首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agricultural Economics最新文献

英文 中文
Stage-Specific Effects of Extreme Temperatures on Rural Labour Reallocation in China 极端气温对中国农村劳动力再分配的阶段性影响
IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-07-06 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12642
Le Yu, Xiaodong Du, Qinan Lu

Mitigating agricultural losses caused by extreme temperatures presents a global challenge. Using household-level data on corn farmers in northern China from 2009 to 2017, this paper examines how farmers mitigate welfare losses caused by extreme temperatures by reallocating labour from farm to off-farm sectors, accounting for the heterogeneity across crop growth stages during which extreme heat occurs. We find that extreme temperatures increase the labour supply in migrant off-farm employment during the initial stage of the growing season, shift labour from corn cultivation to local off-farm employment during the mid-season and do not significantly impact labour allocation in the final stage. These labour shifts are primarily driven by production risks associated with yield losses and harvest failures, which reduce agricultural returns. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that farm households engaged in part-time farming and those with low dependency are more likely to use labour reallocation as an adaptation to extreme temperatures due to lower mobility frictions. Our back-of-the-envelope welfare calculations indicate that labour reallocation from agriculture to off-farm employment, induced by extreme heat, mitigates up to 60.29% of agricultural losses. Ignoring this labour reallocation may overestimate the effect of extreme temperatures on farmers' welfare losses.

减轻极端气温造成的农业损失是一项全球性挑战。本文利用2009年至2017年中国北方玉米种植户的家庭数据,研究了农民如何通过将劳动力从农场重新分配到非农部门来减轻极端高温造成的福利损失,并考虑了极端高温发生期间作物生长阶段的异质性。我们发现,极端温度增加了生长季初期农民工非农就业的劳动力供给,在生长季中期将劳动力从玉米种植转移到当地非农就业,而在最后阶段对劳动力分配没有显著影响。这些劳动力转移主要是由与产量损失和歉收相关的生产风险驱动的,这会降低农业回报。异质性分析显示,从事兼职农业的农户和依赖性较低的农户更有可能利用劳动力再分配来适应极端温度,因为流动性摩擦较低。我们的基本福利计算表明,由极端高温引起的劳动力从农业向非农就业的再分配,减轻了高达60.29%的农业损失。忽视这种劳动力再分配可能高估了极端温度对农民福利损失的影响。
{"title":"Stage-Specific Effects of Extreme Temperatures on Rural Labour Reallocation in China","authors":"Le Yu,&nbsp;Xiaodong Du,&nbsp;Qinan Lu","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12642","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12642","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Mitigating agricultural losses caused by extreme temperatures presents a global challenge. Using household-level data on corn farmers in northern China from 2009 to 2017, this paper examines how farmers mitigate welfare losses caused by extreme temperatures by reallocating labour from farm to off-farm sectors, accounting for the heterogeneity across crop growth stages during which extreme heat occurs. We find that extreme temperatures increase the labour supply in migrant off-farm employment during the initial stage of the growing season, shift labour from corn cultivation to local off-farm employment during the mid-season and do not significantly impact labour allocation in the final stage. These labour shifts are primarily driven by production risks associated with yield losses and harvest failures, which reduce agricultural returns. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that farm households engaged in part-time farming and those with low dependency are more likely to use labour reallocation as an adaptation to extreme temperatures due to lower mobility frictions. Our back-of-the-envelope welfare calculations indicate that labour reallocation from agriculture to off-farm employment, induced by extreme heat, mitigates up to 60.29% of agricultural losses. Ignoring this labour reallocation may overestimate the effect of extreme temperatures on farmers' welfare losses.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 3","pages":"582-601"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144568597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agricultural Productivity Convergence in Latin America: The Role of Research and Development, Knowledge Spillovers, and Education Spending 拉丁美洲农业生产力趋同:研发、知识溢出和教育支出的作用
IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12643
Michée A. Lachaud

This study examines the evolution and drivers of agricultural productivity, measured as Total Factor Productivity (TFP), across 10 Latin American countries from 1981 to 2012. Earlier studies using traditional time series unit root and cointegration methods have assumed common short- and long-run parameters and therefore tended to confirm convergence across countries. This study estimates TFP using a stochastic production frontier model, then tests for convergence using a Panel Error Correction Model that allows for differences between countries and includes variables influenced by policy: cumulative R&D investment (as a proxy for knowledge), trade in capital goods (to capture knowledge spillovers), and education spending (as a proxy for human capital). The study finds no evidence of absolute convergence, that is countries are not all heading toward the same productivity level. However, conditional convergence toward different steady states is observed for all countries except Guatemala. Although most countries are moving toward separate productivity levels, investment in R&D, trade openness, and improved education can both close productivity gaps and raise overall long-run productivity. The findings suggest that targeted policies in these areas are essential to support productivity growth in lagging countries.

