effects of its use. This systematic organization revealed interrelated concerns spanning from data collection and bias to implementation challenges and long-term consequences for health care equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study developed a novel framework that maps critical ethical challenges across 3 domains (values, privacy, and justice) and 3 temporal stages of precision medicine implementation. This framework identifies high-priority areas for future research and policy development, particularly around data representation, privacy protection, and equitable access. Successfully addressing these challenges is essential to realize precision medicine's potential while preserving emergency medicine'","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e68371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: As Korea rapidly transforms into a super-aged society, research indicates that digital literacy among older adults enhances their life satisfaction. Digital literacy refers to the ability to efficiently use digital technologies, encompassing access, competency, and utilization. It reflects the capacity to navigate and benefit from digital environments effectively. Furthermore, social capital positively influences the quality of life, and digital literacy facilitates social capital formation. However, since most studies have only focused on the direct relationship between digital literacy and life satisfaction, research on the mediating role of social capital remains limited.
Objective: To analyze the effect of digital literacy on the life satisfaction of older adults in South Korea and to verify whether social capital acts as a mediating factor in this process.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study used data from the 2023 Report on the Digital Divide-an annual survey conducted by the Korean Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology. The study targeted individuals aged 65 years or older. Descriptive statistics, the Pearson correlation analyses, and the 3-step multiple regression analysis proposed by Baron and Kenny were performed. The bootstrap method was employed, and all analyses were conducted using R, version 4.4.1.
Results: The study included 869 participants. Digital literacy had a significant positive effect on their life satisfaction (β=0.103; P=.008). Social capital was also positively associated with life satisfaction (β=0.337; P<.001). Mediation analysis showed that digital literacy influenced life satisfaction both directly (β=0.103; P=.006) and indirectly through social capital (β=0.037; P=.03). Bootstrapping confirmed the significance of the indirect effect (β=0.037, 95% CI 0.005-0.070; P=.03). The total effect of digital literacy on life satisfaction was also significant (β=0.140, 95% CI 0.058-0.230; P=.002).
Conclusions: This study analyzed the association between digital literacy, social capital, and life satisfaction among older adults in Korea. We identified that social capital mediates the association between digital literacy and life satisfaction among older adults. These findings indicate that tailored digital literacy programs and support policies that promote social capital formation could help bridge the digital divide and foster social inclusion. These measures would enable older adults to access essential services, reduce social isolation, and enhance health and well-being, ultimately improving the overall quality of life.
{"title":"Mediating Effect of Social Capital on the Association Between Digital Literacy and Life Satisfaction Among Older Adults in South Korea: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Hyein Jung, Hocheol Lee, Eun Woo Nam","doi":"10.2196/68163","DOIUrl":"10.2196/68163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As Korea rapidly transforms into a super-aged society, research indicates that digital literacy among older adults enhances their life satisfaction. Digital literacy refers to the ability to efficiently use digital technologies, encompassing access, competency, and utilization. It reflects the capacity to navigate and benefit from digital environments effectively. Furthermore, social capital positively influences the quality of life, and digital literacy facilitates social capital formation. However, since most studies have only focused on the direct relationship between digital literacy and life satisfaction, research on the mediating role of social capital remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effect of digital literacy on the life satisfaction of older adults in South Korea and to verify whether social capital acts as a mediating factor in this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study used data from the 2023 Report on the Digital Divide-an annual survey conducted by the Korean Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology. The study targeted individuals aged 65 years or older. Descriptive statistics, the Pearson correlation analyses, and the 3-step multiple regression analysis proposed by Baron and Kenny were performed. The bootstrap method was employed, and all analyses were conducted using R, version 4.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 869 participants. Digital literacy had a significant positive effect on their life satisfaction (β=0.103; P=.008). Social capital was also positively associated with life satisfaction (β=0.337; P<.001). Mediation analysis showed that digital literacy influenced life satisfaction both directly (β=0.103; P=.006) and indirectly through social capital (β=0.037; P=.03). Bootstrapping confirmed the significance of the indirect effect (β=0.037, 95% CI 0.005-0.070; P=.03). The total effect of digital literacy on life satisfaction was also significant (β=0.140, 95% CI 0.058-0.230; P=.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study analyzed the association between digital literacy, social capital, and life satisfaction among older adults in Korea. We identified that social capital mediates the association between digital literacy and life satisfaction among older adults. These findings indicate that tailored digital literacy programs and support policies that promote social capital formation could help bridge the digital divide and foster social inclusion. These measures would enable older adults to access essential services, reduce social isolation, and enhance health and well-being, ultimately improving the overall quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e68163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stefan Walzer, Isabel Schön, Johanna Pfeil, Sam Klemm, Sven Ziegler, Claudia Schmoor, Christophe Kunze
Background: Technology that detects early when a patient at risk of falling leaves the bed can support nurses in acute care hospitals.
