Journal of Asthma and Allergy最新文献

Background: Bronchial asthma, the most prevalent chronic inflammatory airway disease in children, exhibits a concerning rise in both incidence and prevalence. Asthma biomarkers hold promise for stratifying patients into distinct clinical phenotypes, paving the way for targeted and personalized treatment approaches.

Aim of study: This study aimed to evaluate the association between novel and non-established semi-invasive circulating and well-known exhaled inflammatory biomarkers in two distinct pediatric asthma populations stratified by disease severity.

Materials and methods: Forty-four asthmatic children aged 8-12 years meeting inclusion criteria were recruited from hospitalized patients. The first group (n=15, mean age 9.8 years) consisted of patients with mild persistent asthma who did not require regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The second group (n=29, mean age 9.8 years) consisted of children with moderate to persistent asthma who received regular ICS treatment. Serum levels of interleukins (IL-13, IL-1β), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), and surfactant protein D (SPD) were measured by ELISA in all participants. In addition, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil counts were evaluated.

Results: No significant differences were observed in the baseline plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers (IL-13, IL-1β, SPD, and EDN) or exhaled FeNO between the ICS-treated and non-ICS-treated groups. Further inter-individual analysis confirmed significant positive correlations between IL-13, SPD, and IL-1β (Pearson's r = 0.591-0.781) in both groups of patients. Interestingly, the ICS-treated group compared to the nontreated group showed an exclusive moderate negative correlation between FeNO and IL-1β. In contrast, FeNO exhibited a positive correlation with EDN and a strong association with eosinophil count in all the study groups.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the complex and unresolved role of asthma biomarkers in routine clinical practice for the management of childhood asthma, particularly in predicting exacerbations. By comparing the relationships of carefully selected biomarkers, we can achieve a greater clinical predictive value.

Background: Despite the effectiveness of inhalation therapy, uncontrolled or severe asthma remains prevalent challenges in respiratory care Narrative Medicine (NM) offers a linguistic approach to comprehending illness experiences, thereby providing a framework for advancing healthcare.

Aim: The primary aim of this study was to gather narratives from individuals grappling with severe or uncontrolled asthma and their Healthcare Professionals (HCPs), in order to explore the intricate interplay among quality of care, quality of life, psychological and social determinants, and adherence patterns.

Methods: A cross-sectional NM study was conducted in Italy from February to December 2023, encompassing 135 patients with uncontrolled or severe asthma (54.7% male; mean age: 56.7 years) and 47 HCPs (64.9% male; mean age: 54.3 years). A mixed-method approach was adopted to scrutinize themes, language nuances, emotional expressions, and narrative classifications.

Results: Patients with uncontrolled or severe asthma reported an average illness duration of 4.46 years, with exacerbations occurring over the past 20.9 months. Pulmonologists (83% of HCPs) played a predominant role in diagnosing and treating the disease in 96.1% of patients. Additionally, participants with severe asthma reported higher healthcare needs. The most reported emotions were fatigue (25.96%) and a sense of suffocation (11.53%). Upon commencing treatment, while experiencing physical improvement, patients predominantly expressed feelings of "submission/dependence" on medication (28%), followed by "fear" (21%) and "serenity/joy" (21%). HCPs, primarily pulmonologists (83%), emphasized the importance of raising awareness among specialists and General Practitioners (GPs), disseminating information, optimizing prescriptions, implementing phenotyping, tailoring therapy, and considering paediatric needs.

Conclusion: These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of patient perspectives, facilitate personalized interventions, and underscore the factors influencing therapeutic adherence in uncontrolled or severe asthma.

Purpose: Global prevalence of pediatric asthma and associated morbidity and mortality has continuously increased. Asthma is the most common chronic illness in children in the UK; however, recent epidemiology data are lacking. This analysis describes the overall prevalence and burden of illness of asthma in children.

Methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, database analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. Primary care records of 19,330 patients (6-11 years) between January 1 and December 31, 2017, were analyzed. Asthma prevalence was assessed by severity (as described by Global Initiative for Asthma 2017 guidelines), and symptoms, comorbidities, and treatments were compared between asthma patients and matched non-asthmatic controls. Results are presented descriptively; logistic regression analyses were performed for asthma symptoms.