本研究考察了1981年至2012年10个拉丁美洲国家农业生产率(以全要素生产率(TFP)衡量)的演变及其驱动因素。早期的研究使用传统的时间序列单位根和协整方法,假设了共同的短期和长期参数,因此倾向于确认各国之间的收敛性。本研究使用随机生产前沿模型估计TFP,然后使用面板误差修正模型检验收敛性,该模型允许国家之间的差异,并包括受政策影响的变量:累积研发投资(作为知识的代理)、资本货物贸易(以捕捉知识溢出)和教育支出(作为人力资本的代理)。该研究没有发现绝对趋同的证据,也就是说,并非所有国家都朝着相同的生产率水平前进。然而,除危地马拉外,所有国家都观察到向不同稳定状态的条件收敛。虽然大多数国家都在朝着各自的生产率水平发展,但研发投资、贸易开放和改善教育既可以缩小生产率差距,又可以提高整体的长期生产率。研究结果表明,在这些领域制定有针对性的政策对于支持落后国家的生产率增长至关重要。
{"title":"Agricultural Productivity Convergence in Latin America: The Role of Research and Development, Knowledge Spillovers, and Education Spending","authors":"Michée A. Lachaud","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12643","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12643","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study examines the evolution and drivers of agricultural productivity, measured as Total Factor Productivity (TFP), across 10 Latin American countries from 1981 to 2012. Earlier studies using traditional time series unit root and cointegration methods have assumed common short- and long-run parameters and therefore tended to confirm convergence across countries. This study estimates TFP using a stochastic production frontier model, then tests for convergence using a Panel Error Correction Model that allows for differences between countries and includes variables influenced by policy: cumulative R&amp;D investment (as a proxy for knowledge), trade in capital goods (to capture knowledge spillovers), and education spending (as a proxy for human capital). The study finds no evidence of absolute convergence, that is countries are not all heading toward the same productivity level. However, conditional convergence toward different steady states is observed for all countries except Guatemala. Although most countries are moving toward separate productivity levels, investment in R&amp;D, trade openness, and improved education can both close productivity gaps and raise overall long-run productivity. The findings suggest that targeted policies in these areas are essential to support productivity growth in lagging countries.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 3","pages":"602-623"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144335146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Woody Plant Encroachment, Grassland Loss, and Farm Subsidies 木本植物侵占、草地损失与农业补贴
IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12641
Maximilian Meyer, Sergei Schaub, Petyo Bonev

The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) aims to prevent the degradation of ecosystems, such as grasslands, which play a key role in the provision of biodiversity, forage, and cultural ecosystem services. However, woody plant encroachment increasingly causes the loss of grasslands, which provide forage, are biodiversity hotspots, and are of high cultural value. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of agricultural policies in the form of farm subsidies on halting the loss of grasslands due to woody plant encroachment. To this end, we assemble a novel panel dataset that connects the farm-level census data of Swiss alpine summer farms and high-resolution remotely sensed woody plant encroachment data. To deal with the endogenous selection of claiming subsidies, we leverage an agricultural policy reform that abruptly and unevenly increased subsidies, allowing us to estimate the causal effect of subsidies at the farm level on woody plant encroachment. Our results show that an increase in subsidies causes a loss of 2% of grassland due to woody plant encroachment, which corresponds to an average loss of 4.7 ha of grassland per farm. Hence, our study highlights that the effect of subsidies can be complex and lead to unintended and not desired policy outcomes, which should be considered by policymakers.

联合国生态系统恢复十年(2021-2030年)旨在防止草原等生态系统的退化,草原在提供生物多样性、饲料和文化生态系统服务方面发挥着关键作用。然而,木本植物的入侵日益导致草原的丧失,草原是提供饲料的生物多样性热点,具有很高的文化价值。本文以农业补贴的形式评估了农业政策对阻止木本植物入侵造成的草原损失的影响。为此,我们组装了一个新的面板数据集,该数据集连接了瑞士高山夏季农场的农场级普查数据和高分辨率遥感木本植物入侵数据。为了处理要求补贴的内生选择,我们利用农业政策改革,突然和不均匀地增加补贴,使我们能够估计农场层面的补贴对木本植物入侵的因果效应。研究结果表明,补贴的增加导致木本植物侵蚀造成2%的草地损失,相当于每个农场平均损失4.7 ha的草地。因此,我们的研究强调,补贴的影响可能是复杂的,并导致意想不到的和不希望的政策结果,这应该被政策制定者考虑。
{"title":"Woody Plant Encroachment, Grassland Loss, and Farm Subsidies","authors":"Maximilian Meyer,&nbsp;Sergei Schaub,&nbsp;Petyo Bonev","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12641","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12641","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) aims to prevent the degradation of ecosystems, such as grasslands, which play a key role in the provision of biodiversity, forage, and cultural ecosystem services. However, woody plant encroachment increasingly causes the loss of grasslands, which provide forage, are biodiversity hotspots, and are of high cultural value. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of agricultural policies in the form of farm subsidies on halting the loss of grasslands due to woody plant encroachment. To this end, we assemble a novel panel dataset that connects the farm-level census data of Swiss alpine summer farms and high-resolution remotely sensed woody plant encroachment data. To deal with the endogenous selection of claiming subsidies, we leverage an agricultural policy reform that abruptly and unevenly increased subsidies, allowing us to estimate the causal effect of subsidies at the farm level on woody plant encroachment. Our results show that an increase in subsidies causes a loss of 2% of grassland due to woody plant encroachment, which corresponds to an average loss of 4.7 ha of grassland per farm. Hence, our study highlights that the effect of subsidies can be complex and lead to unintended and not desired policy outcomes, which should be considered by policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 3","pages":"570-581"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12641","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144328695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Information Provision on Consumer Preference and Demand Within a Multitier Food Label System 多层次食品标签制度下信息提供对消费者偏好和需求的影响
IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12637
Longzhong Shi, Xuan Chen, Wuyang Hu, Qi Jiang