Objective: To develop a better understanding of nurses' perspectives and experiences with a bed-exit information system (BES) in an acute care hospital setting.
Methods: BES was implemented on 3 wards of a university medical center. Nurses completed 2 online surveys at each time point (P0 and P1) and participated in focus groups before (P0) and after (P1) implementation. Additional patient data were collected. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, while content analysis was applied to focus group data. Patient rates and adverse events in both phases were compared using negative binomial models. Reporting of this study adhered to the GRAMMS checklist.
Results: A total of 30 questionnaires were completed at P0 (30/72, 42%) and 24 at P1 (24/71, 33%). Of the participants, 15 completed both questionnaires (complete cases). At P1, 64% (9/14) of participants agreed that their perceived workload and strain in caring for patients with cognitive impairment was reduced by the use of the BES. The adverse event rate per patient per day was reduced by a factor of 0.61 (95% CI 0.393-0.955; P=.03). In addition, 11 nurses participated in 4 focus groups before and after the intervention. Participants found it challenging to operationalize the use of the BES due to the heterogeneity of care settings, but certain behaviors of patients with cognitive impairment were recognized as indicating a need for intervention. Negative experiences included information overload and alarm fatigue, leading to occasional removal of the system.
Conclusions: While BES provides some support in managing patients with cognitive impairment, its impact remains limited to specific scenarios and does not significantly reduce nurses' workload or strain. Our findings highlight the need to manage expectations of BES performance to ensure alignment between expected and actual benefits. To improve BES effectiveness and long-term implementation, future research should consider both objective measures of patient care and subjective factors such as nurse experience, structural conditions, and technical specifications. Improving information mechanisms within call systems could help reduce alarm fatigue and increase perceived usefulness. Overall, successful integration of BES in acute care settings will require close collaboration with nursing staff to drive meaningful healthcare innovation and ensure that the technology meets the needs of both patients and nurses.
Trial registration: German Register for Clinical Studies DRKS00021720; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00021720.