Results: The estimated prevalence of pediatric asthma was 6.5% (95% CI: 6.4-6.5) in the UK (mild: 74.2%; moderate: 15.0%; severe: 10.8%). All patients with moderate or severe asthma and 72.5% of patients with mild asthma were prescribed drug therapy. Most patients with moderate or severe asthma were prescribed a short-acting β2-agonist (94.9% and 96.0%, respectively), compared with 69.2% of mild asthma patients. Daytime symptoms were reported by 78.1% in those with severe asthma; 34.9% reported night-time symptoms and 30.8% reported an impact on usual activities. Asthma patients had a higher baseline prevalence of comorbidities compared with non-asthmatic controls, notably atopic dermatitis (47.8% in severe asthma versus 20.8% in controls) and allergic rhinitis (13.3% in severe asthma versus 2.0% in controls).

Conclusion: This analysis confirmed that asthma remains a common morbidity among children in the UK. Increasing asthma severity was associated with worsening symptoms, and asthma patients had significantly more comorbidities compared with non-asthmatic controls.

Objective: Human microbiome is involved in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases, but the impact of nasal microbiota on allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms severity has not been evaluated. This study aimed to characterize nasal microbiome in AR children and its correlations with AR symptoms.

Methods: According to diagnostic guidelines for AR, 45 AR children and 40 healthy subjects were recruited from July to August in 2023. Based on the total score of nasal symptoms (TNSS), the 45 AR patients were divided into a mild AR group (MAR) (n = 16) and a moderate or severe AR group (MSAR) (n = 29). Nasal swabs were collected for microbiome analysis using 16S-rDNA sequencing.

Results: The Simpson and Shannon indices were significantly higher in the AR group compared to the health control group, indicating an increase of nasal microbiota at the species evenness level in AR children. Moreover, the species evenness was significantly increased in the MSAR group compared to the MAR group. Staphylococcus (member of the Firmicutes phylum) was significantly dominant in the AR group, but Moraxella (member of the Proteobacteria phylum) was significantly dominant in the CG group. The LEfSe analysis showed that the mean relative abundances of Ralstonia in the MSAR group was higher than that in the MAR group. Meanwhile, the abundance divided by Ralstonia of Spearman correlation coefficients was positively correlated with the TNSS of AR symptoms (r = 0.4, P = 0.009).

Conclusion: The elevation of species evenness in nasal microbiome was likely related to the aggravation of AR symptoms. The Ralstonia may play a pro-inflammatory role in AR.

Purpose: With the advent of biological therapies, emerging concepts regarding establishing new targets in asthma management, such as disease modification, have entered the debate among the scientific community. The definitions that form the conceptual basis of this goal need to be agreed upon.

Methods: A multidisciplinary expert group was assembled as the steering committee. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the scientific background for constructing appropriate definitions. Based on the literature review and the clinical experience of the experts, the committee built a list of statements that could be applied to establish the definition of disease modification in asthma. After that, a Delphi validation was performed to assess the appropriateness of the list of statements. The questionnaire included a total of 22 statements, divided into "Essential criteria for disease modification in asthma" (5 statements) and "Disease modification indicators and other considerations" (17 statements). Panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to measure agreement on each statement. The cut-off point for high consensus was defined as a minimum score of 7 and had to be reached by at least two-thirds of the experts.

Results: A total of 192 asthma experts voted on statements anonymously. Of those, 104 (54%) were Pneumologists, 65 (34%) were allergologists, and 23 (12%) were Pediatricians. An interim analysis of round 1 data was performed. All statements reached consensus on the first round, with a median score above 7 in all cases.

Conclusion: In conclusion, in this Delphi study, a large number of experts in the management of severe asthma from different specialties agreed on the clinical-functional and pathophysiological aspects to be considered in order to try to achieve disease modification.

Purpose: Omalizumab, the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody used to treat severe asthma, reduces asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, and corticosteroid use. Although allergic asthma is a therapeutic target of omalizumab, omalizumab is not effective in all patients with severe allergic asthma and is not always available for long-term use. We retrospectively investigated factors related to long-term (≥2 years) use of omalizumab for severe asthma.

Patients and methods: Of the 116 patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma at our hospital between 2009 and 2017, 82 were included in this retrospective analysis. Thirty-four were excluded because of adverse events, financial difficulties, or hospital transfers. The number of asthma exacerbations, unscheduled visits, corticosteroid doses, asthma control test scores, pulmonary function test results, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels were evaluated.