Current research on the impact of information provision predominantly pertains to binary food label systems, with limited discussion on multitier food label systems. We propose a parsimonious conceptual framework showing that information provision does not necessarily benefit the multitier labelled food market. The impact depends on how consumers misperceive the quality of labelled food and the extent to which information provision alleviates such misperception. We supplement our conceptual framework with an empirical investigation of China's eco-labels. We find that information provision results in higher willingness to pay, market share and value of information for eco-labelled aquatic products and a preference order aligning closely with the stringency of regulation on these eco-labels. These findings, in conjunction with our theoretical framework, suggest an underestimation of the quality of eco-labelled aquatic products. Our study provides policymakers and relevant stakeholders with a framework to identify the impact and conditions of information provision within a multitier food label system.

目前关于信息提供影响的研究主要涉及二元食品标签系统,对多层食品标签系统的讨论有限。我们提出了一个简约的概念框架,表明信息提供不一定有利于多层标签食品市场。影响取决于消费者如何误解标签食品的质量,以及信息提供在多大程度上减轻了这种误解。我们通过对中国生态标签的实证研究来补充我们的概念框架。我们发现,信息提供导致对生态标签水产品的更高的支付意愿、市场份额和信息价值,并且偏好顺序与这些生态标签监管的严格程度密切相关。这些发现,结合我们的理论框架,表明低估了生态标签水产品的质量。我们的研究为政策制定者和相关利益相关者提供了一个框架,以确定多层食品标签系统中信息提供的影响和条件。
{"title":"Impact of Information Provision on Consumer Preference and Demand Within a Multitier Food Label System","authors":"Longzhong Shi,&nbsp;Xuan Chen,&nbsp;Wuyang Hu,&nbsp;Qi Jiang","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12637","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12637","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Current research on the impact of information provision predominantly pertains to binary food label systems, with limited discussion on multitier food label systems. We propose a parsimonious conceptual framework showing that information provision does not necessarily benefit the multitier labelled food market. The impact depends on how consumers misperceive the quality of labelled food and the extent to which information provision alleviates such misperception. We supplement our conceptual framework with an empirical investigation of China's eco-labels. We find that information provision results in higher willingness to pay, market share and value of information for eco-labelled aquatic products and a preference order aligning closely with the stringency of regulation on these eco-labels. These findings, in conjunction with our theoretical framework, suggest an underestimation of the quality of eco-labelled aquatic products. Our study provides policymakers and relevant stakeholders with a framework to identify the impact and conditions of information provision within a multitier food label system.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 3","pages":"531-554"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144252357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Environmental Regulations and Smallholder Farmers' Technical Efficiency: Empirical Evidence From Pastoral China 环境法规与小农技术效率:来自中国牧区的经验证据
IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12638
Mucong Xin, Shuhao Tan, Huanguang Qiu, Jianjun Tang

Existing studies on the association between environmental regulations and competitiveness have largely been conducted at the country, industry and firm levels, with little attention paid to their impacts on the economic performance of small farming households. We fill this gap by examining China's grassland ecological compensation policy, an environmental regulation aimed at grassland protection that restricts small herder households' grazing activities. Our empirical analysis is based on a relatively large-scale dataset of 570 herder households, and a stochastic frontier analysis is conducted to determine the technical efficiency of livestock production. The results show that the governmentally imposed grassland ecological compensation policy improves herder households' technical efficiencies, supporting the Porter Hypothesis, which suggests that environmental regulations trigger competitiveness. Further analysis shows that balance grazing, which is a less stringent regulation type, is effective in increasing technical efficiency, whereas grazing bans, which form a more stringent regulation type, fail to promote technical efficiency. This supports the narrow version of the Porter Hypothesis, which suggests that flexible environmental regulations have greater innovation effects than prescriptive ones. In addition, we find a positive and significant relationship between payment intensity and technical efficiency. Grassland plots covered by grazing ban and meeting ecological restoration standards should be converted to balance grazing to improve herders' technical efficiencies.