{"title":"Nurses' Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Stefan Walzer, Isabel Schön, Johanna Pfeil, Sam Klemm, Sven Ziegler, Claudia Schmoor, Christophe Kunze","doi":"10.2196/64444","DOIUrl":"10.2196/64444","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technology that detects early when a patient at risk of falling leaves the bed can support nurses in acute care hospitals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a better understanding of nurses' perspectives and experiences with a bed-exit information system (BES) in an acute care hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BES was implemented on 3 wards of a university medical center. Nurses completed 2 online surveys at each time point (P0 and P1) and participated in focus groups before (P0) and after (P1) implementation. Additional patient data were collected. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, while content analysis was applied to focus group data. Patient rates and adverse events in both phases were compared using negative binomial models. Reporting of this study adhered to the GRAMMS checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 questionnaires were completed at P0 (30/72, 42%) and 24 at P1 (24/71, 33%). Of the participants, 15 completed both questionnaires (complete cases). At P1, 64% (9/14) of participants agreed that their perceived workload and strain in caring for patients with cognitive impairment was reduced by the use of the BES. The adverse event rate per patient per day was reduced by a factor of 0.61 (95% CI 0.393-0.955; P=.03). In addition, 11 nurses participated in 4 focus groups before and after the intervention. Participants found it challenging to operationalize the use of the BES due to the heterogeneity of care settings, but certain behaviors of patients with cognitive impairment were recognized as indicating a need for intervention. Negative experiences included information overload and alarm fatigue, leading to occasional removal of the system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While BES provides some support in managing patients with cognitive impairment, its impact remains limited to specific scenarios and does not significantly reduce nurses' workload or strain. Our findings highlight the need to manage expectations of BES performance to ensure alignment between expected and actual benefits. To improve BES effectiveness and long-term implementation, future research should consider both objective measures of patient care and subjective factors such as nurse experience, structural conditions, and technical specifications. Improving information mechanisms within call systems could help reduce alarm fatigue and increase perceived usefulness. Overall, successful integration of BES in acute care settings will require close collaboration with nursing staff to drive meaningful healthcare innovation and ensure that the technology meets the needs of both patients and nurses.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Register for Clinical Studies DRKS00021720; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00021720.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e64444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143189657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Michèle Buchinger, Hisham Atwan, Ruba Tuma, Francesco Chirico, Lukasz Szarpak, Raymond Farah, Rola Khamisy-Farah
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly strained health care systems globally, leading to an overwhelming influx of patients and exacerbating resource limitations. Concurrently, an "infodemic" of misinformation, particularly prevalent in women's health, has emerged. This challenge has been pivotal for health care providers, especially gynecologists and obstetricians, in managing pregnant women's health. The pandemic heightened risks for pregnant women from COVID-19, necessitating balanced advice from specialists on vaccine safety versus known risks. In addition, the advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as large language models (LLMs), offers promising support in health care. However, they necessitate rigorous testing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess LLMs' proficiency, clarity, and objectivity regarding COVID-19's impacts on pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates 4 major AI prototypes (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Bard) using zero-shot prompts in a questionnaire validated among 159 Israeli gynecologists and obstetricians. The questionnaire assesses proficiency in providing accurate information on COVID-19 in relation to pregnancy. Text-mining, sentiment analysis, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level and Flesch Reading Ease Score) were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of LLMs' knowledge, ChatGPT-4 and Microsoft Copilot each scored 97% (32/33), Google Bard 94% (31/33), and ChatGPT-3.5 82% (27/33). ChatGPT-4 incorrectly stated an increased risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19. Google Bard and Microsoft Copilot had minor inaccuracies concerning COVID-19 transmission and complications. In the sentiment analysis, Microsoft Copilot achieved the least negative score (-4), followed by ChatGPT-4 (-6) and Google Bard (-7), while ChatGPT-3.5 obtained the most negative score (-12). Finally, concerning the readability analysis, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease Score showed that Microsoft Copilot was the most accessible at 9.9 and 49, followed by ChatGPT-4 at 12.4 and 37.1, while ChatGPT-3.5 (12.9 and 35.6) and Google Bard (12.9 and 35.8) generated particularly complex responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights varying knowledge levels of LLMs in relation to COVID-19 and pregnancy. ChatGPT-3.5 showed the least knowledge and alignment with scientific evidence. Readability and complexity analyses suggest that each AI's approach was tailored to specific audiences, with ChatGPT versions being more suitable for specialized readers and Microsoft Copilot for the general public. Sentiment analysis revealed notable variations in the way LLMs communicated critical information, underscoring the essential role of neutral and objective health care communication in ensuring that pregnant women, particularly vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic, receive accurate and reassuri