Results: The median age of the study population was 58 years, with 66% female and 26% taking regular oral corticosteroids. After 2 years of treatment, 52 responders were identified using the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) score. Improvements in asthma control test scores, airflow limitation, exacerbations, and oral corticosteroid use were observed in the responders. Multivariate analysis revealed that a peripheral blood eosinophil count of ≥200 or a perennial antigen-specific IgE antibody positivity of ≥2 predicted a response at the 2-year mark. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that neither high eosinophil counts nor perennial antigen-specific IgE positivity influenced the prolongation of treatment beyond 2 years, and responders at 2 years underwent omalizumab treatment for a significantly longer period than non-responders (HR = 9.89, p < 0.001), with GETE at 2 years being the only predictor of long-term omalizumab use.

Conclusion: In this retrospective study the GETE after 2 years of omalizumab therapy emerged as the most meaningful predictor of the long-term effectiveness of omalizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma, highlighting the benefits of prolonged therapy in certain populations. These findings may guide future therapeutic strategies for severe asthma.

Purpose: To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO₂₀₀) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).

Methods: A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.

Results: The values of FENO₂₀₀ in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO₂₀₀ exhibited negative correlations with FEV₁/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO₂₀₀ and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV₁, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO₂₀₀ demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV₁, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV₁ in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO₂₀₀. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV₁ was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO₅₀ discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.

Conclusion: In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO₂₀₀ has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO₂₀₀ levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO₂₀₀ and CANO, FENO₅₀ may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.

Background: Asthma is a health condition with worldwide relevance, evaluated based on the necessary treatment to control symptoms and exacerbations. Severe asthma is uncontrolled despite high doses of ICS-LABA and treatment for triggering factors. Severe eosinophilic asthma is characterized by an increase in eosinophils in the peripheral circulation, walls, and passages of the respiratory tract. Biologic treatments such as benralizumab have demonstrated effectiveness as aids in decreasing respiratory tract inflammation and improving the management of symptoms in patients living with asthma.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as an add-on therapy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts.

Methods: Observational, analytic and ambispective study in 21 patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab, to determine the treatment's effectiveness through the change in estimated respiratory function by spirometry through the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) value, reduction in second controlling treatment, serum eosinophil reduction, change in the Asthma Control Test score and the Asthma Control Questionnaire test at 6 and 16 months of treatment.

Results: An average difference of 241.43 mL (±461.43) in FEV1 at 6 months was found, as well as an average FeNO reduction of 49.8 ppm and eosinophil reduction of 612.78 cells at 12 months of treatment, additionally, CSI requirements were reduced in 95% of patients.

Conclusion: Benralizumab improved respiratory function as well as key biomarkers such as eosinophil count, exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO), which reflected in a decreased requirement of inhaled corticosteroids and improved symptom control.

Background: Patients with severe asthma (SA) benefit from biologic therapy substantially. However, the impact of smoking-related comorbidities remains unclear due to the exclusion of patients with ≥10 pack-years from asthma studies. Our aim was to examine the effects of emphysema on biologic treatment response in SA in this retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Pulmonary emphysema was examined using computed tomography. Patients with SA were included and divided into two groups based on emphysema quantity (≥5% or <5%). They received either anti-IgE (22.1%), anti-IL-5-(receptor) (52.3%), or anti-IL-4/IL-13 (25.6%) biologic therapy. Treatment response was assessed after 7.8 ± 2.5 months based on acute exacerbations (AE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, Asthma Control Test (ACT), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and using the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).

Results: This study comprised 86 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 12.8 years; 54% female). Half (43, 50.0%) were never-smokers, half ex-smokers with an average of 26.9 ± 18.2 pack-years. Patients with ≥5% emphysema were more often ex-smokers (80% vs 41%, p=0.002), had poorer lung function (FEV1 median 1.3 [interquartile range: 1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1-2;2.4] L, p=0.037), and more comorbid COPD (50% vs 21%, p=0.012). However, no significant differences were noted in treatment response regarding annualized AE rate (-2.5[-5;-1] vs -3.0[-5;-2] n/year, p=0.295) and OCS reduction (-4[-10;0] vs -5[-10;0] mg, p=0.691), ACT score (5[3;9] vs 4[0;9] points, p=0.579) or FEV1 improvement (0.03[-0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[-0.5;0.49] L, p=0.052), BARS (p=0.312), and remission rates (15.0% vs 19.7%, p=0.753).

Conclusion: In patients with severe asthma, those with comorbid emphysema show similar treatment response to biologic therapy. Therefore, suitable patients should not be denied biologics due to the presence of emphysema.