关于环境法规和竞争力之间关系的现有研究主要是在国家、工业和公司一级进行的,很少注意到它们对小农户经济业绩的影响。我们通过研究中国的草原生态补偿政策来填补这一空白,这是一项旨在保护草原的环境法规,限制了小牧民的放牧活动。本文的实证分析基于570户牧民的相对较大的数据集,并进行随机前沿分析,以确定畜牧业生产的技术效率。结果表明,政府实施的草原生态补偿政策提高了牧民家庭的技术效率,这支持了波特假说,即环境规制触发竞争力。进一步分析表明,平衡放牧是一种较不严格的监管类型,在提高技术效率方面是有效的,而禁牧是一种较严格的监管类型,在提高技术效率方面是无效的。这支持了狭义的波特假说,即灵活的环境法规比规定性的环境法规具有更大的创新效应。此外,我们发现支付强度与技术效率之间存在显著的正相关关系。封牧区达到生态恢复标准的草地应转为平衡放牧,提高牧民的技术效率。
{"title":"Environmental Regulations and Smallholder Farmers' Technical Efficiency: Empirical Evidence From Pastoral China","authors":"Mucong Xin,&nbsp;Shuhao Tan,&nbsp;Huanguang Qiu,&nbsp;Jianjun Tang","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12638","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12638","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Existing studies on the association between environmental regulations and competitiveness have largely been conducted at the country, industry and firm levels, with little attention paid to their impacts on the economic performance of small farming households. We fill this gap by examining China's grassland ecological compensation policy, an environmental regulation aimed at grassland protection that restricts small herder households' grazing activities. Our empirical analysis is based on a relatively large-scale dataset of 570 herder households, and a stochastic frontier analysis is conducted to determine the technical efficiency of livestock production. The results show that the governmentally imposed grassland ecological compensation policy improves herder households' technical efficiencies, supporting the Porter Hypothesis, which suggests that environmental regulations trigger competitiveness. Further analysis shows that balance grazing, which is a less stringent regulation type, is effective in increasing technical efficiency, whereas grazing bans, which form a more stringent regulation type, fail to promote technical efficiency. This supports the narrow version of the Porter Hypothesis, which suggests that flexible environmental regulations have greater innovation effects than prescriptive ones. In addition, we find a positive and significant relationship between payment intensity and technical efficiency. Grassland plots covered by grazing ban and meeting ecological restoration standards should be converted to balance grazing to improve herders' technical efficiencies.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 3","pages":"555-569"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144228638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Foreword: The Role of Agricultural Trade in Countering the Effects of Extreme Weather 农业贸易在应对极端天气影响中的作用
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12633
John T. Saunders

The phenomenon of anthropogenic climate change is now well-established, with global temperatures in 2024 having already exceeded the Paris Agreement target ceiling of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels (Copernicus 2025) and extreme weather events (EWEs) an increasing occurrence. EWEs—including flooding, extreme heat, drought and wildfires—have profound implications for agriculture (Burke et al. 2015; IPCC 2023; Tebaldi and Lobell 2018; Zhao et al. 2017).

There has been extensive research on how agriculture will need to adapt to climate change (e.g., Huang and Sim 2020), and how policies can facilitate that process, notably by building resilience (Lipper et al. 2018; Wreford et al. 2010). At the same time, agriculture will likely account for an increasing share of global emissions as other sectors decarbonise, and greater efforts will be needed to reduce sectoral emissions. The latter issue has been explored in recent papers in this journal (Kreft et al. 2023; Sørenson et al. 2025).

The impacts of EWEs have been a focus of analysis (e.g., Bezner Kerr et al. 2022; Fabri et al. 2024; Rosenzweig et al. 2001), but the international spill-over effects across markets have received comparatively little attention. Each of the four studies in this Special Focus uses partial equilibrium (PE) modelling to explore how the impacts of extreme weather shocks reverberate across markets. These models are combined with a range of approaches, including stochastic draws based on historic weather variation; Superposed Epoch Analysis; a Combined Stress Index; and a fixed-effects regression analysis on the relationship between weather and overlapping growing periods, to identify and simulate the effects of foreseeable “worst case” scenarios.

The strength of PE models is that they can capture critical interactions within the agricultural economy with a relatively high degree of disaggregation, a strength which for some inquiries outweighs the weakness of treating other sectors exogenously (a weakness addressed by general equilibrium analysis, e.g., Gouël and Laborde 2021). PE models are particularly useful for agricultural policy analysis, for example in assessing how producers and consumers respond to market shocks, and identifying policies that can be used to counter undesired impacts (such as high prices for consumers or suppressed farm incomes).