{"title":"Proficiency, Clarity, and Objectivity of Large Language Models Versus Specialists' Knowledge on COVID-19's Impacts in Pregnancy: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.","authors":"Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Michèle Buchinger, Hisham Atwan, Ruba Tuma, Francesco Chirico, Lukasz Szarpak, Raymond Farah, Rola Khamisy-Farah","doi":"10.2196/56126","DOIUrl":"10.2196/56126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly strained health care systems globally, leading to an overwhelming influx of patients and exacerbating resource limitations. Concurrently, an \"infodemic\" of misinformation, particularly prevalent in women's health, has emerged. This challenge has been pivotal for health care providers, especially gynecologists and obstetricians, in managing pregnant women's health. The pandemic heightened risks for pregnant women from COVID-19, necessitating balanced advice from specialists on vaccine safety versus known risks. In addition, the advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as large language models (LLMs), offers promising support in health care. However, they necessitate rigorous testing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess LLMs' proficiency, clarity, and objectivity regarding COVID-19's impacts on pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates 4 major AI prototypes (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Bard) using zero-shot prompts in a questionnaire validated among 159 Israeli gynecologists and obstetricians. The questionnaire assesses proficiency in providing accurate information on COVID-19 in relation to pregnancy. Text-mining, sentiment analysis, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level and Flesch Reading Ease Score) were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of LLMs' knowledge, ChatGPT-4 and Microsoft Copilot each scored 97% (32/33), Google Bard 94% (31/33), and ChatGPT-3.5 82% (27/33). ChatGPT-4 incorrectly stated an increased risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19. Google Bard and Microsoft Copilot had minor inaccuracies concerning COVID-19 transmission and complications. In the sentiment analysis, Microsoft Copilot achieved the least negative score (-4), followed by ChatGPT-4 (-6) and Google Bard (-7), while ChatGPT-3.5 obtained the most negative score (-12). Finally, concerning the readability analysis, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease Score showed that Microsoft Copilot was the most accessible at 9.9 and 49, followed by ChatGPT-4 at 12.4 and 37.1, while ChatGPT-3.5 (12.9 and 35.6) and Google Bard (12.9 and 35.8) generated particularly complex responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights varying knowledge levels of LLMs in relation to COVID-19 and pregnancy. ChatGPT-3.5 showed the least knowledge and alignment with scientific evidence. Readability and complexity analyses suggest that each AI's approach was tailored to specific audiences, with ChatGPT versions being more suitable for specialized readers and Microsoft Copilot for the general public. Sentiment analysis revealed notable variations in the way LLMs communicated critical information, underscoring the essential role of neutral and objective health care communication in ensuring that pregnant women, particularly vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic, receive accurate and reassuri","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":" ","pages":"e56126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142965016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent problem causing substantial personal and societal burden. Although there are specific types of LBP, each with evidence-based treatment recommendations, most patients receive a nonspecific diagnosis that does not facilitate evidence-based and individualized care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We designed, developed, and initially tested the usability of a LBP diagnosis and treatment decision support tool based on the available evidence for use by clinicians who treat LBP, with an initial focus on chiropractic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our 3-step user-centered design approach consisted of identifying clinical requirements through the analysis of evidence reviews, iteratively identifying task-based user requirements and developing a working web-based prototype, and evaluating usability through scenario-based interviews and the System Usability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5 participating users had an average of 18.5 years of practicing chiropractic medicine. Clinical requirements included 44 patient interview and examination items. Of these, 13 interview items were enabled for all patients and 13 were enabled conditional on other input items. One examination item was enabled for all patients and 16 were enabled conditional on other items. One item was a synthesis of interview and examination items. These items provided evidence of 12 possible working diagnoses of which 3 were macrodiagnoses and 9 were microdiagnoses. Each diagnosis had relevant treatment recommendations and corresponding patient educational materials. User requirements focused on