Each of the PE models used in this Special Focus has been developed by researchers representing some of the most notable institutions engaged in analysing agricultural policy and markets—the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); China Agricultural University (CAU) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the Food

人为气候变化现象现已得到确认,2024年全球气温已超过《巴黎协定》设定的比工业化前水平高出1.5°C的目标上限(哥白尼2025年目标),极端天气事件(ewe)越来越多。ewe——包括洪水、极端高温、干旱和野火——对农业有着深远的影响(Burke et al. 2015;联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会2023年;Tebaldi和Lobell 2018;Zhao et al. 2017)。关于农业需要如何适应气候变化(例如,Huang和Sim 2020),以及政策如何促进这一进程,特别是通过建立复原力(Lipper等人,2018;Wreford et al. 2010)。与此同时,随着其他行业的脱碳,农业在全球排放中所占的份额可能会越来越大,因此需要付出更大的努力来减少行业排放。后一个问题已在本杂志最近的论文中进行了探讨(Kreft et al. 2023;Sørenson et al. 2025)。ewe的影响一直是分析的焦点(例如,Bezner Kerr et al. 2022;Fabri et al. 2024;Rosenzweig et al. 2001),但跨市场的国际溢出效应受到的关注相对较少。本专题中的四项研究均使用部分均衡(PE)模型来探讨极端天气冲击的影响如何在整个市场中产生反响。这些模型与一系列方法相结合,包括基于历史天气变化的随机绘制;叠加历元分析;a综合应力指数;并对天气和重叠生长期之间的关系进行固定效应回归分析,以识别和模拟可预见的“最坏情况”情景的影响。PE模型的优势在于,它们可以以相对较高的分解程度捕捉农业经济内部的关键相互作用,对于一些调查来说,这一优势超过了对其他部门进行外部性处理的弱点(一般均衡分析解决了这一弱点,例如Gouël和Laborde 2021)。PE模型对农业政策分析特别有用,例如评估生产者和消费者如何应对市场冲击,以及确定可用于应对不良影响(例如消费者的高价格或农业收入受到抑制)的政策。本专题中使用的每一个PE模型都是由研究人员开发的,这些研究人员代表了一些从事农业政策和市场分析的最著名机构——经济合作与发展组织(OECD);中国农业大学(CAU)和国际粮食政策研究所(IFPRI);欧盟委员会联合研究中心(JRC)和粮食与农业政策研究所(FAPRI)。这些特别重点文件共同强调了环境影响环境对全球和地方两级农业的重大影响。由于这些论文利用历史数据来预测ewe的影响,可能低估了它们的频率和严重程度,它们可能对国际市场的潜在缓冲作用提供了较低的估计。全球冲击是真实存在的,2007-2008年的粮食价格危机、2011年的“余震”、乌克兰战争以及最近保护主义抬头的威胁都证明了这一点。然而,总的来说,全球市场在集中和抑制风险方面仍发挥着关键作用,鉴于国内粮食歉收的可能性,自给自足是一项风险特别大的政策。随着气候变化和不断增加的ewe频率和严重性继续对全球农业系统造成压力,本专题提出的论文为减轻这种压力的政府方法提供了见解。贸易一体化、库存管理和投资于缩小发展中国家的产量差距,可能提供稳定价格和减少国内及全球粮食不安全的手段。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Foreword: The Role of Agricultural Trade in Countering the Effects of Extreme Weather","authors":"John T. Saunders","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12633","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12633","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The phenomenon of anthropogenic climate change is now well-established, with global temperatures in 2024 having already exceeded the Paris Agreement target ceiling of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels (Copernicus <span>2025</span>) and extreme weather events (EWEs) an increasing occurrence. EWEs—including flooding, extreme heat, drought and wildfires—have profound implications for agriculture (Burke et al. <span>2015</span>; IPCC <span>2023</span>; Tebaldi and Lobell <span>2018</span>; Zhao et al. <span>2017</span>).</p><p>There has been extensive research on how agriculture will need to adapt to climate change (e.g., Huang and Sim <span>2020</span>), and how policies can facilitate that process, notably by building resilience (Lipper et al. <span>2018</span>; Wreford et al. <span>2010</span>). At the same time, agriculture will likely account for an increasing share of global emissions as other sectors decarbonise, and greater efforts will be needed to reduce sectoral emissions. The latter issue has been explored in recent papers in this journal (Kreft et al. <span>2023</span>; Sørenson et al. <span>2025</span>).</p><p>The impacts of EWEs have been a focus of analysis (e.g., Bezner Kerr et al. <span>2022</span>; Fabri et al. <span>2024</span>; Rosenzweig et al. <span>2001</span>), but the international spill-over effects across markets have received comparatively little attention. Each of the four studies in this <i>Special Focus</i> uses partial equilibrium (PE) modelling to explore how the impacts of extreme weather shocks reverberate across markets. These models are combined with a range of approaches, including stochastic draws based on historic weather variation; Superposed Epoch Analysis; a Combined Stress Index; and a fixed-effects regression analysis on the relationship between weather and overlapping growing periods, to identify and simulate the effects of foreseeable “worst case” scenarios.</p><p>The strength of PE models is that they can capture critical interactions within the agricultural economy with a relatively high degree of disaggregation, a strength which for some inquiries outweighs the weakness of treating other sectors exogenously (a weakness addressed by general equilibrium analysis, e.g., Gouël and Laborde <span>2021</span>). PE models are particularly useful for agricultural policy analysis, for example in assessing how producers and consumers respond to market shocks, and identifying policies that can be used to counter undesired impacts (such as high prices for consumers or suppressed farm incomes).</p><p>Each of the PE models used in this Special Focus has been developed by researchers representing some of the most notable institutions engaged in analysing agricultural policy and markets—the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); China Agricultural University (CAU) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the Food","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 2","pages":"239-240"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12633","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144228560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Extreme Weather Events on Global Soybean Markets and China's Imports 极端天气事件对全球大豆市场和中国进口的影响
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12632
Xinran Hu, Yumei Zhang, Shenggen Fan, Kevin Z. Chen, Qi Wu

China imports 65% of the globally traded soybeans to meet the demand for vegetable oil and animal feed, accounting for about 85% of the country's total consumption. Extreme weather events (EWEs) significantly disrupt the global soybean market, with impacts transmitted to China. Using Superposed Epoch Analysis (SEA) and a global agricultural partial equilibrium model, this research examines the effects of EWEs on global soybean production, trade, and China's soybean-related sectors. The findings indicate that single-country EWEs have modest impacts, but simultaneous EWEs in multiple countries lead to global soybean production declines of 8.8%–17.1%, resulting in world price increases of 9.5%–33.2% and a decrease in China's imports by 1.5%–20.7%. Soybean oil and meal prices in China would increase by 0.8%–16.7%, and meat prices would rise by 0.1%–3.9%. Consequently, consumer spending on soybeans and meat may increase by 10.7–174.1 billion yuan. China's soybean stocks play a crucial role in mitigating the impacts of EWEs. Releasing stocks can limit soybean price hikes by up to 8.3% and meat price hikes by up to 1%, potentially lowering consumer spending on soybeans and meat by up to 37.4 billion yuan. Several measures are proposed to mitigate the impacts of EWEs and enhance resilience, including international cooperation for stabilising production, improving domestic stock and demand management, and building production capacity.

中国进口了全球65%的大豆,以满足植物油和动物饲料的需求,约占中国总消费量的85%。极端天气事件严重扰乱了全球大豆市场,并影响到了中国。本研究利用叠加历元分析(叠加历元分析)和全球农业部分均衡模型,考察了ewe对全球大豆生产、贸易和中国大豆相关部门的影响。研究结果表明,单个国家的ewe影响不大,但多个国家同时发生的ewe导致全球大豆产量下降8.8%-17.1%,导致世界价格上涨9.5%-33.2%,中国进口减少1.5%-20.7%。中国的豆油和豆粕价格将上涨0.8%-16.7%,肉类价格将上涨0.1%-3.9%。因此,消费者在大豆和肉类上的支出可能会增加107 - 1741亿元。中国的大豆库存在缓解ewe影响方面发挥着至关重要的作用。释放库存可以限制大豆价格上涨8.3%,肉类价格上涨1%,这可能会使消费者在大豆和肉类上的支出减少至多人民币374亿元。为减轻环境影响和增强抵御力,提出了若干措施,包括开展国际合作以稳定生产、改善国内库存和需求管理以及建设生产能力。
{"title":"The Impact of Extreme Weather Events on Global Soybean Markets and China's Imports","authors":"Xinran Hu,&nbsp;Yumei Zhang,&nbsp;Shenggen Fan,&nbsp;Kevin Z. Chen,&nbsp;Qi Wu","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12632","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12632","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>China imports 65% of the globally traded soybeans to meet the demand for vegetable oil and animal feed, accounting for about 85% of the country's total consumption. Extreme weather events (EWEs) significantly disrupt the global soybean market, with impacts transmitted to China. Using Superposed Epoch Analysis (SEA) and a global agricultural partial equilibrium model, this research examines the effects of EWEs on global soybean production, trade, and China's soybean-related sectors. The findings indicate that single-country EWEs have modest impacts, but simultaneous EWEs in multiple countries lead to global soybean production declines of 8.8%–17.1%, resulting in world price increases of 9.5%–33.2% and a decrease in China's imports by 1.5%–20.7%. Soybean oil and meal prices in China would increase by 0.8%–16.7%, and meat prices would rise by 0.1%–3.9%. Consequently, consumer spending on soybeans and meat may increase by 10.7–174.1 billion yuan. China's soybean stocks play a crucial role in mitigating the impacts of EWEs. Releasing stocks can limit soybean price hikes by up to 8.3% and meat price hikes by up to 1%, potentially lowering consumer spending on soybeans and meat by up to 37.4 billion yuan. Several measures are proposed to mitigate the impacts of EWEs and enhance resilience, including international cooperation for stabilising production, improving domestic stock and demand management, and building production capacity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 2","pages":"251-267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144252358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Weathering the Storm: Trade Openness and the Resilience of Agricultural Markets Under Increasing Weather Extremes 《风平浪静:极端天气加剧下的贸易开放与农产品市场弹性》
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12635
Marcel Adenäuer, Clara Frezal, Thomas Chatzopoulos