tasks related to inputting data, and reviewing and selecting working diagnoses, treatments, and patient education. User input led to key refinements in the design, such as organizing the input questions by microdiagnosis, adding a patient summary screen that persists during data input and when reviewing output, adding more information buttons and graphics to input questions, and providing traceability by highlighting the input items used by the clinical logic to suggest a working diagnosis. Users believed that it would be important to have the tool accessible from within an electronic health record for adoption within their workflows. The System Usability Scale score for the prototype was 84.75 (range: 67.5-95), considered as the top 10th percentile. Users believed that the tool was easy to use although it would require training and practice on the clinical content to use it effectively. With such training and practice, users believed that it would improve care and shed light on the "black hole" of LBP diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic process of defining clinical requirements and eliciting user requirements to inform a clinician-facing decision support tool produced a prototype application that was viewed positively and with enthusiasm by clinical users. With fu
{"title":"Addressing the \"Black Hole\" of Low Back Pain Care With Clinical Decision Support: User-Centered Design and Initial Usability Study.","authors":"Robert S Rudin, Patricia M Herman, Robert Vining","doi":"10.2196/66666","DOIUrl":"10.2196/66666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent problem causing substantial personal and societal burden. Although there are specific types of LBP, each with evidence-based treatment recommendations, most patients receive a nonspecific diagnosis that does not facilitate evidence-based and individualized care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We designed, developed, and initially tested the usability of a LBP diagnosis and treatment decision support tool based on the available evidence for use by clinicians who treat LBP, with an initial focus on chiropractic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our 3-step user-centered design approach consisted of identifying clinical requirements through the analysis of evidence reviews, iteratively identifying task-based user requirements and developing a working web-based prototype, and evaluating usability through scenario-based interviews and the System Usability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5 participating users had an average of 18.5 years of practicing chiropractic medicine. Clinical requirements included 44 patient interview and examination items. Of these, 13 interview items were enabled for all patients and 13 were enabled conditional on other input items. One examination item was enabled for all patients and 16 were enabled conditional on other items. One item was a synthesis of interview and examination items. These items provided evidence of 12 possible working diagnoses of which 3 were macrodiagnoses and 9 were microdiagnoses. Each diagnosis had relevant treatment recommendations and corresponding patient educational materials. User requirements focused on tasks related to inputting data, and reviewing and selecting working diagnoses, treatments, and patient education. User input led to key refinements in the design, such as organizing the input questions by microdiagnosis, adding a patient summary screen that persists during data input and when reviewing output, adding more information buttons and graphics to input questions, and providing traceability by highlighting the input items used by the clinical logic to suggest a working diagnosis. Users believed that it would be important to have the tool accessible from within an electronic health record for adoption within their workflows. The System Usability Scale score for the prototype was 84.75 (range: 67.5-95), considered as the top 10th percentile. Users believed that the tool was easy to use although it would require training and practice on the clinical content to use it effectively. With such training and practice, users believed that it would improve care and shed light on the \"black hole\" of LBP diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic process of defining clinical requirements and eliciting user requirements to inform a clinician-facing decision support tool produced a prototype application that was viewed positively and with enthusiasm by clinical users. With fu","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e66666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813196/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143189630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Duc Minh Tran, Nguyen Thanh Dung, Chau Minh Duc, Huynh Ngoc Hon, Le Minh Khoi, Nguyen Phuc Hau, Duong Thi Thu Huyen, Huynh Thi Le Thu, Tran Van Duc, Lam Minh Yen, C Louise Thwaites, Chris Paton