We analyse how a higher level of trade integration in global agricultural markets can mitigate food-security risks in a world where agro-climatic events increase both in frequency and intensity. By incorporating stochastically simulated crop-yield reductions into a partial-equilibrium model of global agricultural markets, we compare commodity supply, demand and price responses under two alternative trade pathways: a trade-liberalised world and a trade-restricted world. By implementing the same sets of yield reductions (input) on these two pathways and comparing synthesised market outcomes (output), we examine the role of trade as a mechanism for ensuring more resilient agricultural markets. Our findings indicate that trade integration could stabilise food availability and mitigate domestic and world price volatility. While trade policies can play a significant role in mitigating food-security risks in a climate-uncertain future, they must be complemented by broader policies to enhance global resilience and food security.

我们分析了在一个农业气候事件频率和强度都在增加的世界里,全球农业市场中更高水平的贸易一体化如何能够减轻粮食安全风险。通过将随机模拟的作物减产纳入全球农业市场的部分均衡模型,我们比较了两种不同贸易路径下的商品供应、需求和价格反应:贸易自由化世界和贸易限制世界。通过在这两种途径上实施相同的减产(投入),并比较综合市场结果(产出),我们研究了贸易作为确保更具弹性的农业市场的机制的作用。我们的研究结果表明,贸易一体化可以稳定粮食供应,减轻国内和世界价格波动。尽管在气候不确定的未来,贸易政策可以在减轻粮食安全风险方面发挥重要作用,但必须辅之以更广泛的政策,以增强全球抵御力和粮食安全。
{"title":"Weathering the Storm: Trade Openness and the Resilience of Agricultural Markets Under Increasing Weather Extremes","authors":"Marcel Adenäuer,&nbsp;Clara Frezal,&nbsp;Thomas Chatzopoulos","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12635","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12635","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We analyse how a higher level of trade integration in global agricultural markets can mitigate food-security risks in a world where agro-climatic events increase both in frequency and intensity. By incorporating stochastically simulated crop-yield reductions into a partial-equilibrium model of global agricultural markets, we compare commodity supply, demand and price responses under two alternative trade pathways: a trade-liberalised world and a trade-restricted world. By implementing the same sets of yield reductions (input) on these two pathways and comparing synthesised market outcomes (output), we examine the role of trade as a mechanism for ensuring more resilient agricultural markets. Our findings indicate that trade integration could stabilise food availability and mitigate domestic and world price volatility. While trade policies can play a significant role in mitigating food-security risks in a climate-uncertain future, they must be complemented by broader policies to enhance global resilience and food security.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 2","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144228639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Potential for Yield Improvements in Developing Countries to Reduce Their Exposure to Extreme Weather Shocks in Exporting Countries 发展中国家提高产量以减少出口国遭受极端天气冲击的可能性
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12634
Simone Pieralli, Spire Arsov, Christian Elleby, Ignacio Pérez Domínguez, Beatrice Farkas

This article explores the impact of extreme weather on food availability and how yield gap reductions in developing countries could make them less vulnerable to the imported effects of extreme weather shocks. Our extreme weather scenario results show that simultaneous weather-related shocks to crop yields in main exporting countries could lead to substantial increases in world food prices, threatening food security in countries strongly reliant on food imports. Maize and wheat prices increase by 40% and 50% due to extreme weather, increasing food expenditure in import-dependent countries (by up to 5%). Countering this effect, closing yield gaps in developing countries would substantially lower international prices and food expenditures, especially in developing countries. If the yield gap is reduced by 20% relative to economic potential over a 6-year period (yield gap scenario), maize and world prices decrease by 20% and 15%, decreasing food expenditure per capita in import-dependent countries. Finally, a combined scenario shows that the yield improvements only partially offset the impact of imported shocks on import-dependent countries, and these effects vary by country, depending on their production capability and their net-trade position. World maize and wheat prices increase by only 9% and 26% and still raise food expenditure in import-dependent countries.