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have been recognized as a key solution to help countries, especially those in the low- and middle-income group, to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the World Health Organization's (WHO) Triple Billion Targets. In hospital settings, DHTs need to be designed and implemented, considering the local context, to achieve usability and sustainability. As projects such as the Vietnam ICU Translational Applications Laboratory are seeking to integrate new digital technologies in the Vietnamese critical care settings, it is important to understand the current status of DHT adoption in Vietnamese hospitals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to explore the current digital maturity in 5 Vietnamese public hospitals to understand their readiness in implementing new DHTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the adoption of some key DHTs and infrastructure in 5 top-tier public hospitals in Vietnam using a questionnaire adapted from the Vietnam Health Information Technology (HIT) Maturity Model. The questionnaire was answered by the heads of the hospitals' IT departments, with follow-up for clarifications and verifications on some answers. Descriptive statistics demonstrated on radar plots and tile graphs were used to visualize the data collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital information systems (HIS), laboratory information systems (LIS), and radiology information systems-picture archiving and communication systems (RIS-PACS) were implemented in all 5 hospitals, albeit at varied digital maturity levels. At least 50% of the criteria for LIS in the Vietnam HIT Maturity Model were satisfied by the hospitals in the assessment. However, this threshold was only met by 80% and 60% of the hospitals with regard to HIS and RIS-PACS, respectively. Two hospitals were not using any electronic medical record (EMR) system or fulfilling any extra digital capability, such as implementing clinical data repositories (CDRs) and clinical decision support systems (CDSS). No hospital reported sharing clinical data with other organizations using Health Level Seven (HL7) standards, such as Continuity of Care Document (CCD) and Clinical Document Architecture (CDA), although 2 (40%) reported their systems adopted these standards. Of the 5 hospitals, 4 (80%) reported their RIS-PACS adopted the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 5 major Vietnamese public hospitals in this assessment have widely adopted information systems, such as HIS, LIS, and RIS-PACS, to support administrative and clinical tasks. Although the adoption of EMR systems is less common, their implementation revolves around data collection, management, and access to clinical data. Secondary use of clinical data for decision support through the implementation of CDRs and CDSS is limited, posing a potential barrier to the integration of external DHT
{"title":"Status of Digital Health Technology Adoption in 5 Vietnamese Hospitals: Cross-Sectional Assessment.","authors":"Duc Minh Tran, Nguyen Thanh Dung, Chau Minh Duc, Huynh Ngoc Hon, Le Minh Khoi, Nguyen Phuc Hau, Duong Thi Thu Huyen, Huynh Thi Le Thu, Tran Van Duc, Lam Minh Yen, C Louise Thwaites, Chris Paton","doi":"10.2196/53483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53483","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have been recognized as a key solution to help countries, especially those in the low- and middle-income group, to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the World Health Organization's (WHO) Triple Billion Targets. In hospital settings, DHTs need to be designed and implemented, considering the local context, to achieve usability and sustainability. As projects such as the Vietnam ICU Translational Applications Laboratory are seeking to integrate new digital technologies in the Vietnamese critical care settings, it is important to understand the current status of DHT adoption in Vietnamese hospitals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to explore the current digital maturity in 5 Vietnamese public hospitals to understand their readiness in implementing new DHTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the adoption of some key DHTs and infrastructure in 5 top-tier public hospitals in Vietnam using a questionnaire adapted from the Vietnam Health Information Technology (HIT) Maturity Model. The questionnaire was answered by the heads of the hospitals' IT departments, with follow-up for clarifications and verifications on some answers. Descriptive statistics demonstrated on radar plots and tile graphs were used to visualize the data collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital information systems (HIS), laboratory information systems (LIS), and radiology information systems-picture archiving and communication systems (RIS-PACS) were implemented in all 5 hospitals, albeit at varied digital maturity levels. At least 50% of the criteria for LIS in the Vietnam HIT Maturity Model were satisfied by the hospitals in the assessment. However, this threshold was only met by 80% and 60% of the hospitals with regard to HIS and RIS-PACS, respectively. Two hospitals were not using any electronic medical record (EMR) system or fulfilling any extra digital capability, such as implementing clinical data repositories (CDRs) and clinical decision support systems (CDSS). No hospital reported sharing clinical data with other organizations using Health Level Seven (HL7) standards, such as Continuity of Care Document (CCD) and Clinical Document Architecture (CDA), although 2 (40%) reported their systems adopted these standards. Of the 5 hospitals, 4 (80%) reported their RIS-PACS adopted the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 5 major Vietnamese public hospitals in this assessment have widely adopted information systems, such as HIS, LIS, and RIS-PACS, to support administrative and clinical tasks. Although the adoption of EMR systems is less common, their implementation revolves around data collection, management, and access to clinical data. Secondary use of clinical data for decision support through the implementation of CDRs and CDSS is limited, posing a potential barrier to the integration of external DHT","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e53483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The incidence of delirium in patients with burns receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is high, reaching up to 77%, and has been associated with increased mortality rates. Therefore, early identification of patients at high risk of delirium onset is essential for improving treatment strategies.