本文探讨了极端天气对粮食供应的影响,以及减少发展中国家的产量差距如何使它们不那么容易受到极端天气冲击的进口影响。我们的极端天气情景结果表明,主要出口国的作物产量同时受到与天气有关的冲击,可能导致世界粮食价格大幅上涨,严重依赖粮食进口的国家的粮食安全受到威胁。由于极端天气,玉米和小麦价格分别上涨了40%和50%,增加了依赖进口的国家的粮食支出(最多5%)。消除这种影响,缩小发展中国家的产量差距将大大降低国际价格和粮食支出,特别是在发展中国家。如果产量缺口相对于经济潜力在6年期间减少20%(产量缺口情景),玉米和世界价格将分别下降20%和15%,从而减少依赖进口的国家的人均粮食支出。最后,综合情景表明,产量的提高只能部分抵消进口冲击对依赖进口的国家的影响,而这些影响因国家的生产能力和净贸易状况而异。世界玉米和小麦价格仅上涨9%和26%,但仍会增加依赖进口国家的粮食支出。
{"title":"The Potential for Yield Improvements in Developing Countries to Reduce Their Exposure to Extreme Weather Shocks in Exporting Countries","authors":"Simone Pieralli,&nbsp;Spire Arsov,&nbsp;Christian Elleby,&nbsp;Ignacio Pérez Domínguez,&nbsp;Beatrice Farkas","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12634","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12634","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the impact of extreme weather on food availability and how yield gap reductions in developing countries could make them less vulnerable to the imported effects of extreme weather shocks. Our extreme weather scenario results show that simultaneous weather-related shocks to crop yields in main exporting countries could lead to substantial increases in world food prices, threatening food security in countries strongly reliant on food imports. Maize and wheat prices increase by 40% and 50% due to extreme weather, increasing food expenditure in import-dependent countries (by up to 5%). Countering this effect, closing yield gaps in developing countries would substantially lower international prices and food expenditures, especially in developing countries. If the yield gap is reduced by 20% relative to economic potential over a 6-year period (yield gap scenario), maize and world prices decrease by 20% and 15%, decreasing food expenditure per capita in import-dependent countries. Finally, a combined scenario shows that the yield improvements only partially offset the impact of imported shocks on import-dependent countries, and these effects vary by country, depending on their production capability and their net-trade position. World maize and wheat prices increase by only 9% and 26% and still raise food expenditure in import-dependent countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 2","pages":"268-281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12634","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144183951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Climate Variability on Food Security in Bangladesh Under Alternative Trade Regimes 在替代贸易制度下,气候变化对孟加拉国粮食安全的影响
IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12636
Mohammad Hasan Mobarok, Wyatt Thompson

This study examines the impact of climate change on food security in Bangladesh, focusing on rice production and its sensitivity to climatic variability. By linking precipitation and temperature to rice yields and incorporating these relationships into a trade regime-switching partial equilibrium model, the research simulates future market conditions under alternative Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). The analysis is divided into two parts: first, estimating yield variations for Bangladesh's two main rice harvests using historical weather data and stochastic simulations of future conditions; second, modelling the economic impacts of yield fluctuations under autarky and import parity regimes. The latter reduces the effects of domestic shocks but increases exposure to international market shocks. Climate variability interacts with trade regimes to determine food security outcomes: the effects on food availability and access, and the stability of food supplies, can be either nil or strong depending on the trade regime. The effectiveness of market interventions further depends on the trade regime in place, strengthening the case for more directly targeted support to food insecure households.

这项研究考察了气候变化对孟加拉国粮食安全的影响,重点是水稻生产及其对气候变化的敏感性。通过将降水和温度与水稻产量联系起来,并将这些关系纳入贸易制度转换的部分均衡模型,该研究模拟了在不同的共享社会经济途径(ssp)下的未来市场条件。分析分为两个部分:首先,利用历史天气数据和未来条件的随机模拟估计孟加拉国两个主要水稻收成的产量变化;其次,对自给自足和进口平价制度下收益率波动的经济影响进行建模。后者减少了国内冲击的影响,但增加了对国际市场冲击的敞口。气候变率与贸易制度相互作用,决定粮食安全结果:对粮食供应和获取以及粮食供应稳定性的影响可能为零,也可能很大,这取决于贸易制度。市场干预的有效性进一步取决于现有的贸易制度,这加强了对粮食不安全家庭提供更直接、有针对性支持的理由。
{"title":"The Impact of Climate Variability on Food Security in Bangladesh Under Alternative Trade Regimes","authors":"Mohammad Hasan Mobarok,&nbsp;Wyatt Thompson","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12636","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.12636","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study examines the impact of climate change on food security in Bangladesh, focusing on rice production and its sensitivity to climatic variability. By linking precipitation and temperature to rice yields and incorporating these relationships into a trade regime-switching partial equilibrium model, the research simulates future market conditions under alternative Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). The analysis is divided into two parts: first, estimating yield variations for Bangladesh's two main rice harvests using historical weather data and stochastic simulations of future conditions; second, modelling the economic impacts of yield fluctuations under autarky and import parity regimes. The latter reduces the effects of domestic shocks but increases exposure to international market shocks. Climate variability interacts with trade regimes to determine food security outcomes: the effects on food availability and access, and the stability of food supplies, can be either nil or strong depending on the trade regime. The effectiveness of market interventions further depends on the trade regime in place, strengthening the case for more directly targeted support to food insecure households.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 2","pages":"282-295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144183953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1