Objective: This study aimed to create a machine learning model for predicting delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay using patient data from the first day of ICU admission and to identify predictive factors for ICU delirium in patients with burns.
Methods: This study focused on 82 patients with burns aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the ICU at Mie University Hospital for 24 h or more between January 2015 and June 2023. Seventy variables were measured in patients upon ICU admission and used as explanatory variables in the ICU delirium prediction model. Delirium was assessed using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist every 8 h after ICU admission. Ten different machine-learning methods were employed to predict ICU delirium. Multiple receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for various machine learning models, and the area under each curve (AUC) was compared. Additionally, the top 15 risk factors contributing to delirium onset were identified using Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis.
Results: Among the ten machine learning models tested, logistic regression (AUC: 0.906 ± 0.073), support vector machine (AUC: 0.897 ± 0.056), k-nearest neighbors (AUC: 0.894 ± 0.060), neural network (AUC: 0.857 ± 0.058), random forest (AUC: 0.850 ± 0.074), AdaBoost (AUC: 0.832 ± 0.094), gradient boosting machine (AUC: 0.821 ± 0.074), and Naive Bayes (AUC: 0.827 ± 0.095) demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting ICU delirium. Specifically, 24-h urine output (from ICU admission to 24 h), oxygen saturation, burn area, total bilirubin level, and intubation upon ICU admission were identified as the major risk factors for delirium onset. Additionally, variables, such as the proportion of white blood cell fractions, including monocytes, methemoglobin concentration, and respiratory rate, were identified as important risk factors for ICU delirium.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the ability of machine learning models trained with vital signs and blood data upon ICU admission to predict delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay.
Clinicaltrial:
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Delirium and Risk Factor Identification in ICU Patients with Burns: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Ryo Esumi, Hiroki Funao, Eiji Kawamoto, Ryota Sakamoto, Asami Ito-Masui, Fumito Okuno, Toru Shinkai, Atsuya Hane, Kaoru Ikejiri, Yuichi Akama, Arong Gaowa, Eun Jeong Park, Ryo Momosaki, Ryuji Kaku, Motomu Shimaoka","doi":"10.2196/65190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of delirium in patients with burns receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is high, reaching up to 77%, and has been associated with increased mortality rates. Therefore, early identification of patients at high risk of delirium onset is essential for improving treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to create a machine learning model for predicting delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay using patient data from the first day of ICU admission and to identify predictive factors for ICU delirium in patients with burns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study focused on 82 patients with burns aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the ICU at Mie University Hospital for 24 h or more between January 2015 and June 2023. Seventy variables were measured in patients upon ICU admission and used as explanatory variables in the ICU delirium prediction model. Delirium was assessed using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist every 8 h after ICU admission. Ten different machine-learning methods were employed to predict ICU delirium. Multiple receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for various machine learning models, and the area under each curve (AUC) was compared. Additionally, the top 15 risk factors contributing to delirium onset were identified using Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the ten machine learning models tested, logistic regression (AUC: 0.906 ± 0.073), support vector machine (AUC: 0.897 ± 0.056), k-nearest neighbors (AUC: 0.894 ± 0.060), neural network (AUC: 0.857 ± 0.058), random forest (AUC: 0.850 ± 0.074), AdaBoost (AUC: 0.832 ± 0.094), gradient boosting machine (AUC: 0.821 ± 0.074), and Naive Bayes (AUC: 0.827 ± 0.095) demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting ICU delirium. Specifically, 24-h urine output (from ICU admission to 24 h), oxygen saturation, burn area, total bilirubin level, and intubation upon ICU admission were identified as the major risk factors for delirium onset. Additionally, variables, such as the proportion of white blood cell fractions, including monocytes, methemoglobin concentration, and respiratory rate, were identified as important risk factors for ICU delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the ability of machine learning models trained with vital signs and blood data upon ICU admission to predict delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143079959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}